Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #681239 > unrolled thread

A New Machine Progresses

Started byFarley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks>
First post2024-12-25 17:48 +0000
Last post2024-12-30 18:50 -0500
Articles 20 on this page of 116 — 20 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy


Contents

  A New Machine Progresses Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> - 2024-12-25 17:48 +0000
    Re: A New Machine Progresses chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2024-12-25 12:22 -0600
      Re: A New Machine Progresses Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> - 2024-12-25 18:42 +0000
        Re: A New Machine Progresses pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-12-26 02:25 +0000
          Re: A New Machine Progresses Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-26 08:13 +0000
          Re: A New Machine Progresses chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2024-12-26 06:58 -0600
            Re: A New Machine Progresses pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-12-26 15:06 +0000
      Re: A New Machine Progresses -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-26 16:21 -0500
        Re: A New Machine Progresses Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-27 10:13 +0000
          Re: A New Machine Progresses Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-12-27 07:50 -0500
            Re: A New Machine Progresses -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-27 15:03 -0500
          Re: A New Machine Progresses Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 14:11 -0600
            Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 15:18 -0500
              Re: A New Machine Progresses Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 14:36 -0600
                Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 15:43 -0500
                  Re: A New Machine Progresses Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 14:56 -0600
                    Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 15:59 -0500
                      Re: A New Machine Progresses Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 15:05 -0600
                        Re: A New Machine Progresses -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-27 20:55 -0500
                          Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 21:22 -0500
                            Re: A New Machine Progresses -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-27 22:38 -0500
                          Re: A New Machine Progresses Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 20:32 -0600
                            Re: A New Machine Progresses -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-27 22:38 -0500
                              Re: A New Machine Progresses Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 21:47 -0600
                      Re: A New Machine Progresses rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 00:13 +0000
                        Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 20:04 -0500
                          Re: A New Machine Progresses pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-12-28 02:05 +0000
                            Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 21:27 -0500
                              Re: A New Machine Progresses brock <brockt@allied_.abc> - 2024-12-28 09:29 +0100
                                Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 08:33 -0500
                                  Re: A New Machine Progresses Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-12-28 07:30 -0700
                                    Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 10:45 -0500
                                      Re: A New Machine Progresses Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-12-28 11:45 -0700
                                        Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 13:50 -0500
                                          Re: A New Machine Progresses Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> - 2024-12-29 04:47 -0700
                                            Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-29 14:48 -0500
                                              Re: A New Machine Progresses Jack Sovalot <hee-cawkforme@jack.sovalot> - 2024-12-31 04:11 -0500
                                                Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-31 16:08 -0500
                                                Re: A New Machine Progresses Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-01 04:28 -0500
                                                  Re: A New Machine Progresses Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2025-01-01 02:00 -0800
                                                    Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-01 11:58 -0500
                                                      Re: A New Machine Progresses Jack Sovalot <hee-cawkforme@jack.sovalot> - 2025-01-01 12:31 -0500
                                                        Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-01 14:22 -0500
                                                          Re: A New Machine Progresses Jack Sovalot <hee-cawkforme@jack.sovalot> - 2025-01-01 14:49 -0500
                                                            Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-01 14:55 -0500
                                                              Re: A New Machine Progresses Jack Sovalot <hee-cawkforme@jack.sovalot> - 2025-01-01 16:49 -0500
                                                              Re: A New Machine Progresses "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-02 08:06 -0500
                                                                Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-02 18:22 -0500
                                                                  Re: A New Machine Progresses "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-03 08:20 -0500
                                                          Re: A New Machine Progresses Jack Sovalot <hee-cawkforme@jack.sovalot> - 2025-01-01 17:04 -0500
                                                          Re: A New Machine Progresses "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-02 08:05 -0500
                                                        Re: A New Machine Progresses Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-02 07:25 -0500
                                              Re: A New Machine Progresses Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-01 04:26 -0500
                                                Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-01 11:56 -0500
                                                  Re: A New Machine Progresses Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-02 07:27 -0500
                                                    Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-02 10:52 -0500
                                                      Re: A New Machine Progresses Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-02 22:54 -0500
                                                        Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-03 15:24 -0500
                                                          Re: A New Machine Progresses Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 14:44 -0500
                                                            Re: A New Machine Progresses "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-06 07:51 -0500
                                          Re: A New Machine Progresses Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> - 2025-01-01 04:21 -0500
                                            Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-01 11:55 -0500
                                    Re: A New Machine Progresses Ted <ted.street@yahoo.net> - 2024-12-28 10:53 -0500
                                      Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 12:41 -0500
                                        Re: A New Machine Progresses Ted <ted.street@yahoo.net> - 2024-12-28 12:45 -0500
                                          Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 12:56 -0500
                                            Re: A New Machine Progresses Ted <ted.street@yahoo.net> - 2024-12-28 13:02 -0500
                                        Re: A New Machine Progresses "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-28 16:58 -0500
                                  Re: A New Machine Progresses Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-12-28 10:58 -0500
                          Re: A New Machine Progresses "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2024-12-28 16:58 -0500
                            Re: A New Machine Progresses pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-12-29 02:48 +0000
                              Re: A New Machine Progresses -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-29 13:59 -0500
                                Re: A New Machine Progresses pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-12-29 22:37 +0000
                                  Re: A New Machine Progresses -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-29 19:48 -0500
                                    Re: A New Machine Progresses pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-12-30 02:04 +0000
                                      Re: A New Machine Progresses -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-31 10:44 -0500
                                        Re: A New Machine Progresses pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-12-31 21:21 +0000
                                          Re: A New Machine Progresses Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2024-12-31 13:47 -0800
                                          Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-31 16:52 -0500
                                            Re: A New Machine Progresses pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-12-31 22:43 +0000
                                              Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-31 18:29 -0500
                                                Re: A New Machine Progresses Klaus  Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergent�ter.@gmail.com> - 2024-12-31 15:41 -0800
                                                Re: A New Machine Progresses pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-12-31 23:44 +0000
                                                  Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-31 18:47 -0500
                                                    Re: A New Machine Progresses pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-12-31 23:59 +0000
                                                      Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-31 19:06 -0500
                                                        Re: A New Machine Progresses pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-01-01 00:18 +0000
                                                          Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-31 19:44 -0500
                                                            Re: A New Machine Progresses pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-01-01 00:52 +0000
                                                              Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-31 20:24 -0500
                                                                Re: A New Machine Progresses "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-02 08:04 -0500
                                                              Re: A New Machine Progresses Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> - 2024-12-31 19:19 -0800
                                                        Re: A New Machine Progresses "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-02 08:03 -0500
                                                    Re: A New Machine Progresses "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-02 08:02 -0500
                                                Re: A New Machine Progresses "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-02 08:01 -0500
                                                  Re: A New Machine Progresses Klaus Schadenfreude <katt@gmail.com> - 2025-01-02 13:25 -0800
                                                    Re: A New Machine Progresses "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> - 2025-01-03 08:21 -0500
                                                      Re: A New Machine Progresses Klaus Schadenfreude <katt@gmail.com> - 2025-01-03 09:15 -0800
                                          Re: A New Machine Progresses -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-31 17:12 -0500
                        Re: A New Machine Progresses pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-12-28 01:57 +0000
                          Re: A New Machine Progresses rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-28 02:11 +0000
            Re: A New Machine Progresses Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-28 14:02 +0000
              Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 10:11 -0500
                Re: A New Machine Progresses Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-28 12:22 -0500
              Re: A New Machine Progresses Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 15:27 -0600
                Re: A New Machine Progresses Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-28 22:01 +0000
                  Re: A New Machine Progresses Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 17:07 -0600
                    Re: A New Machine Progresses Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-28 23:20 +0000
                      Re: A New Machine Progresses Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 18:24 -0500
                      Re: A New Machine Progresses Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 18:39 -0600
                        Re: A New Machine Progresses Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-29 09:23 +0000
                          Re: A New Machine Progresses DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2024-12-30 19:14 -0500
                          Re: A New Machine Progresses Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-30 19:57 -0600
    Re: A New Machine Progresses Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 20:01 -0600
    Re: A New Machine Progresses Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 20:03 -0600
    Re: A New Machine Progresses DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2024-12-30 18:50 -0500

Page 2 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6  Next page →


#681442

From-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>
Date2024-12-27 22:38 -0500
Message-ID<vknrqv$4cq6$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#681426
On 12/27/24 9:22 PM, Joel wrote:
> -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>> On 12/27/24 4:05 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>>
>>> But none of this means his English should get that precise.
>>
>> A product of hard work.  My English was so deplorably bad at one point
>> that I enrolled to take classes in Latin for a few years.  It helped.
> 
> 
> Is English not your first language?

Unfortunately, it is; was just that bad at it.  Think my first SAT test 
was just 480 in English.


-hh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#681430

FromPhysfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com>
Date2024-12-27 20:32 -0600
Message-ID<vkno0k$1rvj8$1@solani.org>
In reply to#681420
On 12/27/2024 7:55 PM, -hh wrote:
> 
>> So he must've inherited a lot of money from his parents.
> 
> They were public school teachers: care to try some other explanation?


Sure. You may have bought bitcoins early on.

-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#681443

From-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>
Date2024-12-27 22:38 -0500
Message-ID<vknrs1$4cq6$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#681430
On 12/27/24 9:32 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
> On 12/27/2024 7:55 PM, -hh wrote:
>>
>>> So he must've inherited a lot of money from his parents.
>>
>> They were public school teachers: care to try some other explanation?
> 
> 
> Sure. You may have bought bitcoins early on.


That would have been nice, but never got around to it.
Try again.


-hh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#681444

FromPhysfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com>
Date2024-12-27 21:47 -0600
Message-ID<vknsc8$1fcei$1@solani.org>
In reply to#681443
On 12/27/2024 9:38 PM, -hh wrote:
> On 12/27/24 9:32 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>> On 12/27/2024 7:55 PM, -hh wrote:
>>>
>>>> So he must've inherited a lot of money from his parents.
>>>
>>> They were public school teachers: care to try some other explanation?
>>
>>
>> Sure. You may have bought bitcoins early on.
> 
> 
> That would have been nice, but never got around to it.
> Try again.
> 
> 
> -hh


Shot five or six people dead, owned and got to run their huge whorehouse 
in Abu Dhabi.

-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#681413

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2024-12-28 00:13 +0000
Message-ID<lt8u61Fej3gU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#681390
On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 15:59:06 -0500, Joel wrote:

> Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>>>>> I think he's [-hh is] even composing his usenet posts asking AI to
>>>>>> give it an articulate edge. His English command can't be that
>>>>>> precise.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure it can, it's natural for a person like him.  In my case I just
>>>>> brute-force it.
>>>>
>>>> For a person like him? Could you elaborate on that a bit.
>>> 
>>> He's a grown intellect, lived his life the proper way, developed
>>> himself into a functional adult.
>>
>>So did Biden. Does Biden speak English as well as hh presumably does in
>>this forum?
> 
> 
> -hh is warmer on the scale than old Joe, not to disrespect our outgoing
> president, he's a great man.

Adlai Stevenson was well-spoken to the point he was labeled 'egghead'. 
Probably apocryphal but the legend goes that after a speech a supporter 
said every intelligent person would vote for him. Stevenson said that was 
well and good but he needed a majority.

He ran against Eisenhower in '52 and '56, losing by a landslide each time. 
People lapped up Eisenhower's avuncular style and much of the country 
looked at him and Mamie as grandparents.

I don't know if Biden had it in him to be articulate but a successful 
politician may not want to present as very erudite.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#681417

FromJoel <joelcrump@gmail.com>
Date2024-12-27 20:04 -0500
Message-ID<0tiumj5u15mmr0k3h901tj4vuf0pr7ecgt@4ax.com>
In reply to#681413
rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:

>> -hh is warmer on the scale than old Joe [Biden, POTUS], not to disrespect our outgoing
>> president, he's a great man.
>
>Adlai Stevenson was well-spoken to the point he was labeled 'egghead'. 
>Probably apocryphal but the legend goes that after a speech a supporter 
>said every intelligent person would vote for him. Stevenson said that was 
>well and good but he needed a majority.
>
>He ran against Eisenhower in '52 and '56, losing by a landslide each time. 
>People lapped up Eisenhower's avuncular style and much of the country 
>looked at him and Mamie as grandparents.
>
>I don't know if Biden had it in him to be articulate but a successful 
>politician may not want to present as very erudite.


Biden is WYSIWYG - he's a man who appears as he really is, a guy who
isn't a genius but works hard, follows the rules, gets things done. It
was a good thing for four years.  I was looking forward to Harris
expanding on the successes of the administration, but alas Trump won
the election, as I should've known he would.  We're going to have to
find a balance, in the order of government, but my role will make it
work, bet on it.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#681422

Frompothead <pothead@snakebite.com>
Date2024-12-28 02:05 +0000
Message-ID<vknmcq$3v5ip$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#681417
On 2024-12-28, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
> rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
>
>>> -hh is warmer on the scale than old Joe [Biden, POTUS], not to disrespect our outgoing
>>> president, he's a great man.
>>
>>Adlai Stevenson was well-spoken to the point he was labeled 'egghead'. 
>>Probably apocryphal but the legend goes that after a speech a supporter 
>>said every intelligent person would vote for him. Stevenson said that was 
>>well and good but he needed a majority.
>>
>>He ran against Eisenhower in '52 and '56, losing by a landslide each time. 
>>People lapped up Eisenhower's avuncular style and much of the country 
>>looked at him and Mamie as grandparents.
>>
>>I don't know if Biden had it in him to be articulate but a successful 
>>politician may not want to present as very erudite.
>
>
> Biden is WYSIWYG - he's a man who appears as he really is, a guy who
> isn't a genius but works hard, follows the rules, gets things done. It
> was a good thing for four years.  I was looking forward to Harris
> expanding on the successes of the administration, but alas Trump won
> the election, as I should've known he would.  We're going to have to
> find a balance, in the order of government, but my role will make it
> work, bet on it.
>
Please PM the name of your 'supplier' because even though I don't partake I
might make an exception this time.
Man are you brainwashed.


-- 
pothead

"Give a man a fish and you turn him into a Democrat for life"
"Teach a man to fish and he might become a self-sufficient conservative Republican"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#681428

FromJoel <joelcrump@gmail.com>
Date2024-12-27 21:27 -0500
Message-ID<kcoumjp98g9mjqo19iuo4ihvj6kp1uf0g1@4ax.com>
In reply to#681422
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:

>> [Pres.] Biden is WYSIWYG - he's a man who appears as he really is, a guy who
>> isn't a genius but works hard, follows the rules, gets things done. It
>> was a good thing for four years.  I was looking forward to Harris
>> expanding on the successes of the administration, but alas Trump won
>> the election, as I should've known he would.  We're going to have to
>> find a balance, in the order of government, but my role will make it
>> work, bet on it.
>>
>Please PM the name of your 'supplier' because even though I don't partake I
>might make an exception this time.
>Man are you brainwashed.


https://robocough.com/20-99-per-bottle-robotablets-1-bottle/

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#681449

Frombrock <brockt@allied_.abc>
Date2024-12-28 09:29 +0100
Message-ID<c06292fc07c6faffbad2cd7e68c91e29@dizum.com>
In reply to#681428
On 27 Dec 2024, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> posted some
news:kcoumjp98g9mjqo19iuo4ihvj6kp1uf0g1@4ax.com: 

> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
> 
>>> [Pres.] Biden is WYSIWYG - he's a man who appears as he really is, a
>>> guy who isn't a genius but works hard, follows the rules, gets
>>> things done. It was a good thing for four years.  I was looking
>>> forward to Harris expanding on the successes of the administration,
>>> but alas Trump won the election, as I should've known he would. 
>>> We're going to have to find a balance, in the order of government,
>>> but my role will make it work, bet on it.
>>>
>>Please PM the name of your 'supplier' because even though I don't
>>partake I might make an exception this time.
>>Man are you brainwashed.
> 
> 
> https://robocough.com/20-99-per-bottle-robotablets-1-bottle/

While doing some island comm work, there were two guys who would buy
bottles of Robitussin and drink that stuff before they started the day. 
We called them the robi twins.  They would be so stoned that they
couldn't even hold a conversation.  We used to take bets which one would
fall off a tower first. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#681459

FromJoel <joelcrump@gmail.com>
Date2024-12-28 08:33 -0500
Message-ID<afvvmjdfjk054oatsfrqddhasgua3ltne1@4ax.com>
In reply to#681449
brock <brockt@allied_.abc> wrote:
>On 27 Dec 2024, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> posted some
>news:kcoumjp98g9mjqo19iuo4ihvj6kp1uf0g1@4ax.com: 
>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>> 
>>>Please PM the name of your 'supplier' because even though I don't
>>>partake I might make an exception this time.
>>>Man are you brainwashed.
>> 
>> https://robocough.com/20-99-per-bottle-robotablets-1-bottle/
>
>While doing some island comm work, there were two guys who would buy
>bottles of Robitussin and drink that stuff before they started the day. 
>We called them the robi twins.  They would be so stoned that they
>couldn't even hold a conversation.  We used to take bets which one would
>fall off a tower first. 


Some people handle DXM better than others.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#681464

FromSkeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Date2024-12-28 07:30 -0700
Message-ID<67700b87$1$1895498$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
In reply to#681459
In article <afvvmjdfjk054oatsfrqddhasgua3ltne1@4ax.com>, 
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
> 
> brock <brockt@allied_.abc> wrote:
> >On 27 Dec 2024, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> posted some
> >news:kcoumjp98g9mjqo19iuo4ihvj6kp1uf0g1@4ax.com: 
> >> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
> >> 
> >>>Please PM the name of your 'supplier' because even though I don't
> >>>partake I might make an exception this time.
> >>>Man are you brainwashed.
> >> 
> >> https://robocough.com/20-99-per-bottle-robotablets-1-bottle/
> >
> >While doing some island comm work, there were two guys who would buy
> >bottles of Robitussin and drink that stuff before they started the day. 
> >We called them the robi twins.  They would be so stoned that they
> >couldn't even hold a conversation.  We used to take bets which one would
> >fall off a tower first. 
> 
> 
> Some people handle DXM better than others.

Only pussy junkies do that shit.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#681468

FromJoel <joelcrump@gmail.com>
Date2024-12-28 10:45 -0500
Message-ID<8770njpmsl55lji2mhhgi08elaguoiri54@4ax.com>
In reply to#681464
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:

>> Some people handle DXM better than others.
>
>Only pussy junkies do that shit.


Like you would know, heh.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#681484

FromSkeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Date2024-12-28 11:45 -0700
Message-ID<6770473c$0$1895493$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
In reply to#681468
In article <8770njpmsl55lji2mhhgi08elaguoiri54@4ax.com>, 
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
> 
> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> 
> >> Some people handle DXM better than others.
> >
> >Only pussy junkies do that shit.
> 
> 
> Like you would know, heh.

You do.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#681486

FromJoel <joelcrump@gmail.com>
Date2024-12-28 13:50 -0500
Message-ID<b1i0njt5geo9j6jpe84lrk5jj43hsjd740@4ax.com>
In reply to#681484
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:

>> >> Some people handle DXM better than others.
>> >
>> >Only pussy junkies do that shit.
>> 
>> Like you would know, heh.
>
>You do.


What I know is that DXM is one of the key drugs.  Some are unaware of
it.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#681577

FromSkeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com>
Date2024-12-29 04:47 -0700
Message-ID<677136cb$0$1895499$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
In reply to#681486
In article <b1i0njt5geo9j6jpe84lrk5jj43hsjd740@4ax.com>, 
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
> 
> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> 
> >> >> Some people handle DXM better than others.
> >> >
> >> >Only pussy junkies do that shit.
> >> 
> >> Like you would know, heh.
> >
> >You do.
> 
> 
> What I know is that DXM is one of the key drugs.  Some are unaware of
> it.

It's fucking cough syrup.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#681621

FromJoel <joelcrump@gmail.com>
Date2024-12-29 14:48 -0500
Message-ID<ir93njp7paem76c5trduri1l9ob50dan2q@4ax.com>
In reply to#681577
Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:

>> >> >> Some people handle DXM better than others.
>> >> >
>> >> >Only pussy junkies do that shit.
>> >> 
>> >> Like you would know, heh.
>> >
>> >You do.
>> 
>> What I know is that DXM is one of the key drugs.  Some are unaware of
>> it.
>
>It's fucking cough syrup.


It has use as a cough suppressant, that doesn't detract from its
psychedelic properties.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#681840

FromJack Sovalot <hee-cawkforme@jack.sovalot>
Date2024-12-31 04:11 -0500
Message-ID<181638004a6e6893$30679$3091964$26dd2c6e@news.thecubenet.com>
In reply to#681621
Joel wrote:
> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>>>>>> Some people handle DXM better than others.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Only pussy junkies do that shit.
>>>>>
>>>>> Like you would know, heh.
>>>>
>>>> You do.
>>>
>>> What I know is that DXM is one of the key drugs.  Some are unaware of
>>> it.
>>
>> It's fucking cough syrup.
> 
> 
> It has use as a cough suppressant, that doesn't detract from its
> psychedelic properties.
> 
 >
Get a job, drug addict.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#681933

FromJoel <joelcrump@gmail.com>
Date2024-12-31 16:08 -0500
Message-ID<b4n8njl17glf0p60i15s3u6am2kb146i5m@4ax.com>
In reply to#681840
Jack Sovalot <hee-cawkforme@jack.sovalot> wrote:

>User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.19
>
>Joel wrote:
>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>>>>>>> Some people handle DXM better than others.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Only pussy junkies do that shit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Like you would know, heh.
>>>>>
>>>>> You do.
>>>>
>>>> What I know is that DXM is one of the key drugs.  Some are unaware of
>>>> it.
>>>
>>> It's fucking cough syrup.
>> 
>> It has use as a cough suppressant, that doesn't detract from its
>> psychedelic properties.
>> 
>Get a job, drug addict.


Using substances *is* work, for me, dumbshit, why do you think the
government supports me doing it?  All the drugs I use are legal, since
cannabis is legal in my state.  As for you, get a supported OS, lamer.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#682025

FromGovernor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com>
Date2025-01-01 04:28 -0500
Message-ID<pk2anjp7lj72vburoi42umktpngqnrrvq3@4ax.com>
In reply to#681840
On Tue, 31 Dec 2024 04:11:20 -0500, Jack Sovalot <hee-cawkforme@jack.sovalot>
wrote:

>Joel wrote:
>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>>>>>>> Some people handle DXM better than others.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Only pussy junkies do that shit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Like you would know, heh.
>>>>>
>>>>> You do.
>>>>
>>>> What I know is that DXM is one of the key drugs.  Some are unaware of
>>>> it.
>>>
>>> It's fucking cough syrup.
>> 
>> 
>> It has use as a cough suppressant, that doesn't detract from its
>> psychedelic properties.
>> 
> >
>Get a job, drug addict.

Got one.  Selling drugs.

-- 
Been saying since last spring, "let the voters decide."

Well, they did.  Get over it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#682026

FromSiri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com>
Date2025-01-01 02:00 -0800
Message-ID<vl33o5$2nqr6$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#682025
Governor Swill wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Dec 2024 04:11:20 -0500, Jack Sovalot <hee-cawkforme@jack.sovalot>
> wrote:
> 
>> Joel wrote:
>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>>> Some people handle DXM better than others.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Only pussy junkies do that shit.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Like you would know, heh.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You do.
>>>>>
>>>>> What I know is that DXM is one of the key drugs.  Some are unaware of
>>>>> it.
>>>>
>>>> It's fucking cough syrup.
>>>
>>>
>>> It has use as a cough suppressant, that doesn't detract from its
>>> psychedelic properties.
>>>
>>>
>> Get a job, drug addict.
> 
> Got one.  Selling drugs.
> 

Lil Pharma. No morals, just profits.

Bonnie: I wonder how many heroin overdoses are murders.
Trots: All of them.

-- 
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied.  @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'                    /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2        / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 2 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy


csiph-web