Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #366134 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-20 22:17 +0000 |
| Last post | 2016-08-25 18:54 +0000 |
| Articles | 13 on this page of 73 — 8 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-20 22:17 +0000
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-20 16:56 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 00:18 +0000
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-20 17:27 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 00:49 +0000
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-20 18:38 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 01:51 +0000
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-20 19:44 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 03:08 +0000
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-20 20:15 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 03:34 +0000
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-20 21:02 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 04:22 +0000
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-20 22:14 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 05:21 +0000
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-20 22:50 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 06:00 +0000
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-20 23:16 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 06:35 +0000
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 10:01 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 07:58 -0400
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:19 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 07:54 -0400
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:16 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-21 01:07 -0400
Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 05:15 +0000
Re: If you see a liberal DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-21 09:35 -0400
Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 15:13 +0000
Re: If you see a liberal Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-08-21 12:22 -0400
Re: If you see a liberal GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-21 11:06 -0600
Re: If you see a liberal DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-21 18:38 -0400
Re: If you see a liberal Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-08-21 19:08 -0400
Re: If you see a liberal chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-22 06:59 -0500
So, now you are an outhouse attendent? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-22 12:23 -0600
Re: If you see a liberal GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-21 11:04 -0600
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 10:08 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 18:42 +0000
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 12:25 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-22 12:25 -0600
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 11:39 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 11:53 -0600
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:07 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 15:54 -0600
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:40 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 08:36 -0400
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:24 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-22 12:24 -0600
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 11:26 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 11:55 -0600
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:05 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 15:54 -0600
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:38 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:09 -0400
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:25 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 14:09 -0600
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:20 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 07:52 -0400
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:15 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-21 11:03 -0600
Re: If you see a liberal Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 07:49 -0400
Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 15:54 +0000
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 10:19 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 17:33 +0000
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 10:39 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 17:46 +0000
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 11:01 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 14:41 -0400
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 11:51 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 12:22 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 16:00 -0400
Re: If you see a liberal Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:04 -0700
Re: If you see a liberal Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 14:39 -0400
Re: If you see a liberal "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 18:54 +0000
Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 15:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <adhje88a.e9@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366630 |
Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > On 2016-08-20 6:17 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >> If you see a liberal, kill it. >> https://twitter.com/reneejon/status/766851862876135424 > > They're disgusting individuals and like a woman interviewed by Infowars > pointed out, ironic in their existence. After all, they complain about > Trump being a bully all the while doing most of the bullying. > Exactly. Welcome back.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 10:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E476A0.7A17F%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366630 |
On 8/25/16, 4:49 AM, in article npmlvv$bg8$2@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > On 2016-08-20 6:17 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >> If you see a liberal, kill it. >> https://twitter.com/reneejon/status/766851862876135424 > > They're disgusting individuals and like a woman interviewed by Infowars > pointed out, ironic in their existence. After all, they complain about > Trump being a bully all the while doing most of the bullying. > Trump is the ONLY candidate to call for violence. To call him out on that does not in any way excuse the violence of others... backing or protesting against anyone. The idea that liberals are doing most of the bullying is also not supported. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 17:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hguu0a3.370@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366739 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/25/16, 4:49 AM, in article npmlvv$bg8$2@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" > <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > >> On 2016-08-20 6:17 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>> If you see a liberal, kill it. >>> https://twitter.com/reneejon/status/766851862876135424 >> >> They're disgusting individuals and like a woman interviewed by Infowars >> pointed out, ironic in their existence. After all, they complain about >> Trump being a bully all the while doing most of the bullying. >> > Trump is the ONLY candidate to call for violence. To call him out on that > does not in any way excuse the violence of others... backing or protesting > against anyone. > > The idea that liberals are doing most of the bullying is also not supported. > The preponderance of videos showing just that is enough, just google. ---------------------------------- "protesters bully trump supporters" About 151 results (0.51 seconds) "trump supporters bully protesters" No results found for "trump supporters bully protesters". ---------------------------------- "protesters attack trump supporters" About 19,600 results (0.52 seconds) "trump supporters attack protesters" About 514 results (0.61 seconds) ---------------------------------- "protesters assault trump supporters" About 3,200 results (0.51 seconds) "trump supporters assault protesters" About 136 results (0.48 seconds) ----------------------------------
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 10:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E47B75.7A193%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366743 |
On 8/25/16, 10:33 AM, in article hguu0a3.370@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/25/16, 4:49 AM, in article npmlvv$bg8$2@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" >> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >> >>> On 2016-08-20 6:17 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>>> If you see a liberal, kill it. >>>> https://twitter.com/reneejon/status/766851862876135424 >>> >>> They're disgusting individuals and like a woman interviewed by Infowars >>> pointed out, ironic in their existence. After all, they complain about >>> Trump being a bully all the while doing most of the bullying. >>> >> Trump is the ONLY candidate to call for violence. To call him out on that >> does not in any way excuse the violence of others... backing or protesting >> against anyone. >> >> The idea that liberals are doing most of the bullying is also not supported. >> > > The preponderance of videos showing just that is enough, just google. > > ---------------------------------- > "protesters bully trump supporters" > About 151 results (0.51 seconds) > > "trump supporters bully protesters" > No results found for "trump supporters bully protesters". > > ---------------------------------- > "protesters attack trump supporters" > About 19,600 results (0.52 seconds) > > "trump supporters attack protesters" > About 514 results (0.61 seconds) > > ---------------------------------- > "protesters assault trump supporters" > About 3,200 results (0.51 seconds) > > "trump supporters assault protesters" > About 136 results (0.48 seconds) > > ---------------------------------- So you would say the many hits showing support for the idea Trump is racist backs the fact he is. Interesting. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 17:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <adhvjds930.a3@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366745 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/25/16, 10:33 AM, in article hguu0a3.370@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/25/16, 4:49 AM, in article npmlvv$bg8$2@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" >>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2016-08-20 6:17 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>>>> If you see a liberal, kill it. >>>>> https://twitter.com/reneejon/status/766851862876135424 >>>> >>>> They're disgusting individuals and like a woman interviewed by Infowars >>>> pointed out, ironic in their existence. After all, they complain about >>>> Trump being a bully all the while doing most of the bullying. >>>> >>> Trump is the ONLY candidate to call for violence. To call him out on that >>> does not in any way excuse the violence of others... backing or protesting >>> against anyone. >>> >>> The idea that liberals are doing most of the bullying is also not supported. >>> >> >> The preponderance of videos showing just that is enough, just google. >> >> ---------------------------------- >> "protesters bully trump supporters" >> About 151 results (0.51 seconds) >> >> "trump supporters bully protesters" >> No results found for "trump supporters bully protesters". >> >> ---------------------------------- >> "protesters attack trump supporters" >> About 19,600 results (0.52 seconds) >> >> "trump supporters attack protesters" >> About 514 results (0.61 seconds) >> >> ---------------------------------- >> "protesters assault trump supporters" >> About 3,200 results (0.51 seconds) >> >> "trump supporters assault protesters" >> About 136 results (0.48 seconds) >> >> ---------------------------------- > > So you would say the many hits showing support for the idea Trump is racist > backs the fact he is. Interesting. > So you would say that all those reports of protesters assaulting Trump supporters are equivalent to posts of people's opinions of Trump being a racist. Interesting.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 11:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E4809E.7A1A9%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366749 |
On 8/25/16, 10:46 AM, in article adhvjds930.a3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/25/16, 10:33 AM, in article hguu0a3.370@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 8/25/16, 4:49 AM, in article npmlvv$bg8$2@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" >>>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2016-08-20 6:17 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>>>>> If you see a liberal, kill it. >>>>>> https://twitter.com/reneejon/status/766851862876135424 >>>>> >>>>> They're disgusting individuals and like a woman interviewed by Infowars >>>>> pointed out, ironic in their existence. After all, they complain about >>>>> Trump being a bully all the while doing most of the bullying. >>>>> >>>> Trump is the ONLY candidate to call for violence. To call him out on that >>>> does not in any way excuse the violence of others... backing or protesting >>>> against anyone. >>>> >>>> The idea that liberals are doing most of the bullying is also not >>>> supported. >>>> >>> >>> The preponderance of videos showing just that is enough, just google. >>> >>> ---------------------------------- >>> "protesters bully trump supporters" >>> About 151 results (0.51 seconds) >>> >>> "trump supporters bully protesters" >>> No results found for "trump supporters bully protesters". >>> >>> ---------------------------------- >>> "protesters attack trump supporters" >>> About 19,600 results (0.52 seconds) >>> >>> "trump supporters attack protesters" >>> About 514 results (0.61 seconds) >>> >>> ---------------------------------- >>> "protesters assault trump supporters" >>> About 3,200 results (0.51 seconds) >>> >>> "trump supporters assault protesters" >>> About 136 results (0.48 seconds) >>> >>> ---------------------------------- >> >> So you would say the many hits showing support for the idea Trump is racist >> backs the fact he is. Interesting. No answer from you. Why not? You demand answers... showing you think you are ENTITLED to them. Do you not think others deserve the same privileges as you? > So you would say that all those reports of protesters assaulting Trump > supporters are equivalent to posts of people's opinions of Trump being > a racist. Interesting. Nope. The evidence of Trump's racism is NOT what people say ABOUT him but what HE says. Period. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 14:41 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <npne4h$2b8$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366749 |
On 2016-08-25 1:46 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/25/16, 10:33 AM, in article hguu0a3.370@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 8/25/16, 4:49 AM, in article npmlvv$bg8$2@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" >>>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2016-08-20 6:17 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>>>>> If you see a liberal, kill it. >>>>>> https://twitter.com/reneejon/status/766851862876135424 >>>>> >>>>> They're disgusting individuals and like a woman interviewed by Infowars >>>>> pointed out, ironic in their existence. After all, they complain about >>>>> Trump being a bully all the while doing most of the bullying. >>>>> >>>> Trump is the ONLY candidate to call for violence. To call him out on that >>>> does not in any way excuse the violence of others... backing or protesting >>>> against anyone. >>>> >>>> The idea that liberals are doing most of the bullying is also not supported. >>>> >>> >>> The preponderance of videos showing just that is enough, just google. >>> >>> ---------------------------------- >>> "protesters bully trump supporters" >>> About 151 results (0.51 seconds) >>> >>> "trump supporters bully protesters" >>> No results found for "trump supporters bully protesters". >>> >>> ---------------------------------- >>> "protesters attack trump supporters" >>> About 19,600 results (0.52 seconds) >>> >>> "trump supporters attack protesters" >>> About 514 results (0.61 seconds) >>> >>> ---------------------------------- >>> "protesters assault trump supporters" >>> About 3,200 results (0.51 seconds) >>> >>> "trump supporters assault protesters" >>> About 136 results (0.48 seconds) >>> >>> ---------------------------------- >> >> So you would say the many hits showing support for the idea Trump is racist >> backs the fact he is. Interesting. >> > > So you would say that all those reports of protesters assaulting Trump > supporters are equivalent to posts of people's opinions of Trump being > a racist. Interesting. Snit only agrees with statistics or videos which show whatever position he is backing. Any statistics or videos showing the opposite makes us interesting. -- Silver Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 11:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E48C44.7A1DE%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366768 |
On 8/25/16, 11:41 AM, in article npne4h$2b8$2@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > On 2016-08-25 1:46 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/25/16, 10:33 AM, in article hguu0a3.370@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 8/25/16, 4:49 AM, in article npmlvv$bg8$2@dont-email.me, "Silver >>>>> Slimer" >>>>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2016-08-20 6:17 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>>>>>> If you see a liberal, kill it. >>>>>>> https://twitter.com/reneejon/status/766851862876135424 >>>>>> >>>>>> They're disgusting individuals and like a woman interviewed by Infowars >>>>>> pointed out, ironic in their existence. After all, they complain about >>>>>> Trump being a bully all the while doing most of the bullying. >>>>>> >>>>> Trump is the ONLY candidate to call for violence. To call him out on that >>>>> does not in any way excuse the violence of others... backing or protesting >>>>> against anyone. >>>>> >>>>> The idea that liberals are doing most of the bullying is also not >>>>> supported. >>>>> >>>> >>>> The preponderance of videos showing just that is enough, just google. >>>> >>>> ---------------------------------- >>>> "protesters bully trump supporters" >>>> About 151 results (0.51 seconds) >>>> >>>> "trump supporters bully protesters" >>>> No results found for "trump supporters bully protesters". >>>> >>>> ---------------------------------- >>>> "protesters attack trump supporters" >>>> About 19,600 results (0.52 seconds) >>>> >>>> "trump supporters attack protesters" >>>> About 514 results (0.61 seconds) >>>> >>>> ---------------------------------- >>>> "protesters assault trump supporters" >>>> About 3,200 results (0.51 seconds) >>>> >>>> "trump supporters assault protesters" >>>> About 136 results (0.48 seconds) >>>> >>>> ---------------------------------- >>> >>> So you would say the many hits showing support for the idea Trump is racist >>> backs the fact he is. Interesting. >>> >> >> So you would say that all those reports of protesters assaulting Trump >> supporters are equivalent to posts of people's opinions of Trump being >> a racist. Interesting. > > Snit only agrees with statistics or videos which show whatever position > he is backing. Any statistics or videos showing the opposite makes us > interesting. > A direct lie about my view. Why? -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 12:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <137dfa0c-342d-4408-afe1-a47a4d68157d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #366768 |
On Thursday, August 25, 2016 at 12:41:23 PM UTC-6, Silver Slimer wrote: > On 2016-08-25 1:46 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 8/25/16, 10:33 AM, in article hguu0a3.370@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> > >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>>> On 8/25/16, 4:49 AM, in article npmlvv$bg8$2@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" > >>>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On 2016-08-20 6:17 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > >>>>>> If you see a liberal, kill it. > >>>>>> https://twitter.com/reneejon/status/766851862876135424 > >>>>> > >>>>> They're disgusting individuals and like a woman interviewed by Infowars > >>>>> pointed out, ironic in their existence. After all, they complain about > >>>>> Trump being a bully all the while doing most of the bullying. > >>>>> > >>>> Trump is the ONLY candidate to call for violence. To call him out on that > >>>> does not in any way excuse the violence of others... backing or protesting > >>>> against anyone. > >>>> > >>>> The idea that liberals are doing most of the bullying is also not supported. > >>>> > >>> > >>> The preponderance of videos showing just that is enough, just google. > >>> > >>> ---------------------------------- > >>> "protesters bully trump supporters" > >>> About 151 results (0.51 seconds) > >>> > >>> "trump supporters bully protesters" > >>> No results found for "trump supporters bully protesters". > >>> > >>> ---------------------------------- > >>> "protesters attack trump supporters" > >>> About 19,600 results (0.52 seconds) > >>> > >>> "trump supporters attack protesters" > >>> About 514 results (0.61 seconds) > >>> > >>> ---------------------------------- > >>> "protesters assault trump supporters" > >>> About 3,200 results (0.51 seconds) > >>> > >>> "trump supporters assault protesters" > >>> About 136 results (0.48 seconds) > >>> > >>> ---------------------------------- > >> > >> So you would say the many hits showing support for the idea Trump is racist > >> backs the fact he is. Interesting. > >> > > > > So you would say that all those reports of protesters assaulting Trump > > supporters are equivalent to posts of people's opinions of Trump being > > a racist. Interesting. > > Snit only agrees with statistics or videos which show whatever position > he is backing. Any statistics or videos showing the opposite makes us > interesting. Why do you think I usually put the word "interesting" in quotes when I'm responding to his idiocy?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 16:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <npnip6$j3j$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366785 |
On 2016-08-25 3:22 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Thursday, August 25, 2016 at 12:41:23 PM UTC-6, Silver Slimer wrote: >> On 2016-08-25 1:46 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 8/25/16, 10:33 AM, in article hguu0a3.370@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 8/25/16, 4:49 AM, in article npmlvv$bg8$2@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" >>>>>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2016-08-20 6:17 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>>>>>>> If you see a liberal, kill it. >>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/reneejon/status/766851862876135424 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> They're disgusting individuals and like a woman interviewed by Infowars >>>>>>> pointed out, ironic in their existence. After all, they complain about >>>>>>> Trump being a bully all the while doing most of the bullying. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Trump is the ONLY candidate to call for violence. To call him out on that >>>>>> does not in any way excuse the violence of others... backing or protesting >>>>>> against anyone. >>>>>> >>>>>> The idea that liberals are doing most of the bullying is also not supported. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The preponderance of videos showing just that is enough, just google. >>>>> >>>>> ---------------------------------- >>>>> "protesters bully trump supporters" >>>>> About 151 results (0.51 seconds) >>>>> >>>>> "trump supporters bully protesters" >>>>> No results found for "trump supporters bully protesters". >>>>> >>>>> ---------------------------------- >>>>> "protesters attack trump supporters" >>>>> About 19,600 results (0.52 seconds) >>>>> >>>>> "trump supporters attack protesters" >>>>> About 514 results (0.61 seconds) >>>>> >>>>> ---------------------------------- >>>>> "protesters assault trump supporters" >>>>> About 3,200 results (0.51 seconds) >>>>> >>>>> "trump supporters assault protesters" >>>>> About 136 results (0.48 seconds) >>>>> >>>>> ---------------------------------- >>>> >>>> So you would say the many hits showing support for the idea Trump is racist >>>> backs the fact he is. Interesting. >>>> >>> >>> So you would say that all those reports of protesters assaulting Trump >>> supporters are equivalent to posts of people's opinions of Trump being >>> a racist. Interesting. >> >> Snit only agrees with statistics or videos which show whatever position >> he is backing. Any statistics or videos showing the opposite makes us >> interesting. > > Why do you think I usually put the word "interesting" in quotes when I'm responding to his idiocy? I have no idea what you usually do since I only returned today, sorry. Either way, it's very hard to talk to him in general but it's absolutely impossible to debate him. He believes that whatever the left says and does is right and no amount of statistics, logic or evidence will sway him. You truly are wasting your time if you're hoping to convince him of something. -- Silver Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 13:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E49D73.7A207%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366796 |
On 8/25/16, 1:00 PM, in article npnip6$j3j$2@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>> So you would say that all those reports of protesters assaulting Trump >>>> supporters are equivalent to posts of people's opinions of Trump being >>>> a racist. Interesting. >>> >>> Snit only agrees with statistics or videos which show whatever position >>> he is backing. Any statistics or videos showing the opposite makes us >>> interesting. >> >> Why do you think I usually put the word "interesting" in quotes when I'm >> responding to his idiocy? > > I have no idea what you usually do since I only returned today, sorry. > Either way, it's very hard to talk to him in general but it's absolutely > impossible to debate him. I do use logic, reason, and evidence well... those that do not find it a challenge. So be it. > He believes that whatever the left says and does is right and no amount of > statistics, logic or evidence will sway him. You truly are wasting your time > if you're hoping to convince him of something. And that is just poppycock... but so be it. Comes down to you cannot support your views well and it frustrates you. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 14:39 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <npne0q$2b8$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366743 |
On 2016-08-25 1:33 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/25/16, 4:49 AM, in article npmlvv$bg8$2@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" >> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >> >>> On 2016-08-20 6:17 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>>> If you see a liberal, kill it. >>>> https://twitter.com/reneejon/status/766851862876135424 >>> >>> They're disgusting individuals and like a woman interviewed by Infowars >>> pointed out, ironic in their existence. After all, they complain about >>> Trump being a bully all the while doing most of the bullying. >>> >> Trump is the ONLY candidate to call for violence. To call him out on that >> does not in any way excuse the violence of others... backing or protesting >> against anyone. >> >> The idea that liberals are doing most of the bullying is also not supported. >> > > The preponderance of videos showing just that is enough, just google. > > ---------------------------------- > "protesters bully trump supporters" > About 151 results (0.51 seconds) > > "trump supporters bully protesters" > No results found for "trump supporters bully protesters". > > ---------------------------------- > "protesters attack trump supporters" > About 19,600 results (0.52 seconds) > > "trump supporters attack protesters" > About 514 results (0.61 seconds) > > ---------------------------------- > "protesters assault trump supporters" > About 3,200 results (0.51 seconds) > > "trump supporters assault protesters" > About 136 results (0.48 seconds) > > ---------------------------------- Boy am I glad I did not see that post originally! It would take even the biggest idiot about a split second of searching on their choice of search engine (Lycos for Snit, I'm sure) to find hundreds if not thousands of videos of bizarre liberals bullying Trump supporters. One even looked and sounded like Snit! Hell, let me try to find him: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YU3vcvGpALQ (jump to five minutes in to see the Snit doppelganger. Keep watching to see how the doppelganger claims that he was assaulted to the police despite not being touched.) That's not the best bullying video but there are tons of them on Youtube. -- Silver Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 18:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hjgsauf93.all@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366766 |
Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > On 2016-08-25 1:33 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/25/16, 4:49 AM, in article npmlvv$bg8$2@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" >>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2016-08-20 6:17 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>>>> If you see a liberal, kill it. >>>>> https://twitter.com/reneejon/status/766851862876135424 >>>> >>>> They're disgusting individuals and like a woman interviewed by Infowars >>>> pointed out, ironic in their existence. After all, they complain about >>>> Trump being a bully all the while doing most of the bullying. >>>> >>> Trump is the ONLY candidate to call for violence. To call him out on that >>> does not in any way excuse the violence of others... backing or protesting >>> against anyone. >>> >>> The idea that liberals are doing most of the bullying is also not supported. >>> >> >> The preponderance of videos showing just that is enough, just google. >> >> ---------------------------------- >> "protesters bully trump supporters" >> About 151 results (0.51 seconds) >> >> "trump supporters bully protesters" >> No results found for "trump supporters bully protesters". >> >> ---------------------------------- >> "protesters attack trump supporters" >> About 19,600 results (0.52 seconds) >> >> "trump supporters attack protesters" >> About 514 results (0.61 seconds) >> >> ---------------------------------- >> "protesters assault trump supporters" >> About 3,200 results (0.51 seconds) >> >> "trump supporters assault protesters" >> About 136 results (0.48 seconds) >> >> ---------------------------------- > > Boy am I glad I did not see that post originally! It would take even the > biggest idiot about a split second of searching on their choice of > search engine (Lycos for Snit, I'm sure) to find hundreds if not > thousands of videos of bizarre liberals bullying Trump supporters. One > even looked and sounded like Snit! Hell, let me try to find him: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YU3vcvGpALQ (jump to five minutes in to > see the Snit doppelganger. Keep watching to see how the doppelganger > claims that he was assaulted to the police despite not being touched.) > > That's not the best bullying video but there are tons of them on Youtube. > Yeah, I've seen that tard before. Love how he has Rachel Madcow behind him, and what looks to be Al Sharpton in a Gay Fuckes mask: http://i.imgur.com/3nd7KAl.png
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web