Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #366692 > unrolled thread

Snit is a RACIST

Started by"Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid>
First post2016-08-25 15:52 +0000
Last post2016-08-26 18:51 +0000
Articles 20 on this page of 97 — 6 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy


Contents

  Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 15:52 +0000
    Re: Snit is a RACIST Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 12:36 -0400
      Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 09:57 -0700
        Re: Snit is a RACIST Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 10:07 -0700
          Re: Snit is a RACIST GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 14:18 -0600
        Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 17:15 +0000
          Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 10:31 -0700
            Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 17:42 +0000
              Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 11:00 -0700
                Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 18:43 +0000
                  Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 11:50 -0700
                    Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 19:24 +0000
                      Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 12:38 -0700
                        Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:03 +0000
                          Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:06 -0700
                            Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:14 +0000
                              Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:19 -0700
                                Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:30 +0000
                                  Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:38 -0700
                                    Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:48 +0000
                                      Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:59 -0700
              Re: Snit is a RACIST Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 11:20 -0700
                Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 19:02 +0000
                  Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 12:14 -0700
                    Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 19:32 +0000
                      Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 12:42 -0700
                        Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:00 +0000
                          Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:03 -0700
                            Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:18 +0000
                              Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:26 -0700
                                Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:34 +0000
                                  Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:40 -0700
                                    Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 21:09 +0000
                                      Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 14:11 -0700
                    Re: Snit is a RACIST GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2016-08-25 18:19 -0600
                      Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:21 -0700
                  Re: Snit is a RACIST Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-25 12:29 -0700
                    Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:12 +0000
                      Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:18 -0700
                        Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 20:26 +0000
                          Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:38 -0700
                            Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 21:10 +0000
                              Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 14:14 -0700
                              Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 14:15 -0700
                              Re: Snit is a RACIST Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 17:33 -0400
                                Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 14:38 -0700
                                  Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 22:00 +0000
                                    Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 15:06 -0700
                                      Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 22:38 +0000
                                        Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:34 -0700
                                          Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 01:20 +0000
                                            Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 18:24 -0700
                                              Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 01:52 +0000
                                                Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 19:00 -0700
                                                  Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 02:26 +0000
                                                    Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 19:50 -0700
                                                      Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 03:06 +0000
                                                        Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 20:32 -0700
                                                    Re: Snit is a RACIST Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 08:16 -0400
                                                      Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 07:45 -0700
                                            Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 19:03 -0700
                                              Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 02:27 +0000
                                                Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 19:50 -0700
                                    Re: Snit is a RACIST Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-25 18:29 -0400
                                      Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:35 -0700
                                Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 21:53 +0000
                                  Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 15:07 -0700
                                    Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 22:19 +0000
                                      Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 15:25 -0700
                                        Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-25 22:34 +0000
                                          Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 17:31 -0700
                  An example Owl asked for 7 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:33 -0700
    Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 10:38 -0700
    An example Owl asked for 6 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-25 13:32 -0700
    Re: Snit is a RACIST Incubus <incubus9536612@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 01:55 -0700
      Re: Snit is a RACIST Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 08:26 -0400
      Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 13:29 +0000
        Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 07:52 -0700
      Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 07:46 -0700
        Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 15:05 +0000
          Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:17 -0700
            Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 15:29 +0000
              Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 08:45 -0700
                Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 16:04 +0000
                  Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 09:12 -0700
                    Re: Snit is a RACIST Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 09:22 -0700
                    Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 16:23 +0000
                      Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 10:06 -0700
                        Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 17:39 +0000
                Re: Snit is a RACIST Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 09:07 -0700
                  Re: Snit is a RACIST Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:04 -0400
                    Re: Snit is a RACIST Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2016-08-26 10:10 -0700
                      Re: Snit is a RACIST Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2016-08-26 10:27 -0700
                    Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 17:10 +0000
                      Re: Snit is a RACIST Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-08-26 13:30 -0400
                      Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 17:44 +0000
                        Re: Snit is a RACIST "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-08-26 18:51 +0000

Page 1 of 5  [1] 2 3 4 5  Next page →


#366692 — Snit is a RACIST

From"Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid>
Date2016-08-25 15:52 +0000
SubjectSnit is a RACIST
Message-ID<fhjadfo3.38p8@perch.invalid>
In a debate about racism, Snit (a white man) said this to me (a white man):

   "Boo hoo for you feeling like you are not getting what you think you are
   entitled to."

In response, I asked him a simple Yes or No question:

   "Would you say that to a black man?"

Not surprisingly, Snit tap-danced, spewing a multitude of irrelevant blah
blah blah posts, never answering the question.  (He will likely do the
same in reply to this post).  Snit is AFRAID to answer that question,
because it would expose his HATEFUL ANTI-WHITE RACISM.

Now of course there a many liberal whites who go overboard with their
compassion for minorities and are quick to take up the banner for
every Social Justice cause du jour, but while searching for some good
insult material as I sparred with Snit in that thread, I stumbled
across something disturbing, which now leads me to ask the following: 

Is Snit just your typical white liberal obsessed with "white guilt"
or is something more sinister at work?

http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/ashkenazi-jews-are-not-white-response-to-haaretz-article/
<quote>
   Every time I read about a Jew somewhere identifying as a white person,
   I cringe. As an Israeli Jew, who like most other Israeli Jews,
   is completely foreign to the concept of Jews being “white” I
   would like to address this article to my Jewish brothers and sisters
   in America.

   Ashkenazi Jews who identify as “white”, please understand the
   following:
   ...
</quote>

So now we know why Snit HATES WHITE PEOPLE.  To him, WHITES are "OTHERS,"
so he is perfectly comfortable with DEMONIZING them.  He is a RACIST.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#366716

FromSilver Slimer <.m@nsn.s>
Date2016-08-25 12:36 -0400
Message-ID<npn6pk$7k7$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#366692
On 2016-08-25 11:52 AM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote:
> In a debate about racism, Snit (a white man) said this to me (a white man):
>
>    "Boo hoo for you feeling like you are not getting what you think you are
>    entitled to."

It's the current trend in liberal stupidity; shaming white males for 
their "privilege."

> In response, I asked him a simple Yes or No question:
>
>    "Would you say that to a black man?"
>
> Not surprisingly, Snit tap-danced, spewing a multitude of irrelevant blah
> blah blah posts, never answering the question.  (He will likely do the
> same in reply to this post).  Snit is AFRAID to answer that question,
> because it would expose his HATEFUL ANTI-WHITE RACISM.
>
> Now of course there a many liberal whites who go overboard with their
> compassion for minorities and are quick to take up the banner for
> every Social Justice cause du jour, but while searching for some good
> insult material as I sparred with Snit in that thread, I stumbled
> across something disturbing, which now leads me to ask the following:
>
> Is Snit just your typical white liberal obsessed with "white guilt"
> or is something more sinister at work?
>
> http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/ashkenazi-jews-are-not-white-response-to-haaretz-article/
> <quote>
>    Every time I read about a Jew somewhere identifying as a white person,
>    I cringe. As an Israeli Jew, who like most other Israeli Jews,
>    is completely foreign to the concept of Jews being “white” I
>    would like to address this article to my Jewish brothers and sisters
>    in America.
>
>    Ashkenazi Jews who identify as “white”, please understand the
>    following:
>    ...
> </quote>
>
> So now we know why Snit HATES WHITE PEOPLE.  To him, WHITES are "OTHERS,"
> so he is perfectly comfortable with DEMONIZING them.  He is a RACIST.

All I can say to anyone who would believe that I am "privileged" for 
being a white male is that I had to work extra had from adolescence on 
to prove myself as a result of a skin issue which, in the eyes of 
employers, lowered what they saw as my initial value. Add to that the 
fact that not one of my ancestors has ever done a thing to negroes or 
even benefited from slavery and I can proudly dismiss myself from any 
abuse caused by their belief that I am "privileged." My family also 
struggled much in the same way theirs do as I grew up... Hell, my 
parents lived in Communism with no hope of ever escaping from it so if 
anything, we've had it a lot worse than they have.

-- 
Silver Slimer

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#366729

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2016-08-25 09:57 -0700
Message-ID<D3E47195.7A15D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#366716
On 8/25/16, 9:36 AM, in article npn6pk$7k7$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer"
<.m@nsn.s> wrote:

> On 2016-08-25 11:52 AM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote:
>> In a debate about racism, Snit (a white man) said this to me (a white man):
>> 
>>    "Boo hoo for you feeling like you are not getting what you think you are
>>    entitled to."
> 
> It's the current trend in liberal stupidity; shaming white males for
> their "privilege."

I was speaking of his comments that EQUALITY is not enough for him... that
he deserves more than others. So keep in mind that he is lying about the
context of what was said.

>> In response, I asked him a simple Yes or No question:
>> 
>>    "Would you say that to a black man?"

Of which I noted I would not walk up to any random black man and say such a
thing, just as I would not to any random white man, but I would to ANYONE,
of any color, who said that EQUALITY was somehow unfair to them and showed a
sense of entitlement and privilege.

ANYONE. Male. Female. White. Black. Christian. Muslim. Atheist.

Anyone.

Equality.

And how does Owl respond to being treated as an EQUAL:

>> Not surprisingly, Snit tap-danced, spewing a multitude of irrelevant blah
>> blah blah posts, never answering the question.  (He will likely do the
>> same in reply to this post).  Snit is AFRAID to answer that question,
>> because it would expose his HATEFUL ANTI-WHITE RACISM.

That is right... the fact I would treat people equally, no matter their
race, is deemed by Owl to show "HATEFUL ANTI-WHITE RACISM."

To not give white special entitlements is, to Owl, a sign of "HATEFUL
ANTI-WHITE RACISM."

That is reprehensible.

>> Now of course there a many liberal whites who go overboard with their
>> compassion for minorities and are quick to take up the banner for
>> every Social Justice cause du jour, but while searching for some good
>> insult material as I sparred with Snit in that thread, I stumbled
>> across something disturbing, which now leads me to ask the following:
>> 
>> Is Snit just your typical white liberal obsessed with "white guilt"

Remember: I speak of equality and Owl thinks in terms of "white guilt."

Wow.

It is mind boggling!

>> or is something more sinister at work?
>> 
>> http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/ashkenazi-jews-are-not-white-response-to-haare
>> tz-article/
>> <quote>
>>    Every time I read about a Jew somewhere identifying as a white person,
>>    I cringe. As an Israeli Jew, who like most other Israeli Jews,
>>    is completely foreign to the concept of Jews being ³white² I
>>    would like to address this article to my Jewish brothers and sisters
>>    in America.
>> 
>>    Ashkenazi Jews who identify as ³white², please understand the
>>    following:
>>    ...
>> </quote>
>> 
>> So now we know why Snit HATES WHITE PEOPLE.

The evidence of hatred is I want equality.

The sense of privilege and entitlement Owl is showing with this is extreme
and offensive. 

Equality, to him, equals hatred of whites.

>> To him, WHITES are "OTHERS,"
>> so he is perfectly comfortable with DEMONIZING them.  He is a RACIST.
> 
> All I can say to anyone who would believe that I am "privileged" for
> being a white male is that I had to work extra had from adolescence on
> to prove myself as a result of a skin issue which, in the eyes of
> employers, lowered what they saw as my initial value.

This is not even relevant to the idea of racism. To pretend the races are
treated equally in the US, though, is absurd.

> Add to that the fact that not one of my ancestors has ever done a thing to
> negroes or even benefited from slavery and I can proudly dismiss myself from
> any abuse caused by their belief that I am "privileged."

The two are not even related.

> My family also struggled much in the same way theirs do as I grew up... Hell,
> my parents lived in Communism with no hope of ever escaping from it so if
> anything, we've had it a lot worse than they have.

Again, not related to racism in the US.

But keep in mind Owl is talking about how EQUALITY is not good enough for
him... equality, to him, is anti-white.

Can you find ANYONE saying that about being black... that they would find
equality, however they define it, as not being enough?

-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#366735

FromSteve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
Date2016-08-25 10:07 -0700
Message-ID<5784ee2b-ea5f-46ad-8c8c-a686303f547c@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#366729
On Thursday, August 25, 2016 at 10:57:52 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
> On 8/25/16, 9:36 AM, in article npn6pk$7k7$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer"
> <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
> 
> > On 2016-08-25 11:52 AM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote:
> >> In a debate about racism, Snit (a white man) said this to me (a white man):
> >> 
> >>    "Boo hoo for you feeling like you are not getting what you think you are
> >>    entitled to."
> > 
> > It's the current trend in liberal stupidity; shaming white males for
> > their "privilege."
> 
> I was speaking of his comments that EQUALITY is not enough for him... that
> he deserves more than others. So keep in mind that he is lying about the
> context of what was said.
> 
> >> In response, I asked him a simple Yes or No question:
> >> 
> >>    "Would you say that to a black man?"
> 
> Of which I noted I would not walk up to any random black man and say such a
> thing, just as I would not to any random white man, but I would to ANYONE,
> of any color, who said that EQUALITY was somehow unfair to them and showed a
> sense of entitlement and privilege.
> 
> ANYONE. Male. Female. White. Black. Christian. Muslim. Atheist.
> 
> Anyone.
> 
> Equality.
> 
> And how does Owl respond to being treated as an EQUAL:
> 
> >> Not surprisingly, Snit tap-danced, spewing a multitude of irrelevant blah
> >> blah blah posts, never answering the question.  (He will likely do the
> >> same in reply to this post).  Snit is AFRAID to answer that question,
> >> because it would expose his HATEFUL ANTI-WHITE RACISM.
> 
> That is right... the fact I would treat people equally, no matter their
> race, is deemed by Owl to show "HATEFUL ANTI-WHITE RACISM."
> 
> To not give white special entitlements is, to Owl, a sign of "HATEFUL
> ANTI-WHITE RACISM."
> 
> That is reprehensible.
> 
> >> Now of course there a many liberal whites who go overboard with their
> >> compassion for minorities and are quick to take up the banner for
> >> every Social Justice cause du jour, but while searching for some good
> >> insult material as I sparred with Snit in that thread, I stumbled
> >> across something disturbing, which now leads me to ask the following:
> >> 
> >> Is Snit just your typical white liberal obsessed with "white guilt"
> 
> Remember: I speak of equality and Owl thinks in terms of "white guilt."
> 
> Wow.
> 
> It is mind boggling!
> 
> >> or is something more sinister at work?
> >> 
> >> http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/ashkenazi-jews-are-not-white-response-to-haare
> >> tz-article/
> >> <quote>
> >>    Every time I read about a Jew somewhere identifying as a white person,
> >>    I cringe. As an Israeli Jew, who like most other Israeli Jews,
> >>    is completely foreign to the concept of Jews being ³white² I
> >>    would like to address this article to my Jewish brothers and sisters
> >>    in America.
> >> 
> >>    Ashkenazi Jews who identify as ³white², please understand the
> >>    following:
> >>    ...
> >> </quote>
> >> 
> >> So now we know why Snit HATES WHITE PEOPLE.
> 
> The evidence of hatred is I want equality.
> 
> The sense of privilege and entitlement Owl is showing with this is extreme
> and offensive. 
> 
> Equality, to him, equals hatred of whites.
> 
> >> To him, WHITES are "OTHERS,"
> >> so he is perfectly comfortable with DEMONIZING them.  He is a RACIST.
> > 
> > All I can say to anyone who would believe that I am "privileged" for
> > being a white male is that I had to work extra had from adolescence on
> > to prove myself as a result of a skin issue which, in the eyes of
> > employers, lowered what they saw as my initial value.
> 
> This is not even relevant to the idea of racism. To pretend the races are
> treated equally in the US, though, is absurd.
> 
> > Add to that the fact that not one of my ancestors has ever done a thing to
> > negroes or even benefited from slavery and I can proudly dismiss myself from
> > any abuse caused by their belief that I am "privileged."
> 
> The two are not even related.
> 
> > My family also struggled much in the same way theirs do as I grew up... Hell,
> > my parents lived in Communism with no hope of ever escaping from it so if
> > anything, we've had it a lot worse than they have.
> 
> Again, not related to racism in the US.
> 
> But keep in mind Owl is talking about how EQUALITY is not good enough for
> him... equality, to him, is anti-white.
> 
> Can you find ANYONE saying that about being black... that they would find
> equality, however they define it, as not being enough?


All I see is you talking about "Owl" a LOT. The topic? Not so much. Of course, we're all supposed to be as stupid as you need us to be so as not to have spotted it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#366810

FromGreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com>
Date2016-08-25 14:18 -0600
Message-ID<npnjqi$l0v$6@dont-email.me>
In reply to#366735
Steve Carroll wrote:

> 
> 
> All I see is you talking about "Owl" a LOT. The topic? Not so much. Of
> course, we're all supposed to be as stupid as you need us to be so as not
> to have spotted it.

LOL!!!  I thought he voted for hope and change, yet he's never changed.

-- 
My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#366737

From"Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid>
Date2016-08-25 17:15 +0000
Message-ID<hgjdsau83.aiu@perch.invalid>
In reply to#366729
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 8/25/16, 9:36 AM, in article npn6pk$7k7$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer"
> <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
> 
>> On 2016-08-25 11:52 AM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote:
>>> In a debate about racism, Snit (a white man) said this to me (a white man):
>>> 
>>>    "Boo hoo for you feeling like you are not getting what you think you are
>>>    entitled to."
>> 
>> It's the current trend in liberal stupidity; shaming white males for
>> their "privilege."
> 
> I was speaking of his comments that EQUALITY is not enough for him... that
> he deserves more than others. So keep in mind that he is lying about the
> context of what was said.
> 
>>> In response, I asked him a simple Yes or No question:
>>> 
>>>    "Would you say that to a black man?"
> 
> Of which I noted I would not walk up to any random black man and say such a
> thing, just as I would not to any random white man, but I would to ANYONE,
> of any color, who said that EQUALITY was somehow unfair to them and showed a
> sense of entitlement and privilege.
>

Then you should be able to quote, with Message-ID, the post where you
said that.  I don't remember seeing you say any such thing in that thread,
and in fact, when I stated that my suspicion is that your answer would
be "No, you would not say that," you called me a liar.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#366742

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2016-08-25 10:31 -0700
Message-ID<D3E4798E.7A18D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#366737
On 8/25/16, 10:15 AM, in article hgjdsau83.aiu@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:

> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> On 8/25/16, 9:36 AM, in article npn6pk$7k7$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer"
>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 2016-08-25 11:52 AM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote:
>>>> In a debate about racism, Snit (a white man) said this to me (a white man):
>>>> 
>>>>    "Boo hoo for you feeling like you are not getting what you think you are
>>>>    entitled to."
>>> 
>>> It's the current trend in liberal stupidity; shaming white males for
>>> their "privilege."
>> 
>> I was speaking of his comments that EQUALITY is not enough for him... that
>> he deserves more than others. So keep in mind that he is lying about the
>> context of what was said.
>> 
>>>> In response, I asked him a simple Yes or No question:
>>>> 
>>>>    "Would you say that to a black man?"
>> 
>> Of which I noted I would not walk up to any random black man and say such a
>> thing, just as I would not to any random white man, but I would to ANYONE,
>> of any color, who said that EQUALITY was somehow unfair to them and showed a
>> sense of entitlement and privilege.
> 
> Then you should be able to quote, with Message-ID, the post where you
> said that. 

The above is not a quote of what I said but a paraphrase. I pasted it to
multiple times!
    -----
    ... ANYONE who says that simply supporting equality shows you
    are racist against them is being absurd and showing a sense of
    entitlement and privilege.
    -----

You complain I copy and paste the same content... but you refuse to read it
ANY of the times it is shown to you as you pretend I never said it.

Why?

> I don't remember seeing you say any such thing in that thread, and in fact,
> when I stated that my suspicion is that your answer would be "No, you would
> not say that," you called me a liar.

Right: I directly told you I would treat ANYONE who said such an insane
thing the same way you LIED and said I would not do so.

Again: ANYONE who acts as you do and says that EQUALITY is somehow unfair to
them is showing an absurd sense of entitlement and privilege. ANYONE. Black,
white, green, or purple. Does not matter.

Does not mean we will all agree on what it takes and means to have equality
-- given the historic realities and the impacts of that history there can be
reasoned disagreement as to how to go forward to get the closest to true
equality -- but the very idea of equality was repeatedly deemed by you to to
not be enough. You want more.

You keep asking me to show this... but above you show it AGAIN! You
repeatedly insist my call for EQUALITY shows white guilt and white hatred
and on and on and on.

That is just insane.





-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#366747

From"Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid>
Date2016-08-25 17:42 +0000
Message-ID<fhgvcmksdif83.s@perch.invalid>
In reply to#366742
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 8/25/16, 10:15 AM, in article hgjdsau83.aiu@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 8/25/16, 9:36 AM, in article npn6pk$7k7$1@dont-email.me, "Silver Slimer"
>>> <.m@nsn.s> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 2016-08-25 11:52 AM, Octavian W. Lagrange wrote:
>>>>> In a debate about racism, Snit (a white man) said this to me (a white man):
>>>>> 
>>>>>    "Boo hoo for you feeling like you are not getting what you think you are
>>>>>    entitled to."
>>>> 
>>>> It's the current trend in liberal stupidity; shaming white males for
>>>> their "privilege."
>>> 
>>> I was speaking of his comments that EQUALITY is not enough for him... that
>>> he deserves more than others. So keep in mind that he is lying about the
>>> context of what was said.
>>> 
>>>>> In response, I asked him a simple Yes or No question:
>>>>> 
>>>>>    "Would you say that to a black man?"
>>> 
>>> Of which I noted I would not walk up to any random black man and say such a
>>> thing, just as I would not to any random white man, but I would to ANYONE,
>>> of any color, who said that EQUALITY was somehow unfair to them and showed a
>>> sense of entitlement and privilege.
>> 
>> Then you should be able to quote, with Message-ID, the post where you
>> said that. 
> 
> The above is not a quote of what I said but a paraphrase. I pasted it to
> multiple times!


The above is definitely not a paraphrase of these weasel words:

>     -----
>     ... ANYONE who says that simply supporting equality shows you
>     are racist against them is being absurd and showing a sense of
>     entitlement and privilege.
>     -----
> 

Where exactly in that do you say, or even imply, that you would

   "not walk up to any random black man and say such a thing, just as
   I would not to any random white man, but I would to ANYONE, of any
   color, who said that EQUALITY was somehow unfair to them and showed
   a sense of entitlement and privilege."

You never said any such thing, which is why you cannot find a quote from
any post of yours saying anything remotely like that.

> You complain I copy and paste the same content... but you refuse to read it
> ANY of the times it is shown to you as you pretend I never said it.
> 
> Why?
> 

Because what you posted, and reposted, was not an answer.  It was a dodge.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#366755

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2016-08-25 11:00 -0700
Message-ID<D3E48052.7A1A8%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#366747
On 8/25/16, 10:42 AM, in article fhgvcmksdif83.s@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:

...
>>>>>> In response, I asked him a simple Yes or No question:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>    "Would you say that to a black man?"
>>>> 
>>>> Of which I noted I would not walk up to any random black man and say such a
>>>> thing, just as I would not to any random white man, but I would to ANYONE,
>>>> of any color, who said that EQUALITY was somehow unfair to them and showed
>>>> >>>> a sense of entitlement and privilege.
>>> 
>>> Then you should be able to quote, with Message-ID, the post where you
>>> said that. 
>> 
>> The above is not a quote of what I said but a paraphrase. I pasted it to
>> multiple times!
> 
> The above is definitely not a paraphrase of these weasel words:

Nothing weasely about directly telling you I would not ANYONE who shared
your gross sense of entitlement and privilege was wrong. ANYONE.

>>     -----
>>     ... ANYONE who says that simply supporting equality shows you
>>     are racist against them is being absurd and showing a sense of
>>     entitlement and privilege.
>>     -----
>> 
> 
> Where exactly in that do you say, or even imply, that you would
> 
>    "not walk up to any random black man and say such a thing, just as
>    I would not to any random white man, but I would to ANYONE, of any
>    color, who said that EQUALITY was somehow unfair to them and showed
>    a sense of entitlement and privilege."
> 
> You never said any such thing, which is why you cannot find a quote from
> any post of yours saying anything remotely like that.

I would say it to ANYONE who showed your sense of entitlement and privilege.
ANYONE.

You kept pushing to have me say yes or no to if I would say it to a black
man... which is insane. I would not say it to any random black, white,
green, or purple person. I would only say it to people who showed the sense
of entitlement and privilege YOU are showing. ANYONE. Again, color is
irrelevant... your sense of entitlement and privilege is what is I am
responding to.

But you AGAIN deemed my treating ANYONE who did so the same as somehow being
racist against whites.

Not racism against blacks or Mexicans or Chinese or anyone else but whites.

Do you not see how this shows, unequivocally, that you hold your own group
as deserving of entitlement and privilege you deny to others?

>> You complain I copy and paste the same content... but you refuse to read it
>> ANY of the times it is shown to you as you pretend I never said it.
>> 
>> Why?
> 
> Because what you posted, and reposted, was not an answer.  It was a dodge.

I noted very clear, and even wrote in all caps, I would treat "ANYONE" who
acted as you did and showed such a sense of entitlement and privilege the
same. ANYONE.

You deemed that a sign of racism against whites... and directly lied about
my views, saying I would not say the same thing to a black person who showed
your sense of entitlement and privilege.


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#366771

From"Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid>
Date2016-08-25 18:43 +0000
Message-ID<hjgksdi83.a@perch.invalid>
In reply to#366755
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 8/25/16, 10:42 AM, in article fhgvcmksdif83.s@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
> 
> ...
>>>>>>> In response, I asked him a simple Yes or No question:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>    "Would you say that to a black man?"
>>>>> 
>>>>> Of which I noted I would not walk up to any random black man and say such a
>>>>> thing, just as I would not to any random white man, but I would to ANYONE,
>>>>> of any color, who said that EQUALITY was somehow unfair to them and showed
>>>>> >>>> a sense of entitlement and privilege.
>>>> 
>>>> Then you should be able to quote, with Message-ID, the post where you
>>>> said that. 
>>> 
>>> The above is not a quote of what I said but a paraphrase. I pasted it to
>>> multiple times!
>> 
>> The above is definitely not a paraphrase of these weasel words:
> 
> Nothing weasely about directly telling you I would not ANYONE who shared
> your gross sense of entitlement and privilege was wrong. ANYONE.
> 

You just claimed that in the earlier thread you "noted I would not walk up
to any random black man and say such a thing...."  You never said any
such thing before just now.


>>>     -----
>>>     ... ANYONE who says that simply supporting equality shows you
>>>     are racist against them is being absurd and showing a sense of
>>>     entitlement and privilege.
>>>     -----
>>> 
>> 
>> Where exactly in that do you say, or even imply, that you would
>> 
>>    "not walk up to any random black man and say such a thing, just as
>>    I would not to any random white man, but I would to ANYONE, of any
>>    color, who said that EQUALITY was somehow unfair to them and showed
>>    a sense of entitlement and privilege."
>> 
>> You never said any such thing, which is why you cannot find a quote from
>> any post of yours saying anything remotely like that.
> 
> I would say it to ANYONE who showed your sense of entitlement and privilege.
> ANYONE.
> 

Again, you dodge.  I am addressing the claim you just made about what
you had supposedly said in the other thread -- your so-called "answer"
to my question, "Would you say that to a black man?"  The "answer" you
gave then, over and over in multiple reposts, and what you now claim
you said, are two different things, which is why you cannot produce a
quote of yourself saying any such thing in the other thread. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#366775

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2016-08-25 11:50 -0700
Message-ID<D3E48C19.7A1DD%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#366771
On 8/25/16, 11:43 AM, in article hjgksdi83.a@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:

> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> On 8/25/16, 10:42 AM, in article fhgvcmksdif83.s@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>> ...
>>>>>>>> In response, I asked him a simple Yes or No question:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>    "Would you say that to a black man?"
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Of which I noted I would not walk up to any random black man and say such
>>>>>> >>>>>> a thing, just as I would not to any random white man, but I would
>>>>>> to ANYONE, of any color, who said that EQUALITY was somehow unfair to
>>>>>> them and showed a sense of entitlement and privilege.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> Then you should be able to quote, with Message-ID, the post where you said
>>>>> that.
>>>>> 
>>>> The above is not a quote of what I said but a paraphrase. I pasted it to
>>>> multiple times!
>>> 
>>> The above is definitely not a paraphrase of these weasel words:
>> 
>> Nothing weasely about directly telling you I would not ANYONE who shared
>> your gross sense of entitlement and privilege was wrong. ANYONE.
> 
> You just claimed that in the earlier thread you "noted I would not walk up
> to any random black man and say such a thing...."  You never said any
> such thing before just now.

I said I would not say so and you whined on and on and on and on showing you
felt entitled to getting a yes or no answer to your false dichotomy (your
sense of entitlement keeps coming up)!

I made it very clear I would tell ANYONE (I even capitalized the word!) who
shared your sense of entitlement and privilege that I disagreed.

You deemed this a sign I was racist against whites. You even named this
thread after this accusation of yours.

But we have covered this now about a dozen times. Why can't you move
forward? 

>>>>     -----
>>>>     ... ANYONE who says that simply supporting equality shows you
>>>>     are racist against them is being absurd and showing a sense of
>>>>     entitlement and privilege.
>>>>     -----
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Where exactly in that do you say, or even imply, that you would
>>> 
>>>    "not walk up to any random black man and say such a thing, just as
>>>    I would not to any random white man, but I would to ANYONE, of any
>>>    color, who said that EQUALITY was somehow unfair to them and showed
>>>    a sense of entitlement and privilege."
>>> 
>>> You never said any such thing, which is why you cannot find a quote from
>>> any post of yours saying anything remotely like that.
>> 
>> I would say it to ANYONE who showed your sense of entitlement and privilege.
>> ANYONE.
> 
> Again, you dodge.

Nope. I would say the same thing to ANYONE who showed your sense of
entitlement and privilege... and you deem that racist against you.

But this has been covered over and over and over and over and over and over.
I am a very patient person in such debates and you are pushing even my
patience on this. I mean, really, your repetition of your same nonsense is
getting old.

All comes down to you think equality is somehow unfair to you... which shows
your sense of entitlement and privilege. Why try to make it more complex
than that? Why try to bring in a million side issues? Why keep moving goal
posts? Seems you are ashamed of your own sense of entitlement and privilege.
If so then even you know it is wrong... and that is good. You can work
toward changing it.

> I am addressing the claim you just made about what you had supposedly said in
> the other thread -- your so-called "answer" to my question, "Would you say
> that to a black man?"  The "answer" you gave then, over and over in multiple
> reposts, and what you now claim you said, are two different things, which is
> why you cannot produce a quote of yourself saying any such thing in the other
> thread.

See above.



-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#366786

From"Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid>
Date2016-08-25 19:24 +0000
Message-ID<hgjdsau93.au4@perch.invalid>
In reply to#366775
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 8/25/16, 11:43 AM, in article hjgksdi83.a@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 8/25/16, 10:42 AM, in article fhgvcmksdif83.s@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>> 
>>> ...


> 
> But we have covered this now about a dozen times. Why can't you move
> forward? 
> 

IOW, let's just forget your lies.


>>> I would say it to ANYONE who showed your sense of entitlement and privilege.
>>> ANYONE.
>> 
>> Again, you dodge.
> 
> Nope. I would say the same thing to ANYONE who showed your sense of
> entitlement and privilege... and you deem that racist against you.
> 

You say that now, but you never said it before, yet you claim that
you said it repeatedly.  What you did repeatedly was refuse to answer.

There are plenty of blacks who display a "sense of entitlement
and privilege" in the form of Affirmative Action and "reparations."
Would you say it to them?

What do you say to all the non-whites who are shown on video happy
to sign a petition calling for a "tax on white people" to help
smooth over racial tensions?
Would you say it to them?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#366789

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2016-08-25 12:38 -0700
Message-ID<D3E49747.7A1F8%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#366786
On 8/25/16, 12:24 PM, in article hgjdsau93.au4@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:

... 
>> But we have covered this now about a dozen times. Why can't you move
>> forward? 
> 
> IOW, let's just forget your lies.

All the unquotable lies. Yes, forget them being that they do not exist.
Please!

Meanwhile let us focus on the actual issue here: you claim EQUALITY is
somehow unfair to you... which shows your sense of entitlement and
privilege. Why try to make it more complex than that? Why try to bring in a
million side issues? Why keep moving goal posts? Seems you are ashamed of
your own sense of entitlement and privilege. If so then even you know it is
wrong... and that is good. You can work toward changing it.

And below you just spout nonsense and work to change the topic. Not biting.

>>>> I would say it to ANYONE who showed your sense of entitlement and
>>>> privilege.
>>>> ANYONE.
>>> 
>>> Again, you dodge.
>> 
>> Nope. I would say the same thing to ANYONE who showed your sense of
>> entitlement and privilege... and you deem that racist against you.
> 
> You say that now, but you never said it before, yet you claim that
> you said it repeatedly.  What you did repeatedly was refuse to answer.
> 
> There are plenty of blacks who display a "sense of entitlement
> and privilege" in the form of Affirmative Action and "reparations."
> Would you say it to them?
> 
> What do you say to all the non-whites who are shown on video happy
> to sign a petition calling for a "tax on white people" to help
> smooth over racial tensions?
> Would you say it to them?
> 



-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#366797

From"Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid>
Date2016-08-25 20:03 +0000
Message-ID<hgu03raf.hg3@perch.invalid>
In reply to#366789
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 8/25/16, 12:24 PM, in article hgjdsau93.au4@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
> 
> ... 
>>> But we have covered this now about a dozen times. Why can't you move
>>> forward? 
>> 
>> IOW, let's just forget your lies.
> 
> All the unquotable lies. Yes, forget them being that they do not exist.
> Please!
> 

Message-ID: <D3E47195.7A15D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
<quote>
Of which I noted I would not walk up to any random black man and say such a
thing, just as I would not to any random white man, but I would to ANYONE,
of any color, who said that EQUALITY was somehow unfair to them and showed a
sense of entitlement and privilege.
</quote>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#366801

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2016-08-25 13:06 -0700
Message-ID<D3E49DC8.7A20D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#366797
On 8/25/16, 1:03 PM, in article hgu03raf.hg3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:

> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> On 8/25/16, 12:24 PM, in article hgjdsau93.au4@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>> ... 
>>>> But we have covered this now about a dozen times. Why can't you move
>>>> forward? 
>>> 
>>> IOW, let's just forget your lies.
>> 
>> All the unquotable lies. Yes, forget them being that they do not exist.
>> Please!
>> 
> 
> Message-ID: <D3E47195.7A15D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
> <quote>
> Of which I noted I would not walk up to any random black man and say such a
> thing, just as I would not to any random white man, but I would to ANYONE,
> of any color, who said that EQUALITY was somehow unfair to them and showed a
> sense of entitlement and privilege.
> </quote>
> 
And then you called me a RACIST for that! You insisted to not give YOU more
than others was unfair to you.

All comes down to you think equality is somehow unfair to you... which shows
your sense of entitlement and privilege. Why try to make it more complex
than that? Why try to bring in a million side issues? Why keep moving goal
posts? Seems you are ashamed of your own sense of entitlement and privilege.
If so then even you know it is wrong... and that is good. You can work
toward changing it.


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#366805

From"Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid>
Date2016-08-25 20:14 +0000
Message-ID<hgjviu03a.f@perch.invalid>
In reply to#366801
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 8/25/16, 1:03 PM, in article hgu03raf.hg3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 8/25/16, 12:24 PM, in article hgjdsau93.au4@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>> 
>>> ... 
>>>>> But we have covered this now about a dozen times. Why can't you move
>>>>> forward? 
>>>> 
>>>> IOW, let's just forget your lies.
>>> 
>>> All the unquotable lies. Yes, forget them being that they do not exist.
>>> Please!
>>> 
>> 
>> Message-ID: <D3E47195.7A15D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
>> <quote>
>> Of which I noted I would not walk up to any random black man and say such a
>> thing, just as I would not to any random white man, but I would to ANYONE,
>> of any color, who said that EQUALITY was somehow unfair to them and showed a
>> sense of entitlement and privilege.
>> </quote>
>> 
> And then you called me a RACIST for that!

No, I called you a LIAR for that.  I called you a RACIST for you other
bigoted spew.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#366813

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2016-08-25 13:19 -0700
Message-ID<D3E4A0DF.7A21C%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#366805
On 8/25/16, 1:14 PM, in article hgjviu03a.f@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:

> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> On 8/25/16, 1:03 PM, in article hgu03raf.hg3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>> On 8/25/16, 12:24 PM, in article hgjdsau93.au4@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> ... 
>>>>>> But we have covered this now about a dozen times. Why can't you move
>>>>>> forward? 
>>>>> 
>>>>> IOW, let's just forget your lies.
>>>> 
>>>> All the unquotable lies. Yes, forget them being that they do not exist.
>>>> Please!
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Message-ID: <D3E47195.7A15D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
>>> <quote>
>>> Of which I noted I would not walk up to any random black man and say such a
>>> thing, just as I would not to any random white man, but I would to ANYONE,
>>> of any color, who said that EQUALITY was somehow unfair to them and showed a
>>> sense of entitlement and privilege.
>>> </quote>
>>> 
>> And then you called me a RACIST for that!
> 
> No, I called you a LIAR for that.

A liar for backing equality. Wow.

> I called you a RACIST for you other bigoted spew.

All comes down to you think equality is somehow unfair to you... which shows
your sense of entitlement and privilege. Why try to make it more complex
than that? Why try to bring in a million side issues? Why keep moving goal
posts? Seems you are ashamed of your own sense of entitlement and privilege.
If so then even you know it is wrong... and that is good. You can work
toward changing it.


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#366819

From"Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid>
Date2016-08-25 20:30 +0000
Message-ID<afhjdfuv939.a3@perch.invalid>
In reply to#366813
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 8/25/16, 1:14 PM, in article hgjviu03a.f@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 8/25/16, 1:03 PM, in article hgu03raf.hg3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 8/25/16, 12:24 PM, in article hgjdsau93.au4@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> ... 
>>>>>>> But we have covered this now about a dozen times. Why can't you move
>>>>>>> forward? 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> IOW, let's just forget your lies.
>>>>> 
>>>>> All the unquotable lies. Yes, forget them being that they do not exist.
>>>>> Please!
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Message-ID: <D3E47195.7A15D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
>>>> <quote>
>>>> Of which I noted I would not walk up to any random black man and say such a
>>>> thing, just as I would not to any random white man, but I would to ANYONE,
>>>> of any color, who said that EQUALITY was somehow unfair to them and showed a
>>>> sense of entitlement and privilege.
>>>> </quote>
>>>> 
>>> And then you called me a RACIST for that!
>> 
>> No, I called you a LIAR for that.
> 
> A liar for backing equality. Wow.
> 

No, dumbass, a LIAR for claiming that you said those things.
Feel free to post a link to where you said any such thing
as I quote above, prior to that post, in answer to my question.


>> I called you a RACIST for you other bigoted spew.
> 
> All comes down to you think equality is somehow unfair to you...

Something completely contrived on your part, and for which you
can find NO quote from me saying anything remotely like that.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#366830

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2016-08-25 13:38 -0700
Message-ID<D3E4A55E.7A240%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
In reply to#366819
On 8/25/16, 1:30 PM, in article afhjdfuv939.a3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:

> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> On 8/25/16, 1:14 PM, in article hgjviu03a.f@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>> On 8/25/16, 1:03 PM, in article hgu03raf.hg3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/25/16, 12:24 PM, in article hgjdsau93.au4@perch.invalid, "Octavian
>>>>>> W.
>>>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ... 
>>>>>>>> But we have covered this now about a dozen times. Why can't you move
>>>>>>>> forward? 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> IOW, let's just forget your lies.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> All the unquotable lies. Yes, forget them being that they do not exist.
>>>>>> Please!
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Message-ID: <D3E47195.7A15D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
>>>>> <quote>
>>>>> Of which I noted I would not walk up to any random black man and say such
>>>>> a
>>>>> thing, just as I would not to any random white man, but I would to ANYONE,
>>>>> of any color, who said that EQUALITY was somehow unfair to them and showed
>>>>> a
>>>>> sense of entitlement and privilege.
>>>>> </quote>
>>>>> 
>>>> And then you called me a RACIST for that!
>>> 
>>> No, I called you a LIAR for that.
>> 
>> A liar for backing equality. Wow.
> 
> No, dumbass, a LIAR for claiming that you said those things.

I said similar things... you even quoted it. Not in question.

> Feel free to post a link to where you said any such thing
> as I quote above, prior to that post, in answer to my question.
> 
> 
>>> I called you a RACIST for you other bigoted spew.
>> 
>> All comes down to you think equality is somehow unfair to you...
> 
> Something completely contrived on your part, and for which you
> can find NO quote from me saying anything remotely like that.

All comes down to you think equality is somehow unfair to you... which shows
your sense of entitlement and privilege. Why try to make it more complex
than that? Why try to bring in a million side issues? Why keep moving goal
posts? Seems you are ashamed of your own sense of entitlement and privilege.
If so then even you know it is wrong... and that is good. You can work
toward changing it.



-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#366835

From"Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid>
Date2016-08-25 20:48 +0000
Message-ID<fvnjdaoe9.afki@perch.invalid>
In reply to#366830
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 8/25/16, 1:30 PM, in article afhjdfuv939.a3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 8/25/16, 1:14 PM, in article hgjviu03a.f@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 8/25/16, 1:03 PM, in article hgu03raf.hg3@perch.invalid, "Octavian W.
>>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/25/16, 12:24 PM, in article hgjdsau93.au4@perch.invalid, "Octavian
>>>>>>> W.
>>>>>>> Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ... 
>>>>>>>>> But we have covered this now about a dozen times. Why can't you move
>>>>>>>>> forward? 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> IOW, let's just forget your lies.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> All the unquotable lies. Yes, forget them being that they do not exist.
>>>>>>> Please!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Message-ID: <D3E47195.7A15D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
>>>>>> <quote>
>>>>>> Of which I noted I would not walk up to any random black man and say such
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> thing, just as I would not to any random white man, but I would to ANYONE,
>>>>>> of any color, who said that EQUALITY was somehow unfair to them and showed
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> sense of entitlement and privilege.
>>>>>> </quote>
>>>>>> 
>>>>> And then you called me a RACIST for that!
>>>> 
>>>> No, I called you a LIAR for that.
>>> 
>>> A liar for backing equality. Wow.
>> 
>> No, dumbass, a LIAR for claiming that you said those things.
> 
> I said similar things... you even quoted it. Not in question.
> 

You did not.  You never committed to answering the question
of whether or not you would say such a thing to a black man
until you suddenly in that quote above describe what you
supposedly said.  You never said anything remotely like that.


[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 1 of 5  [1] 2 3 4 5  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy


csiph-web