Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #684670 > unrolled thread

Facebook goes mental

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  Facebook goes mental vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-28 18:23 +0000
    Re: Facebook goes mental pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-01-29 00:03 +0000
      Re: Facebook goes mental Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-28 20:06 -0500
        Re: Facebook goes mental -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-28 21:41 -0500
          Re: Facebook goes mental Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-28 22:17 -0500
        Re: Facebook goes mental Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-29 10:45 -0500
        Re: Facebook goes mental mummycullen@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (MummyChunk) - 2025-02-01 04:54 +0000
    Re: Facebook goes mental CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-28 20:15 -0500
    Re: Facebook goes mental candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-01-29 20:20 +0000
    Re: Facebook goes mental Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-30 22:43 +0000
      Re: Facebook goes mental RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-31 02:24 +0000
        Re: Facebook goes mental CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-30 21:35 -0500
          Re: Facebook goes mental RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-31 02:44 +0000
            Re: Facebook goes mental vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-31 02:58 +0000
              Re: Facebook goes mental CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-31 09:06 -0500
                Re: Facebook goes mental RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-31 23:57 +0000
                  Re: Facebook goes mental CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-31 19:04 -0500
                    Re: Facebook goes mental RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-01 05:21 +0000
                      Re: Facebook goes mental CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-01 07:06 -0500
                        Re: Facebook goes mental RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-02 02:02 +0000
                          Re: Facebook goes mental CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-02 07:16 -0500
                            Re: Facebook goes mental rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-02 20:05 +0000
                              Re: Facebook goes mental CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-02 20:28 -0500
                                Re: Facebook goes mental pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-02-03 02:03 +0000
                                  Re: Facebook goes mental RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-03 07:57 +0000
                                    Re: Facebook goes mental rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-03 20:03 +0000
                                      Re: Facebook goes mental CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-03 15:34 -0500
                                        Re: Facebook goes mental pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-02-04 00:42 +0000
                                        Re: Facebook goes mental RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-04 05:46 +0000
                                          Re: Facebook goes mental RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-04 06:17 +0000
                                      Re: Facebook goes mental Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-02-03 16:55 -0500
                                        Re: Facebook goes mental chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-02-04 06:46 -0600
                                          Re: Facebook goes mental CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-04 08:55 -0500
                                      Re: Facebook goes mental RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-04 05:39 +0000
                                        Re: Facebook goes mental -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-02-04 05:14 -0500
                                  Re: Facebook goes mental Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-02-03 08:23 -0500
                                    Re: Facebook goes mental CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-03 08:47 -0500
                                      Re: Facebook goes mental Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-02-03 09:01 -0500
                                        Re: Facebook goes mental CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-03 09:13 -0500
                                      Re: Facebook goes mental chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-02-03 09:50 -0600
                                        Re: Facebook goes mental RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-04 05:50 +0000
                                      Re: Facebook goes mental RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-04 05:49 +0000
                                Re: Facebook goes mental rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-03 04:05 +0000
                                  Re: Facebook goes mental RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-03 08:00 +0000
                                  Re: Facebook goes mental CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-03 06:21 -0500
                                Re: Facebook goes mental RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-03 07:54 +0000
                                  Re: Facebook goes mental rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-03 20:17 +0000
                                    Re: Facebook goes mental % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-02-03 13:22 -0700
                                      Re: Facebook goes mental rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-04 00:57 +0000
                                        Re: Facebook goes mental CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-03 20:53 -0500
                                          Re: Facebook goes mental % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-02-03 19:16 -0700
                                          Re: Facebook goes mental RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-04 05:36 +0000
                                            Re: Facebook goes mental CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-04 08:50 -0500
                                        Re: Facebook goes mental % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-02-03 19:15 -0700
                                    Re: Facebook goes mental RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-04 05:34 +0000
                            Re: Facebook goes mental RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-03 07:53 +0000
                              Re: Facebook goes mental CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-03 06:36 -0500
                                Re: Facebook goes mental RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-02-04 05:26 +0000
                                  Re: Facebook goes mental CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-04 08:48 -0500
                  Re: Facebook goes mental vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-02-01 02:22 +0000
              Re: Facebook goes mental DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-02-02 16:05 -0500
            Re: Facebook goes mental CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-31 09:05 -0500
              Re: Facebook goes mental RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2025-01-31 23:51 +0000
          Re: Facebook goes mental DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-30 22:41 -0500
        Re: Facebook goes mental DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-30 23:07 -0500

Page 1 of 4  [1] 2 3 4  Next page →

#684670 — Facebook goes mental

https://www.theregister.com/2025/01/28/facebook_blocks_distrowatch/

Apparently, even mentioning Linux can get people banned on FB.
(Reports are mixed.)

(I guess we need to remove the Facebook ethernet driver from
the Linux kernel? Lol.)

Seriously though -- it seem like this is most likely a
problem with their AI moderation.  Meta is a member of
the Linux Foundation, and uses Linux extensively.

This isn't just an "own goal", it's as if they hauled-off
and gave themselves a black eye.

-- 
-v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti
   OS: Linux 6.13.0 Release: Mint 21.3 Mem: 258G
   "Some things have got to be believed to be seen."

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#684679

On 2025-01-28, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
> https://www.theregister.com/2025/01/28/facebook_blocks_distrowatch/
>
> Apparently, even mentioning Linux can get people banned on FB.
> (Reports are mixed.)
>
> (I guess we need to remove the Facebook ethernet driver from
> the Linux kernel? Lol.)
>
> Seriously though -- it seem like this is most likely a
> problem with their AI moderation.  Meta is a member of
> the Linux Foundation, and uses Linux extensively.
>
> This isn't just an "own goal", it's as if they hauled-off
> and gave themselves a black eye.
>

Politics aside, anyone who is on FB or just about any social media platform
is an idiot with far too much time on their hands.


-- 
pothead

Why did Joe Biden pardon his family?
Read below to learn the reason.
The Biden Crime Family Timeline here:
https://oversight.house.gov/the-bidens-influence-peddling-timeline/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684682

pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:

>anyone who is on [...] just about any social media platform
>is an idiot with far too much time on their hands.


What do you think Usenet is, genius?

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684685

On 1/28/25 8:06 PM, Joel wrote:
> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
> 
>> anyone who is on [...] just about any social media platform
>> is an idiot with far too much time on their hands.
> 
> 
> What do you think Usenet is, genius?
> 

"Oh, but that's different, because we're L33t!"
/s

-hh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684686

-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>On 1/28/25 8:06 PM, Joel wrote:
>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> anyone who is on [...] just about any social media platform
>>> is an idiot with far too much time on their hands.
>> 
>> What do you think Usenet is, genius?
>
>"Oh, but that's different, because we're L33t!"
>/s


I first used it in 1996 or so, back then it was very standard-issue
Internet, like IRC, there wasn't X and Bluesky, Facebook and TikTok,
that it wasn't called "social media" doesn't make it not a predecessor
thereof.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684717

Joel wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:

> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>
>>anyone who is on [...] just about any social media platform
>>is an idiot with far too much time on their hands.

:-D

> What do you think Usenet is, genius?

Maybe this spewbot thinks Usenet is a "technical media platform" :-D

-- 
When people say nothing, they don't necessarily mean nothing.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684816

> Joel wrote:
> pothead <pothead> wrote:
> 
>> anyone who is on [...] just about any social media platform
>> is an idiot with far too much time on their hands.
> 
> 
> What do you think Usenet is, genius?
> 
> --
> Joel W. Crump
> 
> Amendment XIV
> Section 1.
> 
> [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
> abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
> United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
> life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
> nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
> protection of the laws.
> 
> Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
> liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.


lol 😂 


This is a response to the post seen at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=682762756#682762756

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684683

On 2025-01-28 1:23 p.m., vallor wrote:
> https://www.theregister.com/2025/01/28/facebook_blocks_distrowatch/
> 
> Apparently, even mentioning Linux can get people banned on FB.
> (Reports are mixed.)
> 
> (I guess we need to remove the Facebook ethernet driver from
> the Linux kernel? Lol.)
> 
> Seriously though -- it seem like this is most likely a
> problem with their AI moderation.  Meta is a member of
> the Linux Foundation, and uses Linux extensively.
> 
> This isn't just an "own goal", it's as if they hauled-off
> and gave themselves a black eye.

They're not censoring Linux; they are apparently censoring DistroWatch 
though.

<https://lunduke.substack.com/p/no-facebook-is-not-censoring-linux>

-- 
CrudeSausage
Gab: @CrudeSausage
Telegram: @CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative
KDE supporting member
ASUS Zephyrus GA401QM on Manjaro

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684730

vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote at 18:23 this Tuesday (GMT):
> https://www.theregister.com/2025/01/28/facebook_blocks_distrowatch/
>
> Apparently, even mentioning Linux can get people banned on FB.
> (Reports are mixed.)
>
> (I guess we need to remove the Facebook ethernet driver from
> the Linux kernel? Lol.)
>
> Seriously though -- it seem like this is most likely a
> problem with their AI moderation.  Meta is a member of
> the Linux Foundation, and uses Linux extensively.
>
> This isn't just an "own goal", it's as if they hauled-off
> and gave themselves a black eye.


It's especially ironic since their servers probably run Linux.
-- 
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684763

So they have finally admitted it was all a mistake (as if there was
any doubt)
<https://www.tomshardware.com/software/linux/facebook-admits-that-the-linux-topic-crackdown-was-in-error-and-has-been-fixed>.

So why did it happen? Seems the shift from proper fact-checking of
postings to relying on “community-driven” feedback was a factor.
So-called “freedom of speech absolutism” (as defined by the anti-woke
mob) leads to censorship of ideas that actually promote a free society
-- who knew?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684773

On 2025-01-30, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
> So they have finally admitted it was all a mistake (as if there was
> any doubt)
><https://www.tomshardware.com/software/linux/facebook-admits-that-the-linux-topic-crackdown-was-in-error-and-has-been-fixed>.
>
> So why did it happen? Seems the shift from proper fact-checking of
> postings to relying on “community-driven” feedback was a factor.
> So-called “freedom of speech absolutism” (as defined by the anti-woke
> mob) leads to censorship of ideas that actually promote a free society
> -- who knew?

And speaking of censorship and the Cancel Culture Regime. Apparently Debian 
finds freedom of speech dangerous to their "core values" and have officially 
withdrawn from TwitterX. Woke idiots.

https://micronews.debian.org/

-- 
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy 
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.”  —J.R.R. Tolkien

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684779

On 2025-01-30 9:24 p.m., RonB wrote:
> On 2025-01-30, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>> So they have finally admitted it was all a mistake (as if there was
>> any doubt)
>> <https://www.tomshardware.com/software/linux/facebook-admits-that-the-linux-topic-crackdown-was-in-error-and-has-been-fixed>.
>>
>> So why did it happen? Seems the shift from proper fact-checking of
>> postings to relying on “community-driven” feedback was a factor.
>> So-called “freedom of speech absolutism” (as defined by the anti-woke
>> mob) leads to censorship of ideas that actually promote a free society
>> -- who knew?
> 
> And speaking of censorship and the Cancel Culture Regime. Apparently Debian
> finds freedom of speech dangerous to their "core values" and have officially
> withdrawn from TwitterX. Woke idiots.
> 
> https://micronews.debian.org/

Unsurprisingly, the people behind Debian are choosing to remain tone 
dead to the winds of change sweeping society right now. Despite it being 
inconvenient to them, the reality is that conservatism not only won, but 
it quickly becoming the default position. Nobody even wants to hear 
about what the "progressive" "liberal" "social democrats" think because 
they have not only completely discredited themselves, it has become 
clear to even the dumbest elements of society that they fabricate 
controversies at will. Apparently, Debian is stubbornly insisting on 
remaining on the fringe because some faggots claim their feelings are hurt.

-- 
CrudeSausage
Gab: @CrudeSausage
Telegram: @CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684781

On 2025-01-31, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
> On 2025-01-30 9:24 p.m., RonB wrote:
>> On 2025-01-30, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>>> So they have finally admitted it was all a mistake (as if there was
>>> any doubt)
>>> <https://www.tomshardware.com/software/linux/facebook-admits-that-the-linux-topic-crackdown-was-in-error-and-has-been-fixed>.
>>>
>>> So why did it happen? Seems the shift from proper fact-checking of
>>> postings to relying on “community-driven” feedback was a factor.
>>> So-called “freedom of speech absolutism” (as defined by the anti-woke
>>> mob) leads to censorship of ideas that actually promote a free society
>>> -- who knew?
>> 
>> And speaking of censorship and the Cancel Culture Regime. Apparently Debian
>> finds freedom of speech dangerous to their "core values" and have officially
>> withdrawn from TwitterX. Woke idiots.
>> 
>> https://micronews.debian.org/
>
> Unsurprisingly, the people behind Debian are choosing to remain tone 
> dead to the winds of change sweeping society right now. Despite it being 
> inconvenient to them, the reality is that conservatism not only won, but 
> it quickly becoming the default position. Nobody even wants to hear 
> about what the "progressive" "liberal" "social democrats" think because 
> they have not only completely discredited themselves, it has become 
> clear to even the dumbest elements of society that they fabricate 
> controversies at will. Apparently, Debian is stubbornly insisting on 
> remaining on the fringe because some faggots claim their feelings are hurt.

Maybe it's time for a fork. Hopefully this is just the morons at the top 
instead of those who are doing the actual work (and not obsessing over Woke 
Culture 24/7). This Woke Culture really is brain-rotting disease.

-- 
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy 
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.”  —J.R.R. Tolkien

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684782

On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 02:44:31 -0000 (UTC), RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>
wrote in <vnhdef$37bl1$6@dont-email.me>:

> On 2025-01-31, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>> On 2025-01-30 9:24 p.m., RonB wrote:
>>> On 2025-01-30, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>>>> So they have finally admitted it was all a mistake (as if there was
>>>> any doubt)
>>>> <https://www.tomshardware.com/software/linux/facebook-admits-that-the-linux-topic-crackdown-was-in-error-and-has-been-fixed>.
>>>>
>>>> So why did it happen? Seems the shift from proper fact-checking of
>>>> postings to relying on “community-driven” feedback was a factor.
>>>> So-called “freedom of speech absolutism” (as defined by the anti-woke
>>>> mob) leads to censorship of ideas that actually promote a free society
>>>> -- who knew?
>>> 
>>> And speaking of censorship and the Cancel Culture Regime. Apparently Debian
>>> finds freedom of speech dangerous to their "core values" and have officially
>>> withdrawn from TwitterX. Woke idiots.
>>> 
>>> https://micronews.debian.org/
>>
>> Unsurprisingly, the people behind Debian are choosing to remain tone 
>> dead to the winds of change sweeping society right now. Despite it being 
>> inconvenient to them, the reality is that conservatism not only won, but 
>> it quickly becoming the default position. Nobody even wants to hear 
>> about what the "progressive" "liberal" "social democrats" think because 
>> they have not only completely discredited themselves, it has become 
>> clear to even the dumbest elements of society that they fabricate 
>> controversies at will. Apparently, Debian is stubbornly insisting on 
>> remaining on the fringe because some faggots claim their feelings are hurt.
> 
> Maybe it's time for a fork. Hopefully this is just the morons at the top 
> instead of those who are doing the actual work (and not obsessing over Woke 
> Culture 24/7). This Woke Culture really is brain-rotting disease.

Oh, piss off, both of you.

("Tone dead"?  Maybe he means "tone deaf".  Nice English there,
Mr. "English Professor")

And "the winds of change sweeping society" is hard to reconcile with
Bottom Sludge winning 1.5% over his opponent.  That is not
a "MAGA mandate", as much as Mango Mussolini lies about that.

Why you continue to talk to this avowed bigot, Ron, escapes me.
(Most of the time I see that MAGA clown is quoted by you...I might have
to adjust my reading habits some more.)

-- 
-v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti
   OS: Linux 6.13.0 Release: Mint 22.1 Mem: 258G
   "All that glitters has a high refractive index."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684793

On 2025-01-30 9:58 p.m., vallor wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 02:44:31 -0000 (UTC), RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>
> wrote in <vnhdef$37bl1$6@dont-email.me>:
> 
>> On 2025-01-31, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>> On 2025-01-30 9:24 p.m., RonB wrote:
>>>> On 2025-01-30, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> So they have finally admitted it was all a mistake (as if there was
>>>>> any doubt)
>>>>> <https://www.tomshardware.com/software/linux/facebook-admits-that-the-linux-topic-crackdown-was-in-error-and-has-been-fixed>.
>>>>>
>>>>> So why did it happen? Seems the shift from proper fact-checking of
>>>>> postings to relying on “community-driven” feedback was a factor.
>>>>> So-called “freedom of speech absolutism” (as defined by the anti-woke
>>>>> mob) leads to censorship of ideas that actually promote a free society
>>>>> -- who knew?
>>>>
>>>> And speaking of censorship and the Cancel Culture Regime. Apparently Debian
>>>> finds freedom of speech dangerous to their "core values" and have officially
>>>> withdrawn from TwitterX. Woke idiots.
>>>>
>>>> https://micronews.debian.org/
>>>
>>> Unsurprisingly, the people behind Debian are choosing to remain tone
>>> dead to the winds of change sweeping society right now. Despite it being
>>> inconvenient to them, the reality is that conservatism not only won, but
>>> it quickly becoming the default position. Nobody even wants to hear
>>> about what the "progressive" "liberal" "social democrats" think because
>>> they have not only completely discredited themselves, it has become
>>> clear to even the dumbest elements of society that they fabricate
>>> controversies at will. Apparently, Debian is stubbornly insisting on
>>> remaining on the fringe because some faggots claim their feelings are hurt.
>>
>> Maybe it's time for a fork. Hopefully this is just the morons at the top
>> instead of those who are doing the actual work (and not obsessing over Woke
>> Culture 24/7). This Woke Culture really is brain-rotting disease.
> 
> Oh, piss off, both of you.
> 
> ("Tone dead"?  Maybe he means "tone deaf".  Nice English there,
> Mr. "English Professor")
> 
> And "the winds of change sweeping society" is hard to reconcile with
> Bottom Sludge winning 1.5% over his opponent.  That is not
> a "MAGA mandate", as much as Mango Mussolini lies about that.
> 
> Why you continue to talk to this avowed bigot, Ron, escapes me.
> (Most of the time I see that MAGA clown is quoted by you...I might have
> to adjust my reading habits some more.)

Fuck off, fatty. Put me back in your grease-stained killfile.

-- 
CrudeSausage
Gab: @CrudeSausage
Telegram: @CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684808

On 2025-01-31, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
> On 2025-01-30 9:58 p.m., vallor wrote:
>> On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 02:44:31 -0000 (UTC), RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>
>> wrote in <vnhdef$37bl1$6@dont-email.me>:
>> 
>>> On 2025-01-31, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>> On 2025-01-30 9:24 p.m., RonB wrote:
>>>>> On 2025-01-30, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> So they have finally admitted it was all a mistake (as if there was
>>>>>> any doubt)
>>>>>> <https://www.tomshardware.com/software/linux/facebook-admits-that-the-linux-topic-crackdown-was-in-error-and-has-been-fixed>.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So why did it happen? Seems the shift from proper fact-checking of
>>>>>> postings to relying on “community-driven” feedback was a factor.
>>>>>> So-called “freedom of speech absolutism” (as defined by the anti-woke
>>>>>> mob) leads to censorship of ideas that actually promote a free society
>>>>>> -- who knew?
>>>>>
>>>>> And speaking of censorship and the Cancel Culture Regime. Apparently Debian
>>>>> finds freedom of speech dangerous to their "core values" and have officially
>>>>> withdrawn from TwitterX. Woke idiots.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://micronews.debian.org/
>>>>
>>>> Unsurprisingly, the people behind Debian are choosing to remain tone
>>>> dead to the winds of change sweeping society right now. Despite it being
>>>> inconvenient to them, the reality is that conservatism not only won, but
>>>> it quickly becoming the default position. Nobody even wants to hear
>>>> about what the "progressive" "liberal" "social democrats" think because
>>>> they have not only completely discredited themselves, it has become
>>>> clear to even the dumbest elements of society that they fabricate
>>>> controversies at will. Apparently, Debian is stubbornly insisting on
>>>> remaining on the fringe because some faggots claim their feelings are hurt.
>>>
>>> Maybe it's time for a fork. Hopefully this is just the morons at the top
>>> instead of those who are doing the actual work (and not obsessing over Woke
>>> Culture 24/7). This Woke Culture really is brain-rotting disease.
>> 
>> Oh, piss off, both of you.
>> 
>> ("Tone dead"?  Maybe he means "tone deaf".  Nice English there,
>> Mr. "English Professor")
>> 
>> And "the winds of change sweeping society" is hard to reconcile with
>> Bottom Sludge winning 1.5% over his opponent.  That is not
>> a "MAGA mandate", as much as Mango Mussolini lies about that.
>> 
>> Why you continue to talk to this avowed bigot, Ron, escapes me.
>> (Most of the time I see that MAGA clown is quoted by you...I might have
>> to adjust my reading habits some more.)
>
> Fuck off, fatty. Put me back in your grease-stained killfile.

Speaking of a Woke Culture drone, the misnamed "vallor" shows up right on 
cue. No, vallor, I'm not a MAGA drone. I guess you assume everyone is a 
partisan cultist because you project your own brain-rot, knee-jerk, 
cancel-cult behavior on everyone else.

-- 
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy 
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.”  —J.R.R. Tolkien

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684810

On 2025-01-31 6:57 p.m., RonB wrote:
> On 2025-01-31, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>> On 2025-01-30 9:58 p.m., vallor wrote:
>>> On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 02:44:31 -0000 (UTC), RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>
>>> wrote in <vnhdef$37bl1$6@dont-email.me>:
>>>
>>>> On 2025-01-31, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>> On 2025-01-30 9:24 p.m., RonB wrote:
>>>>>> On 2025-01-30, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>> So they have finally admitted it was all a mistake (as if there was
>>>>>>> any doubt)
>>>>>>> <https://www.tomshardware.com/software/linux/facebook-admits-that-the-linux-topic-crackdown-was-in-error-and-has-been-fixed>.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So why did it happen? Seems the shift from proper fact-checking of
>>>>>>> postings to relying on “community-driven” feedback was a factor.
>>>>>>> So-called “freedom of speech absolutism” (as defined by the anti-woke
>>>>>>> mob) leads to censorship of ideas that actually promote a free society
>>>>>>> -- who knew?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And speaking of censorship and the Cancel Culture Regime. Apparently Debian
>>>>>> finds freedom of speech dangerous to their "core values" and have officially
>>>>>> withdrawn from TwitterX. Woke idiots.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://micronews.debian.org/
>>>>>
>>>>> Unsurprisingly, the people behind Debian are choosing to remain tone
>>>>> dead to the winds of change sweeping society right now. Despite it being
>>>>> inconvenient to them, the reality is that conservatism not only won, but
>>>>> it quickly becoming the default position. Nobody even wants to hear
>>>>> about what the "progressive" "liberal" "social democrats" think because
>>>>> they have not only completely discredited themselves, it has become
>>>>> clear to even the dumbest elements of society that they fabricate
>>>>> controversies at will. Apparently, Debian is stubbornly insisting on
>>>>> remaining on the fringe because some faggots claim their feelings are hurt.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe it's time for a fork. Hopefully this is just the morons at the top
>>>> instead of those who are doing the actual work (and not obsessing over Woke
>>>> Culture 24/7). This Woke Culture really is brain-rotting disease.
>>>
>>> Oh, piss off, both of you.
>>>
>>> ("Tone dead"?  Maybe he means "tone deaf".  Nice English there,
>>> Mr. "English Professor")
>>>
>>> And "the winds of change sweeping society" is hard to reconcile with
>>> Bottom Sludge winning 1.5% over his opponent.  That is not
>>> a "MAGA mandate", as much as Mango Mussolini lies about that.
>>>
>>> Why you continue to talk to this avowed bigot, Ron, escapes me.
>>> (Most of the time I see that MAGA clown is quoted by you...I might have
>>> to adjust my reading habits some more.)
>>
>> Fuck off, fatty. Put me back in your grease-stained killfile.
> 
> Speaking of a Woke Culture drone, the misnamed "vallor" shows up right on
> cue. No, vallor, I'm not a MAGA drone. I guess you assume everyone is a
> partisan cultist because you project your own brain-rot, knee-jerk,
> cancel-cult behavior on everyone else.

Before long, the only person vallor will talk to here is Chris Ahlstrom. 
Yokoscotty seems to enjoy living in an echo chamber.

-- 
CrudeSausage
Gab: @CrudeSausage
Telegram: @CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684817

On 2025-02-01, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
> On 2025-01-31 6:57 p.m., RonB wrote:
>> On 2025-01-31, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>> On 2025-01-30 9:58 p.m., vallor wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 02:44:31 -0000 (UTC), RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote in <vnhdef$37bl1$6@dont-email.me>:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2025-01-31, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2025-01-30 9:24 p.m., RonB wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2025-01-30, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>> So they have finally admitted it was all a mistake (as if there was
>>>>>>>> any doubt)
>>>>>>>> <https://www.tomshardware.com/software/linux/facebook-admits-that-the-linux-topic-crackdown-was-in-error-and-has-been-fixed>.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So why did it happen? Seems the shift from proper fact-checking of
>>>>>>>> postings to relying on “community-driven” feedback was a factor.
>>>>>>>> So-called “freedom of speech absolutism” (as defined by the anti-woke
>>>>>>>> mob) leads to censorship of ideas that actually promote a free society
>>>>>>>> -- who knew?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And speaking of censorship and the Cancel Culture Regime. Apparently Debian
>>>>>>> finds freedom of speech dangerous to their "core values" and have officially
>>>>>>> withdrawn from TwitterX. Woke idiots.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://micronews.debian.org/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Unsurprisingly, the people behind Debian are choosing to remain tone
>>>>>> dead to the winds of change sweeping society right now. Despite it being
>>>>>> inconvenient to them, the reality is that conservatism not only won, but
>>>>>> it quickly becoming the default position. Nobody even wants to hear
>>>>>> about what the "progressive" "liberal" "social democrats" think because
>>>>>> they have not only completely discredited themselves, it has become
>>>>>> clear to even the dumbest elements of society that they fabricate
>>>>>> controversies at will. Apparently, Debian is stubbornly insisting on
>>>>>> remaining on the fringe because some faggots claim their feelings are hurt.
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe it's time for a fork. Hopefully this is just the morons at the top
>>>>> instead of those who are doing the actual work (and not obsessing over Woke
>>>>> Culture 24/7). This Woke Culture really is brain-rotting disease.
>>>>
>>>> Oh, piss off, both of you.
>>>>
>>>> ("Tone dead"?  Maybe he means "tone deaf".  Nice English there,
>>>> Mr. "English Professor")
>>>>
>>>> And "the winds of change sweeping society" is hard to reconcile with
>>>> Bottom Sludge winning 1.5% over his opponent.  That is not
>>>> a "MAGA mandate", as much as Mango Mussolini lies about that.
>>>>
>>>> Why you continue to talk to this avowed bigot, Ron, escapes me.
>>>> (Most of the time I see that MAGA clown is quoted by you...I might have
>>>> to adjust my reading habits some more.)
>>>
>>> Fuck off, fatty. Put me back in your grease-stained killfile.
>> 
>> Speaking of a Woke Culture drone, the misnamed "vallor" shows up right on
>> cue. No, vallor, I'm not a MAGA drone. I guess you assume everyone is a
>> partisan cultist because you project your own brain-rot, knee-jerk,
>> cancel-cult behavior on everyone else.
>
> Before long, the only person vallor will talk to here is Chris Ahlstrom. 
> Yokoscotty seems to enjoy living in an echo chamber.

That's all they can handle and why they're leaving TwitterX in droves. It's 
no longer simply an echo chamber, where anyone who disagrees with them is 
"canceled." They can't stand someone believing something other than what 
their brain-dead Woke cult "teaches" (or rather brainwashes them into 
believing). No logic is involved. It's all predicated on emotion.

-- 
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy 
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.”  —J.R.R. Tolkien

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684826

On 2025-02-01 12:21 a.m., RonB wrote:
> On 2025-02-01, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>> On 2025-01-31 6:57 p.m., RonB wrote:
>>> On 2025-01-31, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>> On 2025-01-30 9:58 p.m., vallor wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 02:44:31 -0000 (UTC), RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote in <vnhdef$37bl1$6@dont-email.me>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2025-01-31, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2025-01-30 9:24 p.m., RonB wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-30, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> So they have finally admitted it was all a mistake (as if there was
>>>>>>>>> any doubt)
>>>>>>>>> <https://www.tomshardware.com/software/linux/facebook-admits-that-the-linux-topic-crackdown-was-in-error-and-has-been-fixed>.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So why did it happen? Seems the shift from proper fact-checking of
>>>>>>>>> postings to relying on “community-driven” feedback was a factor.
>>>>>>>>> So-called “freedom of speech absolutism” (as defined by the anti-woke
>>>>>>>>> mob) leads to censorship of ideas that actually promote a free society
>>>>>>>>> -- who knew?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And speaking of censorship and the Cancel Culture Regime. Apparently Debian
>>>>>>>> finds freedom of speech dangerous to their "core values" and have officially
>>>>>>>> withdrawn from TwitterX. Woke idiots.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://micronews.debian.org/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Unsurprisingly, the people behind Debian are choosing to remain tone
>>>>>>> dead to the winds of change sweeping society right now. Despite it being
>>>>>>> inconvenient to them, the reality is that conservatism not only won, but
>>>>>>> it quickly becoming the default position. Nobody even wants to hear
>>>>>>> about what the "progressive" "liberal" "social democrats" think because
>>>>>>> they have not only completely discredited themselves, it has become
>>>>>>> clear to even the dumbest elements of society that they fabricate
>>>>>>> controversies at will. Apparently, Debian is stubbornly insisting on
>>>>>>> remaining on the fringe because some faggots claim their feelings are hurt.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe it's time for a fork. Hopefully this is just the morons at the top
>>>>>> instead of those who are doing the actual work (and not obsessing over Woke
>>>>>> Culture 24/7). This Woke Culture really is brain-rotting disease.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh, piss off, both of you.
>>>>>
>>>>> ("Tone dead"?  Maybe he means "tone deaf".  Nice English there,
>>>>> Mr. "English Professor")
>>>>>
>>>>> And "the winds of change sweeping society" is hard to reconcile with
>>>>> Bottom Sludge winning 1.5% over his opponent.  That is not
>>>>> a "MAGA mandate", as much as Mango Mussolini lies about that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why you continue to talk to this avowed bigot, Ron, escapes me.
>>>>> (Most of the time I see that MAGA clown is quoted by you...I might have
>>>>> to adjust my reading habits some more.)
>>>>
>>>> Fuck off, fatty. Put me back in your grease-stained killfile.
>>>
>>> Speaking of a Woke Culture drone, the misnamed "vallor" shows up right on
>>> cue. No, vallor, I'm not a MAGA drone. I guess you assume everyone is a
>>> partisan cultist because you project your own brain-rot, knee-jerk,
>>> cancel-cult behavior on everyone else.
>>
>> Before long, the only person vallor will talk to here is Chris Ahlstrom.
>> Yokoscotty seems to enjoy living in an echo chamber.
> 
> That's all they can handle and why they're leaving TwitterX in droves. It's
> no longer simply an echo chamber, where anyone who disagrees with them is
> "canceled." They can't stand someone believing something other than what
> their brain-dead Woke cult "teaches" (or rather brainwashes them into
> believing). No logic is involved. It's all predicated on emotion.

It's actually funny to me the way that they are migrating to BlueSky 
because they've done it before with Mastodon and Threads and both of 
them failed. They ignore that without people disagreeing with you, there 
is no need for conversation. Preaching to the choir is boring, that's 
why X was always the place to go: because there are always lots of 
people going there strictly to disagree with you for the sake of 
conversation.

-- 
CrudeSausage
Gab: @CrudeSausage
Telegram: @CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684841

On 2025-02-01, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
> On 2025-02-01 12:21 a.m., RonB wrote:
>> On 2025-02-01, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>> On 2025-01-31 6:57 p.m., RonB wrote:
>>>> On 2025-01-31, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>> On 2025-01-30 9:58 p.m., vallor wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 02:44:31 -0000 (UTC), RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote in <vnhdef$37bl1$6@dont-email.me>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2025-01-31, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-30 9:24 p.m., RonB wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2025-01-30, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> So they have finally admitted it was all a mistake (as if there was
>>>>>>>>>> any doubt)
>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.tomshardware.com/software/linux/facebook-admits-that-the-linux-topic-crackdown-was-in-error-and-has-been-fixed>.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So why did it happen? Seems the shift from proper fact-checking of
>>>>>>>>>> postings to relying on “community-driven” feedback was a factor.
>>>>>>>>>> So-called “freedom of speech absolutism” (as defined by the anti-woke
>>>>>>>>>> mob) leads to censorship of ideas that actually promote a free society
>>>>>>>>>> -- who knew?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And speaking of censorship and the Cancel Culture Regime. Apparently Debian
>>>>>>>>> finds freedom of speech dangerous to their "core values" and have officially
>>>>>>>>> withdrawn from TwitterX. Woke idiots.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://micronews.debian.org/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Unsurprisingly, the people behind Debian are choosing to remain tone
>>>>>>>> dead to the winds of change sweeping society right now. Despite it being
>>>>>>>> inconvenient to them, the reality is that conservatism not only won, but
>>>>>>>> it quickly becoming the default position. Nobody even wants to hear
>>>>>>>> about what the "progressive" "liberal" "social democrats" think because
>>>>>>>> they have not only completely discredited themselves, it has become
>>>>>>>> clear to even the dumbest elements of society that they fabricate
>>>>>>>> controversies at will. Apparently, Debian is stubbornly insisting on
>>>>>>>> remaining on the fringe because some faggots claim their feelings are hurt.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe it's time for a fork. Hopefully this is just the morons at the top
>>>>>>> instead of those who are doing the actual work (and not obsessing over Woke
>>>>>>> Culture 24/7). This Woke Culture really is brain-rotting disease.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh, piss off, both of you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ("Tone dead"?  Maybe he means "tone deaf".  Nice English there,
>>>>>> Mr. "English Professor")
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And "the winds of change sweeping society" is hard to reconcile with
>>>>>> Bottom Sludge winning 1.5% over his opponent.  That is not
>>>>>> a "MAGA mandate", as much as Mango Mussolini lies about that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why you continue to talk to this avowed bigot, Ron, escapes me.
>>>>>> (Most of the time I see that MAGA clown is quoted by you...I might have
>>>>>> to adjust my reading habits some more.)
>>>>>
>>>>> Fuck off, fatty. Put me back in your grease-stained killfile.
>>>>
>>>> Speaking of a Woke Culture drone, the misnamed "vallor" shows up right on
>>>> cue. No, vallor, I'm not a MAGA drone. I guess you assume everyone is a
>>>> partisan cultist because you project your own brain-rot, knee-jerk,
>>>> cancel-cult behavior on everyone else.
>>>
>>> Before long, the only person vallor will talk to here is Chris Ahlstrom.
>>> Yokoscotty seems to enjoy living in an echo chamber.
>> 
>> That's all they can handle and why they're leaving TwitterX in droves. It's
>> no longer simply an echo chamber, where anyone who disagrees with them is
>> "canceled." They can't stand someone believing something other than what
>> their brain-dead Woke cult "teaches" (or rather brainwashes them into
>> believing). No logic is involved. It's all predicated on emotion.
>
> It's actually funny to me the way that they are migrating to BlueSky 
> because they've done it before with Mastodon and Threads and both of 
> them failed. They ignore that without people disagreeing with you, there 
> is no need for conversation. Preaching to the choir is boring, that's 
> why X was always the place to go: because there are always lots of 
> people going there strictly to disagree with you for the sake of 
> conversation.

Except in the old Twitter if someone made a good point to counter the Woke 
crap, they would be more than likely be canceled or "de-platformed" or 
whatever the term is. Now that the Woke cultists can't automatically have 
the last word on TwitterX, their miffed. So now they're going to BlueSky 
which they hope will become a new "old" Twitter. Unfortunately for them, it 
will become a completely boring echo chamber with about 100% preaching to 
the choir (as you say). So yes, it's probably destined to nosedive into 
oblivion, kind of like CNN and MSNBC. 

-- 
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy 
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.”  —J.R.R. Tolkien

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 4  [1] 2 3 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web