Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #286560 > unrolled thread
| Started by | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-03-29 13:24 +0000 |
| Last post | 2015-03-29 15:50 -0600 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 413 — 25 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 13:24 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-29 15:41 +0200
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 13:59 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-29 16:00 +0200
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 14:09 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-29 16:10 +0200
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 14:19 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-29 16:16 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-29 10:20 -0400
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 14:35 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-29 11:09 -0400
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 14:59 +0000
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-29 16:04 -0600
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-29 10:18 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-29 16:23 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-29 12:38 -0400
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 17:02 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-29 13:08 -0400
Re: fucking firefox John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-03-29 10:12 -0700
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-29 13:53 -0400
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 03:48 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-29 10:04 -0400
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-29 10:15 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-29 10:20 -0400
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-29 10:30 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-29 11:07 -0400
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-29 21:04 -0400
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 01:21 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-30 13:01 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-30 12:54 -0400
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 14:39 +0000
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 14:37 +0000
Re: fucking firefox John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-03-29 07:30 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-03-30 11:21 +0100
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-29 14:39 +0000
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 15:06 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-29 17:09 +0200
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 15:17 +0000
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 04:16 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-30 13:31 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-30 19:47 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-30 14:01 -0400
Re: fucking firefox chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-30 13:35 -0500
Re: fucking firefox chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-30 13:57 -0500
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-30 20:00 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-30 20:56 -0400
Re: fucking firefox William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-30 22:22 +0100
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-30 19:59 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-30 20:02 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 08:53 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-31 05:53 -0400
Re: fucking firefox William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-31 10:59 +0100
The Apache Software Foundation Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-31 06:11 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-31 13:07 -0600
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 22:32 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 21:28 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 12:17 -0600
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 08:40 -0400
Re: fucking firefox vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 08:12 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-01 17:24 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-01 12:10 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-01 18:37 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 10:15 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-01 19:51 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 11:20 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 14:22 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 11:27 -0700
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 16:49 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-02 01:01 +0200
Re: fucking wintrolls ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 23:01 +0000
Re: fucking lintrolls GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:46 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-01 19:51 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:45 -0600
Re: fucking firefox cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-04-02 05:00 -0700
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:44 -0600
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 19:06 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 13:12 +0200
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:39 -0600
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 12:17 -0600
Re: fucking firefox cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-04-01 11:27 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 11:30 -0700
Re: fucking firefox cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-04-01 11:35 -0700
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-01 14:47 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 12:01 -0700
Re: fucking firefox cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-04-01 12:14 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 13:02 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-01 22:57 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-01 23:46 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-02 00:02 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-02 00:08 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-02 00:23 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 15:43 -0700
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:41 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-04 09:36 -0700
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-01 20:11 -0400
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-01 20:30 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 18:30 -0700
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:39 -0600
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 21:02 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 23:47 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-02 06:09 +0200
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-02 08:58 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 09:23 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 08:12 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2015-04-04 02:17 +0000
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-03 09:38 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-01 19:57 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-01 19:56 -0400
Re: fucking firefox JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-02 13:35 -0500
Re: fucking wintrolls ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 22:17 +0000
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 16:46 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 14:58 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-02 00:13 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 15:20 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-01 21:31 +0200
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-01 15:38 -0400
Ezekiel doesn't care, obviously. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-02 08:20 -0700
Re: Ezekiel doesn't care, obviously. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-02 12:01 -0400
Your Usenet skills reflect your email skills. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-02 09:55 -0700
Re: Your Usenet skills reflect your email skills. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 13:37 -0400
Re: Your Usenet skills reflect your email skills. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-02 14:20 -0400
Re: Your Usenet skills reflect your email skills. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 11:34 -0700
If you don't need more, than fine. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-02 19:25 -0700
Re: If you don't need more, than fine. Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-02 23:50 -0400
Re: If you don't need more, than fine. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 13:10 +0200
Re: If you don't need more, than fine. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-03 12:58 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-01 19:53 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 12:17 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-01 19:49 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-02 01:53 +0200
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 12:36 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 12:16 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 08:59 -0400
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 09:25 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 09:54 -0400
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 00:04 +0000
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:29 -0600
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 20:49 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 21:56 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-03-31 10:50 +0100
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 12:11 +0200
Re: fucking firefox chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-31 07:07 -0500
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 14:42 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-03-31 13:45 +0100
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 08:55 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 17:13 +0200
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-31 11:35 -0400
Re: fucking firefox vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 08:09 -0700
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-01 11:59 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 12:15 -0600
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-01 15:26 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 16:42 -0600
Re: fucking firefox vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 15:01 -0700
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 16:43 -0600
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-01 19:54 -0400
If wealth and/or IQ made you happy... Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-02 06:16 -0700
Re: If wealth and/or IQ made you happy... Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 13:47 -0500
Re: If wealth and/or IQ made you happy... jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-04-02 20:14 +0000
Re: If wealth and/or IQ made you happy... benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 17:57 -0400
Re: If wealth and/or IQ made you happy... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-02 18:21 -0400
Re: If wealth and/or IQ made you happy... vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-02 16:48 -0700
Re: If wealth and/or IQ made you happy... "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-02 22:14 -0400
Define "Good things". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-02 19:29 -0700
Re: Define "Good things". Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 22:15 -0500
Re: Define "Good things". Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-02 23:49 -0400
The House of Saud. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-02 07:55 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-01 12:07 -0400
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-01 18:40 +0000
Re: fucking firefox vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 14:52 -0700
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 16:40 -0600
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-31 11:56 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 20:31 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 12:03 -0700
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-31 16:43 -0600
Re: fucking firefox vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 07:38 -0700
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 14:42 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-01 17:13 +0200
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 12:14 -0600
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 12:13 -0600
Re: fucking firefox vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 13:49 -0700
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 16:39 -0600
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 04:15 +0000
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 04:33 +0000
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 04:35 +0000
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 04:50 +0000
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:28 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-30 06:00 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:28 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2015-03-30 23:26 +0000
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-30 08:05 -0400
Hooting owl Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-30 05:56 -0400
Re: Hooting owl William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-30 11:01 +0100
Re: Hooting owl Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 08:58 -0700
Re: Hooting owl Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 09:43 -0700
Re: Hooting owl GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:26 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-30 13:28 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:25 -0600
fucking owl Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-29 12:27 -0400
Re: fucking owl Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-29 12:32 -0400
Re: fucking owl GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-29 16:00 -0600
Fucking bowel Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2015-03-29 18:41 +0000
Re: fucking owl owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 18:54 +0000
Re: fucking owl GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-29 15:58 -0600
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-29 09:45 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-29 15:54 +0200
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 14:06 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-29 10:00 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-29 15:55 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-29 09:55 -0400
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-29 14:38 +0000
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 14:43 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-29 16:42 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-29 15:55 -0600
Re: fucking firefox taka0038@gmail.com - 2015-04-01 09:23 -0700
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-29 14:41 +0000
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 14:55 +0000
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 04:25 +0000
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 04:29 +0000
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:24 -0600
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 04:44 +0000
Re: fucking firefox William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-30 09:05 +0100
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 09:55 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 09:40 -0700
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:23 -0600
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:22 -0600
Re: fucking firefox William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-29 16:19 +0100
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 15:41 +0000
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-29 15:54 -0600
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 04:09 +0000
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 04:23 +0000
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 04:32 +0000
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 04:40 +0000
Re: fucking firefox William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-30 09:06 +0100
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 10:06 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:21 -0600
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 20:45 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:20 -0600
Re: fucking firefox William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-30 09:02 +0100
Irritable bowel chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-30 07:09 -0500
Re: Irritable bowel DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 10:40 -0400
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 10:40 -0400
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-30 11:25 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:18 -0600
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:16 -0600
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-29 15:53 -0600
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 03:47 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-30 08:23 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-03-30 16:06 +0100
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:15 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-29 09:43 -0700
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 16:57 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-29 12:13 -0700
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 19:24 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-29 12:35 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-29 12:44 -0700
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 19:54 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-29 13:06 -0700
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 20:29 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-29 13:59 -0700
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 00:55 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-29 18:15 -0700
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 01:38 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-29 18:54 -0700
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 02:25 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-29 22:53 -0700
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 03:12 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-29 22:56 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-30 13:06 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-30 19:46 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-30 14:00 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-30 20:15 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 11:42 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-30 20:54 +0200
Re: fucking firefox JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-03-30 14:03 -0500
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 12:12 -0700
Re: fucking firefox chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-30 14:22 -0500
Re: fucking firefox vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-03-30 15:37 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-30 19:50 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 21:51 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-30 19:49 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-30 20:01 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 08:50 +0200
"What's a Sea drive?" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-31 05:57 -0400
Re: "What's a Sea drive?" DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 08:40 -0400
Re: "What's a Sea drive?" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-31 09:14 -0500
Re: "What's a Sea drive?" DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 13:22 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 08:57 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 17:11 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 11:40 -0400
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 11:47 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 13:29 -0400
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 22:29 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-03-31 18:39 -0400
Re: fucking firefox JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-02 13:31 -0500
Re: fucking firefox chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-02 14:19 -0500
Re: fucking firefox JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-02 15:42 -0500
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 21:19 +0000
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-02 23:41 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-02 19:37 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-02 12:49 -0700
Re: fucking firefox William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-02 22:56 +0100
C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-02 19:40 -0400
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-03 09:40 +0100
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-03 06:04 -0400
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 13:07 +0200
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-03 12:16 +0100
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-03 07:11 -0500
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:35 -0600
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:35 -0600
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-03 07:57 -0400
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 15:21 +0200
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-03 09:42 -0400
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 16:03 +0200
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-03 10:16 -0400
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-03 10:16 -0400
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:35 -0600
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-03 10:20 -0400
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:34 -0600
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-03 22:29 +0100
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-04 09:33 -0400
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-03 09:49 -0400
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-03 09:10 -0500
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:31 -0600
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-03 11:00 -0500
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-03 12:24 -0400
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-03 12:36 -0400
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:30 -0600
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:30 -0600
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:29 -0600
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-03 15:01 -0400
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-04 16:25 -0600
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:28 -0600
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-03 22:29 +0100
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:28 -0600
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-03 13:01 -0400
Re: C:, D:, relics of DOS, in Windows flagship offering GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:27 -0600
Re: fucking firefox vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-02 16:55 -0700
Re: fucking firefox vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-02 17:21 -0700
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-02 22:06 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 13:02 +0200
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-03 07:53 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 15:19 +0200
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-03 09:36 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:27 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-03 09:51 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:26 -0600
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:25 -0600
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 19:03 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-02 19:35 -0400
Re: fucking firefox chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-03 06:49 -0500
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-03 09:00 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:22 -0600
Re: fucking firefox "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-03 14:55 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-04 16:24 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-03 09:39 -0400
Re: fucking firefox JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-03 11:03 -0500
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-31 17:40 -0700
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 08:45 -0400
Re: fucking firefox JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-03-31 09:33 -0500
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 11:11 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 17:19 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 11:42 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-31 13:18 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-31 11:43 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 20:30 +0200
Re: fucking firefox William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-31 22:36 +0100
Re: fucking firefox Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-31 23:51 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-01 00:18 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-31 19:52 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 21:27 -0400
Re: fucking firefox vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 08:23 -0700
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 12:10 -0600
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 14:30 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 16:30 -0600
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-31 16:41 -0600
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 22:49 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-31 19:54 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 21:35 -0400
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-31 16:40 -0600
Re: fucking firefox William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-31 22:33 +0100
Re: fucking firefox ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 22:39 +0000
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 12:04 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 13:34 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-31 10:50 -0700
Re: fucking firefox chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-31 08:33 -0500
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 12:15 -0700
Re: fucking firefox vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-03-30 15:31 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 16:23 -0700
Re: fucking firefox owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 23:36 +0000
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 17:44 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-30 15:26 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-30 22:06 +0200
Re: fucking firefox JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-03-30 15:19 -0500
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-30 23:02 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 08:49 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 08:52 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 11:39 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 12:16 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-30 19:46 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 08:47 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 08:50 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 17:07 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 11:37 -0400
Re: fucking firefox vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 09:03 -0700
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 12:56 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-01 19:50 +0200
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 14:21 -0400
Re: fucking firefox William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-01 22:45 +0100
Re: fucking firefox DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 21:01 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-01 20:00 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-30 12:54 -0400
Re: fucking firefox Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 10:08 -0700
Re: fucking firefox GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-29 15:50 -0600
Page 9 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 … 21 Next page →
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-02 16:48 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: If wealth and/or IQ made you happy... |
| Message-ID | <551dd568$0$39563$c3e8da3$f017e9df@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #287495 |
On 04/02/2015 03:21 PM, Ezekiel wrote: > -- > Unix has no "official governing body." > The "Nobody" nym > <mcvr6p$g57$1@news.albasani.net> > > > The Open Group holds the definition of what a UNIX system is and its > associated trademark in trust for the industry.... UNIX 03 Certification is > governed by the Open Brand > http://www.unix.org/what_is_unix.html > > > Intentional equivocation is usually regarded as a fib. If you are doing it intentionally, please stop fibbing. "Unix" is a class of operating systems with a very loose definition. UNIX (all caps) is the trademark. Linux is "a Unix" but is not "UNIX(R)". This was settled during the famous Berkeley/ATT flawsuit of yore. ATT's trademark was for "UNIX", but Berkeley could call BSD a "Unix". I'm going to assume you just didn't know that, and you weren't trying to fib intentionally. But now you know. Trivia: That flawsuit meant those of us using Linux couldn't use the BSD stack -- so there were were, with Fred van Kempen's "net2" code, which was buggy as hell. My first Linux kernel patch was a bugfix for bind(2), which we needed for our student-access system to run properly. Linux networking was kind of spit-and-bailing wire at the time -- but it worked. Usually. (NG's trimmed, because this is a Linux post, not an astronomy or physics post.) -- -v QOTD: "Of course there's no reason for it, it's just our policy."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-02 22:14 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: If wealth and/or IQ made you happy... |
| Message-ID | <mfksv0$tss$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #287527 |
"vallor" <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote in message news:551dd568$0$39563$c3e8da3$f017e9df@news.astraweb.com... > On 04/02/2015 03:21 PM, Ezekiel wrote: >> -- >> Unix has no "official governing body." >> The "Nobody" nym >> <mcvr6p$g57$1@news.albasani.net> >> >> >> The Open Group holds the definition of what a UNIX system is and its >> associated trademark in trust for the industry.... UNIX 03 Certification >> is >> governed by the Open Brand >> http://www.unix.org/what_is_unix.html >> >> >> > > Intentional equivocation is usually regarded as a fib. > > If you are doing it intentionally, please stop fibbing. It's actually the "Nobody" nym who was doing this. Go and read the thread. Because he's too stupid to capitalize "UNIX" correctly and wrote it as "Unix" doesn't change the point he was trying to make. Hint - the thread was about "Unix certification" and it's clear to all exactly what was meant.Your pendantic spelling, while technically correct, doesn't change his ignorant claim. > "Unix" is a class of operating systems with a very loose definition. > UNIX (all caps) is the trademark. Linux is "a Unix" but is not "UNIX(R)". That's great. The spelling and capitilaization police have your reward waiting for you. -- "I'm sure people would gladly pay Apple three or four times the price of an Galaxy Note 4 to avoid that couple of sheets of paper thick gap." The Nobody moron - unable to do simple math <4Z8Xv.381574$1s.59297@fx05.iad>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-02 19:29 -0700 |
| Subject | Define "Good things". |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.2{7.29P.Seattle.2015}> |
| In reply to | #287450 |
Sam·Wormley replied to me, saying: > > I just watched a documentary called "40 Kids By 20 Women"; > > the father is a serious drunk who only cares about one thing: sex. > > He lives off welfare and he's damn near retarded. > > Give me a lot of money and I can make lots of contribution enriching > my communities. You got money -- do good things with it. Define "Good things".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-02 22:15 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Define "Good things". |
| Message-ID | <Ufednazst619mIPInZ2dnUU7-YednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #287560 |
On 4/2/15 9:29 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > Sam·Wormley replied to me, saying: >> >> Give me a lot of money and I can make lots of contributions, enriching >> my communities. You got money -- do good things with it. > > Define "Good things". > Endowing the arts, preserving green spaces, educational scholarships, contributing to community projects, promoting diversity in local commerce and funding community space buildings, etc.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-02 23:49 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Define "Good things". |
| Message-ID | <gd3d1d0ef6cf.1izwoj3npzm8t$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #287560 |
On Thu, 02 Apr 2015 19:29:46 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > Sam·Wormley replied to me, saying: >>> I just watched a documentary called "40 Kids By 20 Women"; >>> the father is a serious drunk who only cares about one thing: sex. >>> He lives off welfare and he's damn near retarded. >> >> Give me a lot of money and I can make lots of contribution enriching >> my communities. You got money -- do good things with it. > > Define "Good things". Jeff, you are the biggest fucking idiot on USENET. WTF is wrong with you?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-02 07:55 -0700 |
| Subject | The House of Saud. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.2{7.55A.Seattle.2015}> |
| In reply to | #287188 |
<PRE Style='Font-Family: OCR A !important;'><big><big> If Ezekiel were right, and wealth implied intelligence, then Sam Walton's kids must be damn smart; likewise, The House of Saud.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-01 12:07 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mfh52e$kjb$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #287172 |
vallor wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > On 03/31/2015 08:35 AM, Ezekiel wrote: > Thank you for the blow-by-blow dissection of Zeke's bigotry <rolls eyes> Maybe chrisv can add some of that k00k's statements to his collection. -- How do I type "for i in *.dvi do xdvi i done" in a GUI? (Discussion in comp.os.linux.misc on the intuitiveness of interfaces.)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-01 18:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hgur9.jgo4a3@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #287172 |
vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: > On 03/31/2015 08:35 AM, Ezekiel wrote: [...] >> http://www.wsj.com/articles/brains-wealth-or-its-lack-and-academic-achievement-letters-to-the-editor-1427734470 > A Roger Murdock newspaper's op-ed glad-handing the wealthy? I've never > heard of such a thing! But have you heard of Rupert Murdoch? [...] >> People who drink (and afford) Woodford Reserve bourbon are >> smarter and wealthier than people who drink Old Crow bourbon. > People who drink bourbon are stupider than people who don't drink. That > has nothing to do with their wealth or upbringing, but because they're > imbibing in a drug. So, REALLY stupid example. > But that's not why we're here -- we're here because of your > equivocation. You've taken "wealthier" and turned it into > "smarter+wealthier" based on an op-ed from a Roger Murdock newspaper, Who?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-01 14:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <551c68a5$0$54721$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #287255 |
On 04/01/2015 11:40 AM, owl wrote: > vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >> On 03/31/2015 08:35 AM, Ezekiel wrote: > > [...] > >>> http://www.wsj.com/articles/brains-wealth-or-its-lack-and-academic-achievement-letters-to-the-editor-1427734470 > >> A Roger Murdock newspaper's op-ed glad-handing the wealthy? I've never >> heard of such a thing! > > But have you heard of Rupert Murdoch? > > [...] > >>> People who drink (and afford) Woodford Reserve bourbon are >>> smarter and wealthier than people who drink Old Crow bourbon. > >> People who drink bourbon are stupider than people who don't drink. That >> has nothing to do with their wealth or upbringing, but because they're >> imbibing in a drug. So, REALLY stupid example. > >> But that's not why we're here -- we're here because of your >> equivocation. You've taken "wealthier" and turned it into >> "smarter+wealthier" based on an op-ed from a Roger Murdock newspaper, > > Who? > You got me! "Roger Murdock" is a brain-o from _Airplane_. "Rupert Murdoch" is the asshole destroying the 4th estate as we know it. I stand corrected, and I humbly abase myself. -- -v C for yourself.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-01 16:40 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <weCdnfFK0YtY7oHInZ2dnUU7-U-dnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #287286 |
vallor wrote: > On 04/01/2015 11:40 AM, owl wrote: >> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >>> On 03/31/2015 08:35 AM, Ezekiel wrote: >> >> [...] >> >>>> http://www.wsj.com/articles/brains-wealth-or-its-lack-and-academic- achievement-letters-to-the-editor-1427734470 >> >>> A Roger Murdock newspaper's op-ed glad-handing the wealthy? I've never >>> heard of such a thing! >> >> But have you heard of Rupert Murdoch? >> >> [...] >> >>>> People who drink (and afford) Woodford Reserve bourbon are >>>> smarter and wealthier than people who drink Old Crow bourbon. >> >>> People who drink bourbon are stupider than people who don't drink. That >>> has nothing to do with their wealth or upbringing, but because they're >>> imbibing in a drug. So, REALLY stupid example. >> >>> But that's not why we're here -- we're here because of your >>> equivocation. You've taken "wealthier" and turned it into >>> "smarter+wealthier" based on an op-ed from a Roger Murdock newspaper, >> >> Who? >> > > You got me! > > "Roger Murdock" is a brain-o from _Airplane_. > > "Rupert Murdoch" is the asshole destroying the 4th estate as we know it. > THE Ruptured Mudduck? They're all mad as hatters. > I stand corrected, and I humbly abase myself. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-31 11:56 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <e6Wdnbkc3OdOQofInZ2dnUU7-IednZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #286978 |
Peter Köhlmann wrote: > DFS wrote: > >> On 3/31/2015 6:11 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>> Desk Rabbit wrote: >>> >>>> On 31/03/2015 04:56, GreyCloud wrote: >>>>> DFS wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 3/30/2015 5:29 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>>>>> ronb wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 17:09:28 +0200, Melzzzzz wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I can run firefox from home dir no problem, but I prefer using >>>>>>>>> package manager ... Manjaro rulleeeeez!!! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Who wouldn't prefer the package manager? -- it's just one of the >>>>>>>> ways Linux is superior to WinCrap. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Really? Give an example of this so-called superiority. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> sudo pacman -S xfce4 >>>>>> >>>>>> That's all that's required to download and install to Manjaro the >>>>>> entire xfce desktop environment in about 1 minute. >>>>> >>>>> I've already got the xfce desktop. I don't like it tho. >>>>> I don't see how it is any better than just downloading a program for >>>>> windows and then just running the installer. >>>>> A lot of linux software comes in the tarball format. Still have to >>>>> download it tho, and if the user isn't familiar with what a tar format >>>>> is they'll >>>>> start scratching their head about what to do next. It just isn't that >>>>> intuitive. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Considering the number of Windows users who download a file and then >>>> wonder why nothing happened, asking them to tar -zxf and then compile a >>>> program is a step too far. >>> >>> I am certain of that. OSX users cringe at the thought of files and >>> folders, and windows users in general are not much smarter than those >> >> >> It's well known that wealthier people are smarter than the less-wealthy, > > Nope. Thats bullshit. > And apple users are not wealthier than others, they just tend to spend > more for shiny gadgets. They are on the whole dumb as bread, as they > needlessly spend 2 to 3 times as much money to get something which is > inferior in many cases Guffaw!!! Tell that to your family doctor. He's a wealthy professional that could care less about the nuances of linux or any other operating system. But he get's wealthy by billing you when you see him.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-31 20:31 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mfep4k$ivm$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #287015 |
GreyCloud wrote: > Peter Köhlmann wrote: > >> DFS wrote: >> >>> On 3/31/2015 6:11 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>>> Desk Rabbit wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 31/03/2015 04:56, GreyCloud wrote: >>>>>> DFS wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 3/30/2015 5:29 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>>>>>> ronb wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 17:09:28 +0200, Melzzzzz wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I can run firefox from home dir no problem, but I prefer using >>>>>>>>>> package manager ... Manjaro rulleeeeez!!! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Who wouldn't prefer the package manager? -- it's just one of the >>>>>>>>> ways Linux is superior to WinCrap. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Really? Give an example of this so-called superiority. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> sudo pacman -S xfce4 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That's all that's required to download and install to Manjaro the >>>>>>> entire xfce desktop environment in about 1 minute. >>>>>> >>>>>> I've already got the xfce desktop. I don't like it tho. >>>>>> I don't see how it is any better than just downloading a program for >>>>>> windows and then just running the installer. >>>>>> A lot of linux software comes in the tarball format. Still have to >>>>>> download it tho, and if the user isn't familiar with what a tar >>>>>> format is they'll >>>>>> start scratching their head about what to do next. It just isn't >>>>>> that intuitive. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Considering the number of Windows users who download a file and then >>>>> wonder why nothing happened, asking them to tar -zxf and then compile >>>>> a program is a step too far. >>>> >>>> I am certain of that. OSX users cringe at the thought of files and >>>> folders, and windows users in general are not much smarter than those >>> >>> >>> It's well known that wealthier people are smarter than the less-wealthy, >> >> Nope. Thats bullshit. >> And apple users are not wealthier than others, they just tend to spend >> more for shiny gadgets. They are on the whole dumb as bread, as they >> needlessly spend 2 to 3 times as much money to get something which is >> inferior in many cases > > > Guffaw!!! Tell that to your family doctor. He's a wealthy professional > that could care less about the nuances of linux or any other operating > system. But he get's wealthy by billing you when you see him. Well, most doctors run windows. Not anything apple
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-31 12:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <417aaf07-b1f9-48e4-b2a1-1501516a483f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #287021 |
On Tuesday, March 31, 2015 at 12:31:39 PM UTC-6, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > GreyCloud wrote: > > > Peter Köhlmann wrote: > > > >> DFS wrote: > >> > >>> On 3/31/2015 6:11 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > >>>> Desk Rabbit wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On 31/03/2015 04:56, GreyCloud wrote: > >>>>>> DFS wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 3/30/2015 5:29 PM, GreyCloud wrote: > >>>>>>>> ronb wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 17:09:28 +0200, Melzzzzz wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I can run firefox from home dir no problem, but I prefer using > >>>>>>>>>> package manager ... Manjaro rulleeeeez!!! > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Who wouldn't prefer the package manager? -- it's just one of the > >>>>>>>>> ways Linux is superior to WinCrap. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Really? Give an example of this so-called superiority. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> sudo pacman -S xfce4 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> That's all that's required to download and install to Manjaro the > >>>>>>> entire xfce desktop environment in about 1 minute. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I've already got the xfce desktop. I don't like it tho. > >>>>>> I don't see how it is any better than just downloading a program for > >>>>>> windows and then just running the installer. > >>>>>> A lot of linux software comes in the tarball format. Still have to > >>>>>> download it tho, and if the user isn't familiar with what a tar > >>>>>> format is they'll > >>>>>> start scratching their head about what to do next. It just isn't > >>>>>> that intuitive. > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Considering the number of Windows users who download a file and then > >>>>> wonder why nothing happened, asking them to tar -zxf and then compile > >>>>> a program is a step too far. > >>>> > >>>> I am certain of that. OSX users cringe at the thought of files and > >>>> folders, and windows users in general are not much smarter than those > >>> > >>> > >>> It's well known that wealthier people are smarter than the less-wealthy, > >> > >> Nope. Thats bullshit. > >> And apple users are not wealthier than others, they just tend to spend > >> more for shiny gadgets. They are on the whole dumb as bread, as they > >> needlessly spend 2 to 3 times as much money to get something which is > >> inferior in many cases > > > > > > Guffaw!!! Tell that to your family doctor. He's a wealthy professional > > that could care less about the nuances of linux or any other operating > > system. But he get's wealthy by billing you when you see him. > > Well, most doctors run windows. Probably do run it for billing. Why not? It's an industry standard in that world. > Not anything apple Really? "The survey found that 83 percent of physicians are now taking advantage of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) on mobile devices." http://www.inquisitr.com/684263/doctors-choose-apple-ipad-for-record-keeping/ If they're not running "anything" made by Apple how do you account for surveys like that (where Apple has a healthy showing)? Are they all lying? ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-31 16:43 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <kOidnS1RRY2VvobInZ2dnUU7-XOdnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #287021 |
Peter Köhlmann wrote: > GreyCloud wrote: > >> Peter Köhlmann wrote: >> >>> DFS wrote: >>> >>>> On 3/31/2015 6:11 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>>>> Desk Rabbit wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 31/03/2015 04:56, GreyCloud wrote: >>>>>>> DFS wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 3/30/2015 5:29 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>>>>>>> ronb wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 17:09:28 +0200, Melzzzzz wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I can run firefox from home dir no problem, but I prefer using >>>>>>>>>>> package manager ... Manjaro rulleeeeez!!! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Who wouldn't prefer the package manager? -- it's just one of the >>>>>>>>>> ways Linux is superior to WinCrap. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Really? Give an example of this so-called superiority. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> sudo pacman -S xfce4 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That's all that's required to download and install to Manjaro the >>>>>>>> entire xfce desktop environment in about 1 minute. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've already got the xfce desktop. I don't like it tho. >>>>>>> I don't see how it is any better than just downloading a program for >>>>>>> windows and then just running the installer. >>>>>>> A lot of linux software comes in the tarball format. Still have to >>>>>>> download it tho, and if the user isn't familiar with what a tar >>>>>>> format is they'll >>>>>>> start scratching their head about what to do next. It just isn't >>>>>>> that intuitive. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Considering the number of Windows users who download a file and then >>>>>> wonder why nothing happened, asking them to tar -zxf and then compile >>>>>> a program is a step too far. >>>>> >>>>> I am certain of that. OSX users cringe at the thought of files and >>>>> folders, and windows users in general are not much smarter than those >>>> >>>> >>>> It's well known that wealthier people are smarter than the >>>> less-wealthy, >>> >>> Nope. Thats bullshit. >>> And apple users are not wealthier than others, they just tend to spend >>> more for shiny gadgets. They are on the whole dumb as bread, as they >>> needlessly spend 2 to 3 times as much money to get something which is >>> inferior in many cases >> >> >> Guffaw!!! Tell that to your family doctor. He's a wealthy professional >> that could care less about the nuances of linux or any other operating >> system. But he get's wealthy by billing you when you see him. > > Well, most doctors run windows. Not anything apple A few of the hospital doctors do run macs and love them. Mostly the latest thing with them now is the use of the iPad and synching to their IT dept on data collected.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-01 07:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <551c02ff$0$64275$c3e8da3$b280bf18@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #286918 |
On 03/30/2015 08:56 PM, GreyCloud wrote: > DFS wrote: > >> On 3/30/2015 5:29 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>> ronb wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 17:09:28 +0200, Melzzzzz wrote: >>>> >>>>> I can run firefox from home dir no problem, but I prefer using package >>>>> manager ... Manjaro rulleeeeez!!! >>>> >>>> Who wouldn't prefer the package manager? -- it's just one of the ways >>>> Linux is superior to WinCrap. >>>> >>> Really? Give an example of this so-called superiority. >> >> >> sudo pacman -S xfce4 >> >> That's all that's required to download and install to Manjaro the entire >> xfce desktop environment in about 1 minute. > > I've already got the xfce desktop. I don't like it tho. > I don't see how it is any better than just downloading a program for windows > and then just running the installer. > A lot of linux software comes in the tarball format. Still have to download > it tho, and if the user isn't familiar with what a tar format is they'll > start scratching their head about what to do next. It just isn't that > intuitive. > This old saw? "A lot of linux software comes in the tarball format." Yes, _and_ it's often packaged up in the distribution's repositories. So that, you know, they can avoid installing a tarball by USING THE PACKAGE MANAGER. And around and around we go! Circular logic is thrilling! -- -v Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable. -- John Fitzgerald Kennedy
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-01 14:42 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mfh045$vki$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #287157 |
On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 07:38:55 -0700, vallor wrote: >> A lot of linux software comes in the tarball format. Still have to >> download it tho, and if the user isn't familiar with what a tar format >> is they'll start scratching their head about what to do next. It just >> isn't that intuitive. >> >> > This old saw? > > "A lot of linux software comes in the tarball format." Yes, _and_ it's > often packaged up in the distribution's repositories. So that, you > know, > they can avoid installing a tarball by USING THE PACKAGE MANAGER. > > And around and around we go! Circular logic is thrilling! Same old ... same old. So GreyCloud uses a distribution where a "lot" of the programs come in tarballs. Yeah, right. Is he still using Slackware from 1998? -- To WinDrones and iCultists obsessed with Linux. Get a life.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-01 17:13 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mfh1t8$8nq$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #287160 |
ronb wrote: > On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 07:38:55 -0700, vallor wrote: > >>> A lot of linux software comes in the tarball format. Still have to >>> download it tho, and if the user isn't familiar with what a tar format >>> is they'll start scratching their head about what to do next. It just >>> isn't that intuitive. >>> >>> >> This old saw? >> >> "A lot of linux software comes in the tarball format." Yes, _and_ it's >> often packaged up in the distribution's repositories. So that, you >> know, >> they can avoid installing a tarball by USING THE PACKAGE MANAGER. >> >> And around and around we go! Circular logic is thrilling! Like Debian (and most other DEB-based distros) which have well over 20.000 packages in their repos But that idiot fool *has* to use Redhat. Which is always about 1 year behind its "normal users" distro Fedora > Same old ... same old. So GreyCloud uses a distribution where a "lot" of > the programs come in tarballs. Yeah, right. Is he still using Slackware > from 1998? > He would be weeping all day if he wanted to use Slackware. Way too difficult for a demented old fool with not enough blood in the alcohol
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-01 12:14 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <DOidndvyWOLyqIHInZ2dnUU7-V2dnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #287177 |
Peter Köhlmann wrote: > ronb wrote: > >> On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 07:38:55 -0700, vallor wrote: >> >>>> A lot of linux software comes in the tarball format. Still have to >>>> download it tho, and if the user isn't familiar with what a tar format >>>> is they'll start scratching their head about what to do next. It just >>>> isn't that intuitive. >>>> >>>> >>> This old saw? >>> >>> "A lot of linux software comes in the tarball format." Yes, _and_ it's >>> often packaged up in the distribution's repositories. So that, you >>> know, >>> they can avoid installing a tarball by USING THE PACKAGE MANAGER. >>> >>> And around and around we go! Circular logic is thrilling! > > Like Debian (and most other DEB-based distros) which have well over 20.000 > packages in their repos > But that idiot fool *has* to use Redhat. Which is always about 1 year > behind its "normal users" distro Fedora > >> Same old ... same old. So GreyCloud uses a distribution where a "lot" of >> the programs come in tarballs. Yeah, right. Is he still using Slackware >> from 1998? >> > > He would be weeping all day if he wanted to use Slackware. Way too > difficult for a demented old fool with not enough blood in the alcohol RedHat is tried and true, for the most part. I'm not stupid enough to believe all you advocates lies and lack of real knowledge. Keep blowing your arse off, fool.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-01 12:13 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <DOidndjyWOKwqIHInZ2dnUU7-V2dnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #287157 |
vallor wrote: > On 03/30/2015 08:56 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >> DFS wrote: >> >>> On 3/30/2015 5:29 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>> ronb wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 17:09:28 +0200, Melzzzzz wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I can run firefox from home dir no problem, but I prefer using >>>>>> package manager ... Manjaro rulleeeeez!!! >>>>> >>>>> Who wouldn't prefer the package manager? -- it's just one of the ways >>>>> Linux is superior to WinCrap. >>>>> >>>> Really? Give an example of this so-called superiority. >>> >>> >>> sudo pacman -S xfce4 >>> >>> That's all that's required to download and install to Manjaro the entire >>> xfce desktop environment in about 1 minute. >> >> I've already got the xfce desktop. I don't like it tho. >> I don't see how it is any better than just downloading a program for >> windows and then just running the installer. >> A lot of linux software comes in the tarball format. Still have to >> download it tho, and if the user isn't familiar with what a tar format is >> they'll >> start scratching their head about what to do next. It just isn't that >> intuitive. >> > > This old saw? > > "A lot of linux software comes in the tarball format." Yes, _and_ it's > often packaged up in the distribution's repositories. So that, you > know, they can avoid installing a tarball by USING THE PACKAGE MANAGER. > > And around and around we go! Circular logic is thrilling! > And your idiocy is truly amazing. Yet you still have to deal with tarballs in a lot of cases. Yum seems to do the job well checking for dependencies, and there are a lot of them. But it is far from intutitive, numbnuts.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-04-01 13:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <551c59d1$0$20026$c3e8da3$1cbc7475@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #287234 |
On 04/01/2015 11:13 AM, GreyCloud wrote: > vallor wrote: > >> On 03/30/2015 08:56 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>> DFS wrote: >>> >>>> On 3/30/2015 5:29 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>>> ronb wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 17:09:28 +0200, Melzzzzz wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I can run firefox from home dir no problem, but I prefer using >>>>>>> package manager ... Manjaro rulleeeeez!!! >>>>>> >>>>>> Who wouldn't prefer the package manager? -- it's just one of the ways >>>>>> Linux is superior to WinCrap. >>>>>> >>>>> Really? Give an example of this so-called superiority. >>>> >>>> >>>> sudo pacman -S xfce4 >>>> >>>> That's all that's required to download and install to Manjaro the entire >>>> xfce desktop environment in about 1 minute. >>> >>> I've already got the xfce desktop. I don't like it tho. >>> I don't see how it is any better than just downloading a program for >>> windows and then just running the installer. >>> A lot of linux software comes in the tarball format. Still have to >>> download it tho, and if the user isn't familiar with what a tar format is >>> they'll >>> start scratching their head about what to do next. It just isn't that >>> intuitive. >>> >> >> This old saw? >> >> "A lot of linux software comes in the tarball format." Yes, _and_ it's >> often packaged up in the distribution's repositories. So that, you >> know, they can avoid installing a tarball by USING THE PACKAGE MANAGER. >> >> And around and around we go! Circular logic is thrilling! >> > > And your idiocy is truly amazing. > > Yet you still have to deal with tarballs in a lot of cases. > Yum seems to do the job well checking for dependencies, and there are a lot > of them. > But it is far from intutitive, numbnuts. Which is why you should be using the graphical package manager that comes with your distribution, "numbnuts". (Speaking of which, how did your nuts get to be so numb? Um...nevermind, I don't want to know.) Anyway: Used to be Applications > Add/Remove Software on Red Hat Enterprise Linux: <https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5/html/Deployment_Guide/ch-graphical-rpm.html> On Mint, I use Synaptic -- no frills, does what I want. -- -v Avoid reality at all costs.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 9 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 … 21 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web