Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #331198 > unrolled thread

Poor Anne

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Contents

  Poor Anne owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-06 07:05 +0000
    Re: Poor Owl Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-06 09:45 +0000
      Re: Poor Owl Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-06 11:28 +0100
        Re: Poor Owl Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-06 11:33 +0000
          Re: Poor Owl Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-06 12:51 +0100
            Re: Poor Owl Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-06 12:24 +0000
              Re: Poor Owl Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-06 13:31 +0100
                Re: Poor Owl Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-06 13:00 +0000
                  Re: Poor Owl Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-06 14:33 +0100
                    Re: Poor Owl Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-06 09:12 -0700
                  Re: Poor Owl Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 07:03 -0800
                    Re: Poor Owl Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-09 08:53 +0000
                      Re: Poor Owl Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 06:46 -0800
                        Re: Poor Owl vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-09 22:58 +0000
                        Re: Poor Owl Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-10 09:25 +0000
                          Re: Poor Owl Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 09:30 -0700
                            Re: Poor Owl Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 08:44 -0800
                  Re: Poor Owl Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-06 09:09 -0700
                    Re: Poor Owl Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 08:47 -0800
                Re: Poor Owl Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-06 09:11 -0700
            Re: Poor Owl Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-06 09:11 -0700
          Re: Poor Owl Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-06 09:09 -0700
        Re: Poor Owl Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-06 10:50 -0500
          Re: Poor Owl Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-06 09:16 -0700
        Re: Poor Owl Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-06 09:10 -0700
      Re: Poor Desk Rabbit owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-07 06:26 +0000
        Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-07 08:49 -0500
        Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-07 10:17 -0500
          Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-07 10:56 -0700
            Re: Poor Desk Rabbit owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-07 18:58 +0000
              Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-07 14:10 -0500
              Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-07 14:12 -0500
        Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 09:26 -0800
          Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-07 12:46 -0500
            Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-07 13:10 -0500
              Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-07 11:24 -0700
                Snit's Support Of Incest. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-07 13:28 -0500
                Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 10:58 -0800
                  Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-07 14:12 -0500
              Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-07 13:27 -0500
                Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-07 14:05 -0500
            Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 12:49 -0800
          Re: Poor Desk Rabbit owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-07 19:35 +0000
            Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-07 11:38 -0800
              Re: Poor Desk Rabbit owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-07 20:21 +0000
                Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-07 13:38 -0700
                  Re: Poor Desk Rabbit owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-07 21:42 +0000
                    Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-07 15:39 -0700
              Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2015-11-08 01:46 +0000
                Re: Poor Desk Rabbit owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-08 08:11 +0000
        Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-10 09:27 +0000
          Re: Poor Desk Rabbit owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-10 19:19 +0000
            Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 11:33 -0800
              Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-10 16:29 -0500
              Re: Poor Desk Rabbit GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 17:12 -0700
            Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-17 11:20 +0000
              Re: Poor Desk Rabbit Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-17 13:23 -0700
              Re: Poor Desk Rabbit owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-18 17:52 +0000
    Re: Poor Anne Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-06 07:42 -0500
    Re: Poor Anne Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-06 07:01 -0800
      Re: Poor Anne "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.org.invalid> - 2015-11-07 01:50 +0000
        Re: Poor Anne Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-06 21:03 -0500
    Re: Poor Anne Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-06 10:45 -0500
      Re: Poor Anne Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-06 10:52 -0500
      Re: Poor Anne Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-06 09:13 -0700

Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4  Next page →

#331530 — Re: Poor Desk Rabbit

On 2015-11-07 1:27 PM, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Nov 2015 13:10:26 -0500, Slimer wrote:
> 
>> On 2015-11-07 12:46 PM, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote:
>>> On Sat, 7 Nov 2015 09:26:07 -0800 (PST), Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Friday, November 6, 2015 at 11:26:03 PM UTC-7, owl wrote:
>>>>> Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 06/11/2015 07:05, owl wrote nothing of consequence:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yet another "advocate" who can't advocate so just decides to try and 
>>>>>> create a shit storm.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Love is in the air
>>>>> http://i.imgur.com/RM5bu59.gifv
>>>>
>>>> You need to create  a gallery for them ;)
>>>>
>>>> By the way, you're not doing these because Snit tried the sexual version of "psych degree" routine on you (i.e. BS like "repressed homosexual feelings") are you?  Pay it no mind, that's just one of the ways Snit "proves" his superiority over "others", he's been doing it for years. Of course Snit will want "proof" of this claim, here's a post from almost a decade ago, I call it - A Tail of two Tim's - (apparent misspelling intentional).
>>>>
>>>> A curious little thread where the ever 'politically correct' Snit confronted a black guy named Tim Crowley (who Snit later drove out of the group for co-trolling using a racist remark... but that's another story) and suggested he was ... well, you'll see if you check the link below (Snit seems to have a lot of sex stuff tied up win his "psych degree" usage).
>>>>
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/F8hOVJr5lvA/2nVssAJOA6wJ>
>>>>
>>>> Your art subject was obviously drinking, on drugs or a mixture of the two, as he often appeared to be in CSMA. The other Tim (Adams... a guy Snit continually sought out to replay Snit's incest obsession), summed things up rather nicely with:
>>>>
>>>> "And once again snit proves he can't read and follow a thread."
>>>
>>> Tim Crowley, now that's a blast from the past. I remember those exchanges
>>> but not the details. I do recall that it did get quite nasty as snit would
>>> post while he was all glued up and at some points it was quite bizarre.
>>>
>>> Snit is obviously a repressed closet queen who has been frustrated since
>>> early childhood because he was born with a penis instead of a vagina.
>>> He was probably picked on by the other kids because of his effeminate
>>> behavior and chances are good his father was quite disappointed that his
>>> son turned out to be a girl in a boy's body.
>>>
>>> Fast forward 30 years and these days snit's therapy if you will, consists
>>> of projecting his faults and own disappointments on others.
>>>
>>> He has created a fantasy world where he believes he is superior to others
>>> and that these underlings beg for his attention. Nothing could be farther
>>> from the truth. I doubt there is a single person in any of the groups he
>>> infects that doesn't want snit to disappear from USENET forever.
>>>
>>> It looks like he has returned to csma once again so good luck to whomever
>>> is still left in that group.
>>
>> I'm pretty sure that the people there have learned their lesson and
>> won't take long before putting him in their killfile.
> 
> Only a couple of regulars remain. Seems to be some new faces over there so
> snit has some fresh victims.
> 
> It won't take them long to figure snit out.

I'm sure they'll enjoy reading the same article posted four or five
times in succession.

-- 
Slimer

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331561 — Re: Poor Desk Rabbit

On Saturday, November 7, 2015 at 10:47:13 AM UTC-7, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Nov 2015 09:26:07 -0800 (PST), Steve Carroll wrote:
> 
> > On Friday, November 6, 2015 at 11:26:03 PM UTC-7, owl wrote:
> >> Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> wrote:
> >>> On 06/11/2015 07:05, owl wrote nothing of consequence:
> >>> 
> >>> Yet another "advocate" who can't advocate so just decides to try and 
> >>> create a shit storm.
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> Love is in the air
> >> http://i.imgur.com/RM5bu59.gifv
> > 
> > You need to create  a gallery for them ;)
> > 
> > By the way, you're not doing these because Snit tried the sexual version of "psych degree" routine on you (i.e. BS like "repressed homosexual feelings") are you?  Pay it no mind, that's just one of the ways Snit "proves" his superiority over "others", he's been doing it for years. Of course Snit will want "proof" of this claim, here's a post from almost a decade ago, I call it - A Tail of two Tim's - (apparent misspelling intentional).
> > 
> > A curious little thread where the ever 'politically correct' Snit confronted a black guy named Tim Crowley (who Snit later drove out of the group for co-trolling using a racist remark... but that's another story) and suggested he was ... well, you'll see if you check the link below (Snit seems to have a lot of sex stuff tied up win his "psych degree" usage).
> > 
> > <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/F8hOVJr5lvA/2nVssAJOA6wJ>
> > 
> > Your art subject was obviously drinking, on drugs or a mixture of the two, as he often appeared to be in CSMA. The other Tim (Adams... a guy Snit continually sought out to replay Snit's incest obsession), summed things up rather nicely with:
> > 
> > "And once again snit proves he can't read and follow a thread."
> 
> Tim Crowley, now that's a blast from the past. I remember those exchanges
> but not the details. I do recall that it did get quite nasty as snit would
> post while he was all glued up and at some points it was quite bizarre.
> 
> Snit is obviously a repressed closet queen who has been frustrated since
> early childhood because he was born with a penis instead of a vagina.
> He was probably picked on by the other kids because of his effeminate
> behavior and chances are good his father was quite disappointed that his
> son turned out to be a girl in a boy's body.
> 
> Fast forward 30 years and these days snit's therapy if you will, consists
> of projecting his faults and own disappointments on others.
> 
> He has created a fantasy world where he believes he is superior to others
> and that these underlings beg for his attention. Nothing could be farther
> from the truth. I doubt there is a single person in any of the groups he
> infects that doesn't want snit to disappear from USENET forever.
> 
> It looks like he has returned to csma once again so good luck to whomever
> is still left in that group.

He is trying to return again. LOL!

They won't bite now, those guys are doing their usual stuff between 2 or 3 of them. When I just checked, the top thread is entitled "For Greycloud", written in '04. You can see that, even way back then, Snit never missed an opportunity to engage in his obsession with me, this time, by lying about what I 'admitted' to. Funny stuff ;)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331542 — Re: Poor Desk Rabbit

Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, November 6, 2015 at 11:26:03 PM UTC-7, owl wrote:
>> Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> wrote:
>> > On 06/11/2015 07:05, owl wrote nothing of consequence:
>> > 
>> > Yet another "advocate" who can't advocate so just decides to try and 
>> > create a shit storm.
>> > 
>> 
>> Love is in the air
>> http://i.imgur.com/RM5bu59.gifv
> 
> You need to create  a gallery for them ;)
> 
> By the way, you're not doing these because Snit tried the sexual version of "psych degree" routine on you (i.e. BS like "repressed homosexual feelings") are you?

No.  Boredom mainly -- tinkering, lulz, etc.  And waiting on some books to get
here from amazon.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331543 — Re: Poor Desk Rabbit

On Saturday, November 7, 2015 at 12:35:04 PM UTC-7, owl wrote:
> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Friday, November 6, 2015 at 11:26:03 PM UTC-7, owl wrote:
> >> Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> wrote:
> >> > On 06/11/2015 07:05, owl wrote nothing of consequence:
> >> > 
> >> > Yet another "advocate" who can't advocate so just decides to try and 
> >> > create a shit storm.
> >> > 
> >> 
> >> Love is in the air
> >> http://i.imgur.com/RM5bu59.gifv
> > 
> > You need to create  a gallery for them ;)
> > 
> > By the way, you're not doing these because Snit tried the sexual version of "psych degree" routine on you (i.e. BS like "repressed homosexual feelings") are you?
> 
> No.  Boredom mainly -- tinkering, lulz, etc.  And waiting on some books to get
> here from amazon.

I just saw this article:

http://lifehacker.com/make-animated-gifs-from-still-images-in-os-x-with-a-rig-1740804798

Cue up another epic Snit-owl battle ;)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331555 — Re: Poor Desk Rabbit

Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Saturday, November 7, 2015 at 12:35:04 PM UTC-7, owl wrote:
>> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Friday, November 6, 2015 at 11:26:03 PM UTC-7, owl wrote:
>> >> Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> wrote:
>> >> > On 06/11/2015 07:05, owl wrote nothing of consequence:
>> >> > 
>> >> > Yet another "advocate" who can't advocate so just decides to try and 
>> >> > create a shit storm.
>> >> > 
>> >> 
>> >> Love is in the air
>> >> http://i.imgur.com/RM5bu59.gifv
>> > 
>> > You need to create  a gallery for them ;)
>> > 
>> > By the way, you're not doing these because Snit tried the sexual version of "psych degree" routine on you (i.e. BS like "repressed homosexual feelings") are you?
>> 
>> No.  Boredom mainly -- tinkering, lulz, etc.  And waiting on some books to get
>> here from amazon.
> 
> I just saw this article:
> 
> http://lifehacker.com/make-animated-gifs-from-still-images-in-os-x-with-a-rig-1740804798
> 

Cool.  I just used that info to add the same to my desktop.
https://vid.me/wQ4f


> Cue up another epic Snit-owl battle ;)
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331558 — Re: Poor Desk Rabbit

On 11/7/15, 1:21 PM, in article sdf39a.fe@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
<owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:

>>> No.  Boredom mainly -- tinkering, lulz, etc.  And waiting on some books to
>>> get
>>> here from amazon.
>> 
>> I just saw this article:
>> 
>> http://lifehacker.com/make-animated-gifs-from-still-images-in-os-x-with-a-rig
>> -1740804798
>> 
> 
> Cool.  I just used that info to add the same to my desktop.
> https://vid.me/wQ4f

Does the option show when you select, say, text files?


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331575 — Re: Poor Desk Rabbit

Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 11/7/15, 1:21 PM, in article sdf39a.fe@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
> 
>>>> No.  Boredom mainly -- tinkering, lulz, etc.  And waiting on some books to
>>>> get
>>>> here from amazon.
>>> 
>>> I just saw this article:
>>> 
>>> http://lifehacker.com/make-animated-gifs-from-still-images-in-os-x-with-a-rig
>>> -1740804798
>>> 
>> 
>> Cool.  I just used that info to add the same to my desktop.
>> https://vid.me/wQ4f
> 
> Does the option show when you select, say, text files?
> 

I'm running mate desktop and that functionality requires caja-actions,
which allows restricting the script by mime type.  My host system
is running debian stable, and caja-actions is not available for it.
It *is* available for debian testing, and you can see below in a VM that
you can have it so the menu item only shows for the right file type:
 
https://vid.me/NLZ1

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331592 — Re: Poor Desk Rabbit

On 11/7/15, 2:42 PM, in article sdfhue03.afpe@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
<owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:

> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> On 11/7/15, 1:21 PM, in article sdf39a.fe@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>>>>> No.  Boredom mainly -- tinkering, lulz, etc.  And waiting on some books to
>>>>> get
>>>>> here from amazon.
>>>> 
>>>> I just saw this article:
>>>> 
>>>> http://lifehacker.com/make-animated-gifs-from-still-images-in-os-x-with-a-r
>>>> ig
>>>> -1740804798
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Cool.  I just used that info to add the same to my desktop.
>>> https://vid.me/wQ4f
>> 
>> Does the option show when you select, say, text files?
>> 
> 
> I'm running mate desktop and that functionality requires caja-actions,
> which allows restricting the script by mime type.  My host system
> is running debian stable, and caja-actions is not available for it.
> It *is* available for debian testing, and you can see below in a VM that
> you can have it so the menu item only shows for the right file type:
>  
> https://vid.me/NLZ1
> 
Excellent. Thanks.


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331614 — Re: Poor Desk Rabbit

Steve Carroll wrote:

> Cue up another epic Snit-owl battle

Snot and Bowel, what a matchup.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331626 — Re: Poor Desk Rabbit

Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> wrote:
> Steve Carroll wrote:
> 
>> Cue up another epic Snit-owl battle
> 
> Snot and Bowel, what a matchup.

You are such a ridiculous homo.
http://bit.ly/1NjBYFC

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#332208 — Re: Poor Desk Rabbit

On 07/11/2015 06:26, owl wrote:
> Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> wrote:
>> On 06/11/2015 07:05, owl wrote nothing of consequence:
>>
>> Yet another "advocate" who can't advocate so just decides to try and
>> create a shit storm.
>>
>
> Love is in the air
> http://i.imgur.com/RM5bu59.gifv
>

Funny but don't try and make a living out of it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#332353 — Re: Poor Desk Rabbit

Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> wrote:
> On 07/11/2015 06:26, owl wrote:
>> Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> wrote:
>>> On 06/11/2015 07:05, owl wrote nothing of consequence:
>>>
>>> Yet another "advocate" who can't advocate so just decides to try and
>>> create a shit storm.
>>>
>>
>> Love is in the air
>> http://i.imgur.com/RM5bu59.gifv
>>
> 
> Funny but don't try and make a living out of it.

You'd probably like it better if your character made more appearances
in the future.  I know I would! :)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#332367 — Re: Poor Desk Rabbit

On Tuesday, November 10, 2015 at 12:19:05 PM UTC-7, owl wrote:
> Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> wrote:
> > On 07/11/2015 06:26, owl wrote:
> >> Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> wrote:
> >>> On 06/11/2015 07:05, owl wrote nothing of consequence:
> >>>
> >>> Yet another "advocate" who can't advocate so just decides to try and
> >>> create a shit storm.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Love is in the air
> >> http://i.imgur.com/RM5bu59.gifv
> >>
> > 
> > Funny but don't try and make a living out of it.
> 
> You'd probably like it better if your character made more appearances
> in the future.  I know I would! :)

You should expand your stuff into comic strips. The first episode can be where Snit is going around conducting a 'scientific' experiment by surveying people who looks like Rabbits but swear they aren't ;)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#332402 — Re: Poor Desk Rabbit

On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:33:24 -0800 (PST), Steve Carroll wrote:

> On Tuesday, November 10, 2015 at 12:19:05 PM UTC-7, owl wrote:
>> Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> wrote:
>>> On 07/11/2015 06:26, owl wrote:
>>>> Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 06/11/2015 07:05, owl wrote nothing of consequence:
>>>>>
>>>>> Yet another "advocate" who can't advocate so just decides to try and
>>>>> create a shit storm.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Love is in the air
>>>> http://i.imgur.com/RM5bu59.gifv
>>>>
>>> 
>>> Funny but don't try and make a living out of it.
>> 
>> You'd probably like it better if your character made more appearances
>> in the future.  I know I would! :)
> 
> You should expand your stuff into comic strips. The first episode can be where Snit is going around conducting a 'scientific' experiment by surveying people who looks like Rabbits but swear they aren't ;)

He should do something like "The Linux Zealot" cartoon strip, only focusing
on snit and his socks.

http://www.adequacy.org/stories/2001.11.26.101258.24.html

Click on the links on the right side of the page for other strips.

-- 
You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#332466 — Re: Poor Desk Rabbit

On 11/10/15 12:33, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 10, 2015 at 12:19:05 PM UTC-7, owl wrote:
>> Desk Rabbit<me@example.com>  wrote:
>>> On 07/11/2015 06:26, owl wrote:
>>>> Desk Rabbit<me@example.com>  wrote:
>>>>> On 06/11/2015 07:05, owl wrote nothing of consequence:
>>>>>
>>>>> Yet another "advocate" who can't advocate so just decides to try and
>>>>> create a shit storm.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Love is in the air
>>>> http://i.imgur.com/RM5bu59.gifv
>>>>
>>>
>>> Funny but don't try and make a living out of it.
>>
>> You'd probably like it better if your character made more appearances
>> in the future.  I know I would! :)
>
> You should expand your stuff into comic strips. The first episode can be where Snit is going around conducting a 'scientific' experiment by surveying people who looks like Rabbits but swear they aren't ;)

Like Jimmy Stewart in Harvey?


-- 
My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#333316 — Re: Poor Desk Rabbit

On 10/11/2015 19:19, owl wrote:
> Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> wrote:
>> On 07/11/2015 06:26, owl wrote:
>>> Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> wrote:
>>>> On 06/11/2015 07:05, owl wrote nothing of consequence:
>>>>
>>>> Yet another "advocate" who can't advocate so just decides to try and
>>>> create a shit storm.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Love is in the air
>>> http://i.imgur.com/RM5bu59.gifv
>>>
>>
>> Funny but don't try and make a living out of it.
>
> You'd probably like it better if your character made more appearances
> in the future.  I know I would! :)
>

Am I supposed to be in it? I had no idea.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#333412 — Re: Poor Desk Rabbit

On 11/17/15, 4:20 AM, in article n2f2dt$55f$1@deskrabbit.motzarella.org,
"Desk Rabbit" <me@example.com> wrote:

> On 10/11/2015 19:19, owl wrote:
>> Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> wrote:
>>> On 07/11/2015 06:26, owl wrote:
>>>> Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 06/11/2015 07:05, owl wrote nothing of consequence:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Yet another "advocate" who can't advocate so just decides to try and
>>>>> create a shit storm.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Love is in the air
>>>> http://i.imgur.com/RM5bu59.gifv
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Funny but don't try and make a living out of it.
>> 
>> You'd probably like it better if your character made more appearances
>> in the future.  I know I would! :)
>> 
> 
> Am I supposed to be in it? I had no idea.

I am glad he is playing with tech and teaching himself in a way he finds
amusing... but he is also demonstrating how much he feels he "lost" some
debate. Frankly I have already lost track of which one.

But at least it was recent... better than others who obsess over 2004 / 2005
(in CSMA there are a few people doing that... just freaking out over some
thing from then... I have not even put together what and do not really
care).


-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#333537 — Re: Poor Desk Rabbit

Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> wrote:
> On 10/11/2015 19:19, owl wrote:
>> Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> wrote:
>>> On 07/11/2015 06:26, owl wrote:
>>>> Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 06/11/2015 07:05, owl wrote nothing of consequence:
>>>>>
>>>>> Yet another "advocate" who can't advocate so just decides to try and
>>>>> create a shit storm.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Love is in the air
>>>> http://i.imgur.com/RM5bu59.gifv
>>>>
>>>
>>> Funny but don't try and make a living out of it.
>>
>> You'd probably like it better if your character made more appearances
>> in the future.  I know I would! :)
>>
> 
> Am I supposed to be in it? I had no idea.

I guess I should have added labels for the Mensans among us.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331224

On Fri, 6 Nov 2015 07:05:39 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote:

> Poor Mrs. Snit...
> http://i.imgur.com/H3torBM.gifv

Excellent!

If the Republicans take over the presidency Snit's government meal ticket
is going to be scrutinized and they are going to put his ass to work.
They plan to rid the government handout roles of parasites and snit
certainly qualifies as a parasite.


-- 
You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#331260

On Friday, November 6, 2015 at 12:05:42 AM UTC-7, owl wrote:
> Poor Mrs. Snit...
> http://i.imgur.com/H3torBM.gifv

LOL! 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy

csiph-web