Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #680118 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-12-13 19:35 -0500 |
| Last post | 2024-12-14 13:01 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 131 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-13 19:35 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-14 00:47 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-13 20:05 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-14 06:06 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-14 01:18 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-14 08:27 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-14 08:23 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-15 07:07 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-15 10:23 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-14 07:56 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-14 15:44 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-14 12:55 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-15 07:23 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-15 10:12 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 10:27 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-16 10:59 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 08:13 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-17 08:57 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 20:30 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-17 18:01 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-18 06:00 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-18 08:50 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-19 02:04 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-19 08:45 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-19 19:53 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2024-12-19 14:34 -0600
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-19 17:15 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2024-12-19 18:28 -0600
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-19 20:08 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-20 01:16 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-20 08:37 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-20 18:31 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-20 13:42 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2024-12-19 21:03 -0600
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-20 05:56 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-20 08:58 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-20 18:28 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-20 13:39 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-21 07:39 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-20 13:56 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-21 07:45 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-21 09:45 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2024-12-20 20:37 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-20 16:51 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2024-12-20 21:57 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-20 17:43 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-21 07:47 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-21 07:25 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-21 22:42 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-21 18:19 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2024-12-21 18:26 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-22 00:24 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-22 07:12 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 06:31 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-23 11:56 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-24 09:49 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-24 13:01 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-27 17:55 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2024-12-21 18:46 -0600
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-22 05:41 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-22 07:27 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 06:44 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-23 11:59 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-22 09:24 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-22 11:19 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-23 06:18 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-23 12:03 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-23 19:14 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-27 17:16 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-29 11:08 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 01:19 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-20 05:54 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-20 08:55 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-19 17:14 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-18 11:09 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-18 09:09 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-19 08:03 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-19 09:00 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-20 05:52 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-20 08:54 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-20 18:20 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 19:36 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-19 08:05 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-19 09:02 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 19:58 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 20:22 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-18 11:05 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-18 09:06 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-19 08:00 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-19 08:59 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-20 05:51 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-20 08:53 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 19:43 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-18 20:01 -0600
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-19 08:02 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 20:00 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-14 20:04 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-15 08:47 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-14 22:16 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-15 08:49 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-15 22:24 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-15 20:02 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 10:29 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-16 11:02 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 08:19 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-17 09:01 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 20:59 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 20:20 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-18 11:03 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 20:17 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 05:33 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-19 07:57 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-19 07:47 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 20:01 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-19 01:53 -0600
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2024-12-20 09:29 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 10:28 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-16 11:01 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 08:15 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-17 08:59 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 20:45 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-17 18:03 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-18 11:20 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-18 09:20 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-18 16:27 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-18 19:46 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-12-20 01:35 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-19 08:06 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-14 07:51 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-14 15:58 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-14 13:01 -0500
Page 6 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 Next page →
| From | Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-15 22:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vjnkvl$op3c$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #680316 |
On Sun, 15 Dec 2024 08:49:22 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: > Le 2024-12-14 à 17:16, Lawrence D'Oliveiro a écrit : > >> On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 07:56:30 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: >> >>> Higher performance per watt which leads to lower power use and >>> therefore improved battery life. Whether Intel and AMD want to admit >>> it or not, people _do_ want to have a computer which can handle a >>> whole day's work on a single charge and which won't increase >>> electrical bills. >> >> Sure. But Windows can never give it to them. > > It can and it already does on Snapdragon offerings. Only with ARM-native code, of which there is precious little, with no sign of the situation improving.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-15 20:02 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <0%K7P.31982$bYV2.30352@fx17.iad> |
| In reply to | #680427 |
Le 2024-12-15 à 17:24, Lawrence D'Oliveiro a écrit : > On Sun, 15 Dec 2024 08:49:22 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: > >> Le 2024-12-14 à 17:16, Lawrence D'Oliveiro a écrit : >> >>> On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 07:56:30 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: >>> >>>> Higher performance per watt which leads to lower power use and >>>> therefore improved battery life. Whether Intel and AMD want to admit >>>> it or not, people _do_ want to have a computer which can handle a >>>> whole day's work on a single charge and which won't increase >>>> electrical bills. >>> >>> Sure. But Windows can never give it to them. >> >> It can and it already does on Snapdragon offerings. > > Only with ARM-native code, of which there is precious little, with no sign > of the situation improving. Which is part of why I am suggesting that anyone interested in using an ARM-equipped machine shouldn't hold their breath that Microsoft will do a decent job and simply go straight to Apple. I am very much interested in ARM machines which is why the next laptop is likely to be an Apple. -- CrudeSausage
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-16 10:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vjovdh$134en$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #680445 |
On 2024-12-16, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: > Le 2024-12-15 à 17:24, Lawrence D'Oliveiro a écrit : >> On Sun, 15 Dec 2024 08:49:22 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: >> >>> Le 2024-12-14 à 17:16, Lawrence D'Oliveiro a écrit : >>> >>>> On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 07:56:30 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>> >>>>> Higher performance per watt which leads to lower power use and >>>>> therefore improved battery life. Whether Intel and AMD want to admit >>>>> it or not, people _do_ want to have a computer which can handle a >>>>> whole day's work on a single charge and which won't increase >>>>> electrical bills. >>>> >>>> Sure. But Windows can never give it to them. >>> >>> It can and it already does on Snapdragon offerings. >> >> Only with ARM-native code, of which there is precious little, with no sign >> of the situation improving. > > Which is part of why I am suggesting that anyone interested in using an > ARM-equipped machine shouldn't hold their breath that Microsoft will do > a decent job and simply go straight to Apple. I am very much interested > in ARM machines which is why the next laptop is likely to be an Apple. But only if they play Windows video games? -- “Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-16 11:02 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <NaY7P.71532$oR74.59810@fx16.iad> |
| In reply to | #680472 |
Le 2024-12-16 à 05:29, RonB a écrit : > On 2024-12-16, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >> Le 2024-12-15 à 17:24, Lawrence D'Oliveiro a écrit : >>> On Sun, 15 Dec 2024 08:49:22 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: >>> >>>> Le 2024-12-14 à 17:16, Lawrence D'Oliveiro a écrit : >>>> >>>>> On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 07:56:30 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Higher performance per watt which leads to lower power use and >>>>>> therefore improved battery life. Whether Intel and AMD want to admit >>>>>> it or not, people _do_ want to have a computer which can handle a >>>>>> whole day's work on a single charge and which won't increase >>>>>> electrical bills. >>>>> >>>>> Sure. But Windows can never give it to them. >>>> >>>> It can and it already does on Snapdragon offerings. >>> >>> Only with ARM-native code, of which there is precious little, with no sign >>> of the situation improving. >> >> Which is part of why I am suggesting that anyone interested in using an >> ARM-equipped machine shouldn't hold their breath that Microsoft will do >> a decent job and simply go straight to Apple. I am very much interested >> in ARM machines which is why the next laptop is likely to be an Apple. > > But only if they play Windows video games? I'm getting to a point where the only thing I want to play is NHL, and that game is console-only. I don't have the time or energy to play those 3D games anymore. -- CrudeSausage
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-17 08:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vjrc60$1l8iu$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #680490 |
On 2024-12-16, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: > Le 2024-12-16 à 05:29, RonB a écrit : >> On 2024-12-16, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>> Le 2024-12-15 à 17:24, Lawrence D'Oliveiro a écrit : >>>> On Sun, 15 Dec 2024 08:49:22 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>> >>>>> Le 2024-12-14 à 17:16, Lawrence D'Oliveiro a écrit : >>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 07:56:30 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Higher performance per watt which leads to lower power use and >>>>>>> therefore improved battery life. Whether Intel and AMD want to admit >>>>>>> it or not, people _do_ want to have a computer which can handle a >>>>>>> whole day's work on a single charge and which won't increase >>>>>>> electrical bills. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sure. But Windows can never give it to them. >>>>> >>>>> It can and it already does on Snapdragon offerings. >>>> >>>> Only with ARM-native code, of which there is precious little, with no sign >>>> of the situation improving. >>> >>> Which is part of why I am suggesting that anyone interested in using an >>> ARM-equipped machine shouldn't hold their breath that Microsoft will do >>> a decent job and simply go straight to Apple. I am very much interested >>> in ARM machines which is why the next laptop is likely to be an Apple. >> >> But only if they play Windows video games? > > I'm getting to a point where the only thing I want to play is NHL, and > that game is console-only. I don't have the time or energy to play those > 3D games anymore. My kids have game consoles, but still want to play Windows video games. They occasionally try to get me interested in some of them — but I guess I'm just too old. The last video game I was fairly good at was Pong. About all I play on my computer is Solitaire or Mahjong, and Pinochle on the smartphone. -- “Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-17 09:01 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <8vf8P.12969$DPl.7436@fx13.iad> |
| In reply to | #680562 |
Le 2024-12-17 à 03:19, RonB a écrit : > On 2024-12-16, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >> Le 2024-12-16 à 05:29, RonB a écrit : >>> On 2024-12-16, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>> Le 2024-12-15 à 17:24, Lawrence D'Oliveiro a écrit : >>>>> On Sun, 15 Dec 2024 08:49:22 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Le 2024-12-14 à 17:16, Lawrence D'Oliveiro a écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 07:56:30 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Higher performance per watt which leads to lower power use and >>>>>>>> therefore improved battery life. Whether Intel and AMD want to admit >>>>>>>> it or not, people _do_ want to have a computer which can handle a >>>>>>>> whole day's work on a single charge and which won't increase >>>>>>>> electrical bills. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sure. But Windows can never give it to them. >>>>>> >>>>>> It can and it already does on Snapdragon offerings. >>>>> >>>>> Only with ARM-native code, of which there is precious little, with no sign >>>>> of the situation improving. >>>> >>>> Which is part of why I am suggesting that anyone interested in using an >>>> ARM-equipped machine shouldn't hold their breath that Microsoft will do >>>> a decent job and simply go straight to Apple. I am very much interested >>>> in ARM machines which is why the next laptop is likely to be an Apple. >>> >>> But only if they play Windows video games? >> >> I'm getting to a point where the only thing I want to play is NHL, and >> that game is console-only. I don't have the time or energy to play those >> 3D games anymore. > > My kids have game consoles, but still want to play Windows video games. They > occasionally try to get me interested in some of them — but I guess I'm just > too old. The last video game I was fairly good at was Pong. About all I play > on my computer is Solitaire or Mahjong, and Pinochle on the smartphone. The appeal of playing a game on the PC is the ability to play anywhere through a laptop. If they're trying to do it on their desktop, I don't see the benefit except for greater graphics than what a console can handle. I actually find that fairly ridiculous since both the PS5 and the Xbox Series X plays games natively in 4k. I'm not sure why a gamer would need more than that. There is also the benefit of games being cheaper on the PC since you're not stuck to one marketplace. After all, if Steam is selling your title for $50 but you can get it at the Epic Game Store for $25, why wouldn't you? -- CrudeSausage
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-17 20:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vjsoof$1sthq$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #680574 |
On 2024-12-17, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: > Le 2024-12-17 à 03:19, RonB a écrit : >> On 2024-12-16, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>> Le 2024-12-16 à 05:29, RonB a écrit : >>>> On 2024-12-16, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>> Le 2024-12-15 à 17:24, Lawrence D'Oliveiro a écrit : >>>>>> On Sun, 15 Dec 2024 08:49:22 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Le 2024-12-14 à 17:16, Lawrence D'Oliveiro a écrit : >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 07:56:30 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Higher performance per watt which leads to lower power use and >>>>>>>>> therefore improved battery life. Whether Intel and AMD want to admit >>>>>>>>> it or not, people _do_ want to have a computer which can handle a >>>>>>>>> whole day's work on a single charge and which won't increase >>>>>>>>> electrical bills. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sure. But Windows can never give it to them. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It can and it already does on Snapdragon offerings. >>>>>> >>>>>> Only with ARM-native code, of which there is precious little, with no sign >>>>>> of the situation improving. >>>>> >>>>> Which is part of why I am suggesting that anyone interested in using an >>>>> ARM-equipped machine shouldn't hold their breath that Microsoft will do >>>>> a decent job and simply go straight to Apple. I am very much interested >>>>> in ARM machines which is why the next laptop is likely to be an Apple. >>>> >>>> But only if they play Windows video games? >>> >>> I'm getting to a point where the only thing I want to play is NHL, and >>> that game is console-only. I don't have the time or energy to play those >>> 3D games anymore. >> >> My kids have game consoles, but still want to play Windows video games. They >> occasionally try to get me interested in some of them — but I guess I'm just >> too old. The last video game I was fairly good at was Pong. About all I play >> on my computer is Solitaire or Mahjong, and Pinochle on the smartphone. > > The appeal of playing a game on the PC is the ability to play anywhere > through a laptop. If they're trying to do it on their desktop, I don't > see the benefit except for greater graphics than what a console can > handle. I actually find that fairly ridiculous since both the PS5 and > the Xbox Series X plays games natively in 4k. I'm not sure why a gamer > would need more than that. "Anywhere" for these kids is basically at home. They have an older brother who uses a gaming laptop (not nearly into games as much as they are), but they kind of feel "sorry" for him — like he's got an inferior experience. > There is also the benefit of games being cheaper on the PC since you're > not stuck to one marketplace. After all, if Steam is selling your title > for $50 but you can get it at the Epic Game Store for $25, why wouldn't > you? I guess I can see that point. -- “Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-17 20:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lse4o1F4u57U4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #680562 |
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 08:19:12 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote: > My kids have game consoles, but still want to play Windows video games. > They occasionally try to get me interested in some of them — but I guess > I'm just too old. The last video game I was fairly good at was Pong. > About all I play on my computer is Solitaire or Mahjong, and Pinochle on > the smartphone. I made the mistake of opening Mahjongg and got hooked. I like the Debian/ Ubuntu version better than KMahjongg on the Fedora box. There seems to be a AARP online version with leaderboards but I haven't played it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-18 11:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vjua65$28obp$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #680617 |
On 2024-12-17, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: > On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 08:19:12 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote: > >> My kids have game consoles, but still want to play Windows video games. >> They occasionally try to get me interested in some of them — but I guess >> I'm just too old. The last video game I was fairly good at was Pong. >> About all I play on my computer is Solitaire or Mahjong, and Pinochle on >> the smartphone. > > I made the mistake of opening Mahjongg and got hooked. I like the Debian/ > Ubuntu version better than KMahjongg on the Fedora box. > > There seems to be a AARP online version with leaderboards but I haven't > played it. I like the KMahjongg version (but I don't know if I've tried the Ubuntu version). I always play the "Well" board configuration. I think I've beaten it three or four times total — maybe five times. Not a lot. -- “Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-18 20:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lsgov6FiahdU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #680684 |
On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 11:03:33 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote: > I like the KMahjongg version (but I don't know if I've tried the Ubuntu > version). I always play the "Well" board configuration. I think I've > beaten it three or four times total — maybe five times. Not a lot. That would take some getting used to. The 'Difficult' on Ubuntu is about the same as the 'Default' on Fedora. The perspective is enough different that I missed play since the tile didn't look playable, I'd also have to experiment with the tile selection. The hint showed several matches where the patterns weren't the same. I beat the Ubuntu version fairly regularly. I'm not sure if all layouts are supposed to have a solution. There are times when you have three of the same tiles exposed, which two to remove?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-19 05:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lshph7Fn03cU6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #680730 |
On 18 Dec 2024 20:17:42 GMT, rbowman wrote: > That would take some getting used to. The 'Difficult' on Ubuntu is about > the same as the 'Default' on Fedora. The perspective is enough different > that I missed play since the tile didn't look playable, Follow up: I beat the Default twice. I still don't know what's up with the tiles that look like flowers where what matches isn't the same. I have to click on them and see if it goes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-19 07:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vk0jlq$2osc7$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #680760 |
On 2024-12-19, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: > On 18 Dec 2024 20:17:42 GMT, rbowman wrote: > >> That would take some getting used to. The 'Difficult' on Ubuntu is about >> the same as the 'Default' on Fedora. The perspective is enough different >> that I missed play since the tile didn't look playable, > > Follow up: I beat the Default twice. I still don't know what's up with the > tiles that look like flowers where what matches isn't the same. I have to > click on them and see if it goes. You've got some in pots and some not in pots. I think that's basically the only difference. -- “Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-19 07:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vk0j3c$2osc7$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #680730 |
On 2024-12-18, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: > On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 11:03:33 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote: > >> I like the KMahjongg version (but I don't know if I've tried the Ubuntu >> version). I always play the "Well" board configuration. I think I've >> beaten it three or four times total — maybe five times. Not a lot. > > That would take some getting used to. The 'Difficult' on Ubuntu is about > the same as the 'Default' on Fedora. The perspective is enough different > that I missed play since the tile didn't look playable, > > I'd also have to experiment with the tile selection. The hint showed > several matches where the patterns weren't the same. I beat the Ubuntu > version fairly regularly. I'm not sure if all layouts are supposed to have > a solution. There are times when you have three of the same tiles exposed, > which two to remove? I'm guessing you can always win (as they let your re-run the latest puzzle, which I never do) — but you would have to very lucky. -- “Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-19 20:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lsjcd3Fu136U10@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #680764 |
On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 07:47:57 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote: > I'm guessing you can always win (as they let your re-run the latest > puzzle, > which I never do) — but you would have to very lucky. I did that several times by mistake by clicking the wrong button until the dime dropped that the layout looked familiar.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-19 01:53 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <vk0jdi$12gk0$1@solani.org> |
| In reply to | #680730 |
On 12/18/24 2:17 PM, rbowman wrote: > I'd also have to experiment with the tile selection. The hint showed > several matches where the patterns weren't the same. I beat the Ubuntu > version fairly regularly. I'm not sure if all layouts are supposed to have > a solution. There are times when you have three of the same tiles exposed, > which two to remove? I tried that game about 10 or 12 years back. Found it quite childish. Why I tried it? Cause some new girl in the warehouse said she spent hours each day at home playing it, and I wanted to get an idea what she was and where I could use her in that job. Those peaple play backgammon too. Part of it _must_ be chance cause they're Penis X grade people after all. But play chess, and everything is in your control. You lose, you really lose. You win, you really win :) I still use my 45 year old Radio Shack chessboard. Chess enthusiast friends are all gone. When in the mood, I try yet one more time to beat its level 7. I've never been able to. Level 6 is the highest I ever could beat it, like 10% of the time. Level 7 is so impossible to beat that I'm thinking its scale of 1 to 9 is not even logarithmic. I wish I knew how they determined it in the codes. If it was logarithmic, then on the average about one time in 100 tries I would be able to beat it in level 7. But I have tried a few thousand times since I was in my 20s, in that level, without one win. My own play level is pretty good and I still play a couple times a week, cause who knows :)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-20 09:29 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vk3v0f$3fuj1$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #680765 |
On 12/19/2024 2:53 AM, Physfitfreak wrote: > Cause some new girl in the warehouse The warehouse? You're that old man who walks in front of the forklift waving little orange flags. It's good you found a job commensurate with your mental abilities.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-16 10:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vjovbt$134en$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #680316 |
On 2024-12-15, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: > Le 2024-12-14 à 17:16, Lawrence D'Oliveiro a écrit : >> On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 07:56:30 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: >> >>> Higher performance per watt which leads to lower power use and therefore >>> improved battery life. Whether Intel and AMD want to admit it or not, >>> people _do_ want to have a computer which can handle a whole day's work >>> on a single charge and which won't increase electrical bills. >> >> Sure. But Windows can never give it to them. > > It can and it already does on Snapdragon offerings. Apparently only "sort of." -- “Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-16 11:01 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <F9Y7P.71531$oR74.43492@fx16.iad> |
| In reply to | #680471 |
Le 2024-12-16 à 05:28, RonB a écrit : > On 2024-12-15, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >> Le 2024-12-14 à 17:16, Lawrence D'Oliveiro a écrit : >>> On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 07:56:30 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: >>> >>>> Higher performance per watt which leads to lower power use and therefore >>>> improved battery life. Whether Intel and AMD want to admit it or not, >>>> people _do_ want to have a computer which can handle a whole day's work >>>> on a single charge and which won't increase electrical bills. >>> >>> Sure. But Windows can never give it to them. >> >> It can and it already does on Snapdragon offerings. > > Apparently only "sort of." Which is part of why I recommended that ARM enthusiasts go to Apple. Only Apple actually follows through on their radical decisions. Microsoft will announce something on Monday, do something half-assed on Tuesday and abandon the project altogether on Wednesday. Their fortune comes from the fact that people are reluctant to move away from x86-64. If and once they do, Microsoft will have a lot of trouble catching up to what Apple is doing. -- CrudeSausage
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-17 08:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vjrbu5$1l8iu$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #680489 |
On 2024-12-16, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: > Le 2024-12-16 à 05:28, RonB a écrit : >> On 2024-12-15, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>> Le 2024-12-14 à 17:16, Lawrence D'Oliveiro a écrit : >>>> On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 07:56:30 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>> >>>>> Higher performance per watt which leads to lower power use and therefore >>>>> improved battery life. Whether Intel and AMD want to admit it or not, >>>>> people _do_ want to have a computer which can handle a whole day's work >>>>> on a single charge and which won't increase electrical bills. >>>> >>>> Sure. But Windows can never give it to them. >>> >>> It can and it already does on Snapdragon offerings. >> >> Apparently only "sort of." > > Which is part of why I recommended that ARM enthusiasts go to Apple. > Only Apple actually follows through on their radical decisions. > Microsoft will announce something on Monday, do something half-assed on > Tuesday and abandon the project altogether on Wednesday. Their fortune > comes from the fact that people are reluctant to move away from x86-64. > If and once they do, Microsoft will have a lot of trouble catching up to > what Apple is doing. I get that. But does Apple run these high-end video games that require the powerful (watt-gobbling) GPUs? I don't know, these video games hold no interest for me. -- “Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-17 08:59 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <Osf8P.12968$DPl.12220@fx13.iad> |
| In reply to | #680561 |
Le 2024-12-17 à 03:15, RonB a écrit : > On 2024-12-16, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >> Le 2024-12-16 à 05:28, RonB a écrit : >>> On 2024-12-15, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>> Le 2024-12-14 à 17:16, Lawrence D'Oliveiro a écrit : >>>>> On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 07:56:30 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Higher performance per watt which leads to lower power use and therefore >>>>>> improved battery life. Whether Intel and AMD want to admit it or not, >>>>>> people _do_ want to have a computer which can handle a whole day's work >>>>>> on a single charge and which won't increase electrical bills. >>>>> >>>>> Sure. But Windows can never give it to them. >>>> >>>> It can and it already does on Snapdragon offerings. >>> >>> Apparently only "sort of." >> >> Which is part of why I recommended that ARM enthusiasts go to Apple. >> Only Apple actually follows through on their radical decisions. >> Microsoft will announce something on Monday, do something half-assed on >> Tuesday and abandon the project altogether on Wednesday. Their fortune >> comes from the fact that people are reluctant to move away from x86-64. >> If and once they do, Microsoft will have a lot of trouble catching up to >> what Apple is doing. > > I get that. But does Apple run these high-end video games that require the > powerful (watt-gobbling) GPUs? I don't know, these video games hold no > interest for me. There is a community of Apple users getting their Mx machines to run today's games in the same way Linux users try to get their choice OS to play them. For what it's worth, it's a lot easier in Linux than it is in MacOS. A game developed specifically for Macs will run very well on the hardware because it is indeed a lot more powerful than people realize, but those titles are very few and are likely to remain so. -- CrudeSausage
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web