Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #366357 > unrolled thread
| Started by | tinus61 <tinus61@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-23 18:25 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-08-23 20:18 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 169 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever tinus61 <tinus61@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-23 18:25 +0200
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-23 12:22 -0500
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-23 10:45 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-08-23 20:02 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-23 17:54 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-24 06:43 -0500
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-24 06:26 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 10:58 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-24 13:08 -0500
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 20:56 +0000
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 14:02 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-24 23:21 +0200
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 14:26 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-24 21:25 -0600
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-25 09:37 +0200
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-25 07:22 -0500
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 12:03 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 14:14 -0600
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 16:57 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 14:01 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 14:21 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 18:14 -0600
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:18 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-26 09:05 +0200
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 13:44 +0000
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:17 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 09:15 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 09:20 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 07:53 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 10:55 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:18 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 09:14 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 09:21 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:06 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 10:16 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:16 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 15:08 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 15:36 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 18:57 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 07:55 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 08:31 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 09:21 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 09:30 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 09:58 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 10:15 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 10:46 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 11:03 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 11:35 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 11:54 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 12:18 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 12:22 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 13:48 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 14:15 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-27 00:20 +0000
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 18:08 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-27 01:24 +0000
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 18:42 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 19:09 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-27 04:39 +0000
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 21:49 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 22:04 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-27 02:21 +0000
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-27 03:12 +0000
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 20:46 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 21:48 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-27 04:27 +0000
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 21:53 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 22:01 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 22:23 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-27 05:03 +0000
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-27 05:35 +0000
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 23:03 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 00:05 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-27 09:23 +0200
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 01:13 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 02:05 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-27 08:12 -0500
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 07:15 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 09:24 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 12:16 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 10:52 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 18:02 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-27 08:03 -0500
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-27 04:35 +0000
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-27 15:05 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-27 13:00 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 19:25 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 08:02 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 18:13 -0600
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 14:14 -0600
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-25 23:38 +0200
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 14:40 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-25 23:45 +0200
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 14:46 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-25 23:50 +0200
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 14:54 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-25 18:39 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:41 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-25 19:05 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 19:09 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-08-26 13:28 +0100
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:18 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 18:17 -0600
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-25 07:12 -0500
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 10:49 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:20 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-25 18:28 +0200
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 12:50 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 10:04 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 10:01 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-25 19:39 +0200
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 10:45 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-25 14:52 -0500
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 12:57 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-25 23:34 +0200
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 14:39 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-25 23:43 +0200
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 14:45 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-25 23:46 +0200
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 14:48 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 10:02 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 10:35 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:44 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-25 00:11 +0200
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-24 17:58 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Takuya Saitoh <taka0038@gmail.com> - 2016-08-24 21:41 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-25 14:53 +0200
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-25 07:28 -0500
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-25 14:57 +0200
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-25 08:12 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 11:23 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-25 09:34 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 13:01 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-25 19:15 +0200
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 14:34 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-25 20:41 +0200
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 14:53 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-08-25 23:33 +0200
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 14:36 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 17:50 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 14:57 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 18:10 -0600
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-08-25 21:20 +0200
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 15:56 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 19:28 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 08:04 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 18:08 -0600
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 10:24 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-25 19:25 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 08:01 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:51 -0600
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 14:19 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:31 -0600
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 19:00 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-26 18:26 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-27 14:58 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-27 12:27 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-28 09:24 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-28 08:33 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-28 11:59 -0400
Who the Hell is Marek? John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 11:09 -0700
Re: Who the Hell is Marek? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-08-28 15:16 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 10:52 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:21 -0700
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-08-24 18:11 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 10:36 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-24 09:49 -0400
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever Adlbifhr Mjduhgfks <am@random.us> - 2016-08-23 19:13 +0000
Re: Linux turns 25, is bigger and more professional than ever DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-23 20:18 -0400
Page 3 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 08:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <cd021561-fe26-4a0c-beab-729775be2596@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #366956 |
On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 1:05:59 AM UTC-6, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: > > > On 8/25/16, 5:14 PM, in article npo1kr$2kd$5@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" > > <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: > > > > ... > >>>>> I have to admit that I'd accept a recommendation from Peter Köhlmann a > >>>>> lot faster than I would one from chrisv. > >>>> > >>>> Well, now that Peter has admitted he picks Macs when resources are > >>>> limited I might agree. :) > >>>> > >>>> Peter Köhlmann: > >>>> ----- > >>>> The last days I prepared 2 OSX machines I intend to take with me > >>>> to Berlin, where I will stay for some weeks starting in about 10 > >>>> days. Reason: Too much luggage, so I will take only a apple laptop > >>>> and a iMac instead of the full featured linux rig. > >>>> ----- > >>>> > >>>> Peter finally admitted that when he had to be limited with tech he > >>>> selects his (older!) Macs / OS X because they serves his needs / handle > >>>> tasks better than Linux. I found that interesting. > >>> > >>> LOL! Snit *still* believes it's a good idea to develop for OS X on a > >>> computer that *isn't* a Mac. > > > > To be clear: Carroll made this claim up. He is STILL begging for my > > attention. > > No. *You* completely incompetent "IT professional" actually asked why I > would not take a linux computer to build OSX applications, and then lied > about me "preferring OSX over linux" > > > >>> Talk about clueless ;) > > Well, the Glasser swine is clueless. About everything inside and outside > computers > > >> Only that the latest community edition of Visual Studio from Microsoft is > >> attempting to do just that. Tho they haven't got it all there yet, they > >> are still trying. > >> > > VS from MS isn't able to do OSX programming. You can do part of it there. > It is about as much as you can do with Qt on linux. You can do the complete > programming and testing on linux, but you still have to do the compiling > stage and the building of installation packages on a OSX machine. Which is > exactly what I am doing with OSX. I know, I've seen what you've written, and I've also seen Snit's attempts to distort it. In my opinion the way I just dealt with it is the only way to deal with his BS, throw it back on his own stupidity. If he's not being merely being his usual dishonest self then he obviously needs an education, right? So why not give him one? I suggest you talk about it in minute detail and watch him go off the rails. Consider: He won't even utter a word about his chosen 'profession' (web development) now... and we all know why ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 09:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <-sednQ6Xyrbr8V3KnZ2dnUU7-bHNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #367015 |
On 2016-08-26, Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 1:05:59 AM UTC-6, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: >> >> > On 8/25/16, 5:14 PM, in article npo1kr$2kd$5@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >> > <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >> > >> > ... >> >>>>> I have to admit that I'd accept a recommendation from Peter Köhlmann a >> >>>>> lot faster than I would one from chrisv. >> >>>> >> >>>> Well, now that Peter has admitted he picks Macs when resources are >> >>>> limited I might agree. :) >> >>>> >> >>>> Peter Köhlmann: >> >>>> ----- >> >>>> The last days I prepared 2 OSX machines I intend to take with me >> >>>> to Berlin, where I will stay for some weeks starting in about 10 >> >>>> days. Reason: Too much luggage, so I will take only a apple laptop >> >>>> and a iMac instead of the full featured linux rig. >> >>>> ----- >> >>>> >> >>>> Peter finally admitted that when he had to be limited with tech he >> >>>> selects his (older!) Macs / OS X because they serves his needs / handle >> >>>> tasks better than Linux. I found that interesting. >> >>> >> >>> LOL! Snit *still* believes it's a good idea to develop for OS X on a >> >>> computer that *isn't* a Mac. >> > >> > To be clear: Carroll made this claim up. He is STILL begging for my >> > attention. >> >> No. *You* completely incompetent "IT professional" actually asked why I >> would not take a linux computer to build OSX applications, and then lied >> about me "preferring OSX over linux" >> >> >> >>> Talk about clueless ;) >> >> Well, the Glasser swine is clueless. About everything inside and outside >> computers >> >> >> Only that the latest community edition of Visual Studio from Microsoft is >> >> attempting to do just that. Tho they haven't got it all there yet, they >> >> are still trying. >> >> >> >> VS from MS isn't able to do OSX programming. You can do part of it there. >> It is about as much as you can do with Qt on linux. You can do the complete >> programming and testing on linux, but you still have to do the compiling >> stage and the building of installation packages on a OSX machine. Which is >> exactly what I am doing with OSX. > > I know, I've seen what you've written, and I've also seen Snit's > attempts to distort it. In my opinion the way I just dealt with it is > the only way to deal with his BS, throw it back on his own stupidity. If > he's not being merely being his usual dishonest self then he obviously > needs an education, right? So why not give him one? I suggest you talk > about it in minute detail and watch him go off the rails. > > Consider: He won't even utter a word about his chosen 'profession > (web development) now... and we all know why ;) Yup. As we say recently. Said he could script, when challenged it became obvious he's limited to extreme basics. He likes OSX cause it does the work for him. Work he cannot achieve without the assistance of other software. 1. Owl's simply modification of my script completely through him off. 2. Peter's very simple NFS challenge in which he choked and lied. -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 09:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <680961aa-0550-4fc2-9030-fd5e7f7d7695@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #367041 |
On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 10:21:16 AM UTC-6, Marek Novotny wrote: > On 2016-08-26, Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 1:05:59 AM UTC-6, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > >> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: > >> > >> > On 8/25/16, 5:14 PM, in article npo1kr$2kd$5@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" > >> > <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > ... > >> >>>>> I have to admit that I'd accept a recommendation from Peter Köhlmann a > >> >>>>> lot faster than I would one from chrisv. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Well, now that Peter has admitted he picks Macs when resources are > >> >>>> limited I might agree. :) > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Peter Köhlmann: > >> >>>> ----- > >> >>>> The last days I prepared 2 OSX machines I intend to take with me > >> >>>> to Berlin, where I will stay for some weeks starting in about 10 > >> >>>> days. Reason: Too much luggage, so I will take only a apple laptop > >> >>>> and a iMac instead of the full featured linux rig. > >> >>>> ----- > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Peter finally admitted that when he had to be limited with tech he > >> >>>> selects his (older!) Macs / OS X because they serves his needs / handle > >> >>>> tasks better than Linux. I found that interesting. > >> >>> > >> >>> LOL! Snit *still* believes it's a good idea to develop for OS X on a > >> >>> computer that *isn't* a Mac. > >> > > >> > To be clear: Carroll made this claim up. He is STILL begging for my > >> > attention. > >> > >> No. *You* completely incompetent "IT professional" actually asked why I > >> would not take a linux computer to build OSX applications, and then lied > >> about me "preferring OSX over linux" > >> > >> > >> >>> Talk about clueless ;) > >> > >> Well, the Glasser swine is clueless. About everything inside and outside > >> computers > >> > >> >> Only that the latest community edition of Visual Studio from Microsoft is > >> >> attempting to do just that. Tho they haven't got it all there yet, they > >> >> are still trying. > >> >> > >> > >> VS from MS isn't able to do OSX programming. You can do part of it there. > >> It is about as much as you can do with Qt on linux. You can do the complete > >> programming and testing on linux, but you still have to do the compiling > >> stage and the building of installation packages on a OSX machine. Which is > >> exactly what I am doing with OSX. > > > > I know, I've seen what you've written, and I've also seen Snit's > > attempts to distort it. In my opinion the way I just dealt with it is > > the only way to deal with his BS, throw it back on his own stupidity. If > > he's not being merely being his usual dishonest self then he obviously > > needs an education, right? So why not give him one? I suggest you talk > > about it in minute detail and watch him go off the rails. > > > > Consider: He won't even utter a word about his chosen 'profession > > (web development) now... and we all know why ;) > > Yup. As we say recently. Said he could script, when challenged it became > obvious he's limited to extreme basics. He likes OSX cause it does the > work for him. Work he cannot achieve without the assistance of other > software. > > 1. Owl's simply modification of my script completely through him off. > 2. Peter's very simple NFS challenge in which he choked and lied. I saw... and I've also noticed the effect it had on Snit's trolling in that direction since you began rubbing his nose in his mess ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 09:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <o_GdnTLv8_C26F3KnZ2dnUU7-KmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #367050 |
On 2016-08-26, Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 10:21:16 AM UTC-6, Marek Novotny wrote: >> On 2016-08-26, Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 1:05:59 AM UTC-6, Peter Köhlmann wrote: >> >> The lying imbecile Snit Michael Glasser babbled: >> >> >> >> > On 8/25/16, 5:14 PM, in article npo1kr$2kd$5@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" >> >> > <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > ... >> >> >>>>> I have to admit that I'd accept a recommendation from Peter Köhlmann a >> >> >>>>> lot faster than I would one from chrisv. >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Well, now that Peter has admitted he picks Macs when resources are >> >> >>>> limited I might agree. :) >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Peter Köhlmann: >> >> >>>> ----- >> >> >>>> The last days I prepared 2 OSX machines I intend to take with me >> >> >>>> to Berlin, where I will stay for some weeks starting in about 10 >> >> >>>> days. Reason: Too much luggage, so I will take only a apple laptop >> >> >>>> and a iMac instead of the full featured linux rig. >> >> >>>> ----- >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Peter finally admitted that when he had to be limited with tech he >> >> >>>> selects his (older!) Macs / OS X because they serves his needs / handle >> >> >>>> tasks better than Linux. I found that interesting. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> LOL! Snit *still* believes it's a good idea to develop for OS X on a >> >> >>> computer that *isn't* a Mac. >> >> > >> >> > To be clear: Carroll made this claim up. He is STILL begging for my >> >> > attention. >> >> >> >> No. *You* completely incompetent "IT professional" actually asked why I >> >> would not take a linux computer to build OSX applications, and then lied >> >> about me "preferring OSX over linux" >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Talk about clueless ;) >> >> >> >> Well, the Glasser swine is clueless. About everything inside and outside >> >> computers >> >> >> >> >> Only that the latest community edition of Visual Studio from Microsoft is >> >> >> attempting to do just that. Tho they haven't got it all there yet, they >> >> >> are still trying. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> VS from MS isn't able to do OSX programming. You can do part of it there. >> >> It is about as much as you can do with Qt on linux. You can do the complete >> >> programming and testing on linux, but you still have to do the compiling >> >> stage and the building of installation packages on a OSX machine. Which is >> >> exactly what I am doing with OSX. >> > >> > I know, I've seen what you've written, and I've also seen Snit's >> > attempts to distort it. In my opinion the way I just dealt with it is >> > the only way to deal with his BS, throw it back on his own stupidity. If >> > he's not being merely being his usual dishonest self then he obviously >> > needs an education, right? So why not give him one? I suggest you talk >> > about it in minute detail and watch him go off the rails. >> > >> > Consider: He won't even utter a word about his chosen 'profession >> > (web development) now... and we all know why ;) >> >> Yup. As we say recently. Said he could script, when challenged it became >> obvious he's limited to extreme basics. He likes OSX cause it does the >> work for him. Work he cannot achieve without the assistance of other >> software. >> >> 1. Owl's simply modification of my script completely through him off. >> 2. Peter's very simple NFS challenge in which he choked and lied. > > I saw... and I've also noticed the effect it had on Snit's trolling > in that direction since you began rubbing his nose in his mess ;) He's an idiot. That really stupid retarded video where he is showing off that screen capture app pretty much destroyed all credibility in my eyes. If someone wants to post it. Google for the screen recorder he uses. Look for the forum posts in which he discusses what it can do. Look for a video in which he shows how he made that retarded spread sheet. The one he trolled about in here. Watch that video and tell me this guy is not retarded with a straight face... When you hear how he made that spreadsheet effect, you'll see what I mean. Talk about an idiot. -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 10:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E5C75D.7A400%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #367054 |
On 8/26/16, 9:58 AM, in article o_GdnTLv8_C26F3KnZ2dnUU7-KmdnZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny" <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: >>> Yup. As we say recently. Said he could script, when challenged it became >>> obvious he's limited to extreme basics. He likes OSX cause it does the >>> work for him. Work he cannot achieve without the assistance of other >>> software. >>> >>> 1. Owl's simply modification of my script completely through him off. I did not -- and still have not -- figured it out. No shame in saying so. But it is quite telling that in COLA admitting to a weakness or an area where you do not know something is deemed to be horrid. We ALL have areas we know and do not know. So what? >>> 2. Peter's very simple NFS challenge in which he choked and lied. Nope. Complete fabrication. Now it IS true that I do not know much about NFS... but I never lied about that. >> I saw... and I've also noticed the effect it had on Snit's trolling >> in that direction since you began rubbing his nose in his mess ;) > > He's an idiot. The fact you feel the need to lie about me and push name calling shows you do not REALLY believe this. You are merely insecure. > That really stupid retarded video where he is showing off that screen capture > app pretty much destroyed all credibility in my eyes. What video do you even mean? And why would it destroy credibility? Again you are merely speaking of your own insecurity. > If someone wants to post it. Google for the screen recorder he uses. ScreenFlow is my main screen recorder / screencasting tool. > Look for the forum posts in which he discusses what it can do. Look for a > video in which he shows how he made that retarded spread sheet. The one he > trolled about in here. Watch that video and tell me this guy is not retarded > with a straight face... Comes down to I showed a task you could not do... and you are insecure about it. OK. > When you hear how he made that spreadsheet effect, you'll see what I mean. > Talk about an idiot. Again: I pointed to a task you could not do and you became insecure... and above you show you assume I should feel the same. I do not. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 10:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <35ydnYdE5PgQHV3KnZ2dnUU7-IHNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #367067 |
On 2016-08-26, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/26/16, 9:58 AM, in article > o_GdnTLv8_C26F3KnZ2dnUU7-KmdnZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny" ><marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: > >>>> Yup. As we say recently. Said he could script, when challenged it became >>>> obvious he's limited to extreme basics. He likes OSX cause it does the >>>> work for him. Work he cannot achieve without the assistance of other >>>> software. >>>> >>>> 1. Owl's simply modification of my script completely through him off. > > I did not -- and still have not -- figured it out. No shame in saying so. > But it is quite telling that in COLA admitting to a weakness or an area > where you do not know something is deemed to be horrid. We ALL have areas we > know and do not know. So what? > >>>> 2. Peter's very simple NFS challenge in which he choked and lied. > > Nope. Complete fabrication. Now it IS true that I do not know much about > NFS... but I never lied about that. > >>> I saw... and I've also noticed the effect it had on Snit's trolling >>> in that direction since you began rubbing his nose in his mess ;) >> >> He's an idiot. > > The fact you feel the need to lie about me and push name calling shows you > do not REALLY believe this. You are merely insecure. > >> That really stupid retarded video where he is showing off that screen capture >> app pretty much destroyed all credibility in my eyes. > > What video do you even mean? And why would it destroy credibility? Again you > are merely speaking of your own insecurity. > >> If someone wants to post it. Google for the screen recorder he uses. > > ScreenFlow is my main screen recorder / screencasting tool. > >> Look for the forum posts in which he discusses what it can do. Look for a >> video in which he shows how he made that retarded spread sheet. The one he >> trolled about in here. Watch that video and tell me this guy is not retarded >> with a straight face... > > Comes down to I showed a task you could not do... and you are insecure about > it. OK. > >> When you hear how he made that spreadsheet effect, you'll see what I mean. >> Talk about an idiot. > > Again: I pointed to a task you could not do and you became insecure... and > above you show you assume I should feel the same. > > I do not. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X468EdllTg0 That's the video showing how Snit made the Numbers animated GIF. So Snit, why not explain in detail how this is done in this video? -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 11:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4e4ff2fb-e89c-4d13-8a6e-1610a5eac049@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #367093 |
On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 11:47:00 AM UTC-6, Marek Novotny wrote: > On 2016-08-26, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > > On 8/26/16, 9:58 AM, in article > > o_GdnTLv8_C26F3KnZ2dnUU7-KmdnZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny" > ><marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: > > > >>>> Yup. As we say recently. Said he could script, when challenged it became > >>>> obvious he's limited to extreme basics. He likes OSX cause it does the > >>>> work for him. Work he cannot achieve without the assistance of other > >>>> software. > >>>> > >>>> 1. Owl's simply modification of my script completely through him off. > > > > I did not -- and still have not -- figured it out. No shame in saying so. > > But it is quite telling that in COLA admitting to a weakness or an area > > where you do not know something is deemed to be horrid. We ALL have areas we > > know and do not know. So what? > > > >>>> 2. Peter's very simple NFS challenge in which he choked and lied. > > > > Nope. Complete fabrication. Now it IS true that I do not know much about > > NFS... but I never lied about that. > > > >>> I saw... and I've also noticed the effect it had on Snit's trolling > >>> in that direction since you began rubbing his nose in his mess ;) > >> > >> He's an idiot. > > > > The fact you feel the need to lie about me and push name calling shows you > > do not REALLY believe this. You are merely insecure. > > > >> That really stupid retarded video where he is showing off that screen capture > >> app pretty much destroyed all credibility in my eyes. > > > > What video do you even mean? And why would it destroy credibility? Again you > > are merely speaking of your own insecurity. > > > >> If someone wants to post it. Google for the screen recorder he uses. > > > > ScreenFlow is my main screen recorder / screencasting tool. > > > >> Look for the forum posts in which he discusses what it can do. Look for a > >> video in which he shows how he made that retarded spread sheet. The one he > >> trolled about in here. Watch that video and tell me this guy is not retarded > >> with a straight face... > > > > Comes down to I showed a task you could not do... and you are insecure about > > it. OK. > > > >> When you hear how he made that spreadsheet effect, you'll see what I mean. > >> Talk about an idiot. > > > > Again: I pointed to a task you could not do and you became insecure... and > > above you show you assume I should feel the same. > > > > I do not. > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X468EdllTg0 > > That's the video showing how Snit made the Numbers animated GIF. > > So Snit, why not explain in detail how this is done in this video? Is this from that thread where I initially pointed out that Snit could've (should've) used a javascript solution that's far superior (in flexibility alone)? The one where he had a 'client' with the 'special' criteria of needing exactly the kind of goofy 'solution' that Snit came up with? "Interestingly", Snit always has 'clients' like this.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 11:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fY2dnbJzWqNiFl3KnZ2dnUU7-aWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #367093 |
On 2016-08-26, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: // snip > Correct. > >> So Snit, why not explain in detail how this is done in this video? > > I went into quite some detail in the past. It started with someone wanting > an image created in a spreadsheet. The scope of the task grew when he wanted > it to be animated. So the challenge was to get the pre-existing chart, > created with a spreadsheet, to become an animated GIF (or video). > > If you have other questions I am happy to answer. > > Of note, though, you could not do this task... so you started lying about me > over it. Yeah, Snit, I have a question. Explain in detail how you did this. -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 11:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <kuudnXl76drIDV3KnZ2dnUU7-IednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #367111 |
On 2016-08-26, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/26/16, 11:35 AM, in article > fY2dnbJzWqNiFl3KnZ2dnUU7-aWdnZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny" ><marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: > >> On 2016-08-26, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >> // snip >> >>> Correct. >>> >>>> So Snit, why not explain in detail how this is done in this video? >>> >>> I went into quite some detail in the past. It started with someone wanting >>> an image created in a spreadsheet. The scope of the task grew when he wanted >>> it to be animated. So the challenge was to get the pre-existing chart, >>> created with a spreadsheet, to become an animated GIF (or video). >>> >>> If you have other questions I am happy to answer. >>> >>> Of note, though, you could not do this task... so you started lying about me >>> over it. >> >> Yeah, Snit, I have a question. Explain in detail how you did this. > > I just gave some details... what more do you want to know? Yeah, I'd like the details. Please explain. -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 12:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <534f05c9-425f-4874-9c79-5261d4c74577@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #367114 |
On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 12:54:20 PM UTC-6, Marek Novotny wrote: > On 2016-08-26, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > > On 8/26/16, 11:35 AM, in article > > fY2dnbJzWqNiFl3KnZ2dnUU7-aWdnZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny" > ><marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: > > > >> On 2016-08-26, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> > >> // snip > >> > >>> Correct. > >>> > >>>> So Snit, why not explain in detail how this is done in this video? > >>> > >>> I went into quite some detail in the past. It started with someone wanting > >>> an image created in a spreadsheet. The scope of the task grew when he wanted > >>> it to be animated. So the challenge was to get the pre-existing chart, > >>> created with a spreadsheet, to become an animated GIF (or video). > >>> > >>> If you have other questions I am happy to answer. > >>> > >>> Of note, though, you could not do this task... so you started lying about me > >>> over it. > >> > >> Yeah, Snit, I have a question. Explain in detail how you did this. > > > > I just gave some details... what more do you want to know? > > Yeah, I'd like the details. Please explain. You realize that by you asking for this, in his mind, you're asking for "help" from him, right? And you can expect to see a thread entitled as such as a theater near you ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 12:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <HfWdnW8u-66QCl3KnZ2dnUU7-cednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #367114 |
On 2016-08-26, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/26/16, 11:54 AM, in article > kuudnXl76drIDV3KnZ2dnUU7-IednZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny" ><marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: > >> On 2016-08-26, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/26/16, 11:35 AM, in article >>> fY2dnbJzWqNiFl3KnZ2dnUU7-aWdnZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny" >>> <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2016-08-26, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> // snip >>>> >>>>> Correct. >>>>> >>>>>> So Snit, why not explain in detail how this is done in this video? >>>>> >>>>> I went into quite some detail in the past. It started with someone wanting >>>>> an image created in a spreadsheet. The scope of the task grew when he >>>>> wanted it to be animated. So the challenge was to get the pre-existing >>>>> chart, created with a spreadsheet, to become an animated GIF (or video). >>>>> >>>>> If you have other questions I am happy to answer. >>>>> >>>>> Of note, though, you could not do this task... so you started lying about >>>>> me over it. >>>> >>>> Yeah, Snit, I have a question. Explain in detail how you did this. >>> >>> I just gave some details... what more do you want to know? >> >> Yeah, I'd like the details. Please explain. > > This shows the script and gives more detail. > > Also proves I do some simple scripting... so thanks for asking! :) Not seeing you explain it at all here. Please, Snit, explain how you did it. Explain the AppleScript. What exactly is it doing for you here. Then explain Numbers, and how the bar grows. Explain why there are two bars, one red and one not. Why the need for both. Explain the whole thing Snit. -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 13:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0PCdncCE0ISuNl3KnZ2dnUU7-XudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #367120 |
On 2016-08-26, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/26/16, 12:22 PM, in article > HfWdnW8u-66QCl3KnZ2dnUU7-cednZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny" ><marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: > >> On 2016-08-26, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/26/16, 11:54 AM, in article >>> kuudnXl76drIDV3KnZ2dnUU7-IednZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny" >>> <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2016-08-26, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 8/26/16, 11:35 AM, in article >>>>> fY2dnbJzWqNiFl3KnZ2dnUU7-aWdnZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny" >>>>> <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2016-08-26, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> // snip >>>>>> >>>>>>> Correct. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So Snit, why not explain in detail how this is done in this video? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> I went into quite some detail in the past. It started with someone >>>>>>> wanting an image created in a spreadsheet. The scope of the task grew >>>>>>> when he wanted it to be animated. So the challenge was to get the >>>>>>> pre-existing chart, created with a spreadsheet, to become an animated GIF >>>>>>> (or video). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you have other questions I am happy to answer. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Of note, though, you could not do this task... so you started lying about >>>>>>> me over it. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Yeah, Snit, I have a question. Explain in detail how you did this. >>>>>> >>>>> I just gave some details... what more do you want to know? >>>>> >>>> Yeah, I'd like the details. Please explain. >>>> >>> This shows the script and gives more detail. >>> >>> Also proves I do some simple scripting... so thanks for asking! :) >>> >> Not seeing you explain it at all here. Please, Snit, explain how you did it. >> >> Explain the AppleScript. > > Well, pretty simple really... and with clearer syntax than your script. > Well, more human-language-like anyway. > > It uses the shell script command cliclick (CLI-CLICK... yes, a CLI tool!) > and then the "m" means move and the "c" means click. The "c:." means click > wherever the mouse is (you can send click events elsewhere). > > Then there is a delay which, well, delays. Based on seconds. > > Then a simple loop to click a bunch of times, followed by beeping so I know > when it is done. Great, so just to make sure I am clear. Your Apple script is essentially creating mouse clicks so that the bar in the Numbers sheet goes up. And you're simply recording the whole screen, which is thus recording the bar in the sheet going up. Is that correct or am I missing something? >> What exactly is it doing for you here. Then explain >> Numbers, and how the bar grows. Explain why there are two bars, one red and >> one not. Why the need for both. Explain the whole thing Snit. > > Based on the desired output... fading the first one into the second. If you > are truly interested I can walk though the whole thing on video... but it is > pretty clear you are just trolling. Still, it would take only a few minutes > to recreate and record. The only challenge would be recording the recording > software where I do my editing. I suppose I could record the whole thing > with a different recorder. Right, so again, just to make sure I am not missing anything. You're simply editing out the switch from one color to red after it is recorded to give the appearance that the bar turned red after a particular value was hit. Is that correct? -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 14:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <hrCdnVL_z8jzLF3KnZ2dnUU7-UXNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #367130 |
On 2016-08-26, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/26/16, 1:48 PM, in article > 0PCdncCE0ISuNl3KnZ2dnUU7-XudnZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny" ><marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: > > ... >>>>>>>>> Of note, though, you could not do this task... so you started lying >>>>>>>>> about >>>>>>>>> me over it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yeah, Snit, I have a question. Explain in detail how you did this. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> I just gave some details... what more do you want to know? >>>>>>> >>>>>> Yeah, I'd like the details. Please explain. >>>>>> >>>>> This shows the script and gives more detail. >>>>> >>>>> Also proves I do some simple scripting... so thanks for asking! :) >>>>> >>>> Not seeing you explain it at all here. Please, Snit, explain how you did it. >>>> >>>> Explain the AppleScript. >>> >>> Well, pretty simple really... and with clearer syntax than your script. >>> Well, more human-language-like anyway. >>> >>> It uses the shell script command cliclick (CLI-CLICK... yes, a CLI tool!) >>> and then the "m" means move and the "c" means click. The "c:." means click >>> wherever the mouse is (you can send click events elsewhere). >>> >>> Then there is a delay which, well, delays. Based on seconds. >>> >>> Then a simple loop to click a bunch of times, followed by beeping so I know >>> when it is done. >> >> Great, so just to make sure I am clear. Your Apple script is essentially >> creating mouse clicks so that the bar in the Numbers sheet goes up. And >> you're simply recording the whole screen, which is thus recording the >> bar in the sheet going up. Is that correct or am I missing something? > > Yes, you pretty much have it. Not shown is my editing of the video... > getting the two bars and having a simple fade from one to the other. > >>>> What exactly is it doing for you here. Then explain >>>> Numbers, and how the bar grows. Explain why there are two bars, one red and >>>> one not. Why the need for both. Explain the whole thing Snit. >>> >>> Based on the desired output... fading the first one into the second. If you >>> are truly interested I can walk though the whole thing on video... but it is >>> pretty clear you are just trolling. Still, it would take only a few minutes >>> to recreate and record. The only challenge would be recording the recording >>> software where I do my editing. I suppose I could record the whole thing >>> with a different recorder. >> >> Right, so again, just to make sure I am not missing anything. You're >> simply editing out the switch from one color to red after it is recorded >> to give the appearance that the bar turned red after a particular value >> was hit. Is that correct? > > Mostly correct. One small correction is it is not when a value is hit -- > that makes it sound like it is all at once. Instead it fades from one to the > next... but that can be done in most video editing software. > > Curious why the deeper interest. At first it seemed you were just playing a > game of "give me more details" with an end game I supposed would be to whine > I did not give you every possible thing but now, I admit, you seem more > sincere. Or at least to have a different goal. :) > > But whatever the reasoning I am happy to explain and, if needed and if I > have time, I might be able to show me recreating it or something similar > mostly from scratch. I would save you the pain of watching me type in all > the numbers and the like. Thanks. I just wanted to make absolutely sure that what I think is going on is what is actually going on. See personally I think it is retarded. And not I am not trying to pull the rug out from under you. It is just frankly retarded. When I first saw it just from the appearance of it I thought it was more technical than it is. And when I saw the extremely LAME video I was pretty sure I was correct, and thanks for confirming it, that this couldn't have been done in a more lame retarded way. What I would have personally did if someone asked me to do such a thing was open After Effects and just set a start and stop time and location and then had it interpolate the bar. Flash can do this as well. Anything that makes note of key frames can do this. Your approach is the most retarded approach I've ever seen. But I thought it would be pretty cool if you explained it rather than me expressing what I think I see. Still nice to know I was right though. That's why in my earlier post I said after seeing this video I felt all credibility had been chucked down the drain. You honestly think what you did is cool... I'm damn near speechless you think so. About the only way this could be more lame is if you clicked the button, took a screen shit, and repeated that over and over again. But that's pretty darn close to what you actually did. It's pathetic. -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-27 00:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <afhvda.fkiv83@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #367132 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/26/16, 2:15 PM, in article > hrCdnVL_z8jzLF3KnZ2dnUU7-UXNnZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny" > <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: > > ... >>> >> >> Thanks. I just wanted to make absolutely sure that what I think is going >> on is what is actually going on. See personally I think it is retarded. >> And not I am not trying to pull the rug out from under you. It is just >> frankly retarded. > > Translation: you have no clue how to do something similar on Linux. Ask > Owl.. he figured it out. Sure, the chart was not as pretty but he was able > to do some things with the colors I could not. > I did mine all in gnuplot. No "video editing" involved. > Well, it is more than the general user can do but not all that "cool" -- but > as you are showing it is a lot more than you can do! > > And Owl showed he could sorta do it. His end result was not that great > though. > Better than that cartoon thing you did, with 3D Chicklet bars on a 2D chart.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 18:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <YfidnX1v6KafdV3KnZ2dnUU7-RHNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #367170 |
On 2016-08-27, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/26/16, 2:15 PM, in article >> hrCdnVL_z8jzLF3KnZ2dnUU7-UXNnZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny" >> <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: // snip >>> Thanks. I just wanted to make absolutely sure that what I think is going >>> on is what is actually going on. See personally I think it is retarded. >>> And not I am not trying to pull the rug out from under you. It is just >>> frankly retarded. >> >> Translation: you have no clue how to do something similar on Linux. Ask >> Owl.. he figured it out. Sure, the chart was not as pretty but he was able >> to do some things with the colors I could not. > > I did mine all in gnuplot. No "video editing" involved. > >> Well, it is more than the general user can do but not all that "cool" -- but >> as you are showing it is a lot more than you can do! >> >> And Owl showed he could sorta do it. His end result was not that great >> though. > > Better than that cartoon thing you did, with 3D Chicklet bars on a 2D chart. Did you see that video that shows how he made it?? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X468EdllTg0 -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-27 01:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hajgbau3.a3@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #367176 |
Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: > On 2016-08-27, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/26/16, 2:15 PM, in article >>> hrCdnVL_z8jzLF3KnZ2dnUU7-UXNnZ2d@giganews.com, "Marek Novotny" >>> <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: > > // snip > >>>> Thanks. I just wanted to make absolutely sure that what I think is going >>>> on is what is actually going on. See personally I think it is retarded. >>>> And not I am not trying to pull the rug out from under you. It is just >>>> frankly retarded. >>> >>> Translation: you have no clue how to do something similar on Linux. Ask >>> Owl.. he figured it out. Sure, the chart was not as pretty but he was able >>> to do some things with the colors I could not. >> >> I did mine all in gnuplot. No "video editing" involved. >> >>> Well, it is more than the general user can do but not all that "cool" -- but >>> as you are showing it is a lot more than you can do! >>> >>> And Owl showed he could sorta do it. His end result was not that great >>> though. >> >> Better than that cartoon thing you did, with 3D Chicklet bars on a 2D chart. > > Did you see that video that shows how he made it?? > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X468EdllTg0 > Yeah. Mouse clicks. LOL.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 18:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0LWdnSZV7-CFbV3KnZ2dnUU7-SednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #367177 |
On 2016-08-27, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> wrote: // snip >> Did you see that video that shows how he made it?? >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X468EdllTg0 >> > > Yeah. Mouse clicks. LOL. yeah, can you believe it. What a dork. -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 19:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <adqdnRxxyM_Da13KnZ2dnUU7-aOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #367179 |
On 2016-08-27, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > And that is ripping you to pieces. Whole lot of wishful thinking, loser. -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-27 04:39 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <npr5i8$680$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #367183 |
On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 19:09:34 -0700, Marek Novotny wrote: > On 2016-08-27, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> And that is ripping you to pieces. > > Whole lot of wishful thinking, loser. "Snit" is aggressively delusional. -- Zero tolerance for iCultists and WinDrones
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 21:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0pednS9yT_dthlzKnZ2dnUU7-V-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #367194 |
On 2016-08-27, ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, 26 Aug 2016 19:09:34 -0700, Marek Novotny wrote: > >> On 2016-08-27, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> And that is ripping you to pieces. >> >> Whole lot of wishful thinking, loser. > > "Snit" is aggressively delusional. Too much glue. -- Marek Novotny https://github.com/marek-novotny
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web