Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #286776 > unrolled thread

Linux Meta: Another OT thread

Started byvallor <vallor@cultnix.org>
First post2015-03-30 11:04 -0700
Last post2015-03-31 19:58 -0400
Articles 20 on this page of 521 — 25 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy


Contents

  Linux Meta: Another OT thread vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-03-30 11:04 -0700
    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-30 14:12 -0400
      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Charlie Croyden <charlescroyden3@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 11:29 -0700
        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 18:52 +0000
          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Charlie Croyden <charlescroyden3@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 12:10 -0700
            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:05 -0600
            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-30 20:08 -0400
          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:04 -0600
        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-30 20:07 -0400
          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 23:01 -0400
          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 21:49 -0600
          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-31 08:41 +0100
          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-03-31 09:49 -0500
            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-31 10:20 -0700
    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread JeReMy Rocks <jeremywalmartprescottaz@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 11:12 -0700
      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-30 14:50 -0400
    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Sheriff Wayne Ivy <roundemup@bolo.corn> - 2015-03-30 11:35 -0700
      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-30 20:09 -0400
    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Donald Miller <donaldmiller955@mail.com> - 2015-03-30 14:42 -0400
      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-03-30 14:12 -0500
        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 19:37 +0000
          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-30 20:12 -0400
            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 00:18 +0000
              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Charlie Croyden <charlescroyden3@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 17:35 -0700
                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-31 06:03 -0400
                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-31 07:59 -0500
                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 00:02 +0000
                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 00:00 +0000
                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 21:36 -0400
                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-03-31 19:44 -0700
                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 22:54 -0400
                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 08:33 -0400
                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-02 13:11 -0500
                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-02 14:43 -0400
                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-02 13:36 -0700
                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-02 19:41 -0400
                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 21:56 -0400
                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-03 09:34 -0400
                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-03 18:28 +0000
                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-03 14:56 -0400
                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-01 06:00 -0400
                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 09:27 -0400
                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 08:33 -0400
                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-03-31 09:53 -0500
                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 00:09 +0000
                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-01 07:18 -0500
                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-01 06:08 -0700
                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 09:34 -0400
                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 14:03 +0000
                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-01 07:40 -0700
                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-01 07:49 -0700
            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 21:47 -0600
        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 15:02 -0600
        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-30 22:29 +0100
          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 21:47 -0600
      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-03-30 12:54 -0700
        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 14:57 -0600
          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-03-30 15:03 -0700
            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 21:46 -0600
      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-30 20:59 -0400
    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Teh Mop Jockey" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-03-30 15:32 -0400
      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-30 20:14 -0400
        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-31 07:42 -0500
          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-31 11:38 -0600
    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-30 20:05 -0400
      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-30 21:40 -0600
        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-03-31 04:02 -0700
          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-03-31 09:46 -0500
            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 17:04 +0200
              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-31 11:37 -0600
                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-03-31 10:55 -0700
                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 20:28 +0200
                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-31 13:46 -0500
                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 12:22 -0700
                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-03-31 13:45 -0700
                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-03-31 13:50 -0700
                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-31 16:21 -0500
                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 21:23 -0400
                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 14:25 -0700
                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-03-31 14:33 -0700
                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 23:51 +0200
                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-31 23:53 +0200
                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-03-31 17:54 -0700
                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-01 10:19 +0200
                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-01 06:03 -0400
                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-01 03:38 -0700
                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-01 04:01 -0700
                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 07:06 -0700
                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-01 07:24 -0700
                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 09:15 -0700
                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 09:17 -0700
                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-01 11:48 -0500
                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 13:53 -0700
                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 17:44 -0400
                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-01 20:03 -0400
                                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-02 07:02 -0500
                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-01 14:12 -0700
                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-01 10:41 -0700
                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 14:11 -0700
                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-01 14:53 -0700
                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 15:09 -0700
                                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-01 16:54 -0700
                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-04 02:07 +0000
                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 13:54 +0000
                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 13:52 +0000
                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-01 07:11 -0700
                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-02 09:23 -0500
                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-02 16:30 +0200
                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-02 08:13 -0700
                                              Peter Kohlmann, chrisv & RonB don't need to care. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-02 08:31 -0700
                                                Re: Peter Kohlmann, chrisv & RonB don't need to care. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-02 08:49 -0700
                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-03 09:38 -0400
                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 15:57 +0200
                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-03 10:01 -0400
                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 16:14 +0200
                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-03 10:22 -0400
                                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 16:30 +0200
                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-03 10:32 -0400
                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 17:25 +0200
                                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-03 11:51 -0400
                                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-03 09:37 -0700
                                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-03 18:28 -0400
                                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-03 15:54 -0700
                                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-03 19:32 -0400
                                                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-03 16:52 -0700
                                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-03 20:27 -0400
                                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-03 17:36 -0700
                                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-03 11:53 -0400
                                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-03 11:56 -0400
                                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:20 -0600
                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-03 08:44 -0700
                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:19 -0600
                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-03 13:45 -0400
                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-03 12:49 -0700
                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:18 -0600
                                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-03 08:45 -0700
                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-03 11:47 -0400
                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-03 09:39 -0700
                                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-03 18:26 -0400
                                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-03 16:07 -0700
                                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-08 15:30 -0400
                                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-08 12:43 -0700
                                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-08 18:58 -0400
                                                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-08 16:58 -0700
                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-03 11:55 -0400
                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-03 09:36 -0700
                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:17 -0600
                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-03 13:15 -0400
                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-03 19:24 +0200
                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:16 -0600
                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-03 19:56 -0400
                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-04 03:04 +0200
                                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2015-04-04 02:37 +0000
                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-04 20:08 +0000
                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-04 12:07 -0400
                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-06 07:13 -0500
                                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-06 13:01 +0000
                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-06 15:54 +0200
                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-06 14:23 +0000
                                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-06 09:38 -0500
                                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-06 10:52 -0400
                                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-06 07:56 -0700
                                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-06 11:09 -0400
                                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-06 11:19 -0400
                                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-06 21:16 +0000
                                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-06 21:55 -0400
                                                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-07 05:55 +0000
                                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-07 09:35 -0400
                                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-07 21:32 -0400
                                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-08 01:49 +0000
                                                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-08 03:43 -0700
                                                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-08 18:20 +0000
                                                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-08 12:08 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-08 19:15 +0000
                                                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-08 15:23 -0400
                                                                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-08 12:27 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-08 19:53 +0000
                                                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-08 16:13 -0400
                                                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-08 20:58 +0000
                                                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-08 18:58 -0400
                                                                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-08 19:12 -0400
                                                                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-08 19:41 -0400
                                                                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-08 19:53 -0400
                                                                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-08 20:07 -0400
                                                                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-08 17:33 -0700
                                                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-08 10:06 -0400
                                                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-08 18:27 +0000
                                                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-08 20:20 -0400
                                                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-07 06:08 -0700
                                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-07 12:22 -0400
                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-06 11:19 -0400
                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-06 13:12 -0600
                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-06 10:28 -0400
                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-06 09:39 -0700
                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:15 -0600
                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 20:42 +0000
                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-02 14:27 -0700
                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-02 16:29 -0700
                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 23:46 +0000
                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-03 06:01 -0400
                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-03 03:08 -0700
                                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 12:52 +0200
                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-03 12:06 +0000
                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-03 05:22 -0700
                                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 15:16 +0200
                                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-03 06:56 -0700
                                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 16:13 +0200
                                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:15 -0600
                                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-03 11:20 -0500
                                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-03 09:39 -0700
                                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:14 -0600
                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-03 05:15 -0700
                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-03 11:22 -0500
                                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-03 09:52 -0700
                                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:13 -0600
                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-03 09:06 -0400
                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-03 13:02 -0400
                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:11 -0600
                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:10 -0600
                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-02 19:47 -0400
                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 19:01 -0600
                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-02 19:52 -0700
                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-03 11:24 -0500
                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-03 09:58 -0700
                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-03 08:32 -0500
                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-03 06:48 -0700
                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 16:09 +0200
                                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:02 -0600
                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-03 11:19 -0700
                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 15:55 +0200
                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:01 -0600
                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-03 11:14 -0500
                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-03 09:46 -0700
                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 12:00 -0600
                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-03 14:01 -0400
                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 20:11 +0200
                                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-03 14:51 -0400
                                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-06 09:43 -0500
                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-06 12:01 -0400
                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-06 13:11 -0600
                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-02 14:28 -0700
                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-02 14:29 -0700
                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-02 19:42 -0400
                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 19:00 -0600
                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-03 09:43 +0100
                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 11:59 -0600
                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-03 06:59 -0500
                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-03 09:34 -0400
                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 11:58 -0600
                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-04 00:32 +0000
                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-03 19:25 -0700
                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-06 09:45 -0500
                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-06 08:28 -0700
                                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-06 13:14 -0400
                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-06 13:22 -0400
                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-06 10:41 -0700
                                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-06 14:06 -0400
                                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-06 21:14 +0200
                                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-06 15:53 -0400
                                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-06 22:30 +0200
                                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-06 16:48 -0400
                                                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-06 22:59 +0200
                                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-06 17:20 -0400
                                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-06 23:28 +0200
                                                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-06 17:38 -0400
                                                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-06 23:45 +0200
                                                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-06 20:32 -0400
                                                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-07 01:04 +0000
                                                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-06 19:15 -0600
                                                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-06 21:23 -0400
                                                                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 10:44 -0600
                                                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-06 19:15 -0600
                                                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-06 22:04 -0400
                                                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 10:44 -0600
                                                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-06 23:55 +0200
                                                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-06 20:34 -0400
                                                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-07 01:11 +0000
                                                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-06 20:56 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-07 09:30 +0100
                                                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-07 04:05 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 10:40 -0600
                                                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-06 19:13 -0600
                                                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-06 19:13 -0600
                                                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-06 16:37 -0500
                                                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-06 19:12 -0600
                                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-06 23:50 +0000
                                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-07 02:18 +0200
                                                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-07 00:42 +0000
                                                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-07 02:55 +0200
                                                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-07 02:34 +0000
                                                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-06 22:01 -0400
                                                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-06 22:07 -0400
                                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-06 20:25 -0400
                                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-06 15:13 -0500
                                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-06 20:30 -0400
                                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-06 20:37 -0400
                                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-06 19:10 -0600
                                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-06 20:40 -0400
                                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-06 20:48 -0400
                                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-07 02:51 +0200
                                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-06 19:09 -0600
                                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-06 21:10 -0400
                                                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-07 03:22 +0200
                                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-06 21:32 -0400
                                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-07 03:37 +0200
                                                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-06 21:59 -0400
                                                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-07 04:14 +0200
                                                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-06 22:24 -0400
                                                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 10:38 -0600
                                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 10:36 -0600
                                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-06 21:55 -0400
                                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-07 02:37 +0000
                                                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-07 06:05 -0400
                                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-07 10:52 -0400
                                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-07 12:00 -0400
                                                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 10:35 -0600
                                                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-07 13:00 -0400
                                                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-07 11:45 -0400
                                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-07 12:23 -0400
                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-06 14:49 -0400
                                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-06 15:29 -0400
                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-06 21:56 -0400
                                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-06 22:23 -0400
                                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-06 22:29 -0400
                                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-07 11:44 -0400
                                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 10:33 -0600
                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-06 18:09 +0000
                                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-06 14:27 -0400
                                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Donald Miller <donaldmiller955@mail.com> - 2015-04-06 14:30 -0400
                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-06 11:58 -0700
                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-06 15:10 -0500
                                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-06 16:56 -0400
                                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-06 16:06 -0500
                                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-06 17:15 -0400
                                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-06 23:58 +0000
                                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-06 17:39 -0700
                                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-06 19:08 -0600
                                                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-06 20:56 -0700
                                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-06 20:12 -0400
                                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-07 00:38 +0000
                                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-07 02:53 +0200
                                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-06 19:07 -0600
                                                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-06 21:20 -0400
                                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 10:31 -0600
                                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-06 19:06 -0600
                                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-06 18:28 -0700
                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-06 15:09 -0500
                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-06 16:40 -0400
                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-06 16:43 -0400
                                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-06 17:05 -0400
                                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-06 14:59 -0700
                                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-06 19:16 -0400
                                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-06 18:25 -0700
                                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-06 22:11 -0400
                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-06 16:52 -0400
                                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-06 23:24 +0200
                                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-06 15:31 -0600
                                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-06 17:32 -0400
                                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-06 23:38 +0200
                                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-06 17:58 -0400
                                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-07 00:14 +0200
                                                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-06 19:40 -0400
                                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-06 19:04 -0600
                                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-06 21:16 -0400
                                                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-06 20:24 -0400
                                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-07 02:49 +0200
                                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-06 19:02 -0600
                                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-06 21:06 -0400
                                                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-07 03:20 +0200
                                                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-06 21:30 -0400
                                                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-07 03:40 +0200
                                                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-06 21:54 -0400
                                                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-07 04:01 +0200
                                                                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-06 22:05 -0400
                                                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-07 04:17 +0200
                                                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-06 22:27 -0400
                                                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-07 06:25 -0400
                                                                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-07 12:30 +0200
                                                                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-07 07:13 -0400
                                                                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-07 13:47 +0000
                                                                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-07 10:46 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-07 07:57 -0500
                                                                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-07 06:22 -0400
                                                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-07 12:24 +0200
                                                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-07 07:13 -0400
                                                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-07 11:30 +0100
                                                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-07 13:44 +0000
                                                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-07 12:55 -0400
                                                                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-07 07:54 -0500
                                                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-07 09:25 -0400
                                                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-07 06:17 -0400
                                                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-07 11:53 -0400
                                                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-07 12:07 -0400
                                                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-07 13:03 -0400
                                                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 10:26 -0600
                                                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-07 21:42 +0000
                                                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 19:07 -0600
                                                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-08 03:27 +0000
                                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-07 06:07 -0400
                                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-07 01:04 +0000
                                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-07 08:00 -0500
                                                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-07 09:32 -0400
                                                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-07 07:00 -0700
                                                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-07 10:05 -0400
                                                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 10:25 -0600
                                                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-07 12:52 -0400
                                                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-06 20:17 -0400
                                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-06 18:59 -0600
                                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-07 01:06 +0000
                                                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 10:23 -0600
                                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-07 13:38 -0400
                                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-07 14:42 -0400
                                                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-06 18:44 -0400
                                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-06 16:13 -0500
                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-06 20:13 -0400
                                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-06 11:39 -0700
                                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-06 14:47 -0400
                                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-06 12:18 -0700
                                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-06 13:09 -0600
                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-09 17:59 +0000
                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-01 07:01 -0500
                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-01 06:03 -0700
                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-31 16:37 -0600
                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-03-31 16:18 -0700
                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-31 20:00 -0400
                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-01 20:17 -0500
                                Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-01 06:56 -0500
                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 08:30 -0400
                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-01 17:07 +0200
                                      Another DumFSck lie.  Documented. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-01 10:39 -0500
                                        Re: Another DumFSck lie.  Documented. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-01 09:00 -0700
                                          Re: Another DumFSck lie.  Documented. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-01 12:11 -0400
                                            Re: Another DumFSck lie.  Documented. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-01 18:32 +0200
                                              Re: Another DumFSck lie.  Documented. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-01 12:37 -0400
                                                Re: Another DumFSck lie.  Documented. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-01 18:44 +0200
                                                  Re: Another DumFSck lie.  Documented. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-01 12:56 -0400
                                                    Re: Another DumFSck lie.  Documented. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 14:17 -0700
                                                      Re: Another DumFSck lie.  Documented. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 16:25 -0600
                                                        Re: Another DumFSck lie.  Documented. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-02 00:46 +0200
                                                          Re: Another DumFSck lie.  Documented. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:33 -0600
                                                            Re: Another DumFSck lie.  Documented. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 01:13 +0200
                                                              Re: Another DumFSck lie.  Documented. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 18:59 -0600
                                                            Re: Another DumFSck lie.  Documented. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-02 16:34 -0700
                                                              Re: Another DumFSck lie.  Documented. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 18:58 -0600
                                                      Re: Another DumFSck lie.  Documented. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-01 19:49 -0400
                                                        Re: Another DumFSck lie.  Documented. cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-04-02 04:56 -0700
                                                          Re: Another DumFSck lie.  Documented. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-02 09:56 -0400
                                                            Re: Another DumFSck lie.  Documented. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-02 16:23 +0200
                                                              Re: Another DumFSck lie.  Documented. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-02 09:36 -0500
                                                                Re: Another DumFSck lie.  Documented. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:32 -0600
                                                              Re: Another DumFSck lie.  Documented. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-02 10:47 -0400
                                                                Re: Another DumFSck lie.  Documented. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:31 -0600
                                                              Re: Another DumFSck lie.  Documented. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 08:06 -0700
                                                  Kreep's *lies* get even more ridiculous! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-01 12:21 -0500
                                                    Re: Kreep's *lies* get even more ridiculous! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 21:00 -0400
                                                      Re: Kreep's *lies* get even more ridiculous! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 23:41 -0400
                                                        Re: Kreep's *lies* get even more ridiculous! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-02 08:59 -0400
                                                          Re: Kreep's *lies* get even more ridiculous! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 09:43 -0400
                                                      Re: Kreep's *lies* get even more ridiculous! "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-02 09:46 -0400
                                                        Re: Kreep's *lies* get even more ridiculous! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 10:25 -0400
                                                  Re: Another DumFSck lie.  Documented. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-01 13:40 -0400
                                                    Re: Another DumFSck lie.  Documented. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 12:07 -0600
                                                      Re: Another DumFSck lie.  Documented. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-01 14:19 -0400
                                                  Re: Another DumFSck lie.  Documented. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-01 12:44 -0500
                                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 21:03 -0400
                                                  Re: Another DumFSck lie.  Documented. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 12:07 -0600
                                                    Re: Another DumFSck lie.  Documented. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 14:20 -0700
                                                      Re: Another DumFSck lie.  Documented. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 16:23 -0600
                                                        Re: Another DumFSck lie.  Documented. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-02 00:41 +0200
                                                          Re: Another DumFSck lie.  Documented. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:28 -0600
                                              Kreep's spanking chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-01 12:09 -0500
                                              Re: Another DumFSck lie.  Documented. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 12:06 -0600
                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 12:05 -0600
                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-03 09:40 -0400
                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 15:53 +0200
                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-01 05:38 -0700
                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 07:12 -0700
                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-01 07:27 -0700
                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-01 09:43 -0500
                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 14:45 +0000
                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-01 08:12 -0700
                                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 14:25 -0700
                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 16:20 -0600
                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-01 16:49 -0700
                                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 22:22 +0000
                                              Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-01 19:46 -0400
                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 12:04 -0600
                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 12:04 -0600
                                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-01 17:03 +0200
                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 11:16 -0400
                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-01 08:18 -0700
                                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 12:03 -0600
                                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 14:28 -0400
                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 12:02 -0600
                                  Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 11:03 -0700
                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-31 16:35 -0600
                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-03-31 14:27 -0700
                            Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-31 16:31 -0600
                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-31 16:30 -0600
                          Always, I run the latest software. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-03-31 15:47 -0700
                            Re: Always, I run the latest software. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-01 07:00 -0700
                              Ezekiel is still using WinXP's Outlook. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-01 12:36 -0700
                                Re: Ezekiel is still using WinXP's Outlook. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-01 12:50 -0700
                                  Re: Ezekiel is still using WinXP's Outlook. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-01 16:05 -0400
                                    Ezekiel is still using WinXP's Outlook. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-01 17:08 -0700
                                      Re: Ezekiel is still using WinXP's Outlook. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-01 20:17 -0400
                                        Ezekiel is still using WinXP's Outlook. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-01 19:36 -0700
                                          Re: Ezekiel is still using WinXP's Outlook. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 22:49 -0400
                                            I don't brown nose retards, retard. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-01 20:10 -0700
                                          Re: Ezekiel is still using WinXP's Outlook. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-02 09:48 -0400
                              Re: Always, I run the latest software. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 14:43 -0700
                                Re: Always, I run the latest software. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-01 19:41 -0400
                                  Re: Always, I run the latest software. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-02 07:08 -0500
                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-31 16:27 -0600
                    Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-03-31 13:44 -0700
                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-03-31 14:02 -0700
                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-31 16:26 -0600
                      Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-03-31 16:14 -0500
                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-03-31 14:36 -0700
                          Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-31 16:24 -0600
                        Re: Linux Meta: Another OT thread Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-31 19:58 -0400

Page 10 of 27 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 … 27  Next page →


#288596

FromTomas <tgif9fri@numo.net>
Date2015-04-08 19:12 -0400
Message-ID<g8k4x04vrdun.6l61rfnsqw8g.dlg@40tude.net>
In reply to#288593
On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 18:58:32 -0400, DFS wrote:

> On 4/8/2015 4:13 PM, Ezekiel wrote:
> 
> 
>> The best opening Springsteen line to me is (also from The River album)
>>
>>     "Got a wife and kids in Baltimore, Jack
>>     I went out for a ride and I never went back"
> 
> 
> I like the opening of 'Tunnel of Love':
> 
> Fat man sitting on a little stool
> Takes the money from my hand while his eyes take a walk all over you
> Hands me the ticket smiles and whispers good luck
> Well cuddle up angel cuddle up my little dove
> and we'll ride down baby into this tunnel of love
> 
> 
> Great song.

I vote for ""Got a wife and kids in Baltimore, Jack.
I went out for a ride and I never went back" 

When my whore ex-wife tried to sue me for divorce that's exactly what
I did. Her lawyer brought her to her senses due to the overwhelming
evidence I had regarding her whoring habits.
The bottom line is she would have ended up paying me support.
The good thing is we didn't have any kids.
That's what I got for being an idiot and getting married at 19yo.
I sold the house, bought a Vette and took off for the west coast.
Never looked back. Last I heard she was in jail for embezzlement.
Got to give her credit as I didn't think she was even that smart.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#288602

FromSlimer <slvrslmr@lv.c>
Date2015-04-08 19:41 -0400
Message-ID<mg4e8k$u2s$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#288596
On 2015-04-08 7:12 PM, Tomas wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 18:58:32 -0400, DFS wrote:
>
>> On 4/8/2015 4:13 PM, Ezekiel wrote:
>>
>>
>>> The best opening Springsteen line to me is (also from The River album)
>>>
>>>      "Got a wife and kids in Baltimore, Jack
>>>      I went out for a ride and I never went back"
>>
>>
>> I like the opening of 'Tunnel of Love':
>>
>> Fat man sitting on a little stool
>> Takes the money from my hand while his eyes take a walk all over you
>> Hands me the ticket smiles and whispers good luck
>> Well cuddle up angel cuddle up my little dove
>> and we'll ride down baby into this tunnel of love
>>
>>
>> Great song.
>
> I vote for ""Got a wife and kids in Baltimore, Jack.
> I went out for a ride and I never went back"
>
> When my whore ex-wife tried to sue me for divorce that's exactly what
> I did. Her lawyer brought her to her senses due to the overwhelming
> evidence I had regarding her whoring habits.
> The bottom line is she would have ended up paying me support.
> The good thing is we didn't have any kids.
> That's what I got for being an idiot and getting married at 19yo.
> I sold the house, bought a Vette and took off for the west coast.
> Never looked back. Last I heard she was in jail for embezzlement.
> Got to give her credit as I didn't think she was even that smart.

Wow, married at 19. That's insane. Got hitched at 30 myself and going to 
celebrate our sixth in July. Getting married that old gives you time to 
think about what you like, dislike and want out of a woman. At any 
younger age, you're mostly just marrying her looks.


-- 
Slimer
OpenMedia, GreenPeace Supporter & SPCA Paw Partner
Encrypt.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#288605

FromTomas <tgif9fri@numo.net>
Date2015-04-08 19:53 -0400
Message-ID<qhd81yduxy0t.1t0hi5zybdgm.dlg@40tude.net>
In reply to#288602
On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 19:41:02 -0400, Slimer wrote:

> On 2015-04-08 7:12 PM, Tomas wrote:
>> On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 18:58:32 -0400, DFS wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/8/2015 4:13 PM, Ezekiel wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> The best opening Springsteen line to me is (also from The River album)
>>>>
>>>>      "Got a wife and kids in Baltimore, Jack
>>>>      I went out for a ride and I never went back"
>>>
>>>
>>> I like the opening of 'Tunnel of Love':
>>>
>>> Fat man sitting on a little stool
>>> Takes the money from my hand while his eyes take a walk all over you
>>> Hands me the ticket smiles and whispers good luck
>>> Well cuddle up angel cuddle up my little dove
>>> and we'll ride down baby into this tunnel of love
>>>
>>>
>>> Great song.
>>
>> I vote for ""Got a wife and kids in Baltimore, Jack.
>> I went out for a ride and I never went back"
>>
>> When my whore ex-wife tried to sue me for divorce that's exactly what
>> I did. Her lawyer brought her to her senses due to the overwhelming
>> evidence I had regarding her whoring habits.
>> The bottom line is she would have ended up paying me support.
>> The good thing is we didn't have any kids.
>> That's what I got for being an idiot and getting married at 19yo.
>> I sold the house, bought a Vette and took off for the west coast.
>> Never looked back. Last I heard she was in jail for embezzlement.
>> Got to give her credit as I didn't think she was even that smart.
> 
> Wow, married at 19. That's insane. Got hitched at 30 myself and going to 
> celebrate our sixth in July. Getting married that old gives you time to 
> think about what you like, dislike and want out of a woman. At any 
> younger age, you're mostly just marrying her looks.

God bless you. I do admire people with successful marriages or
relationships. I tend to be more of a loaner so I am happy that way.
My upbringing sucked because my parents were cold, never complimented
me, encouraged me or anything so the first girl that came along and
filled that need in me was the one. Real stupid. Fortunately for me
it was a learning experience and no real harm done. I went back to
school and have a great career these days. I also have many friends
and a wonderful social life.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#288611

FromSlimer <slvrslmr@lv.c>
Date2015-04-08 20:07 -0400
Message-ID<mg4fqm$3qi$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#288605
On 2015-04-08 7:53 PM, Tomas wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 19:41:02 -0400, Slimer wrote:
>
>> On 2015-04-08 7:12 PM, Tomas wrote:
>>> On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 18:58:32 -0400, DFS wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 4/8/2015 4:13 PM, Ezekiel wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> The best opening Springsteen line to me is (also from The River album)
>>>>>
>>>>>       "Got a wife and kids in Baltimore, Jack
>>>>>       I went out for a ride and I never went back"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I like the opening of 'Tunnel of Love':
>>>>
>>>> Fat man sitting on a little stool
>>>> Takes the money from my hand while his eyes take a walk all over you
>>>> Hands me the ticket smiles and whispers good luck
>>>> Well cuddle up angel cuddle up my little dove
>>>> and we'll ride down baby into this tunnel of love
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Great song.
>>>
>>> I vote for ""Got a wife and kids in Baltimore, Jack.
>>> I went out for a ride and I never went back"
>>>
>>> When my whore ex-wife tried to sue me for divorce that's exactly what
>>> I did. Her lawyer brought her to her senses due to the overwhelming
>>> evidence I had regarding her whoring habits.
>>> The bottom line is she would have ended up paying me support.
>>> The good thing is we didn't have any kids.
>>> That's what I got for being an idiot and getting married at 19yo.
>>> I sold the house, bought a Vette and took off for the west coast.
>>> Never looked back. Last I heard she was in jail for embezzlement.
>>> Got to give her credit as I didn't think she was even that smart.
>>
>> Wow, married at 19. That's insane. Got hitched at 30 myself and going to
>> celebrate our sixth in July. Getting married that old gives you time to
>> think about what you like, dislike and want out of a woman. At any
>> younger age, you're mostly just marrying her looks.
>
> God bless you. I do admire people with successful marriages or
> relationships. I tend to be more of a loaner so I am happy that way.
> My upbringing sucked because my parents were cold, never complimented
> me, encouraged me or anything so the first girl that came along and
> filled that need in me was the one. Real stupid. Fortunately for me
> it was a learning experience and no real harm done. I went back to
> school and have a great career these days. I also have many friends
> and a wonderful social life.

After a year of being married, I realized that I would have been just as 
content had I just purchased a dog. It wasn't a girlfriend or a wife 
that I needed as much as a loyal companion. Of course, my wife is 
awesome so I'm not complaining. For me, it was important that whoever I 
married would love me despite my numerous flaws and that I would improve 
myself through her which is exactly what happened. It was also important 
that we marry in a church where friends, family and God could hear the 
words "for better or for worse til death do us part" from the both of 
us. I'm spiritual in that sense and am glad that I was able to find a 
person who matched that.

As for the marriage not working out, everything is a learning experience 
either way. If that one didn't work out, it doesn't mean that life isn't 
reserving something a lot better for you down the road. The right person 
tends to come when we least expect it. At the end of the day though, 
relationships aren't for everyone anyway... as I essentially stated with 
my dog comment. :)


-- 
Slimer
OpenMedia, GreenPeace Supporter & SPCA Paw Partner
Encrypt.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#288621

FromSteve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
Date2015-04-08 17:33 -0700
Message-ID<5256767b-629a-4b30-baa6-8fd3f73541bc@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#288611
On Wednesday, April 8, 2015 at 6:07:44 PM UTC-6, Slimer wrote:
> On 2015-04-08 7:53 PM, Tomas wrote:
> > On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 19:41:02 -0400, Slimer wrote:
> >
> >> On 2015-04-08 7:12 PM, Tomas wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 18:58:32 -0400, DFS wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 4/8/2015 4:13 PM, Ezekiel wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> The best opening Springsteen line to me is (also from The River album)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>       "Got a wife and kids in Baltimore, Jack
> >>>>>       I went out for a ride and I never went back"
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I like the opening of 'Tunnel of Love':
> >>>>
> >>>> Fat man sitting on a little stool
> >>>> Takes the money from my hand while his eyes take a walk all over you
> >>>> Hands me the ticket smiles and whispers good luck
> >>>> Well cuddle up angel cuddle up my little dove
> >>>> and we'll ride down baby into this tunnel of love
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Great song.
> >>>
> >>> I vote for ""Got a wife and kids in Baltimore, Jack.
> >>> I went out for a ride and I never went back"
> >>>
> >>> When my whore ex-wife tried to sue me for divorce that's exactly what
> >>> I did. Her lawyer brought her to her senses due to the overwhelming
> >>> evidence I had regarding her whoring habits.
> >>> The bottom line is she would have ended up paying me support.
> >>> The good thing is we didn't have any kids.
> >>> That's what I got for being an idiot and getting married at 19yo.
> >>> I sold the house, bought a Vette and took off for the west coast.
> >>> Never looked back. Last I heard she was in jail for embezzlement.
> >>> Got to give her credit as I didn't think she was even that smart.
> >>
> >> Wow, married at 19. That's insane. Got hitched at 30 myself and going to
> >> celebrate our sixth in July. Getting married that old gives you time to
> >> think about what you like, dislike and want out of a woman. At any
> >> younger age, you're mostly just marrying her looks.
> >
> > God bless you. I do admire people with successful marriages or
> > relationships. I tend to be more of a loaner so I am happy that way.
> > My upbringing sucked because my parents were cold, never complimented
> > me, encouraged me or anything so the first girl that came along and
> > filled that need in me was the one. Real stupid. Fortunately for me
> > it was a learning experience and no real harm done. I went back to
> > school and have a great career these days. I also have many friends
> > and a wonderful social life.
> 
> After a year of being married, I realized that I would have been just as 
> content had I just purchased a dog. 

That's funny cuz just the other day I was thinking: it's amazing how Slimer's wife was able to find such a silver tongued devil as he.

> It wasn't a girlfriend or a wife 
> that I needed as much as a loyal companion. Of course, my wife is 
> awesome so I'm not complaining.

Well, she's gotta be awesomething... I'm thinking autistic ;)

> For me, it was important that whoever I 
> married would love me despite my numerous flaws and that I would improve 
> myself through her which is exactly what happened. 

Wait a minute...  this is the *improved* version?!!

> It was also important 
> that we marry in a church where friends, family and God could hear the 
> words "for better or for worse til death do us part" from the both of 
> us. I'm spiritual in that sense and am glad that I was able to find a 
> person who matched that.
> 
> As for the marriage not working out, everything is a learning experience 
> either way. If that one didn't work out, it doesn't mean that life isn't 
> reserving something a lot better for you down the road. The right person 
> tends to come when we least expect it. At the end of the day though, 
> relationships aren't for everyone anyway... as I essentially stated with 
> my dog comment. :)

Good point... who needs Henny Youngman's advice on romance when we have a Romeo like you around.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#288440

FromDFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Date2015-04-08 10:06 -0400
Message-ID<mg3ckd$k9v$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#288390
On 4/7/2015 9:49 PM, owl wrote:
> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>> On 4/7/2015 1:55 AM, owl wrote:
>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>>> On 4/6/2015 5:16 PM, owl wrote:
>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 4/6/2015 10:56 AM, -hh wrote:
>>>>>>> chrisv wrote:
>>>>>>>> ronb wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hard to keep up with the nym-shifting, whining,
>>>>>>>>> obsessive anti-Linux cranks. They all "moo" alike.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Whereas non-nymshifters who have pwned you are easier to killfile.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Most of their ilk spend their lives under a rock.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Whereas whines from an anonymous account mean little.
>>>>>>> Case in point, just an example of an online quiz to
>>>>>>> see if one has actually gotten out from under a rock:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <http://www.listchallenges.com/100-places-to-visit>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -hh
>>>>>
>>>>>> 19 of 100 for me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Going to the wailing wall 19 times still only counts as 1, boy.
>>>
>>>
>>>> I don't getchoo, boy.  Speak up.  You sayin' I'm a Jew?
>>>
>>> How can you have any pudding if you don't eat your meat?
>
>> ?
>
>> I think you were lying when you said you didn't take drugs.
>
> The wailing wall is where you went to weep after each beat-down I
> gave you.  What I wrote about the pudding there was just because I was
> listening to pink floyd, and working on something else, and also posting.


Whoa!  Step back and exhale and put down the bong.  The pudding isn't 
real, so quit it with the spoon to mouth action.

Now that you're back in the real world:  where did this '19 beat-downs' 
fantasy happen?  'Cause there's no record of it here on cola.






[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#288509

Fromowl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Date2015-04-08 18:27 +0000
Message-ID<hgue8t.khr8@rooftop.invalid>
In reply to#288440
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
> On 4/7/2015 9:49 PM, owl wrote:
>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>> On 4/7/2015 1:55 AM, owl wrote:
>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 4/6/2015 5:16 PM, owl wrote:
>>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 4/6/2015 10:56 AM, -hh wrote:
>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote:
>>>>>>>>> ronb wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hard to keep up with the nym-shifting, whining,
>>>>>>>>>> obsessive anti-Linux cranks. They all "moo" alike.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Whereas non-nymshifters who have pwned you are easier to killfile.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Most of their ilk spend their lives under a rock.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Whereas whines from an anonymous account mean little.
>>>>>>>> Case in point, just an example of an online quiz to
>>>>>>>> see if one has actually gotten out from under a rock:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <http://www.listchallenges.com/100-places-to-visit>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -hh
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 19 of 100 for me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Going to the wailing wall 19 times still only counts as 1, boy.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I don't getchoo, boy.  Speak up.  You sayin' I'm a Jew?
>>>>
>>>> How can you have any pudding if you don't eat your meat?
>>
>>> ?
>>
>>> I think you were lying when you said you didn't take drugs.
>>
>> The wailing wall is where you went to weep after each beat-down I
>> gave you.  What I wrote about the pudding there was just because I was
>> listening to pink floyd, and working on something else, and also posting.


> Whoa!  Step back and exhale and put down the bong.  The pudding isn't 
> real, so quit it with the spoon to mouth action.

> Now that you're back in the real world:  where did this '19 beat-downs' 
> fantasy happen?  'Cause there's no record of it here on cola.

Who do you think I am, Snit?  I'm not going to waste my valuable
time digging around dejanews to find all of your crushing defeats. :)
Who knows the exact number?  I just extrapolated from your count
of 19 visits to the wailing wall. :)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#288619

FromDFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Date2015-04-08 20:20 -0400
Message-ID<mg4giv$5pk$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#288509
On 4/8/2015 2:27 PM, owl wrote:
> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>> On 4/7/2015 9:49 PM, owl wrote:
>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>>> On 4/7/2015 1:55 AM, owl wrote:
>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 4/6/2015 5:16 PM, owl wrote:
>>>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 4/6/2015 10:56 AM, -hh wrote:
>>>>>>>>> chrisv wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> ronb wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hard to keep up with the nym-shifting, whining,
>>>>>>>>>>> obsessive anti-Linux cranks. They all "moo" alike.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Whereas non-nymshifters who have pwned you are easier to killfile.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Most of their ilk spend their lives under a rock.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Whereas whines from an anonymous account mean little.
>>>>>>>>> Case in point, just an example of an online quiz to
>>>>>>>>> see if one has actually gotten out from under a rock:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <http://www.listchallenges.com/100-places-to-visit>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -hh
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 19 of 100 for me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Going to the wailing wall 19 times still only counts as 1, boy.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't getchoo, boy.  Speak up.  You sayin' I'm a Jew?
>>>>>
>>>>> How can you have any pudding if you don't eat your meat?
>>>
>>>> ?
>>>
>>>> I think you were lying when you said you didn't take drugs.
>>>
>>> The wailing wall is where you went to weep after each beat-down I
>>> gave you.  What I wrote about the pudding there was just because I was
>>> listening to pink floyd, and working on something else, and also posting.
>
>
>> Whoa!  Step back and exhale and put down the bong.  The pudding isn't
>> real, so quit it with the spoon to mouth action.
>
>> Now that you're back in the real world:  where did this '19 beat-downs'
>> fantasy happen?  'Cause there's no record of it here on cola.
>
> Who do you think I am, Snit?  I'm not going to waste my valuable
> time digging around dejanews to find all of your crushing defeats. :)

ha!

Good point, Owl - you would actually have to go back 14 years to Deja 
News to find these 'crushing defeats'.


> Who knows the exact number?  I just extrapolated from your count
> of 19 visits to the wailing wall. :)

Lots of smileys... jokes make me laugh, too.  Owl.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#288255

From-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>
Date2015-04-07 06:08 -0700
Message-ID<36f6e062-2a1f-4c7b-ae91-6e2bee2e6bfe@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#288181
DFS wrote:
> >> On 4/6/2015 10:56 AM, -hh wrote:
> >>> chrisv wrote:
> >>>> Most of their ilk spend their lives under a rock.
> >>>
> >>> Whereas whines from an anonymous account mean little.
> >>> Case in point, just an example of an online quiz to
> >>> see if one has actually gotten out from under a rock:
> >>>
> >>> <http://www.listchallenges.com/100-places-to-visit>
>
> I visited:
> 
> 1.  Big Ben
> 2.  Canals of Amsterdam
> 3.  Colosseum
> 4.  Empire State Bldg
> 5.  French Quarter (lived there)
> 6.  Golden Gate Bridge
> 7.  Grand Canyon
> 8.  Las Vegas Strip
> 9.  Metropolitan Museum of Art
> 10. Napa Valley
> 11. Redwood National Park
> 12. Sears Tower
> 13. Sistine Chapel
> 14. Smithsonian Institution
> 15. Statue of Liberty
> 16. Times Square
> 17. Washington Monument
> 18. White Cliffs of Dover
> 19. White House

All but three on that sublist.  Wonder when the
whiners are going to put forth their own counts? 

> Technically, I went to Muir Woods National Park 
> (southern Cal), but it's a close substitute for 
> Redwoods Natl (northern Cal).

YMMV; that was one of those three; didn't count it 
even though I've been to Big Basins Redwood State Park,
which is west of San Jose, CA.  One of the quirks
of travel is if there's additional "rules" added for
if a particular place will/won't be counted.  Ours
is that one must leave airport security, and then
either sleep overnight or at least have a meal (YMMV).


-hh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#288293

FromDFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Date2015-04-07 12:22 -0400
Message-ID<mg107a$lnr$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#288255
On 4/7/2015 9:08 AM, -hh wrote:
> DFS wrote:
>>>> On 4/6/2015 10:56 AM, -hh wrote:
>>>>> chrisv wrote:
>>>>>> Most of their ilk spend their lives under a rock.
>>>>>
>>>>> Whereas whines from an anonymous account mean little.
>>>>> Case in point, just an example of an online quiz to
>>>>> see if one has actually gotten out from under a rock:
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://www.listchallenges.com/100-places-to-visit>
>>
>> I visited:
>>
>> 1.  Big Ben
>> 2.  Canals of Amsterdam
>> 3.  Colosseum
>> 4.  Empire State Bldg
>> 5.  French Quarter (lived there)
>> 6.  Golden Gate Bridge
>> 7.  Grand Canyon
>> 8.  Las Vegas Strip
>> 9.  Metropolitan Museum of Art
>> 10. Napa Valley
>> 11. Redwood National Park
>> 12. Sears Tower
>> 13. Sistine Chapel
>> 14. Smithsonian Institution
>> 15. Statue of Liberty
>> 16. Times Square
>> 17. Washington Monument
>> 18. White Cliffs of Dover
>> 19. White House
>
> All but three on that sublist.  Wonder when the
> whiners are going to put forth their own counts?

They won't.  They're too afraid of being seen as provincial schmoes.



>> Technically, I went to Muir Woods National Park
>> (southern Cal), but it's a close substitute for
>> Redwoods Natl (northern Cal).
>
> YMMV; that was one of those three; didn't count it
> even though I've been to Big Basins Redwood State Park,
> which is west of San Jose, CA.  One of the quirks
> of travel is if there's additional "rules" added for
> if a particular place will/won't be counted.  Ours
> is that one must leave airport security, and then
> either sleep overnight or at least have a meal (YMMV).


I didn't free-climb the White Cliffs of Dover, but I did drive right in 
front of them and park as near as possible and got out to look at them 
in person.

Does that count?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#288023

FromDFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Date2015-04-06 11:19 -0400
Message-ID<mfu84q$sso$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#287999
On 4/6/2015 9:54 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
> ronb wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 06 Apr 2015 07:13:32 -0500, chrisv wrote:
>>
>>> Like his alter-ago "Hadron", who used to whine about various ways in
>>> which Linux could be intentionally messed-up.
>>
>> Is that who Slime is, Hadron? The old biddy himself?
>>
>
> No. Snit slimeball is Snit Michael Glasser
>
> Hadron is Desk Rabbit


shitv insisted Hadron is Ezekiel.



[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#288067

FromGreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com>
Date2015-04-06 13:12 -0600
Message-ID<N-adndz15OgCR7_InZ2dnUU7-U-dnZ2d@bresnan.com>
In reply to#287999
Peter Köhlmann wrote:

> ronb wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, 06 Apr 2015 07:13:32 -0500, chrisv wrote:
>> 
>>> Like his alter-ago "Hadron", who used to whine about various ways in
>>> which Linux could be intentionally messed-up.
>> 
>> Is that who Slime is, Hadron? The old biddy himself?
>> 
> 
> No. Snit slimeball is Snit Michael Glasser
> 
> Hadron is Desk Rabbit

Guffaw!!!  Koldturd and his crystal ball.

LOL!!!!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#288001

FromSlimer <slvrslmr@lv.c>
Date2015-04-06 10:28 -0400
Message-ID<mfu55h$hsg$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#287997
On 2015-04-06 9:01 AM, ronb wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Apr 2015 07:13:32 -0500, chrisv wrote:
>
>> Like his alter-ago "Hadron", who used to whine about various ways in
>> which Linux could be intentionally messed-up.
>
> Is that who Slime is, Hadron? The old biddy himself?

Yep, I'm both Hadron and Snit. I'm pretty much everyone who has schooled 
you losers at one point or another.

-- 
Slimer
OpenMedia, GreenPeace Supporter & SPCA Paw Partner
Encrypt.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#288035

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2015-04-06 09:39 -0700
Message-ID<D14804B9.49A1E%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#288001
On 4/6/15, 7:28 AM, in article mfu55h$hsg$1@dont-email.me, "Slimer"
<slvrslmr@lv.c> wrote:

> On 2015-04-06 9:01 AM, ronb wrote:
>> On Mon, 06 Apr 2015 07:13:32 -0500, chrisv wrote:
>> 
>>> Like his alter-ago "Hadron", who used to whine about various ways in
>>> which Linux could be intentionally messed-up.
>> 
>> Is that who Slime is, Hadron? The old biddy himself?
> 
> Yep, I'm both Hadron and Snit. I'm pretty much everyone who has schooled
> you losers at one point or another.

That is COLA for you.


-- 
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1:            <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#287725

FromGreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com>
Date2015-04-03 12:15 -0600
Message-ID<sO-dnUrLBNdHRYPInZ2dnUU7-ImdnZ2d@bresnan.com>
In reply to#287617
DFS wrote:

> On 4/2/2015 10:30 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>> chrisv wrote:
>>
>>> ronb wrote:
>>>
>>>> --hh, in typical iCultist fashion, cites niche applications that 95% of
>>>> computer users have zero use for, and then claims that Linux is useless
>>>> because the 5% who want these products can't get that application on
>>>> Linux. I guess Photoshop and Autocad are out of fashion for this
>>>> particular brand of FUD these days.
>>>
>>> But, one must admit that when the *thousands* of "niche" commercial
>>> applications are added-up, one finds that a large chunk of the market
>>> needs to use one of more of them.
>>>
>>
>> No. It needs equivalent programs. Not necessarily the same programs.
>> And today you can run better than 80% of windows applications on wine.
> 
> Where's your evidence for this LUDICROUS claim?
> 
> Probably from another pie-in-the-sky Linux idiot like yourself.

The barbaric butt-crust doesn't have any proof.
He's nuts.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#287461

Fromronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>
Date2015-04-02 20:42 +0000
Message-ID<mfk9j8$vct$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#287412
On Thu, 02 Apr 2015 09:23:03 -0500, chrisv wrote:

> ronb wrote:
> 
>>--hh, in typical iCultist fashion, cites niche applications that 95% of
>>computer users have zero use for, and then claims that Linux is useless
>>because the 5% who want these products can't get that application on
>>Linux. I guess Photoshop and Autocad are out of fashion for this
>>particular brand of FUD these days.
> 
> But, one must admit that when the *thousands* of "niche" commercial
> applications are added-up, one finds that a large chunk of the market
> needs to use one of more of them.

I don't know if you're being facetious or not, but the niche market that 
the iCultists and WinDrones almost always talk about is Photoshop (to 
which, in this case, has been added iPhoto and some other iProgram -- I 
can't remember the name of now). Photoshop is a $700 (or so) commercial 
program. It's definitely not an application that "adds up" to a large 
chunk of the market. If you're in a particular industry that uses it -- 
printing, photo studio and a few other niche markets -- then, yes, it's 
used at a large percentage of shops in these PARTICULAR fields and on 
particular computers in those shops. But still, definitely, a niche 
product. As for the iPrograms, even if every Mac user installed them, it 
would still add up to a very small percentage of all computer users. In 
other words, it's another niche market. If you need Photoshop and 
iWhatever, and don't feel like any of the native Linux substitutes will 
do the job for your -- fine -- use OS X or Windows. But don't pretend 
because you need a small percentage niche market application that the 
majority of all computer users need it.  

-- 
To WinDrones and iCultists obsessed with Linux. Get a life.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#287468

From-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>
Date2015-04-02 14:27 -0700
Message-ID<d1a20558-da0e-4880-b28a-195a6c74fafd@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#287461
ronb wrote:
> chrisv wrote:
> > ronb wrote:
> > 
> >>--hh, in typical iCultist fashion, cites niche applications that 95% of
> >>computer users have zero use for, and then claims that Linux is useless
> >>because the 5% who want these products can't get that application on
> >>Linux. I guess Photoshop and Autocad are out of fashion for this
> >>particular brand of FUD these days.
> > 
> > But, one must admit that when the *thousands* of "niche" commercial
> > applications are added-up, one finds that a large chunk of the market
> > needs to use one of more of them.
> 
> I don't know if you're being facetious or not, ...

It is a distinct possibility that chrisv finally got whiff
of a free clue when he read that there's been 1.3 Billion iOS
devices sold, which also means a roughly comparable number 
of Mac/PC users running iTunes.

And I say "Mac/PC" because 1.3 Billion is significantly larger
than just the Mac marketshare.  Considering that the estimates
for total installed desktops is very roughly 2 Billion, the 
ramifications are that somewhere around roughly half of all 
personal computer users have used (or are still using) iTunes.  


> ...the niche market that the iCultists and WinDrones
> almost always talk about is Photoshop ...

Because of consistent claims that GIMP is fully its equal.

> ... (to which, in this case, has been added iPhoto and 
> some other iProgram -- I can't remember the name of now). 

Adobe Lightroom, which is a multi-platform competitor to Apple.

> As for the iPrograms, even if every Mac user installed them, it 
> would still add up to a very small percentage of all computer users. 

1.3 Billion iOS devices, supported by iTunes (a multi-platform OS).

> In other words, it's another niche market. 

Never mind all of the vague hand-waiving and "convenient" 
memory loss that Ron's been doing to get to this conclusion.  

> But don't pretend because you need a small percentage
> niche market application that the majority of all 
> computer users need it.  

Unfortunately, RonB is trying to rail against a moot point,
because the "niche" bar was already lowered to the much
easier and mainstream "Joe Sixpack" centric use cases.

Specifically, to use iPhoto, iTunes, Lightroom and others 
so that _equivalent_ Linux products could be nominated, 
along with the impartial third party reviews which actually
would assess the validity of each equivalency claim made.  

But no Linux advocate has yet provided even but one equivalent 
candidate Linux app for consideration and discussion. 

At what point do we ask how much lower the bars need to be set for Linux?    


-hh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#287514

Fromvallor <vallor@cultnix.org>
Date2015-04-02 16:29 -0700
Message-ID<551dd0d9$0$43040$c3e8da3$5e5e430d@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#287468
On 04/02/2015 02:27 PM, -hh wrote:

> 1.3 Billion iOS devices, supported by iTunes (a multi-platform OS).

It probably is an OS by now, they've dumped so much shit into its gizzard.

But:  fuck iTunes.  A lot of folks prefer Amazon and Netflix.

And personally (and anecdotally) speaking, I have yet to find any movie,
show, or what have you that isn't available on Amazon or Netflix.

So there's your "alternative" that you were looking for.  HTH. HAND.

Incidentally, the reason people don't start listing equivalent apps from
Linux is that they know you have a list of corner cases to bring up and
say "see?  they aren't equivalent".

We (tinw) are wise to your trollish ways, trollcreeps.

> 
> -hh
> 

Such a rebel!

-- 
 -v

A penny saved has not been spent.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#287524

Fromronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>
Date2015-04-02 23:46 +0000
Message-ID<mfkkc3$b37$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#287514
On Thu, 02 Apr 2015 16:29:28 -0700, vallor wrote:

>> 1.3 Billion iOS devices, supported by iTunes (a multi-platform OS).
> 
> It probably is an OS by now, they've dumped so much shit into its
> gizzard.
> 
> But:  fuck iTunes.  A lot of folks prefer Amazon and Netflix.

Several years ago I used QuickTime to watch movie trailers -- but that 
was as close to iTunes as I ever came. I do, however, have an Amazon 
Prime account for music and video, have a NetFlix account, use Kindles 
and Nooks (and a Sony and Kobo) for reading, have my music stored on 
Google Music, and use Spotify (which, if I were going to specifically 
subscribe to a music service) would be the one I would pick. Not to 
mention everything you can watch and listen to on YouTube these days -- 
or Crackle, or Hulu, or even going directly to the CBS, ABC, NBC and 
other station's websites. Oh, and there's Vudu, where my wife watches her 
TV series and where we have some movies stored.

So, am I missing iTunes? Not in the least.

-- 
To WinDrones and iCultists obsessed with Linux. Get a life.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#287570

FromChris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us>
Date2015-04-03 06:01 -0400
Message-ID<mflod2$ihj$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#287524
ronb wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On Thu, 02 Apr 2015 16:29:28 -0700, vallor wrote:
>
>>> 1.3 Billion iOS devices, supported by iTunes (a multi-platform OS).
>> 
>> It probably is an OS by now, they've dumped so much shit into its
>> gizzard.
>> 
>> But:  fuck iTunes.  A lot of folks prefer Amazon and Netflix.
>
> Several years ago I used QuickTime to watch movie trailers -- but that 
> was as close to iTunes as I ever came. I do, however, have an Amazon 
> Prime account for music and video, have a NetFlix account, use Kindles 
> and Nooks (and a Sony and Kobo) for reading, have my music stored on 
> Google Music, and use Spotify (which, if I were going to specifically 
> subscribe to a music service) would be the one I would pick. Not to 
> mention everything you can watch and listen to on YouTube these days -- 
> or Crackle, or Hulu, or even going directly to the CBS, ABC, NBC and 
> other station's websites. Oh, and there's Vudu, where my wife watches her 
> TV series and where we have some movies stored.
>
> So, am I missing iTunes? Not in the least.

Same here.  Let me add to the list all the fine channels of SomaFM.
My favorites are DEFCON, Groove Salad, and Suburbs of Goa.

There's a metric assload of streaming channels out there.

-- 
A sharper perspective on this matter is particularly important to feminist
thought today, because a major tendency in feminism has constructed the
problem of domination as a drama of female vulnerability victimized by male
aggression.  Even the more sophisticated feminist thinkers frequently shy
away from the analysis of submission, for fear that in admitting woman's
participation in the relationship of domination, the onus of responsibility
will appear to shift from men to women, and the moral victory from women to
men.  More generally, this has been a weakness of radical politics: to
idealize the oppressed, as if their politics and culture were untouched by
the system of domination, as if people did not participate in their own
submission.  To reduce domination to a simple relation of doer and done-to
is to substitute moral outrage for analysis.
		-- Jessica Benjamin, "The Bonds of Love"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 10 of 27 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 … 27  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy


csiph-web