Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #474813 > unrolled thread
| Started by | maureenshoopie@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-11-02 06:20 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-11-03 10:07 +0100 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 166 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus maureenshoopie@gmail.com - 2018-11-02 06:20 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 07:59 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-02 11:42 -0400
Andy Rubin’s ex-wife, Rie Rubin. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-02 09:26 -0700
Re: Andy Rubin’s ex-wife, Rie Rubin. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 16:21 -0400
Re: Andy Rubin’s ex-wife, Rie Rubin. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 20:16 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-02 11:45 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 21:17 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 10:08 +0100
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-03 14:42 -0400
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-03 12:36 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-03 12:22 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 12:52 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-03 03:30 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-03 14:46 -0400
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-03 13:50 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 14:11 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-03 17:30 -0400
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-03 15:49 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-03 18:15 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 18:36 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 20:11 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 00:19 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-04 11:30 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 20:17 +0100
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-04 12:28 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 11:50 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 11:34 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-04 15:03 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-04 20:16 +0000
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 21:33 +0000
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-04 19:18 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 23:46 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 21:33 +0000
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 14:42 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-04 16:08 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 15:28 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 00:17 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-05 07:26 -0600
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-04 19:08 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-05 07:22 -0600
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 07:06 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-05 10:08 -0600
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 08:14 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 10:34 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 10:37 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-05 11:11 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-05 10:49 -0600
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 09:08 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 10:20 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 09:27 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-05 12:14 -0600
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-05 17:32 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 15:41 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-06 07:03 -0600
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 05:20 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 08:06 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 09:11 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 10:22 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-05 14:53 -0600
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 13:22 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 14:23 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-05 16:07 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-05 19:35 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-05 17:38 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-05 21:01 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-05 18:37 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-05 21:56 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 20:04 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 19:23 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-06 08:03 -0600
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-06 06:30 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 06:53 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 08:08 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 08:19 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 09:45 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-06 12:46 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 10:51 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-06 12:36 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 10:55 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 12:23 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 10:11 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 11:15 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-06 13:45 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 11:59 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 05:53 +0000
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 04:47 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-07 08:53 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-07 06:17 -0800
How many "friends" can you afford ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-07 06:29 -0800
Re: How many "friends" can you afford ? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 06:51 -0800
Re: How many "friends" can you afford ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 11:46 -0500
I work a bit, take a rest, then continue. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-09 10:35 -0800
Re: I work a bit, take a rest, then continue. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 22:07 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-07 11:35 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 10:47 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 11:03 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-07 12:22 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-07 18:05 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-11-08 09:02 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-07 11:36 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-06 12:36 -0600
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-06 11:59 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 12:27 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 14:13 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 16:19 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-06 14:41 -0600
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 12:55 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 13:41 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-06 14:31 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 15:00 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 15:18 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 16:25 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-06 19:31 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 20:38 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 20:59 -0800
Hysterical Women (Democrats) ban "substandard" (affordable) housing. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-06 21:13 -0800
Re: Hysterical Women (Democrats) ban "substandard" (affordable) housing. proletariat <myemailisaol@defunct.org> - 2018-11-07 01:13 -0500
Re: Hysterical Women (Democrats) ban "substandard" (affordable) housing. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-06 23:20 -0800
Re: Hysterical Women (Democrats) ban "substandard" (affordable) housing. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 12:06 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-07 04:45 -0800
We hate the sin not the sinner. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-07 06:18 -0800
Re: We hate the sin not the sinner. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 06:36 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 08:38 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-07 11:34 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-07 14:47 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 16:19 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-07 19:08 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 05:29 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 16:50 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-07 19:07 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-11-08 03:32 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 03:55 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 07:36 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-08 08:55 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 08:37 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-08 09:08 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-08 11:10 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 17:33 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-07 11:38 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-07 07:02 -0600
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-07 08:54 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-07 11:32 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 04:46 +0000
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 21:05 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-06 10:46 -0600
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-06 10:04 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 20:00 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-05 19:07 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 20:05 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-05 10:36 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 12:10 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-04 12:52 -0800
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-04 17:53 -0500
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-04 16:10 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-04 19:23 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-03 12:20 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 12:36 -0700
Don't work for Google. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-02 08:43 -0700
Re: Don't work for Google. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-02 11:48 -0400
Re: Don't work for Google. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-02 11:00 -0500
Re: Don't work for Google. Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 10:07 +0100
Re: Don't work for Google. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 02:29 -0700
Re: Don't work for Google. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 09:16 -0700
Re: Don't work for Google. Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-11-02 09:01 -0700
Re: Failing Google pays sexual assaulter $90M bonus Hadron Quark <hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2018-11-03 10:07 +0100
Page 3 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-05 07:22 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <esg0udd6br0ag9nee49i6u8odvamf6bn1b@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #475232 |
SilverSlimer wrote: > Hadron Quark wrote: >> >> Kavanaugh didn't lie. The women lied. Take it to the bank. > >It has since been revealed that one of the Kavanaugh accusers ADMITTED >to have lied and Snit, the resident moron, is still trying to get us to >believe that Kavanaugh is guilty. Check-out the propgandist's "logic". One of them lied, so they all lied. Is anyone stupid enough to be fooled? -- "Negative feedback loops ARE introduced into circuits to provide stability and also to provide noise reduction." - "Hadron" Quack, putting his ignorance on display
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-05 07:06 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <9b87d82e-8f21-4c72-88a0-675cd467a41c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #475334 |
On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 6:22:09 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote: > SilverSlimer wrote: > > > Hadron Quark wrote: > >> > >> Kavanaugh didn't lie. The women lied. Take it to the bank. > > > >It has since been revealed that one of the Kavanaugh accusers ADMITTED > >to have lied and Snit, the resident moron, is still trying to get us to > >believe that Kavanaugh is guilty. > > Check-out the propgandist's "logic". One of them lied, so they all > lied. Where did he claim that? Crackhead pointed to an article entitled "how we know"... blah, blah, which is absurd. Slimer is just pointing out more evidence of the dishonest BS surrounding these *totally unsubstantiated allegations*. For anyone who's 'honest and honorable', even Ford's story doesn't pass the laugh test. If you weren't there and you claim to "know" what happened that *should* mean you can prove it. We all know this basic *fact*, yet, many on 'the left' are pretending it's not a fact, which also doesn't pass the laugh test. > Is anyone stupid enough to be fooled? By what you just tried to do? No.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-05 10:08 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <tdq0udph2o95kk394easbpoavs9498t7ak@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #475357 |
Steve Carroll wrote: >> Check-out the propgandist's "logic". One of them lied, so they all >> lied. > >Where did he claim that? That was the implication, "Steve". >Crackhead pointed to an article entitled "how >we know"... blah, blah, which is absurd. Slimer is just pointing out more >evidence of the dishonest BS surrounding these *totally unsubstantiated >allegations* He's got no right to complain. It's people like "Slimer", extremists who are willing to *lie* to attack, that are the problem. -- 'cola "advocates": software should be free of cost!' - DumFSck, lying shamelessly
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-05 08:14 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5f9047a6-6749-471f-a1bf-760e7be6677d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #475377 |
On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 9:08:56 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote: > Steve Carroll wrote: > > >> Check-out the propgandist's "logic". One of them lied, so they all > >> lied. > > > >Where did he claim that? > > That was the implication, "Steve". Bullsh*t. > >Crackhead pointed to an article entitled "how > >we know"... blah, blah, which is absurd. Slimer is just pointing out more > >evidence of the dishonest BS surrounding these *totally unsubstantiated > >allegations* > > He's got no right to complain. Pointing out admitted lies is complaining now?!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-05 10:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g4bd8hFtgf9U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #475381 |
On 11/5/18 9:14 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 9:08:56 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote: >> Steve Carroll wrote: >> >>>> Check-out the propgandist's "logic". One of them lied, so they all >>>> lied. >>> >>> Where did he claim that? >> >> That was the implication, "Steve". > > Bullsh*t. Then what point do you think he was making? It was noted -- and evidence was provided -- that Kavanaugh lied. His response was to note that one of his accusers ALSO lied (one who was not even mentioned in the evidence against Kavanaugh). If he was not saying it had to be solely one side or the other that was lying he had NO point I can think of. How about you. And off you run. 100% predictable. He was busted, as you have now been, too. You COULD be an adult about this and admit it -- but you never will. >>> Crackhead pointed to an article entitled "how >>> we know"... blah, blah, which is absurd. Slimer is just pointing out more >>> evidence of the dishonest BS surrounding these *totally unsubstantiated >>> allegations* >> >> He's got no right to complain. > > Pointing out admitted lies is complaining now?! Pointing out irrelevant information, that neither exonerated Kavanaugh from the evidence shown or even tied into the evidence shown, in an effort to suggest Kavanaugh was doing as the evidence shown. But you back that sort of nonsense. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-05 10:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g4bdeqFtgf9U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #475377 |
On 11/5/18 9:08 AM, chrisv wrote: > Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> Check-out the propgandist's "logic". One of them lied, so they all >>> lied. >> >> Where did he claim that? > > That was the implication, "Steve". > >> Crackhead pointed to an article entitled "how >> we know"... blah, blah, which is absurd. Slimer is just pointing out more >> evidence of the dishonest BS surrounding these *totally unsubstantiated >> allegations* > > He's got no right to complain. It's people like "Slimer", extremists > who are willing to *lie* to attack, that are the problem. Let us see how many side issues and the like Slimer and Carroll go to as they run from the evidence: 1) Snit noted evidence Kavanaugh lied. <https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/09/how-we-know-kavanaugh-is-lying> 2) Slimer *ignored* that evidence and noted SOMEONE else lied... someone who is not mentioned in that evidence. 3) If other irrelevant people also lied it does not imply Kavanaugh did not. This is simple... but Slimer and Carroll will forever pretend to not get the point. Maybe they really will not. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-05 11:11 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <hZZDD.232200$mJ1.48015@fx24.iad> |
| In reply to | #475357 |
On 2018-11-05 10:06 a.m., Steve Carroll wrote: > On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 6:22:09 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote: >> SilverSlimer wrote: >> >>> Hadron Quark wrote: >>>> >>>> Kavanaugh didn't lie. The women lied. Take it to the bank. >>> >>> It has since been revealed that one of the Kavanaugh accusers ADMITTED >>> to have lied and Snit, the resident moron, is still trying to get us to >>> believe that Kavanaugh is guilty. >> >> Check-out the propgandist's "logic". One of them lied, so they all >> lied. > > Where did he claim that? Crackhead pointed to an article entitled "how > we know"... blah, blah, which is absurd. Slimer is just pointing out more > evidence of the dishonest BS surrounding these *totally unsubstantiated > allegations*. For anyone who's 'honest and honorable', even Ford's story > doesn't pass the laugh test. If you weren't there and you claim to "know" > what happened that *should* mean you can prove it. We all know this > basic *fact*, yet, many on 'the left' are pretending it's not a fact, which > also doesn't pass the laugh test. Actually, a second person came forward and admitted that they lied about Kavanaugh and a man has stepped forward to say that _he_ was the one who had the encounter with Pig Ford, not Kavanaugh. Of course, all of these facts are unfortunate to the leftist media who has done well, so far, to ignore them entirely. >> Is anyone stupid enough to be fooled? > > By what you just tried to do? No. This will sound very "chrisv" of me but I guess he doesn't realize that I have him filtered. He can be a nice guy from time to time (assuming he IS a guy), but his decision to "snip, filter and unread" any post from people he knows he disagrees with seems very childish to me. If he ever stops that behaviour, I'll gladly remove him because our conversations can be productive but I will not stand for censorship on either end (right to left, left to right) ever again. -- SilverSlimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-05 10:49 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <obs0udleg2nscikjmttrndfteeluknu07q@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #475379 |
SilverSlimer wrote: > Steve Carroll wrote: >> >> Where did he claim that? > >Actually, a second person came forward and admitted that they lied about >Kavanaugh and a man has stepped forward to say that _he_ was the one who >had the encounter with Pig Ford, not Kavanaugh. > >Of course, all of these facts are unfortunate to the leftist media who >has done well, so far, to ignore them entirely. And we're supposed to take the word of you, or of "infowars", for this? >> By what you just tried to do? No. I meant people who, unlike you, are not snits, "Steve". >This will sound very "chrisv" of me but I guess he doesn't realize that >I have him filtered. Of course I realize that. >He can be a nice guy from time to time (assuming he >IS a guy), but his decision to "snip, filter and unread" any post from >people he knows he disagrees with seems very childish to me. If he ever >stops that behaviour, I'll gladly remove him because our conversations >can be productive but I will not stand for censorship on either end >(right to left, left to right) ever again. I'm sure that my "snipped, unread" can be annoying, but it's dishonest to call it "censorship". I do it to avoid going around and around with someone, after I have made my point. It's very fair - they get the last word, and I don't have to read it. -- 'I was laughing at the "community" thing. There was no such community.' - "Hadron", attempting to *lie* his way out of his earlier attacks on the Linux community, by claiming that there is no Linux community.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-05 09:08 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <1cf955ff-06ad-4be9-85de-ea66a47d711a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #475390 |
On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 9:49:12 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote: > SilverSlimer wrote: > > > Steve Carroll wrote: > >> > >> Where did he claim that? > > > >Actually, a second person came forward and admitted that they lied about > >Kavanaugh and a man has stepped forward to say that _he_ was the one who > >had the encounter with Pig Ford, not Kavanaugh. > > > >Of course, all of these facts are unfortunate to the leftist media who > >has done well, so far, to ignore them entirely. > > And we're supposed to take the word of you, or of "infowars", for > this? Why would you need to take anyone's word when the facts are available? > >> By what you just tried to do? No. > > I meant people who, unlike you, are not snits, "Steve". Doing what you're doing, you're about as close to being a 'Snit' as one can get. > I do it to avoid going around and around with someone, after I have > made my point. The only "point" you've made is that you're apparently willing to overlook facts.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-05 10:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g4bcemFt8vmU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #475393 |
On 11/5/18 10:08 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 9:49:12 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote: >> SilverSlimer wrote: >> >>> Steve Carroll wrote: >>>> >>>> Where did he claim that? >>> >>> Actually, a second person came forward and admitted that they lied about >>> Kavanaugh and a man has stepped forward to say that _he_ was the one who >>> had the encounter with Pig Ford, not Kavanaugh. >>> >>> Of course, all of these facts are unfortunate to the leftist media who >>> has done well, so far, to ignore them entirely. >> >> And we're supposed to take the word of you, or of "infowars", for >> this? > > Why would you need to take anyone's word when the facts are available? > >>>> By what you just tried to do? No. >> >> I meant people who, unlike you, are not snits, "Steve". > > Doing what you're doing, you're about as close to being a 'Snit' as one can get. > >> I do it to avoid going around and around with someone, after I have >> made my point. > > The only "point" you've made is that you're apparently willing to overlook facts. > Yet you back Slimer. And you also whine about him being "willing to overlook facts" without mentioning what fact you think he is overlooking, and then claim this makes him like me when your issue with me is I *insist* on doing research and using evidence for debates such as these (you never SAY that, but it is then when you bitch the most). In other words: you are being dishonest, as is your norm. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-05 09:27 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <e312ea74-6f14-4872-a06d-4daa3b9edc8f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #475393 |
On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 10:08:18 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 9:49:12 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote: > > SilverSlimer wrote: > > > > > Steve Carroll wrote: > > >> > > >> Where did he claim that? > > > > > >Actually, a second person came forward and admitted that they lied about > > >Kavanaugh and a man has stepped forward to say that _he_ was the one who > > >had the encounter with Pig Ford, not Kavanaugh. > > > > > >Of course, all of these facts are unfortunate to the leftist media who > > >has done well, so far, to ignore them entirely. > > > > And we're supposed to take the word of you, or of "infowars", for > > this? > > Why would you need to take anyone's word when the facts are available? > > > >> By what you just tried to do? No. > > > > I meant people who, unlike you, are not snits, "Steve". > > Doing what you're doing, you're about as close to being a 'Snit' as one can get. > > > I do it to avoid going around and around with someone, after I have > > made my point. > > The only "point" you've made is that you're apparently willing to overlook facts. It doesn't matter because the name on a post is irrelevant, we know it is from the script-troller anyway. Lying sack of shit AKA Prescott Computer Guy does it every time. Then the flood begins. Because the mama's boy just has to run to other groups. This forum is a leaking porta potty. Which regular knows AppleScript, is an IT "master", has forged Klaus Schadenfreude's ID, has passion for this shit and is a gigantic immature toddler who posts ignorant claptrap even when he's NOT flooding... AND... who works to pin everything he is doing on "anyone he can" and has for his whole life? At times, a make believe world is more valuable than truth. After Klaus Schadenfreude's update I no longer can get work done on Linux. Like anyone can! I'm getting sick of the nonsense in here. I'm guessing the sock frenzy whackadoodle has gone ballistic again. Drives the trolls crazy when they do not get attention. - Eight things to never feed your dog https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100012978552519 Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-05 12:14 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <c021udhle1q2o5ffmql3uchr904p2rrmb5@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #475393 |
Steve Carroll wrote: > (snipped, unread) -- "You Linux/OSS wackjobs should be held liable for spreading viruses and malware across the world, via your sendmail and postfix crapware." - DumFSck, putting his ignorance on display
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-05 17:32 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <ky3ED.308644$SG2.142583@fx29.iad> |
| In reply to | #475393 |
On 2018-11-05 12:08 p.m., Steve Carroll wrote: > On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 9:49:12 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote: >> SilverSlimer wrote: >> >>> Steve Carroll wrote: >>>> >>>> Where did he claim that? >>> >>> Actually, a second person came forward and admitted that they lied about >>> Kavanaugh and a man has stepped forward to say that _he_ was the one who >>> had the encounter with Pig Ford, not Kavanaugh. >>> >>> Of course, all of these facts are unfortunate to the leftist media who >>> has done well, so far, to ignore them entirely. >> >> And we're supposed to take the word of you, or of "infowars", for >> this? > > Why would you need to take anyone's word when the facts are available? Even the slightest amount of research is too much for chrisv, our resident leftist. Here, a leftist source: <https://www.yahoo.com/news/kavanaugh-accuser-admits-she-fabricated-184414094.html> Looks like I did the right thing keeping him in my filter. >>>> By what you just tried to do? No. >> >> I meant people who, unlike you, are not snits, "Steve". > > Doing what you're doing, you're about as close to being a 'Snit' as one can get. Agreed. >> I do it to avoid going around and around with someone, after I have >> made my point. > > The only "point" you've made is that you're apparently willing to overlook facts. +1 -- SilverSlimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-05 15:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g4bv9gF2u55U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #475485 |
On 11/5/18 3:32 PM, SilverSlimer wrote: > On 2018-11-05 12:08 p.m., Steve Carroll wrote: >> On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 9:49:12 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote: >>> SilverSlimer wrote: >>> >>>> Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Where did he claim that? >>>> >>>> Actually, a second person came forward and admitted that they lied >>>> about >>>> Kavanaugh and a man has stepped forward to say that _he_ was the one >>>> who >>>> had the encounter with Pig Ford, not Kavanaugh. >>>> >>>> Of course, all of these facts are unfortunate to the leftist media who >>>> has done well, so far, to ignore them entirely. >>> >>> And we're supposed to take the word of you, or of "infowars", for >>> this? >> >> Why would you need to take anyone's word when the facts are available? > > Even the slightest amount of research is too much for chrisv, our > resident leftist. Here, a leftist source: > <https://www.yahoo.com/news/kavanaugh-accuser-admits-she-fabricated-184414094.html> > > > Looks like I did the right thing keeping him in my filter. > >>>>> By what you just tried to do? No. >>> >>> I meant people who, unlike you, are not snits, "Steve". >> >> Doing what you're doing, you're about as close to being a 'Snit' as >> one can get. > > Agreed. > >>> I do it to avoid going around and around with someone, after I have >>> made my point. >> >> The only "point" you've made is that you're apparently willing to >> overlook facts. > > +1 > 1) Snit noted evidence Kavanaugh lied. <https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/09/how-we-know-kavanaugh-is-lying> 2) Slimer *ignored* that evidence and noted SOMEONE else lied... someone who is not mentioned in that evidence. 3) If other irrelevant people also lied it does not imply Kavanaugh did not. This is simple... but Slimer and Carroll will forever pretend to not get the point. Maybe they really will not. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 07:03 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <lg33ud1gaoruge180kvjriknmne2n9u30g@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #475485 |
> Steve Carroll wrote: >> >> (snip lies) Just more bald-faced lying from the snit "Steve Carroll" and the right-wing propagandist "Slimer". I've not seen the thing in Arizona use my "snip, ignore" tactic. Quite the opposite, in fact. The thing will always try to extend the debate. But, the snit was stung, and all he could come up with is a IKYABWAI, even though it's obviously a *lie*. -- "It's the presence of negative feedback that maintains the stability." - trolling fsckwit "Ezekiel", putting his ignorance on display
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 05:20 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <8ced1834-7d74-49d4-b84f-fb958349a867@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #475583 |
On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 6:03:12 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote: > > Steve Carroll wrote: > >> > >> (snip lies) > > Just more bald-faced lying from the snit "Steve Carroll" and the > right-wing propagandist "Slimer". > > I've not seen the thing in Arizona use my "snip, ignore" tactic. > Quite the opposite, in fact. The thing will always try to extend the > debate. > > But, the snit was stung, and all he could come up with is a IKYABWAI, > even though it's obviously a *lie*. > > -- > "It's the presence of negative feedback that maintains the stability." > - trolling fsckwit "Ezekiel", putting his ignorance on display Klaus Schadenfreude is seconds away from being in Steve Carroll's kill filter. At times, a make believe world is more valuable than truth. It's easy as pie to distort the truth by bragging about a few special cases clashing from what is common. What matters more from an advocacy vantage point are the expected values. LOL! C'mon, man... even you have plonked that lummox. Given what he is nobody would blame you for pushing to be rid of his style of craziness. No no. He never agreed to stop flooding. He lied about his trolling and that was that. Honestly, what lie? A shadow of false Steve Carroll, projected by Klaus Schadenfreude, at the wrong time. How Klaus Schadenfreude determines when to use the flood script to best emulate the style of Steve Carroll's posts http://usenet.sandman.net/misc/snit_flood. -- Best CMS Solution of 2017 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OffkiSAsYo8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZNxaaKD7-c Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-06 08:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g4dov1Ff22eU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #475583 |
On 11/6/18 6:03 AM, chrisv wrote: >> Steve Carroll wrote: >>> >>> (snip lies) > > Just more bald-faced lying from the snit "Steve Carroll" and the > right-wing propagandist "Slimer". > > I've not seen the thing in Arizona use my "snip, ignore" tactic. > Quite the opposite, in fact. The thing will always try to extend the > debate. > > But, the snit was stung, and all he could come up with is a IKYABWAI, > even though it's obviously a *lie*. > I am not responsible for his actions. He is. And, yes, he uses what I call "Snip and run"... he has for years. Then he insists there is nobody to support his nonsense to... he knows he cannot back it. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-05 09:11 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <88e35513-6d83-4b96-a166-0ab6f4e24ec3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #475390 |
On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 9:49:12 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote: > SilverSlimer wrote: > > > Steve Carroll wrote: > >> > >> Where did he claim that? > > > >Actually, a second person came forward and admitted that they lied about > >Kavanaugh and a man has stepped forward to say that _he_ was the one who > >had the encounter with Pig Ford, not Kavanaugh. > > > >Of course, all of these facts are unfortunate to the leftist media who > >has done well, so far, to ignore them entirely. > > And we're supposed to take the word of you, or of "infowars", for > this? > > >> By what you just tried to do? No. > > I meant people who, unlike you, are not snits, "Steve". > > >This will sound very "chrisv" of me but I guess he doesn't realize that > >I have him filtered. > > Of course I realize that. > > >He can be a nice guy from time to time (assuming he > >IS a guy), but his decision to "snip, filter and unread" any post from > >people he knows he disagrees with seems very childish to me. If he ever > >stops that behaviour, I'll gladly remove him because our conversations > >can be productive but I will not stand for censorship on either end > >(right to left, left to right) ever again. > > I'm sure that my "snipped, unread" can be annoying, but it's dishonest > to call it "censorship". > > I do it to avoid going around and around with someone, after I have > made my point. It's very fair - they get the last word, and I don't > have to read it. > > -- > 'I was laughing at the "community" thing. There was no such > community.' - "Hadron", attempting to *lie* his way out of his > earlier attacks on the Linux community, by claiming that there is no > Linux community. Klaus Schadenfreude and Peter Köhlmann both lie endlessly and shamelessly and continue to do so. So no motivation in showing any further care or control. You can say I am Satan himself for all I care. Why do you keep repeating Peter Köhlmann? That is the problem now and newer educators don't care, people from older generations SHOULD know better than to fall for liberalism. Studying Linux... forever an initiate... - Live on Kickstarter!! https://youtu.be/IhOfBmWwCVY Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-05 10:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <g4bcisFt8vmU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #475390 |
On 11/5/18 9:49 AM, chrisv wrote: > SilverSlimer wrote: > >> Steve Carroll wrote: >>> >>> Where did he claim that? >> >> Actually, a second person came forward and admitted that they lied about >> Kavanaugh and a man has stepped forward to say that _he_ was the one who >> had the encounter with Pig Ford, not Kavanaugh. >> >> Of course, all of these facts are unfortunate to the leftist media who >> has done well, so far, to ignore them entirely. > > And we're supposed to take the word of you, or of "infowars", for > this? Even if 100 OTHER PEOPLE lied, the question is if Kavanaugh lied. Not only does the evidence suggest he did, even if he did not, he proved himself unfit during the questioning. THAT is what the question was -- his level of fitness. THAT is what matters. Now if someone else lied and they are prosecuted for it or the like then THAT will matter. >>> By what you just tried to do? No. > > I meant people who, unlike you, are not snits, "Steve". Why not have people use reason and logic and evidence? Or do you mean my tendency to respond to trolling? >> This will sound very "chrisv" of me but I guess he doesn't realize that >> I have him filtered. > > Of course I realize that. > >> He can be a nice guy from time to time (assuming he >> IS a guy), but his decision to "snip, filter and unread" any post from >> people he knows he disagrees with seems very childish to me. If he ever >> stops that behaviour, I'll gladly remove him because our conversations >> can be productive but I will not stand for censorship on either end >> (right to left, left to right) ever again. > > I'm sure that my "snipped, unread" can be annoying, but it's dishonest > to call it "censorship". > > I do it to avoid going around and around with someone, after I have > made my point. It's very fair - they get the last word, and I don't > have to read it. > -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-05 14:53 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <upa1ud53c6hglm90h52qomdogsn74h6e6r@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #475390 |
chrisv wrote: >I'm sure that my "snipped, unread" can be annoying, but it's dishonest >to call it "censorship". > >I do it to avoid going around and around with someone, after I have >made my point. It's very fair - they get the last word, and I don't >have to read it. Oh, and I am aware that shitty lying bastards, fsckwits trying to save face, take great pleasure in claiming that I "lie" and really read the messages. That's trolling 101, and there's nothing that I can do, about that. -- "Oh, they read all the posts. They are just too lame to conjure up a response." - some piece of shit that calls itself "GreyCloud"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 9 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web