Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #448915 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-04-23 14:13 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-04-24 15:02 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 380 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-23 14:13 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-23 14:23 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-04-23 22:51 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-23 16:07 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-04-23 23:16 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-23 16:59 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-23 17:33 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-24 14:12 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-24 14:41 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-24 14:55 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-24 10:03 -0500
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-24 15:11 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 08:56 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-24 15:08 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-24 15:15 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-24 15:19 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-24 15:25 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 09:32 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-24 16:42 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 10:14 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-24 17:25 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-24 11:02 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-24 13:19 -0500
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-24 11:21 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 11:51 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-24 13:18 -0700
"Steve Carroll", ASSuming ASShole chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-26 07:23 -0500
Re: "Steve Carroll", ASSuming ASShole Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 06:29 -0700
Re: "Steve Carroll", ASSuming ASShole Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 07:32 -0700
Re: "Steve Carroll", ASSuming ASShole Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 09:15 -0700
Re: "Steve Carroll", ASSuming ASShole Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-26 16:40 +0000
Re: "Steve Carroll", ASSuming ASShole Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-26 16:42 +0000
Re: "Steve Carroll", ASSuming ASShole chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-26 13:21 -0500
Re: "Steve Carroll", ASSuming ASShole Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 11:59 -0700
Re: "Steve Carroll", ASSuming ASShole Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 12:11 -0700
Re: "Steve Carroll", ASSuming ASShole chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-26 14:26 -0500
Re: "Steve Carroll", ASSuming ASShole Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 12:37 -0700
Re: "Steve Carroll", ASSuming ASShole chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-26 14:51 -0500
Re: "Steve Carroll", ASSuming ASShole chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-27 07:45 -0500
Re: "Steve Carroll", ASSuming ASShole Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-27 07:34 -0700
Re: "Steve Carroll", ASSuming ASShole Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-27 09:51 -0700
Re: "Steve Carroll", ASSuming ASShole chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-27 12:38 -0500
Re: "Steve Carroll", ASSuming ASShole Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-26 12:55 -0700
Re: "Steve Carroll", ASSuming ASShole Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 16:07 -0700
Re: "Steve Carroll", ASSuming ASShole chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-26 14:33 -0500
Re: "Steve Carroll", ASSuming ASShole Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 12:50 -0700
Re: "Steve Carroll", ASSuming ASShole chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-26 14:51 -0500
Re: "Steve Carroll", ASSuming ASShole Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-26 14:48 -0700
Re: "Steve Carroll", ASSuming ASShole Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-26 12:54 -0700
Re: "Steve Carroll", ASSuming ASShole Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-26 12:13 -0700
Re: "Steve Carroll", ASSuming ASShole Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 12:29 -0700
Re: "Steve Carroll", ASSuming ASShole chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-26 14:47 -0500
Re: "Steve Carroll", ASSuming ASShole Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-26 12:56 -0700
Re: "Steve Carroll", ASSuming ASShole Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 17:58 -0700
Re: "Steve Carroll", ASSuming ASShole Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-26 20:54 -0700
Re: "Steve Carroll", ASSuming ASShole chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-27 07:34 -0500
Re: "Steve Carroll", ASSuming ASShole Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-27 07:28 -0700
Re: "Steve Carroll", ASSuming ASShole Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-26 12:52 -0700
"Steve Carroll", ASSuming ASShole chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-26 14:12 -0500
Re: "Steve Carroll", ASSuming ASShole Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-26 12:33 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 11:44 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-24 19:58 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 13:06 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-24 13:24 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-25 20:54 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-25 16:18 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-26 02:45 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-25 19:52 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-26 03:07 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-25 20:17 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-26 03:46 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-25 20:57 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-26 04:41 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-26 05:41 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 02:49 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-26 14:52 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-26 08:25 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 09:17 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-26 16:40 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 09:53 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-26 10:43 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 11:09 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 11:22 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 11:40 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-26 12:44 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-26 21:14 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-26 15:12 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-26 23:48 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-26 16:51 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-26 23:58 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 17:08 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-27 00:58 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 18:00 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-27 01:42 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 19:06 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-27 02:17 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 19:23 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-27 02:51 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-26 20:58 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-26 17:21 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-27 01:04 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-26 18:27 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-27 01:49 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-26 20:56 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-27 16:29 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-27 09:34 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-27 16:42 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-27 09:57 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-27 17:27 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-27 10:56 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-27 10:02 -0700
Password protected FTP folders would work. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-27 10:09 -0700
Re: Password protected FTP folders would work. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-27 10:18 -0700
Students can "collaborate" ( cheat ) using email. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-27 10:25 -0700
Re: Password protected FTP folders would work. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-27 12:33 -0700
Re: Password protected FTP folders would work. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-27 14:12 -0700
Re: Password protected FTP folders would work. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-27 17:32 -0700
Re: Password protected FTP folders would work. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-27 18:32 -0700
Re: Password protected FTP folders would work. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-27 18:47 -0700
Re: Password protected FTP folders would work. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-28 09:53 -0700
Re: Password protected FTP folders would work. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 10:02 -0700
Re: Password protected FTP folders would work. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-28 10:50 -0700
Re: Password protected FTP folders would work. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-28 11:00 -0700
Re: Password protected FTP folders would work. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-28 12:13 -0700
Re: Password protected FTP folders would work. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 01:33 -0700
Re: Password protected FTP folders would work. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-27 17:26 +0000
Re: Password protected FTP folders would work. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-27 12:31 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 13:25 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-24 13:42 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-24 13:16 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 13:37 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-24 11:00 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-24 10:50 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-24 10:44 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 11:30 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-24 13:09 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 20:20 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 20:37 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-25 01:04 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-24 20:58 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 23:30 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-25 08:26 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-25 08:53 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-25 09:39 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-25 09:44 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-25 14:04 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-25 16:22 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-25 17:05 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-25 18:09 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 09:25 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-26 16:40 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 10:03 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-26 10:46 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 11:23 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-26 12:47 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 13:20 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-26 13:36 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 14:35 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-26 15:18 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 16:39 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-26 16:45 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-26 10:54 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-25 22:55 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2018-04-29 15:14 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 08:21 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-29 15:46 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 10:08 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 10:25 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2018-05-01 22:56 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-01 23:39 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 18:06 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-01 19:39 -0400
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 18:03 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 08:58 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 10:23 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 11:14 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 11:28 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 12:03 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 14:20 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 14:20 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 14:36 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 16:01 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 16:25 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 17:01 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 17:31 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 18:46 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 19:22 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 20:13 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 20:50 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-30 09:54 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-30 10:24 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-30 10:51 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-30 10:59 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-30 11:36 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-30 12:05 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-30 12:44 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-30 12:50 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-30 12:58 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-30 13:59 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-30 14:08 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-30 14:21 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-30 14:28 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-30 16:14 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-30 16:29 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-30 17:39 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-30 18:30 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-30 18:58 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-30 19:25 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-30 19:37 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-30 20:34 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 08:12 -0600
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 07:23 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 08:46 -0600
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 14:54 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 08:13 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-30 18:36 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-01 06:50 -0500
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 08:06 -0600
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-01 11:21 -0400
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 08:34 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 09:02 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2018-05-01 23:15 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 18:05 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 22:32 -0700
60 images on a single page, and 100 ways to (quickly) refine it. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-29 20:21 -0700
Re: 60 images on a single page, and 100 ways to (quickly) refine it. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 20:25 -0700
Re: 60 images on a single page, and 100 ways to (quickly) refine it. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 20:50 -0700
I'm 58 years old, with the body of an 80 year old. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-29 21:34 -0700
Re: I'm 58 years old, with the body of an 80 year old. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 22:05 -0700
Re: I'm 58 years old, with the body of an 80 year old. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-30 08:12 -0400
Re: I'm 58 years old, with the body of an 80 year old. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-30 08:55 -0500
Re: I'm 58 years old, with the body of an 80 year old. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-30 08:02 -0700
Re: I'm 58 years old, with the body of an 80 year old. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-30 07:07 -0700
Re: I'm 58 years old, with the body of an 80 year old. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-30 09:36 -0500
Re: I'm 58 years old, with the body of an 80 year old. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-04-30 11:22 -0400
Re: I'm 58 years old, with the body of an 80 year old. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-04-30 18:24 -0400
Re: I'm 58 years old, with the body of an 80 year old. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-01 10:20 -0500
Re: I'm 58 years old, with the body of an 80 year old. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-01 07:15 -0500
Re: I'm 58 years old, with the body of an 80 year old. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-01 10:22 -0500
Re: I'm 58 years old, with the body of an 80 year old. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-01 19:29 -0400
Re: I'm 58 years old, with the body of an 80 year old. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 20:58 -0700
Re: I'm 58 years old, with the body of an 80 year old. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-01 00:41 +0000
I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-30 18:05 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-30 18:24 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-01 01:25 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-01 07:20 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-01 12:35 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-01 10:31 -0500
I work two jobs. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-01 08:15 -0700
Re: I work two jobs. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-01 11:39 -0400
Not pursuing women saves me time, money and effort. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-01 09:11 -0700
Re: Not pursuing women saves me time, money and effort. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-01 13:59 -0400
Re: Not pursuing women saves me time, money and effort. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-01 15:29 -0400
Not everyone needs to be a supermodel. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-01 15:43 -0700
Re: I work two jobs. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-01 15:24 -0400
Re: I work two jobs. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 12:31 -0700
I've been living this way for 30 years. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-01 15:31 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-01 16:15 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-01 12:27 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-01 12:34 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-01 17:43 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-01 17:37 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-01 12:42 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-01 20:46 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 13:56 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-01 17:17 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-01 18:33 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 18:02 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 17:59 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-01 22:50 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 20:57 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-01 23:45 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-01 12:48 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-01 15:40 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 13:57 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 15:06 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 17:49 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 17:57 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 18:13 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 18:57 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 19:14 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 19:47 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 20:20 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 20:44 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 20:52 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 21:30 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 22:49 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-02 02:25 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 19:26 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-02 02:56 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 20:24 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-02 04:06 +0000
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 22:31 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 22:52 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-01 17:13 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-01 18:30 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 18:01 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 17:58 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 13:36 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-01 13:47 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-01 17:16 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 14:50 -0700
You called ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-01 16:10 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-01 19:34 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-01 13:32 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 10:48 -0700
I do _not_ eat fast food; I cook. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-01 16:20 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-30 18:37 -0700
I can't motivate myself (much) unless others are there. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-30 19:00 -0700
Re: I can't motivate myself (much) unless others are there. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-30 19:27 -0700
Re: I can't motivate myself (much) unless others are there. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-01 02:30 +0000
I'm not the only couch potato. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-30 19:46 -0700
Re: I'm not the only couch potato. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-01 02:55 +0000
A short happy life is better than a long sad one. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-30 20:42 -0700
Re: A short happy life is better than a long sad one. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-01 04:24 +0000
Re: A short happy life is better than a long sad one. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-30 21:42 -0700
Re: A short happy life is better than a long sad one. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-01 11:13 -0400
Rubber Vaginas. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-01 16:02 -0700
Re: I'm not the only couch potato. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-30 20:25 -0700
Re: I'm not the only couch potato. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-01 11:05 -0400
Re: I'm not the only couch potato. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-01 10:34 -0500
Re: I can't motivate myself (much) unless others are there. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-01 07:24 -0500
Re: I can't motivate myself (much) unless others are there. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-30 19:38 -0700
Re: I can't motivate myself (much) unless others are there. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-01 10:59 -0400
Re: I can't motivate myself (much) unless others are there. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 09:08 -0600
No caffine, No alcohol, No women; just a constant "happy". Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-01 15:56 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-01 08:13 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-01 10:34 -0500
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-05-01 11:28 -0700
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-01 15:22 -0400
Re: I simply enjoy it too much, as Americans do. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-01 18:04 -0400
Re: I'm 58 years old, with the body of an 80 year old. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-01 08:12 -0400
Re: I'm 58 years old, with the body of an 80 year old. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-05-01 16:37 +0000
I've a -lasting- SearchBar. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-29 20:02 -0700
Re: I've a -lasting- SearchBar. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-29 20:15 -0700
Re: I've a -lasting- SearchBar. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-29 20:18 -0700
SearchBar is standard to FireFox but... Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-29 20:37 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 08:10 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2018-04-24 10:49 +0100
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-04-24 05:36 -0400
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-24 08:51 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-23 16:51 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-23 17:05 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-23 19:04 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-23 19:39 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-23 19:45 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-23 20:48 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-24 08:50 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 09:06 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-24 16:14 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 09:26 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-24 10:38 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-24 10:34 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 11:38 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-24 13:11 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 13:32 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-24 13:45 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 12:03 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-24 09:39 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-23 21:45 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 04:46 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-24 13:55 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 07:07 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-24 14:41 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-24 14:51 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-24 15:08 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-24 15:21 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 08:37 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 08:43 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-24 15:54 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 08:56 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-24 09:04 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-24 09:04 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-24 16:19 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-24 10:35 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-27 07:24 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-27 16:36 +0000
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-04-27 09:44 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-04-24 07:56 -0700
Re: OT: Talkin' tech owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-04-24 15:02 +0000
Page 19 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 17 18 [19]
| From | Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-24 04:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <92cc2d6b-d2e5-4212-9a5b-445c4f265e4d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #448947 |
On Monday, April 23, 2018 at 9:45:11 PM UTC-7, Steven Petruzzellis wrote: > On Monday, April 23, 2018 at 7:45:36 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > > On 4/23/18, 7:04 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > On Monday, April 23, 2018 at 6:05:53 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > >> On 4/23/18, 4:51 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > >>> On Monday, April 23, 2018 at 5:07:16 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > >>>> On 4/23/18, 3:51 PM, Melzzzzz wrote: > > >>>>> On 2018-04-23, Snit<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > > >>>>>> On 4/23/18, 2:13 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > >>>>>>> ... IT Master' himself... Snit... Snit...Snit... Snit... Snit... Snit... Snit... Snit... Snit... Snit... Snit... > > >>>>>> Snit... Snit... Snit... Snit... Snit... > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Seriously, Steve, there is more to life than me. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Why not talk about tech? I, for example, would love to see tasks done > > >>>>>> with desktop Linux in ways which are better than the competition. From > > >>>>>> that I would learn more about desktop Linux and perhaps workflows in > > >>>>>> general. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Do you have any such examples? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Do you mean some software in general or particular desktop environment? > > >>> > > >>> He means where he's the sole arbiter of what's "better than the competition". > > >> > > >> Again, you are NOT my spokesperson. > > > > > > LOL! Get real, Snit. Who *isn't* aware of what I pointed out? > > > > Again (as you have been told many times): Your view of me is not > > relevant here. Talk about *TECHNOLOGY*, not me. > > > > There is more to the world than me. Really. Stretch out. Stop blaming > > all of your weaknesses and every bad thing in your life on me. Take > > personal responsibility. Grow up. > > > > >>> Does it still work? That site has changed a lot over the years so it probably > > >>> needs tweaking. > > >> > > >> Had three versions I had saved... none worked as is. > > > > > > Looking at the wayback machine I'm not seeing any major changes. > > > > > > You've obviously generated links for the print pages, how did you do it? I seem > > > to recall you posted the script (or maybe it was another one) but I can't find it. > > > > Wait: you cannot find those quotes (ones you want)... but you attacked > > me for not finding specific quotes OWL wanted and I did not have any > > interest in. > > > > Do you see the hypocrisy there? Of course you will not... or claim not to. > > > > Anyway, to get back to tech and not your obvious and admitted biases, > > here is a video where I show one of the early scripts: > > > > <https://youtu.be/TH3rKDAAvsc> > > > > And a later version: > > > > <https://youtu.be/331vMJGm8CY> > > > > >> Did not even look at the scripts, just ran them. > > >> > > >> When Owl and I first started making our scripts I assumed a more generic > > >> case... but he noted one could accept their code as it is and write for > > >> it specifically (which is fine as long as you understand the limitations > > >> of that). I have not looked at the code at allrecipes for some time, but > > >> I am confident both Owl and I could update our scripts on their new code > > >> if needed or, more importantly, get it to work on many other sites. > > > > > > You could adapt to whatever markup you chose to use that may have since > > > changed but one thing I'd point out... future proofing this stuff is often a bit > > > more stable if you look at the most solid points (IOW, likely to stay solid). > > > > Sure... I started with the assumption of just looking at the page and > > finding all URLs with "recipe" in them. Assuming they kept that it would > > have worked. Owl said it was OK to point to the specific pages, and you > > can see I moved to that in the later version. > > > > > > > > -- > > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> > > > > You insisting a lie is real does not make it true. Advertising is a wonderful thing and consumer cluelessness is even better. > > There is no question that all of them are not automated because some of them are direct responses in very specific ways with attempts to mislead on specific issues, not just gibberish. > > Now Jessica Lane on the other end of the phone doesn't matter. All that matters is Autumn Nissen gets to deliver the punchline. So how to beat Autumn Nissen at his own game? Don't answer the post. Honest discussion isn't part of contrivance and never can be. Don't look now, but I think Autumn Nissen has a serious obsession with Jessica Lane. What is Autumn Nissen's tool for the flooding nonsense? Access? That is the only tool he knows, or admits to. He must be abusing it to create these goofy "attack" garbage posts. Educated hypothesis, Autumn Nissen took Jessica Lane's code that he hacked and try to sell online... he is feeding it content from this group, grabbing hand-picked paragraphs, then re-writing those using a Markv model and then he actively posts them because his lack of work enables him to do that constantly. > > > > -- > E-commerce Simplified! > http://www.macadvocacy.pw/2005/Nov/09/236626.html > http://www.5z8.info/mydick_x6g9hr_nakedgrandmas.jpg > Jonas Eklundh Communication Can you stop asking for my attention? I think the point is far from just to get people to listen to him. The point is likely to piss Jonas Eklundh off for spraying outside groups he knows I frequent. Time to blame the cult-like herd of convenient friends! I have a little script I use as well, but it's something you would not understand. It's easy to cherrypick by focusing on a handful of outliers unrepresentative from what's mainstream. What holds more weight from an advocacy outlook are the ordinary events. Thanks to Carlos E.R. and his 'buddies' you now need an IP filtering system (which I made for Forté Agent and Pan). If others start attacking him again I will not be able to stop myself... as that is just my way. I am referring to real posters here, not trolls, who are his shills. - Best CMS Solution of 2017 https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-24 13:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fz09b03ag.ho@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #448923 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > > Mine not only worked, but the PDF had selectable text and allowed me to > do quick searches on ingredients and the like... something Owl was never > able to do on Linux (to be fair that was not a part of his original > requirements, it seems like a very reasonable thing a user might want). > https://pewtube.com/user/owl/TXO9GJh?autoplay=off
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-24 07:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <486c7711-7b30-4e70-b977-3e15429bd93a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #448976 |
On Tuesday, April 24, 2018 at 6:55:18 AM UTC-7, owl wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > > > > Mine not only worked, but the PDF had selectable text and allowed me to > > do quick searches on ingredients and the like... something Owl was never > > able to do on Linux (to be fair that was not a part of his original > > requirements, it seems like a very reasonable thing a user might want). > > > > https://pewtube.com/user/owl/TXO9GJh?autoplay=off This is what results when really poor self esteem takes over Savageduck's life. Savageduck's posts are nothing but a senseless mess. I'm not going to pretend Jessica Lane did not assist me on this stuff and I appreciate his time. Savageduck has my posts as an example and might learn to at least pretend he is no longer complete ignorant from here on out... of course he stumbled when it mattered. Advertising is a wonderful thing and consumer herd mentality is even better. I am an absolute devotee of Cooledit, because that's where all the stimulating breakthroughs are happening. I bet Savageduck thinks your life was worse than Jessica Lane's. I am working on a script which will be more than anything Savageduck can do! -- What Every Entrepreneur Must Know! https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.c/KDQrv8appR8 http://www.5z8.info/nic_cage_naked_y8b5qk_torrentEverything Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-24 14:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fk8u0rF72udU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #448976 |
owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >> Mine not only worked, but the PDF had selectable text and allowed me to >> do quick searches on ingredients and the like... something Owl was never >> able to do on Linux (to be fair that was not a part of his original >> requirements, it seems like a very reasonable thing a user might want). >> > > https://pewtube.com/user/owl/TXO9GJh?autoplay=off > > Cool. Another one of your solutions where you need yet another widget on your screen even when not needed, but I can see times when it might be worth it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-24 14:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sz9b08z88b3.af@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #448981 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> >>> Mine not only worked, but the PDF had selectable text and allowed me to >>> do quick searches on ingredients and the like... something Owl was never >>> able to do on Linux (to be fair that was not a part of his original >>> requirements, it seems like a very reasonable thing a user might want). >>> >> >> https://pewtube.com/user/owl/TXO9GJh?autoplay=off >> >> > > Cool. Another one of your solutions where you need yet another widget on > your screen even when not needed, but I can see times when it might be > worth it. > No widget needed, but it just streamlines the workflow :) What steps are involved in your text search?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-24 15:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fk8vjtF7elmU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #448984 |
owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Mine not only worked, but the PDF had selectable text and allowed me to >>>> do quick searches on ingredients and the like... something Owl was never >>>> able to do on Linux (to be fair that was not a part of his original >>>> requirements, it seems like a very reasonable thing a user might want). >>>> >>> >>> https://pewtube.com/user/owl/TXO9GJh?autoplay=off >>> >>> >> >> Cool. Another one of your solutions where you need yet another widget on >> your screen even when not needed, but I can see times when it might be >> worth it. >> > > No widget needed, but it just streamlines the workflow :) What steps > are involved in your text search? > > As shown in the video, right click the word and select Google search (or another if you wish). Do not show up when right clicking elsewhere.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-24 15:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <huzy93.u44uae@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #448990 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Mine not only worked, but the PDF had selectable text and allowed me to >>>>> do quick searches on ingredients and the like... something Owl was never >>>>> able to do on Linux (to be fair that was not a part of his original >>>>> requirements, it seems like a very reasonable thing a user might want). >>>>> >>>> >>>> https://pewtube.com/user/owl/TXO9GJh?autoplay=off >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Cool. Another one of your solutions where you need yet another widget on >>> your screen even when not needed, but I can see times when it might be >>> worth it. >>> >> >> No widget needed, but it just streamlines the workflow :) What steps >> are involved in your text search? >> >> > > As shown in the video, right click the word and select Google search (or > another if you wish). Do not show up when right clicking elsewhere. > So your solution does not have generalized applicability? With mine, I can select a word *anywhere* and click a button for lookup. I used to have them for man page lookup, which reminds me, I need to put that back. As for having a widget when "not needed," how is that different from having a launcher widget available on you desktop for *any* program, even when "not needed"? For example, why have a MS Word launcher available on your desktop when you have no need for MS Word at the moment?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-24 08:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8c6258d4-a718-499e-9b28-53d2671f4061@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #448996 |
On Tuesday, April 24, 2018 at 9:22:00 AM UTC-6, owl wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > > owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>> owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Mine not only worked, but the PDF had selectable text and allowed me to > >>>>> do quick searches on ingredients and the like... something Owl was never > >>>>> able to do on Linux (to be fair that was not a part of his original > >>>>> requirements, it seems like a very reasonable thing a user might want). > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> https://pewtube.com/user/owl/TXO9GJh?autoplay=off > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> Cool. Another one of your solutions where you need yet another widget on > >>> your screen even when not needed, but I can see times when it might be > >>> worth it. > >>> > >> > >> No widget needed, but it just streamlines the workflow :) What steps > >> are involved in your text search? > >> > >> > > > > As shown in the video, right click the word and select Google search (or > > another if you wish). Do not show up when right clicking elsewhere. > > > > So your solution does not have generalized applicability? His solution is broken and he doesn't know why. Yours still works, yet, he claimed to use the same refs as you so something is screwy. You can't have "generalized applicability" when there is no applicability ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-24 08:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <36c6ed8e-3119-4341-89d2-7c4c7da8fdb9@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #448998 |
On Tuesday, April 24, 2018 at 9:37:16 AM UTC-6, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Tuesday, April 24, 2018 at 9:22:00 AM UTC-6, owl wrote: > > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > > > owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > > >>> owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > > >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Mine not only worked, but the PDF had selectable text and allowed me to > > >>>>> do quick searches on ingredients and the like... something Owl was never > > >>>>> able to do on Linux (to be fair that was not a part of his original > > >>>>> requirements, it seems like a very reasonable thing a user might want). > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> https://pewtube.com/user/owl/TXO9GJh?autoplay=off > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> Cool. Another one of your solutions where you need yet another widget on > > >>> your screen even when not needed, but I can see times when it might be > > >>> worth it. > > >>> > > >> > > >> No widget needed, but it just streamlines the workflow :) What steps > > >> are involved in your text search? > > >> > > >> > > > > > > As shown in the video, right click the word and select Google search (or > > > another if you wish). Do not show up when right clicking elsewhere. > > > > > > > So your solution does not have generalized applicability? > > His solution is broken and he doesn't know why. Yours still works, yet, > he claimed to use the same refs as you so something is screwy. You > can't have "generalized applicability" when there is no applicability ;) Looks like this was getting long in the tooth well before he used it, maybe it no longer works on later versions of the OS or editor: <http://automatorworld.com/archives/download-urls-as-pdfs/>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-24 15:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <azxb08934.g@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #449000 |
Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tuesday, April 24, 2018 at 9:37:16 AM UTC-6, Steve Carroll wrote: >> On Tuesday, April 24, 2018 at 9:22:00 AM UTC-6, owl wrote: >> > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> > > owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> > >>> owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> > >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> Mine not only worked, but the PDF had selectable text and allowed me to >> > >>>>> do quick searches on ingredients and the like... something Owl was never >> > >>>>> able to do on Linux (to be fair that was not a part of his original >> > >>>>> requirements, it seems like a very reasonable thing a user might want). >> > >>>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>>> https://pewtube.com/user/owl/TXO9GJh?autoplay=off >> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> > >>> >> > >>> Cool. Another one of your solutions where you need yet another widget on >> > >>> your screen even when not needed, but I can see times when it might be >> > >>> worth it. >> > >>> >> > >> >> > >> No widget needed, but it just streamlines the workflow :) What steps >> > >> are involved in your text search? >> > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > As shown in the video, right click the word and select Google search (or >> > > another if you wish). Do not show up when right clicking elsewhere. >> > > >> > >> > So your solution does not have generalized applicability? >> >> His solution is broken and he doesn't know why. Yours still works, yet, >> he claimed to use the same refs as you so something is screwy. You >> can't have "generalized applicability" when there is no applicability ;) > > Looks like this was getting long in the tooth well before he used it, maybe it no > longer works on later versions of the OS or editor: > <http://automatorworld.com/archives/download-urls-as-pdfs/> The PDF above was just a recent download of a single recipe. I don't know if the scripts I had from way back still work for the mass downloads/conversions or whatever. I believe I did that stuff from a VM, and I don't remember which one, or if it still exists.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-24 08:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e074f85c-9d74-4614-be6d-62ffd363ed24@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #449004 |
On Tuesday, April 24, 2018 at 9:54:10 AM UTC-6, owl wrote: > Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tuesday, April 24, 2018 at 9:37:16 AM UTC-6, Steve Carroll wrote: > >> On Tuesday, April 24, 2018 at 9:22:00 AM UTC-6, owl wrote: > >> > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> > > owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> > >>> owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> > >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> > >>>>> > >> > >>>>> Mine not only worked, but the PDF had selectable text and allowed me to > >> > >>>>> do quick searches on ingredients and the like... something Owl was never > >> > >>>>> able to do on Linux (to be fair that was not a part of his original > >> > >>>>> requirements, it seems like a very reasonable thing a user might want). > >> > >>>>> > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> https://pewtube.com/user/owl/TXO9GJh?autoplay=off > >> > >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> > >>> > >> > >>> Cool. Another one of your solutions where you need yet another widget on > >> > >>> your screen even when not needed, but I can see times when it might be > >> > >>> worth it. > >> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> No widget needed, but it just streamlines the workflow :) What steps > >> > >> are involved in your text search? > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > > As shown in the video, right click the word and select Google search (or > >> > > another if you wish). Do not show up when right clicking elsewhere. > >> > > > >> > > >> > So your solution does not have generalized applicability? > >> > >> His solution is broken and he doesn't know why. Yours still works, yet, > >> he claimed to use the same refs as you so something is screwy. You > >> can't have "generalized applicability" when there is no applicability ;) > > > > Looks like this was getting long in the tooth well before he used it, maybe it no > > longer works on later versions of the OS or editor: > > <http://automatorworld.com/archives/download-urls-as-pdfs/> > > The PDF above was just a recent download of a single recipe. > I don't know if the scripts I had from way back still work for the mass > downloads/conversions or whatever. I believe I did that stuff from a VM, > and I don't remember which one, or if it still exists. In any event, by looking at the comments of that page it appears Safari might be the issue.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-24 09:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fk92t3F86h8U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #449006 |
On 4/24/18, 8:56 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Tuesday, April 24, 2018 at 9:54:10 AM UTC-6, owl wrote: >> Steve Carroll<fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Tuesday, April 24, 2018 at 9:37:16 AM UTC-6, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>> On Tuesday, April 24, 2018 at 9:22:00 AM UTC-6, owl wrote: >>>>> Snit<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> owl<owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> Snit<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> owl<owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Snit<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Mine not only worked, but the PDF had selectable text and allowed me to >>>>>>>>>> do quick searches on ingredients and the like... something Owl was never >>>>>>>>>> able to do on Linux (to be fair that was not a part of his original >>>>>>>>>> requirements, it seems like a very reasonable thing a user might want). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://pewtube.com/user/owl/TXO9GJh?autoplay=off >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cool. Another one of your solutions where you need yet another widget on >>>>>>>> your screen even when not needed, but I can see times when it might be >>>>>>>> worth it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No widget needed, but it just streamlines the workflow :) What steps >>>>>>> are involved in your text search? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> As shown in the video, right click the word and select Google search (or >>>>>> another if you wish). Do not show up when right clicking elsewhere. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> So your solution does not have generalized applicability? >>>> >>>> His solution is broken and he doesn't know why. Yours still works, yet, >>>> he claimed to use the same refs as you so something is screwy. You >>>> can't have "generalized applicability" when there is no applicability ;) >>> >>> Looks like this was getting long in the tooth well before he used it, maybe it no >>> longer works on later versions of the OS or editor: >>> <http://automatorworld.com/archives/download-urls-as-pdfs/> >> >> The PDF above was just a recent download of a single recipe. >> I don't know if the scripts I had from way back still work for the mass >> downloads/conversions or whatever. I believe I did that stuff from a VM, >> and I don't remember which one, or if it still exists. > > In any event, by looking at the comments of that page it appears Safari > might be the issue. The issue with using the tool you pointed to or with my scripts? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-24 09:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fk92rqF86h8U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #449004 |
On 4/24/18, 8:54 AM, owl wrote: > Steve Carroll<fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tuesday, April 24, 2018 at 9:37:16 AM UTC-6, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Tuesday, April 24, 2018 at 9:22:00 AM UTC-6, owl wrote: >>>> Snit<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> owl<owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> Snit<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> owl<owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>> Snit<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Mine not only worked, but the PDF had selectable text and allowed me to >>>>>>>>> do quick searches on ingredients and the like... something Owl was never >>>>>>>>> able to do on Linux (to be fair that was not a part of his original >>>>>>>>> requirements, it seems like a very reasonable thing a user might want). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://pewtube.com/user/owl/TXO9GJh?autoplay=off >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cool. Another one of your solutions where you need yet another widget on >>>>>>> your screen even when not needed, but I can see times when it might be >>>>>>> worth it. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> No widget needed, but it just streamlines the workflow :) What steps >>>>>> are involved in your text search? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> As shown in the video, right click the word and select Google search (or >>>>> another if you wish). Do not show up when right clicking elsewhere. >>>>> >>>> >>>> So your solution does not have generalized applicability? >>> >>> His solution is broken and he doesn't know why. Yours still works, yet, >>> he claimed to use the same refs as you so something is screwy. You >>> can't have "generalized applicability" when there is no applicability ;) >> >> Looks like this was getting long in the tooth well before he used it, maybe it no >> longer works on later versions of the OS or editor: >> <http://automatorworld.com/archives/download-urls-as-pdfs/> > > The PDF above was just a recent download of a single recipe. > I don't know if the scripts I had from way back still work for the mass > downloads/conversions or whatever. I believe I did that stuff from a VM, > and I don't remember which one, or if it still exists. > I used different methods as I moved forward... including that (or something like it), Paparazzi!, cURL, Purl2pdf, and wkhtmltopdf. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-24 16:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sabv003ga.ahuo3@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #449008 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/24/18, 8:54 AM, owl wrote: >> Steve Carroll<fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Tuesday, April 24, 2018 at 9:37:16 AM UTC-6, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>> On Tuesday, April 24, 2018 at 9:22:00 AM UTC-6, owl wrote: >>>>> Snit<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> owl<owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> Snit<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> owl<owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Snit<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Mine not only worked, but the PDF had selectable text and allowed me to >>>>>>>>>> do quick searches on ingredients and the like... something Owl was never >>>>>>>>>> able to do on Linux (to be fair that was not a part of his original >>>>>>>>>> requirements, it seems like a very reasonable thing a user might want). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://pewtube.com/user/owl/TXO9GJh?autoplay=off >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cool. Another one of your solutions where you need yet another widget on >>>>>>>> your screen even when not needed, but I can see times when it might be >>>>>>>> worth it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No widget needed, but it just streamlines the workflow :) What steps >>>>>>> are involved in your text search? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> As shown in the video, right click the word and select Google search (or >>>>>> another if you wish). Do not show up when right clicking elsewhere. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> So your solution does not have generalized applicability? >>>> >>>> His solution is broken and he doesn't know why. Yours still works, yet, >>>> he claimed to use the same refs as you so something is screwy. You >>>> can't have "generalized applicability" when there is no applicability ;) >>> >>> Looks like this was getting long in the tooth well before he used it, maybe it no >>> longer works on later versions of the OS or editor: >>> <http://automatorworld.com/archives/download-urls-as-pdfs/> >> >> The PDF above was just a recent download of a single recipe. >> I don't know if the scripts I had from way back still work for the mass >> downloads/conversions or whatever. I believe I did that stuff from a VM, >> and I don't remember which one, or if it still exists. >> > I used different methods as I moved forward... including that (or > something like it), Paparazzi!, cURL, Purl2pdf, and wkhtmltopdf. > I think I used wkhtmltopdf in the old script.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-24 10:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fk986qF9e0cU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #449016 |
On 4/24/18, 9:19 AM, owl wrote: ... >>>>> His solution is broken and he doesn't know why. Yours still works, yet, >>>>> he claimed to use the same refs as you so something is screwy. You >>>>> can't have "generalized applicability" when there is no applicability ;) >>>> >>>> Looks like this was getting long in the tooth well before he used it, maybe it no >>>> longer works on later versions of the OS or editor: >>>> <http://automatorworld.com/archives/download-urls-as-pdfs/> >>> >>> The PDF above was just a recent download of a single recipe. >>> I don't know if the scripts I had from way back still work for the mass >>> downloads/conversions or whatever. I believe I did that stuff from a VM, >>> and I don't remember which one, or if it still exists. >>> >> I used different methods as I moved forward... including that (or >> something like it), Paparazzi!, cURL, Purl2pdf, and wkhtmltopdf. >> > > I think I used wkhtmltopdf in the old script. > I think so... and in my later ones I used it, too. I ended up using the same tool because it stripped the ads (maybe JavaScript?)... again, just based on recollection. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-27 07:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fkgq4rF6avU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #448996 |
On 4/24/18 8:21 AM, owl wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Mine not only worked, but the PDF had selectable text and allowed me to >>>>>> do quick searches on ingredients and the like... something Owl was never >>>>>> able to do on Linux (to be fair that was not a part of his original >>>>>> requirements, it seems like a very reasonable thing a user might want). >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> https://pewtube.com/user/owl/TXO9GJh?autoplay=off >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Cool. Another one of your solutions where you need yet another widget on >>>> your screen even when not needed, but I can see times when it might be >>>> worth it. >>>> >>> >>> No widget needed, but it just streamlines the workflow :) What steps >>> are involved in your text search? >>> >>> >> >> As shown in the video, right click the word and select Google search (or >> another if you wish). Do not show up when right clicking elsewhere. >> > > So your solution does not have generalized applicability? With mine, > I can select a word *anywhere* and click a button for lookup. I used to > have them for man page lookup, which reminds me, I need to put that back. > > As for having a widget when "not needed," how is that different from having > a launcher widget available on you desktop for *any* program, even when > "not needed"? For example, why have a MS Word launcher available on > your desktop when you have no need for MS Word at the moment? The difference is you have a bunch of little one-off programs / scripts which, if you want to not have them overwhelm your screen, you need to swap out. To some extent this can happen with the MS Word launcher (when tied to other programs). I have close to 50 items on my Dock... and a few more things I can launch from my menu. Now imagine adding each relevant thing that is in ANY right click menu... I would likely have several hundred items, and they would be so cluttered it would make things hard to find. I like having my system be as multi-purpose as I can. You seem to do this with having virtual machines for different purposes, and that, really, is not a bad plan unless you need to mix and combine. I do that quite a bit (far more than most, really). -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-27 16:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <9z0b8980eagv.3@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #449275 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/24/18 8:21 AM, owl wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Mine not only worked, but the PDF had selectable text and allowed me to >>>>>>> do quick searches on ingredients and the like... something Owl was never >>>>>>> able to do on Linux (to be fair that was not a part of his original >>>>>>> requirements, it seems like a very reasonable thing a user might want). >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> https://pewtube.com/user/owl/TXO9GJh?autoplay=off >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Cool. Another one of your solutions where you need yet another widget on >>>>> your screen even when not needed, but I can see times when it might be >>>>> worth it. >>>>> >>>> >>>> No widget needed, but it just streamlines the workflow :) What steps >>>> are involved in your text search? >>>> >>>> >>> >>> As shown in the video, right click the word and select Google search (or >>> another if you wish). Do not show up when right clicking elsewhere. >>> >> >> So your solution does not have generalized applicability? With mine, >> I can select a word *anywhere* and click a button for lookup. I used to >> have them for man page lookup, which reminds me, I need to put that back. >> >> As for having a widget when "not needed," how is that different from having >> a launcher widget available on you desktop for *any* program, even when >> "not needed"? For example, why have a MS Word launcher available on >> your desktop when you have no need for MS Word at the moment? > > The difference is you have a bunch of little one-off programs / scripts > which, if you want to not have them overwhelm your screen, you need to > swap out. The same can be said of any program launcher. > To some extent this can happen with the MS Word launcher (when > tied to other programs). I have close to 50 items on my Dock... and a > few more things I can launch from my menu. Now imagine adding each > relevant thing that is in ANY right click menu... I would likely have > several hundred items, and they would be so cluttered it would make > things hard to find. > There are not several hundred things I do often enough to desire a launcher for each, or even a menu item for that matter. > I like having my system be as multi-purpose as I can. You seem to do > this with having virtual machines for different purposes, and that, > really, is not a bad plan unless you need to mix and combine. I do that > quite a bit (far more than most, really). > I actually use virtual machines for very little. I used them in this case because it involved emailing, and I didn't want to potentially leak private info using real accounts in a demo.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-27 09:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fkh2blF1vceU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #449285 |
On 4/27/18 9:36 AM, owl wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 4/24/18 8:21 AM, owl wrote: >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Mine not only worked, but the PDF had selectable text and allowed me to >>>>>>>> do quick searches on ingredients and the like... something Owl was never >>>>>>>> able to do on Linux (to be fair that was not a part of his original >>>>>>>> requirements, it seems like a very reasonable thing a user might want). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://pewtube.com/user/owl/TXO9GJh?autoplay=off >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Cool. Another one of your solutions where you need yet another widget on >>>>>> your screen even when not needed, but I can see times when it might be >>>>>> worth it. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> No widget needed, but it just streamlines the workflow :) What steps >>>>> are involved in your text search? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> As shown in the video, right click the word and select Google search (or >>>> another if you wish). Do not show up when right clicking elsewhere. >>>> >>> >>> So your solution does not have generalized applicability? With mine, >>> I can select a word *anywhere* and click a button for lookup. I used to >>> have them for man page lookup, which reminds me, I need to put that back. >>> >>> As for having a widget when "not needed," how is that different from having >>> a launcher widget available on you desktop for *any* program, even when >>> "not needed"? For example, why have a MS Word launcher available on >>> your desktop when you have no need for MS Word at the moment? >> >> The difference is you have a bunch of little one-off programs / scripts >> which, if you want to not have them overwhelm your screen, you need to >> swap out. > > The same can be said of any program launcher. Right... but you have pretty much a universal launcher. Does not mean, of course, that you cannot use the file browser (or command line) to point to an app and launch it, but for quick access you have one area. What I show is having many areas which show up, more or less, when needed. It is contextual. The options for an address, for example, show up when I select an address but not when I select some other text. >> To some extent this can happen with the MS Word launcher (when >> tied to other programs). I have close to 50 items on my Dock... and a >> few more things I can launch from my menu. Now imagine adding each >> relevant thing that is in ANY right click menu... I would likely have >> several hundred items, and they would be so cluttered it would make >> things hard to find. > > There are not several hundred things I do often enough to desire > a launcher for each, or even a menu item for that matter. Sure... I use my machine as more of a multi-purpose tool. Keep in mind that "search Urban Dictionary with this term" is a small program / script that is launched. >> I like having my system be as multi-purpose as I can. You seem to do >> this with having virtual machines for different purposes, and that, >> really, is not a bad plan unless you need to mix and combine. I do that >> quite a bit (far more than most, really). > > I actually use virtual machines for very little. I used them > in this case because it involved emailing, and I didn't want > to potentially leak private info using real accounts in a > demo. Fair enough. I ran into that when I started to make a search video... showed my bookmarks and history. I did not want that so no video. Might still make it but will hide that info first. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-24 07:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <996134f1-c1f7-4a69-96e8-cedeb672355c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #448976 |
On Tuesday, April 24, 2018 at 7:55:18 AM UTC-6, owl wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > > > > Mine not only worked, but the PDF had selectable text and allowed me to > > do quick searches on ingredients and the like... something Owl was never > > able to do on Linux (to be fair that was not a part of his original > > requirements, it seems like a very reasonable thing a user might want). > > > > https://pewtube.com/user/owl/TXO9GJh?autoplay=off Are you using cURL over the DICT protocol to do that?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-24 15:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sxzb80z.ahoub@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #448987 |
Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tuesday, April 24, 2018 at 7:55:18 AM UTC-6, owl wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> > >> > Mine not only worked, but the PDF had selectable text and allowed me to >> > do quick searches on ingredients and the like... something Owl was never >> > able to do on Linux (to be fair that was not a part of his original >> > requirements, it seems like a very reasonable thing a user might want). >> > >> >> https://pewtube.com/user/owl/TXO9GJh?autoplay=off > > Are you using cURL over the DICT protocol to do that? The dictionary lookup passes X selection to dict client. The google lookup passes X selection to chromium.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 19 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 17 18 [19]
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web