Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #331772 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-09 02:20 +0000 |
| Last post | 2015-11-16 11:41 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 327 — 27 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 02:20 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-11-08 18:55 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-08 20:02 -0700
Circus Alert.. Don't take the bait Fabian Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-08 22:11 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 04:22 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-08 21:50 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 05:13 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-08 22:38 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 10:45 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-16 09:25 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-16 19:09 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2015-11-16 18:59 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-09 04:38 -0800
Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-11-08 21:30 -0800
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 06:18 +0000
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-09 12:43 +0000
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 12:09 -0700
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 11:28 -0800
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 13:03 -0700
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-09 20:26 +0000
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:27 -0700
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-09 15:39 -0500
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-09 15:45 -0500
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-11-09 21:53 +0100
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-09 16:01 -0500
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 17:14 -0500
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 15:18 -0700
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-09 17:48 -0500
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-11-10 01:58 +0100
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:28 -0700
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-11-10 02:30 +0100
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:24 -0700
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-10 22:50 +0000
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 06:31 +0000
Fabian Russell is disabled. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-11-08 23:12 -0800
Re: Plenty of non-idiots use Windows. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 13:03 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 03:12 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 13:04 -0700
Rot in Hell, Russell. There Moi fixed your 1st post. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 02:31 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-09 12:39 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 06:47 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-09 15:35 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 07:51 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-09 16:31 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 11:32 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 13:01 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 20:04 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-09 15:18 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 21:01 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-09 16:08 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:35 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 13:54 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 20:54 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 21:13 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 17:17 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-09 23:24 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 17:36 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:37 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:32 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 13:04 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:30 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 18:44 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 03:58 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 21:38 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-10 08:18 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 15:15 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-10 10:49 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 07:54 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-10 11:21 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 08:46 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:27 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:25 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 12:45 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 22:30 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-10 17:37 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 18:04 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 01:30 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 18:59 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-11 03:15 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-11 07:22 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 10:20 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-12 21:32 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 14:51 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-12 22:13 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-12 23:17 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 15:28 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-12 22:38 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-12 18:40 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-12 23:24 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-13 00:33 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-13 10:57 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-13 12:21 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-13 12:26 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-13 14:57 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-13 17:04 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-13 07:25 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 11:48 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-13 17:09 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-13 20:39 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 15:43 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-13 21:30 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-16 09:27 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-13 22:18 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-16 09:29 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-12 18:39 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-13 10:55 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 10:26 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 15:26 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-12 22:42 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-12 16:06 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-12 23:25 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-12 23:36 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-12 18:46 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-13 00:35 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-13 14:54 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-13 14:53 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 15:36 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 17:40 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-12 18:37 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-13 00:40 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 18:01 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 01:29 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 18:47 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 02:29 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 19:34 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-12 21:45 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 19:05 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-12 21:03 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 02:26 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 19:35 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 02:51 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-12 22:00 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 03:36 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-12 22:41 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 19:46 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 20:00 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 03:18 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 01:49 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 10:27 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 11:15 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-13 11:30 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 11:32 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 08:45 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 12:12 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 10:25 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 12:27 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 10:41 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 12:40 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 10:47 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 12:52 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 10:06 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 10:25 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 10:28 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 11:52 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 10:02 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 12:15 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 08:24 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 12:52 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-12 21:44 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 10:24 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-14 01:01 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 20:08 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 20:17 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 02:07 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-09 21:48 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 14:23 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 21:25 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 14:37 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:41 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 21:07 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 04:05 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 21:48 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-10 08:20 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 15:18 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:29 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:28 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 12:46 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 16:36 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-10 18:32 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:39 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 18:46 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 04:09 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 21:47 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-10 08:21 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-10 14:48 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-10 10:34 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-10 18:27 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:31 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 20:51 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 21:21 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 21:49 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 15:12 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:48 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 04:14 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 21:47 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 12:33 -0700
GhostScipt works well on Windows. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-11-09 16:09 -0800
Re: GhostScipt works well on Windows. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 19:54 -0500
Re: GhostScipt works well on Windows. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:49 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-11-10 03:23 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-11 09:42 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-11 13:29 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-11 13:08 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 16:58 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:43 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-10 04:18 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 21:46 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 13:49 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 13:48 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 04:56 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-08 22:15 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 05:27 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-08 22:43 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-09 04:35 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 06:46 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-09 10:14 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 18:02 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 12:15 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 13:06 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-09 14:13 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-09 06:13 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-11-09 12:32 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-09 11:38 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-09 07:51 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-09 09:48 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-09 10:03 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 18:05 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-09 13:19 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-09 14:24 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 13:08 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 16:35 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-09 13:52 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 12:17 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 13:07 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-09 21:46 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 14:26 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:52 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-11-10 02:54 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 13:51 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-10 10:27 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-10 06:52 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-10 13:21 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-11-10 07:39 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 13:55 -0700
Are the FOSS community "suckers", Kreep? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-10 07:12 -0600
Re: Are the FOSS community "suckers", Kreep? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-10 08:22 -0500
Re: Are the FOSS community "suckers", Kreep? GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 13:58 -0700
Re: Are the FOSS community "suckers", Kreep? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-11 09:27 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 13:58 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-10 22:01 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-10 23:15 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 16:38 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-11 00:45 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-11 14:15 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 18:10 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 17:33 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-12 21:58 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-12 23:15 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-12 22:19 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 15:30 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 00:37 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 18:00 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 01:24 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 18:46 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 02:28 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 19:34 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-13 10:27 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 02:41 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 09:44 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 10:23 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 11:06 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 17:27 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 15:24 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 15:33 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-11 10:05 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-11 11:20 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-11 13:27 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 10:36 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-12 22:58 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 15:15 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-11-11 06:15 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 16:37 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 09:31 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 13:55 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 13:54 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-11-11 20:05 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-12 10:03 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-12 10:18 +0100
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-12 11:40 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-12 11:40 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-09 21:14 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-09 18:53 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-10 18:00 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-10 16:39 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-11 18:00 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-11-11 20:02 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-12 06:46 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-12 11:41 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-12 09:22 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-12 11:43 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-12 18:07 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-13 07:35 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-13 14:58 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-13 14:57 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-14 07:30 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-14 12:18 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-14 22:09 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-14 20:12 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> - 2015-11-15 03:31 +0000
To dvus. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-16 11:40 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-15 10:46 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-16 11:38 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-16 14:47 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-11-16 20:26 +0000
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-16 14:43 -0600
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-16 14:19 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-16 15:39 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-16 15:38 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-16 15:37 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-17 05:30 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-11-17 14:57 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-17 20:04 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-11-17 19:26 -0700
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-09 08:14 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-11-09 06:52 -0800
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. Bob Loblaw <BL@LinuxProfessionals.com> - 2015-11-15 11:05 -0500
Re: Some people don't want a _desktop_ PC. GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-16 11:41 -0700
Page 9 of 17 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 … 17 Next page →
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-14 01:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fshvu83.afa31e@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #332869 |
In comp.os.linux.advocacy Slimer <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > On 2015-11-12 9:26 PM, owl wrote: >> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>> You could start a thread about nuclear fission at the molecular level and >>> he would invade it. >>> >>> Probably the only thread Michael Glasser, The Prescott Computer Guy will >>> avoid is one related to him getting a job and supporting his family. >>> >> >> Can you imagine what it's like having to live in Prescott AZ, and this >> Prescott Computer Guy is the only one you can turn to if you have >> computer problems? The guy's never there when you call because he's >> out trolling usenet 24/7. > > LOL. OK, that's just funny. This scenario demands a comic. > https://gifsound.com/?gifv=0ZqyoYi&v=O38JYX1aml4
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 20:08 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <r5q2pcoihd8q$.18yy3cqg02x4j.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #332987 |
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 01:01:12 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: > In comp.os.linux.advocacy Slimer <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >> On 2015-11-12 9:26 PM, owl wrote: >>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: > >>>> You could start a thread about nuclear fission at the molecular level and >>>> he would invade it. >>>> >>>> Probably the only thread Michael Glasser, The Prescott Computer Guy will >>>> avoid is one related to him getting a job and supporting his family. >>>> >>> >>> Can you imagine what it's like having to live in Prescott AZ, and this >>> Prescott Computer Guy is the only one you can turn to if you have >>> computer problems? The guy's never there when you call because he's >>> out trolling usenet 24/7. >> >> LOL. OK, that's just funny. This scenario demands a comic. >> > > https://gifsound.com/?gifv=0ZqyoYi&v=O38JYX1aml4 +100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Fuck!!!! That's your best one yet! I hope Anne Glasser is reading these. -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 20:17 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n261v0$eie$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #332989 |
On 2015-11-13 8:08 PM, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: > On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 01:01:12 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: > >> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Slimer <.m@nsn.s> wrote: >>> On 2015-11-12 9:26 PM, owl wrote: >>>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >> >>>>> You could start a thread about nuclear fission at the molecular level and >>>>> he would invade it. >>>>> >>>>> Probably the only thread Michael Glasser, The Prescott Computer Guy will >>>>> avoid is one related to him getting a job and supporting his family. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Can you imagine what it's like having to live in Prescott AZ, and this >>>> Prescott Computer Guy is the only one you can turn to if you have >>>> computer problems? The guy's never there when you call because he's >>>> out trolling usenet 24/7. >>> >>> LOL. OK, that's just funny. This scenario demands a comic. >>> >> >> https://gifsound.com/?gifv=0ZqyoYi&v=O38JYX1aml4 > > +100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 > Fuck!!!! > That's your best one yet! > > I hope Anne Glasser is reading these. It's honestly the best one I've seen, I agree. I am still laughing my ass off. -- Slimer EFF & OpenMedia Member / IFAW and PETA Supporter Death to Islam
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-11 02:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dafm7hFnk55U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #332485 |
On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 01:30:36 +0000, Fabian Russell wrote: > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 18:04:07 -0700, Snit wrote: > > >> OK, so you have no idea who Mark Shuttleworth is or why he is a big >> name in the open source community. Wow. >> >> > Oops. My first error in this thread. > > I was thinking of Zuckerberg. But I admit I do not know Shuttleworth. > > I am not a fan of personalities. Incorrect. You just think you are the only personality that matters. Unfortunately for you, the mirror you keep looking at is the only thing that agrees. -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-09 21:48 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <n1r0m1$ig9$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #331944 |
GreyCloud wrote: > On 11/08/15 21:22, Fabian Russell wrote: >> On Sun, 08 Nov 2015 20:02:52 -0700, Snit wrote: >> >>> >>> The computer is working to accommodate the user. And is should. >>> >> >> The computer is working to accommodate the ignoramus who never bothered >> to take the time to learn about computers even though they are an >> integral and indispensable part of our civilization. >> >> There, I fixed that for you. >> >> >>> >>> What text file do you mean? Old .ini files? If so, sure, a general user >>> should never have to see those. >>> >> >> Yeah, Now we are faced with that uniquely Microsoft monstrosity known as >> the REGISTRY. >> >> How about that registry, eh? The registry is an inaccessible heap of >> garbage >> that also forms a gigantic weak spot for complete OS failure. Microsoft >> deserves a medal for that idea. >> > > More FUD. Never had trouble with the registry. > The OS never has failed me or anybody else that uses windows. And because of that all those programs to repair a corrupted registry don't exist You are truly an idiot of snittish proportions
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-09 14:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D2665CFA.634E1%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #331976 |
On 11/9/15, 1:48 PM, in article n1r0m1$ig9$2@dont-email.me, "Peter Köhlmann" <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: >>> Yeah, Now we are faced with that uniquely Microsoft monstrosity known as >>> the REGISTRY. >>> >>> How about that registry, eh? The registry is an inaccessible heap of >>> garbage >>> that also forms a gigantic weak spot for complete OS failure. Microsoft >>> deserves a medal for that idea. >>> >> >> More FUD. Never had trouble with the registry. >> The OS never has failed me or anybody else that uses windows. > > And because of that all those programs to repair a corrupted registry don't > exist > > You are truly an idiot of snittish proportions And all those users avoid Linux because it works so well, right? Face it, Peter, your use of "logic" is so amazingly weak as to be a joke. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lloyd Parsons <lloydp211@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-09 21:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dach9jFtq0rU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #331976 |
On Mon, 09 Nov 2015 21:48:09 +0100, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > GreyCloud wrote: > >> On 11/08/15 21:22, Fabian Russell wrote: >>> On Sun, 08 Nov 2015 20:02:52 -0700, Snit wrote: >>> >>> >>>> The computer is working to accommodate the user. And is should. >>>> >>>> >>> The computer is working to accommodate the ignoramus who never >>> bothered to take the time to learn about computers even though they >>> are an integral and indispensable part of our civilization. >>> >>> There, I fixed that for you. >>> >>> >>> >>>> What text file do you mean? Old .ini files? If so, sure, a general >>>> user should never have to see those. >>>> >>>> >>> Yeah, Now we are faced with that uniquely Microsoft monstrosity known >>> as the REGISTRY. >>> >>> How about that registry, eh? The registry is an inaccessible heap of >>> garbage that also forms a gigantic weak spot for complete OS failure. >>> Microsoft deserves a medal for that idea. >>> >>> >> More FUD. Never had trouble with the registry. >> The OS never has failed me or anybody else that uses windows. > > And because of that all those programs to repair a corrupted registry > don't exist > They exist for old versions of Windows, and for linux geeks that have fucked up their registry with useless shit on the Windows boxes they use to make a living. > You are truly an idiot of snittish proportions -- Lloyd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-09 14:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D266603F.634F6%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #331994 |
On 11/9/15, 2:25 PM, in article dach9jFtq0rU4@mid.individual.net, "Lloyd Parsons" <lloydp211@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> How about that registry, eh? The registry is an inaccessible heap of >>>> garbage that also forms a gigantic weak spot for complete OS failure. >>>> Microsoft deserves a medal for that idea. >>>> >>>> >>> More FUD. Never had trouble with the registry. >>> The OS never has failed me or anybody else that uses windows. >> >> And because of that all those programs to repair a corrupted registry >> don't exist >> > They exist for old versions of Windows, and for linux geeks that have > fucked up their registry with useless shit on the Windows boxes they use > to make a living. How many examples are there of a registry cleaner actually fixing ANY issue? -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-09 18:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <HvCdnXlAd5rO1tzLnZ2dnUU7-LGdnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #332000 |
On 11/09/15 14:37, Snit wrote: > On 11/9/15, 2:25 PM, in article dach9jFtq0rU4@mid.individual.net, "Lloyd > Parsons"<lloydp211@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> How about that registry, eh? The registry is an inaccessible heap of >>>>> garbage that also forms a gigantic weak spot for complete OS failure. >>>>> Microsoft deserves a medal for that idea. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> More FUD. Never had trouble with the registry. >>>> The OS never has failed me or anybody else that uses windows. >>> >>> And because of that all those programs to repair a corrupted registry >>> don't exist >>> >> They exist for old versions of Windows, and for linux geeks that have >> fucked up their registry with useless shit on the Windows boxes they use >> to make a living. > > How many examples are there of a registry cleaner actually fixing ANY issue? > > I've heard from MS that these registry cleaners are risky to use. http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_xp-files/registry-cleaners/5311416e-e8f5-460b-981c-925abf7c22bd?auth=1 -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-09 21:07 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n1rjc7$lcd$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #332128 |
On 2015-11-09 8:41 PM, GreyCloud wrote: > On 11/09/15 14:37, Snit wrote: >> On 11/9/15, 2:25 PM, in article dach9jFtq0rU4@mid.individual.net, "Lloyd >> Parsons"<lloydp211@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>>>> How about that registry, eh? The registry is an inaccessible heap of >>>>>> garbage that also forms a gigantic weak spot for complete OS failure. >>>>>> Microsoft deserves a medal for that idea. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> More FUD. Never had trouble with the registry. >>>>> The OS never has failed me or anybody else that uses windows. >>>> >>>> And because of that all those programs to repair a corrupted registry >>>> don't exist >>>> >>> They exist for old versions of Windows, and for linux geeks that have >>> fucked up their registry with useless shit on the Windows boxes they use >>> to make a living. >> >> How many examples are there of a registry cleaner actually fixing ANY >> issue? >> >> > I've heard from MS that these registry cleaners are risky to use. > > http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_xp-files/registry-cleaners/5311416e-e8f5-460b-981c-925abf7c22bd?auth=1 Ken Blake actually posts in the alt.comp.os.windows-10 newsgroup. I disagree with him on this one though. While I haven't seen any difference in performance whether I cleaned the registry or not, I still think that it makes sense to remove useless entries if the software itself didn't bother to do so as those entries might eventually conflict with other software used for the same purpose. It doesn't happen often, but it might. For instance, installing WordPerfect Office without removing the registry entries before installing Microsoft Office is just looking for conflicts. -- Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 04:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pan.2015.11.10.04.03.44@localhost.localdomain> |
| In reply to | #332153 |
On Mon, 09 Nov 2015 21:07:11 -0500, Slimer wrote: > > I still > think that it makes sense to remove useless entries if the software > itself didn't bother to do so as those entries might eventually conflict > with other software used for the same purpose. It doesn't happen often, > but it might. > Lamentably, MS Windows requires many third-party tools to make it usable. One such tool that I can't live without is Revo Uninstaller. Revo will track all installs and remove EVERYTHING when it comes time to uninstall. Revo, and a lot of other third-party apps, should have been built-in as part of the native Windows OS, but Microsoft stupidity prevented it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-09 21:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D266C52F.6362C%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #332179 |
On 11/9/15, 9:05 PM, in article pan.2015.11.10.04.03.44@localhost.localdomain, "Fabian Russell" <root@localhost.localdomain> wrote: > On Mon, 09 Nov 2015 21:07:11 -0500, Slimer wrote: > >> >> I still >> think that it makes sense to remove useless entries if the software >> itself didn't bother to do so as those entries might eventually conflict >> with other software used for the same purpose. It doesn't happen often, >> but it might. > > Lamentably, MS Windows requires many third-party tools to make it > usable. Are you suggesting desktop Linux comes from one company and not third party tools are needed?!?!? > One such tool that I can't live without is Revo Uninstaller. Revo > will track all installs and remove EVERYTHING when it comes time > to uninstall. Yet most people work happily without it. > Revo, and a lot of other third-party apps, should have been built-in > as part of the native Windows OS, but Microsoft stupidity prevented > it. > -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 08:20 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n1sqq3$9vi$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #332179 |
On 2015-11-09 11:05 PM, Fabian Russell wrote: > On Mon, 09 Nov 2015 21:07:11 -0500, Slimer wrote: > >> >> I still >> think that it makes sense to remove useless entries if the software >> itself didn't bother to do so as those entries might eventually conflict >> with other software used for the same purpose. It doesn't happen often, >> but it might. >> > > Lamentably, MS Windows requires many third-party tools to make it > usable. I use CCleaner Pro only because I paid for it. Without it, my desktop is still usable. Similarly, I installed Macrium Reflect but only because I am accustomed to it. I can just as easily use Windows' own backup utility. > One such tool that I can't live without is Revo Uninstaller. Revo > will track all installs and remove EVERYTHING when it comes time > to uninstall. > > Revo, and a lot of other third-party apps, should have been built-in > as part of the native Windows OS, but Microsoft stupidity prevented > it. Had Revo ever OFFERED to build it in? Microsoft cannot implement technology it doesn't own. -- Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fabian Russell <root@localhost.localdomain> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 15:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pan.2015.11.10.15.18.35@localhost.localdomain> |
| In reply to | #332231 |
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 08:20:12 -0500, Slimer wrote: >> >> Revo, and a lot of other third-party apps, should have been built-in >> as part of the native Windows OS, but Microsoft stupidity prevented >> it. > > Had Revo ever OFFERED to build it in? Microsoft cannot implement > technology it doesn't own. > I meant that Microsoft should have built in functionality similar to that offered by Revo and others. Revo just performs a before and after snapshot of the registry and file system. Microsoft could build in something more direct.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 12:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <IL6dnVZMe4wQ2N_LnZ2dnUU7-U2dnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #332179 |
On 11/09/15 21:05, Fabian Russell wrote: > On Mon, 09 Nov 2015 21:07:11 -0500, Slimer wrote: > >> >> I still >> think that it makes sense to remove useless entries if the software >> itself didn't bother to do so as those entries might eventually conflict >> with other software used for the same purpose. It doesn't happen often, >> but it might. >> > > Lamentably, MS Windows requires many third-party tools to make it > usable. > > One such tool that I can't live without is Revo Uninstaller. Revo > will track all installs and remove EVERYTHING when it comes time > to uninstall. > > Revo, and a lot of other third-party apps, should have been built-in > as part of the native Windows OS, but Microsoft stupidity prevented > it. > More FUD and trolling on your part. Guffaw!!! -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 12:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <IL6dnVdMe4zq2N_LnZ2dnUU7-U2dnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #332153 |
On 11/09/15 19:07, Slimer wrote: > On 2015-11-09 8:41 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >> On 11/09/15 14:37, Snit wrote: >>> On 11/9/15, 2:25 PM, in article dach9jFtq0rU4@mid.individual.net, "Lloyd >>> Parsons"<lloydp211@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>>> How about that registry, eh? The registry is an inaccessible heap of >>>>>>> garbage that also forms a gigantic weak spot for complete OS failure. >>>>>>> Microsoft deserves a medal for that idea. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> More FUD. Never had trouble with the registry. >>>>>> The OS never has failed me or anybody else that uses windows. >>>>> >>>>> And because of that all those programs to repair a corrupted registry >>>>> don't exist >>>>> >>>> They exist for old versions of Windows, and for linux geeks that have >>>> fucked up their registry with useless shit on the Windows boxes they use >>>> to make a living. >>> >>> How many examples are there of a registry cleaner actually fixing ANY >>> issue? >>> >>> >> I've heard from MS that these registry cleaners are risky to use. >> >> http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_xp-files/registry-cleaners/5311416e-e8f5-460b-981c-925abf7c22bd?auth=1 > > Ken Blake actually posts in the alt.comp.os.windows-10 newsgroup. > > I disagree with him on this one though. While I haven't seen any > difference in performance whether I cleaned the registry or not, I still > think that it makes sense to remove useless entries if the software > itself didn't bother to do so as those entries might eventually conflict > with other software used for the same purpose. It doesn't happen often, > but it might. > > For instance, installing WordPerfect Office without removing the > registry entries before installing Microsoft Office is just looking for > conflicts. > > At the speed the registry is processed, no one will ever notice any slow downs, just due to extra entries. At 3.4Ghz, you won't even notice it. Best to just leave the registry alone. -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 12:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D2679793.63778%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #332362 |
On 11/10/15, 12:28 PM, in article IL6dnVdMe4zq2N_LnZ2dnUU7-U2dnZ2d@bresnan.com, "GreyCloud" <cumulus@mist.com> wrote: >>> I've heard from MS that these registry cleaners are risky to use. >>> >>> http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_xp-files/registry-c >>> leaners/5311416e-e8f5-460b-981c-925abf7c22bd?auth=1 >> >> Ken Blake actually posts in the alt.comp.os.windows-10 newsgroup. >> >> I disagree with him on this one though. While I haven't seen any >> difference in performance whether I cleaned the registry or not, I still >> think that it makes sense to remove useless entries if the software >> itself didn't bother to do so as those entries might eventually conflict >> with other software used for the same purpose. It doesn't happen often, >> but it might. >> >> For instance, installing WordPerfect Office without removing the >> registry entries before installing Microsoft Office is just looking for >> conflicts. >> >> > At the speed the registry is processed, no one will ever notice any slow > downs, just due to extra entries. At 3.4Ghz, you won't even notice it. > Best to just leave the registry alone. And you can have MS Word and Word Perfect installed at the same time without any issues as far as I know. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 16:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <Feidnae65-QX4t_LnZ2dnUU7-WWdnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #332373 |
On 11/10/15 12:46, Snit wrote: > On 11/10/15, 12:28 PM, in article > IL6dnVdMe4zq2N_LnZ2dnUU7-U2dnZ2d@bresnan.com, "GreyCloud"<cumulus@mist.com> > wrote: > >>>> I've heard from MS that these registry cleaners are risky to use. >>>> >>>> http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_xp-files/registry-c >>>> leaners/5311416e-e8f5-460b-981c-925abf7c22bd?auth=1 >>> >>> Ken Blake actually posts in the alt.comp.os.windows-10 newsgroup. >>> >>> I disagree with him on this one though. While I haven't seen any >>> difference in performance whether I cleaned the registry or not, I still >>> think that it makes sense to remove useless entries if the software >>> itself didn't bother to do so as those entries might eventually conflict >>> with other software used for the same purpose. It doesn't happen often, >>> but it might. >>> >>> For instance, installing WordPerfect Office without removing the >>> registry entries before installing Microsoft Office is just looking for >>> conflicts. >>> >>> >> At the speed the registry is processed, no one will ever notice any slow >> downs, just due to extra entries. At 3.4Ghz, you won't even notice it. >> Best to just leave the registry alone. > > And you can have MS Word and Word Perfect installed at the same time without > any issues as far as I know. > > Yep. The only issues that used to be out there was installing the VS2010 community edition and the VS2010 Pro on the same PC. But I hear that problem is no longer. -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-10 18:32 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n1tulk$4o5$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #332362 |
On 2015-11-10 2:28 PM, GreyCloud wrote: > On 11/09/15 19:07, Slimer wrote: >> On 2015-11-09 8:41 PM, GreyCloud wrote: >>> On 11/09/15 14:37, Snit wrote: >>>> On 11/9/15, 2:25 PM, in article dach9jFtq0rU4@mid.individual.net, >>>> "Lloyd >>>> Parsons"<lloydp211@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>>>> How about that registry, eh? The registry is an inaccessible >>>>>>>> heap of >>>>>>>> garbage that also forms a gigantic weak spot for complete OS >>>>>>>> failure. >>>>>>>> Microsoft deserves a medal for that idea. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> More FUD. Never had trouble with the registry. >>>>>>> The OS never has failed me or anybody else that uses windows. >>>>>> >>>>>> And because of that all those programs to repair a corrupted registry >>>>>> don't exist >>>>>> >>>>> They exist for old versions of Windows, and for linux geeks that have >>>>> fucked up their registry with useless shit on the Windows boxes >>>>> they use >>>>> to make a living. >>>> >>>> How many examples are there of a registry cleaner actually fixing ANY >>>> issue? >>>> >>>> >>> I've heard from MS that these registry cleaners are risky to use. >>> >>> http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_xp-files/registry-cleaners/5311416e-e8f5-460b-981c-925abf7c22bd?auth=1 >>> >> >> Ken Blake actually posts in the alt.comp.os.windows-10 newsgroup. >> >> I disagree with him on this one though. While I haven't seen any >> difference in performance whether I cleaned the registry or not, I still >> think that it makes sense to remove useless entries if the software >> itself didn't bother to do so as those entries might eventually conflict >> with other software used for the same purpose. It doesn't happen often, >> but it might. >> >> For instance, installing WordPerfect Office without removing the >> registry entries before installing Microsoft Office is just looking for >> conflicts. >> >> > At the speed the registry is processed, no one will ever notice any slow > downs, just due to extra entries. At 3.4Ghz, you won't even notice it. > Best to just leave the registry alone. I can imagine that it was a problem back in the Windows 95 days when machines ran between 66 and 120MHz and had little more than 16MB of RAM. Now though, there's no reason to complain unless you're a lying Linux loser. -- Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-09 18:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <HvCdnX5Ad5oq19zLnZ2dnUU7-LGdnZ2d@bresnan.com> |
| In reply to | #331976 |
On 11/09/15 13:48, Peter Köhlmann wrote: > GreyCloud wrote: > >> On 11/08/15 21:22, Fabian Russell wrote: >>> On Sun, 08 Nov 2015 20:02:52 -0700, Snit wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> The computer is working to accommodate the user. And is should. >>>> >>> >>> The computer is working to accommodate the ignoramus who never bothered >>> to take the time to learn about computers even though they are an >>> integral and indispensable part of our civilization. >>> >>> There, I fixed that for you. >>> >>> >>>> >>>> What text file do you mean? Old .ini files? If so, sure, a general user >>>> should never have to see those. >>>> >>> >>> Yeah, Now we are faced with that uniquely Microsoft monstrosity known as >>> the REGISTRY. >>> >>> How about that registry, eh? The registry is an inaccessible heap of >>> garbage >>> that also forms a gigantic weak spot for complete OS failure. Microsoft >>> deserves a medal for that idea. >>> >> >> More FUD. Never had trouble with the registry. >> The OS never has failed me or anybody else that uses windows. > > And because of that all those programs to repair a corrupted registry don't > exist > > You are truly an idiot of snittish proportions And you are lying out your ass again, as usual. I've never in 4 years had troubles with the registry. Just more FUD from the lying, braying jackasses known as linux advocates. -- My problem is that I don't have enough middle fingers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 9 of 17 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 … 17 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web