Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #366692 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-25 15:52 +0000 |
| Last post | 2016-08-26 18:51 +0000 |
| Articles | 17 on this page of 97 — 6 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 15:52 +0000
Re: Snit is a RACIST Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 12:36 -0400
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:57 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 10:07 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 14:18 -0600
Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 17:15 +0000
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 10:31 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 17:42 +0000
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 11:00 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 18:43 +0000
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 11:50 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 19:24 +0000
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 12:38 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:03 +0000
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:06 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:14 +0000
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:19 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:30 +0000
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:38 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:48 +0000
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:59 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 11:20 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 19:02 +0000
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 12:14 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 19:32 +0000
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 12:42 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:00 +0000
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:03 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:18 +0000
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:26 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:34 +0000
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:40 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 21:09 +0000
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 14:11 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 18:19 -0600
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:21 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 12:29 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:12 +0000
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:18 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:26 +0000
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:38 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 21:10 +0000
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 14:14 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 14:15 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 17:33 -0400
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 14:38 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 22:00 +0000
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 15:06 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 22:38 +0000
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:34 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 01:20 +0000
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:24 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 01:52 +0000
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 19:00 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 02:26 +0000
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 19:50 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 03:06 +0000
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 20:32 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 08:16 -0400
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 07:45 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 19:03 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 02:27 +0000
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 19:50 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 18:29 -0400
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:35 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 21:53 +0000
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 15:07 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 22:19 +0000
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 15:25 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 22:34 +0000
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:31 -0700
An example Owl asked for 7 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:33 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 10:38 -0700
An example Owl asked for 6 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:32 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST Incubus <incubus9536612@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 01:55 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 08:26 -0400
Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 13:29 +0000
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 07:52 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 07:46 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 15:05 +0000
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:17 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 15:29 +0000
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:45 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 16:04 +0000
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 09:12 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 09:22 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 16:23 +0000
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 10:06 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 17:39 +0000
Re: Snit is a RACIST Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 09:07 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:04 -0400
Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 10:10 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 10:27 -0700
Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 17:10 +0000
Re: Snit is a RACIST Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:30 -0400
Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 17:44 +0000
Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 18:51 +0000
Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 08:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E5AB99.7A398%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #367001 |
On 8/26/16, 8:05 AM, in article hjgadad9fa.ko@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/26/16, 1:55 AM, in article >> be113c51-d7d1-42d6-8d3d-88fb53674dd2@googlegroups.com, "Incubus" >> <incubus9536612@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> If everyone who dislikes Snit simply ignored him, there would be little to >>> complain about as he would likely get bored and seek attention elsewhere. >>> By >>> engaging with him in this manner, you're no less of a troll. >> >> He is trolling me at this point... or is just such a bigot he cannot stop >> himself from spewing such nonsense. Penis checks? Equality = racism against >> whites? Jews are all bigots? >> > > I'll be waiting for a quote with Message-ID of me saying any such thing. I gave you seven examples yesterday, AND the subject of this thread is an example. But, hey, you think you have special entitlement and privilege where your words do not mean what you say. >> He is just off his rocker. >> -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 15:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hjgdsu03a.xxfa@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #367003 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/26/16, 8:05 AM, in article hjgadad9fa.ko@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/26/16, 1:55 AM, in article >>> be113c51-d7d1-42d6-8d3d-88fb53674dd2@googlegroups.com, "Incubus" >>> <incubus9536612@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> If everyone who dislikes Snit simply ignored him, there would be little to >>>> complain about as he would likely get bored and seek attention elsewhere. >>>> By >>>> engaging with him in this manner, you're no less of a troll. >>> >>> He is trolling me at this point... or is just such a bigot he cannot stop >>> himself from spewing such nonsense. Penis checks? Equality = racism against >>> whites? Jews are all bigots? >>> >> >> I'll be waiting for a quote with Message-ID of me saying any such thing. > > I gave you seven examples yesterday, AND the subject of this thread is an > example. But, hey, you think you have special entitlement and privilege > where your words do not mean what you say. > So no quotes. Just your misrepresentations. Typical lying libtard. Do you think that the KKK's endorsement of your candidate Hillary Clinton is going to make a difference in this election? I'm sure it makes her friend and mentor, the late Sen. Robert Byrd, KKK Exulted Cyclops, proud that his beloved KKK is standing on principle and not deserting its parent organization, the Democrat Party, in these trying times.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 08:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E5B22A.7A3BB%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #367014 |
On 8/26/16, 8:29 AM, in article hjgdsu03a.xxfa@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/26/16, 8:05 AM, in article hjgadad9fa.ko@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 8/26/16, 1:55 AM, in article >>>> be113c51-d7d1-42d6-8d3d-88fb53674dd2@googlegroups.com, "Incubus" >>>> <incubus9536612@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> If everyone who dislikes Snit simply ignored him, there would be little to >>>>> complain about as he would likely get bored and seek attention elsewhere. >>>>> By >>>>> engaging with him in this manner, you're no less of a troll. >>>> >>>> He is trolling me at this point... or is just such a bigot he cannot stop >>>> himself from spewing such nonsense. Penis checks? Equality = racism against >>>> whites? Jews are all bigots? >>>> >>> >>> I'll be waiting for a quote with Message-ID of me saying any such thing. >> >> I gave you seven examples yesterday, AND the subject of this thread is an >> example. But, hey, you think you have special entitlement and privilege >> where your words do not mean what you say. > > So no quotes. Just your misrepresentations. Typical lying libtard. The subject line of this thread and seven examples I provided yesterday are all quotes... no matter how much you deny. You accused me of bigotry, as you do in the subject line, based on NOTHING other than my backing of equality. Well, you also added in my Jewish heritage at one point - unable to stop yourself from doubling down on your bigotry. It was appalling. And you did go on about your Big Brother penis check nonsense... absolutely. You can try to back pedal as much as you want but you cannot remove your own comments from Usenet. You CAN say you have reconsidered and no longer think my support for equality shows, in any way, a sign of bigotry on my part. You CAN say you no longer support penis checks. You CAN say you no longer want to lump all with Ashkenazi heritage together. You CAN do these things. I would like to see it and not hold your past against you. > Do you think that the KKK's endorsement of your candidate Hillary Clinton No such thing exists. You are, of course, lying. Absolutely lying. And you know it. Heck, before you went on and on and on about how I was supporting Trump... now you say Clinton is my candidate. You just lie and lie and lie to try to change the topic from your own sense of entitlement and privilege. Amazing how easy it is to point it out over and over. > is going to make a difference in this election? I'm sure it makes > her friend and mentor, the late Sen. Robert Byrd, KKK Exulted Cyclops, > proud that his beloved KKK is standing on principle and not deserting > its parent organization, the Democrat Party, in these trying times. > -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 16:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fngjald.i03ta@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #367023 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/26/16, 8:29 AM, in article hjgdsu03a.xxfa@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/26/16, 8:05 AM, in article hjgadad9fa.ko@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 8/26/16, 1:55 AM, in article >>>>> be113c51-d7d1-42d6-8d3d-88fb53674dd2@googlegroups.com, "Incubus" >>>>> <incubus9536612@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> If everyone who dislikes Snit simply ignored him, there would be little to >>>>>> complain about as he would likely get bored and seek attention elsewhere. >>>>>> By >>>>>> engaging with him in this manner, you're no less of a troll. >>>>> >>>>> He is trolling me at this point... or is just such a bigot he cannot stop >>>>> himself from spewing such nonsense. Penis checks? Equality = racism against >>>>> whites? Jews are all bigots? >>>>> >>>> >>>> I'll be waiting for a quote with Message-ID of me saying any such thing. >>> >>> I gave you seven examples yesterday, AND the subject of this thread is an >>> example. But, hey, you think you have special entitlement and privilege >>> where your words do not mean what you say. >> >> So no quotes. Just your misrepresentations. Typical lying libtard. > > The subject line of this thread Noting that you are a racist is not the same as equating equality with racism. You are just lost. > and seven examples I provided yesterday are > all quotes... You provided no example quotes yesterday. > no matter how much you deny. > > You accused me of bigotry, as you do in the subject line, based on NOTHING > other than my backing of equality. That is a flat out lie. You keep saying that without ANY quotes to back up your LIE. > Well, you also added in my Jewish > heritage at one point - unable to stop yourself from doubling down on your > bigotry. It was appalling. I quoted a Jewish lady addressing one of her concerns. We can see from this very thread that you are averse to quotes, but that's your personal problem and says nothing about me. > And you did go on about your Big Brother penis > check nonsense... absolutely. > You keep referring to "big brother" and "penis." Just what sort of traumatic childhood did you live through? > You can try to back pedal as much as you want but you cannot remove your own > comments from Usenet. You CAN say you have reconsidered and no longer think > my support for equality shows, in any way, a sign of bigotry on my part. You > CAN say you no longer support penis checks. You CAN say you no longer want > to lump all with Ashkenazi heritage together. You need to talk to that Jewish lady in the article if you disagree with her. I have no dog in that fight. > You CAN do these things. > > I would like to see it and not hold your past against you. > >> Do you think that the KKK's endorsement of your candidate Hillary Clinton > > No such thing exists. You are, of course, lying. Absolutely lying. Nope. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3r5mGcHOEK4
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 09:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E5B864.7A3CD%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #367030 |
On 8/26/16, 9:04 AM, in article fngjald.i03ta@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: ... >>> So no quotes. Just your misrepresentations. Typical lying libtard. >> >> The subject line of this thread > > Noting that you are a racist is not the same as equating equality with > racism. You are just lost. Keep in mind the ONLY "evidence" you have of me being a racist is my support of equality. If you had ANYTHING else you would have mentioned it by now. You have no. You will not. It is all you have... which is to say NOTHING. You simply cannot stand the idea of being seen as no better than others. Heck, look at how you attack transexuals and, I believe, Muslims (maybe that was only Slimer... this conversation is getting old). Look at how many times I have pointed out your sense of entitlement and privilege. THAT is what this is about for you. Below you just go into denial mode and repeat yourself a lot. Not biting. All comes down to you think equality is somehow unfair to you... which shows your sense of entitlement and privilege. Why try to make it more complex than that? Why try to bring in a million side issues? Why keep moving goal posts? Seems you are ashamed of your own sense of entitlement and privilege. If so then even you know it is wrong... and that is good. You can work toward changing it. And why do you whine when I note how repulsive I find your Big Brother bathroom licenses and penis checks? YOU are the one who made it clear you want such things simply so you can feel better than transexuals and work to push your bigotry against them. But when it is mentioned you get very uncomfortable. Comes down to even you know your positions are completely unsupportable. >> and seven examples I provided yesterday are >> all quotes... > > > You provided no example quotes yesterday. > > >> no matter how much you deny. >> >> You accused me of bigotry, as you do in the subject line, based on NOTHING >> other than my backing of equality. > > > That is a flat out lie. You keep saying that without ANY quotes > to back up your LIE. > > >> Well, you also added in my Jewish >> heritage at one point - unable to stop yourself from doubling down on your >> bigotry. It was appalling. > > > I quoted a Jewish lady addressing one of her concerns. > We can see from this very thread that you are averse to quotes, > but that's your personal problem and says nothing about me. > > >> And you did go on about your Big Brother penis >> check nonsense... absolutely. >> > > You keep referring to "big brother" and "penis." Just what > sort of traumatic childhood did you live through? > > >> You can try to back pedal as much as you want but you cannot remove your own >> comments from Usenet. You CAN say you have reconsidered and no longer think >> my support for equality shows, in any way, a sign of bigotry on my part. You >> CAN say you no longer support penis checks. You CAN say you no longer want >> to lump all with Ashkenazi heritage together. > > > You need to talk to that Jewish lady in the article if you disagree > with her. I have no dog in that fight. > > >> You CAN do these things. >> >> I would like to see it and not hold your past against you. >> >>> Do you think that the KKK's endorsement of your candidate Hillary Clinton >> >> No such thing exists. You are, of course, lying. Absolutely lying. > > Nope. > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3r5mGcHOEK4 > -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 09:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <67d18147-1957-4fd9-8745-9552a2242c62@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #367034 |
On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 10:12:12 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 8/26/16, 9:04 AM, in article fngjald.i03ta@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > > ... > >>> So no quotes. Just your misrepresentations. Typical lying libtard. > >> > >> The subject line of this thread > > > > Noting that you are a racist is not the same as equating equality with > > racism. You are just lost. > > Keep in mind the ONLY "evidence" you have of me being a racist is my support > of equality. LOL! Your "support of equality" where you refuse to take a position when asked about specifics? How is it "support" if you refuse to talk about what you're willing to do, or not? Are you afraid that someone might come back with something from the usenet archive that shows you've flip flopped for the 20th time (you should be ;) ? > If you had ANYTHING else you would have mentioned it by now. If you had ANYTHING in the way of "support" you wouldn't be like a deer in the headlights when asked about specifics.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 16:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gjav3afa.agjui@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #367034 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/26/16, 9:04 AM, in article fngjald.i03ta@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > > ... >>> >>>> Do you think that the KKK's endorsement of your candidate Hillary Clinton >>> >>> No such thing exists. You are, of course, lying. Absolutely lying. >> >> Nope. >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3r5mGcHOEK4 >> No comment? Not even a retraction of the accusation that I was lying. Snit being Snit. Dishonest to the core.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 10:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E5C50C.7A3F7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #367044 |
On 8/26/16, 9:23 AM, in article gjav3afa.agjui@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/26/16, 9:04 AM, in article fngjald.i03ta@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >> ... >>>> >>>>> Do you think that the KKK's endorsement of your candidate Hillary Clinton >>>> >>>> No such thing exists. You are, of course, lying. Absolutely lying. >>> >>> Nope. >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3r5mGcHOEK4 >>> > > No comment? Not even a retraction of the accusation that I was > lying. Snit being Snit. Dishonest to the core. You lied about Clinton being my candidate. You know she is not... and even pushed the idiotic idea that I was backing Trump. Comes down to you live in a black and white world: you cannot imagine someone NOT supporting either Trump or Clinton. I do not. You feel the need to put me into one of those cubbyholes. As far as who the KKK backs: I had that discussion with someone else in terms of Trump. As much as Trump was wrong to deny his association with David Duke, the endorsement of the KKK for him is not a sign of him being bad, no more than the endorsement of the idiot who has raised the prices grossly on epipens is a bad thing about Clinton. A concept many in COLA have a hard time understanding is that what speaks about a person is their OWN comments and actions. The failure to understand this SIMPLE concept is why so many glom onto Carroll's list of alleged quotes ABOUT me. Well, that and they cannot find quotes FROM me to back their accusations. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 17:39 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhjgdua03.a99r0@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #367060 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/26/16, 9:23 AM, in article gjav3afa.agjui@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/26/16, 9:04 AM, in article fngjald.i03ta@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> ... >>>>> >>>>>> Do you think that the KKK's endorsement of your candidate Hillary Clinton >>>>> >>>>> No such thing exists. You are, of course, lying. Absolutely lying. >>>> >>>> Nope. >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3r5mGcHOEK4 >>>> >> >> No comment? Not even a retraction of the accusation that I was >> lying. Snit being Snit. Dishonest to the core. > > You lied about Clinton being my candidate. You know she is not... and even > pushed the idiotic idea that I was backing Trump. > So when you said above, "No such thing exists," you were not referring to the KKK endorsement of Hillary Clinton? OK. That's settled then. You agree that the KKK has endorsed Hillary Clinton. I understand that you claim to support Stein or whoever, but you realize that any vote, other than a vote for Trump, aids Clinton, since no other candidate besides those two has even the slightest chance of winning. So whether you agree or disagree, I'll stand by my statement that Hillary Clinton is "your candidate" by virtue of the fact that you have indicated that you will vote in a way that helps her to victory.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 09:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1d80f81d-91dd-46f2-a9ec-1edf1e7e92ad@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #367023 |
On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 9:45:38 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 8/26/16, 8:29 AM, in article hjgdsu03a.xxfa@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > > > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> On 8/26/16, 8:05 AM, in article hjgadad9fa.ko@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> > >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>>> On 8/26/16, 1:55 AM, in article > >>>> be113c51-d7d1-42d6-8d3d-88fb53674dd2@googlegroups.com, "Incubus" > >>>> <incubus9536612@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> If everyone who dislikes Snit simply ignored him, there would be little to > >>>>> complain about as he would likely get bored and seek attention elsewhere. > >>>>> By > >>>>> engaging with him in this manner, you're no less of a troll. > >>>> > >>>> He is trolling me at this point... or is just such a bigot he cannot stop > >>>> himself from spewing such nonsense. Penis checks? Equality = racism against > >>>> whites? Jews are all bigots? > >>>> > >>> > >>> I'll be waiting for a quote with Message-ID of me saying any such thing. > >> > >> I gave you seven examples yesterday, AND the subject of this thread is an > >> example. But, hey, you think you have special entitlement and privilege > >> where your words do not mean what you say. > > > > So no quotes. Just your misrepresentations. Typical lying libtard. > > The subject line of this thread and seven examples I provided yesterday are > all quotes... no matter how much you deny. > > You accused me of bigotry, as you do in the subject line, based on NOTHING > other than my backing of equality. Well, you also added in my Jewish > heritage at one point - unable to stop yourself from doubling down on your > bigotry. It was appalling. And you did go on about your Big Brother penis > check nonsense... absolutely. > > You can try to back pedal as much as you want but you cannot remove your own > comments from Usenet. You CAN say you have reconsidered and no longer think > my support for equality shows, in any way, a sign of bigotry on my part. You > CAN say you no longer support penis checks. You CAN say you no longer want > to lump all with Ashkenazi heritage together. You CAN do these things. > > I would like to see it and not hold your past against you. > > > Do you think that the KKK's endorsement of your candidate Hillary Clinton > > No such thing exists. You are, of course, lying. Absolutely lying. Lying? He can't just be "wrong"? ;) In any event, the 'Grand Dragon' in CA, Will Quigg, seems to believe HRC has a hidden agenda: <http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-03-14/ku-klux-klan-grand-dragon-will-quigg-endorses-hillary-clinton-for-president>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 13:04 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nppsr1$igf$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #367031 |
On 2016-08-26 12:07 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 9:45:38 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 8/26/16, 8:29 AM, in article hjgdsu03a.xxfa@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 8/26/16, 8:05 AM, in article hjgadad9fa.ko@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 8/26/16, 1:55 AM, in article >>>>>> be113c51-d7d1-42d6-8d3d-88fb53674dd2@googlegroups.com, "Incubus" >>>>>> <incubus9536612@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If everyone who dislikes Snit simply ignored him, there would be little to >>>>>>> complain about as he would likely get bored and seek attention elsewhere. >>>>>>> By >>>>>>> engaging with him in this manner, you're no less of a troll. >>>>>> >>>>>> He is trolling me at this point... or is just such a bigot he cannot stop >>>>>> himself from spewing such nonsense. Penis checks? Equality = racism against >>>>>> whites? Jews are all bigots? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I'll be waiting for a quote with Message-ID of me saying any such thing. >>>> >>>> I gave you seven examples yesterday, AND the subject of this thread is an >>>> example. But, hey, you think you have special entitlement and privilege >>>> where your words do not mean what you say. >>> >>> So no quotes. Just your misrepresentations. Typical lying libtard. >> >> The subject line of this thread and seven examples I provided yesterday are >> all quotes... no matter how much you deny. >> >> You accused me of bigotry, as you do in the subject line, based on NOTHING >> other than my backing of equality. Well, you also added in my Jewish >> heritage at one point - unable to stop yourself from doubling down on your >> bigotry. It was appalling. And you did go on about your Big Brother penis >> check nonsense... absolutely. >> >> You can try to back pedal as much as you want but you cannot remove your own >> comments from Usenet. You CAN say you have reconsidered and no longer think >> my support for equality shows, in any way, a sign of bigotry on my part. You >> CAN say you no longer support penis checks. You CAN say you no longer want >> to lump all with Ashkenazi heritage together. You CAN do these things. >> >> I would like to see it and not hold your past against you. >> >>> Do you think that the KKK's endorsement of your candidate Hillary Clinton >> >> No such thing exists. You are, of course, lying. Absolutely lying. > > Lying? He can't just be "wrong"? ;) > > In any event, the 'Grand Dragon' in CA, Will Quigg, seems to believe HRC has a hidden agenda: > > <http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-03-14/ku-klux-klan-grand-dragon-will-quigg-endorses-hillary-clinton-for-president> It should be noted that NO mainstream media followed that story at all. David Duke's supposed endorsement of Trump, however, was everywhere. -- Silver Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 10:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E5C602.7A3FC%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #367058 |
On 8/26/16, 10:04 AM, in article nppsr1$igf$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>> You can try to back pedal as much as you want but you cannot remove your own >>> comments from Usenet. You CAN say you have reconsidered and no longer think >>> my support for equality shows, in any way, a sign of bigotry on my part. You >>> CAN say you no longer support penis checks. You CAN say you no longer want >>> to lump all with Ashkenazi heritage together. You CAN do these things. >>> >>> I would like to see it and not hold your past against you. >>> >>>> Do you think that the KKK's endorsement of your candidate Hillary Clinton >>> >>> No such thing exists. You are, of course, lying. Absolutely lying. >> >> Lying? He can't just be "wrong"? ;) >> >> In any event, the 'Grand Dragon' in CA, Will Quigg, seems to believe HRC has >> a hidden agenda: >> >> <http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-03-14/ku-klux-klan-grand-dragon-wil >> l-quigg-endorses-hillary-clinton-for-president> > > It should be noted that NO mainstream media followed that story at all. > David Duke's supposed endorsement of Trump, however, was everywhere. And the endorsement of the idiot tied to the epipen scandal was tossed at Clinton. BOTH are wrong. What matters is what people do and say, NOT what others say of them. Carroll knows this but still uses his list of alleged quotes against me because he cannot find actual quotes FROM me. Has been driving him crazy for over a decade. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 10:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <315715b1-81c9-43f3-8b14-4234a77053bc@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #367063 |
On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 11:10:16 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 8/26/16, 10:04 AM, in article nppsr1$igf$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" > <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > > >>> You can try to back pedal as much as you want but you cannot remove your own > >>> comments from Usenet. You CAN say you have reconsidered and no longer think > >>> my support for equality shows, in any way, a sign of bigotry on my part. You > >>> CAN say you no longer support penis checks. You CAN say you no longer want > >>> to lump all with Ashkenazi heritage together. You CAN do these things. > >>> > >>> I would like to see it and not hold your past against you. > >>> > >>>> Do you think that the KKK's endorsement of your candidate Hillary Clinton > >>> > >>> No such thing exists. You are, of course, lying. Absolutely lying. > >> > >> Lying? He can't just be "wrong"? ;) > >> > >> In any event, the 'Grand Dragon' in CA, Will Quigg, seems to believe HRC has > >> a hidden agenda: > >> > >> <http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-03-14/ku-klux-klan-grand-dragon-wil > >> l-quigg-endorses-hillary-clinton-for-president> > > > > It should be noted that NO mainstream media followed that story at all. > > David Duke's supposed endorsement of Trump, however, was everywhere. > > And the endorsement of the idiot tied to the epipen scandal was tossed at > Clinton. > > BOTH are wrong. You were just given proof of what you previously labeled an 'absolute lie' and *this* is your response? LOL! > What matters is what people do and say Yeah... and in the video Owl put up you just saw the guy "say", publicly, exactly what Owl was talking about (and, above, I pointed to a news article about it). >, NOT what others say > of them. Carroll knows this but still uses his list of alleged quotes I'll bite: What are "alleged quotes"? > against me because he cannot find actual quotes FROM me. Has been driving > him crazy for over a decade. Translation: They are *still* driving you crazy. By the way, the quotes on your list are 'to you' and/or 'about you'... if they are "against" you that's your doing, not mine. Like many posters, I've posted all kinds of disingenuous quotes (lies) FROM you, only to watch you deny them. But you can't deny all the people who have caught you doing the same thing to them (which is the reason your list exists), yet, you keep trying... and it's hilarious to watch ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 17:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hgadalf.iv@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #367058 |
Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > On 2016-08-26 12:07 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >> On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 9:45:38 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>> On 8/26/16, 8:29 AM, in article hjgdsu03a.xxfa@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 8/26/16, 8:05 AM, in article hjgadad9fa.ko@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 8/26/16, 1:55 AM, in article >>>>>>> be113c51-d7d1-42d6-8d3d-88fb53674dd2@googlegroups.com, "Incubus" >>>>>>> <incubus9536612@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If everyone who dislikes Snit simply ignored him, there would be little to >>>>>>>> complain about as he would likely get bored and seek attention elsewhere. >>>>>>>> By >>>>>>>> engaging with him in this manner, you're no less of a troll. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> He is trolling me at this point... or is just such a bigot he cannot stop >>>>>>> himself from spewing such nonsense. Penis checks? Equality = racism against >>>>>>> whites? Jews are all bigots? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I'll be waiting for a quote with Message-ID of me saying any such thing. >>>>> >>>>> I gave you seven examples yesterday, AND the subject of this thread is an >>>>> example. But, hey, you think you have special entitlement and privilege >>>>> where your words do not mean what you say. >>>> >>>> So no quotes. Just your misrepresentations. Typical lying libtard. >>> >>> The subject line of this thread and seven examples I provided yesterday are >>> all quotes... no matter how much you deny. >>> >>> You accused me of bigotry, as you do in the subject line, based on NOTHING >>> other than my backing of equality. Well, you also added in my Jewish >>> heritage at one point - unable to stop yourself from doubling down on your >>> bigotry. It was appalling. And you did go on about your Big Brother penis >>> check nonsense... absolutely. >>> >>> You can try to back pedal as much as you want but you cannot remove your own >>> comments from Usenet. You CAN say you have reconsidered and no longer think >>> my support for equality shows, in any way, a sign of bigotry on my part. You >>> CAN say you no longer support penis checks. You CAN say you no longer want >>> to lump all with Ashkenazi heritage together. You CAN do these things. >>> >>> I would like to see it and not hold your past against you. >>> >>>> Do you think that the KKK's endorsement of your candidate Hillary Clinton >>> >>> No such thing exists. You are, of course, lying. Absolutely lying. >> >> Lying? He can't just be "wrong"? ;) >> >> In any event, the 'Grand Dragon' in CA, Will Quigg, seems to believe HRC has a hidden agenda: >> >> <http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-03-14/ku-klux-klan-grand-dragon-will-quigg-endorses-hillary-clinton-for-president> > > It should be noted that NO mainstream media followed that story at all. > David Duke's supposed endorsement of Trump, however, was everywhere. > Along with video of some other klantard "endorsing Trump." But DFS trusts the MSM. They are honest and respectable and professional.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 13:30 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nppuc7$p1q$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #367064 |
On 2016-08-26 1:10 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >> On 2016-08-26 12:07 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 9:45:38 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>> On 8/26/16, 8:29 AM, in article hjgdsu03a.xxfa@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 8/26/16, 8:05 AM, in article hjgadad9fa.ko@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 8/26/16, 1:55 AM, in article >>>>>>>> be113c51-d7d1-42d6-8d3d-88fb53674dd2@googlegroups.com, "Incubus" >>>>>>>> <incubus9536612@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If everyone who dislikes Snit simply ignored him, there would be little to >>>>>>>>> complain about as he would likely get bored and seek attention elsewhere. >>>>>>>>> By >>>>>>>>> engaging with him in this manner, you're no less of a troll. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> He is trolling me at this point... or is just such a bigot he cannot stop >>>>>>>> himself from spewing such nonsense. Penis checks? Equality = racism against >>>>>>>> whites? Jews are all bigots? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'll be waiting for a quote with Message-ID of me saying any such thing. >>>>>> >>>>>> I gave you seven examples yesterday, AND the subject of this thread is an >>>>>> example. But, hey, you think you have special entitlement and privilege >>>>>> where your words do not mean what you say. >>>>> >>>>> So no quotes. Just your misrepresentations. Typical lying libtard. >>>> >>>> The subject line of this thread and seven examples I provided yesterday are >>>> all quotes... no matter how much you deny. >>>> >>>> You accused me of bigotry, as you do in the subject line, based on NOTHING >>>> other than my backing of equality. Well, you also added in my Jewish >>>> heritage at one point - unable to stop yourself from doubling down on your >>>> bigotry. It was appalling. And you did go on about your Big Brother penis >>>> check nonsense... absolutely. >>>> >>>> You can try to back pedal as much as you want but you cannot remove your own >>>> comments from Usenet. You CAN say you have reconsidered and no longer think >>>> my support for equality shows, in any way, a sign of bigotry on my part. You >>>> CAN say you no longer support penis checks. You CAN say you no longer want >>>> to lump all with Ashkenazi heritage together. You CAN do these things. >>>> >>>> I would like to see it and not hold your past against you. >>>> >>>>> Do you think that the KKK's endorsement of your candidate Hillary Clinton >>>> >>>> No such thing exists. You are, of course, lying. Absolutely lying. >>> >>> Lying? He can't just be "wrong"? ;) >>> >>> In any event, the 'Grand Dragon' in CA, Will Quigg, seems to believe HRC has a hidden agenda: >>> >>> <http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-03-14/ku-klux-klan-grand-dragon-will-quigg-endorses-hillary-clinton-for-president> >> >> It should be noted that NO mainstream media followed that story at all. >> David Duke's supposed endorsement of Trump, however, was everywhere. >> > > Along with video of some other klantard "endorsing Trump." > But DFS trusts the MSM. They are honest and respectable and professional. Yeah, it's not like CNN ever lied or anything. <https://nypost.com/2014/11/29/why-cnn-wants-you-to-believe-the-ferguson-protests-were-peaceful/> , <http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2016/02/08/carsongate-cover-up-cnn-fact-checker-lies-about-ted-cruz/> , <http://www.naturalnews.com/050547_sanctuary_cities_CNN_Donald_Trump.html> ... I can go on and on. I will give them credit for the way they treated their Republican debates and find that they did a decent job but you'd have to be a gigantic Snit to trust them on news. -- Silver Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 17:44 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <afhjvid0.3agf@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #367064 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/26/16, 10:10 AM, in article hgadalf.iv@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >>>>>> Do you think that the KKK's endorsement of your candidate Hillary Clinton >>>>> >>>>> No such thing exists. You are, of course, lying. Absolutely lying. >>>> >>>> Lying? He can't just be "wrong"? ;) >>>> >>>> In any event, the 'Grand Dragon' in CA, Will Quigg, seems to believe HRC has >>>> a hidden agenda: >>>> >>>> <http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-03-14/ku-klux-klan-grand-dragon-wi >>>> ll-quigg-endorses-hillary-clinton-for-president> >>> >>> It should be noted that NO mainstream media followed that story at all. >>> David Duke's supposed endorsement of Trump, however, was everywhere. >>> >> >> Along with video of some other klantard "endorsing Trump." >> But DFS trusts the MSM. They are honest and respectable and professional. > > You made that up. Why? > What did I "make up"? The Klan thing was in a Hillary Clinton ad. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gcT5anvp9XY It has been discussed ad nauseum on the MSM for the past couple of days. DFS was asked about his trust for the MSM in the context of its reliability vs that of the alternative media. He said something to the effect of trusting the MSM for the most part.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 18:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hjafau0e893.ajiu@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #367089 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 8/26/16, 10:44 AM, in article afhjvid0.3agf@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 8/26/16, 10:10 AM, in article hgadalf.iv@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>> Do you think that the KKK's endorsement of your candidate Hillary
>>>>>>>> Clinton
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No such thing exists. You are, of course, lying. Absolutely lying.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lying? He can't just be "wrong"? ;)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In any event, the 'Grand Dragon' in CA, Will Quigg, seems to believe HRC
>>>>>> has
>>>>>> a hidden agenda:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-03-14/ku-klux-klan-grand-dragon-
>>>>>> wi
>>>>>> ll-quigg-endorses-hillary-clinton-for-president>
>>>>>
>>>>> It should be noted that NO mainstream media followed that story at all.
>>>>> David Duke's supposed endorsement of Trump, however, was everywhere.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Along with video of some other klantard "endorsing Trump."
>>>> But DFS trusts the MSM. They are honest and respectable and professional.
>>>
>>> You made that up. Why?
>>>
>>
>> What did I "make up"?
>
> About Clinton being my candidate when I have been very clear I do not back
> her in any way.
>
I have already explained how the way you intend to vote amounts
to supporting Clinton.
> Oh, and about DFS saying he trusts the MSM. You just make things up all the
> time... what makes you feel entitled and privileged enough to do so?
>
I didn't "make anything up" about that either:
<quote>
From: DFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Another day
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 22:29:15 -0400
Message-ID: <npo9it$miv$2@dont-email.me>
On 8/25/2016 7:37 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote:
> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>> You and GreyCloud babbling on sure is.
>>
>
> You blindly believe everything the MSM tells you
Most of it. Why not? They're professionals who are held to the highest
journalistic standards. Their integrity is all they have.
When a "MSM" reporter or producer is caught telling even mild lies
they're usually fired outright. When Alex Jones spews outrageous lies
and idiocy, nothing happens to him.
</quote>
>> The Klan thing was in a Hillary Clinton ad.
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gcT5anvp9XY
>>
>> It has been discussed ad nauseum on the MSM for the past couple of
>> days.
>>
>> DFS was asked about his trust for the MSM in the context of its
>> reliability vs that of the alternative media. He said something to the
>> effect of trusting the MSM for the most part.
>>
>
>
>
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5]
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web