Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #349538 > unrolled thread

Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript

Started by	DFS <nospam@dfs.com>
First post	2016-04-12 13:22 -0400
Last post	2016-04-17 18:21 -0400
Articles	20 on this page of 200 — 20 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

  Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-12 13:22 -0400
    Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-04-13 10:07 +0000
      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-13 12:53 -0400
        Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-13 13:13 -0400
    Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 11:18 -0700
      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-13 17:13 -0400
        Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 14:35 -0700
          Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-13 18:44 -0400
            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-15 05:39 -0700
    Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-13 20:49 +0000
      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-13 17:41 -0400
        Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-13 23:00 +0000
          Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-13 19:44 -0400
            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-14 02:10 +0000
              Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-13 22:29 -0400
                Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-14 02:36 +0000
                Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-13 22:42 -0400
                  Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-14 03:07 +0000
                    Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-13 23:56 -0400
                  Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-14 03:32 +0000
                    Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-14 00:04 -0400
                      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-14 04:38 +0000
    Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-15 19:25 +0000
      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-15 19:37 +0000
        Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-15 16:17 -0400
          Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-15 13:33 -0700
            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-15 16:59 -0400
              Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 08:11 -0700
                Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-18 11:54 -0400
                  Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-20 00:19 +0000
            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-15 21:02 +0000
              Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 08:05 -0700
          Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-16 08:56 +0000
            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-16 11:28 +0000
              Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-16 19:13 +0000
                Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-16 21:12 +0000
                  Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-17 08:51 +0000
                    Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-17 14:43 +0000
                      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-17 15:16 +0000
                        Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-17 16:10 +0000
                          Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-17 21:38 +0000
                            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-17 22:04 +0000
                              Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 07:38 +0000
                    Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-17 13:08 -0400
                      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-17 21:57 +0000
                        Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-17 18:15 -0400
                          Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 07:43 +0000
                            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-18 10:49 -0400
                              Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 15:08 +0000
                                Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 08:18 -0700
                                Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-18 11:46 -0400
                                  Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 09:16 -0700
                                    Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-18 12:39 -0400
                                  Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 17:43 +0000
                                    Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-18 14:27 -0400
                                      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Silver Slimer <peter@klown.is> - 2016-04-18 17:50 -0400
                                    Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-18 12:18 -0700
                                      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 12:27 -0700
                                        Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-18 13:13 -0700
                                          Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 13:46 -0700
                                            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-18 13:51 -0700
                                              Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 14:09 -0700
                                                Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 14:13 -0700
                                                Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-18 14:19 -0700
                                                  Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 14:23 -0700
                                                    Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-18 14:26 -0700
                                                      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 14:35 -0700
                                                      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 21:36 +0000
                                                      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 14:38 -0700
                                                        Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-18 14:48 -0700
                                                          Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 14:56 -0700
                                                            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-18 15:00 -0700
                                                              Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 15:05 -0700
                                                    Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 14:34 -0700
                                                  Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 14:34 -0700
                                                  Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-04-18 22:34 +0100
                                              Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 14:11 -0700
                                                Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 14:13 -0700
                                                Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 21:38 +0000
                                                  Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-18 14:42 -0700
                                                    Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-19 05:51 +0000
                                                      Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 08:24 -0700
                                                        Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-19 16:37 +0000
                                                          Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 09:49 -0700
                                                            Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-19 16:53 +0000
                                                          Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-19 12:04 -0500
                                                            Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-19 10:15 -0700
                                                          Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-19 13:08 -0700
                                                            Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-19 21:14 +0000
                                                              Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-19 21:39 +0000
                                                                Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-19 22:03 +0000
                                                                  Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-19 16:21 -0700
                                                                    Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-19 17:07 -0700
                                                                      Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-19 20:36 -0700
                                                                      Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-20 10:19 -0400
                                                                      Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-20 12:44 -0400
                                                                Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Richard King <kingsley651@webby.org> - 2016-04-19 18:27 -0400
                                                                  Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-19 16:15 -0700
                                                                    Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Richard King <kingsley651@webby.org> - 2016-04-19 19:32 -0400
                                                                  Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-20 03:39 +0000
                                                                    Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-20 04:01 +0000
                                                                  Snit digest 211 / 2016-04-20 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-20 05:24 +0000
                                                              Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-19 15:01 -0700
                                                                Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-19 22:11 +0000
                                                                  Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-19 16:20 -0700
                                                                    Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-19 23:36 +0000
                                                                      Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-19 20:30 -0700
                                                                        Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-20 03:58 +0000
                                                                          Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-19 21:19 -0700
                                                                            Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-20 05:01 +0000
                                                                              Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-19 22:14 -0700
                                                                                Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-20 05:29 +0000
                                                                                  Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-19 22:33 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-20 05:52 +0000
                                                                                      Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-20 16:02 +0000
                                                                                        Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 09:11 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-20 10:40 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-20 10:43 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 11:36 -0700
                                                                  Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-20 06:01 +0000
                                                  Re: Snit digest 206 / 2016-04-18 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-18 16:30 -0700
                                                    Snit digest 207 / 2016-04-19 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-19 05:52 +0000
                                                      Re: Snit digest 207 / 2016-04-19 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-04-18 23:25 -0700
                                                        Snit digest 208 / 2016-04-19 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-19 07:49 +0000
                                          Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 20:49 +0000
                                            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-18 13:52 -0700
                                              Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 21:33 +0000
                                              Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-19 05:48 -0400
                                            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-04-18 13:55 -0700
                                              Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 21:35 +0000
                                          Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-19 05:41 -0400
                                      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-18 15:52 -0400
                                      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 20:47 +0000
                                      Re: Microsoft is the standard; Apple extends it; Ubuntu falls short. Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-04-18 22:59 +0000
                                        Re: Microsoft is the standard; Apple extends it; Ubuntu falls short. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-20 10:19 -0400
                                      Re: Microsoft is the standard; Apple extends it; Ubuntu falls short. benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-19 00:03 -0400
              Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 13:19 -0700
                Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-16 16:25 -0400
                  Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 15:08 -0700
                    Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-16 18:15 -0400
                      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 15:26 -0700
                        Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-16 18:35 -0400
                          Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 15:51 -0700
                            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-20 10:10 -0400
                              Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 08:13 -0700
                                Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-20 12:10 -0400
                                  Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-20 09:12 -0700
                Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-17 09:02 +0000
                  Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-17 13:31 -0400
                    Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-17 21:59 +0000
                      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-17 20:06 -0400
                        Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-18 00:24 +0000
                        Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 07:46 +0000
                          Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-18 05:41 -0400
                          Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-18 11:01 -0400
                            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-18 17:04 +0200
                              Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-18 11:08 -0400
                            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 15:23 +0000
                              Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-20 10:16 -0400
                                Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-20 18:22 +0000
            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-16 14:03 -0400
              Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-17 08:38 +0000
                Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-17 07:27 -0400
                Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-17 13:03 -0400
                  Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-17 21:55 +0000
            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-16 18:26 -0400
              Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-17 08:59 +0000
              Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-17 09:40 +0000
                Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-17 14:14 +0000
                  Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-17 15:07 +0000
                    Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-17 15:51 +0000
                      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-17 21:39 +0000
                        Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-17 22:09 +0000
                          Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 07:40 +0000
        Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-15 17:18 -0400
        Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-15 19:12 -0400
          Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-16 08:57 +0000
            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-16 11:29 +0000
          Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-16 18:28 -0400
      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-15 23:03 +0200
        Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-16 08:57 +0000
      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is> - 2016-04-15 17:17 -0400
        Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-15 21:39 +0000
        Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-16 08:58 +0000
      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-15 18:24 -0400
        Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-16 08:59 +0000
          Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-16 06:34 -0400
            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-16 11:32 +0000
            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Omar <omarsayeed@linuxmail.org> - 2016-04-16 09:01 -0400
            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-16 14:02 -0400
          Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-16 11:16 +0000
            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-16 14:02 -0400
            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-16 19:12 +0000
          Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-16 14:05 -0400
            Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-17 08:40 +0000
              Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-18 10:48 -0400
                Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-04-18 15:06 +0000
    Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Norman Peelman <npeelman@cfl.rr.com> - 2016-04-17 09:33 -0400
      Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-17 14:30 -0400
        Re: Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript Norman Peelman <npeelman@cfl.rr.com> - 2016-04-17 18:21 -0400

Page 9 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 Next page →

#350370

From	DFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Date	2016-04-16 14:03 -0400
Message-ID	<netuk8$ku6$4@dont-email.me>
In reply to	#350266

On 4/16/2016 4:56 AM, Sandman wrote:


> I end up with 24 lines (i.e. your 25 addresses with one duplicate) and it
> takes perl 0.3 seconds to plow through more than 30 times as much data. If we
> compare it to your 10k rows, we get:
>
>> wc -l addresses.txt
>      9998 addresses.txt

That's line count, not address count.  Divide by 5 = 2000 addresses.



>> time ./process.pl
> real	0m0.022s
>
> A measly 0.02 seconds :)

Scary fast.  My VBS program was 0.33 seconds to process 10K addresses, 
and I was shocked at that.  It was 52 lines of code.



> Here's an example using PHP:
<snip>
> Name;Address;City;Zip
> "Carlitos Mexican Restaurant, Inc";"2445 Moon Rd";Grayson;"GA 30017"
> "After The Game Sports Bar and Grill";"2445 Moon Rd Ste 1";Grayson;"GA 30017"
> McDonald's;"1881 Grayson Hwy";Grayson;"GA 30017"
<snip>
> So that's 10k rows of addresses, with a 14 line php script taking 0.11
> seconds to process them all and output a correctly formed CSV file (I
> selected to separate the address, city and zip into different fields for
> clarity :)


Looks good.

Not that MS Excel is the arbiter, but a .csv file won't open correctly 
in Excel unless it's comma-separated (quote-delimiter not required).

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350447

From	Sandman <mr@sandman.net>
Date	2016-04-17 08:38 +0000
Message-ID	<sandman-dcb9841eff129ad148f7e82cb154556c@individual.net>
In reply to	#350370

In article <netuk8$ku6$4@dont-email.me>, DFS wrote:

> > > DFS:
> > > time ./process.pl
> > 
> > Sandman:
> > real	0m0.022s
> 
> > A measly 0.02 seconds :)
> 
> Scary fast. My VBS program was 0.33 seconds to process 10K
> addresses, and I was shocked at that. It was 52 lines of code.

Well, perl is the king of anti-verbosity. I'm pretty sure this could all be 
done in a one-liner :)

> > Sandman:
> > So that's 10k rows of addresses, with a 14 line php script taking
> > 0.11 seconds to process them all and output a correctly formed CSV
> > file (I selected to separate the address, city and zip into
> > different fields for clarity :)
> 
> Looks good.

> Not that MS Excel is the arbiter, but a .csv file won't open
> correctly in Excel unless it's comma-separated (quote-delimiter not
> required).

This isn't true, Excel supports semicolon as delimiter.


-- 
Sandman

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350463

From	Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us>
Date	2016-04-17 07:27 -0400
Message-ID	<nevrvs$56d$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to	#350447

Sandman wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> In article <netuk8$ku6$4@dont-email.me>, DFS wrote:
>
>> Not that MS Excel is the arbiter, but a .csv file won't open
>> correctly in Excel unless it's comma-separated (quote-delimiter not
>> required).
>
> This isn't true, Excel supports semicolon as delimiter.

I thought it'd be like LibreOffice Calc, which let's you specify
a number of delimiters.

-- 
Today is the first day of the rest of your life.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350501

From	DFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Date	2016-04-17 13:03 -0400
Message-ID	<nf0fet$c3j$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to	#350447

On 4/17/2016 4:38 AM, Sandman wrote:
> In article <netuk8$ku6$4@dont-email.me>, DFS wrote:
>
>>>> DFS:
>>>> time ./process.pl
>>>
>>> Sandman:
>>> real	0m0.022s
>>
>>> A measly 0.02 seconds :)
>>
>> Scary fast. My VBS program was 0.33 seconds to process 10K
>> addresses, and I was shocked at that. It was 52 lines of code.
>
> Well, perl is the king of anti-verbosity. I'm pretty sure this could all be
> done in a one-liner :)
>
>>> Sandman:
>>> So that's 10k rows of addresses, with a 14 line php script taking
>>> 0.11 seconds to process them all and output a correctly formed CSV
>>> file (I selected to separate the address, city and zip into
>>> different fields for clarity :)
>>
>> Looks good.
>
>> Not that MS Excel is the arbiter, but a .csv file won't open
>> correctly in Excel unless it's comma-separated (quote-delimiter not
>> required).
>
> This isn't true, Excel supports semicolon as delimiter.


As of Excel 2003 it is true (unless you use the Data Import Wizard).

You mean it supports semicolon as a separator?

Delimiter encloses the data in a field, the separator separates the fields.

"Carlitos Mexican Restaurant, Inc";"2445 Moon Rd";Grayson;"GA 30017"

is quote-delimited, semicolon-separated


If you dbl-click to open a semicolon-separated .csv file in Excel 2003, 
it doesn't parse at all.  Everything shows in column A.  But if you use 
a comma separator, it parses out into columns.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350536

From	Sandman <mr@sandman.net>
Date	2016-04-17 21:55 +0000
Message-ID	<sandman-06d3b8720eedf023e0ee00203307730e@individual.net>
In reply to	#350501

In article <nf0fet$c3j$1@dont-email.me>, DFS wrote:

> > > DFS:
> > > Looks good.
> > 
> > > Not that MS Excel is the arbiter, but a .csv file won't open
> > > correctly in Excel unless it's comma-separated (quote-delimiter
> > > not required).
> > 
> > Sandman:
> > This isn't true, Excel supports semicolon as delimiter.
> 
> As of Excel 2003 it is true (unless you use the Data Import Wizard).

> You mean it supports semicolon as a separator?

> Delimiter encloses the data in a field, the separator separates the
> fields.

> "Carlitos Mexican Restaurant, Inc";"2445 Moon Rd";Grayson;"GA 30017"

> is quote-delimited, semicolon-separated

It's semantics, and can be used either way. Here's how Wikipedia defines it:

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delimiter-separated_values>

   "the following fields in each record are delimited by commas, and
   each record by newlines:

   "Date","Pupil","Grade" "25 May","Bloggs, Fred","C"

Also:

   "Note the use of the double quote to enclose each field. This
   prevents the comma in the actual field value (Bloggs, Fred; Doe,
   Jane, etc.) from being interpreted as a field separator."

Here's the RFC:

<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4180#section-2>

Which mentions the word "delimiter" only once and is in reference to the 
newline (i.e. each post should be delimited by a newline). The word "delimiter" 
allows for both interpretations and you are free to use it either way if you so 
choose, but don't try to say that your interpretation is the only valid one :)

-- 
Sandman

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350409

From	DFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Date	2016-04-16 18:26 -0400
Message-ID	<neudvk$40d$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to	#350266

On 4/16/2016 4:56 AM, Sandman wrote:

> Name;Address;City;Zip
> "Carlitos Mexican Restaurant, Inc";"2445 Moon Rd";Grayson;"GA 30017"
> "After The Game Sports Bar and Grill";"2445 Moon Rd Ste 1";Grayson;"GA 30017"
> McDonald's;"1881 Grayson Hwy";Grayson;"GA 30017"
> Zaxby's;"1931 Grayson Hwy";Grayson;"GA 30017"
> "Riverside Pizza";"1845 Grayson Hwy Ste 1400";Grayson;"GA 30017"
> "Taco Bell";"1855 Grayson Hwy";Grayson;"GA 30017"
> "China Cafe";"1911 Grayson Hwy";Grayson;"GA 30017"
> "Hail Mary Sports Pub";"1950 Grayson Hwy Ste 140";Grayson;"GA 30017"
> "Burger King";"1990 Grayson Hwy";Grayson;"GA 30017"
> "Joa Wings and Deli";"1911 Grayson Hwy";Grayson;"GA 30017"
> "Parkside Bakery & Cafe";"2023 Grayson Hwy";Grayson;"GA 30017"
> "Pancake House";"1911 Grayson Hwy";Grayson;"GA 30017"
> "Johnny's Pizza";"2023 Grayson Hwy Ste 110";Grayson;"GA 30017"
> "Little Caesars Pizza";"1950 Grayson Hwy";Grayson;"GA 30017"
> KFC;"1855 Grayson Hwy";Grayson;"GA 30017"
> "Grand China Chinese Restaurant";"910 Athens Hwy Ste O";Loganville;"GA 30052"
> "Thai Taste Restaurant";"1009 Athens Hwy";Loganville;"GA 30052"
> "Papa John's Pizza";"1009 Athens Hwy Ste 8";Loganville;"GA 30052"
> "Nagoya Japanese Steak House";"2944 Rosebud Rd";Loganville;"GA 30052"
> "My Pizza Buffet";"2944 Rosebud Rd Ste D";Loganville;"GA 30052"
> "Coopers Corner B&G";"1111 Athens Hwy";Grayson;"GA 30017"


They're not sorted.  That'll add 10 seconds.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350451

From	Sandman <mr@sandman.net>
Date	2016-04-17 08:59 +0000
Message-ID	<sandman-ae6ee3b1dd210ef9960999ca63ce9c5c@individual.net>
In reply to	#350409

In article <neudvk$40d$2@dont-email.me>, DFS wrote:

> They're not sorted.  That'll add 10 seconds.

Of course not, sorting is super quick:

 sandman@Fantasy  ~/Desktop/dfs> wc -l addresses.txt 
   49998 addresses.txt

 sandman@Fantasy  ~/Desktop/dfs> time ./process.php 
real	0m0.123s
user	0m0.106s
sys	0m0.014s

 sandman@Fantasy  ~/Desktop/dfs> cat out.txt 
Name,Address,City,Zip
"After The Game Sports Bar and Grill","2445 Moon Rd Ste 1",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Burger King","1990 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Carlitos Mexican Restaurant, Inc","2445 Moon Rd",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"China Cafe","1911 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Coopers Corner B&G","1111 Athens Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Grand China Chinese Restaurant","910 Athens Hwy Ste O",Loganville,"GA 30052"
"Hail Mary Sports Pub","1950 Grayson Hwy Ste 140",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Joa Wings and Deli","1911 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Johnny's Pizza","2023 Grayson Hwy Ste 110",Grayson,"GA 30017"
KFC,"1855 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Little Caesars Pizza","1950 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
McDonald's,"1881 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"My Pizza Buffet","2944 Rosebud Rd Ste D",Loganville,"GA 30052"
"Nagoya Japanese Steak House","2944 Rosebud Rd",Loganville,"GA 30052"
"Pancake House","1911 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Papa John's Pizza","1009 Athens Hwy Ste 8",Loganville,"GA 30052"
"Parkside Bakery & Cafe","2023 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Riverside Pizza","1845 Grayson Hwy Ste 1400",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Taco Bell","1855 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Thai Taste Restaurant","1009 Athens Hwy",Loganville,"GA 30052"
Zaxby's,"1931 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"

 sandman@Fantasy  ~/Desktop/dfs> wc -l process.php 
      16 process.php

0.12 seconds for 10k addresses (not 10k lines), fully sorted and fully 
compliant CSV output, all in 16 lines of PHP code.

I did it with PHP because it has built in CSV functions, and I didn't have the 
CSV libraries for perl, and I couldn't be bothered. Perl is obviously a bit 
faster.

-- 
Sandman

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350459

From	Sandman <mr@sandman.net>
Date	2016-04-17 09:40 +0000
Message-ID	<sandman-bc7cbe04cacf4c206f71714a0014ab49@individual.net>
In reply to	#350409

In article <neudvk$40d$2@dont-email.me>, DFS wrote:

> They're not sorted.  That'll add 10 seconds.

Here's the same output with perl:

 sandman@Fantasy  ~/Desktop/dfs> wc -l addresses.txt 
   49998 addresses.txt
 sandman@Fantasy  ~/Desktop/dfs> wc -l process.pl
      23 process.pl
 sandman@Fantasy  ~/Desktop/dfs> time ./process.pl
real	0m0.087s
user	0m0.079s
sys	0m0.006s
 sandman@Fantasy  ~/Desktop/dfs> cat out.txt 
Name,Address,City,Zip
"After The Game Sports Bar and Gril","2445 Moon Rd Ste 1",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Burger Kin","1990 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Carlitos Mexican Restaurant, In","2445 Moon Rd",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"China Caf","1911 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Coopers Corner B&","1111 Athens Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Grand China Chinese Restauran","910 Athens Hwy Ste O",Loganville,"GA 30052"
"Hail Mary Sports Pu","1950 Grayson Hwy Ste 140",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Joa Wings and Del","1911 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Johnny's Pizz","2023 Grayson Hwy Ste 110",Grayson,"GA 30017"
KF,"1855 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Little Caesars Pizz","1950 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
McDonald',"1881 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"My Pizza Buffe","2944 Rosebud Rd Ste D",Loganville,"GA 30052"
"Nagoya Japanese Steak Hous","2944 Rosebud Rd",Loganville,"GA 30052"
"Pancake Hous","1911 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Papa John's Pizz","1009 Athens Hwy Ste 8",Loganville,"GA 30052"
"Parkside Bakery & Caf","2023 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Riverside Pizz","1845 Grayson Hwy Ste 1400",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Taco Bel","1855 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Thai Taste Restauran","1009 Athens Hwy",Loganville,"GA 30052"
Zaxby',"1931 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"

Not even 0.1 seconds. Heres the perl script:

#!/opt/local/bin/perl
use strict;
use warnings;
use 5.010;
use Class::CSV;
my $csv = Class::CSV->new(fields => [qw/Name Address City Zip/]);
$csv->add_line([qw/Name Address City Zip/]);
$/ = "\n\n";
open my $fh, "<addresses.txt" or die;
open my $oh, ">out.txt" or die;
my (%o, @l, @a);
while (<$fh>){
	s/Call now\!//mi;
	@l = split "\n";
	chop @l;
	@a = split ", ", $l[2];
	$o{$l[0]} = [$l[0], $a[0], $a[1], $a[2]];
}
foreach (sort keys %o){
	$csv->add_line($o{$_});
}
print $oh $csv->string();
close $fh;
close $oh;

-- 
Sandman

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350483

From	owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Date	2016-04-17 14:14 +0000
Message-ID	<ghjdnmgk938a.afji@rooftop.invalid>
In reply to	#350459

Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote:
> In article <neudvk$40d$2@dont-email.me>, DFS wrote:
> 
>> They're not sorted.  That'll add 10 seconds.
> 
> Here's the same output with perl:
> 
>  sandman@Fantasy  ~/Desktop/dfs> wc -l addresses.txt 
>    49998 addresses.txt
>  sandman@Fantasy  ~/Desktop/dfs> wc -l process.pl
>       23 process.pl
>  sandman@Fantasy  ~/Desktop/dfs> time ./process.pl
> real    0m0.087s
> user    0m0.079s
> sys     0m0.006s
>  sandman@Fantasy  ~/Desktop/dfs> cat out.txt 
> Name,Address,City,Zip
> "After The Game Sports Bar and Gril","2445 Moon Rd Ste 1",Grayson,"GA 30017"
> "Burger Kin","1990 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
> "Carlitos Mexican Restaurant, In","2445 Moon Rd",Grayson,"GA 30017"
> "China Caf","1911 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
> "Coopers Corner B&","1111 Athens Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
> "Grand China Chinese Restauran","910 Athens Hwy Ste O",Loganville,"GA 30052"
> "Hail Mary Sports Pu","1950 Grayson Hwy Ste 140",Grayson,"GA 30017"
> "Joa Wings and Del","1911 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
> "Johnny's Pizz","2023 Grayson Hwy Ste 110",Grayson,"GA 30017"
> KF,"1855 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
> "Little Caesars Pizz","1950 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
> McDonald',"1881 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
> "My Pizza Buffe","2944 Rosebud Rd Ste D",Loganville,"GA 30052"
> "Nagoya Japanese Steak Hous","2944 Rosebud Rd",Loganville,"GA 30052"
> "Pancake Hous","1911 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
> "Papa John's Pizz","1009 Athens Hwy Ste 8",Loganville,"GA 30052"
> "Parkside Bakery & Caf","2023 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
> "Riverside Pizz","1845 Grayson Hwy Ste 1400",Grayson,"GA 30017"
> "Taco Bel","1855 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
> "Thai Taste Restauran","1009 Athens Hwy",Loganville,"GA 30052"
> Zaxby',"1931 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
> 
> Not even 0.1 seconds. Heres the perl script:
> 
> #!/opt/local/bin/perl
> use strict;
> use warnings;
> use 5.010;
> use Class::CSV;
> my $csv = Class::CSV->new(fields => [qw/Name Address City Zip/]);
> $csv->add_line([qw/Name Address City Zip/]);
> $/ = "\n\n";
> open my $fh, "<addresses.txt" or die;
> open my $oh, ">out.txt" or die;
> my (%o, @l, @a);
> while (<$fh>){
>         s/Call now\!//mi;
>         @l = split "\n";
>         chop @l;
>         @a = split ", ", $l[2];
>         $o{$l[0]} = [$l[0], $a[0], $a[1], $a[2]];
> }
> foreach (sort keys %o){
>         $csv->add_line($o{$_});
> }
> print $oh $csv->string();
> close $fh;
> close $oh;
> 

First field is truncated.  Perl fails again.  :)
BTW, why do you leave the City unquoted?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350488

From	Sandman <mr@sandman.net>
Date	2016-04-17 15:07 +0000
Message-ID	<sandman-a65acc18182ce797ec1f28ba27ad8ddf@individual.net>
In reply to	#350483

In article <ghjdnmgk938a.afji@rooftop.invalid>, owl wrote:

> First field is truncated.

Incorrect.

> BTW, why do you leave the City unquoted?

Because proper CSV doesn't require it to be enclosed. That's why you use a CSV 
library instead of just handmangling it. 

-- 
Sandman

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350492

From	owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Date	2016-04-17 15:51 +0000
Message-ID	<ghjd03.afeo@rooftop.invalid>
In reply to	#350488

Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote:
> In article <ghjdnmgk938a.afji@rooftop.invalid>, owl wrote:
> 
>> First field is truncated.
> 
> Incorrect.
> 

Look at what you posted.  The first field is truncated:

sandman@Fantasy  ~/Desktop/dfs> cat out.txt
Name,Address,City,Zip
"After The Game Sports Bar and Gril","2445 Moon Rd Ste 1",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Burger Kin","1990 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Carlitos Mexican Restaurant, In","2445 Moon Rd",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"China Caf","1911 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Coopers Corner B&","1111 Athens Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Grand China Chinese Restauran","910 Athens Hwy Ste O",Loganville,"GA 30052"
"Hail Mary Sports Pu","1950 Grayson Hwy Ste 140",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Joa Wings and Del","1911 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Johnny's Pizz","2023 Grayson Hwy Ste 110",Grayson,"GA 30017"
KF,"1855 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Little Caesars Pizz","1950 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
McDonald',"1881 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"My Pizza Buffe","2944 Rosebud Rd Ste D",Loganville,"GA 30052"
"Nagoya Japanese Steak Hous","2944 Rosebud Rd",Loganville,"GA 30052"
"Pancake Hous","1911 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Papa John's Pizz","1009 Athens Hwy Ste 8",Loganville,"GA 30052"
"Parkside Bakery & Caf","2023 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Riverside Pizz","1845 Grayson Hwy Ste 1400",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Taco Bel","1855 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Thai Taste Restauran","1009 Athens Hwy",Loganville,"GA 30052"
Zaxby',"1931 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"


>> BTW, why do you leave the City unquoted?
> 
> Because proper CSV doesn't require it to be enclosed. That's why you use a CSV 
> library instead of just handmangling it. 
> 

OK, I see now that it's not just the City field.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350533

From	Sandman <mr@sandman.net>
Date	2016-04-17 21:39 +0000
Message-ID	<sandman-4c1eb7d67de4335144af19577bbf8c99@individual.net>
In reply to	#350492

In article <ghjd03.afeo@rooftop.invalid>, owl wrote:

> > > owl:
> > > First field is truncated.
> > 
> > Sandman:
> > Incorrect.
> 
> Look at what you posted.  The first field is truncated:

Not due to the script, but due to line lengths in usenet postings.

> > > owl:
> > > BTW, why do you leave the City unquoted?
> > 
> > Sandman:
> > Because proper CSV doesn't require it to be enclosed. That's why
> > you use a CSV library instead of just handmangling it.
> 
> OK, I see now that it's not just the City field.

Indeed. :)

-- 
Sandman

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350540

From	owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Date	2016-04-17 22:09 +0000
Message-ID	<gudo93.ag4ua4@rooftop.invalid>
In reply to	#350533

Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote:
> In article <ghjd03.afeo@rooftop.invalid>, owl wrote:
> 
>> > > owl:
>> > > First field is truncated.
>> > 
>> > Sandman:
>> > Incorrect.
>> 
>> Look at what you posted.  The first field is truncated:
> 
> Not due to the script, but due to line lengths in usenet postings.
> 

How does usenet line length strip a character off the tail end of the
*first* field?  ('"...Grill";' becomes '"Gril";', '"Pizza";' becomes
'"Pizz";', etc.).

sandman@Fantasy  ~/Desktop/dfs> cat out.txt
Name,Address,City,Zip
"After The Game Sports Bar and Gril","2445 Moon Rd Ste 1",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Burger Kin","1990 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Carlitos Mexican Restaurant, In","2445 Moon Rd",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"China Caf","1911 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Coopers Corner B&","1111 Athens Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Grand China Chinese Restauran","910 Athens Hwy Ste O",Loganville,"GA 30052"
"Hail Mary Sports Pu","1950 Grayson Hwy Ste 140",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Joa Wings and Del","1911 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Johnny's Pizz","2023 Grayson Hwy Ste 110",Grayson,"GA 30017"
KF,"1855 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Little Caesars Pizz","1950 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
McDonald',"1881 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"My Pizza Buffe","2944 Rosebud Rd Ste D",Loganville,"GA 30052"
"Nagoya Japanese Steak Hous","2944 Rosebud Rd",Loganville,"GA 30052"
"Pancake Hous","1911 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Papa John's Pizz","1009 Athens Hwy Ste 8",Loganville,"GA 30052"
"Parkside Bakery & Caf","2023 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Riverside Pizz","1845 Grayson Hwy Ste 1400",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Taco Bel","1855 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"
"Thai Taste Restauran","1009 Athens Hwy",Loganville,"GA 30052"
Zaxby',"1931 Grayson Hwy",Grayson,"GA 30017"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350605

From	Sandman <mr@sandman.net>
Date	2016-04-18 07:40 +0000
Message-ID	<sandman-c8b23e591b18e8b711c9a314cb15b2e2@individual.net>
In reply to	#350540

In article <gudo93.ag4ua4@rooftop.invalid>, owl wrote:

> > > > > owl:
> > > > > First field is truncated.
> > > > 
> > > > Sandman:
> > > > Incorrect.
> > > 
> > > owl:
> > > Look at what you posted.  The first field is truncated:
> > 
> > Sandman:
> > Not due to the script, but due to line lengths in usenet postings.
> 
> How does usenet line length strip a character off the tail end of
> the *first* field? ('"...Grill";' becomes '"Gril";', '"Pizza";'
> becomes '"Pizz";', etc.).

Oh, sorry, misunderstood you. When you said "first field" I assumed you meant 
"first line", which had a line break in it.

I'm going to assume it's a 'chop' going wild there. 

-- 
Sandman

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350143

From	Silver Slimer <linux@shit.is>
Date	2016-04-15 17:18 -0400
Message-ID	<nerlkc$r81$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to	#350125

On 2016-04-15 3:37 PM, Sandman wrote:
> In article <sandman-81c9fb86564f5573d013141b93d6cee2@individual.net>, Sandman
> wrote:
>
>>> DFS:
>>> http://i.imgur.com/XD1A5It.jpg
>>
>>> Took the base 25 addresses, and copied until I had 10,000 entries.
>>
>>> My superior MS Windows VBScript then transformed 10,000 addresses
>>> from 4 lines per address to one line per address (removing
>>> extraneous lines and words in the process), delimited it, de-duped
>>> the 10,000 rows, then sorted, then saved ... all in just over half
>>> a second? WTF!? And the final result was 25 unique lines, as it
>>> should be.
>>
>>> 10,000 addresses in 0.53 seconds? Holy Shit that's fast! Using an
>>> i5 WinTel PC, I can deliver a sorted 100,000 mailing label .csv
>>> file in just over 5 seconds!
>>
>>> You - and the slow, bumbling, incomprehensible New/Linux bash and
>>> perl crapware - CANNOT compete. You know it and I know it. You're
>>> fired for promoting that hobby ware.
>>
>> Since I don't know the exact format they were supposed to be in,
>> here's my entry:
>
>> ~/Desktop/dfs>cat out.txt
>> cat: out.txt: No such file or directory
>> ~/Desktop/dfs>wc -l addresses.txt
>>   115438 addresses.txt
>> ~/Desktop/dfs>wc -l process.pl
>>   21 process.pl
>> ~/Desktop/dfs>time ./process.pl
>> real 0m0.105s
>> user 0m0.096s>
>> sys 0m0.006s
>>
>> That's 21 lines of perl code running on a Macbook Air, doing it in
>> 0.1 seconds.
>
> Oh yeah, and that's ten times as many addresses as well, I forgot to add. :)

They will be doubly butt-hurt.


-- 
Silver Slimer
The silver-tongued heel

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350163

From	Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us>
Date	2016-04-15 19:12 -0400
Message-ID	<nersi7$kpc$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to	#350125

Sandman wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> In article <sandman-81c9fb86564f5573d013141b93d6cee2@individual.net>, Sandman 
> wrote:
>
>> > DFS:
>> > http://i.imgur.com/XD1A5It.jpg
>> 
>> > Took the base 25 addresses, and copied until I had 10,000 entries.
>> 
>> > My superior MS Windows VBScript then transformed 10,000 addresses
>> > from 4 lines per address to one line per address (removing
>> > extraneous lines and words in the process), delimited it, de-duped
>> > the 10,000 rows, then sorted, then saved ... all in just over half
>> > a second? WTF!? And the final result was 25 unique lines, as it
>> > should be.
>> 
>> > 10,000 addresses in 0.53 seconds? Holy Shit that's fast! Using an
>> > i5 WinTel PC, I can deliver a sorted 100,000 mailing label .csv
>> > file in just over 5 seconds!
>> 
>> > You - and the slow, bumbling, incomprehensible New/Linux bash and
>> > perl crapware - CANNOT compete. You know it and I know it. You're
>> > fired for promoting that hobby ware.
>> 
>> Since I don't know the exact format they were supposed to be in,
>> here's my entry:
>
>> ~/Desktop/dfs>cat out.txt
>> cat: out.txt: No such file or directory
>> ~/Desktop/dfs>wc -l addresses.txt
>>  115438 addresses.txt
>> ~/Desktop/dfs>wc -l process.pl
>>  21 process.pl
>> ~/Desktop/dfs>time ./process.pl
>> real 0m0.105s
>> user 0m0.096s>
>> sys 0m0.006s
>>
>> That's 21 lines of perl code running on a Macbook Air, doing it in
>> 0.1 seconds.
>
> Oh yeah, and that's ten times as many addresses as well, I forgot to add. :)

There's undoubtedly a wide range of speeds across all the different
scripting languages, even for these small problems.

-- 
Be different: conform.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350267

From	Sandman <mr@sandman.net>
Date	2016-04-16 08:57 +0000
Message-ID	<sandman-50b043dcd5f591338f76761ff37df796@individual.net>
In reply to	#350163

In article <nersi7$kpc$1@dont-email.me>, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> > > That's 21 lines of perl code running on a Macbook Air, doing it
> > > in 0.1 seconds.
> > 
> > Oh yeah, and that's ten times as many addresses as well, I forgot
> > to add. :)
> 
> There's undoubtedly a wide range of speeds across all the different
> scripting languages, even for these small problems.

Indeed, but perl is crazy efficient when it comes to handling data in this way, 
for a scripting language.

-- 
Sandman

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350279

From	owl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Date	2016-04-16 11:29 +0000
Message-ID	<hgjnvmd93.af3@rooftop.invalid>
In reply to	#350267

Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote:
> In article <nersi7$kpc$1@dont-email.me>, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> 
>> > > That's 21 lines of perl code running on a Macbook Air, doing it
>> > > in 0.1 seconds.
>> > 
>> > Oh yeah, and that's ten times as many addresses as well, I forgot
>> > to add. :)
>> 
>> There's undoubtedly a wide range of speeds across all the different
>> scripting languages, even for these small problems.
> 
> Indeed, but perl is crazy efficient when it comes to handling data in this way, 
> for a scripting language.
> 

And invisible too, apparently.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350414

From	DFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Date	2016-04-16 18:28 -0400
Message-ID	<neue53$40d$6@dont-email.me>
In reply to	#350163

On 4/15/2016 7:12 PM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:


> There's undoubtedly a wide range of speeds across all the different
> scripting languages, even for these small problems.


What a bold statement, Creepy.  Worthy of shitv even...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#350141

From	Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com>
Date	2016-04-15 23:03 +0200
Message-ID	<20160415230310.163f4118@maxa-pc>
In reply to	#350124

On 15 Apr 2016 19:25:07 GMT
Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote:

> 
> That's 21 lines of perl code running on a Macbook Air, doing it in
> 0.1 seconds.
> 
You mean it ran fast on crappy hardware?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 9 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 Next page →

csiph-web

Fabian: 10,000 addresses processed in 0.53 seconds with VBScript

Contents

#350370

#350447

#350463

#350501

#350536

#350409

#350451

#350459

#350483

#350488

#350492

#350533

#350540

#350605

#350143

#350163

#350267

#350279

#350414

#350141