Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #327971 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-10-23 12:10 -0700 |
| Last post | 2015-10-30 07:55 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 101 — 9 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 12:10 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-23 21:14 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 14:35 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-23 21:58 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 15:16 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-23 22:46 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 15:53 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-23 22:57 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 16:11 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-23 23:46 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 21:10 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 21:14 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 21:58 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 20:57 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 21:55 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 14:40 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-23 21:53 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 15:34 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-23 22:43 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-23 20:52 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-24 18:06 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-24 12:17 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-24 23:03 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-24 16:27 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-24 23:41 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-24 16:57 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 00:11 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-24 17:17 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 00:25 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-24 17:47 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-25 12:54 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 10:36 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 18:23 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-25 14:32 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 18:46 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-25 16:45 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 21:08 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 11:45 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 14:54 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 19:18 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 15:23 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 19:34 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 15:37 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 19:58 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 16:01 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 20:11 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 16:11 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 20:27 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 16:27 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 20:38 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 16:47 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 21:02 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 17:08 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 21:31 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 17:33 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 21:51 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 18:07 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 22:28 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:17 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:32 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:20 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-25 17:28 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 21:37 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:21 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:15 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:14 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 20:23 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:13 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-25 17:25 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 17:30 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-25 20:06 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 20:12 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:22 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:11 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 20:13 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 08:44 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 00:39 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 20:42 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-25 20:58 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 03:53 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:46 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 03:56 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 23:57 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 04:46 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 22:22 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 05:43 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 13:05 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 21:11 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 04:48 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 22:27 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 05:51 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 13:05 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 15:47 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-23 15:10 -0700
Re: OT: OK, what changed? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-27 22:46 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2015-10-29 00:31 +0000
Re: OT: OK, what changed? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-10-29 07:10 -0500
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-29 08:36 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-10-29 14:46 +0100
Re: OT: OK, what changed? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-29 09:41 -0400
Re: OT: OK, what changed? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-30 07:55 -0700
Page 1 of 6 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 Next page →
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 12:10 -0700 |
| Subject | OT: OK, what changed? |
| Message-ID | <c271285b-f733-4db7-8303-61849e46a4be@googlegroups.com> |
I've read a lot of posts from the last month or so and I notice what seems to be a pattern where some of the people who were often seen +1-ing (of a sort) Snit's trolling are no longer doing it, at least, not nearly to the same extent. I don't think anyone can doubt that DFS and Ezekiel are the poster boys for anti-Snit engagement. While they might post a quote of his for some reason or other, they rarely (if ever) acknowledge his existence and several of you appear to be doing the same, at least, to a greater extent than previously.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 21:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sdfmnbjc83.03pp@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #327971 |
Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > I've read a lot of posts from the last month or so and I notice what seems to be a pattern where some of the people who were often seen +1-ing (of a sort) Snit's trolling are no longer doing it, at least, not nearly to the same extent. I don't think anyone can doubt that DFS and Ezekiel are the poster boys for anti-Snit engagement. While they might post a quote of his for some reason or other, they rarely (if ever) acknowledge his existence and several of you appear to be doing the same, at least, to a greater extent than previously. Well, I haven't been feeding him lately. I've had him on a 30-day plonk, which seems to have expired about two hours ago. It'll probably end up going permafrost though, because I doubt he'll ever cease to be a jackass and learn how to take a beating like a man.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 14:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D24FF615.61362%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #327992 |
On 10/23/15, 2:14 PM, in article sdfmnbjc83.03pp@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >> I've read a lot of posts from the last month or so and I notice what seems to >> be a pattern where some of the people who were often seen +1-ing (of a sort) >> Snit's trolling are no longer doing it, at least, not nearly to the same >> extent. I don't think anyone can doubt that DFS and Ezekiel are the poster >> boys for anti-Snit engagement. While they might post a quote of his for some >> reason or other, they rarely (if ever) acknowledge his existence and several >> of you appear to be doing the same, at least, to a greater extent than >> previously. > > Well, I haven't been feeding him lately. I've had him on a 30-day > plonk, which seems to have expired about two hours ago. It'll probably > end up going permafrost though, because I doubt he'll ever cease to be > a jackass and learn how to take a beating like a man. > LOL! I am not good at backing down from bullies - I stick to evidence and just keep repeating it in the face of lies. Those who troll tend to hate it. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 21:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sfmcjx93.adjf9@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #327995 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 10/23/15, 2:14 PM, in article sdfmnbjc83.03pp@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I've read a lot of posts from the last month or so and I notice what seems to >>> be a pattern where some of the people who were often seen +1-ing (of a sort) >>> Snit's trolling are no longer doing it, at least, not nearly to the same >>> extent. I don't think anyone can doubt that DFS and Ezekiel are the poster >>> boys for anti-Snit engagement. While they might post a quote of his for some >>> reason or other, they rarely (if ever) acknowledge his existence and several >>> of you appear to be doing the same, at least, to a greater extent than >>> previously. >> >> Well, I haven't been feeding him lately. I've had him on a 30-day >> plonk, which seems to have expired about two hours ago. It'll probably >> end up going permafrost though, because I doubt he'll ever cease to be >> a jackass and learn how to take a beating like a man. >> > > LOL! I am not good at backing down from bullies - I stick to evidence and > just keep repeating it in the face of lies. Those who troll tend to hate it. > LOL! Two replies to the same post. Smack!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 15:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7e7741ac-df2c-4c50-83e7-b63b9188efeb@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #328009 |
On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 3:58:12 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > > On 10/23/15, 2:14 PM, in article sdfmnbjc83.03pp@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > > > >> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> I've read a lot of posts from the last month or so and I notice what seems to > >>> be a pattern where some of the people who were often seen +1-ing (of a sort) > >>> Snit's trolling are no longer doing it, at least, not nearly to the same > >>> extent. I don't think anyone can doubt that DFS and Ezekiel are the poster > >>> boys for anti-Snit engagement. While they might post a quote of his for some > >>> reason or other, they rarely (if ever) acknowledge his existence and several > >>> of you appear to be doing the same, at least, to a greater extent than > >>> previously. > >> > >> Well, I haven't been feeding him lately. I've had him on a 30-day > >> plonk, which seems to have expired about two hours ago. It'll probably > >> end up going permafrost though, because I doubt he'll ever cease to be > >> a jackass and learn how to take a beating like a man. > >> > > > > LOL! I am not good at backing down from bullies - I stick to evidence and > > just keep repeating it in the face of lies. Those who troll tend to hate it. > > > > LOL! Two replies to the same post. Smack! I killed the key I had because it was verifying as used from one of the 'fretwizzen' acct. forgeries. It had nothing added to it, I assume that couldn't be done... but that it was passing at all seems kind of strange to me. Isn't that the whole point of that system?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 22:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <adf.eif9@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #328020 |
Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 3:58:12 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> > On 10/23/15, 2:14 PM, in article sdfmnbjc83.03pp@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> > >> >> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I've read a lot of posts from the last month or so and I notice what seems to >> >>> be a pattern where some of the people who were often seen +1-ing (of a sort) >> >>> Snit's trolling are no longer doing it, at least, not nearly to the same >> >>> extent. I don't think anyone can doubt that DFS and Ezekiel are the poster >> >>> boys for anti-Snit engagement. While they might post a quote of his for some >> >>> reason or other, they rarely (if ever) acknowledge his existence and several >> >>> of you appear to be doing the same, at least, to a greater extent than >> >>> previously. >> >> >> >> Well, I haven't been feeding him lately. I've had him on a 30-day >> >> plonk, which seems to have expired about two hours ago. It'll probably >> >> end up going permafrost though, because I doubt he'll ever cease to be >> >> a jackass and learn how to take a beating like a man. >> >> >> > >> > LOL! I am not good at backing down from bullies - I stick to evidence and >> > just keep repeating it in the face of lies. Those who troll tend to hate it. >> > >> >> LOL! Two replies to the same post. Smack! > > I killed the key I had because it was verifying as used from one of the 'fretwizzen' acct. forgeries. It had nothing added to it, I assume that couldn't be done... but that it was passing at all seems kind of strange to me. Isn't that the whole point of that system? It was verifying because entire signed posts were copied and re-posted, not because anyone gained access to your private key.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 15:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6ae196ed-00e8-4e08-8397-7d172431662e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #328036 |
On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 4:46:57 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: > Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 3:58:12 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> > On 10/23/15, 2:14 PM, in article sdfmnbjc83.03pp@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > >> > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>> I've read a lot of posts from the last month or so and I notice what seems to > >> >>> be a pattern where some of the people who were often seen +1-ing (of a sort) > >> >>> Snit's trolling are no longer doing it, at least, not nearly to the same > >> >>> extent. I don't think anyone can doubt that DFS and Ezekiel are the poster > >> >>> boys for anti-Snit engagement. While they might post a quote of his for some > >> >>> reason or other, they rarely (if ever) acknowledge his existence and several > >> >>> of you appear to be doing the same, at least, to a greater extent than > >> >>> previously. > >> >> > >> >> Well, I haven't been feeding him lately. I've had him on a 30-day > >> >> plonk, which seems to have expired about two hours ago. It'll probably > >> >> end up going permafrost though, because I doubt he'll ever cease to be > >> >> a jackass and learn how to take a beating like a man. > >> >> > >> > > >> > LOL! I am not good at backing down from bullies - I stick to evidence and > >> > just keep repeating it in the face of lies. Those who troll tend to hate it. > >> > > >> > >> LOL! Two replies to the same post. Smack! > > > > I killed the key I had because it was verifying as used from one of the 'fretwizzen' acct. forgeries. It had nothing added to it, I assume that couldn't be done... but that it was passing at all seems kind of strange to me. Isn't that the whole point of that system? > > It was verifying because entire signed posts were copied and re-posted, not > because anyone gained access to your private key. I didn't notice that, I only looked at one... but I didn't figure access was actually obtained. Too bad there wasn't a way for it to be tied to the post's header info.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 22:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <asdfv.k9z93@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #328041 |
Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 4:46:57 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: >> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 3:58:12 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: >> >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >> > On 10/23/15, 2:14 PM, in article sdfmnbjc83.03pp@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> >> > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> I've read a lot of posts from the last month or so and I notice what seems to >> >> >>> be a pattern where some of the people who were often seen +1-ing (of a sort) >> >> >>> Snit's trolling are no longer doing it, at least, not nearly to the same >> >> >>> extent. I don't think anyone can doubt that DFS and Ezekiel are the poster >> >> >>> boys for anti-Snit engagement. While they might post a quote of his for some >> >> >>> reason or other, they rarely (if ever) acknowledge his existence and several >> >> >>> of you appear to be doing the same, at least, to a greater extent than >> >> >>> previously. >> >> >> >> >> >> Well, I haven't been feeding him lately. I've had him on a 30-day >> >> >> plonk, which seems to have expired about two hours ago. It'll probably >> >> >> end up going permafrost though, because I doubt he'll ever cease to be >> >> >> a jackass and learn how to take a beating like a man. >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > LOL! I am not good at backing down from bullies - I stick to evidence and >> >> > just keep repeating it in the face of lies. Those who troll tend to hate it. >> >> > >> >> >> >> LOL! Two replies to the same post. Smack! >> > >> > I killed the key I had because it was verifying as used from one of the 'fretwizzen' acct. forgeries. It had nothing added to it, I assume that couldn't be done... but that it was passing at all seems kind of strange to me. Isn't that the whole point of that system? >> >> It was verifying because entire signed posts were copied and re-posted, not >> because anyone gained access to your private key. > > I didn't notice that, I only looked at one... but I didn't figure access was actually obtained. Too bad there wasn't a way for it to be tied to the post's header info. Like we discussed when this was happening before, the solution is to include enough context within the signed portion to make a repost obvious.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 16:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c559d1ad-4853-4c2c-ab7e-517d4ad19e5f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #328044 |
On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 4:57:30 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: > Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 4:46:57 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: > >> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 3:58:12 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: > >> >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> >> > On 10/23/15, 2:14 PM, in article sdfmnbjc83.03pp@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > >> >> > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >>> I've read a lot of posts from the last month or so and I notice what seems to > >> >> >>> be a pattern where some of the people who were often seen +1-ing (of a sort) > >> >> >>> Snit's trolling are no longer doing it, at least, not nearly to the same > >> >> >>> extent. I don't think anyone can doubt that DFS and Ezekiel are the poster > >> >> >>> boys for anti-Snit engagement. While they might post a quote of his for some > >> >> >>> reason or other, they rarely (if ever) acknowledge his existence and several > >> >> >>> of you appear to be doing the same, at least, to a greater extent than > >> >> >>> previously. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Well, I haven't been feeding him lately. I've had him on a 30-day > >> >> >> plonk, which seems to have expired about two hours ago. It'll probably > >> >> >> end up going permafrost though, because I doubt he'll ever cease to be > >> >> >> a jackass and learn how to take a beating like a man. > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > LOL! I am not good at backing down from bullies - I stick to evidence and > >> >> > just keep repeating it in the face of lies. Those who troll tend to hate it. > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> LOL! Two replies to the same post. Smack! > >> > > >> > I killed the key I had because it was verifying as used from one of the 'fretwizzen' acct. forgeries. It had nothing added to it, I assume that couldn't be done... but that it was passing at all seems kind of strange to me. Isn't that the whole point of that system? > >> > >> It was verifying because entire signed posts were copied and re-posted, not > >> because anyone gained access to your private key. > > > > I didn't notice that, I only looked at one... but I didn't figure access was actually obtained. Too bad there wasn't a way for it to be tied to the post's header info. > > Like we discussed when this was happening before, the solution is to include > enough context within the signed portion to make a repost obvious. The entire post is probably the only way and, if it's signed... by me, someone else or multiple people, seems it'd get awfully cluttered.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 23:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <adsfammb9.30a@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #328045 |
Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 4:57:30 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: >> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 4:46:57 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: >> >> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 3:58:12 PM UTC-6, owl wrote: >> >> >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >> >> > On 10/23/15, 2:14 PM, in article sdfmnbjc83.03pp@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> >> >> > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>> I've read a lot of posts from the last month or so and I notice what seems to >> >> >> >>> be a pattern where some of the people who were often seen +1-ing (of a sort) >> >> >> >>> Snit's trolling are no longer doing it, at least, not nearly to the same >> >> >> >>> extent. I don't think anyone can doubt that DFS and Ezekiel are the poster >> >> >> >>> boys for anti-Snit engagement. While they might post a quote of his for some >> >> >> >>> reason or other, they rarely (if ever) acknowledge his existence and several >> >> >> >>> of you appear to be doing the same, at least, to a greater extent than >> >> >> >>> previously. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Well, I haven't been feeding him lately. I've had him on a 30-day >> >> >> >> plonk, which seems to have expired about two hours ago. It'll probably >> >> >> >> end up going permafrost though, because I doubt he'll ever cease to be >> >> >> >> a jackass and learn how to take a beating like a man. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > LOL! I am not good at backing down from bullies - I stick to evidence and >> >> >> > just keep repeating it in the face of lies. Those who troll tend to hate it. >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> LOL! Two replies to the same post. Smack! >> >> > >> >> > I killed the key I had because it was verifying as used from one of the 'fretwizzen' acct. forgeries. It had nothing added to it, I assume that couldn't be done... but that it was passing at all seems kind of strange to me. Isn't that the whole point of that system? >> >> >> >> It was verifying because entire signed posts were copied and re-posted, not >> >> because anyone gained access to your private key. >> > >> > I didn't notice that, I only looked at one... but I didn't figure access was actually obtained. Too bad there wasn't a way for it to be tied to the post's header info. >> >> Like we discussed when this was happening before, the solution is to include >> enough context within the signed portion to make a repost obvious. > > The entire post is probably the only way and, if it's signed... by me, someone else or multiple people, seems it'd get awfully cluttered. You could also trim at will and just include the Message-ID of the replied-to post within the signed portion.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 21:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D25052B0.61435%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #328051 |
On 10/23/15, 4:46 PM, in article adsfammb9.30a@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> Like we discussed when this was happening before, the solution is to include >>> enough context within the signed portion to make a repost obvious. >> >> The entire post is probably the only way and, if it's signed... by me, >> someone else or multiple people, seems it'd get awfully cluttered. > > You could also trim at will and just include the Message-ID of the > replied-to post within the signed portion. Or he could just use one account or, when he uses multiple ones, be honest about it. Maybe the word "could" is too strong there - it implies some level of self control by him. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 21:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D25053BF.6143B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #328044 |
On 10/23/15, 3:57 PM, in article asdfv.k9z93@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> I killed the key I had because it was verifying as used from one of the >>>> 'fretwizzen' acct. forgeries. It had nothing added to it, I assume that >>>> couldn't be done... but that it was passing at all seems kind of strange to >>>> me. Isn't that the whole point of that system? >>> >>> It was verifying because entire signed posts were copied and re-posted, not >>> because anyone gained access to your private key. >> >> I didn't notice that, I only looked at one... but I didn't figure access was >> actually obtained. Too bad there wasn't a way for it to be tied to the post's >> header info. > > Like we discussed when this was happening before, the solution is to include > enough context within the signed portion to make a repost obvious. Not gonna happen - that would ruin his game of claiming he is a victim. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 21:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a6e9c15c-611a-47b9-8db0-ae6f460fadaf@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #328098 |
On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 10:14:44 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 10/23/15, 3:57 PM, in article asdfv.k9z93@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > > >>>> I killed the key I had because it was verifying as used from one of the > >>>> 'fretwizzen' acct. forgeries. It had nothing added to it, I assume that > >>>> couldn't be done... but that it was passing at all seems kind of strange to > >>>> me. Isn't that the whole point of that system? > >>> > >>> It was verifying because entire signed posts were copied and re-posted, not > >>> because anyone gained access to your private key. > >> > >> I didn't notice that, I only looked at one... but I didn't figure access was > >> actually obtained. Too bad there wasn't a way for it to be tied to the post's > >> header info. > > > > Like we discussed when this was happening before, the solution is to include > > enough context within the signed portion to make a repost obvious. > > Not gonna happen - that would ruin his game of claiming he is a victim. So which is it? Did I "really" disable my key or am I just claiming to have done so in order to play victim? See your problem here, yet... crackhead? LOL!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 20:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D2504FA5.6142B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #328036 |
On 10/23/15, 3:46 PM, in article adf.eif9@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: ... >> I killed the key I had because it was verifying as used from one of the >> 'fretwizzen' acct. forgeries. It had nothing added to it, I assume that >> couldn't be done... but that it was passing at all seems kind of strange to >> me. Isn't that the whole point of that system? > > It was verifying because entire signed posts were copied and re-posted, not > because anyone gained access to your private key. > Carroll killed his private key because someone copied a message with his public key?!?!?! LOL! That is really very funny. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 21:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1e9b654b-5e1d-4304-9215-8c49e7a2a60e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #328091 |
On Friday, October 23, 2015 at 9:57:14 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 10/23/15, 3:46 PM, in article adf.eif9@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > > ... > >> I killed the key I had because it was verifying as used from one of the > >> 'fretwizzen' acct. forgeries. It had nothing added to it, I assume that > >> couldn't be done... but that it was passing at all seems kind of strange to > >> me. Isn't that the whole point of that system? > > > > It was verifying because entire signed posts were copied and re-posted, not > > because anyone gained access to your private key. > > > Carroll killed his private key because someone copied a message with his > public key?!?!?! > > LOL! > > That is really very funny. What's "very funny" here can be addressed by asking you the following obvious question: Does it really not occur to you that you should not show any indication you believe I've disabled my key if you also believe I'm the owner of the 'fretwizzen' gmail acct.? One possibility is that you're so over-medicated you don't comprehend things that makes sense (i.e. your suggestion that I'm "forging" myself). Another possibility is that you're simply an idiot. Of course, there's always the combo pack ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 14:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D24FF750.61367%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #327992 |
On 10/23/15, 2:14 PM, in article sdfmnbjc83.03pp@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
<owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
> Well, I haven't been feeding him lately. I've had him on a 30-day
> plonk, which seems to have expired about two hours ago. It'll probably
> end up going permafrost though, because I doubt he'll ever cease to be
> a jackass and learn how to take a beating like a man.
Ah, you think the "proper" way to take your beating is to run away for 30
days and not if someone rudely corrects you again you will never talk to
them again. Waaaaah!
LOL!
Anyway, did not even remember what debate you were running from. Now I see
you were whining my quoting style with Peter was completely confusing to you
("completely wacky, intentionally deceptive and annoying, and unlike
anything ever seen from a normal human.")
After a month rest are you better able to understand?
Peter Köhlmann:
-----
| For example, if I modified a BSD variant and tried to pass it
| off as "Linux" to people I would be stopped. I know of no
| example of this but I think it is pretty obvious the license
| holders would not allow this.
BSD allows such sheenigans
-----
The BSD license has no power to override trademarks and "allow" this.
Message-ID: l98q2g$nj1$1@dont-email.me
<http://goo.gl/zvo4fv>
--
* OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 21:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fscmvk93.izd@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #327996 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 10/23/15, 2:14 PM, in article sdfmnbjc83.03pp@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Well, I haven't been feeding him lately. I've had him on a 30-day
>> plonk, which seems to have expired about two hours ago. It'll probably
>> end up going permafrost though, because I doubt he'll ever cease to be
>> a jackass and learn how to take a beating like a man.
>
> Ah, you think the "proper" way to take your beating is to run away for 30
> days and not if someone rudely corrects you again you will never talk to
> them again. Waaaaah!
>
> LOL!
>
> Anyway, did not even remember what debate you were running from. Now I see
> you were whining my quoting style with Peter was completely confusing to you
> ("completely wacky, intentionally deceptive and annoying, and unlike
> anything ever seen from a normal human.")
>
> After a month rest are you better able to understand?
>
> Peter Köhlmann:
> -----
> | For example, if I modified a BSD variant and tried to pass it
> | off as "Linux" to people I would be stopped. I know of no
> | example of this but I think it is pretty obvious the license
> | holders would not allow this.
> BSD allows such sheenigans
> -----
> The BSD license has no power to override trademarks and "allow" this.
>
> Message-ID: l98q2g$nj1$1@dont-email.me
> <http://goo.gl/zvo4fv>
>
Wrong thread.
(Do you ever get anything right? LOL!)
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/slecnXVi2Pg/9IJ1TSfLDwAJ
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 15:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D250040A.613A4%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #328008 |
On 10/23/15, 2:53 PM, in article fscmvk93.izd@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
<owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> On 10/23/15, 2:14 PM, in article sdfmnbjc83.03pp@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> Well, I haven't been feeding him lately. I've had him on a 30-day
>>> plonk, which seems to have expired about two hours ago. It'll probably
>>> end up going permafrost though, because I doubt he'll ever cease to be
>>> a jackass and learn how to take a beating like a man.
>>
>> Ah, you think the "proper" way to take your beating is to run away for 30
>> days and not if someone rudely corrects you again you will never talk to
>> them again. Waaaaah!
>>
>> LOL!
>>
>> Anyway, did not even remember what debate you were running from. Now I see
>> you were whining my quoting style with Peter was completely confusing to you
>> ("completely wacky, intentionally deceptive and annoying, and unlike
>> anything ever seen from a normal human.")
>>
>> After a month rest are you better able to understand?
>>
>> Peter Köhlmann:
>> -----
>> | For example, if I modified a BSD variant and tried to pass it
>> | off as "Linux" to people I would be stopped. I know of no
>> | example of this but I think it is pretty obvious the license
>> | holders would not allow this.
>> BSD allows such sheenigans
>> -----
>> The BSD license has no power to override trademarks and "allow" this.
>>
>> Message-ID: l98q2g$nj1$1@dont-email.me
>> <http://goo.gl/zvo4fv>
>>
>
> Wrong thread.
This is the exact right thread I meant to ask the question in. The fact it
references another is not in question. But after a month of relaxing from
your humiliation of yourself do you understand the quote style?
Pretty much you have noted if I beat you down again you will kill filter me
for life. I am happy if you do.
To be fair, I should give you another chance... so will not keep reminding
you of the nonsense that got you to run a month ago.
> (Do you ever get anything right? LOL!)
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/slecnXVi2Pg/
> 9IJ1TSfLDwAJ
>
--
* OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 22:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ads.kb923@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #328031 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 10/23/15, 2:53 PM, in article fscmvk93.izd@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 10/23/15, 2:14 PM, in article sdfmnbjc83.03pp@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Well, I haven't been feeding him lately. I've had him on a 30-day
>>>> plonk, which seems to have expired about two hours ago. It'll probably
>>>> end up going permafrost though, because I doubt he'll ever cease to be
>>>> a jackass and learn how to take a beating like a man.
>>>
>>> Ah, you think the "proper" way to take your beating is to run away for 30
>>> days and not if someone rudely corrects you again you will never talk to
>>> them again. Waaaaah!
>>>
>>> LOL!
>>>
>>> Anyway, did not even remember what debate you were running from. Now I see
>>> you were whining my quoting style with Peter was completely confusing to you
>>> ("completely wacky, intentionally deceptive and annoying, and unlike
>>> anything ever seen from a normal human.")
>>>
>>> After a month rest are you better able to understand?
>>>
>>> Peter Köhlmann:
>>> -----
>>> | For example, if I modified a BSD variant and tried to pass it
>>> | off as "Linux" to people I would be stopped. I know of no
>>> | example of this but I think it is pretty obvious the license
>>> | holders would not allow this.
>>> BSD allows such sheenigans
>>> -----
>>> The BSD license has no power to override trademarks and "allow" this.
>>>
>>> Message-ID: l98q2g$nj1$1@dont-email.me
>>> <http://goo.gl/zvo4fv>
>>>
>>
>> Wrong thread.
>
> This is the exact right thread I meant to ask the question in. The fact it
> references another is not in question. But after a month of relaxing from
> your humiliation of yourself do you understand the quote style?
>
What are you babbling about? That was *not* the thread you were plonked in.
Simple as that. You claimed it was. You were wrong. Again. As usual.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 20:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D2504E89.61425%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #328034 |
On 10/23/15, 3:43 PM, in article ads.kb923@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: ... >>>> After a month rest are you better able to understand? >>>> >>>> Peter Köhlmann: >>>> ----- >>>> | For example, if I modified a BSD variant and tried to pass it >>>> | off as "Linux" to people I would be stopped. I know of no >>>> | example of this but I think it is pretty obvious the license >>>> | holders would not allow this. >>>> BSD allows such sheenigans >>>> ----- >>>> The BSD license has no power to override trademarks and "allow" this. >>>> >>>> Message-ID: l98q2g$nj1$1@dont-email.me >>>> <http://goo.gl/zvo4fv> >>>> >>> >>> Wrong thread. >> >> This is the exact right thread I meant to ask the question in. The fact it >> references another is not in question. But after a month of relaxing from >> your humiliation of yourself do you understand the quote style? > > What are you babbling about? The quote, above, which you claimed was done in a way that you found "completely wacky, intentionally deceptive and annoying, and unlike anything ever seen from a normal human." The question is if you have figured out how to actually read such a quote yet? But you knew that and are just dodging. ... -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 6 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web