Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #474813 > unrolled thread
| Started by | maureenshoopie@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-11-02 06:20 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-11-03 10:07 +0100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 166 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus maureenshoopie@gmail.com - 2018-11-02 06:20 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 07:59 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-02 11:42 -0400
Andy Rubin’s ex-wife, Rie Rubin. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-02 09:26 -0700
Re: Andy Rubin’s ex-wife, Rie Rubin. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 16:21 -0400
Re: Andy Rubin’s ex-wife, Rie Rubin. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 20:16 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-02 11:45 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 21:17 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 10:08 +0100
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-03 14:42 -0400
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-03 12:36 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-03 12:22 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 12:52 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-03 03:30 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-03 14:46 -0400
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-03 13:50 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 14:11 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-03 17:30 -0400
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-03 15:49 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-03 18:15 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 18:36 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 20:11 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 00:19 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-04 11:30 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 20:17 +0100
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-04 12:28 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 11:50 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 11:34 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-04 15:03 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-04 20:16 +0000
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 21:33 +0000
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-04 19:18 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 23:46 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 21:33 +0000
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 14:42 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-04 16:08 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 15:28 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 00:17 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-05 07:26 -0600
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-04 19:08 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-05 07:22 -0600
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 07:06 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-05 10:08 -0600
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 08:14 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 10:34 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 10:37 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-05 11:11 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-05 10:49 -0600
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 09:08 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 10:20 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 09:27 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-05 12:14 -0600
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-05 17:32 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 15:41 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-06 07:03 -0600
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 05:20 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 08:06 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 09:11 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 10:22 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-05 14:53 -0600
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 13:22 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 14:23 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-05 16:07 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-05 19:35 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-05 17:38 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-05 21:01 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-05 18:37 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-05 21:56 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 20:04 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 19:23 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-06 08:03 -0600
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-06 06:30 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 06:53 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 08:08 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 08:19 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 09:45 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-06 12:46 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 10:51 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-06 12:36 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 10:55 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 12:23 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 10:11 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 11:15 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-06 13:45 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 11:59 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 05:53 +0000
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 04:47 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-07 08:53 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-07 06:17 -0800
How many "friends" can you afford ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-07 06:29 -0800
Re: How many "friends" can you afford ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 06:51 -0800
Re: How many "friends" can you afford ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 11:46 -0500
I work a bit, take a rest, then continue. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-09 10:35 -0800
Re: I work a bit, take a rest, then continue. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 22:07 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-07 11:35 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 10:47 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 11:03 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-07 12:22 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-07 18:05 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-11-08 09:02 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-07 11:36 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-06 12:36 -0600
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-06 11:59 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 12:27 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 14:13 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 16:19 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-06 14:41 -0600
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 12:55 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 13:41 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-06 14:31 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 15:00 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 15:18 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 16:25 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-06 19:31 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 20:38 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 20:59 -0800
Hysterical Women (Democrats) ban "substandard" (affordable) housing. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-06 21:13 -0800
Re: Hysterical Women (Democrats) ban "substandard" (affordable) housing. proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-07 01:13 -0500
Re: Hysterical Women (Democrats) ban "substandard" (affordable) housing. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 23:20 -0800
Re: Hysterical Women (Democrats) ban "substandard" (affordable) housing. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 12:06 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-07 04:45 -0800
We hate the sin not the sinner. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-07 06:18 -0800
Re: We hate the sin not the sinner. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 06:36 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 08:38 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-07 11:34 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-07 14:47 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 16:19 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-07 19:08 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 05:29 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 16:50 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-07 19:07 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-08 03:32 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 03:55 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 07:36 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-08 08:55 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 08:37 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 09:08 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-08 11:10 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 17:33 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-07 11:38 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-07 07:02 -0600
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 08:54 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-07 11:32 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 04:46 +0000
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 21:05 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-06 10:46 -0600
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 10:04 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 20:00 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 19:07 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 20:05 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 10:36 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 12:10 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 12:52 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-04 17:53 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-04 16:10 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-04 19:23 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-03 12:20 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 12:36 -0700
Don't work for Google. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-02 08:43 -0700
Re: Don't work for Google. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-02 11:48 -0400
Re: Don't work for Google. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-02 11:00 -0500
Re: Don't work for Google. Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 10:07 +0100
Re: Don't work for Google. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 02:29 -0700
Re: Don't work for Google. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 09:16 -0700
Re: Don't work for Google. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 09:01 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 10:07 +0100
Page 5 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 Next page →
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 12:23 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <e0e714df-a051-451e-b1e0-39b51c04cee2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #475664 |
On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 10:55:14 AM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 11/6/18 10:36 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: > >> > >> You forgot the other obvious option... > >> > >> It's entirely possible that this person came forward on behalf of Dr. > >> Ford > >> (and may have been waiting in the wings from the start for that purpose) > >> to give her safeguard against what's happening to Munro-Leighton in the > >> event her 'mission' fails. Ford and her 'handlers' probably even > >> correctly > >> anticipated the 'piling on' effect, but there was always a high > >> potential for > >> failure due to the *complete* lack of evidence and this was the most > >> logical way out. > >> > >> You have no more "evidence" for your options than I do for the one I just > >> laid out. See? Anyone really can play 'make believe' ;) > >> > >> Face it, there is zero evidence (something that makes something > >> 'evident') > >> on this Kavanaugh case; there is evidence of foul play, as has already > >> been > >> admitted to by at least 2 and as seen by Ford's 'less than credible' > >> tale. > >> > >> The bottom line is #BelieveWomen, #BelieveSurvivors and #IBelieveHer > >> causes were all hurt by the Dems, who were happy to use *anything*, even > >> if they suspected it wasn't credible (and some of them surely had to) > >> in order > >> to achieve their political goals. > > > > A very reasonable assessment from Steve Carroll. Much appreciated. > > 1) Snit noted evidence Kavanaugh lied. > <https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/09/how-we-know-kavanaugh-is-lying> > > 2) Slimer *ignored* that evidence and noted SOMEONE else lied... someone > who is not mentioned in that evidence. > > 3) If other irrelevant people also lied it does not imply Kavanaugh did not. > > This is simple... but Slimer and Carroll will forever pretend to not get > the point. Maybe they really will not. > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> I shall not ask the Script Troller how any part of Steven Petruzzellis's anatomy tastes no matter how many times the Script Troller smooches it. Please give a single time of a successful business that has acquired its position by not giving a hoot about its clients and products. Besides the Script Troller, who *doesn't* know what Steven Petruzzellis is doing? - Top Six Ways the Script Troller Trolls https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhOfBmWwCVY Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 10:11 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <4f03956f-2ee1-44c5-9f35-c85792499d74@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #475649 |
On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 10:36:40 AM UTC-7, SilverSlimer wrote: > On 2018-11-06 11:08 a.m., Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 7:30:16 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote: > >> On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 9:03:40 AM UTC-5, chrisv wrote: > >>> SilverSlimer wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 2018-11-05 9:37 p.m., -hh wrote: > >>>> > >>>> (snipped, unread) > >>>> > >>>> *plonk* > >>> > >>> See? This is why I snip, unread, and end things early. > >> > >> What you missed was a liar being called out for lying. > >> > >>> Otherwise, you can end-up in long arguements with a *completely* > >>> unreasonable bastard, like "-hh" or "Steve Carroll", who only > >>> wants to attack you, using idiocy and lies to do so. > >> > >> Because it is 'completely unreasonable' to call out liars? > >> > >> Try to remember that the next time you accuse someone of being > >> a "fsking liar", because otherwise you're being a hypocrite. > >> > >> No, the irony is that SS cut & ran because he couldn't support > >> his own claim as credible. > >> > >> SS first tried to change the subject, but got caught. > >> > >> He did finally come up with a cite that appeared to support his > >> claim (namely that a man had supposedly confessed to assaulting > >> Ford), > > > > Finally? This was reported approximately a week ago... and I don't > > get why you'd need anyone to parrot a widely covered story to you. > > I didn't get "caught;" I don't know why he's referring to that but I wasn't talking about it, I was just pointing out that this was a widely reported story. What he believes you got "caught" at is his issue <shrug>. > I had no idea that hh- was looking for a specific > kind of information and to this day have no idea why I need to give him > whatever information he requests. From what I recall, he's not an > authority here or in my life and he could easily have looked for the > information on his own. > > >> but even though he was warned in advance, it was clearly > >> and grossly inadequate. > > > > How is noting the reporting of a news story "grossly inadequate"? > > Are you talking about his claim of there being 3 accusers that have > > reportedly admitted they lied? FWIW, I'm only aware of 2 (one, tacitly). > > > > Here's one: > > <https://imgur.com/a/Kn1M73n> > > > > The other is what's being referred to as Swetnick's 'backtracking', > > (once the FBI looked into her claim) which is another name for lying > > in this case because the 'backtrack' was fundamentally different than > > the original claim. It's interesting how the mainstream media used the > > concept of 'backtracking' instead of calling it what it actually is, a tacit > > admission of lying... but we're all just as stupid as they need us to be > > <eyeroll>. > > Again, I wonder how hh- is the moral or ethical authority here. In fact, > if he's an authority of any kind, I wonder how I can keep his boring ass > in my killfile as long as I can without any repercussions. Pretty > useless authority if you ask me. Reality is the only "authority". The problem is some believe that allegation *is* reality, these people usually have a tough time in life when interacting with "others". > >> Inadequate because if the Senate Judiciary Committee did actually > >> questioned an unnamed claimant as reported, then their failure to > >> forward this evidence to Law Enforcement for criminal prosecution > > > > Or, like Dr. Ford's claims, there just wasn't enough evidence, even for > > referral. That's the problem with a lack of evidence, it leaves one with > > no legal path... comes in handy for political BS, though. > > > >> has to mean that either the claim was a lie, or this Republican- > >> chaired Committee has conspired to cover-up evidence of a crime. > >> Choose your poison. > > > > You forgot the other obvious option... > > > > It's entirely possible that this person came forward on behalf of Dr. Ford > > (and may have been waiting in the wings from the start for that purpose) > > to give her safeguard against what's happening to Munro-Leighton in the > > event her 'mission' fails. Ford and her 'handlers' probably even correctly > > anticipated the 'piling on' effect, but there was always a high potential for > > failure due to the *complete* lack of evidence and this was the most > > logical way out. > > > > You have no more "evidence" for your options than I do for the one I just > > laid out. See? Anyone really can play 'make believe' ;) > > > > Face it, there is zero evidence (something that makes something 'evident') > > on this Kavanaugh case; there is evidence of foul play, as has already been > > admitted to by at least 2 and as seen by Ford's 'less than credible' tale. > > > > The bottom line is #BelieveWomen, #BelieveSurvivors and #IBelieveHer > > causes were all hurt by the Dems, who were happy to use *anything*, even > > if they suspected it wasn't credible (and some of them surely had to) in order > > to achieve their political goals. > > A very reasonable assessment from Steve Carroll. Much appreciated. For all the whining about 'the bad things Republicans do' it's ironic that this kind of crap would be so easily overlooked by Democrats.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 11:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g4e41oFhgrpU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #475669 |
On 11/6/18 11:11 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: ... >> Again, I wonder how hh- is the moral or ethical authority here. In fact, >> if he's an authority of any kind, I wonder how I can keep his boring ass >> in my killfile as long as I can without any repercussions. Pretty >> useless authority if you ask me. > > Reality is the only "authority". The problem is some believe that > allegation *is* reality, these people usually have a tough time in life > when interacting with "others". Interesting take on your challenges about your unsupported accusations against me. But you have reduced them... and I commend you for that. ... >>> The bottom line is #BelieveWomen, #BelieveSurvivors and #IBelieveHer >>> causes were all hurt by the Dems, who were happy to use *anything*, even >>> if they suspected it wasn't credible (and some of them surely had to) in order >>> to achieve their political goals. >> >> A very reasonable assessment from Steve Carroll. Much appreciated. > > For all the whining about 'the bad things Republicans do' it's ironic that > this kind of crap would be so easily overlooked by Democrats. 1) Snit noted evidence Kavanaugh lied. <https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/09/how-we-know-kavanaugh-is-lying> 2) Slimer *ignored* that evidence and noted SOMEONE else lied... someone who is not mentioned in that evidence. 3) If other irrelevant people also lied it does not imply Kavanaugh did not. This is simple... but Slimer and Carroll will forever pretend to not get the point. Maybe they really will not. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 13:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <njlED.230858$X82.118138@fx22.iad> |
| In reply to | #475669 |
On 2018-11-06 1:11 p.m., Steve Carroll wrote: > On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 10:36:40 AM UTC-7, SilverSlimer wrote: >> On 2018-11-06 11:08 a.m., Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 7:30:16 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote: >>>> On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 9:03:40 AM UTC-5, chrisv wrote: >>>>> SilverSlimer wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2018-11-05 9:37 p.m., -hh wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> (snipped, unread) >>>>>> >>>>>> *plonk* >>>>> >>>>> See? This is why I snip, unread, and end things early. >>>> >>>> What you missed was a liar being called out for lying. >>>> >>>>> Otherwise, you can end-up in long arguements with a *completely* >>>>> unreasonable bastard, like "-hh" or "Steve Carroll", who only >>>>> wants to attack you, using idiocy and lies to do so. >>>> >>>> Because it is 'completely unreasonable' to call out liars? >>>> >>>> Try to remember that the next time you accuse someone of being >>>> a "fsking liar", because otherwise you're being a hypocrite. >>>> >>>> No, the irony is that SS cut & ran because he couldn't support >>>> his own claim as credible. >>>> >>>> SS first tried to change the subject, but got caught. >>>> >>>> He did finally come up with a cite that appeared to support his >>>> claim (namely that a man had supposedly confessed to assaulting >>>> Ford), >>> >>> Finally? This was reported approximately a week ago... and I don't >>> get why you'd need anyone to parrot a widely covered story to you. >> >> I didn't get "caught;" > > I don't know why he's referring to that but I wasn't talking about it, > I was just pointing out that this was a widely reported story. What he > believes you got "caught" at is his issue <shrug>. In the same way that Snit believes that everyone is as stupid as he needs them to be, hh- believes that he's a lot more interesting than he actually is. His posts are routinely similar to the ramblings of an elderly man and very rarely worth more than a glance. Under such conditions, he shouldn't be surprised that I didn't bother to read much of his posts and paid even less attention to what I did. < snip > >> Again, I wonder how hh- is the moral or ethical authority here. In fact, >> if he's an authority of any kind, I wonder how I can keep his boring ass >> in my killfile as long as I can without any repercussions. Pretty >> useless authority if you ask me. > > Reality is the only "authority". The problem is some believe that > allegation *is* reality, these people usually have a tough time in life > when interacting with "others". Even if it had turned out that Pig Ford's allegations were authentic and correct, she had never bothered to make a complaint with police at the time and the statute of limitations had long passed. However, even if it _were_ true, what he supposedly did is not even considered rape by the loosest definition of the term and not even remotely prosecutable. Most importantly, it is impossible to prove especially since the people who supposedly witnessed the event deny it even happened. Only in the mind of a leftist can all of this be ignored and it become virtuous to destroy the life of an exemplary man. If people were on the fence about whether they preferred the Demonrats or the Republicans, this should have showed them what they're voting for when they vote for the left. Cory Booker's behaviour alone is enough to see the Demonrats as a disgrace to the nation. -- SilverSlimer Proud recipient of special entitlements and fierce adversary of equal rights Minds: @silverslimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 11:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g4e6kiFi3vuU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #475679 |
On 11/6/18 11:45 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: ... >> I don't know why he's referring to that but I wasn't talking about it, >> I was just pointing out that this was a widely reported story. What he >> believes you got "caught" at is his issue <shrug>. > > In the same way that Snit believes that everyone is as stupid as he > needs them to be You feel that way because YOU think I am smarter than you. Interesting. > , hh- believes that he's a lot more interesting than he > actually is. His posts are routinely similar to the ramblings of an > elderly man and very rarely worth more than a glance. Under such > conditions, he shouldn't be surprised that I didn't bother to read much > of his posts and paid even less attention to what I did. Your lashing out demonstrates your insecurity. > < snip > > >>> Again, I wonder how hh- is the moral or ethical authority here. In fact, >>> if he's an authority of any kind, I wonder how I can keep his boring ass >>> in my killfile as long as I can without any repercussions. Pretty >>> useless authority if you ask me. >> >> Reality is the only "authority". The problem is some believe that >> allegation *is* reality, these people usually have a tough time in life >> when interacting with "others". > > Even if it had turned out that Pig Ford's allegations were authentic and > correct, she had never bothered to make a complaint with police at the > time and the statute of limitations had long passed. There is no statue of limitations on sharing your story. > However, even if it > _were_ true, what he supposedly did is not even considered rape by the > loosest definition of the term and not even remotely prosecutable. Most > importantly, it is impossible to prove especially since the people who > supposedly witnessed the event deny it even happened. Only in the mind > of a leftist can all of this be ignored and it become virtuous to > destroy the life of an exemplary man. You claim he is "virtuous" even though there is plenty of contrary evidence. But keep in mind what you are running from: 1) Snit noted evidence Kavanaugh lied. <https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/09/how-we-know-kavanaugh-is-lying> 2) Slimer *ignored* that evidence and noted SOMEONE else lied... someone who is not mentioned in that evidence. 3) If other irrelevant people also lied it does not imply Kavanaugh did not. This is simple... but Slimer and Carroll will forever pretend to not get the point. Maybe they really will not. > If people were on the fence about > whether they preferred the Demonrats or the Republicans, this should > have showed them what they're voting for when they vote for the left. You have heard of Trump, right? LOL! > Cory Booker's behaviour alone is enough to see the Demonrats as a > disgrace to the nation. Again, have you even heard of Trump? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-07 05:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <prtuld$cv8$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #475679 |
On 2018-11-06, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote: > > In the same way that Snit believes that everyone is as stupid as he > needs them to be, hh- believes that he's a lot more interesting than he > actually is. His posts are routinely similar to the ramblings of an > elderly man and very rarely worth more than a glance. Under such > conditions, he shouldn't be surprised that I didn't bother to read much > of his posts and paid even less attention to what I did. Or, to put it succinctly, he's a bitter old biddy. President emeritus of the Bitter Old Biddy Committee. Killfiling works really well for him. -- The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-07 04:47 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ec4eb27d-669b-4740-8baf-0a8e5ceaa09e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #475870 |
On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 10:53:52 PM UTC-7, RonB wrote: > On 2018-11-06, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote: > > > > In the same way that Snit believes that everyone is as stupid as he > > needs them to be, hh- believes that he's a lot more interesting than he > > actually is. His posts are routinely similar to the ramblings of an > > elderly man and very rarely worth more than a glance. Under such > > conditions, he shouldn't be surprised that I didn't bother to read much > > of his posts and paid even less attention to what I did. > > Or, to put it succinctly, he's a bitter old biddy. President emeritus of the > Bitter Old Biddy Committee. Killfiling works really well for him. > > -- > The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux. What is the world coming to when a Steve Petruzzellis insult fails to get any responses? Frankly I do not really think you understand. How is FileZilla on Linux doing anything above the lowest common denominator? -- E-commerce Simplified! http://tinyurl.com/proof-about-ebot https://youtu.be/lF8yk7ul4Mw Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-07 08:53 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <h7CED.363202$wV2.93382@fx01.iad> |
| In reply to | #475870 |
On 2018-11-07 12:53 a.m., RonB wrote: > On 2018-11-06, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote: >> >> In the same way that Snit believes that everyone is as stupid as he >> needs them to be, hh- believes that he's a lot more interesting than he >> actually is. His posts are routinely similar to the ramblings of an >> elderly man and very rarely worth more than a glance. Under such >> conditions, he shouldn't be surprised that I didn't bother to read much >> of his posts and paid even less attention to what I did. > > Or, to put it succinctly, he's a bitter old biddy. President emeritus of the > Bitter Old Biddy Committee. Killfiling works really well for him. The only reason I didn't have him there already was because of my recent migration. What I know is that while he's filtered, I don't actually miss anything of worth so there's truly no point to conversing with him. -- SilverSlimer Proud recipient of special entitlements and fierce adversary of equal rights Minds: @silverslimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-07 06:17 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <a787c66c-a8a8-44b0-a781-d80a960c8540@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #475915 |
On Wednesday, November 7, 2018 at 8:53:20 AM UTC-5, SilverSlimer wrote: > On 2018-11-07 12:53 a.m., RonB wrote: > > On 2018-11-06, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote: > >> > >> In the same way that Snit believes that everyone is as stupid as he > >> needs them to be, hh- believes that he's a lot more interesting than he > >> actually is. His posts are routinely similar to the ramblings of an > >> elderly man and very rarely worth more than a glance. Under such > >> conditions, he shouldn't be surprised that I didn't bother to read much > >> of his posts and paid even less attention to what I did. > > > > Or, to put it succinctly, he's a bitter old biddy. President emeritus > > of the Bitter Old Biddy Committee. Killfiling works really well for him. Succinctly: RonB is substantially older, and complains more. Not that it will make him any happier, but: "Survey: iPhone Owners Happier, Have More Money, Friends Than Android Users" <https://www.studyfinds.org/survey-iphone-owners-happier-more-money-friends-android/> > The only reason I didn't have him there already was because > of my recent migration. What I know is that while he's filtered, > I don't actually miss anything of worth so there's truly no point > to conversing with him. Because trying to hide behind a killfile just couldn't be because he's grown tired of getting slammed for saying stupid stuff... ...and hasn't learned that the cure is to stop saying stupid stuff. /S -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-07 06:29 -0800 |
| Subject | How many "friends" can you afford ? |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.7--6.29am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #475923 |
> "Survey: iPhone Owners Happier, Have More Money, Friends Than Android Users" The same could be said of those who buy thousand dollar bottles of wine. How many "friends" can you afford ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-07 06:51 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: How many "friends" can you afford ? |
| Message-ID | <ff569602-1a04-4b1d-b496-c3b258bc7551@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #475927 |
On Wednesday, November 7, 2018 at 7:30:00 AM UTC-7, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > > "Survey: iPhone Owners Happier, Have More Money, Friends Than Android Users" > > The same could be said of those who buy thousand dollar bottles of wine. > > How many "friends" can you afford ? Now Desk Rabbit on the other end of the phone doesn't matter. All that matters is Klaus Schadenfreude gets to deliver the punchline. So how to respond? Don't respond to the post. Honest discussion isn't part of the plan and never can be. Open source is only less expensive if your time has no value. Klaus Schadenfreude is commonly seen posting "I KNOW BETTER" when it comes to text on a site where information is easy to find... but Klaus Schadenfreude is just too dumb and/or lost to discern any instruction he sees... or he doesn't recognize it *as* information when he does see it. -- Curious how these posts are made? Email: frelwizzen@gmail.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-07 11:46 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: How many "friends" can you afford ? |
| Message-ID | <prv4t1$1t34$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #475927 |
On 11/7/2018 9:29 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >> "Survey: iPhone Owners Happier, Have More Money, Friends Than Android Users" > > The same could be said of those who buy thousand dollar bottles of wine. > > How many "friends" can you afford ? > hey, Rolf, my smartphone only cost $50 new and in fact like you I got it for free when it's owner threw it out when he got a new one. I love the socialist life where everything is paid for by someone else! Phone works GREAT! (only it still is full of his old apps that I don't have authorization to operate.)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-09 10:35 -0800 |
| Subject | I work a bit, take a rest, then continue. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.9--10.35am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #475950 |
Bert: > my fingers keep dropping stuff, I don't have that problem, maybe because I mouse a lot. > my legs and back give me pain. Physical work gives me cramps. > If I get under the van, best I take my phone, > so I can call for help ( to get up ). I can't relate to that. I used to walk miles and miles, up and down steep Hills, just because it was fun. I'd do 50 mile bike rides, super fast. Today: I work a bit, take a rest, then continue. Just walking up and down the stairs winds me. > Still thinking of parking at Steven Spielbergs driveway. > That way we can go over my sci-fiction stories. > They would make great movies. Some stories are for _ you to enjoy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-09 22:07 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: I work a bit, take a rest, then continue. |
| Message-ID | <ecaf5b54-5590-4b6f-baed-e63718bdc073@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #476405 |
On Friday, November 9, 2018 at 11:35:13 AM UTC-7, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > Bert: > > my fingers keep dropping stuff, > > I don't have that problem, maybe because I mouse a lot. > > > my legs and back give me pain. > > Physical work gives me cramps. > > > If I get under the van, best I take my phone, > > so I can call for help ( to get up ). > > I can't relate to that. > > I used to walk miles and miles, up and down steep Hills, > just because it was fun. I'd do 50 mile bike rides, super fast. > > Today: I work a bit, take a rest, then continue. > Just walking up and down the stairs winds me. > > > Still thinking of parking at Steven Spielbergs driveway. > > That way we can go over my sci-fiction stories. > > They would make great movies. > > Some stories are for _ you to enjoy. Just mindless trolling. And I am giving attention to that trolling. THAT is what the "Klaus Schadenfreude circus" is. Klaus Schadenfreude's posts are nothing but an indecipherable brain dump. Klaus Schadenfreude has cut down on the nonstop egotistical, senseless threads he used to post but he's surely the same in the honesty dept. He uses puppets more to produce those circuses. Of course I noted specific examples of Klaus Schadenfreude flat out making things up, attacking Steven Petruzzellis, etc. His response: to troll Steven Petruzzellis. Where did you find your scripts? Enough already. You're again trying to act like you know as much as Steven Petruzzellis. You're the village idiot and your many stupid posts show this. -- Puppy Videos http://www.5z8.info/michaelangelo-virus_t6v2vq_molotovcocktail http://www.5z8.info/creditscore_g7f8du_launchexe http://www.5z8.info/how-to-build-a-bomb_o8n9lg_racist-raps Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-07 11:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g4gpjsF59mhU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #475915 |
On 11/7/18 6:53 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: > On 2018-11-07 12:53 a.m., RonB wrote: >> On 2018-11-06, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote: >>> >>> In the same way that Snit believes that everyone is as stupid as he >>> needs them to be, hh- believes that he's a lot more interesting than he >>> actually is. His posts are routinely similar to the ramblings of an >>> elderly man and very rarely worth more than a glance. Under such >>> conditions, he shouldn't be surprised that I didn't bother to read much >>> of his posts and paid even less attention to what I did. >> >> Or, to put it succinctly, he's a bitter old biddy. President emeritus >> of the >> Bitter Old Biddy Committee. Killfiling works really well for him. > > The only reason I didn't have him there already was because of my recent > migration. What I know is that while he's filtered, I don't actually > miss anything of worth so there's truly no point to conversing with him. > > You refuse to respond to me because you are frustrated with your own inability to refute my comments / back yours. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-07 10:47 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <3c54281a-e9ba-4a29-9c2e-519481e92139@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #475975 |
On Wednesday, November 7, 2018 at 11:35:45 AM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 11/7/18 6:53 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: > > On 2018-11-07 12:53 a.m., RonB wrote: > >> On 2018-11-06, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote: > >>> > >>> In the same way that Snit believes that everyone is as stupid as he > >>> needs them to be, hh- believes that he's a lot more interesting than he > >>> actually is. His posts are routinely similar to the ramblings of an > >>> elderly man and very rarely worth more than a glance. Under such > >>> conditions, he shouldn't be surprised that I didn't bother to read much > >>> of his posts and paid even less attention to what I did. > >> > >> Or, to put it succinctly, he's a bitter old biddy. President emeritus > >> of the > >> Bitter Old Biddy Committee. Killfiling works really well for him. > > > > The only reason I didn't have him there already was because of my recent > > migration. What I know is that while he's filtered, I don't actually > > miss anything of worth so there's truly no point to conversing with him. > > > > > > You refuse to respond to me because you are frustrated with your own > inability to refute my comments / back yours. > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> Too much glue for you, Sandman, AKA Jonas Eklundh. After chrisv's update I no longer want to gouge out my eyeballs from the flicker of the screen. A shadow of causation, projected wisely, at the wrong time. Despite all the big talk Sandman, AKA Jonas Eklundh's done on this topic, the 'Computer Instructor' does not know how to do this. It literally takes a couple seconds to click and drag across text and 'PDF convert' it. Thanks to Sandman, AKA Jonas Eklundh and his 'convenient friends' you now need a go / no-go list. If others start targeting him again I will feel compelled to... as I've always stated I would. I am referring to good people here, not idiots, who he largely controls. Who are you even blubbering to? I'm well aware the stuff I link to from YouTube is total beginner level; that said, it is good enough. -- My Snoring Solution!! https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/RSikBcWxBLo Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-07 11:03 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <74928f38-4619-4eca-bf51-43b47c5f8199@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #475915 |
On Wednesday, November 7, 2018 at 6:53:20 AM UTC-7, SilverSlimer wrote: > On 2018-11-07 12:53 a.m., RonB wrote: > > On 2018-11-06, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote: > >> > >> In the same way that Snit believes that everyone is as stupid as he > >> needs them to be, hh- believes that he's a lot more interesting than he > >> actually is. His posts are routinely similar to the ramblings of an > >> elderly man and very rarely worth more than a glance. Under such > >> conditions, he shouldn't be surprised that I didn't bother to read much > >> of his posts and paid even less attention to what I did. > > > > Or, to put it succinctly, he's a bitter old biddy. President emeritus of the > > Bitter Old Biddy Committee. Killfiling works really well for him. > > The only reason I didn't have him there already was because of my recent > migration. What I know is that while he's filtered, I don't actually > miss anything of worth so there's truly no point to conversing with him. Unfortunately, even when he sticks to the more tech oriented topics he pulls the same BS that he's pulled with politics, etc. Before I made the decision to ignore him I gave him one last chance but he couldn't do it. He needs mental health service, until he gets it he will never be able to engage rational people for any length of time, he's just far too detached from reality. For the life of me I don't know what ever convinced me that he would somehow be 'salvageable' without first getting the help he so clearly needs. I figured that a constant exposure to reality would have to 'fix' him but I've never been more wrong about anything in my life. Despite bing told by many, it turns out *I* was the one ignoring the 800 pound reality gorilla in the room... mental illness.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-07 12:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g4gsblF5vhjU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #475987 |
On 11/7/18 12:03 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Wednesday, November 7, 2018 at 6:53:20 AM UTC-7, SilverSlimer wrote: >> On 2018-11-07 12:53 a.m., RonB wrote: >>> On 2018-11-06, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote: >>>> >>>> In the same way that Snit believes that everyone is as stupid as he >>>> needs them to be, hh- believes that he's a lot more interesting than he >>>> actually is. His posts are routinely similar to the ramblings of an >>>> elderly man and very rarely worth more than a glance. Under such >>>> conditions, he shouldn't be surprised that I didn't bother to read much >>>> of his posts and paid even less attention to what I did. >>> >>> Or, to put it succinctly, he's a bitter old biddy. President emeritus of the >>> Bitter Old Biddy Committee. Killfiling works really well for him. >> >> The only reason I didn't have him there already was because of my recent >> migration. What I know is that while he's filtered, I don't actually >> miss anything of worth so there's truly no point to conversing with him. > > Unfortunately, even when he sticks to the more tech oriented topics > he pulls the same BS that he's pulled with politics, etc. Before I made > the decision to ignore him I gave him one last chance but he couldn't > do it. He needs mental health service, until he gets it he will never be > able to engage rational people for any length of time, he's just far too > detached from reality. Ah, insults to try to hide that you stopped harassing me as much ONLY when your family and the police intervened. > For the life of me I don't know what ever convinced me that he would > somehow be 'salvageable' without first getting the help he so clearly > needs. I figured that a constant exposure to reality would have to 'fix' > him but I've never been more wrong about anything in my life. Despite > bing told by many, it turns out *I* was the one ignoring the 800 pound > reality gorilla in the room... mental illness. Notice you do not even say what you disagree with me about -- you merely attack. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-07 18:05 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <bdKED.641703$cL2.485765@fx43.iad> |
| In reply to | #475987 |
On 2018-11-07 2:03 p.m., Steve Carroll wrote: > On Wednesday, November 7, 2018 at 6:53:20 AM UTC-7, SilverSlimer wrote: >> On 2018-11-07 12:53 a.m., RonB wrote: >>> On 2018-11-06, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote: >>>> >>>> In the same way that Snit believes that everyone is as stupid as he >>>> needs them to be, hh- believes that he's a lot more interesting than he >>>> actually is. His posts are routinely similar to the ramblings of an >>>> elderly man and very rarely worth more than a glance. Under such >>>> conditions, he shouldn't be surprised that I didn't bother to read much >>>> of his posts and paid even less attention to what I did. >>> >>> Or, to put it succinctly, he's a bitter old biddy. President emeritus of the >>> Bitter Old Biddy Committee. Killfiling works really well for him. >> >> The only reason I didn't have him there already was because of my recent >> migration. What I know is that while he's filtered, I don't actually >> miss anything of worth so there's truly no point to conversing with him. > > Unfortunately, even when he sticks to the more tech oriented topics > he pulls the same BS that he's pulled with politics, etc. Before I made > the decision to ignore him I gave him one last chance but he couldn't > do it. He needs mental health service, until he gets it he will never be > able to engage rational people for any length of time, he's just far too > detached from reality. > > For the life of me I don't know what ever convinced me that he would > somehow be 'salvageable' without first getting the help he so clearly > needs. I figured that a constant exposure to reality would have to 'fix' > him but I've never been more wrong about anything in my life. Despite > bing told by many, it turns out *I* was the one ignoring the 800 pound > reality gorilla in the room... mental illness. This is off-topic but I have to mention it anyway: Today, I found out that one of my rather stellar students who happens to be an extreme leftist is considered mentally ill by the school and is closely monitored by the city's most well-known mental institution. Finally, I've been hired by a school that recognizes leftism as a mental illness! -- SilverSlimer Proud recipient of special entitlements and fierce adversary of equal rights Minds: @silverslimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-08 09:02 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ymXED.198653$LL1.186813@fx23.iad> |
| In reply to | #476026 |
On 11/7/2018 6:05 PM, SilverSlimer wrote: > Today, I found out that one of my rather stellar students who happens to > be an extreme leftist is considered mentally ill by the school and is > closely monitored by the city's most well-known mental institution. > > Finally, I've been hired by a school that recognizes leftism as a mental > illness! heh!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web