Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #354536 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sandman <mr@sandman.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-05-10 18:22 +0000 |
| Last post | 2016-05-16 09:54 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 109 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-10 18:22 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-10 13:35 -0500
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-10 17:53 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-10 17:53 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-11 15:51 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-11 17:26 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 10:40 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 12:16 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-11 22:57 +0200
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 18:02 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 19:12 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-12 13:27 +0200
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-12 08:48 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 06:21 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-12 08:42 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 09:29 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-05-12 21:47 -0300
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-12 23:14 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-05-13 08:52 -0300
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-13 09:12 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-13 15:38 +0200
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-13 09:50 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-13 18:06 +0200
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 09:15 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-13 18:26 +0200
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 09:37 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-05-13 09:39 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Alan Bundis <birdwatcheralanbundis@mymail.net> - 2016-05-13 17:34 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 10:39 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 10:57 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-13 18:38 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-13 14:44 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 11:56 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-13 20:07 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 09:04 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-14 21:35 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-13 19:20 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 14:29 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-13 23:37 +0200
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 15:24 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-13 21:39 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-13 23:19 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-13 21:09 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-13 21:13 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-13 14:23 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <PeteM@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 11:23 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-14 15:59 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-14 16:28 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 09:30 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 13:07 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <PeteM@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 12:55 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-14 17:22 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 15:11 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-14 20:52 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 18:14 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-15 00:29 +0200
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 19:43 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-14 23:20 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 19:36 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-14 23:57 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 20:18 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-15 00:29 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 21:00 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-15 01:13 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 09:54 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-15 14:41 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 09:47 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-15 08:21 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 09:59 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Alan Bundis <birdwatcheralanbundis@mymail.net> - 2016-05-13 17:37 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-25 17:23 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 15:39 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-25 20:23 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 08:21 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-14 22:00 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 10:24 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-15 14:30 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-15 18:48 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-15 15:03 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-15 12:16 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-15 19:32 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-16 15:13 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-16 19:22 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-16 16:01 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-16 21:27 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-15 12:06 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-13 14:08 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-13 16:31 +0000
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> - 2016-05-14 19:46 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-05-14 08:47 -0300
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-15 13:04 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-05-18 09:01 -0300
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-16 07:41 -0500
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat sbd <sbd.pambu@safe-mail.net> - 2016-05-18 09:03 -0300
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-13 10:28 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-05-13 13:44 -0400
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-16 07:36 -0500
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-12 08:37 -0700
Snit digest 236 / 2016-05-12 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-12 16:06 +0000
Re: Snit digest 236 / 2016-05-12 tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 09:32 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-12 08:36 -0700
Snit digest 235 / 2016-05-12 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-12 16:02 +0000
Re: Snit digest 235 / 2016-05-12 tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 09:32 -0700
Re: Snit digest 235 / 2016-05-12 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 09:37 -0700
Re: Snit digest 235 / 2016-05-12 tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-12 18:28 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-18 11:29 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> - 2016-05-11 18:12 -0700
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2016-05-16 13:57 +0100
Re: Snit latest sock puppet exposed: meat Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-16 09:54 -0700
Page 3 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 Next page →
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-13 21:39 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <tugi00a3r.a@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #355139 |
Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote: > In article <fhjg0afae.kig@rooftop.invalid>, owl wrote: > >> > > Alan Bundis: >> > > 3. fretwizzer@gmail = Steve Carroll = fretwizzen@gmail and that >> > > is a fact. >> > >> > DFS: >> > Evidence of this 'fact'? >> >> Alan Bundis == meat, et al. > > Well, in that it's one of Snit sock puppets, yes. But Snit has several ways of > trying to hide his tracks. One is using TOR accounts. He uses this to post as > meat, tmelmosfire and the forged Steve Carroll account. But he also uses a > Powerhouse VPN to post with these throwaway names. He has used it to forge > flatfish, and also used names like Edward Stansfield, Big Fish in a Small > Crotch, Barry H, mike antipasto, anonymous, Nobody, Somebody, Crusher, Omar, > Richard King, Richard Bone and Miguel Lubricant to name a few. They have all > used the same IP from a Powerhouse VPN. > Those nicks you list at the end are definitely all the same person, and all post from one of the Yokubaitis company networks. But I have yet to see any link to Snit from any of them, and I have looked pretty hard to find one. Thelma is definitely a Snit sock, as are the Carroll fakes, IMO; but the others look more like flatfish or somebody channelling flatfish. I know that sometimes they "come to Snit's rescue", but when that happens, the post reeks with sarcasm.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sandman <mr@sandman.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-13 23:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sandman-7ae2ce07b31c88730d18f443ec3b6712@individual.net> |
| In reply to | #355168 |
In article <tugi00a3r.a@rooftop.invalid>, owl wrote: > > > > > Alan Bundis: > > > > > 3. fretwizzer@gmail = Steve Carroll = > > > > > fretwizzen@gmail and that is a fact. > > > > > > > > DFS: > > > > Evidence of this 'fact'? > > > > > > owl: > > > Alan Bundis == meat, et al. > > > > Sandman: > > Well, in that it's one of Snit sock puppets, yes. But Snit has > > several ways of trying to hide his tracks. One is using TOR > > accounts. He uses this to post as meat, tmelmosfire and the forged > > Steve Carroll account. But he also uses a Powerhouse VPN to post > > with these throwaway names. He has used it to forge flatfish, and > > also used names like Edward Stansfield, Big Fish in a Small > > Crotch, Barry H, mike antipasto, anonymous, Nobody, Somebody, > > Crusher, Omar, Richard King, Richard Bone and Miguel Lubricant to > > name a few. They have all used the same IP from a Powerhouse VPN. > > Those nicks you list at the end are definitely all the same person, > and all post from one of the Yokubaitis company networks. But I have > yet to see any link to Snit from any of them, and I have looked > pretty hard to find one. Thelma is definitely a Snit sock, as are > the Carroll fakes, IMO; but the others look more like flatfish or > somebody channelling flatfish. I know that sometimes they "come to > Snit's rescue", but when that happens, the post reeks with sarcasm. Well, Snit's methods are somewhat counterintuitive, and it's used to try to cover his track - but the common methodology is to whip up or create as much attention around Snit as possible. For instance, after new years, Snit stopped posting. Maybe it was because he had exposed a bit too much about his personal life and his wife, or maybe it was personal (medical) reasons. During this period, no posts were made by these accounts either. No faked Steve Carroll posts, no Powerhouse VPN posts, no TOR posts. That was almost four months (2016-01-01 to 2016-03-22). For instance, "tmelmosfire" stopped posting between 2015-12-23 and 2016-05- 04. Snit did, however, "return" a bit earlier, using his Powerhouse VPN, posting as (among others) flatfish. For example: <1xl7ndud6h4pb$.6vxsm01b5z81.dlg@40tude.net> I actually think that him using socks is the only way he can talk/write at least semi-normally. But you can see in my followup to the above post that his anti-Steve Carroll comments shone through and I double checked the IP. But it's an interesting thought though. He is universally hated and despised by everyone in CSMA and COLA and the only way he can have a normal discussion/conversation is by creating a sock puppet and try to maintain some form of mental stability for a period of time. Ultimately it shines through of course. It's a bit of a cycle though. Just see all the Steve Carroll threads he has created lately, trying to whip up some attention, and his normal cut'n'paste job he does when he just want to flood the group with something, perhaps hoping something will stick. -- Sandman
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sandman <mr@sandman.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-13 21:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sandman-6fe0dd4b97849abef37ae833860595bb@individual.net> |
| In reply to | #355134 |
In article <nh573m$v4l$1@dont-email.me>, DFS wrote:
> > Alan Bundis:
> > 3. fretwizzer@gmail = Steve Carroll = fretwizzen@gmail and that is
> > a fact.
>
> Evidence of this 'fact'?
Here's the evidence:
Snit posting the same content using his "Snit" name and his "meat" name:
meat: <ngr0ge$dr7$1@dont-email.me>
Snit: <D356534D.72652%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
("meat" hasn't posted since this screwup, after having posted multiple posts a
day up until then).
Then also, Snit posting the same content using his "tmelmosfire" name and his
"meat" name:
meat: <ngqg1i$uv2$1@dont-email.me>
tmelmosfire: <e84ad25c-3327-4930-a977-090bf14f9f15@googlegroups.com>
And then lastly, his "tmelmosfire" name and his forged "Steve Carroll" account
sharing the same TOR posting host:
89.234.157.254:
- tmelmosfire (tmelmosfire@gmail.com)
<b888d078-2fcf-40e4-880a-747d29ad6daa@googlegroups.com>
- Steve Carroll (fretwizzen@gmail.com)
<9de4f627-ae53-4fde-a1de-651e82a223bf@googlegroups.com>
217.12.199.209:
- tmelmosfire (tmelmosfire@gmail.com)
<452d936f-6e37-43d2-9c03-58a4e3509e07@googlegroups.com>
- Steve Carroll (fretwizzen@gmail.com)
<57ca88be-51b4-46ec-8f9d-ce922bc292ca@googlegroups.com>
94.242.246.23:
- tmelmosfire (tmelmosfire@gmail.com)
<93b39b89-ecde-460f-be59-fca39f17b406@googlegroups.com>
- Steve Carroll (fretwizzen@gmail.com)
<054d8cf3-1f41-4293-b10c-c866aaa55b8b@googlegroups.com>
37.187.129.166:
- (tmelmosfire@gmail.com)
<00a75186-df8e-4694-9754-2807c58f6b32@googlegroups.com>
- Steve Carroll (fretwizzen@gmail.com)
<8cf48895-8808-4847-8d85-a53acb00b57c@googlegroups.com>
etc, etc, many more overlaps.
--
Sandman
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-13 21:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ghjv0afa.gi@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #355148 |
Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote:
> In article <nh573m$v4l$1@dont-email.me>, DFS wrote:
>
>> > Alan Bundis:
>> > 3. fretwizzer@gmail = Steve Carroll = fretwizzen@gmail and that is
>> > a fact.
>>
>> Evidence of this 'fact'?
>
> Here's the evidence:
>
> Snit posting the same content using his "Snit" name and his "meat" name:
>
> meat: <ngr0ge$dr7$1@dont-email.me>
> Snit: <D356534D.72652%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
>
> ("meat" hasn't posted since this screwup, after having posted multiple posts a
> day up until then).
>
Alan Bundis is meat.
anon@lowtide:~/code/md5$ grep -c 9ce25ee9d783bb9a1b1356ba2d886ac0 *.out
frog.out:0
poho.out:0
unus.out:1
yhc.out:0
anon@lowtide:~/code/md5$
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-13 14:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c8cf2b84-fd91-4815-9acc-9967effd25e2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #355151 |
On Friday, May 13, 2016 at 3:13:10 PM UTC-6, owl wrote:
> Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote:
> > In article <nh573m$v4l$1@dont-email.me>, DFS wrote:
> >
> >> > Alan Bundis:
> >> > 3. fretwizzer@gmail = Steve Carroll = fretwizzen@gmail and that is
> >> > a fact.
> >>
> >> Evidence of this 'fact'?
> >
> > Here's the evidence:
> >
> > Snit posting the same content using his "Snit" name and his "meat" name:
> >
> > meat: <ngr0ge$dr7$1@dont-email.me>
> > Snit: <D356534D.72652%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
> >
> > ("meat" hasn't posted since this screwup, after having posted multiple posts a
> > day up until then).
> >
>
> Alan Bundis is meat.
Which isn't far from... Al Bundy plays his meat ;)
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CW7Ufq_seR8>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Moustache Pete" <PeteM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-14 11:23 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nh7fn6$kss$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #355148 |
"Sandman" wrote in message
news:sandman-6fe0dd4b97849abef37ae833860595bb@individual.net...
In article <nh573m$v4l$1@dont-email.me>, DFS wrote:
> > Alan Bundis:
> > 3. fretwizzer@gmail = Steve Carroll = fretwizzen@gmail and that is
> > a fact.
>
> Evidence of this 'fact'?
Here's the evidence:
Snit posting the same content using his "Snit" name and his "meat" name:
meat: <ngr0ge$dr7$1@dont-email.me>
Snit: <D356534D.72652%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
("meat" hasn't posted since this screwup, after having posted multiple posts
a
day up until then).
Then also, Snit posting the same content using his "tmelmosfire" name and
his
"meat" name:
meat: <ngqg1i$uv2$1@dont-email.me>
tmelmosfire: <e84ad25c-3327-4930-a977-090bf14f9f15@googlegroups.com>
And then lastly, his "tmelmosfire" name and his forged "Steve Carroll"
account
sharing the same TOR posting host:
89.234.157.254:
- tmelmosfire (tmelmosfire@gmail.com)
<b888d078-2fcf-40e4-880a-747d29ad6daa@googlegroups.com>
- Steve Carroll (fretwizzen@gmail.com)
<9de4f627-ae53-4fde-a1de-651e82a223bf@googlegroups.com>
217.12.199.209:
- tmelmosfire (tmelmosfire@gmail.com)
<452d936f-6e37-43d2-9c03-58a4e3509e07@googlegroups.com>
- Steve Carroll (fretwizzen@gmail.com)
<57ca88be-51b4-46ec-8f9d-ce922bc292ca@googlegroups.com>
94.242.246.23:
- tmelmosfire (tmelmosfire@gmail.com)
<93b39b89-ecde-460f-be59-fca39f17b406@googlegroups.com>
- Steve Carroll (fretwizzen@gmail.com)
<054d8cf3-1f41-4293-b10c-c866aaa55b8b@googlegroups.com>
37.187.129.166:
- (tmelmosfire@gmail.com)
<00a75186-df8e-4694-9754-2807c58f6b32@googlegroups.com>
- Steve Carroll (fretwizzen@gmail.com)
<8cf48895-8808-4847-8d85-a53acb00b57c@googlegroups.com>
etc, etc, many more overlaps.
**************************************************************************
Snit must have really PWND you. You should accept your defeat and fuck off.
Your incessant rants about Snit reinforce what an asshole you really are.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sandman <mr@sandman.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-14 15:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sandman-2f839e2304e2c6af12d9128f205eb396@individual.net> |
| In reply to | #355289 |
In article <nh7fn6$kss$1@dont-email.me>, Moustache Pete wrote: > Snit must have really PWND you. You should accept your defeat and > fuck off. Your incessant rants about Snit reinforce what an asshole > you really are. Hello Michael! And no, citizens of COLA, this isn't Michael Glasser, this is Michael Patelmo from Stuart Florida. He must have grown bored of being ignored in CSMA and wanted to troll COLA a bit. When using your Eternal September account, Michael, don't use it with the same IP you use to post to CSMA :-D 09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c = 2601:584:201:b069:2870:1b9c:7b2c:4f06 -- Sandman
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-14 16:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhgjf03a.fjig@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #355294 |
Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote: > In article <nh7fn6$kss$1@dont-email.me>, Moustache Pete wrote: > >> Snit must have really PWND you. You should accept your defeat and >> fuck off. Your incessant rants about Snit reinforce what an asshole >> you really are. > > Hello Michael! > > And no, citizens of COLA, this isn't Michael Glasser, this is Michael Patelmo > from Stuart Florida. He must have grown bored of being ignored in CSMA and > wanted to troll COLA a bit. > > When using your Eternal September account, Michael, don't use it with the same > IP you use to post to CSMA :-D > > 09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c = 2601:584:201:b069:2870:1b9c:7b2c:4f06 > Are Michael and Walter the same person?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-14 09:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4e370e37-fabf-4697-99ea-52af60855040@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #355300 |
On Saturday, May 14, 2016 at 10:28:24 AM UTC-6, owl wrote: > Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote: > > In article <nh7fn6$kss$1@dont-email.me>, Moustache Pete wrote: > > > >> Snit must have really PWND you. You should accept your defeat and > >> fuck off. Your incessant rants about Snit reinforce what an asshole > >> you really are. > > > > Hello Michael! > > > > And no, citizens of COLA, this isn't Michael Glasser, this is Michael Patelmo > > from Stuart Florida. He must have grown bored of being ignored in CSMA and > > wanted to troll COLA a bit. > > > > When using your Eternal September account, Michael, don't use it with the same > > IP you use to post to CSMA :-D > > > > 09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c = 2601:584:201:b069:2870:1b9c:7b2c:4f06 > > > > Are Michael and Walter the same person? And undoubtedly many others, in CSMA and COLA.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | tmelmosfire <tmelmosfire@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-14 13:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <cc59b24f-0692-42a9-b369-eb6e0bbf3bd7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #355302 |
Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll is a nearly 60 year old guy who is single, broke and has no skills. He blames Snit for his loss of his wife and girlfriend. Steven is jealous of what Snit has and in a narcissistic rage repeatedly works to take it away from him. For over 10 years he has failed at even this. Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll is an utter failure in life.
Of his online life Steven says
I've been booted off by past providers before because people
complain about me and all my bullshit. I don't want to lose my ISP
*again* but I still need my army of sock puppets so I continually
search usenet for whatever servers I haven't yet been booted
from.
Some examples where Steven has been booted
X10 Hosting booted Steven for inappropriate activity
http://tinyurl.com/z92qmz4
Comcast booted Steven for inappropriate activity
http://tinyurl.com/h75nh9l
FreeHostingEU booted Steven for copyright infringement http://devsite.eu.pn
AwardSpace (atwebpages.com) booted Steven for breaking terms of service
http://demsites.atwebpages.com/pokeman
His wife booted Steven to the curb for cheating on her
He has not posted from fretwizzen Google account since shortly after I complained. Seems he lost that too.
Only site Steven Petruzzellis has pointed to that is still available
http://www.oldneighborhoodrestaurant.net
http://tinyurl.com/zgby6mp
Made by the Go Daddy Website builder and is utter crap. Later he denied he said he was merely taking credit for someone else's work but Steven is the contact person http://tinyurl.com/hcw6dul http://tinyurl.com/hc7ee9q
He likely went to the Go Daddy Website Builder after he failed to get WordPress installed.
https://mu.wordpress.org/forums/topic/13879
This is why Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll attacks Snit.
Steven Petruzzellis was is divorced because his wife caught him screwing another woman.
Snit is married and by all appearances happily so.
He never complains about his wife in COLA.
Steven Petruzzellis is living on charity of a friend in a single room.
Snit does not live in a mansion or even a high end home but has a house and a yard.
Steven Petruzzellis has two kids but no respect. He repeatedly called Ryan his "little screwup" and refers to his son Steve as a "dick" and worse. He mocks his possible future daughter-in-law as someone who takes too many selfies and is focused only on herself
Snit has two kids (or more) and never speaks poorly of them in public.
No reason to think they are not a happy family.
Steven Petruzzellis claims to be a stay at home dad who pays thousands of dollars for day care. Steven has no job and no purpose in life. Steven has given up and now seeks a mother-figure to date.
Snit has his own business doing technical work and also teaches.
Snit offers a true contribution to society.
Teachers are truly under appreciated.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Moustache Pete" <PeteM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-14 12:55 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nh7l2c$9eb$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #355300 |
"owl" wrote in message news:fhgjf03a.fjig@rooftop.invalid... Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote: > In article <nh7fn6$kss$1@dont-email.me>, Moustache Pete wrote: > >> Snit must have really PWND you. You should accept your defeat and >> fuck off. Your incessant rants about Snit reinforce what an asshole >> you really are. > > Hello Michael! > > And no, citizens of COLA, this isn't Michael Glasser, this is Michael > Patelmo > from Stuart Florida. He must have grown bored of being ignored in CSMA and > wanted to troll COLA a bit. > > When using your Eternal September account, Michael, don't use it with the > same > IP you use to post to CSMA :-D > > 09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c = 2601:584:201:b069:2870:1b9c:7b2c:4f06 > >Are Michael and Walter the same person? Nah. He's just obsessed and stupid. Really stupid, as you can see by his posts.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-14 17:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhjd0p3raf.g@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #355309 |
Moustache Pete <PeteM@gmail.com> wrote: > > > "owl" wrote in message news:fhgjf03a.fjig@rooftop.invalid... > > Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote: >> In article <nh7fn6$kss$1@dont-email.me>, Moustache Pete wrote: >> >>> Snit must have really PWND you. You should accept your defeat and >>> fuck off. Your incessant rants about Snit reinforce what an asshole >>> you really are. >> >> Hello Michael! >> >> And no, citizens of COLA, this isn't Michael Glasser, this is Michael >> Patelmo >> from Stuart Florida. He must have grown bored of being ignored in CSMA and >> wanted to troll COLA a bit. >> >> When using your Eternal September account, Michael, don't use it with the >> same >> IP you use to post to CSMA :-D >> >> 09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c = 2601:584:201:b069:2870:1b9c:7b2c:4f06 >> > >>Are Michael and Walter the same person? > > Nah. He's just obsessed and stupid. Really stupid, as you can see by his > posts. > How so? Your IP appears in posts by "Michael" and "Walter Myer."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-14 15:11 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nh7t1m$8b0$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #355312 |
"owl" wrote in message news:fhjd0p3raf.g@rooftop.invalid... Moustache Pete <PeteM@gmail.com> wrote: > > > "owl" wrote in message news:fhgjf03a.fjig@rooftop.invalid... > > Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote: >> In article <nh7fn6$kss$1@dont-email.me>, Moustache Pete wrote: >> >>> Snit must have really PWND you. You should accept your defeat and >>> fuck off. Your incessant rants about Snit reinforce what an asshole >>> you really are. >> >> Hello Michael! >> >> And no, citizens of COLA, this isn't Michael Glasser, this is Michael >> Patelmo >> from Stuart Florida. He must have grown bored of being ignored in CSMA >> and >> wanted to troll COLA a bit. >> >> When using your Eternal September account, Michael, don't use it with the >> same >> IP you use to post to CSMA :-D >> >> 09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c = 2601:584:201:b069:2870:1b9c:7b2c:4f06 >> > >>Are Michael and Walter the same person? > > Nah. He's just obsessed and stupid. Really stupid, as you can see by his > posts. > >How so? Your IP appears in posts by "Michael" and "Walter Myer." Posts by "Michael", haven't seen any of those. Walter Meyer, yes I've seen them. Am I either? No.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-14 20:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhjg0af.aa34@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #355323 |
Moustache Pete <petem@gmail.com> wrote: > > > "owl" wrote in message news:fhjd0p3raf.g@rooftop.invalid... > > Moustache Pete <PeteM@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> "owl" wrote in message news:fhgjf03a.fjig@rooftop.invalid... >> >> Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote: >>> In article <nh7fn6$kss$1@dont-email.me>, Moustache Pete wrote: >>> >>>> Snit must have really PWND you. You should accept your defeat and >>>> fuck off. Your incessant rants about Snit reinforce what an asshole >>>> you really are. >>> >>> Hello Michael! >>> >>> And no, citizens of COLA, this isn't Michael Glasser, this is Michael >>> Patelmo >>> from Stuart Florida. He must have grown bored of being ignored in CSMA >>> and >>> wanted to troll COLA a bit. >>> >>> When using your Eternal September account, Michael, don't use it with the >>> same >>> IP you use to post to CSMA :-D >>> >>> 09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c = 2601:584:201:b069:2870:1b9c:7b2c:4f06 >>> >> >>>Are Michael and Walter the same person? >> >> Nah. He's just obsessed and stupid. Really stupid, as you can see by his >> posts. >> > >>How so? Your IP appears in posts by "Michael" and "Walter Myer." > > Posts by "Michael", haven't seen any of those. Walter Meyer, yes I've seen > them. Am I either? No. > So you are just using their headers to appear to be them. If so, remove the incriminating header and reply to this post.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-14 18:14 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nh87p7$img$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #355343 |
"owl" wrote in message news:fhjg0af.aa34@rooftop.invalid... Moustache Pete <petem@gmail.com> wrote: > > > "owl" wrote in message news:fhjd0p3raf.g@rooftop.invalid... > > Moustache Pete <PeteM@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> "owl" wrote in message news:fhgjf03a.fjig@rooftop.invalid... >> >> Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote: >>> In article <nh7fn6$kss$1@dont-email.me>, Moustache Pete wrote: >>> >>>> Snit must have really PWND you. You should accept your defeat and >>>> fuck off. Your incessant rants about Snit reinforce what an asshole >>>> you really are. >>> >>> Hello Michael! >>> >>> And no, citizens of COLA, this isn't Michael Glasser, this is Michael >>> Patelmo >>> from Stuart Florida. He must have grown bored of being ignored in CSMA >>> and >>> wanted to troll COLA a bit. >>> >>> When using your Eternal September account, Michael, don't use it with >>> the >>> same >>> IP you use to post to CSMA :-D >>> >>> 09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c = 2601:584:201:b069:2870:1b9c:7b2c:4f06 >>> >> >>>Are Michael and Walter the same person? >> >> Nah. He's just obsessed and stupid. Really stupid, as you can see by >> his >> posts. >> > >>How so? Your IP appears in posts by "Michael" and "Walter Myer." > > Posts by "Michael", haven't seen any of those. Walter Meyer, yes I've > seen > them. Am I either? No. > >So you are just using their headers to appear to be them. If so, remove >the incriminating header and reply to this post. There is no "incriminating" header. I am using the server I was instructed to use. You referred to "them". I know for a fact that no one called "Michael" has posted here. Maybe you can point me to one of "Michaels" posts. Anything else that I can help with?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-15 00:29 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <nh88l3$l2k$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #355360 |
Moustache Pete wrote: > > > > "owl" wrote in message news:fhjg0af.aa34@rooftop.invalid... > > Moustache Pete <petem@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> "owl" wrote in message news:fhjd0p3raf.g@rooftop.invalid... >> >> Moustache Pete <PeteM@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> "owl" wrote in message news:fhgjf03a.fjig@rooftop.invalid... >>> >>> Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote: >>>> In article <nh7fn6$kss$1@dont-email.me>, Moustache Pete wrote: >>>> >>>>> Snit must have really PWND you. You should accept your defeat and >>>>> fuck off. Your incessant rants about Snit reinforce what an asshole >>>>> you really are. >>>> >>>> Hello Michael! >>>> >>>> And no, citizens of COLA, this isn't Michael Glasser, this is Michael >>>> Patelmo >>>> from Stuart Florida. He must have grown bored of being ignored in CSMA >>>> and >>>> wanted to troll COLA a bit. >>>> >>>> When using your Eternal September account, Michael, don't use it with >>>> the >>>> same >>>> IP you use to post to CSMA :-D >>>> >>>> 09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c = >>>> 2601:584:201:b069:2870:1b9c:7b2c:4f06 >>>> >>> >>>>Are Michael and Walter the same person? >>> >>> Nah. He's just obsessed and stupid. Really stupid, as you can see by >>> his >>> posts. >>> >> >>>How so? Your IP appears in posts by "Michael" and "Walter Myer." >> >> Posts by "Michael", haven't seen any of those. Walter Meyer, yes I've >> seen >> them. Am I either? No. >> > >>So you are just using their headers to appear to be them. If so, remove >>the incriminating header and reply to this post. > > There is no "incriminating" header. I am using the server I was > instructed to use. > > You referred to "them". I know for a fact that no one called "Michael" > has > posted here. Maybe you can point me to one of "Michaels" posts. > > Anything else that I can help with? Certainly, "meat", "Onion Knight", "Ginseng root" or the other assorted socks. You are allowed to commit suicide
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-14 19:43 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nh8cvo$2kj$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #355363 |
"PeterKöhlmann" wrote in message news:nh88l3$l2k$2@dont-email.me... Moustache Pete wrote: > > > > "owl" wrote in message news:fhjg0af.aa34@rooftop.invalid... > > Moustache Pete <petem@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> "owl" wrote in message news:fhjd0p3raf.g@rooftop.invalid... >> >> Moustache Pete <PeteM@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> "owl" wrote in message news:fhgjf03a.fjig@rooftop.invalid... >>> >>> Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote: >>>> In article <nh7fn6$kss$1@dont-email.me>, Moustache Pete wrote: >>>> >>>>> Snit must have really PWND you. You should accept your defeat and >>>>> fuck off. Your incessant rants about Snit reinforce what an asshole >>>>> you really are. >>>> >>>> Hello Michael! >>>> >>>> And no, citizens of COLA, this isn't Michael Glasser, this is Michael >>>> Patelmo >>>> from Stuart Florida. He must have grown bored of being ignored in CSMA >>>> and >>>> wanted to troll COLA a bit. >>>> >>>> When using your Eternal September account, Michael, don't use it with >>>> the >>>> same >>>> IP you use to post to CSMA :-D >>>> >>>> 09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c = >>>> 2601:584:201:b069:2870:1b9c:7b2c:4f06 >>>> >>> >>>>Are Michael and Walter the same person? >>> >>> Nah. He's just obsessed and stupid. Really stupid, as you can see by >>> his >>> posts. >>> >> >>>How so? Your IP appears in posts by "Michael" and "Walter Myer." >> >> Posts by "Michael", haven't seen any of those. Walter Meyer, yes I've >> seen >> them. Am I either? No. >> > >>So you are just using their headers to appear to be them. If so, remove >>the incriminating header and reply to this post. > > There is no "incriminating" header. I am using the server I was > instructed to use. > > You referred to "them". I know for a fact that no one called "Michael" > has > posted here. Maybe you can point me to one of "Michaels" posts. > > Anything else that I can help with? >Certainly, "meat", "Onion Knight", "Ginseng root" or the other assorted >socks. >You are allowed to commit suicide almost missed your post, Pecker. Suck Sandmans dick. I'm sure he will appreciate it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-14 23:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ghnvjckfi93.ar3@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #355360 |
Moustache Pete <petem@gmail.com> wrote: > > > "owl" wrote in message news:fhjg0af.aa34@rooftop.invalid... > > Moustache Pete <petem@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> "owl" wrote in message news:fhjd0p3raf.g@rooftop.invalid... >> >> Moustache Pete <PeteM@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> "owl" wrote in message news:fhgjf03a.fjig@rooftop.invalid... >>> >>> Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote: >>>> In article <nh7fn6$kss$1@dont-email.me>, Moustache Pete wrote: >>>> >>>>> Snit must have really PWND you. You should accept your defeat and >>>>> fuck off. Your incessant rants about Snit reinforce what an asshole >>>>> you really are. >>>> >>>> Hello Michael! >>>> >>>> And no, citizens of COLA, this isn't Michael Glasser, this is Michael >>>> Patelmo >>>> from Stuart Florida. He must have grown bored of being ignored in CSMA >>>> and >>>> wanted to troll COLA a bit. >>>> >>>> When using your Eternal September account, Michael, don't use it with >>>> the >>>> same >>>> IP you use to post to CSMA :-D >>>> >>>> 09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c = 2601:584:201:b069:2870:1b9c:7b2c:4f06 >>>> >>> >>>>Are Michael and Walter the same person? >>> >>> Nah. He's just obsessed and stupid. Really stupid, as you can see by >>> his >>> posts. >>> >> >>>How so? Your IP appears in posts by "Michael" and "Walter Myer." >> >> Posts by "Michael", haven't seen any of those. Walter Meyer, yes I've >> seen >> them. Am I either? No. >> > >>So you are just using their headers to appear to be them. If so, remove >>the incriminating header and reply to this post. > > There is no "incriminating" header. I am using the server I was instructed > to use. > Of course there is. See below. > You referred to "them". I know for a fact that no one called "Michael" has > posted here. Maybe you can point me to one of "Michaels" posts. > Sure. See below. > Anything else that I can help with? > Sure. Help me understand why you say you are not "Michael" and "Walter Meyer." I gave you the opportunity to claim that you forged the incriminating header, and instead you claim that it does not exist. That means that you did not forge it, the header is real, and you are "Michael" and "Walter Meyer." group comp.os.linux.advocacy 211 85957 2155087 2241043 comp.os.linux.advocacy xpat from 2155087-2241043 *awoolmeyer* 221 from matches follow (NOV) 2168340 awoolmeyer@gmail.com 2168341 awoolmeyer@gmail.com 2169159 awoolmeyer@gmail.com 2171049 awoolmeyer@gmail.com 2171111 awoolmeyer@gmail.com ... 2217771 awoolmeyer@gmail.com 2217823 awoolmeyer@gmail.com 2229032 Walter Myer <awoolmeyer@gmail.com> 2240118 Walter Myer <awoolmeyer@gmail.com> 2240122 Walter Myer <awoolmeyer@gmail.com> 2240373 Walter Myer <awoolmeyer@gmail.com> 2240790 Michael <awoolmeyer@gmail.com> 2240792 Michael <awoolmeyer@gmail.com> . xpat message-id 2240790 * 221 message-id matches follow (NOV) 2240790 <d87c3ea7-7825-40dd-907c-31f759a43e3a@googlegroups.com> . xpat message-id 2240792 * 221 message-id matches follow (NOV) 2240792 <cbe9ae36-15e0-4b47-8da5-dda5e710b97c@googlegroups.com> . xpat injection-info 2240790 * 221 injection-info matches follow (art) 2240790 glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:584:201:b069:2870:1b9c:7b2c:4f06; . xpat injection-info 2240792 * 221 injection-info matches follow (art) 2240792 glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:584:201:b069:2870:1b9c:7b2c:4f06; . xpat from 2155087-2241043 *Moustache Pete* 221 from matches follow (NOV) 2240963 "Moustache Pete" <PeteM@gmail.com> 2240983 "Moustache Pete" <PeteM@gmail.com> 2240997 "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> 2240999 "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> 2241036 "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> . xpat injection-info 2240963 * 221 injection-info matches follow (art) 2240963 mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c"; . xpat injection-info 2240983 * 221 injection-info matches follow (art) 2240983 mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c"; . xpat injection-info 2240997 * 221 injection-info matches follow (art) 2240997 mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c"; . xpat injection-info 2240999 * 221 injection-info matches follow (art) 2240999 mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c"; . xpat injection-info 2241036 * 221 injection-info matches follow (art) 2241036 mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c"; . quit 205 . Connection closed by foreign host. anon@lowtide:~$ anon@lowtide:~$ echo -n 2601:584:201:b069:2870:1b9c:7b2c:4f06 |md5sum 09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c - anon@lowtide:~$
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-14 19:36 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nh8cjt$1lb$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #355370 |
"owl" wrote in message news:ghnvjckfi93.ar3@rooftop.invalid... Moustache Pete <petem@gmail.com> wrote: > > > "owl" wrote in message news:fhjg0af.aa34@rooftop.invalid... > > Moustache Pete <petem@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> "owl" wrote in message news:fhjd0p3raf.g@rooftop.invalid... >> >> Moustache Pete <PeteM@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> "owl" wrote in message news:fhgjf03a.fjig@rooftop.invalid... >>> >>> Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote: >>>> In article <nh7fn6$kss$1@dont-email.me>, Moustache Pete wrote: >>>> >>>>> Snit must have really PWND you. You should accept your defeat and >>>>> fuck off. Your incessant rants about Snit reinforce what an asshole >>>>> you really are. >>>> >>>> Hello Michael! >>>> >>>> And no, citizens of COLA, this isn't Michael Glasser, this is Michael >>>> Patelmo >>>> from Stuart Florida. He must have grown bored of being ignored in CSMA >>>> and >>>> wanted to troll COLA a bit. >>>> >>>> When using your Eternal September account, Michael, don't use it with >>>> the >>>> same >>>> IP you use to post to CSMA :-D >>>> >>>> 09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c = >>>> 2601:584:201:b069:2870:1b9c:7b2c:4f06 >>>> >>> >>>>Are Michael and Walter the same person? >>> >>> Nah. He's just obsessed and stupid. Really stupid, as you can see by >>> his >>> posts. >>> >> >>>How so? Your IP appears in posts by "Michael" and "Walter Myer." >> >> Posts by "Michael", haven't seen any of those. Walter Meyer, yes I've >> seen >> them. Am I either? No. >> > >>So you are just using their headers to appear to be them. If so, remove >>the incriminating header and reply to this post. > > There is no "incriminating" header. I am using the server I was > instructed > to use. > >Of course there is. See below. > You referred to "them". I know for a fact that no one called "Michael" > has > posted here. Maybe you can point me to one of "Michaels" posts. > >Sure. See below. > Anything else that I can help with? > >Sure. Help me understand why you say you are not "Michael" and "Walter >Meyer." I gave you the opportunity to claim that you forged the >incriminating >header, and instead you claim that it does not exist. That means that you >did not forge it, the header is real, and you are "Michael" and "Walter >Meyer." Whatever makes you happy wasting your time. Anything else? snipped errors.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-14 23:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hjga30af.3ar@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #355374 |
Moustache Pete <petem@gmail.com> wrote: > > > "owl" wrote in message news:ghnvjckfi93.ar3@rooftop.invalid... > > Moustache Pete <petem@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> "owl" wrote in message news:fhjg0af.aa34@rooftop.invalid... >> >> Moustache Pete <petem@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> "owl" wrote in message news:fhjd0p3raf.g@rooftop.invalid... >>> >>> Moustache Pete <PeteM@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "owl" wrote in message news:fhgjf03a.fjig@rooftop.invalid... >>>> >>>> Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote: >>>>> In article <nh7fn6$kss$1@dont-email.me>, Moustache Pete wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Snit must have really PWND you. You should accept your defeat and >>>>>> fuck off. Your incessant rants about Snit reinforce what an asshole >>>>>> you really are. >>>>> >>>>> Hello Michael! >>>>> >>>>> And no, citizens of COLA, this isn't Michael Glasser, this is Michael >>>>> Patelmo >>>>> from Stuart Florida. He must have grown bored of being ignored in CSMA >>>>> and >>>>> wanted to troll COLA a bit. >>>>> >>>>> When using your Eternal September account, Michael, don't use it with >>>>> the >>>>> same >>>>> IP you use to post to CSMA :-D >>>>> >>>>> 09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c = >>>>> 2601:584:201:b069:2870:1b9c:7b2c:4f06 >>>>> >>>> >>>>>Are Michael and Walter the same person? >>>> >>>> Nah. He's just obsessed and stupid. Really stupid, as you can see by >>>> his >>>> posts. >>>> >>> >>>>How so? Your IP appears in posts by "Michael" and "Walter Myer." >>> >>> Posts by "Michael", haven't seen any of those. Walter Meyer, yes I've >>> seen >>> them. Am I either? No. >>> >> >>>So you are just using their headers to appear to be them. If so, remove >>>the incriminating header and reply to this post. >> >> There is no "incriminating" header. I am using the server I was >> instructed >> to use. >> > >>Of course there is. See below. > >> You referred to "them". I know for a fact that no one called "Michael" >> has >> posted here. Maybe you can point me to one of "Michaels" posts. >> > >>Sure. See below. > >> Anything else that I can help with? >> > >>Sure. Help me understand why you say you are not "Michael" and "Walter >>Meyer." I gave you the opportunity to claim that you forged the >>incriminating >>header, and instead you claim that it does not exist. That means that you >>did not forge it, the header is real, and you are "Michael" and "Walter >>Meyer." > > Whatever makes you happy wasting your time. > > Anything else? > Yeah. What the hell is a "Popkin"? > snipped errors. > xpat injection-info 2155087-2241053 *09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c* 221 injection-info matches follow (art) 2235510 mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c"; 2235694 mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c"; 2236215 mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c"; 2236719 mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c"; 2236733 mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c"; 2240963 mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c"; 2240983 mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c"; 2240997 mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c"; 2240999 mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c"; 2241036 mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c"; 2241050 mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c"; 2241051 mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c"; 2241052 mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c"; 2241053 mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="09ca0db7c157db2db39f0c8d32f7d09c"; . xpat from 2235510 * 221 from matches follow (NOV) 2235510 "Popkin" <Popkin@telus.net> . xpat from 2235694 * 221 from matches follow (NOV) 2235694 "Popkin" <Popkin@telus.net> . ... xpat from 2241052 * 221 from matches follow (NOV) 2241052 "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> . xpat from 2241053 * 221 from matches follow (NOV) 2241053 "Moustache Pete" <petem@gmail.com> .
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web