Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #365819 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-17 14:02 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-08-18 18:56 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 217 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-17 14:02 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-17 21:32 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-17 14:39 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-17 21:49 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-17 16:01 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-17 23:35 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-17 16:45 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-17 23:58 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-17 16:59 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 00:16 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-17 17:44 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 00:55 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-17 18:14 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 01:41 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-17 19:13 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-17 22:17 -0600
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-17 17:24 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 00:35 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-18 03:24 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 15:19 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-18 09:15 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 16:34 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 09:39 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 16:45 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 09:51 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 16:59 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 10:03 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 17:14 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 10:26 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 17:35 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 10:52 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 18:25 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 11:32 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 18:40 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 13:02 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 13:27 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 21:21 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 14:41 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 21:54 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 15:28 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 23:06 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 16:19 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 23:28 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 16:48 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 23:56 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 17:09 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-19 00:19 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 18:01 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-19 01:34 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 18:54 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-18 18:56 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 19:24 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-18 14:30 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 18:38 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-18 14:39 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 19:00 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-18 14:26 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 21:46 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-18 15:57 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 23:08 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-18 19:22 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 23:31 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-18 19:21 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-19 03:31 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-20 19:50 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 04:29 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-21 06:58 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-21 10:53 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-21 09:20 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 16:50 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 16:36 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-21 14:57 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 19:57 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 13:15 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 20:25 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 13:44 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 20:57 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 14:09 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 21:22 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 14:33 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-21 18:35 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 22:49 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-21 14:31 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 14:42 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 23:00 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 16:10 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 23:40 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 17:18 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 00:49 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 18:11 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-21 16:10 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 23:35 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-21 17:19 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 00:44 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-21 18:41 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 15:12 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-22 09:37 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 17:08 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-22 11:15 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 18:48 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-22 12:07 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 19:30 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 12:56 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 20:03 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 13:17 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 20:37 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 13:40 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 20:54 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 14:03 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 21:09 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 14:17 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 21:46 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 14:48 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-22 14:48 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 22:29 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-22 17:40 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 01:16 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-23 05:04 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-23 12:47 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 12:16 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 19:38 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 12:51 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 20:01 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 13:15 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 20:45 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 13:54 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 21:18 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 14:29 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 21:48 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 14:51 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 08:22 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-25 06:28 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 10:57 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-26 04:18 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 10:36 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-26 08:26 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 11:50 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 09:12 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 16:24 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 10:02 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 17:20 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:21 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:48 -0600
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 14:16 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 16:29 -0600
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 18:54 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-27 12:39 -0600
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-27 01:03 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 16:20 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:11 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-26 11:46 -0600
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-26 10:52 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 14:25 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-26 11:40 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:28 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 17:44 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 00:51 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-21 18:12 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 15:14 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 08:36 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 15:51 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 08:56 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 16:00 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 09:54 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 17:16 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 10:23 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 17:36 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 10:44 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 17:50 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 10:53 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 08:32 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:23 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-22 17:52 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-22 10:58 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-21 15:00 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-18 10:18 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 17:44 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 10:54 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 18:23 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 11:29 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 18:31 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 11:46 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 19:10 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 12:49 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 19:59 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 14:49 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 22:03 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 15:30 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 10:51 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 18:27 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 11:45 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-18 09:46 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 09:58 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-18 14:32 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 18:42 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-18 18:58 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 11:45 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-18 09:21 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-18 16:52 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-18 10:10 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 10:25 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 10:08 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-17 17:50 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-17 14:43 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-17 16:06 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Incubus <incubus9536612@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 00:58 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-18 07:12 -0500
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-08-18 13:43 +0100
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-18 06:20 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-18 07:19 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-08-18 15:49 +0000
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-18 10:02 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-08-19 07:18 -0500
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-08-19 07:41 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-08-21 06:35 -0700
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-21 10:55 -0400
Re: Less Is More: The Problem with Having Too Many Choices DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-08-18 18:56 -0400
Page 8 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 Next page →
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 17:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hjagua003.a3@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #367056 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/26/16, 9:24 AM, in article fhjavadu.jif@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/26/16, 8:50 AM, in article nppogt$3em$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" >>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>> >>>> Muslim invasion >>> >>> This is about as un-Christian of a phrase as one could imagine. >>> >>> You are no Christian. >>> >> Says the so-called atheist who believes that Man is not part of Nature. >> PKB much? > > Ah, another debate where you got completely lost because of multiple > meanings of words. That was funny... you made a complete ass of yourself. > > I had forgotten about it... keep in mind how simple it is! > > There are two meanings of the word "nature": one is in terms of natural vs. > supernatural. I think all things are natural in THAT sense of the word. > > There is also the meaning of man vs. nature... where things are made in > nature or are man-made. Things that man makes, in that sense, are not > natural. How can man make something that exists outside of nature? At what point do the individual components (down to the subatomic level) exit "nature"? > > Easy peasy! And completely over your head. Ah, that was a fun debate. :) > You think that things that are man-made are not "natural" because of what again? What about an eagle's nest, or a beaver dam, or an ant-hill, or a bee hive. Those things don't exist at all in nature until the creature constructs them. Do you consider those things to be outside of nature as well, simply because they don't spring into being on their own?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 13:21 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <npptpt$mui$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #367046 |
On 2016-08-26 12:24 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/26/16, 8:50 AM, in article nppogt$3em$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" >> <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >> >>> Muslim invasion >> >> This is about as un-Christian of a phrase as one could imagine. >> >> You are no Christian. >> > Says the so-called atheist who believes that Man is not part of Nature. > PKB much? What a moron that guy is. It is indeed a Muslim invasion called a hijrah. It is a purposeful migration of Muslims to an area where Islam is not in power to change that fact. They know very well that once their numbers are significant enough, they can start to make demands as they are doing in France (the burkini) and Britain. Eventually, it is a total destruction of the norm in favour of a sharia-friendly culture and government. It's essentially what they did to start the Ottoman Empire and take over Constantinople and they were continuing to do it in their invasion in the subsequent years. In fact, Hussar Poles were the ones to finally stop it in 1683 and fight off the Ottoman Empire in the decades following. In other words, Europe is still Christian due in large part to the Polish forces that were willing to sacrifice their lives for God, country and their religion. If it weren't for us, Snit would have eventually been born Muhammad Al-Snit Muslim Computer Guy rather than Michael Glasser. -- Silver Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 11:48 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nppvd6$pjj$7@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #367035 |
Snit wrote: > On 8/26/16, 8:50 AM, in article nppogt$3em$1@dont-email.me, "Silver > Slimer" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > >> Muslim invasion > > This is about as un-Christian of a phrase as one could imagine. > > You are no Christian. > > Haven't you ever heard of the Crusades? It was to eradicate the muslims that were invading Europe a long time ago because they were invading. I suppose there is more history tied to this but I haven't looked into it. -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 14:16 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <npq11q$2ro$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #367094 |
On 2016-08-26 1:48 PM, GreyCloud wrote: > Snit wrote: > >> On 8/26/16, 8:50 AM, in article nppogt$3em$1@dont-email.me, "Silver >> Slimer" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >> >>> Muslim invasion >> >> This is about as un-Christian of a phrase as one could imagine. >> >> You are no Christian. >> >> > > Haven't you ever heard of the Crusades? > It was to eradicate the muslims that were invading Europe a long time ago > because they were invading. I suppose there is more history tied to this > but I haven't looked into it. They had done two things: 1) invaded the European continent repeatedly in the same manner that they had invaded and conquered the Middle East, 2) conquered a territory traditionally associated with the Christian faith and turned it into a second-class faith there. In other words, the Crusades were a response to REAL aggression and a DESERVED response no matter what the liberal Snits tell you. To be honest, I believe that they should never have ended until every single one of the people dumb enough to believe in Islam were either eliminated or forcibly converted in the same manner that they eliminated or forcibly converted anyone in THEIR path. -- Silver Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 16:29 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <npqfrg$n40$7@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #367106 |
Silver Slimer wrote: > On 2016-08-26 1:48 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >> Snit wrote: >> >>> On 8/26/16, 8:50 AM, in article nppogt$3em$1@dont-email.me, "Silver >>> Slimer" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>> >>>> Muslim invasion >>> >>> This is about as un-Christian of a phrase as one could imagine. >>> >>> You are no Christian. >>> >>> >> >> Haven't you ever heard of the Crusades? >> It was to eradicate the muslims that were invading Europe a long time ago >> because they were invading. I suppose there is more history tied to this >> but I haven't looked into it. > > They had done two things: 1) invaded the European continent repeatedly > in the same manner that they had invaded and conquered the Middle East, > 2) conquered a territory traditionally associated with the Christian > faith and turned it into a second-class faith there. > > In other words, the Crusades were a response to REAL aggression and a > DESERVED response no matter what the liberal Snits tell you. To be > honest, I believe that they should never have ended until every single > one of the people dumb enough to believe in Islam were either eliminated > or forcibly converted in the same manner that they eliminated or > forcibly converted anyone in THEIR path. > Odd point to all of this was a catholic Cardinal wrote a book on how Islam was created. I forgot who he was, but he found out inside the vatican that they created Islam to kill jews and christians during around 500 AD. They also found some camel humper to be their leader... Muhammed. They also wrote the Koran, not Muhammed. You might like to buy the book at Amazon and see how much was done. -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 18:54 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <npqhap$spr$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #367145 |
On 2016-08-26 6:29 PM, GreyCloud wrote: > Silver Slimer wrote: > >> On 2016-08-26 1:48 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>> Snit wrote: >>> >>>> On 8/26/16, 8:50 AM, in article nppogt$3em$1@dont-email.me, "Silver >>>> Slimer" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Muslim invasion >>>> >>>> This is about as un-Christian of a phrase as one could imagine. >>>> >>>> You are no Christian. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Haven't you ever heard of the Crusades? >>> It was to eradicate the muslims that were invading Europe a long time ago >>> because they were invading. I suppose there is more history tied to this >>> but I haven't looked into it. >> >> They had done two things: 1) invaded the European continent repeatedly >> in the same manner that they had invaded and conquered the Middle East, >> 2) conquered a territory traditionally associated with the Christian >> faith and turned it into a second-class faith there. >> >> In other words, the Crusades were a response to REAL aggression and a >> DESERVED response no matter what the liberal Snits tell you. To be >> honest, I believe that they should never have ended until every single >> one of the people dumb enough to believe in Islam were either eliminated >> or forcibly converted in the same manner that they eliminated or >> forcibly converted anyone in THEIR path. >> > > Odd point to all of this was a catholic Cardinal wrote a book on how Islam > was created. I forgot who he was, but he found out inside the vatican that > they created Islam to kill jews and christians during around 500 AD. They > also found some camel humper to be their leader... Muhammed. They also > wrote the Koran, not Muhammed. You might like to buy the book at Amazon and > see how much was done. I read that Islam was actually created by the Catholic church as a scheme to get rid of the true Christians and consolidate power in Rome. Apparently, at the very beginning, Islam would target Christians but not Catholics and keep their sights away from Rome. As their power grew, they lost interest in doing the Catholic church's bidding and did whatever they wanted which was to simply destroy anything that wasn't Islamic. Either way, I don't trust either Islam or the Catholic church as a result of Pope Francis' disgusting behaviour in the past year and especially in light of the fact that it has been determined that he was bribed to behave in such a manner. I see myself as Christian, nothing more nothing less. -- Silver Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-27 12:39 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <npsmod$prp$7@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #367154 |
Silver Slimer wrote: > On 2016-08-26 6:29 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >> Silver Slimer wrote: >> >>> On 2016-08-26 1:48 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>> Snit wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 8/26/16, 8:50 AM, in article nppogt$3em$1@dont-email.me, "Silver >>>>> Slimer" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Muslim invasion >>>>> >>>>> This is about as un-Christian of a phrase as one could imagine. >>>>> >>>>> You are no Christian. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Haven't you ever heard of the Crusades? >>>> It was to eradicate the muslims that were invading Europe a long time >>>> ago >>>> because they were invading. I suppose there is more history tied to >>>> this but I haven't looked into it. >>> >>> They had done two things: 1) invaded the European continent repeatedly >>> in the same manner that they had invaded and conquered the Middle East, >>> 2) conquered a territory traditionally associated with the Christian >>> faith and turned it into a second-class faith there. >>> >>> In other words, the Crusades were a response to REAL aggression and a >>> DESERVED response no matter what the liberal Snits tell you. To be >>> honest, I believe that they should never have ended until every single >>> one of the people dumb enough to believe in Islam were either eliminated >>> or forcibly converted in the same manner that they eliminated or >>> forcibly converted anyone in THEIR path. >>> >> >> Odd point to all of this was a catholic Cardinal wrote a book on how >> Islam >> was created. I forgot who he was, but he found out inside the vatican >> that >> they created Islam to kill jews and christians during around 500 AD. >> They >> also found some camel humper to be their leader... Muhammed. They also >> wrote the Koran, not Muhammed. You might like to buy the book at Amazon >> and see how much was done. > > I read that Islam was actually created by the Catholic church as a > scheme to get rid of the true Christians and consolidate power in Rome. > Apparently, at the very beginning, Islam would target Christians but not > Catholics and keep their sights away from Rome. As their power grew, > they lost interest in doing the Catholic church's bidding and did > whatever they wanted which was to simply destroy anything that wasn't > Islamic. Either way, I don't trust either Islam or the Catholic church > as a result of Pope Francis' disgusting behaviour in the past year and > especially in light of the fact that it has been determined that he was > bribed to behave in such a manner. I see myself as Christian, nothing > more nothing less. > > Same here, but I do not participate in any denomination. That's the part that King James the 2nd altered a bit, the part about tithing... a tax. After all, what did we expect from a kiddy diddler? -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-27 01:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ahjgia3.8apfpe@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #367145 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/26/16, 3:29 PM, in article npqfrg$n40$7@dont-email.me, "GreyCloud" > <mist@cumulus.com> wrote: > >> Silver Slimer wrote: >> >>> On 2016-08-26 1:48 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>>> Snit wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 8/26/16, 8:50 AM, in article nppogt$3em$1@dont-email.me, "Silver >>>>> Slimer" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Muslim invasion >>>>> >>>>> This is about as un-Christian of a phrase as one could imagine. >>>>> >>>>> You are no Christian. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Haven't you ever heard of the Crusades? >>>> It was to eradicate the muslims that were invading Europe a long time ago >>>> because they were invading. I suppose there is more history tied to this >>>> but I haven't looked into it. >>> >>> They had done two things: 1) invaded the European continent repeatedly >>> in the same manner that they had invaded and conquered the Middle East, >>> 2) conquered a territory traditionally associated with the Christian >>> faith and turned it into a second-class faith there. >>> >>> In other words, the Crusades were a response to REAL aggression and a >>> DESERVED response no matter what the liberal Snits tell you. To be >>> honest, I believe that they should never have ended until every single >>> one of the people dumb enough to believe in Islam were either eliminated >>> or forcibly converted in the same manner that they eliminated or >>> forcibly converted anyone in THEIR path. >>> >> >> Odd point to all of this was a catholic Cardinal wrote a book on how Islam >> was created. I forgot who he was, but he found out inside the vatican that >> they created Islam to kill jews and christians during around 500 AD. They >> also found some camel humper to be their leader... Muhammed. They also >> wrote the Koran, not Muhammed. You might like to buy the book at Amazon and >> see how much was done. > > All the major religions have major skeletons in their closets. Which one is generating all the skeletons today? > And each > religion thinks theirs is the best. From an outsiders viewpoint it is all > just silliness. > Those silly moslems. What pranksters.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 16:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hgdiav3.afji98@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #367027 |
Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > On 2016-08-26 11:26 AM, -hh wrote: >> >> Sorry, but your own citation didn't support your claim. > > Your statement: "First, historical statistics show a trend that those > who choose to (and who have the resources to) flee conflict as refugees > are usually "more" educated than the average." Not only did you not > provide any citation for that, but your statement does not mention > conveniently omits the word "some." If 27% of Syrians and 35% of > Iranians graduated from a university, there's still 73% and 65% in that > order who don't. Additionally, the migrants are not coming from Syria > and Iran exclusively and are, in majority, coming from desolate areas of > Africa. This fact is now clear to everyone who has been tracking the > migrant invasion whether they are on the left or the right. Of course, > you omitted these basic details to further your lie and manipulate > statistics in your favour. I have no interest in discussing this topic > with you further considering your lack of even basic knowledge on the > matter. > You've probably seen this but just in case... http://www.lucify.com/the-flow-towards-europe/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 13:11 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nppt7m$kmv$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #367039 |
On 2016-08-26 12:20 PM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >> On 2016-08-26 11:26 AM, -hh wrote: > >>> >>> Sorry, but your own citation didn't support your claim. >> >> Your statement: "First, historical statistics show a trend that those >> who choose to (and who have the resources to) flee conflict as refugees >> are usually "more" educated than the average." Not only did you not >> provide any citation for that, but your statement does not mention >> conveniently omits the word "some." If 27% of Syrians and 35% of >> Iranians graduated from a university, there's still 73% and 65% in that >> order who don't. Additionally, the migrants are not coming from Syria >> and Iran exclusively and are, in majority, coming from desolate areas of >> Africa. This fact is now clear to everyone who has been tracking the >> migrant invasion whether they are on the left or the right. Of course, >> you omitted these basic details to further your lie and manipulate >> statistics in your favour. I have no interest in discussing this topic >> with you further considering your lack of even basic knowledge on the >> matter. >> > > You've probably seen this but just in case... > http://www.lucify.com/the-flow-towards-europe/ I haven't seen it and thank you for it. I'm just proud to see that Poland has effectively shut the door to these parasites. -- Silver Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 11:46 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nppva7$pjj$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #367039 |
Octavian W. Lagrange wrote: > Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >> On 2016-08-26 11:26 AM, -hh wrote: > >>> >>> Sorry, but your own citation didn't support your claim. >> >> Your statement: "First, historical statistics show a trend that those >> who choose to (and who have the resources to) flee conflict as refugees >> are usually "more" educated than the average." Not only did you not >> provide any citation for that, but your statement does not mention >> conveniently omits the word "some." If 27% of Syrians and 35% of >> Iranians graduated from a university, there's still 73% and 65% in that >> order who don't. Additionally, the migrants are not coming from Syria >> and Iran exclusively and are, in majority, coming from desolate areas of >> Africa. This fact is now clear to everyone who has been tracking the >> migrant invasion whether they are on the left or the right. Of course, >> you omitted these basic details to further your lie and manipulate >> statistics in your favour. I have no interest in discussing this topic >> with you further considering your lack of even basic knowledge on the >> matter. >> > > You've probably seen this but just in case... > http://www.lucify.com/the-flow-towards-europe/ Looks like all the violent nutcases heading to europe. -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 10:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3ef8459a-9c77-406a-aa0c-7eaa9df9b006@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #367027 |
On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 11:50:56 AM UTC-4, Silver Slimer wrote: > -hh wrote: > > Silver Slimer wrote: > >> -hh wrote: > >>> Silver Slimer wrote: > >>>> -hh wrote: > >>>>> Slimer wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> ...where Muslims (and black people from what I hear)... > >>>>> > >>>>> So is this YA example of 3rd party hearsay based on some > >>>>> cherry picked YouTubes and zero lifetime personal experience > >>>>> in Poland? > >>>> > >>>> It's from a friend ... > >>> > >>> That's still third party. > >>> > >>> In the meantime, the reports are that refugee crisis didn't really begin for > >>> Europe until 2014 and Poland's rate of asylum applications in 2015 was > >>> 32 per 100K of Poland population, which means even if 2014 and 2016 > >>> were at the same rate as the 2015, the cumulative impact on Poland is > >>> approximately a 0.096% change in population (which is 1 in ~1042). > >> > >> All news reports suggest that refugees are not considering Poland as an > >> option because the welfare system is not generous at all and the Poles > >> themselves are very intolerant of anything going against the Catholic, > >> conservative culture. Since ... > > > > So you're confirming that they're not emigrating there in large > > numbers ... and yet you believe your friend that the country > > has already been "ruined"? Care to explain that contradiction? > > I clearly said that EUROPE was ruined by the Muslim invasion and that > Poland was spared it by closing the borders and refusing to let them in. > It looks like you haven't read my post at all. Where now your definition of "spared" needs to be reconciled against when you said: SS> 1) ... on a Polish beach... SS> 2) Elderly Poles ... SS> 3) Polish politicians ... So just what is your claim now? Inquiring brains want to know if they've been kept out (as you're claiming now) or is the place overrun (as the 1,2,3 was claiming)? Or does the answer depend on what your agenda-of-the-moment requires? > >>>>> Wondering to what degree you think that any of these complaints > >>>>> are any different than the last hundred years of the Roma's in > >>>>> Europe: any comment there? Or is it supposedly okay that those > >>>>> professional beggars, swindlers, pickpockets, robbers & theives > >>>>> are all "ok" because they profess to somehow be Christians? > >>>> > >>>> You mean the gypsies? Why, exactly, would I be in favour of gypsies? > >>> > >>> Wrong question: where's been a similarly strong opposition to them > >>> for the entirety of you life? > >> > >> You won't find any Poles or Europeans for that matter with a positive > >> opinion of gypsies. However, they don't rape and assault people te way > >> the sand parasites do and are therefore seen as little more than a > >> nuisance because of their culture of thievery. > > > > Oh, so then you're blithely excusing that for each alleged rape/assault > > that there's been 1,000 pickpockets? And that every park has their > > share of professional beggars working in shifts? And gosh golly, > > you're all okay with this because for some reason _they_ don't have > > to confirm & assimilate into society because its their "culture" of > > thievery. Please excuse me while I wring out my keyboard from all > > of the dripping satire. > > You're insinuating things and basing them on your own erroneous > interpretation of what I wrote caused by your inability to read a clear, > simple text. Text which has clearly self-contradicted itself. "Check!". > I'm not going to participate in your nonsense any further. Okay! Have a great day ... at least as best as you can anymore, since you've chosen to live in ********** FEAR ********** !!! > > Sorry, but your own citation didn't support your claim. > > Your statement: "First, historical statistics show a trend that those > who choose to (and who have the resources to) flee conflict as refugees > are usually "more" educated than the average." Not only did you not > provide any citation for that... No, I didn't bother to, but you also didn't ask. Here's one example: 09/09/15: "Europe Refugee Crisis Facts: Wealthy, Educated Syrians Risking Lives To Leave War" <http://www.ibtimes.com/> "Recent figures from the U.N. and other aid organizations, however, have shown that the majority of people arriving in Europe often come from upper middle class, well-educated backgrounds...." Is that clear enough yet for you? "Syrians are...far more likely to come from professional backgrounds than refugees originating in African countries like Eritrea, for instance, according to migration experts..." But Syrians are the ones we're supposed to FEAR the most, right? /S "....Children represent more than half of all Syrian refugees worldwide. Of those children, the majority are under 12 years old,...." Keep this 'over half' in mind when you then realize that 30% of the total are _still_ college educated. Because in very simple terms, that means a 60% college education rate amongst the adult refugees. That is, unless you believe that 30% of their under age 12 population have already finished both high school and college. What's the percentage of kids under 12 in the USA who have college degrees? Heck, who even have high school diplomas? "Daily threats of violence and limited economic opportunities are not the only factors driving millions out of Syria. Unemployment rates were 15% back in 2011, before the crisis really began to take off. Need a cite for this too? Okay here ya go: <http://www.tradingeconomics.com/syria/unemployment-rate> Continuing, "The crisis' escalation has resulted in the need for more aggressive conscription and recruitment, factoring into the huge drain of young men leaving Syria. We have certainly dealt with young men who were fleeing recruitment by ISIS, as well as by the government and any number of the insurgent groups," said Judith Sunderland of the nonprofit Human Rights Watch..." IOW, because they didn't want to get drafted, they fled. "...Donohoe said many of the refugees living in camps in Lesbos, Greece -- one of the most popular arrival points for refugees and migrants -- had smartphones. At least a few people could speak English on every boat arriving to Lesbos, meaning that many of them likely had a formal education or came from an upper middle-class background, he said." A smartphone in a country with a per capita GDP of only $5,000. Additionally, this was a generalized historical trend comment, so one needs to go check on the historical data from events such as the flight from Cuba (FYI, a family friend was a "Peter Pan" and their father, an MD, was also able to escape), as well as the anti-intellectual purges that have occurred in SW Asia as other useful references for said generalization. And of course, it also nicely helped that your own citation also illustrated that the mainstream refugees are pretty typical to some of our own Western demographics in terms of educational levels...especially if you also make an effort to normalize to other factors, such as per capita GDP. > >> I would rather not risk ... > > > > FEAR! FEAR! FEAR! FEAR! FEAR! FEAR! FEAR! [etc] > Stupid liberal. > > < snip > Don't let the door hit you in the ass **too hard** as you run away. And don't forget that you did claim that you were going to run away. -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 14:25 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <npq1j2$4pd$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #367097 |
On 2016-08-26 1:52 PM, -hh wrote: > On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 11:50:56 AM UTC-4, Silver Slimer wrote: >> -hh wrote: >>> Silver Slimer wrote: >>>> -hh wrote: >>>>> Silver Slimer wrote: >>>>>> -hh wrote: >>>>>>> Slimer wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ...where Muslims (and black people from what I hear)... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So is this YA example of 3rd party hearsay based on some >>>>>>> cherry picked YouTubes and zero lifetime personal experience >>>>>>> in Poland? >>>>>> >>>>>> It's from a friend ... >>>>> >>>>> That's still third party. >>>>> >>>>> In the meantime, the reports are that refugee crisis didn't really begin for >>>>> Europe until 2014 and Poland's rate of asylum applications in 2015 was >>>>> 32 per 100K of Poland population, which means even if 2014 and 2016 >>>>> were at the same rate as the 2015, the cumulative impact on Poland is >>>>> approximately a 0.096% change in population (which is 1 in ~1042). >>>> >>>> All news reports suggest that refugees are not considering Poland as an >>>> option because the welfare system is not generous at all and the Poles >>>> themselves are very intolerant of anything going against the Catholic, >>>> conservative culture. Since ... >>> >>> So you're confirming that they're not emigrating there in large >>> numbers ... and yet you believe your friend that the country >>> has already been "ruined"? Care to explain that contradiction? >> >> I clearly said that EUROPE was ruined by the Muslim invasion and that >> Poland was spared it by closing the borders and refusing to let them in. >> It looks like you haven't read my post at all. > > Where now your definition of "spared" needs to be reconciled > against when you said: > > SS> 1) ... on a Polish beach... Does that statement indicate that they had become _residents_ of Poland. I've gone to a number of beaches in countries where I am not a resident. > SS> 2) Elderly Poles ... What about them? They were faced with the prospect of accepting "refugees" and were vocal in denying them entry. Once again, the sand parasites were not given shelter. > SS> 3) Polish politicians ... Speaking about the prospect of being forced to accept sand parasites. Once again, they haven't become residents and Poles are simply thinking ahead as a result of seeing how these monsters have affected neighbouring countries. > So just what is your claim now? Inquiring brains want > to know if they've been kept out (as you're claiming now) > or is the place overrun (as the 1,2,3 was claiming)? > > Or does the answer depend on what your agenda-of-the-moment requires? See above. Try to read it correctly for a change. < snip > >> Your statement: "First, historical statistics show a trend that those >> who choose to (and who have the resources to) flee conflict as refugees >> are usually "more" educated than the average." Not only did you not >> provide any citation for that... > > No, I didn't bother to, but you also didn't ask. Here's one example: > > 09/09/15: "Europe Refugee Crisis Facts: Wealthy, Educated Syrians > Risking Lives To Leave War" > > <http://www.ibtimes.com/> > > "Recent figures from the U.N. and other aid organizations, > however, have shown that the majority of people arriving in > Europe often come from upper middle class, well-educated > backgrounds...." > > Is that clear enough yet for you? > > "Syrians are...far more likely to come from professional > backgrounds than refugees originating in African countries > like Eritrea, for instance, according to migration experts..." > > But Syrians are the ones we're supposed to FEAR the most, right? /S > > "....Children represent more than half of all Syrian > refugees worldwide. Of those children, the majority are > under 12 years old,...." > > Keep this 'over half' in mind when you then realize that 30% > of the total are _still_ college educated. Because in very > simple terms, that means a 60% college education rate amongst > the adult refugees. > > That is, unless you believe that 30% of their under age 12 > population have already finished both high school and college. > What's the percentage of kids under 12 in the USA who have > college degrees? Heck, who even have high school diplomas? > > "Daily threats of violence and limited economic opportunities > are not the only factors driving millions out of Syria. > > Unemployment rates were 15% back in 2011, before the crisis > really began to take off. Need a cite for this too? Okay > here ya go: > > <http://www.tradingeconomics.com/syria/unemployment-rate> > > Continuing, > > "The crisis' escalation has resulted in the need for more > aggressive conscription and recruitment, factoring into > the huge drain of young men leaving Syria. > We have certainly dealt with young men who were fleeing > recruitment by ISIS, as well as by the government and any > number of the insurgent groups," said Judith Sunderland of > the nonprofit Human Rights Watch..." > > IOW, because they didn't want to get drafted, they fled. > > "...Donohoe said many of the refugees living in camps in > Lesbos, Greece -- one of the most popular arrival points > for refugees and migrants -- had smartphones. At least a > few people could speak English on every boat arriving to > Lesbos, meaning that many of them likely had a formal > education or came from an upper middle-class background, he said." > > A smartphone in a country with a per capita GDP of only $5,000. > > Additionally, this was a generalized historical trend comment, > so one needs to go check on the historical data from events such > as the flight from Cuba (FYI, a family friend was a "Peter Pan" > and their father, an MD, was also able to escape), as well as > the anti-intellectual purges that have occurred in SW Asia as > other useful references for said generalization. > > And of course, it also nicely helped that your own citation > also illustrated that the mainstream refugees are pretty > typical to some of our own Western demographics in terms > of educational levels...especially if you also make an > effort to normalize to other factors, such as per capita GDP. Meanwhile, 80% of Europe's Muslims are on welfare and Germany considers the sand parasites who arrived there to be unemployable. I wonder who is telling the truth: the UN or the governments of the places where these people actually live? < snip > -- Silver Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 11:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <150c59b6-993e-4680-abf3-1ee5761f869a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #367108 |
On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 2:25:40 PM UTC-4, Silver Slimer wrote:
> On 2016-08-26 1:52 PM, -hh wrote:
> > On Friday, August 26, 2016 at 11:50:56 AM UTC-4, Silver Slimer wrote:
> > > I'm not going to participate in your nonsense any further.
So now you're a liar too.
> < snip >
Yeah, run away from it all. FYI, here's one more historical citation for ya:
<http://www.pewhispanic.org/files/factsheets/23.pdf>
"Overview of the Cuban Migration
Cuban immigration to the United States can be described as
having four distinct waves. The first, from 1959-62, began with
the departure of Cubans following the rise of Fidel Castro. The
initial exodus primarily consisted of upper and upper middle
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
class families in professional and managerial occupations.
^^^^^
The second wave, from about 1965 to 1974, featured orderly
departure programs administered by the U.S and Cuban governments.
The so-called 'freedom flights' brought middle and working class
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cubans to the United States. The third wave began in 1980 with
the Mariel boatlift, a chaotic exodus that was in many ways
distinct from previous migrations. The Marielitos, as they are
known, came from virtually every segment of Cuban society,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
including the poor.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
The fourth wave, which continues to the present, began after
the collapse of Communism in 1989 and the tightening of the
U.S. embargo in 1992. It includes balseros, or rafters, who
float to Florida aboard improvised vessels as well as the
beneficiaries of a special visa lottery system the two
governments agreed to implement in 1994."
For more history, also read:
<http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/1980/07/the-cuban-refugee-problem-in-perspective-1959-1980>
Overall, it does makes sense for the upper class to be an
"early adopters" of flight, as they would typically also
have more/better resources to employ to act on a plan.
-hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-26 08:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E5AE3D.7A3AA%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366990 |
On 8/26/16, 7:36 AM, in article nppk5a$jmp$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer" <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > On 2016-08-26 7:18 AM, -hh wrote: >> Silver Slimer wrote: >>> -hh wrote: >>>> Slimer wrote: >>>> >>>>> ...where Muslims (and black people from what I hear)... >>>> >>>> So is this YA example of 3rd party hearsay based on some >>>> cherry picked YouTubes and zero lifetime personal experience >>>> in Poland? >>> >>> It's from a friend ... >> >> That's still third party. >> >> In the meantime, the reports are that refugee crisis didn't really begin for >> Europe until 2014 and Poland's rate of asylum applications in 2015 was >> 32 per 100K of Poland population, which means even if 2014 and 2016 >> were at the same rate as the 2015, the cumulative impact on Poland is >> approximately a 0.096% change in population (which is 1 in ~1042). > > All news reports suggest that refugees are not considering Poland as an > option because the welfare system is not generous at all and the Poles > themselves are very intolerant of anything going against the Catholic, > conservative culture. Since sand parasites are not aware that their > attempts to rape our women all the while being bankrolled by the > taxpayers will not be effective (same as in Russia), they don't bother > to go there. How can you even pretend to be Christian as you spew such bigotry? I do not understand how you live with such internal inconsistencies. ... >> ... is a dodge which avoids answer the above. > > Not at all. My question made it clear that the idiotic, liberal belief > that a conservative vote is accepting "fear mongering" has no bearing in > common sense. Look above. You push fear mongering. You can deny it, but you can also see it in your above quotes. And below. > The sand parasites A bigoted, fear-mongering word. It is what you have... as you hypocritically call yourself Christian. How do you handle that inconsistency? > have already - for years and on a > continuing basis - shown that they have no respect for the West, our > women, our culture and our values. You are the one showing a lack of respect. Compelte and utter fear mongering and endless horrid attacks against others all because of your conservative sense of entitlement and privilege. > They rape, they assault and they > demand special treatment. A complete lie on your part. Complete. It is not even tied to reality. No, they do not do this. Sure, there are bad apples in any group, but your claim is an out and out lie... one driven by fear and your own sense of entitlement and privilege. It is repulsive. > Insisting that they be left out of the West is > not "fear," it's common sense no matter how much manipulation liberals > do to make it sound otherwise. It is fear and your sense of entitlement and privilege... you think your own religion and your own groups deserve special treatment. Look at how you speak of members of the LGBT community. You are just unable to look past your own nose and see that people should be free to be different. You want to control others... bully those who are not like you. It is reprehensible and inexcusable. ... -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-21 17:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3DF9906.79C91%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366214 |
On 8/21/16, 4:35 PM, in article fhjgasdie98093.a@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> You brought up the issue of personal resources, and now that you've had >>> your ass handed to you in that regard, you curl up in a ball and cry like >>> a little girl. What an insecure snowflake you are. >> >> That claim is funny as hell since it is coming from an anonymous 'bruiser' >> who first claimed that they're terrified of some moslem refugees. >> > > Not terrified at all. Just disgusted with that the Eurofags have > allowed them to swarm all over the (previously) civilized world. Here you are, AGAIN, throwing out the rule of any reasonable law... insisting that whole groups of people should be judged on the actions of a few. You belittle liberals as you show you have a very weak sense of morality... one which is fear based on not reason based. ... -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-22 00:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hjgadu8tajgi8@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366220 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/21/16, 4:35 PM, in article fhjgasdie98093.a@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >>>> You brought up the issue of personal resources, and now that you've had >>>> your ass handed to you in that regard, you curl up in a ball and cry like >>>> a little girl. What an insecure snowflake you are. >>> >>> That claim is funny as hell since it is coming from an anonymous 'bruiser' >>> who first claimed that they're terrified of some moslem refugees. >>> >> >> Not terrified at all. Just disgusted with that the Eurofags have >> allowed them to swarm all over the (previously) civilized world. > > Here you are, AGAIN, throwing out the rule of any reasonable law... > insisting that whole groups of people should be judged on the actions of a > few. You belittle liberals as you show you have a very weak sense of > morality... one which is fear based on not reason based. > Here you are, AGAIN, lying. Lyin Ted.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-21 18:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3DF9FAA.79C99%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366222 |
On 8/21/16, 5:51 PM, in article hjgadu8tajgi8@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/21/16, 4:35 PM, in article fhjgasdie98093.a@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >>>>> You brought up the issue of personal resources, and now that you've had >>>>> your ass handed to you in that regard, you curl up in a ball and cry like >>>>> a little girl. What an insecure snowflake you are. >>>> >>>> That claim is funny as hell since it is coming from an anonymous 'bruiser' >>>> who first claimed that they're terrified of some moslem refugees. >>>> >>> >>> Not terrified at all. Just disgusted with that the Eurofags have >>> allowed them to swarm all over the (previously) civilized world. >> >> Here you are, AGAIN, throwing out the rule of any reasonable law... >> insisting that whole groups of people should be judged on the actions of a >> few. You belittle liberals as you show you have a very weak sense of >> morality... one which is fear based on not reason based. > > Here you are, AGAIN, lying. Lyin Ted. I merely pointed out how you pissed on the rule of law by calling for others to KILL people for merely disagreeing with you (being liberal). You have stood by this absolutely immoral stance of yours. Instead of facing that reality you try to turn things around and put me on the defensive. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-22 15:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ghjdsv.bmjd82@perch.invalid> |
| In reply to | #366224 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 8/21/16, 5:51 PM, in article hjgadu8tajgi8@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. > Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 8/21/16, 4:35 PM, in article fhjgasdie98093.a@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>>>> You brought up the issue of personal resources, and now that you've had >>>>>> your ass handed to you in that regard, you curl up in a ball and cry like >>>>>> a little girl. What an insecure snowflake you are. >>>>> >>>>> That claim is funny as hell since it is coming from an anonymous 'bruiser' >>>>> who first claimed that they're terrified of some moslem refugees. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Not terrified at all. Just disgusted with that the Eurofags have >>>> allowed them to swarm all over the (previously) civilized world. >>> >>> Here you are, AGAIN, throwing out the rule of any reasonable law... >>> insisting that whole groups of people should be judged on the actions of a >>> few. You belittle liberals as you show you have a very weak sense of >>> morality... one which is fear based on not reason based. >> >> Here you are, AGAIN, lying. Lyin Ted. > > I merely pointed out how you pissed on the rule of law by calling for others > to KILL people for merely disagreeing with you (being liberal). You have > stood by this absolutely immoral stance of yours. > > Instead of facing that reality you try to turn things around and put me on > the defensive. > Laws are for humans. I suppose animal cruelty laws might protect liberals, but I never said anything about being cruel.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-22 08:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D3E06A23.79CF0%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #366253 |
On 8/22/16, 8:14 AM, in article ghjdsv.bmjd82@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 8/21/16, 5:51 PM, in article hjgadu8tajgi8@perch.invalid, "Octavian W. >> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 8/21/16, 4:35 PM, in article fhjgasdie98093.a@perch.invalid, "Octavian >>>> W. >>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> You brought up the issue of personal resources, and now that you've had >>>>>>> your ass handed to you in that regard, you curl up in a ball and cry >>>>>>> like >>>>>>> a little girl. What an insecure snowflake you are. >>>>>> >>>>>> That claim is funny as hell since it is coming from an anonymous >>>>>> 'bruiser' >>>>>> who first claimed that they're terrified of some moslem refugees. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Not terrified at all. Just disgusted with that the Eurofags have >>>>> allowed them to swarm all over the (previously) civilized world. >>>> >>>> Here you are, AGAIN, throwing out the rule of any reasonable law... >>>> insisting that whole groups of people should be judged on the actions of a >>>> few. You belittle liberals as you show you have a very weak sense of >>>> morality... one which is fear based on not reason based. >>> >>> Here you are, AGAIN, lying. Lyin Ted. >> >> I merely pointed out how you pissed on the rule of law by calling for others >> to KILL people for merely disagreeing with you (being liberal). You have >> stood by this absolutely immoral stance of yours. >> >> Instead of facing that reality you try to turn things around and put me on >> the defensive. > > Laws are for humans. I suppose animal cruelty laws might protect liberals, > but I never said anything about being cruel. As noted: you have no respect for the rule of law and try to excuse your nonsense in the most absurd ways possible. You piss on the rule of law as you claim to care about it. Then you work to turn things around and put others on the defensive when this is pointed out. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 8 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web