Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #291339 > unrolled thread

Windows 10 shit

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  Windows 10 shit Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2015-04-24 12:06 +0000
    Re: Windows 10 shit ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-24 12:09 +0000
      Re: Windows 10 shit William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-24 13:21 +0100
        All I see are a couple of lincultists braying away like fools. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-24 11:41 -0600
    Re: Windows 10 shit Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-24 13:17 +0100
      Re: Windows 10 shit "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-24 08:21 -0400
      Re: Windows 10 shit Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-24 09:35 -0400
        Re: Windows 10 shit Marti van Lin <ml2mst@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-27 01:17 +0200
          Re: Windows 10 shit Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2015-04-27 00:28 +0000
            Re: Windows 10 shit Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-26 21:04 -0400
              Re: Windows 10 shit William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-27 08:57 +0100
            Re: Windows 10 shit Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-26 22:17 -0400
    Re: Windows 10 shit cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-04-24 05:23 -0700
      Re: Windows 10 shit Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2015-04-25 00:14 +0000
        Re: Windows 10 shit Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-24 21:59 -0700
        Re: Windows 10 shit Marti van Lin <ml2mst@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-26 03:56 +0200
          Re: Windows 10 shit Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-25 22:12 -0400
            Re: Windows 10 shit Marti van Lin <ml2mst@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-27 01:01 +0200
          Re: Windows 10 shit Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-26 08:07 -0400
            Re: Windows 10 shit Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-26 09:16 -0400
              Re: Windows 10 shit GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-04-26 14:22 -0600
          Re: Windows 10 shit Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2015-04-26 13:01 +0000
            Re: Windows 10 shit Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-26 10:39 -0400
              Re: Windows 10 shit Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-26 17:02 +0200
                Re: Windows 10 shit Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-26 13:27 -0400
                  Re: Windows 10 shit GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-04-26 14:28 -0600
                  Re: Windows 10 shit chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-27 07:41 -0500
                    What dancing dog?  You still using XP?  LOL!!! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-04-27 11:24 -0600
                  Re: Windows 10 shit owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-27 23:52 +0000
                Re: Windows 10 shit GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-04-26 14:27 -0600
    Re: Windows 10 shit Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-24 09:32 -0400
    Re: Windows 10 shit GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-24 11:39 -0600
    Re: Windows 10 shit Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-24 21:57 -0700
    Re: Windows 10 shit "Cola Zealot" <Cola_Zealot@fuckoff.com> - 2015-04-26 12:43 +0200
      Re: Windows 10 shit Marti van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2015-04-28 17:52 +0200
        Re: Windows 10 shit DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-28 12:09 -0400
        Re: Windows 10 shit chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-28 11:19 -0500
          Yet colas Turdv still uses XP.  ROFLMAO!!!! GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-04-28 11:34 -0600
        Re: Windows 10 shit Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2015-04-29 11:38 +0000
          Re: Windows 10 shit William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-29 12:43 +0100
          Re: Windows 10 shit Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-29 13:09 -0400
    Re: Windows 10 shit John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 07:45 -0700
      Re: Windows 10 shit Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-30 14:04 +0100

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

#291645

On 04/26/15 07:16, Tomas wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Apr 2015 08:07:56 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> Marti van Lin wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>> Op 25-04-15 om 02:14 schreef Tattoo Vampire:
>>>> cc wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> That's a shitty update, but it is just a tech preview. Granted,
>>>>> it's farther along on the release cycle. Just like any other unstable or
>>>>> beta release, shit happens. Hope they fix it for you soon.
>>>>
>>>> I know. ;-) Just had to toss out something for the trolls.
>>>>
>>>> Overall Win10, even at this stage, runs fairly well. I did have a nasty
>>>> crash about a month ago (after installing VMWare Player) that totally
>>>> hosed the installation, but that's what drive images are for!
>>>>
>>> The most recent build 10061 is *very* troublesome.
>>>
>>> I'm in the alt.comp.os.windows-10 newsgroup and almost *everybody* has
>>> problems with the Startmenu.
>>>
>>> I hope Microsoft will release updates ASAP.
>>
>> Sounds like the usual churn in Redmond, land of 10000 tornadoes.
>
> What part of beta test do you not understand?
> Linux users should be used to beta software.

He doesn't understand.  Maybe he lives in Northern Texas where the 
tornados are rampant these days.


-- 
When told the reason for daylight savings time the Old
Indian said, "Only the government would believe that you
could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the
bottom, and have a longer blanket."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#291618

Marti van Lin wrote:

> The most recent build 10061 is *very* troublesome.
> 
> I'm in the alt.comp.os.windows-10 newsgroup and almost *everybody* has
> problems with the Startmenu.
> 
> I hope Microsoft will release updates ASAP.

In a nutshell, 32 bit apps won't launch from Start. They've acknowledged 
the issue but gave no indication when a fix would be forthcoming.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#291623

Tattoo Vampire wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> Marti van Lin wrote:
>
>> The most recent build 10061 is *very* troublesome.
>> 
>> I'm in the alt.comp.os.windows-10 newsgroup and almost *everybody* has
>> problems with the Startmenu.
>> 
>> I hope Microsoft will release updates ASAP.
>
> In a nutshell, 32 bit apps won't launch from Start. They've acknowledged 
> the issue but gave no indication when a fix would be forthcoming.

That's some hi kwality crapware there!

-- 
Don't get stuck in a closet -- wear yourself out.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#291625

Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> Tattoo Vampire wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
> 
>> Marti van Lin wrote:
>>
>>> The most recent build 10061 is *very* troublesome.
>>> 
>>> I'm in the alt.comp.os.windows-10 newsgroup and almost *everybody* has
>>> problems with the Startmenu.
>>> 
>>> I hope Microsoft will release updates ASAP.
>>
>> In a nutshell, 32 bit apps won't launch from Start. They've acknowledged
>> the issue but gave no indication when a fix would be forthcoming.
> 
> That's some hi kwality crapware there!
> 

But but but
MS supports 64bits just as well as linux does. The MS shills have aussured 
us of that "fact"

Must be user error. No other explanation possible...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#291631

Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> Tattoo Vampire wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>> 
>>> Marti van Lin wrote:
>>>
>>>> The most recent build 10061 is *very* troublesome.
>>>> 
>>>> I'm in the alt.comp.os.windows-10 newsgroup and almost *everybody* has
>>>> problems with the Startmenu.
>>>> 
>>>> I hope Microsoft will release updates ASAP.
>>>
>>> In a nutshell, 32 bit apps won't launch from Start. They've acknowledged
>>> the issue but gave no indication when a fix would be forthcoming.
>> 
>> That's some hi kwality crapware there!
>
> But but but
> MS supports 64bits just as well as linux does. The MS shills have aussured 
> us of that "fact"
>
> Must be user error. No other explanation possible...

Hell, I *still* get a chuckle out of "C:\Program Files (x86)".

Imagine that.  Tying your directory name to a processor.

And "Program Files"?  Why?  Just because you can have spaces in your names?
Why not just "programs"?  And "programs32"?

"Documents and Settings"?  Really?  (Old stuff, I know.)

-- 
Welcome back, my friends, to the show that never ends!
We're so glad you could attend, come inside, come inside!
There behind the glass there's a real blade of grass,
Be careful as you pass, move along, move along.
Come inside, the show's about to start,
Guaranteed to blow your head apart.
Rest assured, you'll get your money's worth,
Greatest show, in heaven, hell or earth!
You gotta see the show!  It's a dynamo!
You gotta see the show!  It's rock 'n' roll!
		-- ELP, "Karn Evil 9" (1st Impression, Part 2)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#291648

On 04/26/15 11:27, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>>> Tattoo Vampire wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>
>>>> Marti van Lin wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The most recent build 10061 is *very* troublesome.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm in the alt.comp.os.windows-10 newsgroup and almost *everybody* has
>>>>> problems with the Startmenu.
>>>>>
>>>>> I hope Microsoft will release updates ASAP.
>>>>
>>>> In a nutshell, 32 bit apps won't launch from Start. They've acknowledged
>>>> the issue but gave no indication when a fix would be forthcoming.
>>>
>>> That's some hi kwality crapware there!
>>
>> But but but
>> MS supports 64bits just as well as linux does. The MS shills have aussured
>> us of that "fact"
>>
>> Must be user error. No other explanation possible...
>
> Hell, I *still* get a chuckle out of "C:\Program Files (x86)".
>
> Imagine that.  Tying your directory name to a processor.
>
> And "Program Files"?  Why?  Just because you can have spaces in your names?
> Why not just "programs"?  And "programs32"?
>
> "Documents and Settings"?  Really?  (Old stuff, I know.)
>
Time for you to start looking for a retirement home, old boy.


-- 
When told the reason for daylight savings time the Old
Indian said, "Only the government would believe that you
could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the
bottom, and have a longer blanket."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#291763

Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

>And "Program Files"?  Why?  Just because you can have spaces in your names?
>Why not just "programs"?  And "programs32"?
>
>"Documents and Settings"?  Really?  (Old stuff, I know.)

Don't forget the dancing dog during files searches.

It those "professional designers".  They know better than you.

-- 
"(The Windows UI is) much cleaner than Gnome's. And no surprising of
course : MS have far bigger pockets for paying progressional
designers."  -  "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#291834 — What dancing dog? You still using XP? LOL!!!

On 04/27/15 06:41, chrisv wrote:
> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> And "Program Files"?  Why?  Just because you can have spaces in your names?
>> Why not just "programs"?  And "programs32"?
>>
>> "Documents and Settings"?  Really?  (Old stuff, I know.)
>
> Don't forget the dancing dog during files searches.
>
> It those "professional designers".  They know better than you.
>


-- 
When told the reason for daylight savings time the Old
Indian said, "Only the government would believe that you
could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the
bottom, and have a longer blanket."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#291895

Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
> Peter Köhlmann wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>>> Tattoo Vampire wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>> 
>>>> Marti van Lin wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The most recent build 10061 is *very* troublesome.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm in the alt.comp.os.windows-10 newsgroup and almost *everybody* has
>>>>> problems with the Startmenu.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I hope Microsoft will release updates ASAP.
>>>>
>>>> In a nutshell, 32 bit apps won't launch from Start. They've acknowledged
>>>> the issue but gave no indication when a fix would be forthcoming.
>>> 
>>> That's some hi kwality crapware there!
>>
>> But but but
>> MS supports 64bits just as well as linux does. The MS shills have aussured 
>> us of that "fact"
>>
>> Must be user error. No other explanation possible...

> Hell, I *still* get a chuckle out of "C:\Program Files (x86)".

> Imagine that.  Tying your directory name to a processor.

> And "Program Files"?  Why?  Just because you can have spaces in your names?
> Why not just "programs"?  And "programs32"?

> "Documents and Settings"?  Really?  (Old stuff, I know.)

"lost+found"?  Really?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#291647

On 04/26/15 09:02, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> Tattoo Vampire wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>> Marti van Lin wrote:
>>>
>>>> The most recent build 10061 is *very* troublesome.
>>>>
>>>> I'm in the alt.comp.os.windows-10 newsgroup and almost *everybody* has
>>>> problems with the Startmenu.
>>>>
>>>> I hope Microsoft will release updates ASAP.
>>>
>>> In a nutshell, 32 bit apps won't launch from Start. They've acknowledged
>>> the issue but gave no indication when a fix would be forthcoming.
>>
>> That's some hi kwality crapware there!
>>
>
> But but but
> MS supports 64bits just as well as linux does. The MS shills have aussured
> us of that "fact"
>
> Must be user error. No other explanation possible...

Yeah, your sarcasm is right up there on top.

LOL!!!  Again, what part of beta testing do you not understand?

With all the bleeding edge linux distros out there, the distro maker "It 
compiles, put it up for downloads."

What MS is really looking for is user feedback.  Some they ignore and 
some they'll think about and maybe make a change or two.  But it isn't 
ready for public use yet and won't be till they gather up all the bugs 
that they can fix... and maybe one more trial before release to catch a 
few more bugs.

So, when is linux going to completely fix their bugs?  So far, with 
RedHat, they've reverted back to sysintv from systemd, found a few more 
security vulnerabilies in the os, and found more security problems in 
Xorg.  And that isn't even covering the other bugs in their other apps.


-- 
When told the reason for daylight savings time the Old
Indian said, "Only the government would believe that you
could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the
bottom, and have a longer blanket."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#291370

On 2015-04-24 8:06 AM, Tattoo Vampire wrote:
> After updating to the latest build of the tech preview,

Commenting on unfinished, beta software...

> suddenly I can no
> longer launch regular applications from the start menu without right
> clicking and selecting "run as administrator", or by opening the file
> location and then clicking on the program file itself. Modern apps still
> launch fine from start, though.

Oh no! Beta software doesn't work properly? EVERYBODY SHOULD UNINSTALL 
WINDOWS IN PROTEST!

> Using the feedback feature, it looks like the start menu is broken for
> everyone who updated to the latest build.
>
> Oh, and I'm still nagged to re-enter my Microsoft credentials several
> times a session.

Woe is you. It must be very difficult for you to wake up every morning.

-- 
Slimer
Encrypt.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#291446

Tattoo Vampire wrote:

> After updating to the latest build of the tech preview, suddenly I can no
> longer launch regular applications from the start menu without right
> clicking and selecting "run as administrator", or by opening the file
> location and then clicking on the program file itself. Modern apps still
> launch fine from start, though.
> 
> Using the feedback feature, it looks like the start menu is broken for
> everyone who updated to the latest build.

It is.
Just don't forget to provide feedback about it.

> 
> Oh, and I'm still nagged to re-enter my Microsoft credentials several
> times a session.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#291527

On 4/24/15, 5:06 AM, in article
mhdbks$nbf$1@tattoovampire.eternal-september.org, "Tattoo Vampire"
<sitting@this.computer> wrote:

> After updating to the latest build of the tech preview, suddenly I can no
> longer launch regular applications from the start menu without right
> clicking and selecting "run as administrator", or by opening the file
> location and then clicking on the program file itself. Modern apps still
> launch fine from start, though.
> 
> Using the feedback feature, it looks like the start menu is broken for
> everyone who updated to the latest build.
> 
> Oh, and I'm still nagged to re-enter my Microsoft credentials several
> times a session.

The last is because nobody trusts you. :)

-- 
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mavericks / Pages 5.1:            <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#291616

"Tattoo Vampire"  wrote in message 
news:mhdbks$nbf$1@tattoovampire.eternal-september.org...
>
>After updating to the latest build of the tech preview, suddenly I can no
>longer launch regular applications from the start menu without right
>clicking and selecting "run as administrator", or by opening the file
>location and then clicking on the program file itself. Modern apps still
>launch fine from start, though.
>
>Using the feedback feature, it looks like the start menu is broken for
>everyone who updated to the latest build.
>
>Oh, and I'm still nagged to re-enter my Microsoft credentials several
>times a session.
>
>
lol !
You always were an incompetent twat, eh Tattoo shitlicker?, no need to prove 
it again and again, fool! 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#291989

Cola Zealot schreef op 26-4-2015 om 12:43:

> "Tattoo Vampire"  wrote in message
> news:mhdbks$nbf$1@tattoovampire.eternal-september.org...
>>
>> After updating to the latest build of the tech preview, suddenly I can no
>> longer launch regular applications from the start menu without right
>> clicking and selecting "run as administrator", or by opening the file
>> location and then clicking on the program file itself. Modern apps still
>> launch fine from start, though.
>>
>> Using the feedback feature, it looks like the start menu is broken for
>> everyone who updated to the latest build.
>>
>> Oh, and I'm still nagged to re-enter my Microsoft credentials several
>> times a session.
>>
>>
> lol !
> You always were an incompetent twat, eh Tattoo shitlicker?, no need to
> prove it again and again, fool!

Don't agree with you trashing TV, yet nice to see you again, Cola Zealot ;-)

Update was released last night, Windows (10) Technical Preview works 
like a charm again \o/

Greetings,

-- 
|_|0|_| Marti T. van Lin (alias ML2MST)
|_|_|0| Computer enthusiast and Amateur musician
|0|0|0| http://www.soundclick.com/martivanlin

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#291995

On 4/28/2015 11:52 AM, Marti van Lin wrote:
> Cola Zealot schreef op 26-4-2015 om 12:43:
>
>> "Tattoo Vampire"  wrote in message
>> news:mhdbks$nbf$1@tattoovampire.eternal-september.org...
>>>
>>> After updating to the latest build of the tech preview, suddenly I
>>> can no
>>> longer launch regular applications from the start menu without right
>>> clicking and selecting "run as administrator", or by opening the file
>>> location and then clicking on the program file itself. Modern apps still
>>> launch fine from start, though.
>>>
>>> Using the feedback feature, it looks like the start menu is broken for
>>> everyone who updated to the latest build.
>>>
>>> Oh, and I'm still nagged to re-enter my Microsoft credentials several
>>> times a session.
>>>
>>>
>> lol !
>> You always were an incompetent twat, eh Tattoo shitlicker?, no need to
>> prove it again and again, fool!
>
> Don't agree with you trashing TV, yet nice to see you again, Cola Zealot
> ;-)
>
> Update was released last night, Windows (10) Technical Preview works
> like a charm again \o/
>
> Greetings,
>
> --
> |_|0|_| Marti T. van Lin (alias ML2MST)
> |_|_|0| Computer enthusiast and Amateur musician
> |0|0|0| http://www.soundclick.com/martivanlin



No kidding Marti, you seem MUCH happier running and talking about 
Windows than you ever did running and talking about Linux.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#291997

Marti van Lin wrote:

> Colon Zealot wrote:
>>
>> lol !
>> You always were an incompetent twat, eh Tattoo shitlicker?, no need to
>> prove it again and again, fool!

Because it's so hard to believe that the tech preview is buggy.  It
must be TV's fault, right?

What's next, a Hadronesque claim that you dont know any Windows users
who have been infected "since 98, give or take"?

>Don't agree with you trashing TV, yet nice to see you again, Cola Zealot ;-)

The Colon Zealot lowers the "curve" for us all.

-- 
"More specifically, a company that is coming out with a
netbook/tablet/etc will likely select a platform for their device.
Will it be the "open" Linux kernel or will it be the proprietary one
from Google. If they intend on running Android - it's likely to be the
later."  -  trolling fsckwit "Ezekiel"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#292026 — Yet colas Turdv still uses XP. ROFLMAO!!!!

On 04/28/15 10:19, chrisv wrote:
> Marti van Lin wrote:
>
>> Colon Zealot wrote:
>>>
>>> lol !
>>> You always were an incompetent twat, eh Tattoo shitlicker?, no need to
>>> prove it again and again, fool!
>
> Because it's so hard to believe that the tech preview is buggy.  It
> must be TV's fault, right?
>
> What's next, a Hadronesque claim that you dont know any Windows users
> who have been infected "since 98, give or take"?
>
>> Don't agree with you trashing TV, yet nice to see you again, Cola Zealot ;-)
>
> The Colon Zealot lowers the "curve" for us all.
>


-- 
When told the reason for daylight savings time the Old
Indian said, "Only the government would believe that you
could cut a foot off the top of a blanket, sew it to the
bottom, and have a longer blanket."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#292117

Marti van Lin wrote:

> Don't agree with you trashing TV, yet nice to see you again, Cola Zealot
> ;-)

"Cola Zealot" (and all the other nyms he operates under) is a twat.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#292118

It was reported that Tattoo Vampire posted:

> Marti van Lin wrote:
>
>> Don't agree with you trashing TV, yet nice to see you again, Cola Zealot
>> ;-)
>
> "Cola Zealot" (and all the other nyms he operates under) is a twat.

+1

-- 
openSUSE 13.2 64-bit
KDE 4.14.6
Kernel: 4.0.0-1.1.g49e42b3.x86_64 GNU/Linux 2015-04-17

  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web