Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #328277 > unrolled thread
| Started by | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-10-25 13:13 -0400 |
| Last post | 2015-10-27 08:48 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 80 — 8 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-25 13:13 -0400
Mind games. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-10-25 11:41 -0700
Re: Mind games. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-29 09:43 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 19:23 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-25 16:24 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 20:33 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-25 16:54 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 17:00 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 21:19 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 17:24 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 21:33 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 17:40 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 21:54 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 18:05 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 22:14 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 18:24 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 22:34 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 18:44 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 23:08 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 19:22 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-25 23:34 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 19:39 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 00:12 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 20:21 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 00:50 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 20:54 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 01:23 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 21:28 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 01:37 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 18:50 -0700
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 02:03 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 22:08 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 03:30 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 23:34 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 03:48 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 23:52 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 04:03 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 22:06 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 03:37 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 23:42 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 03:50 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-25 20:54 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 17:37 -0700
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-10-25 20:43 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 00:56 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 18:41 -0700
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 01:58 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 19:18 -0700
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 03:18 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 21:01 -0700
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 04:19 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-25 22:26 -0700
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 05:35 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 13:05 -0700
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 21:29 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 14:38 -0700
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 21:45 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 15:14 -0700
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 22:26 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 15:37 -0700
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 23:03 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 16:29 -0700
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-26 19:31 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 16:58 -0700
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-27 00:43 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 17:49 -0700
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-27 01:23 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 18:31 -0700
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-27 01:41 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 18:53 -0700
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 17:21 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 13:05 -0700
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-10-26 21:23 +0000
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 14:40 -0700
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-10-26 09:49 -0400
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-26 08:39 -0700
Is there a more pathetic Bullying doofus anywhere than our own DooFuS? John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-10-25 14:51 -0700
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-10-26 07:12 -0700
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-10-27 02:31 -0700
Re: This is my 40,000th cola post. That's worrisome. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-10-27 08:48 -0400
Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 Next page →
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-26 03:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fsdj8fal.p@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #328464 |
Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: > On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 03:37:00 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: > >> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 01:37:42 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>> >>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 01:23:04 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 00:50:01 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 00:12:52 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You were then asked: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Why not? >>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Do you think it's normal for two guys to fuck each other in the ass? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Something will probably again keep you from answering. >>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe ignorance. Maybe fear. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Again, key points: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 1. Opposed or not to homosexuality. >>>>>>>>>>> Answer: I am not opposed. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 2. Men fucking each other in the ass being normal. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> One has nothing to do with the other. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Still no answer to the two questions you were asked: >>>>>>>>>> 1. Why are you not opposed to homosexuality? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So now it turns into WHY are you not opposed to homosexuality. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That has always been "question 1". I see that despite a flurry >>>>>>>> of words below, you still fail to answer the question. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Not just a simple "are you opposed to homosexuality" which was your >>>>>>>>> original question. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I do wish you would learn to focus, Owl. >>>>>>>>> This is getting boring. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 2. Do you think two men fucking each other in the ass is normal? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No I do not. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Finally. That took you long enough. Question 2 answered. Will question >>>>>>>> 1 ever be answered? Who knows... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Wrong. >>>>>>> Your original question was ARE you opposed to homosexuality. >>>>>>> Not WHY are you opposed to homosexuality. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Why not" was the first of the pair of questions that you started >>>>>> to resist answering. The question "are you opposed" was indeed >>>>>> asked and answered prior to that. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Keep moving them goal posts. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes, that's what you are doing to avoid the question of why you >>>>>> are not opposed to homosexuality. >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You must *really* not want to answer those, so we'll add a third: >>>>>>>>>> 3. Why do you fear answering questions 1 and 2? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I answered question 1 a few posts ago. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nope. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes. >>>>>>> Answer: I am not opposed to homosexuality. >>>>>>> Since you seem to be missing it. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> If I were missing your answer to that question, then asking "Why not?" >>>>>> would not have made much sense, now would it? Try to keep up. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You seem unable to read that answer. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Question 1 has always been "Why not". And you still have not answered. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No it hasn't. >>>>>>> You keep moving the goal posts. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> You keep running from the question. >>>>> >>>>> All answered. >>>> >>>> Surely then you will be able to point to exactly where you answered >>>> the question, "Why are you not opposed to homosexuality?" >>> >>> I will accomodate your goal post move now that you are framing the question >>> that way, by itself. >>> >> >> Why then did you link the two questions when responding to Snit? >> >>> Why? >>> >>> Freedom and the fact that what people do in their own personal life as long >>> as it's consensual and not breaking any law, is no business of mine. >>> >> >> Do you think it's OK for a man to marry a man? >> >>> Now of course one can argue sodomy laws and technically that's a valid >>> point however in practice who are these homosexuals harming, except maybe >>> each other? >>> >> >> They are harming society. They are lobbying for unrealistic propaganda >> representation in media in order to corrupt young minds to be sympathetic >> to their cause. They spread disease into the hetero population. They are >> generally without morality and love to parade their filthy lifestyle. >> >> >>> Laws get changed all the time. >>> Maybe the USA is a bit behind the rest of the earth. >>> >> >> Maybe the rest of the earth is just full of fags. > > Goal posts have moved into the middle east. > Noted. > So now running away can be excused by simply claiming falsely that the goal poast have moved?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charmed Tuna <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 20:54 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <n0jtf7$ch0$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #328398 |
On 2015-10-25 7:39 PM, Big Fish in a Small Crotch wrote: > On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 23:34:23 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: > >> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 23:08:06 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>> >>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 22:34:15 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 22:14:27 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 21:54:14 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 21:33:20 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 21:19:28 +0000 (UTC), owl wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/25/2015 4:33 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/25/2015 3:23 PM, owl wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Starting June 3, 2004. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Minus a year or so off, so ~4000 posts per year, or 11 per day >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for 10 years straight on average. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scary. Sicko. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who knew a crappy, hobbyist operating system and it's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mentally-challenged adherents could inspire such an unhealthy >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obsession... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "it's mentally-challenged adherents" I do love a good self-nuke. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ha! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And that's about the only one you can find in 40K posts... Im >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doing alright... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess you can thank the gods of Affirmative Action that "alright" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has forced its way into common usage, allowing you to sidestep yet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> another self-nuke. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You missed [an intentional] one I made, thereby increasing your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> self-nuke count by one. Aight? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And there's nothing affirmative action about the 150-year-old Oxford >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dictionary: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Similar ???merged??? words such as altogether and already have been >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accepted in standard English for a very long time, so there is no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> logical reason to object to the one-word form alright." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/words/all-right-or-alright >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You should lobby them for "it's" as a possessive form. Threaten to get >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Al Sharpton on the case if they don't see things your way. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Brother Al is the man. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Like him or not, Al Sharpton gets the job done. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Al Sharpton is a racist opportunist. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> And I'll just wager that some of your best friends are people of color. >>>>>>>>>>> Brother Al gets the job done. >>>>>>>>>>> Speaking of racists, how is George Zimmerman these days? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Brother Al, racist homophobe: >>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sUjlle7ZVo >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Most people are racists. >>>>>>>>> They just won't admit it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Are you a racist? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I try not to be but it's human nature to see the races differently >>>>>>> depending on the context. Racism doesn't have to be negative. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Is that a "yes" or a "no"? >>>>> >>>>> It's a yes. >>>>> Unfortunately. >>>>> The same answer for most people, including you. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yes. Only without the cowardly PC qualifier in my case. >>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Most men of the cloth are opposed to homosexuality based upon the Bible, >>>>>>>>> Koran or other book of faith. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Are you opposed to homosexuality? >>>>>>> No I am not. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Why not? You think it's normal for two guys to fuck each other in the ass? >>>>> >>>>> What does that have to do with being opposed to homosexuality, which was >>>>> your question? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Two simple questions. You either have no answers, or you choose not to >>>> answer. Ignorance or fear: neither state is a happy one. >>> >>> My being opposed to homosexuality >> >> Make up your mind. You just said earlier that you are *not* opposed to >> homosexuality. > > I'm using your phrase. > IOW, "am I opposed to homosexuality". > > I clearly said I am not. > Already answered. > > However your question is about a direct sexual act regarding men being > NORMAL. > > One has nothing to do with the other. > >>> has nothing to do with two guys fucking >>> each other in the ass being NORMAL. >>> >>> Key word NORMAL. >>> >>> Is English your native language? >> >> I should ask you, since you are doing everything in your power to avoid >> answering two simple question written in the English language. > >> You stated you are not opposed to homosexuality. > > I'm not. > Already answered. > >> You were then asked: >> >> 1. Why not? >> 2. Do you think it's normal for two guys to fuck each other in the ass? >> >> Something will probably again keep you from answering. >> Maybe ignorance. Maybe fear. > > Again, key points: > > 1. Opposed or not to homosexuality. > Answer: I am not opposed. > > 2. Men fucking each other in the ass being normal. > > One has nothing to do with the other. Hi, Edwin. -- Charmed Tuna
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 17:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D252C3D4.6170F%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #328396 |
On 10/25/15, 4:34 PM, in article sesf.kf12i@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: ... > I should ask you, since you are doing everything in your power to avoid > answering two simple question written in the English language. > > You stated you are not opposed to homosexuality. Jumping in: I am not opposed either. Does not matter to me one whit. People pushing special entitlements for heterosexuals is offensive. > You were then asked: > > 1. Why not? Same reason I am not opposed to heterosexuality. > 2. Do you think it's normal for two guys to fuck each other in the ass? I do not know what percent of gay men engage in this behavior, nor what percent of heterosexual couples do, nor what percent of gay women do. Nor do I care. There is a large range of "normal" in human sexuality... and what is done by consenting adults is no business of yours or mine. > Something will probably again keep you from answering. > Maybe ignorance. Maybe fear. Why would you care one whit what type sex two other people are engaging in unless you feel left out? -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 20:43 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <h3htf555680w$.h62z5p32hhoc.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #328425 |
On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 17:37:24 -0700, Snit wrote: > On 10/25/15, 4:34 PM, in article sesf.kf12i@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > > ... >> I should ask you, since you are doing everything in your power to avoid >> answering two simple question written in the English language. >> >> You stated you are not opposed to homosexuality. > > Jumping in: I am not opposed either. Does not matter to me one whit. People > pushing special entitlements for heterosexuals is offensive. > >> You were then asked: >> >> 1. Why not? > > Same reason I am not opposed to heterosexuality. > >> 2. Do you think it's normal for two guys to fuck each other in the ass? > > I do not know what percent of gay men engage in this behavior, nor what > percent of heterosexual couples do, nor what percent of gay women do. Nor do > I care. There is a large range of "normal" in human sexuality... and what is > done by consenting adults is no business of yours or mine. > >> Something will probably again keep you from answering. >> Maybe ignorance. Maybe fear. > > Why would you care one whit what type sex two other people are engaging in > unless you feel left out? See my other post. He is using the typical tactics that haters use. -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-26 00:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <seriot93.q3@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #328425 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 10/25/15, 4:34 PM, in article sesf.kf12i@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > > ... >> I should ask you, since you are doing everything in your power to avoid >> answering two simple question written in the English language. >> >> You stated you are not opposed to homosexuality. > > Jumping in: I am not opposed either. Attention all homos... > Does not matter to me one whit. People > pushing special entitlements for heterosexuals is offensive. > >> You were then asked: >> >> 1. Why not? > > Same reason I am not opposed to heterosexuality. > What kind of freak *would* be opposed to heterosexuality? Are you also not opposed to money, good food, or a nice house? >> 2. Do you think it's normal for two guys to fuck each other in the ass? > > I do not know what percent of gay men engage in this behavior, nor what > percent of heterosexual couples do, nor what percent of gay women do. Nor do > I care. There is a large range of "normal" in human sexuality... and what is > done by consenting adults is no business of yours or mine. > So go take a count and find out what's normal. >> Something will probably again keep you from answering. >> Maybe ignorance. Maybe fear. > > Why would you care one whit what type sex two other people are engaging in > unless you feel left out? > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 18:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D252D2BC.6172E%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #328442 |
On 10/25/15, 5:56 PM, in article seriot93.q3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 10/25/15, 4:34 PM, in article sesf.kf12i@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >> ... >>> I should ask you, since you are doing everything in your power to avoid >>> answering two simple question written in the English language. >>> >>> You stated you are not opposed to homosexuality. >> >> Jumping in: I am not opposed either. > > Attention all homos... Most gay people know not all heterosexuals are homophobes. >> Does not matter to me one whit. People >> pushing special entitlements for heterosexuals is offensive. >> >>> You were then asked: >>> >>> 1. Why not? >> >> Same reason I am not opposed to heterosexuality. > > What kind of freak *would* be opposed to heterosexuality? Exactly! The same type freak who would be opposed to homosexuality. It is insane! > Are you also not opposed to money, good food, or a nice house? Correct! >>> 2. Do you think it's normal for two guys to fuck each other in the ass? >> >> I do not know what percent of gay men engage in this behavior, nor what >> percent of heterosexual couples do, nor what percent of gay women do. Nor do >> I care. There is a large range of "normal" in human sexuality... and what is >> done by consenting adults is no business of yours or mine. > > So go take a count and find out what's normal. First: who cares? Second: are you assuming what is normal is best? If so, the "norm" for religion is to be Muslim. It is the most popular religion on the planet. It is not "normal" to be a Christian nor a Jew. But so what? I have no problem with people being either. Are you against people not being the "norm" and being something other than Muslims? >>> Something will probably again keep you from answering. >>> Maybe ignorance. Maybe fear. >> >> Why would you care one whit what type sex two other people are engaging in >> unless you feel left out? >> >> > -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-26 01:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fdsae.gjf99@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #328452 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 10/25/15, 5:56 PM, in article seriot93.q3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 10/25/15, 4:34 PM, in article sesf.kf12i@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> ... >>>> I should ask you, since you are doing everything in your power to avoid >>>> answering two simple question written in the English language. >>>> >>>> You stated you are not opposed to homosexuality. >>> >>> Jumping in: I am not opposed either. >> >> Attention all homos... > > Most gay people know not all heterosexuals are homophobes. > I don't know anybody who is afraid of a queer, so that's a strange word to use. >>> Does not matter to me one whit. People >>> pushing special entitlements for heterosexuals is offensive. >>> >>>> You were then asked: >>>> >>>> 1. Why not? >>> >>> Same reason I am not opposed to heterosexuality. >> >> What kind of freak *would* be opposed to heterosexuality? > > Exactly! The same type freak who would be opposed to homosexuality. It is > insane! You seriously think that people who oppose homosexuality are the same type of people who oppose heterosexuality (do these freaks even exist?) > >> Are you also not opposed to money, good food, or a nice house? > > Correct! > >>>> 2. Do you think it's normal for two guys to fuck each other in the ass? >>> >>> I do not know what percent of gay men engage in this behavior, nor what >>> percent of heterosexual couples do, nor what percent of gay women do. Nor do >>> I care. There is a large range of "normal" in human sexuality... and what is >>> done by consenting adults is no business of yours or mine. >> >> So go take a count and find out what's normal. > > First: who cares? > Walk, don't run... > Second: are you assuming what is normal is best? If so, the "norm" for > religion is to be Muslim. Not in America. > It is the most popular religion on the planet. It > is not "normal" to be a Christian nor a Jew. > > But so what? I have no problem with people being either. > I'm sure you have no problem with it. Daisies in your hair, peace sign tshirt, sandals... A muslim still would cut your throat, and ironically it would be *because* of your beliefs. > Are you against people not being the "norm" and being something other than > Muslims? > Muslims are not normal. They divide their time between worshipping the Moon and getting a proper bearing on the Great Meteorite.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 19:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D252DB87.6173D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #328454 |
On 10/25/15, 6:58 PM, in article fdsae.gjf99@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 10/25/15, 5:56 PM, in article seriot93.q3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 10/25/15, 4:34 PM, in article sesf.kf12i@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>> ... >>>>> I should ask you, since you are doing everything in your power to avoid >>>>> answering two simple question written in the English language. >>>>> >>>>> You stated you are not opposed to homosexuality. >>>> >>>> Jumping in: I am not opposed either. >>> >>> Attention all homos... >> >> Most gay people know not all heterosexuals are homophobes. > > I don't know anybody who is afraid of a queer, so that's a strange word > to use. OK, we shall call your affliction simple bigotry. That is what it is. Fine. >>>> Does not matter to me one whit. People >>>> pushing special entitlements for heterosexuals is offensive. >>>> >>>>> You were then asked: >>>>> >>>>> 1. Why not? >>>> >>>> Same reason I am not opposed to heterosexuality. >>> >>> What kind of freak *would* be opposed to heterosexuality? >> >> Exactly! The same type freak who would be opposed to homosexuality. It is >> insane! > > You seriously think that people who oppose homosexuality are the same > type of people who oppose heterosexuality (do these freaks even exist?) Of course! Why would anyone oppose someone else's non-harmful sexuality. It is utterly insane... or to use your term something only a freak would do. A freak such as you (or so you claim). >>> Are you also not opposed to money, good food, or a nice house? >> >> Correct! >> >>>>> 2. Do you think it's normal for two guys to fuck each other in the ass? >>>> >>>> I do not know what percent of gay men engage in this behavior, nor what >>>> percent of heterosexual couples do, nor what percent of gay women do. Nor >>>> do >>>> I care. There is a large range of "normal" in human sexuality... and what >>>> is >>>> done by consenting adults is no business of yours or mine. >>> >>> So go take a count and find out what's normal. >> >> First: who cares? > > Walk, don't run... > >> Second: are you assuming what is normal is best? If so, the "norm" for >> religion is to be Muslim. > > Not in America. Who cares about it being just America? You set the standard of "normal" being what you define as good. So you should be a Muslim. Right? Of course, what is normal or abnormal is not the same as what is good and bad. You are just using the term to try to defend your "freakish" bigotry. >> It is the most popular religion on the planet. It >> is not "normal" to be a Christian nor a Jew. >> >> But so what? I have no problem with people being either. > > I'm sure you have no problem with it. Daisies in your hair, peace sign > tshirt, sandals... A muslim still would cut your throat, and ironically > it would be *because* of your beliefs. You making up stories about what my Muslim friends are doing simply shows MORE "freakish" bigotry from you. >> Are you against people not being the "norm" and being something other than >> Muslims? > > Muslims are not normal. Of course they are. The most "normal" religion for people to be. > They divide their time between worshipping the > Moon and getting a proper bearing on the Great Meteorite. What you think of them and what stories you tell is not relevant. They are the norm. You are not. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-26 03:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <segfla.djgi9@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #328458 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 10/25/15, 6:58 PM, in article fdsae.gjf99@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> Second: are you assuming what is normal is best? If so, the "norm" for >>> religion is to be Muslim. >> >> Not in America. > > Who cares about it being just America? You set the standard of "normal" > being what you define as good. So you should be a Muslim. Right? > Nope. Maybe in 35 years or so, but not today. http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2015/04/02/397042004/muslim-population-will-surpass-christians-this-century-pew-says <quote> "As of 2010, Christianity was by far the world's largest religion, with an estimated 2.2 billion adherents, nearly a third (31 percent) of all 6.9 billion people on Earth," the Pew report says. "Islam was second, with 1.6 billion adherents, or 23 percent of the global population." Those numbers are predicted to shift in the coming decades, as the world's population rises to 9.3 billion by the middle of this century. In that time, Pew projects, Islam will grow by 73 percent while Christianity will grow by 35 percent ??? resulting in 2.8 billion Muslims and 2.9 billion Christians worldwide. </quote> > Of course, what is normal or abnormal is not the same as what is good and > bad. You are just using the term to try to defend your "freakish" bigotry. > >>> It is the most popular religion on the planet. Nope. That would be Christianity. >>> It >>> is not "normal" to be a Christian nor a Jew. >>> Of course it is. >>> But so what? I have no problem with people being either. >> >> I'm sure you have no problem with it. Daisies in your hair, peace sign >> tshirt, sandals... A muslim still would cut your throat, and ironically >> it would be *because* of your beliefs. > > You making up stories about what my Muslim friends are doing simply shows > MORE "freakish" bigotry from you. > I don't make up anything. All you have to do is remove your head from your ass to see what murderous savages they are. >>> Are you against people not being the "norm" and being something other than >>> Muslims? >> >> Muslims are not normal. > > Of course they are. The most "normal" religion for people to be. > Nope. That would be Christianity. >> They divide their time between worshipping the >> Moon and getting a proper bearing on the Great Meteorite. > > What you think of them and what stories you tell is not relevant. They are > the norm. Nope. That would be Christianity.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 21:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D252F3B4.61753%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #328459 |
On 10/25/15, 8:18 PM, in article segfla.djgi9@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
<owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> What kind of freak *would* be opposed to heterosexuality?
>>>>>
>>>> Exactly! The same type freak who would be opposed to homosexuality. It is
>>>> insane!
>>>>
>>> You seriously think that people who oppose homosexuality are the same type
>>> of people who oppose heterosexuality (do these freaks even exist?)
>>>
>> Of course! Why would anyone oppose someone else's non-harmful sexuality. It
>> is utterly insane... or to use your term something only a freak would do. A
>> freak such as you (or so you claim).
No comment from you. You cannot back your bigotry. OK.
>>>> Second: are you assuming what is normal is best? If so, the "norm" for
>>>> religion is to be Muslim.
>>>
>>> Not in America.
>>
>> Who cares about it being just America? You set the standard of "normal"
>> being what you define as good. So you should be a Muslim. Right?
>
> Nope. Maybe in 35 years or so, but not today.
>
> http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2015/04/02/397042004/muslim-population-
> will-surpass-christians-this-century-pew-says
> <quote>
> "As of 2010, Christianity was by far the world's largest religion, with
> an estimated 2.2 billion adherents, nearly a third (31 percent) of all
> 6.9 billion people on Earth," the Pew report says. "Islam was second,
> with 1.6 billion adherents, or 23 percent of the global population."
>
> Those numbers are predicted to shift in the coming decades, as the world's
> population rises to 9.3 billion by the middle of this century. In that
> time, Pew projects, Islam will grow by 73 percent while Christianity
> will grow by 35 percent ??? resulting in 2.8 billion Muslims and 2.9
> billion Christians worldwide.
> </quote>
Based on your research and more I did I stand corrected. Thank you. I
appreciate it.
But there are more women then men. So being a woman is "normal" and a man is
not, right? And there are more right handed people than left and more brown
eyed people than blue. So being a left handed person or having blue eyes is
not normal.
Not sure where this gets us. Is your goal to be "normal"? Do you see being
"normal" as somehow better than being uncommon? Using Windows is normal.
Eating McDonald's burgers is normal.
What is the point of this exercise to find what is "normal"?
...
>>> I'm sure you have no problem with it. Daisies in your hair, peace sign
>>> tshirt, sandals... A muslim still would cut your throat, and ironically
>>> it would be *because* of your beliefs.
>>
>> You making up stories about what my Muslim friends are doing simply shows
>> MORE "freakish" bigotry from you.
>
> I don't make up anything. All you have to do is remove your head from your
> ass to see what murderous savages they are.
Of course you made up an idiotic story about how my Muslim friends are going
to cut my throat! That is just idiotic. I mean, really, when do you think
this is going to happen? Tomorrow? Next week? Why have they not done it
already? You simply lied to push your bigotry.
You used a Pew study... so here is info from Pew:
<http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/asiapcf/10/07/muslim.world.population/>
-----
Nearly one in four people worldwide is Muslim -- and they are not
necessarily where you might think, according to an extensive new
study that aims to map the global Muslim population.
Nearly two out of three of the world's Muslims are in Asia,
stretching from Turkey to Indonesia. Nearly two out of three of
the world's Muslims are in Asia, stretching from Turkey to
Indonesia.
India, a majority-Hindu country, has more Muslims than any country
except for Indonesia and Pakistan, and more than twice as many as
Egypt.
China has more Muslims than Syria.
Germany has more Muslims than Lebanon.
And Russia has more Muslims than Jordan and Libya put together.
Nearly two out of three of the world's Muslims are in Asia,
stretching from Turkey to Indonesia.
The Middle East and north Africa, which together are home to about
one in five of the world's Muslims, trail a very distant second.
There are about 1.57 billion Muslims in the world, according to
the report, "Mapping the Global Muslim Population," by the Pew
Forum on Religion & Public Life. That represents about 23 percent
of the total global population of 6.8 billion.
-----
And you think all 1.5 billion plus Muslims are the same. That is idiotic and
bigoted.
--
* OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-26 04:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fsdr93.apg@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #328471 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 10/25/15, 8:18 PM, in article segfla.djgi9@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > ... >> I don't make up anything. All you have to do is remove your head from your >> ass to see what murderous savages they are. > > Of course you made up an idiotic story about how my Muslim friends are going > to cut my throat! That is just idiotic. I mean, really, when do you think > this is going to happen? Tomorrow? Next week? Why have they not done it > already? You simply lied to push your bigotry. > So not only are you an expert on black people, living as you do in Prescott AZ, where blacks represent 0.7 % of the population, you astoundingly also have all these muslim friends even though AZ appears to have fewer than one-half of one percent muslims statewide, with Yavapai County apparently having *no* muslims at all: http://i.huffpost.com/gen/661235/thumbs/a-MUSLIM-POPULATION-PENETRATION-640x468.jpg?4 Hell, I had you all wrong. You're not Rainman. You're Rainbow Man.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-25 22:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D2530796.61764%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #328474 |
On 10/25/15, 9:19 PM, in article fsdr93.apg@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 10/25/15, 8:18 PM, in article segfla.djgi9@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> > ... > >>> I don't make up anything. All you have to do is remove your head from your >>> ass to see what murderous savages they are. >> >> Of course you made up an idiotic story about how my Muslim friends are going >> to cut my throat! That is just idiotic. I mean, really, when do you think >> this is going to happen? Tomorrow? Next week? Why have they not done it >> already? You simply lied to push your bigotry. >> > > So not only are you an expert on black people, living as you do in > Prescott AZ, where blacks represent 0.7 % of the population, you > astoundingly also have all these muslim friends even though AZ > appears to have fewer than one-half of one percent muslims statewide, > with Yavapai County apparently having *no* muslims at all: > > http://i.huffpost.com/gen/661235/thumbs/a-MUSLIM-POPULATION-PENETRATION-640x46 > 8.jpg?4 > > Hell, I had you all wrong. You're not Rainman. You're Rainbow Man. > And dodges galore from you. Expert in black people? WTF? No Muslims in Prescott? Look up Prescott Masjid. I mean, really, you are an idiot. But let us get past your current idiocy and just have you answer the questions based on your past bigotry and lies. You claimed my Muslim friends would behead me. WHEN? Come on you spineless bigot: answer the question. But you won't. You are just that: a spineless bigot who hates gays (even though you have given suggestions you are one yourself) and Muslims (because you insanely think they are going to behead you). You are functionally illiterate, bigoted, and too stupid to figure out that if you calculate an average rate of happenings that does not mean the events happened all at that average time. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-26 05:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fsd.gkdo9@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #328478 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 10/25/15, 9:19 PM, in article fsdr93.apg@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 10/25/15, 8:18 PM, in article segfla.djgi9@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >> ... >> >>>> I don't make up anything. All you have to do is remove your head from your >>>> ass to see what murderous savages they are. >>> >>> Of course you made up an idiotic story about how my Muslim friends are going >>> to cut my throat! That is just idiotic. I mean, really, when do you think >>> this is going to happen? Tomorrow? Next week? Why have they not done it >>> already? You simply lied to push your bigotry. >>> >> >> So not only are you an expert on black people, living as you do in >> Prescott AZ, where blacks represent 0.7 % of the population, you >> astoundingly also have all these muslim friends even though AZ >> appears to have fewer than one-half of one percent muslims statewide, >> with Yavapai County apparently having *no* muslims at all: >> >> http://i.huffpost.com/gen/661235/thumbs/a-MUSLIM-POPULATION-PENETRATION-640x46 >> 8.jpg?4 >> >> Hell, I had you all wrong. You're not Rainman. You're Rainbow Man. >> > > And dodges galore from you. Expert in black people? WTF? No Muslims in > Prescott? Look up Prescott Masjid. I mean, really, you are an idiot. > > But let us get past your current idiocy and just have you answer the > questions based on your past bigotry and lies. You claimed my Muslim friends > would behead me. > > WHEN? > > Come on you spineless bigot: answer the question. > > But you won't. You are just that: a spineless bigot who hates gays (even > though you have given suggestions you are one yourself) and Muslims (because > you insanely think they are going to behead you). > > You are functionally illiterate, bigoted, and too stupid to figure out that > if you calculate an average rate of happenings that does not mean the events > happened all at that average time. > LOL!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-26 13:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D253D59D.6183B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #328480 |
On 10/25/15, 10:35 PM, in article fsd.gkdo9@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: ... >> And dodges galore from you. Expert in black people? WTF? No Muslims in >> Prescott? Look up Prescott Masjid. I mean, really, you are an idiot. >> >> But let us get past your current idiocy and just have you answer the >> questions based on your past bigotry and lies. You claimed my Muslim friends >> would behead me. >> >> WHEN? >> >> Come on you spineless bigot: answer the question. >> >> But you won't. You are just that: a spineless bigot who hates gays (even >> though you have given suggestions you are one yourself) and Muslims (because >> you insanely think they are going to behead you). >> >> You are functionally illiterate, bigoted, and too stupid to figure out that >> if you calculate an average rate of happenings that does not mean the events >> happened all at that average time. > > LOL! And you have no response. No reason why you would lie about my friends (as if you even know anything about them - and yet you insist they are going to behead me!). No defense of your functional illiteracy. Just insane of you. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-26 21:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fsespdoe9.afj@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #328603 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 10/25/15, 10:35 PM, in article fsd.gkdo9@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > > ... >>> And dodges galore from you. Expert in black people? WTF? No Muslims in >>> Prescott? Look up Prescott Masjid. I mean, really, you are an idiot. >>> >>> But let us get past your current idiocy and just have you answer the >>> questions based on your past bigotry and lies. You claimed my Muslim friends >>> would behead me. >>> >>> WHEN? >>> >>> Come on you spineless bigot: answer the question. >>> >>> But you won't. You are just that: a spineless bigot who hates gays (even >>> though you have given suggestions you are one yourself) and Muslims (because >>> you insanely think they are going to behead you). >>> >>> You are functionally illiterate, bigoted, and too stupid to figure out that >>> if you calculate an average rate of happenings that does not mean the events >>> happened all at that average time. >> >> LOL! > > And you have no response. No reason why you would lie about my friends (as > if you even know anything about them - and yet you insist they are going to > behead me!). > I never said that, you damn drama queen. > No defense of your functional illiteracy. > > Just insane of you. So you think it's insane that I don't defend functional illiteracy. You're a teacher, or so you say. One would expect that a teacher would be *against* functional illiteracy, not ridiculing someone for failing to defend it. You sure are a nutcase.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-26 14:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D253EB63.61889%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #328616 |
On 10/26/15, 2:29 PM, in article fsespdoe9.afj@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: ... >> And you have no response. No reason why you would lie about my friends (as >> if you even know anything about them - and yet you insist they are going to >> behead me!). >> > > I never said that, you damn drama queen. Ah, you merely said my Muslims friends want to "cut my throat" because of my beliefs and not behead me. Gee, sorry for the horrid misrepresentation of your bigoted nonsense. >> No defense of your functional illiteracy. >> >> Just insane of you. > > So you think it's insane that I don't defend functional illiteracy. You do not seek to rise above being functionally illiterate, nor do you seek to understand what an average is. ... -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-26 21:45 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sqeof0s.kfdi@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #328618 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 10/26/15, 2:29 PM, in article fsespdoe9.afj@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > > ... >>> And you have no response. No reason why you would lie about my friends (as >>> if you even know anything about them - and yet you insist they are going to >>> behead me!). >>> >> >> I never said that, you damn drama queen. > > Ah, you merely said my Muslims friends How many muslim friends do you have? > want to "cut my throat" because of my > beliefs and not behead me. Gee, sorry for the horrid misrepresentation of > your bigoted nonsense. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-26 15:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D253F3E8.618B6%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #328623 |
On 10/26/15, 2:45 PM, in article sqeof0s.kfdi@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 10/26/15, 2:29 PM, in article fsespdoe9.afj@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >> ... >>>> And you have no response. No reason why you would lie about my friends (as >>>> if you even know anything about them - and yet you insist they are going to >>>> behead me!). >>>> >>> >>> I never said that, you damn drama queen. >> >> Ah, you merely said my Muslims friends > > How many muslim friends do you have? You already claimed "many". Now you admit you do not know. The answer: none of your damned business (and, really, I have no idea of the religion of many of my friends). But I do know some who are definitely Muslim.... whom you claim wish to cut my throat. But you lied. Comes down to you just flat out lying. Oh, I also have friends in Israel with Muslim friends and used to have a Muslim in the family (she no longer is because of divorce). Oh, and years ago went on a date with a Muslim woman (well, went to a movie and dinner with her, there was no spark and no real interest either way, but I knew her for years after that and she and I got along fine). Hmmm, and I worked at a camp where there were mostly Jewish campers but in my cabin we had two Muslim's (they were brothers). The camp had been a Jewish camp for years but had opened up to anyone and the Muslim family wanted their kids to see other cultures. You paint all Muslims with one big, bigoted brush. As far as more details: I have no obligation to share ANYTHING with you. You are the one who claimed Muslims wish to cut my throat for my beliefs. Why have they not? >> want to "cut my throat" because of my >> beliefs and not behead me. Gee, sorry for the horrid misrepresentation of >> your bigoted nonsense. >> > -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-26 22:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fsavmc83.ajf@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #328631 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 10/26/15, 2:45 PM, in article sqeof0s.kfdi@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 10/26/15, 2:29 PM, in article fsespdoe9.afj@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> ... >>>>> And you have no response. No reason why you would lie about my friends (as >>>>> if you even know anything about them - and yet you insist they are going to >>>>> behead me!). >>>>> >>>> >>>> I never said that, you damn drama queen. >>> >>> Ah, you merely said my Muslims friends >> >> How many muslim friends do you have? > > You already claimed "many". Now you admit you do not know. The answer: none > of your damned business (and, really, I have no idea of the religion of many > of my friends). But I do know some who are definitely Muslim.... whom you > claim wish to cut my throat. > Lie. I never said they "wish" to cut your throat. > But you lied. > You're lying again. Can't help yourself, huh? > Comes down to you just flat out lying. Comes down to you just flat out lying about having muslim friends. [more lies snipped]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-26 15:37 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D253F955.618E2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #328645 |
On 10/26/15, 3:26 PM, in article fsavmc83.ajf@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
<owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
...
>>> How many muslim friends do you have?
>>
>> You already claimed "many". Now you admit you do not know. The answer: none
>> of your damned business (and, really, I have no idea of the religion of many
>> of my friends). But I do know some who are definitely Muslim.... whom you
>> claim wish to cut my throat.
>
> Lie. I never said they "wish" to cut your throat.
Owl:
-----
A muslim still would cut your throat, and ironically it would be
*because* of your beliefs.
-----
But that is idiotic bigoted nonsense. So the question is why would you spew
idiotic bigoted nonsense?
But you will just run. Comes down to your idiotic bigoted nonsense cannot be
backed. Nor can your bigoted nonsense about gays.
Such bigotry, by the way, is not "normal".
--
* OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web