Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #366369 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-23 17:51 +0000 |
| Last post | 2016-08-25 14:00 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 113 — 6 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 17:51 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:18 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 18:32 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:43 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 19:13 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 12:29 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 19:53 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 13:07 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 20:33 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 13:41 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 21:01 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 14:14 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 22:01 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:12 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 22:43 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:50 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 23:26 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 16:57 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 01:41 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 18:56 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 03:16 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 20:23 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 03:40 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 20:46 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 04:10 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 21:29 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 04:44 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 07:56 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 15:45 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 08:49 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 16:00 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 09:15 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 16:42 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 09:50 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 17:58 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:12 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 18:54 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 12:06 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 19:25 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 12:41 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 19:55 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:13 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:29 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:34 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:50 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:55 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:59 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 14:02 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 21:09 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 14:14 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 21:27 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 14:32 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 21:47 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 14:56 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 23:51 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 18:00 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 01:28 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 18:32 -0700
An example Owl asked for 5 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:31 -0700
Re: An example Owl asked for 5 "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:38 +0000
Re: An example Owl asked for 5 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:59 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 15:04 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 00:00 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 18:03 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 01:28 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 18:33 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 01:52 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 19:01 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 02:49 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:06 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 03:27 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 21:24 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 21:21 -0600
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 03:51 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 21:27 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 21:23 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-08-25 07:04 -0400
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 01:56 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 19:03 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 03:00 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:19 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 03:32 +0000
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 21:25 -0700
An example Owl asked for 6 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:31 -0700
Re: An example Owl asked for 6 "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:39 +0000
Re: An example Owl asked for 6 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:58 -0700
An example Owl asked for 4 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:31 -0700
An example Owl asked for 3 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:30 -0700
An example Owl asked for 2 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:30 -0700
An example Owl asked for Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:29 -0700
Re: An example Owl asked for "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:33 +0000
Re: An example Owl asked for Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:40 -0700
Re: An example Owl asked for "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:45 +0000
Re: An example Owl asked for Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:58 -0700
Re: An example Owl asked for "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 21:07 +0000
Re: An example Owl asked for Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 14:09 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:30 -0400
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:38 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:28 -0400
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:33 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 09:44 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:19 -0400
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:32 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:16 -0400
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:31 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 09:42 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 13:05 -0400
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 10:17 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 11:06 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 14:51 -0400
Re: future Democrat voters Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 12:56 -0700
Re: future Democrat voters Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 16:54 -0400
Re: future Democrat voters Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 14:00 -0700
Page 2 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 Next page →
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 03:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hjad11u03.ako9@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366439 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/23/16, 6:41 PM, in article hjvadyu93.fak9@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/23/16, 4:26 PM, in article hje79rr3fkh.p@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> >> >>>> There is currently a government-sanctioned war on whites. If you don't >>>> see it, you are blind. >>> >>> War on whites. Sigh. Are you a white supremist. You are offended by others >>> wanting equality. You want special rights. Boo hoo for you. >> >> Yep, every other race gets special treatment, but whites are "bigots" >> if they point that out. > > I am not a big fan of the word "privilege," but you have NO clue about the > history and societal challenges of blacks and native Americans. That is > crystal clear. > Keyword "history." Go back fifty years and you might have a point. This is 2016. I know you libtards pine for the days of the hippies, Vietnam, and LSD. I hate to break it to you but today all you have is hipsters, pokemon, and BLM. > You cannot see past your own nose. Then you claim offense at things being > made more equal. Boo hoo for you. > Boo hoo foo yoo too, joo. Your self-loathing, anti-white racism comes flying out at every opportunity, doesn't it. >> The only "privilege" operating out there is wealth. > > Support? And keep in mind the MASSIVE wealth disadvantage blacks in the US > are at. MASSIVE. > So? Find a way to deal with the wealth disadvantage. Institutional racism against whites is not the answer to the wealth problem. And BTW, more whites are in poverty than blacks. http://ow.ly/8qKN303wBuQ <quote> Poverty Rate by Race/Ethnicity Timeframe: 2014 Location White Black Total United States 19,796,700 10,145,100 47,021,300 </quote> Democrat policies that make financial assistance dependent on broken families is keeping people in poverty and crime rates high. Just look at inner cities which are all controlled by Democrats and you will see the terrible result of this misguided approach. >> Race hasn't had anything to do with opportunity in >> this country in decades. > > Again you ignore science. > What science says the that the current institutional racism against whites is causing blacks problems? >> But keep chanting that leftist hate >> and make sure the country becomes more and more divided. > > You fight against equality and then whine when others seek to be treated as > equals. Sickening. > I fight for equality. You fight to maintain institutional racism against whites.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-23 20:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E26140.79EB6%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366440 |
On 8/23/16, 8:16 PM, in article hjad11u03.ako9@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/23/16, 6:41 PM, in article hjvadyu93.fak9@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 8/23/16, 4:26 PM, in article hje79rr3fkh.p@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>>> There is currently a government-sanctioned war on whites. If you don't >>>>> see it, you are blind. >>>> >>>> War on whites. Sigh. Are you a white supremist. You are offended by others >>>> wanting equality. You want special rights. Boo hoo for you. >>> >>> Yep, every other race gets special treatment, but whites are "bigots" >>> if they point that out. >> >> I am not a big fan of the word "privilege," but you have NO clue about the >> history and societal challenges of blacks and native Americans. That is >> crystal clear. > > Keyword "history." Go back fifty years and you might have a point. > This is 2016. I know you libtards pine for the days of the hippies, > Vietnam, and LSD. I hate to break it to you but today all you have is > hipsters, pokemon, and BLM. History impacts TODAY. >> You cannot see past your own nose. Then you claim offense at things being >> made more equal. Boo hoo for you. > > Boo hoo foo yoo too, joo. > > Your self-loathing, anti-white racism comes flying out at every > opportunity, doesn't it. I said nothing about being anti-white. NOT. ONE. WORD. You made that up. I talked about equality and you deemed that anti-white. Think about this: you think OTHERS have the SAME as you is somehow AGAINST you. Wow. >>> The only "privilege" operating out there is wealth. >> >> Support? And keep in mind the MASSIVE wealth disadvantage blacks in the US >> are at. MASSIVE. > > So? So you are lost and do not understand how history impacts today. > Find a way to deal with the wealth disadvantage. Institutional > racism against whites is not the answer to the wealth problem. I talk about EQUALITY and you deem that to be racism against whites. For others to have what you have you deem to be agaisnt you. Wow. ... >>> Race hasn't had anything to do with opportunity in >>> this country in decades. >> >> Again you ignore science. > > What science says the that the current institutional racism against > whites is causing blacks problems? That is your straw man. You back it. >>> But keep chanting that leftist hate >>> and make sure the country becomes more and more divided. >> >> You fight against equality and then whine when others seek to be treated as >> equals. Sickening. > > I fight for equality. You fight to maintain institutional racism > against whites. See above for two counter examples. You deem EQUALITY to be anti-white. Anti-you. Wow. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 03:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hjguasd93.ajifu@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366441 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/23/16, 8:16 PM, in article hjad11u03.ako9@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/23/16, 6:41 PM, in article hjvadyu93.fak9@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 8/23/16, 4:26 PM, in article hje79rr3fkh.p@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>> >>>>>> There is currently a government-sanctioned war on whites. If you don't >>>>>> see it, you are blind. >>>>> >>>>> War on whites. Sigh. Are you a white supremist. You are offended by others >>>>> wanting equality. You want special rights. Boo hoo for you. >>>> >>>> Yep, every other race gets special treatment, but whites are "bigots" >>>> if they point that out. >>> >>> I am not a big fan of the word "privilege," but you have NO clue about the >>> history and societal challenges of blacks and native Americans. That is >>> crystal clear. >> >> Keyword "history." Go back fifty years and you might have a point. >> This is 2016. I know you libtards pine for the days of the hippies, >> Vietnam, and LSD. I hate to break it to you but today all you have is >> hipsters, pokemon, and BLM. > > History impacts TODAY. > Yes, fifty year history of the failed, RACIST approach of the DEMOCRAT PARTY -- the party of the KKK -- has nearly ruined our cities and created more racial division than ever existed in the past. >>> You cannot see past your own nose. Then you claim offense at things being >>> made more equal. Boo hoo for you. >> >> Boo hoo foo yoo too, joo. >> >> Your self-loathing, anti-white racism comes flying out at every >> opportunity, doesn't it. > > I said nothing about being anti-white. NOT. ONE. WORD. > > You made that up. I talked about equality and you deemed that anti-white. > > Think about this: you think OTHERS have the SAME as you is somehow AGAINST > you. > > Wow. You are a racist. You support institutional racist policies against whites. What are you going to do in fifty years when whites are in the minority? Probably just kill us off, right, you AshkeNAZI slime? > >>>> The only "privilege" operating out there is wealth. >>> >>> Support? And keep in mind the MASSIVE wealth disadvantage blacks in the US >>> are at. MASSIVE. >> >> So? > > So you are lost and do not understand how history impacts today. > I understand plenty. You are brainwashed and delusional. And RACIST. >> Find a way to deal with the wealth disadvantage. Institutional >> racism against whites is not the answer to the wealth problem. > > I talk about EQUALITY and you deem that to be racism against whites. > > For others to have what you have you deem to be agaisnt you. > > Wow. > You are a BIGOT. You support INSTITUTIONAL RACISM against whites. > ... >>>> Race hasn't had anything to do with opportunity in >>>> this country in decades. >>> >>> Again you ignore science. >> >> What science says the that the current institutional racism against >> whites is causing blacks problems? > > That is your straw man. You back it. > No, joo back it. >>>> But keep chanting that leftist hate >>>> and make sure the country becomes more and more divided. >>> >>> You fight against equality and then whine when others seek to be treated as >>> equals. Sickening. >> >> I fight for equality. You fight to maintain institutional racism >> against whites. > > See above for two counter examples. You deem EQUALITY to be anti-white. > > Anti-you. > > Wow. > Oy vey.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-23 20:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E266A3.79EBD%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366442 |
On 8/23/16, 8:40 PM, in article hjguasd93.ajifu@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: ... >>>> I am not a big fan of the word "privilege," but you have NO clue about the >>>> history and societal challenges of blacks and native Americans. That is >>>> crystal clear. >>> >>> Keyword "history." Go back fifty years and you might have a point. >>> This is 2016. I know you libtards pine for the days of the hippies, >>> Vietnam, and LSD. I hate to break it to you but today all you have is >>> hipsters, pokemon, and BLM. >> >> History impacts TODAY. > > Yes, fifty year history of the failed, RACIST approach of the DEMOCRAT PARTY > -- the party of the KKK -- has nearly ruined our cities and created more > racial division than ever existed in the past. How do you think your unsupported view on this is relevant? Keep in mind you have repeatedly said you see equality as being unfair to you. You want MORE than what is fair and equal. >>>> You cannot see past your own nose. Then you claim offense at things being >>>> made more equal. Boo hoo for you. >>> >>> Boo hoo foo yoo too, joo. >>> >>> Your self-loathing, anti-white racism comes flying out at every >>> opportunity, doesn't it. >> >> I said nothing about being anti-white. NOT. ONE. WORD. >> >> You made that up. I talked about equality and you deemed that anti-white. >> >> Think about this: you think OTHERS have the SAME as you is somehow AGAINST >> you. >> >> Wow. > > You are a racist. You support institutional racist policies against > whites. What are you going to do in fifty years when whites are in > the minority? Probably just kill us off, right, you AshkeNAZI slime? Notice you go into attack mode when I point out a fact: I spoke of EQUALITY and you deemed that unfair to YOU. >>>>> The only "privilege" operating out there is wealth. >>>> >>>> Support? And keep in mind the MASSIVE wealth disadvantage blacks in the US >>>> are at. MASSIVE. >>> >>> So? >> >> So you are lost and do not understand how history impacts today. > > I understand plenty. You are brainwashed and delusional. > And RACIST. More baseless attacks by you not based on ANY view of mine. >>> Find a way to deal with the wealth disadvantage. Institutional >>> racism against whites is not the answer to the wealth problem. >> >> I talk about EQUALITY and you deem that to be racism against whites. >> >> For others to have what you have you deem to be agaisnt you. >> >> Wow. > > You are a BIGOT. You support INSTITUTIONAL RACISM against > whites. More baseless attacks by you not based on ANY view of mine. Remember: I spoke of EQUALITY. People being equal... people being judged by the content of their character. You deemed that unfair to YOU. YOU want things to be easier for YOU. You want, I suppose the word works: privilege. > >> ... >>>>> Race hasn't had anything to do with opportunity in >>>>> this country in decades. >>>> >>>> Again you ignore science. >>> >>> What science says the that the current institutional racism against >>> whites is causing blacks problems? >> >> That is your straw man. You back it. > > No, joo back it. Ok, so your claim that there is institutional racism against whites that causing blacks problems is utter rubbish neither of us can support. > >>>>> But keep chanting that leftist hate >>>>> and make sure the country becomes more and more divided. >>>> >>>> You fight against equality and then whine when others seek to be treated as >>>> equals. Sickening. >>> >>> I fight for equality. You fight to maintain institutional racism >>> against whites. >> >> See above for two counter examples. You deem EQUALITY to be anti-white. >> >> Anti-you. >> >> Wow. > > Oy vey. You are the one who made this claim: equality is not fair to you. You think you should get more than what is equal. Wow. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 04:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hjgadie892.a@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366443 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/23/16, 8:40 PM, in article hjguasd93.ajifu@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > > ... > >>>> Find a way to deal with the wealth disadvantage. Institutional >>>> racism against whites is not the answer to the wealth problem. >>> >>> I talk about EQUALITY and you deem that to be racism against whites. >>> >>> For others to have what you have you deem to be agaisnt you. >>> >>> Wow. >> >> You are a BIGOT. You support INSTITUTIONAL RACISM against >> whites. > > More baseless attacks by you not based on ANY view of mine. Remember: I > spoke of EQUALITY. People being equal... people being judged by the content > of their character. > > You deemed that unfair to YOU. YOU want things to be easier for YOU. > > You want, I suppose the word works: privilege. > You are a DEMOCRAT KKK RACIST AshkeNAZI. You support INSTITUTIONAL RACISM against whites. According to you, wealth means NOTHING. The child of a BLACK NBA PLAYER should be given preferential treatment by the GOVERNMENT over a WHITE child of POVERTY specifically because of his RACE.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-23 21:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E270A8.79EC3%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366444 |
On 8/23/16, 9:10 PM, in article hjgadie892.a@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/23/16, 8:40 PM, in article hjguasd93.ajifu@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >> ... >> >>>>> Find a way to deal with the wealth disadvantage. Institutional >>>>> racism against whites is not the answer to the wealth problem. >>>> >>>> I talk about EQUALITY and you deem that to be racism against whites. >>>> >>>> For others to have what you have you deem to be agaisnt you. >>>> >>>> Wow. >>> >>> You are a BIGOT. You support INSTITUTIONAL RACISM against >>> whites. >> >> More baseless attacks by you not based on ANY view of mine. Remember: I >> spoke of EQUALITY. People being equal... people being judged by the content >> of their character. >> >> You deemed that unfair to YOU. YOU want things to be easier for YOU. >> >> You want, I suppose the word works: privilege. > > You are a DEMOCRAT KKK RACIST AshkeNAZI. You support INSTITUTIONAL RACISM > against whites. According to you, wealth means NOTHING. The child of a > BLACK NBA PLAYER should be given preferential treatment by the GOVERNMENT > over a WHITE child of POVERTY specifically because of his RACE. > See how you just lash out with anger and humiliation when your own claims are pointed out. You claim I am racist but give NO example. Remember, I have said I support equality... but to you equality IS racist by nature because you, used to privilege, will end up being treated as an equal. How can you even begin to justify this? Oh, you cannot... hence why you lash out. Interesting conversation... -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 04:44 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhjavid98983.aji@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366450 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/23/16, 9:10 PM, in article hjgadie892.a@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/23/16, 8:40 PM, in article hjguasd93.ajifu@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> ... >>> >>>>>> Find a way to deal with the wealth disadvantage. Institutional >>>>>> racism against whites is not the answer to the wealth problem. >>>>> >>>>> I talk about EQUALITY and you deem that to be racism against whites. >>>>> >>>>> For others to have what you have you deem to be agaisnt you. >>>>> >>>>> Wow. >>>> >>>> You are a BIGOT. You support INSTITUTIONAL RACISM against >>>> whites. >>> >>> More baseless attacks by you not based on ANY view of mine. Remember: I >>> spoke of EQUALITY. People being equal... people being judged by the content >>> of their character. >>> >>> You deemed that unfair to YOU. YOU want things to be easier for YOU. >>> >>> You want, I suppose the word works: privilege. >> >> You are a DEMOCRAT KKK RACIST AshkeNAZI. You support INSTITUTIONAL RACISM >> against whites. According to you, wealth means NOTHING. The child of a >> BLACK NBA PLAYER should be given preferential treatment by the GOVERNMENT >> over a WHITE child of POVERTY specifically because of his RACE. >> > See how you just lash out with anger and humiliation when your own claims > are pointed out. You haven't seen lashing out yet. Wait till I start double-spacing. > You claim I am racist but give NO example. Remember, I have > said I support equality... but to you equality IS racist by nature because > you, used to privilege, That right there. "Privilege." That term is RACIST. You assume that just because I am white I come from privilege. Being white, contrary to your brainwashing, means DISADVANTAGES at the INSTITUTIONAL level. Not only that, you think that a BLACK child from a WEALTHY family should be given AFFIRMATIVE ACTION preference over a poor white soot-faced child from Appalachia just because of his RACE. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqDVObM1kxc > will end up being treated as an equal. > > How can you even begin to justify this? Oh, you cannot... hence why you lash > out. Interesting conversation... > Why are you so RACIST against whites? Is it because of the Holohoax?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 07:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E303BB.79F0D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366456 |
On 8/23/16, 9:44 PM, in article fhjavid98983.aji@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/23/16, 9:10 PM, in article hjgadie892.a@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 8/23/16, 8:40 PM, in article hjguasd93.ajifu@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>> ... >>>> >>>>>>> Find a way to deal with the wealth disadvantage. Institutional >>>>>>> racism against whites is not the answer to the wealth problem. >>>>>> >>>>>> I talk about EQUALITY and you deem that to be racism against whites. >>>>>> >>>>>> For others to have what you have you deem to be agaisnt you. >>>>>> >>>>>> Wow. >>>>> >>>>> You are a BIGOT. You support INSTITUTIONAL RACISM against >>>>> whites. >>>> >>>> More baseless attacks by you not based on ANY view of mine. Remember: I >>>> spoke of EQUALITY. People being equal... people being judged by the content >>>> of their character. >>>> >>>> You deemed that unfair to YOU. YOU want things to be easier for YOU. >>>> >>>> You want, I suppose the word works: privilege. >>> >>> You are a DEMOCRAT KKK RACIST AshkeNAZI. You support INSTITUTIONAL RACISM >>> against whites. According to you, wealth means NOTHING. The child of a >>> BLACK NBA PLAYER should be given preferential treatment by the GOVERNMENT >>> over a WHITE child of POVERTY specifically because of his RACE. >>> >> See how you just lash out with anger and humiliation when your own claims >> are pointed out. > > You haven't seen lashing out yet. Wait till I start double-spacing. LOL! You have gone into attack mode merely because I pointed out a solid, irrefutable fact. I spoke of EQUALITY: nobody being given privileges based on color or sex or religion or the like... and your response was to claim that this was somehow racist / bigoted by nature... that you think it is against you. For others to have what YOU have is, to you, unfair. You think you deserve more based on your color or race or religion or sex or whatever. You react with anger to the mere idea of equality. And I find that reprehensible. >> You claim I am racist but give NO example. Remember, I have >> said I support equality... but to you equality IS racist by nature because >> you, used to privilege, > > That right there. "Privilege." That term is RACIST. Of note: I said I was not fond of that word and did not use it until you showed you felt you deserved it... when you showed you thought equality was unfair to YOU. When you said that equality was not good enough for you. That, Owl, is by definition you saying you think you should be privileged. You think you should have more... based on race or color or religion or sex or whatever. I am sure you will not say specifically, but your focus at the time was race. > You assume that just because I am white I come from privilege. I said no such thing... and even rejected the use of the word until you directly noted you felt you should be privileged. > Being white, contrary to your brainwashing, means DISADVANTAGES at the > INSTITUTIONAL level. In a way no evidence shows. Um, whatever. Heck, when you can show that an equal percentage of whites and blacks institutionalized I might even start to consider that whites are treated as poorly on an institutional level. Until then your claim is a complete non-starter. > Not only that, you think that a BLACK child from a > WEALTHY family should be given AFFIRMATIVE ACTION preference over a poor white > soot-faced child from Appalachia just because of his RACE. I never said any such thing. You made that up. > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqDVObM1kxc > > >> will end up being treated as an equal. >> >> How can you even begin to justify this? Oh, you cannot... hence why you lash >> out. Interesting conversation... > > Why are you so RACIST against whites? Is it because of the Holohoax? See how you lash out... no evidence of me being racist... esp. against whites. But you are angry, clearly, that you absolute bigotry has been shown. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 15:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhjavd.vj9@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366480 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/23/16, 9:44 PM, in article fhjavid98983.aji@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/23/16, 9:10 PM, in article hjgadie892.a@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 8/23/16, 8:40 PM, in article hjguasd93.ajifu@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> ... >>>>> >>>>>>>> Find a way to deal with the wealth disadvantage. Institutional >>>>>>>> racism against whites is not the answer to the wealth problem. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I talk about EQUALITY and you deem that to be racism against whites. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For others to have what you have you deem to be agaisnt you. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Wow. >>>>>> >>>>>> You are a BIGOT. You support INSTITUTIONAL RACISM against >>>>>> whites. >>>>> >>>>> More baseless attacks by you not based on ANY view of mine. Remember: I >>>>> spoke of EQUALITY. People being equal... people being judged by the content >>>>> of their character. >>>>> >>>>> You deemed that unfair to YOU. YOU want things to be easier for YOU. >>>>> >>>>> You want, I suppose the word works: privilege. >>>> >>>> You are a DEMOCRAT KKK RACIST AshkeNAZI. You support INSTITUTIONAL RACISM >>>> against whites. According to you, wealth means NOTHING. The child of a >>>> BLACK NBA PLAYER should be given preferential treatment by the GOVERNMENT >>>> over a WHITE child of POVERTY specifically because of his RACE. >>>> >>> See how you just lash out with anger and humiliation when your own claims >>> are pointed out. >> >> You haven't seen lashing out yet. Wait till I start double-spacing. > > LOL! You have gone into attack mode merely because I pointed out a solid, > irrefutable fact. > > I spoke of EQUALITY: nobody being given privileges based on color or sex or > religion or the like... and your response was to claim that this was somehow > racist / bigoted by nature... that you think it is against you. For others > to have what YOU have is, to you, unfair. You think you deserve more based > on your color or race or religion or sex or whatever. You react with anger > to the mere idea of equality. > > And I find that reprehensible. > >>> You claim I am racist but give NO example. Remember, I have >>> said I support equality... but to you equality IS racist by nature because >>> you, used to privilege, >> >> That right there. "Privilege." That term is RACIST. > > Of note: I said I was not fond of that word and did not use it until you > showed you felt you deserved it... when you showed you thought equality was > unfair to YOU. When you said that equality was not good enough for you. > That, Owl, is by definition you saying you think you should be privileged. > You think you should have more... based on race or color or religion or sex > or whatever. I am sure you will not say specifically, but your focus at the > time was race. > >> You assume that just because I am white I come from privilege. > > I said no such thing... and even rejected the use of the word until you > directly noted you felt you should be privileged. > >> Being white, contrary to your brainwashing, means DISADVANTAGES at the >> INSTITUTIONAL level. > > In a way no evidence shows. Um, whatever. Heck, when you can show that an > equal percentage of whites and blacks institutionalized I might even start > to consider that whites are treated as poorly on an institutional level. > Until then your claim is a complete non-starter. > >> Not only that, you think that a BLACK child from a >> WEALTHY family should be given AFFIRMATIVE ACTION preference over a poor white >> soot-faced child from Appalachia just because of his RACE. > > I never said any such thing. You made that up. > >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqDVObM1kxc >> >> >>> will end up being treated as an equal. >>> >>> How can you even begin to justify this? Oh, you cannot... hence why you lash >>> out. Interesting conversation... >> >> Why are you so RACIST against whites? Is it because of the Holohoax? > > See how you lash out... no evidence of me being racist... esp. against > whites. But you are angry, clearly, that you absolute bigotry has been > shown. > You'll never get it. You are a brainwashed libtard mush-head who lives in a town with less than 1 percent black population, yet you like to throw around the terms "bigot" and "racist" as if you have the first clue what they mean. Institutional racism exists today, and it is in the form of Government-sanctioned discrimination and hatred focused against white people. http://www.binghamtonreview.com/2016/08/stopwhitepeople2k16-is-an-official-part-of-residential-assistant-training/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 08:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E31012.79F1F%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366487 |
On 8/24/16, 8:45 AM, in article fhjavd.vj9@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: ... >> See how you lash out... no evidence of me being racist... esp. against >> whites. But you are angry, clearly, that you absolute bigotry has been >> shown. > > You'll never get it. Oh, I get it very well that you have gone into attack mode merely because I pointed out a solid, irrefutable fact: I spoke of EQUALITY -- nobody being given privileges based on color or sex or religion or the like and your response was to claim that this was somehow racist / bigoted by nature... and even more that you think it is against you! For others to have what YOU have is, to your sick way of thinking, unfair. You think you deserve more based on your color or race or religion or sex or whatever. You react with anger to the mere idea of equality. And I find that reprehensible. I noted before I do not generally like the use of the word "privilege" in such conversations, but you showed the concept very well. You think you deserve privileges others do not. Why? Of course you will not answer and will simply lash out with false accusations and name calling -- see below for examples: > You are a brainwashed libtard mush-head who lives in a town with less than 1 > percent black population, yet you like to throw around the terms "bigot" and > "racist" as if you have the first clue what they mean. Institutional racism > exists today, and it is in the form of Government-sanctioned discrimination > and hatred focused against white people. > > http://www.binghamtonreview.com/2016/08/stopwhitepeople2k16-is-an-official-par > t-of-residential-assistant-training/ > -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 16:00 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hjgus93b.akio@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366488 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/24/16, 8:45 AM, in article fhjavd.vj9@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > > ... >>> See how you lash out... no evidence of me being racist... esp. against >>> whites. But you are angry, clearly, that you absolute bigotry has been >>> shown. >> >> You'll never get it. > > Oh, I get it very well that you have gone into attack mode merely because I > pointed out a solid, irrefutable fact: I spoke of EQUALITY -- nobody being > given privileges based on color or sex or religion But giving privileges based on color or sex is exactly what you support. So long as the person is not white or male. > or the like and your > response was to claim that this was somehow racist / bigoted by nature... > and even more that you think it is against you! For others to have what YOU > have is, Plenty of blacks have what I have, and more. *All* blacks have more Government-sanctioned privileges than I do, based simply on their being black. It is written into law that blacks are to receive preferential treatment just because they are black. > to your sick way of thinking, unfair. You think you deserve more > based on your color or race or religion or sex or whatever. You react with > anger to the mere idea of equality. > I think that Government forms should not be allowed to ask for your race. That in your distorted mind makes me a racist. > And I find that reprehensible. I noted before I do not generally like the > use of the word "privilege" in such conversations, but you showed the > concept very well. You think you deserve privileges others do not. > I think that I deserve fair and equal treatment under the law. You support something else. I'm not sure where your confusion started, but it must have happened at some point during your communist indoctrination. > Why? > > Of course you will not answer and will simply lash out with false > accusations and name calling -- see below for examples: > >> You are a brainwashed libtard mush-head who lives in a town with less than 1 >> percent black population, yet you like to throw around the terms "bigot" and >> "racist" as if you have the first clue what they mean. Institutional racism >> exists today, and it is in the form of Government-sanctioned discrimination >> and hatred focused against white people. >> >> http://www.binghamtonreview.com/2016/08/stopwhitepeople2k16-is-an-official-par >> t-of-residential-assistant-training/ >> > As expected, you just don't get it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 09:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E31645.79F30%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366491 |
On 8/24/16, 9:00 AM, in article hjgus93b.akio@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/24/16, 8:45 AM, in article fhjavd.vj9@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >> ... >>>> See how you lash out... no evidence of me being racist... esp. against >>>> whites. But you are angry, clearly, that you absolute bigotry has been >>>> shown. >>> >>> You'll never get it. >> >> Oh, I get it very well that you have gone into attack mode merely because I >> pointed out a solid, irrefutable fact: I spoke of EQUALITY -- nobody being >> given privileges based on color or sex or religion > > But giving privileges based on color or sex is exactly what you support. I said no such thing. You made that up to try to back out of your repulsive position that somehow (though you cannot say how) EQUALITY is a form of racism against YOU. You are the walking poster child of thinking you deserve privilege. > So long as the person is not white or male. >> or the like and your response was to claim that this was somehow racist / >> bigoted by nature... and even more that you think it is against you! For >> others to have what YOU have is, > > Plenty of blacks have what I have, and more. *All* blacks have more > Government-sanctioned privileges than I do, based simply on their being > black. It is written into law that blacks are to receive preferential > treatment just because they are black. You playing victim backs what I am noting. OK. >> to your sick way of thinking, unfair. You think you deserve more >> based on your color or race or religion or sex or whatever. You react with >> anger to the mere idea of equality. > > I think that Government forms should not be allowed to ask for your > race. That in your distorted mind makes me a racist. I never said any such thing. You are, again, making things up. >> And I find that reprehensible. I noted before I do not generally like the >> use of the word "privilege" in such conversations, but you showed the >> concept very well. You think you deserve privileges others do not. > > I think that I deserve fair and equal treatment under the law. You claimed equality was a form of racism against you. Period. > You support something else. I support equality... the best we can do. At times there is no perfect answer, but equality is the goal. You can twist my words all you want -- and you will -- but it comes down to you lashing out with lies because you do not like what you have admitted. > I'm not sure where your confusion started, but it must have happened at some > point during your communist indoctrination. Random insult from you to try to put me on the defensive. >> Why? >> >> Of course you will not answer and will simply lash out with false >> accusations and name calling -- see below for examples: >> >>> You are a brainwashed libtard mush-head who lives in a town with less than 1 >>> percent black population, yet you like to throw around the terms "bigot" and >>> "racist" as if you have the first clue what they mean. Institutional racism >>> exists today, and it is in the form of Government-sanctioned discrimination >>> and hatred focused against white people. >>> >>> http://www.binghamtonreview.com/2016/08/stopwhitepeople2k16-is-an-official-p >>> ar >>> t-of-residential-assistant-training/ > > As expected, you just don't get it. > > Oh, I get it very well that you have gone into attack mode merely because I pointed out a solid, irrefutable fact: I spoke of EQUALITY -- nobody being given privileges based on color or sex or religion or the like and your response was to claim that this was somehow racist / bigoted by nature... and even more that you think it is against you! For others to have what YOU have is, to your sick way of thinking, unfair. You think you deserve more based on your color or race or religion or sex or whatever. You react with anger to the mere idea of equality. And I find that reprehensible. I noted before I do not generally like the use of the word "privilege" in such conversations, but you showed the concept very well. You think you deserve privileges others do not. Why? Of course you will not answer and will simply lash out with false accusations and name calling -- see above for examples. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 16:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhjavud03.ae@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366494 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/24/16, 9:00 AM, in article hjgus93b.akio@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/24/16, 8:45 AM, in article fhjavd.vj9@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> ... >>>>> See how you lash out... no evidence of me being racist... esp. against >>>>> whites. But you are angry, clearly, that you absolute bigotry has been >>>>> shown. >>>> >>>> You'll never get it. >>> >>> Oh, I get it very well that you have gone into attack mode merely because I >>> pointed out a solid, irrefutable fact: I spoke of EQUALITY -- nobody being >>> given privileges based on color or sex or religion >> >> But giving privileges based on color or sex is exactly what you support. > > I said no such thing. You made that up to try to back out of your repulsive > position that somehow (though you cannot say how) EQUALITY is a form of > racism against YOU. > You define EQUALITY as Government-sanctioned SPECIAL TREATMENT based on RACE. That is the very definition of INSTITUTIONAL RACISM.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 09:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E31E7E.79F3C%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366497 |
On 8/24/16, 9:42 AM, in article fhjavud03.ae@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/24/16, 9:00 AM, in article hjgus93b.akio@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 8/24/16, 8:45 AM, in article fhjavd.vj9@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>> ... >>>>>> See how you lash out... no evidence of me being racist... esp. against >>>>>> whites. But you are angry, clearly, that you absolute bigotry has been >>>>>> shown. >>>>> >>>>> You'll never get it. >>>> >>>> Oh, I get it very well that you have gone into attack mode merely because I >>>> pointed out a solid, irrefutable fact: I spoke of EQUALITY -- nobody being >>>> given privileges based on color or sex or religion >>> >>> But giving privileges based on color or sex is exactly what you support. >> >> I said no such thing. You made that up to try to back out of your repulsive >> position that somehow (though you cannot say how) EQUALITY is a form of >> racism against YOU. > > You define EQUALITY as Government-sanctioned SPECIAL TREATMENT > based on RACE. When? Quote? You have none. You made that up once you realized how you pushed the idea that equality was somehow unfair to you. You think you deserve more than being treated as an equal. Why? You keep avoiding this question. > That is the very definition of INSTITUTIONAL RACISM. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 17:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ifua83.afju@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366498 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/24/16, 9:42 AM, in article fhjavud03.ae@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/24/16, 9:00 AM, in article hjgus93b.akio@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 8/24/16, 8:45 AM, in article fhjavd.vj9@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> ... >>>>>>> See how you lash out... no evidence of me being racist... esp. against >>>>>>> whites. But you are angry, clearly, that you absolute bigotry has been >>>>>>> shown. >>>>>> >>>>>> You'll never get it. >>>>> >>>>> Oh, I get it very well that you have gone into attack mode merely because I >>>>> pointed out a solid, irrefutable fact: I spoke of EQUALITY -- nobody being >>>>> given privileges based on color or sex or religion >>>> >>>> But giving privileges based on color or sex is exactly what you support. >>> >>> I said no such thing. You made that up to try to back out of your repulsive >>> position that somehow (though you cannot say how) EQUALITY is a form of >>> racism against YOU. >> >> You define EQUALITY as Government-sanctioned SPECIAL TREATMENT >> based on RACE. > > When? Quote? You have none. > Do you not support Affirmative Action? > You made that up once you realized how you pushed the idea that equality was > somehow unfair to you. You think you deserve more than being treated as an > equal. Why? > Why do you feel a need to lie about this? Can you not justify your RACISM without lying about me? > You keep avoiding this question. > I am not avoiding anything. You, on the other hand, are doing everything in your power to present a distortion of your views. >> That is the very definition of INSTITUTIONAL RACISM. > Apparently, for some there is not enough INSTITUTIONAL RACISM against whites yet: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9j1GLsKtpQA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYwY85K1MB0
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 11:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E331AC.79F54%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366501 |
On 8/24/16, 10:58 AM, in article ifua83.afju@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/24/16, 9:42 AM, in article fhjavud03.ae@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 8/24/16, 9:00 AM, in article hjgus93b.akio@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 8/24/16, 8:45 AM, in article fhjavd.vj9@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> ... >>>>>>>> See how you lash out... no evidence of me being racist... esp. against >>>>>>>> whites. But you are angry, clearly, that you absolute bigotry has been >>>>>>>> shown. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You'll never get it. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Oh, I get it very well that you have gone into attack mode merely because >>>>>> >>>>>> I pointed out a solid, irrefutable fact: I spoke of EQUALITY -- >>>>>> nobody being given privileges based on color or sex or religion >>>>>> >>>>> But giving privileges based on color or sex is exactly what you support. >>>>> >>>> I said no such thing. You made that up to try to back out of your repulsive >>>> position that somehow (though you cannot say how) EQUALITY is a form of >>>> racism against YOU. >>> >>> You define EQUALITY as Government-sanctioned SPECIAL TREATMENT >>> based on RACE. >> >> When? Quote? You have none. > > Do you not support Affirmative Action? You ask NOW! After all this time? I think we can say this is a direct admission that you flat out made things up about my view. I spoke of EQUALITY. I said NOTHING of affirmative action (though you and I have talked about that before). But without the context of affirmative action -- without that even being a consideration -- you deemed EQUALITY to be unfair to you. Why? Do not change the topic. Do not try to put me on the defensive. Just answer the question. Below you spew a bunch of accusations to try to put me on the defensive. NOT biting. You flat out said EQUALITY was unfair to you... racist against you. How can you possibly justify this? >> You made that up once you realized how you pushed the idea that equality was >> somehow unfair to you. You think you deserve more than being treated as an >> equal. Why? > > Why do you feel a need to lie about this? Can you not justify > your RACISM without lying about me? > >> You keep avoiding this question. >> > > I am not avoiding anything. You, on the other hand, are doing > everything in your power to present a distortion of your views. > >>> That is the very definition of INSTITUTIONAL RACISM. >> > > Apparently, for some there is not enough INSTITUTIONAL RACISM > against whites yet: > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9j1GLsKtpQA > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYwY85K1MB0 > -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 18:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fg3ufa883r7.hfyy@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366507 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/24/16, 10:58 AM, in article ifua83.afju@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/24/16, 9:42 AM, in article fhjavud03.ae@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 8/24/16, 9:00 AM, in article hjgus93b.akio@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 8/24/16, 8:45 AM, in article fhjavd.vj9@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>> See how you lash out... no evidence of me being racist... esp. against >>>>>>>>> whites. But you are angry, clearly, that you absolute bigotry has been >>>>>>>>> shown. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You'll never get it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Oh, I get it very well that you have gone into attack mode merely because >>>>>>> >>>>>> I pointed out a solid, irrefutable fact: I spoke of EQUALITY -- >>>>>>> nobody being given privileges based on color or sex or religion >>>>>>> >>>>>> But giving privileges based on color or sex is exactly what you support. >>>>>> >>>>> I said no such thing. You made that up to try to back out of your repulsive >>>>> position that somehow (though you cannot say how) EQUALITY is a form of >>>>> racism against YOU. >>>> >>>> You define EQUALITY as Government-sanctioned SPECIAL TREATMENT >>>> based on RACE. >>> >>> When? Quote? You have none. >> >> Do you not support Affirmative Action? > > You ask NOW! After all this time? I think we can say this is a direct > admission that you flat out made things up about my view. > What the fuck are you on? > I spoke of EQUALITY. I said NOTHING of affirmative action (though you and I > have talked about that before). Nice to see that we agree that Affirmative Action has nothing to do with EQUALITY. It has everything to do with RACISM. GOVERNMENT SANCTIONED RACISM. > > But without the context of affirmative action -- without that even being a > consideration -- you deemed EQUALITY to be unfair to you. > > Why? > > Do not change the topic. Do not try to put me on the defensive. Just answer > the question. > LOL. > Below you spew a bunch of accusations to try to put me on the defensive. NOT > biting. You flat out said EQUALITY was unfair to you... racist against you. > When did I "flat out say that"? Quote please. > How can you possibly justify this? > JHC, you do nothing but lie. It is pathetic really. :(
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 12:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E33E61.79F7D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366526 |
On 8/24/16, 11:54 AM, in article fg3ufa883r7.hfyy@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: ... >>>>>>> But giving privileges based on color or sex is exactly what you support. >>>>>>> >>>>>> I said no such thing. You made that up to try to back out of your >>>>>> repulsive position that somehow (though you cannot say how) EQUALITY is a >>>>>> form of racism against YOU. >>>>>> >>>>> You define EQUALITY as Government-sanctioned SPECIAL TREATMENT based on >>>>> RACE. >>>>> >>>> When? Quote? You have none. >>>> >>> Do you not support Affirmative Action? >>> >> You ask NOW! After all this time? I think we can say this is a direct >> admission that you flat out made things up about my view. > > What the fuck are you on? I am not going down the rabbit hole with you as you move goal posts and change topics repeatedly. I am staying focused. You claimed EQUALITY was a form of racism against you. Equality. Not affirmative action but EQUALITY. When called out on how absurd this was you insisted I am somehow racist. For wanting equality. You could not defend that so you just went off on me being a racist in some way you cannot show. When asked to back it you started asking me my views on other things. Just insane. All comes back to you saying EQUALITY is against you. And that is just insane. You are the walking poster child of thinking you deserve privileges others do not. Below you go off onto side issues... not biting. >> I spoke of EQUALITY. I said NOTHING of affirmative action (though you and I >> have talked about that before). > > Nice to see that we agree that Affirmative Action has nothing to do > with EQUALITY. It has everything to do with RACISM. GOVERNMENT > SANCTIONED RACISM. > >> But without the context of affirmative action -- without that even being a >> consideration -- you deemed EQUALITY to be unfair to you. >> >> Why? >> >> Do not change the topic. Do not try to put me on the defensive. Just answer >> the question. > > LOL. > >> Below you spew a bunch of accusations to try to put me on the defensive. NOT >> biting. You flat out said EQUALITY was unfair to you... racist against you. > > When did I "flat out say that"? > Quote please. > >> How can you possibly justify this? > > JHC, you do nothing but lie. It is pathetic really. :( -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 19:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhjavd9.kaie@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366527 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/24/16, 11:54 AM, in article fg3ufa883r7.hfyy@perch.invalid, "Octavian > W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > > ... >>>>>>>> But giving privileges based on color or sex is exactly what you support. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> I said no such thing. You made that up to try to back out of your >>>>>>> repulsive position that somehow (though you cannot say how) EQUALITY is a >>>>>>> form of racism against YOU. >>>>>>> >>>>>> You define EQUALITY as Government-sanctioned SPECIAL TREATMENT based on >>>>>> RACE. >>>>>> >>>>> When? Quote? You have none. >>>>> >>>> Do you not support Affirmative Action? >>>> >>> You ask NOW! After all this time? I think we can say this is a direct >>> admission that you flat out made things up about my view. >> >> What the fuck are you on? > > I am not going down the rabbit hole with you as you move goal posts and > change topics repeatedly. I am staying focused. > > You claimed EQUALITY was a form of racism against you. Equality. Not > affirmative action but EQUALITY. > Then you should be able to provide a quote of me doing so. Knock yourself out, Lyin Ted.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 12:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E3466C.79F8B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366531 |
On 8/24/16, 12:25 PM, in article fhjavd9.kaie@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> On 8/24/16, 11:54 AM, in article fg3ufa883r7.hfyy@perch.invalid, "Octavian
>> W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>>>>>>>> But giving privileges based on color or sex is exactly what you
>>>>>>>>> support.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I said no such thing. You made that up to try to back out of your
>>>>>>>> repulsive position that somehow (though you cannot say how) EQUALITY is
>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>> form of racism against YOU.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You define EQUALITY as Government-sanctioned SPECIAL TREATMENT based on
>>>>>>> RACE.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> When? Quote? You have none.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Do you not support Affirmative Action?
>>>>>
>>>> You ask NOW! After all this time? I think we can say this is a direct
>>>> admission that you flat out made things up about my view.
>>>
>>> What the fuck are you on?
>>
>> I am not going down the rabbit hole with you as you move goal posts and
>> change topics repeatedly. I am staying focused.
>>
>> You claimed EQUALITY was a form of racism against you. Equality. Not
>> affirmative action but EQUALITY.
>
> Then you should be able to provide a quote of me doing so.
> Knock yourself out, Lyin Ted.
How about the quotes where I first noted what you did and you have been
trying to do ANYTHING to stop that from being the focus, including spewing
absurd insults and accusations against me.
I spoke of equality and you responded with:
Owl <hjad11u03.ako9@perch.invalid>:
-----
Your self-loathing, anti-white racism comes flying out at
every opportunity, doesn't it.
-----
That was about EQUALITY. You deemed EQUALITY to be a sign of "anti-white
racism"... a sure and clear sign you think whites deserve more than
non-whites.
And I find that grossly offensive.
--
* OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web