Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #679101 > unrolled thread

Wish me luck

Started byDFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca>
First post2024-12-06 10:58 -0500
Last post2024-12-09 18:12 -0600
Articles 20 on this page of 42 — 15 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy


Contents

  Wish me luck DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2024-12-06 10:58 -0500
    Re: Wish me luck vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-12-06 16:12 +0000
      Re: Wish me luck Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-06 11:22 -0500
      Re: Wish me luck DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2024-12-06 16:56 -0500
        Re: Wish me luck -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-06 18:01 -0500
        Re: Wish me luck rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-07 04:59 +0000
          Re: Wish me luck DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2024-12-07 09:05 -0500
            Re: Wish me luck rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-07 17:43 +0000
            Re: Wish me luck Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-07 16:56 -0500
              Re: Wish me luck DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2024-12-08 19:22 -0500
                Re: Wish me luck Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-08 19:45 -0500
                  Re: Wish me luck Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-12-09 08:14 -0500
                    Re: Wish me luck DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2024-12-09 13:38 -0500
                    Re: Wish me luck chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2024-12-09 15:46 -0600
                      Re: Wish me luck Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-09 22:24 +0000
                        Re: Wish me luck Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 17:17 -0600
                          Re: Wish me luck DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2024-12-15 10:22 -0500
                        Re: Wish me luck DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2024-12-10 18:58 -0500
                          Re: Wish me luck -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-10 19:58 -0500
                            Re: Wish me luck Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> - 2024-12-11 18:05 +0000
                              Re: Wish me luck Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 13:18 -0500
                                Re: Wish me luck CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2024-12-12 10:03 -0500
                                  Re: Wish me luck Farley Flud <fsquared@fsquared.linux> - 2024-12-13 13:09 +0000
                              Re: Wish me luck DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2024-12-12 13:03 -0500
                              Re: Wish me luck Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2024-12-13 21:17 +0000
                            Re: Wish me luck DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2024-12-11 15:23 -0500
                              Re: Wish me luck Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-11 15:50 -0500
                Re: Wish me luck rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-09 03:04 +0000
                  Re: Wish me luck vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-12-09 03:39 +0000
                    Re: Wish me luck Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2024-12-13 21:12 +0000
                  Re: Wish me luck RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 15:12 +0000
                    Re: Wish me luck rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-09 20:55 +0000
                    Re: Wish me luck candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2024-12-09 21:10 +0000
                    Re: Wish me luck Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-10 12:31 -0500
                      Re: Wish me luck DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2024-12-10 18:57 -0500
                        Re: Wish me luck rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-11 02:17 +0000
                          Re: Wish me luck DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2024-12-10 22:20 -0500
                          Re: Wish me luck Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-12-11 12:14 -0500
                  Re: Wish me luck DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2024-12-09 13:19 -0500
                  Re: Wish me luck Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 15:57 -0600
                    Re: Wish me luck Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-09 23:15 +0000
                      Re: Wish me luck Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-09 18:12 -0600

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →


#679727

FromJoel <joelcrump@gmail.com>
Date2024-12-11 13:18 -0500
Message-ID<jpljlj5mc8o39m9ms14jo8082eerop9bsa@4ax.com>
In reply to#679726
Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> wrote:
>On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 19:58:52 -0500, -hh wrote:
>
>> He's jealous of even those who he thinks have just an 85 IQ.
>
>I'd rather be a total "loser" than a brain-compromised retard.
>
>Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha. ha. ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
>
>Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha. ha. ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
>
>Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha. ha. ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!


I'd rather be a cool person, using Linux because it's the best OS, not
to show off tech skill.  I might get buttfucked a lot but I have an
awesome computer.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#679905

FromCrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge>
Date2024-12-12 10:03 -0500
Message-ID<rXC6P.7468$DYHc.1198@fx41.iad>
In reply to#679727
Le 2024-12-11 à 13:18, Joel a écrit :
> Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> wrote:
>> On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 19:58:52 -0500, -hh wrote:
>>
>>> He's jealous of even those who he thinks have just an 85 IQ.
>>
>> I'd rather be a total "loser" than a brain-compromised retard.
>>
>> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha. ha. ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
>>
>> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha. ha. ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
>>
>> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha. ha. ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
> 
> 
> I'd rather be a cool person, using Linux because it's the best OS, not
> to show off tech skill.  I might get buttfucked a lot but I have an
> awesome computer.

If I buy a 2TB SSD which advertises hardware encryption, I can enable 
said protection on Windows 11 if I go through a few (rather complicated) 
steps. That same SSD, under Linux, does not support hardware encryption.

If you aren't aware, software encryption slows an SSD's random writes 
and reads _significantly_. A benchmark on Tom's Hardware suggests that 
it's up to 45%, but it is actually closer to about 400%. Meanwhile, 
hardware encryption provides you all of the protection and doesn't slow 
the storage down at all.

That's why Windows is superior.

-- 
CrudeSausage

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#680035

FromFarley Flud <fsquared@fsquared.linux>
Date2024-12-13 13:09 +0000
Message-ID<1810be8dcc74ecc5$9372$435926$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>
In reply to#679905
On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 10:03:51 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote:

> 
> If I buy a 2TB SSD which advertises hardware encryption, I can enable
> said protection on Windows 11 if I go through a few (rather complicated)
> steps. That same SSD, under Linux, does not support hardware encryption.
> 

More bullshit from the brain-dead bullshitter.

Linux fully supports SED, or self-encrypting drives:

https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Self-encrypting_drives

From the link:

"The kernel supports OPAL self-encrypting drives via the BLK_SED_OPAL 
option."

"sedutil is "an Open Source (GPLv3) effort to make Self Encrypting Drive 
technology freely available to everyone."


I don't know anything about these techniques because I don't give a flying
fuck about drive encryption, especially with that gimmicky junk technology
known as SSD.

Providing false information, like this RottenSausage just did, should be
a punishable offense.  Perpetrators should be hung up by their thumbs and
whipped with strands of barbed wire.





-- 
Hail Linux!  Hail FOSS!  Hail Stallman!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#679946

FromDFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca>
Date2024-12-12 13:03 -0500
Message-ID<vjf8ho$2scol$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#679726
On 12/11/2024 1:05 PM, Farley Flud wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 19:58:52 -0500, -hh wrote:
> 
> 
>>
>> He's jealous of even those who he thinks have just an 85 IQ.
>>
> 
> I'd rather be a total "loser" than a brain-compromised retard.


5 uncompleted "Simple Challenges For The Simpleton Feeb":


<o6fqH.420221$Av7.358131@fx34.iad>
<TwuzH.197436$sW6.104370@fx47.iad>
<n7uAH.19256$Eo4.8778@fx44.iad>
<JzLDH.35307$R82.29164@fx46.iad>
<F5Q9I.74959$RS3.10472@fx18.iad>


Momma and Poppa Feeb raised a programming dunce.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#680089

FromStéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr>
Date2024-12-13 21:17 +0000
Message-ID<675ca459$0$5215$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
In reply to#679726
Le 11-12-2024, Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> a écrit :
>
> I'd rather be a total "loser" 

First part: checked. That's good to know you are happy about that.

> than a brain-compromised retard.

Second part: checked. That will be more difficult for you to accept.

The both parts of your sentence are not mutually exclusive.

> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha. ha. ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
>
> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha. ha. ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
>
> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha. ha. ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

You see? You are a living proof.

-- 
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#679768

FromDFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca>
Date2024-12-11 15:23 -0500
Message-ID<vjcsc6$1md94$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#679653
On 12/10/2024 7:58 PM, -hh wrote:
> On 12/10/24 6:58 PM, DFS wrote:
>> On 12/9/2024 5:24 PM, Lameass Larry Piet wrote:
>>
>>
>>> My guess is that his [DFS's] IQ is about 85.
>>
>>
>> My certainty is you're a bust at life.
>>
> 
> He's jealous of even those who he thinks have just an 85 IQ.
> 
> 
> Sorry, no "/s" tag applies.
> 
> 
> -hh


He's permanently butthurt because I exposed him as a programming dud, 
serial plagiarizer and boastful, no compunction liar.

I believe Feeb is also mentally ill, ala Rex Ballard, and has fantasies 
that he's making significant contributions to computer science.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#679806

FromJoel <joelcrump@gmail.com>
Date2024-12-11 15:50 -0500
Message-ID<0hujlj927f1rpdtk1r6b3ehge4qi34o0v2@4ax.com>
In reply to#679768
DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
>On 12/10/2024 7:58 PM, -hh wrote:
>> On 12/10/24 6:58 PM, DFS wrote:
>>> On 12/9/2024 5:24 PM, Lameass Larry Piet wrote:
>>>
>>>> My guess is that his [DFS's] IQ is about 85.
>>>
>>> My certainty is you're a bust at life.
>> 
>> He's jealous of even those who he thinks have just an 85 IQ.
>> 
>> Sorry, no "/s" tag applies.
>
>He's permanently butthurt because I exposed him as a programming dud, 
>serial plagiarizer and boastful, no compunction liar.
>
>I believe Feeb is also mentally ill, ala Rex Ballard, and has fantasies 
>that he's making significant contributions to computer science.


Larry does some OK things but there does approach a point where he's
simply missing the benefits of a distro.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#679301

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2024-12-09 03:04 +0000
Message-ID<lrn517Fd8qpU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#679276
On Sun, 8 Dec 2024 19:22:21 -0500, DFS wrote:

> Running Linux means giving up MS Office (never unless something just as
> good is available on Linux) and Notepad++ (difficult but not impossible
> to give up), and maybe a few games.

It is a hardship for me to give up two applications I don't use...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#679302

Fromvallor <vallor@cultnix.org>
Date2024-12-09 03:39 +0000
Message-ID<lrn743Fd071U2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#679301
On 9 Dec 2024 03:04:07 GMT, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote in
<lrn517Fd8qpU1@mid.individual.net>:

> On Sun, 8 Dec 2024 19:22:21 -0500, DFS wrote:
> 
>> Running Linux means giving up MS Office (never unless something just as
>> good is available on Linux) and Notepad++ (difficult but not impossible
>> to give up), and maybe a few games.
> 
> It is a hardship for me to give up two applications I don't use...

Office 365 works fine with Linux.

-- 
-v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti
   OS: Linux 6.12.3 Release: Mint 21.3 Mem: 258G
   "It's 11:00 p.m., do you know what your cats are shredding?"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#680088

FromStéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr>
Date2024-12-13 21:12 +0000
Message-ID<675ca350$0$5215$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
In reply to#679302
Le 09-12-2024, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> a écrit :
> On 9 Dec 2024 03:04:07 GMT, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote in
><lrn517Fd8qpU1@mid.individual.net>:
>
>> On Sun, 8 Dec 2024 19:22:21 -0500, DFS wrote:
>> 
>>> Running Linux means giving up MS Office (never unless something just as
>>> good is available on Linux) and Notepad++ (difficult but not impossible
>>> to give up), and maybe a few games.
>> 
>> It is a hardship for me to give up two applications I don't use...
>
> Office 365 works fine with Linux.

I don't know all of Office 365, but the part containing Outlook is the
worst shit I ever saw. Use it only if you can't do differently. It's
horrible. I don't like outlook on the desktop, but at least, it's
usable. And compared with outlook in office 365 it looks wonderful.

-- 
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#679328

FromRonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>
Date2024-12-09 15:12 +0000
Message-ID<vj71de$ev0q$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#679301
On 2024-12-09, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Dec 2024 19:22:21 -0500, DFS wrote:
>
>> Running Linux means giving up MS Office (never unless something just as
>> good is available on Linux) and Notepad++ (difficult but not impossible
>> to give up), and maybe a few games.
>
> It is a hardship for me to give up two applications I don't use...

The only time I ever used M$ Office was when I had to at work. I could have 
bought it for $14 for home use once (company deal) and I had zero interest 
in it. Just bloatware in my opinion. As for Notepad++, I use Jstar for just 
about everything. If I wanted something that looks something like Notepad++ 
I would probably look into Kate (K Advanced Text Editor). But I'm not 
looking for a Notepad++ clone. Have no need for it.

-- 
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy 
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.”  —J.R.R. Tolkien

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#679420

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2024-12-09 20:55 +0000
Message-ID<lrp3qmFn0hlU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#679328
On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 15:12:46 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:

> The only time I ever used M$ Office was when I had to at work.

Programming never had Office loaded on our Windows machines by IT. We 
didn't really need it and licenses cost money. LibreOffice was good 
enough.

We were on our own for the Linux machines. IT would drop off a bare metal 
box and run. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#679422

Fromcandycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
Date2024-12-09 21:10 +0000
Message-ID<slrnvlemm8.cik4.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
In reply to#679328
RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote at 15:12 this Monday (GMT):
> On 2024-12-09, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, 8 Dec 2024 19:22:21 -0500, DFS wrote:
>>
>>> Running Linux means giving up MS Office (never unless something just as
>>> good is available on Linux) and Notepad++ (difficult but not impossible
>>> to give up), and maybe a few games.
>>
>> It is a hardship for me to give up two applications I don't use...
>
> The only time I ever used M$ Office was when I had to at work. I could have 
> bought it for $14 for home use once (company deal) and I had zero interest 
> in it. Just bloatware in my opinion. As for Notepad++, I use Jstar for just 
> about everything. If I wanted something that looks something like Notepad++ 
> I would probably look into Kate (K Advanced Text Editor). But I'm not 
> looking for a Notepad++ clone. Have no need for it.


Honestly, my favorite GUI editor is actually featherpad. It doesn't
natively let you compile stuff, but it does have syntax highlighting
which is really nice.
-- 
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#679527

FromJoel <joelcrump@gmail.com>
Date2024-12-10 12:31 -0500
Message-ID<5iugljpt0s4oc83fajtfd704s7c8leoirb@4ax.com>
In reply to#679328
RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 2024-12-09, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, 8 Dec 2024 19:22:21 -0500, DFS wrote:
>>
>>> Running Linux means giving up MS Office (never unless something just as
>>> good is available on Linux) and Notepad++ (difficult but not impossible
>>> to give up), and maybe a few games.
>>
>> It is a hardship for me to give up two applications I don't use...
>
>The only time I ever used M$ Office was when I had to at work. I could have 
>bought it for $14 for home use once (company deal) and I had zero interest 
>in it. Just bloatware in my opinion. As for Notepad++, I use Jstar for just 
>about everything. If I wanted something that looks something like Notepad++ 
>I would probably look into Kate (K Advanced Text Editor). But I'm not 
>looking for a Notepad++ clone. Have no need for it.


When you have LO and WPS Office, and gedit and Kate, DFS's
proclamations of running Win10/11 even on a computer like mine is just
not having the best appreciation.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#679647

FromDFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca>
Date2024-12-10 18:57 -0500
Message-ID<vjakgc$16m37$4@dont-email.me>
In reply to#679527
On 12/10/2024 12:31 PM, Joel wrote:

 > When you have LO and WPS Office

You've been beaten down multiple times on this, since 2010.  LO and WPS 
Office can't compete with MS Office.



 > and gedit and Kate, DFS's
 > proclamations of running Win10/11 even on a computer like mine is just
 > not having the best appreciation.

Here are the programmer editor features I really would rather not do 
without:

1 block commenting - insert or remove a comment symbol in front of a
   selected block of lines
2 line sort operations
3 show symbols (mainly end of line and tabs)
4 function list
5 change tab sizing
6 language syntax highlighting
7 column mode (might be called block selection)
8 search across folders/multiple documents.

Advanced editors have most or all those features, plus a million more.


I downloaded Kate for Windows (24.08.0, thru the MS Store) and gave it a 
try.  It's very, very good.


1  it does block commenting

2  kate sorts lines (right-click | Editing | Sort Selected Text Alpha),
    but won't sort these correctly:

line 29
line 3

29th line
3rd line

29 line
3 line

Notepad++ does, with the 'Sort Lines as Integers' option


3  kate shows tab marks by default (but I couldn't find a way to show
    end of line characters).

4  found function list in Settings | Configure Kate | Plugins | Symbol
    Viewer

5  change tab size in Settings | Configure Kate | Editing | Indentation
    | Tabulators

6  of course kate has syntax highlighting, for dozens of languages

7  kate slightly outdoes Notepad++ on column mode / block selection.
    With Notepad++ you have to hold down left Alt and drag, with kate
    there's a check box to turn it off and on.  So it's a little easier
    to do block selection in kate.

8  kate will search / replace in multiple files / in a folder



kate has some other nice features:
* appearance, color and theme settings that are easy to use.
* there's a little clickable breadcrumb line at the top of the open file
   showing the directory structure.  Cool!
* the mini-map to the right of the screen makes scrolling easier

niggles:
* bloated: kate uses 46MB of memory vs 17MB for Notepad++
* slower than Notepad++
* I don't like the Welcome screen that comes up by default (edit - found
   a way to turn it off)
* far fewer plugins than available with Notepad++


Based on my limited usage, kate is a really good editor I could live 
with in Linux.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#679659

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2024-12-11 02:17 +0000
Message-ID<lrsb21F7n0tU4@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#679647
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 18:57:03 -0500, DFS wrote:

> Here are the programmer editor features I really would rather not do
> without:

That sounds like a list of vim features...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#679668

FromDFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca>
Date2024-12-10 22:20 -0500
Message-ID<vjb0e1$1c666$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#679659
On 12/10/2024 9:17 PM, rbowman wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 18:57:03 -0500, DFS wrote:
> 
>> Here are the programmer editor features I really would rather not do
>> without:
> 
> That sounds like a list of vim features...


I'm too young for vim, and my goatee is too short.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#679718

FromChris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us>
Date2024-12-11 12:14 -0500
Message-ID<vjcha1$1kgno$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#679659
rbowman wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:

> On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 18:57:03 -0500, DFS wrote:
>
>> Here are the programmer editor features I really would rather not do
>> without:
>
> That sounds like a list of vim features...

Very incomplete.  Here's a Vim book:

    https://www.iopb.res.in/vimbook-OPL.pdf

572 pages, 35 of that being an index. You can also buy a number of physical
books from outlets such as O'Reilly. One has a section "vi for MS Word and
Outlook".

-- 
QOTD:
	"I used to be an idealist, but I got mugged by reality."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#679382

FromDFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca>
Date2024-12-09 13:19 -0500
Message-ID<vj7cc1$guc0$4@dont-email.me>
In reply to#679301
On 12/8/2024 10:04 PM, rbowman wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Dec 2024 19:22:21 -0500, DFS wrote:
> 
>> Running Linux means giving up MS Office (never unless something just as
>> good is available on Linux) and Notepad++ (difficult but not impossible
>> to give up), and maybe a few games.
> 
> It is a hardship for me to give up two applications I don't use...


I hear you.  Life is tough all over.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#679427

FromPhysfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com>
Date2024-12-09 15:57 -0600
Message-ID<vj7p54$jgh7$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#679301
On 12/8/24 9:04 PM, rbowman wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Dec 2024 19:22:21 -0500, DFS wrote:
> 
>> Running Linux means giving up MS Office (never unless something just as
>> good is available on Linux) and Notepad++ (difficult but not impossible
>> to give up), and maybe a few games.
> 
> It is a hardship for me to give up two applications I don't use...


Excel not only is impossible to give up, it is the best tool that has 
appeared since PCs took over.

Anyone who doesn't have an intense need for Excel is either doing 
nothing in life, or is doing a lot at the "ant" level :)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy


csiph-web