Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #680118 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-12-13 19:35 -0500 |
| Last post | 2024-12-14 13:01 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 131 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-13 19:35 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-14 00:47 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-13 20:05 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-14 06:06 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-14 01:18 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-14 08:27 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-14 08:23 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-15 07:07 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-15 10:23 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-14 07:56 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-14 15:44 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-14 12:55 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-15 07:23 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-15 10:12 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 10:27 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-16 10:59 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 08:13 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-17 08:57 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 20:30 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-17 18:01 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-18 06:00 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-18 08:50 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-19 02:04 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-19 08:45 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-19 19:53 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2024-12-19 14:34 -0600
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-19 17:15 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2024-12-19 18:28 -0600
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-19 20:08 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-20 01:16 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-20 08:37 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-20 18:31 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-20 13:42 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2024-12-19 21:03 -0600
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-20 05:56 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-20 08:58 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-20 18:28 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-20 13:39 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-21 07:39 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-20 13:56 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-21 07:45 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-21 09:45 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2024-12-20 20:37 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-20 16:51 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2024-12-20 21:57 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-20 17:43 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-21 07:47 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-21 07:25 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-21 22:42 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-21 18:19 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2024-12-21 18:26 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-22 00:24 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-22 07:12 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 06:31 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-23 11:56 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-24 09:49 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-24 13:01 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-27 17:55 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2024-12-21 18:46 -0600
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-22 05:41 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-22 07:27 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-23 06:44 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-23 11:59 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-22 09:24 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-22 11:19 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-23 06:18 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-23 12:03 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-23 19:14 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-27 17:16 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-29 11:08 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-20 01:19 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-20 05:54 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-20 08:55 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-19 17:14 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-18 11:09 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-18 09:09 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-19 08:03 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-19 09:00 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-20 05:52 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-20 08:54 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-20 18:20 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 19:36 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-19 08:05 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-19 09:02 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 19:58 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 20:22 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-18 11:05 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-18 09:06 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-19 08:00 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-19 08:59 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-20 05:51 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-20 08:53 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 19:43 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-18 20:01 -0600
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-19 08:02 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 20:00 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-14 20:04 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-15 08:47 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-14 22:16 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-15 08:49 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-15 22:24 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-15 20:02 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 10:29 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-16 11:02 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 08:19 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-17 09:01 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 20:59 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-17 20:20 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-18 11:03 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-18 20:17 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 05:33 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-19 07:57 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-19 07:47 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-19 20:01 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-19 01:53 -0600
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2024-12-20 09:29 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-16 10:28 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-16 11:01 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 08:15 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-17 08:59 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-17 20:45 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-17 18:03 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-18 11:20 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-18 09:20 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-18 16:27 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-18 19:46 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2024-12-20 01:35 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-19 08:06 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-14 07:51 -0500
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-14 15:58 +0000
Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-14 13:01 -0500
Page 3 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 Next page →
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-21 07:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vk5rms$3ucu6$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #680901 |
On 2024-12-20, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: > Le 2024-12-20 à 13:28, RonB a écrit : >> On 2024-12-20, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>> Le 2024-12-20 à 00:56, RonB a écrit : >>>> On 2024-12-20, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>> Le 2024-12-19 à 19:28, chrisv a écrit : >>>>>> CrudeSausage wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Le 2024-12-19 à 15:34, chrisv a écrit : >>>>>>>> Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Linux is the only platform that offers a full suite of software native for >>>>>>>>> both ARM and x86 (both 32- and 64-bit). Nobody else does. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Payware vendors can't compete with the efficiency of FOSS. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> They can: they eventually implement features that the open-source world >>>>>>> will copy and implement later in a more rudimentary form. >>>>>> >>>>>> So where's the payware OS and software for, say, Raspbarry Pi? >>>>> >>>>> Where are the profits in producing an operating system and software for >>>>> such hardware? >>>> >>>> Open source is not profit driven. The Raspberry Pi computers make a lot of >>>> money for small start-up companies. But they're making hardware, not >>>> software. >>> >>> And this is why GNOME is a few months away from going bankrupt as is >>> Mozilla after Google's legal loss. This is also why KDE nags you for >>> donations when you first use the desktop environment. Say what you will >>> about open-source users, but they're pretty bad at giving money to the >>> organizations that produce the software they use. This is also why the >>> most talented programmers working on open-source eventually give up and >>> produce software that they can sell. >> >> A quick lookup on the GNOME Foundation (not GNOME's) supposed upcoming >> bankruptcy. And exchange from two posters on Reddit... >> >> Who started this fake news saying that GNOME would "go bankrupt"? I'm >> really curious. We're talking about a non-profit organization. >> >> Lunduke. It's always f-ing Lunduke. >> >> Hope someone sues his ass one day for this type of shit. >> >> I'm guessing that the Lunduke moron was your "source" (so to speak). > > I just want to add that Lunduke is currently hated by the woke idiots > running Linux because he tells the truth. He's the one who revealed Red > Hat and IBM's discriminatoty practises, he's also the one who revealed > how Mozilla is turning into its own woke organization. Everyone is > refusing to speak about the elephant in the room but he's pointing it > out. Feel free to read his entire article with the numbers GNOME itself > has provided and show where he is wrong, especially now that GNOME laid > off 33% of its staff. > > Face it: you're being played by the same bearded men who are telling you > they're women. No Lunduke spreads FUD, he doesn't tell the truth. I remember the last "scare" you brought up of his about CUPs and how it was supposedly going to be the end of Linux. Where did that "the sky is falling" story go? Total drama queen and bullshitter. Politics is another matter, but Woke is dying, I'm getting less and less concerened about it. Disney even recently removed a transgender character from one of their cartoons. They're getting the message, "Go Woke, Go Broke." Sex crap should not be a part of kid's shows. Period. -- “Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-21 09:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vk6kai$2e70$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #680971 |
On 12/21/24 2:45 AM, RonB wrote: > ... > Politics is another matter, but Woke is dying, I'm getting less and less > concerened about it. Disney even recently removed a transgender character > from one of their cartoons. They're getting the message, "Go Woke, Go > Broke." Sex crap should not be a part of kid's shows. Period. > "Woke" was only ever a massive scaremongering hype by the far right, which a lot of folks fell for, hook, line & sinker. Case in point: "NCAA president says there are ‘less than 10’ transgender athletes in college sports DEC 19, 2024 / 11:36 AM CST NCAA President Charlie Baker told a Senate panel that there are fewer than 10 transgender athletes he is aware of who currently compete in college sports, pouring cold water on an issue Republicans have said is a nationwide problem and one that is increasingly fraught territory for Democrats. “How many athletes are there in the U.S. in NCAA schools?” Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) asked Baker during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing Tuesday on federal regulations around sports gambling. “Five hundred and ten thousand,” said Baker, a former Republican governor of Massachusetts who has served as president of the NCAA, which governs intercollegiate athletics at more than 1,000 colleges and universities across the country, since 2023." <https://www.newsnationnow.com/us-news/sports/ncaa-preside-transgender-athletes-college-sports/> For those who are bad at math, 10/510,000 = 0.002% FYI, let's also preempt the "..but what if the NCAA's reporting system is wrong?" scaremongering scenario: The above number is so small that their reporting would have to be wrong by 50,000% for it to become even but 1% of their population. -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-20 20:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <6765d57a$0$12946$426a74cc@news.free.fr> |
| In reply to | #680856 |
Le 20-12-2024, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> a écrit : > > Open source is not profit driven. Tell that to Red Hat. -- Si vous avez du temps à perdre : https://scarpet42.gitlab.io
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-20 16:51 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <WFl9P.5770$YXj.5557@fx34.iad> |
| In reply to | #680904 |
Le 2024-12-20 à 15:37, Stéphane CARPENTIER a écrit : > Le 20-12-2024, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> a écrit : >> >> Open source is not profit driven. > > Tell that to Red Hat. It's the support not the software that makes Red Hat money. -- CrudeSausage
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-20 21:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <6765e85a$0$16836$426a74cc@news.free.fr> |
| In reply to | #680920 |
Le 20-12-2024, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> a écrit : > Le 2024-12-20 à 15:37, Stéphane CARPENTIER a écrit : >> Le 20-12-2024, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> a écrit : >>> >>> Open source is not profit driven. >> >> Tell that to Red Hat. > > It's the support not the software that makes Red Hat money. Not only. With the support comes some tools developed by Red Hat. There is no clear cut between the part in Red Hat that makes money and the part in Red Hat that contributes to open source. The part that contribute to open source help them to make money with the parts that sell support. And the part that makes money with support help them to pay for the part that contribute to open source. You wouldn't have one without the other. -- Si vous avez du temps à perdre : https://scarpet42.gitlab.io
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-20 17:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <Lqm9P.10720$vfee.10191@fx45.iad> |
| In reply to | #680921 |
Le 2024-12-20 à 16:57, Stéphane CARPENTIER a écrit : > Le 20-12-2024, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> a écrit : >> Le 2024-12-20 à 15:37, Stéphane CARPENTIER a écrit : >>> Le 20-12-2024, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> a écrit : >>>> >>>> Open source is not profit driven. >>> >>> Tell that to Red Hat. >> >> It's the support not the software that makes Red Hat money. > > Not only. With the support comes some tools developed by Red Hat. There > is no clear cut between the part in Red Hat that makes money and the > part in Red Hat that contributes to open source. The part that > contribute to open source help them to make money with the parts that > sell support. And the part that makes money with support help them to > pay for the part that contribute to open source. You wouldn't have one > without the other. You might be right, I'll concede that much. I just know that I would never use anything either IBM or Red Hat makes through the pedophile fruitcakes they employ. -- CrudeSausage
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-21 07:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vk5rrc$3ucu6$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #680922 |
On 2024-12-20, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: > Le 2024-12-20 à 16:57, Stéphane CARPENTIER a écrit : >> Le 20-12-2024, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> a écrit : >>> Le 2024-12-20 à 15:37, Stéphane CARPENTIER a écrit : >>>> Le 20-12-2024, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> a écrit : >>>>> >>>>> Open source is not profit driven. >>>> >>>> Tell that to Red Hat. >>> >>> It's the support not the software that makes Red Hat money. >> >> Not only. With the support comes some tools developed by Red Hat. There >> is no clear cut between the part in Red Hat that makes money and the >> part in Red Hat that contributes to open source. The part that >> contribute to open source help them to make money with the parts that >> sell support. And the part that makes money with support help them to >> pay for the part that contribute to open source. You wouldn't have one >> without the other. > > You might be right, I'll concede that much. I just know that I would > never use anything either IBM or Red Hat makes through the pedophile > fruitcakes they employ. But the "pedophile fruitcakes" are a-okay at Microsoft? -- “Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-21 07:25 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <Esy9P.28627$aTp4.1259@fx09.iad> |
| In reply to | #680972 |
Le 2024-12-21 à 02:47, RonB a écrit : > On 2024-12-20, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >> Le 2024-12-20 à 16:57, Stéphane CARPENTIER a écrit : >>> Le 20-12-2024, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> a écrit : >>>> Le 2024-12-20 à 15:37, Stéphane CARPENTIER a écrit : >>>>> Le 20-12-2024, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> a écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>> Open source is not profit driven. >>>>> >>>>> Tell that to Red Hat. >>>> >>>> It's the support not the software that makes Red Hat money. >>> >>> Not only. With the support comes some tools developed by Red Hat. There >>> is no clear cut between the part in Red Hat that makes money and the >>> part in Red Hat that contributes to open source. The part that >>> contribute to open source help them to make money with the parts that >>> sell support. And the part that makes money with support help them to >>> pay for the part that contribute to open source. You wouldn't have one >>> without the other. >> >> You might be right, I'll concede that much. I just know that I would >> never use anything either IBM or Red Hat makes through the pedophile >> fruitcakes they employ. > > But the "pedophile fruitcakes" are a-okay at Microsoft? Microsoft hires progressives, but not pedophiles. Pedophiles are too busy trying to get dates with 13-year-olds using ElementaryOS to get the university degrees necessary to get hired at Microsoft. -- CrudeSausage
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-21 22:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vk7g8u$8e67$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #680980 |
On 2024-12-21, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: > Le 2024-12-21 à 02:47, RonB a écrit : >> On 2024-12-20, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>> Le 2024-12-20 à 16:57, Stéphane CARPENTIER a écrit : >>>> Le 20-12-2024, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> a écrit : >>>>> Le 2024-12-20 à 15:37, Stéphane CARPENTIER a écrit : >>>>>> Le 20-12-2024, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> a écrit : >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Open source is not profit driven. >>>>>> >>>>>> Tell that to Red Hat. >>>>> >>>>> It's the support not the software that makes Red Hat money. >>>> >>>> Not only. With the support comes some tools developed by Red Hat. There >>>> is no clear cut between the part in Red Hat that makes money and the >>>> part in Red Hat that contributes to open source. The part that >>>> contribute to open source help them to make money with the parts that >>>> sell support. And the part that makes money with support help them to >>>> pay for the part that contribute to open source. You wouldn't have one >>>> without the other. >>> >>> You might be right, I'll concede that much. I just know that I would >>> never use anything either IBM or Red Hat makes through the pedophile >>> fruitcakes they employ. >> >> But the "pedophile fruitcakes" are a-okay at Microsoft? > > Microsoft hires progressives, but not pedophiles. Pedophiles are too > busy trying to get dates with 13-year-olds using ElementaryOS to get the > university degrees necessary to get hired at Microsoft. Right. And it's "nice" that you believe that about Microsoft's Woke "progressives." (They're fuzzy and warm, unlike the Woke "progressives" in the Linux world. This transgender crap has one purpose, to give kids the "right" to make their own sexual decisions so pedophile perverts can have sex with kids.) Funny how people can shunt their brains when they become fanboi partisans for a specific product. -- “Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-21 18:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <82I9P.12206$mi11.9810@fx48.iad> |
| In reply to | #681022 |
Le 2024-12-21 à 17:42, RonB a écrit : > On 2024-12-21, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >> Le 2024-12-21 à 02:47, RonB a écrit : >>> On 2024-12-20, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>> Le 2024-12-20 à 16:57, Stéphane CARPENTIER a écrit : >>>>> Le 20-12-2024, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> a écrit : >>>>>> Le 2024-12-20 à 15:37, Stéphane CARPENTIER a écrit : >>>>>>> Le 20-12-2024, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> a écrit : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Open source is not profit driven. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Tell that to Red Hat. >>>>>> >>>>>> It's the support not the software that makes Red Hat money. >>>>> >>>>> Not only. With the support comes some tools developed by Red Hat. There >>>>> is no clear cut between the part in Red Hat that makes money and the >>>>> part in Red Hat that contributes to open source. The part that >>>>> contribute to open source help them to make money with the parts that >>>>> sell support. And the part that makes money with support help them to >>>>> pay for the part that contribute to open source. You wouldn't have one >>>>> without the other. >>>> >>>> You might be right, I'll concede that much. I just know that I would >>>> never use anything either IBM or Red Hat makes through the pedophile >>>> fruitcakes they employ. >>> >>> But the "pedophile fruitcakes" are a-okay at Microsoft? >> >> Microsoft hires progressives, but not pedophiles. Pedophiles are too >> busy trying to get dates with 13-year-olds using ElementaryOS to get the >> university degrees necessary to get hired at Microsoft. > > Right. And it's "nice" that you believe that about Microsoft's Woke > "progressives." (They're fuzzy and warm, unlike the Woke "progressives" in > the Linux world. This transgender crap has one purpose, to give kids the > "right" to make their own sexual decisions so pedophile perverts can have > sex with kids.) Funny how people can shunt their brains when they become > fanboi partisans for a specific product. I'm not saying that the pedophiles at Microsoft are any more moral than the ones in the Linux world; I'm saying that they are at the very least university graduates. The work Microsoft demands from them also doesn't afford them much time to diddle children whereas open-source developers have lots of free time because they usually make their own schedules. -- CrudeSausage
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-21 18:26 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vk7iqc$8tip$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #681027 |
On 12/21/2024 6:19 PM, CrudeSausage wrote: > I'm not saying that the pedophiles at Microsoft are any more moral than > the ones in the Linux world; I'm saying that they are at the very least > university graduates. The work Microsoft demands from them also doesn't > afford them much time to diddle children whereas open-source developers > have lots of free time because they usually make their own schedules. LMFAO! Linux devs also use their race-car beds to lure children into their basements...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-22 00:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vk7m73$9jp7$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #681028 |
On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 18:26:06 -0500, DFS wrote: > Linux devs also use their race-car beds ... Oddly specific accusation alert: What do *you* know about race-car beds?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-22 07:12 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <VmT9P.10050$zX7.10036@fx37.iad> |
| In reply to | #681028 |
Le 2024-12-21 à 18:26, DFS a écrit : > On 12/21/2024 6:19 PM, CrudeSausage wrote: > >> I'm not saying that the pedophiles at Microsoft are any more moral >> than the ones in the Linux world; I'm saying that they are at the very >> least university graduates. The work Microsoft demands from them also >> doesn't afford them much time to diddle children whereas open-source >> developers have lots of free time because they usually make their own >> schedules. > > > LMFAO! > > Linux devs also use their race-car beds to lure children into their > basements... LMAO! -- CrudeSausage
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-23 06:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vkb03s$12pp6$10@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #681061 |
On 2024-12-22, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: > Le 2024-12-21 à 18:26, DFS a écrit : >> On 12/21/2024 6:19 PM, CrudeSausage wrote: >> >>> I'm not saying that the pedophiles at Microsoft are any more moral >>> than the ones in the Linux world; I'm saying that they are at the very >>> least university graduates. The work Microsoft demands from them also >>> doesn't afford them much time to diddle children whereas open-source >>> developers have lots of free time because they usually make their own >>> schedules. >> >> >> LMFAO! >> >> Linux devs also use their race-car beds to lure children into their >> basements... > > LMAO! Your regressing to Junior High level "humor." (Windows fanboi-ism rots the brain.) -- “Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-23 11:56 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <RCgaP.47690$EYNf.38126@fx11.iad> |
| In reply to | #681112 |
Le 2024-12-23 à 01:31, RonB a écrit : > On 2024-12-22, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >> Le 2024-12-21 à 18:26, DFS a écrit : >>> On 12/21/2024 6:19 PM, CrudeSausage wrote: >>> >>>> I'm not saying that the pedophiles at Microsoft are any more moral >>>> than the ones in the Linux world; I'm saying that they are at the very >>>> least university graduates. The work Microsoft demands from them also >>>> doesn't afford them much time to diddle children whereas open-source >>>> developers have lots of free time because they usually make their own >>>> schedules. >>> >>> >>> LMFAO! >>> >>> Linux devs also use their race-car beds to lure children into their >>> basements... >> >> LMAO! > > Your regressing to Junior High level "humor." (Windows fanboi-ism rots the > brain.) I'm not a Windows fanboy as much as I am a disgruntled Linux advocate. I still offer it as a solution to others and am aiming to use it as my main operating system, but I can't help but admit that for most of what I am looking for, Apple and Microsoft provide better options. -- CrudeSausage
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-24 09:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vke02q$1p1nc$9@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #681135 |
On 2024-12-23, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: > Le 2024-12-23 à 01:31, RonB a écrit : >> On 2024-12-22, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>> Le 2024-12-21 à 18:26, DFS a écrit : >>>> On 12/21/2024 6:19 PM, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'm not saying that the pedophiles at Microsoft are any more moral >>>>> than the ones in the Linux world; I'm saying that they are at the very >>>>> least university graduates. The work Microsoft demands from them also >>>>> doesn't afford them much time to diddle children whereas open-source >>>>> developers have lots of free time because they usually make their own >>>>> schedules. >>>> >>>> >>>> LMFAO! >>>> >>>> Linux devs also use their race-car beds to lure children into their >>>> basements... >>> >>> LMAO! >> >> Your regressing to Junior High level "humor." (Windows fanboi-ism rots the >> brain.) > > I'm not a Windows fanboy as much as I am a disgruntled Linux advocate. I > still offer it as a solution to others and am aiming to use it as my > main operating system, but I can't help but admit that for most of what > I am looking for, Apple and Microsoft provide better options. I realize that. I get the idea you really want to use Linux, but you want it to do some of the things (like play games) the same as Windows. I see a lot of people on Reddit who say they want to move to Linux from Windows, and ask what's the best distribution for games. If I respond, I just tell them they'll probably want to dual-boot or stick with Windows for gaming. I'm guessing there will be some fairly good PCs that will be abandoned (or moved to Linux) when Microsoft forces Windows 11 on Windows 10 users. -- “Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-24 13:01 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ahtlmj178d3gn9amr8tohfq4heisbmg9sf@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #681186 |
RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >On 2024-12-23, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >> >> I'm not a Windows fanboy as much as I am a disgruntled Linux advocate. I >> still offer it as a solution to others and am aiming to use it as my >> main operating system, but I can't help but admit that for most of what >> I am looking for, Apple and Microsoft provide better options. > >I realize that. I get the idea you really want to use Linux, but you want it >to do some of the things (like play games) the same as Windows. I see a lot >of people on Reddit who say they want to move to Linux from Windows, and ask >what's the best distribution for games. If I respond, I just tell them >they'll probably want to dual-boot or stick with Windows for gaming. I'm >guessing there will be some fairly good PCs that will be abandoned (or moved >to Linux) when Microsoft forces Windows 11 on Windows 10 users. Microsoft can always claim that older computers are well supported by Linux, so they don't need to genuinely support them with Winblows (other than with unsupported versions pre-10), but it's funny how people don't get that message, and stick with painfully slow systems running Windows 10 or 11, without heavy-duty hardware. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-27 17:55 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <YfGbP.176517$oR74.69340@fx16.iad> |
| In reply to | #681186 |
On 2024-12-24 04:49, RonB wrote: > On 2024-12-23, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >> Le 2024-12-23 à 01:31, RonB a écrit : >>> On 2024-12-22, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>> Le 2024-12-21 à 18:26, DFS a écrit : >>>>> On 12/21/2024 6:19 PM, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I'm not saying that the pedophiles at Microsoft are any more moral >>>>>> than the ones in the Linux world; I'm saying that they are at the very >>>>>> least university graduates. The work Microsoft demands from them also >>>>>> doesn't afford them much time to diddle children whereas open-source >>>>>> developers have lots of free time because they usually make their own >>>>>> schedules. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> LMFAO! >>>>> >>>>> Linux devs also use their race-car beds to lure children into their >>>>> basements... >>>> >>>> LMAO! >>> >>> Your regressing to Junior High level "humor." (Windows fanboi-ism rots the >>> brain.) >> >> I'm not a Windows fanboy as much as I am a disgruntled Linux advocate. I >> still offer it as a solution to others and am aiming to use it as my >> main operating system, but I can't help but admit that for most of what >> I am looking for, Apple and Microsoft provide better options. > > I realize that. I get the idea you really want to use Linux, but you want it > to do some of the things (like play games) the same as Windows. I see a lot > of people on Reddit who say they want to move to Linux from Windows, and ask > what's the best distribution for games. If I respond, I just tell them > they'll probably want to dual-boot or stick with Windows for gaming. I'm > guessing there will be some fairly good PCs that will be abandoned (or moved > to Linux) when Microsoft forces Windows 11 on Windows 10 users. Games are becoming less of an issue for me since I don't really have that much time to play anyway. When I do have time, I'm a lot more likely to play NHL on the console or Civilization on the PC. Everything else seems like too much of an investment. -- Andrzej (Andre) Matuch Telegram: @AndrzejMatuch
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-21 18:46 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <l9oemj1ogen4vu7vga4p9rukk47qo89kl2@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #681027 |
CrudeSausage wrote: > (idiocy snipped) Idiot.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-12-22 05:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vk88ps$g4du$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #681027 |
On 2024-12-21, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: > Le 2024-12-21 à 17:42, RonB a écrit : >> On 2024-12-21, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>> Le 2024-12-21 à 02:47, RonB a écrit : >>>> On 2024-12-20, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote: >>>>> Le 2024-12-20 à 16:57, Stéphane CARPENTIER a écrit : >>>>>> Le 20-12-2024, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> a écrit : >>>>>>> Le 2024-12-20 à 15:37, Stéphane CARPENTIER a écrit : >>>>>>>> Le 20-12-2024, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> a écrit : >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Open source is not profit driven. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Tell that to Red Hat. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's the support not the software that makes Red Hat money. >>>>>> >>>>>> Not only. With the support comes some tools developed by Red Hat. There >>>>>> is no clear cut between the part in Red Hat that makes money and the >>>>>> part in Red Hat that contributes to open source. The part that >>>>>> contribute to open source help them to make money with the parts that >>>>>> sell support. And the part that makes money with support help them to >>>>>> pay for the part that contribute to open source. You wouldn't have one >>>>>> without the other. >>>>> >>>>> You might be right, I'll concede that much. I just know that I would >>>>> never use anything either IBM or Red Hat makes through the pedophile >>>>> fruitcakes they employ. >>>> >>>> But the "pedophile fruitcakes" are a-okay at Microsoft? >>> >>> Microsoft hires progressives, but not pedophiles. Pedophiles are too >>> busy trying to get dates with 13-year-olds using ElementaryOS to get the >>> university degrees necessary to get hired at Microsoft. >> >> Right. And it's "nice" that you believe that about Microsoft's Woke >> "progressives." (They're fuzzy and warm, unlike the Woke "progressives" in >> the Linux world. This transgender crap has one purpose, to give kids the >> "right" to make their own sexual decisions so pedophile perverts can have >> sex with kids.) Funny how people can shunt their brains when they become >> fanboi partisans for a specific product. > > I'm not saying that the pedophiles at Microsoft are any more moral than > the ones in the Linux world; I'm saying that they are at the very least > university graduates. The work Microsoft demands from them also doesn't > afford them much time to diddle children whereas open-source developers > have lots of free time because they usually make their own schedules. Bullshit. Universities are where this Woke bullshit brainwashing is inculcated. If you really think Microsoft is "superior" because they (may) have more college graduates, then you're more deluded than I thought. And if you think Microsoft's demands on their employees are more intense than what pressure Open Source developer's put on themselves than I'm guessing you've never really seen an American corporation "at work." A LOT of wasted resources. A lot of wasted time, and at a lot of stupid meetings. -- “Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web