Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #366298 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-22 20:04 +0000 |
| Last post | 2016-08-25 08:38 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 382 — 16 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 20:04 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 13:35 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 20:47 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 13:51 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 21:07 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 14:16 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 21:32 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 14:38 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 22:04 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 15:22 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 23:00 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 16:13 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 16:00 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 09:11 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 16:22 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 09:37 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 16:54 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 10:14 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 17:21 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 10:29 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 17:43 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:03 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 09:51 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 14:17 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 09:05 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 11:51 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:01 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 18:27 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:46 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 21:17 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 10:07 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:41 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 20:06 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 00:13 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 20:33 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 01:24 +0000
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 08:14 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:26 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 08:10 -0400
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-26 09:07 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 13:37 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-26 09:56 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 10:42 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:23 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:29 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 10:41 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:23 -0700
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 09:17 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:08 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 10:17 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:32 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 09:24 -0700
Re: Another day chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-26 11:27 -0500
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:36 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:45 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 13:52 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 13:43 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 17:18 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 14:39 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 18:42 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 17:24 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-27 00:09 +0000
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 17:33 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:29 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 12:08 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 18:26 -0600
Re: Another day ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-27 04:21 +0000
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 21:46 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-27 05:15 +0000
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-27 05:42 +0000
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 00:07 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:30 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 12:09 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 18:27 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 19:06 -0700
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 09:20 +0200
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 10:04 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 01:06 -0700
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 10:23 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 01:39 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 01:09 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 01:27 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-27 15:10 -0400
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 21:58 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 13:17 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 18:28 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 19:15 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-28 09:38 -0400
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 22:22 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 13:37 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-27 19:10 -0400
Re: Another day ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 03:20 +0000
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-28 09:35 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-28 09:16 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 10:03 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-27 15:02 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:19 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 15:34 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 19:03 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:28 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:27 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 12:06 -0700
Re: Another day -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-27 15:30 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 18:20 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 18:24 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 19:01 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 19:42 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 07:39 -0700
Re: Another day William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-08-28 16:22 +0100
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 09:50 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 15:29 -0400
Re: Another day ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 20:16 +0000
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 17:40 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 15:14 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 18:19 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 16:18 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 19:40 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 16:42 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 19:44 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 16:56 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 19:59 -0400
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 18:16 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-28 09:08 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-28 09:17 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-29 09:06 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-28 09:42 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 08:12 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-28 11:50 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 10:00 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-28 19:22 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 16:57 -0700
Re: Another day Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-08-29 18:39 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 15:43 -0700
Re: Another day ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 23:12 +0000
Re: Another day ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 23:15 +0000
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 17:09 -0700
Re: Another day Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-08-29 20:52 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 18:13 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-29 19:34 -0400
Re: Another day Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-30 01:49 +0200
Re: Another day Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-30 01:46 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 17:21 -0700
Re: Another day Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-30 02:26 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 17:33 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-30 09:16 -0400
Re: Another day Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-30 15:26 +0200
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-28 12:38 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 17:16 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 14:23 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:20 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 15:35 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 18:38 -0400
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 01:50 +0200
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 20:13 -0400
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 09:19 +0200
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:35 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 12:15 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-29 11:02 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 08:08 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-27 15:10 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:21 -0600
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 09:36 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 16:43 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 10:00 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 17:08 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 10:16 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 17:32 +0000
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 10:39 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 18:04 +0000
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:39 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 10:53 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 14:26 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 12:23 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 18:06 +0000
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 19:11 +0000
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:22 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 10:11 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 17:29 +0000
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 18:12 +0000
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 19:19 +0000
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 10:33 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 21:20 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 21:27 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 14:04 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:07 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 18:00 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:18 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 23:40 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 08:26 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:37 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:42 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 11:49 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 14:08 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 21:18 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:47 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 12:00 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:13 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 15:57 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:16 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 22:31 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:44 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 23:00 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 16:07 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:25 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 21:40 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:22 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 21:39 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 11:59 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:41 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 21:14 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:50 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:39 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 12:07 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:44 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:17 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-23 20:07 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 01:02 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 09:59 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 14:25 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 10:58 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 15:16 +0000
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:16 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 21:34 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:09 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-23 20:08 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 01:10 +0000
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:28 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 10:12 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 09:03 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:20 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:41 -0700
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 12:29 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:55 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:11 -0700
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 13:20 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:33 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:45 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:50 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 14:02 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:54 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:10 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:19 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:32 -0400
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 10:54 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 11:08 -0400
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 12:03 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 12:47 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:19 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 11:59 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:16 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 15:59 -0600
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 22:13 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:18 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:29 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:14 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:33 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 07:56 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:23 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:43 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:53 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:10 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:22 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:26 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:36 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:46 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 20:58 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:14 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:18 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-23 20:47 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 01:24 +0000
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:48 -0600
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 05:06 +0000
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:27 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 10:24 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 14:34 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 10:58 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 15:14 +0000
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:30 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 10:00 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 08:58 -0700
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 09:24 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:31 -0600
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 12:16 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:51 -0600
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 13:17 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 20:56 -0600
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 20:33 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:16 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:30 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:49 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:48 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:09 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 20:55 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:13 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:15 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 11:44 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:22 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:48 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 07:57 -0400
Re: Another day -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-26 06:41 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:35 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 13:51 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:17 -0600
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 13:03 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:36 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 16:09 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 09:27 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:33 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:44 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 13:44 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 17:14 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:10 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 13:48 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:16 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:24 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:28 -0600
Re: Another day Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-08-25 07:10 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:46 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 09:58 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 14:28 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 08:54 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:47 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:08 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 20:45 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:03 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:00 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 11:12 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:09 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:37 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 14:50 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:07 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 19:23 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:25 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 10:44 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:47 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 11:58 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 11:04 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:05 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:37 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 23:38 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:39 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:26 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 13:42 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 14:47 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 11:53 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:04 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 19:20 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:24 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:36 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 23:37 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 07:53 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 11:56 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 11:04 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 11:53 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 19:16 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 23:22 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 19:24 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 23:37 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:26 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 02:51 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 22:54 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 19:59 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 03:01 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 21:19 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 19:56 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 03:00 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 20:31 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 22:29 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 02:50 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 19:57 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 03:04 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 20:31 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 08:22 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 07:58 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:26 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:44 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:43 -0600
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 19:15 +0000
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 10:19 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 11:51 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 14:42 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 08:38 -0400
Page 2 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 20 Next page →
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-23 17:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hjau03.aj9@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366364 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/23/16, 10:21 AM, in article hjgua993.ajgi8@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/23/16, 9:54 AM, in article hjgdua993ga.jgi@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 8/23/16, 9:22 AM, in article fhjgie899.37@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> ... >>>>>>>>> This is not complex: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> * A vote for Trump is a vote for Trump >>>>>>>>> * A vote for Clinton is a vote for Clinton. >>>>>>>>> * A vote for nether is a vote for neither. >>>>>>>>> * A vote does not imply it is a counted vote, sadly. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What does it tell you that I, a Trump supporter, encourage you, a >>>>>>>> liberal, >>>>>>>> to either abstain from voting or vote for Stein? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You are not. You are pushing me to vote for one of the two least trusted, >>>>>>> least liked politicians on the national scene. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Nope. Clearly you would never vote for Trump, so I won't bother >>>>>> trying to get you to vote Trump. >>>>> >>>>> I will not vote for him or Clinton. Both are horrid choices and I will not >>>>> be responsible in any way for either of them. >>>> >>>> Fantastic! Vote for Stein. Tell all your liberal friends >>>> to vote for Stein. Hell, write in Bernie. LOL! Go Trump! >>> >>> Wait: if you are going to be consistent, given how Trump is not likely to >>> win, you should not vote for him either. >> >> I'm consistent. Trump has a chance. Hillary has a chance. No one else >> has a chance. A vote for Trump is not wasted. > > Trump has a slim chance... so why vote for him? > He has far more than a slim chance. Wait. Forget I said that. You probably don't even need to vote at all, since Hillary's got it in the bag. >>> I am not a big fan of Stein, either. She is not a leader and her comments on >>> things like Wi-Fi and vaccinations are a bit whacky. >> >> I don't care what she does or says. Just vote for her. :) > > I might... though I would have to hold my nose to do so. There are truly no > decent options. > No! You need to vote your conscience. Stein is the best match. Plus, whether it's Trump or Hillary who wins, you will not be responsible. Win-Win!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-23 11:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E1DDF3.79E0D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366366 |
On 8/23/16, 10:43 AM, in article hjau03.aj9@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: ... >>>> Wait: if you are going to be consistent, given how Trump is not likely to >>>> win, you should not vote for him either. >>> >>> I'm consistent. Trump has a chance. Hillary has a chance. No one else >>> has a chance. A vote for Trump is not wasted. >> >> Trump has a slim chance... so why vote for him? > > He has far more than a slim chance. Wait. Forget I said that. > You probably don't even need to vote at all, since Hillary's > got it in the bag. You act like I prefer Clinton over him. Why? As far as his chances: he has literally NO qualifications. Clinton at least has some... but she is grossly corrupt. But with him there is literally NO reason to back him. He has no decent policy ideas, no experience, poor success in business... what does he have going for him? >>>> I am not a big fan of Stein, either. She is not a leader and her comments >>>> on >>>> things like Wi-Fi and vaccinations are a bit whacky. >>> >>> I don't care what she does or says. Just vote for her. :) >> >> I might... though I would have to hold my nose to do so. There are truly no >> decent options. > > No! You need to vote your conscience. Stein is the best match. Maybe. She is not great either. > Plus, whether it's Trump or Hillary who wins, you will not be responsible. > Win-Win! Pretty much. I will not be responsible for either of them. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 09:51 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <npk8p8$r78$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366359 |
On 8/23/2016 12:54 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > This election is going to be a Trump landslide. You're delusional.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 14:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hgjds0.3a88b@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366470 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 8/23/2016 12:54 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > > >> This election is going to be a Trump landslide. > > > You're delusional. > Hillary is not Obama. Hillary can't get anybody to the polls. The Bernie people hate her. The blacks don't care about her. Trump's people are more fired-up than the Berntards. We will be out in record numbers. Trump landslide. http://ow.ly/DFO6303xA1D
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 09:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E313C1.79F29%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366475 |
On 8/24/16, 7:17 AM, in article hgjds0.3a88b@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >> On 8/23/2016 12:54 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >> >> >>> This election is going to be a Trump landslide. >> >> >> You're delusional. >> > > Hillary is not Obama. Hillary can't get anybody to the polls. > The Bernie people hate her. The blacks don't care about her. > Trump's people are more fired-up than the Berntards. We will > be out in record numbers. Trump landslide. > > http://ow.ly/DFO6303xA1D > Trump has almost no chance of winning. His only chance is that he is running against the ONLY other person on the national stage with an almost equal level of lack of trust and dislike. The two parties picked the worst candidates they could... though the Republicans really had no good choices. Somehow they managed to make Jeb Bush look decent... an amazing feat! -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 11:51 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <npkmro$ec6$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366493 |
On 08/24/16 10:05, Snit wrote: > On 8/24/16, 7:17 AM, in article hgjds0.3a88b@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange"<olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> DFS<nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>> On 8/23/2016 12:54 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>> >>> >>>> This election is going to be a Trump landslide. >>> >>> >>> You're delusional. >>> >> >> Hillary is not Obama. Hillary can't get anybody to the polls. >> The Bernie people hate her. The blacks don't care about her. >> Trump's people are more fired-up than the Berntards. We will >> be out in record numbers. Trump landslide. >> >> http://ow.ly/DFO6303xA1D >> > Trump has almost no chance of winning. His only chance is that he is running > against the ONLY other person on the national stage with an almost equal > level of lack of trust and dislike. > > The two parties picked the worst candidates they could... though the > Republicans really had no good choices. Somehow they managed to make Jeb > Bush look decent... an amazing feat! > > https://www.sbstatesman.com/2016/02/23/political-science-professor-forecasts-trump-as-general-election-winner/ http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/24/political-science-professor-odds-of-president-trump-range-between-97-and-99/ http://www.aol.com/article/2016/02/26/professor-if-trump-gets-the-nomination-hell-win-in-november/21319450/ Seems like these people say otherwise.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 11:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E32F22.79F49%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366500 |
On 8/24/16, 10:51 AM, in article npkmro$ec6$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: > On 08/24/16 10:05, Snit wrote: >> On 8/24/16, 7:17 AM, in article hgjds0.3a88b@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange"<olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >>> DFS<nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>> On 8/23/2016 12:54 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> This election is going to be a Trump landslide. >>>> >>>> >>>> You're delusional. >>>> >>> >>> Hillary is not Obama. Hillary can't get anybody to the polls. >>> The Bernie people hate her. The blacks don't care about her. >>> Trump's people are more fired-up than the Berntards. We will >>> be out in record numbers. Trump landslide. >>> >>> http://ow.ly/DFO6303xA1D >>> >> Trump has almost no chance of winning. His only chance is that he is running >> against the ONLY other person on the national stage with an almost equal >> level of lack of trust and dislike. >> >> The two parties picked the worst candidates they could... though the >> Republicans really had no good choices. Somehow they managed to make Jeb >> Bush look decent... an amazing feat! >> >> > https://www.sbstatesman.com/2016/02/23/political-science-professor-forecasts-t > rump-as-general-election-winner/ > > http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/24/political-science-professor-odds-of-presiden > t-trump-range-between-97-and-99/ > > http://www.aol.com/article/2016/02/26/professor-if-trump-gets-the-nomination-h > ell-win-in-november/21319450/ > > Seems like these people say otherwise. > What "these people"? They all point back to one person... and here is his professional page at the university they claim he represents: <http://www.stonybrook.edu/commcms/polisci/professors/norpoth.html> With that said, Trump did better in the primaries than I expected... but he gamed the system well, trolling the media and working the fact he was different from a mass of others who did not differentiate themselves well. Now it is a different game: one-to-one. And on that front how much do you think the media, who heavily backs Clinton, is going to allow Trump to troll them? To some extent, sure... they love the ratings his antics bring the but they are FUNDING Clinton. The same games will not work. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 18:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhvxc.vkd983@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366503 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/24/16, 10:51 AM, in article npkmro$ec6$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" > <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: > ... > > Now it is a different game: one-to-one. And on that front how much do you > think the media, who heavily backs Clinton, is going to allow Trump to troll > them? To some extent, sure... they love the ratings his antics bring the but > they are FUNDING Clinton. The same games will not work. > Trump is going to destroy her in the first debate. He will not hold back on her like Bernie did. He will bring up every one of her scandals and failures. It won't matter what question is asked. He will use every speaking opportunity to hammer her into a quivering pulp. They'll have to scoop her up off the floor before the first commercial break. Remember what he did to Tired Jeb, Little Marco, and Lyin Ted. Democrats will be in tears before it's over. It will be heartbreaking for them to watch her lose her mind and dignity on stage. If it was me, I'd go after her right out of the gate: "Hillary, why are you yelling? We can hear you. Holy crap." (hand to ear). Or: "Hillary, I like what you're wearing tonight. What is that, a pantsuit?" Treat her with the absolute disrespect that she has earned. Take control of the stage and put her on defense, making her address things outside the scripted narrative. Disrespect the moderators too if necessary. Play to the people for entertainment value. These moments will then be replayed on tv for weeks. It will be golden.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 11:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E3397A.79F74%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366512 |
On 8/24/16, 11:27 AM, in article fhvxc.vkd983@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/24/16, 10:51 AM, in article npkmro$ec6$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >> <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >> > ... > >> >> Now it is a different game: one-to-one. And on that front how much do you >> think the media, who heavily backs Clinton, is going to allow Trump to troll >> them? To some extent, sure... they love the ratings his antics bring the but >> they are FUNDING Clinton. The same games will not work. > > Trump is going to destroy her in the first debate. He will not > hold back on her like Bernie did. Many of his fans think his grade school antics are "winning" a debate... where I look at reason and logic. So it depends on what you mean by "winning." > He will bring up every one of her scandals and failures. It won't matter what > question is asked. He will use every speaking opportunity to hammer her into > a quivering pulp. They'll have to scoop her up off the floor before the first > commercial break. Remember what he did to Tired Jeb, Little Marco, and Lyin > Ted. Democrats will be in tears before it's over. It will be heartbreaking > for them to watch her lose her mind and dignity on stage. This might work if he was not just as bad. He is, however, better at that type of attack... and he does not care one whit about how honest the attacks are. > If it was me, I'd go after her right out of the gate: > > "Hillary, why are you yelling? We can hear you. Holy crap." (hand to ear). > > Or: > > "Hillary, I like what you're wearing tonight. What is that, a pantsuit?" > > Treat her with the absolute disrespect that she has earned. Both of those would be immediate loses to anyone looking for reason and policies and not just grade school antics. But sure, many in America will look at the debate like a grade school putdown contest. To them Trump will win. > Take control of the stage and put her on defense, making her address things > outside the scripted narrative. Disrespect the moderators too if necessary. > Play to the people for entertainment value. These moments will then be > replayed on tv for weeks. It will be golden. Troll the media. He does it well. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-24 21:17 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nplnvc$ni6$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366512 |
Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/24/16, 10:51 AM, in article npkmro$ec6$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >> <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >> > ... >> >> Now it is a different game: one-to-one. And on that front how much do you >> think the media, who heavily backs Clinton, is going to allow Trump to >> troll them? To some extent, sure... they love the ratings his antics >> bring the but they are FUNDING Clinton. The same games will not work. >> > > Trump is going to destroy her in the first debate. He will not > hold back on her like Bernie did. He will bring up every one of her > scandals and failures. It won't matter what question is asked. He will > use every speaking opportunity to hammer her into a quivering pulp. > They'll have to scoop her up off the floor before the first commercial > break. Remember what he did to Tired Jeb, Little Marco, and Lyin Ted. > Democrats will be in tears before it's over. It will be heartbreaking > for them to watch her lose her mind and dignity on stage. > > If it was me, I'd go after her right out of the gate: > > "Hillary, why are you yelling? We can hear you. Holy crap." (hand to > ear). > > Or: > > "Hillary, I like what you're wearing tonight. What is that, a pantsuit?" > > Treat her with the absolute disrespect that she has earned. Take control > of the stage and put her on defense, making her address things outside > the scripted narrative. Disrespect the moderators too if necessary. > Play to the people for entertainment value. These moments will then > be replayed on tv for weeks. It will be golden. Hehehe... first she'll piss in her diapers that she is wearing... then she'll have a few seizures where her black medic can't poke her with Diazapam, and then they'll take her out in a stretcher. She won't be able to handle it. -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 10:07 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <npmu3e$6am$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366512 |
On 2016-08-24 2:27 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/24/16, 10:51 AM, in article npkmro$ec6$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >> <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >> > ... >> >> Now it is a different game: one-to-one. And on that front how much do you >> think the media, who heavily backs Clinton, is going to allow Trump to troll >> them? To some extent, sure... they love the ratings his antics bring the but >> they are FUNDING Clinton. The same games will not work. >> > > Trump is going to destroy her in the first debate. Is that the one that was scheduled to air at the same time as a very important (if that exists) NFL game? To me, a political debate has always been a lot more interesting than any sport but I don't think that Americans would agree with me. > He will not > hold back on her like Bernie did. He will bring up every one of her > scandals and failures. It won't matter what question is asked. He will > use every speaking opportunity to hammer her into a quivering pulp. > They'll have to scoop her up off the floor before the first commercial > break. Remember what he did to Tired Jeb, Little Marco, and Lyin Ted. > Democrats will be in tears before it's over. It will be heartbreaking > for them to watch her lose her mind and dignity on stage. They'll keep repeating that he's a racist, a fascist and a sexist like they've been doing for the past few months. They have absolutely nothing else to use against him. > If it was me, I'd go after her right out of the gate: > > "Hillary, why are you yelling? We can hear you. Holy crap." (hand to ear). > > Or: > > "Hillary, I like what you're wearing tonight. What is that, a pantsuit?" > > Treat her with the absolute disrespect that she has earned. Take control > of the stage and put her on defense, making her address things outside > the scripted narrative. Disrespect the moderators too if necessary. > Play to the people for entertainment value. These moments will then > be replayed on tv for weeks. It will be golden. I'm looking forward to it as is my wife. We both love Trump though I'm not a fan of how he loves to repeat things. -- Silver Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 09:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E46DDC.7A146%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366669 |
On 8/25/16, 7:07 AM, in article npmu3e$6am$2@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > On 2016-08-24 2:27 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/24/16, 10:51 AM, in article npkmro$ec6$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >>> <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >>> >> ... >>> >>> Now it is a different game: one-to-one. And on that front how much do you >>> think the media, who heavily backs Clinton, is going to allow Trump to troll >>> them? To some extent, sure... they love the ratings his antics bring the but >>> they are FUNDING Clinton. The same games will not work. >>> >> >> Trump is going to destroy her in the first debate. > > Is that the one that was scheduled to air at the same time as a very > important (if that exists) NFL game? To me, a political debate has > always been a lot more interesting than any sport but I don't think that > Americans would agree with me. Sadly you are right about that. And Americans see politics as a sporting event... just replace "my team" with "my party." It is part of the reason why I do not align myself with any party in the US, even if I tend to agree with one of the "biggies" more than the other. >> He will not hold back on her like Bernie did. He will bring up every one of >> her scandals and failures. It won't matter what question is asked. He will >> use every speaking opportunity to hammer her into a quivering pulp. They'll >> have to scoop her up off the floor before the first commercial break. >> Remember what he did to Tired Jeb, Little Marco, and Lyin Ted. Democrats will >> be in tears before it's over. It will be heartbreaking for them to watch her >> lose her mind and dignity on stage. >> > They'll keep repeating that he's a racist, a fascist and a sexist like they've > been doing for the past few months. They have absolutely nothing else to use > against him. One: those are enough. Two: there is a LOT more about him to be against. Three: even if not, he needs to find a reason to be FOR him. So far he has none. >> If it was me, I'd go after her right out of the gate: >> >> "Hillary, why are you yelling? We can hear you. Holy crap." (hand to ear). >> >> Or: >> >> "Hillary, I like what you're wearing tonight. What is that, a pantsuit?" >> >> Treat her with the absolute disrespect that she has earned. Take control >> of the stage and put her on defense, making her address things outside >> the scripted narrative. Disrespect the moderators too if necessary. >> Play to the people for entertainment value. These moments will then >> be replayed on tv for weeks. It will be golden. > > I'm looking forward to it as is my wife. We both love Trump though I'm > not a fan of how he loves to repeat things. Well all politicians do that... they have to give tons of speeches. :) I would like to see him TRY to speak of issues and not insults. He would be well accepted in COLA for his grade school insults but he has no actual qualifications to be president. http://hildoclump.wordpress.com :) -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 20:06 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <npo17n$3mu$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366512 |
On 8/24/2016 2:27 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote:
> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> On 8/24/16, 10:51 AM, in article npkmro$ec6$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud"
>> <mist@cumulus.com> wrote:
>>
> ...
>>
>> Now it is a different game: one-to-one. And on that front how much do you
>> think the media, who heavily backs Clinton, is going to allow Trump to troll
>> them? To some extent, sure... they love the ratings his antics bring the but
>> they are FUNDING Clinton. The same games will not work.
>>
>
> Trump is going to destroy her in the first debate. He will not
> hold back on her like Bernie did. He will bring up every one of her
> scandals and failures.
As he should. Much of it is fair game - some of it has a bearing on her
judgement and leadership abilities.
And I hope she brings up Trump's flip-flops and hypocrisy on just about
everything, bankruptcies, product outsourcing, using H-1B workers,
mocking the disabled reporter, failure to honor real war heroes, and his
sex creepiness toward daughter Ivanka.
-------------------------------
"She does have a very nice figure. I've said if Ivanka weren't my
daughter, perhaps I'd be dating her."
-------------------------------
Wendy Williams: "Ivanka, what's the favorite thing you have in common
with your father?
Ivanka: "Either real estate or golf."
Trump: "Well, I was going to say sex, but I can't relate that to her."
-------------------------------
“Yeah, she’s really something, and what a beauty, that one. If I weren’t
happily married and, ya know, her father . . . ”
-------------------------------
Maybe the Dems will bring up what he said about Rosie O'Donnell:
"She talks like a truck driver, she doesn’t have her facts, she’ll say
anything that comes to her mind.”
What a PKB.
And what kind of $10-billionaire asks for donations to his political
campaign?
> It won't matter what question is asked. He will
> use every speaking opportunity to hammer her into a quivering pulp.
She's far too tough to be hammered, let alone to a pulp. She's spent a
life in American politics, which is a hard place to survive in.
Trump has gotten a taste, and failed the test miserably. A little
criticism via Twitter and he flies off the handle.
You're observant enough to see he's unfit to be President, right?
First he'll "soften" his stances on immigration, deportation, the border
wall, and making Mexico pay for it. Then he'll disavow ALL of his
original positions. Wait and watch. I GUARANTEE it.
> They'll have to scoop her up off the floor before the first commercial
> break. Remember what he did to Tired Jeb, Little Marco, and Lyin Ted.
> Democrats will be in tears before it's over. It will be heartbreaking
> for them to watch her lose her mind and dignity on stage.
At least she has a mind and some dignity to lose; Trump has neither.
> If it was me, I'd go after her right out of the gate:
>
> "Hillary, why are you yelling? We can hear you. Holy crap." (hand to ear).
>
> Or:
>
> "Hillary, I like what you're wearing tonight. What is that, a pantsuit?"
That's about the level of juvenile discourse to be expected from Trump.
> Treat her with the absolute disrespect that she has earned. Take control
> of the stage and put her on defense, making her address things outside
> the scripted narrative. Disrespect the moderators too if necessary.
> Play to the people for entertainment value. These moments will then
> be replayed on tv for weeks. It will be golden.
In other words, act like even more of an overgrown, teenage bully and
buffoon than he has so far.
You're losing your mind.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 00:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hgjdsie893.a@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366895 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 8/24/2016 2:27 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/24/16, 10:51 AM, in article npkmro$ec6$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >>> <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >>> >> ... >>> >>> Now it is a different game: one-to-one. And on that front how much do you >>> think the media, who heavily backs Clinton, is going to allow Trump to troll >>> them? To some extent, sure... they love the ratings his antics bring the but >>> they are FUNDING Clinton. The same games will not work. >>> >> >> Trump is going to destroy her in the first debate. He will not >> hold back on her like Bernie did. He will bring up every one of her >> scandals and failures. > > > As he should. Much of it is fair game - some of it has a bearing on her > judgement and leadership abilities. > > And I hope she brings up Trump's flip-flops and hypocrisy on just about > everything, bankruptcies, product outsourcing, using H-1B workers, > mocking the disabled reporter, failure to honor real war heroes, and his > sex creepiness toward daughter Ivanka. > > ------------------------------- > "She does have a very nice figure. I've said if Ivanka weren't my > daughter, perhaps I'd be dating her." > ------------------------------- > Wendy Williams: "Ivanka, what's the favorite thing you have in common > with your father? > > Ivanka: "Either real estate or golf." > > Trump: "Well, I was going to say sex, but I can't relate that to her." > ------------------------------- > “Yeah, she’s really something, and what a beauty, that one. If I weren’t > happily married and, ya know, her father . . . ” > ------------------------------- > > > > Maybe the Dems will bring up what he said about Rosie O'Donnell: > > "She talks like a truck driver, she doesn’t have her facts, she’ll say > anything that comes to her mind.” > > What a PKB. > > > And what kind of $10-billionaire asks for donations to his political > campaign? > > > > >> It won't matter what question is asked. He will >> use every speaking opportunity to hammer her into a quivering pulp. > > She's far too tough to be hammered, let alone to a pulp. She's spent a > life in American politics, which is a hard place to survive in. > > Trump has gotten a taste, and failed the test miserably. A little > criticism via Twitter and he flies off the handle. > > You're observant enough to see he's unfit to be President, right? > > First he'll "soften" his stances on immigration, deportation, the border > wall, and making Mexico pay for it. Then he'll disavow ALL of his > original positions. Wait and watch. I GUARANTEE it. > > > > >> They'll have to scoop her up off the floor before the first commercial >> break. Remember what he did to Tired Jeb, Little Marco, and Lyin Ted. >> Democrats will be in tears before it's over. It will be heartbreaking >> for them to watch her lose her mind and dignity on stage. > > At least she has a mind and some dignity to lose; Trump has neither. > > > >> If it was me, I'd go after her right out of the gate: >> >> "Hillary, why are you yelling? We can hear you. Holy crap." (hand to ear). >> >> Or: >> >> "Hillary, I like what you're wearing tonight. What is that, a pantsuit?" > > That's about the level of juvenile discourse to be expected from Trump. > > > >> Treat her with the absolute disrespect that she has earned. Take control >> of the stage and put her on defense, making her address things outside >> the scripted narrative. Disrespect the moderators too if necessary. >> Play to the people for entertainment value. These moments will then >> be replayed on tv for weeks. It will be golden. > > > In other words, act like even more of an overgrown, teenage bully and > buffoon than he has so far. > > You're losing your mind. The obvious question is how did Mrs DFS get ahold of DFS's account?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 20:33 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <npo2p6$7gc$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366898 |
On 8/25/2016 8:13 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > The obvious question is how did Mrs DFS get ahold of DFS's account? You know I'm right. And the idea you and GC are floating - that I support a liberal Democrat like Clinton - is preposterous. Now grab your "Shriveled Balls by Trump" and do the right thing and vote for someone other than the embarrassing loon.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 01:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <kkgladeog9.ia8@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366906 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 8/25/2016 8:13 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > > >> The obvious question is how did Mrs DFS get ahold of DFS's account? > > > You know I'm right. > I know you appear to be fucked in the head. > And the idea you and GC are floating - that I support a liberal Democrat > like Clinton - is preposterous. > Then do your duty and vote for the Republican candidate. > Now grab your "Shriveled Balls by Trump" and do the right thing and vote > for someone other than the embarrassing loon. > Unless you are a liberal, any action other than a vote for Trump helps Hillary get elected. It takes quite a moron not to see that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 08:14 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nppbrk$l74$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366918 |
On 2016-08-25 9:24 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >> On 8/25/2016 8:13 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >> >> >>> The obvious question is how did Mrs DFS get ahold of DFS's account? >> >> >> You know I'm right. >> > > I know you appear to be fucked in the head. > >> And the idea you and GC are floating - that I support a liberal Democrat >> like Clinton - is preposterous. >> > > Then do your duty and vote for the Republican candidate. > > >> Now grab your "Shriveled Balls by Trump" and do the right thing and vote >> for someone other than the embarrassing loon. >> > > Unless you are a liberal, any action other than a vote for Trump > helps Hillary get elected. It takes quite a moron not to see that. I agree with that. If each candidate had the same chance of being elected, I'd be leaning toward the Libertarian Party though Johnson's recent support of mandatory vaccinations has shown him to have been bought out and I'd have trouble supporting him specifically. Considering the close percentages between Trump and Clinton, a vote for Trump is a vote to make sure that Clinton doesn't receive the ultimate power to continue enriching herself on the backs of innocent people, not so much support for her specifically. -- Silver Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 17:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E4DADA.7A2D5%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366895 |
On 8/25/16, 5:06 PM, in article npo17n$3mu$2@dont-email.me, "DFS" <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 8/24/2016 2:27 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/24/16, 10:51 AM, in article npkmro$ec6$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >>> <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >>> >> ... >>> >>> Now it is a different game: one-to-one. And on that front how much do you >>> think the media, who heavily backs Clinton, is going to allow Trump to troll >>> them? To some extent, sure... they love the ratings his antics bring the but >>> they are FUNDING Clinton. The same games will not work. >>> >> >> Trump is going to destroy her in the first debate. He will not >> hold back on her like Bernie did. He will bring up every one of her >> scandals and failures. > > As he should. Much of it is fair game - some of it has a bearing on her > judgement and leadership abilities. They both have horrid judgment... but at least she has a more even temperament. More even. Not good. :) > And I hope she brings up Trump's flip-flops and hypocrisy on just about > everything, bankruptcies, product outsourcing, using H-1B workers, > mocking the disabled reporter, failure to honor real war heroes, and his > sex creepiness toward daughter Ivanka. She will not bring up the last. > ------------------------------- > "She does have a very nice figure. I've said if Ivanka weren't my > daughter, perhaps I'd be dating her." > ------------------------------- > Wendy Williams: "Ivanka, what's the favorite thing you have in common > with your father? > > Ivanka: "Either real estate or golf." > > Trump: "Well, I was going to say sex, but I can't relate that to her." > ------------------------------- > ³Yeah, she¹s really something, and what a beauty, that one. If I weren¹t > happily married and, ya know, her father . . . ² > ------------------------------- > > > > Maybe the Dems will bring up what he said about Rosie O'Donnell: > > "She talks like a truck driver, she doesn¹t have her facts, she¹ll say > anything that comes to her mind.² > > What a PKB. > > > And what kind of $10-billionaire asks for donations to his political > campaign? One who is treating the whole thing as a way to get his new reality show. >> It won't matter what question is asked. He will >> use every speaking opportunity to hammer her into a quivering pulp. > > She's far too tough to be hammered, let alone to a pulp. She's spent a > life in American politics, which is a hard place to survive in. > > Trump has gotten a taste, and failed the test miserably. A little > criticism via Twitter and he flies off the handle. He is VERY thin skinned. She is not. > You're observant enough to see he's unfit to be President, right? > > First he'll "soften" his stances on immigration, deportation, the border > wall, and making Mexico pay for it. Then he'll disavow ALL of his > original positions. Wait and watch. I GUARANTEE it. Right... though his positions now are already all over the place. What wall? How tall? Where? He has no clue. >> They'll have to scoop her up off the floor before the first commercial >> break. Remember what he did to Tired Jeb, Little Marco, and Lyin Ted. >> Democrats will be in tears before it's over. It will be heartbreaking >> for them to watch her lose her mind and dignity on stage. > > At least she has a mind and some dignity to lose; Trump has neither. Scary but I agree. >> If it was me, I'd go after her right out of the gate: >> >> "Hillary, why are you yelling? We can hear you. Holy crap." (hand to ear). >> >> Or: >> >> "Hillary, I like what you're wearing tonight. What is that, a pantsuit?" > > That's about the level of juvenile discourse to be expected from Trump. He would do well in COLA. >> Treat her with the absolute disrespect that she has earned. Take control >> of the stage and put her on defense, making her address things outside >> the scripted narrative. Disrespect the moderators too if necessary. >> Play to the people for entertainment value. These moments will then >> be replayed on tv for weeks. It will be golden. > > > In other words, act like even more of an overgrown, teenage bully and > buffoon than he has so far. > > You're losing your mind. You are assuming he had one. :) -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 08:10 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nppbjq$l74$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366895 |
On 2016-08-25 8:06 PM, DFS wrote: > On 8/24/2016 2:27 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/24/16, 10:51 AM, in article npkmro$ec6$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >>> <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >>> >> ... >>> >>> Now it is a different game: one-to-one. And on that front how much do >>> you >>> think the media, who heavily backs Clinton, is going to allow Trump >>> to troll >>> them? To some extent, sure... they love the ratings his antics bring >>> the but >>> they are FUNDING Clinton. The same games will not work. >>> >> >> Trump is going to destroy her in the first debate. He will not >> hold back on her like Bernie did. He will bring up every one of her >> scandals and failures. > > > As he should. Much of it is fair game - some of it has a bearing on her > judgement and leadership abilities. > > And I hope she brings up Trump's flip-flops and hypocrisy on just about > everything, bankruptcies, product outsourcing, using H-1B workers, > mocking the disabled reporter, failure to honor real war heroes, and his > sex creepiness toward daughter Ivanka. > > ------------------------------- > "She does have a very nice figure. I've said if Ivanka weren't my > daughter, perhaps I'd be dating her." > ------------------------------- > Wendy Williams: "Ivanka, what's the favorite thing you have in common > with your father? > > Ivanka: "Either real estate or golf." > > Trump: "Well, I was going to say sex, but I can't relate that to her." > ------------------------------- > “Yeah, she’s really something, and what a beauty, that one. If I weren’t > happily married and, ya know, her father . . . ” > ------------------------------- I don't see why it is such a problem that Trump noticed that his daughter is such a catch. People are always willing to misinterpret what he said but even if what he said sounded creepy, it has no bearing whatsoever on his ability to do the president's job. Bill Clinton raped most of the women he came across and you Americans still voted his hillbilly ass in, didn't you? > Maybe the Dems will bring up what he said about Rosie O'Donnell: > > "She talks like a truck driver, she doesn’t have her facts, she’ll say > anything that comes to her mind.” > > What a PKB. I don't see how anyone can defend Rosie O'Donnell; she is a lot more disgusting than he describes her as being. Pigs would be ashamed to be associated with her if they understood that they were being compared to such a grotesque creature. > And what kind of $10-billionaire asks for donations to his political > campaign? Why would an evil cunt who's made hundreds of millions of dollars off the backs of innocent people and by selling America's future ask for donations for hers? >> It won't matter what question is asked. He will >> use every speaking opportunity to hammer her into a quivering pulp. > > She's far too tough to be hammered, let alone to a pulp. She's spent a > life in American politics, which is a hard place to survive in. > > Trump has gotten a taste, and failed the test miserably. A little > criticism via Twitter and he flies off the handle. > > You're observant enough to see he's unfit to be President, right? > > First he'll "soften" his stances on immigration, deportation, the border > wall, and making Mexico pay for it. Then he'll disavow ALL of his > original positions. Wait and watch. I GUARANTEE it. It won't be the result of him not wanting to do it; it will be the result of laws and agencies preventing him from doing it. >> They'll have to scoop her up off the floor before the first commercial >> break. Remember what he did to Tired Jeb, Little Marco, and Lyin Ted. >> Democrats will be in tears before it's over. It will be heartbreaking >> for them to watch her lose her mind and dignity on stage. > > At least she has a mind and some dignity to lose; Trump has neither. Hillary has neither mind nor dignity. < snip > -- Silver Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 09:07 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nppevn$g9$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366969 |
On 8/26/2016 8:10 AM, Silver Slimer wrote: > Bill Clinton raped > most of the women he came across and you Americans still voted his > hillbilly ass in, didn't you? *plonk*
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 20 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web