Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #684568 > unrolled thread

Kernel 6.13 Changes

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  Kernel 6.13 Changes Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-01-25 12:45 +0000
    Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-01-25 14:16 +0000
      Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> - 2025-01-25 14:54 +0000
        Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-01-25 19:39 +0000
          Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> - 2025-01-25 20:13 +0000
            Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-25 15:21 -0500
              Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-25 15:12 -0600
              Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-01-25 21:39 +0000
            Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-25 15:02 -0600
            Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-01-25 21:29 +0000
              Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-01-25 22:22 +0000
                Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-01-25 22:44 +0000
                  Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-01-25 23:33 +0000
                  Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-26 07:00 -0500
                  Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes Diego Garcia <dg@linux.rocks> - 2025-01-26 12:11 +0000
              Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-25 19:12 -0500
                Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-01-26 00:16 +0000
                Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 03:52 +0000
                  Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-26 10:58 -0500
                    Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-26 19:14 +0000
                  Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-26 12:19 -0600
                    Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-27 09:48 -0500
                      Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-27 09:57 -0500
                        Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-28 22:26 -0500
                          Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-29 09:27 -0500
                            Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-29 11:51 -0500
                              Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-29 12:15 -0500
                                Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-29 13:21 -0500
                                  Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-29 15:36 -0500
                      OT: Amélie (was: Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-27 22:11 +0000
                        Re: OT: Amélie CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-27 17:34 -0500
                        Re: OT: Amélie DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-28 22:22 -0500
                          Re: OT: Amélie Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-02-01 10:10 +0000
                            Re: OT: Amélie vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-02-01 13:03 +0000
                            Re: OT: Name Conventions Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-02-07 08:15 +0000
                              Re: OT: Name Conventions DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-02-07 10:09 -0500
        Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-25 14:52 -0600
          Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-01-26 11:35 +0000
            Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-26 09:52 -0600
              Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-01-26 16:41 +0000
                Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-26 13:36 -0600
                  Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-26 14:58 -0500
                  Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-27 01:06 +0000
                    Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-27 09:04 -0500
            Re: Kernel 6.13 Changes Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-26 12:43 -0600

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

#684568 — Kernel 6.13 Changes

For the builders, here are some goodies I found in the latest
kernel 6.13:

**Preemption Model
  1. No Forced Preemption (Server) (PREEMPT_NONE)
> 2. Voluntary Kernel Preemption (Desktop) (PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY)
  3. Preemptible Kernel (Low-Latency Desktop) (PREEMPT)
  4. Scheduler controlled preemption model (PREEMPT_LAZY) (NEW)
choice[1-4?]: 4

Yes, definitely select #4, or lazy preemption.

**Enable RCU priority boosting (RCU_BOOST) [N/y/?] (NEW) ?

I'm not sure about this, but the help says to enable if
using RT or heavy loads.  I'll pick "no" which is the default.

**Split Lock Detect and Bus Lock Detect support (X86_BUS_LOCK_DETECT) [Y/n/?] (NEW) ?

Definitely say "yes" to this.  In the event that this occurs it
will improve performance.  Read the docs for more info.

**TLP Processing Hints (PCIE_TPH) [N/y/?] (NEW) ?

I believe that this is AMD specific.  Since I don't use that AMD
junk I say "no."  But it doesn't really matter since this option
is only for PCIe 5th Gen and I don't have that.

**PCIe cooling support (PCIE_THERMAL) [N/y/?] (NEW) ?

My systems are so efficiently cooled that nothing ever rises
far above ambient, so "no."

That's all for this iteration.



-- 
Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#684571

Le 25-01-2025, Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> a écrit :
>
> I believe that this is AMD specific.

You shouldn't believe, you should learn, but it's beyond you abilities.

> My systems are so efficiently cooled that nothing ever rises
> far above ambient, so "no."

The only thing I know about your systems is a picture you sent here not
that long ago. And they weren't efficiently cooled. A designed box to
put your computer in it is far more efficient than open air. You can
believe what you want: you are wrong about it.

-- 
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684576

On 25 Jan 2025 14:16:42 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:

> 
>  A designed box to
> put your computer in it is far more efficient than open air. You can
> believe what you want: you are wrong about it.
>

Prove it, idiot.

You know nothing about fluid dynamics and heat transfer.

My hardware is cooled far more efficiently than any "box"
setup.

The only drawback is dust build up but now I employ vacuum
systems to handle it during regular maintenance.

You have only a fat, stupid mouth but no fucking brains.





-- 
Gentoo: The Fastest GNU/Linux Hands Down

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684582

Le 25-01-2025, Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> a écrit :
> On 25 Jan 2025 14:16:42 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>
>> 
>>  A designed box to
>> put your computer in it is far more efficient than open air. You can
>> believe what you want: you are wrong about it.
>
> Prove it, idiot.

There is nothing to prove: it's obvious.

> You know nothing about fluid dynamics and heat transfer.

Obviously, you don't understand what you pretend to know.

> My hardware is cooled far more efficiently than any "box"
> setup.

It can't be because in a box you can control the flow of the air. With
your open construction, you control nothing. You just have to open a
door and a window to see that by yourself.

> You have only a fat, stupid mouth but no fucking brains.

There are two miracles here at the same time:
- First you have a running computer, that proves FOSS is great.
- Second you are still alive, you should thank the protection of your
  asylum.

-- 
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684583

On 25 Jan 2025 19:39:04 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:

> 
>> My hardware is cooled far more efficiently than any "box"
>> setup.
> 
> It can't be 
>

I warned you before.  Do not attempt to overrule my statements
with your profound idiocy.

I have brothers in KGB/Spetsnaz all over the world, and if I ask
them they will do it.  Those mutherfuckers are brutal.

If you make the attempt again then your ass is grass.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/one%27s_ass_is_grass





-- 
Gentoo: The Fastest GNU/Linux Hands Down

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684584

Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> wrote:
>On 25 Jan 2025 19:39:04 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>
>>> My hardware is cooled far more efficiently than any "box"
>>> setup.
>> 
>> It can't be 
>
>I warned you before.  Do not attempt to overrule my statements
>with your profound idiocy.
>
>I have brothers in KGB/Spetsnaz all over the world, and if I ask
>them they will do it.  Those mutherfuckers are brutal.
>
>If you make the attempt again then your ass is grass.
>
>https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/one%27s_ass_is_grass


Enough, Larry, no threatening Stéphane.  Your setup works for you,
fine, some of us are going to say that it's not particularly efficient
to not have a case, and you were overreacting to him.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684589

On 1/25/25 2:21 PM, Joel wrote:
> Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> wrote:
>> On 25 Jan 2025 19:39:04 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>>
>>>> My hardware is cooled far more efficiently than any "box"
>>>> setup.
>>>
>>> It can't be
>>
>> I warned you before.  Do not attempt to overrule my statements
>> with your profound idiocy.
>>
>> I have brothers in KGB/Spetsnaz all over the world, and if I ask
>> them they will do it.  Those mutherfuckers are brutal.
>>
>> If you make the attempt again then your ass is grass.
>>
>> https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/one%27s_ass_is_grass
> 
> 
> Enough, Larry, no threatening Stéphane.  Your setup works for you,
> fine, some of us are going to say that it's not particularly efficient
> to not have a case, and you were overreacting to him.
> 


No, Carpentier's anus got too close to him at last :-) Hehe :)

Let that anus get within one inch of "DFS" and see what _her_ reaction 
would be.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684591

Le 25-01-2025, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> wrote:
>>On 25 Jan 2025 19:39:04 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>>
>>>> My hardware is cooled far more efficiently than any "box"
>>>> setup.
>>> 
>>> It can't be 
>>
>>I warned you before.  Do not attempt to overrule my statements
>>with your profound idiocy.
>>
>>I have brothers in KGB/Spetsnaz all over the world, and if I ask
>>them they will do it.  Those mutherfuckers are brutal.
>>
>>If you make the attempt again then your ass is grass.
>>
>>https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/one%27s_ass_is_grass
>
> Enough, Larry, no threatening Stéphane.

He's not threatening me: he's daydreaming. He's living in the fantasy
world he pretends to disapprove.

> Your setup works for you, fine, 

Note that I'm not saying his setup doesn't work. I'm just saying that,
unlike his claim, it's not the best one.

> some of us are going to say that it's not particularly efficient to
> not have a case,

Nobody has to answer him, but if someone wants to answer, it's the only
possible one.

> and you were overreacting to him.

Like always, his mouth is far bigger than his brain. I'm not afraid of
his reaction, if you are, you shouldn't. You are nice, but you shouldn't
believe he can support his claims.

-- 
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684588

On 1/25/25 2:13 PM, Farley Flud wrote:
> I have brothers in KGB/Spetsnaz all over the world,


Do you know Russian?.. :)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684590

Le 25-01-2025, Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> a écrit :
> On 25 Jan 2025 19:39:04 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>
>> 
>>> My hardware is cooled far more efficiently than any "box"
>>> setup.
>> 
>> It can't be 
>
> I warned you before.

Yes, I remember that. I wasn't impressed at the time, I'm still not
impressed today. I can't be impressed by a self deceiving illiterate
first class order moron unable to get far away from is asylum.

> Do not attempt to overrule my statements with your profound idiocy.

Or what? You'll laugh like a lunatic? You'll give me a badge of honor
calling me idiot? You'll liberate your homosexual behavior to tell once
again you are ready to fuck me? You'll bang your head against your
asylum wall crying like a little boy? You'll cry for your pet dog the
terrorist to be near me when he blows his head off believing he'll go to
paradise after a suicide?

> I have brothers in KGB/Spetsnaz all over the world, and if I ask
> them they will do it.  Those mutherfuckers are brutal.

OK, I was surprised to discovered you don't know Forrest GUMP. I
shouldn't have been, but I was nevertheless. Hollywood makes great
movies, but not only. And it looks like you are knowing only the bad
ones. So, for your information, Rambo is not a documentary. Neither is
Commando. Fast and Furious 42 is not a realistic movie. You pretend you
disapprove about fiction, but it looks like you are living in a world of
fiction. The wake up will be difficult.

No real special force guy would kill someone for no reason. It would
blow his cover and he wouldn't do it just because I proved you are a
fraud.

And, by the way, for your information: the KBG doesn't exist anymore.
Neither the Spetsnaz. You should try to keep up: you are the only one is
the world unaware of it. You just proved, once again, that you are stuck
in the past

> If you make the attempt again then your ass is grass.

Yes, I know, you are obsessed with my ass. But make no mistake. I don't
care about your homosexual behaviour as long as you keep it with your
homosexual friends. If you try to rape me, you'll be surprised it won't
go as further as your expectations.

-- 
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684592

On 25 Jan 2025 21:29:56 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:

> 
> OK, I was surprised to discovered you don't know Forrest GUMP. I
> shouldn't have been, but I was nevertheless. Hollywood makes great
> movies, 
>


OMFG!  What do think that I am, a fucking stupefied couch potato?

I am proud to admit that I have not watched television or seen
a Hollywood "movie" since I was 14 years old -- and before then
it was only because I did not, indeed could not, know any better.

But _you_ are obviously another stupefied victim of the ubiquitous
popular culture.  All that you know or understand has been spoon
fed to you by the Hollywood moguls.  You are a pathetically flawed
and failed human organism.

_You_ are a puppet of the conglomerates.  You will eat, drink,
think, and believe only what they tell you.

That's why you use mainstream distros.  You are incapable of
making your own decisions.  You are an IDIOT.

Now get out of my site.  I want nothing to do with a total
loser like you.





-- 
Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684593

On 2025-01-25, Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote:
> On 25 Jan 2025 21:29:56 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>
>> 
>> OK, I was surprised to discovered you don't know Forrest GUMP. I
>> shouldn't have been, but I was nevertheless. Hollywood makes great
>> movies, 
>>
>
>
> OMFG!  What do think that I am, a fucking stupefied couch potato?

Most people think you are a fucking retard.
You prove it every time you post.
A stupefied couch potato would be an improvement for a fool like you.

> I am proud to admit that I have not watched television or seen
> a Hollywood "movie" since I was 14 years old -- and before then
> it was only because I did not, indeed could not, know any better.

If true, which I doubt, it's one of your better traits.
I suspect you are lying though.

> But _you_ are obviously another stupefied victim of the ubiquitous
> popular culture.  All that you know or understand has been spoon
> fed to you by the Hollywood moguls.  You are a pathetically flawed
> and failed human organism.

What does this have to do with Linux?

> _You_ are a puppet of the conglomerates.  You will eat, drink,
> think, and believe only what they tell you.

Huh?

> That's why you use mainstream distros.  You are incapable of
> making your own decisions.  You are an IDIOT.

I also drive mainstream cars, use mainstream microwaves, have
a mainstream phone, use mainstream antibiotics, etc.
What is your point?

> Now get out of my site.  I want nothing to do with a total
> loser like you.

Site?
 What site?
 You think Usenet belongs to you?
 Please explain.
Stéphane CARPENTIER owns you.
You are not even in the same league as him.
I'm sure Linus and the Linux community would welcome you switching to
another OS because you make Linux look bad and obviously don't know
diddly squat about Linux.

-- 
pothead

Why did Joe Biden pardon his family?
Read below to learn the reason.
The Biden Crime Family Timeline here:
https://oversight.house.gov/the-bidens-influence-peddling-timeline/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684594

Le 25-01-2025, pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> a écrit :
> On 2025-01-25, Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote:
>> On 25 Jan 2025 21:29:56 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>>
>>> OK, I was surprised to discovered you don't know Forrest GUMP. I
>>> shouldn't have been, but I was nevertheless. Hollywood makes great
>>> movies, 
>>
>> OMFG!  What do think that I am, a fucking stupefied couch potato?
>
> Most people think you are a fucking retard.
> You prove it every time you post.
> A stupefied couch potato would be an improvement for a fool like you.

Yep. He says so many stupid things in so little words it's difficult to
catch them all. It's impressive: it can't be natural.

>> I am proud to admit that I have not watched television or seen
>> a Hollywood "movie" since I was 14 years old -- and before then
>> it was only because I did not, indeed could not, know any better.
>
> If true, which I doubt, it's one of your better traits.

Why? There are many great Hollywood movies. He could learn a lot with
some of them. And it would be better for him to be inspired by them than
pretending he has brothers among long dismantled units.

> I suspect you are lying though.

Yes, like everything he claims.

>> But _you_ are obviously another stupefied victim of the ubiquitous
>> popular culture.  All that you know or understand has been spoon
>> fed to you by the Hollywood moguls.  You are a pathetically flawed
>> and failed human organism.
>
> What does this have to do with Linux?

Nothing, he just wants to show he doesn't understand what culture means.

>> _You_ are a puppet of the conglomerates.  You will eat, drink,
>> think, and believe only what they tell you.
>
> Huh?

Yep, I'm French and I know far better than him about food and drink.
It's obvious from everything he wrote.
<https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpreview.redd.it%2Fzod7y77lfja61.jpg%3Fauto%3Dwebp%26s%3Dd36d2a6ac791a75f38fdb57515f76433c0ddcf82>

> Stéphane CARPENTIER owns you.

Of course, he's my toy.

> I'm sure Linus and the Linux community would welcome you switching to
> another OS because you make Linux look bad and obviously don't know
> diddly squat about Linux.

Not exactly. He doesn't makes Linux look bad, he makes Linux users look
bad. But except for this little precision, I agree.

-- 
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684609

On 1/25/25 5:44 PM, pothead wrote:
> On 2025-01-25, Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote:
>> On 25 Jan 2025 21:29:56 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> OK, I was surprised to discovered you don't know Forrest GUMP. I
>>> shouldn't have been, but I was nevertheless. Hollywood makes great
>>> movies,
>>>
>>
>>
>> OMFG!  What do think that I am, a fucking stupefied couch potato?
> 
> Most people think you are a fucking retard.
> You prove it every time you post.
> A stupefied couch potato would be an improvement for a fool like you.
> 
>> I am proud to admit that I have not watched television or seen
>> a Hollywood "movie" since I was 14 years old -- and before then
>> it was only because I did not, indeed could not, know any better.
> 
> If true, which I doubt, it's one of your better traits.
> I suspect you are lying though.
> 
>> But _you_ are obviously another stupefied victim of the ubiquitous
>> popular culture.  All that you know or understand has been spoon
>> fed to you by the Hollywood moguls.  You are a pathetically flawed
>> and failed human organism.
> 
> What does this have to do with Linux?
> 
>> _You_ are a puppet of the conglomerates.  You will eat, drink,
>> think, and believe only what they tell you.
> 
> Huh?
> 
>> That's why you use mainstream distros.  You are incapable of
>> making your own decisions.  You are an IDIOT.
> 
> I also drive mainstream cars, use mainstream microwaves, have
> a mainstream phone, use mainstream antibiotics, etc.
> What is your point?
> 
>> Now get out of my site.  I want nothing to do with a total
>> loser like you.
> 
> Site?
>   What site?
>   You think Usenet belongs to you?
>   Please explain.
> Stéphane CARPENTIER owns you.
> You are not even in the same league as him.
> I'm sure Linus and the Linux community would welcome you switching to
> another OS because you make Linux look bad and obviously don't know
> diddly squat about Linux.

+1

-- 
CrudeSausage
Gab: @CrudeSausage
Telegram: @CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative
KDE supporting member
ASUS Zephyrus GA401QM on Manjaro

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684610

On Sat, 25 Jan 2025 22:44:14 -0000 (UTC), pothead wrote:

>
> [...]
>

I hear a pig fart.  Nay, a big, fat ugly hog.

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

>
> You are not even in the same league as him.
> 

The correct grammatical construction is "as he."

Whew!  This flatus passer never made it past the third grade.

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!








> another OS because you make Linux look bad and obviously don't know
> diddly squat about Linux.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684595

On 1/25/2025 4:29 PM, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:


> Hollywood makes great movies, but not only.


My Dad and I used to see French films (always subtitled of course) at an 
art house theater.

The only ones I remember the names of are:

Jean de Florette
Manon of the Spring
Cyrano de Bergerac
Germinal
Breathless

I once rented Irréversible, a horrific movie with Monica Bellucci.

I remember My New Partner (1984) was funny.

Everyone was in love with Catherine Deneuve way back then.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684596

On 2025-01-26, DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
> On 1/25/2025 4:29 PM, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>
>
>> Hollywood makes great movies, but not only.
>
>
> My Dad and I used to see French films (always subtitled of course) at an 
> art house theater.
>
> The only ones I remember the names of are:
>
> Jean de Florette
> Manon of the Spring
> Cyrano de Bergerac
> Germinal
> Breathless
>
> I once rented Irréversible, a horrific movie with Monica Bellucci.
>
> I remember My New Partner (1984) was funny.
>
> Everyone was in love with Catherine Deneuve way back then.

Look up  "Les Diaboliques," . You will probably like it.



-- 
pothead

Why did Joe Biden pardon his family?
Read below to learn the reason.
The Biden Crime Family Timeline here:
https://oversight.house.gov/the-bidens-influence-peddling-timeline/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684598

On Sat, 25 Jan 2025 19:12:52 -0500, DFS wrote:

> My Dad and I used to see French films (always subtitled of course) at an
> art house theater.

No 'Tirez sur le pianiste' or ' Les quatre cents coups' ?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684616

On 1/25/2025 10:52 PM, rbowman wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Jan 2025 19:12:52 -0500, DFS wrote:
> 
>> My Dad and I used to see French films (always subtitled of course) at an
>> art house theater.
> 
> No 'Tirez sur le pianiste' or 'Les quatre cents coups' ?


Don't tell me you speak French too!

I always meant to seek out a couple Truffaut movies to see what the fuss 
was about.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#684629

On Sun, 26 Jan 2025 10:58:22 -0500, DFS wrote:

> On 1/25/2025 10:52 PM, rbowman wrote:
>> On Sat, 25 Jan 2025 19:12:52 -0500, DFS wrote:
>> 
>>> My Dad and I used to see French films (always subtitled of course) at
>>> an art house theater.
>> 
>> No 'Tirez sur le pianiste' or 'Les quatre cents coups' ?
> 
> 
> Don't tell me you speak French too!

Hell no! That's led to interesting moments as I tried to get a chocolate 
shake to go in a small Quebec town.

> I always meant to seek out a couple Truffaut movies to see what the fuss
> was about.

I'm not sure I ever saw either of the above but French New Wave was the 
hip thing back in the day. The only French film I specifically remember is 
'La Femme Nikita'.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web