Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #478234 > unrolled thread

Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-11-20 10:27 -0500
    Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-20 15:36 +0000
      Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-11-20 21:05 -0500
        Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-21 03:42 +0000
          Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 20:05 -0800
          Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-11-21 06:03 -0800
          Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-11-21 09:30 -0500
            Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-21 14:47 +0000
              Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 07:27 -0800
                Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 07:49 -0800
                Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-11-21 11:52 -0500
                  Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-21 17:07 +0000
                    Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 09:22 -0800
                      Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-21 17:44 +0000
                        Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 09:58 -0800
                          Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 12:00 -0800
                        Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-11-22 11:04 -0500
                      Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 09:56 -0800
                Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 17:29 -0700
                  Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 11:41 +0100
                    Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 03:17 -0800
                    Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-22 12:49 -0500
                      Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 10:57 -0700
                      Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 11:08 -0800
                      Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 13:29 -0800
                    Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-11-22 17:47 -0500
                      Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 15:34 -0800
                        Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 05:23 -0800
            Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 07:18 -0800
          Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 03:43 +0000
            Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 21:02 -0700
            Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-11-22 17:44 -0500
          Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-11-22 10:41 -0500
            Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 08:00 -0800
            Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-22 16:13 +0000
              Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-11-22 17:53 -0500
                Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-23 00:20 +0000
                  Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 16:36 -0800
                  Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-11-25 18:26 -0500
                    Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-26 07:22 -0600
                      Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 05:53 -0800
                    Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-26 16:23 +0000
                      Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-26 10:55 -0600
                        Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-26 17:06 +0000
                          Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-26 12:06 -0600
                            Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 10:17 -0800
                            Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-26 18:24 +0000
                              Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 10:33 -0800
                              Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 10:49 -0800
                              Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 18:55 -0800
        Re: Year after year after year, Windows is the default OS at CERN Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 20:53 -0800

Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]

#479574

On Monday, November 26, 2018 at 6:22:57 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote:
> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> 
> >You're compression of events here is, of course, purely propagandistic.
> 
> You think?  They need only to fool some simpletons, to join their
> coalition of the greedy and the selfish and the religious kooks.



You installed and did extensive testing and your "diagnostic abilities" lead you to that assumption, did they? Generally, Zeus would not call something like Klaus 'The Flooder' Schadenfreude's claims an outright lie until you refute it (as you are here) and he responds with the distraction with one of his socks. 

The pathological liar AKA Klaus 'The Flooder' Schadenfreude does it every time. Then the torrent begins. Because the troll just has to run to other groups. You likely think Fluxbox handles the desktop well. Nope. Not compared to what normal people use. 

Where did you go to school? These posts are clearly NOT automated, they are made by Klaus 'The Flooder' Schadenfreude who is an overmedicated loser with a sick agenda who has way too much time on his hands (and possibly has other morons helping him). 

That's what Klaus 'The Flooder' Schadenfreude does when he gets caught. He quickly creates a puppet, starts a cross posted thread so he can claim here made a mistake. Hey it was my left hand... and then he talks to his own post with his right hand. Lots of trolls are talking about the GNU/Linux "desktop" as if that literally would be useful. 



--
One Smart Penny
http://www.5z8.info/-php-deactivate_phishing_filter-48-_e3m8dt_malicious-cookie
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.c/KDQrv8appR8
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#479599

Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
> owl wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> 
>> Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>>> owl wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>> 
>>>> Democrats killed science.
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconducting_Super_Collider
>>>> <quote>
>>>> The SSC's planned collision energy of 2 x 20 = 40 TeV was roughly three
>>>> times that of the 2 x 6.5 = 13 TeV (as of June 2015) of its European
>>>> counterpart, the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN in Geneva.[23]
>>>> </quote>
>>> 
>>> That doesn't refer to Democrats.  Physics Today mentions Congress.
>>
>> Democrat House.
>> Democrat Senate.
>> Democrat President.
> 
> Oh, I see.  However:
>    
>    Congress officially canceled the project October 21, 1993 after $2
>    billion had been spent.[13] Many factors contributed to the
>    cancellation:[3] rising cost estimates (to $12bn);

12 Billion dollars is a drop in the ocean wrt the US budget.

>[14] poor management by
>    physicists and Department of Energy officials; the end of the need to
>    prove the supremacy of American science with the collapse of the Soviet
>    Union; belief that many smaller scientific experiments of equal merit
>    could be funded for the same cost; Congress's desire to generally reduce
>    spending (the USA was running a $255bn budget deficit); the reluctance of
>    Texas Governor Ann Richards;[15] and President Bill Clinton's initial
>    lack of support for a project begun during the administrations of
>    Richards's predecessor, Bill Clements, and Clinton's predecessors, Ronald
>    Reagan and George H. W. Bush
> 
> You're compression of events here is, of course, purely propagandistic.
> 

Nice try, Spinmeister Ahlstrom.

Democrat House.
Democrat Senate.
Democrat President.

Democrats killed the SSC for strictly partisan reasons.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#479607

owl wrote:

> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>    
>>    Congress officially canceled the project October 21, 1993 after $2
>>    billion had been spent.[13] Many factors contributed to the
>>    cancellation:[3] rising cost estimates (to $12bn);
>
>12 Billion dollars is a drop in the ocean wrt the US budget.

(rolling eyes)

Mind boggling.

>>[14] poor management by
>>    physicists and Department of Energy officials; the end of the need to
>>    prove the supremacy of American science with the collapse of the Soviet
>>    Union; belief that many smaller scientific experiments of equal merit
>>    could be funded for the same cost; Congress's desire to generally reduce
>>    spending (the USA was running a $255bn budget deficit); the reluctance of
>>    Texas Governor Ann Richards;[15] and President Bill Clinton's initial
>>    lack of support for a project begun during the administrations of
>>    Richards's predecessor, Bill Clements, and Clinton's predecessors, Ronald
>>    Reagan and George H. W. Bush
>> 
>> You're compression of events here is, of course, purely propagandistic.
>
>Nice try, Spinmeister Ahlstrom.

Good reasons are "spin", to a right-wing propagandist.

Of course, it is *not* dishonest "spin" to summarize a complex
situation, involving billions of dollars, as "Democrats killed
science". 

(rolling eyes)

>Democrat House.
>Democrat Senate.
>Democrat President.
>
>Democrats killed the SSC for strictly partisan reasons.

The right-wing propagandist is hoping to fool a few simpletons with
the above "logic".  

It was probably the best decision.  But the propagandist sees an
opportunity to attack the left as "anti-science".

Like most right-wing propaganda, it is exactly 180 degrees from the
truth.

Of course, any lying propagandist worth his salt can easily find
individual cases that "prove" that their opponent is "anti science" or
"anti veteran" or "anti old people" or "anti gay" or "anti balanced
budget".  The truth, the details, are easily ignored, as they spew
their twisted "logic".

Don't be fooled by their simpletons' arguments, like owl's above.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#479611

chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> owl wrote:
> 
>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>>    
>>>    Congress officially canceled the project October 21, 1993 after $2
>>>    billion had been spent.[13] Many factors contributed to the
>>>    cancellation:[3] rising cost estimates (to $12bn);
>>
>>12 Billion dollars is a drop in the ocean wrt the US budget.
> 
> (rolling eyes)
> 
> Mind boggling.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_United_States_federal_budget
<quote>
The total outlays for FY1993 was 1.409 trillion dollars as authorized by congress.[1]
</quote>

https://www.thebalance.com/current-u-s-federal-government-spending-3305763
<quote>
Current U.S. government spending is $4.407 trillion. That's the federal budget for the fiscal year 2019 
</quote>

[Further idiocy from left-wing propagandist chrisv snipped, unread]

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#479617

owl wrote:

> (snipped, unread)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#479618

On Monday, November 26, 2018 at 11:06:10 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote:
> owl wrote:
> 
> > (snipped, unread)



Yup. Of course this is what we have to put up with. Jerks who clearly have no reason for being here other than to troll. 

How is wasting random neuron firings tied to a random neuron generator in any way going to lead to intelligent newsgroup discussion? But when the data were collected, it turns out beyond any doubt, Steven Petruzzellis was far more "obsessive" than anybody else. Reviewing Linux... forever a novice. 

Until Steven Petruzzellis offers up his 'top-of-the-line' GNU/Linux application for assessment, there is no threat, just wild claims. 

Do you even believe the nonsense Steven Petruzzellis is posting? 

These posts are clearly at most partially automated, they are made by Steven Petruzzellis who is an overmedicated pervert with a sick agenda who has way too much time on his hands (and possibly has other scum helping him). 

--
Top 15 Ways Steven Petruzzellis Trolls
http://www.5z8.info/how-to-build-a-bomb_o8n9lg_racist-raps
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#479620

chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> owl wrote:
> 
>> (snipped, unread)
> 

https://imgur.com/a/BxXe3vO

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#479622

On Monday, November 26, 2018 at 11:24:33 AM UTC-7, owl wrote:
> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> > owl wrote:
> > 
> >> (snipped, unread)
> > 
> 
> https://imgur.com/a/BxXe3vO



It was Jonas Eklundh Communication who got caught using hundreds of socks repeatedly, and these are 'people' who come basically out of the blue straight into threads where he was being proved wrong... nonstop for over a decade. You haven't been following him to figure out the depths of Jonas Eklundh Communication's descent. Being self-governed as it is, low-level programming will never go away but it'll never be well known. That lame duck update system failed over and over again. A shadow of justification, projected incorrectly, at the wrong time. 

Just rubbish from Jonas Eklundh Communication. But Jonas Eklundh Communication has left tech behind and is just holding me guilty for the actions of himself. I shall not ask Jonas Eklundh Communication how any part of Michael Glasser Snit's anatomy tastes no matter how many times Jonas Eklundh Communication kisses it. 

Michael Glasser Snit's computer has more scripts than Jonas Eklundh Communication's. Michael Glasser Snit wins. Jonas Eklundh Communication loses. So take that, Jonas Eklundh Communication. 

--
Eight things to never feed your dog!!
http://www.5z8.info/myspace-of-sex_q7q7zl_instant-purchase
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhOfBmWwCVY
https://youtu.be/qwb1Ez0GWMA
Jonas Eklundh Communication

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#479624

On Monday, November 26, 2018 at 11:24:33 AM UTC-7, owl wrote:
> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> > owl wrote:
> > 
> >> (snipped, unread)
> > 
> 
> https://imgur.com/a/BxXe3vO



Turns out Klaus Schadenfreude's persistent referencing of Snit met the agreed on criteria of trolling, so he insisted that comment of his was forged by Snit. I don't know if there is a encumbered open sores program to handle such tasks. For most I would merely suggest the comment is dubious. Of course, given that it's Klaus Schadenfreude I would forget that step and go straight to 'drug-induced delusion' because that's most of what he does. It is faster to assume it is a lie until proved otherwise. 

Klaus Schadenfreude suffers from waking lies so, to him, everything, even simple comments about tech, are "libel". Who *doesn't* know this? 



- 
Eight things to never feed your cat
http://www.5z8.info/gruesome-gunshot-wounds_t5z0au_cockdock.gif
Jonas Eklundh Communication

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#479666

On Monday, November 26, 2018 at 11:24:33 AM UTC-7, owl wrote:
> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> > owl wrote:
> > 
> >> (snipped, unread)
> > 
> 
> https://imgur.com/a/BxXe3vO



Carroll, 4/10/2015 4:04 PM:
    -----
    Cute trick... To the guy who hacked my Google account.
    -----
No details. Seems to treat it as a joke.

Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:02 PM, <https://goo.gl/51rsmZ>:
    -----
    Email Hacking Is A Serious Crime
    -----    
No longer "cute"... now it is a serious crime. OK.

Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:07 PM:
By now he is posting more links to how serious this crime against him is.

Carroll, 4/10/2015 7:25 PM:
    -----
    I didn't write that.
    -----
Now he is denying the posts from his own account. OK, he was "hacked". Someone else posted this. Hard to hack a gmail account given how they use two-step authentication and someone would need access to his phone or the like... but at least POSSIBLE. 

Even then, though, if someone tries to guess your password Google alerts you and lets you know what IP address and other info. I know because someone in a Denver internet cafe has tried mine on several occasions.

Google even forces you to change your password when this happens. Very hard to hack these days. 

So already Carroll's story is unlikely. 

But let us accept it... someone somehow hacked his account bypassing the two step verification. This person did not, however, change his password and Carroll posted within an hour of the "hacker". Before that, unless he is an idiot, he changed his password and the "hacker" was locked out. The "hacker" got one post in. 

But Carroll could not leave his story there.

Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:36 PM, <https://goo.gl/NJ2bMH>:
    -----
    Someone hacked my fretwizzer gmail acct so, for the time being,
    don't trust anything from it.
    -----
Wait. What? Even after Carroll figured out this "hacker" who was too stupid to change his password had broken into his account and Carroll *surely* must have changed his own password, he is saying the "hacker" might still have access. Might be able to break Google's two-step verification process *again*. 

This is *very* unlikely... to the point of being unbelievable. 

Even worse for him: he notes which of his accounts he is claiming was hacked - but in the past he has denied even using the other accounts! LOL! He screwed up and made it very clear he has multiple accounts and felt the need to note which one. He made the same mistake in the next quote where he speaks of WHICH of his gmail accounts he is claiming was hacked. Oops! If he only posts with one there would be no need to specify which one!

He has completely screwed up in his game to pretend he posts with only one gmail account. Completely idiotic of him, too!

Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:38 PM, <https://goo.gl/YA7gMO>:
    -----
    Some mentally deficient child hacked my 'fretwizzer' gmail account
    so I may have to kill it. For the time being, don't assume
    anything that's coming from it was written by me.
    -----
He is still saying that he may have to kill the account instead of just changing the password which anyone with half a brain would have already done (and Google *forces* you to do when someone even tries to hack your account... I know because someone in the Denver area has tried to hack mine multiple times... likely Carroll but I have no proof of this). And he specifies WHICH of his accounts! He is directly admitting he uses more than one account! His claim of being "forged" with his second account is a lie. Proved.

Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:40 PM, <https://goo.gl/j6yCuV>:
    -----
    Looks like it's still being hacked despite me taking precautions,
    I may have to kill the account.
    -----
What makes it look like its still being hacked? And what precautions other than changing the two-step verification options does he need? And how would someone bypass this... is he really on the NSA watch list? Seems you would need someone at that level to be doing this. He watches too much TV where they computer hackers spend thirty seconds and bypass all security.

Just nonsense.

Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:05 PM:
    -----
    Apparently Google is having issues with their accounts to the
    point where they're ready to undertake some additional measures.
    -----
But, of course, no evidence of this... and what measures? They already alert users if someone else tries to guess your password and use two-step authentication and even force you to make a new password if it seems someone is trying to hack you.
    -----
    They're now involving several federal agencies in things they
    didn't bother with previously in an effort to deal with people who
    hack into accounts. They've asked me to leave the account open.
    -----
So now Google is letting Carroll know how they are handling these things - and asking him to leave a *hacked* account open... one someone can be using to steal his identity. No. This does not pass the sniff test in any way. Even if they were doing this for some bizarre sting operation, which is in itself far fetched, they would have told Carroll to not make it public information so the hacker would not know.

Just insanity. His own story is so idiotic and full of idiotic claims it simply cannot be true. Carroll uses his secondary Google account - the one he accesses via Tor and is referred to as his Tor account - to have plausible deniability for things he says there. Now he is working to do the same thing with his main account. Maybe Carroll read a report like this: <http://cnnmon.ie/111QeT8> [money.com]. If so he missed the part where they note if you are *really* hacked, which is rare, the hackers change your password and lock you out. Why would they not?
    -----
    There's some new legislation that will help them deal with this
    issue... which probably means more BS for us ;)
    -----
Yes, new legislation to make sure Carroll does not have to deal with "hackers" and "forgers" which do not even exist. 

The funny part is, this happened shortly after someone in the Denver area, likely Carroll, tried to guess *my* passwords and they did it from an Internet café (Google tells you the IP and that can be used to trace back). 

My guess: Carroll is the one who was working to guess my password and figured this new lie of his was a good way to deny his own words even more than he does with his Tor account *and* a way to make it so if I had talked about him trying to hack my account he could say I was just copying his comments. "Proving" I read his posts... which for now I am to see how absurd his lies are. :)

Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:25 PM:
    -----
    The person who hacked into my Gmail acct. changed the wording on
    this post. I've removed the others but Google asked me to leave
    one standing for some odd reason. 
    -----
Here Carroll claims the hacker changed the wording on a post of his from *before* he had even claimed he was hacked. So this hacker not only can *post* for him but edit his old Usenet posts.

I call utter bullshit on this. Out and out lie from Carroll. And then Carroll says Google asked him to not delete these "hacked" posts... this is nonsense. Why would Google want him to leave forged posts in the public and why would Google not just keep their own copy? Even Carroll notes it is for "some odd reason" - yeah, because Carroll is telling stories that make *no* sense at all.

Carroll is lying. Maybe there is some kernel of truth to his stories? Even if so - and frankly it is unlikely he will ever show any evidence to back his claims - the details he is posting are absurd.

Carroll, 4/11/2015 2:10 PM:
    -----
    And he's so high he thinks people still have to manually enter all
    their passwords in whenever they want to use anything that's been
    password protected ;)
    -----
Nobody had suggested, hinted, implied, or said anything like what Carroll says they did.

Maybe his story will be someone stole his laptop (or mobile device) and he had his passwords saved? If so why not have the device deactivated remotely? Why has he not said anything about this? 

My guess: he realizes he screwed up when trying to guess my passwords and is now building a story so he can say his computer was stolen and it was not him. Or, LOL, maybe someone broke into his house and did it. 

This unknown hacker knew he was obsessed with me and carried on acting like him. Makes complete sense, eh?

Carroll, 4/12/2015 8:45 AM, <https://goo.gl/KMf4pa>:
    -----
    The first one, that has since been deleted. My bad for having such
    a feeble password on this account.
    -----
Now he suggests it was merely from someone guessing his password - which contradicts his above insinuations that it could have been from a saved password on a device he had.

His story changes with the telling.

But as noted, when someone tries to guess your password Google has ways to deal with it. I know - Carroll or someone in his neck of the woods recently tried it with me.

Carroll, 4/12/2015 9:29 AM:
    -----
    The account in question here is a gmail account. Contrary to
    Snit's delusions, I have no idea what a TOR account looks like but
    it's a good bet it doesn't bear much of a resemblance to a gmail
    account. 
    -----
Here Carroll plays stupid and pretends that if when he or anyone uses the Tor browser *Carroll* pointed to this somehow changes the way the gmail interface looks. Um, no. Worse it might do is make Google think you are in another country and you would have to set it back to English. But the basic look stays the same.

He is playing stupid and pretending to not know how the Tor browser he pointed to works. Just idiotic of him.
    -----
    That idiocy aside, I love how Snit has repeatedly, for years, 
    feigned ignorance about gmail accounts, yet, he keeps disclosing
    info that proves he knows about them. Some fools do stuff like
    this when they believe people are as stupid as the fool needs them
    to be ;)
    -----
I do not think Google would allow you to edit your Usenet / groups posts but I do not use it much and do not know for sure. Seems absurd that they would... and others have now said they do not. But given how I do not use Google Groups for posting why would I know the details of their system for certain? 

Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:47 PM:
    -----
    Your obsession with me is insane. Working with Google I now have
    proof you and ebot worked together to hack me. Clever. If I press
    charges against you I have to also include her so you remain safe
    for now.

    Do not think this is over.
    -----
    
No evidence of working with Google on this (and all out and out lies). Carroll is making public threats based on lies. 

Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:50 PM:
    -----
    I promised COLA your trolling days were over so you contacted ebot
    and worked with her to hack my account. I might not be able to get
    your ass handed to you in court over this but wait until your boss
    at Yavapai College contacts you.

    Maybe you should make that call first. Ask about your comments on
    incest.

    See if those can not be quoted.
    -----
    
Direct lies and threats by Carroll.

Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:51 PM:
    -----
    You went too far this time Snit. We have trolled each other for
    years but to contact ebot and get her to help you hack my account
    was over a line.
    -----
    
A complete and utter lie from Carroll. 

Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:52 PM:
    -----
    The above post is Snit hacking my account.
    -----
A complete and utter lie... more false accusations from him.

Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:53 PM:
    -----
    You edited those posts when you hacked my account. Do not trust
    anything from my fretwizzer account now that Snit and ebot have
    access to it.
    -----
More unsupported claims and attacks by Carroll.

Carroll, 4/16/2015 8:56 PM:
    -----
    Working with Google I now have proof Snit and ebot hacked the
    account. Many of the older posts were edited. You can see evidence
    of this by Snit pointing to "old" posts which have been modified to
    say I claimed I was his "personal newsgroup rapist", a phrase I
    have never used.
    -----
    
No evidence of Carroll working with Google. No evidence of any older posts being edited.

--
Live on Kickstarter!
http://www.5z8.info/racist-raps_r6r3wf_best-russian-sites-for-bootleg-everything
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#478368

On Tuesday, November 20, 2018 at 7:06:53 PM UTC-7, DFS wrote:
> On 11/20/2018 10:36 AM, owl wrote:
> > DFS <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
> >> "October 2016: Windows 10 becomes the default operating system at CERN."
> >>
> > 
> > Good enough for CERN, but not good enough for DFS.
> 
> 
> I don't have any protons to smash.
> 
> 
> 
> >> https://espace.cern.ch/winservices-help/NICEEnvironment/NICEWindows10/Pages/Status-of-Windows-10-at-CERN.aspx
> >>
> >>
> >> "As of end of March 2010, Windows 7 is officially supported at CERN and
> >> is the default operating system to install on the computers that meet
> >> the minimum hardware requirements"
> >>
> > 
> > I didn't realize CERN had so many secretaries.
> 
> 
> I bet the last button clicked to start a collider experiment is on a 
> Windows screen.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >> I can only imagine the bribes MS paid...
> >>
> >>
> >   
> > "If you are interested in Windows 10, please join the CERN Windows 10
> > Community."
> > 
> > If you click on that, you get this:
> > <quote>
> > Running Windows Edge as your browser?
> > If you are running Windows Edge as your favorite
> > browser and have a laptop/PC not managed by CERN
> > IT's "CMF", patch now! There is a nasty vulnerability
> > (https://securelist.com/a-new-exploit-for-zero-day-vulnerability-cve-2018-8589/88845/)
> > out which can compromize your computer if you happened to browse
> > to the wrong web-page... Just go to "Windows Update" and let it
> > do its job. Centrally CERN/Windows PCs will be patched through CMF
> > today. Managers of locally managed Windows PC should consider applying
> > those patches, too.​
> > </quote>
> > 
> > LOL!
> 
> 
> Don't run Edge, and don't go to the wrong web page.  Non-problem solved...



Several of us reported him years ago. As expected, it did nothing to stop the kook. 

It's a never ending story, and Jonas Eklundh Communication is simultaneously a master at off-the-cuff trolling remarks, while posting with nyms that speak just like him. Ha! Come on, Klaus Schadenfreude... even you have kill filtered that idiot. Given what Jonas Eklundh Communication is (and does) nary a soul could condemn me for wanting to be rid of his ridiculous form of crap. I've worked in or with the IT producers industry for more than 45 years. I have served top businesses working with governments and the communications industry. Never were we on any account directed to not offer any other OS. We sold AIX, Ultix, Symbian, and more alongside Windows with no issues. 



--
Best CMS Solution of 2017
https://www.facebook.com/JonasEklundh
http://www.5z8.info/killallimmigrants_t8w8io_asian-brides
Jonas Eklundh Communication

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web