Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #460873 > unrolled thread
| Started by | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-08-02 18:54 +0000 |
| Last post | 2018-08-03 12:52 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 66 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
"Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 18:54 +0000
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-08-02 14:11 -0500
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 23:12 +0000
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-08-02 19:20 -0400
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 16:42 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-08-03 05:18 -0500
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-08-03 12:12 -0400
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 09:19 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-03 14:44 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-08-03 12:35 +0000
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-08-02 23:38 +0000
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 18:16 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-08-03 05:21 -0500
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2018-08-03 12:35 +0000
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-08-03 12:56 +0000
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-08-03 12:41 +0000
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-03 14:28 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Helinka Svoboda <helinkasvoboda@protestant.com> - 2018-08-03 23:34 +0000
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-08-03 20:06 -0400
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-08-02 20:04 +0000
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-02 13:13 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 13:29 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-02 13:36 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 14:05 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-02 14:16 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 14:30 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-02 17:40 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-03 08:17 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-03 14:35 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 09:59 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-04 10:12 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 10:23 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-04 10:34 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 10:44 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-04 17:51 +0000
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-04 17:52 +0000
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 10:55 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-08-04 19:55 +0000
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 13:15 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-08-04 22:48 +0000
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-04 17:01 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 17:26 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-04 17:46 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-04 16:57 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-04 17:31 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-04 17:48 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-04 18:00 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-04 16:59 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-04 16:53 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Helinka Svoboda <helinkasvoboda@protestant.com> - 2018-08-02 21:30 +0000
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-08-02 18:46 -0400
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 16:11 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-08-03 05:24 -0500
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-03 14:26 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-02 18:10 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 18:32 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-08-02 21:50 -0400
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 19:35 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 13:36 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 14:22 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-02 13:06 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 13:17 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-02 13:27 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Russian Election Hacker <Anatoly@hacker.ru.com> - 2018-08-02 20:22 -0400
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 17:45 -0700
Re: "Respectable" NYT hires racist bigot SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-08-03 12:52 +0000
Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-04 17:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fsmt2gFe4h8U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #461163 |
On 8/4/18 3:48 PM, vallor wrote: > On Sat, 04 Aug 2018 13:15:27 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: > >> On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 1:55:22 PM UTC-6, vallor wrote: >> >>> You're a scumbag and a clown, Carroll. >> >> Actually, you're the scumbag and clown here, Doty... for writing this >> based on just subject line alone. >> >> "With a subject line like that, there is no way you can ever be >> considered as anything but a racist." - (scumbag and clown) Scott Doty >> >> Me: >> "If a person had never read any of his posts, there is no reason to >> assume this by the subject line. This is exactly the kind of stuff even >> black people are complaining about." >> >> <b4415b04-5065-4d77-8d1d-d93057438bc7@googlegroups.com> >> >> You *unquestionably* let Slimer's posting history color your 'judgement' >> here. >> >>> Re: >>> Subject: Re: Firearms-related offenses surged during the Smiling & >>> Dancing >>> Black Man's last two years >>> >>> You wrote: >>> >>> "I don't believe he is middle of the road but the idea that it's been >>> 'proven' by this subject is absurd. IMO people claiming otherwise are >>> no better than he in this respect. This kind of BS has to stop." >> >> And I stand by every word there *and* my previous post... that you left >> out. >> >>> Who do you think you're fooling? >> >> >> You're actually asking *me* that after what I just proved what you tried >> to do here? >> >> Writing the word "Black" does not make anyone a "racist". Only TRUE >> scumbag, >> racist clowns push that kind of politicized crap. The kind that want >> everyone to think they're 'oh, so sensitive' to the issues of black >> people... who are sick and tired of being used as political pawns by >> these racist clown jackasses. > > Just keep digging your hole deeper and deeper, Carroll -- you're not > fooling anybody. > Not at all. But this is what he does... piles lie upon lie. This BS about being called a racist because you merely say the word black... where the hell does he even get that nonsense? Slimer made openly racist comments Carroll backed. Period. No matter how he cries and whines and plays victim it is THAT simple. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-04 17:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1b90c06e-8fe7-40ce-8548-9b49f84f3595@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #461163 |
On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 4:48:49 PM UTC-6, vallor wrote: > On Sat, 04 Aug 2018 13:15:27 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 1:55:22 PM UTC-6, vallor wrote: > > > >> You're a scumbag and a clown, Carroll. > > > > Actually, you're the scumbag and clown here, Doty... for writing this > > based on just subject line alone. > > > > "With a subject line like that, there is no way you can ever be > > considered as anything but a racist." - (scumbag and clown) Scott Doty > > > > Me: > > "If a person had never read any of his posts, there is no reason to > > assume this by the subject line. This is exactly the kind of stuff even > > black people are complaining about." > > > > <b4415b04-5065-4d77-8d1d-d93057438bc7@googlegroups.com> > > > > You *unquestionably* let Slimer's posting history color your 'judgement' > > here. > > > >> Re: > >> Subject: Re: Firearms-related offenses surged during the Smiling & > >> Dancing > >> Black Man's last two years > >> > >> You wrote: > >> > >> "I don't believe he is middle of the road but the idea that it's been > >> 'proven' by this subject is absurd. IMO people claiming otherwise are > >> no better than he in this respect. This kind of BS has to stop." > > > > And I stand by every word there *and* my previous post... that you left > > out. > > > >> Who do you think you're fooling? > > > > > > You're actually asking *me* that after what I just proved what you tried > > to do here? > > > > Writing the word "Black" does not make anyone a "racist". Only TRUE > > scumbag, > > racist clowns push that kind of politicized crap. The kind that want > > everyone to think they're 'oh, so sensitive' to the issues of black > > people... who are sick and tired of being used as political pawns by > > these racist clown jackasses. > > Just keep digging your hole deeper and deeper, Carroll Hole? WTF are you babbling? > -- you're not fooling anybody. You're the one who's not fooling anyone here, Doty, despite your absurd attempts to use Snit-ish 'psychology' on me with some user-lib playing of the 'race' card that doesn't fit in my case.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-04 17:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fsmvn5Fem4rU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #461171 |
On 8/4/18 5:26 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 4:48:49 PM UTC-6, vallor wrote: >> On Sat, 04 Aug 2018 13:15:27 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: >> >>> On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 1:55:22 PM UTC-6, vallor wrote: >>> >>>> You're a scumbag and a clown, Carroll. >>> >>> Actually, you're the scumbag and clown here, Doty... for writing this >>> based on just subject line alone. >>> >>> "With a subject line like that, there is no way you can ever be >>> considered as anything but a racist." - (scumbag and clown) Scott Doty >>> >>> Me: >>> "If a person had never read any of his posts, there is no reason to >>> assume this by the subject line. This is exactly the kind of stuff even >>> black people are complaining about." >>> >>> <b4415b04-5065-4d77-8d1d-d93057438bc7@googlegroups.com> >>> >>> You *unquestionably* let Slimer's posting history color your 'judgement' >>> here. >>> >>>> Re: >>>> Subject: Re: Firearms-related offenses surged during the Smiling & >>>> Dancing >>>> Black Man's last two years >>>> >>>> You wrote: >>>> >>>> "I don't believe he is middle of the road but the idea that it's been >>>> 'proven' by this subject is absurd. IMO people claiming otherwise are >>>> no better than he in this respect. This kind of BS has to stop." >>> >>> And I stand by every word there *and* my previous post... that you left >>> out. >>> >>>> Who do you think you're fooling? >>> >>> >>> You're actually asking *me* that after what I just proved what you tried >>> to do here? >>> >>> Writing the word "Black" does not make anyone a "racist". Only TRUE >>> scumbag, >>> racist clowns push that kind of politicized crap. The kind that want >>> everyone to think they're 'oh, so sensitive' to the issues of black >>> people... who are sick and tired of being used as political pawns by >>> these racist clown jackasses. >> >> Just keep digging your hole deeper and deeper, Carroll > > Hole? WTF are you babbling? > >> -- you're not fooling anybody. > > You're the one who's not fooling anyone here, Doty, despite your absurd attempts > to use Snit-ish 'psychology' on me with some user-lib playing of the 'race' card > that doesn't fit in my case. > Slimer speed racist crap. You backed it. When called out on it you lied / moved goal posts. It really is THAT simple. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-04 16:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fsmss5Fe4h8U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #461153 |
On 8/4/18 1:15 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 1:55:22 PM UTC-6, vallor wrote: > >> You're a scumbag and a clown, Carroll. > > Actually, you're the scumbag and clown here, Doty... for writing this based on > just subject line alone. > > "With a subject line like that, there is no way you can ever be considered > as anything but a racist." - (scumbag and clown) Scott Doty > > Me: > "If a person had never read any of his posts, there is no reason to assume > this by the subject line. This is exactly the kind of stuff even black people > are complaining about." > > <b4415b04-5065-4d77-8d1d-d93057438bc7@googlegroups.com> > > You *unquestionably* let Slimer's posting history color your 'judgement' here. > >> Re: >> Subject: Re: Firearms-related offenses surged during the Smiling & Dancing >> Black Man's last two years >> >> You wrote: >> >> "I don't believe he is middle of the road but the idea that it's been >> 'proven' by this subject is absurd. IMO people claiming otherwise are no >> better than he in this respect. This kind of BS has to stop." > > And I stand by every word there *and* my previous post... that you left out. > >> Who do you think you're fooling? > > > You're actually asking *me* that after what I just proved what you tried to do here? > > Writing the word "Black" does not make anyone a "racist". Nor has ANYONE suggested it does. Obama is black (or really half black, half white). NOTHING racist about saying so. That does not in any way excuse the bigoted crap Slimer posts and you backed. > Only TRUE scumbag, > racist clowns push that kind of politicized crap. NOBODY in this group suggested merely saying "black" made ANYONE a racist. You are whining about what did not even happen. Hey, let's see your hypocrisy in action: quote ANYONE relevant to this discussion who said merely saying "black" makes someone a racist. ANYONE. You will fail. You will have NO quote. You will not show what you are using as your "defense". You have been caught lying and piling lies again. > The kind that want everyone to > think they're 'oh, so sensitive' to the issues of black people... who are sick and > tired of being used as political pawns by these racist clown jackasses. Stop blaming OTHERS for your open support of racist crap. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-04 17:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <cc686a34-db4d-4580-aea0-10d46f651046@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #461167 |
On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 5:58:00 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 8/4/18 1:15 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 1:55:22 PM UTC-6, vallor wrote: > > > >> You're a scumbag and a clown, Carroll. > > > > Actually, you're the scumbag and clown here, Doty... for writing this based on > > just subject line alone. > > > > "With a subject line like that, there is no way you can ever be considered > > as anything but a racist." - (scumbag and clown) Scott Doty > > > > Me: > > "If a person had never read any of his posts, there is no reason to assume > > this by the subject line. This is exactly the kind of stuff even black people > > are complaining about." > > > > <b4415b04-5065-4d77-8d1d-d93057438bc7@googlegroups.com> > > > > You *unquestionably* let Slimer's posting history color your 'judgement' here. > > > >> Re: > >> Subject: Re: Firearms-related offenses surged during the Smiling & Dancing > >> Black Man's last two years > >> > >> You wrote: > >> > >> "I don't believe he is middle of the road but the idea that it's been > >> 'proven' by this subject is absurd. IMO people claiming otherwise are no > >> better than he in this respect. This kind of BS has to stop." > > > > And I stand by every word there *and* my previous post... that you left out. > > > >> Who do you think you're fooling? > > > > > > You're actually asking *me* that after what I just proved what you tried to do here? > > > > Writing the word "Black" does not make anyone a "racist". > > Nor has ANYONE suggested it does. Bull, that's exactly what you two cowardly imbeciles have done here. You remove Slimer's posting history and there is nothing "racist" about the subject line. Anyone would expect this kind of crap from you... seems now it can be expected from Doty.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-04 17:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fsmvrlFem4rU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #461173 |
On 8/4/18 5:31 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 5:58:00 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 8/4/18 1:15 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 1:55:22 PM UTC-6, vallor wrote: >>> >>>> You're a scumbag and a clown, Carroll. >>> >>> Actually, you're the scumbag and clown here, Doty... for writing this based on >>> just subject line alone. >>> >>> "With a subject line like that, there is no way you can ever be considered >>> as anything but a racist." - (scumbag and clown) Scott Doty >>> >>> Me: >>> "If a person had never read any of his posts, there is no reason to assume >>> this by the subject line. This is exactly the kind of stuff even black people >>> are complaining about." >>> >>> <b4415b04-5065-4d77-8d1d-d93057438bc7@googlegroups.com> >>> >>> You *unquestionably* let Slimer's posting history color your 'judgement' here. >>> >>>> Re: >>>> Subject: Re: Firearms-related offenses surged during the Smiling & Dancing >>>> Black Man's last two years >>>> >>>> You wrote: >>>> >>>> "I don't believe he is middle of the road but the idea that it's been >>>> 'proven' by this subject is absurd. IMO people claiming otherwise are no >>>> better than he in this respect. This kind of BS has to stop." >>> >>> And I stand by every word there *and* my previous post... that you left out. >>> >>>> Who do you think you're fooling? >>> >>> >>> You're actually asking *me* that after what I just proved what you tried to do here? >>> >>> Writing the word "Black" does not make anyone a "racist". >> >> Nor has ANYONE suggested it does. > > Bull, that's exactly what you two cowardly imbeciles have done here. And yet you cannot quote it because it did not happen. Ever. Nor would it. Ever. > You remove > Slimer's posting history and there is nothing "racist" about the subject line. Your failure to admit to your support of bigoted crap does not make the bigoted crap any less bigoted. > Anyone > would expect this kind of crap from you... seems now it can be expected from Doty. Poor Victim Carroll... called out on his supported of bigoted crap and lying. Remember, Carroll, YOUR standard is one does not even need to quote you (though you WERE quoted backing racist crap)... one merely needs "eye witnesses" who will say they say your racist crap. YOUR standards. YOUR double standards. You are showing yourself as a bigoted, dishonest, hypocrite. Again. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-04 18:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fsn0hkFeq8bU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #461176 |
On 8/4/18 5:48 PM, Snit wrote: > On 8/4/18 5:31 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >> On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 5:58:00 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>> On 8/4/18 1:15 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>> On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 1:55:22 PM UTC-6, vallor wrote: >>>> >>>>> You're a scumbag and a clown, Carroll. >>>> >>>> Actually, you're the scumbag and clown here, Doty... for writing >>>> this based on >>>> just subject line alone. >>>> >>>> "With a subject line like that, there is no way you can ever be >>>> considered >>>> as anything but a racist." - (scumbag and clown) Scott Doty >>>> >>>> Me: >>>> "If a person had never read any of his posts, there is no reason to >>>> assume >>>> this by the subject line. This is exactly the kind of stuff even >>>> black people >>>> are complaining about." >>>> >>>> <b4415b04-5065-4d77-8d1d-d93057438bc7@googlegroups.com> >>>> >>>> You *unquestionably* let Slimer's posting history color your >>>> 'judgement' here. >>>> >>>>> Re: >>>>> Subject: Re: Firearms-related offenses surged during the Smiling & >>>>> Dancing >>>>> Black Man's last two years >>>>> >>>>> You wrote: >>>>> >>>>> "I don't believe he is middle of the road but the idea that it's been >>>>> 'proven' by this subject is absurd. IMO people claiming otherwise >>>>> are no >>>>> better than he in this respect. This kind of BS has to stop." >>>> >>>> And I stand by every word there *and* my previous post... that you >>>> left out. >>>> >>>>> Who do you think you're fooling? >>>> >>>> >>>> You're actually asking *me* that after what I just proved what you >>>> tried to do here? >>>> >>>> Writing the word "Black" does not make anyone a "racist". >>> >>> Nor has ANYONE suggested it does. >> >> Bull, that's exactly what you two cowardly imbeciles have done here. > > And yet you cannot quote it because it did not happen. Ever. Nor would > it. Ever. > >> You remove >> Slimer's posting history and there is nothing "racist" about the >> subject line. > > Your failure to admit to your support of bigoted crap does not make the > bigoted crap any less bigoted. > >> Anyone >> would expect this kind of crap from you... seems now it can be >> expected from Doty. > > Poor Victim Carroll... called out on his supported of bigoted crap and > lying. > > Remember, Carroll, YOUR standard is one does not even need to quote you > (though you WERE quoted backing racist crap)... one merely needs "eye > witnesses" who will say they say your racist crap. > > YOUR standards. YOUR double standards. > > You are showing yourself as a bigoted, dishonest, hypocrite. > > Again. > > Carroll freaked out and snipped most of the above. Of course. He is NEVER going to be honest about his actions. He will NEVER apologize for his support of bigotry. He will never stop lying. But he will ALWAYS play victim. And I make it too easy for him to get the attention he begs for. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-04 16:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fsmsvpFe4h8U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #461153 |
On 8/4/18 1:15 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 1:55:22 PM UTC-6, vallor wrote: > >> You're a scumbag and a clown, Carroll. > > Actually, you're the scumbag and clown here, Doty... for writing this based on > just subject line alone. > > "With a subject line like that, there is no way you can ever be considered > as anything but a racist." - (scumbag and clown) Scott Doty > > Me: > "If a person had never read any of his posts, there is no reason to assume > this by the subject line. This is exactly the kind of stuff even black people > are complaining about." > > <b4415b04-5065-4d77-8d1d-d93057438bc7@googlegroups.com> > > You *unquestionably* let Slimer's posting history color your 'judgement' here. > >> Re: >> Subject: Re: Firearms-related offenses surged during the Smiling & Dancing >> Black Man's last two years >> >> You wrote: >> >> "I don't believe he is middle of the road but the idea that it's been >> 'proven' by this subject is absurd. IMO people claiming otherwise are no >> better than he in this respect. This kind of BS has to stop." > > And I stand by every word there *and* my previous post... that you left out. > >> Who do you think you're fooling? > > > You're actually asking *me* that after what I just proved what you tried to do here? > > Writing the word "Black" does not make anyone a "racist". Only TRUE scumbag, > racist clowns push that kind of politicized crap. The kind that want everyone to > think they're 'oh, so sensitive' to the issues of black people... who are sick and > tired of being used as political pawns by these racist clown jackasses. > Also, IF you were not a hypocrite you would be saying that Vallor's comments about you show a "witness" to your bigotry. There is not even a reason to quote you, just as you fail to quote me as you accuse me of all sorts of things. You are AGAIN proved to be a bigot, a liar, and a hypocrite. As noted, you lie more in a day than you can show me lying in a year. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-04 16:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fsmskfFe331U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #461152 |
On 8/4/18 12:55 PM, vallor wrote: ... >>> Look to the recent discussion >> >> Again, no quotes, as expected from a fraud. >> >> It's one thing to be a fraud, quite another to be willing to prove it >> over and over in public every single day. The things that turn people >> on... <shrug>. > > You're a scumbag and a clown, Carroll. > > Re: > Subject: Re: Firearms-related offenses surged during the Smiling & Dancing > Black Man's last two years > > You wrote: > > "I don't believe he is middle of the road but the idea that it's been > 'proven' by this subject is absurd. IMO people claiming otherwise are no > better than he in this respect. This kind of BS has to stop." > > Who do you think you're fooling? The sad thing is he repeatedly talks about people being "stupid enough" and the like... though he projects it onto others. But his bigotry is easy to quote. As you just proved. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Helinka Svoboda <helinkasvoboda@protestant.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-02 21:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pjvt5h$blm$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #460901 |
On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 13:29:24 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Thursday, August 2, 2018 at 2:13:43 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 8/2/18 1:04 PM, SilverSlimer wrote: >> > On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 18:54:30 +0000, RonB wrote: >> > >> >> The so-called "respectable" New York Times has hired a known racist >> >> bigot, Sarah Jeong, for their Editorial Board. >> >> >> >> In the past she has tweeted ... >> >> >> >> ~~ >> >> "Dumbass fucking black people marking up the internet with their >> >> opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants" >> >> >> >> "oh man it's kind of sick how much joy I get out of being cruel to >> >> old black men" >> >> >> >> "I dare you to get on Wikipedia and play "Things black people can >> >> definitely take credit for." It's really hard." >> >> >> >> "1. black men are bullshit" >> >> >> >> "Black people have stopped breeding. You'll all go extinct soon. >> >> This was my plan all along." >> >> >> >> "#CancelBlackPeople" >> >> >> >> "These are inconvenient truths but we should thoroughly examine them >> >> instead of giving onto the PC lie that black people don't smell bad" >> >> ~~ >> >> >> >> The New York Times admitted they knew about these tweets, but hired >> >> her anyhow. >> >> >> >> Well, actually, you need to replace "black" with "white" in every >> >> quote. >> >> Since she was only attacking white people, it really can't be >> >> "racist" can it? >> >> >> >> Oh, and besides, she claims this was all "satire." If she thinks >> >> this is satire, then she has no place as an editor anyhow, because >> >> she doesn't even understand the terms she uses. >> >> >> >> "chrisv" will take the trouble to note that he's ignoring this. >> > >> > I'm looking forward to seeing snitv and Snit's apologies for the >> > racist quoted in your future articles. >> > >> > >> Which only proves you have NO clue about my views. Read what I already >> posted. > > I have. Feel free to post an example of where you've labeled me a racist > and explain why you won't use the term for this person for this crap. > > You're a fraud, Snit, you prove it over and over, this is just another > example. Snit has a couple of tactics he uses when his fraudulent points are exposed. 1. Claim the other person is playing the victim. 2. Claim the other person is demanding special entitlements. 3. Compare whatever evidence he doesn't agree with to the satire site "The Onion". 4. Claim people engaged in a discussion with him are obsessed with snit. 5. Use words like "whatever" which suggest he is throwing a hissy fit. 6. Ignore parts of the conversation that don't back his points and focus on some semi relevant minutia endlessly. 7. Lie. Snit is like a broken record. You are correct Steve, snit is a fraud. So why would a person who claims the police visited you to advise you to cease and desist contact with him continually reply to your posts? It doesn't make sense. Neither does the flooding scripts which mostly attack you and your family. Why would you do that to yourself? This person snit has some serious mental disease. He needs to seek professional help and get the monkey's off his back before he goes postal. I hope snit doesn't know where you or your family live Steve because he exhibits all the classic signs of a person who is delusional and might snap if he gets triggered the wrong way. I think you are the person who should be reporting snit not the other way around. And if you decide to go that route, do yourself a favor and ignore him from that point on.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-02 18:46 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <fshftfF7hisU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #460918 |
On Thu, 2 Aug 2018 21:30:26 -0000 (UTC), Helinka Svoboda wrote: > On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 13:29:24 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: > >> On Thursday, August 2, 2018 at 2:13:43 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>> On 8/2/18 1:04 PM, SilverSlimer wrote: >>> > On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 18:54:30 +0000, RonB wrote: >>> > >>> >> The so-called "respectable" New York Times has hired a known racist >>> >> bigot, Sarah Jeong, for their Editorial Board. >>> >> >>> >> In the past she has tweeted ... >>> >> >>> >> ~~ >>> >> "Dumbass fucking black people marking up the internet with their >>> >> opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants" >>> >> >>> >> "oh man it's kind of sick how much joy I get out of being cruel to >>> >> old black men" >>> >> >>> >> "I dare you to get on Wikipedia and play "Things black people can >>> >> definitely take credit for." It's really hard." >>> >> >>> >> "1. black men are bullshit" >>> >> >>> >> "Black people have stopped breeding. You'll all go extinct soon. >>> >> This was my plan all along." >>> >> >>> >> "#CancelBlackPeople" >>> >> >>> >> "These are inconvenient truths but we should thoroughly examine them >>> >> instead of giving onto the PC lie that black people don't smell bad" >>> >> ~~ >>> >> >>> >> The New York Times admitted they knew about these tweets, but hired >>> >> her anyhow. >>> >> >>> >> Well, actually, you need to replace "black" with "white" in every >>> >> quote. >>> >> Since she was only attacking white people, it really can't be >>> >> "racist" can it? >>> >> >>> >> Oh, and besides, she claims this was all "satire." If she thinks >>> >> this is satire, then she has no place as an editor anyhow, because >>> >> she doesn't even understand the terms she uses. >>> >> >>> >> "chrisv" will take the trouble to note that he's ignoring this. >>> > >>> > I'm looking forward to seeing snitv and Snit's apologies for the >>> > racist quoted in your future articles. >>> > >>> > >>> Which only proves you have NO clue about my views. Read what I already >>> posted. >> >> I have. Feel free to post an example of where you've labeled me a racist >> and explain why you won't use the term for this person for this crap. >> >> You're a fraud, Snit, you prove it over and over, this is just another >> example. > > Snit has a couple of tactics he uses when his fraudulent points are > exposed. > > 1. Claim the other person is playing the victim. > 2. Claim the other person is demanding special entitlements. > 3. Compare whatever evidence he doesn't agree with to the satire site > "The Onion". > 4. Claim people engaged in a discussion with him are obsessed with snit. > 5. Use words like "whatever" which suggest he is throwing a hissy fit. > 6. Ignore parts of the conversation that don't back his points and focus > on some semi relevant minutia endlessly. > 7. Lie. > > Snit is like a broken record. > > You are correct Steve, snit is a fraud. So why would a person who claims > the police visited you to advise you to cease and desist contact with him > continually reply to your posts? > It doesn't make sense. > Neither does the flooding scripts which mostly attack you and your family. > Why would you do that to yourself? > > This person snit has some serious mental disease. He needs to seek > professional help and get the monkey's off his back before he goes postal. > > I hope snit doesn't know where you or your family live Steve because he > exhibits all the classic signs of a person who is delusional and might > snap if he gets triggered the wrong way. > > I think you are the person who should be reporting snit not the other way > around. > And if you decide to go that route, do yourself a favor and ignore him > from that point on. Snit doesn't process words, sentences, paragraphs the way the rest of us do. He could read 1984 and spend three hours discussing why the book wasn't named 1980 instead all the time missing the entire point of the book. Couple that with his paranoia, drug abuse and you have all the trappings of a village idiot. My advice is to laugh at him like the rest of us are but avoid confronting him directly. Ignore any replies he makes and it will drive him batty. People like snit crave attention and when they don't receive it they tend to go unstable. Some drink. Some use drugs. Some literally hang from the rafters. Snit does all of the above. You haven't had a good laugh until you've watched snit posting after mixing up a drug and alcohol laced cocktail. Trust me when I say it's hilarious to watch snit melt down.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-02 16:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <77afe398-018d-4051-979e-91358e45be94@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #460924 |
On Thursday, August 2, 2018 at 3:46:10 PM UTC-7, GasPipe wrote: > On Thu, 2 Aug 2018 21:30:26 -0000 (UTC), Helinka Svoboda wrote: > > > On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 13:29:24 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > >> On Thursday, August 2, 2018 at 2:13:43 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>> On 8/2/18 1:04 PM, SilverSlimer wrote: > >>> > On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 18:54:30 +0000, RonB wrote: > >>> > > >>> >> The so-called "respectable" New York Times has hired a known racist > >>> >> bigot, Sarah Jeong, for their Editorial Board. > >>> >> > >>> >> In the past she has tweeted ... > >>> >> > >>> >> ~~ > >>> >> "Dumbass fucking black people marking up the internet with their > >>> >> opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants" > >>> >> > >>> >> "oh man it's kind of sick how much joy I get out of being cruel to > >>> >> old black men" > >>> >> > >>> >> "I dare you to get on Wikipedia and play "Things black people can > >>> >> definitely take credit for." It's really hard." > >>> >> > >>> >> "1. black men are bullshit" > >>> >> > >>> >> "Black people have stopped breeding. You'll all go extinct soon. > >>> >> This was my plan all along." > >>> >> > >>> >> "#CancelBlackPeople" > >>> >> > >>> >> "These are inconvenient truths but we should thoroughly examine them > >>> >> instead of giving onto the PC lie that black people don't smell bad" > >>> >> ~~ > >>> >> > >>> >> The New York Times admitted they knew about these tweets, but hired > >>> >> her anyhow. > >>> >> > >>> >> Well, actually, you need to replace "black" with "white" in every > >>> >> quote. > >>> >> Since she was only attacking white people, it really can't be > >>> >> "racist" can it? > >>> >> > >>> >> Oh, and besides, she claims this was all "satire." If she thinks > >>> >> this is satire, then she has no place as an editor anyhow, because > >>> >> she doesn't even understand the terms she uses. > >>> >> > >>> >> "chrisv" will take the trouble to note that he's ignoring this. > >>> > > >>> > I'm looking forward to seeing snitv and Snit's apologies for the > >>> > racist quoted in your future articles. > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Which only proves you have NO clue about my views. Read what I already > >>> posted. > >> > >> I have. Feel free to post an example of where you've labeled me a racist > >> and explain why you won't use the term for this person for this crap. > >> > >> You're a fraud, Snit, you prove it over and over, this is just another > >> example. > > > > Snit has a couple of tactics he uses when his fraudulent points are > > exposed. > > > > 1. Claim the other person is playing the victim. > > 2. Claim the other person is demanding special entitlements. > > 3. Compare whatever evidence he doesn't agree with to the satire site > > "The Onion". > > 4. Claim people engaged in a discussion with him are obsessed with snit. > > 5. Use words like "whatever" which suggest he is throwing a hissy fit. > > 6. Ignore parts of the conversation that don't back his points and focus > > on some semi relevant minutia endlessly. > > 7. Lie. > > > > Snit is like a broken record. > > > > You are correct Steve, snit is a fraud. So why would a person who claims > > the police visited you to advise you to cease and desist contact with him > > continually reply to your posts? > > It doesn't make sense. > > Neither does the flooding scripts which mostly attack you and your family. > > Why would you do that to yourself? > > > > This person snit has some serious mental disease. He needs to seek > > professional help and get the monkey's off his back before he goes postal. > > > > I hope snit doesn't know where you or your family live Steve because he > > exhibits all the classic signs of a person who is delusional and might > > snap if he gets triggered the wrong way. > > > > I think you are the person who should be reporting snit not the other way > > around. > > And if you decide to go that route, do yourself a favor and ignore him > > from that point on. > > Snit doesn't process words, sentences, paragraphs the way the rest of us > do. > He could read 1984 and spend three hours discussing why the book wasn't > named 1980 instead all the time missing the entire point of the book. > Couple that with his paranoia, drug abuse and you have all the trappings of > a village idiot. > > My advice is to laugh at him like the rest of us are but avoid confronting > him directly. Ignore any replies he makes and it will drive him batty. > People like snit crave attention and when they don't receive it they tend > to go unstable. Some drink. Some use drugs. Some literally hang from the > rafters. Snit does all of the above. You haven't had a good laugh until > you've watched snit posting after mixing up a drug and alcohol laced > cocktail. Trust me when I say it's hilarious to watch snit melt down. I noted specific examples of Klaus Schadenfreude lying -- flat out making things up, etc. His response: to claim I am Klaus Schadenfreude. In fact Klaus Schadenfreude's lies got bigger. So needless to say I regret writing software for Klaus Schadenfreude. While I am sure his wife approved of it, I've not helped the situation at all. I bet Klaus Schadenfreude thinks my life was worse than Steve Carroll's. To my way of thinking, spending time possibly getting informed is never a waste. Claiming you know everything and taking it on yourself to 'prove' others that it is true, as Klaus Schadenfreude tries to do? That is a waste. -- E-commerce Simplified! http://www.5z8.info/php-start_GPS_tracking-user_f8h9lv_-OPEN-WEBCAM---START-RECORD-- Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-03 05:24 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <87b8md519sac8c9q23c2n1df5v05cu64mk@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #460924 |
GasPipe wrote: > Helinka Svoboda wrote: >> >> Snit >> Snit >> snit >> snit > > Snit > snit > Snit > snit
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-03 14:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fsjvjeForj8U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #460960 |
On 8/3/18 3:24 AM, chrisv wrote: > GasPipe wrote: > >> Helinka Svoboda wrote: >>> >>> Snit >>> Snit >>> snit >>> snit >> >> Snit >> snit >> Snit >> snit > But nobody in COLA is obsessed with me. Got it! -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-02 18:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fshocrF97ffU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #460918 |
On 8/2/18 2:30 PM, Helinka Svoboda wrote: > On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 13:29:24 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: > >> On Thursday, August 2, 2018 at 2:13:43 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>> On 8/2/18 1:04 PM, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>> On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 18:54:30 +0000, RonB wrote: >>>> >>>>> The so-called "respectable" New York Times has hired a known racist >>>>> bigot, Sarah Jeong, for their Editorial Board. >>>>> >>>>> In the past she has tweeted ... >>>>> >>>>> ~~ >>>>> "Dumbass fucking black people marking up the internet with their >>>>> opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants" >>>>> >>>>> "oh man it's kind of sick how much joy I get out of being cruel to >>>>> old black men" >>>>> >>>>> "I dare you to get on Wikipedia and play "Things black people can >>>>> definitely take credit for." It's really hard." >>>>> >>>>> "1. black men are bullshit" >>>>> >>>>> "Black people have stopped breeding. You'll all go extinct soon. >>>>> This was my plan all along." >>>>> >>>>> "#CancelBlackPeople" >>>>> >>>>> "These are inconvenient truths but we should thoroughly examine them >>>>> instead of giving onto the PC lie that black people don't smell bad" >>>>> ~~ >>>>> >>>>> The New York Times admitted they knew about these tweets, but hired >>>>> her anyhow. >>>>> >>>>> Well, actually, you need to replace "black" with "white" in every >>>>> quote. >>>>> Since she was only attacking white people, it really can't be >>>>> "racist" can it? >>>>> >>>>> Oh, and besides, she claims this was all "satire." If she thinks >>>>> this is satire, then she has no place as an editor anyhow, because >>>>> she doesn't even understand the terms she uses. >>>>> >>>>> "chrisv" will take the trouble to note that he's ignoring this. >>>> >>>> I'm looking forward to seeing snitv and Snit's apologies for the >>>> racist quoted in your future articles. >>>> >>>> >>> Which only proves you have NO clue about my views. Read what I already >>> posted. >> >> I have. Feel free to post an example of where you've labeled me a racist >> and explain why you won't use the term for this person for this crap. >> >> You're a fraud, Snit, you prove it over and over, this is just another >> example. > > Snit has a couple of tactics he uses when his fraudulent points are > exposed. > > 1. Claim the other person is playing the victim. > 2. Claim the other person is demanding special entitlements. > 3. Compare whatever evidence he doesn't agree with to the satire site > "The Onion". > 4. Claim people engaged in a discussion with him are obsessed with snit. > 5. Use words like "whatever" which suggest he is throwing a hissy fit. > 6. Ignore parts of the conversation that don't back his points and focus > on some semi relevant minutia endlessly. > 7. Lie. > > Snit is like a broken record. > > You are correct Steve, snit is a fraud. So why would a person who claims > the police visited you to advise you to cease and desist contact with him > continually reply to your posts? > It doesn't make sense. > Neither does the flooding scripts which mostly attack you and your family. > Why would you do that to yourself? > > This person snit has some serious mental disease. He needs to seek > professional help and get the monkey's off his back before he goes postal. > > I hope snit doesn't know where you or your family live Steve because he > exhibits all the classic signs of a person who is delusional and might > snap if he gets triggered the wrong way. > > I think you are the person who should be reporting snit not the other way > around. > And if you decide to go that route, do yourself a favor and ignore him > from that point on. > Gee, as Carroll is being called out a "convenient friend" comes in with vague accusations and insult. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-02 18:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <33ff427c-7874-4334-8012-367d5642c0d6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #460942 |
On Thursday, August 2, 2018 at 6:10:55 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 8/2/18 2:30 PM, Helinka Svoboda wrote: > > On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 13:29:24 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > >> On Thursday, August 2, 2018 at 2:13:43 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>> On 8/2/18 1:04 PM, SilverSlimer wrote: > >>>> On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 18:54:30 +0000, RonB wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> The so-called "respectable" New York Times has hired a known racist > >>>>> bigot, Sarah Jeong, for their Editorial Board. > >>>>> > >>>>> In the past she has tweeted ... > >>>>> > >>>>> ~~ > >>>>> "Dumbass fucking black people marking up the internet with their > >>>>> opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants" > >>>>> > >>>>> "oh man it's kind of sick how much joy I get out of being cruel to > >>>>> old black men" > >>>>> > >>>>> "I dare you to get on Wikipedia and play "Things black people can > >>>>> definitely take credit for." It's really hard." > >>>>> > >>>>> "1. black men are bullshit" > >>>>> > >>>>> "Black people have stopped breeding. You'll all go extinct soon. > >>>>> This was my plan all along." > >>>>> > >>>>> "#CancelBlackPeople" > >>>>> > >>>>> "These are inconvenient truths but we should thoroughly examine them > >>>>> instead of giving onto the PC lie that black people don't smell bad" > >>>>> ~~ > >>>>> > >>>>> The New York Times admitted they knew about these tweets, but hired > >>>>> her anyhow. > >>>>> > >>>>> Well, actually, you need to replace "black" with "white" in every > >>>>> quote. > >>>>> Since she was only attacking white people, it really can't be > >>>>> "racist" can it? > >>>>> > >>>>> Oh, and besides, she claims this was all "satire." If she thinks > >>>>> this is satire, then she has no place as an editor anyhow, because > >>>>> she doesn't even understand the terms she uses. > >>>>> > >>>>> "chrisv" will take the trouble to note that he's ignoring this. > >>>> > >>>> I'm looking forward to seeing snitv and Snit's apologies for the > >>>> racist quoted in your future articles. > >>>> > >>>> > >>> Which only proves you have NO clue about my views. Read what I already > >>> posted. > >> > >> I have. Feel free to post an example of where you've labeled me a racist > >> and explain why you won't use the term for this person for this crap. > >> > >> You're a fraud, Snit, you prove it over and over, this is just another > >> example. > > > > Snit has a couple of tactics he uses when his fraudulent points are > > exposed. > > > > 1. Claim the other person is playing the victim. > > 2. Claim the other person is demanding special entitlements. > > 3. Compare whatever evidence he doesn't agree with to the satire site > > "The Onion". > > 4. Claim people engaged in a discussion with him are obsessed with snit. > > 5. Use words like "whatever" which suggest he is throwing a hissy fit. > > 6. Ignore parts of the conversation that don't back his points and focus > > on some semi relevant minutia endlessly. > > 7. Lie. > > > > Snit is like a broken record. > > > > You are correct Steve, snit is a fraud. So why would a person who claims > > the police visited you to advise you to cease and desist contact with him > > continually reply to your posts? > > It doesn't make sense. > > Neither does the flooding scripts which mostly attack you and your family. > > Why would you do that to yourself? > > > > This person snit has some serious mental disease. He needs to seek > > professional help and get the monkey's off his back before he goes postal. > > > > I hope snit doesn't know where you or your family live Steve because he > > exhibits all the classic signs of a person who is delusional and might > > snap if he gets triggered the wrong way. > > > > I think you are the person who should be reporting snit not the other way > > around. > > And if you decide to go that route, do yourself a favor and ignore him > > from that point on. > > > > Gee, as Carroll is being called out a "convenient friend" comes in with > vague accusations and insult. > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> I often kill beetles with my thoughts. What chrisv does is certainly more productive. What were you thinking? Ending support for DOS programs is long overdue. Unlike the intelligent people in political groups, F 'The Fool' Russell relies on false news to concoct his beliefs on the news. Consequently, he only knows and consents to the government claims which also happens to be the ones which portray conspiracy theories in an extremely auspicious and heroic way. F 'The Fool' Russell claims to be the spreadsheet-authority. Let us see him put up a variant minus the normalization procedures.He'd have to have mental illness to be unsure of if he "never had" purchased a website. Ring any bells? When F 'The Fool' Russell can not tell the same tale one day and the next and utilizes dishonest, face saving BS later, it's very undeniable what his game is. Protected code is not enough to protect you. -- Get Rich Slow http://www.5z8.info/mercenary_w5v9dl_open.exe http://www.5z8.info/hack-outlook_c6c9in_michaelangelo-virus Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-02 21:50 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <fshqnnF9me4U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #460918 |
On Thu, 2 Aug 2018 21:30:26 -0000 (UTC), Helinka Svoboda wrote: > On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 13:29:24 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: > >> On Thursday, August 2, 2018 at 2:13:43 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>> On 8/2/18 1:04 PM, SilverSlimer wrote: >>> > On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 18:54:30 +0000, RonB wrote: >>> > >>> >> The so-called "respectable" New York Times has hired a known racist >>> >> bigot, Sarah Jeong, for their Editorial Board. >>> >> >>> >> In the past she has tweeted ... >>> >> >>> >> ~~ >>> >> "Dumbass fucking black people marking up the internet with their >>> >> opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants" >>> >> >>> >> "oh man it's kind of sick how much joy I get out of being cruel to >>> >> old black men" >>> >> >>> >> "I dare you to get on Wikipedia and play "Things black people can >>> >> definitely take credit for." It's really hard." >>> >> >>> >> "1. black men are bullshit" >>> >> >>> >> "Black people have stopped breeding. You'll all go extinct soon. >>> >> This was my plan all along." >>> >> >>> >> "#CancelBlackPeople" >>> >> >>> >> "These are inconvenient truths but we should thoroughly examine them >>> >> instead of giving onto the PC lie that black people don't smell bad" >>> >> ~~ >>> >> >>> >> The New York Times admitted they knew about these tweets, but hired >>> >> her anyhow. >>> >> >>> >> Well, actually, you need to replace "black" with "white" in every >>> >> quote. >>> >> Since she was only attacking white people, it really can't be >>> >> "racist" can it? >>> >> >>> >> Oh, and besides, she claims this was all "satire." If she thinks >>> >> this is satire, then she has no place as an editor anyhow, because >>> >> she doesn't even understand the terms she uses. >>> >> >>> >> "chrisv" will take the trouble to note that he's ignoring this. >>> > >>> > I'm looking forward to seeing snitv and Snit's apologies for the >>> > racist quoted in your future articles. >>> > >>> > >>> Which only proves you have NO clue about my views. Read what I already >>> posted. >> >> I have. Feel free to post an example of where you've labeled me a racist >> and explain why you won't use the term for this person for this crap. >> >> You're a fraud, Snit, you prove it over and over, this is just another >> example. > > Snit has a couple of tactics he uses when his fraudulent points are > exposed. > > 1. Claim the other person is playing the victim. > 2. Claim the other person is demanding special entitlements. > 3. Compare whatever evidence he doesn't agree with to the satire site > "The Onion". > 4. Claim people engaged in a discussion with him are obsessed with snit. > 5. Use words like "whatever" which suggest he is throwing a hissy fit. > 6. Ignore parts of the conversation that don't back his points and focus > on some semi relevant minutia endlessly. > 7. Lie. > > Snit is like a broken record. > > You are correct Steve, snit is a fraud. So why would a person who claims > the police visited you to advise you to cease and desist contact with him > continually reply to your posts? > It doesn't make sense. > Neither does the flooding scripts which mostly attack you and your family. > Why would you do that to yourself? > > This person snit has some serious mental disease. He needs to seek > professional help and get the monkey's off his back before he goes postal. > > I hope snit doesn't know where you or your family live Steve because he > exhibits all the classic signs of a person who is delusional and might > snap if he gets triggered the wrong way. > > I think you are the person who should be reporting snit not the other way > around. > And if you decide to go that route, do yourself a favor and ignore him > from that point on. Good post but you missed one of snit's tricks. When someone supports Steve Carroll he calls that person a "convenient friend" implying that the person is a Steve Carroll sock puppet. That one is rather humorous considering snit has been caught using sock puppets many times. Meat, Brock McNuggets, Larry Washington, Onion Knight and many others come to mind. Snit has a sock puppet army that he mobilizes as required. You haven't lived till you have witnessed 5 or more of snit's socks all talking to and arguing with each other. It's hilarious. Sometimes I think even snit's comfort bear, Toasty, has socks of his own. Oh, you might not know who Toasty is. Google it. You won't believe it but it's true.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-02 19:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bfec5d56-771d-4a0a-b5fe-c3448a049867@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #460946 |
On Thursday, August 2, 2018 at 6:50:50 PM UTC-7, GasPipe wrote: > On Thu, 2 Aug 2018 21:30:26 -0000 (UTC), Helinka Svoboda wrote: > > > On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 13:29:24 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > >> On Thursday, August 2, 2018 at 2:13:43 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>> On 8/2/18 1:04 PM, SilverSlimer wrote: > >>> > On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 18:54:30 +0000, RonB wrote: > >>> > > >>> >> The so-called "respectable" New York Times has hired a known racist > >>> >> bigot, Sarah Jeong, for their Editorial Board. > >>> >> > >>> >> In the past she has tweeted ... > >>> >> > >>> >> ~~ > >>> >> "Dumbass fucking black people marking up the internet with their > >>> >> opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants" > >>> >> > >>> >> "oh man it's kind of sick how much joy I get out of being cruel to > >>> >> old black men" > >>> >> > >>> >> "I dare you to get on Wikipedia and play "Things black people can > >>> >> definitely take credit for." It's really hard." > >>> >> > >>> >> "1. black men are bullshit" > >>> >> > >>> >> "Black people have stopped breeding. You'll all go extinct soon. > >>> >> This was my plan all along." > >>> >> > >>> >> "#CancelBlackPeople" > >>> >> > >>> >> "These are inconvenient truths but we should thoroughly examine them > >>> >> instead of giving onto the PC lie that black people don't smell bad" > >>> >> ~~ > >>> >> > >>> >> The New York Times admitted they knew about these tweets, but hired > >>> >> her anyhow. > >>> >> > >>> >> Well, actually, you need to replace "black" with "white" in every > >>> >> quote. > >>> >> Since she was only attacking white people, it really can't be > >>> >> "racist" can it? > >>> >> > >>> >> Oh, and besides, she claims this was all "satire." If she thinks > >>> >> this is satire, then she has no place as an editor anyhow, because > >>> >> she doesn't even understand the terms she uses. > >>> >> > >>> >> "chrisv" will take the trouble to note that he's ignoring this. > >>> > > >>> > I'm looking forward to seeing snitv and Snit's apologies for the > >>> > racist quoted in your future articles. > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Which only proves you have NO clue about my views. Read what I already > >>> posted. > >> > >> I have. Feel free to post an example of where you've labeled me a racist > >> and explain why you won't use the term for this person for this crap. > >> > >> You're a fraud, Snit, you prove it over and over, this is just another > >> example. > > > > Snit has a couple of tactics he uses when his fraudulent points are > > exposed. > > > > 1. Claim the other person is playing the victim. > > 2. Claim the other person is demanding special entitlements. > > 3. Compare whatever evidence he doesn't agree with to the satire site > > "The Onion". > > 4. Claim people engaged in a discussion with him are obsessed with snit. > > 5. Use words like "whatever" which suggest he is throwing a hissy fit. > > 6. Ignore parts of the conversation that don't back his points and focus > > on some semi relevant minutia endlessly. > > 7. Lie. > > > > Snit is like a broken record. > > > > You are correct Steve, snit is a fraud. So why would a person who claims > > the police visited you to advise you to cease and desist contact with him > > continually reply to your posts? > > It doesn't make sense. > > Neither does the flooding scripts which mostly attack you and your family. > > Why would you do that to yourself? > > > > This person snit has some serious mental disease. He needs to seek > > professional help and get the monkey's off his back before he goes postal. > > > > I hope snit doesn't know where you or your family live Steve because he > > exhibits all the classic signs of a person who is delusional and might > > snap if he gets triggered the wrong way. > > > > I think you are the person who should be reporting snit not the other way > > around. > > And if you decide to go that route, do yourself a favor and ignore him > > from that point on. > > Good post but you missed one of snit's tricks. When someone supports Steve > Carroll he calls that person a "convenient friend" implying that the person > is a Steve Carroll sock puppet. > That one is rather humorous considering snit has been caught using sock > puppets many times. > Meat, Brock McNuggets, Larry Washington, Onion Knight and many others come > to mind. Snit has a sock puppet army that he mobilizes as required. You > haven't lived till you have witnessed 5 or more of snit's socks all talking > to and arguing with each other. It's hilarious. > Sometimes I think even snit's comfort bear, Toasty, has socks of his own. > Oh, you might not know who Toasty is. Google it. You won't believe it but > it's true. If Jeremy calls having his lies quoted for over a decade by dozens of people good 'trolling', then no doubt... he is a splendid troll. I don't agree with that meaning, I use another term. I call that person a complete peabrain. Jeremy can't get anything else to work, either. Another successful "thumb drive install" test. That is if you count utter failure as a success. A shadow of reason, projected foolishly, at the wrong time. At times, fancy is more valuable than faithful descriptions of reality. - Live on Kickstarter http://www.5z8.info/php-start_GPS_tracking-user_j3m3lg_whitepower Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-02 13:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4e8b8a30-a043-4212-b32a-b1ec004575dd@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #460893 |
On Thursday, August 2, 2018 at 1:13:43 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 8/2/18 1:04 PM, SilverSlimer wrote: > > On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 18:54:30 +0000, RonB wrote: > > > >> The so-called "respectable" New York Times has hired a known racist > >> bigot, Sarah Jeong, for their Editorial Board. > >> > >> In the past she has tweeted ... > >> > >> ~~ > >> "Dumbass fucking black people marking up the internet with their > >> opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants" > >> > >> "oh man it's kind of sick how much joy I get out of being cruel to old > >> black men" > >> > >> "I dare you to get on Wikipedia and play "Things black people can > >> definitely take credit for." It's really hard." > >> > >> "1. black men are bullshit" > >> > >> "Black people have stopped breeding. You'll all go extinct soon. This > >> was my plan all along." > >> > >> "#CancelBlackPeople" > >> > >> "These are inconvenient truths but we should thoroughly examine them > >> instead of giving onto the PC lie that black people don't smell bad" > >> ~~ > >> > >> The New York Times admitted they knew about these tweets, but hired her > >> anyhow. > >> > >> Well, actually, you need to replace "black" with "white" in every quote. > >> Since she was only attacking white people, it really can't be "racist" > >> can it? > >> > >> Oh, and besides, she claims this was all "satire." If she thinks this is > >> satire, then she has no place as an editor anyhow, because she doesn't > >> even understand the terms she uses. > >> > >> "chrisv" will take the trouble to note that he's ignoring this. > > > > I'm looking forward to seeing snitv and Snit's apologies for the racist > > quoted in your future articles. > > > > > Which only proves you have NO clue about my views. Read what I already > posted. > > Remember: I want equal rights. > > Equal. > > No special entitlements. > > Completely foreign to your way of thinking. > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> Klaus Schadenfreude's computer has more scripts than Prescott Computer Guy's. Klaus Schadenfreude wins. Prescott Computer Guy loses. Simple as that. Why would you want to cap all commands on GNU/Linux to what can be done on Macs? Linux offers the least of any of the competition. My position: Even if you were barely learning just for fun, the feeling that obtaining expertise as being one of having "*nothing*" to show for it doesn't make any sense because you will by definition have the insight to show for it and proficiency is a powerful thing. Open source is only less expensive if your time has no value. Prescott Computer Guy can't get anything else to work, either. Time to blame the herd! These types of trolls get their jollies out of provoking annoyed replies to their flooding, which is the very definition of a troll. -- Puppy Videos http://www.5z8.info/stalin-will-rise-again_j3h5uj_nakedgrandmas.jpg Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-08-02 14:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0f7f1837-252d-4763-b8a2-9761231b82cf@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #460887 |
On Thursday, August 2, 2018 at 1:04:35 PM UTC-7, SilverSlimer wrote: > On Thu, 02 Aug 2018 18:54:30 +0000, RonB wrote: > > > The so-called "respectable" New York Times has hired a known racist > > bigot, Sarah Jeong, for their Editorial Board. > > > > In the past she has tweeted ... > > > > ~~ > > "Dumbass fucking black people marking up the internet with their > > opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants" > > > > "oh man it's kind of sick how much joy I get out of being cruel to old > > black men" > > > > "I dare you to get on Wikipedia and play "Things black people can > > definitely take credit for." It's really hard." > > > > "1. black men are bullshit" > > > > "Black people have stopped breeding. You'll all go extinct soon. This > > was my plan all along." > > > > "#CancelBlackPeople" > > > > "These are inconvenient truths but we should thoroughly examine them > > instead of giving onto the PC lie that black people don't smell bad" > > ~~ > > > > The New York Times admitted they knew about these tweets, but hired her > > anyhow. > > > > Well, actually, you need to replace "black" with "white" in every quote. > > Since she was only attacking white people, it really can't be "racist" > > can it? > > > > Oh, and besides, she claims this was all "satire." If she thinks this is > > satire, then she has no place as an editor anyhow, because she doesn't > > even understand the terms she uses. > > > > "chrisv" will take the trouble to note that he's ignoring this. > > I'm looking forward to seeing snitv and Snit's apologies for the racist > quoted in your future articles. > > > -- > SilverSlimer > Ubuntu 18.04 on MSI GT72 2QD > Proudly blocking Facebook, Twitter and Youtube > Liberals will be killfiled Proof Sandman accuses everyone of being Snit http://sandman.net/files/snit_circus.png. "You are never up to anything good" said Klaus Schadenfreude's husband. I am an absolute supporter of macOS, because that's where all the compelling programming is happening. Seriously, what lie? If Steve Carroll has 'some_file.pdf' open in an editor such as gedit and Klaus Schadenfreude wants to change its name to 'mack.txt' via a bash script, that might be wise. I sometimes defeat Klaus Schadenfreude with my thoughts. -- Live on Kickstarter!! https://redd.it/6sfkup http://www.5z8.info/warez_w2t4ge_girlsgonewildpart1.wmv Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web