Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #365819 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-17 14:02 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-08-18 18:56 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 217 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-17 14:02 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-17 21:32 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-17 14:39 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-17 21:49 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-17 16:01 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-17 23:35 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-17 16:45 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-17 23:58 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-17 16:59 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 00:16 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-17 17:44 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 00:55 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-17 18:14 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 01:41 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-17 19:13 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-17 22:17 -0600
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-17 17:24 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 00:35 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-18 03:24 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 15:19 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-18 09:15 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 16:34 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 09:39 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 16:45 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 09:51 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 16:59 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 10:03 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 17:14 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 10:26 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 17:35 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 10:52 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 18:25 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 11:32 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 18:40 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 13:02 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 13:27 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 21:21 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 14:41 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 21:54 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 15:28 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 23:06 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 16:19 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 23:28 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 16:48 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 23:56 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 17:09 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-19 00:19 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 18:01 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-19 01:34 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 18:54 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-18 18:56 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 19:24 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-18 14:30 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 18:38 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-18 14:39 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 19:00 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-18 14:26 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 21:46 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-18 15:57 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 23:08 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-18 19:22 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 23:31 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-18 19:21 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-19 03:31 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-20 19:50 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 04:29 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-21 06:58 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-21 10:53 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-21 09:20 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 16:50 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 16:36 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-21 14:57 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 19:57 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 13:15 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 20:25 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 13:44 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 20:57 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 14:09 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 21:22 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 14:33 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-21 18:35 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 22:49 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-21 14:31 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 14:42 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 23:00 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 16:10 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 23:40 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 17:18 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 00:49 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 18:11 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-21 16:10 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 23:35 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-21 17:19 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 00:44 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-21 18:41 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 15:12 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-22 09:37 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 17:08 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-22 11:15 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 18:48 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-22 12:07 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 19:30 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 12:56 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 20:03 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 13:17 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 20:37 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 13:40 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 20:54 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 14:03 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 21:09 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 14:17 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 21:46 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 14:48 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-22 14:48 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 22:29 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-22 17:40 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 01:16 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-23 05:04 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 12:47 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 12:16 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 19:38 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 12:51 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 20:01 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 13:15 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 20:45 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 13:54 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 21:18 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 14:29 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 21:48 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 14:51 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 08:22 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-25 06:28 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 10:57 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-26 04:18 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 10:36 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-26 08:26 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 11:50 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 09:12 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 16:24 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 10:02 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 17:20 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:21 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:48 -0600
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 14:16 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:29 -0600
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 18:54 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:39 -0600
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-27 01:03 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 16:20 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:11 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:46 -0600
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-26 10:52 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 14:25 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-26 11:40 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:28 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 17:44 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 00:51 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 18:12 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 15:14 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 08:36 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 15:51 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 08:56 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 16:00 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 09:54 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 17:16 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 10:23 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 17:36 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 10:44 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 17:50 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 10:53 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 08:32 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:23 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 17:52 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 10:58 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 15:00 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-18 10:18 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 17:44 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 10:54 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 18:23 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 11:29 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 18:31 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 11:46 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 19:10 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 12:49 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 19:59 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 14:49 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 22:03 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 15:30 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 10:51 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 18:27 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 11:45 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-18 09:46 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 09:58 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-18 14:32 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 18:42 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-18 18:58 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 11:45 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-18 09:21 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 16:52 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-18 10:10 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 10:25 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 10:08 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-17 17:50 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-17 14:43 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-17 16:06 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Incubus <incubus9536612@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 00:58 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-18 07:12 -0500
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-08-18 13:43 +0100
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-18 06:20 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-18 07:19 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 15:49 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 10:02 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-19 07:18 -0500
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-19 07:41 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-21 06:35 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-21 10:55 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-18 18:56 -0400
Page 4 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 11 Next page →
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-18 19:22 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <np5g15$kt4$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366003 |
On 8/18/2016 7:08 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >> On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 5:46:45 PM UTC-4, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>> -hh wrote: >>>> Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> What's...? What's...? How...? Does...? >>>>> >>>>> I've never been there. Just rented the place for this test. >>>>> http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/02479/VersaillePalace_2479923k.jpg >>>> >>>> Been there twice. >>>> >>>> Pretty interesting place, although the compound is pretty damn >>>> big, so you can blow a lot of time just getting around. For >>>> example, from the RER Chantiers to where that not-your's photo >>>> was taken is a quick mile one way. And if you were to turn >>>> around to face the other way from that same photo location, >>>> you'd look down some steps to the Latone fountain: >>>> >>>> <http://photo-hh.com/Europe/Pages/Paris-05.html#46> >>>> >>>> Now go down the steps, walk past the Latone, down the hill >>>> to the Apollo fountain (~1/2 mi), then walk another 1/2 mile >>>> along the Grand Canal until you reach the crosspiece (its >>>> visible in the photo if you know where to look) and turn right. >>>> In a 1/4 mile you'll reach Le Grand Trianon, and +1/4 mile >>>> beyond Grand is Le Petit Trianon, which was part of the >>>> private residence of Marie-Antoinette. Its a bit further still >>>> to the billiard room at Maison de la Reine, but you've already >>>> walked 2.5 miles so far from Chantiers and the return includes >>>> a decent uphill right after the Apollo. >>> >>> Google street view means you don't have to risk attacks >>> from the Moslem hoardes. >> >> Actually, the good news is that since they charge an admission, >> one doesn't have any COLA Freetards running around. >> >> Which also explains why you've never been there! ;-P >> > > Have you been back since the Conquest began? https://www.google.com/search?client=opera&q=muslims+in+kannapolics+nc&sourceid=opera&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8#q=muslims+in+kannapolis+nc&rflfq=1&rlha=0&rllag=35250399,-80751635,2494&tbm=lcl&tbs=lf:1,lf_ui:2 You're caught in the middle.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-18 23:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hjfdsao83.gki@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366006 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 8/18/2016 7:08 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >> -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: >>> On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 5:46:45 PM UTC-4, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>>> -hh wrote: >>>>> Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What's...? What's...? How...? Does...? >>>>>> >>>>>> I've never been there. Just rented the place for this test. >>>>>> http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/02479/VersaillePalace_2479923k.jpg >>>>> >>>>> Been there twice. >>>>> >>>>> Pretty interesting place, although the compound is pretty damn >>>>> big, so you can blow a lot of time just getting around. For >>>>> example, from the RER Chantiers to where that not-your's photo >>>>> was taken is a quick mile one way. And if you were to turn >>>>> around to face the other way from that same photo location, >>>>> you'd look down some steps to the Latone fountain: >>>>> >>>>> <http://photo-hh.com/Europe/Pages/Paris-05.html#46> >>>>> >>>>> Now go down the steps, walk past the Latone, down the hill >>>>> to the Apollo fountain (~1/2 mi), then walk another 1/2 mile >>>>> along the Grand Canal until you reach the crosspiece (its >>>>> visible in the photo if you know where to look) and turn right. >>>>> In a 1/4 mile you'll reach Le Grand Trianon, and +1/4 mile >>>>> beyond Grand is Le Petit Trianon, which was part of the >>>>> private residence of Marie-Antoinette. Its a bit further still >>>>> to the billiard room at Maison de la Reine, but you've already >>>>> walked 2.5 miles so far from Chantiers and the return includes >>>>> a decent uphill right after the Apollo. >>>> >>>> Google street view means you don't have to risk attacks >>>> from the Moslem hoardes. >>> >>> Actually, the good news is that since they charge an admission, >>> one doesn't have any COLA Freetards running around. >>> >>> Which also explains why you've never been there! ;-P >>> >> >> Have you been back since the Conquest began? > > > https://www.google.com/search?client=opera&q=muslims+in+kannapolics+nc&sourceid=opera&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8#q=muslims+in+kannapolis+nc&rflfq=1&rlha=0&rllag=35250399,-80751635,2494&tbm=lcl&tbs=lf:1,lf_ui:2 > > You're caught in the middle. > We're building a wall. And Concord's gonna pay for it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-18 19:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <69c24a45-1545-4259-a116-57b0364317ae@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #366003 |
On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 7:08:54 PM UTC-4, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > -hh wrote: > > Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > >> -hh wrote: > >> > Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > >> >>... > >> > >> Google street view means you don't have to risk attacks > >> from the Moslem hoardes. > > > > Actually, the good news is that since they charge an admission, > > one doesn't have any COLA Freetards running around. > > > > Which also explains why you've never been there! ;-P > > Have you been back since the Conquest began? To Europe? Yes, and even within the past twelve months. Plus just this past week, I had breakfast with a friend who was in the USA for one week this month: they've lived in EU close to full time for the past decade+. There apparently was some sort of heavy rain recently in Prague that messed up their apartment while they were on business travel, so while its being repaired, they decided to take some time off and come home to the USA to visit family. Naturally, our conversations are more worldly... -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-19 03:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <shjfuaqrfea9.j@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366033 |
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: > On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 7:08:54 PM UTC-4, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >> -hh wrote: >> > Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >> >> -hh wrote: >> >> > Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >> >> >>... >> >> >> >> Google street view means you don't have to risk attacks >> >> from the Moslem hoardes. >> > >> > Actually, the good news is that since they charge an admission, >> > one doesn't have any COLA Freetards running around. >> > >> > Which also explains why you've never been there! ;-P >> >> Have you been back since the Conquest began? > > To Europe? Yes, and even within the past twelve months. > To Versailles. > Plus just this past week, I had breakfast with a friend who was > in the USA for one week this month: they've lived in EU close to > full time for the past decade+. There apparently was some sort > of heavy rain recently in Prague that messed up their apartment > while they were on business travel, so while its being repaired, > they decided to take some time off and come home to the USA > to visit family. Naturally, our conversations are more worldly... > Which naturally gets boring, so you come here to talk to the gods. BTW, next time you go to France, if you get some time, stop by Châtteau-Thierry and kiss the ground where my great-grandfather gave his life at age 25 in WWI.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-20 19:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fe4b08d1-416f-4b18-8c89-48511a9a86c4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #366035 |
Octavian wrote: > -hh wrote: >> Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>> -hh wrote: >>> > Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>> >> -hh wrote: >>> >> > Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>> >> >>... >>> >> >>> >> Google street view means you don't have to risk attacks >>> >> from the Moslem hoardes. >>> > >>> > Actually, the good news is that since they charge an admission, >>> > one doesn't have any COLA Freetards running around. >>> > Which also explains why you've never been there! ;-P >>> >>> Have you been back since the Conquest began? >> >> To Europe? Yes, and even within the past twelve months. > > To Versailles. Oh, are you suggesting that France is using Versailles as a refugee camp? > BTW, next time you go to France, if you get some time, stop by > Château-Thierry and kiss the ground where my great-grandfather > gave his life at age 25 in WWI. Soooo...yet another place you've not been to either, right? It's obvious that you have too many travel options to choose from and not enough resources and you're living that which you derided. Ironic. -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-21 04:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhjcs893.au@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366144 |
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: > Octavian wrote: >> -hh wrote: >>> Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>>> -hh wrote: >>>> > Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>>> >> -hh wrote: >>>> >> > Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>>> >> >>... >>>> >> >>>> >> Google street view means you don't have to risk attacks >>>> >> from the Moslem hoardes. >>>> > >>>> > Actually, the good news is that since they charge an admission, >>>> > one doesn't have any COLA Freetards running around. >>>> > Which also explains why you've never been there! ;-P >>>> >>>> Have you been back since the Conquest began? >>> >>> To Europe? Yes, and even within the past twelve months. >> >> To Versailles. > > Oh, are you suggesting that France is using Versailles as a refugee camp? > You don't read so well. >> BTW, next time you go to France, if you get some time, stop by >> Château-Thierry and kiss the ground where my great-grandfather >> gave his life at age 25 in WWI. > > Soooo...yet another place you've not been to either, right? > No desire to visit the Caliphate and look on the ruins of Western Civilization. > It's obvious that you have too many travel options to choose from and > not enough resources and you're living that which you derided. Ironic. > Says the man who drives the ugliest Porsche ever made because he cannot afford a 911.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-21 06:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <989fc258-ae2c-4935-9e55-b5b02bc4a321@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #366151 |
On Sunday, August 21, 2016 at 12:29:20 AM UTC-4, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > -hh wrote: > > Octavian wrote: > >> -hh wrote: > >>> Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > >>>> -hh wrote: > >>>> > Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > >>>> >> -hh wrote: > >>>> >> > Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > >>>> >> >>... > >>>> >> > >>>> >> Google street view means you don't have to risk attacks > >>>> >> from the Moslem hoardes. > >>>> > > >>>> > Actually, the good news is that since they charge an admission, > >>>> > one doesn't have any COLA Freetards running around. > >>>> > Which also explains why you've never been there! ;-P > >>>> > >>>> Have you been back since the Conquest began? > >>> > >>> To Europe? Yes, and even within the past twelve months. > >> > >> To Versailles. > > > > Oh, are you suggesting that France is using Versailles as a refugee camp? > > You don't read so well. On the contrary: it was a question ... you've now dodged. > >> BTW, next time you go to France, if you get some time, stop by > >> Château-Thierry and kiss the ground where my great-grandfather > >> gave his life at age 25 in WWI. > > > > Soooo...yet another place you've not been to either, right? > > No desire to visit the Caliphate and look on the ruins of Western > Civilization. Oh, look: another simple question ... that you've also dodged. And it doesn't help your case that the Freetard Thesaurus is tells us claims of "has no desire..." is code for "has no freedom/money/resources...", > > It's obvious that you have too many travel options to choose from and > > not enough resources and you're living that which you derided. Ironic. > > Says the man who drives the ugliest Porsche ever made because he > cannot afford a 911. Oh, look, a lame lash-out. -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-21 10:53 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <npcfau$pcm$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366168 |
On 8/21/2016 9:58 AM, -hh wrote: > On Sunday, August 21, 2016 at 12:29:20 AM UTC-4, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >> Says the man who drives the ugliest Porsche ever made because he >> cannot afford a 911. > > Oh, look, a lame lash-out. Octavian does this from time to time: makes fun of someone's automobile, but refuses to say what he drives. Ask him. Watch him run. For a long time I thought the best-looking Porsche was the 968. Nowadays I like the Cayman Black Edition. http://www.porsche.com/usa/models/cayman/cayman-black-edition/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-21 09:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <81e32d09-9a28-46ae-9651-6f32b627edac@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #366169 |
On Sunday, August 21, 2016 at 10:54:24 AM UTC-4, DFS wrote: > On 8/21/2016 9:58 AM, -hh wrote: > > On Sunday, August 21, 2016 at 12:29:20 AM UTC-4, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > >> > >> Says the man who drives the ugliest Porsche ever made because he > >> cannot afford a 911. > > > > Oh, look, a lame lash-out. > > > Octavian does this from time to time: makes fun of someone's automobile, > but refuses to say what he drives. > > Ask him. Watch him run. No need, as this tangent was merely a distraction attempt to try to have readers forget how he's failed to counter the original post. -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-21 16:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ghjdsad039.a8@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366175 |
-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote: > On Sunday, August 21, 2016 at 10:54:24 AM UTC-4, DFS wrote: >> On 8/21/2016 9:58 AM, -hh wrote: >> > On Sunday, August 21, 2016 at 12:29:20 AM UTC-4, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >> >> >> >> Says the man who drives the ugliest Porsche ever made because he >> >> cannot afford a 911. >> > >> > Oh, look, a lame lash-out. >> >> >> Octavian does this from time to time: makes fun of someone's automobile, >> but refuses to say what he drives. >> >> Ask him. Watch him run. > > No need, as this tangent was merely a distraction attempt to try to > have readers forget how he's failed to counter the original post. > Tell "the readers" what it feels like in the pit of your stomach when you pull into the country club parking lot in your Macan and the only vacant space is next to a 911.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-21 16:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <gudoa3.f93@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366169 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 8/21/2016 9:58 AM, -hh wrote: >> On Sunday, August 21, 2016 at 12:29:20 AM UTC-4, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > > >>> Says the man who drives the ugliest Porsche ever made because he >>> cannot afford a 911. >> >> Oh, look, a lame lash-out. > > > Octavian does this from time to time: makes fun of someone's automobile, > but refuses to say what he drives. > > Ask him. Watch him run. > > > For a long time I thought the best-looking Porsche was the 968. > Nowadays I like the Cayman Black Edition. > > http://www.porsche.com/usa/models/cayman/cayman-black-edition/ > LOL. If you drive a Porsche, and it's not a 911, the only message you are sending is, "Could not afford a 911."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-21 14:57 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <npctk7$d6n$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #366177 |
On 8/21/2016 12:36 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >> On 8/21/2016 9:58 AM, -hh wrote: >>> On Sunday, August 21, 2016 at 12:29:20 AM UTC-4, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >> >> >>>> Says the man who drives the ugliest Porsche ever made because he >>>> cannot afford a 911. >>> >>> Oh, look, a lame lash-out. >> >> >> Octavian does this from time to time: makes fun of someone's automobile, >> but refuses to say what he drives. >> >> Ask him. Watch him run. >> >> >> For a long time I thought the best-looking Porsche was the 968. >> Nowadays I like the Cayman Black Edition. >> >> http://www.porsche.com/usa/models/cayman/cayman-black-edition/ >> > > LOL. If you drive a Porsche, and it's not a 911, the only message you > are sending is, "Could not afford a 911." "Watch him run"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-21 19:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <shjdfaoe897g.3a@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366190 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 8/21/2016 12:36 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>> On 8/21/2016 9:58 AM, -hh wrote: >>>> On Sunday, August 21, 2016 at 12:29:20 AM UTC-4, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: >>> >>> >>>>> Says the man who drives the ugliest Porsche ever made because he >>>>> cannot afford a 911. >>>> >>>> Oh, look, a lame lash-out. >>> >>> >>> Octavian does this from time to time: makes fun of someone's automobile, >>> but refuses to say what he drives. >>> >>> Ask him. Watch him run. >>> >>> >>> For a long time I thought the best-looking Porsche was the 968. >>> Nowadays I like the Cayman Black Edition. >>> >>> http://www.porsche.com/usa/models/cayman/cayman-black-edition/ >>> >> >> LOL. If you drive a Porsche, and it's not a 911, the only message you >> are sending is, "Could not afford a 911." > > > "Watch him run" > I need to see your man card. Right now. So which would you rather have: 1. 2009 911 + $15k-$35k cash to cover maintenance. 2. 2017 Macan (any version)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-21 13:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3DF5A0F.79C58%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366193 |
On 8/21/16, 12:57 PM, in article shjdfaoe897g.3a@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: ... > I need to see your man card. Right now. The other day you asked about the bias in terms of men showing a "weakness" such as being impacted by a health condition. You just demonstrated it... the whole "man up" thing. No such phrase applies to women. ... Thank you for backing my point. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-21 20:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hjfdsau093.fj@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366195 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/21/16, 12:57 PM, in article shjdfaoe897g.3a@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > > ... >> I need to see your man card. Right now. > > The other day you asked about the bias in terms of men showing a "weakness" > such as being impacted by a health condition. You just demonstrated it... > the whole "man up" thing. No such phrase applies to women. > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iPLDuhwhKcY
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-21 13:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3DF60B6.79C63%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366196 |
On 8/21/16, 1:25 PM, in article hjfdsau093.fj@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/21/16, 12:57 PM, in article shjdfaoe897g.3a@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >> ... >>> I need to see your man card. Right now. >> >> The other day you asked about the bias in terms of men showing a "weakness" >> such as being impacted by a health condition. You just demonstrated it... >> the whole "man up" thing. No such phrase applies to women. >> > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iPLDuhwhKcY > > Did not know that song... but let us do a search for how common these things are: <https://www.google.com/search?num=20&q=%22woman+up%22> 475,000 results. <https://www.google.com/search?num=20&q=%22man+up%22> 9,300,000 results (about 20x as many). Even without that I think we can safely say "woman up" is a lot less common... can you show ANY examples of it being used in COLA? -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-21 20:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hgsd.fkog983@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366198 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/21/16, 1:25 PM, in article hjfdsau093.fj@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/21/16, 12:57 PM, in article shjdfaoe897g.3a@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> ... >>>> I need to see your man card. Right now. >>> >>> The other day you asked about the bias in terms of men showing a "weakness" >>> such as being impacted by a health condition. You just demonstrated it... >>> the whole "man up" thing. No such phrase applies to women. >>> >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iPLDuhwhKcY >> >> > Did not know that song... but let us do a search for how common these things > are: > > <https://www.google.com/search?num=20&q=%22woman+up%22> > 475,000 results. > > <https://www.google.com/search?num=20&q=%22man+up%22> > 9,300,000 results (about 20x as many). > Wow, that was scientific. > Even without that I think we can safely say "woman up" is a lot less > common... can you show ANY examples of it being used in COLA? > Would that be another one of your "scientific" surveys -- extrapolating popularity of female-originated slang from its usage in a newsgroup populated almost exclusively by men? In fact, I actually heard it used in real life several years ago.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-21 14:09 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3DF66AF.79C6A%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366199 |
On 8/21/16, 1:57 PM, in article hgsd.fkog983@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/21/16, 1:25 PM, in article hjfdsau093.fj@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 8/21/16, 12:57 PM, in article shjdfaoe897g.3a@perch.invalid, "Octavian >>>> W. >>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>> ... >>>>> I need to see your man card. Right now. >>>> >>>> The other day you asked about the bias in terms of men showing a "weakness" >>>> such as being impacted by a health condition. You just demonstrated it... >>>> the whole "man up" thing. No such phrase applies to women. >>>> >>> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iPLDuhwhKcY >>> >>> >> Did not know that song... but let us do a search for how common these things >> are: >> >> <https://www.google.com/search?num=20&q=%22woman+up%22> >> 475,000 results. >> >> <https://www.google.com/search?num=20&q=%22man+up%22> >> 9,300,000 results (about 20x as many). > > Wow, that was scientific. Nope. Just noting a quick way to check. If you disagree I am open to looking at other data. >> Even without that I think we can safely say "woman up" is a lot less >> common... can you show ANY examples of it being used in COLA? > > Would that be another one of your "scientific" surveys -- extrapolating > popularity of female-originated slang from its usage in a newsgroup populated > almost exclusively by men? > > In fact, I actually heard it used in real life several years ago. Come down to I have offered evidence... and, face it, what I have noted is just basic common sense. You want to pretend otherwise but have NOTHING. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-21 21:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ghjsdir839q.ag@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366200 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/21/16, 1:57 PM, in article hgsd.fkog983@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/21/16, 1:25 PM, in article hjfdsau093.fj@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 8/21/16, 12:57 PM, in article shjdfaoe897g.3a@perch.invalid, "Octavian >>>>> W. >>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> ... >>>>>> I need to see your man card. Right now. >>>>> >>>>> The other day you asked about the bias in terms of men showing a "weakness" >>>>> such as being impacted by a health condition. You just demonstrated it... >>>>> the whole "man up" thing. No such phrase applies to women. >>>>> >>>> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iPLDuhwhKcY >>>> >>>> >>> Did not know that song... but let us do a search for how common these things >>> are: >>> >>> <https://www.google.com/search?num=20&q=%22woman+up%22> >>> 475,000 results. >>> >>> <https://www.google.com/search?num=20&q=%22man+up%22> >>> 9,300,000 results (about 20x as many). >> >> Wow, that was scientific. > > Nope. Just noting a quick way to check. If you disagree I am open to looking > at other data. > >>> Even without that I think we can safely say "woman up" is a lot less >>> common... can you show ANY examples of it being used in COLA? >> >> Would that be another one of your "scientific" surveys -- extrapolating >> popularity of female-originated slang from its usage in a newsgroup populated >> almost exclusively by men? >> >> In fact, I actually heard it used in real life several years ago. > > Come down to I have offered evidence... and, face it, what I have noted is > just basic common sense. You want to pretend otherwise but have NOTHING. > "NOTHING" is what your non-scientific "evidence" amounts to. But you pyschotard trannies need to realize that there *are* real differences between the sexes, and they are not created for some ginned-up "bias" by men motivated to keep women down. It's perfectly reasonable to demand that a man "man up" occasionally, especially if he has be overexposed to PC propaganda and is on the verge of losing it. (Just like women need to have a cookbook on hand).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-21 14:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3DF6C4A.79C71%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366201 |
On 8/21/16, 2:22 PM, in article ghjsdir839q.ag@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/21/16, 1:57 PM, in article hgsd.fkog983@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 8/21/16, 1:25 PM, in article hjfdsau093.fj@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 8/21/16, 12:57 PM, in article shjdfaoe897g.3a@perch.invalid, "Octavian >>>>>> W. >>>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> ... >>>>>>> I need to see your man card. Right now. >>>>>> >>>>>> The other day you asked about the bias in terms of men showing a >>>>>> "weakness" >>>>>> such as being impacted by a health condition. You just demonstrated it... >>>>>> the whole "man up" thing. No such phrase applies to women. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iPLDuhwhKcY >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Did not know that song... but let us do a search for how common these >>>> things >>>> are: >>>> >>>> <https://www.google.com/search?num=20&q=%22woman+up%22> >>>> 475,000 results. >>>> >>>> <https://www.google.com/search?num=20&q=%22man+up%22> >>>> 9,300,000 results (about 20x as many). >>> >>> Wow, that was scientific. >> >> Nope. Just noting a quick way to check. If you disagree I am open to looking >> at other data. >> >>>> Even without that I think we can safely say "woman up" is a lot less >>>> common... can you show ANY examples of it being used in COLA? >>> >>> Would that be another one of your "scientific" surveys -- extrapolating >>> popularity of female-originated slang from its usage in a newsgroup >>> populated >>> almost exclusively by men? >>> >>> In fact, I actually heard it used in real life several years ago. >> >> Come down to I have offered evidence... and, face it, what I have noted is >> just basic common sense. You want to pretend otherwise but have NOTHING. >> > > "NOTHING" is what your non-scientific "evidence" amounts to. Ah, so your claim about liberals is "nothing"... yet you still put out a call to kill them. You wish to kill for "nothing" - yet claim to support the rule of law. > But you pyschotard trannies I do not even know what you mean... other than you are basing insults on bigoted irrelevancies. > need to realize that there *are* real differences between the sexes, Yet you talked about speaking of women having larger breasts as somehow being sexist. > and they are not created for some ginned-up "bias" by men motivated to keep > women down. It's perfectly reasonable to demand that a man "man up" > occasionally, especially if he has be overexposed to PC propaganda and is on > the verge of losing it. Why focus on just men here? > (Just like women need to have a cookbook on hand). And more bigoted nonsense from you. Note a complete lack of the standard you set: scientific evidence. To the contrary your view is about controlling others. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web