Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #475286 > unrolled thread
| Started by | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-11-05 03:14 +0000 |
| Last post | 2018-11-14 11:18 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 184 — 17 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 03:14 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 19:36 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-11-05 04:19 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 20:39 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 04:48 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-05 11:35 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 12:57 +0100
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 04:13 -0800
Moi always knew that RonB was a henpecked idiot Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 06:46 -0800
Re: Moi always knew that RonB was a henpecked idiot owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-05 15:01 +0000
Re: Moi always knew that RonB was a henpecked idiot SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-05 11:07 -0500
Re: Moi always knew that RonB was a henpecked idiot RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 19:21 +0000
Re: Moi always knew that RonB was a henpecked idiot RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 19:12 +0000
Re: Moi always knew that RonB was a henpecked idiot Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 07:05 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 03:58 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 19:09 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-05 13:15 -0600
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-11-05 15:39 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 14:25 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 13:54 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-05 22:13 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 22:21 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-11-05 19:06 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 16:15 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-06 01:45 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 18:05 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 20:01 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 20:42 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-06 08:50 -0600
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 08:07 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 07:25 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 07:09 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-11-06 11:58 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-06 17:55 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-06 12:12 -0600
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-11-06 18:56 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-07 00:58 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-05 19:23 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 01:09 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 17:33 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-06 09:51 -0600
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 08:12 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-06 10:21 -0600
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 09:44 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 08:29 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-06 12:37 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-06 11:40 -0600
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 10:54 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 10:18 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 04:59 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 21:20 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 21:51 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-10 09:49 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-10 11:15 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-10 11:10 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 09:53 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 08:59 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-11-06 12:01 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 09:15 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 09:18 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 09:30 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-06 11:38 -0600
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 09:43 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 10:53 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-06 11:57 -0600
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 11:13 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-11-06 13:21 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 10:34 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 10:49 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 11:26 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-06 13:34 -0600
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 12:37 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 11:44 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-06 13:48 -0600
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 12:07 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 11:52 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 12:36 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 10:54 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-11-16 11:12 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 08:25 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 08:46 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 08:30 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-11-06 16:06 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 13:10 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-06 17:08 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 14:45 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 16:44 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 16:02 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-06 19:03 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 16:45 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 20:44 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 13:38 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 12:23 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-11-05 22:20 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-05 19:12 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 05:59 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-07 01:10 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 22:49 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-07 08:54 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 18:24 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-07 13:54 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-07 17:59 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 05:05 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 22:53 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-10 09:52 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 17:18 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-11-10 19:50 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 17:50 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-11 02:39 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-13 18:38 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-10 11:09 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-05 08:45 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 06:03 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 07:21 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 19:29 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-05 19:20 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 06:00 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-07 01:11 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 00:48 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 17:17 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-06 08:18 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-06 08:44 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 06:10 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 22:18 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-07 08:55 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 18:27 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-07 13:54 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 13:39 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-07 18:01 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 01:33 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-07 21:04 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 18:20 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 02:52 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 02:32 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-08 22:00 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 04:14 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-08 23:21 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-08 21:23 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-08 23:27 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again nobody <nobodysaysitalldoesntit@nobo.org> - 2018-11-08 23:30 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-08 22:07 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-08 21:29 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-11-09 05:45 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 06:01 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-09 11:40 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 19:04 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-07 19:04 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-08 06:47 -0600
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 05:13 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-11-08 08:59 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 06:16 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 02:34 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-08 22:01 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again nobody <nobodysaysitalldoesntit@nobo.org> - 2018-11-08 22:36 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-08 20:38 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-08 22:50 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-08 20:58 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-08 23:19 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-08 21:28 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 20:53 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-09 11:44 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-09 12:37 -0600
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 11:12 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 20:07 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-09 11:36 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-09 11:46 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 04:19 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 20:38 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 22:27 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-09 11:42 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 09:06 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 04:54 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-05 10:33 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 10:43 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Tammy <frenchielamour69@gmail.com> - 2018-11-14 00:51 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-13 17:52 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-14 03:42 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-13 20:58 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-14 04:16 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again fagen <streetrobber@kite.org> - 2018-11-14 01:16 -0500
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-13 22:32 -0800
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-14 18:44 +0000
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-14 11:48 -0700
Re: Windows 10 on its ass again Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-14 11:18 -0800
Page 3 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 10 Next page →
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 09:51 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <kpc3ud5bi1pts8rq58t27kklg51kauvfai@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #475510 |
SilverSlimer wrote:
> some dumb fsck wrote:
>>
>> On 11/5/2018 2:15 PM, shit("I'm a hypocrite!")v wrote:
>>>
>>> 'Well, the "advocates" claim that if something is desired then OSS
>>> will be made to fit the need.' - some thing, lying shamelessly (but
>>> no one can quote it lying)
>>
>> <turd_quote>
>> Free software ensures that what people want will be provided, if it is
>> worth the effort.
>> </turd_quote>
>>
>> You call Snit a liar for making a claim nearly identical to your own
>> claim. What's your problem?
Our position was reasonable and correct. The "Snit" thing twisted it
into something unreasonable and incorrect.
Qualifiers, like "if it is worth the effort", can mean the difference
between a reasonable statement and an unreasonable statement.
Do you understand my "problem", now, you dumb fsck?
> He just loves arguing and insulting people, methinks.
At least I'm not such an attention-starved loser as DumFSck, willing
to make a complete jackass of himself, as long as he can fling some
snot at his moral and intellectual superiors.
Dumfsck does this all the time, of course. He ignores the important
point. He cherry-picks the one part of the quote that wasn't
dishonest or incorrect. He pretends that the objection was about
something different that what it really was. He gives the troll all
the benefits of doubt, so that he can attack me as the "bad guy" for
complaining.
I know that Dumfsck does this, but it doesn't concern me. I am
confident that everyone (who isn't a God-damned idiot themselves)
immediately recognizes the flaws in his shitty attacks. He's
self-nuking idiot.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 08:12 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <843d18b6-cea1-4d66-886c-628c61089166@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #475619 |
On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 8:51:56 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote:
> SilverSlimer wrote:
>
> > some dumb fsck wrote:
> >>
> >> On 11/5/2018 2:15 PM, shit("I'm a hypocrite!")v wrote:
> >>>
> >>> 'Well, the "advocates" claim that if something is desired then OSS
> >>> will be made to fit the need.' - some thing, lying shamelessly (but
> >>> no one can quote it lying)
> >>
> >> <turd_quote>
> >> Free software ensures that what people want will be provided, if it is
> >> worth the effort.
> >> </turd_quote>
> >>
> >> You call Snit a liar for making a claim nearly identical to your own
> >> claim. What's your problem?
>
> Our position was reasonable and correct. The "Snit" thing twisted it
> into something unreasonable and incorrect.
>
> Qualifiers, like "if it is worth the effort", can mean the difference
> between a reasonable statement and an unreasonable statement.
>
> Do you understand my "problem", now, you dumb fsck?
>
> > He just loves arguing and insulting people, methinks.
>
> At least I'm not such an attention-starved loser as DumFSck, willing
> to make a complete jackass of himself, as long as he can fling some
> snot at his moral and intellectual superiors.
>
> Dumfsck does this all the time, of course. He ignores the important
> point. He cherry-picks the one part of the quote that wasn't
> dishonest or incorrect. He pretends that the objection was about
> something different that what it really was. He gives the troll all
> the benefits of doubt, so that he can attack me as the "bad guy" for
> complaining.
>
> I know that Dumfsck does this, but it doesn't concern me. I am
> confident that everyone (who isn't a God-damned idiot themselves)
> immediately recognizes the flaws in his shitty attacks. He's
> self-nuking idiot.
You realize that talking to yourself like this only makes you appear more like
'the thing', right?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 10:21 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <3pf3udl84m5ustbs3ql94iu3c4cl6sui1h@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #475623 |
Steve Carroll wrote: >You realize that talking to yourself like this I responded to a "Slimer" post, "Steve". >only makes you appear more like 'the thing', right? Wrong again, "Steve". -- "(What Micheal Dell said) negates every 'idiotic lie' cola losers have ever drooled about Microsoft controlling OEMs." - DumFSck, lying shamelessly
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 09:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g4dummFgbe9U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #475626 |
On 11/6/18 9:21 AM, chrisv wrote: > Steve Carroll wrote: > >> You realize that talking to yourself like this > > I responded to a "Slimer" post, "Steve". > >> only makes you appear more like 'the thing', right? > > Wrong again, "Steve". > The fact you keep obsessing over me actually makes you more like Carroll. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 08:29 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <96476db0-70ec-4dc9-8b2d-1920e9282b30@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #475623 |
On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 9:12:21 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 8:51:56 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote:
> > SilverSlimer wrote:
> >
> > > some dumb fsck wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 11/5/2018 2:15 PM, shit("I'm a hypocrite!")v wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> 'Well, the "advocates" claim that if something is desired then OSS
> > >>> will be made to fit the need.' - some thing, lying shamelessly (but
> > >>> no one can quote it lying)
> > >>
> > >> <turd_quote>
> > >> Free software ensures that what people want will be provided, if it is
> > >> worth the effort.
> > >> </turd_quote>
> > >>
> > >> You call Snit a liar for making a claim nearly identical to your own
> > >> claim. What's your problem?
> >
> > Our position was reasonable and correct. The "Snit" thing twisted it
> > into something unreasonable and incorrect.
> >
> > Qualifiers, like "if it is worth the effort", can mean the difference
> > between a reasonable statement and an unreasonable statement.
> >
> > Do you understand my "problem", now, you dumb fsck?
> >
> > > He just loves arguing and insulting people, methinks.
> >
> > At least I'm not such an attention-starved loser as DumFSck, willing
> > to make a complete jackass of himself, as long as he can fling some
> > snot at his moral and intellectual superiors.
> >
> > Dumfsck does this all the time, of course. He ignores the important
> > point. He cherry-picks the one part of the quote that wasn't
> > dishonest or incorrect. He pretends that the objection was about
> > something different that what it really was. He gives the troll all
> > the benefits of doubt, so that he can attack me as the "bad guy" for
> > complaining.
> >
> > I know that Dumfsck does this, but it doesn't concern me. I am
> > confident that everyone (who isn't a God-damned idiot themselves)
> > immediately recognizes the flaws in his shitty attacks. He's
> > self-nuking idiot.
>
> You realize that talking to yourself like this only makes you appear more like
> 'the thing', right?
Fool! Contrary to The Thing's claim that he has "no interest in making trouble" (a lie as demonstrated by the fact that he annoyed everyone in COLA) he was quoted asking IT departments how they would automate posting through Google Groups.
I would post to The Thing at once but he is a blockhead who takes things out of context to achieve his desire to call everyone a sock. The Thing doesn't have any idea what he is babbling about.
--
E-commerce Simplified
http://www.5z8.info/lemon-party-redux_v1o7pm_nakedgrandmas.jpg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhOfBmWwCVY
https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o
Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 12:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <BjkED.324509$9O2.137837@fx03.iad> |
| In reply to | #475623 |
On 2018-11-06 11:12 a.m., Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 8:51:56 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote:
>> SilverSlimer wrote:
>>
>>> some dumb fsck wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 11/5/2018 2:15 PM, shit("I'm a hypocrite!")v wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> 'Well, the "advocates" claim that if something is desired then OSS
>>>>> will be made to fit the need.' - some thing, lying shamelessly (but
>>>>> no one can quote it lying)
>>>>
>>>> <turd_quote>
>>>> Free software ensures that what people want will be provided, if it is
>>>> worth the effort.
>>>> </turd_quote>
>>>>
>>>> You call Snit a liar for making a claim nearly identical to your own
>>>> claim. What's your problem?
>>
>> Our position was reasonable and correct. The "Snit" thing twisted it
>> into something unreasonable and incorrect.
>>
>> Qualifiers, like "if it is worth the effort", can mean the difference
>> between a reasonable statement and an unreasonable statement.
>>
>> Do you understand my "problem", now, you dumb fsck?
>>
>>> He just loves arguing and insulting people, methinks.
>>
>> At least I'm not such an attention-starved loser as DumFSck, willing
>> to make a complete jackass of himself, as long as he can fling some
>> snot at his moral and intellectual superiors.
>>
>> Dumfsck does this all the time, of course. He ignores the important
>> point. He cherry-picks the one part of the quote that wasn't
>> dishonest or incorrect. He pretends that the objection was about
>> something different that what it really was. He gives the troll all
>> the benefits of doubt, so that he can attack me as the "bad guy" for
>> complaining.
>>
>> I know that Dumfsck does this, but it doesn't concern me. I am
>> confident that everyone (who isn't a God-damned idiot themselves)
>> immediately recognizes the flaws in his shitty attacks. He's
>> self-nuking idiot.
>
> You realize that talking to yourself like this only makes you appear more like
> 'the thing', right?
Having seen them both in action, I'm actually shocked that chrisv and
Snit aren't best friends.
--
SilverSlimer
Proud recipient of special entitlements
Fierce adversary of equal rights, improved productivity and error-reduction
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 11:40 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <rfk3uddsd9vb28gdnuip70qrmhn7pcso64@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #475650 |
SilverSlimer wrote: > (lies snipped) Nothing new from the right-wing propagandist, again accusing others of *exactly* what he is guilty of.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 10:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g4e2r8Fh75pU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #475650 |
On 11/6/18 10:37 AM, SilverSlimer wrote:
> On 2018-11-06 11:12 a.m., Steve Carroll wrote:
>> On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 8:51:56 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote:
>>> SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>
>>>> some dumb fsck wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/5/2018 2:15 PM, shit("I'm a hypocrite!")v wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 'Well, the "advocates" claim that if something is desired then OSS
>>>>>> will be made to fit the need.' - some thing, lying shamelessly (but
>>>>>> no one can quote it lying)
>>>>>
>>>>> <turd_quote>
>>>>> Free software ensures that what people want will be provided, if it is
>>>>> worth the effort.
>>>>> </turd_quote>
>>>>>
>>>>> You call Snit a liar for making a claim nearly identical to your own
>>>>> claim. What's your problem?
>>>
>>> Our position was reasonable and correct. The "Snit" thing twisted it
>>> into something unreasonable and incorrect.
>>>
>>> Qualifiers, like "if it is worth the effort", can mean the difference
>>> between a reasonable statement and an unreasonable statement.
>>>
>>> Do you understand my "problem", now, you dumb fsck?
>>>
>>>> He just loves arguing and insulting people, methinks.
>>>
>>> At least I'm not such an attention-starved loser as DumFSck, willing
>>> to make a complete jackass of himself, as long as he can fling some
>>> snot at his moral and intellectual superiors.
>>>
>>> Dumfsck does this all the time, of course. He ignores the important
>>> point. He cherry-picks the one part of the quote that wasn't
>>> dishonest or incorrect. He pretends that the objection was about
>>> something different that what it really was. He gives the troll all
>>> the benefits of doubt, so that he can attack me as the "bad guy" for
>>> complaining.
>>>
>>> I know that Dumfsck does this, but it doesn't concern me. I am
>>> confident that everyone (who isn't a God-damned idiot themselves)
>>> immediately recognizes the flaws in his shitty attacks. He's
>>> self-nuking idiot.
>>
>> You realize that talking to yourself like this only makes you appear
>> more like
>> 'the thing', right?
>
> Having seen them both in action, I'm actually shocked that chrisv and
> Snit aren't best friends.
>
>
Remember, before you got mad at me for calling you out on your bigotry
you thought I was a great guy. :)
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 10:18 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <8e3ab5c2-931f-4b8b-98b6-4ada5c2bfa5f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #475662 |
On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 10:54:51 AM UTC-7, Snit wrote:
> On 11/6/18 10:37 AM, SilverSlimer wrote:
> > On 2018-11-06 11:12 a.m., Steve Carroll wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 8:51:56 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote:
> >>> SilverSlimer wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> some dumb fsck wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 11/5/2018 2:15 PM, shit("I'm a hypocrite!")v wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 'Well, the "advocates" claim that if something is desired then OSS
> >>>>>> will be made to fit the need.' - some thing, lying shamelessly (but
> >>>>>> no one can quote it lying)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> <turd_quote>
> >>>>> Free software ensures that what people want will be provided, if it is
> >>>>> worth the effort.
> >>>>> </turd_quote>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You call Snit a liar for making a claim nearly identical to your own
> >>>>> claim. What's your problem?
> >>>
> >>> Our position was reasonable and correct. The "Snit" thing twisted it
> >>> into something unreasonable and incorrect.
> >>>
> >>> Qualifiers, like "if it is worth the effort", can mean the difference
> >>> between a reasonable statement and an unreasonable statement.
> >>>
> >>> Do you understand my "problem", now, you dumb fsck?
> >>>
> >>>> He just loves arguing and insulting people, methinks.
> >>>
> >>> At least I'm not such an attention-starved loser as DumFSck, willing
> >>> to make a complete jackass of himself, as long as he can fling some
> >>> snot at his moral and intellectual superiors.
> >>>
> >>> Dumfsck does this all the time, of course. He ignores the important
> >>> point. He cherry-picks the one part of the quote that wasn't
> >>> dishonest or incorrect. He pretends that the objection was about
> >>> something different that what it really was. He gives the troll all
> >>> the benefits of doubt, so that he can attack me as the "bad guy" for
> >>> complaining.
> >>>
> >>> I know that Dumfsck does this, but it doesn't concern me. I am
> >>> confident that everyone (who isn't a God-damned idiot themselves)
> >>> immediately recognizes the flaws in his shitty attacks. He's
> >>> self-nuking idiot.
> >>
> >> You realize that talking to yourself like this only makes you appear
> >> more like
> >> 'the thing', right?
> >
> > Having seen them both in action, I'm actually shocked that chrisv and
> > Snit aren't best friends.
> >
> >
> Remember, before you got mad at me for calling you out on your bigotry
> you thought I was a great guy. :)
>
> --
> Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
> cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
> somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
>
> They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
>
> <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
I think we have two different notions about Klaus Schadenfreude.
His dream is to see me chased away by nonstop flooding. And hey, that could happen. Well... like I said, I know the flooder is Klaus Schadenfreude, who is a self professed AppleScripter but I don't know if it could be used to spam like this. Asking Klaus Schadenfreude to admit guilt, which is just common sense, is different than spotting his duplicity. My point was that people show up here in order to take on deniers. It is not as if we all do not quickly figure out what this forum is, Sandman especially.
--
What Every Entrepreneur Must Know
http://jeff-relf.me/Cola_Regs.HTM
Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-10 04:59 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ps5ok7$7ks$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #475650 |
On 2018-11-06, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote:
> On 2018-11-06 11:12 a.m., Steve Carroll wrote:
>> On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 8:51:56 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote:
>>> SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>
>>>> some dumb fsck wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/5/2018 2:15 PM, shit("I'm a hypocrite!")v wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 'Well, the "advocates" claim that if something is desired then OSS
>>>>>> will be made to fit the need.' - some thing, lying shamelessly (but
>>>>>> no one can quote it lying)
>>>>>
>>>>> <turd_quote>
>>>>> Free software ensures that what people want will be provided, if it is
>>>>> worth the effort.
>>>>> </turd_quote>
>>>>>
>>>>> You call Snit a liar for making a claim nearly identical to your own
>>>>> claim. What's your problem?
>>>
>>> Our position was reasonable and correct. The "Snit" thing twisted it
>>> into something unreasonable and incorrect.
>>>
>>> Qualifiers, like "if it is worth the effort", can mean the difference
>>> between a reasonable statement and an unreasonable statement.
>>>
>>> Do you understand my "problem", now, you dumb fsck?
>>>
>>>> He just loves arguing and insulting people, methinks.
>>>
>>> At least I'm not such an attention-starved loser as DumFSck, willing
>>> to make a complete jackass of himself, as long as he can fling some
>>> snot at his moral and intellectual superiors.
>>>
>>> Dumfsck does this all the time, of course. He ignores the important
>>> point. He cherry-picks the one part of the quote that wasn't
>>> dishonest or incorrect. He pretends that the objection was about
>>> something different that what it really was. He gives the troll all
>>> the benefits of doubt, so that he can attack me as the "bad guy" for
>>> complaining.
>>>
>>> I know that Dumfsck does this, but it doesn't concern me. I am
>>> confident that everyone (who isn't a God-damned idiot themselves)
>>> immediately recognizes the flaws in his shitty attacks. He's
>>> self-nuking idiot.
>>
>> You realize that talking to yourself like this only makes you appear more like
>> 'the thing', right?
>
> Having seen them both in action, I'm actually shocked that chrisv and
> Snit aren't best friends.
Unlike "Snit", chrisv is sane.
--
The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-09 21:20 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <c9f2f6bd-f24b-4d41-8c8e-e60e57c52cab@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #476520 |
On Friday, November 9, 2018 at 9:59:53 PM UTC-7, RonB wrote:
> On 2018-11-06, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote:
> > On 2018-11-06 11:12 a.m., Steve Carroll wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 8:51:56 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote:
> >>> SilverSlimer wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> some dumb fsck wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 11/5/2018 2:15 PM, shit("I'm a hypocrite!")v wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 'Well, the "advocates" claim that if something is desired then OSS
> >>>>>> will be made to fit the need.' - some thing, lying shamelessly (but
> >>>>>> no one can quote it lying)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> <turd_quote>
> >>>>> Free software ensures that what people want will be provided, if it is
> >>>>> worth the effort.
> >>>>> </turd_quote>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You call Snit a liar for making a claim nearly identical to your own
> >>>>> claim. What's your problem?
> >>>
> >>> Our position was reasonable and correct. The "Snit" thing twisted it
> >>> into something unreasonable and incorrect.
> >>>
> >>> Qualifiers, like "if it is worth the effort", can mean the difference
> >>> between a reasonable statement and an unreasonable statement.
> >>>
> >>> Do you understand my "problem", now, you dumb fsck?
> >>>
> >>>> He just loves arguing and insulting people, methinks.
> >>>
> >>> At least I'm not such an attention-starved loser as DumFSck, willing
> >>> to make a complete jackass of himself, as long as he can fling some
> >>> snot at his moral and intellectual superiors.
> >>>
> >>> Dumfsck does this all the time, of course. He ignores the important
> >>> point. He cherry-picks the one part of the quote that wasn't
> >>> dishonest or incorrect. He pretends that the objection was about
> >>> something different that what it really was. He gives the troll all
> >>> the benefits of doubt, so that he can attack me as the "bad guy" for
> >>> complaining.
> >>>
> >>> I know that Dumfsck does this, but it doesn't concern me. I am
> >>> confident that everyone (who isn't a God-damned idiot themselves)
> >>> immediately recognizes the flaws in his shitty attacks. He's
> >>> self-nuking idiot.
> >>
> >> You realize that talking to yourself like this only makes you appear more like
> >> 'the thing', right?
> >
> > Having seen them both in action, I'm actually shocked that chrisv and
> > Snit aren't best friends.
>
> Unlike "Snit", chrisv is sane.
>
> --
> The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
Desk 'The Moron' Rabbit is the upshot of the reality that Russians have been appointed to take the lead in schooling kids. It is not a coincidence that he is an idiotic liberal.
For all the big talk Desk 'The Moron' Rabbit has done on this topic, the 'UX Designer' does not know how to do this. It really takes a couple seconds to highlight text and 'print' it.
But when the charts were produced, it turns out by _that_ criteria, Desk 'The Moron' Rabbit was far more "obsessive" than anybody else. Right, Desk 'The Moron' Rabbit is wanting to retail a DOM variable, which Klaus Schadenfreude can get from torrent sites. If he wasn't so slow he'd understand how screwed up he appears.
For crying out loud, just recently he was declaring himself the only "true Linux advocate", and claiming that "advocates" (in mockery-quotes, because he is afraid of them) are actively working against the success of desktop Linux. Thanks to Desk 'The Moron' Rabbit and his 'buddies' you now need a recognized list (which I made for Forté Agent and slrn). If Klaus Schadenfreude and others start up with him again I will slip in my resolve... as I said. I am referring to good people here, not socks, who are just here to disrupt anyway. I'm not going to play like Klaus Schadenfreude didn't help me on this stuff and I am indebted to him for it. Desk 'The Moron' Rabbit has my example to study and could begin to sound like he has a clue from this day forward... as always he stumbled when it mattered.
-
This Trick Gets Women Hot For You!!
https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/6sfhq6/what_desktop_tasks_does_linux_handle_better_than/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZNxaaKD7-c
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-09 21:51 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <e0438e9b-13ec-491b-b77d-419990e9ca7f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #476520 |
On Friday, November 9, 2018 at 9:59:53 PM UTC-7, RonB wrote:
> On 2018-11-06, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote:
> > On 2018-11-06 11:12 a.m., Steve Carroll wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 8:51:56 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote:
> >>> SilverSlimer wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> some dumb fsck wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 11/5/2018 2:15 PM, shit("I'm a hypocrite!")v wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 'Well, the "advocates" claim that if something is desired then OSS
> >>>>>> will be made to fit the need.' - some thing, lying shamelessly (but
> >>>>>> no one can quote it lying)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> <turd_quote>
> >>>>> Free software ensures that what people want will be provided, if it is
> >>>>> worth the effort.
> >>>>> </turd_quote>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You call Snit a liar for making a claim nearly identical to your own
> >>>>> claim. What's your problem?
> >>>
> >>> Our position was reasonable and correct. The "Snit" thing twisted it
> >>> into something unreasonable and incorrect.
> >>>
> >>> Qualifiers, like "if it is worth the effort", can mean the difference
> >>> between a reasonable statement and an unreasonable statement.
> >>>
> >>> Do you understand my "problem", now, you dumb fsck?
> >>>
> >>>> He just loves arguing and insulting people, methinks.
> >>>
> >>> At least I'm not such an attention-starved loser as DumFSck, willing
> >>> to make a complete jackass of himself, as long as he can fling some
> >>> snot at his moral and intellectual superiors.
> >>>
> >>> Dumfsck does this all the time, of course. He ignores the important
> >>> point. He cherry-picks the one part of the quote that wasn't
> >>> dishonest or incorrect. He pretends that the objection was about
> >>> something different that what it really was. He gives the troll all
> >>> the benefits of doubt, so that he can attack me as the "bad guy" for
> >>> complaining.
> >>>
> >>> I know that Dumfsck does this, but it doesn't concern me. I am
> >>> confident that everyone (who isn't a God-damned idiot themselves)
> >>> immediately recognizes the flaws in his shitty attacks. He's
> >>> self-nuking idiot.
> >>
> >> You realize that talking to yourself like this only makes you appear more like
> >> 'the thing', right?
> >
> > Having seen them both in action, I'm actually shocked that chrisv and
> > Snit aren't best friends.
>
> Unlike "Snit", chrisv is sane.
>
> --
> The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
Several people continue talking to HWSNBN. I can not denounce Klaus Schadenfreude for his animosity but, truly, I do not fathom why he writes here with HWSNBN here. Klaus Schadenfreude is more interested in dialog as seen in a moderated environment and trolling forums just will never work for him. Who does NOT know that this kind of codswallop is HWSNBN's approach, not the modus operandi of Klaus Schadenfreude? It is all just projection... the trolling, the posting with Klaus Schadenfreude's name, the writing of gibberish, the outbursts... the diaper rash and tendency to show how flustered he is over being booted from the playground for crapping in it again... all of it.
No one here has ever read my code, much less found a bug; still, in the dark recesses of my brain, I'm thinking, "My mistakes will come to haunt me". I'm getting more posts hidden then show. I'm guessing the small-minded Mac cultist is unable to control his own actions. Drives the trolls crazy when they do not get attention. The guy is as loved as a tax collector -- and with good reason.
-
Curious how these posts are made? Email: usenet@gallopinginsanity.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-10 09:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ieCFD.967162$Vl2.59266@fx46.iad> |
| In reply to | #476520 |
On 2018-11-09 11:59 p.m., RonB wrote:
> On 2018-11-06, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote:
>> On 2018-11-06 11:12 a.m., Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 8:51:56 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote:
>>>> SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> some dumb fsck wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/5/2018 2:15 PM, shit("I'm a hypocrite!")v wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 'Well, the "advocates" claim that if something is desired then OSS
>>>>>>> will be made to fit the need.' - some thing, lying shamelessly (but
>>>>>>> no one can quote it lying)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <turd_quote>
>>>>>> Free software ensures that what people want will be provided, if it is
>>>>>> worth the effort.
>>>>>> </turd_quote>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You call Snit a liar for making a claim nearly identical to your own
>>>>>> claim. What's your problem?
>>>>
>>>> Our position was reasonable and correct. The "Snit" thing twisted it
>>>> into something unreasonable and incorrect.
>>>>
>>>> Qualifiers, like "if it is worth the effort", can mean the difference
>>>> between a reasonable statement and an unreasonable statement.
>>>>
>>>> Do you understand my "problem", now, you dumb fsck?
>>>>
>>>>> He just loves arguing and insulting people, methinks.
>>>>
>>>> At least I'm not such an attention-starved loser as DumFSck, willing
>>>> to make a complete jackass of himself, as long as he can fling some
>>>> snot at his moral and intellectual superiors.
>>>>
>>>> Dumfsck does this all the time, of course. He ignores the important
>>>> point. He cherry-picks the one part of the quote that wasn't
>>>> dishonest or incorrect. He pretends that the objection was about
>>>> something different that what it really was. He gives the troll all
>>>> the benefits of doubt, so that he can attack me as the "bad guy" for
>>>> complaining.
>>>>
>>>> I know that Dumfsck does this, but it doesn't concern me. I am
>>>> confident that everyone (who isn't a God-damned idiot themselves)
>>>> immediately recognizes the flaws in his shitty attacks. He's
>>>> self-nuking idiot.
>>>
>>> You realize that talking to yourself like this only makes you appear more like
>>> 'the thing', right?
>>
>> Having seen them both in action, I'm actually shocked that chrisv and
>> Snit aren't best friends.
>
> Unlike "Snit", chrisv is sane.
To be absolutely fair, I think chrisv's sanity is hanging by a thread.
--
SilverSlimer
Minds: @silverslimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-10 11:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g4oliuFshfsU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #476568 |
On 11/10/18 7:49 AM, SilverSlimer wrote:
> On 2018-11-09 11:59 p.m., RonB wrote:
>> On 2018-11-06, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote:
>>> On 2018-11-06 11:12 a.m., Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 8:51:56 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote:
>>>>> SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> some dumb fsck wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 11/5/2018 2:15 PM, shit("I'm a hypocrite!")v wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 'Well, the "advocates" claim that if something is desired then OSS
>>>>>>>> will be made to fit the need.' - some thing, lying shamelessly
>>>>>>>> (but
>>>>>>>> no one can quote it lying)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <turd_quote>
>>>>>>> Free software ensures that what people want will be provided, if
>>>>>>> it is
>>>>>>> worth the effort.
>>>>>>> </turd_quote>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You call Snit a liar for making a claim nearly identical to your own
>>>>>>> claim. What's your problem?
>>>>>
>>>>> Our position was reasonable and correct. The "Snit" thing twisted it
>>>>> into something unreasonable and incorrect.
>>>>>
>>>>> Qualifiers, like "if it is worth the effort", can mean the difference
>>>>> between a reasonable statement and an unreasonable statement.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you understand my "problem", now, you dumb fsck?
>>>>>
>>>>>> He just loves arguing and insulting people, methinks.
>>>>>
>>>>> At least I'm not such an attention-starved loser as DumFSck, willing
>>>>> to make a complete jackass of himself, as long as he can fling some
>>>>> snot at his moral and intellectual superiors.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dumfsck does this all the time, of course. He ignores the important
>>>>> point. He cherry-picks the one part of the quote that wasn't
>>>>> dishonest or incorrect. He pretends that the objection was about
>>>>> something different that what it really was. He gives the troll all
>>>>> the benefits of doubt, so that he can attack me as the "bad guy" for
>>>>> complaining.
>>>>>
>>>>> I know that Dumfsck does this, but it doesn't concern me. I am
>>>>> confident that everyone (who isn't a God-damned idiot themselves)
>>>>> immediately recognizes the flaws in his shitty attacks. He's
>>>>> self-nuking idiot.
>>>>
>>>> You realize that talking to yourself like this only makes you appear
>>>> more like
>>>> 'the thing', right?
>>>
>>> Having seen them both in action, I'm actually shocked that chrisv and
>>> Snit aren't best friends.
>>
>> Unlike "Snit", chrisv is sane.
>
> To be absolutely fair, I think chrisv's sanity is hanging by a thread.
>
At least I can talk about ideas and not just attack people to try to
feel better about myself... that is what you do. I mean, look above,
this whole thread is about vague insults and attacks... no real content.
Why not rise above that? If you disagree with me, cool! Let's talk.
Explain your view. Listen to mine. Maybe we will end up agreeing. Maybe
not. But we can both learn.
I welcome learning... I find it hard to understand your fear of it.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-10 11:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g4ol84FshfsU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #476520 |
On 11/9/18 9:59 PM, RonB wrote:
> On 2018-11-06, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote:
>> On 2018-11-06 11:12 a.m., Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 8:51:56 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote:
>>>> SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> some dumb fsck wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/5/2018 2:15 PM, shit("I'm a hypocrite!")v wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 'Well, the "advocates" claim that if something is desired then OSS
>>>>>>> will be made to fit the need.' - some thing, lying shamelessly (but
>>>>>>> no one can quote it lying)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <turd_quote>
>>>>>> Free software ensures that what people want will be provided, if it is
>>>>>> worth the effort.
>>>>>> </turd_quote>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You call Snit a liar for making a claim nearly identical to your own
>>>>>> claim. What's your problem?
>>>>
>>>> Our position was reasonable and correct. The "Snit" thing twisted it
>>>> into something unreasonable and incorrect.
>>>>
>>>> Qualifiers, like "if it is worth the effort", can mean the difference
>>>> between a reasonable statement and an unreasonable statement.
>>>>
>>>> Do you understand my "problem", now, you dumb fsck?
>>>>
>>>>> He just loves arguing and insulting people, methinks.
>>>>
>>>> At least I'm not such an attention-starved loser as DumFSck, willing
>>>> to make a complete jackass of himself, as long as he can fling some
>>>> snot at his moral and intellectual superiors.
>>>>
>>>> Dumfsck does this all the time, of course. He ignores the important
>>>> point. He cherry-picks the one part of the quote that wasn't
>>>> dishonest or incorrect. He pretends that the objection was about
>>>> something different that what it really was. He gives the troll all
>>>> the benefits of doubt, so that he can attack me as the "bad guy" for
>>>> complaining.
>>>>
>>>> I know that Dumfsck does this, but it doesn't concern me. I am
>>>> confident that everyone (who isn't a God-damned idiot themselves)
>>>> immediately recognizes the flaws in his shitty attacks. He's
>>>> self-nuking idiot.
>>>
>>> You realize that talking to yourself like this only makes you appear more like
>>> 'the thing', right?
>>
>> Having seen them both in action, I'm actually shocked that chrisv and
>> Snit aren't best friends.
>
> Unlike "Snit", chrisv is sane.
>
And yet you cannot even say what you think I am wrong about. LOL!
Your real issue is with yourself. Clearly.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 09:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g4dv8gFgg91U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #475619 |
On 11/6/18 8:51 AM, chrisv wrote:
> SilverSlimer wrote:
>
>> some dumb fsck wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/5/2018 2:15 PM, shit("I'm a hypocrite!")v wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 'Well, the "advocates" claim that if something is desired then OSS
>>>> will be made to fit the need.' - some thing, lying shamelessly (but
>>>> no one can quote it lying)
>>>
>>> <turd_quote>
>>> Free software ensures that what people want will be provided, if it is
>>> worth the effort.
>>> </turd_quote>
>>>
>>> You call Snit a liar for making a claim nearly identical to your own
>>> claim. What's your problem?
>
> Our position was reasonable and correct. The "Snit" thing twisted it
> into something unreasonable and incorrect.
By basically parroting it... LOL!
> Qualifiers, like "if it is worth the effort", can mean the difference
> between a reasonable statement and an unreasonable statement.
You are splitting absurd hairs. And also keep in mind that the ONE quote
shown is not the only one where the claim was made. And, no, I am NOT
going to dig back years and play these games of yours.
> Do you understand my "problem", now, you dumb fsck?
Sure: the problem is you have seen ONE time I referenced ONE idea from
years ago, an idea that was repeatedly noted, and then you split hairs
to cry and play victim.
>> He just loves arguing and insulting people, methinks.
>
> At least I'm not such an attention-starved loser as DumFSck, willing
> to make a complete jackass of himself, as long as he can fling some
> snot at his moral and intellectual superiors.
The quote in question is from your .sig where you do exactly as you said
you do not do.
You are crying about how you can split hairs and play games to insist I
lied, but as you do so you tell lies like that.
Do you see how you just self-nuked?
> Dumfsck does this all the time, of course. He ignores the important
> point. He cherry-picks the one part of the quote that wasn't
> dishonest or incorrect. He pretends that the objection was about
> something different that what it really was. He gives the troll all
> the benefits of doubt, so that he can attack me as the "bad guy" for
> complaining.
He is noting how your absurd trolling was dishonest. And now you are
crying over it. Oh well.
> I know that Dumfsck does this, but it doesn't concern me. I am
> confident that everyone (who isn't a God-damned idiot themselves)
> immediately recognizes the flaws in his shitty attacks. He's
> self-nuking idiot.
Yet above you self-nuked. :)
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 08:59 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <4656dc0a-1ea0-4874-ac17-f738573cdddb@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #475634 |
On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 9:53:40 AM UTC-7, Snit wrote:
> On 11/6/18 8:51 AM, chrisv wrote:
> > SilverSlimer wrote:
> >
> >> some dumb fsck wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 11/5/2018 2:15 PM, shit("I'm a hypocrite!")v wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> 'Well, the "advocates" claim that if something is desired then OSS
> >>>> will be made to fit the need.' - some thing, lying shamelessly (but
> >>>> no one can quote it lying)
> >>>
> >>> <turd_quote>
> >>> Free software ensures that what people want will be provided, if it is
> >>> worth the effort.
> >>> </turd_quote>
> >>>
> >>> You call Snit a liar for making a claim nearly identical to your own
> >>> claim. What's your problem?
> >
> > Our position was reasonable and correct. The "Snit" thing twisted it
> > into something unreasonable and incorrect.
>
> By basically parroting it... LOL!
>
> > Qualifiers, like "if it is worth the effort", can mean the difference
> > between a reasonable statement and an unreasonable statement.
>
> You are splitting absurd hairs. And also keep in mind that the ONE quote
> shown is not the only one where the claim was made. And, no, I am NOT
> going to dig back years and play these games of yours.
>
> > Do you understand my "problem", now, you dumb fsck?
>
> Sure: the problem is you have seen ONE time I referenced ONE idea from
> years ago, an idea that was repeatedly noted, and then you split hairs
> to cry and play victim.
>
> >> He just loves arguing and insulting people, methinks.
> >
> > At least I'm not such an attention-starved loser as DumFSck, willing
> > to make a complete jackass of himself, as long as he can fling some
> > snot at his moral and intellectual superiors.
>
> The quote in question is from your .sig where you do exactly as you said
> you do not do.
>
> You are crying about how you can split hairs and play games to insist I
> lied, but as you do so you tell lies like that.
>
> Do you see how you just self-nuked?
>
> > Dumfsck does this all the time, of course. He ignores the important
> > point. He cherry-picks the one part of the quote that wasn't
> > dishonest or incorrect. He pretends that the objection was about
> > something different that what it really was. He gives the troll all
> > the benefits of doubt, so that he can attack me as the "bad guy" for
> > complaining.
>
> He is noting how your absurd trolling was dishonest. And now you are
> crying over it. Oh well.
>
> > I know that Dumfsck does this, but it doesn't concern me. I am
> > confident that everyone (who isn't a God-damned idiot themselves)
> > immediately recognizes the flaws in his shitty attacks. He's
> > self-nuking idiot.
>
> Yet above you self-nuked. :)
>
>
> --
> Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
> cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
> somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
>
> They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
>
> <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
For crying out loud, just recently he was declaring himself the only "true Linux advocate", and claiming that "advocates" (in mockery-quotes just to annoy people) are actively working against the success of desktop Linux.
I am not going to pretend Klaus Schadenfreude didn't help me with OS X and I am thankful for his knowledge. the Script Troller has my example as an example and should begin to at least pretend he has a clue from here on... though he stepped on his own dick when he first talked. In spite of my experiences with Ubuntu, I even now continue to install it for newbies who've had trouble with Windows 8, particularly if I see that they're not good at troubleshooting and using window widgets. I nonetheless am unpersuaded that these flooding posts are not from Klaus Schadenfreude, clearly they are from the Script Troller.
--
Puppy Videos
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OffkiSAsYo8
http://tinyurl.com/gsleb4p
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 12:01 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <2PjED.513791$OM2.135315@fx37.iad> |
| In reply to | #475619 |
On 11/6/2018 10:51 AM, shit("duh")v wrote:
> He's self-nuking idiot.
heh!
tags: shitv, self-nuke, again and again and again
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 09:15 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <3c1bf91f-afb7-44d1-90d1-24e0f14b1225@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #475641 |
On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 10:02:57 AM UTC-7, DFS wrote:
> On 11/6/2018 10:51 AM, shit("duh")v wrote:
>
> > He's self-nuking idiot.
>
> heh!
>
> tags: shitv, self-nuke, again and again and again
I bet he thinks your life was perfect. Klaus Schadenfreude's actions are really false. There's no doubt that as soon as any past 'person in his KF' does whatever to frighten the feeble daisy's feelings that they will be blocked again.
What Snit does is certainly faster. Anyone familiar with our history knows it is not written in the nature Snit is suggesting, and some of them are flat out hand written.
Who are you even talking to? Yup. Of course this is what we have to stop. Psychopaths who have no reason for being here other than to upset me.
--
This broke the Internet!
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.os.linux.advocacy/smzXrBhsWf4
https://youtu.be/48_DdtLGR9s
Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 09:18 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <60fef081-066e-481f-9f45-d107ef50a282@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #475641 |
On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 10:02:57 AM UTC-7, DFS wrote:
> On 11/6/2018 10:51 AM, shit("duh")v wrote:
>
> > He's self-nuking idiot.
>
> heh!
>
> tags: shitv, self-nuke, again and again and again
On second thought, maybe you should make a 'chrisv' bot ;)
Or give the Dice bot access to your database... which has the addition
of tagging 'stupid' or 'smart' statements (have to be done manually) so
when it pulls one it knows how to 'Dice' it up.
I read your pother post... didn't you create your database because you
"just like to create code"? Seems that'd apply (on some level) whether
one is paid, or not.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web