Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #286324 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-03-26 19:11 -0700 |
| Last post | 2015-03-31 10:49 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 143 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-26 19:11 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 04:10 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-26 21:45 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 17:08 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-27 13:14 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 17:16 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-27 14:36 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 18:44 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-27 15:14 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 22:35 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-27 15:59 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-27 13:23 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-27 14:40 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-27 15:11 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-27 13:18 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 17:21 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-27 13:44 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 17:46 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-27 13:52 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 18:01 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-27 14:45 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 18:58 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-27 15:05 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 19:13 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-27 15:16 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 22:32 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-27 15:43 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 22:55 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-27 16:01 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 23:14 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-27 16:47 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 00:32 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-27 18:08 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 01:21 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-27 18:30 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 01:50 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-27 22:54 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-27 20:02 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-27 23:22 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-28 09:03 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 13:13 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 13:42 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 14:17 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 19:13 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 12:23 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 19:38 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 19:59 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 21:51 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-28 18:02 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-03-30 09:06 -0500
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-30 15:51 +0100
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-30 11:22 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 12:48 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-30 14:02 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-30 11:14 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-30 11:17 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-28 23:12 +0100
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-28 18:55 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Donald Miller <donaldmiller955@mail.com> - 2015-03-28 19:11 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-28 19:20 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-29 00:29 +0100
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-28 23:38 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-28 19:43 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 23:51 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-29 14:45 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 15:00 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-29 16:14 +0100
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 15:42 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-29 12:41 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 16:59 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Donald Miller <donaldmiller955@mail.com> - 2015-03-29 13:03 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 03:45 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 03:54 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-30 07:00 -0500
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 10:27 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 20:56 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-28 21:13 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 22:21 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-28 22:23 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 22:46 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 01:28 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 19:25 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 22:47 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 16:42 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-28 19:44 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-03-30 09:13 -0500
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-30 13:45 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 22:23 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-28 22:40 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 22:43 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-29 09:51 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 22:22 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-28 18:49 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-28 09:47 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 14:15 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 09:49 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 17:02 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 11:52 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-28 10:16 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-27 15:02 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-27 15:10 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-27 15:17 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-27 10:25 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 17:29 +0000
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-30 04:30 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 08:36 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-30 09:06 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 09:20 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-30 18:31 +0200
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-30 09:36 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-30 12:23 -0500
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 20:45 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 18:01 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 23:01 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 20:11 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 21:58 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 19:09 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 23:02 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 20:10 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 09:36 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-31 10:13 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 12:35 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 08:32 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 07:34 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 11:22 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 21:02 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-02 08:45 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 09:16 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-04 20:00 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-04 18:42 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-02 08:48 -0500
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-02 08:53 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 09:27 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 11:30 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 12:44 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 10:06 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 20:51 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 18:02 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 23:01 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-31 05:12 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 09:41 -0400
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 12:08 -0700
Re: The stupid case sensitivity debate Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-31 10:49 -0700
Page 4 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-29 00:29 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <20150329002954.6610a4f9@maxa-pc> |
| In reply to | #286501 |
On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 19:20:27 -0400 Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote: > > The moment I really decided that I should never use it again is when > I suffered through a number of problems with Linux on my desktop, > after I had decided that I would it to power my gaming machine as > well. Screen tearing, refusal to shut down and a missing splash > screen were but three of the multiple problems I had. This sentence is from same guy claiming that he installed Linux in 1998 or was it 1999?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Poaster <wp@dev.null> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-28 23:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <okqjub-dra.ln1@user-1842.linux.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #286503 |
It was reported that Melzzzzz posted: > On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 19:20:27 -0400 > Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote: > >> >> The moment I really decided that I should never use it again is when >> I suffered through a number of problems with Linux on my desktop, >> after I had decided that I would it to power my gaming machine as >> well. Screen tearing, refusal to shut down and a missing splash >> screen were but three of the multiple problems I had. > > This sentence is from same guy claiming that he installed Linux > in 1998 or was it 1999? If you believe that that dimwit actually installed any Linux distro, I have a bridge for sale..... -- openSUSE 13.2 64-bit KDE 4.14.6 Kernel: 3.19.1-2.1.desktop x86_64 GNU/Linux 2015-3-10
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-28 19:43 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <9hbmbv9q98ol.3e6r66xaue96$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #286506 |
On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 23:38:32 +0000, William Poaster wrote: > It was reported that Melzzzzz posted: > >> On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 19:20:27 -0400 >> Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote: >> >>> >>> The moment I really decided that I should never use it again is when >>> I suffered through a number of problems with Linux on my desktop, >>> after I had decided that I would it to power my gaming machine as >>> well. Screen tearing, refusal to shut down and a missing splash >>> screen were but three of the multiple problems I had. >> >> This sentence is from same guy claiming that he installed Linux >> in 1998 or was it 1999? > > If you believe that that dimwit actually installed any Linux distro, I have > a bridge for sale..... So you bought the Brooklyn Bridge? It figures. You seem ignorant enough. Good luck locating someone dumber than you to take it off your hands. I think you just might be stuck with it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-28 23:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hhfd83.a03@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #286508 |
Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> wrote: > On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 23:38:32 +0000, William Poaster wrote: >> It was reported that Melzzzzz posted: >> >>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 19:20:27 -0400 >>> Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> The moment I really decided that I should never use it again is when >>>> I suffered through a number of problems with Linux on my desktop, >>>> after I had decided that I would it to power my gaming machine as >>>> well. Screen tearing, refusal to shut down and a missing splash >>>> screen were but three of the multiple problems I had. >>> >>> This sentence is from same guy claiming that he installed Linux >>> in 1998 or was it 1999? >> >> If you believe that that dimwit actually installed any Linux distro, I have >> a bridge for sale..... > So you bought the Brooklyn Bridge? > It figures. You seem ignorant enough. > Good luck locating someone dumber than you to take it off your hands. > I think you just might be stuck with it. LOL! that was awesome
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-29 14:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mf9364$l5l$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #286513 |
On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 23:51:38 +0000, owl wrote:
> Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> wrote:
>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 23:38:32 +0000, William Poaster wrote:
>
>>> It was reported that Melzzzzz posted:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 19:20:27 -0400 Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> The moment I really decided that I should never use it again is when
>>>>> I suffered through a number of problems with Linux on my desktop,
>>>>> after I had decided that I would it to power my gaming machine as
>>>>> well. Screen tearing, refusal to shut down and a missing splash
>>>>> screen were but three of the multiple problems I had.
>>>>
>>>> This sentence is from same guy claiming that he installed Linux in
>>>> 1998 or was it 1999?
>>>
>>> If you believe that that dimwit actually installed any Linux distro, I
>>> have a bridge for sale.....
>
>> So you bought the Brooklyn Bridge?
>> It figures. You seem ignorant enough.
>> Good luck locating someone dumber than you to take it off your hands.
>> I think you just might be stuck with it.
>
> LOL! that was awesome
Yeah, if you were in sixth grade, that would be one "snappy" comeback.
--
When Microsoft makes a product that doesn't suck ...
it'll be a vacuum cleaner
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-29 15:00 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mgje9.0awef@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #286600 |
ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 23:51:38 +0000, owl wrote: >> Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> wrote: >>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 23:38:32 +0000, William Poaster wrote: >> >>>> It was reported that Melzzzzz posted: >>>> >>>>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 19:20:27 -0400 Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> The moment I really decided that I should never use it again is when >>>>>> I suffered through a number of problems with Linux on my desktop, >>>>>> after I had decided that I would it to power my gaming machine as >>>>>> well. Screen tearing, refusal to shut down and a missing splash >>>>>> screen were but three of the multiple problems I had. >>>>> >>>>> This sentence is from same guy claiming that he installed Linux in >>>>> 1998 or was it 1999? >>>> >>>> If you believe that that dimwit actually installed any Linux distro, I >>>> have a bridge for sale..... >> >>> So you bought the Brooklyn Bridge? >>> It figures. You seem ignorant enough. >>> Good luck locating someone dumber than you to take it off your hands. >>> I think you just might be stuck with it. >> >> LOL! that was awesome > Yeah, if you were in sixth grade, that would be one "snappy" comeback. Yeah, that "bridge for sale" thing was so witty and mature.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | William Poaster <wp@dev.null> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-29 16:14 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <efhlub-vd2.ln1@user-1842.linux.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #286600 |
It was reported that ronb posted: > On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 23:51:38 +0000, owl wrote: > >> Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> wrote: >>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 23:38:32 +0000, William Poaster wrote: <snip drivel> > > Yeah, if you were in sixth grade, that would be one "snappy" comeback. Went right over the two dumbasses heads. Why am I not surprised. -- openSUSE 13.2 64-bit KDE 4.14.6 Kernel: 3.19.1-2.1.desktop x86_64 GNU/Linux 2015-3-10
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-29 15:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hhg830.0a3fe@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #286612 |
William Poaster <wp@dev.null> wrote: > It was reported that ronb posted: >> On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 23:51:38 +0000, owl wrote: >> >>> Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> wrote: >>>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 23:38:32 +0000, William Poaster wrote: > <snip drivel> >> >> Yeah, if you were in sixth grade, that would be one "snappy" comeback. > Went right over the two dumbasses heads. Why am I not surprised. You're right up there with gohde. He can go over retards' heads. You can go over dumbasses' heads. Congratulations.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-29 12:41 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mf99ug$f18$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #286600 |
ronb wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 23:51:38 +0000, owl wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 19:20:27 -0400 Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote: >> >> LOL! that was awesome > > Yeah, if you were in sixth grade, that would be one "snappy" comeback. These trolls are like 8th graders hassling an adult by hurling kiddie abuse at him. Best ignored like the lame-asses they are. -- They went rushing down that freeway, Messed around and got lost. They didn't care... they were just dying to get off, And it was life in the fast lane. -- Eagles, "Life in the Fast Lane"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-29 16:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bbvh9.afw@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #286621 |
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: > ronb wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 23:51:38 +0000, owl wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 19:20:27 -0400 Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote: >>> >>> LOL! that was awesome >> >> Yeah, if you were in sixth grade, that would be one "snappy" comeback. > These trolls are like 8th graders hassling an adult by hurling kiddie abuse > at him. > Best ignored like the lame-asses they are. Did you get that from a Mad Magazine editorial, Little Beaver?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Donald Miller <donaldmiller955@mail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-29 13:03 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <d0cgha99rp847f0po5mim4qpdvk73higeb@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #286625 |
On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 16:59:24 +0000 (UTC), owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >> ronb wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 23:51:38 +0000, owl wrote: >>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 19:20:27 -0400 Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote: >>>> >>>> LOL! that was awesome >>> >>> Yeah, if you were in sixth grade, that would be one "snappy" comeback. > >> These trolls are like 8th graders hassling an adult by hurling kiddie abuse >> at him. > >> Best ignored like the lame-asses they are. > >Did you get that from a Mad Magazine editorial, Little Beaver? He seems to enjoy being made fun of. Rather odd behavior I would say.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-30 03:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mfags5$o8g$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #286625 |
On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 16:59:24 +0000, owl wrote:
> Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>> ronb wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 23:51:38 +0000, owl wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 19:20:27 -0400 Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> LOL! that was awesome
>>>
>>> Yeah, if you were in sixth grade, that would be one "snappy" comeback.
>
>> These trolls are like 8th graders hassling an adult by hurling kiddie
>> abuse at him.
>
>> Best ignored like the lame-asses they are.
>
> Did you get that from a Mad Magazine editorial, Little Beaver?
You just proved his point. Congratulations.
--
When Microsoft makes a product that doesn't suck ...
it'll be a vacuum cleaner
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-30 03:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gh3.ref0e@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #286672 |
ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 16:59:24 +0000, owl wrote: >> Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>> ronb wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> >>>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 23:51:38 +0000, owl wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 19:20:27 -0400 Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> LOL! that was awesome >>>> >>>> Yeah, if you were in sixth grade, that would be one "snappy" comeback. >> >>> These trolls are like 8th graders hassling an adult by hurling kiddie >>> abuse at him. >> >>> Best ignored like the lame-asses they are. >> >> Did you get that from a Mad Magazine editorial, Little Beaver? > You just proved his point. Congratulations. You just managed to do a flyby on yourself. Awesome.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-30 07:00 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kheihah5pl8fetb9a7pskjcncuf23nvk99@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #286600 |
ronb wrote: > bowel wrote: >> >> Tom ass wrote: >>> >>> So you bought the Brooklyn Bridge? >>> It figures. You seem ignorant enough. >>> Good luck locating someone dumber than you to take it off your hands. >>> I think you just might be stuck with it. >> >> LOL! that was awesome > >Yeah, if you were in sixth grade, that would be one "snappy" comeback. The shitty little children are easily amused. -- "LOL. It seems like yesterday that all the "advocates" were creaming themselves here in COLA about how Wave would be another nail in MS's coffin!" - Hadron Quark, lying shamelessly
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-30 10:27 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mfbmft$gf7$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #286710 |
On 3/30/2015 8:00 AM, chrisv wrote: > ronb wrote: > >> bowel wrote: >>> >>> Tom ass wrote: >>>> >>>> So you bought the Brooklyn Bridge? >>>> It figures. You seem ignorant enough. >>>> Good luck locating someone dumber than you to take it off your hands. >>>> I think you just might be stuck with it. >>> >>> LOL! that was awesome >> >> Yeah, if you were in sixth grade, that would be one "snappy" comeback. > > The shitty little children are easily amused. shitv (you) in two posts to Hadron: "shitty little freedom-hating dictator wannabee, fscking idiot, piece of shit, stupid, ignorant, shameless asshole. asshole imbecile, stupid piece of shit, lying, insulting freedom-hating pricks, stupid lying asshole, shithead, jackass" I see a shitty little child here in cola, that's for sure.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-28 20:56 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mf7ijh$3bp$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #286508 |
On 3/28/2015 7:43 PM, Tomas wrote: > On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 23:38:32 +0000, William Poaster wrote: > >> It was reported that Melzzzzz posted: >> >>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 19:20:27 -0400 >>> Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> The moment I really decided that I should never use it again is when >>>> I suffered through a number of problems with Linux on my desktop, >>>> after I had decided that I would it to power my gaming machine as >>>> well. Screen tearing, refusal to shut down and a missing splash >>>> screen were but three of the multiple problems I had. >>> >>> This sentence is from same guy claiming that he installed Linux >>> in 1998 or was it 1999? >> >> If you believe that that dimwit actually installed any Linux distro, I have >> a bridge for sale..... > > So you bought the Brooklyn Bridge? > It figures. You seem ignorant enough. > Good luck locating someone dumber than you to take it off your hands. > I think you just might be stuck with it. What's up Flattie? Why the nymshift?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-28 21:13 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <1u9xm71zht1ho.mozawf1sm852.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #286519 |
On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 20:56:46 -0400, DFS wrote: > On 3/28/2015 7:43 PM, Tomas wrote: >> On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 23:38:32 +0000, William Poaster wrote: >> >>> It was reported that Melzzzzz posted: >>> >>>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 19:20:27 -0400 >>>> Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> The moment I really decided that I should never use it again is when >>>>> I suffered through a number of problems with Linux on my desktop, >>>>> after I had decided that I would it to power my gaming machine as >>>>> well. Screen tearing, refusal to shut down and a missing splash >>>>> screen were but three of the multiple problems I had. >>>> >>>> This sentence is from same guy claiming that he installed Linux >>>> in 1998 or was it 1999? >>> >>> If you believe that that dimwit actually installed any Linux distro, I have >>> a bridge for sale..... >> >> So you bought the Brooklyn Bridge? >> It figures. You seem ignorant enough. >> Good luck locating someone dumber than you to take it off your hands. >> I think you just might be stuck with it. > > > What's up Flattie? Try again Connor. Or should I call you Bull Connor? > Why the nymshift? No nymshift.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-28 22:21 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mf7nhh$7ma$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #286520 |
On 3/28/2015 9:13 PM, Tomas wrote: > On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 20:56:46 -0400, DFS wrote: > >> On 3/28/2015 7:43 PM, Tomas wrote: >>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 23:38:32 +0000, William Poaster wrote: >>> >>>> It was reported that Melzzzzz posted: >>>> >>>>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 19:20:27 -0400 >>>>> Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The moment I really decided that I should never use it again is when >>>>>> I suffered through a number of problems with Linux on my desktop, >>>>>> after I had decided that I would it to power my gaming machine as >>>>>> well. Screen tearing, refusal to shut down and a missing splash >>>>>> screen were but three of the multiple problems I had. >>>>> >>>>> This sentence is from same guy claiming that he installed Linux >>>>> in 1998 or was it 1999? >>>> >>>> If you believe that that dimwit actually installed any Linux distro, I have >>>> a bridge for sale..... >>> >>> So you bought the Brooklyn Bridge? >>> It figures. You seem ignorant enough. >>> Good luck locating someone dumber than you to take it off your hands. >>> I think you just might be stuck with it. >> >> >> What's up Flattie? > > Try again Connor. > Or should I call you Bull Connor? > >> Why the nymshift? > > No nymshift. Stinking liar.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-28 22:23 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <198suezgshyd6.vbn8kxuolain.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #286526 |
On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 22:21:02 -0400, DFS wrote: > On 3/28/2015 9:13 PM, Tomas wrote: >> On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 20:56:46 -0400, DFS wrote: >> >>> On 3/28/2015 7:43 PM, Tomas wrote: >>>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 23:38:32 +0000, William Poaster wrote: >>>> >>>>> It was reported that Melzzzzz posted: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 19:20:27 -0400 >>>>>> Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The moment I really decided that I should never use it again is when >>>>>>> I suffered through a number of problems with Linux on my desktop, >>>>>>> after I had decided that I would it to power my gaming machine as >>>>>>> well. Screen tearing, refusal to shut down and a missing splash >>>>>>> screen were but three of the multiple problems I had. >>>>>> >>>>>> This sentence is from same guy claiming that he installed Linux >>>>>> in 1998 or was it 1999? >>>>> >>>>> If you believe that that dimwit actually installed any Linux distro, I have >>>>> a bridge for sale..... >>>> >>>> So you bought the Brooklyn Bridge? >>>> It figures. You seem ignorant enough. >>>> Good luck locating someone dumber than you to take it off your hands. >>>> I think you just might be stuck with it. >>> >>> >>> What's up Flattie? >> >> Try again Connor. >> Or should I call you Bull Connor? > > >>> Why the nymshift? >> >> No nymshift. > > > Stinking liar. Prove it, Connor.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-28 22:46 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mf7p0r$kj6$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #286530 |
On 3/28/2015 10:23 PM, Tomas wrote: > On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 22:21:02 -0400, DFS wrote: > >> On 3/28/2015 9:13 PM, Tomas wrote: >>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 20:56:46 -0400, DFS wrote: >>> >>>> On 3/28/2015 7:43 PM, Tomas wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 23:38:32 +0000, William Poaster wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> It was reported that Melzzzzz posted: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 19:20:27 -0400 >>>>>>> Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The moment I really decided that I should never use it again is when >>>>>>>> I suffered through a number of problems with Linux on my desktop, >>>>>>>> after I had decided that I would it to power my gaming machine as >>>>>>>> well. Screen tearing, refusal to shut down and a missing splash >>>>>>>> screen were but three of the multiple problems I had. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This sentence is from same guy claiming that he installed Linux >>>>>>> in 1998 or was it 1999? >>>>>> >>>>>> If you believe that that dimwit actually installed any Linux distro, I have >>>>>> a bridge for sale..... >>>>> >>>>> So you bought the Brooklyn Bridge? >>>>> It figures. You seem ignorant enough. >>>>> Good luck locating someone dumber than you to take it off your hands. >>>>> I think you just might be stuck with it. >>>> >>>> >>>> What's up Flattie? >>> >>> Try again Connor. >>> Or should I call you Bull Connor? >> > >>>> Why the nymshift? >>> >>> No nymshift. >> >> >> Stinking liar. > > Prove it, Connor. Easily. You stink and you lie.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web