Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #465319 > unrolled thread

imgur down?

Started byDFS <nospam@nospam.com>
First post2018-08-28 14:03 -0400
Last post2018-09-05 22:28 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 40 — 15 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy


Contents

  imgur down? DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-08-28 14:03 -0400
    Re: imgur down? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-08-28 18:07 +0000
    Re: imgur down? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-08-28 18:07 +0000
      Re: imgur down? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 11:23 -0700
        Re: imgur down? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-02 20:01 -0700
    Re: imgur down? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-08-28 18:44 +0000
    Re: imgur down? <fire@starter.net> (🔥🔥🔥) - 2018-09-02 07:20 -0500
      Re: imgur down? DFS <nospam@nospam.com> - 2018-09-02 20:59 -0400
        Re: Global Fertility Rates, 1970 vs. 2014 "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesbabes@bigass-babes.com> - 2018-09-03 09:17 -0700
          Re: Global Fertility Rates, 1970 vs. 2014 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-03 09:20 -0700
          Re: Global Fertility Rates, 1970 vs. 2014 Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-03 09:36 -0700
            Re: Global Fertility Rates, 1970 vs. 2014 Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-03 16:04 -0700
          Re: Global Fertility Rates, 1970 vs. 2014 Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-03 10:54 -0700
            Re: Global Fertility Rates, 1970 vs. 2014 Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-03 18:24 -0700
          Re: Global Fertility Rates, 1970 vs. 2014 "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-04 15:28 -0400
            Re: Global Fertility Rates, 1970 vs. 2014 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-04 14:35 -0500
              Re: Global Fertility Rates, 1970 vs. 2014 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-04 16:46 -0700
                Re: Global Fertility Rates, 1970 vs. 2014 Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-04 17:23 -0700
                Re: Global Fertility Rates, 1970 vs. 2014 Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 08:57 -0700
            Re: Global Fertility Rates, 1970 vs. 2014 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-04 12:45 -0700
              Re: Global Fertility Rates, 1970 vs. 2014 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-04 14:55 -0500
                Re: Global Fertility Rates, 1970 vs. 2014 "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-05 14:43 -0400
                  Re: Global Fertility Rates, 1970 vs. 2014 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 13:29 -0700
                    Re: Global Fertility Rates, 1970 vs. 2014 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-06 07:14 -0500
              Re: Global Fertility Rates, 1970 vs. 2014 Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-04 12:57 -0700
              Re: Global Fertility Rates, 1970 vs. 2014 Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-04 13:13 -0700
            Re: Global Fertility Rates, 1970 vs. 2014 "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesbabes@bigass-babes.com> - 2018-09-05 07:48 -0700
        Re: imgur down? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-09-03 13:27 -0700
          Re: imgur down? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-03 18:55 -0700
          Re: imgur down? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 09:41 -0700
            Re: imgur down? fr314159@gmail.com - 2018-09-05 12:04 -0700
              Re: imgur down? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 16:15 -0700
                Re: imgur down? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 19:38 -0700
              Re: imgur down? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-06 01:10 +0000
                Re: imgur down? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 18:36 -0700
                Re: imgur down? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 20:56 -0700
                  Re: imgur down? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 01:21 -0700
              Re: imgur down? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 09:41 -0700
            Re: imgur down? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-05 21:27 -0700
              Re: imgur down? Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-09-05 22:28 -0700

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]


#465867 — Re: Global Fertility Rates, 1970 vs. 2014

Fromchrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
Date2018-09-04 14:55 -0500
SubjectRe: Global Fertility Rates, 1970 vs. 2014
Message-ID<6botodpt3big9ocbgmc4hck0429n43004g@4ax.com>
In reply to#465865
Checkmate wrote:

>"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
>kensi."    -Nadegda  

Hehehe.  Good quote.

-- 
Jeff Relf:  Testing is how you know if the code works or not, not
compile-time warnings.

chrisv:  One doesn't need to be a pro, to know how stupid that is.

DFS:  What Relf said is 100% correct and reasonable.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#465973 — Re: Global Fertility Rates, 1970 vs. 2014

From"Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>
Date2018-09-05 14:43 -0400
SubjectRe: Global Fertility Rates, 1970 vs. 2014
Message-ID<so80pd5o1juih7n6bpi90ohf14fk8goed3@4ax.com>
In reply to#465867
On Tue, 04 Sep 2018 14:55:41 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:

>Checkmate wrote:
>
>>"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
>>kensi."    -Nadegda  
>
>Hehehe.  Good quote.

No, it's stupid but you are too stupid to 
understand why.

The why is this: I did not say shit was a
human nutrient. Rather, I said shit was 
a nutrient. I assumed some of my reading
audience, at least, was intelligent enough
to understand shit is a nutrient to various
plants, mollusks, insects, bacteria, etc.

It would appear you are in the subset of my
reading audience that is NOT intelligent.

Have a nice day!

-- 

Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

"Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow. 
(There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#465985 — Re: Global Fertility Rates, 1970 vs. 2014

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-05 13:29 -0700
SubjectRe: Global Fertility Rates, 1970 vs. 2014
Message-ID<MPG.35f9dc93c3020d80994855@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#465973
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <so80pd5o1juih7n6bpi90ohf14fk8goed3@4ax.com>, 
greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...


> 
> On Tue, 04 Sep 2018 14:55:41 -0500, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> 
> >Checkmate wrote:
> >
> >>"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
> >>kensi."    -Nadegda  
> >
> >Hehehe.  Good quote.
> 
> No, it's stupid but you are too stupid to 
> understand why.
> 
> The why is this: I did not say shit was a
> human nutrient. Rather, I said shit was 
> a nutrient. I assumed some of my reading
> audience, at least, was intelligent enough
> to understand shit is a nutrient to various
> plants, mollusks, insects, bacteria, etc.
> 
> It would appear you are in the subset of my
> reading audience that is NOT intelligent.
> 
> Have a nice day!

It's obvious that Chrisy is referring to Nads' inadvertent admission of 
authoring much Ko0k butthurt, as found in my sig.  Everything isn't 
always about you and your assorted scat fetishes.

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#466055 — Re: Global Fertility Rates, 1970 vs. 2014

Fromchrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
Date2018-09-06 07:14 -0500
SubjectRe: Global Fertility Rates, 1970 vs. 2014
Message-ID<ga62pd949m5u7ie336vj7lna8tste6k5vg@4ax.com>
In reply to#465985
Checkmate wrote:

> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
>> 
>> chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
>>>>kensi."    -Nadegda  
>>>
>>>Hehehe.  Good quote.
>> 
>> No, it's stupid but you are too stupid to  understand why. 

Idiot.

>It's obvious that Chrisy is referring to Nads' inadvertent admission of 
>authoring much Ko0k butthurt, as found in my sig.

Could not be more clear.  Yet I'm the "stupid" one.  (rolling eyes)

-- 
"Hey, we don't call it Apelanta for nothing.  If you're coming here, I
apologize in advance if any screeching jigs make your visit
unpleasant."  -  "DFS"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#465868 — Re: Global Fertility Rates, 1970 vs. 2014

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-04 12:57 -0700
SubjectRe: Global Fertility Rates, 1970 vs. 2014
Message-ID<42a1e23d-a53d-4bbf-a830-e2a2c1062712@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#465865
On Tuesday, September 4, 2018 at 12:45:31 PM UTC-7, Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
> Checkmate!  In article <f30rodh10lvib8s08hkkfgkdb6pfjkvm07@4ax.com>, 
> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
> 
> 
> > 
> > On Mon, 3 Sep 2018 09:17:05 -0700, "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesbabes@bigass-babes.com> wrote:
> > >On 9/2/2018 8:04 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> > >>> > you can upload your picture directly to Usenet and 
> > >>> > provide Message-ID to text group.
> > >>> 
> > >>> I won't be doing that.
> > >> 
> > >> Global Fertility Rates, 1970 vs. 2014
> > >> 
> > >I shit on this planet.
> > 
> > Everybody does, except perhaps for a 
> > handful of astronauts.
> > 
> > Stupid libtards seem to think that shit
> > is some kind of toxic pollution. It is NOT!
> > Shit is a nutrient to many forms of animal
> > and vegetable life. Shit has even shaped the
> > very evolution of the Earth's flora and fauna.
> 
> What does it taste like?
> 
> -- 
> Checkmate ® 
> Author, Humorist, Cynic
> Philosopher, Humanitarian
> Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
> Usenet Shot-Caller           
> Copyright © 2018 
> all rights reserved
> 
> In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
> May 2010-February 12, 2017
> 
> "There are many here among us, 
> who feel that life is but a joke."
> 
> "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
> kensi."    -Nadegda  
> Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>



This is clearly a hobby of Jesus's. 

Jesus is repeatedly seen insisting "I KNOW BETTER" when it comes to info on Jonas Eklundh's post where information is written with other words... but Jesus is just too ignorant or distracted to grasp any info he finds. Perhaps you use it like Jesus. Do you not fathom the use of private networks? Jonas Eklundh has been around to ascertain the depths of the guy's lechery. Jesus is two seconds away from being in everyone's kill file. 

Everyone is Jesus -- the oldest gag in the book. 

Not only did Jonas Eklundh's question not touch on the "kernel", it has diddly-squat to do with GIMP. Jesus should learn to read ;) 

What did you assume from the lying imbecile? That Jesus jackass has nothing to waste but time. He has nothing else, especially not a caring family. 



--
This broke the Internet!
https://youtu.be/UkAyrfOZaXc
https://youtu.be/OffkiSAsYo8
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#465870 — Re: Global Fertility Rates, 1970 vs. 2014

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-04 13:13 -0700
SubjectRe: Global Fertility Rates, 1970 vs. 2014
Message-ID<67129b29-1d15-43e0-94e3-b827c3094dd1@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#465865
On Tuesday, September 4, 2018 at 12:45:31 PM UTC-7, Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
> Checkmate!  In article <f30rodh10lvib8s08hkkfgkdb6pfjkvm07@4ax.com>, 
> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
> 
> 
> > 
> > On Mon, 3 Sep 2018 09:17:05 -0700, "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesbabes@bigass-babes.com> wrote:
> > >On 9/2/2018 8:04 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> > >>> > you can upload your picture directly to Usenet and 
> > >>> > provide Message-ID to text group.
> > >>> 
> > >>> I won't be doing that.
> > >> 
> > >> Global Fertility Rates, 1970 vs. 2014
> > >> 
> > >I shit on this planet.
> > 
> > Everybody does, except perhaps for a 
> > handful of astronauts.
> > 
> > Stupid libtards seem to think that shit
> > is some kind of toxic pollution. It is NOT!
> > Shit is a nutrient to many forms of animal
> > and vegetable life. Shit has even shaped the
> > very evolution of the Earth's flora and fauna.
> 
> What does it taste like?
> 
> -- 
> Checkmate ® 
> Author, Humorist, Cynic
> Philosopher, Humanitarian
> Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
> Usenet Shot-Caller           
> Copyright © 2018 
> all rights reserved
> 
> In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
> May 2010-February 12, 2017
> 
> "There are many here among us, 
> who feel that life is but a joke."
> 
> "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
> kensi."    -Nadegda  
> Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>



I don't know if there is a free FOSS that promotes PEE. Which regular knows Perl, is an insomniac, has forged Klaus Schadenfreude's account, has an obsession and is a huge immature toddler who, when he is called out, posts ignorant claptrap even when he's not flooding... AND... who endeavors to blame everything *he* is doing on "advocates" and has for over a decade? What do you get out of lying? Outright baloney by an ignorant, tall-tale telling, slippery, co-trolling bozo who would not be honest even if you paid him to. Just hogwash from him. But he has completely left technology behind and is merely holding me responsible for the words of himself. 

--
My Snoring Solution!
http://www.5z8.info/boobs_j0v3qo_dont-just-drizzle
http://www.5z8.info/hack-outlook_c6c9in_michaelangelo-virus
https://youtu.be/HHT9SJgYsH4
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#465944 — Re: Global Fertility Rates, 1970 vs. 2014

From"Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesbabes@bigass-babes.com>
Date2018-09-05 07:48 -0700
SubjectRe: Global Fertility Rates, 1970 vs. 2014
Message-ID<T0SjD.23037$tK2.9992@fx42.iad>
In reply to#465861
On 9/4/2018 12:28 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Sep 2018 09:17:05 -0700, "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesbabes@bigass-babes.com> wrote:
>> On 9/2/2018 8:04 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>>>>> you can upload your picture directly to Usenet and
>>>>> provide Message-ID to text group.
>>>>
>>>> I won't be doing that.
>>>
>>> Global Fertility Rates, 1970 vs. 2014
>>>
>> I shit on this planet.
> 
> Everybody does, except perhaps for a
> handful of astronauts.
> 
> Stupid libtards seem to think that shit
> is some kind of toxic pollution. It is NOT!
> Shit is a nutrient to many forms of animal
> and vegetable life. Shit has even shaped the
> very evolution of the Earth's flora and fauna.
> 

Greg, when you put in like that, in perspective that is, now it all makes sense.
Thank you and have a Pleasance day!
					ʘ‿ʘ


[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#465742

From-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>
Date2018-09-03 13:27 -0700
Message-ID<9ad572d5-7ccf-4f30-a39b-258a09f5015c@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#465656
DFS wrote:
>On 9/2/2018 8:20 AM, (🔥🔥🔥) wrote: 
>> DFS <nos...@nospam.com> writes: 
>>> For a 1/2 hour I can't post any new images. 
>>> 
>>> www.imgur.com returns 403 ERROR bad request 
>>> 
>> https://imgur.com opens and lets you select an image, but the 
>>> upload tries 2x or 3x and fails. 
>>> 
>>> Anyone else? 
>> 
>> There's a lot of similar services on the Internet. 
>
> imgur was the best I found (upload multiple pics at once, rearrange 
>them, click to enlarge, add titles, see # of downloads, etc). 
>
> Which other free upload sites give all that? 

Egads, boys, just spend a piddling $20/mo and own your own domain
outright, with a service that offers a couple of Gigs of space.  All of this 
talk claiming huge prowess in programming skills can’t hand a little HTML 
(or just use a wsiwg)!

-hh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#465764

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-03 18:55 -0700
Message-ID<ee6264b6-47d0-40ee-84de-5d46a8689699@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#465742
On Monday, September 3, 2018 at 1:27:35 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
> DFS wrote:
> >On 9/2/2018 8:20 AM, (🔥🔥🔥) wrote: 
> >> DFS <nos...@nospam.com> writes: 
> >>> For a 1/2 hour I can't post any new images. 
> >>> 
> >>> www.imgur.com returns 403 ERROR bad request 
> >>> 
> >> https://imgur.com opens and lets you select an image, but the 
> >>> upload tries 2x or 3x and fails. 
> >>> 
> >>> Anyone else? 
> >> 
> >> There's a lot of similar services on the Internet. 
> >
> > imgur was the best I found (upload multiple pics at once, rearrange 
> >them, click to enlarge, add titles, see # of downloads, etc). 
> >
> > Which other free upload sites give all that? 
> 
> Egads, boys, just spend a piddling $20/mo and own your own domain
> outright, with a service that offers a couple of Gigs of space.  All of this 
> talk claiming huge prowess in programming skills can’t hand a little HTML 
> (or just use a wsiwg)!
> 
> -hh



Here are some of the scripted posts from Jonas Eklundh... the script adds a nonsense or irrelevant insult or accusation after most sentences and adds numbers to the text so he can better track his trolling:

<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.os.linux.advocacy/RZtEyvJr8HI/VcEqOk2qCgAJ> or <https://goo.gl/67NLfr>.

You can see a run of three scripted flood posts from his primary account.

From: Sandman <mr@sandman.net>
Message-ID: <sandman-b7df8761d3b6831e96d5976e9e67f379@individual.net>
X-Trace: individual.net +MPBYFbnugFd2iPraU5I9ABV/5ZlNHtqj79Ij19mAYCfL5sHI=
User-Agent: Sandmania 2.0

He also has them elsewhere, here are some examples:

<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.os.linux.advocacy/Xetqyi1T0F0/cvoqp3eqCgAJ> OR <https://goo.gl/jy0rsr>.

<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.os.linux.advocacy/10d0Emx_ABk/eN0r1_epCgAJ> OR <https://goo.gl/Rkz0PO>.

On that one he has a run of two.

And a longer and clearly scripted, content-free flood post:

<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.os.linux.advocacy/2WS3xlecnw8/lizfGLOnCgAJ> OR <https://goo.gl/t7cTHd>.

And even more!

<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.os.linux.advocacy/cYutxNP1hWc/KZikieXECgAJ> OR <https://goo.gl/Z6G7Ic>

<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.os.linux.advocacy/RZtEyvJr8HI/6sJfxaDECgAJ> OR <https://goo.gl/mTXlFt>

Lots more but that is enough to prove the point multiple times over. Sandman has been flooding not just with his Google accounts but with his standard account. ALL of those come from the same source I listed above and it is Sandman's standard account. 

Jonas Eklundh: busted.

--
My Snoring Solution
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.os.linux/BVpdH5KOc6s
Jonas Eklundh Communication

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#465952

FromSteve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-05 09:41 -0700
Message-ID<108254be-b51a-4b58-9bf6-103560c0da42@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#465742
On Monday, September 3, 2018 at 2:27:35 PM UTC-6, -hh wrote:
> DFS wrote:
> >On 9/2/2018 8:20 AM, (🔥🔥🔥) wrote: 
> >> DFS <nos...@nospam.com> writes: 
> >>> For a 1/2 hour I can't post any new images. 
> >>> 
> >>> www.imgur.com returns 403 ERROR bad request 
> >>> 
> >> https://imgur.com opens and lets you select an image, but the 
> >>> upload tries 2x or 3x and fails. 
> >>> 
> >>> Anyone else? 
> >> 
> >> There's a lot of similar services on the Internet. 
> >
> > imgur was the best I found (upload multiple pics at once, rearrange 
> >them, click to enlarge, add titles, see # of downloads, etc). 
> >
> > Which other free upload sites give all that? 
> 
> Egads, boys, just spend a piddling $20/mo and own your own domain
> outright, with a service that offers a couple of Gigs of space.  All of this 
> talk claiming huge prowess in programming skills can’t hand a little HTML 
> (or just use a wsiwg)!

Why would anyone hand out a domain name they paid for in a usenet ng, 
especially one like this, only to have it bombarded by a kiddie script?
Remember what Glasser did with Jonas?


<mr-779304.13441524082006@individual.net>

<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/fFxNRVJv7Qw/qWP1zmak5_MJ>

I'll pass ;)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#465977

Fromfr314159@gmail.com
Date2018-09-05 12:04 -0700
Message-ID<a1ca5a89-d9ab-4fb4-a296-74b2377aeced@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#465952
On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 at 12:41:12 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll wrote:

> > 
> > Egads, boys, just spend a piddling $20/mo and own your own domain
> > outright, with a service that offers a couple of Gigs of space.  All of this 
> > talk claiming huge prowess in programming skills can’t hand a little HTML 
> > (or just use a wsiwg)!
> 
> Why would anyone hand out a domain name they paid for in a usenet ng, 
> especially one like this, only to have it bombarded by a kiddie script?
> Remember what Glasser did with Jonas?
> 

Why not just post binary files to Usenet?  It's totally free.  It's
totally easy.  It's totally anonymous.  It's totally limitless.  What
more could anyone ask for?

Oh, wait.  I know.  It too "1980s" (whatever the fuck that's supposed
to mean) to suit these cola fops.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#465999

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-05 16:15 -0700
Message-ID<6004a172-4101-4be0-af74-205cf78da724@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#465977
On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 at 12:04:48 PM UTC-7, fr31...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 at 12:41:12 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll wrote:
> 
> > > 
> > > Egads, boys, just spend a piddling $20/mo and own your own domain
> > > outright, with a service that offers a couple of Gigs of space.  All of this 
> > > talk claiming huge prowess in programming skills can’t hand a little HTML 
> > > (or just use a wsiwg)!
> > 
> > Why would anyone hand out a domain name they paid for in a usenet ng, 
> > especially one like this, only to have it bombarded by a kiddie script?
> > Remember what Glasser did with Jonas?
> > 
> 
> Why not just post binary files to Usenet?  It's totally free.  It's
> totally easy.  It's totally anonymous.  It's totally limitless.  What
> more could anyone ask for?
> 
> Oh, wait.  I know.  It too "1980s" (whatever the fuck that's supposed
> to mean) to suit these cola fops.



Learning ChromeOS... still a neophyte. 

Oh goodness, that is just tons of nonsense. 

The "advocates" value the lowest common denominator in both their lives and their computer systems. Who _ doesn't_ know that this kind of hokum is The Thing's modus operandi, not the approach of chrisv? It's all just nonsense... the trolling, the sock puppets, the writing of nonsense, the anger... the false bravado and willingness to show how ashamed he is over being booted from the playground for crapping in it again... The Thing can not help himself ;) 

That's what The Thing does when he gets mad. He quickly creates a nym, starts a cross posted thread so he can claim he didn't do it. Don't blame me it was my left hand... and then he talks to himself with his right hand. 

chrisv just wiped the floor with The Thing. 

Just some names Carroll has used
    "Evil" John *
    "Evil" Snit *
    Big Crotch on a Small Fish
    Cornelius Munshower
    CSMA Moderator
    Edward Stanfield
    Fretwiz *
    Hitman Hero
    Measles
    Petruzzellis Kids
    Sigmond
    Slaveen
    Smit
    Steve C *
    Steve Camoll *
    Steve Carroll <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> *
    Steve Carroll <stevecarroll@xxxxxxxxxxx> *
    Steve Carroll <trollkiller@xxxxxx> *
    Steve Carroll's Dog *
    Steve Carrolll *
    Steve Carrroll *
    Yevette Owens
    Yobo_Obyo


--
"You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him. He clearly wants the attention"
Steven Petruzzellis, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#466015

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-05 19:38 -0700
Message-ID<27c81282-81e9-4805-93d0-969c77719b38@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#465999
On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 at 4:15:50 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 at 12:04:48 PM UTC-7, fr31...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 at 12:41:12 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll wrote:
> > 
> > > > 
> > > > Egads, boys, just spend a piddling $20/mo and own your own domain
> > > > outright, with a service that offers a couple of Gigs of space.  All of this 
> > > > talk claiming huge prowess in programming skills can’t hand a little HTML 
> > > > (or just use a wsiwg)!
> > > 
> > > Why would anyone hand out a domain name they paid for in a usenet ng, 
> > > especially one like this, only to have it bombarded by a kiddie script?
> > > Remember what Glasser did with Jonas?
> > > 
> > 
> > Why not just post binary files to Usenet?  It's totally free.  It's
> > totally easy.  It's totally anonymous.  It's totally limitless.  What
> > more could anyone ask for?
> > 
> > Oh, wait.  I know.  It too "1980s" (whatever the fuck that's supposed
> > to mean) to suit these cola fops.
> 
> 
> 
> Learning ChromeOS... still a neophyte. 
> 
> Oh goodness, that is just tons of nonsense. 
> 
> The "advocates" value the lowest common denominator in both their lives and their computer systems. Who _ doesn't_ know that this kind of hokum is The Thing's modus operandi, not the approach of chrisv? It's all just nonsense... the trolling, the sock puppets, the writing of nonsense, the anger... the false bravado and willingness to show how ashamed he is over being booted from the playground for crapping in it again... The Thing can not help himself ;) 
> 
> That's what The Thing does when he gets mad. He quickly creates a nym, starts a cross posted thread so he can claim he didn't do it. Don't blame me it was my left hand... and then he talks to himself with his right hand. 
> 
> chrisv just wiped the floor with The Thing. 
> 
> Just some names Carroll has used
>     "Evil" John *
>     "Evil" Snit *
>     Big Crotch on a Small Fish
>     Cornelius Munshower
>     CSMA Moderator
>     Edward Stanfield
>     Fretwiz *
>     Hitman Hero
>     Measles
>     Petruzzellis Kids
>     Sigmond
>     Slaveen
>     Smit
>     Steve C *
>     Steve Camoll *
>     Steve Carroll <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx> *
>     Steve Carroll <stevecarroll@xxxxxxxxxxx> *
>     Steve Carroll <trollkiller@xxxxxx> *
>     Steve Carroll's Dog *
>     Steve Carrolll *
>     Steve Carrroll *
>     Yevette Owens
>     Yobo_Obyo
> 
> 
> --
> "You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him. He clearly wants the attention"
> Steven Petruzzellis, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.



Habits change. Maybe the idea of a newspaper is getting outdated. Both Aristotle and da Vince had their snafus and their awkward moments. One presented it as the effect of ghosts and didn't do anything too horrendous that could not be proved with tricks. 

Klaus Schadenfreude doesn't have any clue what he is sniveling about. 



-- 
This Trick Gets Women Hot For You!!
https://youtu.be/BUjnZhKk1Bg 
http://prescottcomputerguy.com
Jonas Eklundh Communication

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#466008

FromSilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>
Date2018-09-06 01:10 +0000
Message-ID<d8%jD.7376$ZJ2.1956@fx33.iad>
In reply to#465977
On Wed, 05 Sep 2018 12:04:46 -0700, fr314159 wrote:

> On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 at 12:41:12 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll
> wrote:
> 
> 
>> > Egads, boys, just spend a piddling $20/mo and own your own domain
>> > outright, with a service that offers a couple of Gigs of space.  All
>> > of this talk claiming huge prowess in programming skills can’t hand a
>> > little HTML (or just use a wsiwg)!
>> 
>> Why would anyone hand out a domain name they paid for in a usenet ng,
>> especially one like this, only to have it bombarded by a kiddie script?
>> Remember what Glasser did with Jonas?
>> 
>> 
> Why not just post binary files to Usenet?  It's totally free.  It's
> totally easy.  It's totally anonymous.  It's totally limitless.  What
> more could anyone ask for?
> 
> Oh, wait.  I know.  It too "1980s" (whatever the fuck that's supposed to
> mean) to suit these cola fops.

Downloading binaries on Usenet used to be the most fun part of the 
Internet back around 1994 to 1998 or so for me. The only issue was that 
most news servers provided for free by ISPs were missing articles and 
therefore made it impossible to actually get a binary. You had to pay for 
a decent server, even then, if you intended to get software, images or 
whatever from Usenet.

Nonetheless, I assume that most of us here pay for Usenet access now 
since no ISPs provide access anymore so I don't see why this would be a 
problem.


-- 
SilverSlimer
FSF Contributor / EFF Member / Free speech advocate
Absolute centrist, proud Catholic

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#466010

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-05 18:36 -0700
Message-ID<9f1ea662-b4df-45e3-b923-745673efbbe1@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#466008
On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 at 6:10:36 PM UTC-7, SilverSlimer wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Sep 2018 12:04:46 -0700, fr314159 wrote:
> 
> > On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 at 12:41:12 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll
> > wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >> > Egads, boys, just spend a piddling $20/mo and own your own domain
> >> > outright, with a service that offers a couple of Gigs of space.  All
> >> > of this talk claiming huge prowess in programming skills can’t hand a
> >> > little HTML (or just use a wsiwg)!
> >> 
> >> Why would anyone hand out a domain name they paid for in a usenet ng,
> >> especially one like this, only to have it bombarded by a kiddie script?
> >> Remember what Glasser did with Jonas?
> >> 
> >> 
> > Why not just post binary files to Usenet?  It's totally free.  It's
> > totally easy.  It's totally anonymous.  It's totally limitless.  What
> > more could anyone ask for?
> > 
> > Oh, wait.  I know.  It too "1980s" (whatever the fuck that's supposed to
> > mean) to suit these cola fops.
> 
> Downloading binaries on Usenet used to be the most fun part of the 
> Internet back around 1994 to 1998 or so for me. The only issue was that 
> most news servers provided for free by ISPs were missing articles and 
> therefore made it impossible to actually get a binary. You had to pay for 
> a decent server, even then, if you intended to get software, images or 
> whatever from Usenet.
> 
> Nonetheless, I assume that most of us here pay for Usenet access now 
> since no ISPs provide access anymore so I don't see why this would be a 
> problem.
> 
> 
> -- 
> SilverSlimer
> FSF Contributor / EFF Member / Free speech advocate
> Absolute centrist, proud Catholic



Was that meant to be clever? 

That is the problem today and uneducated students don't care, people from earlier generations (~60 yo) should know better than to fall for socialism. 

Did Steve Carroll think that was clever? Steve Carroll is being controlled by RMS. Steve Carroll can only understand from the perspective of a sociopath. 



--
I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened!
https://youtu.be/iztSc_msHuo
http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/BilkHelp.html
Jonas Eklundh Communication

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#466021

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-05 20:56 -0700
Message-ID<6c03e4ce-9825-41be-a5da-ba5f4f385a91@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#466008
On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 at 6:10:36 PM UTC-7, SilverSlimer wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Sep 2018 12:04:46 -0700, fr314159 wrote:
> 
> > On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 at 12:41:12 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll
> > wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >> > Egads, boys, just spend a piddling $20/mo and own your own domain
> >> > outright, with a service that offers a couple of Gigs of space.  All
> >> > of this talk claiming huge prowess in programming skills can’t hand a
> >> > little HTML (or just use a wsiwg)!
> >> 
> >> Why would anyone hand out a domain name they paid for in a usenet ng,
> >> especially one like this, only to have it bombarded by a kiddie script?
> >> Remember what Glasser did with Jonas?
> >> 
> >> 
> > Why not just post binary files to Usenet?  It's totally free.  It's
> > totally easy.  It's totally anonymous.  It's totally limitless.  What
> > more could anyone ask for?
> > 
> > Oh, wait.  I know.  It too "1980s" (whatever the fuck that's supposed to
> > mean) to suit these cola fops.
> 
> Downloading binaries on Usenet used to be the most fun part of the 
> Internet back around 1994 to 1998 or so for me. The only issue was that 
> most news servers provided for free by ISPs were missing articles and 
> therefore made it impossible to actually get a binary. You had to pay for 
> a decent server, even then, if you intended to get software, images or 
> whatever from Usenet.
> 
> Nonetheless, I assume that most of us here pay for Usenet access now 
> since no ISPs provide access anymore so I don't see why this would be a 
> problem.
> 
> 
> -- 
> SilverSlimer
> FSF Contributor / EFF Member / Free speech advocate
> Absolute centrist, proud Catholic



What I do is certainly better. He makes false accusation to an entire group of people who are like the grass when elephants fight, but that's a narcissist for you. What others care about isn't a factor. flatfish is being controlled by RMS. 



-- 
One Smart Penny
http://www.5z8.info/hackwebcam_e9z2tw_friendster-of-sex
Jonas Eklundh Communication

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#466041

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-06 01:21 -0700
Message-ID<5be7191a-daea-4e59-9df7-b778189eeb35@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#466021
On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 at 8:56:23 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 at 6:10:36 PM UTC-7, SilverSlimer wrote:
> > On Wed, 05 Sep 2018 12:04:46 -0700, fr314159 wrote:
> > 
> > > On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 at 12:41:12 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll
> > > wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > >> > Egads, boys, just spend a piddling $20/mo and own your own domain
> > >> > outright, with a service that offers a couple of Gigs of space.  All
> > >> > of this talk claiming huge prowess in programming skills can’t hand a
> > >> > little HTML (or just use a wsiwg)!
> > >> 
> > >> Why would anyone hand out a domain name they paid for in a usenet ng,
> > >> especially one like this, only to have it bombarded by a kiddie script?
> > >> Remember what Glasser did with Jonas?
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > > Why not just post binary files to Usenet?  It's totally free.  It's
> > > totally easy.  It's totally anonymous.  It's totally limitless.  What
> > > more could anyone ask for?
> > > 
> > > Oh, wait.  I know.  It too "1980s" (whatever the fuck that's supposed to
> > > mean) to suit these cola fops.
> > 
> > Downloading binaries on Usenet used to be the most fun part of the 
> > Internet back around 1994 to 1998 or so for me. The only issue was that 
> > most news servers provided for free by ISPs were missing articles and 
> > therefore made it impossible to actually get a binary. You had to pay for 
> > a decent server, even then, if you intended to get software, images or 
> > whatever from Usenet.
> > 
> > Nonetheless, I assume that most of us here pay for Usenet access now 
> > since no ISPs provide access anymore so I don't see why this would be a 
> > problem.
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > SilverSlimer
> > FSF Contributor / EFF Member / Free speech advocate
> > Absolute centrist, proud Catholic
> 
> 
> 
> What I do is certainly better. He makes false accusation to an entire group of people who are like the grass when elephants fight, but that's a narcissist for you. What others care about isn't a factor. flatfish is being controlled by RMS. 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> One Smart Penny
> http://www.5z8.info/hackwebcam_e9z2tw_friendster-of-sex
> Jonas Eklundh Communication



Why would you want to restrict the tools on open source tools to what can be done on the competition? 

I suspect Sandman does not even know what is wrong with the MSM. Sandman and Snit Glasser both lie endlessly and flagrantly and continue to do so. So no incentive in showing any further civility or judiciousness. Snit Glasser can create a virtual machine. Rips what that Mac can do to shreds! Yup. Sadly this is what we have to end. Trolls who obviously have no reason for being here other than to troll. 

-- 
Curious how these posts are made? Email: usenet@gallopinginsanity.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#466087

FromSteve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-06 09:41 -0700
Message-ID<d0209d65-dc77-4493-b5b8-6f55df90ad45@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#465977
On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 at 1:04:48 PM UTC-6, fr31...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 at 12:41:12 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll wrote:
> 
> > > 
> > > Egads, boys, just spend a piddling $20/mo and own your own domain
> > > outright, with a service that offers a couple of Gigs of space.  All of this 
> > > talk claiming huge prowess in programming skills can’t hand a little HTML 
> > > (or just use a wsiwg)!
> > 
> > Why would anyone hand out a domain name they paid for in a usenet ng, 
> > especially one like this, only to have it bombarded by a kiddie script?
> > Remember what Glasser did with Jonas?
> > 
> 
> Why not just post binary files to Usenet?  It's totally free.

So are the services that host them.

> It's
> totally easy.  It's totally anonymous.  It's totally limitless.  What
> more could anyone ask for?
> 
> Oh, wait.  I know.  It too "1980s" (whatever the fuck that's supposed
> to mean) to suit these cola fops.

I haven't posted binaries since the 90's but it being 'too dated' isn't the
reason.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#466023

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-09-05 21:27 -0700
Message-ID<fvbokpFqpscU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#465952
On 9/5/18 9:41 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Monday, September 3, 2018 at 2:27:35 PM UTC-6, -hh wrote:
>> DFS wrote:
>>> On 9/2/2018 8:20 AM, (🔥🔥🔥) wrote:
>>>> DFS <nos...@nospam.com> writes:
>>>>> For a 1/2 hour I can't post any new images.
>>>>>
>>>>> www.imgur.com returns 403 ERROR bad request
>>>>>
>>>> https://imgur.com opens and lets you select an image, but the
>>>>> upload tries 2x or 3x and fails.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone else?
>>>>
>>>> There's a lot of similar services on the Internet.
>>>
>>> imgur was the best I found (upload multiple pics at once, rearrange
>>> them, click to enlarge, add titles, see # of downloads, etc).
>>>
>>> Which other free upload sites give all that?
>>
>> Egads, boys, just spend a piddling $20/mo and own your own domain
>> outright, with a service that offers a couple of Gigs of space.  All of this
>> talk claiming huge prowess in programming skills can’t hand a little HTML
>> (or just use a wsiwg)!
> 
> Why would anyone hand out a domain name they paid for in a usenet ng,
> especially one like this, only to have it bombarded by a kiddie script?
> Remember what Glasser did with Jonas?
> 
> 
> <mr-779304.13441524082006@individual.net>
> 
> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/fFxNRVJv7Qw/qWP1zmak5_MJ>
> 
> I'll pass ;)
> 

What Sandman ACCUSED me of doing, with ZERO evidence, and for which you 
troll me over even years later.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#466032

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-05 22:28 -0700
Message-ID<e80c4168-237e-4dca-9613-ed6bdbe18569@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#466023
On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 at 9:27:08 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote:
> On 9/5/18 9:41 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> > On Monday, September 3, 2018 at 2:27:35 PM UTC-6, -hh wrote:
> >> DFS wrote:
> >>> On 9/2/2018 8:20 AM, (🔥🔥🔥) wrote:
> >>>> DFS <nos...@nospam.com> writes:
> >>>>> For a 1/2 hour I can't post any new images.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> www.imgur.com returns 403 ERROR bad request
> >>>>>
> >>>> https://imgur.com opens and lets you select an image, but the
> >>>>> upload tries 2x or 3x and fails.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Anyone else?
> >>>>
> >>>> There's a lot of similar services on the Internet.
> >>>
> >>> imgur was the best I found (upload multiple pics at once, rearrange
> >>> them, click to enlarge, add titles, see # of downloads, etc).
> >>>
> >>> Which other free upload sites give all that?
> >>
> >> Egads, boys, just spend a piddling $20/mo and own your own domain
> >> outright, with a service that offers a couple of Gigs of space.  All of this
> >> talk claiming huge prowess in programming skills can’t hand a little HTML
> >> (or just use a wsiwg)!
> > 
> > Why would anyone hand out a domain name they paid for in a usenet ng,
> > especially one like this, only to have it bombarded by a kiddie script?
> > Remember what Glasser did with Jonas?
> > 
> > 
> > <mr-779304.13441524082006@individual.net>
> > 
> > <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/fFxNRVJv7Qw/qWP1zmak5_MJ>
> > 
> > I'll pass ;)
> > 
> 
> What Sandman ACCUSED me of doing, with ZERO evidence, and for which you 
> troll me over even years later.
> 
> -- 
> Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
> cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
> somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
> 
> They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
> 
> <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>



Linux offers the least of everything to the average user. You're two seconds away from being in my kill filter. 

Sandman, AKA Jonas Eklundh suffers from neurotic delusions so, to him, everything, even randomized bot posts, are "slander". Who doesn't know this? Over and over, the demand is he wants to "talk tech", but the guy spends most of his time whining about "trolling". You hacked it and read multiple reviews and your "professional opinions" lead you to that verdict, did they? 

I think the point is far from just to get people to listen to him. The point is likely to piss me off for trolling outside groups he knows I frequent. 

--
Best CMS Solution of 2017
http://www.5z8.info/peepshow_z9s9ht_dogporn
http://www.5z8.info/nic_cage_naked_y8b5qk_torrentEverything
Jonas Eklundh Communication

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy


csiph-web