Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #460873 > unrolled thread
| Started by | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-08-02 18:54 +0000 |
| Last post | 2018-08-03 12:52 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 66 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
"Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 18:54 +0000
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-08-02 14:11 -0500
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 23:12 +0000
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-08-02 19:20 -0400
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 16:42 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-08-03 05:18 -0500
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-08-03 12:12 -0400
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 09:19 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-03 14:44 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-08-03 12:35 +0000
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-08-02 23:38 +0000
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 18:16 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-08-03 05:21 -0500
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-08-03 12:35 +0000
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-08-03 12:56 +0000
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-08-03 12:41 +0000
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-03 14:28 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Helinka Svoboda <helinkasvoboda@protestant.com> - 2018-08-03 23:34 +0000
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-08-03 20:06 -0400
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-08-02 20:04 +0000
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-02 13:13 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 13:29 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-02 13:36 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 14:05 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-02 14:16 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 14:30 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-02 17:40 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 08:17 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-03 14:35 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 09:59 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-04 10:12 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 10:23 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-04 10:34 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 10:44 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-04 17:51 +0000
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-04 17:52 +0000
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 10:55 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-08-04 19:55 +0000
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 13:15 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-08-04 22:48 +0000
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-04 17:01 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 17:26 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-04 17:46 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-04 16:57 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 17:31 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-04 17:48 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-04 18:00 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-04 16:59 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-04 16:53 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Helinka Svoboda <helinkasvoboda@protestant.com> - 2018-08-02 21:30 +0000
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-08-02 18:46 -0400
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 16:11 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-08-03 05:24 -0500
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-03 14:26 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-02 18:10 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 18:32 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-08-02 21:50 -0400
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 19:35 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 13:36 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 14:22 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-02 13:06 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 13:17 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-02 13:27 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Russian Election Hacker <Anatoly@hacker.ru.com> - 2018-08-02 20:22 -0400
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 17:45 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-08-03 12:52 +0000
Page 1 of 4 [1] 2 3 4 Next page →
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-02 18:54 +0000 |
| Subject | "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot |
| Message-ID | <pjvk16$b9q$3@dont-email.me> |
The so-called "respectable" New York Times has hired a known racist bigot, Sarah Jeong, for their Editorial Board. In the past she has tweeted ... ~~ "Dumbass fucking black people marking up the internet with their opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants" "oh man it's kind of sick how much joy I get out of being cruel to old black men" "I dare you to get on Wikipedia and play "Things black people can definitely take credit for." It's really hard." "1. black men are bullshit" "Black people have stopped breeding. You'll all go extinct soon. This was my plan all along." "#CancelBlackPeople" "These are inconvenient truths but we should thoroughly examine them instead of giving onto the PC lie that black people don't smell bad" ~~ The New York Times admitted they knew about these tweets, but hired her anyhow. Well, actually, you need to replace "black" with "white" in every quote. Since she was only attacking white people, it really can't be "racist" can it? Oh, and besides, she claims this was all "satire." If she thinks this is satire, then she has no place as an editor anyhow, because she doesn't even understand the terms she uses. "chrisv" will take the trouble to note that he's ignoring this. -- The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-02 14:11 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <g0l6mdtmh38qmjit02sk6uguapmp4r0i9t@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #460873 |
RonB wrote: >The so-called "respectable" New York Times has hired a known racist bigot, >Sarah Jeong, for their Editorial Board. > >In the past she has tweeted ... > >~~ >"Dumbass fucking black people marking up the internet with their >opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants" > >"oh man it's kind of sick how much joy I get out of being cruel to old >black men" > >"I dare you to get on Wikipedia and play "Things black people can >definitely take credit for." It's really hard." > >"1. black men are bullshit" > >"Black people have stopped breeding. You'll all go extinct soon. This >was my plan all along." > >"#CancelBlackPeople" > >"These are inconvenient truths but we should thoroughly examine them >instead of giving onto the PC lie that black people don't smell bad" >~~ > >The New York Times admitted they knew about these tweets, but hired her anyhow. > >Well, actually, you need to replace "black" with "white" in every quote. >Since she was only attacking white people, it really can't be "racist" can >it? > >Oh, and besides, she claims this was all "satire." If she thinks this is >satire, then she has no place as an editor anyhow, because she doesn't >even understand the terms she uses. > >"chrisv" will take the trouble to note that he's ignoring this. Wrong again. 8) I had seen owl's link to this story, and wasn't sure how to respond. It may be unfair to pull these quotes out of context. We don't know for sure. Certainly there are some double-standards in regards to who we are allowed to "satire". White men are fair game, but minorities are not. It's also acceptable to have stuff like the "black music awards" and "black students group", but not the white equivalent. I will not defend PC bullshit like this, but it is the reality in our world, today.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-02 23:12 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pk035p$hnh$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #460875 |
On 2018-08-02, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > RonB wrote: > >>The so-called "respectable" New York Times has hired a known racist bigot, >>Sarah Jeong, for their Editorial Board. >> >>In the past she has tweeted ... >> >>~~ >>"Dumbass fucking black people marking up the internet with their >>opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants" >> >>"oh man it's kind of sick how much joy I get out of being cruel to old >>black men" >> >>"I dare you to get on Wikipedia and play "Things black people can >>definitely take credit for." It's really hard." >> >>"1. black men are bullshit" >> >>"Black people have stopped breeding. You'll all go extinct soon. This >>was my plan all along." >> >>"#CancelBlackPeople" >> >>"These are inconvenient truths but we should thoroughly examine them >>instead of giving onto the PC lie that black people don't smell bad" >>~~ >> >>The New York Times admitted they knew about these tweets, but hired her anyhow. >> >>Well, actually, you need to replace "black" with "white" in every quote. >>Since she was only attacking white people, it really can't be "racist" can >>it? >> >>Oh, and besides, she claims this was all "satire." If she thinks this is >>satire, then she has no place as an editor anyhow, because she doesn't >>even understand the terms she uses. >> >>"chrisv" will take the trouble to note that he's ignoring this. > > Wrong again. 8) I had seen owl's link to this story, and wasn't > sure how to respond. Wrong again about what, exactly? (I got it, never mind. You were responding to the last sentence – yes, I was wrong about your response.) > It may be unfair to pull these quotes out of context. We don't know > for sure. These were tweets, this IS the context. Would anyone be worrying about context if this woman had tweeted the same thing about blacks? This is clutching at straws. > Certainly there are some double-standards in regards to who we are > allowed to "satire". White men are fair game, but minorities are not. These are direct insults. They are not satire. Satire requires wit and truth, as it's something written "tongue in cheek." Nothing this woman wrote would indicate wit, truth or something written "tongue in cheek." She's just making up the "it's satire" bullshit to cover her racist ass after the fact. Of course she's Korean and a woman so she's "entitled" to attack white men without consequences. > It's also acceptable to have stuff like the "black music awards" and > "black students group", but not the white equivalent. > > I will not defend PC bullshit like this, but it is the reality in our > world, today. Racism should be called racism. The source and those attacked shouldn't matter. It's wrong no matter who is attacked. -- The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-02 19:20 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <fshhuiF7tdaU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #460927 |
On Thu, 2 Aug 2018 23:12:57 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote: > On 2018-08-02, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> RonB wrote: >> >>>The so-called "respectable" New York Times has hired a known racist bigot, >>>Sarah Jeong, for their Editorial Board. >>> >>>In the past she has tweeted ... >>> >>>~~ >>>"Dumbass fucking black people marking up the internet with their >>>opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants" >>> >>>"oh man it's kind of sick how much joy I get out of being cruel to old >>>black men" >>> >>>"I dare you to get on Wikipedia and play "Things black people can >>>definitely take credit for." It's really hard." >>> >>>"1. black men are bullshit" >>> >>>"Black people have stopped breeding. You'll all go extinct soon. This >>>was my plan all along." >>> >>>"#CancelBlackPeople" >>> >>>"These are inconvenient truths but we should thoroughly examine them >>>instead of giving onto the PC lie that black people don't smell bad" >>>~~ >>> >>>The New York Times admitted they knew about these tweets, but hired her anyhow. >>> >>>Well, actually, you need to replace "black" with "white" in every quote. >>>Since she was only attacking white people, it really can't be "racist" can >>>it? >>> >>>Oh, and besides, she claims this was all "satire." If she thinks this is >>>satire, then she has no place as an editor anyhow, because she doesn't >>>even understand the terms she uses. >>> >>>"chrisv" will take the trouble to note that he's ignoring this. >> >> Wrong again. 8) I had seen owl's link to this story, and wasn't >> sure how to respond. > > Wrong again about what, exactly? (I got it, never mind. You were responding > to the last sentence – yes, I was wrong about your response.) > >> It may be unfair to pull these quotes out of context. We don't know >> for sure. > > These were tweets, this IS the context. Would anyone be worrying about > context if this woman had tweeted the same thing about blacks? This is > clutching at straws. > >> Certainly there are some double-standards in regards to who we are >> allowed to "satire". White men are fair game, but minorities are not. > > These are direct insults. They are not satire. Satire requires wit and > truth, as it's something written "tongue in cheek." Nothing this woman wrote > would indicate wit, truth or something written "tongue in cheek." She's just > making up the "it's satire" bullshit to cover her racist ass after the fact. > Of course she's Korean and a woman so she's "entitled" to attack white men > without consequences. > >> It's also acceptable to have stuff like the "black music awards" and >> "black students group", but not the white equivalent. >> >> I will not defend PC bullshit like this, but it is the reality in our >> world, today. > > Racism should be called racism. The source and those attacked shouldn't > matter. It's wrong no matter who is attacked. There is Miss America contest. All races. Then there is Miss Black America. Blacks only. There is MTV awards. All races. Then there is Black Entertainment Awards (BET). Beginning to get the picture chrisv? In case you aren't, could you imagine if the entertainment industry had "White Entertainment Awards"? Or Miss "White America"? Come on already, it would start a race war yet the same thing is accepted on the other side. Double standard.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-02 16:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <07a96676-9917-4474-8304-c532903ba8f5@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #460928 |
On Thursday, August 2, 2018 at 4:20:54 PM UTC-7, GasPipe wrote: > On Thu, 2 Aug 2018 23:12:57 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote: > > > On 2018-08-02, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >> RonB wrote: > >> > >>>The so-called "respectable" New York Times has hired a known racist bigot, > >>>Sarah Jeong, for their Editorial Board. > >>> > >>>In the past she has tweeted ... > >>> > >>>~~ > >>>"Dumbass fucking black people marking up the internet with their > >>>opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants" > >>> > >>>"oh man it's kind of sick how much joy I get out of being cruel to old > >>>black men" > >>> > >>>"I dare you to get on Wikipedia and play "Things black people can > >>>definitely take credit for." It's really hard." > >>> > >>>"1. black men are bullshit" > >>> > >>>"Black people have stopped breeding. You'll all go extinct soon. This > >>>was my plan all along." > >>> > >>>"#CancelBlackPeople" > >>> > >>>"These are inconvenient truths but we should thoroughly examine them > >>>instead of giving onto the PC lie that black people don't smell bad" > >>>~~ > >>> > >>>The New York Times admitted they knew about these tweets, but hired her anyhow. > >>> > >>>Well, actually, you need to replace "black" with "white" in every quote. > >>>Since she was only attacking white people, it really can't be "racist" can > >>>it? > >>> > >>>Oh, and besides, she claims this was all "satire." If she thinks this is > >>>satire, then she has no place as an editor anyhow, because she doesn't > >>>even understand the terms she uses. > >>> > >>>"chrisv" will take the trouble to note that he's ignoring this. > >> > >> Wrong again. 8) I had seen owl's link to this story, and wasn't > >> sure how to respond. > > > > Wrong again about what, exactly? (I got it, never mind. You were responding > > to the last sentence – yes, I was wrong about your response.) > > > >> It may be unfair to pull these quotes out of context. We don't know > >> for sure. > > > > These were tweets, this IS the context. Would anyone be worrying about > > context if this woman had tweeted the same thing about blacks? This is > > clutching at straws. > > > >> Certainly there are some double-standards in regards to who we are > >> allowed to "satire". White men are fair game, but minorities are not. > > > > These are direct insults. They are not satire. Satire requires wit and > > truth, as it's something written "tongue in cheek." Nothing this woman wrote > > would indicate wit, truth or something written "tongue in cheek." She's just > > making up the "it's satire" bullshit to cover her racist ass after the fact. > > Of course she's Korean and a woman so she's "entitled" to attack white men > > without consequences. > > > >> It's also acceptable to have stuff like the "black music awards" and > >> "black students group", but not the white equivalent. > >> > >> I will not defend PC bullshit like this, but it is the reality in our > >> world, today. > > > > Racism should be called racism. The source and those attacked shouldn't > > matter. It's wrong no matter who is attacked. > > There is Miss America contest. All races. > Then there is Miss Black America. Blacks only. > There is MTV awards. All races. > Then there is Black Entertainment Awards (BET). > > Beginning to get the picture chrisv? > > In case you aren't, could you imagine if the entertainment industry had > "White Entertainment Awards"? Or Miss "White America"? > Come on already, it would start a race war yet the same thing is accepted > on the other side. > Double standard. I'm not going to pretend Snit (a real advocate) did not square me away on my network and I am indebted to him for his service. Desk Rabbit has this thread to examine and might learn to sound like he is not just making things up from this day forward. Desk Rabbit has cut down on the endless self promoting, hogwash threads he used to knock off but he's surely consistent in the morality territory. He just uses psychological manipulation more to generate those threads. Right now there are too many "lowest common denominator is fine" freetards and not enough people with enough understanding to help the people with Android. This is clearly a joy of mine. The person you are referencing is in my KF. That's what Desk Rabbit does when he gets upset. He of course creates a flood, starts a trolling thread so he can claim he didn't do it. Don't blame me it was my left hand... and then Desk Rabbit replies to his own post with his right hand. A sustained, relentless, posting itch, while suffering from an empty mind - like slippery worm tarts, and well-lubricated sheep, hung from the ceiling for his own immoral requirements. Of course, the lone thing that is important to Desk Rabbit is appearing "moral", and if he can not have that he will create socks to desperately slap advocates down... he's been that way for years. -- Do not click this link! http://www.5z8.info/killallimmigrants_j6f7mm_gruesome-gunshot-wounds http://tinyurl.com/proof-about-ebot http://tinyurl.com/proof-about-ebot Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-03 05:18 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <sta8md92o2nub88lmv4qnipbp54hstdibe@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #460928 |
GasPipe wrote: >There is Miss America contest. All races. >Then there is Miss Black America. Blacks only. >There is MTV awards. All races. >Then there is Black Entertainment Awards (BET). > >Beginning to get the picture chrisv? > >In case you aren't, could you imagine if the entertainment industry had >"White Entertainment Awards"? Or Miss "White America"? >Come on already, it would start a race war yet the same thing is accepted >on the other side. >Double standard. Err... That was my point, Einstein. -- "but when I noted JPG files could have EXIF data I was repeatedly told I was wrong, lying, an idiot, etc. Funny stuff." - some thing, lying shamelessly (but no one can quote it lying)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-03 12:12 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <fsjd80Fkn5oU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #460958 |
On Fri, 03 Aug 2018 05:18:42 -0500, chrisv wrote: > GasPipe wrote: > >>There is Miss America contest. All races. >>Then there is Miss Black America. Blacks only. >>There is MTV awards. All races. >>Then there is Black Entertainment Awards (BET). >> >>Beginning to get the picture chrisv? >> >>In case you aren't, could you imagine if the entertainment industry had >>"White Entertainment Awards"? Or Miss "White America"? >>Come on already, it would start a race war yet the same thing is accepted >>on the other side. >>Double standard. > > Err... That was my point, Einstein. Indeed it was. My apologies as I thought I replying to the Prescott Parasite and mixed up my reply.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-03 09:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4fa6c713-38ac-4dca-85be-b412fcaf23ff@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #460958 |
On Friday, August 3, 2018 at 4:18:45 AM UTC-6, chrisv wrote: > GasPipe wrote: > > >There is Miss America contest. All races. > >Then there is Miss Black America. Blacks only. > >There is MTV awards. All races. > >Then there is Black Entertainment Awards (BET). > > > >Beginning to get the picture chrisv? > > > >In case you aren't, could you imagine if the entertainment industry had > >"White Entertainment Awards"? Or Miss "White America"? > >Come on already, it would start a race war yet the same thing is accepted > >on the other side. > >Double standard. > > Err... That was my point, Einstein. You're one of the few people claiming to be a 'liberal' who admits that this double standard is the reality in our world today.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-03 14:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fsk0mdFp1l9U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #460989 |
On 8/3/18 9:19 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Friday, August 3, 2018 at 4:18:45 AM UTC-6, chrisv wrote: >> GasPipe wrote: >> >>> There is Miss America contest. All races. >>> Then there is Miss Black America. Blacks only. >>> There is MTV awards. All races. >>> Then there is Black Entertainment Awards (BET). >>> >>> Beginning to get the picture chrisv? >>> >>> In case you aren't, could you imagine if the entertainment industry had >>> "White Entertainment Awards"? Or Miss "White America"? >>> Come on already, it would start a race war yet the same thing is accepted >>> on the other side. >>> Double standard. >> >> Err... That was my point, Einstein. > > You're one of the few people claiming to be a 'liberal' who admits > that this double standard is the reality in our world today. > Who do you think denies it? Who do you think does not understand the reason behind such things? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-03 12:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <8_X8D.5555$r04.2866@fx08.iad> |
| In reply to | #460928 |
On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 19:20:50 -0400, GasPipe wrote: > On Thu, 2 Aug 2018 23:12:57 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote: > >> On 2018-08-02, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> RonB wrote: >>> >>>>The so-called "respectable" New York Times has hired a known racist >>>>bigot, Sarah Jeong, for their Editorial Board. >>>> >>>>In the past she has tweeted ... >>>> >>>>~~ >>>>"Dumbass fucking black people marking up the internet with their >>>>opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants" >>>> >>>>"oh man it's kind of sick how much joy I get out of being cruel to old >>>>black men" >>>> >>>>"I dare you to get on Wikipedia and play "Things black people can >>>>definitely take credit for." It's really hard." >>>> >>>>"1. black men are bullshit" >>>> >>>>"Black people have stopped breeding. You'll all go extinct soon. This >>>>was my plan all along." >>>> >>>>"#CancelBlackPeople" >>>> >>>>"These are inconvenient truths but we should thoroughly examine them >>>>instead of giving onto the PC lie that black people don't smell bad" >>>>~~ >>>> >>>>The New York Times admitted they knew about these tweets, but hired >>>>her anyhow. >>>> >>>>Well, actually, you need to replace "black" with "white" in every >>>>quote. >>>>Since she was only attacking white people, it really can't be "racist" >>>>can it? >>>> >>>>Oh, and besides, she claims this was all "satire." If she thinks this >>>>is satire, then she has no place as an editor anyhow, because she >>>>doesn't even understand the terms she uses. >>>> >>>>"chrisv" will take the trouble to note that he's ignoring this. >>> >>> Wrong again. 8) I had seen owl's link to this story, and wasn't >>> sure how to respond. >> >> Wrong again about what, exactly? (I got it, never mind. You were >> responding to the last sentence – yes, I was wrong about your >> response.) >> >>> It may be unfair to pull these quotes out of context. We don't know >>> for sure. >> >> These were tweets, this IS the context. Would anyone be worrying about >> context if this woman had tweeted the same thing about blacks? This is >> clutching at straws. >> >>> Certainly there are some double-standards in regards to who we are >>> allowed to "satire". White men are fair game, but minorities are not. >> >> These are direct insults. They are not satire. Satire requires wit and >> truth, as it's something written "tongue in cheek." Nothing this woman >> wrote would indicate wit, truth or something written "tongue in cheek." >> She's just making up the "it's satire" bullshit to cover her racist ass >> after the fact. >> Of course she's Korean and a woman so she's "entitled" to attack white >> men without consequences. >> >>> It's also acceptable to have stuff like the "black music awards" and >>> "black students group", but not the white equivalent. >>> >>> I will not defend PC bullshit like this, but it is the reality in our >>> world, today. >> >> Racism should be called racism. The source and those attacked shouldn't >> matter. It's wrong no matter who is attacked. > > There is Miss America contest. All races. > Then there is Miss Black America. Blacks only. > There is MTV awards. All races. > Then there is Black Entertainment Awards (BET). > > Beginning to get the picture chrisv? > > In case you aren't, could you imagine if the entertainment industry had > "White Entertainment Awards"? Or Miss "White America"? > Come on already, it would start a race war yet the same thing is > accepted on the other side. > Double standard. Excellent examples! -- SilverSlimer Ubuntu 18.04 on MSI GT72 2QD Proudly blocking Facebook, Twitter and Youtube Liberals will be killfiled
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-02 23:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <lp3zb97g880ab.htgu93@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #460927 |
RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2018-08-02, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> Certainly there are some double-standards in regards to who we are >> allowed to "satire". White men are fair game, but minorities are not. > > These are direct insults. They are not satire. Satire requires wit and > truth, as it's something written "tongue in cheek." Nothing this woman wrote > would indicate wit, truth or something written "tongue in cheek." She's just > making up the "it's satire" bullshit to cover her racist ass after the fact. > Of course she's Korean and a woman so she's "entitled" to attack white men > without consequences. > Funny how when a "journalist" does it, it's acceptable "satire," but when a professional comedienne does it (and much less disgustingly), it's racism worthy of ending a career, despite the fact that satire is more in the realm of comedy than journalism. Liberals are despicable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-02 18:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8fdbbf57-95e5-496f-87a6-5e339d682e05@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #460930 |
On Thursday, August 2, 2018 at 4:38:57 PM UTC-7, owl wrote: > RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 2018-08-02, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > > >> Certainly there are some double-standards in regards to who we are > >> allowed to "satire". White men are fair game, but minorities are not. > > > > These are direct insults. They are not satire. Satire requires wit and > > truth, as it's something written "tongue in cheek." Nothing this woman wrote > > would indicate wit, truth or something written "tongue in cheek." She's just > > making up the "it's satire" bullshit to cover her racist ass after the fact. > > Of course she's Korean and a woman so she's "entitled" to attack white men > > without consequences. > > > > Funny how when a "journalist" does it, it's acceptable "satire," but > when a professional comedienne does it (and much less disgustingly), > it's racism worthy of ending a career, despite the fact that satire > is more in the realm of comedy than journalism. Liberals are despicable. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi, Snit! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJYY/GZAAoJELnOYK54exUCoY8P/A2to3G0OJrV4rFZqrfos0G+ Hlz52idYDsiO9KbYI9E2AaEhX5Jado6kJgDD31LTOnYSHrIuTi/LeywcjOL/FCy7 bEojPW3xtu/XWHHSKU1Grce80Q2PHuR+878JDbCjXgrFplNEVk8+kiv2+5RlYegG 7xEgm+/J8zvxVlPfyoHOO65AygYy/ykShdza+MAW6OFWaXFNOxExjRx3mCmWcu3b eyf0bxgzL4zAFCuPBAOXQ56vxO8AOuwk8F7mXLV2Vn2Q2OTcqrEYMjwQZ2q7wFSg khU6VkEs7aFJ6keLSCoZlFmnoymptflJw3h0O6bb9GK67JBV6Moh5rev6aJfqGuZ fo38FgD/eRVroAYSm3FSCcknNbUhdNLUO/JmCRtx62YQvZoyUqUL64YRGlJ+moAV ZnU6NfI4WeeQ5nuagTS+kKjj1qGxsUkXEUTFRJpv4zQcHnTKTyUl+38t3+Jke7ua NRtkWtIvgg9+JCsA1qHjDDP29hdR5v7KFFnRKBaVgV+/nrALANWybFJKYsqxpP95 LMd0pxvEy2ZlX9n3nkmMIn4iRX3dY795NgOzHGd1ZWtMS3BPu4QWFA/YS7Adb30Z yHClb/JJWGtTPvgVtPzHyNbPhF6+kgJ/KQ6YrqiX71ZNLZNqCze7z3nw6xjcWr9V soXbWlBBa6AX7lnolpK8 =hcV2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- "You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him. He clearly wants the attention" Steven Petruzzellis, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-03 05:21 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <f0b8md5o1gsrgvdfq080hi3a30kjjnu07i@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #460930 |
owl wrote: >Funny how when a "journalist" does it, it's acceptable "satire," but >when a professional comedienne does it (and much less disgustingly), >it's racism worthy of ending a career, despite the fact that satire >is more in the realm of comedy than journalism. I don't disagree with you, there. >Liberals are despicable. Right-wingers are worse. The "political correctness problem" is only one of many, that face society. Global warming, anyone? -- "Pretty much just described your herd who thinks you have to be 100% with Linux or you are evil." - some thing, lying shamelessly (but no one can quote it lying)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-03 12:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <09a08b0a3.auo93@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #460959 |
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > owl wrote: > >>Funny how when a "journalist" does it, it's acceptable "satire," but >>when a professional comedienne does it (and much less disgustingly), >>it's racism worthy of ending a career, despite the fact that satire >>is more in the realm of comedy than journalism. > > I don't disagree with you, there. > >>Liberals are despicable. > > Right-wingers are worse. > > The "political correctness problem" is only one of many, that face > society. Global warming, anyone? > http://www.spaceweather.com/images2018/03aug18/hmi200.gif http://www.spaceweather.com/ <quote> Daily Sun: 03 Aug 18   Barely visible sunspot AR2717 is tiny and poses no threat for solar flares. Solar minimum continues. Credit: SDO/HMI </quote> https://www.livescience.com/61716-sun-cooling-global-warming.html <quote> A periodic solar event called a "grand minimum" could overtake the sun perhaps as soon as 2020 and lasting through 2070, resulting in diminished magnetism, infrequent sunspot production and less ultraviolet (UV) radiation reaching Earth — all bringing a cooler period to the planet that may span 50 years. The last grand-minimum event — a disruption of the sun's 11-year cycle of variable sunspot activity — happened in the mid-17th century. Known as the Maunder Minimum, it occurred between 1645 and 1715, during a longer span of time when parts of the world became so cold that the period was called the Little Ice Age, which lasted from about 1300 to 1850. </quote> And then there's this: https://bit.ly/2ANFpeb
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-03 12:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <JhY8D.5559$r04.3801@fx08.iad> |
| In reply to | #460963 |
On Fri, 03 Aug 2018 12:35:30 +0000, owl wrote: > chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> owl wrote: >> >>>Funny how when a "journalist" does it, it's acceptable "satire," but >>>when a professional comedienne does it (and much less disgustingly), >>>it's racism worthy of ending a career, despite the fact that satire is >>>more in the realm of comedy than journalism. >> >> I don't disagree with you, there. >> >>>Liberals are despicable. >> >> Right-wingers are worse. >> >> The "political correctness problem" is only one of many, that face >> society. Global warming, anyone? >> >> > http://www.spaceweather.com/images2018/03aug18/hmi200.gif > > http://www.spaceweather.com/ > <quote> > Daily Sun: 03 Aug 18 >  >  > Barely visible sunspot AR2717 is tiny and poses no threat for solar > flares. Solar minimum continues. Credit: SDO/HMI </quote> > > https://www.livescience.com/61716-sun-cooling-global-warming.html > <quote> > A periodic solar event called a "grand minimum" could overtake the sun > perhaps as soon as 2020 and lasting through 2070, resulting in > diminished magnetism, infrequent sunspot production and less ultraviolet > (UV) radiation reaching Earth — all bringing a cooler period to the > planet that may span 50 years. > > The last grand-minimum event — a disruption of the sun's 11-year cycle > of variable sunspot activity — happened in the mid-17th century. Known > as the Maunder Minimum, it occurred between 1645 and 1715, during a > longer span of time when parts of the world became so cold that the > period was called the Little Ice Age, which lasted from about 1300 to > 1850. > </quote> > > And then there's this: > https://bit.ly/2ANFpeb If our summers become much cooler from 2020 on, we'll know for sure that the sun, and only the sun, is responsible for how warm the planet is. It can also be used as motivation for any citizen whose country was forced into paying a carbon tax to head to the administrative building and demand the leader's head... or at least a complete refund of the scheme. -- SilverSlimer Ubuntu 18.04 on MSI GT72 2QD Proudly blocking Facebook, Twitter and Youtube Liberals will be killfiled
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-03 12:41 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <a4Y8D.5556$r04.3771@fx08.iad> |
| In reply to | #460930 |
On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 23:38:55 +0000, owl wrote: > RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 2018-08-02, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>> Certainly there are some double-standards in regards to who we are >>> allowed to "satire". White men are fair game, but minorities are not. >> >> These are direct insults. They are not satire. Satire requires wit and >> truth, as it's something written "tongue in cheek." Nothing this woman >> wrote would indicate wit, truth or something written "tongue in cheek." >> She's just making up the "it's satire" bullshit to cover her racist ass >> after the fact. >> Of course she's Korean and a woman so she's "entitled" to attack white >> men without consequences. >> >> > Funny how when a "journalist" does it, it's acceptable "satire," but > when a professional comedienne does it (and much less disgustingly), > it's racism worthy of ending a career, despite the fact that satire is > more in the realm of comedy than journalism. Liberals are despicable. Today's liberals can get away with anything nowadays. 1) They can get away with calls for violence against republicans. <https://www.truthrevolt.org/news/20-liberal-calls-violence-against- republicans> 2) Blatant racism as in the case of Sarah Jeong <http://www.foxnews.com/ entertainment/2018/08/02/new-york-times-stands-by-new-tech-writer-sarah- jeong-after-racist-tweets-surface.html> 3) Domestic terrorism as in the case of Antifa of which Bloated Scott Doty is a supporter <https://www.newsweek.com/are-antifa-terrorists-658396> 4) Treason <https://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/homeland-security-chairman- says-hillary-clinton-committed-treason> Need I go on? -- SilverSlimer Ubuntu 18.04 on MSI GT72 2QD Proudly blocking Facebook, Twitter and Youtube Liberals will be killfiled
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-03 14:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fsjvnbForj8U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #460964 |
On 8/3/18 5:41 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: > On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 23:38:55 +0000, owl wrote: > >> RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 2018-08-02, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> >>>> Certainly there are some double-standards in regards to who we are >>>> allowed to "satire". White men are fair game, but minorities are not. >>> >>> These are direct insults. They are not satire. Satire requires wit and >>> truth, as it's something written "tongue in cheek." Nothing this woman >>> wrote would indicate wit, truth or something written "tongue in cheek." >>> She's just making up the "it's satire" bullshit to cover her racist ass >>> after the fact. >>> Of course she's Korean and a woman so she's "entitled" to attack white >>> men without consequences. >>> >>> >> Funny how when a "journalist" does it, it's acceptable "satire," but >> when a professional comedienne does it (and much less disgustingly), >> it's racism worthy of ending a career, despite the fact that satire is >> more in the realm of comedy than journalism. Liberals are despicable. > > Today's liberals can get away with anything nowadays. Clearly not true. But you DO like to play victim. > 1) They can get away with calls for violence against republicans. > <https://www.truthrevolt.org/news/20-liberal-calls-violence-against- > republicans> > > 2) Blatant racism as in the case of Sarah Jeong <http://www.foxnews.com/ > entertainment/2018/08/02/new-york-times-stands-by-new-tech-writer-sarah- > jeong-after-racist-tweets-surface.html> > > 3) Domestic terrorism as in the case of Antifa of which Bloated Scott Doty > is a supporter <https://www.newsweek.com/are-antifa-terrorists-658396> > > 4) Treason <https://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/homeland-security-chairman- > says-hillary-clinton-committed-treason> > > Need I go on? > -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Helinka Svoboda <helinkasvoboda@protestant.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-03 23:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pk2opq$l3q$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #460927 |
On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 23:12:57 +0000, RonB wrote: > On 2018-08-02, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >> RonB wrote: >> >>>The so-called "respectable" New York Times has hired a known racist >>>bigot, Sarah Jeong, for their Editorial Board. >>> >>>In the past she has tweeted ... >>> >>>~~ >>>"Dumbass fucking black people marking up the internet with their >>>opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants" >>> >>>"oh man it's kind of sick how much joy I get out of being cruel to old >>>black men" >>> >>>"I dare you to get on Wikipedia and play "Things black people can >>>definitely take credit for." It's really hard." >>> >>>"1. black men are bullshit" >>> >>>"Black people have stopped breeding. You'll all go extinct soon. This >>>was my plan all along." >>> >>>"#CancelBlackPeople" >>> >>>"These are inconvenient truths but we should thoroughly examine them >>>instead of giving onto the PC lie that black people don't smell bad" >>>~~ >>> >>>The New York Times admitted they knew about these tweets, but hired her >>>anyhow. >>> >>>Well, actually, you need to replace "black" with "white" in every >>>quote. >>>Since she was only attacking white people, it really can't be "racist" >>>can it? >>> >>>Oh, and besides, she claims this was all "satire." If she thinks this >>>is satire, then she has no place as an editor anyhow, because she >>>doesn't even understand the terms she uses. >>> >>>"chrisv" will take the trouble to note that he's ignoring this. >> >> Wrong again. 8) I had seen owl's link to this story, and wasn't >> sure how to respond. > > Wrong again about what, exactly? (I got it, never mind. You were > responding to the last sentence – yes, I was wrong about your response.) > >> It may be unfair to pull these quotes out of context. We don't know >> for sure. > > These were tweets, this IS the context. Would anyone be worrying about > context if this woman had tweeted the same thing about blacks? This is > clutching at straws. Hopefully not in California because you can go to jail for possessing plastic straws. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/07/25/california-city-oks-jail-time- for-defying-plastic-straw-ban.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-03 20:06 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <fsk8v9Fqod6U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #461040 |
On Fri, 3 Aug 2018 23:34:18 -0000 (UTC), Helinka Svoboda wrote: > On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 23:12:57 +0000, RonB wrote: > >> On 2018-08-02, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> RonB wrote: >>> >>>>The so-called "respectable" New York Times has hired a known racist >>>>bigot, Sarah Jeong, for their Editorial Board. >>>> >>>>In the past she has tweeted ... >>>> >>>>~~ >>>>"Dumbass fucking black people marking up the internet with their >>>>opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants" >>>> >>>>"oh man it's kind of sick how much joy I get out of being cruel to old >>>>black men" >>>> >>>>"I dare you to get on Wikipedia and play "Things black people can >>>>definitely take credit for." It's really hard." >>>> >>>>"1. black men are bullshit" >>>> >>>>"Black people have stopped breeding. You'll all go extinct soon. This >>>>was my plan all along." >>>> >>>>"#CancelBlackPeople" >>>> >>>>"These are inconvenient truths but we should thoroughly examine them >>>>instead of giving onto the PC lie that black people don't smell bad" >>>>~~ >>>> >>>>The New York Times admitted they knew about these tweets, but hired her >>>>anyhow. >>>> >>>>Well, actually, you need to replace "black" with "white" in every >>>>quote. >>>>Since she was only attacking white people, it really can't be "racist" >>>>can it? >>>> >>>>Oh, and besides, she claims this was all "satire." If she thinks this >>>>is satire, then she has no place as an editor anyhow, because she >>>>doesn't even understand the terms she uses. >>>> >>>>"chrisv" will take the trouble to note that he's ignoring this. >>> >>> Wrong again. 8) I had seen owl's link to this story, and wasn't >>> sure how to respond. >> >> Wrong again about what, exactly? (I got it, never mind. You were >> responding to the last sentence – yes, I was wrong about your response.) >> >>> It may be unfair to pull these quotes out of context. We don't know >>> for sure. >> >> These were tweets, this IS the context. Would anyone be worrying about >> context if this woman had tweeted the same thing about blacks? This is >> clutching at straws. > > Hopefully not in California because you can go to jail for possessing > plastic straws. > http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/07/25/california-city-oks-jail-time- > for-defying-plastic-straw-ban.html This is at least 2 years old but it's even worse now. https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/how-decades-of-democratic-rule-ruined-some-of-our-finest-cities/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-02 20:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ktJ8D.892$E_.144@fx30.iad> |
| In reply to | #460873 |
On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 18:54:30 +0000, RonB wrote: > The so-called "respectable" New York Times has hired a known racist > bigot, Sarah Jeong, for their Editorial Board. > > In the past she has tweeted ... > > ~~ > "Dumbass fucking black people marking up the internet with their > opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants" > > "oh man it's kind of sick how much joy I get out of being cruel to old > black men" > > "I dare you to get on Wikipedia and play "Things black people can > definitely take credit for." It's really hard." > > "1. black men are bullshit" > > "Black people have stopped breeding. You'll all go extinct soon. This > was my plan all along." > > "#CancelBlackPeople" > > "These are inconvenient truths but we should thoroughly examine them > instead of giving onto the PC lie that black people don't smell bad" > ~~ > > The New York Times admitted they knew about these tweets, but hired her > anyhow. > > Well, actually, you need to replace "black" with "white" in every quote. > Since she was only attacking white people, it really can't be "racist" > can it? > > Oh, and besides, she claims this was all "satire." If she thinks this is > satire, then she has no place as an editor anyhow, because she doesn't > even understand the terms she uses. > > "chrisv" will take the trouble to note that he's ignoring this. I'm looking forward to seeing snitv and Snit's apologies for the racist quoted in your future articles. -- SilverSlimer Ubuntu 18.04 on MSI GT72 2QD Proudly blocking Facebook, Twitter and Youtube Liberals will be killfiled
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 4 [1] 2 3 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web