Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #328277 > unrolled thread
| Started by | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-10-25 13:13 -0400 |
| Last post | 2015-10-27 08:48 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 80 — 8 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-25 13:13 -0400
Mind games. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-10-25 11:41 -0700
Re: Mind games. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-29 09:43 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 19:23 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-25 16:24 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 20:33 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-25 16:54 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 17:00 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 21:19 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 17:24 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 21:33 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 17:40 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 21:54 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 18:05 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 22:14 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 18:24 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 22:34 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 18:44 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 23:08 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 19:22 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 23:34 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 19:39 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 00:12 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 20:21 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 00:50 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 20:54 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 01:23 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 21:28 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 01:37 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 18:50 -0700
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 02:03 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 22:08 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 03:30 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 23:34 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 03:48 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 23:52 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 04:03 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 22:06 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 03:37 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 23:42 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 03:50 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-25 20:54 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:37 -0700
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 20:43 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 00:56 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 18:41 -0700
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 01:58 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 19:18 -0700
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 03:18 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 21:01 -0700
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 04:19 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 22:26 -0700
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 05:35 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 13:05 -0700
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 21:29 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 14:38 -0700
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 21:45 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 15:14 -0700
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 22:26 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 15:37 -0700
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 23:03 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 16:29 -0700
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-26 19:31 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 16:58 -0700
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-27 00:43 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 17:49 -0700
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-27 01:23 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 18:31 -0700
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-27 01:41 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 18:53 -0700
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 17:21 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 13:05 -0700
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 21:23 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 14:40 -0700
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-26 09:49 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 08:39 -0700
Is there a more pathetic Bullying doofus anywhere than our own DooFuS? John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 14:51 -0700
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 07:12 -0700
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 02:31 -0700
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-27 08:48 -0400
Page 1 of 4 [1] 2 3 4 Next page →
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 13:13 -0400 |
| Subject | This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. |
| Message-ID | <n0j2gk$dok$1@dont-email.me> |
Starting June 3, 2004. Minus a year or so off, so ~4000 posts per year, or 11 per day for 10 years straight on average. Scary. Sicko. Who knew a crappy, hobbyist operating system and it's mentally-challenged adherents could inspire such an unhealthy obsession...
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 11:41 -0700 |
| Subject | Mind games. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Oct.25{11.41A.Seattle.2015}> |
| In reply to | #328277 |
Usenet is the opposite of work: PLAY. Like me, you (@DFS) have enjoyed your self here, last 11 years, PLAYing mind games.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-29 09:43 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Mind games. |
| Message-ID | <n0t7la$tcv$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #328313 |
On 10/25/2015 2:41 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > Usenet is the opposite of work: PLAY. > > Like me, you (@DFS) have enjoyed your self here, > last 11 years, PLAYing mind games. ha! Good way to look at it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 19:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <se23p4.6a3@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #328277 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > Starting June 3, 2004. > > Minus a year or so off, so ~4000 posts per year, or 11 per day for 10 > years straight on average. > > Scary. Sicko. > > Who knew a crappy, hobbyist operating system and it's > mentally-challenged adherents could inspire such an unhealthy obsession... > "it's mentally-challenged adherents" I do love a good self-nuke.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 16:24 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0jdmg$hmb$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #328325 |
On 10/25/2015 3:23 PM, owl wrote: > DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >> Starting June 3, 2004. >> >> Minus a year or so off, so ~4000 posts per year, or 11 per day for 10 >> years straight on average. >> >> Scary. Sicko. >> >> Who knew a crappy, hobbyist operating system and it's >> mentally-challenged adherents could inspire such an unhealthy obsession... >> > > "it's mentally-challenged adherents" > I do love a good self-nuke. ha! And that's about the only one you can find in 40K posts... Im doing alright...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 20:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fae8.a3rf@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #328336 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 10/25/2015 3:23 PM, owl wrote: >> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>> Starting June 3, 2004. >>> >>> Minus a year or so off, so ~4000 posts per year, or 11 per day for 10 >>> years straight on average. >>> >>> Scary. Sicko. >>> >>> Who knew a crappy, hobbyist operating system and it's >>> mentally-challenged adherents could inspire such an unhealthy obsession... >>> >> >> "it's mentally-challenged adherents" >> I do love a good self-nuke. > > ha! > > And that's about the only one you can find in 40K posts... Im doing > alright... > I guess you can thank the gods of Affirmative Action that "alright" has forced its way into common usage, allowing you to sidestep yet another self-nuke.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 16:54 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0jff8$p7u$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #328339 |
On 10/25/2015 4:33 PM, owl wrote: > DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >> On 10/25/2015 3:23 PM, owl wrote: >>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>> Starting June 3, 2004. >>>> >>>> Minus a year or so off, so ~4000 posts per year, or 11 per day >>>> for 10 years straight on average. >>>> >>>> Scary. Sicko. >>>> >>>> Who knew a crappy, hobbyist operating system and it's >>>> mentally-challenged adherents could inspire such an unhealthy >>>> obsession... >>>> >>> >>> "it's mentally-challenged adherents" I do love a good self-nuke. >> >> ha! >> >> And that's about the only one you can find in 40K posts... Im >> doing alright... >> > > I guess you can thank the gods of Affirmative Action that "alright" > has forced its way into common usage, allowing you to sidestep yet > another self-nuke. You missed [an intentional] one I made, thereby increasing your self-nuke count by one. Aight? And there's nothing affirmative action about the 150-year-old Oxford Dictionary: "Similar ‘merged’ words such as altogether and already have been accepted in standard English for a very long time, so there is no logical reason to object to the one-word form alright." http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/words/all-right-or-alright
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 17:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <13uvco6loglpv$.740s4zso6ylb.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #328343 |
On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 16:54:51 -0400, DFS wrote: > On 10/25/2015 4:33 PM, owl wrote: >> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>> On 10/25/2015 3:23 PM, owl wrote: >>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>> Starting June 3, 2004. >>>>> >>>>> Minus a year or so off, so ~4000 posts per year, or 11 per day >>>>> for 10 years straight on average. >>>>> >>>>> Scary. Sicko. >>>>> >>>>> Who knew a crappy, hobbyist operating system and it's >>>>> mentally-challenged adherents could inspire such an unhealthy >>>>> obsession... >>>>> >>>> >>>> "it's mentally-challenged adherents" I do love a good self-nuke. >>> >>> ha! >>> >>> And that's about the only one you can find in 40K posts... Im >>> doing alright... >>> >> >> I guess you can thank the gods of Affirmative Action that "alright" >> has forced its way into common usage, allowing you to sidestep yet >> another self-nuke. > > > You missed [an intentional] one I made, thereby increasing your > self-nuke count by one. Aight? > > > And there's nothing affirmative action about the 150-year-old Oxford > Dictionary: > > "Similar ‘merged’ words such as altogether and already have been > accepted in standard English for a very long time, so there is no > logical reason to object to the one-word form alright." > > http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/words/all-right-or-alright Is this you, Bull Connor? https://thevelvetrocket.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/southern-white-trash-tour-1.jpg -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 21:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fasdu83.fjd@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #328343 |
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 10/25/2015 4:33 PM, owl wrote: >> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>> On 10/25/2015 3:23 PM, owl wrote: >>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>> Starting June 3, 2004. >>>>> >>>>> Minus a year or so off, so ~4000 posts per year, or 11 per day >>>>> for 10 years straight on average. >>>>> >>>>> Scary. Sicko. >>>>> >>>>> Who knew a crappy, hobbyist operating system and it's >>>>> mentally-challenged adherents could inspire such an unhealthy >>>>> obsession... >>>>> >>>> >>>> "it's mentally-challenged adherents" I do love a good self-nuke. >>> >>> ha! >>> >>> And that's about the only one you can find in 40K posts... Im >>> doing alright... >>> >> >> I guess you can thank the gods of Affirmative Action that "alright" >> has forced its way into common usage, allowing you to sidestep yet >> another self-nuke. > > > You missed [an intentional] one I made, thereby increasing your > self-nuke count by one. Aight? > > > And there's nothing affirmative action about the 150-year-old Oxford > Dictionary: > > "Similar ???merged??? words such as altogether and already have been > accepted in standard English for a very long time, so there is no > logical reason to object to the one-word form alright." > > http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/words/all-right-or-alright > You should lobby them for "it's" as a possessive form. Threaten to get Al Sharpton on the case if they don't see things your way.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 17:24 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <1p4mwlj0m5myy.1cr59rws5ki9k$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #328348 |
On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 21:19:28 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: > DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >> On 10/25/2015 4:33 PM, owl wrote: >>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>> On 10/25/2015 3:23 PM, owl wrote: >>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>> Starting June 3, 2004. >>>>>> >>>>>> Minus a year or so off, so ~4000 posts per year, or 11 per day >>>>>> for 10 years straight on average. >>>>>> >>>>>> Scary. Sicko. >>>>>> >>>>>> Who knew a crappy, hobbyist operating system and it's >>>>>> mentally-challenged adherents could inspire such an unhealthy >>>>>> obsession... >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "it's mentally-challenged adherents" I do love a good self-nuke. >>>> >>>> ha! >>>> >>>> And that's about the only one you can find in 40K posts... Im >>>> doing alright... >>>> >>> >>> I guess you can thank the gods of Affirmative Action that "alright" >>> has forced its way into common usage, allowing you to sidestep yet >>> another self-nuke. >> >> >> You missed [an intentional] one I made, thereby increasing your >> self-nuke count by one. Aight? >> >> >> And there's nothing affirmative action about the 150-year-old Oxford >> Dictionary: >> >> "Similar ???merged??? words such as altogether and already have been >> accepted in standard English for a very long time, so there is no >> logical reason to object to the one-word form alright." >> >> http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/words/all-right-or-alright >> > > You should lobby them for "it's" as a possessive form. Threaten to get > Al Sharpton on the case if they don't see things your way. Brother Al is the man. Like him or not, Al Sharpton gets the job done. -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 21:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sfad93.afj@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #328349 |
Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: > On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 21:19:28 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: > >> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>> On 10/25/2015 4:33 PM, owl wrote: >>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>> On 10/25/2015 3:23 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>> Starting June 3, 2004. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Minus a year or so off, so ~4000 posts per year, or 11 per day >>>>>>> for 10 years straight on average. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Scary. Sicko. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Who knew a crappy, hobbyist operating system and it's >>>>>>> mentally-challenged adherents could inspire such an unhealthy >>>>>>> obsession... >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "it's mentally-challenged adherents" I do love a good self-nuke. >>>>> >>>>> ha! >>>>> >>>>> And that's about the only one you can find in 40K posts... Im >>>>> doing alright... >>>>> >>>> >>>> I guess you can thank the gods of Affirmative Action that "alright" >>>> has forced its way into common usage, allowing you to sidestep yet >>>> another self-nuke. >>> >>> >>> You missed [an intentional] one I made, thereby increasing your >>> self-nuke count by one. Aight? >>> >>> >>> And there's nothing affirmative action about the 150-year-old Oxford >>> Dictionary: >>> >>> "Similar ???merged??? words such as altogether and already have been >>> accepted in standard English for a very long time, so there is no >>> logical reason to object to the one-word form alright." >>> >>> http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/words/all-right-or-alright >>> >> >> You should lobby them for "it's" as a possessive form. Threaten to get >> Al Sharpton on the case if they don't see things your way. > > Brother Al is the man. > Like him or not, Al Sharpton gets the job done. > Al Sharpton is a racist opportunist.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 17:40 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <18pplevohevio.1gfbn4jktyhzv$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #328354 |
On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 21:33:20 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: > Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 21:19:28 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >> >>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>> On 10/25/2015 4:33 PM, owl wrote: >>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 10/25/2015 3:23 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> Starting June 3, 2004. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Minus a year or so off, so ~4000 posts per year, or 11 per day >>>>>>>> for 10 years straight on average. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Scary. Sicko. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Who knew a crappy, hobbyist operating system and it's >>>>>>>> mentally-challenged adherents could inspire such an unhealthy >>>>>>>> obsession... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "it's mentally-challenged adherents" I do love a good self-nuke. >>>>>> >>>>>> ha! >>>>>> >>>>>> And that's about the only one you can find in 40K posts... Im >>>>>> doing alright... >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I guess you can thank the gods of Affirmative Action that "alright" >>>>> has forced its way into common usage, allowing you to sidestep yet >>>>> another self-nuke. >>>> >>>> >>>> You missed [an intentional] one I made, thereby increasing your >>>> self-nuke count by one. Aight? >>>> >>>> >>>> And there's nothing affirmative action about the 150-year-old Oxford >>>> Dictionary: >>>> >>>> "Similar ???merged??? words such as altogether and already have been >>>> accepted in standard English for a very long time, so there is no >>>> logical reason to object to the one-word form alright." >>>> >>>> http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/words/all-right-or-alright >>>> >>> >>> You should lobby them for "it's" as a possessive form. Threaten to get >>> Al Sharpton on the case if they don't see things your way. >> >> Brother Al is the man. >> Like him or not, Al Sharpton gets the job done. >> > > Al Sharpton is a racist opportunist. And I'll just wager that some of your best friends are people of color. Brother Al gets the job done. Speaking of racists, how is George Zimmerman these days? -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 21:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <asde1op03.a@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #328357 |
Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: > On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 21:33:20 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: > >> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 21:19:28 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>> >>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>> On 10/25/2015 4:33 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 10/25/2015 3:23 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Starting June 3, 2004. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Minus a year or so off, so ~4000 posts per year, or 11 per day >>>>>>>>> for 10 years straight on average. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Scary. Sicko. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Who knew a crappy, hobbyist operating system and it's >>>>>>>>> mentally-challenged adherents could inspire such an unhealthy >>>>>>>>> obsession... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "it's mentally-challenged adherents" I do love a good self-nuke. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ha! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And that's about the only one you can find in 40K posts... Im >>>>>>> doing alright... >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I guess you can thank the gods of Affirmative Action that "alright" >>>>>> has forced its way into common usage, allowing you to sidestep yet >>>>>> another self-nuke. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You missed [an intentional] one I made, thereby increasing your >>>>> self-nuke count by one. Aight? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> And there's nothing affirmative action about the 150-year-old Oxford >>>>> Dictionary: >>>>> >>>>> "Similar ???merged??? words such as altogether and already have been >>>>> accepted in standard English for a very long time, so there is no >>>>> logical reason to object to the one-word form alright." >>>>> >>>>> http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/words/all-right-or-alright >>>>> >>>> >>>> You should lobby them for "it's" as a possessive form. Threaten to get >>>> Al Sharpton on the case if they don't see things your way. >>> >>> Brother Al is the man. >>> Like him or not, Al Sharpton gets the job done. >>> >> >> Al Sharpton is a racist opportunist. > > And I'll just wager that some of your best friends are people of color. > Brother Al gets the job done. > Speaking of racists, how is George Zimmerman these days? > Brother Al, racist homophobe: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sUjlle7ZVo
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 18:05 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <1407l9o6k4zmf$.18crpc14fmb5x$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #328362 |
On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 21:54:14 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: > Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 21:33:20 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >> >>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 21:19:28 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>> >>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 10/25/2015 4:33 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 10/25/2015 3:23 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Starting June 3, 2004. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Minus a year or so off, so ~4000 posts per year, or 11 per day >>>>>>>>>> for 10 years straight on average. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Scary. Sicko. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Who knew a crappy, hobbyist operating system and it's >>>>>>>>>> mentally-challenged adherents could inspire such an unhealthy >>>>>>>>>> obsession... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "it's mentally-challenged adherents" I do love a good self-nuke. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ha! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And that's about the only one you can find in 40K posts... Im >>>>>>>> doing alright... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I guess you can thank the gods of Affirmative Action that "alright" >>>>>>> has forced its way into common usage, allowing you to sidestep yet >>>>>>> another self-nuke. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> You missed [an intentional] one I made, thereby increasing your >>>>>> self-nuke count by one. Aight? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> And there's nothing affirmative action about the 150-year-old Oxford >>>>>> Dictionary: >>>>>> >>>>>> "Similar ???merged??? words such as altogether and already have been >>>>>> accepted in standard English for a very long time, so there is no >>>>>> logical reason to object to the one-word form alright." >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/words/all-right-or-alright >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You should lobby them for "it's" as a possessive form. Threaten to get >>>>> Al Sharpton on the case if they don't see things your way. >>>> >>>> Brother Al is the man. >>>> Like him or not, Al Sharpton gets the job done. >>>> >>> >>> Al Sharpton is a racist opportunist. >> >> And I'll just wager that some of your best friends are people of color. >> Brother Al gets the job done. >> Speaking of racists, how is George Zimmerman these days? >> > Brother Al, racist homophobe: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sUjlle7ZVo Most people are racists. They just won't admit it. Most men of the cloth are opposed to homosexuality based upon the Bible, Koran or other book of faith. -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 22:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fsa93.fjja9@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #328364 |
Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: > On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 21:54:14 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: > >> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 21:33:20 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>> >>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 21:19:28 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 10/25/2015 4:33 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 10/25/2015 3:23 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Starting June 3, 2004. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Minus a year or so off, so ~4000 posts per year, or 11 per day >>>>>>>>>>> for 10 years straight on average. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Scary. Sicko. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Who knew a crappy, hobbyist operating system and it's >>>>>>>>>>> mentally-challenged adherents could inspire such an unhealthy >>>>>>>>>>> obsession... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "it's mentally-challenged adherents" I do love a good self-nuke. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ha! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And that's about the only one you can find in 40K posts... Im >>>>>>>>> doing alright... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I guess you can thank the gods of Affirmative Action that "alright" >>>>>>>> has forced its way into common usage, allowing you to sidestep yet >>>>>>>> another self-nuke. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You missed [an intentional] one I made, thereby increasing your >>>>>>> self-nuke count by one. Aight? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And there's nothing affirmative action about the 150-year-old Oxford >>>>>>> Dictionary: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Similar ???merged??? words such as altogether and already have been >>>>>>> accepted in standard English for a very long time, so there is no >>>>>>> logical reason to object to the one-word form alright." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/words/all-right-or-alright >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> You should lobby them for "it's" as a possessive form. Threaten to get >>>>>> Al Sharpton on the case if they don't see things your way. >>>>> >>>>> Brother Al is the man. >>>>> Like him or not, Al Sharpton gets the job done. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Al Sharpton is a racist opportunist. >>> >>> And I'll just wager that some of your best friends are people of color. >>> Brother Al gets the job done. >>> Speaking of racists, how is George Zimmerman these days? >>> >> Brother Al, racist homophobe: >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sUjlle7ZVo > > Most people are racists. > They just won't admit it. Are you a racist? > Most men of the cloth are opposed to homosexuality based upon the Bible, > Koran or other book of faith. Are you opposed to homosexuality?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 18:24 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <3zlnjnpv3aal$.msvgs9kxzbd.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #328366 |
On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 22:14:27 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: > Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 21:54:14 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >> >>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 21:33:20 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>> >>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 21:19:28 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 10/25/2015 4:33 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 10/25/2015 3:23 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Starting June 3, 2004. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Minus a year or so off, so ~4000 posts per year, or 11 per day >>>>>>>>>>>> for 10 years straight on average. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Scary. Sicko. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Who knew a crappy, hobbyist operating system and it's >>>>>>>>>>>> mentally-challenged adherents could inspire such an unhealthy >>>>>>>>>>>> obsession... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "it's mentally-challenged adherents" I do love a good self-nuke. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ha! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And that's about the only one you can find in 40K posts... Im >>>>>>>>>> doing alright... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I guess you can thank the gods of Affirmative Action that "alright" >>>>>>>>> has forced its way into common usage, allowing you to sidestep yet >>>>>>>>> another self-nuke. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You missed [an intentional] one I made, thereby increasing your >>>>>>>> self-nuke count by one. Aight? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And there's nothing affirmative action about the 150-year-old Oxford >>>>>>>> Dictionary: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Similar ???merged??? words such as altogether and already have been >>>>>>>> accepted in standard English for a very long time, so there is no >>>>>>>> logical reason to object to the one-word form alright." >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/words/all-right-or-alright >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You should lobby them for "it's" as a possessive form. Threaten to get >>>>>>> Al Sharpton on the case if they don't see things your way. >>>>>> >>>>>> Brother Al is the man. >>>>>> Like him or not, Al Sharpton gets the job done. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Al Sharpton is a racist opportunist. >>>> >>>> And I'll just wager that some of your best friends are people of color. >>>> Brother Al gets the job done. >>>> Speaking of racists, how is George Zimmerman these days? >>>> >>> Brother Al, racist homophobe: >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sUjlle7ZVo >> >> Most people are racists. >> They just won't admit it. > > Are you a racist? I try not to be but it's human nature to see the races differently depending on the context. Racism doesn't have to be negative. >> Most men of the cloth are opposed to homosexuality based upon the Bible, >> Koran or other book of faith. > > Are you opposed to homosexuality? No I am not. -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 22:34 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fsd83.fjai93@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #328367 |
Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: > On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 22:14:27 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: > >> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 21:54:14 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>> >>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 21:33:20 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 21:19:28 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 10/25/2015 4:33 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 10/25/2015 3:23 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Starting June 3, 2004. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Minus a year or so off, so ~4000 posts per year, or 11 per day >>>>>>>>>>>>> for 10 years straight on average. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Scary. Sicko. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Who knew a crappy, hobbyist operating system and it's >>>>>>>>>>>>> mentally-challenged adherents could inspire such an unhealthy >>>>>>>>>>>>> obsession... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "it's mentally-challenged adherents" I do love a good self-nuke. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ha! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> And that's about the only one you can find in 40K posts... Im >>>>>>>>>>> doing alright... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I guess you can thank the gods of Affirmative Action that "alright" >>>>>>>>>> has forced its way into common usage, allowing you to sidestep yet >>>>>>>>>> another self-nuke. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You missed [an intentional] one I made, thereby increasing your >>>>>>>>> self-nuke count by one. Aight? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And there's nothing affirmative action about the 150-year-old Oxford >>>>>>>>> Dictionary: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "Similar ???merged??? words such as altogether and already have been >>>>>>>>> accepted in standard English for a very long time, so there is no >>>>>>>>> logical reason to object to the one-word form alright." >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/words/all-right-or-alright >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You should lobby them for "it's" as a possessive form. Threaten to get >>>>>>>> Al Sharpton on the case if they don't see things your way. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Brother Al is the man. >>>>>>> Like him or not, Al Sharpton gets the job done. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Al Sharpton is a racist opportunist. >>>>> >>>>> And I'll just wager that some of your best friends are people of color. >>>>> Brother Al gets the job done. >>>>> Speaking of racists, how is George Zimmerman these days? >>>>> >>>> Brother Al, racist homophobe: >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sUjlle7ZVo >>> >>> Most people are racists. >>> They just won't admit it. >> >> Are you a racist? > > I try not to be but it's human nature to see the races differently > depending on the context. Racism doesn't have to be negative. > Is that a "yes" or a "no"? > >>> Most men of the cloth are opposed to homosexuality based upon the Bible, >>> Koran or other book of faith. >> >> Are you opposed to homosexuality? > No I am not. > Why not? You think it's normal for two guys to fuck each other in the ass?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 18:44 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <gxdi40fs20tm.lw0mnb6r9m8q$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #328371 |
On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 22:34:15 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: > Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 22:14:27 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >> >>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 21:54:14 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>> >>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 21:33:20 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 21:19:28 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 10/25/2015 4:33 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/25/2015 3:23 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Starting June 3, 2004. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Minus a year or so off, so ~4000 posts per year, or 11 per day >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for 10 years straight on average. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scary. Sicko. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who knew a crappy, hobbyist operating system and it's >>>>>>>>>>>>>> mentally-challenged adherents could inspire such an unhealthy >>>>>>>>>>>>>> obsession... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "it's mentally-challenged adherents" I do love a good self-nuke. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ha! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> And that's about the only one you can find in 40K posts... Im >>>>>>>>>>>> doing alright... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I guess you can thank the gods of Affirmative Action that "alright" >>>>>>>>>>> has forced its way into common usage, allowing you to sidestep yet >>>>>>>>>>> another self-nuke. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You missed [an intentional] one I made, thereby increasing your >>>>>>>>>> self-nuke count by one. Aight? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And there's nothing affirmative action about the 150-year-old Oxford >>>>>>>>>> Dictionary: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "Similar ???merged??? words such as altogether and already have been >>>>>>>>>> accepted in standard English for a very long time, so there is no >>>>>>>>>> logical reason to object to the one-word form alright." >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/words/all-right-or-alright >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You should lobby them for "it's" as a possessive form. Threaten to get >>>>>>>>> Al Sharpton on the case if they don't see things your way. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Brother Al is the man. >>>>>>>> Like him or not, Al Sharpton gets the job done. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Al Sharpton is a racist opportunist. >>>>>> >>>>>> And I'll just wager that some of your best friends are people of color. >>>>>> Brother Al gets the job done. >>>>>> Speaking of racists, how is George Zimmerman these days? >>>>>> >>>>> Brother Al, racist homophobe: >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sUjlle7ZVo >>>> >>>> Most people are racists. >>>> They just won't admit it. >>> >>> Are you a racist? >> >> I try not to be but it's human nature to see the races differently >> depending on the context. Racism doesn't have to be negative. >> > > Is that a "yes" or a "no"? It's a yes. Unfortunately. The same answer for most people, including you. >> >>>> Most men of the cloth are opposed to homosexuality based upon the Bible, >>>> Koran or other book of faith. >>> >>> Are you opposed to homosexuality? >> No I am not. >> > > Why not? You think it's normal for two guys to fuck each other in the ass? What does that have to do with being opposed to homosexuality, which was your question? -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 23:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fsdeoe.pg93@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #328377 |
Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: > On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 22:34:15 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: > >> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 22:14:27 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>> >>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 21:54:14 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 21:33:20 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 21:19:28 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 10/25/2015 4:33 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/25/2015 3:23 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Starting June 3, 2004. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Minus a year or so off, so ~4000 posts per year, or 11 per day >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for 10 years straight on average. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scary. Sicko. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who knew a crappy, hobbyist operating system and it's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mentally-challenged adherents could inspire such an unhealthy >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obsession... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "it's mentally-challenged adherents" I do love a good self-nuke. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ha! >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> And that's about the only one you can find in 40K posts... Im >>>>>>>>>>>>> doing alright... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I guess you can thank the gods of Affirmative Action that "alright" >>>>>>>>>>>> has forced its way into common usage, allowing you to sidestep yet >>>>>>>>>>>> another self-nuke. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You missed [an intentional] one I made, thereby increasing your >>>>>>>>>>> self-nuke count by one. Aight? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> And there's nothing affirmative action about the 150-year-old Oxford >>>>>>>>>>> Dictionary: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "Similar ???merged??? words such as altogether and already have been >>>>>>>>>>> accepted in standard English for a very long time, so there is no >>>>>>>>>>> logical reason to object to the one-word form alright." >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/words/all-right-or-alright >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You should lobby them for "it's" as a possessive form. Threaten to get >>>>>>>>>> Al Sharpton on the case if they don't see things your way. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Brother Al is the man. >>>>>>>>> Like him or not, Al Sharpton gets the job done. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Al Sharpton is a racist opportunist. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And I'll just wager that some of your best friends are people of color. >>>>>>> Brother Al gets the job done. >>>>>>> Speaking of racists, how is George Zimmerman these days? >>>>>>> >>>>>> Brother Al, racist homophobe: >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sUjlle7ZVo >>>>> >>>>> Most people are racists. >>>>> They just won't admit it. >>>> >>>> Are you a racist? >>> >>> I try not to be but it's human nature to see the races differently >>> depending on the context. Racism doesn't have to be negative. >>> >> >> Is that a "yes" or a "no"? > > It's a yes. > Unfortunately. > The same answer for most people, including you. > Yes. Only without the cowardly PC qualifier in my case. > >>> >>>>> Most men of the cloth are opposed to homosexuality based upon the Bible, >>>>> Koran or other book of faith. >>>> >>>> Are you opposed to homosexuality? >>> No I am not. >>> >> >> Why not? You think it's normal for two guys to fuck each other in the ass? > > What does that have to do with being opposed to homosexuality, which was > your question? > Two simple questions. You either have no answers, or you choose not to answer. Ignorance or fear: neither state is a happy one.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 19:22 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <1knlgmcgah550$.q509tgwvijeg$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #328383 |
On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 23:08:06 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: > Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 22:34:15 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >> >>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 22:14:27 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>> >>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 21:54:14 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 21:33:20 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 21:19:28 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/25/2015 4:33 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/25/2015 3:23 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Starting June 3, 2004. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Minus a year or so off, so ~4000 posts per year, or 11 per day >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for 10 years straight on average. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scary. Sicko. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who knew a crappy, hobbyist operating system and it's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mentally-challenged adherents could inspire such an unhealthy >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obsession... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "it's mentally-challenged adherents" I do love a good self-nuke. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ha! >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And that's about the only one you can find in 40K posts... Im >>>>>>>>>>>>>> doing alright... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess you can thank the gods of Affirmative Action that "alright" >>>>>>>>>>>>> has forced its way into common usage, allowing you to sidestep yet >>>>>>>>>>>>> another self-nuke. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You missed [an intentional] one I made, thereby increasing your >>>>>>>>>>>> self-nuke count by one. Aight? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> And there's nothing affirmative action about the 150-year-old Oxford >>>>>>>>>>>> Dictionary: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "Similar ???merged??? words such as altogether and already have been >>>>>>>>>>>> accepted in standard English for a very long time, so there is no >>>>>>>>>>>> logical reason to object to the one-word form alright." >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/words/all-right-or-alright >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You should lobby them for "it's" as a possessive form. Threaten to get >>>>>>>>>>> Al Sharpton on the case if they don't see things your way. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Brother Al is the man. >>>>>>>>>> Like him or not, Al Sharpton gets the job done. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Al Sharpton is a racist opportunist. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And I'll just wager that some of your best friends are people of color. >>>>>>>> Brother Al gets the job done. >>>>>>>> Speaking of racists, how is George Zimmerman these days? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Brother Al, racist homophobe: >>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sUjlle7ZVo >>>>>> >>>>>> Most people are racists. >>>>>> They just won't admit it. >>>>> >>>>> Are you a racist? >>>> >>>> I try not to be but it's human nature to see the races differently >>>> depending on the context. Racism doesn't have to be negative. >>>> >>> >>> Is that a "yes" or a "no"? >> >> It's a yes. >> Unfortunately. >> The same answer for most people, including you. >> > > Yes. Only without the cowardly PC qualifier in my case. > >> >>>> >>>>>> Most men of the cloth are opposed to homosexuality based upon the Bible, >>>>>> Koran or other book of faith. >>>>> >>>>> Are you opposed to homosexuality? >>>> No I am not. >>>> >>> >>> Why not? You think it's normal for two guys to fuck each other in the ass? >> >> What does that have to do with being opposed to homosexuality, which was >> your question? >> > > Two simple questions. You either have no answers, or you choose not to > answer. Ignorance or fear: neither state is a happy one. My being opposed to homosexuality has nothing to do with two guys fucking each other in the ass being NORMAL. Key word NORMAL. Is English your native language? -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 4 [1] 2 3 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web