Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #340753 > unrolled thread

Statistics on 16.1.2016.

Started byMelzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com>
First post2016-01-16 23:32 +0100
Last post2016-01-20 00:11 +0000
Articles 2 on this page of 22 — 5 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  Statistics on 16.1.2016. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-01-16 23:32 +0100
    Re: Statistics on 16.1.2016. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-17 03:02 +0000
      Re: Statistics on 16.1.2016. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-01-17 07:48 -0800
        Re: Statistics on 16.1.2016. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-18 05:23 +0000
          Re: Statistics on 16.1.2016. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-18 00:58 -0500
            Re: Statistics on 16.1.2016. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-01-18 06:26 -0800
              Re: Statistics on 16.1.2016. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-18 10:36 -0500
                Poor DooFuS, the Twinnies make more money than he does. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-01-18 10:50 -0800
                Re: Statistics on 16.1.2016. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-18 21:34 +0000
            Re: Statistics on 16.1.2016. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-18 21:46 +0000
          Re: Statistics on 16.1.2016. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-01-18 06:21 -0800
            Re: Statistics on 16.1.2016. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-18 21:43 +0000
      Re: Statistics on 16.1.2016. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-18 00:36 -0500
        Re: Statistics on 16.1.2016. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-18 05:51 +0000
          Re: Statistics on 16.1.2016. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-18 00:59 -0500
            Re: Statistics on 16.1.2016. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-19 01:07 +0000
              Re: Statistics on 16.1.2016. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-18 23:11 -0500
                Re: Statistics on 16.1.2016. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-19 05:12 +0000
                  Re: Statistics on 16.1.2016. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-19 11:46 -0500
                    Re: Statistics on 16.1.2016. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-19 20:51 +0000
                      Re: Statistics on 16.1.2016. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-01-19 18:57 -0500
                        Re: Statistics on 16.1.2016. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-01-20 00:11 +0000

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#341100

FromDFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Date2016-01-19 18:57 -0500
Message-ID<n7mib8$hvq$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#341075
On 1/19/2016 3:51 PM, owl wrote:
> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>> On 1/19/2016 12:12 AM, owl wrote:
>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>>> On 1/18/2016 8:07 PM, owl wrote:
>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 1/18/2016 12:51 AM, owl wrote:
>>>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 1/16/2016 10:02 PM, owl wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> articles 531 since 2016-01-10 00:00:00 +0000 UTC
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Posters with most posts
>>>>>>>>>> Posts   Poster  Posters 34
>>>>>>>>>> 91       Slimer <.m@nsn.s>
>>>>>>>>>> 56       owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No life mf.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sort fail, boy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I had 0 fewer posts than you, no life mf.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "0 fewer" is consistent with "more," boy.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If I "sort failed" and also showed the next highest post count above
>>>> yours, how is "0 fewer consistent with more", no life innumerate mf?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Melzzzz's sort failed.  See my post in reply to his.
>>> "0 fewer" => "greater than or equal"
>>
>>
>> Left side of piehole:  "0 fewer" is consistent with "more"
>> Right side of piehole: "0 fewer" => "greater than or equal"
>>
>> No life, logic-challenged, desperate mf.
>>
>
> LOL.  You truly are the self-nuke master.  Let me know when
> a "greater than or equal" test fails to trigger on "greater than."
> If you come across one, we can name it the "Georgia conditional"
> in your honor.

ha!

owl: "consistent with more /or/ equal"

You no life, logic-challenged, desperate, bet-hedging mf.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#341105

Fromowl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Date2016-01-20 00:11 +0000
Message-ID<ghjds93.0@rooftop.invalid>
In reply to#341100
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
> On 1/19/2016 3:51 PM, owl wrote:
>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>> On 1/19/2016 12:12 AM, owl wrote:
>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 1/18/2016 8:07 PM, owl wrote:
>>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 1/18/2016 12:51 AM, owl wrote:
>>>>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 1/16/2016 10:02 PM, owl wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> articles 531 since 2016-01-10 00:00:00 +0000 UTC
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Posters with most posts
>>>>>>>>>>> Posts   Poster  Posters 34
>>>>>>>>>>> 91       Slimer <.m@nsn.s>
>>>>>>>>>>> 56       owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No life mf.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sort fail, boy.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I had 0 fewer posts than you, no life mf.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "0 fewer" is consistent with "more," boy.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If I "sort failed" and also showed the next highest post count above
>>>>> yours, how is "0 fewer consistent with more", no life innumerate mf?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Melzzzz's sort failed.  See my post in reply to his.
>>>> "0 fewer" => "greater than or equal"
>>>
>>>
>>> Left side of piehole:  "0 fewer" is consistent with "more"
>>> Right side of piehole: "0 fewer" => "greater than or equal"
>>>
>>> No life, logic-challenged, desperate mf.
>>>
>>
>> LOL.  You truly are the self-nuke master.  Let me know when
>> a "greater than or equal" test fails to trigger on "greater than."
>> If you come across one, we can name it the "Georgia conditional"
>> in your honor.
> 
> ha!
> 
> owl: "consistent with more /or/ equal"
> 
> You no life, logic-challenged, desperate, bet-hedging mf.
> 

Gibberish much?

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web