Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #366298 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-22 20:04 +0000 |
| Last post | 2016-08-25 08:38 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 382 — 16 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 20:04 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 13:35 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 20:47 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 13:51 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 21:07 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 14:16 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 21:32 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 14:38 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 22:04 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 15:22 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 23:00 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 16:13 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 16:00 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 09:11 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 16:22 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 09:37 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 16:54 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 10:14 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 17:21 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 10:29 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 17:43 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:03 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 09:51 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 14:17 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 09:05 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 11:51 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:01 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 18:27 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:46 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 21:17 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 10:07 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:41 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 20:06 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 00:13 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 20:33 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 01:24 +0000
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 08:14 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:26 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 08:10 -0400
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-26 09:07 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 13:37 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-26 09:56 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 10:42 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:23 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:29 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 10:41 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:23 -0700
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 09:17 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:08 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 10:17 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:32 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 09:24 -0700
Re: Another day chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-26 11:27 -0500
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:36 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:45 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 13:52 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 13:43 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 17:18 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 14:39 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 18:42 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 17:24 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-27 00:09 +0000
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 17:33 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:29 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 12:08 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 18:26 -0600
Re: Another day ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-27 04:21 +0000
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 21:46 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-27 05:15 +0000
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-27 05:42 +0000
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 00:07 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:30 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 12:09 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 18:27 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 19:06 -0700
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 09:20 +0200
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 10:04 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 01:06 -0700
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 10:23 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 01:39 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 01:09 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 01:27 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-27 15:10 -0400
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 21:58 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 13:17 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 18:28 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 19:15 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-28 09:38 -0400
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 22:22 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 13:37 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-27 19:10 -0400
Re: Another day ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 03:20 +0000
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-28 09:35 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-28 09:16 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 10:03 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-27 15:02 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:19 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 15:34 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 19:03 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:28 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:27 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 12:06 -0700
Re: Another day -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-27 15:30 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 18:20 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 18:24 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 19:01 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 19:42 -0700
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 07:39 -0700
Re: Another day William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-08-28 16:22 +0100
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 09:50 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 15:29 -0400
Re: Another day ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 20:16 +0000
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 17:40 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 15:14 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 18:19 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 16:18 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 19:40 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 16:42 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 19:44 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 16:56 -0700
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 19:59 -0400
Re: Another day Andy Rains <andyrains@myself.com> - 2016-08-28 18:16 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-28 09:08 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-28 09:17 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-29 09:06 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-28 09:42 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 08:12 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-28 11:50 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 10:00 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-28 19:22 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 16:57 -0700
Re: Another day Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-08-29 18:39 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 15:43 -0700
Re: Another day ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 23:12 +0000
Re: Another day ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 23:15 +0000
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 17:09 -0700
Re: Another day Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-08-29 20:52 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 18:13 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-29 19:34 -0400
Re: Another day Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-30 01:49 +0200
Re: Another day Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-30 01:46 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 17:21 -0700
Re: Another day Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-30 02:26 +0200
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 17:33 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-30 09:16 -0400
Re: Another day Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-30 15:26 +0200
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-28 12:38 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 17:16 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 14:23 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:20 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 15:35 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 18:38 -0400
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 01:50 +0200
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 20:13 -0400
Re: Another day Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 09:19 +0200
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:35 -0600
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 12:15 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-29 11:02 -0400
Re: Another day Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-29 08:08 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-27 15:10 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:21 -0600
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 09:36 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 16:43 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 10:00 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 17:08 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 10:16 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 17:32 +0000
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 10:39 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 18:04 +0000
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:39 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 10:53 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 14:26 -0400
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 12:23 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 18:06 +0000
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 19:11 +0000
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:22 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 10:11 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 17:29 +0000
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 18:12 +0000
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 19:19 +0000
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 10:33 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 21:20 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 21:27 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 14:04 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:07 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 18:00 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:18 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 23:40 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 08:26 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:37 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:42 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 11:49 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 14:08 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 21:18 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:47 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 12:00 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:13 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 15:57 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:16 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 22:31 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:44 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 23:00 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 16:07 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:25 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 21:40 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:22 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 21:39 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 11:59 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:41 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 21:14 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:50 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:39 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 12:07 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:44 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:17 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-23 20:07 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 01:02 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 09:59 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 14:25 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 10:58 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 15:16 +0000
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:16 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 21:34 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:09 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-23 20:08 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 01:10 +0000
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:28 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 10:12 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 09:03 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:20 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:41 -0700
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 12:29 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:55 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:11 -0700
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 13:20 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:33 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:45 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:50 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 14:02 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:54 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:10 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:19 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 09:32 -0400
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 10:54 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 11:08 -0400
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 12:03 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 12:47 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:19 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 11:59 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 11:16 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 15:59 -0600
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 22:13 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:18 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:29 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-23 15:14 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:33 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 07:56 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:23 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:43 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:53 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:10 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:22 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:26 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 20:36 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:46 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 20:58 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:14 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:18 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-23 20:47 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 01:24 +0000
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:48 -0600
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 05:06 +0000
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:27 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 10:24 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 14:34 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 10:58 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 15:14 +0000
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:30 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 10:00 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 08:58 -0700
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 09:24 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:31 -0600
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 12:16 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:51 -0600
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 13:17 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 20:56 -0600
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 20:33 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:16 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:30 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 11:49 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:48 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:09 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 20:55 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:13 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:15 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 11:44 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:22 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:48 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 07:57 -0400
Re: Another day -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-26 06:41 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:35 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 13:51 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:17 -0600
Re: Another day Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 13:03 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:36 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 16:09 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 09:27 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:33 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:44 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 13:44 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 17:14 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:10 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 13:48 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:16 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:24 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:28 -0600
Re: Another day Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-08-25 07:10 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-23 22:46 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 09:58 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 14:28 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 08:54 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 13:47 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 13:08 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 20:45 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 20:03 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 12:00 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 11:12 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:09 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:37 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 14:50 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:07 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 19:23 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:25 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 10:44 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:47 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 11:58 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 11:04 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:05 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:37 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 23:38 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:39 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:26 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 13:42 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 14:47 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 11:53 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 17:04 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 19:20 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:24 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:36 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 23:37 -0600
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 07:53 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 11:56 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 11:04 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 11:53 -0600
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 19:16 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 23:22 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 19:24 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 23:37 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:26 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 02:51 +0000
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 22:54 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 19:59 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 03:01 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 21:19 -0700
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 19:56 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 03:00 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 20:31 -0700
Re: Another day DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 22:29 -0400
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 02:50 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 19:57 -0700
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 03:04 +0000
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 20:31 -0700
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 08:22 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 07:58 -0400
Re: Another day Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:26 -0700
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:44 -0600
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 12:43 -0600
Re: Another day "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-24 19:15 +0000
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 10:19 -0400
Re: Another day GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 11:51 -0600
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 14:42 -0400
Re: Another day Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 08:38 -0400
Page 18 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 … 16 17 [18] 19 20 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 08:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E5B0C2.7A3B1%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366953 |
On 8/25/16, 10:38 PM, in article npokkf$ejj$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >>>> By all means show the NBC site acting as those two sites you pointed to >>>> act. I just went to their home page... did load a bit slowly and jump >>>> around some, but nothing like the sites you pointed to... and the >>>> articles are not designed to be unreadable. They want you to see their >>>> content. Does not mean they do not have ads (they do) but they make >>>> their content readable. You can scroll up and down, select, and >>>> otherwise actually see it. >>>> >>> In other words, you won't even trust what the secret service agents has >>> to say then? >>> >>> Amazing. >> >> Blindly... no. But what agent are you talking about? >> >> > The secret service agents that had to protect her... that's who. I have heard of one who has come out making claims... but before you talked about her own emails. When you are rich and powerful people close to you will say all sorts of things. They MIGHT be right. They might not be. We do know, directly from her own mouth, she lies and deceives and refuses to answer questions. We know from strong statistical evidence she has benefitted from election fraud. But I will not accuse her of things I cannot back strongly. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 11:26 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nppu3r$mqk$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #367020 |
Snit wrote: > On 8/25/16, 10:38 PM, in article npokkf$ejj$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" > <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: > >>>>> By all means show the NBC site acting as those two sites you pointed >>>>> to act. I just went to their home page... did load a bit slowly and >>>>> jump around some, but nothing like the sites you pointed to... and the >>>>> articles are not designed to be unreadable. They want you to see their >>>>> content. Does not mean they do not have ads (they do) but they make >>>>> their content readable. You can scroll up and down, select, and >>>>> otherwise actually see it. >>>>> >>>> In other words, you won't even trust what the secret service agents has >>>> to say then? >>>> >>>> Amazing. >>> >>> Blindly... no. But what agent are you talking about? >>> >>> >> The secret service agents that had to protect her... that's who. > > I have heard of one who has come out making claims... but before you > talked about her own emails. > > When you are rich and powerful people close to you will say all sorts of > things. They MIGHT be right. They might not be. > > We do know, directly from her own mouth, she lies and deceives and refuses > to answer questions. We know from strong statistical evidence she has > benefitted from election fraud. But I will not accuse her of things I > cannot back strongly. > > A few of the claims made by the secret service when he was guarding her majesty, was when he had a K-9 dog with him and her response was "Get the fucking dog away from me". Another one was when she had somebody bring in the disadvantaged kids, she said "Get those fucking retards outta here". The secret service agent said she was the most foul mouthed woman he's ever met. -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 13:42 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <npq63o$l40$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #367075 |
Snit wrote: > On 8/26/16, 10:26 AM, in article nppu3r$mqk$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" > <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: > >> Snit wrote: >> >>> On 8/25/16, 10:38 PM, in article npokkf$ejj$2@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >>> <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>>> By all means show the NBC site acting as those two sites you pointed >>>>>>> to act. I just went to their home page... did load a bit slowly and >>>>>>> jump around some, but nothing like the sites you pointed to... and >>>>>>> the articles are not designed to be unreadable. They want you to see >>>>>>> their content. Does not mean they do not have ads (they do) but they >>>>>>> make their content readable. You can scroll up and down, select, and >>>>>>> otherwise actually see it. >>>>>>> >>>>>> In other words, you won't even trust what the secret service agents >>>>>> has to say then? >>>>>> >>>>>> Amazing. >>>>> >>>>> Blindly... no. But what agent are you talking about? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> The secret service agents that had to protect her... that's who. >>> >>> I have heard of one who has come out making claims... but before you >>> talked about her own emails. >>> >>> When you are rich and powerful people close to you will say all sorts of >>> things. They MIGHT be right. They might not be. >>> >>> We do know, directly from her own mouth, she lies and deceives and >>> refuses to answer questions. We know from strong statistical evidence >>> she has benefitted from election fraud. But I will not accuse her of >>> things I cannot back strongly. >> >> A few of the claims made by the secret service when he was guarding her >> majesty, > > The Queen of England? Who do you mean? Sarcasm. > >> was when he had a K-9 dog with him and her response was "Get the >> fucking dog away from me". Another one was when she had somebody bring >> in the disadvantaged kids, she said "Get those fucking retards outta >> here". The secret service agent said she was the most foul mouthed woman >> he's ever met. > > I have heard such things about Clinton but not the Queen of England (or > any other queen). Again, I take them with a grain of salt -- as I do some > of the accusations I have heard about Trump. They MIGHT be true (and it > would not be in the least bit surprising) but we do not know. > > -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 14:47 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <npnefe$3p6$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366753 |
On 2016-08-25 1:58 PM, GreyCloud wrote: > Snit wrote: > >> On 8/25/16, 7:44 AM, in article npn08r$f2g$1@dont-email.me, "Silver >> Slimer" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >> >>>>> One one side you have a person who has trolled the media well but does >>>>> not even have the support of his own party. >>>> >>>> I don't think he has trolled the media in the ways we think. It is the >>>> media that has been bought off to troll him instead. I don't hear one >>>> negative thing from the news media about Hillary. >>> >>> If they say something negative about her, it is because they often don't >>> have a choice. For instance, when her e-mails came out and showed a >>> conspiracy against Sanders, they had to comment on it in the hope of >>> keeping his supporters around to vote for her. However, their >>> perspective was not as negative as it should have been. More recently, >>> e-mails came out which showed her to indeed have some sort of >>> degenerative illness at least partly related to Parkinson's. >> >> I would like to see evidence of this.... real evidence, not a claim on >> infowars or whatever. No, you wouldn't, Snit. The only "sources" you trust are the ones being controlled by liberals which say whatever people like you want them to say. > Infowars has the best evidence so far. Even the Secret Service can't even > get the press to pay attention to their warnings, so they went to Infowars > to blow the whistle. Then Alex put them on air and the rest is their claims > that she isn't fit for office. When I first started reading Infowars and watching the Alex Jones Show, I took most of what he said with a grain of salt. That was around 2011 though I sporadically watched and read him before that. Now that much of what he predicted actually happened, I don't question Infowars as much. I do, however, question everything our state media, ABC, CNN and the others say as they not only constantly lie or change their position on a monthly basis. It's exhausting and only inexhaustible creatures from another planet who never sleep like Snit or people who think that they're "in the know" but only watch the news once in a blue moon can support them. < snip > -- Silver Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 11:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E48CBC.7A1E0%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366773 |
On 8/25/16, 11:47 AM, in article npnefe$3p6$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > On 2016-08-25 1:58 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >> Snit wrote: >> >>> On 8/25/16, 7:44 AM, in article npn08r$f2g$1@dont-email.me, "Silver >>> Slimer" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>> >>>>>> One one side you have a person who has trolled the media well but does >>>>>> not even have the support of his own party. >>>>> >>>>> I don't think he has trolled the media in the ways we think. It is the >>>>> media that has been bought off to troll him instead. I don't hear one >>>>> negative thing from the news media about Hillary. >>>> >>>> If they say something negative about her, it is because they often don't >>>> have a choice. For instance, when her e-mails came out and showed a >>>> conspiracy against Sanders, they had to comment on it in the hope of >>>> keeping his supporters around to vote for her. However, their >>>> perspective was not as negative as it should have been. More recently, >>>> e-mails came out which showed her to indeed have some sort of >>>> degenerative illness at least partly related to Parkinson's. >>> >>> I would like to see evidence of this.... real evidence, not a claim on >>> infowars or whatever. > > No, you wouldn't, Snit. The only "sources" you trust are the ones being > controlled by liberals which say whatever people like you want them to say. And you fold. OK. So you made a claim you have no evidence for, specifically that Clinton's emails show significant health issues. >> Infowars has the best evidence so far. Even the Secret Service can't even >> get the press to pay attention to their warnings, so they went to Infowars >> to blow the whistle. Then Alex put them on air and the rest is their claims >> that she isn't fit for office. > > When I first started reading Infowars and watching the Alex Jones Show, > I took most of what he said with a grain of salt. That was around 2011 > though I sporadically watched and read him before that. Now that much of > what he predicted actually happened, I don't question Infowars as much. <https://youtu.be/ZwURLwd8pEA> His predictions are absurd. > I do, however, question everything our state media, ABC, CNN and the > others say as they not only constantly lie or change their position on a > monthly basis. It's exhausting and only inexhaustible creatures from > another planet who never sleep like Snit or people who think that > they're "in the know" but only watch the news once in a blue moon can > support them. Again, you lie about me. Why? Frankly it shows insecurity on your part. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 17:04 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <npntie$pb0$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366773 |
Silver Slimer wrote: > On 2016-08-25 1:58 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >> Snit wrote: >> >>> On 8/25/16, 7:44 AM, in article npn08r$f2g$1@dont-email.me, "Silver >>> Slimer" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>> >>>>>> One one side you have a person who has trolled the media well but >>>>>> does not even have the support of his own party. >>>>> >>>>> I don't think he has trolled the media in the ways we think. It is >>>>> the >>>>> media that has been bought off to troll him instead. I don't hear one >>>>> negative thing from the news media about Hillary. >>>> >>>> If they say something negative about her, it is because they often >>>> don't have a choice. For instance, when her e-mails came out and showed >>>> a conspiracy against Sanders, they had to comment on it in the hope of >>>> keeping his supporters around to vote for her. However, their >>>> perspective was not as negative as it should have been. More recently, >>>> e-mails came out which showed her to indeed have some sort of >>>> degenerative illness at least partly related to Parkinson's. >>> >>> I would like to see evidence of this.... real evidence, not a claim on >>> infowars or whatever. > > No, you wouldn't, Snit. The only "sources" you trust are the ones being > controlled by liberals which say whatever people like you want them to > say. > >> Infowars has the best evidence so far. Even the Secret Service can't >> even get the press to pay attention to their warnings, so they went to >> Infowars >> to blow the whistle. Then Alex put them on air and the rest is their >> claims that she isn't fit for office. > > When I first started reading Infowars and watching the Alex Jones Show, > I took most of what he said with a grain of salt. That was around 2011 > though I sporadically watched and read him before that. Now that much of > what he predicted actually happened, I don't question Infowars as much. > I do, however, question everything our state media, ABC, CNN and the > others say as they not only constantly lie or change their position on a > monthly basis. It's exhausting and only inexhaustible creatures from > another planet who never sleep like Snit or people who think that > they're "in the know" but only watch the news once in a blue moon can > support them. > > < snip > > This article from the russians seems to put it in the right light. http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2099.htm August 24, 2016 New York Times Hosts “Top Secret” Meet To Cover-up Hillary Clinton Health, Destroy Fox News By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers A stunning report circulating in the Kremlin today prepared by the Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) for the Security Council (SC) states that the New York Times hosted a “top secret” George Soros sponsored meeting on 22 August with at least 50 of America’s media elites where the hiding of Hillary Clinton’s grave health issues from the US public and the “destruction” of the Fox News Television Network was “strategized and discussed”. According to this report, this 22 August “top secret” meeting of these American media elites was held at the home of Alexander Soros, the 31-year- old playboy son of George Soros, at his “Hamptons”, New York, mansion where he “supplied/gave freely” to the participants a large number of female models for “companionship”—and that was described in one New York Times email as being the “must attend event of the season”. And much more at the link. -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 19:20 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <npnufo$sgm$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366879 |
On 2016-08-25 7:04 PM, GreyCloud wrote: > Silver Slimer wrote: > >> On 2016-08-25 1:58 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>> Snit wrote: >>> >>>> On 8/25/16, 7:44 AM, in article npn08r$f2g$1@dont-email.me, "Silver >>>> Slimer" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> One one side you have a person who has trolled the media well but >>>>>>> does not even have the support of his own party. >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't think he has trolled the media in the ways we think. It is >>>>>> the >>>>>> media that has been bought off to troll him instead. I don't hear one >>>>>> negative thing from the news media about Hillary. >>>>> >>>>> If they say something negative about her, it is because they often >>>>> don't have a choice. For instance, when her e-mails came out and showed >>>>> a conspiracy against Sanders, they had to comment on it in the hope of >>>>> keeping his supporters around to vote for her. However, their >>>>> perspective was not as negative as it should have been. More recently, >>>>> e-mails came out which showed her to indeed have some sort of >>>>> degenerative illness at least partly related to Parkinson's. >>>> >>>> I would like to see evidence of this.... real evidence, not a claim on >>>> infowars or whatever. >> >> No, you wouldn't, Snit. The only "sources" you trust are the ones being >> controlled by liberals which say whatever people like you want them to >> say. >> >>> Infowars has the best evidence so far. Even the Secret Service can't >>> even get the press to pay attention to their warnings, so they went to >>> Infowars >>> to blow the whistle. Then Alex put them on air and the rest is their >>> claims that she isn't fit for office. >> >> When I first started reading Infowars and watching the Alex Jones Show, >> I took most of what he said with a grain of salt. That was around 2011 >> though I sporadically watched and read him before that. Now that much of >> what he predicted actually happened, I don't question Infowars as much. >> I do, however, question everything our state media, ABC, CNN and the >> others say as they not only constantly lie or change their position on a >> monthly basis. It's exhausting and only inexhaustible creatures from >> another planet who never sleep like Snit or people who think that >> they're "in the know" but only watch the news once in a blue moon can >> support them. >> >> < snip > >> > This article from the russians seems to put it in the right light. > http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2099.htm > > August 24, 2016 > > New York Times Hosts “Top Secret” Meet To Cover-up Hillary Clinton Health, > Destroy Fox News > > By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers > > A stunning report circulating in the Kremlin today prepared by the Foreign > Intelligence Service (SVR) for the Security Council (SC) states that the New > York Times hosted a “top secret” George Soros sponsored meeting on 22 August > with at least 50 of America’s media elites where the hiding of Hillary > Clinton’s grave health issues from the US public and the “destruction” of > the Fox News Television Network was “strategized and discussed”. > > According to this report, this 22 August “top secret” meeting of these > American media elites was held at the home of Alexander Soros, the 31-year- > old playboy son of George Soros, at his “Hamptons”, New York, mansion where > he “supplied/gave freely” to the participants a large number of female > models for “companionship”—and that was described in one New York Times > email as being the “must attend event of the season”. > > And much more at the link. But this is opposite to what Snit believes so it can't be true! -- Silver Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 18:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E4E863.7A2FA%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366884 |
On 8/25/16, 4:20 PM, in article npnufo$sgm$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>> When I first started reading Infowars and watching the Alex Jones Show, >>> I took most of what he said with a grain of salt. That was around 2011 >>> though I sporadically watched and read him before that. Now that much of >>> what he predicted actually happened, I don't question Infowars as much. >>> I do, however, question everything our state media, ABC, CNN and the >>> others say as they not only constantly lie or change their position on a >>> monthly basis. It's exhausting and only inexhaustible creatures from >>> another planet who never sleep like Snit or people who think that >>> they're "in the know" but only watch the news once in a blue moon can >>> support them. >>> >>> < snip > >>> >> This article from the russians seems to put it in the right light. >> http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2099.htm >> >> August 24, 2016 >> >> New York Times Hosts ³Top Secret² Meet To Cover-up Hillary Clinton Health, >> Destroy Fox News >> >> By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers >> >> A stunning report circulating in the Kremlin today prepared by the Foreign >> Intelligence Service (SVR) for the Security Council (SC) states that the New >> York Times hosted a ³top secret² George Soros sponsored meeting on 22 August >> with at least 50 of America¹s media elites where the hiding of Hillary >> Clinton¹s grave health issues from the US public and the ³destruction² of >> the Fox News Television Network was ³strategized and discussed². >> >> According to this report, this 22 August ³top secret² meeting of these >> American media elites was held at the home of Alexander Soros, the 31-year- >> old playboy son of George Soros, at his ³Hamptons², New York, mansion where >> he ³supplied/gave freely² to the participants a large number of female >> models for ³companionship²‹and that was described in one New York Times >> email as being the ³must attend event of the season². >> >> And much more at the link. > > But this is opposite to what Snit believes so it can't be true! Opposite of what I believe? Sigh. I will bite... go on. Explain. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 17:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E4DD2B.7A2DF%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366879 |
On 8/25/16, 4:04 PM, in article npntie$pb0$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: > Silver Slimer wrote: > >> On 2016-08-25 1:58 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>> Snit wrote: >>> >>>> On 8/25/16, 7:44 AM, in article npn08r$f2g$1@dont-email.me, "Silver >>>> Slimer" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> One one side you have a person who has trolled the media well but >>>>>>> does not even have the support of his own party. >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't think he has trolled the media in the ways we think. It is >>>>>> the >>>>>> media that has been bought off to troll him instead. I don't hear one >>>>>> negative thing from the news media about Hillary. >>>>> >>>>> If they say something negative about her, it is because they often >>>>> don't have a choice. For instance, when her e-mails came out and showed >>>>> a conspiracy against Sanders, they had to comment on it in the hope of >>>>> keeping his supporters around to vote for her. However, their >>>>> perspective was not as negative as it should have been. More recently, >>>>> e-mails came out which showed her to indeed have some sort of >>>>> degenerative illness at least partly related to Parkinson's. >>>> >>>> I would like to see evidence of this.... real evidence, not a claim on >>>> infowars or whatever. >> >> No, you wouldn't, Snit. The only "sources" you trust are the ones being >> controlled by liberals which say whatever people like you want them to >> say. >> >>> Infowars has the best evidence so far. Even the Secret Service can't >>> even get the press to pay attention to their warnings, so they went to >>> Infowars >>> to blow the whistle. Then Alex put them on air and the rest is their >>> claims that she isn't fit for office. >> >> When I first started reading Infowars and watching the Alex Jones Show, >> I took most of what he said with a grain of salt. That was around 2011 >> though I sporadically watched and read him before that. Now that much of >> what he predicted actually happened, I don't question Infowars as much. >> I do, however, question everything our state media, ABC, CNN and the >> others say as they not only constantly lie or change their position on a >> monthly basis. It's exhausting and only inexhaustible creatures from >> another planet who never sleep like Snit or people who think that >> they're "in the know" but only watch the news once in a blue moon can >> support them. >> >> < snip > >> > This article from the russians seems to put it in the right light. > http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2099.htm > > August 24, 2016 > > New York Times Hosts ³Top Secret² Meet To Cover-up Hillary Clinton Health, > Destroy Fox News > > By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers > > A stunning report circulating in the Kremlin today prepared by the Foreign > Intelligence Service (SVR) for the Security Council (SC) states that the New > York Times hosted a ³top secret² George Soros sponsored meeting on 22 August > with at least 50 of America¹s media elites where the hiding of Hillary > Clinton¹s grave health issues from the US public and the ³destruction² of > the Fox News Television Network was ³strategized and discussed². > > According to this report, this 22 August ³top secret² meeting of these > American media elites was held at the home of Alexander Soros, the 31-year- > old playboy son of George Soros, at his ³Hamptons², New York, mansion where > he ³supplied/gave freely² to the participants a large number of female > models for ³companionship²‹and that was described in one New York Times > email as being the ³must attend event of the season². > > And much more at the link. Didn't you say before it was Clinton's emails which showed her health issues? -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 23:37 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <npokj7$ejj$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366909 |
Snit wrote: > On 8/25/16, 4:04 PM, in article npntie$pb0$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" > <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: > >> Silver Slimer wrote: >> >>> On 2016-08-25 1:58 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>> Snit wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 8/25/16, 7:44 AM, in article npn08r$f2g$1@dont-email.me, "Silver >>>>> Slimer" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>> One one side you have a person who has trolled the media well but >>>>>>>> does not even have the support of his own party. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't think he has trolled the media in the ways we think. It is >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> media that has been bought off to troll him instead. I don't hear >>>>>>> one negative thing from the news media about Hillary. >>>>>> >>>>>> If they say something negative about her, it is because they often >>>>>> don't have a choice. For instance, when her e-mails came out and >>>>>> showed a conspiracy against Sanders, they had to comment on it in the >>>>>> hope of keeping his supporters around to vote for her. However, their >>>>>> perspective was not as negative as it should have been. More >>>>>> recently, e-mails came out which showed her to indeed have some sort >>>>>> of degenerative illness at least partly related to Parkinson's. >>>>> >>>>> I would like to see evidence of this.... real evidence, not a claim on >>>>> infowars or whatever. >>> >>> No, you wouldn't, Snit. The only "sources" you trust are the ones being >>> controlled by liberals which say whatever people like you want them to >>> say. >>> >>>> Infowars has the best evidence so far. Even the Secret Service can't >>>> even get the press to pay attention to their warnings, so they went to >>>> Infowars >>>> to blow the whistle. Then Alex put them on air and the rest is their >>>> claims that she isn't fit for office. >>> >>> When I first started reading Infowars and watching the Alex Jones Show, >>> I took most of what he said with a grain of salt. That was around 2011 >>> though I sporadically watched and read him before that. Now that much of >>> what he predicted actually happened, I don't question Infowars as much. >>> I do, however, question everything our state media, ABC, CNN and the >>> others say as they not only constantly lie or change their position on a >>> monthly basis. It's exhausting and only inexhaustible creatures from >>> another planet who never sleep like Snit or people who think that >>> they're "in the know" but only watch the news once in a blue moon can >>> support them. >>> >>> < snip > >>> >> This article from the russians seems to put it in the right light. >> http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2099.htm >> >> August 24, 2016 >> >> New York Times Hosts ³Top Secret² Meet To Cover-up Hillary Clinton >> Health, Destroy Fox News >> >> By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers >> >> A stunning report circulating in the Kremlin today prepared by the >> Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) for the Security Council (SC) states >> that the New York Times hosted a ³top secret² George Soros sponsored >> meeting on 22 August with at least 50 of America¹s media elites where the >> hiding of Hillary Clinton¹s grave health issues from the US public and >> the ³destruction² of the Fox News Television Network was ³strategized and >> discussed². >> >> According to this report, this 22 August ³top secret² meeting of these >> American media elites was held at the home of Alexander Soros, the >> 31-year- old playboy son of George Soros, at his ³Hamptons², New York, >> mansion where he ³supplied/gave freely² to the participants a large >> number of female models for ³companionship²and that was described in one >> New York Times email as being the ³must attend event of the season². >> >> And much more at the link. > > Didn't you say before it was Clinton's emails which showed her health > issues? > Yes, so? It was a romanian hacker that got to them first, then gave them to the russians. Next, hillary said she got the idea of using her own personal email server from Colin Powell, which he said was a lie. She must have something wrong with her to tell so many lies. -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 07:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E5A5F3.7A38C%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366952 |
On 8/25/16, 10:37 PM, in article npokj7$ejj$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >>> According to this report, this 22 August ³top secret² meeting of these >>> American media elites was held at the home of Alexander Soros, the >>> 31-year- old playboy son of George Soros, at his ³Hamptons², New York, >>> mansion where he ³supplied/gave freely² to the participants a large >>> number of female models for ³companionship²땇nd that was described in one >>> New York Times email as being the ³must attend event of the season². >>> >>> And much more at the link. >> >> Didn't you say before it was Clinton's emails which showed her health >> issues? >> > Yes, so? Any support for that? > It was a romanian hacker that got to them first, then gave them to the > russians. Next, hillary said she got the idea of using her own personal > email server from Colin Powell, which he said was a lie. > She must have something wrong with her to tell so many lies. I am not in any way denying she is a liar. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 11:56 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <npnbg7$n6v$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366676 |
Silver Slimer wrote: > On 2016-08-24 10:45 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >> Snit wrote: >> >>> On 8/24/16, 12:47 PM, in article npktk9$940$1@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >>> <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 8/24/16, 7:28 AM, in article fhjavi903.afgp0@perch.invalid, >>>>> "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 8/24/2016 12:46 AM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>>>>>> On 08/23/16 18:47, DFS wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 8/23/2016 5:59 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I find Trump mostly honest. I don't know what lies he's told yet. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> They're not "lies". They're flip-flops. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/full-list-donald- >> trump- >>>> s-rapi >>>>>>>>> dly-changing-policy-positions-n547801 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As if the liars can ever tell the truth, once they are paid in >>>>>>>> full. The only flip flops is the cabal panicing over this. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The ONLY flip-flops are Trump saying something different week after >>>>>>> week. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> http://ow.ly/DFO6303xA1D >>>>>> Get used to it. >>>>>> >>>>> He has almost no chance of winning. By your own standards you should >>>>> not vote for him. >>>> >>>> Says who? >>> >>> One one side you have a person who has trolled the media well but does >>> not even have the support of his own party. >> >> I don't think he has trolled the media in the ways we think. It is the >> media that has been bought off to troll him instead. I don't hear one >> negative thing from the news media about Hillary. > > If they say something negative about her, it is because they often don't > have a choice. For instance, when her e-mails came out and showed a > conspiracy against Sanders, they had to comment on it in the hope of > keeping his supporters around to vote for her. However, their > perspective was not as negative as it should have been. More recently, > e-mails came out which showed her to indeed have some sort of > degenerative illness at least partly related to Parkinson's. Has the > media even bothered to mention it? Only Breitbart and smaller right-wing > enterprises as far as I know. CNN, for its part, concealed everything. > >> Who is doing the paying off of the media? I'm sure it is the banking >> cabal. After all, didn't he make some rather blunt claims against the >> banks? > > They don't need to be paid off as they gain as much as their owners from > putting Hillary in power. Yes, it is hillarys' pay-to-play ponzi scheme that is making her rich. But the banking cabal is pulling the strings on their puppets, the major news media, which jump at their beck and call. > Many of these supposed news agencies would > already have been out of business if they had not first been purchased > by a left-leaning person of wealth and would have been forgotten > entirely had channels like CNN not referred to their propaganda to > advance any of their on-air agendas. If you consider places like > Facebook, making sure that Hillary gets power ensures that the borders > are open. They want the borders to remain open to ensure that they can > continue to find workers who will accept lower wages and have said so > themselves on the http://www.fwd.us/ website. I wouldn't be surprised to > discover that their support for sand parasite migrants and uneducated > spics in the United States is a result of ensuring that there is a > constant supply of people willing to work for less which would force > existing citizens to lower their own demands. > I don't doubt that. But the lower paid laboring group, the 94,000,000 number, is getting the shaft. >>> On the other side you have a person who has a massive and dishonest >>> political machine behind her and a party that is willing to cheat to >>> help her and a media that is willing to fund her. >>> >>> I think it is pretty clear how this is going to end. >>> >> Oh, not completely. Some venture to say that she may not make it to >> election time. If that happens, who will be the new presidential >> candidate? Tim Kaine? > > Very likely. > I'll have to look into his background from my insiders. -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 11:04 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <npn1eh$fju$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366591 |
On 8/24/2016 10:45 PM, GreyCloud wrote: > Some venture to say that she may not make it to election time. Which drooling idiots say that? Look at "the Devil" having an imminent death seizure due to her advanced brain cancer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-lrMjAB3MzA ps Are you actually a grown man, GC?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 11:53 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <npnbat$n6v$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366685 |
DFS wrote: > On 8/24/2016 10:45 PM, GreyCloud wrote: > > >> Some venture to say that she may not make it to election time. > > > Which drooling idiots say that? > Oh, the doctors that are attending to her. > > > Look at "the Devil" having an imminent death seizure due to her advanced > brain cancer: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-lrMjAB3MzA > > > ps Are you actually a grown man, GC? Yes, are you? Only a fool would believe in all the lies of Hillary, especially when she left the white house with bill stealing all of our nations priceless artifacts. One thing is certain, she is a thief. -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 19:16 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <npnuac$s6r$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366751 |
On 8/25/2016 1:53 PM, GreyCloud wrote: > DFS wrote: > >> On 8/24/2016 10:45 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >> >> >>> Some venture to say that she may not make it to election time. >> >> >> Which drooling idiots say that? >> > > Oh, the doctors that are attending to her. Which doctors? Witch doctors? >> Look at "the Devil" having an imminent death seizure due to her advanced >> brain cancer: >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-lrMjAB3MzA >> >> >> ps Are you actually a grown man, GC? > > Yes, are you? > > Only a fool would believe in all the lies of Hillary, especially when she > left the white house with bill stealing all of our nations priceless > artifacts. One thing is certain, she is a thief. And a murderer... don't forget murderer. And the Devil. And the co-founder of ISIS.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 23:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hgfbdn39.ap@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366883 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 8/25/2016 1:53 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >> >> Only a fool would believe in all the lies of Hillary, especially when she >> left the white house with bill stealing all of our nations priceless >> artifacts. One thing is certain, she is a thief. > > > And a murderer... don't forget murderer. And the Devil. And the > co-founder of ISIS. > And knowing all of that, you still support her. Sad.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 19:24 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <npnuo5$sut$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366885 |
On 8/25/2016 7:22 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >> On 8/25/2016 1:53 PM, GreyCloud wrote: > >>> >>> Only a fool would believe in all the lies of Hillary, especially when she >>> left the white house with bill stealing all of our nations priceless >>> artifacts. One thing is certain, she is a thief. >> >> >> And a murderer... don't forget murderer. And the Devil. And the >> co-founder of ISIS. >> > > And knowing all of that, you still support her. Liar. > Sad. You and GreyCloud babbling on sure is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 23:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hjfo0a3.ago@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366888 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 8/25/2016 7:22 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>> On 8/25/2016 1:53 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >> >>>> >>>> Only a fool would believe in all the lies of Hillary, especially when she >>>> left the white house with bill stealing all of our nations priceless >>>> artifacts. One thing is certain, she is a thief. >>> >>> >>> And a murderer... don't forget murderer. And the Devil. And the >>> co-founder of ISIS. >>> >> >> And knowing all of that, you still support her. > > Liar. > You've said already that you're going to vote in a way that benefits her. That's the kind of support that matters. > >> Sad. > > > You and GreyCloud babbling on sure is. > You blindly believe everything the MSM tells you and think that all other sources of information are kooky. Say it with me, "baa-aaa-aaa-aaa."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-25 18:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E4E8BD.7A301%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366892 |
On 8/25/16, 4:37 PM, in article hjfo0a3.ago@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >> On 8/25/2016 7:22 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>> On 8/25/2016 1:53 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>> >>>>> >>>>> Only a fool would believe in all the lies of Hillary, especially when she >>>>> left the white house with bill stealing all of our nations priceless >>>>> artifacts. One thing is certain, she is a thief. >>>> >>>> >>>> And a murderer... don't forget murderer. And the Devil. And the >>>> co-founder of ISIS. >>>> >>> >>> And knowing all of that, you still support her. >> >> Liar. >> > > You've said already that you're going to vote in a way > that benefits her. That's the kind of support that matters. Why don't you just stop lying about how people are voting? >> >>> Sad. >> >> >> You and GreyCloud babbling on sure is. >> > > You blindly believe everything the MSM tells you and think > that all other sources of information are kooky. Say it > with me, "baa-aaa-aaa-aaa." And this is just you saying you cannot defend your tin foil hat nonsense. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 02:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhjgbcuz03.a@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366922 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/25/16, 4:37 PM, in article hjfo0a3.ago@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>> On 8/25/2016 7:22 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>> On 8/25/2016 1:53 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Only a fool would believe in all the lies of Hillary, especially when she >>>>>> left the white house with bill stealing all of our nations priceless >>>>>> artifacts. One thing is certain, she is a thief. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> And a murderer... don't forget murderer. And the Devil. And the >>>>> co-founder of ISIS. >>>>> >>>> >>>> And knowing all of that, you still support her. >>> >>> Liar. >>> >> >> You've said already that you're going to vote in a way >> that benefits her. That's the kind of support that matters. > > Why don't you just stop lying about how people are voting? > Why don't you go fuck your daughter before some other freak pretending to be a tranny gets there first.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 18 of 20 — ← Prev page 1 … 16 17 [18] 19 20 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web