Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #327971 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-10-23 12:10 -0700 |
| Last post | 2015-10-30 07:55 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 101 — 9 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 12:10 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-23 21:14 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 14:35 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-23 21:58 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 15:16 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-23 22:46 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 15:53 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-23 22:57 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 16:11 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-23 23:46 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 21:10 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 21:14 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 21:58 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 20:57 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 21:55 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 14:40 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-23 21:53 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 15:34 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-23 22:43 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 20:52 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-24 18:06 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-24 12:17 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-24 23:03 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-24 16:27 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-24 23:41 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-24 16:57 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 00:11 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-24 17:17 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 00:25 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-24 17:47 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-25 12:54 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 10:36 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 18:23 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-25 14:32 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 18:46 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-25 16:45 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 21:08 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 11:45 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 14:54 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 19:18 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 15:23 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 19:34 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 15:37 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 19:58 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 16:01 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 20:11 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 16:11 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 20:27 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 16:27 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 20:38 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 16:47 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 21:02 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 17:08 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 21:31 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 17:33 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 21:51 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 18:07 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 22:28 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:17 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:32 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:20 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-25 17:28 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 21:37 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:21 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:15 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:14 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 20:23 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:13 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-25 17:25 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 17:30 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-25 20:06 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 20:12 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:22 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:11 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 20:13 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 08:44 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 00:39 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 20:42 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-25 20:58 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 03:53 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:46 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 03:56 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 23:57 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 04:46 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 22:22 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 05:43 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 13:05 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 21:11 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 04:48 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 22:27 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 05:51 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 13:05 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 15:47 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 15:10 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-27 22:46 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2015-10-29 00:31 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-29 07:10 -0500
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 08:36 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-29 14:46 +0100
Re: OT: OK, what changed? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-29 09:41 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 07:55 -0700
Page 4 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 17:20 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D252BFD1.616ED%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #328353 |
On 10/25/15, 2:31 PM, in article ase93.fjaig02@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>> For starters, if you agree with Snit that 154 rounds in 264 seconds equals >>>>> an average of 1 round every 0.583 seconds, then you are bad at math. Do >>>>> you agree with Snit's math? >>>> >>>> Where did I make that claim? >>>> >>> I'm just asking if you agree with Snit's math or not, and for some reason >>> you don't want to answer that question. >> >> I do not agree with snit's math as it stands. > > Then why did you claim that the key word was "AVERAGE" and ignore the > glaring basic math error? Your error with the very concept of an average is a bigger error than mine given I showed no lack of understanding of the concept *and* I admitted to my error. You have not shown you even understand why your claim was wrong. >> As usually the case, snit is wrong. > > I have to agree with you there. > >> >> However in recent threads, snit has your ball sack in a twisted mess. >> > > Surely you can quote an example of him twisting my ball sack in a recent > thread. Maybe his insinuation that it would take "much developer time" to > change a malloc() limit? You are in error in saying that. You made that up. > Or his defense of his intentionally deceptive > quoting style that includes no attribution for the majority of the quote? Your functional illiteracy is NOT my weakness. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 17:28 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0jhec$l5$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #328345 |
On 10/25/2015 5:02 PM, owl wrote: > Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 20:38:42 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >> >>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 20:27:25 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>> >>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 20:11:41 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 19:58:19 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 19:34:10 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 19:18:46 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 18:23:53 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/24/2015 8:25 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will let you. When are you going to start trying? Below you just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> demonstrate, again, that you are functionally illiterate. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you have no argument. None. Just repetition of nonsense. Got it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's all it takes to totally control you, Carroll, cc, Kohlmann and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And like the proverbial self-righteous ex-smoker, DFS tosses a PKB without >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full disclosure. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For me, Snit is just a convenient practice dummy that I pull from the drawer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on occasion to keep my claws sharp. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You need a better scratching post because Snit owns you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> He needs all the help he can get, so it's good to see that you're doing >>>>>>>>>>>>> your part. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Boring. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> If you had the proper attitude, you wouldn't find school so boring. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I don't need to join the school of snit to watch him schooling you on every >>>>>>>>>> topic. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You mean how he schooled me in math class? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I had written this: >>>>>>>>> Message-ID: <mbjcur96.kdi@rooftop.invalid> >>>>>>>>> [owl]: >>>>>>>>> "Now that's funny. 154 rounds in 264 seconds with a semi-auto AR-15. >>>>>>>>> That's 1 round every 1.714 seconds." >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So Snit came up with this nonsense: >>>>>>>>> Message-ID: <D1A24EE6.4D65B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>>>> [Snit]: >>>>>>>>> "And it would NOT be even an AVERAGE of "1 round every 1.714 seconds", it >>>>>>>>> would be an AVERAGE of 1 round every 0.583 seconds." >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> See, school is NOT boring. It's full of comedy! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Key word AVERAGE. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No, Snit's key words were "1 round every 0.583 seconds." FAIL! LOL! >>>>>> >>>>>> What words were those? >>>>>> >>>>> Are you bad at math too? >>>> >>>> Define bad. >>>> >>> For starters, if you agree with Snit that 154 rounds in 264 seconds equals >>> an average of 1 round every 0.583 seconds, then you are bad at math. Do >>> you agree with Snit's math? >> >> Where did I make that claim? >> > I'm just asking if you agree with Snit's math or not, and for some reason > you don't want to answer that question. You gave this dumbass too much time, and too many outs.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 21:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <asd3.fa03@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #328351 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 10/25/2015 5:02 PM, owl wrote: >> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 20:38:42 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>> >>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 20:27:25 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 20:11:41 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 19:58:19 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 19:34:10 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 19:18:46 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 18:23:53 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/24/2015 8:25 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will let you. When are you going to start trying? Below you just >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> demonstrate, again, that you are functionally illiterate. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you have no argument. None. Just repetition of nonsense. Got it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's all it takes to totally control you, Carroll, cc, Kohlmann and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And like the proverbial self-righteous ex-smoker, DFS tosses a PKB without >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> full disclosure. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For me, Snit is just a convenient practice dummy that I pull from the drawer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on occasion to keep my claws sharp. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You need a better scratching post because Snit owns you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> He needs all the help he can get, so it's good to see that you're doing >>>>>>>>>>>>>> your part. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Boring. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> If you had the proper attitude, you wouldn't find school so boring. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I don't need to join the school of snit to watch him schooling you on every >>>>>>>>>>> topic. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You mean how he schooled me in math class? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I had written this: >>>>>>>>>> Message-ID: <mbjcur96.kdi@rooftop.invalid> >>>>>>>>>> [owl]: >>>>>>>>>> "Now that's funny. 154 rounds in 264 seconds with a semi-auto AR-15. >>>>>>>>>> That's 1 round every 1.714 seconds." >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So Snit came up with this nonsense: >>>>>>>>>> Message-ID: <D1A24EE6.4D65B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>>>>> [Snit]: >>>>>>>>>> "And it would NOT be even an AVERAGE of "1 round every 1.714 seconds", it >>>>>>>>>> would be an AVERAGE of 1 round every 0.583 seconds." >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> See, school is NOT boring. It's full of comedy! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Key word AVERAGE. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No, Snit's key words were "1 round every 0.583 seconds." FAIL! LOL! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What words were those? >>>>>>> >>>>>> Are you bad at math too? >>>>> >>>>> Define bad. >>>>> >>>> For starters, if you agree with Snit that 154 rounds in 264 seconds equals >>>> an average of 1 round every 0.583 seconds, then you are bad at math. Do >>>> you agree with Snit's math? >>> >>> Where did I make that claim? >>> >> I'm just asking if you agree with Snit's math or not, and for some reason >> you don't want to answer that question. > > > You gave this dumbass too much time, and too many outs. > I know. It's a fine line you have to walk when you're stringing it out to let a fool dig himself to China. I could use some improvement in that skill area. Hence the need for practicing on ragdolls like snit and his socks.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 17:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D252BFFF.616F7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #328351 |
On 10/25/15, 2:28 PM, in article n0jhec$l5$2@dont-email.me, "DFS" <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> No, Snit's key words were "1 round every 0.583 seconds." FAIL! LOL! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What words were those? >>>>>>> >>>>>> Are you bad at math too? >>>>> >>>>> Define bad. >>>>> >>>> For starters, if you agree with Snit that 154 rounds in 264 seconds equals >>>> an average of 1 round every 0.583 seconds, then you are bad at math. Do >>>> you agree with Snit's math? >>> >>> Where did I make that claim? >>> >> I'm just asking if you agree with Snit's math or not, and for some reason >> you don't want to answer that question. > > > You gave this dumbass too much time, and too many outs. No matter how many chances Owl is given he will NEVER admit to how his quote shows he did not even get the concept of an average. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 17:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D252BEA0.616EA%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #328340 |
On 10/25/15, 1:38 PM, in article fadsle9.dsfj@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> I had written this: >>>>>>> Message-ID: <mbjcur96.kdi@rooftop.invalid> >>>>>>> [owl]: >>>>>>> "Now that's funny. 154 rounds in 264 seconds with a semi-auto AR-15. >>>>>>> That's 1 round every 1.714 seconds." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So Snit came up with this nonsense: >>>>>>> Message-ID: <D1A24EE6.4D65B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>>> [Snit]: >>>>>>> "And it would NOT be even an AVERAGE of "1 round every 1.714 >>>>>>> seconds", it >>>>>>> would be an AVERAGE of 1 round every 0.583 seconds." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> See, school is NOT boring. It's full of comedy! >>>>>> >>>>>> Key word AVERAGE. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> No, Snit's key words were "1 round every 0.583 seconds." FAIL! LOL! >>>> >>>> What words were those? >>>> >>> Are you bad at math too? >> >> Define bad. >> > For starters, if you agree with Snit that 154 rounds in 264 seconds equals > an average of 1 round every 0.583 seconds, then you are bad at math. Do > you agree with Snit's math? Again: I openly admitted to my error. Why don't you show you are as reasonable as I am and admit to yours? -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 17:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D252BE7C.616E9%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #328337 |
On 10/25/15, 1:27 PM, in article fda3a.fe3h@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>> I had written this: >>>>> Message-ID: <mbjcur96.kdi@rooftop.invalid> >>>>> [owl]: >>>>> "Now that's funny. 154 rounds in 264 seconds with a semi-auto AR-15. >>>>> That's 1 round every 1.714 seconds." >>>>> >>>>> So Snit came up with this nonsense: >>>>> Message-ID: <D1A24EE6.4D65B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>> [Snit]: >>>>> "And it would NOT be even an AVERAGE of "1 round every 1.714 seconds", >>>>> it >>>>> would be an AVERAGE of 1 round every 0.583 seconds." >>>>> >>>>> See, school is NOT boring. It's full of comedy! >>>> >>>> Key word AVERAGE. >>>> >>> >>> No, Snit's key words were "1 round every 0.583 seconds." FAIL! LOL! >> >> What words were those? >> > Are you bad at math too? Have you figured out what an average is yet? Remember: I openly admitted to my error. Yup - I goofed. When if ever will you admit to yours? -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 20:23 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <h0y1hcrypdr6.yay2d8ltrvlg.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #328411 |
On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 17:14:36 -0700, Snit wrote: > On 10/25/15, 1:27 PM, in article fda3a.fe3h@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>>>>> I had written this: >>>>>> Message-ID: <mbjcur96.kdi@rooftop.invalid> >>>>>> [owl]: >>>>>> "Now that's funny. 154 rounds in 264 seconds with a semi-auto AR-15. >>>>>> That's 1 round every 1.714 seconds." >>>>>> >>>>>> So Snit came up with this nonsense: >>>>>> Message-ID: <D1A24EE6.4D65B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>>> [Snit]: >>>>>> "And it would NOT be even an AVERAGE of "1 round every 1.714 seconds", >>>>>> it >>>>>> would be an AVERAGE of 1 round every 0.583 seconds." >>>>>> >>>>>> See, school is NOT boring. It's full of comedy! >>>>> >>>>> Key word AVERAGE. >>>>> >>>> >>>> No, Snit's key words were "1 round every 0.583 seconds." FAIL! LOL! >>> >>> What words were those? >>> >> Are you bad at math too? > > Have you figured out what an average is yet? > > Remember: I openly admitted to my error. Yup - I goofed. > > When if ever will you admit to yours? Owl seems to have a multitude of problems with reading comprehension. -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 17:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D252BE26.616E7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #328334 |
On 10/25/15, 1:11 PM, in article fsds93.a8f3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> I don't need to join the school of snit to watch him schooling you on every >>>> topic. >>>> >>> You mean how he schooled me in math class? >>> >>> I had written this: >>> Message-ID: <mbjcur96.kdi@rooftop.invalid> >>> [owl]: >>> "Now that's funny. 154 rounds in 264 seconds with a semi-auto AR-15. >>> That's 1 round every 1.714 seconds." >>> >>> So Snit came up with this nonsense: >>> Message-ID: <D1A24EE6.4D65B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> [Snit]: >>> "And it would NOT be even an AVERAGE of "1 round every 1.714 seconds", it >>> would be an AVERAGE of 1 round every 0.583 seconds." >>> >>> See, school is NOT boring. It's full of comedy! >> >> Key word AVERAGE. >> > > No, Snit's key words were "1 round every 0.583 seconds." FAIL! LOL! Yeah: we both goofed. I did incorrect math and openly admitted it. You did not even get the CONCEPT of an average and STILL have not. Yeah: great comedy. Even more funny is you STILL do not even recognize your error - or at least will not admit to it. Prove me wrong and show you are the adult I am: admit to your error. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 17:25 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0jh81$l5$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #328333 |
On 10/25/2015 4:01 PM, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: > On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 19:58:19 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: > >> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 19:34:10 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>> >>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 19:18:46 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 18:23:53 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 10/24/2015 8:25 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I will let you. When are you going to start trying? Below you just >>>>>>>>>>> demonstrate, again, that you are functionally illiterate. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So you have no argument. None. Just repetition of nonsense. Got it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That's all it takes to totally control you, Carroll, cc, Kohlmann and >>>>>>>>> others. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And like the proverbial self-righteous ex-smoker, DFS tosses a PKB without >>>>>>>> full disclosure. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For me, Snit is just a convenient practice dummy that I pull from the drawer >>>>>>>> on occasion to keep my claws sharp. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You need a better scratching post because Snit owns you. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> He needs all the help he can get, so it's good to see that you're doing >>>>>> your part. >>>>> >>>>> Boring. >>>>> >>>> >>>> If you had the proper attitude, you wouldn't find school so boring. >>> >>> I don't need to join the school of snit to watch him schooling you on every >>> topic. >>> >> You mean how he schooled me in math class? >> >> I had written this: >> Message-ID: <mbjcur96.kdi@rooftop.invalid> >> [owl]: >> "Now that's funny. 154 rounds in 264 seconds with a semi-auto AR-15. >> That's 1 round every 1.714 seconds." >> >> So Snit came up with this nonsense: >> Message-ID: <D1A24EE6.4D65B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> [Snit]: >> "And it would NOT be even an AVERAGE of "1 round every 1.714 seconds", it >> would be an AVERAGE of 1 round every 0.583 seconds." >> >> See, school is NOT boring. It's full of comedy! > > Key word AVERAGE. I'm smelling a fucking idiot named NoBrains. 154 rounds fired in 264 seconds is an AVERAGE of 1 round every 1.714 seconds, just like owl said.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 17:30 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <182td1dxfav6p$.lz7lemsxbg9a.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #328350 |
On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 17:25:09 -0400, DFS wrote: > On 10/25/2015 4:01 PM, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: >> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 19:58:19 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >> >>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 19:34:10 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>> >>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 19:18:46 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 18:23:53 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 10/24/2015 8:25 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I will let you. When are you going to start trying? Below you just >>>>>>>>>>>> demonstrate, again, that you are functionally illiterate. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> So you have no argument. None. Just repetition of nonsense. Got it. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That's all it takes to totally control you, Carroll, cc, Kohlmann and >>>>>>>>>> others. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And like the proverbial self-righteous ex-smoker, DFS tosses a PKB without >>>>>>>>> full disclosure. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For me, Snit is just a convenient practice dummy that I pull from the drawer >>>>>>>>> on occasion to keep my claws sharp. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You need a better scratching post because Snit owns you. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> He needs all the help he can get, so it's good to see that you're doing >>>>>>> your part. >>>>>> >>>>>> Boring. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If you had the proper attitude, you wouldn't find school so boring. >>>> >>>> I don't need to join the school of snit to watch him schooling you on every >>>> topic. >>>> >>> You mean how he schooled me in math class? >>> >>> I had written this: >>> Message-ID: <mbjcur96.kdi@rooftop.invalid> >>> [owl]: >>> "Now that's funny. 154 rounds in 264 seconds with a semi-auto AR-15. >>> That's 1 round every 1.714 seconds." >>> >>> So Snit came up with this nonsense: >>> Message-ID: <D1A24EE6.4D65B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> [Snit]: >>> "And it would NOT be even an AVERAGE of "1 round every 1.714 seconds", it >>> would be an AVERAGE of 1 round every 0.583 seconds." >>> >>> See, school is NOT boring. It's full of comedy! >> >> Key word AVERAGE. > > > I'm smelling a fucking idiot named NoBrains. > > 154 rounds fired in 264 seconds is an AVERAGE of 1 round every 1.714 > seconds, just like owl said. I'm smelling a redneck. Right Bull Connor? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WqNMjZpSbnU -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 20:06 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0jqmd$46h$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #328352 |
On 10/25/2015 5:30 PM, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: > On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 17:25:09 -0400, DFS wrote: > >> On 10/25/2015 4:01 PM, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: >>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 19:58:19 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>> >>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 19:34:10 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 19:18:46 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 18:23:53 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 10/24/2015 8:25 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I will let you. When are you going to start trying? Below you just >>>>>>>>>>>>> demonstrate, again, that you are functionally illiterate. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> So you have no argument. None. Just repetition of nonsense. Got it. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> That's all it takes to totally control you, Carroll, cc, Kohlmann and >>>>>>>>>>> others. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And like the proverbial self-righteous ex-smoker, DFS tosses a PKB without >>>>>>>>>> full disclosure. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> For me, Snit is just a convenient practice dummy that I pull from the drawer >>>>>>>>>> on occasion to keep my claws sharp. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You need a better scratching post because Snit owns you. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> He needs all the help he can get, so it's good to see that you're doing >>>>>>>> your part. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Boring. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> If you had the proper attitude, you wouldn't find school so boring. >>>>> >>>>> I don't need to join the school of snit to watch him schooling you on every >>>>> topic. >>>>> >>>> You mean how he schooled me in math class? >>>> >>>> I had written this: >>>> Message-ID: <mbjcur96.kdi@rooftop.invalid> >>>> [owl]: >>>> "Now that's funny. 154 rounds in 264 seconds with a semi-auto AR-15. >>>> That's 1 round every 1.714 seconds." >>>> >>>> So Snit came up with this nonsense: >>>> Message-ID: <D1A24EE6.4D65B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> [Snit]: >>>> "And it would NOT be even an AVERAGE of "1 round every 1.714 seconds", it >>>> would be an AVERAGE of 1 round every 0.583 seconds." >>>> >>>> See, school is NOT boring. It's full of comedy! >>> >>> Key word AVERAGE. >> >> >> I'm smelling a fucking idiot named NoBrains. >> >> 154 rounds fired in 264 seconds is an AVERAGE of 1 round every 1.714 >> seconds, just like owl said. > > I'm smelling a redneck. > Right Bull Connor? > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WqNMjZpSbnU Better a 'redneck' than a fucking idiot who can't figure out rounds per second.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 20:12 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <1csba6nvlxvdj$.1pchr12sthiz8.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #328404 |
On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 20:06:25 -0400, DFS wrote: > On 10/25/2015 5:30 PM, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: >> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 17:25:09 -0400, DFS wrote: >> >>> On 10/25/2015 4:01 PM, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: >>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 19:58:19 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>> >>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 19:34:10 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 19:18:46 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 18:23:53 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/24/2015 8:25 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will let you. When are you going to start trying? Below you just >>>>>>>>>>>>>> demonstrate, again, that you are functionally illiterate. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> So you have no argument. None. Just repetition of nonsense. Got it. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> That's all it takes to totally control you, Carroll, cc, Kohlmann and >>>>>>>>>>>> others. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> And like the proverbial self-righteous ex-smoker, DFS tosses a PKB without >>>>>>>>>>> full disclosure. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> For me, Snit is just a convenient practice dummy that I pull from the drawer >>>>>>>>>>> on occasion to keep my claws sharp. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You need a better scratching post because Snit owns you. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> He needs all the help he can get, so it's good to see that you're doing >>>>>>>>> your part. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Boring. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you had the proper attitude, you wouldn't find school so boring. >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't need to join the school of snit to watch him schooling you on every >>>>>> topic. >>>>>> >>>>> You mean how he schooled me in math class? >>>>> >>>>> I had written this: >>>>> Message-ID: <mbjcur96.kdi@rooftop.invalid> >>>>> [owl]: >>>>> "Now that's funny. 154 rounds in 264 seconds with a semi-auto AR-15. >>>>> That's 1 round every 1.714 seconds." >>>>> >>>>> So Snit came up with this nonsense: >>>>> Message-ID: <D1A24EE6.4D65B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>>> [Snit]: >>>>> "And it would NOT be even an AVERAGE of "1 round every 1.714 seconds", it >>>>> would be an AVERAGE of 1 round every 0.583 seconds." >>>>> >>>>> See, school is NOT boring. It's full of comedy! >>>> >>>> Key word AVERAGE. >>> >>> >>> I'm smelling a fucking idiot named NoBrains. >>> >>> 154 rounds fired in 264 seconds is an AVERAGE of 1 round every 1.714 >>> seconds, just like owl said. >> >> I'm smelling a redneck. >> Right Bull Connor? >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WqNMjZpSbnU > > > Better a 'redneck' than a fucking idiot who can't figure out rounds per > second. I had it figured out from the first post. It boils down to semantics, George. You should appreciate that as you seem to have a penchant for correcting people's grammar and word usage. After all, what's good for the stuck pig (that's you) should be good for your superior, that's me. So how is the video business coming along George? -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 17:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D252C03A.616FA%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #328350 |
On 10/25/15, 2:25 PM, in article n0jh81$l5$1@dont-email.me, "DFS" <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>> I don't need to join the school of snit to watch him schooling you on every >>>> topic. >>>> >>> You mean how he schooled me in math class? >>> >>> I had written this: >>> Message-ID: <mbjcur96.kdi@rooftop.invalid> >>> [owl]: >>> "Now that's funny. 154 rounds in 264 seconds with a semi-auto AR-15. >>> That's 1 round every 1.714 seconds." >>> >>> So Snit came up with this nonsense: >>> Message-ID: <D1A24EE6.4D65B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> [Snit]: >>> "And it would NOT be even an AVERAGE of "1 round every 1.714 seconds", >>> it >>> would be an AVERAGE of 1 round every 0.583 seconds." >>> >>> See, school is NOT boring. It's full of comedy! >> >> Key word AVERAGE. > > > I'm smelling a fucking idiot named NoBrains. > > 154 rounds fired in 264 seconds is an AVERAGE of 1 round every 1.714 > seconds, just like owl said. Owl never showed any understanding of the concept of an average. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 17:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D252BDC5.616E6%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #328331 |
On 10/25/15, 12:58 PM, in article fsd.kbkc93x@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> I don't need to join the school of snit to watch him schooling you on every >> topic. >> > You mean how he schooled me in math class? > > I had written this: > Message-ID: <mbjcur96.kdi@rooftop.invalid> > [owl]: > "Now that's funny. 154 rounds in 264 seconds with a semi-auto AR-15. > That's 1 round every 1.714 seconds." > > So Snit came up with this nonsense: > Message-ID: <D1A24EE6.4D65B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> > [Snit]: > "And it would NOT be even an AVERAGE of "1 round every 1.714 seconds", it > would be an AVERAGE of 1 round every 0.583 seconds." > > See, school is NOT boring. It's full of comedy! Yes! When you could not get the concept of an average. That WAS funny! I also goofed on math and then openly admitted it. Yup. I made a mistake. But not so funny when someone openly admits it. I did. You NEVER did. And you won't now, will you? -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 20:13 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <3pipyrmosu9b$.159szo0q356y9$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #328406 |
On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 17:11:33 -0700, Snit wrote: > On 10/25/15, 12:58 PM, in article fsd.kbkc93x@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>> I don't need to join the school of snit to watch him schooling you on every >>> topic. >>> >> You mean how he schooled me in math class? >> >> I had written this: >> Message-ID: <mbjcur96.kdi@rooftop.invalid> >> [owl]: >> "Now that's funny. 154 rounds in 264 seconds with a semi-auto AR-15. >> That's 1 round every 1.714 seconds." >> >> So Snit came up with this nonsense: >> Message-ID: <D1A24EE6.4D65B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> [Snit]: >> "And it would NOT be even an AVERAGE of "1 round every 1.714 seconds", it >> would be an AVERAGE of 1 round every 0.583 seconds." >> >> See, school is NOT boring. It's full of comedy! > > Yes! When you could not get the concept of an average. That WAS funny! Yes. Key word AVERAGE. > I also goofed on math and then openly admitted it. Yup. I made a mistake. > But not so funny when someone openly admits it. You did. > I did. You NEVER did. > > And you won't now, will you? Owl is dancing around once again. He needs to find another nest. This one is obviously polluted. -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-27 08:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ebb596c7-445b-4c0e-b5ae-b2c429d5303c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #328410 |
On Sunday, October 25, 2015 at 6:13:47 PM UTC-6, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: > On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 17:11:33 -0700, Snit wrote: > > > On 10/25/15, 12:58 PM, in article fsd.kbkc93x@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > > > >>> I don't need to join the school of snit to watch him schooling you on every > >>> topic. > >>> > >> You mean how he schooled me in math class? > >> > >> I had written this: > >> Message-ID: <mbjcur96.kdi@rooftop.invalid> > >> [owl]: > >> "Now that's funny. 154 rounds in 264 seconds with a semi-auto AR-15. > >> That's 1 round every 1.714 seconds." > >> > >> So Snit came up with this nonsense: > >> Message-ID: <D1A24EE6.4D65B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> > >> [Snit]: > >> "And it would NOT be even an AVERAGE of "1 round every 1.714 seconds", it > >> would be an AVERAGE of 1 round every 0.583 seconds." > >> > >> See, school is NOT boring. It's full of comedy! > > > > Yes! When you could not get the concept of an average. That WAS funny! > > Yes. > Key word AVERAGE. Ok, "Crotch", ask Snit *how* he arrived at the number he did if he's such an expert on "AVERAGE" ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-26 00:39 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <asd39r.gjiua@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #328406 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 10/25/15, 12:58 PM, in article fsd.kbkc93x@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >>> I don't need to join the school of snit to watch him schooling you on every >>> topic. >>> >> You mean how he schooled me in math class? >> >> I had written this: >> Message-ID: <mbjcur96.kdi@rooftop.invalid> >> [owl]: >> "Now that's funny. 154 rounds in 264 seconds with a semi-auto AR-15. >> That's 1 round every 1.714 seconds." >> >> So Snit came up with this nonsense: >> Message-ID: <D1A24EE6.4D65B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> [Snit]: >> "And it would NOT be even an AVERAGE of "1 round every 1.714 seconds", it >> would be an AVERAGE of 1 round every 0.583 seconds." >> >> See, school is NOT boring. It's full of comedy! > > Yes! When you could not get the concept of an average. That WAS funny! > > I also goofed on math and then openly admitted it. Yup. I made a mistake. > But not so funny when someone openly admits it. > > I did. You NEVER did. > > And you won't now, will you? > When you provide proof that the rounds fired at Sandy Hook were *not* fired at a rate of *exactly* 1 round every 1.714 seconds, which was very likely the case given that the so-called shooter was a known Assburger who may well have been fixated on that number, Rainman that he was, then we can take it as an average. The original point of that post, which you completely failed to grasp, was that this rate of fire had been trumpeted by a liberal blogger to illustrate the danger posed to society by semi-auto "assault rifles," even though that pathetic rate was eclipsed by another famous so-called shooter with a *bolt action* rifle in 1963. http://jfkassassination.net/russ/jfkinfo/jfk8/mc.htm <quote> (3) It is not difficult to fire two consecutive shots from a Mannlicher-Carcano within 1.66 seconds, and to "point aim", if not carefully "sight" it, on the target of each shot. Cornwell fired the rifle twice in 1.2 seconds, and I fired it twice within 1.5 seconds. In both cases the second shot missed, but was close to the silhouette. In fact, my second shot only missed the silhouette by approximately 2". [4] </quote> Interestingly, in the same thread where you boasted of your idiotic math failings included the following equally idiotic gem showing what you think the rate of fire is for an AR-15 (based on something you read about M-16 rate of fire, with zero actual knowledge of the subject, as is the case with most things you post): Message-ID: <D1A24EE6.4D65B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> [Snit]: "That comes to between 11.667 and 15.833 rounds per second." And you actually *argued* this point. LOL! Can you imagine the blur of a trigger finger moving that fast! I would love to see that.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 20:42 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <itiro065xdpj$.u5wwyzsmo254$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #328427 |
On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 00:39:15 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 10/25/15, 12:58 PM, in article fsd.kbkc93x@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>>> I don't need to join the school of snit to watch him schooling you on every >>>> topic. >>>> >>> You mean how he schooled me in math class? >>> >>> I had written this: >>> Message-ID: <mbjcur96.kdi@rooftop.invalid> >>> [owl]: >>> "Now that's funny. 154 rounds in 264 seconds with a semi-auto AR-15. >>> That's 1 round every 1.714 seconds." >>> >>> So Snit came up with this nonsense: >>> Message-ID: <D1A24EE6.4D65B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> [Snit]: >>> "And it would NOT be even an AVERAGE of "1 round every 1.714 seconds", it >>> would be an AVERAGE of 1 round every 0.583 seconds." >>> >>> See, school is NOT boring. It's full of comedy! >> >> Yes! When you could not get the concept of an average. That WAS funny! >> >> I also goofed on math and then openly admitted it. Yup. I made a mistake. >> But not so funny when someone openly admits it. >> >> I did. You NEVER did. >> >> And you won't now, will you? >> > > When you provide proof that the rounds fired at Sandy Hook were *not* > fired at a rate of *exactly* 1 round every 1.714 seconds, which was very > likely the case given that the so-called shooter was a known Assburger > who may well have been fixated on that number, Rainman that he was, > then we can take it as an average. > > The original point of that post, which you completely failed to grasp, > was that this rate of fire had been trumpeted by a liberal blogger to > illustrate the danger posed to society by semi-auto "assault rifles," > even though that pathetic rate was eclipsed by another famous so-called > shooter with a *bolt action* rifle in 1963. > > http://jfkassassination.net/russ/jfkinfo/jfk8/mc.htm > <quote> > (3) It is not difficult to fire two consecutive shots from a > Mannlicher-Carcano within 1.66 seconds, and to "point aim", if not > carefully "sight" it, on the target of each shot. Cornwell fired the rifle > twice in 1.2 seconds, and I fired it twice within 1.5 seconds. In both > cases the second shot missed, but was close to the silhouette. In fact, > my second shot only missed the silhouette by approximately 2". [4] > </quote> > > Interestingly, in the same thread where you boasted of your idiotic > math failings included the following equally idiotic gem showing what > you think the rate of fire is for an AR-15 (based on something you read > about M-16 rate of fire, with zero actual knowledge of the subject, > as is the case with most things you post): > > Message-ID: <D1A24EE6.4D65B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> > [Snit]: > "That comes to between 11.667 and 15.833 rounds per second." > > And you actually *argued* this point. LOL! Can you imagine the blur > of a trigger finger moving that fast! I would love to see that. Goal posts have just been attached to an Indy car. Headed ----------->>>>>That way---------> -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 20:58 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0jtmo$ch0$8@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #328428 |
On 2015-10-25 8:42 PM, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: > On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 00:39:15 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 10/25/15, 12:58 PM, in article fsd.kbkc93x@rooftop.invalid, >>> "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>>> I don't need to join the school of snit to watch him >>>>> schooling you on every topic. >>>>> >>>> You mean how he schooled me in math class? >>>> >>>> I had written this: Message-ID: <mbjcur96.kdi@rooftop.invalid> >>>> [owl]: "Now that's funny. 154 rounds in 264 seconds with a >>>> semi-auto AR-15. That's 1 round every 1.714 seconds." >>>> >>>> So Snit came up with this nonsense: Message-ID: >>>> <D1A24EE6.4D65B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> [Snit]: "And it >>>> would NOT be even an AVERAGE of "1 round every 1.714 seconds", >>>> it would be an AVERAGE of 1 round every 0.583 seconds." >>>> >>>> See, school is NOT boring. It's full of comedy! >>> >>> Yes! When you could not get the concept of an average. That WAS >>> funny! >>> >>> I also goofed on math and then openly admitted it. Yup. I made a >>> mistake. But not so funny when someone openly admits it. >>> >>> I did. You NEVER did. >>> >>> And you won't now, will you? >>> >> >> When you provide proof that the rounds fired at Sandy Hook were >> *not* fired at a rate of *exactly* 1 round every 1.714 seconds, >> which was very likely the case given that the so-called shooter was >> a known Assburger who may well have been fixated on that number, >> Rainman that he was, then we can take it as an average. >> >> The original point of that post, which you completely failed to >> grasp, was that this rate of fire had been trumpeted by a liberal >> blogger to illustrate the danger posed to society by semi-auto >> "assault rifles," even though that pathetic rate was eclipsed by >> another famous so-called shooter with a *bolt action* rifle in >> 1963. >> >> http://jfkassassination.net/russ/jfkinfo/jfk8/mc.htm <quote> (3) It >> is not difficult to fire two consecutive shots from a >> Mannlicher-Carcano within 1.66 seconds, and to "point aim", if not >> carefully "sight" it, on the target of each shot. Cornwell fired >> the rifle twice in 1.2 seconds, and I fired it twice within 1.5 >> seconds. In both cases the second shot missed, but was close to the >> silhouette. In fact, my second shot only missed the silhouette by >> approximately 2". [4] </quote> >> >> Interestingly, in the same thread where you boasted of your >> idiotic math failings included the following equally idiotic gem >> showing what you think the rate of fire is for an AR-15 (based on >> something you read about M-16 rate of fire, with zero actual >> knowledge of the subject, as is the case with most things you >> post): >> >> Message-ID: <D1A24EE6.4D65B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> [Snit]: >> "That comes to between 11.667 and 15.833 rounds per second." >> >> And you actually *argued* this point. LOL! Can you imagine the >> blur of a trigger finger moving that fast! I would love to see >> that. > > Goal posts have just been attached to an Indy car. Headed > ----------->>>>>That way---------> Hi, Edwin. -- Charmed Tuna
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-26 03:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fsdkvm.b@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #328428 |
Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: > On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 00:39:15 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 10/25/15, 12:58 PM, in article fsd.kbkc93x@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>>> I don't need to join the school of snit to watch him schooling you on every >>>>> topic. >>>>> >>>> You mean how he schooled me in math class? >>>> >>>> I had written this: >>>> Message-ID: <mbjcur96.kdi@rooftop.invalid> >>>> [owl]: >>>> "Now that's funny. 154 rounds in 264 seconds with a semi-auto AR-15. >>>> That's 1 round every 1.714 seconds." >>>> >>>> So Snit came up with this nonsense: >>>> Message-ID: <D1A24EE6.4D65B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>>> [Snit]: >>>> "And it would NOT be even an AVERAGE of "1 round every 1.714 seconds", it >>>> would be an AVERAGE of 1 round every 0.583 seconds." >>>> >>>> See, school is NOT boring. It's full of comedy! >>> >>> Yes! When you could not get the concept of an average. That WAS funny! >>> >>> I also goofed on math and then openly admitted it. Yup. I made a mistake. >>> But not so funny when someone openly admits it. >>> >>> I did. You NEVER did. >>> >>> And you won't now, will you? >>> >> >> When you provide proof that the rounds fired at Sandy Hook were *not* >> fired at a rate of *exactly* 1 round every 1.714 seconds, which was very >> likely the case given that the so-called shooter was a known Assburger >> who may well have been fixated on that number, Rainman that he was, >> then we can take it as an average. >> >> The original point of that post, which you completely failed to grasp, >> was that this rate of fire had been trumpeted by a liberal blogger to >> illustrate the danger posed to society by semi-auto "assault rifles," >> even though that pathetic rate was eclipsed by another famous so-called >> shooter with a *bolt action* rifle in 1963. >> >> http://jfkassassination.net/russ/jfkinfo/jfk8/mc.htm >> <quote> >> (3) It is not difficult to fire two consecutive shots from a >> Mannlicher-Carcano within 1.66 seconds, and to "point aim", if not >> carefully "sight" it, on the target of each shot. Cornwell fired the rifle >> twice in 1.2 seconds, and I fired it twice within 1.5 seconds. In both >> cases the second shot missed, but was close to the silhouette. In fact, >> my second shot only missed the silhouette by approximately 2". [4] >> </quote> >> >> Interestingly, in the same thread where you boasted of your idiotic >> math failings included the following equally idiotic gem showing what >> you think the rate of fire is for an AR-15 (based on something you read >> about M-16 rate of fire, with zero actual knowledge of the subject, >> as is the case with most things you post): >> >> Message-ID: <D1A24EE6.4D65B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> [Snit]: >> "That comes to between 11.667 and 15.833 rounds per second." >> >> And you actually *argued* this point. LOL! Can you imagine the blur >> of a trigger finger moving that fast! I would love to see that. > > Goal posts have just been attached to an Indy car. > Headed ----------->>>>>That way---------> That's going to be your new M.O. then? "Goalposts!"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web