Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #475286 > unrolled thread
| Started by | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-11-05 03:14 +0000 |
| Last post | 2018-11-14 11:18 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 184 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 03:14 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 19:36 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-11-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 20:39 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 04:48 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-05 11:35 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 12:57 +0100
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 04:13 -0800
Moi always knew that RonB was a henpecked idiot Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 06:46 -0800
Re: Moi always knew that RonB was a henpecked idiot owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-05 15:01 +0000
Re: Moi always knew that RonB was a henpecked idiot SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-05 11:07 -0500
Re: Moi always knew that RonB was a henpecked idiot RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 19:21 +0000
Re: Moi always knew that RonB was a henpecked idiot RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 19:12 +0000
Re: Moi always knew that RonB was a henpecked idiot Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 07:05 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 03:58 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 19:09 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-05 13:15 -0600
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-11-05 15:39 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 14:25 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 13:54 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-05 22:13 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 22:21 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-11-05 19:06 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 16:15 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-06 01:45 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 18:05 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 20:01 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 20:42 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-06 08:50 -0600
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 08:07 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 07:25 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 07:09 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-11-06 11:58 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-06 17:55 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-06 12:12 -0600
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-11-06 18:56 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-07 00:58 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-05 19:23 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 01:09 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 17:33 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-06 09:51 -0600
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 08:12 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-06 10:21 -0600
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 09:44 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 08:29 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-06 12:37 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-06 11:40 -0600
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 10:54 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 10:18 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 04:59 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 21:20 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 21:51 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-10 09:49 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-10 11:15 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-10 11:10 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 09:53 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 08:59 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-11-06 12:01 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 09:15 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 09:18 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 09:30 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-06 11:38 -0600
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 09:43 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 10:53 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-06 11:57 -0600
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 11:13 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-11-06 13:21 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 10:34 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 10:49 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 11:26 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-06 13:34 -0600
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 12:37 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 11:44 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-06 13:48 -0600
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 12:07 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 11:52 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 12:36 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 10:54 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-11-16 11:12 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 08:25 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 08:46 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 08:30 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-11-06 16:06 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 13:10 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-06 17:08 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 14:45 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 16:44 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 16:02 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-06 19:03 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 16:45 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 20:44 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 13:38 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 12:23 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-05 22:20 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-05 19:12 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 05:59 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-07 01:10 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 22:49 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-07 08:54 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 18:24 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-07 13:54 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-07 17:59 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 05:05 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 22:53 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-10 09:52 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 17:18 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-11-10 19:50 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 17:50 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-11 02:39 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-13 18:38 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-10 11:09 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-05 08:45 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 06:03 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 07:21 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 19:29 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-05 19:20 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 06:00 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-07 01:11 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 00:48 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 17:17 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-06 08:18 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-06 08:44 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 06:10 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 22:18 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-07 08:55 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 18:27 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-07 13:54 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 13:39 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-07 18:01 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 01:33 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-07 21:04 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 18:20 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 02:52 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 02:32 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-08 22:00 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 04:14 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-08 23:21 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-08 21:23 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-08 23:27 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again nobody <nobodysaysitalldoesntit@nobo.org> - 2018-11-08 23:30 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-08 22:07 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-08 21:29 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-11-09 05:45 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 06:01 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-09 11:40 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 19:04 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-07 19:04 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-08 06:47 -0600
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 05:13 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-11-08 08:59 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 06:16 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 02:34 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-08 22:01 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again nobody <nobodysaysitalldoesntit@nobo.org> - 2018-11-08 22:36 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-08 20:38 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-08 22:50 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-08 20:58 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-08 23:19 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-08 21:28 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 20:53 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-09 11:44 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-09 12:37 -0600
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 11:12 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 20:07 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-09 11:36 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-09 11:46 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 04:19 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 20:38 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 22:27 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-09 11:42 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 09:06 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 04:54 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-05 10:33 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 10:43 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Tammy <frenchielamour69@gmail.com> - 2018-11-14 00:51 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-13 17:52 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-14 03:42 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-13 20:58 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-14 04:16 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again fagen <streetrobber@kite.org> - 2018-11-14 01:16 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-13 22:32 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-14 18:44 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-14 11:48 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-14 11:18 -0800
Page 4 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 10 Next page →
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 09:30 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <41a70715-3200-40cc-bb3f-da5f0bac0525@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #475644 |
On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 10:18:43 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 10:02:57 AM UTC-7, DFS wrote:
> > On 11/6/2018 10:51 AM, shit("duh")v wrote:
> >
> > > He's self-nuking idiot.
> >
> > heh!
> >
> > tags: shitv, self-nuke, again and again and again
>
> On second thought, maybe you should make a 'chrisv' bot ;)
>
> Or give the Dice bot access to your database... which has the addition
> of tagging 'stupid' or 'smart' statements (have to be done manually) so
> when it pulls one it knows how to 'Dice' it up.
>
> I read your pother post... didn't you create your database because you
> "just like to create code"? Seems that'd apply (on some level) whether
> one is paid, or not.
Time to blame Desk Rabbit! I am an obsessed advocate of GNU/Linux, because that's where all the stimulating ingenuity is happening. Why does Desk Rabbit focus on his own pride so much? If Desk Rabbit calls being busted using socks like an idiot day in and day out by numerous people successful 'trolling', then sure... he is a first-class troll. I can't personally go along with that meaning, I use another term. I call Desk Rabbit a perfect numbskull. Desk Rabbit wants to hurt us: If Desk Rabbit can't have dominate conversations here then nobody will.
--
E-commerce Simplified
http://www.5z8.info/open.exe_f2s2ea_nazi
https://youtu.be/E3m_i-x92D0
Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 11:38 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <noj3udpd5o6blc4cvcujecoj6b8dkb68qg@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #475644 |
Steve Carroll wrote: > (snipped, unread) This is a perfect example of when I will snip, unread. I am *indisputably* correct. Dumfsck *lied* when he claimed that there is some "hypocrisy" in my complaining about the thing's *lie*. Just like he *lied* when he claimed that I said something that meant that my daughter was a "dullard" (because she uses Windows). Humiliated by his spankings, he is expected to do *nothing* but spew yet more lies and invective. There's no reason to read it. Dumfsck is a loser. He's a shameless liar. He's a bigot. He's a fool. "Hadron" likes him, though.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 09:43 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <d3a1267b-b070-4033-b6a9-99ecc682b1ea@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #475651 |
On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 10:38:38 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote: > Steve Carroll wrote: > > > (snipped, unread) > > This is a perfect example of when I will snip, unread. Right... 'cuz there's a little guy sitting on your left shoulder telling you what to read and what to run away from. > I am *indisputably* correct. You're *indisputably* a loony.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 10:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g4e2o5Fh75pU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #475653 |
On 11/6/18 10:43 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 10:38:38 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote: >> Steve Carroll wrote: >> >>> (snipped, unread) >> >> This is a perfect example of when I will snip, unread. > > Right... 'cuz there's a little guy sitting on your left shoulder telling you > what to read and what to run away from. > >> I am *indisputably* correct. > > You're *indisputably* a loony. > Do you even remember what you were debating about or are you just in your name calling phase? Remember: 1) Snit noted evidence Kavanaugh lied. <https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/09/how-we-know-kavanaugh-is-lying> 2) Slimer *ignored* that evidence and noted SOMEONE else lied... someone who is not mentioned in that evidence. 3) If other irrelevant people also lied it does not imply Kavanaugh did not. This is simple... but Slimer and Carroll will forever pretend to not get the point. Maybe they really will not. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 11:57 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <9tk3udt09871gsnog8bc9gq4jderu76659@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #475653 |
Steve Carroll wrote: > (snipped, unread) Don't need any more of your snittish lies today, "Steve". YOu are a snit. Unlike you and the thing, I don't *lie* to attack. Unlike you and the thing, I don't *insist* that people think something absurd, and *refuse* all corrections and explanations. Tell us, "Steve", if I really thought that some "good features" should "never* be used (rolling eyes), why would I completely abandon that position, when challenged? Why would I not "stick to my guns"? It doesn't make any sense, does you, you *stupid* snit. Of course the "Steve Carroll" snit will now say something like "you realized that it was a stupid position, and quickly abandoned it". He will use this kind of ridiculous, snittish "logic" to assert that I'm stupid, and that I am a liar. He would rather viciously attack me, than admit that he misunderstood me. And he'll *never* back down, once commited, as he is. "Steve" is a snit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 11:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g4e3upFhgrpU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #475667 |
On 11/6/18 10:57 AM, chrisv wrote: > Steve Carroll wrote: > >> (snipped, unread) > > Don't need any more of your snittish lies today, "Steve". > > YOu are a snit. Unlike you and the thing, I don't *lie* to attack. But you DID. And you have not shown I do. > Unlike you and the thing, I don't *insist* that people think something > absurd, and *refuse* all corrections and explanations. Yet you did. And you do. > Tell us, "Steve", if I really thought that some "good features" should > "never* be used (rolling eyes), why would I completely abandon that > position, when challenged? Why would I not "stick to my guns"? > > It doesn't make any sense, does you, you *stupid* snit. > > Of course the "Steve Carroll" snit will now say something like "you > realized that it was a stupid position, and quickly abandoned it". He > will use this kind of ridiculous, snittish "logic" to assert that I'm > stupid, and that I am a liar. He would rather viciously attack me, > than admit that he misunderstood me. Interesting how you assume you are the only herd member to express such a position even you now show you know is wrong. > And he'll *never* back down, once commited, as he is. I do not see you backing down here from your false accusation. And you just self-nuked again. LOL! > "Steve" is a snit. Everyone is Snit. The oldest gag there is. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 13:21 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <CZkED.375849$oH2.335526@fx10.iad> |
| In reply to | #475667 |
On 11/6/2018 12:57 PM, shit("I'm SO confused!")v wrote:
> It doesn't make any sense, does you, you *stupid* snit.
heh!
What an idiot.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 10:34 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <793aee08-a119-4c65-910a-c1996797b3c2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #475674 |
On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 11:22:28 AM UTC-7, DFS wrote:
> On 11/6/2018 12:57 PM, shit("I'm SO confused!")v wrote:
>
> > It doesn't make any sense, does you, you *stupid* snit.
>
> heh!
>
> What an idiot.
After chrisv's update I no longer can get work done on Linux. Like anyone can! I thought showing him a little generosity might help the situation. It did not. Sandman must realize that others can go get whatever software he has found, right, tweaker? Meanwhile, anyone can just ignore him, which renders *his* trolling useless, just like Sandman ;) Are you being like Sandman on purpose?
In fact Sandman's lies became more vile. So naturally I regret not joining the herd in attacking Sandman. While I am sure his wife liked it, being nice to him made things worse. Sandman shows that all of them are not automated because some of them are keyed in to posts that occur in very specific ways with clear thought behind them, not just gibberish. Which can only be Sandman.
What Debian looks like is what it is and is no big deal, especially if it's approved by RMS.
--
Live on Kickstarter!!
https://youtu.be/UkAyrfOZaXc
https://youtu.be/OffkiSAsYo8
Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 10:49 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <9e0d82ab-495d-4593-b6e0-62f393b15280@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #475674 |
On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 11:22:28 AM UTC-7, DFS wrote:
> On 11/6/2018 12:57 PM, shit("I'm SO confused!")v wrote:
>
> > It doesn't make any sense, does you, you *stupid* snit.
>
> heh!
>
> What an idiot.
At times, an inner world is more valuable than faithful descriptions of reality. Just nonsense from him. But he has completely left tech behind and is simply holding me responsible for the exploits of himself. Now that nobody is replying to Klaus Schadenfreude, he's making it sound like he's gotten what he wants -- when in fact, people are just sick of his shit.
--
One Smart Penny
https://youtu.be/u4xD43Khhkw
https://goo.gl/Fho5Nq
Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 11:26 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ce1e8cdd-7e9b-466c-b4f5-3a0119bac21c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #475667 |
On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 10:57:53 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote: > Steve Carroll wrote: > > > (snipped, unread) > > Don't need any more of your ... blah... blah. Obviously, you never got over your annotation goofiness, even after having it explained to you in detail on several occasions. Some fun highlights you overlooked... 1 - "None, other than from a "workflow" standpoint: the annotations should be completed *before* loading the email client." - owl 2 - "Yes, but his claim was that this is a more "streamlined" workflow." - owl The "this" being referred to in #2 is the use of annotation *in* the email client (Hint: this necessarily means it's used *after* loading the email client). Notable is the fact that you replied to #2 with: "Using Macs has made them stupid." - chrisv <iqsuddt3v25b7tg5ikvj5uu09gt9ruo0ul@4ax.com> Clearly, to you, the users of the 'less streamlined' workflow (in owl's opinion) are "stupid" for not believing that annotation is best done *before* loading an email client. There's just no other way to read that, which is why I previously asked the obvious question: -- At what point in time could a Mac user actually use this "nice feature" of their Apple "email client" to annotate without appearing "stupid" in the eyes of "chrisv"? -- The obvious answer is: "never'... 'cuz you can't use a "nice feature" that hasn't been loaded yet, given that the app which has it isn't running yet. IOW, you're saying that the feature is a "nice" one but only for the "stupid". IOW, being able to annotate before *and* after is only for the "stupid". Exactly who's coming off as "stupid here, Mr. Choice?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 13:34 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <j6r3udprtraivr8qksv4uad67s18lbim73@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #475692 |
Steve Carroll wrote: > (snipped, unread)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 12:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g4e8rjFil5cU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #475693 |
On 11/6/18 12:34 PM, chrisv wrote: > Steve Carroll wrote: > >> (snipped, unread) LOL! Carroll ripped you a new one, and actually used evidence and reasoning as he did so. Off you run. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 11:44 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <34196e47-0395-42f4-b033-6e8004523489@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #475693 |
On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 12:34:59 PM UTC-7, chrisv wrote: > Steve Carroll wrote: > > > (snipped, unread) You got what you were looking for, another spanking; no need to pull that '13 year old girl' BS. -- "You've already been spanked. Accept it like a man." - chrisv (that was a funny one, especially in reference to this topic ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 13:48 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <o0s3udplf58ktrrqrt3q13d73bispjsa49@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #475697 |
Steve Carroll wrote: > (snipped, unread)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 12:07 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <de80755a-b80d-4332-85ef-68cb1316702e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #475697 |
On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 12:44:50 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 12:34:59 PM UTC-7, chrisv wrote: > > Steve Carroll wrote: > > > > > (snipped, unread) > > You got what you were looking for, another spanking; no need to pull that > '13 year old girl' BS. > > -- > "You've already been spanked. Accept it like a man." - chrisv > > (that was a funny one, especially in reference to this topic ;) Don't look now, but I think Klaus 'The Shill' Schadenfreude has a serious mancrush on Peter Köhlmann. Protected code is making fast programs slow. Where did you go to school? -- This broke the Internet http://www.5z8.info/trojan_p4g1zy_how-to-skin-a-gerbil http://www.5z8.info/dont-just-drizzle_y8q4ut_5waystokillwithamelon Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 11:52 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <b8707a00-b047-4216-aaa5-9459de36071c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #475693 |
On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 12:34:59 PM UTC-7, chrisv wrote: > Steve Carroll wrote: > > > (snipped, unread) What's the Earth coming to when a Sockboy shill can't get any reaction... I'm not irate, he wants me to be but I'm laughing at him because Sockboy's idiocy is so juvenile. He actively didn't speak of all the benchmarks that he would quickly dismiss... and we all know why, Sockboy made that much clear. At least he has his own socks rushing to his rescue. "You are never up to anything good" said Sockboy's husband. At one point, Sockboy said an online denizen was "obsessing" over him, which was nothing more than him posting to himself. - What Every Entrepreneur Must Know!! http://prescottcomputerguy.com https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OffkiSAsYo8 Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 12:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g4e8qoFil5cU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #475692 |
On 11/6/18 12:26 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 10:57:53 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote: >> Steve Carroll wrote: >> >>> (snipped, unread) >> >> Don't need any more of your > > .... blah... blah. Obviously, you never got over your annotation goofiness, > even after having it explained to you in detail on several occasions. > > Some fun highlights you overlooked... > > 1 - "None, other than from a "workflow" standpoint: the annotations > should be completed *before* loading the email client." - owl > > 2 - "Yes, but his claim was that this is a more "streamlined" workflow." - owl > > The "this" being referred to in #2 is the use of annotation *in* the email client > (Hint: this necessarily means it's used *after* loading the email client). Notable > is the fact that you replied to #2 with: > > "Using Macs has made them stupid." - chrisv > <iqsuddt3v25b7tg5ikvj5uu09gt9ruo0ul@4ax.com> > > Clearly, to you, the users of the 'less streamlined' workflow (in owl's opinion) > are "stupid" for not believing that annotation is best done *before* loading an > email client. There's just no other way to read that, which is why I previously > asked the obvious question: > > -- > At what point in time could a Mac user actually use this "nice feature" > of their Apple "email client" to annotate without appearing "stupid" in > the eyes of "chrisv"? > -- > > The obvious answer is: "never'... 'cuz you can't use a "nice feature" that > hasn't been loaded yet, given that the app which has it isn't running yet. > > IOW, you're saying that the feature is a "nice" one but only for the "stupid". > > IOW, being able to annotate before *and* after is only for the "stupid". > > Exactly who's coming off as "stupid here, Mr. Choice? > Well stated. One benefit of macOS is the flexibility it offers users in many workflows. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 10:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g4e2pvFh75pU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #475651 |
On 11/6/18 10:38 AM, chrisv wrote: > Steve Carroll wrote: > >> (snipped, unread) > > This is a perfect example of when I will snip, unread. > > I am *indisputably* correct. > > Dumfsck *lied* when he claimed that there is some "hypocrisy" in my > complaining about the thing's *lie*. Of course there is hypocrisy in you whining about an alleged lie of mine shown to NOT be a lie even as you repeatedly lie. > Just like he *lied* when he claimed that I said something that meant > that my daughter was a "dullard" (because she uses Windows). > > Humiliated by his spankings, he is expected to do *nothing* but spew > yet more lies and invective. There's no reason to read it. > > Dumfsck is a loser. He's a shameless liar. He's a bigot. He's a > fool. > > "Hadron" likes him, though. > -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-16 11:12 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <A0CHD.1027254$Vl2.699253@fx46.iad> |
| In reply to | #475644 |
On 11/6/2018 12:18 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > I read your pother post... didn't you create your database because you > "just like to create code"? I created my relational Usenet db to collect newsgroup posts, with which I can primarily bash Linux idiots like Feeb and turdv, and secondarily torment jazz lamers :) Note that the database and code and front-end is 100% "group neutral"; nothing is hard-coded for cola or any other group. I purposely chose to use python and SQLite and Postgres for learning, and to get away from Windows-only technology.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-16 08:25 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <2a497287-3d38-4ec9-a9df-dc9422dd48f8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #477658 |
On Friday, November 16, 2018 at 9:13:23 AM UTC-7, DFS wrote: > On 11/6/2018 12:18 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > I read your pother post... didn't you create your database because you > > "just like to create code"? > > > I created my relational Usenet db to collect newsgroup posts, with which > I can primarily bash Linux idiots like Feeb and turdv, and secondarily > torment jazz lamers :) LOL! > Note that the database and code and front-end is 100% "group neutral"; > nothing is hard-coded for cola or any other group. > > I purposely chose to use python and SQLite and Postgres for learning, > and to get away from Windows-only technology. Python, becoming wildly popular, doesn't hurt.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web