Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #366298 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-22 20:04 +0000 |
| Last post | 2016-08-25 08:38 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 382 — 16 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 20:04 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 13:35 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 20:47 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 13:51 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 21:07 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 14:16 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 21:32 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 14:38 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 22:04 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 15:22 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 23:00 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 16:13 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 16:00 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 09:11 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 16:22 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 09:37 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 16:54 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 10:14 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 17:21 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 10:29 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 17:43 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:03 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 09:51 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 14:17 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 09:05 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 11:51 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:01 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 18:27 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:46 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 21:17 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 10:07 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:41 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 20:06 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 00:13 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 20:33 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 01:24 +0000
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 08:14 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:26 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 08:10 -0400
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-26 09:07 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 13:37 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-26 09:56 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 10:42 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:23 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:29 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 10:41 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:23 -0700
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 09:17 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:08 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 10:17 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:32 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 09:24 -0700
Re: Another day chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-26 11:27 -0500
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:36 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:45 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 13:52 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 13:43 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 17:18 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 14:39 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 18:42 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 17:24 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-27 00:09 +0000
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 17:33 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:29 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 12:08 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 18:26 -0600
Re: Another day ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-27 04:21 +0000
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 21:46 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-27 05:15 +0000
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-27 05:42 +0000
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 00:07 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:30 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 12:09 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 18:27 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 19:06 -0700
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 09:20 +0200
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 10:04 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 01:06 -0700
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 10:23 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 01:39 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 01:09 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 01:27 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-27 15:10 -0400
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 21:58 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 13:17 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 18:28 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 19:15 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-28 09:38 -0400
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 22:22 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 13:37 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-27 19:10 -0400
Re: Another day ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 03:20 +0000
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-28 09:35 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-28 09:16 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 10:03 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-27 15:02 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:19 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 15:34 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 19:03 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:28 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:27 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 12:06 -0700
Re: Another day -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-27 15:30 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 18:20 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 18:24 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 19:01 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 19:42 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 07:39 -0700
Re: Another day William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-08-28 16:22 +0100
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 09:50 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 15:29 -0400
Re: Another day ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 20:16 +0000
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 17:40 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 15:14 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 18:19 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 16:18 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 19:40 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 16:42 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 19:44 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 16:56 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 19:59 -0400
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 18:16 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-28 09:08 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-28 09:17 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-29 09:06 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-28 09:42 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 08:12 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-28 11:50 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 10:00 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-28 19:22 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 16:57 -0700
Re: Another day Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-08-29 18:39 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 15:43 -0700
Re: Another day ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 23:12 +0000
Re: Another day ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 23:15 +0000
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 17:09 -0700
Re: Another day Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-08-29 20:52 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 18:13 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-29 19:34 -0400
Re: Another day Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-30 01:49 +0200
Re: Another day Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-30 01:46 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 17:21 -0700
Re: Another day Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-30 02:26 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 17:33 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-30 09:16 -0400
Re: Another day Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-30 15:26 +0200
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-28 12:38 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 17:16 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 14:23 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:20 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 15:35 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 18:38 -0400
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 01:50 +0200
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 20:13 -0400
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 09:19 +0200
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:35 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 12:15 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-29 11:02 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 08:08 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-27 15:10 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:21 -0600
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 09:36 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 16:43 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 10:00 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 17:08 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 10:16 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 17:32 +0000
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 10:39 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 18:04 +0000
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:39 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 10:53 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 14:26 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 12:23 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 18:06 +0000
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 19:11 +0000
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:22 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 10:11 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 17:29 +0000
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 18:12 +0000
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 19:19 +0000
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 10:33 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 21:20 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 21:27 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 14:04 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:07 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 18:00 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:18 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 23:40 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 08:26 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:37 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:42 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 11:49 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 14:08 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 21:18 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:47 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 12:00 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:13 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 15:57 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:16 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 22:31 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:44 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 23:00 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 16:07 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:25 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 21:40 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:22 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 21:39 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 11:59 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:41 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 21:14 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:50 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:39 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 12:07 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:44 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:17 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-23 20:07 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 01:02 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 09:59 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 14:25 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 10:58 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 15:16 +0000
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:16 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 21:34 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:09 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-23 20:08 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 01:10 +0000
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:28 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 10:12 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 09:03 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:20 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:41 -0700
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 12:29 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:55 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:11 -0700
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 13:20 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:33 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:45 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:50 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 14:02 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:54 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:10 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:19 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:32 -0400
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 10:54 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 11:08 -0400
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 12:03 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 12:47 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:19 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 11:59 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:16 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 15:59 -0600
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 22:13 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:18 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:29 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:14 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:33 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 07:56 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:23 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:43 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:53 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:10 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:22 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:26 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:36 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:46 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 20:58 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:14 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:18 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-23 20:47 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 01:24 +0000
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:48 -0600
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 05:06 +0000
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:27 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 10:24 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 14:34 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 10:58 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 15:14 +0000
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:30 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 10:00 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 08:58 -0700
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 09:24 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:31 -0600
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 12:16 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:51 -0600
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 13:17 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 20:56 -0600
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 20:33 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:16 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:30 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:49 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:48 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:09 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 20:55 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:13 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:15 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 11:44 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:22 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:48 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 07:57 -0400
Re: Another day -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-26 06:41 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:35 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 13:51 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:17 -0600
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 13:03 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:36 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 16:09 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 09:27 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:33 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:44 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 13:44 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 17:14 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:10 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 13:48 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:16 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:24 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:28 -0600
Re: Another day Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-08-25 07:10 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:46 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 09:58 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 14:28 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 08:54 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:47 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:08 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 20:45 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:03 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:00 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 11:12 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:09 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:37 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 14:50 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:07 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 19:23 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:25 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 10:44 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:47 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 11:58 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 11:04 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:05 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:37 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 23:38 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:39 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:26 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 13:42 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 14:47 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 11:53 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:04 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 19:20 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:24 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:36 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 23:37 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 07:53 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 11:56 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 11:04 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 11:53 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 19:16 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 23:22 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 19:24 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 23:37 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:26 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 02:51 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 22:54 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 19:59 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 03:01 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 21:19 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 19:56 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 03:00 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 20:31 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 22:29 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 02:50 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 19:57 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 03:04 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 20:31 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 08:22 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 07:58 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:26 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:44 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:43 -0600
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 19:15 +0000
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 10:19 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 11:51 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 14:42 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 08:38 -0400
Page 14 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 … 12 13 [14] 15 16 … 20 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 13:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E34D3D.79FA0%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366537 |
On 8/24/16, 12:53 PM, in article npku0l$940$4@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: > Snit wrote: > >> On 8/24/16, 11:23 AM, in article npkoms$l8v$3@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >> <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >> >> ... >>>>> I looked at the politfact site. Unfortunately, they are taking a lot >>>>> of things out of context making his statements look false... hence the >>>>> free ride hillary is getting. >>>> >>>> She is a better liar... lying by innuendo and omission. She is a trained >>>> lawyer and it shows. But both are grossly dishonest. >>> >>> http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/barexam.asp >>> >>> I don't think she is a good lawyer, but an expert liar. >> >> Oh, I never said she was a good lawyer... but she is trained as a lawyer. >> And an expert liar. Sure. > > Isn't that what lawyers do best if they can? > > LOL!!! > > One lawyer told me in the spirit of sarcasm, said "You want to see my heart > in the jar I keep? When I retire I'll have it sewn back in". Pretty much. She has no heart. I do not think Trump does either. They are both about themselves. ... >>> Imagine if when you go to vote that you get a copy of your vote with a >>> unique serial number to check after the vote. It's been tried here and >>> the precinct committee officer was kicked out for cheating. Too many >>> people wanted to see if this type of system worked... oh did it work >>> well. >> >> I would love to see it. I do see where there is a risk it could lead to >> people buying votes. > > And I'm sure with George Soros money paying for them too. > I like to call him SoreAss because he doesn't like borders. People on both sides would abuse it... but at least that might be trackable? -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 20:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhjvsdv93.a@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366543 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/24/16, 12:53 PM, in article npku0l$940$4@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" > <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: > ... >> >> One lawyer told me in the spirit of sarcasm, said "You want to see my heart >> in the jar I keep? When I retire I'll have it sewn back in". > > Pretty much. She has no heart. I do not think Trump does either. They are > both about themselves. > You're not a very judge of people, are you?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 13:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E35101.79FAE%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366549 |
On 8/24/16, 1:22 PM, in article fhjvsdv93.a@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/24/16, 12:53 PM, in article npku0l$940$4@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >> <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >> > ... > >>> >>> One lawyer told me in the spirit of sarcasm, said "You want to see my heart >>> in the jar I keep? When I retire I'll have it sewn back in". >> >> Pretty much. She has no heart. I do not think Trump does either. They are >> both about themselves. > > You're not a very judge of people, are you? Actually I am... but who cares? -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 20:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ghjau03.af@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366550 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/24/16, 1:22 PM, in article fhjvsdv93.a@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/24/16, 12:53 PM, in article npku0l$940$4@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >>> <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >>> >> ... >> >>>> >>>> One lawyer told me in the spirit of sarcasm, said "You want to see my heart >>>> in the jar I keep? When I retire I'll have it sewn back in". >>> >>> Pretty much. She has no heart. I do not think Trump does either. They are >>> both about themselves. >> >> You're not a very judge of people, are you? > > Actually I am... but who cares? > Actually you are not, but then you wouldn't see that, since you are not a good judge of people.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 13:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E355B4.79FB8%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366554 |
On 8/24/16, 1:36 PM, in article ghjau03.af@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/24/16, 1:22 PM, in article fhjvsdv93.a@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 8/24/16, 12:53 PM, in article npku0l$940$4@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >>>> <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >>>> >>> ... >>> >>>>> >>>>> One lawyer told me in the spirit of sarcasm, said "You want to see my >>>>> heart >>>>> in the jar I keep? When I retire I'll have it sewn back in". >>>> >>>> Pretty much. She has no heart. I do not think Trump does either. They are >>>> both about themselves. >>> >>> You're not a very judge of people, are you? >> >> Actually I am... but who cares? >> > Actually you are not, Or I am but you are not. :) > but then you wouldn't see that, since > you are not a good judge of people. A claim you make with no support. But I am not the topic anyway, no matter how much you and others who troll often try to use that game to dodge. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 20:58 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nplmsm$l0n$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366543 |
Snit wrote: > On 8/24/16, 12:53 PM, in article npku0l$940$4@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" > <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: > >> Snit wrote: >> >>> On 8/24/16, 11:23 AM, in article npkoms$l8v$3@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >>> <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >>> >>> ... >>>>>> I looked at the politfact site. Unfortunately, they are taking a lot >>>>>> of things out of context making his statements look false... hence >>>>>> the free ride hillary is getting. >>>>> >>>>> She is a better liar... lying by innuendo and omission. She is a >>>>> trained lawyer and it shows. But both are grossly dishonest. >>>> >>>> http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/barexam.asp >>>> >>>> I don't think she is a good lawyer, but an expert liar. >>> >>> Oh, I never said she was a good lawyer... but she is trained as a >>> lawyer. And an expert liar. Sure. >> >> Isn't that what lawyers do best if they can? >> >> LOL!!! >> >> One lawyer told me in the spirit of sarcasm, said "You want to see my >> heart >> in the jar I keep? When I retire I'll have it sewn back in". > > Pretty much. She has no heart. I do not think Trump does either. They are > both about themselves. > There are a lot of people that have had close and decent dealings with donald. They say he is a very nice and generous man. I don't know that tho. Just saying. > ... >>>> Imagine if when you go to vote that you get a copy of your vote with a >>>> unique serial number to check after the vote. It's been tried here and >>>> the precinct committee officer was kicked out for cheating. Too many >>>> people wanted to see if this type of system worked... oh did it work >>>> well. >>> >>> I would love to see it. I do see where there is a risk it could lead to >>> people buying votes. >> >> And I'm sure with George Soros money paying for them too. >> I like to call him SoreAss because he doesn't like borders. > > People on both sides would abuse it... but at least that might be > trackable? > Maybe, but borders are like your neighbors fence... it keeps both honest. -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 20:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E3B0BD.7A049%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366595 |
On 8/24/16, 7:58 PM, in article nplmsm$l0n$3@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: > Snit wrote: > >> On 8/24/16, 12:53 PM, in article npku0l$940$4@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >> <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >> >>> Snit wrote: >>> >>>> On 8/24/16, 11:23 AM, in article npkoms$l8v$3@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >>>> <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> ... >>>>>>> I looked at the politfact site. Unfortunately, they are taking a lot >>>>>>> of things out of context making his statements look false... hence >>>>>>> the free ride hillary is getting. >>>>>> >>>>>> She is a better liar... lying by innuendo and omission. She is a >>>>>> trained lawyer and it shows. But both are grossly dishonest. >>>>> >>>>> http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/barexam.asp >>>>> >>>>> I don't think she is a good lawyer, but an expert liar. >>>> >>>> Oh, I never said she was a good lawyer... but she is trained as a >>>> lawyer. And an expert liar. Sure. >>> >>> Isn't that what lawyers do best if they can? >>> >>> LOL!!! >>> >>> One lawyer told me in the spirit of sarcasm, said "You want to see my >>> heart >>> in the jar I keep? When I retire I'll have it sewn back in". >> >> Pretty much. She has no heart. I do not think Trump does either. They are >> both about themselves. >> > > There are a lot of people that have had close and decent dealings with > donald. They say he is a very nice and generous man. I don't know that > tho. Just saying. Who says that? Many he has worked with say they were screwed... but I admit that is true of almost any wealthy person. >> ... >>>>> Imagine if when you go to vote that you get a copy of your vote with a >>>>> unique serial number to check after the vote. It's been tried here and >>>>> the precinct committee officer was kicked out for cheating. Too many >>>>> people wanted to see if this type of system worked... oh did it work >>>>> well. >>>> >>>> I would love to see it. I do see where there is a risk it could lead to >>>> people buying votes. >>> >>> And I'm sure with George Soros money paying for them too. >>> I like to call him SoreAss because he doesn't like borders. >> >> People on both sides would abuse it... but at least that might be >> trackable? >> > Maybe, but borders are like your neighbors fence... it keeps both honest. We have fences. They could be improved in places but a good percent of illegal immigation is not even from the fences. It is a talking point... and one where the numbers make no sense. There will never be a "big beautiful wall." -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 12:18 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <npncp1$t6u$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366601 |
Snit wrote: > On 8/24/16, 7:58 PM, in article nplmsm$l0n$3@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" > <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: > >> Snit wrote: >> >>> On 8/24/16, 12:53 PM, in article npku0l$940$4@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >>> <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 8/24/16, 11:23 AM, in article npkoms$l8v$3@dont-email.me, >>>>> "GreyCloud" <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> ... >>>>>>>> I looked at the politfact site. Unfortunately, they are taking a >>>>>>>> lot of things out of context making his statements look false... >>>>>>>> hence the free ride hillary is getting. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> She is a better liar... lying by innuendo and omission. She is a >>>>>>> trained lawyer and it shows. But both are grossly dishonest. >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/barexam.asp >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't think she is a good lawyer, but an expert liar. >>>>> >>>>> Oh, I never said she was a good lawyer... but she is trained as a >>>>> lawyer. And an expert liar. Sure. >>>> >>>> Isn't that what lawyers do best if they can? >>>> >>>> LOL!!! >>>> >>>> One lawyer told me in the spirit of sarcasm, said "You want to see my >>>> heart >>>> in the jar I keep? When I retire I'll have it sewn back in". >>> >>> Pretty much. She has no heart. I do not think Trump does either. They >>> are both about themselves. >>> >> >> There are a lot of people that have had close and decent dealings with >> donald. They say he is a very nice and generous man. I don't know that >> tho. Just saying. > > Who says that? People that know Trump. > Many he has worked with say they were screwed... but I > admit that is true of almost any wealthy person. > Not really. >>> ... >>>>>> Imagine if when you go to vote that you get a copy of your vote with >>>>>> a >>>>>> unique serial number to check after the vote. It's been tried here >>>>>> and >>>>>> the precinct committee officer was kicked out for cheating. Too many >>>>>> people wanted to see if this type of system worked... oh did it work >>>>>> well. >>>>> >>>>> I would love to see it. I do see where there is a risk it could lead >>>>> to people buying votes. >>>> >>>> And I'm sure with George Soros money paying for them too. >>>> I like to call him SoreAss because he doesn't like borders. >>> >>> People on both sides would abuse it... but at least that might be >>> trackable? >>> >> Maybe, but borders are like your neighbors fence... it keeps both honest. > > We have fences. They could be improved in places but a good percent of > illegal immigation is not even from the fences. It is a talking point... > and one where the numbers make no sense. There will never be a "big > beautiful wall." That depends on the viewers perspective of course. -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-23 20:47 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <npiqr5$rp7$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366403 |
On 8/23/2016 5:59 PM, GreyCloud wrote: > I find Trump mostly honest. I don't know what lies he's told yet. They're not "lies". They're flip-flops. http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/full-list-donald-trump-s-rapidly-changing-policy-positions-n547801 He lied - hugely - when he claimed he was worth $10 billion. He lied when he claimed "No one knows the system better than me, which is why I alone can fix it". He lied when he claimed he didn't know the disabled reporter he cruelly mocked was disabled. He lied when he said Obama was the founder of ISIS, and Clinton the co-founder. He lied when he says he saw video of the $400M ransom/leverage payment made to Iran recently. He lied when he said Clinton and the Democrats are rigging the debates. He lied when he said Hillary Clinton laundered money to Bill Clinton. http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/statements/ He's ridiculous, and the Dem platform is a horrorshow of liberalism.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 01:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhjaud03fk.o@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366430 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 8/23/2016 5:59 PM, GreyCloud wrote: > >> I find Trump mostly honest. I don't know what lies he's told yet. > > > They're not "lies". They're flip-flops. > > http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/full-list-donald-trump-s-rapidly-changing-policy-positions-n547801 > > > He lied - hugely - when he claimed he was worth $10 billion. > He didn't claim that. Some magazine like Forbes or something put it at that. Prior to his entry in the election, I heard number between 4 and 7. > He lied when he claimed "No one knows the system better than me, which > is why I alone can fix it". > He's talking about the big donor system. I'm sure he's well versed in that system. > He lied when he claimed he didn't know the disabled reporter he cruelly > mocked was disabled. > The spaz attacked Trump first. Disability not a shield. > He lied when he said Obama was the founder of ISIS, and Clinton the > co-founder. > Their actions led to ISIS forming. He's mainly saying that to piss her off. Obviously it's working. > He lied when he says he saw video of the $400M ransom/leverage payment > made to Iran recently. > An Iranian propaganda video showing the pallet of money is online. I've seen it. (It's not the one with the plane). > > He lied when he said Clinton and the Democrats are rigging the debates. > Clinton does not want anybody watching her get slaughtered by Donald J. Trump on national TV. She'll probably back out. She knows that if she pulls that bathroom stunt with him he'll start making fun of her. He might even whip out one of those flashy things like they had in MIB and fuck with damaged brain. That head will start bobbing. > He lied when he said Hillary Clinton laundered money to Bill Clinton. > > http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/statements/ > http://www.politifactbias.com/p/about-politifact-bias.html > > > He's ridiculous, and the Dem platform is a horrorshow of liberalism. > Hold your nose and pull the lever for Trump. You know it's the right thing to do. Think of the Supreme Court if nothing else.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-23 22:48 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <npj8ui$rni$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366437 |
On 08/23/16 19:24, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > DFS<nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >> On 8/23/2016 5:59 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >> >>> I find Trump mostly honest. I don't know what lies he's told yet. >> >> >> They're not "lies". They're flip-flops. >> >> http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/full-list-donald-trump-s-rapidly-changing-policy-positions-n547801 >> >> >> He lied - hugely - when he claimed he was worth $10 billion. >> > > He didn't claim that. Some magazine like Forbes or something put it at > that. Prior to his entry in the election, I heard number between 4 and 7. > >> He lied when he claimed "No one knows the system better than me, which >> is why I alone can fix it". >> > > He's talking about the big donor system. I'm sure he's well versed > in that system. > >> He lied when he claimed he didn't know the disabled reporter he cruelly >> mocked was disabled. >> > > The spaz attacked Trump first. Disability not a shield. > >> He lied when he said Obama was the founder of ISIS, and Clinton the >> co-founder. >> > > Their actions led to ISIS forming. He's mainly saying that > to piss her off. Obviously it's working. > > >> He lied when he says he saw video of the $400M ransom/leverage payment >> made to Iran recently. >> > > An Iranian propaganda video showing the pallet of money is online. > I've seen it. (It's not the one with the plane). > > >> >> He lied when he said Clinton and the Democrats are rigging the debates. >> > > Clinton does not want anybody watching her get slaughtered > by Donald J. Trump on national TV. She'll probably back out. > She knows that if she pulls that bathroom stunt with him he'll > start making fun of her. He might even whip out one of those > flashy things like they had in MIB and fuck with damaged brain. > That head will start bobbing. > > >> He lied when he said Hillary Clinton laundered money to Bill Clinton. >> >> http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/statements/ >> > > http://www.politifactbias.com/p/about-politifact-bias.html > >> >> >> He's ridiculous, and the Dem platform is a horrorshow of liberalism. >> > > Hold your nose and pull the lever for Trump. You know it's the right > thing to do. Think of the Supreme Court if nothing else. > > > What does it take to wake DFS up to the real truth?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 05:06 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hjgssd892.a@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366458 |
GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: > On 08/23/16 19:24, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >> DFS<nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>> On 8/23/2016 5:59 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>> >>>> I find Trump mostly honest. I don't know what lies he's told yet. >>> >>> >>> They're not "lies". They're flip-flops. >>> >>> http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/full-list-donald-trump-s-rapidly-changing-policy-positions-n547801 >>> >>> >>> He lied - hugely - when he claimed he was worth $10 billion. >>> >> >> He didn't claim that. Some magazine like Forbes or something put it at >> that. Prior to his entry in the election, I heard number between 4 and 7. >> >>> He lied when he claimed "No one knows the system better than me, which >>> is why I alone can fix it". >>> >> >> He's talking about the big donor system. I'm sure he's well versed >> in that system. >> >>> He lied when he claimed he didn't know the disabled reporter he cruelly >>> mocked was disabled. >>> >> >> The spaz attacked Trump first. Disability not a shield. >> >>> He lied when he said Obama was the founder of ISIS, and Clinton the >>> co-founder. >>> >> >> Their actions led to ISIS forming. He's mainly saying that >> to piss her off. Obviously it's working. >> >> >>> He lied when he says he saw video of the $400M ransom/leverage payment >>> made to Iran recently. >>> >> >> An Iranian propaganda video showing the pallet of money is online. >> I've seen it. (It's not the one with the plane). >> >> >>> >>> He lied when he said Clinton and the Democrats are rigging the debates. >>> >> >> Clinton does not want anybody watching her get slaughtered >> by Donald J. Trump on national TV. She'll probably back out. >> She knows that if she pulls that bathroom stunt with him he'll >> start making fun of her. He might even whip out one of those >> flashy things like they had in MIB and fuck with damaged brain. >> That head will start bobbing. >> >> >>> He lied when he said Hillary Clinton laundered money to Bill Clinton. >>> >>> http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/statements/ >>> >> >> http://www.politifactbias.com/p/about-politifact-bias.html >> >>> >>> >>> He's ridiculous, and the Dem platform is a horrorshow of liberalism. >>> >> >> Hold your nose and pull the lever for Trump. You know it's the right >> thing to do. Think of the Supreme Court if nothing else. >> >> >> > What does it take to wake DFS up to the real truth? > He must have a new girlfriend and he's trying to be all "sensitive" and "intellectual" or something. Either that or he's listening to too much Glenn Beck or Mark Levin. I used to like Mark, but became a NeverTrump kook with a whole lot of Lyin Ted butthurt.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 12:27 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <npkotq$msu$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366461 |
On 08/23/16 23:06, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > GreyCloud<mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >> On 08/23/16 19:24, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>> DFS<nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>> On 8/23/2016 5:59 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>> >>>>> I find Trump mostly honest. I don't know what lies he's told yet. >>>> >>>> >>>> They're not "lies". They're flip-flops. >>>> >>>> http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/full-list-donald-trump-s-rapidly-changing-policy-positions-n547801 >>>> >>>> >>>> He lied - hugely - when he claimed he was worth $10 billion. >>>> >>> >>> He didn't claim that. Some magazine like Forbes or something put it at >>> that. Prior to his entry in the election, I heard number between 4 and 7. >>> >>>> He lied when he claimed "No one knows the system better than me, which >>>> is why I alone can fix it". >>>> >>> >>> He's talking about the big donor system. I'm sure he's well versed >>> in that system. >>> >>>> He lied when he claimed he didn't know the disabled reporter he cruelly >>>> mocked was disabled. >>>> >>> >>> The spaz attacked Trump first. Disability not a shield. >>> >>>> He lied when he said Obama was the founder of ISIS, and Clinton the >>>> co-founder. >>>> >>> >>> Their actions led to ISIS forming. He's mainly saying that >>> to piss her off. Obviously it's working. >>> >>> >>>> He lied when he says he saw video of the $400M ransom/leverage payment >>>> made to Iran recently. >>>> >>> >>> An Iranian propaganda video showing the pallet of money is online. >>> I've seen it. (It's not the one with the plane). >>> >>> >>>> >>>> He lied when he said Clinton and the Democrats are rigging the debates. >>>> >>> >>> Clinton does not want anybody watching her get slaughtered >>> by Donald J. Trump on national TV. She'll probably back out. >>> She knows that if she pulls that bathroom stunt with him he'll >>> start making fun of her. He might even whip out one of those >>> flashy things like they had in MIB and fuck with damaged brain. >>> That head will start bobbing. >>> >>> >>>> He lied when he said Hillary Clinton laundered money to Bill Clinton. >>>> >>>> http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/statements/ >>>> >>> >>> http://www.politifactbias.com/p/about-politifact-bias.html >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> He's ridiculous, and the Dem platform is a horrorshow of liberalism. >>>> >>> >>> Hold your nose and pull the lever for Trump. You know it's the right >>> thing to do. Think of the Supreme Court if nothing else. >>> >>> >>> >> What does it take to wake DFS up to the real truth? >> > > He must have a new girlfriend and he's trying to be all "sensitive" and > "intellectual" or something. Either that or he's listening to too much > Glenn Beck or Mark Levin. I used to like Mark, but became a NeverTrump > kook with a whole lot of Lyin Ted butthurt. > I heard that one as well. Our local radio station kicked him off the air and put Hannity in that time slot. Hannity is really ticked off at the press lately. DFS is pretty smart in figuring things out tho, but still can't figure it out as to why he hasn't caught on to alternative media lately. All of the alternatives are telling the same truth about what is going on. whatdoesitmean.com has always been the first to report the bad news of what is going on, but from the Russian viewpoint. But they've always been correct for the last few years, so I have vetted that news source to be very accurate.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 10:24 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <npkaol$33i$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366437 |
On 8/23/2016 9:24 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > Hold your nose and pull the lever for Trump. You know it's the right > thing to do. I know voting for Trump - or Clinton - is the /wrong/ thing to do for the United States. > Think of the Supreme Court if nothing else. arrggghhh... it's so frustrating. I can't stand either of them: Trump for his trainwreck buffoonery, Clinton for her liberal, politician mentality. I'm gonna have to write-in a Republican. Maybe vote Libertarian.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 14:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <shjfva903.a@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366476 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 8/23/2016 9:24 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > > >> Hold your nose and pull the lever for Trump. You know it's the right >> thing to do. > > I know voting for Trump - or Clinton - is the /wrong/ thing to do for > the United States. > > > > > Think of the Supreme Court if nothing else. > > arrggghhh... it's so frustrating. I can't stand either of them: Trump > for his trainwreck buffoonery, Clinton for her liberal, politician > mentality. > > I'm gonna have to write-in a Republican. Maybe vote Libertarian. > Split the Republican vote. That's a path to success. Not. Hillary thanks you for your support. Just think, win she wins and stacks the Court with three or four liberal Justices, you'll be able to say, "I stood with Glenn Beck in 2016." At least you'll have that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 10:58 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <npkcnh$aht$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366479 |
On 8/24/2016 10:34 AM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >> On 8/23/2016 9:24 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >> >> >>> Hold your nose and pull the lever for Trump. You know it's the right >>> thing to do. >> >> I know voting for Trump - or Clinton - is the /wrong/ thing to do for >> the United States. >> >> >> >> > Think of the Supreme Court if nothing else. >> >> arrggghhh... it's so frustrating. I can't stand either of them: Trump >> for his trainwreck buffoonery, Clinton for her liberal, politician >> mentality. >> >> I'm gonna have to write-in a Republican. Maybe vote Libertarian. >> > > Split the Republican vote. That's a path to success. Not. > Hillary thanks you for your support. It would be cool if my vote is the deciding one that keeps Trump out! > Just think, win she wins ? Just thinking about voting for Trump has softened your brain. > and stacks the Court with three or four > liberal Justices, you'll be able to say, "I stood with Glenn Beck > in 2016." At least you'll have that. When your Walmart shopping sprees cost 50% more because of tariffs, you'll have Trump to thank.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 15:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hjgua93.faji@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366483 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 8/24/2016 10:34 AM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>> >>> > >> and stacks the Court with three or four >> liberal Justices, you'll be able to say, "I stood with Glenn Beck >> in 2016." At least you'll have that. > > > When your Walmart shopping sprees cost 50% more because of tariffs, > you'll have Trump to thank. > Just think, if nobody in America had a job, everything would be free!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 12:30 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <npkp3s$msu$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366485 |
On 08/24/16 09:14, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > DFS<nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >> On 8/24/2016 10:34 AM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>>> >>>> > >> >>> and stacks the Court with three or four >>> liberal Justices, you'll be able to say, "I stood with Glenn Beck >>> in 2016." At least you'll have that. >> >> >> When your Walmart shopping sprees cost 50% more because of tariffs, >> you'll have Trump to thank. >> > > Just think, if nobody in America had a job, everything would be free! > YEAH!! Where's my free car, my free computer, my free iPhone? LOL!!! Who's going to pay for it? Not those without any moeny... and all the rich will have left the U.S. by that time.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 10:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <npmtlk$6am$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366483 |
On 2016-08-24 10:58 AM, DFS wrote: >> and stacks the Court with three or four >> liberal Justices, you'll be able to say, "I stood with Glenn Beck >> in 2016." At least you'll have that. > > > When your Walmart shopping sprees cost 50% more because of tariffs, > you'll have Trump to thank. It should be noted that in Canada at least, before the income tax was sold to the citizens as a "temporary measure to fund the Great War," tariffs were the the government received most of its money. It also forced other countries to play by the rules. Trump's tariffs, no matter how much you might dislike them, will raise the price of goods produced OUTSIDE of the United States. However, the price of products made IN the United States will not change unless they depend on items coming from those countries. Not only that but tariffs will only be applied IF the country in question does not provide the United States with any kind of incentive which is what is currently happening. In other words, China is allowed to sell its goods here for the same price or less than what American ones cost all the while paying no compensation to the American government for that privilege. Meanwhile, if an American company sells in China, its products cost a lot more than comparable Chinese products. Is it fair? OF COURSE NOT, which is why Trump wants to do something about it. If you know the history of Latin America and Jamaica very well, you'll know that the United States essentially decimated their economies by doing what China is doing to the US at the moment. They provided those countries with a loan of some sort and gave them a set amount of time to pay it back knowing very well that the country would never be able to do so. Before the loan was up, it needed to be spent on American goods. After it was up, if it wasn't repaid, American companies were allowed to sell goods in those countries without tariffs which essentially meant that their products cost less than what was produced locally. Do Americans want the country to become the same kind of economic success that Latin America and Jamaica currently are? No? Then support Trump. -- Silver Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 08:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E31219.79F22%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366476 |
On 8/24/16, 7:24 AM, in article npkaol$33i$2@dont-email.me, "DFS" <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 8/23/2016 9:24 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > > >> Hold your nose and pull the lever for Trump. You know it's the right >> thing to do. > > I know voting for Trump - or Clinton - is the /wrong/ thing to do for > the United States. You and I do not often agree on politics, but on this we do agree. Both are disasters. Trump is horrific... but I do not back election fraud even to block him. He is, at least, a mostly legitimate candidate. She is not. >> Think of the Supreme Court if nothing else. > > arrggghhh... it's so frustrating. I can't stand either of them: Trump > for his trainwreck buffoonery, Clinton for her liberal, politician > mentality. Liberal? She is a Republican... or what the Republicans used to be. Completely pro-wealthy and anti-general citizen. Republicans should be flocking to her. Heck, she even had the same "luck" as Bush II to have jurisdictions with more hackable voting machines and no paper trails lean toward her in ways that is so statistically unlikely as to be unbelievable. The Democrats have become the Republicans and the Republicans have become a cartoon... a really bad one. > I'm gonna have to write-in a Republican. Maybe vote Libertarian. If the Libertarians were not so inconsistent and caught up in a fantasy world I might back them... but sadly neither they nor Stein with the Green party are really viable options either. We have no even decent options this time around. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 14 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 … 12 13 [14] 15 16 … 20 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web