Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #463615 > unrolled thread

Steven Petruzzellis Gotta' Love Red Hat stupid design decisions

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  Steven Petruzzellis Gotta' Love Red Hat stupid design decisions Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-08-17 11:59 -0700
    Re: Steven Petruzzellis Gotta' Love Red Hat stupid design decisions Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-17 13:04 -0700
    Re: Steven Petruzzellis Gotta' Love Red Hat stupid design decisions Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-08-17 14:03 -0700

#463615 — Steven Petruzzellis Gotta' Love Red Hat stupid design decisions

I persist in being unconvinced that these nonstop posts are killing this group, no matter how hard Klaus Schadenfreude tries. It's a prolonged conflict, and Klaus Schadenfreude is simultaneously unable to stop his trolling remarks, while posting with socks with a myriad of tells. I think the point is not really to get them to listen to him. The point is likely to piss me off for spraying outside groups he knows I frequent. That is the problem today and American educators don't stand a chance; people from older generations should know better than to fall for the New World agenda. 

Everyone is Klaus Schadenfreude -- the oldest gag in the book. If Steven Petruzzellis has 'some_file.doc' open in a word processor such as LibreOffice Writer and Klaus Schadenfreude wants to change its name to 'mack.pdf' via a preset script, Steven Petruzzellis's video might be wise. 

Hell, just recently he was declaring himself the only "true Linux advocate", and claiming that "advocates" (in scare-quotes, who he also refers to as "the herd") are trying to rewrite Red Hat from scratch. Klaus Schadenfreude and the other trolls suggest searching for guidance for a FOSS application is instigating. 



-- 
E-commerce Simplified
http://comp.os.linux.advocacy.narkive.com/711dskzA/steven-petruzzellis-admits-he-can-not-back-his-claims-about-snit
Jonas Eklundh Communication

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#463634

On 8/17/18 11:59 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> I persist in being unconvinced that these nonstop posts are killing this group, no matter how hard Klaus Schadenfreude tries. It's a prolonged conflict, and Klaus Schadenfreude is simultaneously unable to stop his trolling remarks, while posting with socks with a myriad of tells. I think the point is not really to get them to listen to him. The point is likely to piss me off for spraying outside groups he knows I frequent. That is the problem today and American educators don't stand a chance; people from older generations should know better than to fall for the New World agenda.
> 
> Everyone is Klaus Schadenfreude -- the oldest gag in the book. If Steven Petruzzellis has 'some_file.doc' open in a word processor such as LibreOffice Writer and Klaus Schadenfreude wants to change its name to 'mack.pdf' via a preset script, Steven Petruzzellis's video might be wise.
> 
> Hell, just recently he was declaring himself the only "true Linux advocate", and claiming that "advocates" (in scare-quotes, who he also refers to as "the herd") are trying to rewrite Red Hat from scratch. Klaus Schadenfreude and the other trolls suggest searching for guidance for a FOSS application is instigating.
> 
> 
> 

Earlier today, Carroll, you accused me of lying about your flood bot 
posts. Why not quote the lie you say I told about them?


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#463641

On Friday, August 17, 2018 at 11:59:26 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
> I persist in being unconvinced that these nonstop posts are killing this group, no matter how hard Klaus Schadenfreude tries. It's a prolonged conflict, and Klaus Schadenfreude is simultaneously unable to stop his trolling remarks, while posting with socks with a myriad of tells. I think the point is not really to get them to listen to him. The point is likely to piss me off for spraying outside groups he knows I frequent. That is the problem today and American educators don't stand a chance; people from older generations should know better than to fall for the New World agenda. 
> 
> Everyone is Klaus Schadenfreude -- the oldest gag in the book. If Steven Petruzzellis has 'some_file.doc' open in a word processor such as LibreOffice Writer and Klaus Schadenfreude wants to change its name to 'mack.pdf' via a preset script, Steven Petruzzellis's video might be wise. 
> 
> Hell, just recently he was declaring himself the only "true Linux advocate", and claiming that "advocates" (in scare-quotes, who he also refers to as "the herd") are trying to rewrite Red Hat from scratch. Klaus Schadenfreude and the other trolls suggest searching for guidance for a FOSS application is instigating. 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> E-commerce Simplified
> http://comp.os.linux.advocacy.narkive.com/711dskzA/steven-petruzzellis-admits-he-can-not-back-his-claims-about-snit
> Jonas Eklundh Communication



Peopel who can grok my posts knows the flood bot is not spawned in the way Jonas Eklundh is saying, and most of them are flat out manually written. 

In fact Klaus Schadenfreude's lies only grew. So as might be expected I regret helping Klaus Schadenfreude. While I am sure his shills appreciated it, I've not helped the situation at all. 

Why would you want to limit all programs on Linux to what can be done on the competition? What is the world coming to when a Klaus Schadenfreude sock can't get any attention? 

No no hell no. He never agreed to stop trolling. He lied about his trolling which surprised nobody. It was Klaus Schadenfreude who was publicly asking how better to obscure his nonsense. 

--
"You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him. He clearly wants the attention"
Steven Petruzzellis, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web