Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #366298 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-22 20:04 +0000 |
| Last post | 2016-08-25 08:38 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 382 — 16 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 20:04 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 13:35 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 20:47 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 13:51 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 21:07 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 14:16 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 21:32 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 14:38 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 22:04 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 15:22 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 23:00 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 16:13 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 16:00 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 09:11 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 16:22 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 09:37 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 16:54 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 10:14 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 17:21 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 10:29 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 17:43 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:03 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 09:51 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 14:17 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 09:05 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 11:51 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:01 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 18:27 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:46 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 21:17 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 10:07 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:41 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 20:06 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 00:13 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 20:33 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 01:24 +0000
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 08:14 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:26 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 08:10 -0400
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-26 09:07 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 13:37 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-26 09:56 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 10:42 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:23 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:29 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 10:41 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:23 -0700
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 09:17 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:08 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 10:17 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:32 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 09:24 -0700
Re: Another day chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-26 11:27 -0500
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:36 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:45 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 13:52 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 13:43 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 17:18 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 14:39 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 18:42 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 17:24 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-27 00:09 +0000
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 17:33 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:29 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 12:08 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 18:26 -0600
Re: Another day ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-27 04:21 +0000
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 21:46 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-27 05:15 +0000
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-27 05:42 +0000
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 00:07 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:30 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 12:09 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 18:27 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 19:06 -0700
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 09:20 +0200
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 10:04 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 01:06 -0700
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 10:23 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 01:39 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 01:09 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 01:27 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-27 15:10 -0400
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 21:58 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 13:17 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 18:28 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 19:15 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-28 09:38 -0400
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 22:22 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 13:37 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-27 19:10 -0400
Re: Another day ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 03:20 +0000
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-28 09:35 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-28 09:16 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 10:03 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-27 15:02 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:19 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 15:34 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 19:03 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:28 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:27 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 12:06 -0700
Re: Another day -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-27 15:30 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 18:20 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 18:24 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 19:01 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 19:42 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 07:39 -0700
Re: Another day William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-08-28 16:22 +0100
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 09:50 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 15:29 -0400
Re: Another day ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 20:16 +0000
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 17:40 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 15:14 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 18:19 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 16:18 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 19:40 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 16:42 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 19:44 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 16:56 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 19:59 -0400
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 18:16 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-28 09:08 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-28 09:17 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-29 09:06 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-28 09:42 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 08:12 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-28 11:50 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 10:00 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-28 19:22 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 16:57 -0700
Re: Another day Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-08-29 18:39 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 15:43 -0700
Re: Another day ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 23:12 +0000
Re: Another day ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 23:15 +0000
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 17:09 -0700
Re: Another day Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-08-29 20:52 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 18:13 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-29 19:34 -0400
Re: Another day Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-30 01:49 +0200
Re: Another day Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-30 01:46 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 17:21 -0700
Re: Another day Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-30 02:26 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 17:33 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-30 09:16 -0400
Re: Another day Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-30 15:26 +0200
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-28 12:38 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 17:16 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 14:23 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:20 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 15:35 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 18:38 -0400
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 01:50 +0200
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 20:13 -0400
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 09:19 +0200
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:35 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 12:15 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-29 11:02 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 08:08 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-27 15:10 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:21 -0600
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 09:36 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 16:43 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 10:00 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 17:08 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 10:16 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 17:32 +0000
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 10:39 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 18:04 +0000
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:39 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 10:53 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 14:26 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 12:23 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 18:06 +0000
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 19:11 +0000
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:22 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 10:11 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 17:29 +0000
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 18:12 +0000
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 19:19 +0000
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 10:33 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 21:20 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 21:27 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 14:04 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:07 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 18:00 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:18 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 23:40 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 08:26 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:37 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:42 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 11:49 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 14:08 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 21:18 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:47 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 12:00 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:13 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 15:57 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:16 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 22:31 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:44 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 23:00 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 16:07 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:25 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 21:40 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:22 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 21:39 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 11:59 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:41 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 21:14 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:50 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:39 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 12:07 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:44 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:17 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-23 20:07 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 01:02 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 09:59 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 14:25 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 10:58 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 15:16 +0000
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:16 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 21:34 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:09 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-23 20:08 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 01:10 +0000
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:28 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 10:12 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 09:03 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:20 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:41 -0700
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 12:29 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:55 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:11 -0700
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 13:20 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:33 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:45 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:50 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 14:02 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:54 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:10 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:19 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:32 -0400
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 10:54 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 11:08 -0400
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 12:03 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 12:47 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:19 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 11:59 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:16 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 15:59 -0600
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 22:13 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:18 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:29 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:14 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:33 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 07:56 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:23 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:43 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:53 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:10 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:22 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:26 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:36 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:46 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 20:58 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:14 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:18 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-23 20:47 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 01:24 +0000
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:48 -0600
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 05:06 +0000
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:27 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 10:24 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 14:34 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 10:58 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 15:14 +0000
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:30 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 10:00 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 08:58 -0700
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 09:24 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:31 -0600
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 12:16 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:51 -0600
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 13:17 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 20:56 -0600
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 20:33 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:16 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:30 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:49 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:48 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:09 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 20:55 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:13 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:15 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 11:44 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:22 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:48 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 07:57 -0400
Re: Another day -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-26 06:41 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:35 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 13:51 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:17 -0600
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 13:03 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:36 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 16:09 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 09:27 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:33 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:44 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 13:44 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 17:14 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:10 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 13:48 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:16 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:24 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:28 -0600
Re: Another day Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-08-25 07:10 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:46 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 09:58 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 14:28 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 08:54 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:47 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:08 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 20:45 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:03 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:00 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 11:12 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:09 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:37 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 14:50 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:07 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 19:23 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:25 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 10:44 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:47 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 11:58 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 11:04 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:05 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:37 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 23:38 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:39 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:26 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 13:42 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 14:47 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 11:53 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:04 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 19:20 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:24 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:36 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 23:37 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 07:53 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 11:56 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 11:04 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 11:53 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 19:16 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 23:22 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 19:24 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 23:37 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:26 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 02:51 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 22:54 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 19:59 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 03:01 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 21:19 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 19:56 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 03:00 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 20:31 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 22:29 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 02:50 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 19:57 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 03:04 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 20:31 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 08:22 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 07:58 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:26 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:44 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:43 -0600
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 19:15 +0000
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 10:19 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 11:51 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 14:42 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 08:38 -0400
Page 12 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 … 10 11 [12] 13 14 … 20 Next page →
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 15:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhjgjvoa033.3@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366482 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 8/24/2016 10:25 AM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >> >> Damn, that ate at you all night. lol. >> You and Ted Cruz. Peas in a pod. > > > Peas in an pod. > Good catch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-23 22:16 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <npj73v$npa$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366410 |
On 08/23/16 16:16, Snit wrote: > On 8/23/16, 2:57 PM, in article npigt3$tkm$3@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" > <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: > > ... >>>> Trump isn't a horror show. >>> >>> He has no plans and no qualifications, and has not been successful in his >>> businesses. He *is* a good troll, able to play the media. But what else does >>> he have? >> >> Who says that Trump has no qualifications? He has one... he's a mason. > > How is that a qualification? > >> And the masons are the ones that created the U.S. Constitution. He has >> plenty of help across the country. >> Funny thing, it is the media that is ragging on trump but not one bad >> word about hillary. > > He is in an organization. That is not a qualification. How do you know that this is not a qualification? > >>> His ever changing yet always unrealistic wall? That is a non-starter. His >>> xenophobic fear mongering which will split the country and lead to wars? Not >>> a fan. Really... what does he offer? >> >> Peace and back to the real law of the land... not sharia law that >> hillary is promoting. > > She is not promoting that. Nor is she pushing fear mongering bigotry as much > as he does. By allowing muslims into the U.S. they are pushing for and saying that Sharia law trumps the U.S. Constitution. OTW, she lies. > >>>> He gives great promise of putting back the balance to government, where it >>>> started with the Chimp, in scoffing the law and doing whatever he wants to >>>> anyway. >>> >>> I truly have no idea what you are even talking about? Bedtime for Bonzo? >>> Undoing what Reagan did? Balance with??? >> >> You know, George Bush, aka the chimp. > > I think Trump is in the same IQ / capability range... though more > charismatic and a better troll. Trump is far smarter than the chimp. He knows how to get rich and knows how to cut a deal that benefits both parties. Obama is neither of these, and Hillary is neither of these. Both want to sit on the wealth of a nation and just spend it. > >>>> Even Obama said he can do anything he wanted to do now. >>> >>> Obama is very much against Trump. >> >> I don't doubt it, but Obama is a very weak president. He plays way too >> much golf while rome is burning. > > He is far too moderate and not willing to stand up to corporations. > And also Putin makes him look like monkey.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-23 21:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E271DF.79EC9%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366445 |
On 8/23/16, 9:16 PM, in article npj73v$npa$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: > On 08/23/16 16:16, Snit wrote: >> On 8/23/16, 2:57 PM, in article npigt3$tkm$3@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >> <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >> >> ... >>>>> Trump isn't a horror show. >>>> >>>> He has no plans and no qualifications, and has not been successful in his >>>> businesses. He *is* a good troll, able to play the media. But what else >>>> does >>>> he have? >>> >>> Who says that Trump has no qualifications? He has one... he's a mason. >> >> How is that a qualification? >> >>> And the masons are the ones that created the U.S. Constitution. He has >>> plenty of help across the country. >>> Funny thing, it is the media that is ragging on trump but not one bad >>> word about hillary. >> >> He is in an organization. That is not a qualification. > > How do you know that this is not a qualification? I do not see how being a member of any organization could be... esp. one where you get in based on gender, the "old boy's" network, and requirement to say you are not an atheist(!). That is just not something which is at all reasonable to me. >>>> His ever changing yet always unrealistic wall? That is a non-starter. His >>>> xenophobic fear mongering which will split the country and lead to wars? >>>> Not a fan. Really... what does he offer? >>>> >>> Peace and back to the real law of the land... not sharia law that hillary is >>> promoting. >>> >> She is not promoting that. Nor is she pushing fear mongering bigotry as much >> as he does. >> > By allowing muslims into the U.S. they are pushing for and saying that Sharia > law trumps the U.S. Constitution. OTW, she lies. That is like saying if you allow Christians into the country they will say biblical law trumps the Constitution. Some do, but you can be religious and still respect the law! Heck, you count as a qualification membership to a group that has religious ties... helping to push religious law. >>>>> He gives great promise of putting back the balance to government, where it >>>>> started with the Chimp, in scoffing the law and doing whatever he wants to >>>>> anyway. >>>>> >>>> I truly have no idea what you are even talking about? Bedtime for Bonzo? >>>> Undoing what Reagan did? Balance with??? >>>> >>> You know, George Bush, aka the chimp. >>> >> I think Trump is in the same IQ / capability range... though more charismatic >> and a better troll. > > Trump is far smarter than the chimp. He knows how to get rich and knows > how to cut a deal that benefits both parties. What would make you think this? I see NO evidence of it. > Obama is neither of these, and Hillary is neither of these. Both want to sit > on the wealth of a nation and just spend it. Obama has done a decent job, though he has catered to the wealthy too much and is too conservative. I wish we could get a liberal into the White House. >>>>> Even Obama said he can do anything he wanted to do now. >>>> >>>> Obama is very much against Trump. >>> >>> I don't doubt it, but Obama is a very weak president. He plays way too >>> much golf while rome is burning. >> >> He is far too moderate and not willing to stand up to corporations. > > And also Putin makes him look like monkey. The right tries to push that claim. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 12:09 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <npknsd$j4s$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366453 |
On 08/23/16 22:34, Snit wrote: >>> He is in an organization. That is not a qualification. >> >> How do you know that this is not a qualification? > > I do not see how being a member of any organization could be... esp. one > where you get in based on gender, the "old boy's" network, and requirement > to say you are not an atheist(!). That is just not something which is at all > reasonable to me. > A lot of people, the vast majority, misunderstand the masons core beliefs. That all seeing eye on top of a pyramid represents the God of the entire universe, not the Illuminati. They are a good people that also helps a lot of people. They are good organizers and get things done properly and have for a very long time. Example: Benjamin Franklin created the U.S. Postal Service that was made international. Back then it was a very good idea that served well for the entire world. >>>>> His ever changing yet always unrealistic wall? That is a non-starter. His >>>>> xenophobic fear mongering which will split the country and lead to wars? >>>>> Not a fan. Really... what does he offer? >>>>> >>>> Peace and back to the real law of the land... not sharia law that hillary is >>>> promoting. >>>> >>> She is not promoting that. Nor is she pushing fear mongering bigotry as much >>> as he does. >>> >> By allowing muslims into the U.S. they are pushing for and saying that Sharia >> law trumps the U.S. Constitution. OTW, she lies. > > That is like saying if you allow Christians into the country they will say > biblical law trumps the Constitution. But they don't. That's the difference. > Some do, but you can be religious and > still respect the law! > The jihadists don't respect our laws. That's the problem. > Heck, you count as a qualification membership to a group that has religious > ties... helping to push religious law. That is what the jihadists are tying to do... promote their sharia law and toss out the Constitution. Their claim is they be guaranteed justice, which in our current view is violence beyond reason and is just insane. > >>>>>> He gives great promise of putting back the balance to government, where it >>>>>> started with the Chimp, in scoffing the law and doing whatever he wants to >>>>>> anyway. >>>>>> >>>>> I truly have no idea what you are even talking about? Bedtime for Bonzo? >>>>> Undoing what Reagan did? Balance with??? >>>>> >>>> You know, George Bush, aka the chimp. >>>> >>> I think Trump is in the same IQ / capability range... though more charismatic >>> and a better troll. >> >> Trump is far smarter than the chimp. He knows how to get rich and knows >> how to cut a deal that benefits both parties. > > What would make you think this? I see NO evidence of it. > A lot of Bushs' business deals were disasters. Some of Trumps business deals failed, but most are successes. >> Obama is neither of these, and Hillary is neither of these. Both want to sit >> on the wealth of a nation and just spend it. > > Obama has done a decent job, though he has catered to the wealthy too much > and is too conservative. I wish we could get a liberal into the White House. > Obama has done a terrible job. It was Hillary who first came out the health care act when Bill was in the white house. The Obama Care Act was just an extension to her proposals. All it did was make the Health Insurance industry into an oligarchy where you have to pay big time for a lot of things you don't need. As one professor put it, "Communism only works on top of a big pile of wealth". Once the wealth is gone you become like other communist countries... poor. No one left to pay for their insane policies. Look at Venezula... people are fighting down there for something to eat. >>>>>> Even Obama said he can do anything he wanted to do now. >>>>> >>>>> Obama is very much against Trump. >>>> >>>> I don't doubt it, but Obama is a very weak president. He plays way too >>>> much golf while rome is burning. >>> >>> He is far too moderate and not willing to stand up to corporations. >> >> And also Putin makes him look like monkey. > > The right tries to push that claim. > And it also has been proven correct by many other countries. It is the MSM that makes the counter claims.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-23 20:08 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <npioi0$m0n$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366402 |
On 8/23/2016 5:57 PM, GreyCloud wrote: > Funny thing, it is the media that is ragging on trump but not one bad > word about hillary. Ridiculous lie. An hour ago on CNN she was being hammered by Trump surrogates for supposed crossover/access between the Clinton Foundation and the State Dept. And the CNN hostess asked some pointed questions about it, too, such as "Why is Clinton promising to refuse foreign donations to the Foundation now, as opposed to a year ago?"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 01:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hjgsif83.ak99@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366424 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 8/23/2016 5:57 PM, GreyCloud wrote: > > >> Funny thing, it is the media that is ragging on trump but not one bad >> word about hillary. > > > Ridiculous lie. > > An hour ago on CNN she was being hammered by Trump surrogates for > supposed crossover/access between the Clinton Foundation and the State Dept. > > And the CNN hostess asked some pointed questions about it, too, such as > "Why is Clinton promising to refuse foreign donations to the Foundation > now, as opposed to a year ago?" > Did they push her on the fact that CHAI will continue to accept foreign donates?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-23 22:28 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <npj7p8$oi8$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366424 |
On 08/23/16 18:08, DFS wrote: > On 8/23/2016 5:57 PM, GreyCloud wrote: > > >> Funny thing, it is the media that is ragging on trump but not one bad >> word about hillary. > > > Ridiculous lie. > No, even trump made that point. She lies like a dog. > An hour ago on CNN she was being hammered by Trump surrogates for > supposed crossover/access between the Clinton Foundation and the State > Dept. > > And the CNN hostess asked some pointed questions about it, too, such as > "Why is Clinton promising to refuse foreign donations to the Foundation > now, as opposed to a year ago?" > > You watch... if Hillary ever gets to the debate... he'll cream the stupid bitch into seizures and they'll just have to give her more diazepam.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 10:12 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <npka0h$v8o$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366449 |
On 8/24/2016 12:28 AM, GreyCloud wrote:
> On 08/23/16 18:08, DFS wrote:
>> On 8/23/2016 5:57 PM, GreyCloud wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Funny thing, it is the media that is ragging on trump but not one bad
>>> word about hillary.
>>
>>
>> Ridiculous lie.
>>
>
> No, even trump made that point. She lies like a dog.
Trump lies 10x as much. In 1/2 hour he spews so much idiocy and
half-truths and unfulfillable promises that I can only sit there and gape.
The other night Trump said "I will be your agent of change." The last
politician I heard say that? Bill Clinton.
>> An hour ago on CNN she was being hammered by Trump surrogates for
>> supposed crossover/access between the Clinton Foundation and the State
>> Dept.
>>
>> And the CNN hostess asked some pointed questions about it, too, such as
>> "Why is Clinton promising to refuse foreign donations to the Foundation
>> now, as opposed to a year ago?"
>>
>>
> You watch... if Hillary ever gets to the debate... he'll cream the
> stupid bitch into seizures and they'll just have to give her more diazepam.
She'll get to the debates - it's Trump that will hem and haw and set as
many conditions as he can. Guarantee it.
And then you'll see who's stupid and unprepared and unfit. Trump will
resort to his shouting, idiocy, lowlife bullying and bringing up
non-issues. Clinton will simply, calmly annihilate him.
I agree with a good many of his positions (those he hasn't backed down
from yet), but he doesn't nearly have the temperament, judgement or
experience to be President of the US. Other than a year of campaigning
and lying and insulting everyone, he has no political experience
whatsoever. To me, he just sounds lost on most topics.
He'll get a solid percent of the votes, because he's an anomaly: a
blunt-talking, non-politician, successful businessman with a good slogan
("Make America great again"). That doesn't mean he's worth voting for,
or that he can deliver on his claims and promises.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 09:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E31368.79F28%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366474 |
On 8/24/16, 7:12 AM, in article npka0h$v8o$2@dont-email.me, "DFS"
<nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
> On 8/24/2016 12:28 AM, GreyCloud wrote:
>> On 08/23/16 18:08, DFS wrote:
>>> On 8/23/2016 5:57 PM, GreyCloud wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Funny thing, it is the media that is ragging on trump but not one bad
>>>> word about hillary.
>>>
>>>
>>> Ridiculous lie.
>>>
>>
>> No, even trump made that point. She lies like a dog.
>
> Trump lies 10x as much. In 1/2 hour he spews so much idiocy and
> half-truths and unfulfillable promises that I can only sit there and gape.
>
> The other night Trump said "I will be your agent of change." The last
> politician I heard say that? Bill Clinton.
I am not sure Trump lies more but he lies more directly. Clinton is a
trained lawyer and is very good at lying by innuendo, using deception,
changing the topic, etc. Politifact percentages "show" her to be relatively
honest but they do not account for such things (and based on their
methodology it is not clear they should).
>>> An hour ago on CNN she was being hammered by Trump surrogates for
>>> supposed crossover/access between the Clinton Foundation and the State
>>> Dept.
>>>
>>> And the CNN hostess asked some pointed questions about it, too, such as
>>> "Why is Clinton promising to refuse foreign donations to the Foundation
>>> now, as opposed to a year ago?"
>>>
>> You watch... if Hillary ever gets to the debate... he'll cream the
>> stupid bitch into seizures and they'll just have to give her more diazepam.
>
> She'll get to the debates - it's Trump that will hem and haw and set as
> many conditions as he can. Guarantee it.
Both of them ran from debates with Sanders. They are scared to debate...
but, yes, Trump will be more scared.
Really comes down to Trump is Clinton's only chance... and Clinton is
Trump's only chance... and even then his chances are slim.
> And then you'll see who's stupid and unprepared and unfit. Trump will
> resort to his shouting, idiocy, lowlife bullying and bringing up
> non-issues.
That is the mentality of his supporters.
> Clinton will simply, calmly annihilate him.
She will dodge and change topics. Watch the NY debate with Sanders. Try to
find ANY question she answered. She will do the same thing in other debates
(even if not to the extent... with Trump she is facing a completely
unacceptable opponent, with Sanders she knew she was out-classed).
> I agree with a good many of his positions (those he hasn't backed down
> from yet), but he doesn't nearly have the temperament, judgement or
> experience to be President of the US.
He does not even really have positions. Nor does she.
> Other than a year of campaigning and lying and insulting everyone, he has no
> political experience whatsoever. To me, he just sounds lost on most topics.
Yup.
> He'll get a solid percent of the votes, because he's an anomaly: a
> blunt-talking, non-politician, successful businessman with a good slogan
> ("Make America great again").
What on Earth makes you or anyone else think he is a good business man? I
keep hearing that but see no evidence. He is a decent entertainer with his
over-the-top nonsense but that is not the same thing. He is excellent at
trolling the media. But what else?
> That doesn't mean he's worth voting for,
> or that he can deliver on his claims and promises.
Agreed.
--
* OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 12:20 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <npkoic$l8v$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366492 |
On 08/24/16 10:03, Snit wrote: > On 8/24/16, 7:12 AM, in article npka0h$v8o$2@dont-email.me, "DFS" > <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > >> On 8/24/2016 12:28 AM, GreyCloud wrote: >>> On 08/23/16 18:08, DFS wrote: >>>> On 8/23/2016 5:57 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Funny thing, it is the media that is ragging on trump but not one bad >>>>> word about hillary. >>>> >>>> >>>> Ridiculous lie. >>>> >>> >>> No, even trump made that point. She lies like a dog. >> >> Trump lies 10x as much. In 1/2 hour he spews so much idiocy and >> half-truths and unfulfillable promises that I can only sit there and gape. >> >> The other night Trump said "I will be your agent of change." The last >> politician I heard say that? Bill Clinton. > > I am not sure Trump lies more but he lies more directly. Clinton is a > trained lawyer and is very good at lying by innuendo, using deception, > changing the topic, etc. Politifact percentages "show" her to be relatively > honest but they do not account for such things (and based on their > methodology it is not clear they should). Trained lawyer? LOL!!! http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/barexam.asp
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 11:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E33885.79F6C%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366509 |
On 8/24/16, 11:20 AM, in article npkoic$l8v$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: > On 08/24/16 10:03, Snit wrote: >> On 8/24/16, 7:12 AM, in article npka0h$v8o$2@dont-email.me, "DFS" >> <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >> >>> On 8/24/2016 12:28 AM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>> On 08/23/16 18:08, DFS wrote: >>>>> On 8/23/2016 5:57 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Funny thing, it is the media that is ragging on trump but not one bad >>>>>> word about hillary. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Ridiculous lie. >>>>> >>>> >>>> No, even trump made that point. She lies like a dog. >>> >>> Trump lies 10x as much. In 1/2 hour he spews so much idiocy and >>> half-truths and unfulfillable promises that I can only sit there and gape. >>> >>> The other night Trump said "I will be your agent of change." The last >>> politician I heard say that? Bill Clinton. >> >> I am not sure Trump lies more but he lies more directly. Clinton is a >> trained lawyer and is very good at lying by innuendo, using deception, >> changing the topic, etc. Politifact percentages "show" her to be relatively >> honest but they do not account for such things (and based on their >> methodology it is not clear they should). > > Trained lawyer? LOL!!! > > http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/barexam.asp > Yes, trained lawyer. As the link you provided shows. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 12:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <cbc4dc37-7528-4550-a6a6-7adf9d2ccf34@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #366518 |
On Wednesday, August 24, 2016 at 12:42:03 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 8/24/16, 11:20 AM, in article npkoic$l8v$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" > <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: > > > On 08/24/16 10:03, Snit wrote: > >> On 8/24/16, 7:12 AM, in article npka0h$v8o$2@dont-email.me, "DFS" > >> <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > >> > >>> On 8/24/2016 12:28 AM, GreyCloud wrote: > >>>> On 08/23/16 18:08, DFS wrote: > >>>>> On 8/23/2016 5:57 PM, GreyCloud wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> Funny thing, it is the media that is ragging on trump but not one bad > >>>>>> word about hillary. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Ridiculous lie. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> No, even trump made that point. She lies like a dog. > >>> > >>> Trump lies 10x as much. In 1/2 hour he spews so much idiocy and > >>> half-truths and unfulfillable promises that I can only sit there and gape. > >>> > >>> The other night Trump said "I will be your agent of change." The last > >>> politician I heard say that? Bill Clinton. > >> > >> I am not sure Trump lies more but he lies more directly. Clinton is a > >> trained lawyer and is very good at lying by innuendo, using deception, > >> changing the topic, etc. Politifact percentages "show" her to be relatively > >> honest but they do not account for such things (and based on their > >> methodology it is not clear they should). > > > > Trained lawyer? LOL!!! > > > > http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/barexam.asp > > > Yes, trained lawyer. As the link you provided shows. What 'special powers' does that confer upon her in your mind? Do you think it enables her to pull crap like this... <http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/clinton-donor-sensitive-intelligence-board/story?id=39710624> ... while believing that people are as stupid as she needs them to be? A "trained lawyer" with a working brain doesn't underestimate *everyone*.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 13:55 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <npku3h$940$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366532 |
Steve Carroll wrote: > On Wednesday, August 24, 2016 at 12:42:03 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 8/24/16, 11:20 AM, in article npkoic$l8v$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >> <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >> >> > On 08/24/16 10:03, Snit wrote: >> >> On 8/24/16, 7:12 AM, in article npka0h$v8o$2@dont-email.me, "DFS" >> >> <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On 8/24/2016 12:28 AM, GreyCloud wrote: >> >>>> On 08/23/16 18:08, DFS wrote: >> >>>>> On 8/23/2016 5:57 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>>> Funny thing, it is the media that is ragging on trump but not one >> >>>>>> bad word about hillary. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Ridiculous lie. >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> No, even trump made that point. She lies like a dog. >> >>> >> >>> Trump lies 10x as much. In 1/2 hour he spews so much idiocy and >> >>> half-truths and unfulfillable promises that I can only sit there and >> >>> gape. >> >>> >> >>> The other night Trump said "I will be your agent of change." The >> >>> last >> >>> politician I heard say that? Bill Clinton. >> >> >> >> I am not sure Trump lies more but he lies more directly. Clinton is a >> >> trained lawyer and is very good at lying by innuendo, using deception, >> >> changing the topic, etc. Politifact percentages "show" her to be >> >> relatively honest but they do not account for such things (and based >> >> on their methodology it is not clear they should). >> > >> > Trained lawyer? LOL!!! >> > >> > http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/barexam.asp >> > >> Yes, trained lawyer. As the link you provided shows. > > > What 'special powers' does that confer upon her in your mind? Do you think > it enables her to pull crap like this... > > <http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/clinton-donor-sensitive-intelligence- board/story?id=39710624> > > ... while believing that people are as stupid as she needs them to be? > > A "trained lawyer" with a working brain doesn't underestimate *everyone*. Or the fact that she failed her bar exam. -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 13:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E34D9F.79FA2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366539 |
On 8/24/16, 12:55 PM, in article npku3h$940$6@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >>>>> I am not sure Trump lies more but he lies more directly. Clinton is a >>>>> trained lawyer and is very good at lying by innuendo, using deception, >>>>> changing the topic, etc. Politifact percentages "show" her to be >>>>> relatively honest but they do not account for such things (and based >>>>> on their methodology it is not clear they should). >>>> >>>> Trained lawyer? LOL!!! >>>> >>>> http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/barexam.asp >>>> >>> Yes, trained lawyer. As the link you provided shows. >> >> >> What 'special powers' does that confer upon her in your mind? Do you think >> it enables her to pull crap like this... >> >> <http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/clinton-donor-sensitive-intelligence- > board/story?id=39710624> >> >> ... while believing that people are as stupid as she needs them to be? >> >> A "trained lawyer" with a working brain doesn't underestimate *everyone*. > > Or the fact that she failed her bar exam. Being trained as a lawyer and being able to lie and deceive is, to Carroll, a "special power." Sigh. Does he ever do anything other than troll me? Ever? -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 13:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3b2a6855-cb00-480a-9dc9-0b166825a860@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #366545 |
On Wednesday, August 24, 2016 at 2:12:08 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 8/24/16, 12:55 PM, in article npku3h$940$6@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" > <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: > > >>>>> I am not sure Trump lies more but he lies more directly. Clinton is a > >>>>> trained lawyer and is very good at lying by innuendo, using deception, > >>>>> changing the topic, etc. Politifact percentages "show" her to be > >>>>> relatively honest but they do not account for such things (and based > >>>>> on their methodology it is not clear they should). > >>>> > >>>> Trained lawyer? LOL!!! > >>>> > >>>> http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/barexam.asp > >>>> > >>> Yes, trained lawyer. As the link you provided shows. > >> > >> > >> What 'special powers' does that confer upon her in your mind? Do you think > >> it enables her to pull crap like this... > >> > >> <http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/clinton-donor-sensitive-intelligence- > > board/story?id=39710624> > >> > >> ... while believing that people are as stupid as she needs them to be? > >> > >> A "trained lawyer" with a working brain doesn't underestimate *everyone*. > > > > Or the fact that she failed her bar exam. > > Being trained as a lawyer and being able to lie and deceive is, to Carroll, > a "special power." As 'read' by you. > Sigh. > > Does he ever do anything other than troll me? Ever? Yeah... and I just did 'it' again, fool. Anyone that can read can see how you've avoided this issue by using your "psych degree" ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 20:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hjga49a.ve@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366548 |
Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wednesday, August 24, 2016 at 2:12:08 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 8/24/16, 12:55 PM, in article npku3h$940$6@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >> <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >> >> >>>>> I am not sure Trump lies more but he lies more directly. Clinton is a >> >>>>> trained lawyer and is very good at lying by innuendo, using deception, >> >>>>> changing the topic, etc. Politifact percentages "show" her to be >> >>>>> relatively honest but they do not account for such things (and based >> >>>>> on their methodology it is not clear they should). >> >>>> >> >>>> Trained lawyer? LOL!!! >> >>>> >> >>>> http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/barexam.asp >> >>>> >> >>> Yes, trained lawyer. As the link you provided shows. >> >> >> >> >> >> What 'special powers' does that confer upon her in your mind? Do you think >> >> it enables her to pull crap like this... >> >> >> >> <http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/clinton-donor-sensitive-intelligence- >> > board/story?id=39710624> >> >> >> >> ... while believing that people are as stupid as she needs them to be? >> >> >> >> A "trained lawyer" with a working brain doesn't underestimate *everyone*. >> > >> > Or the fact that she failed her bar exam. >> >> Being trained as a lawyer and being able to lie and deceive is, to Carroll, >> a "special power." > > As 'read' by you. > >> Sigh. >> >> Does he ever do anything other than troll me? Ever? > > Yeah... and I just did 'it' again, fool. Anyone that can read can see how you've avoided this issue by using your "psych degree" ;) I have a friend who is both a veterinarian and a lawyer. He earns his living as a vet. Snit should follow that example and find an alternative occupation that he is actually good at.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 13:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E35578.79FB7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366552 |
On 8/24/16, 1:33 PM, in article hjga49a.ve@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wednesday, August 24, 2016 at 2:12:08 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>> On 8/24/16, 12:55 PM, in article npku3h$940$6@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >>> <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>>>> I am not sure Trump lies more but he lies more directly. Clinton is a >>>>>>>> trained lawyer and is very good at lying by innuendo, using deception, >>>>>>>> changing the topic, etc. Politifact percentages "show" her to be >>>>>>>> relatively honest but they do not account for such things (and based >>>>>>>> on their methodology it is not clear they should). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Trained lawyer? LOL!!! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/barexam.asp >>>>>>> >>>>>> Yes, trained lawyer. As the link you provided shows. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> What 'special powers' does that confer upon her in your mind? Do you think >>>>> it enables her to pull crap like this... >>>>> >>>>> <http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/clinton-donor-sensitive-intelligence- >>>> board/story?id=39710624> >>>>> >>>>> ... while believing that people are as stupid as she needs them to be? >>>>> >>>>> A "trained lawyer" with a working brain doesn't underestimate *everyone*. >>>> >>>> Or the fact that she failed her bar exam. >>> >>> Being trained as a lawyer and being able to lie and deceive is, to Carroll, >>> a "special power." >> >> As 'read' by you. >> >>> Sigh. >>> >>> Does he ever do anything other than troll me? Ever? >> >> Yeah... and I just did 'it' again, fool. Anyone that can read can see how >> you've avoided this issue by using your "psych degree" ;) > > I have a friend who is both a veterinarian and a lawyer. He earns his living > as a vet. Snit should follow that example and find an alternative occupation > that he is actually good at. > Ah, insults. How classy! -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 20:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ahfjda93.vjid@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366555 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/24/16, 1:33 PM, in article hjga49a.ve@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Wednesday, August 24, 2016 at 2:12:08 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>> On 8/24/16, 12:55 PM, in article npku3h$940$6@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >>>> <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>>> I am not sure Trump lies more but he lies more directly. Clinton is a >>>>>>>>> trained lawyer and is very good at lying by innuendo, using deception, >>>>>>>>> changing the topic, etc. Politifact percentages "show" her to be >>>>>>>>> relatively honest but they do not account for such things (and based >>>>>>>>> on their methodology it is not clear they should). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Trained lawyer? LOL!!! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/barexam.asp >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, trained lawyer. As the link you provided shows. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> What 'special powers' does that confer upon her in your mind? Do you think >>>>>> it enables her to pull crap like this... >>>>>> >>>>>> <http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/clinton-donor-sensitive-intelligence- >>>>> board/story?id=39710624> >>>>>> >>>>>> ... while believing that people are as stupid as she needs them to be? >>>>>> >>>>>> A "trained lawyer" with a working brain doesn't underestimate *everyone*. >>>>> >>>>> Or the fact that she failed her bar exam. >>>> >>>> Being trained as a lawyer and being able to lie and deceive is, to Carroll, >>>> a "special power." >>> >>> As 'read' by you. >>> >>>> Sigh. >>>> >>>> Does he ever do anything other than troll me? Ever? >>> >>> Yeah... and I just did 'it' again, fool. Anyone that can read can see how >>> you've avoided this issue by using your "psych degree" ;) >> >> I have a friend who is both a veterinarian and a lawyer. He earns his living >> as a vet. Snit should follow that example and find an alternative occupation >> that he is actually good at. >> > Ah, insults. How classy! > Thanks.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 14:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E3597F.79FC5%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366558 |
On 8/24/16, 1:50 PM, in article ahfjda93.vjid@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/24/16, 1:33 PM, in article hjga49a.ve@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Wednesday, August 24, 2016 at 2:12:08 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>>> On 8/24/16, 12:55 PM, in article npku3h$940$6@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >>>>> <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I am not sure Trump lies more but he lies more directly. Clinton is a >>>>>>>>>> trained lawyer and is very good at lying by innuendo, using >>>>>>>>>> deception, >>>>>>>>>> changing the topic, etc. Politifact percentages "show" her to be >>>>>>>>>> relatively honest but they do not account for such things (and based >>>>>>>>>> on their methodology it is not clear they should). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Trained lawyer? LOL!!! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/barexam.asp >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yes, trained lawyer. As the link you provided shows. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What 'special powers' does that confer upon her in your mind? Do you >>>>>>> think >>>>>>> it enables her to pull crap like this... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/clinton-donor-sensitive-intelligence- >>>>>> board/story?id=39710624> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ... while believing that people are as stupid as she needs them to be? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> A "trained lawyer" with a working brain doesn't underestimate >>>>>>> *everyone*. >>>>>> >>>>>> Or the fact that she failed her bar exam. >>>>> >>>>> Being trained as a lawyer and being able to lie and deceive is, to >>>>> Carroll, >>>>> a "special power." >>>> >>>> As 'read' by you. >>>> >>>>> Sigh. >>>>> >>>>> Does he ever do anything other than troll me? Ever? >>>> >>>> Yeah... and I just did 'it' again, fool. Anyone that can read can see how >>>> you've avoided this issue by using your "psych degree" ;) >>> >>> I have a friend who is both a veterinarian and a lawyer. He earns his >>> living >>> as a vet. Snit should follow that example and find an alternative >>> occupation >>> that he is actually good at. >>> >> Ah, insults. How classy! >> > > Thanks. > :) -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 13:54 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <npku1u$940$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366518 |
Snit wrote: > On 8/24/16, 11:20 AM, in article npkoic$l8v$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" > <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: > >> On 08/24/16 10:03, Snit wrote: >>> On 8/24/16, 7:12 AM, in article npka0h$v8o$2@dont-email.me, "DFS" >>> <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 8/24/2016 12:28 AM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>>> On 08/23/16 18:08, DFS wrote: >>>>>> On 8/23/2016 5:57 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Funny thing, it is the media that is ragging on trump but not one >>>>>>> bad word about hillary. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Ridiculous lie. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> No, even trump made that point. She lies like a dog. >>>> >>>> Trump lies 10x as much. In 1/2 hour he spews so much idiocy and >>>> half-truths and unfulfillable promises that I can only sit there and >>>> gape. >>>> >>>> The other night Trump said "I will be your agent of change." The last >>>> politician I heard say that? Bill Clinton. >>> >>> I am not sure Trump lies more but he lies more directly. Clinton is a >>> trained lawyer and is very good at lying by innuendo, using deception, >>> changing the topic, etc. Politifact percentages "show" her to be >>> relatively honest but they do not account for such things (and based on >>> their methodology it is not clear they should). >> >> Trained lawyer? LOL!!! >> >> http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/barexam.asp >> > Yes, trained lawyer. As the link you provided shows. > > And failed her bar exam. Not too talented a lawyer, I'd say. -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 12 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 … 10 11 [12] 13 14 … 20 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web