Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #349538 > unrolled thread

Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript

Started by	DFS <nospam@dfs.com>
First post	2016-04-12 13:22 -0400
Last post	2016-04-17 18:21 -0400
Articles	20 on this page of 200 — 20 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

  Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-12 13:22 -0400
    Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-04-13 10:07 +0000
      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-13 12:53 -0400
        Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-13 13:13 -0400
    Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 11:18 -0700
      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-13 17:13 -0400
        Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 14:35 -0700
          Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-13 18:44 -0400
            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-15 05:39 -0700
    Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-13 20:49 +0000
      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-13 17:41 -0400
        Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-13 23:00 +0000
          Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-13 19:44 -0400
            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-14 02:10 +0000
              Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-13 22:29 -0400
                Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-14 02:36 +0000
                Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-13 22:42 -0400
                  Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-14 03:07 +0000
                    Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-13 23:56 -0400
                  Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-14 03:32 +0000
                    Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-14 00:04 -0400
                      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-14 04:38 +0000
    Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-15 19:25 +0000
      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-15 19:37 +0000
        Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-15 16:17 -0400
          Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-15 13:33 -0700
            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-15 16:59 -0400
              Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 08:11 -0700
                Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-18 11:54 -0400
                  Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-20 00:19 +0000
            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-15 21:02 +0000
              Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 08:05 -0700
          Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-16 08:56 +0000
            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-16 11:28 +0000
              Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-16 19:13 +0000
                Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-16 21:12 +0000
                  Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-17 08:51 +0000
                    Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-17 14:43 +0000
                      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-17 15:16 +0000
                        Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-17 16:10 +0000
                          Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-17 21:38 +0000
                            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-17 22:04 +0000
                              Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 07:38 +0000
                    Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-17 13:08 -0400
                      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-17 21:57 +0000
                        Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-17 18:15 -0400
                          Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 07:43 +0000
                            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-18 10:49 -0400
                              Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 15:08 +0000
                                Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 08:18 -0700
                                Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-18 11:46 -0400
                                  Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 09:16 -0700
                                    Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-18 12:39 -0400
                                  Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 17:43 +0000
                                    Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-18 14:27 -0400
                                      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Silver Slimer <peter@klown.is> - 2016-04-18 17:50 -0400
                                    Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-18 12:18 -0700
                                      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 12:27 -0700
                                        Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-18 13:13 -0700
                                          Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 13:46 -0700
                                            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-18 13:51 -0700
                                              Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 14:09 -0700
                                                Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 14:13 -0700
                                                Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-18 14:19 -0700
                                                  Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 14:23 -0700
                                                    Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-18 14:26 -0700
                                                      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 14:35 -0700
                                                      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 21:36 +0000
                                                      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 14:38 -0700
                                                        Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-18 14:48 -0700
                                                          Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 14:56 -0700
                                                            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-18 15:00 -0700
                                                              Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 15:05 -0700
                                                    Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 14:34 -0700
                                                  Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 14:34 -0700
                                                  Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-18 22:34 +0100
                                              Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 14:11 -0700
                                                Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 14:13 -0700
                                                Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 21:38 +0000
                                                  Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 14:42 -0700
                                                    Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-19 05:51 +0000
                                                      Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 08:24 -0700
                                                        Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-19 16:37 +0000
                                                          Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 09:49 -0700
                                                            Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-19 16:53 +0000
                                                          Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-19 12:04 -0500
                                                            Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 10:15 -0700
                                                          Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-19 13:08 -0700
                                                            Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-19 21:14 +0000
                                                              Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-19 21:39 +0000
                                                                Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-19 22:03 +0000
                                                                  Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-19 16:21 -0700
                                                                    Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-19 17:07 -0700
                                                                      Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-19 20:36 -0700
                                                                      Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-20 10:19 -0400
                                                                      Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-20 12:44 -0400
                                                                Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Richard King <kingsley651@webby.org> - 2016-04-19 18:27 -0400
                                                                  Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-19 16:15 -0700
                                                                    Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Richard King <kingsley651@webby.org> - 2016-04-19 19:32 -0400
                                                                  Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-20 03:39 +0000
                                                                    Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-20 04:01 +0000
                                                                  Snit digest 211 / 2016-04-20 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-20 05:24 +0000
                                                              Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-19 15:01 -0700
                                                                Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-19 22:11 +0000
                                                                  Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-19 16:20 -0700
                                                                    Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-19 23:36 +0000
                                                                      Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-19 20:30 -0700
                                                                        Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-20 03:58 +0000
                                                                          Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-19 21:19 -0700
                                                                            Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-20 05:01 +0000
                                                                              Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-19 22:14 -0700
                                                                                Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-20 05:29 +0000
                                                                                  Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-19 22:33 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-20 05:52 +0000
                                                                                      Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-20 16:02 +0000
                                                                                        Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 09:11 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-20 10:40 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-20 10:43 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 11:36 -0700
                                                                  Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-20 06:01 +0000
                                                  Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-18 16:30 -0700
                                                    Snit digest 207 / 2016-04-19 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-19 05:52 +0000
                                                      Re: Snit digest 207 / 2016-04-19 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-18 23:25 -0700
                                                        Snit digest 208 / 2016-04-19 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-19 07:49 +0000
                                          Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 20:49 +0000
                                            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-18 13:52 -0700
                                              Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 21:33 +0000
                                              Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-19 05:48 -0400
                                            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-18 13:55 -0700
                                              Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 21:35 +0000
                                          Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-19 05:41 -0400
                                      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-18 15:52 -0400
                                      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 20:47 +0000
                                      Re: Microsoft is the standard; Apple extends it; Ubuntu falls short. Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-04-18 22:59 +0000
                                        Re: Microsoft is the standard; Apple extends it; Ubuntu falls short. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-20 10:19 -0400
                                      Re: Microsoft is the standard; Apple extends it; Ubuntu falls short. benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-19 00:03 -0400
              Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 13:19 -0700
                Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-16 16:25 -0400
                  Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 15:08 -0700
                    Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-16 18:15 -0400
                      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 15:26 -0700
                        Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-16 18:35 -0400
                          Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 15:51 -0700
                            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-20 10:10 -0400
                              Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 08:13 -0700
                                Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-20 12:10 -0400
                                  Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 09:12 -0700
                Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-17 09:02 +0000
                  Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-17 13:31 -0400
                    Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-17 21:59 +0000
                      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-17 20:06 -0400
                        Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-18 00:24 +0000
                        Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 07:46 +0000
                          Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-18 05:41 -0400
                          Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-18 11:01 -0400
                            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-18 17:04 +0200
                              Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-18 11:08 -0400
                            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 15:23 +0000
                              Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-20 10:16 -0400
                                Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-20 18:22 +0000
            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-16 14:03 -0400
              Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-17 08:38 +0000
                Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-17 07:27 -0400
                Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-17 13:03 -0400
                  Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-17 21:55 +0000
            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-16 18:26 -0400
              Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-17 08:59 +0000
              Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-17 09:40 +0000
                Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-17 14:14 +0000
                  Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-17 15:07 +0000
                    Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-17 15:51 +0000
                      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-17 21:39 +0000
                        Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-17 22:09 +0000
                          Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 07:40 +0000
        Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-15 17:18 -0400
        Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-15 19:12 -0400
          Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-16 08:57 +0000
            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-16 11:29 +0000
          Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-16 18:28 -0400
      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-15 23:03 +0200
        Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-16 08:57 +0000
      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-15 17:17 -0400
        Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-15 21:39 +0000
        Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-16 08:58 +0000
      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-15 18:24 -0400
        Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-16 08:59 +0000
          Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-16 06:34 -0400
            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-16 11:32 +0000
            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-16 09:01 -0400
            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-16 14:02 -0400
          Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-16 11:16 +0000
            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-16 14:02 -0400
            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-16 19:12 +0000
          Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-16 14:05 -0400
            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-17 08:40 +0000
              Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-18 10:48 -0400
                Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 15:06 +0000
    Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Norman Peelman <npeelman@cfl.rr.com> - 2016-04-17 09:33 -0400
      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-17 14:30 -0400
        Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Norman Peelman <npeelman@cfl.rr.com> - 2016-04-17 18:21 -0400

Page 10 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10]

#350268

From	Sandman <mr@sandman.net>
Date	2016-04-16 08:57 +0000
Message-ID	<sandman-b75cf8d7cf86f874e7d2aa37cfca16d9@individual.net>
In reply to	#350141

In article <20160415230310.163f4118@maxa-pc>, Melzzzzz wrote:

> On 15 Apr 2016 19:25:07 GMT

> > Sandman:
> > That's 21 lines of perl code running on a Macbook Air, doing it in
> > 0.1 seconds.
> 
> You mean it ran fast on crappy hardware?

I wouldn't know...

-- 
Sandman

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350142

From	Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is>
Date	2016-04-15 17:17 -0400
Message-ID	<nerljl$r81$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to	#350124

On 2016-04-15 3:25 PM, Sandman wrote:
> In article <nejanb$p7n$1@dont-email.me>, DFS wrote:
>
>> http://i.imgur.com/XD1A5It.jpg
>
>> Took the base 25 addresses, and copied until I had 10,000 entries.
>
>> My superior MS Windows VBScript then transformed 10,000 addresses
>> from 4 lines per address to one line per address (removing
>> extraneous lines and words in the process), delimited it, de-duped
>> the 10,000 rows, then sorted, then saved ... all in just over half a
>> second? WTF!? And the final result was 25 unique lines, as it should
>> be.
>
>> 10,000 addresses in 0.53 seconds? Holy Shit that's fast! Using an i5
>> WinTel PC, I can deliver a sorted 100,000 mailing label .csv file in
>> just over 5 seconds!
>
>> You - and the slow, bumbling, incomprehensible New/Linux bash and
>> perl crapware - CANNOT compete. You know it and I know it. You're
>> fired for promoting that hobby ware.
>
> Since I don't know the exact format they were supposed to be in, here's my
> entry:
>
> ~/Desktop/dfs> cat out.txt
> cat: out.txt: No such file or directory
> ~/Desktop/dfs> wc -l addresses.txt
>    115438 addresses.txt
> ~/Desktop/dfs> wc -l process.pl
>        21 process.pl
> ~/Desktop/dfs> time ./process.pl
> real	0m0.105s
> user	0m0.096s
> sys	0m0.006s
> ~/Desktop/dfs> cat out.txt
> Angelito's Restaurant,1441 E Fletcher Ave, Tampa, FL 33612
> Olive Garden Italian Restaurant,2801 E Busch Blvd, Tampa, FL 33612
> First Watch Restaurant Dls,2726 E Fowler Ave, Tampa, FL 33612
> Carribean Cuisine Restaurant,9714 N Nebraska Ave, Tampa, FL 33612
> Quiznos Sandwich Restaurants,10001 N Florida Ave, Tampa, FL 33612
> Ming Dou Chinese Restaurant,1120 E Fowler Ave, Tampa, FL 33612
> Caribbean Connections Restaurant & Bar,10509 N Nebraska Ave, Tampa, FL 33612
> Gino's Bar & Restaurant,10006 N Armenia Ave, Tampa, FL 33612
> Checkers Drive-In Restaurant,1509 E Fowler Ave, Tampa, FL 33612
> Ronnie's Restaurant,10910 N 30th St Ste 101, Tampa, FL 33612
> Golden Touch Caribbean Restaurant & Bakery,9310 N Florida Ave, Tampa, FL 33612
> A&W Restaurant,1707 E Fowler Ave, Tampa, FL 33612
> Ho Ho Choy Chinese Restaurant,1441 E Fletcher Ave Ste 125, Tampa, FL 33612
> Alsutan Restaurant,11150 N 30th St, Tampa, FL 33612
> Gino's Bar & Restaurant,10010 N Armenia Ave, Tampa, FL 33612
>
> That's 21 lines of perl code running on a Macbook Air, doing it in 0.1 seconds.

OS X beats Linux. How sad it must be for the Linux losers.


-- 
Silver Slimer
The silver-tongued heel

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350146

From	owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Date	2016-04-15 21:39 +0000
Message-ID	<hgjcmbkd993a.afj@rooftop.invalid>
In reply to	#350142

Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> wrote:
> On 2016-04-15 3:25 PM, Sandman wrote:
>> In article <nejanb$p7n$1@dont-email.me>, DFS wrote:
>>
>>> http://i.imgur.com/XD1A5It.jpg
>>
>>> Took the base 25 addresses, and copied until I had 10,000 entries.
>>
>>> My superior MS Windows VBScript then transformed 10,000 addresses
>>> from 4 lines per address to one line per address (removing
>>> extraneous lines and words in the process), delimited it, de-duped
>>> the 10,000 rows, then sorted, then saved ... all in just over half a
>>> second? WTF!? And the final result was 25 unique lines, as it should
>>> be.
>>
>>> 10,000 addresses in 0.53 seconds? Holy Shit that's fast! Using an i5
>>> WinTel PC, I can deliver a sorted 100,000 mailing label .csv file in
>>> just over 5 seconds!
>>
>>> You - and the slow, bumbling, incomprehensible New/Linux bash and
>>> perl crapware - CANNOT compete. You know it and I know it. You're
>>> fired for promoting that hobby ware.
>>
>> Since I don't know the exact format they were supposed to be in, here's my
>> entry:
>>
>> ~/Desktop/dfs> cat out.txt
>> cat: out.txt: No such file or directory
>> ~/Desktop/dfs> wc -l addresses.txt
>>    115438 addresses.txt
>> ~/Desktop/dfs> wc -l process.pl
>>        21 process.pl
>> ~/Desktop/dfs> time ./process.pl
>> real  0m0.105s
>> user  0m0.096s
>> sys   0m0.006s
>> ~/Desktop/dfs> cat out.txt
>> Angelito's Restaurant,1441 E Fletcher Ave, Tampa, FL 33612
>> Olive Garden Italian Restaurant,2801 E Busch Blvd, Tampa, FL 33612
>> First Watch Restaurant Dls,2726 E Fowler Ave, Tampa, FL 33612
>> Carribean Cuisine Restaurant,9714 N Nebraska Ave, Tampa, FL 33612
>> Quiznos Sandwich Restaurants,10001 N Florida Ave, Tampa, FL 33612
>> Ming Dou Chinese Restaurant,1120 E Fowler Ave, Tampa, FL 33612
>> Caribbean Connections Restaurant & Bar,10509 N Nebraska Ave, Tampa, FL 33612
>> Gino's Bar & Restaurant,10006 N Armenia Ave, Tampa, FL 33612
>> Checkers Drive-In Restaurant,1509 E Fowler Ave, Tampa, FL 33612
>> Ronnie's Restaurant,10910 N 30th St Ste 101, Tampa, FL 33612
>> Golden Touch Caribbean Restaurant & Bakery,9310 N Florida Ave, Tampa, FL 33612
>> A&W Restaurant,1707 E Fowler Ave, Tampa, FL 33612
>> Ho Ho Choy Chinese Restaurant,1441 E Fletcher Ave Ste 125, Tampa, FL 33612
>> Alsutan Restaurant,11150 N 30th St, Tampa, FL 33612
>> Gino's Bar & Restaurant,10010 N Armenia Ave, Tampa, FL 33612
>>
>> That's 21 lines of perl code running on a Macbook Air, doing it in 0.1 seconds.
> 
> OS X beats Linux. How sad it must be for the Linux losers.
> 

I don't think he's shown that.  Was he working with the same data
we did, and doing all the same processing?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350269

From	Sandman <mr@sandman.net>
Date	2016-04-16 08:58 +0000
Message-ID	<sandman-8770a7be94ce4deb01b8b95a89fbd11d@individual.net>
In reply to	#350142

In article <nerljl$r81$1@dont-email.me>, Silver Slimer wrote:

> > That's 21 lines of perl code running on a Macbook Air, doing it in
> > 0.1 seconds.
> 
> OS X beats Linux. How sad it must be for the Linux losers.

It has nothing to do with OS X, perl is available for many operating systems.

-- 
Sandman

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350151

From	DFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Date	2016-04-15 18:24 -0400
Message-ID	<nerph1$bee$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to	#350124

On 4/15/2016 3:25 PM, Sandman wrote:

> That's 21 lines of perl code running on a Macbook Air, doing it in 0.1 seconds.


Invisible code, even!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350270

From	Sandman <mr@sandman.net>
Date	2016-04-16 08:59 +0000
Message-ID	<sandman-f44727f5140e5faefb3c2d41d47b0f2b@individual.net>
In reply to	#350151

In article <nerph1$bee$2@dont-email.me>, DFS wrote:

> > Sandman:
> > That's 21 lines of perl code running on a Macbook Air, doing it in
> > 0.1 seconds.
> 
> Invisible code, even!

Since your vbscript code is like greek to me, I didn't bother show you my perl 
code that may be the same to you. Why does it matter?

-- 
Sandman

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350275

From	Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us>
Date	2016-04-16 06:34 -0400
Message-ID	<net4hm$6ed$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to	#350270

Sandman wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> In article <nerph1$bee$2@dont-email.me>, DFS wrote:
>
>> > Sandman:
>> > That's 21 lines of perl code running on a Macbook Air, doing it in
>> > 0.1 seconds.
>> 
>> Invisible code, even!
>
> Since your vbscript code is like greek to me, I didn't bother show you my perl 
> code that may be the same to you. Why does it matter?

More opportunity for sneering?

-- 
What happened last night can happen again.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350280

From	owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Date	2016-04-16 11:32 +0000
Message-ID	<hnvmfji93.af3@rooftop.invalid>
In reply to	#350275

Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
> Sandman wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> 
>> In article <nerph1$bee$2@dont-email.me>, DFS wrote:
>>
>>> > Sandman:
>>> > That's 21 lines of perl code running on a Macbook Air, doing it in
>>> > 0.1 seconds.
>>> 
>>> Invisible code, even!
>>
>> Since your vbscript code is like greek to me, I didn't bother show you my perl 
>> code that may be the same to you. Why does it matter?
> 
> More opportunity for sneering?
> 

Opportunity for comparison, Einstein.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350291

From	Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org>
Date	2016-04-16 09:01 -0400
Message-ID	<netcth$mtb$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to	#350275

On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 06:34:44 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> Sandman wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> 
>> In article <nerph1$bee$2@dont-email.me>, DFS wrote:
>>
>>> > Sandman:
>>> > That's 21 lines of perl code running on a Macbook Air, doing it in
>>> > 0.1 seconds.
>>> 
>>> Invisible code, even!
>>
>> Since your vbscript code is like greek to me, I didn't bother show you my perl 
>> code that may be the same to you. Why does it matter?
> 
> More opportunity for sneering?

He's making a comparison you idiot.
That's your problem Ahlstrom, you are a single tasker who goes through
life making a single choice and never bothering to explore the
alternatives.

In your case it's Linux, amongst other things I'm sure.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350367

From	DFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Date	2016-04-16 14:02 -0400
Message-ID	<netuhf$ku6$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to	#350275

On 4/16/2016 6:34 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> Sandman wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> In article <nerph1$bee$2@dont-email.me>, DFS wrote:
>>
>>>> Sandman:
>>>> That's 21 lines of perl code running on a Macbook Air, doing it in
>>>> 0.1 seconds.
>>>
>>> Invisible code, even!
>>
>> Since your vbscript code is like greek to me, I didn't bother show you my perl
>> code that may be the same to you. Why does it matter?
>
> More opportunity for sneering?


Jump in the fray, Creepy.  Give us a python version.

Or play it like you usually do: stand meekly on the sidelines and make 
wimpy comments while your wife does the heavy lifting.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350277

From	owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Date	2016-04-16 11:16 +0000
Message-ID	<gnbmc993.jfdua@rooftop.invalid>
In reply to	#350270

Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote:
> In article <nerph1$bee$2@dont-email.me>, DFS wrote:
> 
>> > Sandman:
>> > That's 21 lines of perl code running on a Macbook Air, doing it in
>> > 0.1 seconds.
>> 
>> Invisible code, even!
> 
> Since your vbscript code is like greek to me, I didn't bother show you my perl 
> code that may be the same to you. Why does it matter?
> 

I tweaked my code and now it processes 1 million addresses in 0.02 sec.
on my 486.  No need for y'all to see the initial 25-address file or the
17 lines of source code, since usenet might collapse under such weight. 

anon@lowtide:~/code/dfs$ wc -l dfs_addresses_e
5000000 dfs_addresses_e
anon@lowtide:~/code/dfs$ 
anon@lowtide:~/code/dfs$ time ./sortem
Name;Street;CityStateZip
After The Game Sports Bar and Grill;2445 Moon Rd Ste 1; Grayson, GA 30017 
Burger King;1990 Grayson Hwy; Grayson, GA 30017 
Carlitos Mexican Restaurant, Inc;2445 Moon Rd; Grayson, GA 30017 
China Cafe;1911 Grayson Hwy; Grayson, GA 30017 
China Cafe;1911 Grayson Hwy Ste 4; Grayson, GA 30017 
Coopers Corner B&G;1111 Athens Hwy; Grayson, GA 30017 
Grand China Chinese Restaurant;910 Athens Hwy Ste O; Loganville, GA 30052 
Hail Mary Sports Pub;1950 Grayson Hwy Ste 140; Grayson, GA 30017 
Joa Wings and Deli;1911 Grayson Hwy; Grayson, GA 30017 
Joa Wings and Deli;1911 Grayson Hwy Ste 17; Grayson, GA 30017 
Johnny's Pizza;2023 Grayson Hwy Ste 110; Grayson, GA 30017 
KFC;1855 Grayson Hwy; Grayson, GA 30017 
Little Caesars Pizza;1950 Grayson Hwy; Grayson, GA 30017 
McDonald's;1881 Grayson Hwy; Grayson, GA 30017 
My Pizza Buffet;2944 Rosebud Rd Ste D; Loganville, GA 30052 
Nagoya Japanese Steak House;2944 Rosebud Rd; Loganville, GA 30052 
Pancake House;1911 Grayson Hwy; Grayson, GA 30017 
Pancake House;1911 Grayson Hwy Ste 5; Grayson, GA 30017 
Papa John's Pizza;1009 Athens Hwy Ste 8; Loganville, GA 30052 
Parkside Bakery & Cafe;2023 Grayson Hwy; Grayson, GA 30017 
Riverside Pizza;1845 Grayson Hwy Ste 1400; Grayson, GA 30017 
Taco Bell;1855 Grayson Hwy; Grayson, GA 30017 
Thai Taste Restaurant;1009 Athens Hwy; Loganville, GA 30052 
Zaxby's;1931 Grayson Hwy; Grayson, GA 30017 

real	0m0.023s
user	0m0.026s
sys	0m0.001s
anon@lowtide:~/code/dfs$

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350366

From	DFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Date	2016-04-16 14:02 -0400
Message-ID	<netugm$l16$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to	#350277

On 4/16/2016 7:16 AM, owl wrote:
> Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote:
>> In article <nerph1$bee$2@dont-email.me>, DFS wrote:
>>
>>>> Sandman:
>>>> That's 21 lines of perl code running on a Macbook Air, doing it in
>>>> 0.1 seconds.
>>>
>>> Invisible code, even!
>>
>> Since your vbscript code is like greek to me, I didn't bother show you my perl
>> code that may be the same to you. Why does it matter?
>>
>
> I tweaked my code and now it processes 1 million addresses in 0.02 sec.
> on my 486.  No need for y'all to see the initial 25-address file or the
> 17 lines of source code, since usenet might collapse under such weight.
>
> real	0m0.023s
> user	0m0.026s
> sys	0m0.001s
> anon@lowtide:~/code/dfs$


owl sed afu nny ooo

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350390

From	Sandman <mr@sandman.net>
Date	2016-04-16 19:12 +0000
Message-ID	<sandman-369b79f4cb6a1ac54fda608ecc64343a@individual.net>
In reply to	#350277

In article <gnbmc993.jfdua@rooftop.invalid>, owl wrote:

> > > > Sandman:
> > > > That's 21 lines of perl code running on a Macbook
> > > > Air, doing it in 0.1 seconds.
> > > 
> > > DFS:
> > > Invisible code, even!
> > 
> > Sandman:
> > Since your vbscript code is like greek to me, I didn't bother show
> > you my perl code that may be the same to you. Why does it matter?
> 
> I tweaked my code and now it processes 1 million addresses in 0.02
> sec. on my 486.

Are you trying to say I'm lying? That perl can't process the addresses in the 
time I claimed?

-- 
Sandman

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350371

From	DFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Date	2016-04-16 14:05 -0400
Message-ID	<netumh$ku6$5@dont-email.me>
In reply to	#350270

On 4/16/2016 4:59 AM, Sandman wrote:
> In article <nerph1$bee$2@dont-email.me>, DFS wrote:
>
>>> Sandman:
>>> That's 21 lines of perl code running on a Macbook Air, doing it in
>>> 0.1 seconds.
>>
>> Invisible code, even!
>
> Since your vbscript code is like greek to me, I didn't bother show you my perl
> code that may be the same to you. Why does it matter?


There're lots of perl tools for Windows, so I could run your code 
against my address list and see how it works.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350448

From	Sandman <mr@sandman.net>
Date	2016-04-17 08:40 +0000
Message-ID	<sandman-9aba5cc4709cc77c8da93e051d5cfc4f@individual.net>
In reply to	#350371

In article <netumh$ku6$5@dont-email.me>, DFS wrote:

> > > > Sandman:
> > > > That's 21 lines of perl code running on a Macbook
> > > > Air, doing it in 0.1 seconds.
> > > 
> > > DFS:
> > > Invisible code, even!
> > 
> > Sandman:
> > Since your vbscript code is like greek to me, I didn't bother show
> > you my perl code that may be the same to you. Why does it matter?
> 
> There're lots of perl tools for Windows, so I could run your code 
> against my address list and see how it works.

Sure:

#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use warnings;
use 5.010;
$/ = "\n\n";
open my $fh, "<addresses.txt" or die;
open my $oh, ">out.txt" or die;
my (@o, @l);
while (<$fh>){
	chomp;
	s/Call now\!//mi;
	chop;
	@l = split "\n";
	my $f = $l[0] . "," . $l[2] . "\n";
	push @o, $f unless grep {$_ eq $f} @o;
}
foreach (sort keys @o){
	print $oh $o[$_];
}
close $fh;
close $oh;



-- 
Sandman

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350656

From	DFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Date	2016-04-18 10:48 -0400
Message-ID	<nf2rtk$vjb$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to	#350448

On 4/17/2016 4:40 AM, Sandman wrote:
> In article <netumh$ku6$5@dont-email.me>, DFS wrote:
>
>>>>> Sandman:
>>>>> That's 21 lines of perl code running on a Macbook
>>>>> Air, doing it in 0.1 seconds.
>>>>
>>>> DFS:
>>>> Invisible code, even!
>>>
>>> Sandman:
>>> Since your vbscript code is like greek to me, I didn't bother show
>>> you my perl code that may be the same to you. Why does it matter?
>>
>> There're lots of perl tools for Windows, so I could run your code
>> against my address list and see how it works.
>
> Sure:
>
> #!/usr/bin/perl
> use strict;
> use warnings;
> use 5.010;
> $/ = "\n\n";
> open my $fh, "<addresses.txt" or die;
> open my $oh, ">out.txt" or die;
> my (@o, @l);
> while (<$fh>){
> 	chomp;
> 	s/Call now\!//mi;


Is the 'mi' in your code looking for the 'mi' in line 4?  If it changes 
to 0.48 km will your code fail?

---------------------------------------------
Carlitos Mexican Restaurant, Inc
RESTAURANTS MEXICAN
2445 Moon Rd, Grayson, GA 30017 Call Now!
0.3 mi
---------------------------------------------



> 	chop;
> 	@l = split "\n";
> 	my $f = $l[0] . "," . $l[2] . "\n";
> 	push @o, $f unless grep {$_ eq $f} @o;
> }
> foreach (sort keys @o){
> 	print $oh $o[$_];
> }
> close $fh;
> close $oh;
>
>
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350664

From	Sandman <mr@sandman.net>
Date	2016-04-18 15:06 +0000
Message-ID	<sandman-f0fa0ef4350c36863cdea7b07003efee@individual.net>
In reply to	#350656

In article <nf2rtk$vjb$1@dont-email.me>, DFS wrote:

> > > > > > Sandman:
> > > > > > That's 21 lines of perl code running on a Macbook
> > > > > > Air, doing it in 0.1 seconds.
> > > > > 
> > > > > DFS:
> > > > > Invisible code, even!
> > > > 
> > > > Sandman:
> > > > Since your vbscript code is like greek to me, I
> > > > didn't bother show you my perl code that may be the same to
> > > > you. Why does it matter?
> > > 
> > > DFS:
> > > There're lots of perl tools for Windows, so I could run your
> > > code against my address list and see how it works.
> > 
> > Sandman:
> > Sure:
> 
> > #!/usr/bin/perl
> > use strict;
> > use warnings;
> > use 5.010;
> > $/ = "\n\n";
> > open my $fh, "<addresses.txt" or die;
> > open my $oh, ">out.txt" or die;
> > my (@o, @l);
> > while (<$fh>){
> > chomp;
> > s/Call now\!//mi;
> 
> Is the 'mi' in your code looking for the 'mi' in line 4? If it
> changes to 0.48 km will your code fail?

Nope, "mi" means multiline and case insensitive in the preg replace.

The distance is in $l[3] and is ignored. 

-- 
Sandman

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350478

From	Norman Peelman <npeelman@cfl.rr.com>
Date	2016-04-17 09:33 -0400
Message-ID	<nf034k$uat$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to	#349538

On 04/12/2016 01:22 PM, DFS wrote:
> http://i.imgur.com/XD1A5It.jpg
>
> Took the base 25 addresses, and copied until I had 10,000 entries.
>
> My superior MS Windows VBScript then transformed 10,000 addresses from 4
> lines per address to one line per address (removing extraneous lines and
> words in the process), delimited it, de-duped the 10,000 rows, then
> sorted, then saved ... all in just over half a second?  WTF!?  And the
> final result was 25 unique lines, as it should be.
>
> 10,000 addresses in 0.53 seconds?  Holy Shit that's fast!  Using an i5
> WinTel PC, I can deliver a sorted 100,000 mailing label .csv file in
> just over 5 seconds!
>
> You - and the slow, bumbling, incomprehensible New/Linux bash and perl
> crapware - CANNOT compete.  You know it and I know it.  You're fired for
> promoting that hobbyware.
>
> I added timers and address counters to the code.  Now, when you move to
> the big leagues (Microsoft Windows and the best software on Earth),
> you'll have a nice address processing module to keep you employed.  Keep
> it with you at all times.
>
>
> usage: \process_addresses.vbs inputFile outputFile
>
>
>
>

   *Untested*, but see if this is any faster... This is your VB, just 
rearranged a bit. If it fails on the recordset stuff try just reverting 
the Open command to yours and reversing the comments on the 
.Update/.UpdateBatch methods.

#1 - Skips intermediate output file by writing to the 'dictionary' 
(removing duplicates) and the recordset at the same time.
#2 - Uses the recordset .UpdateBatch method instead of .Update


'process_addresses.vbs

Option Explicit
Dim fso, dict, strKey, strLine
Dim fIn, addressFile, addrList
Dim fOut, newAddressFile
Dim delim, business, street, citystatezip
Dim startTime, endTime, addressCount
Dim tmpkey As String

Const ForReading =  1
Const ForWriting =  2
Const AdVarChar  =  200
Const MaxCharacters =  255

startTime = Timer

'-----------------------------------------------------------
'OBJECTS
'-----------------------------------------------------------
Set fso      = CreateObject("Scripting.FileSystemObject")
Set dict     = CreateObject("Scripting.Dictionary")
Set addrList = CreateObject("ADOR.Recordset")


'-----------------------------------------------------------
'SETTINGS
'-----------------------------------------------------------
delim = ";"  'don't use comma - code leaves 'City, State Zip' format in 
place
addressFile    = WScript.Arguments.Item(0)
newAddressFile = WScript.Arguments.Item(1)


'-----------------------------------------------------------
'TRANSFORM DATA TO ONE ROW PER ADDRESS
'-----------------------------------------------------------
set fIn  = fso.OpenTextFile(addressFile , ForReading)

addressCount = 0
addrList.Fields.Append "Address", AdVarChar, MaxCharacters
addrList.Open ,,, adLockBatchOptimistic,

Do until fIn.AtEndOfStream

   business = fIn.ReadLine
   fIn.SkipLine
   strLine = Replace(fIn.ReadLine," Call Now!","")
   street = Left(strLine, InStr(strLine,",")-1)
   citystatezip = Mid(strLine, Len(street) + 3)

   'Read file - removing dupes and populating recordset at same time
   tmpkey = business & delim & street & delim & citystatezip
   If Not dict.ContainsKey(tmpkey) Then
     dict.Add tmpkey, business & delim & street & delim & citystatezip
     addrList.AddNew
     addrList("Address") = tmpkey
     'addrList.Update
   End If

   addressCount = addressCount + 1

   If Not fIn.AtEndOfStream Then fIn.SkipLine
   If Not fIn.AtEndOfStream Then fIn.SkipLine

Loop

fIn.Close

addrList.UpdateBatch
addrList.Sort = "Address"
addrList.MoveFirst
strLine = ""
Do Until addrList.EOF
   strLine = strLine & addrList.Fields.Item ("Address") & vbCrLf
   addrList.MoveNext
Loop
addrList.Close

Set fOut = fso.OpenTextFile(newAddressFile , ForWriting)
fOut.WriteLine("#Name" & delim & "Street" & delim & "CityStateZip" & vbCrLf)
fOut.WriteLine strLine
fOut.close

'-----------------------------------------------------------
'FINISHED
'-----------------------------------------------------------
endTime = Timer
WScript.Echo "Processed " & addressCount & " addresses in " & 
FormatNumber(endTime - startTime,2) & " seconds"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350517

From	DFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Date	2016-04-17 14:30 -0400
Message-ID	<nf0kif$unj$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to	#350478

On 4/17/2016 9:33 AM, Norman Peelman wrote:


>    *Untested*, but see if this is any faster... This is your VB, just
> rearranged a bit. If it fails on the recordset stuff try just reverting
> the Open command to yours and reversing the comments on the
> .Update/.UpdateBatch methods.

After a few small fixes (noted in the code below), it runs in 0.33 
seconds, so good improvement from 0.53.



> #1 - Skips intermediate output file by writing to the 'dictionary'
> (removing duplicates) and the recordset at the same time.

Not long after the first post in this thread, I came to my senses and 
rewrote it to skip 2 unneeded file writes.  That code is in the thread: 
"Fabian: now I'm processing 10,000 addresses in 0.33 seconds"

See that post for a virtual $1 million if you can speed it up even further.



> #2 - Uses the recordset .UpdateBatch method instead of .Update

I'll have to remember that one.


> 'process_addresses.vbs
>
> Option Explicit
> Dim fso, dict, strKey, strLine
> Dim fIn, addressFile, addrList
> Dim fOut, newAddressFile
> Dim delim, business, street, citystatezip
> Dim startTime, endTime, addressCount
> Dim tmpkey As String

Compilation error: VBScript doesn't accept different data types.  In 
case you didn't know, they're all Variants.

I dropped the 'as String'


> Const ForReading =  1
> Const ForWriting =  2
> Const AdVarChar  =  200
> Const MaxCharacters =  255
>
> startTime = Timer
>
> '-----------------------------------------------------------
> 'OBJECTS
> '-----------------------------------------------------------
> Set fso      = CreateObject("Scripting.FileSystemObject")
> Set dict     = CreateObject("Scripting.Dictionary")
> Set addrList = CreateObject("ADOR.Recordset")
>
>
> '-----------------------------------------------------------
> 'SETTINGS
> '-----------------------------------------------------------
> delim = ";"  'don't use comma - code leaves 'City, State Zip' format in
> place
> addressFile    = WScript.Arguments.Item(0)
> newAddressFile = WScript.Arguments.Item(1)
>
>
> '-----------------------------------------------------------
> 'TRANSFORM DATA TO ONE ROW PER ADDRESS
> '-----------------------------------------------------------
> set fIn  = fso.OpenTextFile(addressFile , ForReading)
>
> addressCount = 0
> addrList.Fields.Append "Address", AdVarChar, MaxCharacters
> addrList.Open ,,, adLockBatchOptimistic,

Compilation errors: I removed trailing comma, and had to declare 
adLockBatchOptimistic as a Const (or put 4 in its place)


> Do until fIn.AtEndOfStream
>
>    business = fIn.ReadLine
>    fIn.SkipLine
>    strLine = Replace(fIn.ReadLine," Call Now!","")
>    street = Left(strLine, InStr(strLine,",")-1)
>    citystatezip = Mid(strLine, Len(street) + 3)
>
>    'Read file - removing dupes and populating recordset at same time
>    tmpkey = business & delim & street & delim & citystatezip
>    If Not dict.ContainsKey(tmpkey) Then

Runtime error.  VBScript dict object uses Exists method.  I replaced.


>      dict.Add tmpkey, business & delim & street & delim & citystatezip
>      addrList.AddNew
>      addrList("Address") = tmpkey
>      'addrList.Update
>    End If
>
>    addressCount = addressCount + 1
>
>    If Not fIn.AtEndOfStream Then fIn.SkipLine
>    If Not fIn.AtEndOfStream Then fIn.SkipLine
>
> Loop
>
> fIn.Close
>
> addrList.UpdateBatch
> addrList.Sort = "Address"
> addrList.MoveFirst
> strLine = ""
> Do Until addrList.EOF
>    strLine = strLine & addrList.Fields.Item ("Address") & vbCrLf
>    addrList.MoveNext
> Loop
> addrList.Close
>
> Set fOut = fso.OpenTextFile(newAddressFile , ForWriting)
> fOut.WriteLine("#Name" & delim & "Street" & delim & "CityStateZip" &
> vbCrLf)
> fOut.WriteLine strLine
> fOut.close
>
> '-----------------------------------------------------------
> 'FINISHED
> '-----------------------------------------------------------
> endTime = Timer
> WScript.Echo "Processed " & addressCount & " addresses in " &
> FormatNumber(endTime - startTime,2) & " seconds"
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350542

From	Norman Peelman <npeelman@cfl.rr.com>
Date	2016-04-17 18:21 -0400
Message-ID	<nf122g$mps$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to	#350517

On 04/17/2016 02:30 PM, DFS wrote:
> On 4/17/2016 9:33 AM, Norman Peelman wrote:
>
>
>>    *Untested*, but see if this is any faster... This is your VB, just
>> rearranged a bit. If it fails on the recordset stuff try just reverting
>> the Open command to yours and reversing the comments on the
>> .Update/.UpdateBatch methods.
>
> After a few small fixes (noted in the code below), it runs in 0.33
> seconds, so good improvement from 0.53.
>
>

   I only program in *VBA* when I have to... So the fact that it works 
without modification (to the logic) is nice! I doubt it could be speeded 
up another 38% at this point.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 10 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10]

csiph-web

Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript

Contents

#350268

#350142

#350146

#350269

#350151

#350270

#350275

#350280

#350291

#350367

#350277

#350366

#350390

#350371

#350448

#350656

#350664

#350478

#350517

#350542