Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #474804 > unrolled thread
| Started by | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-11-02 11:57 +0000 |
| Last post | 2018-11-02 17:24 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 142 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Another failed Windows 10 Update RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 11:57 +0000
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 12:04 +0000
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-02 11:41 -0400
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 18:00 +0000
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-03 11:29 -0400
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 08:59 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-02 07:22 -0500
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 05:52 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 18:10 +0000
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 11:22 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-02 11:33 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 12:40 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 11:37 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 12:24 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-02 11:32 -0400
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 10:03 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 11:53 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 18:14 +0000
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-03 11:44 -0400
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 17:02 +0000
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-03 12:18 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-03 15:53 -0400
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-03 15:50 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 23:36 +0000
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 17:02 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-04 11:38 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update nobody <nobodysaysitalldoesntit@nobo.org> - 2018-11-04 16:35 -0500
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 13:54 -0800
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 17:17 -0800
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-04 16:07 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 16:30 -0800
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 01:52 -0800
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 05:05 -0800
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 03:42 -0800
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 12:09 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update nobody <nobodysaysitalldoesntit@nobo.org> - 2018-11-02 16:59 -0400
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 14:15 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 22:17 +0000
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-02 22:35 +0000
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 15:49 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 16:05 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-02 18:45 -0400
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 23:32 +0000
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 16:36 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 16:52 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-02 17:07 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update nobody <nobodysaysitalldoesntit@nobo.org> - 2018-11-02 20:16 -0400
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update nobody <nobodysaysitalldoesntit@nobo.org> - 2018-11-02 20:23 -0400
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 00:46 +0000
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 17:55 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-02 21:13 -0400
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-02 20:39 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 23:54 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 00:44 +0000
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-02 21:11 -0400
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update nobody <nobodysaysitalldoesntit@nobo.org> - 2018-11-02 21:20 -0400
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-03 14:32 -0400
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-03 12:36 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-02 20:39 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 04:34 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-03 14:20 -0400
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-03 15:51 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 16:47 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-11-16 10:00 -0500
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 07:12 -0800
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-03 18:27 +0000
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 22:28 +0000
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-03 15:49 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-02 17:17 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-02 20:18 -0400
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-02 17:24 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-02 20:28 -0400
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-02 17:36 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 17:40 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 01:03 +0000
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-02 21:17 -0400
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-02 20:31 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-05 07:49 -0600
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 04:34 -0800
Some people think a $1000 bottle of wine tastes better, others don't. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-03 07:48 -0700
Re: Some people think a $1000 bottle of wine tastes better, others don't. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 07:57 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-11-06 05:21 -0500
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 03:14 -0800
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-06 08:14 -0500
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-06 08:42 -0500
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-11-06 11:57 -0500
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-06 12:52 -0500
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-11-08 09:09 -0500
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-08 20:55 -0500
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-08 19:04 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 01:50 -0800
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 03:41 -0800
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-11-09 05:25 -0500
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 03:09 -0800
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 18:46 +0000
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 11:56 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 11:21 -0800
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-06 17:02 -0500
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 16:30 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-06 18:43 -0500
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-06 23:47 +0000
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-06 19:07 -0500
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 17:28 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-06 20:56 -0500
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 19:10 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-07 00:47 +0000
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 17:56 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-06 21:01 -0500
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 19:11 -0700
Owl and DFS write code. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-06 20:18 -0800
Re: Owl and DFS write code. proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-07 01:12 -0500
Re: Owl and DFS write code. DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-11-07 08:05 -0500
Re: Owl and DFS write code. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 05:33 -0800
Re: Owl and DFS write code. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 07:22 -0800
What's "mad" about mono-/duo- spaced glyphs in a console ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-07 06:02 -0800
Re: What's "mad" about mono-/duo- spaced glyphs in a console ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 06:20 -0800
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 17:20 -0800
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-06 20:58 -0500
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 19:13 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 23:52 -0800
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 17:25 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 17:28 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 15:46 -0800
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 11:05 -0800
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-06 17:00 -0500
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 00:48 +0000
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-02 21:14 -0400
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 18:41 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-02 20:39 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 22:35 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 06:07 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 00:55 +0000
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-02 20:37 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-03 14:29 -0400
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-03 12:39 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 13:24 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update nobody <nobodysaysitalldoesntit@nobo.org> - 2018-11-02 20:24 -0400
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 01:06 +0000
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-02 21:18 -0400
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 18:25 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-02 20:30 -0700
Re: Another failed Windows 10 Update Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 17:24 -0700
Page 5 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-03 07:57 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Some people think a $1000 bottle of wine tastes better, others don't. |
| Message-ID | <ef0535c8-3287-4d15-95fa-f6c3caed6751@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #474999 |
On Saturday, November 3, 2018 at 7:48:54 AM UTC-7, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > My updated a copy of Windows 10 runs great. > > There's no shame in being a poor, "do it yourself" Linux lover. > Nor is there shame in being a rich, snobby Apple user. > Some people think a $1000 bottle of wine tastes better, others don't. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Gee, no on saw more forgeries coming. LOL! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.28 Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWJpfjAAoJEC03b6bOr/+drC0P/RZBxcLK8eFZ7QUKjlqJRqfj 66udasAYnovhi+C1bpBxXZIm8Xxg2+JDdVoMfw/d+5R8+KpEXpxK+4y9GB8NuBBz 98+LuNNIus0cXJ6goCyKZj5FUajHYIhgoEAb+O8F0pYMcqv08R39IddgVEQCasDZ 9QPXlQco0QOSD49BArlDa7qgwi17Rs2zkYnw27jEIVEuYlfhqj2T7Mcirwby4JD3 +1Geq5kCdeCtMG+z6gAdth0akrSMlYLAnixbYolEFm6wtg7DW2BrwVo7NTY8Zuy1 UjRrn8JAoHrCec82HulrBBEXC/dhti2SIszDnt1GnZSTB33p1plQgklUmmqN8Qvu To/TAz07YWAeUHcYSyHzmJuVbL0r9emcQD/AfB8CxAhh+p5F5kc2hfwAOmJ4cGpV +kIqUp7N1UXqSOXnFyxYz4HJv9/c0UPNXSY2QDPmaWd7AFrB80BcOw2yVS30jQwo QhBtvoj2t/FJi/G7KnIpGYl3ZFy7QxtNL6PnPW5y46EjzDbNEnMbETTxAzI24QGw x5xgyhdiyRnpCvyHFd21d09bYOrBHH6qe3NMVTRBPjh1MUaw1E8WhQo916Zvk4jz pD23EIt9uk79a2aD+EbC/vZHLPGTqlbI1bmYV5KlzJusIO2i939Cs/AhYcdM8mEQ WqdC0S1YIC7GfYk7riFe =F3OP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - Live on Kickstarter! http://www.5z8.info/--INITIATE-CREDIT-CARD-XFER--_k7s1jt_inject_worm Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 05:21 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <prrr6t$p76$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #474912 |
proletariat wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > It's obvious he is trying to convince himself that Linux is a better > alternative and at the same time he refuses to sit down and actually > compare a MODERN VERSION of Windows with his Linux. > > He knows Windows destroys Linux for a typical, average, non programmer > person, simply by choice of applications but he will never admit it. That's > why his dander gets fired up when people show him how poorly Linux does for > his application and how great Windows is in comparison. > So to compensate he makes up these long winded stories, without proof, > about Windows. I use Windows 10 a lot at work. I greatly prefer my Debian Linux with Fluxbox desktop, as well as the free apps. Got a good laugh yesterday. Someone sent around a Visio file (*.vsdx as I recall), and noted it would not open with Visio 2010. Ha ha, I just opened it with LibreOffice, as I usually do with Visio files because they won't PAY for a copy of Visio for me. And don't get me started on the speed comparison. Linux wins that race hands down, prole. -- You are sick, twisted and perverted. I like that in a person.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 03:14 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <51643f0b-6404-4efa-ac59-6e72ffbc0bb9@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #475575 |
On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 3:42:40 AM UTC-7, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> proletariat wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
> > It's obvious he is trying to convince himself that Linux is a better
> > alternative and at the same time he refuses to sit down and actually
> > compare a MODERN VERSION of Windows with his Linux.
> >
> > He knows Windows destroys Linux for a typical, average, non programmer
> > person, simply by choice of applications but he will never admit it. That's
> > why his dander gets fired up when people show him how poorly Linux does for
> > his application and how great Windows is in comparison.
> > So to compensate he makes up these long winded stories, without proof,
> > about Windows.
>
> I use Windows 10 a lot at work. I greatly prefer my Debian Linux with
> Fluxbox desktop, as well as the free apps.
>
> Got a good laugh yesterday. Someone sent around a Visio file (*.vsdx as I
> recall), and noted it would not open with Visio 2010.
>
> Ha ha, I just opened it with LibreOffice, as I usually do with Visio files
> because they won't PAY for a copy of Visio for me.
>
> And don't get me started on the speed comparison. Linux wins that race
> hands down, prole.
>
> --
> You are sick, twisted and perverted. I like that in a person.
Carroll, 4/10/2015 4:04 PM:
-----
Cute trick... To the guy who hacked my Google account.
-----
No details. Seems to treat it as a joke.
Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:02 PM, <https://goo.gl/51rsmZ>:
-----
Email Hacking Is A Serious Crime
-----
No longer "cute"... now it is a serious crime. OK.
Carroll, 4/10/2015 5:07 PM:
By now he is posting more links to how serious this crime against him is.
Carroll, 4/10/2015 7:25 PM:
-----
I didn't write that.
-----
Now he is denying the posts from his own account. OK, he was "hacked". Someone else posted this. Hard to hack a gmail account given how they use two-step authentication and someone would need access to his phone or the like... but at least POSSIBLE.
Even then, though, if someone tries to guess your password Google alerts you and lets you know what IP address and other info. I know because someone in a Denver internet cafe has tried mine on several occasions.
Google even forces you to change your password when this happens. Very hard to hack these days.
So already Carroll's story is unlikely.
But let us accept it... someone somehow hacked his account bypassing the two step verification. This person did not, however, change his password and Carroll posted within an hour of the "hacker". Before that, unless he is an idiot, he changed his password and the "hacker" was locked out. The "hacker" got one post in.
But Carroll could not leave his story there.
Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:36 PM, <https://goo.gl/NJ2bMH>:
-----
Someone hacked my fretwizzer gmail acct so, for the time being,
don't trust anything from it.
-----
Wait. What? Even after Carroll figured out this "hacker" who was too stupid to change his password had broken into his account and Carroll *surely* must have changed his own password, he is saying the "hacker" might still have access. Might be able to break Google's two-step verification process *again*.
This is *very* unlikely... to the point of being unbelievable.
Even worse for him: he notes which of his accounts he is claiming was hacked - but in the past he has denied even using the other accounts! LOL! He screwed up and made it very clear he has multiple accounts and felt the need to note which one. He made the same mistake in the next quote where he speaks of WHICH of his gmail accounts he is claiming was hacked. Oops! If he only posts with one there would be no need to specify which one!
He has completely screwed up in his game to pretend he posts with only one gmail account. Completely idiotic of him, too!
Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:38 PM, <https://goo.gl/YA7gMO>:
-----
Some mentally deficient child hacked my 'fretwizzer' gmail account
so I may have to kill it. For the time being, don't assume
anything that's coming from it was written by me.
-----
He is still saying that he may have to kill the account instead of just changing the password which anyone with half a brain would have already done (and Google *forces* you to do when someone even tries to hack your account... I know because someone in the Denver area has tried to hack mine multiple times... likely Carroll but I have no proof of this). And he specifies WHICH of his accounts! He is directly admitting he uses more than one account! His claim of being "forged" with his second account is a lie. Proved.
Carroll, 4/10/2015 8:40 PM, <https://goo.gl/j6yCuV>:
-----
Looks like it's still being hacked despite me taking precautions,
I may have to kill the account.
-----
What makes it look like its still being hacked? And what precautions other than changing the two-step verification options does he need? And how would someone bypass this... is he really on the NSA watch list? Seems you would need someone at that level to be doing this. He watches too much TV where they computer hackers spend thirty seconds and bypass all security.
Just nonsense.
Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:05 PM:
-----
Apparently Google is having issues with their accounts to the
point where they're ready to undertake some additional measures.
-----
But, of course, no evidence of this... and what measures? They already alert users if someone else tries to guess your password and use two-step authentication and even force you to make a new password if it seems someone is trying to hack you.
-----
They're now involving several federal agencies in things they
didn't bother with previously in an effort to deal with people who
hack into accounts. They've asked me to leave the account open.
-----
So now Google is letting Carroll know how they are handling these things - and asking him to leave a *hacked* account open... one someone can be using to steal his identity. No. This does not pass the sniff test in any way. Even if they were doing this for some bizarre sting operation, which is in itself far fetched, they would have told Carroll to not make it public information so the hacker would not know.
Just insanity. His own story is so idiotic and full of idiotic claims it simply cannot be true. Carroll uses his secondary Google account - the one he accesses via Tor and is referred to as his Tor account - to have plausible deniability for things he says there. Now he is working to do the same thing with his main account. Maybe Carroll read a report like this: <http://cnnmon.ie/111QeT8> [money.com]. If so he missed the part where they note if you are *really* hacked, which is rare, the hackers change your password and lock you out. Why would they not?
-----
There's some new legislation that will help them deal with this
issue... which probably means more BS for us ;)
-----
Yes, new legislation to make sure Carroll does not have to deal with "hackers" and "forgers" which do not even exist.
The funny part is, this happened shortly after someone in the Denver area, likely Carroll, tried to guess *my* passwords and they did it from an Internet café (Google tells you the IP and that can be used to trace back).
My guess: Carroll is the one who was working to guess my password and figured this new lie of his was a good way to deny his own words even more than he does with his Tor account *and* a way to make it so if I had talked about him trying to hack my account he could say I was just copying his comments. "Proving" I read his posts... which for now I am to see how absurd his lies are. :)
Carroll, 4/11/2015 12:25 PM:
-----
The person who hacked into my Gmail acct. changed the wording on
this post. I've removed the others but Google asked me to leave
one standing for some odd reason.
-----
Here Carroll claims the hacker changed the wording on a post of his from *before* he had even claimed he was hacked. So this hacker not only can *post* for him but edit his old Usenet posts.
I call utter bullshit on this. Out and out lie from Carroll. And then Carroll says Google asked him to not delete these "hacked" posts... this is nonsense. Why would Google want him to leave forged posts in the public and why would Google not just keep their own copy? Even Carroll notes it is for "some odd reason" - yeah, because Carroll is telling stories that make *no* sense at all.
Carroll is lying. Maybe there is some kernel of truth to his stories? Even if so - and frankly it is unlikely he will ever show any evidence to back his claims - the details he is posting are absurd.
Carroll, 4/11/2015 2:10 PM:
-----
And he's so high he thinks people still have to manually enter all
their passwords in whenever they want to use anything that's been
password protected ;)
-----
Nobody had suggested, hinted, implied, or said anything like what Carroll says they did.
Maybe his story will be someone stole his laptop (or mobile device) and he had his passwords saved? If so why not have the device deactivated remotely? Why has he not said anything about this?
My guess: he realizes he screwed up when trying to guess my passwords and is now building a story so he can say his computer was stolen and it was not him. Or, LOL, maybe someone broke into his house and did it.
This unknown hacker knew he was obsessed with me and carried on acting like him. Makes complete sense, eh?
Carroll, 4/12/2015 8:45 AM, <https://goo.gl/KMf4pa>:
-----
The first one, that has since been deleted. My bad for having such
a feeble password on this account.
-----
Now he suggests it was merely from someone guessing his password - which contradicts his above insinuations that it could have been from a saved password on a device he had.
His story changes with the telling.
But as noted, when someone tries to guess your password Google has ways to deal with it. I know - Carroll or someone in his neck of the woods recently tried it with me.
Carroll, 4/12/2015 9:29 AM:
-----
The account in question here is a gmail account. Contrary to
Snit's delusions, I have no idea what a TOR account looks like but
it's a good bet it doesn't bear much of a resemblance to a gmail
account.
-----
Here Carroll plays stupid and pretends that if when he or anyone uses the Tor browser *Carroll* pointed to this somehow changes the way the gmail interface looks. Um, no. Worse it might do is make Google think you are in another country and you would have to set it back to English. But the basic look stays the same.
He is playing stupid and pretending to not know how the Tor browser he pointed to works. Just idiotic of him.
-----
That idiocy aside, I love how Snit has repeatedly, for years,
feigned ignorance about gmail accounts, yet, he keeps disclosing
info that proves he knows about them. Some fools do stuff like
this when they believe people are as stupid as the fool needs them
to be ;)
-----
I do not think Google would allow you to edit your Usenet / groups posts but I do not use it much and do not know for sure. Seems absurd that they would... and others have now said they do not. But given how I do not use Google Groups for posting why would I know the details of their system for certain?
Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:47 PM:
-----
Your obsession with me is insane. Working with Google I now have
proof you and ebot worked together to hack me. Clever. If I press
charges against you I have to also include her so you remain safe
for now.
Do not think this is over.
-----
No evidence of working with Google on this (and all out and out lies). Carroll is making public threats based on lies.
Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:50 PM:
-----
I promised COLA your trolling days were over so you contacted ebot
and worked with her to hack my account. I might not be able to get
your ass handed to you in court over this but wait until your boss
at Yavapai College contacts you.
Maybe you should make that call first. Ask about your comments on
incest.
See if those can not be quoted.
-----
Direct lies and threats by Carroll.
Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:51 PM:
-----
You went too far this time Snit. We have trolled each other for
years but to contact ebot and get her to help you hack my account
was over a line.
-----
A complete and utter lie from Carroll.
Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:52 PM:
-----
The above post is Snit hacking my account.
-----
A complete and utter lie... more false accusations from him.
Carroll, 6/16/2015 8:53 PM:
-----
You edited those posts when you hacked my account. Do not trust
anything from my fretwizzer account now that Snit and ebot have
access to it.
-----
More unsupported claims and attacks by Carroll.
Carroll, 4/16/2015 8:56 PM:
-----
Working with Google I now have proof Snit and ebot hacked the
account. Many of the older posts were edited. You can see evidence
of this by Snit pointing to "old" posts which have been modified to
say I claimed I was his "personal newsgroup rapist", a phrase I
have never used.
-----
No evidence of Carroll working with Google. No evidence of any older posts being edited.
-
Get Rich Slow
https://youtu.be/iztSc_msHuo
http://jeff-relf.me/Cola_Regs.HTM
Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 08:14 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pvnohh7ysbfx$.2pqqpn4466sb$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #475575 |
On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 05:21:25 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > proletariat wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> It's obvious he is trying to convince himself that Linux is a better >> alternative and at the same time he refuses to sit down and actually >> compare a MODERN VERSION of Windows with his Linux. >> >> He knows Windows destroys Linux for a typical, average, non programmer >> person, simply by choice of applications but he will never admit it. That's >> why his dander gets fired up when people show him how poorly Linux does for >> his application and how great Windows is in comparison. >> So to compensate he makes up these long winded stories, without proof, >> about Windows. > > I use Windows 10 a lot at work. I greatly prefer my Debian Linux with > Fluxbox desktop, as well as the free apps. > > Got a good laugh yesterday. Someone sent around a Visio file (*.vsdx as I > recall), and noted it would not open with Visio 2010. That's because you don't have the Visio compatibility pack installed via service pack 2. Pilot error once again. https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/2844302/you-cannot-open-vsdx-or-vsdm-files-in-visio-2010 > Ha ha, I just opened it with LibreOffice, as I usually do with Visio files > because they won't PAY for a copy of Visio for me. I don't blame them. Obviously you have no idea how to use Visio. And you seem to be surrounded by co-workers who are equally ignorant. > And don't get me started on the speed comparison. Linux wins that race > hands down, prole. No it doesn't unless you run some featureless, ugly window manager or spend your days at the command line. Compare equal systems with Linux running a comparable window manager/enviorment like KDE or Gnome and Windows wins every time. Of course Linux pundits like trying to load the latest version of Windows on some ancient PC and then complain how slow it is. For an antique PC Linux is a great choice and it's always been that way.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 08:42 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <6TgED.486742$oM2.155561@fx07.iad> |
| In reply to | #475575 |
On 2018-11-06 5:21 a.m., Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > proletariat wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> It's obvious he is trying to convince himself that Linux is a better >> alternative and at the same time he refuses to sit down and actually >> compare a MODERN VERSION of Windows with his Linux. >> >> He knows Windows destroys Linux for a typical, average, non programmer >> person, simply by choice of applications but he will never admit it. That's >> why his dander gets fired up when people show him how poorly Linux does for >> his application and how great Windows is in comparison. >> So to compensate he makes up these long winded stories, without proof, >> about Windows. > > I use Windows 10 a lot at work. I greatly prefer my Debian Linux with > Fluxbox desktop, as well as the free apps. > > Got a good laugh yesterday. Someone sent around a Visio file (*.vsdx as I > recall), and noted it would not open with Visio 2010. > > Ha ha, I just opened it with LibreOffice, as I usually do with Visio files > because they won't PAY for a copy of Visio for me. > > And don't get me started on the speed comparison. Linux wins that race > hands down, prole. I wasn't aware that LibreOffice could open Visio files. It seems that for a free product, it really is very versatile. -- SilverSlimer Proud recipient of special entitlements Fierce adversary of equal rights, improved productivity and error-reduction
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 11:57 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <IJjED.513787$OM2.346813@fx37.iad> |
| In reply to | #475593 |
On 11/6/2018 8:42 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: > I wasn't aware that LibreOffice could open Visio files. It seems that > for a free product, it really is very versatile. Open up LO Calc, choose File | Open, then in the bottom right drop down the list that says 'All files (*.*)' Rather than just show spreadsheet type files, it shows a list of every file type LibreOffice claims to be able to open (well over 100). I say claims because it took 30 seconds to open a tiny 555KB .pdf file that Sumatra opens instantly. Throwing a 28MB .pdf at LibreOffice results in two green progress bars that take ~3 minutes to finish, but it does load. Overall it's not worth using for .pdf files, but if you have a bunch of legacy documents you want to reminisce over before you off yourself, LO might help you slide into eternity...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 12:52 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <CxkED.534648$MK2.421043@fx35.iad> |
| In reply to | #475635 |
On 2018-11-06 11:57 a.m., DFS wrote: > On 11/6/2018 8:42 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: > > >> I wasn't aware that LibreOffice could open Visio files. It seems that >> for a free product, it really is very versatile. > > > Open up LO Calc, choose File | Open, then in the bottom right drop down > the list that says 'All files (*.*)' > > Rather than just show spreadsheet type files, it shows a list of every > file type LibreOffice claims to be able to open (well over 100). > > I say claims because it took 30 seconds to open a tiny 555KB .pdf file > that Sumatra opens instantly. > > Throwing a 28MB .pdf at LibreOffice results in two green progress bars > that take ~3 minutes to finish, but it does load. > > Overall it's not worth using for .pdf files, but if you have a bunch of > legacy documents you want to reminisce over before you off yourself, LO > might help you slide into eternity... LOL @ the last sentence. -- SilverSlimer Proud recipient of special entitlements Fierce adversary of equal rights, improved productivity and error-reduction
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-08 09:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <rtXED.963374$Vl2.233289@fx46.iad> |
| In reply to | #475659 |
On 11/6/2018 12:52 PM, SilverSlimer wrote: > On 2018-11-06 11:57 a.m., DFS wrote: >> On 11/6/2018 8:42 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >> >> >>> I wasn't aware that LibreOffice could open Visio files. It seems that >>> for a free product, it really is very versatile. >> >> >> Open up LO Calc, choose File | Open, then in the bottom right drop >> down the list that says 'All files (*.*)' >> >> Rather than just show spreadsheet type files, it shows a list of every >> file type LibreOffice claims to be able to open (well over 100). >> >> I say claims because it took 30 seconds to open a tiny 555KB .pdf file >> that Sumatra opens instantly. >> >> Throwing a 28MB .pdf at LibreOffice results in two green progress bars >> that take ~3 minutes to finish, but it does load. >> >> Overall it's not worth using for .pdf files, but if you have a bunch >> of legacy documents you want to reminisce over before you off >> yourself, LO might help you slide into eternity... > > LOL @ the last sentence. ha... LibreOffice "Undertaker" Edition: opens files from 70 years ago.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-08 20:55 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <WN5FD.535541$Ac3.40067@fx45.iad> |
| In reply to | #476174 |
On 2018-11-08 9:09 a.m., DFS wrote: > On 11/6/2018 12:52 PM, SilverSlimer wrote: >> On 2018-11-06 11:57 a.m., DFS wrote: >>> On 11/6/2018 8:42 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >>> >>> >>>> I wasn't aware that LibreOffice could open Visio files. It seems >>>> that for a free product, it really is very versatile. >>> >>> >>> Open up LO Calc, choose File | Open, then in the bottom right drop >>> down the list that says 'All files (*.*)' >>> >>> Rather than just show spreadsheet type files, it shows a list of >>> every file type LibreOffice claims to be able to open (well over 100). >>> >>> I say claims because it took 30 seconds to open a tiny 555KB .pdf >>> file that Sumatra opens instantly. >>> >>> Throwing a 28MB .pdf at LibreOffice results in two green progress >>> bars that take ~3 minutes to finish, but it does load. >>> >>> Overall it's not worth using for .pdf files, but if you have a bunch >>> of legacy documents you want to reminisce over before you off >>> yourself, LO might help you slide into eternity... >> >> LOL @ the last sentence. > > > ha... LibreOffice "Undertaker" Edition: opens files from 70 years ago. Snit might need to load up the suicide note he wrote under Microsoft works in 1991! -- SilverSlimer Minds: @silverslimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-08 19:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g4k89iFt3ipU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #476276 |
On 11/8/18 6:55 PM, SilverSlimer wrote: > On 2018-11-08 9:09 a.m., DFS wrote: >> On 11/6/2018 12:52 PM, SilverSlimer wrote: >>> On 2018-11-06 11:57 a.m., DFS wrote: >>>> On 11/6/2018 8:42 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> I wasn't aware that LibreOffice could open Visio files. It seems >>>>> that for a free product, it really is very versatile. >>>> >>>> >>>> Open up LO Calc, choose File | Open, then in the bottom right drop >>>> down the list that says 'All files (*.*)' >>>> >>>> Rather than just show spreadsheet type files, it shows a list of >>>> every file type LibreOffice claims to be able to open (well over 100). >>>> >>>> I say claims because it took 30 seconds to open a tiny 555KB .pdf >>>> file that Sumatra opens instantly. >>>> >>>> Throwing a 28MB .pdf at LibreOffice results in two green progress >>>> bars that take ~3 minutes to finish, but it does load. >>>> >>>> Overall it's not worth using for .pdf files, but if you have a bunch >>>> of legacy documents you want to reminisce over before you off >>>> yourself, LO might help you slide into eternity... >>> >>> LOL @ the last sentence. >> >> >> ha... LibreOffice "Undertaker" Edition: opens files from 70 years ago. > > Snit might need to load up the suicide note he wrote under Microsoft > works in 1991! > You are getting more and more desperate for attention. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-09 01:50 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <07274c07-7ef7-428f-b6e2-18ff9fa4302f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #476174 |
On Thursday, November 8, 2018 at 7:10:34 AM UTC-7, DFS wrote: > On 11/6/2018 12:52 PM, SilverSlimer wrote: > > On 2018-11-06 11:57 a.m., DFS wrote: > >> On 11/6/2018 8:42 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: > >> > >> > >>> I wasn't aware that LibreOffice could open Visio files. It seems that > >>> for a free product, it really is very versatile. > >> > >> > >> Open up LO Calc, choose File | Open, then in the bottom right drop > >> down the list that says 'All files (*.*)' > >> > >> Rather than just show spreadsheet type files, it shows a list of every > >> file type LibreOffice claims to be able to open (well over 100). > >> > >> I say claims because it took 30 seconds to open a tiny 555KB .pdf file > >> that Sumatra opens instantly. > >> > >> Throwing a 28MB .pdf at LibreOffice results in two green progress bars > >> that take ~3 minutes to finish, but it does load. > >> > >> Overall it's not worth using for .pdf files, but if you have a bunch > >> of legacy documents you want to reminisce over before you off > >> yourself, LO might help you slide into eternity... > > > > LOL @ the last sentence. > > > ha... LibreOffice "Undertaker" Edition: opens files from 70 years ago. Translation of Sandman Script-Troller speak: Sandman Script-Troller's unbelievable "technical support mastery" diverted his attention from a module he wants that does exist on this application. The only thing on the fritz here is Sandman Script-Troller. Any dreadfully moronic insomniac could easily do the same. You've proven only what a moron you are. What did Sandman Script-Troller have to say about this amazing support from new posters? Most of the time he would try to lead others to trust they're students of his who just happened to have great timing. Makes no sense. The cult-like herd of convenient friends value the lowest common denominator in all things. It doesn't matter because the name on a post is irrelevant, it's the content that counts. Being an open format as it is, the listserv concept will never go away but it'll never be known by the general public. Sandman Script-Troller only thinks about Peter Köhlmann, Peter Köhlmann, Peter Köhlmann! - Live on Kickstarter! https://youtu.be/Z5wo5aE7MUk https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100012978552519 Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-09 03:41 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <dc0e9307-014a-4c19-8dd2-20d09a8a0e65@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #476356 |
On Friday, November 9, 2018 at 2:50:48 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Thursday, November 8, 2018 at 7:10:34 AM UTC-7, DFS wrote: > > On 11/6/2018 12:52 PM, SilverSlimer wrote: > > > On 2018-11-06 11:57 a.m., DFS wrote: > > >> On 11/6/2018 8:42 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >>> I wasn't aware that LibreOffice could open Visio files. It seems that > > >>> for a free product, it really is very versatile. > > >> > > >> > > >> Open up LO Calc, choose File | Open, then in the bottom right drop > > >> down the list that says 'All files (*.*)' > > >> > > >> Rather than just show spreadsheet type files, it shows a list of every > > >> file type LibreOffice claims to be able to open (well over 100). > > >> > > >> I say claims because it took 30 seconds to open a tiny 555KB .pdf file > > >> that Sumatra opens instantly. > > >> > > >> Throwing a 28MB .pdf at LibreOffice results in two green progress bars > > >> that take ~3 minutes to finish, but it does load. > > >> > > >> Overall it's not worth using for .pdf files, but if you have a bunch > > >> of legacy documents you want to reminisce over before you off > > >> yourself, LO might help you slide into eternity... > > > > > > LOL @ the last sentence. > > > > > > ha... LibreOffice "Undertaker" Edition: opens files from 70 years ago. > > > > Translation of Sandman Script-Troller speak: Sandman Script-Troller's unbelievable "technical support mastery" diverted his attention from a module he wants that does exist on this application. The only thing on the fritz here is Sandman Script-Troller. > > Any dreadfully moronic insomniac could easily do the same. You've proven only what a moron you are. What did Sandman Script-Troller have to say about this amazing support from new posters? Most of the time he would try to lead others to trust they're students of his who just happened to have great timing. Makes no sense. The cult-like herd of convenient friends value the lowest common denominator in all things. > > It doesn't matter because the name on a post is irrelevant, it's the content that counts. Being an open format as it is, the listserv concept will never go away but it'll never be known by the general public. Sandman Script-Troller only thinks about Peter Köhlmann, Peter Köhlmann, Peter Köhlmann! > > - > Live on Kickstarter! > https://youtu.be/Z5wo5aE7MUk > https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100012978552519 > Jonas Eklundh Communication What it looks like can be skinned and of no concern, especially if it's support is good. The Mack has a more consistent interface. Even MATE runs better on it. Too much glue for you, Gluey. Troll Killer Snit can create a virtual machine. Of course that is not possible on anything but Linux! The one skill The Script Troller learned well is to try to guilt Troll Killer Snit into false confession and if that does not work, drown him out with flooding or quickly change the argument. Everyone is The Script Troller -- the oldest gag in the book. The Script Troller has yet to show how his moral code does anything above the LCD on Linux. Really, those of you who troll are not able to control Troll Killer Snit anymore. -- My Snoring Solution https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/6sfhq6/what_desktop_tasks_does_linux_handle_better_than/ Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-09 05:25 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ps3ojb$opf$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #475659 |
SilverSlimer wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > On 2018-11-06 11:57 a.m., DFS wrote: >> On 11/6/2018 8:42 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >> >> >>> I wasn't aware that LibreOffice could open Visio files. It seems that >>> for a free product, it really is very versatile. >> >> >> Open up LO Calc, choose File | Open, then in the bottom right drop down >> the list that says 'All files (*.*)' >> >> Rather than just show spreadsheet type files, it shows a list of every >> file type LibreOffice claims to be able to open (well over 100). >> >> I say claims because it took 30 seconds to open a tiny 555KB .pdf file >> that Sumatra opens instantly. >> >> Throwing a 28MB .pdf at LibreOffice results in two green progress bars >> that take ~3 minutes to finish, but it does load. >> >> Overall it's not worth using for .pdf files, but if you have a bunch of >> legacy documents you want to reminisce over before you off yourself, LO >> might help you slide into eternity... > > LOL @ the last sentence. It takes awhile because it is converting the PDF format to LibreOffice format. Libreoffice just loaded a 40 Mb file, converting it to LibreOffice format, in about 25 seconds, showing import progress the whole time. Why did DFS's LibreOffice take 30 seconds to load a 0.5 Mb PDF? Because he's running it on Windoze!! -- FORTUNE PROVIDES QUESTIONS FOR THE GREAT ANSWERS: #4 A: Go west, young man, go west! Q: What do wabbits do when they get tiwed of wunning awound?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-09 03:09 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <3ed8b036-a907-40d8-ab4e-aeb136e26cbf@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #476360 |
On Friday, November 9, 2018 at 3:47:10 AM UTC-7, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> SilverSlimer wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
> > On 2018-11-06 11:57 a.m., DFS wrote:
> >> On 11/6/2018 8:42 AM, SilverSlimer wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> I wasn't aware that LibreOffice could open Visio files. It seems that
> >>> for a free product, it really is very versatile.
> >>
> >>
> >> Open up LO Calc, choose File | Open, then in the bottom right drop down
> >> the list that says 'All files (*.*)'
> >>
> >> Rather than just show spreadsheet type files, it shows a list of every
> >> file type LibreOffice claims to be able to open (well over 100).
> >>
> >> I say claims because it took 30 seconds to open a tiny 555KB .pdf file
> >> that Sumatra opens instantly.
> >>
> >> Throwing a 28MB .pdf at LibreOffice results in two green progress bars
> >> that take ~3 minutes to finish, but it does load.
> >>
> >> Overall it's not worth using for .pdf files, but if you have a bunch of
> >> legacy documents you want to reminisce over before you off yourself, LO
> >> might help you slide into eternity...
> >
> > LOL @ the last sentence.
>
> It takes awhile because it is converting the PDF format to LibreOffice
> format.
>
> Libreoffice just loaded a 40 Mb file, converting it to LibreOffice format,
> in about 25 seconds, showing import progress the whole time.
>
> Why did DFS's LibreOffice take 30 seconds to load a 0.5 Mb PDF?
>
> Because he's running it on Windoze!!
>
> --
> FORTUNE PROVIDES QUESTIONS FOR THE GREAT ANSWERS: #4
> A: Go west, young man, go west!
> Q: What do wabbits do when they get tiwed of wunning awound?
Facts about Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll
Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll will be 60 years old on August 29, 2018 and yet is still single, broke and yet with his skills he has nothing to show for it but flooding Usenet. He blames Jonas Eklundh for his loss of his wife and girlfriend and his begging of older women to sleep with him (http://www.seniorpeoplemeet.com/v3/externalsearch/singles?Profile=1AE1BDAAFC6D6F08ACA0C235BB8ED21D&Username=STEVECARROL). Steven is jealous of what Jonas Eklundh has and in a narcissistic rage repeatedly works to take it away from him. For over 10 years he has failed at even this. Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll is an utter failure in life.
Of his online life Steven says
I've been booted off by past providers before because people
complain about me and all my bullshit. I don't want to lose my ISP
*again* but I still need my army of sock puppets so I continually
search usenet for whatever servers I haven't yet been booted
from.
Some examples where Steven has been booted
X10 Hosting booted Steven for inappropriate activity
http://tinyurl.com/z92qmz4
Comcast booted Steven for inappropriate activity
http://tinyurl.com/h75nh9l
FreeHostingEU booted Steven for copyright infringement http://devsite.eu.pn
AwardSpace (atwebpages.com) booted Steven for breaking terms of service
http://demsites.atwebpages.com/pokeman
Imgur took down an image for breaking terms of service http://imgur.com/yv2XppE
Had a GigaNews account which was removed for harassing Jonas Eklundh
Stopped posting from his fretwizzen Google account since shortly after I complained. Seems he lost that too.
His wife booted Steven to the curb for cheating on her
Only site Steven Petruzzellis has pointed to that has ever been available
http://web.archive.org/web/20161019062351/http://www.oldneighborhoodrestaurant.net/
https://goo.gl/DMno6J
Made by the Go Daddy Website builder and is utter crap. Later he denied he said he was merely taking credit for someone else's work but Steven is the contact person http://tinyurl.com/hcw6dul
http://web.archive.org/web/20161202192456/http://www.reservationdiary.eu/eng/reservation/d76d1156-e9f7-43c1-b77b-b07189857820
He also bragged he was working on an update and showed it here https://vid.me/u6RK
The business still failed.
He likely went to the Go Daddy Website Builder after he failed to get WordPress installed.
https://mu.wordpress.org/forums/topic/13879
This is why Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll attacks Jonas Eklundh.
Steven Petruzzellis was is divorced on June 22 , 2012 at the Golden Municipal Court House because his wife caught him screwing another woman.
Jonas Eklundh is married and by all appearances happily so.
He never complains about his wife in COLA.
Steven Petruzzellis is living on charity of a friend in a single room.
Jonas Eklundh does not live in a mansion or even a high end home but has a house and a yard.
Steven Petruzzellis has two kids but no respect. He repeatedly called Ryan his "little screwup" and refers to his son Steve as a "dick" and worse. He says at least one of them likely hacked his computer and is a "mentally deficient child." He mocks his possible future daughter-in-law as someone who takes too many selfies and is focused only on herself
Jonas Eklundh has two kids (or more) and never speaks poorly of them in public.
No reason to think they are not a happy family.
Steven Petruzzellis claims to be a stay at home dad who pays thousands of dollars for day care. Steven has no job and no purpose in life. Steven has given up and now seeks a mother-figure to date.
Jonas Eklundh has his own business doing technical work and also teaches.
Jonas Eklundh offers a true contribution to society.
Teachers are truly under appreciated.
--
This broke the Internet
https://youtu.be/u4xD43Khhkw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AglvCo3dJ38&feature=youtu.be
Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 18:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <prsnii$c17$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #475575 |
On 2018-11-06, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: > proletariat wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> It's obvious he is trying to convince himself that Linux is a better >> alternative and at the same time he refuses to sit down and actually >> compare a MODERN VERSION of Windows with his Linux. I've been using Linux for 12 years, I'm not trying to convince myself of anything. I'm venting about the Crapware Malware Magnet Swiss Cheese Hobbyware WinCrap from Microshit that I'm roped into TRYING to keep running. I don't like it and I don't like having to TRY to fix it. There's no question on whether I would use it, that's simply not going to happen. >> He knows Windows destroys Linux for a typical, average, non programmer >> person, simply by choice of applications but he will never admit it. That's >> why his dander gets fired up when people show him how poorly Linux does for >> his application and how great Windows is in comparison. >> So to compensate he makes up these long winded stories, without proof, >> about Windows. Wincrap "destroys" Linux with its incredible ability to collect malware and ransomware from every passing source and its penchant to blow up spectacularly when "upgrading." For some reason that's not what I'm looking for. > I use Windows 10 a lot at work. I greatly prefer my Debian Linux with > Fluxbox desktop, as well as the free apps. > > Got a good laugh yesterday. Someone sent around a Visio file (*.vsdx as I > recall), and noted it would not open with Visio 2010. > > Ha ha, I just opened it with LibreOffice, as I usually do with Visio files > because they won't PAY for a copy of Visio for me. > > And don't get me started on the speed comparison. Linux wins that race > hands down, prole. It's not even a contest, Linux is superior to the Malware Magnet Hobbyware from Microshit. -- The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 11:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g4e6fbFi3vuU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #475681 |
On 11/6/18 11:46 AM, RonB wrote: > On 2018-11-06, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >> proletariat wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >> >>> It's obvious he is trying to convince himself that Linux is a better >>> alternative and at the same time he refuses to sit down and actually >>> compare a MODERN VERSION of Windows with his Linux. > > I've been using Linux for 12 years, I'm not trying to convince myself of > anything. Yet you post in a way consistent with that idea on an almost daily basis, lashing out against competing systems with absurd stories and attacking those of us who use Linux *and* other systems. You behave as if you want to NOT convince US you have made the right choice but that you want to convince YOURSELF. > I'm venting about the Crapware Malware Magnet Swiss Cheese > Hobbyware WinCrap from Microshit that I'm roped into TRYING to keep running. > I don't like it and I don't like having to TRY to fix it. There's no > question on whether I would use it, that's simply not going to happen. Use what you like: but if your stories were true you would just NOT work on your wife's computer and have someone with a clue get it working well. >>> He knows Windows destroys Linux for a typical, average, non programmer >>> person, simply by choice of applications but he will never admit it. That's >>> why his dander gets fired up when people show him how poorly Linux does for >>> his application and how great Windows is in comparison. >>> So to compensate he makes up these long winded stories, without proof, >>> about Windows. > > Wincrap "destroys" Linux with its incredible ability to collect malware and > ransomware from every passing source and its penchant to blow up > spectacularly when "upgrading." For some reason that's not what I'm looking > for. So lower susceptibility to malware... and your fantasies about upgrading. Any other benefit? Any task you actually think it handles well? Oh, and remember, my offer to show you Windows updating is still open. Heck, it is a boring video but maybe I will upload it just to show you how easy it is. >> I use Windows 10 a lot at work. I greatly prefer my Debian Linux with >> Fluxbox desktop, as well as the free apps. >> >> Got a good laugh yesterday. Someone sent around a Visio file (*.vsdx as I >> recall), and noted it would not open with Visio 2010. >> >> Ha ha, I just opened it with LibreOffice, as I usually do with Visio files >> because they won't PAY for a copy of Visio for me. >> >> And don't get me started on the speed comparison. Linux wins that race >> hands down, prole. > > It's not even a contest, Linux is superior to the Malware Magnet Hobbyware > from Microshit. So SHOW it. Show some tasks it handles better. But you will not. This is 100% predictable. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 11:21 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <22c84753-2578-4c9d-89d1-c5499287e50c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #475683 |
On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 11:56:46 AM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 11/6/18 11:46 AM, RonB wrote: > > On 2018-11-06, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: > >> proletariat wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> > >>> It's obvious he is trying to convince himself that Linux is a better > >>> alternative and at the same time he refuses to sit down and actually > >>> compare a MODERN VERSION of Windows with his Linux. > > > > I've been using Linux for 12 years, I'm not trying to convince myself of > > anything. > > Yet you post in a way consistent with that idea on an almost daily > basis, lashing out against competing systems with absurd stories and > attacking those of us who use Linux *and* other systems. > > You behave as if you want to NOT convince US you have made the right > choice but that you want to convince YOURSELF. > > > I'm venting about the Crapware Malware Magnet Swiss Cheese > > Hobbyware WinCrap from Microshit that I'm roped into TRYING to keep running. > > I don't like it and I don't like having to TRY to fix it. There's no > > question on whether I would use it, that's simply not going to happen. > > Use what you like: but if your stories were true you would just NOT work > on your wife's computer and have someone with a clue get it working well. > > >>> He knows Windows destroys Linux for a typical, average, non programmer > >>> person, simply by choice of applications but he will never admit it. That's > >>> why his dander gets fired up when people show him how poorly Linux does for > >>> his application and how great Windows is in comparison. > >>> So to compensate he makes up these long winded stories, without proof, > >>> about Windows. > > > > Wincrap "destroys" Linux with its incredible ability to collect malware and > > ransomware from every passing source and its penchant to blow up > > spectacularly when "upgrading." For some reason that's not what I'm looking > > for. > > So lower susceptibility to malware... and your fantasies about > upgrading. Any other benefit? Any task you actually think it handles well? > > Oh, and remember, my offer to show you Windows updating is still open. > Heck, it is a boring video but maybe I will upload it just to show you > how easy it is. > > >> I use Windows 10 a lot at work. I greatly prefer my Debian Linux with > >> Fluxbox desktop, as well as the free apps. > >> > >> Got a good laugh yesterday. Someone sent around a Visio file (*.vsdx as I > >> recall), and noted it would not open with Visio 2010. > >> > >> Ha ha, I just opened it with LibreOffice, as I usually do with Visio files > >> because they won't PAY for a copy of Visio for me. > >> > >> And don't get me started on the speed comparison. Linux wins that race > >> hands down, prole. > > > > It's not even a contest, Linux is superior to the Malware Magnet Hobbyware > > from Microshit. > > So SHOW it. Show some tasks it handles better. > > But you will not. This is 100% predictable. > > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> And in response you have nothing but an attempt to start a circus. Already moved on from that. You are too slow! I can tell from how Troll Master Steve Carroll responded - by showing ignorance of details of the operating system and so on - he's never worked on a graphically complex challenge before. If he had he'd have understood the requirements including being POSIX compliant! My view is beyond your understanding. This forum is a leaking porta potty. Troll Master Steve Carroll is far too stupid to write a Fedora script. The only scripting he's ever shown he can do is click, click, drool, drool. - One Smart Penny https://youtu.be/E3m_i-x92D0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhOfBmWwCVY Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 17:02 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <16qb6v7fa6ple.1nc3leseqs4av$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #475683 |
On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 11:56:42 -0700, Snit wrote: > On 11/6/18 11:46 AM, RonB wrote: >> On 2018-11-06, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>> proletariat wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>> >>>> It's obvious he is trying to convince himself that Linux is a better >>>> alternative and at the same time he refuses to sit down and actually >>>> compare a MODERN VERSION of Windows with his Linux. >> >> I've been using Linux for 12 years, I'm not trying to convince myself of >> anything. > > Yet you post in a way consistent with that idea on an almost daily > basis, lashing out against competing systems with absurd stories and > attacking those of us who use Linux *and* other systems. > > You behave as if you want to NOT convince US you have made the right > choice but that you want to convince YOURSELF. > >> I'm venting about the Crapware Malware Magnet Swiss Cheese >> Hobbyware WinCrap from Microshit that I'm roped into TRYING to keep running. >> I don't like it and I don't like having to TRY to fix it. There's no >> question on whether I would use it, that's simply not going to happen. > > Use what you like: but if your stories were true you would just NOT work > on your wife's computer and have someone with a clue get it working well. > >>>> He knows Windows destroys Linux for a typical, average, non programmer >>>> person, simply by choice of applications but he will never admit it. That's >>>> why his dander gets fired up when people show him how poorly Linux does for >>>> his application and how great Windows is in comparison. >>>> So to compensate he makes up these long winded stories, without proof, >>>> about Windows. >> >> Wincrap "destroys" Linux with its incredible ability to collect malware and >> ransomware from every passing source and its penchant to blow up >> spectacularly when "upgrading." For some reason that's not what I'm looking >> for. > > So lower susceptibility to malware... and your fantasies about > upgrading. Any other benefit? Any task you actually think it handles well? > > Oh, and remember, my offer to show you Windows updating is still open. > Heck, it is a boring video but maybe I will upload it just to show you > how easy it is. > >>> I use Windows 10 a lot at work. I greatly prefer my Debian Linux with >>> Fluxbox desktop, as well as the free apps. >>> >>> Got a good laugh yesterday. Someone sent around a Visio file (*.vsdx as I >>> recall), and noted it would not open with Visio 2010. >>> >>> Ha ha, I just opened it with LibreOffice, as I usually do with Visio files >>> because they won't PAY for a copy of Visio for me. >>> >>> And don't get me started on the speed comparison. Linux wins that race >>> hands down, prole. >> >> It's not even a contest, Linux is superior to the Malware Magnet Hobbyware >> from Microshit. > > So SHOW it. Show some tasks it handles better. > > But you will not. This is 100% predictable. Good post. He will never accept your challenge because he knows he will lose. This is especially true for a Mac where the applications are closely tied to each other and interact very well.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 16:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g4emhaFlgp3U4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #475716 |
On 11/6/18 3:02 PM, proletariat wrote: > On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 11:56:42 -0700, Snit wrote: > >> On 11/6/18 11:46 AM, RonB wrote: >>> On 2018-11-06, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>>> proletariat wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>>> >>>>> It's obvious he is trying to convince himself that Linux is a better >>>>> alternative and at the same time he refuses to sit down and actually >>>>> compare a MODERN VERSION of Windows with his Linux. >>> >>> I've been using Linux for 12 years, I'm not trying to convince myself of >>> anything. >> >> Yet you post in a way consistent with that idea on an almost daily >> basis, lashing out against competing systems with absurd stories and >> attacking those of us who use Linux *and* other systems. >> >> You behave as if you want to NOT convince US you have made the right >> choice but that you want to convince YOURSELF. >> >>> I'm venting about the Crapware Malware Magnet Swiss Cheese >>> Hobbyware WinCrap from Microshit that I'm roped into TRYING to keep running. >>> I don't like it and I don't like having to TRY to fix it. There's no >>> question on whether I would use it, that's simply not going to happen. >> >> Use what you like: but if your stories were true you would just NOT work >> on your wife's computer and have someone with a clue get it working well. >> >>>>> He knows Windows destroys Linux for a typical, average, non programmer >>>>> person, simply by choice of applications but he will never admit it. That's >>>>> why his dander gets fired up when people show him how poorly Linux does for >>>>> his application and how great Windows is in comparison. >>>>> So to compensate he makes up these long winded stories, without proof, >>>>> about Windows. >>> >>> Wincrap "destroys" Linux with its incredible ability to collect malware and >>> ransomware from every passing source and its penchant to blow up >>> spectacularly when "upgrading." For some reason that's not what I'm looking >>> for. >> >> So lower susceptibility to malware... and your fantasies about >> upgrading. Any other benefit? Any task you actually think it handles well? >> >> Oh, and remember, my offer to show you Windows updating is still open. >> Heck, it is a boring video but maybe I will upload it just to show you >> how easy it is. >> >>>> I use Windows 10 a lot at work. I greatly prefer my Debian Linux with >>>> Fluxbox desktop, as well as the free apps. >>>> >>>> Got a good laugh yesterday. Someone sent around a Visio file (*.vsdx as I >>>> recall), and noted it would not open with Visio 2010. >>>> >>>> Ha ha, I just opened it with LibreOffice, as I usually do with Visio files >>>> because they won't PAY for a copy of Visio for me. >>>> >>>> And don't get me started on the speed comparison. Linux wins that race >>>> hands down, prole. >>> >>> It's not even a contest, Linux is superior to the Malware Magnet Hobbyware >>> from Microshit. >> >> So SHOW it. Show some tasks it handles better. >> >> But you will not. This is 100% predictable. > > Good post. > He will never accept your challenge because he knows he will lose. > This is especially true for a Mac where the applications are closely tied > to each other and interact very well. > I have now posted a video for him... how to update Windows from a version more than a year old: <https://youtu.be/QiUSPaOMfso> I do cut down an hour+ boring process to less than one minute, but ZERO problems. I *must* be a tech genius! :) -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 18:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <1foco2s2psh98.eqyxehuet3rv.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #475741 |
On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 16:30:50 -0700, Snit wrote: > On 11/6/18 3:02 PM, proletariat wrote: >> On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 11:56:42 -0700, Snit wrote: >> >>> On 11/6/18 11:46 AM, RonB wrote: >>>> On 2018-11-06, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote: >>>>> proletariat wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: >>>>> >>>>>> It's obvious he is trying to convince himself that Linux is a better >>>>>> alternative and at the same time he refuses to sit down and actually >>>>>> compare a MODERN VERSION of Windows with his Linux. >>>> >>>> I've been using Linux for 12 years, I'm not trying to convince myself of >>>> anything. >>> >>> Yet you post in a way consistent with that idea on an almost daily >>> basis, lashing out against competing systems with absurd stories and >>> attacking those of us who use Linux *and* other systems. >>> >>> You behave as if you want to NOT convince US you have made the right >>> choice but that you want to convince YOURSELF. >>> >>>> I'm venting about the Crapware Malware Magnet Swiss Cheese >>>> Hobbyware WinCrap from Microshit that I'm roped into TRYING to keep running. >>>> I don't like it and I don't like having to TRY to fix it. There's no >>>> question on whether I would use it, that's simply not going to happen. >>> >>> Use what you like: but if your stories were true you would just NOT work >>> on your wife's computer and have someone with a clue get it working well. >>> >>>>>> He knows Windows destroys Linux for a typical, average, non programmer >>>>>> person, simply by choice of applications but he will never admit it. That's >>>>>> why his dander gets fired up when people show him how poorly Linux does for >>>>>> his application and how great Windows is in comparison. >>>>>> So to compensate he makes up these long winded stories, without proof, >>>>>> about Windows. >>>> >>>> Wincrap "destroys" Linux with its incredible ability to collect malware and >>>> ransomware from every passing source and its penchant to blow up >>>> spectacularly when "upgrading." For some reason that's not what I'm looking >>>> for. >>> >>> So lower susceptibility to malware... and your fantasies about >>> upgrading. Any other benefit? Any task you actually think it handles well? >>> >>> Oh, and remember, my offer to show you Windows updating is still open. >>> Heck, it is a boring video but maybe I will upload it just to show you >>> how easy it is. >>> >>>>> I use Windows 10 a lot at work. I greatly prefer my Debian Linux with >>>>> Fluxbox desktop, as well as the free apps. >>>>> >>>>> Got a good laugh yesterday. Someone sent around a Visio file (*.vsdx as I >>>>> recall), and noted it would not open with Visio 2010. >>>>> >>>>> Ha ha, I just opened it with LibreOffice, as I usually do with Visio files >>>>> because they won't PAY for a copy of Visio for me. >>>>> >>>>> And don't get me started on the speed comparison. Linux wins that race >>>>> hands down, prole. >>>> >>>> It's not even a contest, Linux is superior to the Malware Magnet Hobbyware >>>> from Microshit. >>> >>> So SHOW it. Show some tasks it handles better. >>> >>> But you will not. This is 100% predictable. >> >> Good post. >> He will never accept your challenge because he knows he will lose. >> This is especially true for a Mac where the applications are closely tied >> to each other and interact very well. >> > > I have now posted a video for him... how to update Windows from a > version more than a year old: > > <https://youtu.be/QiUSPaOMfso> > > I do cut down an hour+ boring process to less than one minute, but ZERO > problems. I *must* be a tech genius! :) I updated Windows 10 to 1803 and then to the latest with no troubles.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web