Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #460037 > unrolled thread

Peaceful Muslims thank their welcoming Christian hosts...

Started by	SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>
First post	2018-07-28 18:24 +0000
Last post	2018-07-29 04:41 -0700
Articles	19 on this page of 79 — 9 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy

Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]

#460426

From	Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
Date	2018-07-30 14:15 -0700
Message-ID	<ba8bedb6-3a3b-4a49-98a5-eccb6fab581f@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#460419

On Monday, July 30, 2018 at 3:00:41 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:

> So in response to Slimer's comments dealing with religion you say you 
> cannot figure out why I mentioned religion.

Yes, given that you don't believe we're a "Christian nation" and have made
your belief abundantly clear. How are Slimer's comments relevant to your 
blatantly hypocrisy?

> But remember the topic: Slimer blames Mulsims for things majority-Muslim 
> countries do but he has a double standard and does not blame Christians 
> for what majority-Christian nations do.

So? What has that to do with your hypocrisy, fraud?

> > according to the many
> > things you've written in the past we're clearly not, in your mind, as singularly
> > positioned as you're trying to make it appear here (as based on Christianity).
> 
> See: you are continuing to confuse having the biggest religion of the US 
> being Christianity with the US being a Christian nation.

Nah... I'm pointing out your blatant hypocrisy.

> Below you present yourself as so amazingly clueless that you cannot 
> figure out why when Slimer focuses on his bigotry toward Muslims 
> (religious-based bigotry) 

... that it's the alarn for you to blow your blatant hypocrisy horn?

No, I figured that out. I'm asking why you believe "others" won't notice?

> >> Here, let me give you some
> >> other examples and see if it helps you to understand:
> >>
> >> * We the majority of people in the nation are women but we are not a
> >> female nation
> > 
> > Yet, you didn't say that a female majority nation "screwed things up".
> > 
> >> * We the majority of people in the nation are white but we are not a
> >> white nation
> > 
> > You didn't say that a white majority nation "screwed things up", either.
> > Why the focus on Christianity *only* when it's 'bad' stuff, Mr. Hypocrite?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#460428

From	Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date	2018-07-30 14:19 -0700
Message-ID	<fs9dnnFcae1U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to	#460426

On 7/30/18 2:15 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Monday, July 30, 2018 at 3:00:41 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
> 
>> So in response to Slimer's comments dealing with religion you say you
>> cannot figure out why I mentioned religion.
> 
> Yes, given that you don't believe we're a "Christian nation" and have made
> your belief abundantly clear. How are Slimer's comments relevant to your
> blatantly hypocrisy?

There are so many false assumptions in your question it is hard to know 
even where to begin. Here are just some basics:

AGAIN, you are confusing being a country with a majority of X with being 
an X country. This is a logical error on your part. We have gone over 
this... one example was we are a country with a majority of women but we 
are not a "female" country.

AGAIN: in response to Slimer's religion based bigotry it is reasonable 
and logical to focus on religion and not gender or sex or hair color.

If you truly cannot get these points there is nothing I can do to help you.

Below, based on your rather unbelievable ignorance you repeat false 
accusations. This is another issue with you: when you are lost you blame 
others for things which are not in any way true or supportable.

>> But remember the topic: Slimer blames Mulsims for things majority-Muslim
>> countries do but he has a double standard and does not blame Christians
>> for what majority-Christian nations do.
> 
> So? What has that to do with your hypocrisy, fraud?
> 
>>> according to the many
>>> things you've written in the past we're clearly not, in your mind, as singularly
>>> positioned as you're trying to make it appear here (as based on Christianity).
>>
>> See: you are continuing to confuse having the biggest religion of the US
>> being Christianity with the US being a Christian nation.
> 
> Nah... I'm pointing out your blatant hypocrisy.
> 
>> Below you present yourself as so amazingly clueless that you cannot
>> figure out why when Slimer focuses on his bigotry toward Muslims
>> (religious-based bigotry)
> 
> ... that it's the alarn for you to blow your blatant hypocrisy horn?
> 
> No, I figured that out. I'm asking why you believe "others" won't notice?
> 
>>>> Here, let me give you some
>>>> other examples and see if it helps you to understand:
>>>>
>>>> * We the majority of people in the nation are women but we are not a
>>>> female nation
>>>
>>> Yet, you didn't say that a female majority nation "screwed things up".
>>>
>>>> * We the majority of people in the nation are white but we are not a
>>>> white nation
>>>
>>> You didn't say that a white majority nation "screwed things up", either.
>>> Why the focus on Christianity *only* when it's 'bad' stuff, Mr. Hypocrite?
> 


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#460431

From	Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
Date	2018-07-30 14:38 -0700
Message-ID	<91528feb-594b-41dc-b92b-2a22347734e7@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#460428

On Monday, July 30, 2018 at 3:19:54 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
> On 7/30/18 2:15 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> > On Monday, July 30, 2018 at 3:00:41 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
> > 
> >> So in response to Slimer's comments dealing with religion you say you
> >> cannot figure out why I mentioned religion.
> > 
> > Yes, given that you don't believe we're a "Christian nation" and have made
> > your belief abundantly clear. How are Slimer's comments relevant to your
> > blatantly hypocrisy?
> 
> There are so many false assumptions 

You're now trying to argue that you *haven't* made it clear you believe 
the U.S. is not a Christian nation?!

> in your question it is hard to know 
> even where to begin. Here are just some basics:
> 
> AGAIN, you are confusing being a country with a majority of X with being 
> an X country.

No, fool...I'm pointing out your hypocrisy for even attempting to bring
religion into it at all, even if you believe it's merely a valid counterargument. 
You're doing exactly what you're complaining about. That you do it regularly 
seems to have escaped your notice but doing it to that degree puts you in 
the same class in the eyes of "others" who aren't doing what you both often 
do.

> AGAIN: in response to Slimer's religion based bigotry

What has his alleged "religion based bigotry" to do with your blatant 
hypocrisy where all things 'bad' are tied together with our Christian 
majority? Put another way, why should anyone look at your statements 
as anything other than "religion based bigotry"?

> >> But remember the topic: Slimer blames Mulsims for things majority-Muslim
> >> countries do but he has a double standard and does not blame Christians

And you blame Christian but never Muslims to about the same degree he does
that I've ever seen. What's your point? You're like he is? That's how it looks from
where I'm sitting.

> > So? What has that to do with your hypocrisy, fraud?
> > 
> >>> according to the many
> >>> things you've written in the past we're clearly not, in your mind, as singularly
> >>> positioned as you're trying to make it appear here (as based on Christianity).
> >>
> >> See: you are continuing to confuse having the biggest religion of the US
> >> being Christianity with the US being a Christian nation.
> > 
> > Nah... I'm pointing out your blatant hypocrisy.
> > 
> >> Below you present yourself as so amazingly clueless that you cannot
> >> figure out why when Slimer focuses on his bigotry toward Muslims
> >> (religious-based bigotry)
> > 
> > ... that it's the alarn for you to blow your blatant hypocrisy horn?
> > 
> > No, I figured that out. I'm asking why you believe "others" won't notice?
> > 
> >>>> Here, let me give you some
> >>>> other examples and see if it helps you to understand:
> >>>>
> >>>> * We the majority of people in the nation are women but we are not a
> >>>> female nation
> >>>
> >>> Yet, you didn't say that a female majority nation "screwed things up".
> >>>
> >>>> * We the majority of people in the nation are white but we are not a
> >>>> white nation
> >>>
> >>> You didn't say that a white majority nation "screwed things up", either.
> >>> Why the focus on Christianity *only* when it's 'bad' stuff, Mr. Hypocrite?
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
> cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
> somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
> 
> They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
> 
> <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#460442

From	Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date	2018-07-30 15:11 -0700
Message-ID	<fs9gomFcundU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to	#460431

On 7/30/18 2:38 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Monday, July 30, 2018 at 3:19:54 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
>> On 7/30/18 2:15 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> On Monday, July 30, 2018 at 3:00:41 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
>>>
>>>> So in response to Slimer's comments dealing with religion you say you
>>>> cannot figure out why I mentioned religion.
>>>
>>> Yes, given that you don't believe we're a "Christian nation" and have made
>>> your belief abundantly clear. How are Slimer's comments relevant to your
>>> blatantly hypocrisy?
>>
>> There are so many false assumptions in your question it is hard to know even where to begin. Here are just some basics:
>> 
>> AGAIN, you are confusing being a country with a majority of X with being an X country. This is a logical error on your part. We have gone over this... one example was we are a country with a majority of women but we are not a "female" country.
>> 
>> AGAIN: in response to Slimer's religion based bigotry it is reasonable and logical to focus on religion and not gender or sex or hair color.
>> 
>> If you truly cannot get these points there is nothing I can do to help you.
>> 
>> Below, based on your rather unbelievable ignorance you repeat false accusations. This is another issue with you: when you are lost you blame others for things which are not in any way true or supportable. >
> You're now trying to argue that you *haven't* made it clear you believe
> the U.S. is not a Christian nation?!

Not even in the slightest and it would take some sort of major 
psychological problem to get such an idea from what I just said. But you 
want to change the topic from Slimer's religious based bigotry, which 
you back, to if the US has Christianity as its official religion -- 
which it does not.

>> in your question it is hard to know
>> even where to begin. Here are just some basics:
>>
>> AGAIN, you are confusing being a country with a majority of X with being
>> an X country.
> 
> No, fool...I'm pointing out your hypocrisy for even attempting to bring
> religion into it at all, even if you believe it's merely a valid counterargument.
> You're doing exactly what you're complaining about. That you do it regularly
> seems to have escaped your notice but doing it to that degree puts you in
> the same class in the eyes of "others" who aren't doing what you both often
> do.

Slimer religious based bigotry brought religion into this conversation. 
You blame me for doing so.

>> AGAIN: in response to Slimer's religion based bigotry
> 
> What has his alleged "religion based bigotry" to do with your blatant
> hypocrisy where all things 'bad' are tied together with our Christian
> majority? Put another way, why should anyone look at your statements
> as anything other than "religion based bigotry"?

Notice how you refuse to call Slimer out on his bigotry and then lie 
about my views... saying my noting one should NOT blame the majority 
religion for the "sins" of a country into saying I claimed the exact 
opposite of what I did.

>>>> But remember the topic: Slimer blames Mulsims for things majority-Muslim
>>>> countries do but he has a double standard and does not blame Christians
> 
> And you blame Christian

This is a direct lie on your part.

> but never Muslims to about the same degree he does
> that I've ever seen. What's your point? You're like he is? That's how it looks from
> where I'm sitting.

Wow... you falsely blaming me for something... that is a shock! LOL! 
Heck, you still blame me for the police talking to you about your 
harassment... as if I forced you to harass people.

...
-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#460438

From	Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date	2018-07-30 15:02 -0700
Message-ID	<f7639ffc-8bec-445c-bc24-18ddfb34a5f1@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#460428

On Monday, July 30, 2018 at 2:19:54 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote:
> On 7/30/18 2:15 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> > On Monday, July 30, 2018 at 3:00:41 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
> > 
> >> So in response to Slimer's comments dealing with religion you say you
> >> cannot figure out why I mentioned religion.
> > 
> > Yes, given that you don't believe we're a "Christian nation" and have made
> > your belief abundantly clear. How are Slimer's comments relevant to your
> > blatantly hypocrisy?
> 
> There are so many false assumptions in your question it is hard to know 
> even where to begin. Here are just some basics:
> 
> AGAIN, you are confusing being a country with a majority of X with being 
> an X country. This is a logical error on your part. We have gone over 
> this... one example was we are a country with a majority of women but we 
> are not a "female" country.
> 
> AGAIN: in response to Slimer's religion based bigotry it is reasonable 
> and logical to focus on religion and not gender or sex or hair color.
> 
> If you truly cannot get these points there is nothing I can do to help you.
> 
> Below, based on your rather unbelievable ignorance you repeat false 
> accusations. This is another issue with you: when you are lost you blame 
> others for things which are not in any way true or supportable.
> 
> >> But remember the topic: Slimer blames Mulsims for things majority-Muslim
> >> countries do but he has a double standard and does not blame Christians
> >> for what majority-Christian nations do.
> > 
> > So? What has that to do with your hypocrisy, fraud?
> > 
> >>> according to the many
> >>> things you've written in the past we're clearly not, in your mind, as singularly
> >>> positioned as you're trying to make it appear here (as based on Christianity).
> >>
> >> See: you are continuing to confuse having the biggest religion of the US
> >> being Christianity with the US being a Christian nation.
> > 
> > Nah... I'm pointing out your blatant hypocrisy.
> > 
> >> Below you present yourself as so amazingly clueless that you cannot
> >> figure out why when Slimer focuses on his bigotry toward Muslims
> >> (religious-based bigotry)
> > 
> > ... that it's the alarn for you to blow your blatant hypocrisy horn?
> > 
> > No, I figured that out. I'm asking why you believe "others" won't notice?
> > 
> >>>> Here, let me give you some
> >>>> other examples and see if it helps you to understand:
> >>>>
> >>>> * We the majority of people in the nation are women but we are not a
> >>>> female nation
> >>>
> >>> Yet, you didn't say that a female majority nation "screwed things up".
> >>>
> >>>> * We the majority of people in the nation are white but we are not a
> >>>> white nation
> >>>
> >>> You didn't say that a white majority nation "screwed things up", either.
> >>> Why the focus on Christianity *only* when it's 'bad' stuff, Mr. Hypocrite?
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
> cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
> somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
> 
> They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
> 
> <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>



Yup. Sadly this is what we have to stop. Psychopaths who clearly have no reason for being here other than to upset me. 

I am working on a system which will blow what Linux has away. 

"You are never up to anything good" said Onion Knight's boyfriend. 

--
Live on Kickstarter!
http://www.5z8.info/trojan_p4g1zy_how-to-skin-a-gerbil
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#460395

From	GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org>
Date	2018-07-30 16:34 -0400
Message-ID	<fs9b2oFbnl4U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to	#460349

On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 09:25:56 -0700, Snit wrote:

> On 7/30/18 9:23 AM, SilverSlimer wrote:
>> On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 16:11:39 +0000, RonB wrote:
>> 
>>> On 2018-07-30, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Iran is exactly an excellent example to use. Like you said, it was a
>>>> nation which was mostly secular and actually very favourable to the
>>>> United States. Then, suddenly, Muslims fanatics came in and started to
>>>> protest that there was "corruption" in the government and demanded an
>>>> Islamic State to replace it. Then Iranian shah, Pahlavi, asked for
>>>> American aid and got no support from the _Democrat_ Jimmy Carter. The
>>>> end result is very well known and Iranians who could once speak freely
>>>> no longer could whereas women who were allowed to wear bikinis and show
>>>> their hair were told to wear their baggy ninja outfits instead for fear
>>>> of death.
>>>
>>> The Shah was a vicious dictator put into power by the United States via
>>> the CIA. The United States replaced the ELECTED secular leader of Iran,
>>> Mahammad Mosaddegh. The Islamic Revolution in Iran was in REACTION to
>>> the U.S. backed dictator and conditions he imposed on his people. Had we
>>> never opposed the will of the Iranian people (and ousted their ELECTED
>>> and secular government)
>>> the history of Iran would have been completely different. So just
>>> another example of U.S. interference into another country's sovereignty
>>> and the decisions of her people.
>>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Mosaddegh
>> 
>> Ah, good to know the additional details, thanks.
>> 
>> 
>> 
> So a majority Christian nation screwed things up. Interesting.

Yet you claim the US is not a Christian nation.
So which one is it snit?
You can't have it both ways.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#460551

From	chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
Date	2018-07-31 09:47 -0500
Message-ID	<bct0mdlrlbecso8aovsma828j8uanerl5g@4ax.com>
In reply to	#460395

GasPipe wrote:

> some thing wrote:
>> SilverSlimer wrote:
>>> RonB wrote:
>>>>
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Mosaddegh
>>> 
>>> Ah, good to know the additional details, thanks.
>> 
>> So a majority Christian nation screwed things up. Interesting.
>
> Yet you claim the US is not a Christian nation.

It doesn't matter what some thing has claimed.  What matters is what
happened, and how it is perceived by the people in the countries that
it happened to.

From their POV, they were fscked-over by Christians.  By the white
man.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#460553

From	Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date	2018-07-31 08:13 -0700
Message-ID	<8d10e256-31ec-481f-9e44-318b931c5841@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#460551

On Tuesday, July 31, 2018 at 7:47:53 AM UTC-7, chrisv wrote:
> GasPipe wrote:
> 
> > some thing wrote:
> >> SilverSlimer wrote:
> >>> RonB wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Mosaddegh
> >>> 
> >>> Ah, good to know the additional details, thanks.
> >> 
> >> So a majority Christian nation screwed things up. Interesting.
> >
> > Yet you claim the US is not a Christian nation.
> 
> It doesn't matter what some thing has claimed.  What matters is what
> happened, and how it is perceived by the people in the countries that
> it happened to.
> 
> From their POV, they were fscked-over by Christians.  By the white
> man.

With all the big talk flatfish's done on this topic, the 'Phd.' does not know how to do this. It literally takes a couple seconds to select a range and 'PDF convert' it. The content is a bunch of rambling baby sh*t. 2+2= 

Now Steven Carroll on the other end of the line doesn't matter. All that matters is flatfish gets to deliver the punchline. So how to beat flatfish at his own game? Don't pay attention the phone. Logic isn't part of scheme and never will be. Real posters will be overwhelmed once the trolls overpopulate. That and there will perpetually be a snit thrower or two in an unmoderated news group (e.g. flatfish). The flooding BS aside, we've all seen who frequently blames others when he does not get a catch on his hook. 

--
Top Ten Ways flatfish Trolls
http://www.5z8.info/backyard-fireworks-disasters_t7w7pu_bombbuilding
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#460563

From	Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date	2018-07-31 09:17 -0700
Message-ID	<fsbgdjFqlq0U2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to	#460551

On 7/31/18 7:47 AM, chrisv wrote:
> GasPipe wrote:
> 
>> some thing wrote:
>>> SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>> RonB wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Mosaddegh
>>>>
>>>> Ah, good to know the additional details, thanks.
>>>
>>> So a majority Christian nation screwed things up. Interesting.
>>
>> Yet you claim the US is not a Christian nation.
> 
> It doesn't matter what some thing has claimed.  What matters is what
> happened, and how it is perceived by the people in the countries that
> it happened to.
> 
>  From their POV, they were fscked-over by Christians.  By the white
> man.
> 

And Slimer gives them good reason to think Christians and whites are evil.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#460564

From	Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
Date	2018-07-31 09:20 -0700
Message-ID	<5e96ab25-4107-4c75-a0d0-f5a97402eefd@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#460563

On Tuesday, July 31, 2018 at 10:17:59 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
> On 7/31/18 7:47 AM, chrisv wrote:
> > GasPipe wrote:
> > 
> >> some thing wrote:
> >>> SilverSlimer wrote:
> >>>> RonB wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Mosaddegh
> >>>>
> >>>> Ah, good to know the additional details, thanks.
> >>>
> >>> So a majority Christian nation screwed things up. Interesting.
> >>
> >> Yet you claim the US is not a Christian nation.
> > 
> > It doesn't matter what some thing has claimed.  What matters is what
> > happened, and how it is perceived by the people in the countries that
> > it happened to.
> > 
> >  From their POV, they were fscked-over by Christians.  By the white
> > man.
> > 
> 
> And Slimer gives them good reason to think Christians and whites are evil.

LOL! That statement says more about you than Slimer as it assumes they're
as narrow minded as you two are. Good one, Snit! ;)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#460570

From	Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date	2018-07-31 09:29 -0700
Message-ID	<fsbh39FqqqlU3@mid.individual.net>
In reply to	#460564

On 7/31/18 9:20 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 31, 2018 at 10:17:59 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
>> On 7/31/18 7:47 AM, chrisv wrote:
>>> GasPipe wrote:
>>>
>>>> some thing wrote:
>>>>> SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>>>> RonB wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Mosaddegh
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ah, good to know the additional details, thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> So a majority Christian nation screwed things up. Interesting.
>>>>
>>>> Yet you claim the US is not a Christian nation.
>>>
>>> It doesn't matter what some thing has claimed.  What matters is what
>>> happened, and how it is perceived by the people in the countries that
>>> it happened to.
>>>
>>>   From their POV, they were fscked-over by Christians.  By the white
>>> man.
>>>
>>
>> And Slimer gives them good reason to think Christians and whites are evil.
> 
> LOL! That statement says more about you than Slimer as it assumes they're
> as narrow minded as you two are. Good one, Snit! ;)
> 

It assumes that there are people who are like you and Slimer... who 
judge ALL people of a religion or race based on the views of some. Do 
you think, in general, Muslims are less bigoted in this regard than the 
two of you?

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#460577

From	Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
Date	2018-07-31 09:55 -0700
Message-ID	<e34f0386-2e73-46c7-9623-a459a4979a60@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#460570

On Tuesday, July 31, 2018 at 10:29:32 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
> On 7/31/18 9:20 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> > On Tuesday, July 31, 2018 at 10:17:59 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
> >> On 7/31/18 7:47 AM, chrisv wrote:
> >>> GasPipe wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> some thing wrote:
> >>>>> SilverSlimer wrote:
> >>>>>> RonB wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Mosaddegh
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Ah, good to know the additional details, thanks.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So a majority Christian nation screwed things up. Interesting.
> >>>>
> >>>> Yet you claim the US is not a Christian nation.
> >>>
> >>> It doesn't matter what some thing has claimed.  What matters is what
> >>> happened, and how it is perceived by the people in the countries that
> >>> it happened to.
> >>>
> >>>   From their POV, they were fscked-over by Christians.  By the white
> >>> man.
> >>>
> >>
> >> And Slimer gives them good reason to think Christians and whites are evil.
> > 
> > LOL! That statement says more about you than Slimer as it assumes they're
> > as narrow minded as you two are. Good one, Snit! ;)
> > 
> 
> It assumes that there are people who are like you and Slimer

LOL! For someone who holds a "psych degree" this is pretty funny stuff.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#460583

From	Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date	2018-07-31 10:34 -0700
Message-ID	<fc3132d3-9472-451d-b8d1-e40e1d2922e3@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#460577

On Tuesday, July 31, 2018 at 9:55:12 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 31, 2018 at 10:29:32 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
> > On 7/31/18 9:20 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, July 31, 2018 at 10:17:59 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
> > >> On 7/31/18 7:47 AM, chrisv wrote:
> > >>> GasPipe wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> some thing wrote:
> > >>>>> SilverSlimer wrote:
> > >>>>>> RonB wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Mosaddegh
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Ah, good to know the additional details, thanks.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> So a majority Christian nation screwed things up. Interesting.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Yet you claim the US is not a Christian nation.
> > >>>
> > >>> It doesn't matter what some thing has claimed.  What matters is what
> > >>> happened, and how it is perceived by the people in the countries that
> > >>> it happened to.
> > >>>
> > >>>   From their POV, they were fscked-over by Christians.  By the white
> > >>> man.
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> And Slimer gives them good reason to think Christians and whites are evil.
> > > 
> > > LOL! That statement says more about you than Slimer as it assumes they're
> > > as narrow minded as you two are. Good one, Snit! ;)
> > > 
> > 
> > It assumes that there are people who are like you and Slimer
> 
> LOL! For someone who holds a "psych degree" this is pretty funny stuff.



I know we have two different beliefs completely. 

I am not angry, he wants me to be but I am laughing at him because owl's lying is so absurd. He actively did not speak of all the details that he would quickly dismiss... and we all know why. At least he has his own socks in his corner. 

Once Snit (a real advocate) realized how effective owl is at playing 'victim' he sees this isn't nearly as unbelievable as it sounded. 

--
My Snoring Solution!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OffkiSAsYo8
Jonas Eklundh Communication

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#460587

From	Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date	2018-07-31 10:40 -0700
Message-ID	<fsbl99Frmr9U5@mid.individual.net>
In reply to	#460577

On 7/31/18 9:55 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 31, 2018 at 10:29:32 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
>> On 7/31/18 9:20 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, July 31, 2018 at 10:17:59 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
>>>> On 7/31/18 7:47 AM, chrisv wrote:
>>>>> GasPipe wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> some thing wrote:
>>>>>>> SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>>>>>> RonB wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Mosaddegh
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ah, good to know the additional details, thanks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So a majority Christian nation screwed things up. Interesting.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yet you claim the US is not a Christian nation.
>>>>>
>>>>> It doesn't matter what some thing has claimed.  What matters is what
>>>>> happened, and how it is perceived by the people in the countries that
>>>>> it happened to.
>>>>>
>>>>>    From their POV, they were fscked-over by Christians.  By the white
>>>>> man.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And Slimer gives them good reason to think Christians and whites are evil.
>>>
>>> LOL! That statement says more about you than Slimer as it assumes they're
>>> as narrow minded as you two are. Good one, Snit! ;)
>>>
>>
>> It assumes that there are people who are like you and Slimer... who judge ALL people of a religion or race based on the views of some. Do you think, in general, Muslims are less bigoted in this regard than the two of you? 
> 
> LOL! For someone who holds a "psych degree" this is pretty funny stuff.

It takes no degree to understand the meaning of your refusal to answer 
that question.

Your very arguments is dependent on Muslims, in general, being less 
bigoted than you are. Amazing.


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#460396

From	Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com>
Date	2018-07-30 20:34 +0000
Message-ID	<pjnsor$1q0$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to	#460349

On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 09:25:56 -0700, Snit wrote:

> On 7/30/18 9:23 AM, SilverSlimer wrote:
>> On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 16:11:39 +0000, RonB wrote:
>> 
>>> On 2018-07-30, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Iran is exactly an excellent example to use. Like you said, it was a
>>>> nation which was mostly secular and actually very favourable to the
>>>> United States. Then, suddenly, Muslims fanatics came in and started
>>>> to protest that there was "corruption" in the government and demanded
>>>> an Islamic State to replace it. Then Iranian shah, Pahlavi, asked for
>>>> American aid and got no support from the _Democrat_ Jimmy Carter. The
>>>> end result is very well known and Iranians who could once speak
>>>> freely no longer could whereas women who were allowed to wear bikinis
>>>> and show their hair were told to wear their baggy ninja outfits
>>>> instead for fear of death.
>>>
>>> The Shah was a vicious dictator put into power by the United States
>>> via the CIA. The United States replaced the ELECTED secular leader of
>>> Iran, Mahammad Mosaddegh. The Islamic Revolution in Iran was in
>>> REACTION to the U.S. backed dictator and conditions he imposed on his
>>> people. Had we never opposed the will of the Iranian people (and
>>> ousted their ELECTED and secular government)
>>> the history of Iran would have been completely different. So just
>>> another example of U.S. interference into another country's
>>> sovereignty and the decisions of her people.
>>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Mosaddegh
>> 
>> Ah, good to know the additional details, thanks.
>> 
>> 
>> 
> So a majority Christian nation screwed things up. Interesting.

Yet you claim the US is not a Christian nation.
So which one is it snit?
You can't have it both ways.




-- 
Read about snit here:   http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#460376

From	Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date	2018-07-30 11:08 -0700
Message-ID	<cbcc6e6d-d22a-4717-b6c6-276c3d797c79@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#460346

On Monday, July 30, 2018 at 9:23:31 AM UTC-7, SilverSlimer wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 16:11:39 +0000, RonB wrote:
> 
> > On 2018-07-30, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote:
> >>
> >> Iran is exactly an excellent example to use. Like you said, it was a
> >> nation which was mostly secular and actually very favourable to the
> >> United States. Then, suddenly, Muslims fanatics came in and started to
> >> protest that there was "corruption" in the government and demanded an
> >> Islamic State to replace it. Then Iranian shah, Pahlavi, asked for
> >> American aid and got no support from the _Democrat_ Jimmy Carter. The
> >> end result is very well known and Iranians who could once speak freely
> >> no longer could whereas women who were allowed to wear bikinis and show
> >> their hair were told to wear their baggy ninja outfits instead for fear
> >> of death.
> > 
> > The Shah was a vicious dictator put into power by the United States via
> > the CIA. The United States replaced the ELECTED secular leader of Iran,
> > Mahammad Mosaddegh. The Islamic Revolution in Iran was in REACTION to
> > the U.S. backed dictator and conditions he imposed on his people. Had we
> > never opposed the will of the Iranian people (and ousted their ELECTED
> > and secular government)
> > the history of Iran would have been completely different. So just
> > another example of U.S. interference into another country's sovereignty
> > and the decisions of her people.
> > 
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Mosaddegh
> 
> Ah, good to know the additional details, thanks.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> SilverSlimer
> Ubuntu 18.04 on MSI GT72 2QD
> Proudly blocking Facebook, Twitter and Youtube
> 
> Confused about how to plug a USB device into a USB port?
> Have a problem that any moron can easily fix?
> Need a website which looks like it was designed by a brain-damaged four 
> year-old?
> Then contact the Prescott Computer Guy for all of your trivial issues!
> http://www.prescottcomputerguy.com/



How is GIMP on Linux doing anything above the lowest common denominator? I think it is already over. Both Snit (a real advocate) and Klaus Schadenfreude had their snafus and their predicaments. One presented it dishonestly and didn't do anything too appalling that could not be blamed on someone else. GNU is based on Linux. Period. 

But Klaus Schadenfreude feels the need to please the cult-like herd of convenient friends. So be it. No no hell no. Klaus Schadenfreude never agreed to stop accusing good people of being like him. He lied about his trolling and that was that. 

-- 
What Every Entrepreneur Must Know
Michael Glasser: Prescott Computer Guy
http://prescottcomputerguy.com
https://youtu.be/HMx0RyzbPgQ
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#460063

From	Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date	2018-07-28 13:13 -0700
Message-ID	<fs4143F5cquU5@mid.individual.net>
In reply to	#460037

On 7/28/18 11:24 AM, SilverSlimer wrote:
> ... by vandalizing a church and attempting to set it on fire.
> 
> <https://www.breitbart.com/

<https://www.theonion.com>


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#460099

From	Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com>
Date	2018-07-29 00:36 +0000
Message-ID	<pjj26b$npv$4@dont-email.me>
In reply to	#460037

On Sat, 28 Jul 2018 18:24:33 +0000, SilverSlimer wrote:

> ... by vandalizing a church and attempting to set it on fire.
> 
> <https://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/07/28/allah-ou-akbar-graffiti-
> found-in-french-church-partially-set-on-fire/?
> utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+breitbart+
> %28Breitbart+News%29>

People are fools if they think these desert rats are peaceful.
They should be turned away at the borders and if they try to sneak into 
the country they should be shot.




-- 
Read about snit here:   http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#460139

From	Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date	2018-07-29 04:41 -0700
Message-ID	<a4caad54-244e-4d0d-8f0c-00ed0511547e@googlegroups.com>
In reply to	#460099

On Saturday, July 28, 2018 at 5:36:30 PM UTC-7, Kompyler wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jul 2018 18:24:33 +0000, SilverSlimer wrote:
> 
> > ... by vandalizing a church and attempting to set it on fire.
> > 
> > <https://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/07/28/allah-ou-akbar-graffiti-
> > found-in-french-church-partially-set-on-fire/?
> > utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+breitbart+
> > %28Breitbart+News%29>
> 
> People are fools if they think these desert rats are peaceful.
> They should be turned away at the borders and if they try to sneak into 
> the country they should be shot.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Read about snit here:   http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html

The herd's passed old text through Google translate with (I am betting) the MaxCliqueDyn Maximum Clique algorithm to produce posts which are hard to distinguish from my posts. This forum is a cesspool. 

I'd answer Melzzz honestly but he is an imbecile who twists what you say to fulfill his appetite to call everyone a fool. 

So, yeah, I buy into my own make believe world, fully knowing it's fake, because it makes me reconsider my code, improving it. This is something the mainstream media never covers. 

Who does NOT know that this kind of hogwash is Melzzz's approach, not the MO of Klaus Schadenfreude? It's all just projection... the endless posting, the posting with Klaus Schadenfreude's name, the writing of incomprehensible idiocy, the temper... the diaper rash and tendency to show how flustered he is over being banned from the schoolyard for pissing in it again... all of it. 

--
I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened!!
http://www.5z8.info/backyard-fireworks-disasters_t7w7pu_bombbuilding
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.c/KDQrv8appR8
http://jeff-relf.me/Cola_Regs.HTM
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]

csiph-web

Peaceful Muslims thank their welcoming Christian hosts...

Contents

#460426

#460428

#460431

#460442

#460438

#460395

#460551

#460553

#460563

#460564

#460570

#460577

#460583

#460587

#460396

#460376

#460063

#460099

#460139