Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #20845 > unrolled thread

Earth shattering: Flatty LIEd about Ubuntu 11.04

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  Earth shattering: Flatty LIEd about Ubuntu 11.04 Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-05-04 00:44 +0200
    Re: Earth shattering: Flatty LIEd about Ubuntu 11.04 Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-05-03 18:45 -0400
      Re: Earth shattering: Flatty LIEd about Ubuntu 11.04 William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-05-03 23:53 +0100
    Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-05-03 21:31 -0400
      Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-05-03 23:38 -0400
        Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-05-04 00:03 -0400
          Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> - 2011-05-04 17:52 +0100
      Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-05-04 06:56 +0200
        Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-05-04 01:22 -0400
          Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2011-05-04 12:38 -0500
            Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-05-04 14:22 -0400
              Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2011-05-04 17:24 -0500
            Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? Marti Van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2011-05-05 15:36 +0200
              Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-05-05 09:43 -0400
                Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2011-05-05 13:04 -0500
                  Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-05-05 14:43 -0400
                    Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2011-05-06 10:29 -0500
                      Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-05-06 12:11 -0400
                        Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2011-05-06 13:56 -0500
                      Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-05-06 11:59 -0500
                        Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-05-06 13:01 -0400
                          Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-05-06 20:17 +0200
                            Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-05-06 14:27 -0400
                              Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-05-06 15:41 -0400
                            Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2011-05-06 12:07 -0700
                            Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-05-06 15:43 -0400
                              Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2011-05-06 19:29 -0500
                                Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-05-09 07:48 -0500
                              Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-05-07 17:54 +0200
                                Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-05-07 12:03 -0400
                                  Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-05-07 18:57 +0200
                                  Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2011-05-07 19:03 +0200
                            Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2011-05-06 14:13 -0500
                          Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2011-05-06 13:58 -0500
              Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-05-05 15:28 +0100
                Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-05-05 10:59 -0400
      Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2011-05-04 12:36 -0500
        Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-05-04 14:20 -0400
          Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2011-05-04 17:22 -0500
            Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-05-04 20:19 -0400
              Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-05-04 22:24 -0400
            Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? Tom Shelton <tom_shelton@comcast.invalid> - 2011-05-04 18:31 -0600
              Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-05-04 22:24 -0400
              Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2011-05-05 13:02 -0500
                Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti? flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-05-05 14:43 -0400
    Re: Earth shattering: Flatty LIEd about Ubuntu 11.04 "Drs. Arend Preudhomme" <nospam.nospam.preudhomme@nospammers.invalid> - 2011-05-04 17:50 +0200
      Re: Earth shattering: Flatty LIEd about Ubuntu 11.04 Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-05-04 12:22 -0400
        Re: Earth shattering: Flatty LIEd about Ubuntu 11.04 William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-05-04 18:12 +0100
          Re: Earth shattering: Flatty LIEd about Ubuntu 11.04 "Drs. Arend Preudhomme" <nospam.nospam.preudhomme@nospammers.invalid> - 2011-05-04 19:56 +0200
            Re: Earth shattering: Flatty LIEd about Ubuntu 11.04 flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-05-04 14:07 -0400
              Re: Earth shattering: Flatty LIEd about Ubuntu 11.04 "Drs. Arend Preudhomme" <nospam.nospam.preudhomme@nospammers.invalid> - 2011-05-04 22:34 +0200
                Re: Earth shattering: Flatty LIEd about Ubuntu 11.04 flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-05-04 22:21 -0400
        Re: Earth shattering: Flatty LIEd about Ubuntu 11.04 flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-05-04 13:24 -0400

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

#21611 — Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti?

On 5/6/2011 12:59 PM, chrisv wrote:
> JEDIDIAH wrote:
>
>>     I can trust my own experiences, or some jackass in a usenet group.
>>
>>     So can anyone else infact. This is a great thing about Linux. You don't
>> have to take my word for it or yours. You don't even have to install anything
>> either. You can just run Linux in a free VM product or boot it straight off
>> the install media.
>
> Can you imagine how many chairs were thrown in Redmond when Blammer
> learned about LiveCD's?    :-D


They're not a Linux creation, turd.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#21646 — Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti?

On 2011-05-06, the following emerged from the brain of DFS:
> On 5/6/2011 12:59 PM, chrisv wrote:
>> JEDIDIAH wrote:
>>
>>>     I can trust my own experiences, or some jackass in a usenet
>>>     group.
>>>
>>>     So can anyone else infact. This is a great thing about Linux.
>>>     You don't have to take my word for it or yours. You don't even
>>>     have to install anything either. You can just run Linux in a
>>>     free VM product or boot it straight off the install media.
>>
>> Can you imagine how many chairs were thrown in Redmond when Blammer
>> learned about LiveCD's?    :-D
>
> They're not a Linux creation, turd.

Linux perfected and popularlized the concept though.

-- 
Three may keep a secret, if two of them are dead.
	~ Benjamin Franklin

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#21650 — Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti?

On Fri, 6 May 2011 20:17:04 +0200, TomB wrote:

> On 2011-05-06, the following emerged from the brain of DFS:
>> On 5/6/2011 12:59 PM, chrisv wrote:
>>> JEDIDIAH wrote:
>>>
>>>>     I can trust my own experiences, or some jackass in a usenet
>>>>     group.
>>>>
>>>>     So can anyone else infact. This is a great thing about Linux.
>>>>     You don't have to take my word for it or yours. You don't even
>>>>     have to install anything either. You can just run Linux in a
>>>>     free VM product or boot it straight off the install media.
>>>
>>> Can you imagine how many chairs were thrown in Redmond when Blammer
>>> learned about LiveCD's?    :-D
>>
>> They're not a Linux creation, turd.
> 
> Linux perfected and popularlized the concept though.

Of course.
It's almost a necessity for Linux.
How else are you going to try out 500+ different distributions.

-- 
flatfish+++
Please visit our hall of Linux idiots.
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

Watching Linux Fail:
http://limuxwatch.blogspot.com/
 
Desktop Linux: The Dream Is Dead
"By the time Microsoft released the Windows 7 beta 
in January 2009, Linux had clearly lost its chance at desktop glory."
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/207999/desktop_linux_the_dream_is_dead.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#21674 — Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti?

On 5/6/2011 2:27 PM, flatfish+++ wrote:
> On Fri, 6 May 2011 20:17:04 +0200, TomB wrote:
>
>> On 2011-05-06, the following emerged from the brain of DFS:
>>> On 5/6/2011 12:59 PM, chrisv wrote:
>>>> JEDIDIAH wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>      I can trust my own experiences, or some jackass in a usenet
>>>>>      group.
>>>>>
>>>>>      So can anyone else infact. This is a great thing about Linux.
>>>>>      You don't have to take my word for it or yours. You don't even
>>>>>      have to install anything either. You can just run Linux in a
>>>>>      free VM product or boot it straight off the install media.
>>>>
>>>> Can you imagine how many chairs were thrown in Redmond when Blammer
>>>> learned about LiveCD's?    :-D
>>>
>>> They're not a Linux creation, turd.
>>
>> Linux perfected and popularlized the concept though.
>
> Of course.
> It's almost a necessity for Linux.
> How else are you going to try out 500+ different distributions.

As they say, lack of necessity is the mother of useless invention.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#21660 — Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti?

TomB stated in post 20110506201601.519@usenet.drumscum.be on 5/6/11 11:17
AM:

> On 2011-05-06, the following emerged from the brain of DFS:
>> On 5/6/2011 12:59 PM, chrisv wrote:
>>> JEDIDIAH wrote:
>>> 
>>>>     I can trust my own experiences, or some jackass in a usenet
>>>>     group.
>>>> 
>>>>     So can anyone else infact. This is a great thing about Linux.
>>>>     You don't have to take my word for it or yours. You don't even
>>>>     have to install anything either. You can just run Linux in a
>>>>     free VM product or boot it straight off the install media.
>>> 
>>> Can you imagine how many chairs were thrown in Redmond when Blammer
>>> learned about LiveCD's?    :-D
>> 
>> They're not a Linux creation, turd.
> 
> Linux perfected and popularlized the concept though.

So Linux gets the credit there - and Apple gets the credit for the GUI.  I
can go with that.


-- 
[INSERT .SIG HERE]

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#21677 — Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti?

On 5/6/2011 2:17 PM, TomB wrote:
> On 2011-05-06, the following emerged from the brain of DFS:
>> On 5/6/2011 12:59 PM, chrisv wrote:
>>> JEDIDIAH wrote:
>>>
>>>>      I can trust my own experiences, or some jackass in a usenet
>>>>      group.
>>>>
>>>>      So can anyone else infact. This is a great thing about Linux.
>>>>      You don't have to take my word for it or yours. You don't even
>>>>      have to install anything either. You can just run Linux in a
>>>>      free VM product or boot it straight off the install media.
>>>
>>> Can you imagine how many chairs were thrown in Redmond when Blammer
>>> learned about LiveCD's?    :-D
>>
>> They're not a Linux creation, turd.
>
> Linux perfected and popularlized the concept though.


Since they're just extremely derivative of an earlier invention, Linux 
deserves no credit whatsoever for anything related to LiveCDs  (if you 
subscribe to the idiotic babbling of Hypocrite Homer).

And Ubuntu perfected and popularized the concept of a crappy distro 
release every 6 months.

And don't forget Windows popularized the concept of a GUI operating 
system.

And I popularized the concept of a Linux "advocate".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#21735 — Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti?

On 2011-05-06, DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
> On 5/6/2011 2:17 PM, TomB wrote:
>> On 2011-05-06, the following emerged from the brain of DFS:
>>> On 5/6/2011 12:59 PM, chrisv wrote:
>>>> JEDIDIAH wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>      I can trust my own experiences, or some jackass in a usenet
>>>>>      group.
>>>>>
>>>>>      So can anyone else infact. This is a great thing about Linux.
>>>>>      You don't have to take my word for it or yours. You don't even
>>>>>      have to install anything either. You can just run Linux in a
>>>>>      free VM product or boot it straight off the install media.
>>>>
>>>> Can you imagine how many chairs were thrown in Redmond when Blammer
>>>> learned about LiveCD's?    :-D
>>>
>>> They're not a Linux creation, turd.
>>
>> Linux perfected and popularlized the concept though.
>
>
> Since they're just extremely derivative of an earlier invention, Linux 

...by whom exactly?

All of you idiots are whining about how the Linux community didn't invent
this but you aren't actually giving any indication that you know who actually
did.

[deletia]

-- 
	Linux: because everyone should get to drink the beer of their    |||
choice and not merely be limited to pretensious imports or hard cider.  / | \

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22296 — Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti?

JEDIDIAH wrote:

>>>>> Can you imagine how many chairs were thrown in Redmond when Blammer
>>>>> learned about LiveCD's?    :-D
>>>>
>>>> They're not a Linux creation, turd.
>>>
>>> Linux perfected and popularlized the concept though.
>>
>> Since they're just extremely derivative of an earlier invention, Linux 
>
>...by whom exactly?
>
>All of you idiots are whining about how the Linux community didn't invent
>this but you aren't actually giving any indication that you know who actually
>did.

Is that crickets I hear?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#21873 — Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti?

DFS <nospam@dfs.com> writes:

> On 5/6/2011 2:17 PM, TomB wrote:
>> On 2011-05-06, the following emerged from the brain of DFS:
>>> On 5/6/2011 12:59 PM, chrisv wrote:
>>>> JEDIDIAH wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>      I can trust my own experiences, or some jackass in a usenet
>>>>>      group.
>>>>>
>>>>>      So can anyone else infact. This is a great thing about Linux.
>>>>>      You don't have to take my word for it or yours. You don't even
>>>>>      have to install anything either. You can just run Linux in a
>>>>>      free VM product or boot it straight off the install media.
>>>>
>>>> Can you imagine how many chairs were thrown in Redmond when Blammer
>>>> learned about LiveCD's?    :-D
>>>
>>> They're not a Linux creation, turd.
>>
>> Linux perfected and popularlized the concept though.
>
> Since they're just extremely derivative of an earlier invention, Linux deserves
> no credit whatsoever for anything related to LiveCDs  (if you subscribe to the
> idiotic babbling of Hypocrite Homer).
>
> And Ubuntu perfected and popularized the concept of a crappy distro release
> every 6 months.
>
> And don't forget Windows popularized the concept of a GUI operating system.
>
> And I popularized the concept of a Linux "advocate".

I think you will find I started "quoting" "advocate" ... ;)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#21876 — Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti?

On 5/7/2011 11:54 AM, Hadron wrote:
> DFS<nospam@dfs.com>  writes:
>
>> On 5/6/2011 2:17 PM, TomB wrote:
>>> On 2011-05-06, the following emerged from the brain of DFS:
>>>> On 5/6/2011 12:59 PM, chrisv wrote:
>>>>> JEDIDIAH wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>       I can trust my own experiences, or some jackass in a usenet
>>>>>>       group.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>       So can anyone else infact. This is a great thing about Linux.
>>>>>>       You don't have to take my word for it or yours. You don't even
>>>>>>       have to install anything either. You can just run Linux in a
>>>>>>       free VM product or boot it straight off the install media.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you imagine how many chairs were thrown in Redmond when Blammer
>>>>> learned about LiveCD's?    :-D
>>>>
>>>> They're not a Linux creation, turd.
>>>
>>> Linux perfected and popularlized the concept though.
>>
>> Since they're just extremely derivative of an earlier invention, Linux deserves
>> no credit whatsoever for anything related to LiveCDs  (if you subscribe to the
>> idiotic babbling of Hypocrite Homer).
>>
>> And Ubuntu perfected and popularized the concept of a crappy distro release
>> every 6 months.
>>
>> And don't forget Windows popularized the concept of a GUI operating system.
>>
>> And I popularized the concept of a Linux "advocate".
>
> I think you will find I started "quoting" "advocate" ... ;)



A challenge!

My earliest use of "advocate" is Oct 8, 2004, in the thread "[OT] MS 
Word is a steaming pile of crap"

Can you beat that?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#21886 — Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti?

DFS <nospam@dfs.com> writes:

> On 5/7/2011 11:54 AM, Hadron wrote:
>> DFS<nospam@dfs.com>  writes:
>>
>>> On 5/6/2011 2:17 PM, TomB wrote:
>>>> On 2011-05-06, the following emerged from the brain of DFS:
>>>>> On 5/6/2011 12:59 PM, chrisv wrote:
>>>>>> JEDIDIAH wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       I can trust my own experiences, or some jackass in a usenet
>>>>>>>       group.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       So can anyone else infact. This is a great thing about Linux.
>>>>>>>       You don't have to take my word for it or yours. You don't even
>>>>>>>       have to install anything either. You can just run Linux in a
>>>>>>>       free VM product or boot it straight off the install media.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you imagine how many chairs were thrown in Redmond when Blammer
>>>>>> learned about LiveCD's?    :-D
>>>>>
>>>>> They're not a Linux creation, turd.
>>>>
>>>> Linux perfected and popularlized the concept though.
>>>
>>> Since they're just extremely derivative of an earlier invention, Linux deserves
>>> no credit whatsoever for anything related to LiveCDs  (if you subscribe to the
>>> idiotic babbling of Hypocrite Homer).
>>>
>>> And Ubuntu perfected and popularized the concept of a crappy distro release
>>> every 6 months.
>>>
>>> And don't forget Windows popularized the concept of a GUI operating system.
>>>
>>> And I popularized the concept of a Linux "advocate".
>>
>> I think you will find I started "quoting" "advocate" ... ;)
>
> A challenge!
>
> My earliest use of "advocate" is Oct 8, 2004, in the thread "[OT] MS Word is a
> steaming pile of crap"
>
> Can you beat that?

Hmm. Damn you. No I dont think I can. But I am sure I was the more
consistent propagator of "advocate" and have frequently pointed out the
difference betwee the word advocate and "advocate". Brr. "advocates"
really are a nasty little bunch of know nothing weenies...

Regardless, the word has a meaning. Unsavoury though it might be.

They appear to be in disarray at the moment. Homer's savaging of that
big headed wind bag Keith Curtis is quite something.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#21890 — Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti?

On 2011-05-07, the following emerged from the brain of DFS:
>
> A challenge!
>
> My earliest use of "advocate" is Oct 8, 2004, in the thread "[OT] MS
> Word is a steaming pile of crap"
>
> Can you beat that?

Hey, you can almost celebrate the 10th anniversary!

-- 
It takes a big man to cry, but it takes a bigger man
to laugh at that man. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#21688 — Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti?

On 2011-05-06, TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2011-05-06, the following emerged from the brain of DFS:
>> On 5/6/2011 12:59 PM, chrisv wrote:
>>> JEDIDIAH wrote:
>>>
>>>>     I can trust my own experiences, or some jackass in a usenet
>>>>     group.
>>>>
>>>>     So can anyone else infact. This is a great thing about Linux.
>>>>     You don't have to take my word for it or yours. You don't even
>>>>     have to install anything either. You can just run Linux in a
>>>>     free VM product or boot it straight off the install media.
>>>
>>> Can you imagine how many chairs were thrown in Redmond when Blammer
>>> learned about LiveCD's?    :-D
>>
>> They're not a Linux creation, turd.
>
> Linux perfected and popularlized the concept though.

   I wonder who did then? What OS was also around then that even allowed
for that sort of thing. Most other things even if they were flexible enough
and leading edge enough (like perhaps MacOS) were licensed in a manner such
that having 3rd parties put these things together would be a legal issue.

   What? Were pirate groups doing this kind of thing with Windows?

-- 
	Linux: because everyone should get to drink the beer of their    |||
choice and not merely be limited to pretensious imports or hard cider.  / | \

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#21664 — Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti?

On 2011-05-06, DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
> On 5/6/2011 12:59 PM, chrisv wrote:
>> JEDIDIAH wrote:
>>
>>>     I can trust my own experiences, or some jackass in a usenet group.
>>>
>>>     So can anyone else infact. This is a great thing about Linux. You don't
>>> have to take my word for it or yours. You don't even have to install anything
>>> either. You can just run Linux in a free VM product or boot it straight off
>>> the install media.
>>
>> Can you imagine how many chairs were thrown in Redmond when Blammer
>> learned about LiveCD's?    :-D
>
>
> They're not a Linux creation, turd.

    They certainly weren't a Microsoft one.

    Microsoft dragged their feet just getting Windows onto CDs. 

    Nevermind booting the OS from it.

-- 
	Linux: because everyone should get to drink the beer of their    |||
choice and not merely be limited to pretensious imports or hard cider.  / | \

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#21273 — Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti?

Marti Van Lin wrote:

> Op 04-05-11 19:38, JEDIDIAH schreef:
>
>> On 2011-05-04, flatfish+++<flatfish@marianatrench.com>  wrote:
>>> On Wed, 04 May 2011 06:56:50 +0200, Hadron wrote:
>>>
>>>> flatfish+++<flatfish@marianatrench.com>  writes:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 04 May 2011 00:44:35 +0200, Marti Van Lin wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I upgraded my Ubuntu 10.10 systems to 11.04:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * No GRUB problems;
>>>>>> * no Pulse Audio problems;
>>>>>> * no Video driver problems;
>>>>>> * no Battery problems.
>> [deletia]
>>>>> Thanks again for allowing me to seed Google with evidence of the
>>>>> LINturds LIEing for LIEnux.
>>>>
>>>> It would be funny if it wasn't so sad.
>
> Make sure you wipe Flatso's p00p of your nose when your done "Hadron".
>
>>> How true.
>>>
>>> They lie through their teeth for an operating system?
>
> No we don't, you on the other hand do.
>
>>     Why would we need to lie. On the other hand, you have to engage in hearsay.
>>
>>     Enjoy your true DOS Lemming moment Hadron.
>>
>>     The last ALSA problem I had was a muted mixer. Nearly thought it was
>> something more sinister due to all of the FUD that gets slung in here.
>
> I upgraded from 10.10 to 11.04
>
> $ sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get dist-upgrade
>
> It took almost 3 freaking hours (I have both Gnome and KDE installed), 
> plus a lot of emulators (DosBox, DosEmu, ModEmu, BasiliskII, Hatari, 
> OpenMSX, PlayOnLinux/WinE, UAE, VICE), development environments 
> (Eclipse, Lazarus, Gambas2, Kdevelop etc) and loads of games.
>
> KDE SC 4.6.1 ran just fine, right out of the box, using the Free Nouveau 
> driver, with all the eye candy bells and whistles (like the cube and 
> transparency).
>
> Unity failed. Yet after responding to the "Proprietary hardware drivers" 
> pop-up (Jocky), I installed the Nvidia Binary blob, rebooted and Unity 
> works like a charm.
>
> No further issues like Flatso claims.

I liked this reply to Flatfarce in another group where he was trolling:

"Sorry you are so technically challenged that you couldn't get any distro 
to work to your liking.
I'll enjoy my Linux now.You can go in the kill file."
WLS

The trolls like Flatfish, DFS, & Hadron etc really like to show how
incompetent they are when it comes to Linux. 

-- 
Earth is 98% full...please delete anyone you can.
"Microsoft has vast resources, literally billions of dollars in cash, or liquid assets reserves. 
Microsoft is an incredibly successful empire built on the premise of market dominance with low-quality goods." 
-- Former White House adviser Richard A. Clarke --

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#21280 — Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti?

On Thu, 5 May 2011 15:28:04 +0100, William Poaster wrote:

> Marti Van Lin wrote:
> 
>> Op 04-05-11 19:38, JEDIDIAH schreef:
>>
>>> On 2011-05-04, flatfish+++<flatfish@marianatrench.com>  wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 04 May 2011 06:56:50 +0200, Hadron wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> flatfish+++<flatfish@marianatrench.com>  writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 04 May 2011 00:44:35 +0200, Marti Van Lin wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I upgraded my Ubuntu 10.10 systems to 11.04:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * No GRUB problems;
>>>>>>> * no Pulse Audio problems;
>>>>>>> * no Video driver problems;
>>>>>>> * no Battery problems.
>>> [deletia]
>>>>>> Thanks again for allowing me to seed Google with evidence of the
>>>>>> LINturds LIEing for LIEnux.
>>>>>
>>>>> It would be funny if it wasn't so sad.
>>
>> Make sure you wipe Flatso's p00p of your nose when your done "Hadron".
>>
>>>> How true.
>>>>
>>>> They lie through their teeth for an operating system?
>>
>> No we don't, you on the other hand do.
>>
>>>     Why would we need to lie. On the other hand, you have to engage in hearsay.
>>>
>>>     Enjoy your true DOS Lemming moment Hadron.
>>>
>>>     The last ALSA problem I had was a muted mixer. Nearly thought it was
>>> something more sinister due to all of the FUD that gets slung in here.
>>
>> I upgraded from 10.10 to 11.04
>>
>> $ sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get dist-upgrade
>>
>> It took almost 3 freaking hours (I have both Gnome and KDE installed), 
>> plus a lot of emulators (DosBox, DosEmu, ModEmu, BasiliskII, Hatari, 
>> OpenMSX, PlayOnLinux/WinE, UAE, VICE), development environments 
>> (Eclipse, Lazarus, Gambas2, Kdevelop etc) and loads of games.
>>
>> KDE SC 4.6.1 ran just fine, right out of the box, using the Free Nouveau 
>> driver, with all the eye candy bells and whistles (like the cube and 
>> transparency).
>>
>> Unity failed. Yet after responding to the "Proprietary hardware drivers" 
>> pop-up (Jocky), I installed the Nvidia Binary blob, rebooted and Unity 
>> works like a charm.
>>
>> No further issues like Flatso claims.
> 
> I liked this reply to Flatfarce in another group where he was trolling:
> 
> "Sorry you are so technically challenged that you couldn't get any distro 
> to work to your liking.
> I'll enjoy my Linux now.You can go in the kill file."
> WLS
> 
> The trolls like Flatfish, DFS, & Hadron etc really like to show how
> incompetent they are when it comes to Linux.

Hahahah!

Classic Linux elitist "blame the user".

With Linux, it's always someone else's fault never the fault of Linux.

We are certainly competent when it comes to Linux and looking at the
losers over in that other group, we were Linux before some of them made
it past grade school.

The truth is desktop Linux is crap ware and Ubuntu 11.04 takes it to an
entirely new level of crap ware.

You can pretend to ignore us all you want but you can't ignore the bug
reports that are streaming into the forums by irate users.

You can't ignore the hostile attitude on the irc channels because people
have hosed their systems with the latest Ubuntu 11.04 crap.

You just can't.

Burying your head in the sand doesn't change that fact nor does it
change the fact that after 20 years of being free, desktop Linux is
still hovering around the 1 percent mark.

That says it all about the "quality" of Linux as seen by the average
user.





-- 
flatfish+++
Please visit our hall of Linux idiots.
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

Watching Linux Fail:
http://limuxwatch.blogspot.com/
 
Desktop Linux: The Dream Is Dead
"By the time Microsoft released the Windows 7 beta 
in January 2009, Linux had clearly lost its chance at desktop glory."
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/207999/desktop_linux_the_dream_is_dead.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#21081 — Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti?

On 2011-05-04, flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 04 May 2011 00:44:35 +0200, Marti Van Lin wrote:
>
>> I upgraded my Ubuntu 10.10 systems to 11.04:
>> 
>> * No GRUB problems;
>> * no Pulse Audio problems;
>> * no Video driver problems;
>> * no Battery problems.
>> 
>> Did the mentally ill Wind-droid copy his "issues" from bug reports < 2 
>> years ago or just made them up?
>> 
>> Say it ain't so!
>> 
>> Kind regards,
>> 
>> ML2MST (temporary using a DUN connection over Bluetooth on Mobile Phone, 
>> using Ubuntu 11.04)
>
>
> Sigh......
>
> Total lack of proof on your part noted. IOW "works for me".

   We could say the same about anything else any of you Lemmings have
ever said about anything. 

   That's just the Lemming mentality. Someone, somewhere out there in the
world managed to have a problem with something on Linux therefore it is
not possible for anyone anywhere to have a trouble free experience with
Linux.

   Great Lemming logic there.

-- 
   Apple: because you really don't want to take any more video          ||| 
than your camera can hold. Really.                                     / | \
                     

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#21088 — Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti?

On Wed, 4 May 2011 12:36:34 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote:

> On 2011-05-04, flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 04 May 2011 00:44:35 +0200, Marti Van Lin wrote:
>>
>>> I upgraded my Ubuntu 10.10 systems to 11.04:
>>> 
>>> * No GRUB problems;
>>> * no Pulse Audio problems;
>>> * no Video driver problems;
>>> * no Battery problems.
>>> 
>>> Did the mentally ill Wind-droid copy his "issues" from bug reports < 2 
>>> years ago or just made them up?
>>> 
>>> Say it ain't so!
>>> 
>>> Kind regards,
>>> 
>>> ML2MST (temporary using a DUN connection over Bluetooth on Mobile Phone, 
>>> using Ubuntu 11.04)
>>
>>
>> Sigh......
>>
>> Total lack of proof on your part noted. IOW "works for me".
> 
>    We could say the same about anything else any of you Lemmings have
> ever said about anything. 

Except that I and the others have backed up my claims with links.
What has sMarti offered as proof?

Nothing.....

Nice try....

You just keep on LIEing for LIEnux Jeb.

It makes you look like an even bigger fool than you appear already.

BTW, can you get through one single day without using the word lemming
in a post?

Was that you nickname as a kid?

-- 
flatfish+++
Please visit our hall of Linux idiots.
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

Watching Linux Fail:
http://limuxwatch.blogspot.com/
 
Desktop Linux: The Dream Is Dead
"By the time Microsoft released the Windows 7 beta 
in January 2009, Linux had clearly lost its chance at desktop glory."
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/207999/desktop_linux_the_dream_is_dead.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#21151 — Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti?

On 2011-05-04, flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 4 May 2011 12:36:34 -0500, JEDIDIAH wrote:
>
>> On 2011-05-04, flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 04 May 2011 00:44:35 +0200, Marti Van Lin wrote:
>>>
>>>> I upgraded my Ubuntu 10.10 systems to 11.04:
>>>> 
>>>> * No GRUB problems;
>>>> * no Pulse Audio problems;
>>>> * no Video driver problems;
>>>> * no Battery problems.
>>>> 
>>>> Did the mentally ill Wind-droid copy his "issues" from bug reports < 2 
>>>> years ago or just made them up?
>>>> 
>>>> Say it ain't so!
>>>> 
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>> 
>>>> ML2MST (temporary using a DUN connection over Bluetooth on Mobile Phone, 
>>>> using Ubuntu 11.04)
>>>
>>>
>>> Sigh......
>>>
>>> Total lack of proof on your part noted. IOW "works for me".
>> 
>>    We could say the same about anything else any of you Lemmings have
>> ever said about anything. 
>
> Except that I and the others have backed up my claims with links.

...in other words: claims by strangers that can not be fully verified,
or examined, and are included without their knowledge or consent.

-- 
	Sure, I could use iTunes even under Linux. However, I have       |||
better things to do with my time than deal with how iTunes doesn't      / | \
want to play nicely with everyone else's data (namely mine). I'd 
rather create a DVD using those Linux apps we're told don't exist.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#21167 — Re: LIEing for LIEnux AGAIN Marti?

On 5/4/2011 6:22 PM, JEDIDIAH wrote:
> On 2011-05-04, flatfish+++<flatfish@marianatrench.com>  wrote:

>> Except that I and the others have backed up my claims with links.
>
> ...in other words: claims by strangers that can not be fully verified,
> or examined, and are included without their knowledge or consent.


Of course all that Ubuntu forum raging over the incompetent hobbyware is 
lies.  We all know Linux just works.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web