Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #370649 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-09-13 20:05 +0000 |
| Last post | 2016-09-17 21:27 +0200 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 476 — 19 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-09-13 20:05 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-09-13 20:23 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-09-14 09:46 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-14 11:27 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-14 12:45 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-14 12:21 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-14 14:36 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 19:40 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-14 08:42 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-14 14:44 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-14 08:15 -0500
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-14 14:44 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-14 16:12 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-14 15:49 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-14 10:13 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-14 16:17 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-14 15:54 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-14 12:17 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-15 09:39 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 11:20 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-15 11:06 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 12:28 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-15 15:01 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-15 15:02 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 20:11 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 20:34 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 21:36 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 22:27 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 22:52 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-16 00:14 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-16 07:11 -0500
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 14:13 -0700
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-16 04:03 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-16 05:13 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-16 06:19 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-16 06:51 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-16 07:36 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-16 17:09 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-16 18:40 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-16 19:45 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-16 19:55 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-16 20:25 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-16 20:49 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-16 21:08 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-17 01:23 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-17 08:10 -0500
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 13:36 -0700
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-16 21:42 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-16 23:20 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-16 23:48 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-16 14:53 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Yolanda Squatpump <y16spumpSPAMNO@post.com> - 2016-09-16 15:25 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-09-16 13:42 -0600
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-16 20:21 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-16 20:48 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-16 21:04 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-16 21:16 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-16 21:33 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-16 21:37 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-09-16 16:38 -0600
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-17 01:42 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-09-17 11:41 -0600
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-16 23:16 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-16 21:35 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-09-16 16:36 -0600
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-09-16 08:51 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-16 10:25 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 16:32 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-16 00:49 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-16 03:58 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-16 10:33 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-16 11:16 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-09-16 09:06 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-16 15:40 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-09-16 13:41 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-16 15:48 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-09-16 14:05 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-16 16:17 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-16 15:47 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-09-16 13:49 -0600
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-16 15:46 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-09-16 10:21 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-16 16:39 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-09-16 13:53 -0600
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-16 15:18 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-09-16 11:33 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-16 16:29 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-16 15:41 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-16 16:59 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 10:03 -0700
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-16 17:27 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 08:30 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-15 15:06 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 12:06 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-15 17:39 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 18:42 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 21:11 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Godzilla <godzilla@lizardboss.invalid> - 2016-09-15 21:13 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 17:31 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-16 09:56 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-16 08:27 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-16 13:44 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-16 00:37 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 19:09 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-16 09:55 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-16 11:11 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-16 13:37 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-16 08:44 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-16 14:49 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-16 16:06 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-16 15:04 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-16 16:11 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-16 16:06 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-16 09:58 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-16 11:15 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-09-16 08:58 -0300
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-16 08:31 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-09-16 13:59 -0600
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-16 13:38 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-16 14:51 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-16 16:04 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-16 16:04 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-16 12:07 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-16 13:42 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-16 08:46 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 12:54 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-16 10:00 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-15 15:42 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 12:35 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-15 16:58 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 13:08 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-15 17:47 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 10:54 -0700
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 14:02 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-16 10:04 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-16 11:06 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-16 08:29 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-16 08:27 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-16 15:23 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-09-16 11:32 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-09-16 11:43 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-16 12:16 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-16 16:13 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-16 12:19 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-09-16 16:27 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-16 12:40 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-16 17:15 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-16 12:28 -0500
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 09:40 -0700
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-16 14:03 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 11:52 -0700
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-09-16 13:28 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-16 17:54 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-16 14:10 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-09-19 23:24 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-16 12:11 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-16 15:21 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-09-16 15:30 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-16 16:09 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-09-16 14:08 -0600
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-16 20:38 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-09-16 16:41 -0600
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-16 12:12 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-16 18:38 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-14 15:46 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-14 11:57 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-14 15:44 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-14 12:39 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-14 17:00 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-14 15:47 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-14 20:08 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-14 16:26 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-14 22:57 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-14 17:03 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 00:24 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-14 18:55 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 01:02 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-14 19:11 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-15 09:44 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 11:18 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-15 10:59 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 12:04 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 12:07 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 08:38 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-15 15:07 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 20:35 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-15 15:07 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-09-14 18:42 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-15 09:46 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 11:15 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-15 10:58 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 08:31 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-15 15:09 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 12:07 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-15 06:55 -0500
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-14 21:34 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-14 21:38 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-14 17:48 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-14 22:12 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-14 18:49 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 00:54 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-14 19:04 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-15 00:34 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-14 20:38 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-15 01:20 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-15 00:28 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-14 20:37 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-15 01:12 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 08:07 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-15 15:28 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 12:23 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 21:08 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-16 07:01 -0500
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-16 14:43 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 09:32 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 08:28 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 14:38 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 08:45 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 15:07 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 12:04 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-15 15:01 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-09-15 15:10 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-15 16:12 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-15 10:21 -0500
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-15 16:07 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Godzilla <godzilla@lizardboss.invalid> - 2016-09-15 16:20 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 21:06 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 12:20 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-15 16:55 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 13:07 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-16 03:18 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-16 08:23 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-09-16 10:46 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-16 15:53 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-09-16 11:19 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-16 11:59 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-09-14 18:43 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-14 23:55 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-14 22:30 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 19:50 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 19:49 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Alfred Holtz <alfredismyname@myself.com> - 2016-09-14 12:15 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-09-14 10:18 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-14 15:20 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 19:48 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-14 20:03 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-14 22:18 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 00:49 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-15 01:22 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 01:27 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 09:27 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 12:04 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 07:59 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-15 06:47 -0500
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 12:00 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-15 14:08 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-15 09:18 -0500
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 21:04 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Godzilla <godzilla@lizardboss.invalid> - 2016-09-15 21:09 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-09-16 05:44 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Godzilla <godzilla@lizardboss.invalid> - 2016-09-16 11:59 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-09-16 09:39 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Godzilla <godzilla@lizardboss.invalid> - 2016-09-16 14:32 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-16 15:52 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-09-16 11:35 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Godzilla <godzilla@lizardboss.invalid> - 2016-09-16 15:49 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-15 15:47 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 21:03 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-16 00:08 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-09-15 22:10 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 18:15 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-09-15 22:18 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-16 00:36 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 18:53 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 18:14 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-16 00:20 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 18:57 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 18:59 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-09-15 23:15 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 19:50 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-16 01:12 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-09-16 01:16 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-16 02:22 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-16 02:01 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-16 01:01 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 21:14 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-09-16 01:17 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-16 04:25 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-16 08:15 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-16 14:42 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-16 07:53 -0500
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-16 04:21 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-16 06:55 -0500
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-16 14:40 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-16 08:24 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-16 15:57 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 18:11 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 18:55 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-16 00:57 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 21:14 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 00:18 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-14 18:54 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 00:52 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Godzilla <godzilla@lizardboss.invalid> - 2016-09-14 22:20 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-14 22:30 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-14 22:33 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-14 23:39 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 00:54 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 08:00 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-15 15:27 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 12:06 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-15 15:18 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 20:57 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Godzilla <godzilla@lizardboss.invalid> - 2016-09-14 23:10 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-14 19:12 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Godzilla <godzilla@lizardboss.invalid> - 2016-09-14 23:24 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-14 19:45 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-09-14 18:35 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Godzilla <godzilla@lizardboss.invalid> - 2016-09-14 23:01 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 00:55 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 00:47 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 07:58 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 14:25 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 08:43 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 15:05 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-15 08:42 -0500
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-09-17 10:00 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 12:04 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 20:09 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-15 07:48 -0500
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-15 15:31 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-15 15:34 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 17:33 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-16 10:09 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-16 11:19 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-16 13:29 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-16 14:36 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-16 08:42 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-16 14:48 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-16 08:50 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Alfred Holtz <alfredismyname@myself.com> - 2016-09-16 13:11 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-16 07:59 -0500
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-09-16 10:28 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-09-16 14:35 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-16 09:57 -0500
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-09-19 23:51 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 08:18 -0700
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-16 11:51 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-09-16 12:56 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-16 14:06 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-16 15:44 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-09-16 16:23 -0600
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-16 08:37 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-09-16 12:48 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-16 10:21 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-09-16 14:31 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-16 15:32 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-16 11:51 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-16 15:31 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Alfred Holtz <alfredismyname@myself.com> - 2016-09-16 11:34 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-16 17:41 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-16 16:16 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-16 16:23 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-09-16 13:33 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-16 12:14 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-09-16 13:10 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-16 14:08 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-16 17:22 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-16 15:27 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-15 13:21 -0500
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-15 18:42 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 16:22 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Godzilla <godzilla@lizardboss.invalid> - 2016-09-15 21:06 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 17:30 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 18:08 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-16 00:29 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 18:54 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-09-17 11:02 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 20:46 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 20:07 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 20:43 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 21:32 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 22:30 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-16 06:47 -0500
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 16:28 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 16:09 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-15 15:15 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 16:18 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-15 15:37 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 20:04 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 20:28 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 19:43 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-09-14 18:32 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 00:59 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-09-14 23:35 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-09-15 03:37 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-15 07:38 -0500
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-15 10:56 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 08:01 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 14:23 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 08:41 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 15:04 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 12:03 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 18:30 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 20:02 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 20:19 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 20:36 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 16:18 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 22:24 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 16:34 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 22:46 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 16:06 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 20:41 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 20:39 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 17:29 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 23:38 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 18:09 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-14 14:58 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-14 10:15 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-14 16:09 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-14 15:38 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Yolanda Squatpump <y16spumpSPAMNO@post.com> - 2016-09-14 15:44 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-15 09:49 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 11:15 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-15 10:52 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-14 10:53 -0500
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 09:15 -0700
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-14 12:37 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-14 16:58 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-14 12:28 -0500
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-14 15:46 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-14 20:06 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-09-14 18:40 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-09-14 20:46 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-09-15 06:43 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-15 07:01 -0500
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-09-16 20:15 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2016-09-16 20:51 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-09-17 06:57 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 00:56 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 19:54 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-09-14 19:54 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-14 20:00 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-09-14 15:21 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Yolanda Squatpump <y16spumpSPAMNO@post.com> - 2016-09-14 15:29 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-14 10:35 -0500
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-15 09:54 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 11:14 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-15 10:50 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 12:00 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 08:36 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 14:40 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 08:47 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 14:50 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 08:51 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-15 15:41 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 17:32 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 12:25 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-15 15:40 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-15 17:31 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-09-15 10:41 -0500
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 12:25 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-15 12:11 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 09:29 -0700
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-15 10:50 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy fr314159@gmail.com - 2016-09-14 07:08 -0700
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-14 16:16 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy fr314159@gmail.com - 2016-09-14 10:47 -0700
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-09-15 10:01 +0100
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-09-14 11:58 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy fr314159@gmail.com - 2016-09-14 10:51 -0700
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-09-14 14:36 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-09-14 23:08 +0000
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-09-14 11:57 -0400
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-17 21:05 +0200
Re: Microshit Enormous Failure -- GNU/Linux Joy Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-09-17 21:27 +0200
Page 2 of 24 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 24 Next page →
| From | Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-15 11:06 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <nrdrrh$r2n$1@deskrabbit.motzarella.org> |
| In reply to | #371035 |
On 15/09/2016 10:20, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > Desk Rabbit wrote: > >> On 14/09/2016 17:17, Silver Slimer wrote: >>> On 2016-09-14 10:54 AM, Desk Rabbit wrote: >>>> On 14/09/2016 15:17, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>>>> Silver Slimer wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2016-09-14 8:44 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>>>>>> Silver Slimer wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2016-09-14 7:21 AM, Desk Rabbit wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 14/09/2016 11:45, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Desk Rabbit babbled: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 14/09/2016 10:46, Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 20:23:14 -0400, DFS wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> self-contradicting >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Fuck you, insufferable turd brain. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You not only have the computer programming ability of >>>>>>>>>>>> a six-year-old girl, but your reading comprehension skills >>>>>>>>>>>> are at the same level as well. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> A registry hack is NOT a valid component of a GUI. Having >>>>>>>>>>>> to hack the registry to change window focus is equivalent >>>>>>>>>>>> to the diver of a car having to go under the hood to cut and >>>>>>>>>>>> splice wires just to turn on the headlights. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Shall we start discussing the number of functions of the Linux >>>>>>>>>>> Desktop GUI that must be changed by a config file rather than >>>>>>>>>>> via the >>>>>>>>>>> GUI or is that going to expose yet more of your stupidity and >>>>>>>>>>> hypocrisy? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> By all means, start to tell us. This should be good >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Idiot. You know even less about linux then the lying imbecile. >>>>>>>>>> And he >>>>>>>>>> knows >>>>>>>>>> nothing >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'll give you back your standard reply that if you can't figure it >>>>>>>>> out >>>>>>>>> or google it yourself then you are a moron. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Desk Rabbit, why are you even bothering to argue with Peter? If you >>>>>>>> show >>>>>>>> that Linux is anything but perfect, you are a dimbulb blah blah >>>>>>>> blah. He >>>>>>>> doesn't even consider the _possibility_ that Linux is lacking in any >>>>>>>> area. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I *know* that linux isn't perfect. Nothing is. >>>>>> >>>>>> So it's a trade-off between secure but unstable (Linux), >>>>> >>>>> Wrong. Linux is much more stable than windows could ever hope to be >>>> >>>> FX: Looks at circa 1000 workstations and servers being monitored showing >>>> that comment to be complete an utter bullshit. Also looks at the Global >>>> success that is the Microsoft Azure platform which is hosted on >>>> Microsoft Windows. Realises that Peter the Klown is just spouting yet >>>> more ill-informed and out of date nonsense from his isolation >>>> environment of working at home by himself in his underpants. >>>> >>>> Wake up Peter, this is 2016 not 1986, Windows is a stable platform just >>>> like Linux, you need to accept this fact. >>> >>> To be fair about Windows 95 and 98 in particular (ignore Windows ME), >>> they were both very stable platforms as long as you didn't use >>> third-party software. We all know that it's fairly impossible to do so, >>> but if you had a computer and only installed the drivers (and kept them >>> updated) and used say Microsoft Office and Internet Explorer, chances >>> are you never faced a blue screen or a freeze at all. I used to work >>> with a lot of techs who made the same claim. >>> >>> However, once XP came along, it no longer mattered whether third-party >>> software was used or not as the publishers had a better idea of how the >>> operating system functioned and wrote software which utilized its >>> functions more properly. As a result, things installed and uninstalled >>> more cleanly (not perfectly) and limited the problems. Vista and 7 were >>> also very stable (regardless of what advocates claim) as were 8 and 8.1. >>> In general, the operating system is stubbornly solid despite what we >>> throw at it. It IS insecure though... that's not likely to change yet. >>> >> >> Windows 10 is a lot better in that respect but I readily admit that >> Linux starts out more secure. >> >> But having said that, it is trivial to make Windows secure and it is >> also trivial to make Linux insecure. > > Oh, this seems to be a secret which is still unsolved by MS. Nope, it's unsolved by you. Need I remind you yet again that the entire Azure and Office 365 services run on the Windows platform? Can you point to one instance of that *ever* being hacked? > > Care to enlighten us, Dimbulb Rabbit? > > And would you also "teach us" about the methods needed to make linux > insecure? After all, since it is "trivial" according to you, this should be > easily explained in a few words > Really? I need to tell you? OK. Set your root password to 1234 or Create a user called guest and set the password to the same as the user name or In SSH do not disable password logins for root and give it a weak password I could go on but I think that's enough kicking of your arse for one day.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-15 12:28 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <nrdt3v$uuu$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #371045 |
Desk Rabbit wrote: > On 15/09/2016 10:20, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >> Desk Rabbit wrote: >> >>> On 14/09/2016 17:17, Silver Slimer wrote: >>>> On 2016-09-14 10:54 AM, Desk Rabbit wrote: >>>>> On 14/09/2016 15:17, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>>>>> Silver Slimer wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2016-09-14 8:44 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>>>>>>> Silver Slimer wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 2016-09-14 7:21 AM, Desk Rabbit wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 14/09/2016 11:45, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Desk Rabbit babbled: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/09/2016 10:46, Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 20:23:14 -0400, DFS wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> self-contradicting >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fuck you, insufferable turd brain. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You not only have the computer programming ability of >>>>>>>>>>>>> a six-year-old girl, but your reading comprehension skills >>>>>>>>>>>>> are at the same level as well. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> A registry hack is NOT a valid component of a GUI. Having >>>>>>>>>>>>> to hack the registry to change window focus is equivalent >>>>>>>>>>>>> to the diver of a car having to go under the hood to cut and >>>>>>>>>>>>> splice wires just to turn on the headlights. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Shall we start discussing the number of functions of the Linux >>>>>>>>>>>> Desktop GUI that must be changed by a config file rather than >>>>>>>>>>>> via the >>>>>>>>>>>> GUI or is that going to expose yet more of your stupidity and >>>>>>>>>>>> hypocrisy? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> By all means, start to tell us. This should be good >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Idiot. You know even less about linux then the lying imbecile. >>>>>>>>>>> And he >>>>>>>>>>> knows >>>>>>>>>>> nothing >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'll give you back your standard reply that if you can't figure >>>>>>>>>> it out >>>>>>>>>> or google it yourself then you are a moron. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Desk Rabbit, why are you even bothering to argue with Peter? If >>>>>>>>> you show >>>>>>>>> that Linux is anything but perfect, you are a dimbulb blah blah >>>>>>>>> blah. He >>>>>>>>> doesn't even consider the _possibility_ that Linux is lacking in >>>>>>>>> any area. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I *know* that linux isn't perfect. Nothing is. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So it's a trade-off between secure but unstable (Linux), >>>>>> >>>>>> Wrong. Linux is much more stable than windows could ever hope to be >>>>> >>>>> FX: Looks at circa 1000 workstations and servers being monitored >>>>> showing that comment to be complete an utter bullshit. Also looks at >>>>> the Global success that is the Microsoft Azure platform which is >>>>> hosted on Microsoft Windows. Realises that Peter the Klown is just >>>>> spouting yet more ill-informed and out of date nonsense from his >>>>> isolation environment of working at home by himself in his underpants. >>>>> >>>>> Wake up Peter, this is 2016 not 1986, Windows is a stable platform >>>>> just like Linux, you need to accept this fact. >>>> >>>> To be fair about Windows 95 and 98 in particular (ignore Windows ME), >>>> they were both very stable platforms as long as you didn't use >>>> third-party software. We all know that it's fairly impossible to do so, >>>> but if you had a computer and only installed the drivers (and kept them >>>> updated) and used say Microsoft Office and Internet Explorer, chances >>>> are you never faced a blue screen or a freeze at all. I used to work >>>> with a lot of techs who made the same claim. >>>> >>>> However, once XP came along, it no longer mattered whether third-party >>>> software was used or not as the publishers had a better idea of how the >>>> operating system functioned and wrote software which utilized its >>>> functions more properly. As a result, things installed and uninstalled >>>> more cleanly (not perfectly) and limited the problems. Vista and 7 were >>>> also very stable (regardless of what advocates claim) as were 8 and >>>> 8.1. In general, the operating system is stubbornly solid despite what >>>> we throw at it. It IS insecure though... that's not likely to change >>>> yet. >>>> >>> >>> Windows 10 is a lot better in that respect but I readily admit that >>> Linux starts out more secure. >>> >>> But having said that, it is trivial to make Windows secure and it is >>> also trivial to make Linux insecure. >> >> Oh, this seems to be a secret which is still unsolved by MS. > > Nope, it's unsolved by you. Need I remind you yet again that the entire > Azure and Office 365 services run on the Windows platform? Can you point > to one instance of that *ever* being hacked? > In short: You fail to tell us how those "trivial things" are done to make windows secure. And even worse, you don't well us why those "trivial" things are not done by default by MS, when they are so "trivial". Why do they instead deliver a shoddy product which is "unsafe at any speed"? >> >> Care to enlighten us, Dimbulb Rabbit? >> >> And would you also "teach us" about the methods needed to make linux >> insecure? After all, since it is "trivial" according to you, this should >> be easily explained in a few words >> > > Really? I need to tell you? OK. > > Set your root password to 1234 > or > Create a user called guest and set the password to the same as the user > name or > In SSH do not disable password logins for root and give it a weak password > > I could go on but I think that's enough kicking of your arse for one day. Idiot. A "guest user" is unable to compromise the system. He can only compromise his own account And why would I set the root password to such a stupid string? And why would I set up SSH to such idiotic settings? There are much better ways for SSH on linux. Have you ever heard about public/private keys and how they are used on linux systems for SSH connections? Have you ever heard about ECDSA fingerprints? You seem to think that "Putty" is the best way for SSH. Instead it is the windows way of simulating safety You are dumber than a slightly demented brick, and it shows. You know absolutely nothing about linux, just like your fellow idiots
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-15 15:01 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <nre9jg$a4n$1@deskrabbit.motzarella.org> |
| In reply to | #371046 |
On 15/09/2016 11:28, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > Desk Rabbit wrote: > >> On 15/09/2016 10:20, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>> Desk Rabbit wrote: >>> >>>> On 14/09/2016 17:17, Silver Slimer wrote: >>>>> On 2016-09-14 10:54 AM, Desk Rabbit wrote: >>>>>> On 14/09/2016 15:17, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>>>>>> Silver Slimer wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2016-09-14 8:44 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>>>>>>>> Silver Slimer wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 2016-09-14 7:21 AM, Desk Rabbit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 14/09/2016 11:45, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Desk Rabbit babbled: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/09/2016 10:46, Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 20:23:14 -0400, DFS wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> self-contradicting >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fuck you, insufferable turd brain. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You not only have the computer programming ability of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a six-year-old girl, but your reading comprehension skills >>>>>>>>>>>>>> are at the same level as well. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> A registry hack is NOT a valid component of a GUI. Having >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to hack the registry to change window focus is equivalent >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the diver of a car having to go under the hood to cut and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> splice wires just to turn on the headlights. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Shall we start discussing the number of functions of the Linux >>>>>>>>>>>>> Desktop GUI that must be changed by a config file rather than >>>>>>>>>>>>> via the >>>>>>>>>>>>> GUI or is that going to expose yet more of your stupidity and >>>>>>>>>>>>> hypocrisy? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> By all means, start to tell us. This should be good >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Idiot. You know even less about linux then the lying imbecile. >>>>>>>>>>>> And he >>>>>>>>>>>> knows >>>>>>>>>>>> nothing >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I'll give you back your standard reply that if you can't figure >>>>>>>>>>> it out >>>>>>>>>>> or google it yourself then you are a moron. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Desk Rabbit, why are you even bothering to argue with Peter? If >>>>>>>>>> you show >>>>>>>>>> that Linux is anything but perfect, you are a dimbulb blah blah >>>>>>>>>> blah. He >>>>>>>>>> doesn't even consider the _possibility_ that Linux is lacking in >>>>>>>>>> any area. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I *know* that linux isn't perfect. Nothing is. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So it's a trade-off between secure but unstable (Linux), >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Wrong. Linux is much more stable than windows could ever hope to be >>>>>> >>>>>> FX: Looks at circa 1000 workstations and servers being monitored >>>>>> showing that comment to be complete an utter bullshit. Also looks at >>>>>> the Global success that is the Microsoft Azure platform which is >>>>>> hosted on Microsoft Windows. Realises that Peter the Klown is just >>>>>> spouting yet more ill-informed and out of date nonsense from his >>>>>> isolation environment of working at home by himself in his underpants. >>>>>> >>>>>> Wake up Peter, this is 2016 not 1986, Windows is a stable platform >>>>>> just like Linux, you need to accept this fact. >>>>> >>>>> To be fair about Windows 95 and 98 in particular (ignore Windows ME), >>>>> they were both very stable platforms as long as you didn't use >>>>> third-party software. We all know that it's fairly impossible to do so, >>>>> but if you had a computer and only installed the drivers (and kept them >>>>> updated) and used say Microsoft Office and Internet Explorer, chances >>>>> are you never faced a blue screen or a freeze at all. I used to work >>>>> with a lot of techs who made the same claim. >>>>> >>>>> However, once XP came along, it no longer mattered whether third-party >>>>> software was used or not as the publishers had a better idea of how the >>>>> operating system functioned and wrote software which utilized its >>>>> functions more properly. As a result, things installed and uninstalled >>>>> more cleanly (not perfectly) and limited the problems. Vista and 7 were >>>>> also very stable (regardless of what advocates claim) as were 8 and >>>>> 8.1. In general, the operating system is stubbornly solid despite what >>>>> we throw at it. It IS insecure though... that's not likely to change >>>>> yet. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Windows 10 is a lot better in that respect but I readily admit that >>>> Linux starts out more secure. >>>> >>>> But having said that, it is trivial to make Windows secure and it is >>>> also trivial to make Linux insecure. >>> >>> Oh, this seems to be a secret which is still unsolved by MS. >> >> Nope, it's unsolved by you. Need I remind you yet again that the entire >> Azure and Office 365 services run on the Windows platform? Can you point >> to one instance of that *ever* being hacked? >> > > In short: You fail to tell us how those "trivial things" are done to make > windows secure. And even worse, you don't well us why those "trivial" things > are not done by default by MS, when they are so "trivial". Why do they > instead deliver a shoddy product which is "unsafe at any speed"? > >>> >>> Care to enlighten us, Dimbulb Rabbit? >>> >>> And would you also "teach us" about the methods needed to make linux >>> insecure? After all, since it is "trivial" according to you, this should >>> be easily explained in a few words >>> >> >> Really? I need to tell you? OK. >> >> Set your root password to 1234 >> or >> Create a user called guest and set the password to the same as the user >> name or >> In SSH do not disable password logins for root and give it a weak password >> >> I could go on but I think that's enough kicking of your arse for one day. > > Idiot. A "guest user" is unable to compromise the system. He can only > compromise his own account Your failure to understand the answer is recognised. > > And why would I set the root password to such a stupid string? It's an example of how Linux can be made insecure as requested. You may not do it but there are plenty of end users out there who would prefer a password of "mypassword" to a complex string that a system administrator would use on their system. > > And why would I set up SSH to such idiotic settings? There are much better > ways for SSH on linux. Have you ever heard about public/private keys and how > they are used on linux systems for SSH connections? Have you ever heard > about ECDSA fingerprints? The fact is you can change these settings and you can make Linux insecure just as you can change settings in Windows to make it more secure. Your inability to see this is just astonishing. > You seem to think that "Putty" is the best way for SSH. Instead it is the > windows way of simulating safety Who mentioned Putty? But since you have, it can use a private/public key pair to log in to a remote system. > > You are dumber than a slightly demented brick, and it shows. You know > absolutely nothing about linux, just like your fellow idiots > You'd like to think that but clearly your the one who is lacking in knowledge and real world experience by being isolated in your working from home environment. I'll bet you have to hide the Usenet screen from your family as they'd be shocked at the way you speak to people (Unless of course your entire family is similarly socially inept)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-15 15:02 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <nre9m6$a4n$2@deskrabbit.motzarella.org> |
| In reply to | #371046 |
On 15/09/2016 11:37, William Poaster wrote: > On 15/9/2016 11:28 in comp.os.linux.advocacy, Peter Köhlmann posted: > >> Desk Rabbit wrote: >> >>> On 15/09/2016 10:20, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>>> Desk Rabbit wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 14/09/2016 17:17, Silver Slimer wrote: >>>>>> On 2016-09-14 10:54 AM, Desk Rabbit wrote: >>>>>>> On 14/09/2016 15:17, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>>>>>>> Silver Slimer wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 2016-09-14 8:44 AM, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Silver Slimer wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 2016-09-14 7:21 AM, Desk Rabbit wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/09/2016 11:45, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Desk Rabbit babbled: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 14/09/2016 10:46, Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 20:23:14 -0400, DFS wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> self-contradicting >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fuck you, insufferable turd brain. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You not only have the computer programming ability of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a six-year-old girl, but your reading comprehension skills >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are at the same level as well. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A registry hack is NOT a valid component of a GUI. Having >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to hack the registry to change window focus is equivalent >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the diver of a car having to go under the hood to cut and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> splice wires just to turn on the headlights. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shall we start discussing the number of functions of the Linux >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Desktop GUI that must be changed by a config file rather than >>>>>>>>>>>>>> via the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> GUI or is that going to expose yet more of your stupidity and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> hypocrisy? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> By all means, start to tell us. This should be good >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Idiot. You know even less about linux then the lying imbecile. >>>>>>>>>>>>> And he >>>>>>>>>>>>> knows >>>>>>>>>>>>> nothing >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'll give you back your standard reply that if you can't figure >>>>>>>>>>>> it out >>>>>>>>>>>> or google it yourself then you are a moron. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Desk Rabbit, why are you even bothering to argue with Peter? If >>>>>>>>>>> you show >>>>>>>>>>> that Linux is anything but perfect, you are a dimbulb blah blah >>>>>>>>>>> blah. He >>>>>>>>>>> doesn't even consider the _possibility_ that Linux is lacking in >>>>>>>>>>> any area. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I *know* that linux isn't perfect. Nothing is. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So it's a trade-off between secure but unstable (Linux), >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Wrong. Linux is much more stable than windows could ever hope to be >>>>>>> >>>>>>> FX: Looks at circa 1000 workstations and servers being monitored >>>>>>> showing that comment to be complete an utter bullshit. Also looks at >>>>>>> the Global success that is the Microsoft Azure platform which is >>>>>>> hosted on Microsoft Windows. Realises that Peter the Klown is just >>>>>>> spouting yet more ill-informed and out of date nonsense from his >>>>>>> isolation environment of working at home by himself in his underpants. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Wake up Peter, this is 2016 not 1986, Windows is a stable platform >>>>>>> just like Linux, you need to accept this fact. >>>>>> >>>>>> To be fair about Windows 95 and 98 in particular (ignore Windows ME), >>>>>> they were both very stable platforms as long as you didn't use >>>>>> third-party software. We all know that it's fairly impossible to do so, >>>>>> but if you had a computer and only installed the drivers (and kept them >>>>>> updated) and used say Microsoft Office and Internet Explorer, chances >>>>>> are you never faced a blue screen or a freeze at all. I used to work >>>>>> with a lot of techs who made the same claim. >>>>>> >>>>>> However, once XP came along, it no longer mattered whether third-party >>>>>> software was used or not as the publishers had a better idea of how the >>>>>> operating system functioned and wrote software which utilized its >>>>>> functions more properly. As a result, things installed and uninstalled >>>>>> more cleanly (not perfectly) and limited the problems. Vista and 7 were >>>>>> also very stable (regardless of what advocates claim) as were 8 and >>>>>> 8.1. In general, the operating system is stubbornly solid despite what >>>>>> we throw at it. It IS insecure though... that's not likely to change >>>>>> yet. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Windows 10 is a lot better in that respect but I readily admit that >>>>> Linux starts out more secure. >>>>> >>>>> But having said that, it is trivial to make Windows secure and it is >>>>> also trivial to make Linux insecure. >>>> >>>> Oh, this seems to be a secret which is still unsolved by MS. >>> >>> Nope, it's unsolved by you. Need I remind you yet again that the entire >>> Azure and Office 365 services run on the Windows platform? Can you point >>> to one instance of that *ever* being hacked? >>> >> >> In short: You fail to tell us how those "trivial things" are done to make >> windows secure. And even worse, you don't well us why those "trivial" things >> are not done by default by MS, when they are so "trivial". Why do they >> instead deliver a shoddy product which is "unsafe at any speed"? >> >>>> >>>> Care to enlighten us, Dimbulb Rabbit? >>>> >>>> And would you also "teach us" about the methods needed to make linux >>>> insecure? After all, since it is "trivial" according to you, this should >>>> be easily explained in a few words >>>> >>> >>> Really? I need to tell you? OK. >>> >>> Set your root password to 1234 >>> or >>> Create a user called guest and set the password to the same as the user >>> name or >>> In SSH do not disable password logins for root and give it a weak password >>> >>> I could go on but I think that's enough kicking of your arse for one day. > > LMAO!! > >> Idiot. A "guest user" is unable to compromise the system. He can only >> compromise his own account >> >> And why would I set the root password to such a stupid string? >> >> And why would I set up SSH to such idiotic settings? There are much better >> ways for SSH on linux. Have you ever heard about public/private keys and how >> they are used on linux systems for SSH connections? Have you ever heard >> about ECDSA fingerprints? >> You seem to think that "Putty" is the best way for SSH. Instead it is the >> windows way of simulating safety >> >> You are dumber than a slightly demented brick, and it shows. You know >> absolutely nothing about linux, just like your fellow idiots > > Oh, man! DimRabbit excelled himself there. Just when you thought he > could NOT get any more stupid, he posts that drivel to prove you wrong. > LOL > And as usual you contribute nothing other than being Peter's lapdog. Shouldn't you be curled up in a basket in the corner licking your phantom testicles?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-15 20:11 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <nreo96$snh$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #371046 |
The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: > On 9/15/16, 3:28 AM, in article nrdt3v$uuu$1@dont-email.me, "Peter > Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > >>> I could go on but I think that's enough kicking of your arse for one >>> day. >> >> Idiot. A "guest user" is unable to compromise the system. He can only >> compromise his own account > > Unable? No. It is pretty easy, Peter, to do things outside your own > account. > And you have naturally supplied so many examples *how* exactly to do that. Keep in mind we are talking about linux, not OSX or windows
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-15 20:34 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <nrepiu$3o2$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #371193 |
The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: > On 9/15/16, 11:11 AM, in article nreo96$snh$5@dont-email.me, "Peter > Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > >> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: >> >>> On 9/15/16, 3:28 AM, in article nrdt3v$uuu$1@dont-email.me, "Peter >>> Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>> >>>>> I could go on but I think that's enough kicking of your arse for one >>>>> day. >>>> >>>> Idiot. A "guest user" is unable to compromise the system. He can only >>>> compromise his own account >>> >>> Unable? No. It is pretty easy, Peter, to do things outside your own >>> account. >> >> And you have naturally supplied so many examples *how* exactly to do >> that. > > Look up su and sudo. You can run things as other users, including the > super user. No, you can *not* If that user can run su or sudo it is because root has configured that user account to be allowed to run those. If root has not activly enabled that, a normal user is *not* allowed to run them. Again, this is linux, not shabby OS like windows or OSX >> Keep in mind we are talking about linux, not OSX or windows > > Glad you can keep that focused. A step in the right direction for you! > Well, you obviously can't. You are even so incompetent that you think that every user is able to run su or sudo. We all know that you are utterly incompetent, and should not be allowed to come nearer to any computer than at least 20 meters, but this puts a new low to your "competence"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-15 21:36 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <nret8l$g23$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #371202 |
The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: > On 9/15/16, 11:34 AM, in article nrepiu$3o2$1@dont-email.me, "Peter > Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > >> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: >> >>> On 9/15/16, 11:11 AM, in article nreo96$snh$5@dont-email.me, "Peter >>> Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>> >>>> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: >>>> >>>>> On 9/15/16, 3:28 AM, in article nrdt3v$uuu$1@dont-email.me, "Peter >>>>> Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> I could go on but I think that's enough kicking of your arse for one >>>>>>> day. >>>>>> >>>>>> Idiot. A "guest user" is unable to compromise the system. He can only >>>>>> compromise his own account >>>>> >>>>> Unable? No. It is pretty easy, Peter, to do things outside your own >>>>> account. >>>> >>>> And you have naturally supplied so many examples *how* exactly to do >>>> that. >>> >>> Look up su and sudo. You can run things as other users, including the >>> super user. >> >> No, you can *not* > > <http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man1/su.1.html> > ----- > su - run a command with substitute user and group ID > ... > su allows to run commands with a substitute user and group ID. > > When called without arguments, su defaults to running an interactive > shell as root. > ----- > > <https://www.sudo.ws/man/sudo.man.html> > ----- > sudo, sudoedit execute a command as another user > ... > sudo allows a permitted user to execute a command as the superuser > or another user, as specified by the security policy. The invoking > user's real (not effective) user ID is used to determine the user > name with which to query the security policy. > ----- > > There... once again you make a complete and utter ass of yourself. > > <snipped your attempts to change topics> > > What part of "root *must* enable those to be useable by normal users is too difficult for you, lying imbecile? You can quote all you want, the fact remains: Without first being enabled by root those commands are *not* useable by normal users. They can *not* run anything as another user or as root then But keep showing us how utterly incompetent you really are, "IT specialist" Snit Michael Glasser, proud "business" owner of the shabbiest "computer business" outside pakistan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-15 22:27 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <nrf07n$r88$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #371213 |
The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: > On 9/15/16, 12:36 PM, in article nret8l$g23$2@dont-email.me, "Peter > Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > > ... >>>>> Look up su and sudo. You can run things as other users, including the >>>>> super user. >>>> >>>> No, you can *not* >>> >>> <http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man1/su.1.html> >>> ----- >>> su - run a command with substitute user and group ID >>> ... >>> su allows to run commands with a substitute user and group ID. >>> >>> When called without arguments, su defaults to running an interactive >>> shell as root. >>> ----- >>> >>> <https://www.sudo.ws/man/sudo.man.html> >>> ----- >>> sudo, sudoedit execute a command as another user >>> ... >>> sudo allows a permitted user to execute a command as the superuser >>> or another user, as specified by the security policy. The invoking >>> user's real (not effective) user ID is used to determine the user >>> name with which to query the security policy. >>> ----- >>> >>> There... once again you make a complete and utter ass of yourself. >>> >>> <snipped your attempts to change topics> > > Face it, Peter, you made a complete and utter idiot of yourself AGAIN. You > once again proved there is yet another area you are ignorant of Linux. > > And this is a pretty basic thing! > > Below you look to try to dig your way out. Nope. It is simple a fact su > and sudo do as I told you. No matter how you try to squirm out, you are > fighting against the man pages, NOT me. > >> What part of "root *must* enable those to be useable by normal users is >> too difficult for you, lying imbecile? >> >> You can quote all you want, the fact remains: Without first being enabled >> by root those commands are *not* useable by normal users. They can *not* >> run anything as another user or as root then >> >> But keep showing us how utterly incompetent you really are, "IT >> specialist" Snit Michael Glasser, proud "business" owner of the shabbiest >> "computer business" outside pakistan >> > Idiot. Just *try* it, you fool If su and sudo would enable normal users to run programs as other users and even as root, the complete security of linux/unix would be thrown out with one fell swoop. You really are incompetent beyond any belief. You don't know *anything* at all about unix
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-15 22:52 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <nrf1m3$1lk$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #371222 |
Snit wrote: > On 9/15/16, 1:27 PM, in article nrf07n$r88$2@dont-email.me, "Peter > Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > >> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: >> >>> On 9/15/16, 12:36 PM, in article nret8l$g23$2@dont-email.me, "Peter >>> Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>> >>> ... >>>>>>> Look up su and sudo. You can run things as other users, including >>>>>>> the super user. >>>>>> >>>>>> No, you can *not* >>>>> >>>>> <http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man1/su.1.html> >>>>> ----- >>>>> su - run a command with substitute user and group ID >>>>> ... >>>>> su allows to run commands with a substitute user and group ID. >>>>> >>>>> When called without arguments, su defaults to running an >>>>> interactive shell as root. >>>>> ----- >>>>> >>>>> <https://www.sudo.ws/man/sudo.man.html> >>>>> ----- >>>>> sudo, sudoedit execute a command as another user >>>>> ... >>>>> sudo allows a permitted user to execute a command as the superuser >>>>> or another user, as specified by the security policy. The invoking >>>>> user's real (not effective) user ID is used to determine the user >>>>> name with which to query the security policy. >>>>> ----- >>>>> >>>>> There... once again you make a complete and utter ass of yourself. >>>>> >>>>> <snipped your attempts to change topics> >>> >>> Face it, Peter, you made a complete and utter idiot of yourself AGAIN. >>> You once again proved there is yet another area you are ignorant of >>> Linux. >>> >>> And this is a pretty basic thing! >>> >>> Below you look to try to dig your way out. Nope. It is simple a fact su >>> and sudo do as I told you. No matter how you try to squirm out, you are >>> fighting against the man pages, NOT me. >>> >>>> What part of "root *must* enable those to be useable by normal users is >>>> too difficult for you, lying imbecile? >>>> >>>> You can quote all you want, the fact remains: Without first being >>>> enabled by root those commands are *not* useable by normal users. They >>>> can *not* run anything as another user or as root then >>>> >>>> But keep showing us how utterly incompetent you really are, "IT >>>> specialist" Snit Michael Glasser, proud "business" owner of the >>>> shabbiest "computer business" outside pakistan >> >> Idiot. Just *try* it, you fool > > Poor Peter... he clearly cannot figure out how to get su and sudo to work. > LOL! Naturally you have to claim that I don't know commands I am using daily >> If su and sudo would enable normal users to run programs as other users >> and even as root, the complete security of linux/unix would be thrown out >> with one fell swoop. > > Might I suggest you look up the concept of passwords. :) Well, might I suggest you intense reading of "sudoers" >> You really are incompetent beyond any belief. You don't know *anything* >> at all about unix > > Well, I knew about the existence of su and sudo... which was more than > you. > :) > Idiot. You can't get it to work correctly. After all, you claim that su can be used by any normal user. You fail to add that that "normal user" *must* supply root level password. You fail to admit that when you create a new user, that user is *not* allowed to run sudo In short: Your claim that a normal user can run programs outside of his account. Which is patiently wrong for the scenario being discussed For all these cases, that user *must* be allowed to do that by root
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-16 00:14 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <nrf6gu$kh2$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #371233 |
The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: > On 9/15/16, 1:52 PM, in article nrf1m3$1lk$1@dont-email.me, "Peter > Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > > ... >>> Poor Peter... he clearly cannot figure out how to get su and sudo to >>> work. LOL! >> >> Naturally you have to claim that I don't know commands I am using daily > > Snit: > ----- > Look up su and sudo. You can run things as other users, including > the super user. > ----- > > Peter Köhlmann: > ----- > No, you can *not* > ----- > > But of course Peter is wrong. As is his norm. > The lying imbecile as we know him. Always quoting out of context Fact is: A normal user can *not* use sudo when root has not given permission to do so. These permissions are *not* active by default, they have to be enabled So the fact stands: A normal user can *not* use sudo It has to be allowed for him first You can misquote as much as you want, lying imbecile, everyone has read your incredibly stupid claims
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-16 07:11 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <77ontbpn0jch3lacjr8h4ebhs2ogrioe4n@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #371233 |
William Poaster wrote: >> I have never seen anything like it. >> What a fool. > >Quite amazing. Descending into lunacy. It's only lying its ass off, to get the attention it craves. Nothing more or less. -- "TomB claimed that I was saying he was a child sex abuser." - some thing, lying shamelessly (but no one can quote it lying)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-15 14:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <81746413-c1fd-4c79-8a7d-c677ec4c00cf@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #371222 |
On Thursday, September 15, 2016 at 2:27:42 PM UTC-6, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: > > > On 9/15/16, 12:36 PM, in article nret8l$g23$2@dont-email.me, "Peter > > Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > > > > ... > >>>>> Look up su and sudo. You can run things as other users, including the > >>>>> super user. > >>>> > >>>> No, you can *not* > >>> > >>> <http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man1/su.1.html> > >>> ----- > >>> su - run a command with substitute user and group ID > >>> ... > >>> su allows to run commands with a substitute user and group ID. > >>> > >>> When called without arguments, su defaults to running an interactive > >>> shell as root. > >>> ----- > >>> > >>> <https://www.sudo.ws/man/sudo.man.html> > >>> ----- > >>> sudo, sudoedit ‹ execute a command as another user > >>> ... > >>> sudo allows a permitted user to execute a command as the superuser > >>> or another user, as specified by the security policy. The invoking > >>> user's real (not effective) user ID is used to determine the user > >>> name with which to query the security policy. > >>> ----- > >>> > >>> There... once again you make a complete and utter ass of yourself. > >>> > >>> <snipped your attempts to change topics> > > > > Face it, Peter, you made a complete and utter idiot of yourself AGAIN. You > > once again proved there is yet another area you are ignorant of Linux. > > > > And this is a pretty basic thing! > > > > Below you look to try to dig your way out. Nope. It is simple a fact su > > and sudo do as I told you. No matter how you try to squirm out, you are > > fighting against the man pages, NOT me. > > > >> What part of "root *must* enable those to be useable by normal users is > >> too difficult for you, lying imbecile? > >> > >> You can quote all you want, the fact remains: Without first being enabled > >> by root those commands are *not* useable by normal users. They can *not* > >> run anything as another user or as root then > >> > >> But keep showing us how utterly incompetent you really are, "IT > >> specialist" Snit Michael Glasser, proud "business" owner of the shabbiest > >> "computer business" outside pakistan > >> > > > > Idiot. Just *try* it, you fool > If su and sudo would enable normal users to run programs as other users and > even as root, the complete security of linux/unix would be thrown out with > one fell swoop. > > You really are incompetent beyond any belief. You don't know *anything* at > all about unix LOL! You're talking to a guy who proved he couldn't find the dev console in a browser... what makes you think he could find a terminal app on OS X?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-16 04:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <C62dnVkj961g80bKnZ2dnUU7-SmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #371222 |
On 2016-09-15, William Poaster <wp@dev.null> wrote: // snip > Glasser, YOU are a complete & utter moron. No, in fact to call you a > moron is an insult to the REAL morons. > It is YOU who has made a complete and utter idiot of yourself YET AGAIN. > > Unless the sysadmin gives the *normal* user admin privileges, the normal > user *cannot* use sudo or su. > > "sudo is a program that allows a system administrator to give certain > users (or groups of users) the ability to run some (or all) commands > as root or another user." Well said. -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-16 05:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ahfagoak.gjii@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #371306 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 9/15/16, 9:03 PM, in article > C62dnVkj961g80bKnZ2dnUU7-SmdnZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny" > <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: > >> On 2016-09-15, William Poaster <wp@dev.null> wrote: >> >> // snip >> >>> Glasser, YOU are a complete & utter moron. No, in fact to call you a >>> moron is an insult to the REAL morons. >>> It is YOU who has made a complete and utter idiot of yourself YET AGAIN. >>> >>> Unless the sysadmin gives the *normal* user admin privileges, the normal >>> user *cannot* use sudo or su. >>> >>> "sudo is a program that allows a system administrator to give certain >>> users (or groups of users) the ability to run some (or all) commands >>> as root or another user." >> >> Well said. > > Keep in mind the only one who was incorrect about su and sudo was Peter... > but the herd comes in to back HIM and attack the person who helped correct > Peter and educate him: > > Snit: > ----- > Look up su and sudo. You can run things as other users, including > the super user. > ----- > > Peter Köhlmann: > ----- > No, you can *not* > ----- > > But of course Peter is wrong. As is his norm. > > <http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man1/su.1.html> > ----- > su - run a command with substitute user and group ID > ... > su allows to run commands with a substitute user and group ID. > > When called without arguments, su defaults to running an > interactive shell as root. > ----- > > <https://www.sudo.ws/man/sudo.man.html> > ----- > sudo, sudoedit -- execute a command as another user > ... > sudo allows a permitted user to execute a command as the superuser > or another user, as specified by the security policy. The invoking > user's real (not effective) user ID is used to determine the user > name with which to query the security policy. > ----- > Are you doubling down on this moronic idea of yours that a user can sudo or su without root allowing it?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-16 06:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhjagid9ea.jig8@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #371309 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 9/15/16, 10:13 PM, in article ahfagoak.gjii@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 9/15/16, 9:03 PM, in article >>> C62dnVkj961g80bKnZ2dnUU7-SmdnZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny" >>> <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2016-09-15, William Poaster <wp@dev.null> wrote: >>>> >>>> // snip >>>> >>>>> Glasser, YOU are a complete & utter moron. No, in fact to call you a >>>>> moron is an insult to the REAL morons. >>>>> It is YOU who has made a complete and utter idiot of yourself YET AGAIN. >>>>> >>>>> Unless the sysadmin gives the *normal* user admin privileges, the normal >>>>> user *cannot* use sudo or su. >>>>> >>>>> "sudo is a program that allows a system administrator to give certain >>>>> users (or groups of users) the ability to run some (or all) commands >>>>> as root or another user." >>>> >>>> Well said. >>> >>> Keep in mind the only one who was incorrect about su and sudo was Peter... >>> but the herd comes in to back HIM and attack the person who helped correct >>> Peter and educate him: >>> >>> Snit: >>> ----- >>> Look up su and sudo. You can run things as other users, including >>> the super user. >>> ----- >>> >>> Peter Köhlmann: >>> ----- >>> No, you can *not* >>> ----- >>> ... >> >> Are you doubling down on this moronic idea of yours that a user >> can sudo or su without root allowing it? > > I never made that claim... but, hey, Peter lied and said I did so to you > that is good enough! > > What is amazing is how much those of you who troll back each other's lies. > Here's how that went: In response to Peter telling Desk Rabbit that a guest user is unable to compromise the system, and could only compromise his own account, you wrote: "Unable? No. It is pretty easy, Peter, to do things outside your own account." And when he asked you "how" the guest user would compromise the system, you wrote: "Look up su and sudo. You can run things as other users, including the super user." Peter replied: <quote> No, you can *not* If that user can run su or sudo it is because root has configured that user account to be allowed to run those. If root has not activly enabled that, a normal user is *not* allowed to run them. Again, this is linux, not shabby OS like windows or OSX </quote> But you snipped everything after the "No, you can *not*". Why did you snip the rest? Was it because he schooled your stupid ass on su and sudo?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-16 06:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ahjgdue03.t3@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #371310 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 9/15/16, 11:19 PM, in article fhjagid9ea.jig8@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> In response to Peter telling Desk Rabbit that a guest user is unable >> to compromise the system, and could only compromise his own account, >> you wrote: >> >> "Unable? No. It is pretty easy, Peter, to do things outside your own account." > > This is NOT me saying "a user can sudo or su without root allowing it." You > claimed I said this but cannot show it. Admit to your error or it will be > clear you are not just wrong but lying. Your claim was clear. You think a user can just do things outside his account willy nilly. When asked to substantiate that claim, your answer was "su or sudo." >> And when he asked you "how" the guest user would compromise the system, >> you wrote: >> >> "Look up su and sudo. You can run things as other users, including the super >> user." > > This is NOT me saying "a user can sudo or su without root allowing it." You > claimed I said this but cannot show it. Admit to your error or it will be > clear you are not just wrong but lying. > What is clear is that you don't belong anywhere near a keyboard. >> Peter replied: >> <quote> >> No, you can *not* > > And this is where Peter was wrong... as I prove, above. > He is not wrong. You are wrong in your claim that the user could decide to use su or sudo. That decision is not up to the user. > And then Peter changed the topic... as you quote below. > How is correcting your stupidity "changing the argument"? >> If that user can run su or sudo it is because root has configured that user >> account to be allowed to run those. If root has not activly enabled that, a >> normal user is *not* allowed to run them. Again, this is linux, not shabby >> OS like windows or OSX >> </quote> >> >> But you snipped everything after the "No, you can *not*". >> Why did you snip the rest? Was it because he schooled your >> stupid ass on su and sudo? > > Of course not. What a stupid question. > You clearly don't know the first thing about Unix, which makes your constant crowing about Macks being Unix sound even more retarded.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-16 07:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hagt0atlhiuif.agji@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #371312 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 9/16/16, 12:23 AM, in article > sandman-b120f96b0acdbe438dc4a838d7ae3745@individual.net, "Sandman" > <mr@sandman.net> wrote: > >> In article <D400E713.7D2FD%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote: >> >>> Snit: >>> ----- >>> Look up su and sudo. You can run things as other users, including >>> the super user. >>> ----- >>> >>> And, of course this is correct. But Peter claimed it was not: >>> >>> Peter Köhlmann: >>> ----- >>> No, you can *not* >>> ----- >> >> [X] Quote editing (http://tinyurl.com/zb6q2ko) >> >> >> The actual exchange: >> >> Peter Köhlmann, stating correctly: >> Idiot. A "guest user" is unable to compromise the system. He can only >> compromise his own account > > Which is clearly and unambiguously INCORRECT. As I proved. > Snit lets guest user sudo and su. What a TARD!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-16 17:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ahjgjdu00.a43@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #371313 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 9/16/16, 12:36 AM, in article hagt0atlhiuif.agji@perch.invalid, "Octavian > W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 9/16/16, 12:23 AM, in article >>> sandman-b120f96b0acdbe438dc4a838d7ae3745@individual.net, "Sandman" >>> <mr@sandman.net> wrote: >>> >>>> In article <D400E713.7D2FD%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote: >>>> >>>>> Snit: >>>>> ----- >>>>> Look up su and sudo. You can run things as other users, including >>>>> the super user. >>>>> ----- >>>>> >>>>> And, of course this is correct. But Peter claimed it was not: >>>>> >>>>> Peter Köhlmann: >>>>> ----- >>>>> No, you can *not* >>>>> ----- >>>> >>>> [X] Quote editing (http://tinyurl.com/zb6q2ko) >>>> >>>> >>>> The actual exchange: >>>> >>>> Peter Köhlmann, stating correctly: >>>> Idiot. A "guest user" is unable to compromise the system. He can only >>>> compromise his own account >>> >>> Which is clearly and unambiguously INCORRECT. As I proved. >>> >> >> Snit lets guest user sudo and su. What a TARD! >> > > > This whole conversation is just AMAZINGLY stupid. I noted that su and sudo > allow users to run things as other users, including the super user. > > Peter denied this. He was wrong. Period. That is EXACTLY what those commands > do. > > Peter's "defense" was that not everyone has permissions. It would be like > him saying he lets others use his computers and then me twisting that to > mean he lets ANYONE use his computer. The herd would be ALL over me... if I > twisted as Peter is you can bet they would be screaming and yelling and > throwing a fit. > Nope. The conversation about su/sudo was about a "guest" user, which you said could just run su or sudo to "do things outside his user account."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-16 18:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hgdjsalof983.3@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #371477 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 9/16/16, 10:09 AM, in article ahjgjdu00.a43@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >>> >> >> Nope. The conversation about su/sudo was about a "guest" user, which you >> said could just run su or sudo to "do things outside his user account." >> > Then, of course, you can quote that... right? > Sure. The following [>>>Peter/>>Snit/>Peter/Snit] exchange makes it clear: Message-ID: <D4003390.7D190%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <quote> >>> Idiot. A "guest user" is unable to compromise the system. He can only >>> compromise his own account >> >> Unable? No. It is pretty easy, Peter, to do things outside your own >> account. > > And you have naturally supplied so many examples *how* exactly to do that. Look up su and sudo. You can run things as other users, including the super user. </quote>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-09-16 19:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <asdfjg39t.ja8g@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #371508 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 9/16/16, 11:40 AM, in article hgdjsalof983.3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 9/16/16, 10:09 AM, in article ahjgjdu00.a43@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> >> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Nope. The conversation about su/sudo was about a "guest" user, which you >>>> said could just run su or sudo to "do things outside his user account." >>>> >>> Then, of course, you can quote that... right? >>> >> >> Sure. The following [>>>Peter/>>Snit/>Peter/Snit] exchange makes it clear: >> >> Message-ID: <D4003390.7D190%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> <quote> >>>>> Idiot. A "guest user" is unable to compromise the system. He can only >>>>> compromise his own account >>>> >>>> Unable? No. It is pretty easy, Peter, to do things outside your own >>>> account. >>> >>> And you have naturally supplied so many examples *how* exactly to do that. >> >> Look up su and sudo. You can run things as other users, including the super >> user. >> </quote> > > Which says NOTHING of the guest account. Can you not read? Let's take a look at this part: ----------------- Idiot. A "guest user" is unable to compromise the system. He can only compromise his own account ----------------- What user are we talking about here? A "guest user" of course. "A 'guest user' is unable to compromise the system." *"guest user" unable* And this is your response: ----------------- Unable? No. It is pretty easy, Peter, to do things outside your own account. ----------------- (...using su/sudo). Flail those arms and bang that head all you need to, moron.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 24 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 24 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web