Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #352744 > unrolled thread
| Started by | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-29 22:13 +0000 |
| Last post | 2016-04-30 07:33 -0700 |
| Articles | 16 on this page of 116 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-29 22:13 +0000
Re: done John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2016-04-29 15:43 -0700
Re: done DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-29 19:26 -0400
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 03:50 +0000
Re: done Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 05:51 +0200
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 03:55 +0000
Re: done Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 05:57 +0200
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 04:04 +0000
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 04:07 +0000
Re: done Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 06:08 +0200
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 14:35 +0000
Re: done Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 17:20 +0200
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 15:40 +0000
Re: done Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 18:11 +0200
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 16:17 +0000
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 17:23 +0000
Re: done Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-01 00:56 +0200
Re: done Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-01 01:30 +0200
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 23:11 +0000
Re: done Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2016-05-01 08:38 +0000
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-01 15:58 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 11:59 -0700
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 12:00 -0700
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-01 19:48 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 13:02 -0700
Re: done Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-05-01 22:04 +0200
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 13:41 -0700
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 13:47 -0700
Re: done Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-05-02 02:21 +0200
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 18:34 -0700
Re: done chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-02 08:27 -0500
Re: done Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-02 15:54 +0200
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 13:15 -0700
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-01 20:16 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 13:38 -0700
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-01 20:55 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 14:17 -0700
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-01 21:35 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 14:47 -0700
Re: done Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2016-05-01 14:56 -0700
Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-01 22:37 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 15:59 -0700
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-01 23:10 +0000
Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-01 23:09 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 17:11 -0700
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-02 00:27 +0000
Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-02 00:31 +0000
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-02 00:52 +0000
Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-02 01:04 +0000
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-02 01:47 +0000
Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-02 01:51 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 18:44 -0700
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 18:41 -0700
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 19:43 -0700
Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-02 03:36 +0000
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 21:14 -0700
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 21:43 -0700
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 22:25 -0700
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 22:27 -0700
Re: done ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 17:45 +0000
Re: done Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-02 20:16 +0200
Re: done Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-05-02 20:46 +0200
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 12:43 -0700
Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-02 20:55 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 18:32 -0700
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 18:38 -0700
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-02 01:48 +0000
Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-02 01:49 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 19:18 -0700
Re: done ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 01:02 +0000
Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-02 01:10 +0000
Re: done chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-05-02 08:31 -0500
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-02 07:27 -0700
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 09:10 -0700
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzen@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 10:45 -0700
Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-02 14:51 +0000
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 11:18 -0700
Re: done ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 19:13 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 17:12 -0700
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-02 00:27 +0000
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-02 00:53 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 18:42 -0700
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-02 01:50 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 19:17 -0700
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 18:40 -0700
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-02 01:49 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 19:16 -0700
Re: done ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-05-02 01:02 +0000
Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-02 01:08 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 18:33 -0700
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 18:43 -0700
Re: done William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-05-02 09:30 +0100
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 16:02 -0700
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 20:36 -0700
Re: done meat <meat.stretcher@linuxmail.org> - 2016-05-02 03:40 +0000
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-05-01 21:14 -0700
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-01 21:58 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 15:32 -0700
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-01 22:37 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 15:55 -0700
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-01 23:00 +0000
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-05-01 23:33 +0000
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 17:13 -0700
Re: done Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-05-01 12:01 -0700
Re: done DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-29 23:58 -0400
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 04:08 +0000
Re: done Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 13:12 +0200
Re: done Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-04-30 14:09 +0200
Re: done DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-30 10:02 -0400
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 15:05 +0000
Re: done DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-30 11:19 -0400
Re: done owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-04-30 15:41 +0000
Re: done DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-30 13:19 -0400
Re: done Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-04-30 13:54 -0400
Re: done DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2016-04-30 19:36 -0400
Re: done Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-04-30 07:33 -0700
Page 6 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-01 23:00 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ghb.vkofpi@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #353121 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 5/1/16, 3:37 PM, in article faoe00.a3bnv7af@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 5/1/16, 2:58 PM, in article fhjf0q3.fa355@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >> ... >> >>>> I thought it was you not being able to mirror it. Maybe it was that >>>> the tool you used only worked over the network. >>> >>> Odd given how you accusation was that I had the data locally and I was just >>> copying it from a local source. :) >>> >>> >>> I would love to see... >> >> the outside world again. > > If so I Buttpain in the membrane.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-01 23:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <log094lgki.jh33@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #353083 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 5/1/16, 1:16 PM, in article ghjd0a3a.efgh@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>
...
>>
>> Cry me a river. I've seen this often enough:
>>
>> -> Sock A makes a post
>> --> Somebody B replies to that sock.
>> ---> You respond to Somebody B, as Snit, but with language making
>> it seem as if you were Sock A continuing the discussion.
>>
>> (IOW, you forgot to switch to the sock when replying).
>> Invariably somebody busts you on it, but it's all crickets from
>> you at that point, unless later downthread you make one of your
>> pathetic "Everybody's Snit har har orange you glad i didn't say
>> banana" whines.
>>
> One word: bullshit.
>
> Your claim is utter and complete bullshit. The ongoing joke of COLA is
> everyone is Snit. This is just a fact. I do not think you or others are
> stupid enough to really believe it.
>
> The fact is I do not use socks and as such there is no evidence I do. There
> are idiots who post about screencasting and consistency and pretend to be me
> to fool idiots... and then those who troll pretend to be stupid enough to
> fall for it.
>
> I am giving you a compliment here: I do not think you are so stupid as to
> actually fall for it. Are you saying you are? If so, well, I suppose I will
> accept your word you are THAT stupid.
>
Here's one that's the reverse. A sock seeming to forget to change back to
"Snit". This one probably flatfish being clever, but the idea was triggered
by multiple occurences of you, Snit, forgetting to switch back to the sock
while in fever mode.
<quote>
From: Richard King <kingsley651@webby.org>
Message-ID: <nfg20i$4h5$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="1ab71f9efbdd66785a8ee9e31cf301e5";
logging-data="4645"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+tfvzjQxvVZWJbjjyqTLFsL/+ZwlWko7g="
...
On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 07:50:16 -0700 (PDT), John Gohde wrote:
> On Saturday, April 23, 2016 at 2:02:12 AM UTC-4, Snit wrote:
>> OK, so many in COLA have repeatedly claimed I am anti-Linux or against OSS
>> or trolling for the purpose of pushing Windows or OS X or some such
>> nonsense. Complete rubbish. So, hey, while I have made my views clear
>> before, why not put them in a single "essay" form. It will not, of course,
>> answer all questions - but for those who want to have a reasoned discussion
>> on Linux and OSS it is an opening for that. Hopefully (though I doubt it,
>> sadly), it will reduce the name calling and spewing of insults.
>
>
> Who needs a roomful of monkeys banging on a keyboard, when you have Snit?
I see you are still begging for my attention.
</quote>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-01 17:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D34BE9BC.71949%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #353128 |
On 5/1/16, 4:33 PM, in article log094lgki.jh33@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 5/1/16, 1:16 PM, in article ghjd0a3a.efgh@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> > ... > >>> >>> Cry me a river. I've seen this often enough: >>> >>> -> Sock A makes a post >>> --> Somebody B replies to that sock. >>> ---> You respond to Somebody B, as Snit, but with language making >>> it seem as if you were Sock A continuing the discussion. >>> >>> (IOW, you forgot to switch to the sock when replying). >>> Invariably somebody busts you on it, but it's all crickets from >>> you at that point, unless later downthread you make one of your >>> pathetic "Everybody's Snit har har orange you glad i didn't say >>> banana" whines. >>> >> One word: bullshit. >> >> Your claim is utter and complete bullshit. The ongoing joke of COLA is >> everyone is Snit. This is just a fact. I do not think you or others are >> stupid enough to really believe it. >> >> The fact is I do not use socks and as such there is no evidence I do. There >> are idiots who post about screencasting and consistency and pretend to be me >> to fool idiots... and then those who troll pretend to be stupid enough to >> fall for it. >> >> I am giving you a compliment here: I do not think you are so stupid as to >> actually fall for it. Are you saying you are? If so, well, I suppose I will >> accept your word you are THAT stupid. > > Here's one that's the reverse. A sock seeming to forget to change back to > "Snit". So you point to the actions of someone else and try to say they say something about me. Nope. You are asking ME to take responsibility for someone else's behavior. Not gonna do it. > This one probably flatfish being clever, but the idea was triggered > by multiple occurences of you, Snit, forgetting to switch back to the sock > while in fever mode. > > <quote> > > From: Richard King <kingsley651@webby.org> > Message-ID: <nfg20i$4h5$1@dont-email.me> > Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; > posting-host="1ab71f9efbdd66785a8ee9e31cf301e5"; > logging-data="4645"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; > posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+tfvzjQxvVZWJbjjyqTLFsL/+ZwlWko7g=" > > ... > > > On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 07:50:16 -0700 (PDT), John Gohde wrote: > >> On Saturday, April 23, 2016 at 2:02:12 AM UTC-4, Snit wrote: >>> OK, so many in COLA have repeatedly claimed I am anti-Linux or against OSS >>> or trolling for the purpose of pushing Windows or OS X or some such >>> nonsense. Complete rubbish. So, hey, while I have made my views clear >>> before, why not put them in a single "essay" form. It will not, of course, >>> answer all questions - but for those who want to have a reasoned discussion >>> on Linux and OSS it is an opening for that. Hopefully (though I doubt it, >>> sadly), it will reduce the name calling and spewing of insults. >> >> >> Who needs a roomful of monkeys banging on a keyboard, when you have Snit? > > I see you are still begging for my attention. > > </quote> > > > -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-01 12:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D34BA09D.718CD%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #352992 |
On 5/1/16, 1:38 AM, in article sandman-2f3d08a25915707781db047bc35b4457@individual.net, "Sandman" <mr@sandman.net> wrote: > The host "1ab71f9efbdd66785a8ee9e31cf301e5" has been used by: > > - Edward Stansfield > - Big Fish in a Small Crotch > - Barry H > - anonymous > - mike antipasto > - Nobody > - Omar > - Richard King > - Richard Bone At least three of those are known names by Carroll. Somewhere I have a list of the ones I busted him with or he directly admitted to... can likely dig it up if anyone cares. But, really, that is a PROXY... just because Carroll used it does not mean others did not. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-29 23:58 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ng1aac$lh7$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #352810 |
On 4/29/2016 11:55 PM, owl wrote: > Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: >> Why don't you first try on known ip address? > > You got one? Your own. Open an eternal-sep account and post something to Usenet.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-30 04:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhjgiua00q3ra.44@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #352812 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 4/29/2016 11:55 PM, owl wrote: >> Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: > > >>> Why don't you first try on known ip address? >> >> You got one? > > > Your own. > > Open an eternal-sep account and post something to Usenet. > Melzzzzz gave me his. grep found it. :) I'll have to go back and look at that other one again. Maybe I got it wrong.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-30 13:12 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <20160430131254.324d6b01@maxa-pc> |
| In reply to | #352816 |
On 30 Apr 2016 08:45:13 GMT Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote: > In article <fhjgiua00q3ra.44@rooftop.invalid>, owl wrote: > > > > > > Melzzzzz: > > > > > Why don't you first try on known ip address? > > > > > > > > owl: > > > > You got one? > > > > > > DFS: > > > Your own. > > > > > Open an eternal-sep account and post something to Usenet. > > > > Melzzzzz gave me his. grep found it. :) I'll have to go back and > > look at that other one again. Maybe I got it wrong. > > IPv6... :) > They might perform rdns lookup and if found, hash host name, instead of ip address...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-30 14:09 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <20160430140937.16081e5d@maxa-pc> |
| In reply to | #352827 |
On 30 Apr 2016 12:06:29 GMT Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote: > In article <20160430131254.324d6b01@maxa-pc>, Melzzzzz wrote: > > > > > owl: > > > > Melzzzzz gave me his. grep found it. :) I'll have to go back and > > > > look at that other one again. Maybe I got it wrong. > > > > > > Sandman: > > > IPv6... :) > > > > They might perform rdns lookup and if found, hash host name, instead > > of ip address... > > Eternal september doesn't, if that's what we're talking about. > How do you know?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-30 10:02 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ng2dn8$643$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #352816 |
On 4/30/2016 12:08 AM, owl wrote: > DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >> On 4/29/2016 11:55 PM, owl wrote: >>> Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: >> >> >>>> Why don't you first try on known ip address? >>> >>> You got one? >> >> >> Your own. >> >> Open an eternal-sep account and post something to Usenet. >> > > Melzzzzz gave me his. grep found it. :) Happy Stalker! > I'll have to go back and look at that other one again. Maybe I got > it wrong.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-30 15:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ghjdi93.gju8g@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #352853 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 4/30/2016 12:08 AM, owl wrote: >> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>> On 4/29/2016 11:55 PM, owl wrote: >>>> Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>> Why don't you first try on known ip address? >>>> >>>> You got one? >>> >>> >>> Your own. >>> >>> Open an eternal-sep account and post something to Usenet. >>> >> >> Melzzzzz gave me his. grep found it. :) > > > Happy Stalker! > Not stalking. Curiousity.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-30 11:19 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ng2i8f$o8d$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #352867 |
On 4/30/2016 11:05 AM, owl wrote: > DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >> On 4/30/2016 12:08 AM, owl wrote: >>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>> On 4/29/2016 11:55 PM, owl wrote: >>>>> Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>> Why don't you first try on known ip address? >>>>> >>>>> You got one? >>>> >>>> >>>> Your own. >>>> >>>> Open an eternal-sep account and post something to Usenet. >>>> >>> >>> Melzzzzz gave me his. grep found it. :) >> >> >> Happy Stalker! >> > > Not stalking. Curiousity. Feverishly writing code to generate 4 billion hashes to unmask IP addresses, and a willingness to let it burn up your CPU for 3 months straight... Morbid curiosity or deranged obsessed stalking /freak/? You decide, viewers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-30 15:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <thjgid03.arttu@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #352873 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 4/30/2016 11:05 AM, owl wrote: >> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>> On 4/30/2016 12:08 AM, owl wrote: >>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>> On 4/29/2016 11:55 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>> Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> Why don't you first try on known ip address? >>>>>> >>>>>> You got one? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Your own. >>>>> >>>>> Open an eternal-sep account and post something to Usenet. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Melzzzzz gave me his. grep found it. :) >>> >>> >>> Happy Stalker! >>> >> >> Not stalking. Curiousity. > > > Feverishly writing code to generate 4 billion hashes to unmask IP > addresses, and a willingness to let it burn up your CPU for 3 months > straight... > 3 hours. I gave up on the earlier trials after a day or so. > Morbid curiosity or deranged obsessed stalking /freak/? You decide, > viewers. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-30 13:19 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ng2p8b$ihq$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #352885 |
On 04/30/2016 01:01 PM, vallor wrote: > On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 15:41:51 +0000, owl wrote: > >> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>> On 4/30/2016 11:05 AM, owl wrote: >>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>> On 4/30/2016 12:08 AM, owl wrote: >>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 4/29/2016 11:55 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>> Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Why don't you first try on known ip address? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You got one? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Your own. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Open an eternal-sep account and post something to Usenet. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Melzzzzz gave me his. grep found it. :) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Happy Stalker! >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Not stalking. Curiousity. >>> >>> >>> Feverishly writing code to generate 4 billion hashes to unmask IP >>> addresses, and a willingness to let it burn up your CPU for 3 months >>> straight... >>> >>> >> 3 hours. I gave up on the earlier trials after a day or so. >> >>> Morbid curiosity or deranged obsessed stalking /freak/? You decide, >>> viewers. >>> > > Says the outerfilther that tries to intimidate people by posting their > addresses online. Says the moron who splatters his info all over the place, posts with his real name, brags about being a millionaire, posts a screenshot of his military commendation letter, etc. Just look how 'anonymous' you want to be, Bloaty: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/vallor Google+ : https://plus.google.com/+ScottDoty old G+ : https://plus.google.com/116236096836985934797/about myspace : https://myspace.com/vallor twitter : https://twitter.com/vallor/ blogspot: http://creon-vallor.blogspot.com old home: http://sonic.net/scott/index2.html old home: http://sonic.net/scott/index3.html Then there's peekyou: http://www.peekyou.com/scott_doty/13886384 > You can't make this up folks, Doofus is that deranged. Idiot.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-30 13:54 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ng2rja$ohb$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #352885 |
vallor wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 15:41:51 +0000, owl wrote: >> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >> >>> Morbid curiosity or deranged obsessed stalking /freak/? You decide, >>> viewers. >>> > > Says the outerfilther that tries to intimidate people by posting their > addresses online. More than just addresses. > You can't make this up folks, Doofus is that deranged. It's worse than that. From a DFS post I happened to save: Because she has a Jamaican father and white, English mother? I don't believe in race-mixing AT ALL, but Jessica Ennis can't help it. Based on her small, non-muscular frame and running grace, Allyson Felix (black) is probably my favorite female track athlete, though I would only Huddle with Molly (white). Either way, I would much rather live next to Ennis or Felix than a sack of shit like turdv. Now do you feel stimulated, Creepy? Wow. Deranged For Sure. -- If two people love each other, there can be no happy end to it. -- Ernest Hemingway
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-30 19:36 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ng3fbm$8nt$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #352930 |
On 4/30/2016 1:54 PM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > It's worse than that. From a DFS post I happened to save: > > Because she has a Jamaican father and white, English mother? I don't > believe in race-mixing AT ALL, but Jessica Ennis can't help it. > > Based on her small, non-muscular frame and running grace, Allyson Felix > (black) is probably my favorite female track athlete, though I would > only Huddle with Molly (white). > > Either way, I would much rather live next to Ennis or Felix than a sack > of shit like turdv. > > Now do you feel stimulated, Creepy? Good quote! > Wow. Deranged For Sure. "The levels of mincing faux propriety and patronizing confabulation are quite chuckle-worthy." Guess who? Hint: he laughs at blue dongles exposing themselves.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-30 07:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b1fd6fb9-abed-48db-b8cf-573074aa8f39@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #352816 |
On Friday, April 29, 2016 at 10:08:54 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: > DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > > On 4/29/2016 11:55 PM, owl wrote: > >> Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: > > > > > >>> Why don't you first try on known ip address? > >> > >> You got one? > > > > > > Your own. > > > > Open an eternal-sep account and post something to Usenet. > > > > Melzzzzz gave me his. grep found it. :) > I'll have to go back and look at that other one again. Maybe I got > it wrong. What are you trying to do, exactly?
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web