Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #332076 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-09 17:04 -0700 |
| Last post | 2015-11-12 16:04 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 83 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 17:04 -0700
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-10 02:09 +0000
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 19:11 -0700
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-10 02:17 +0000
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 19:25 -0700
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-10 02:49 +0000
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-09 20:00 -0700
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-10 08:16 -0500
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 09:27 -0700
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-10 06:01 -0800
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-10 09:23 -0700
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 09:13 -0800
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-10 10:14 -0800
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 11:17 -0800
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-10 11:34 -0800
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 12:08 -0800
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-11-10 10:03 -0800
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Marti van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2015-11-11 16:14 +0100
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-11 16:32 +0100
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-11 10:49 -0500
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-11 17:47 +0100
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-11 12:23 -0500
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-11 12:12 -0800
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-11 16:35 -0500
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 11:21 -0700
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 11:02 -0700
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Marti van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> - 2015-11-12 09:49 +0100
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-11-12 10:04 +0100
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... GreyCloud <cumulus@mist.com> - 2015-11-12 11:34 -0700
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 11:59 -0700
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-12 12:33 -0600
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-11-12 13:55 -0600
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-11-15 11:19 -0500
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-15 09:34 -0700
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-11 10:47 -0500
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 10:53 -0700
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 10:33 -0700
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-12 22:57 +0000
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-12 18:42 -0500
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 17:58 -0700
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 01:20 +0000
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 18:44 -0700
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 18:14 -0800
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 10:19 -0500
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-11-12 12:32 -0600
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 12:07 -0700
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 00:29 +0000
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 17:59 -0700
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 01:23 +0000
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 18:46 -0700
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 02:21 +0000
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 19:25 -0700
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 02:49 +0000
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-12 20:04 -0700
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 03:23 +0000
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 01:49 -0700
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-11-13 09:24 +0000
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 02:39 -0700
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 11:04 -0500
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 11:23 -0500
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 12:43 -0500
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 11:06 -0700
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 10:25 -0800
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 10:08 -0800
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 13:28 -0500
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 11:34 -0700
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 11:11 -0800
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 14:45 -0500
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 14:38 -0700
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 13:50 -0800
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 15:08 -0500
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 20:13 -0500
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 18:18 -0700
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 20:20 -0500
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2015-11-13 23:55 -0500
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-14 09:06 -0700
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 09:03 -0800
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 08:39 -0800
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-11-13 10:05 -0700
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 09:32 -0800
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> - 2015-11-13 12:42 -0500
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 08:35 -0800
Re: OT: While we fight over if Muslims or Christians are more evil... awoolmeyer@gmail.com - 2015-11-12 16:04 -0800
Page 3 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 Next page →
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 01:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fdahu30a.f@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #332762 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 11/12/15, 3:57 PM, in article sfhnejgu83.a0@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 11/11/15, 8:14 AM, in article n1vm19$fbs$1@news.albasani.net, "Marti van >>> Lin" <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Op 10-11-15 om 03:09 schreef owl: >>>> >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> <http://news.sciencemag.org/node/117179> >>>>>> ----- >>>> >>>> [crap snipped] >>>> >>>>> Another horseshit, non-scientific "study." >>>> >>>> What else did you expect? Its a "Snit" post after all :-p >>>> >>>> [more ridiculous crap snipped] >>>> >>>>> Percentages matter. Muslims are hysterical, insane, violent subhumans >>>>> in far greater percentages than any other group. >>>> >>>> I'm openly *GAY* (of Roman-Catholic descent) never seen a *Conservative >>>> Christian* dropping a Homo from a large building so far :-p >>> >>> Uganda is a primarily Catholic nation >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Uganda> >>> >>> And one of their laws dealing with homosexuality: >>> <http://www.refworld.org/pdfid/530c4bc64.pdf> >>> >>> It is true the death penalty was dropped from the final version, but >>> originally it included even that! >> >> Uganda was 12.1 percent Muslim in 2002, up from 10.5 percent in 1991. >> Probably more like 15% today. Well beyond the 5 percent that it >> normally takes for Muslims to start being a real nuisance politically >> and sociologically. > > It is a MAJORITY Christian nation, most of those Christians being Catholics. > The most common religion is Catholicism. And they passed a bill to imprison > people for being gay... which is better than the original bill which called > for *death*, the very thing which three Republican Christian presidential > candidates went to a conference which pushed that idea. > > The Republicans have been taken over by their extremists - including their > right wing Christian extremists. > > Muslims only need about a 5-percent presence to start stirring up the shit and completely ruin a normal country. Just look at Europe. Who would want to go there now?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 18:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D26A8E80.63B50%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #332769 |
On 11/12/15, 6:20 PM, in article fdahu30a.f@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 11/12/15, 3:57 PM, in article sfhnejgu83.a0@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 11/11/15, 8:14 AM, in article n1vm19$fbs$1@news.albasani.net, "Marti van >>>> Lin" <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Op 10-11-15 om 03:09 schreef owl: >>>>> >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> <http://news.sciencemag.org/node/117179> >>>>>>> ----- >>>>> >>>>> [crap snipped] >>>>> >>>>>> Another horseshit, non-scientific "study." >>>>> >>>>> What else did you expect? Its a "Snit" post after all :-p >>>>> >>>>> [more ridiculous crap snipped] >>>>> >>>>>> Percentages matter. Muslims are hysterical, insane, violent subhumans >>>>>> in far greater percentages than any other group. >>>>> >>>>> I'm openly *GAY* (of Roman-Catholic descent) never seen a *Conservative >>>>> Christian* dropping a Homo from a large building so far :-p >>>> >>>> Uganda is a primarily Catholic nation >>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Uganda> >>>> >>>> And one of their laws dealing with homosexuality: >>>> <http://www.refworld.org/pdfid/530c4bc64.pdf> >>>> >>>> It is true the death penalty was dropped from the final version, but >>>> originally it included even that! >>> >>> Uganda was 12.1 percent Muslim in 2002, up from 10.5 percent in 1991. >>> Probably more like 15% today. Well beyond the 5 percent that it >>> normally takes for Muslims to start being a real nuisance politically >>> and sociologically. >> >> It is a MAJORITY Christian nation, most of those Christians being Catholics. >> The most common religion is Catholicism. And they passed a bill to imprison >> people for being gay... which is better than the original bill which called >> for *death*, the very thing which three Republican Christian presidential >> candidates went to a conference which pushed that idea. >> >> The Republicans have been taken over by their extremists - including their >> right wing Christian extremists. >> >> > > Muslims only need about a 5-percent presence to start stirring up the > shit and completely ruin a normal country. Just look at Europe. Who > would want to go there now? This is a majority Christian country - but you blame the Muslims. Amazing. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 18:14 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <07904b64-64a8-4a01-aeca-fcaad7b04c70@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #332769 |
On Thursday, November 12, 2015 at 6:20:05 PM UTC-7, owl wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > > On 11/12/15, 3:57 PM, in article sfhnejgu83.a0@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > > > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>> On 11/11/15, 8:14 AM, in article n1vm19$fbs$1@news.albasani.net, "Marti van > >>> Lin" <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Op 10-11-15 om 03:09 schreef owl: > >>>> > >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >>>>>> <http://news.sciencemag.org/node/117179> > >>>>>> ----- > >>>> > >>>> [crap snipped] > >>>> > >>>>> Another horseshit, non-scientific "study." > >>>> > >>>> What else did you expect? Its a "Snit" post after all :-p > >>>> > >>>> [more ridiculous crap snipped] > >>>> > >>>>> Percentages matter. Muslims are hysterical, insane, violent subhumans > >>>>> in far greater percentages than any other group. > >>>> > >>>> I'm openly *GAY* (of Roman-Catholic descent) never seen a *Conservative > >>>> Christian* dropping a Homo from a large building so far :-p > >>> > >>> Uganda is a primarily Catholic nation > >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Uganda> > >>> > >>> And one of their laws dealing with homosexuality: > >>> <http://www.refworld.org/pdfid/530c4bc64.pdf> > >>> > >>> It is true the death penalty was dropped from the final version, but > >>> originally it included even that! > >> > >> Uganda was 12.1 percent Muslim in 2002, up from 10.5 percent in 1991. > >> Probably more like 15% today. Well beyond the 5 percent that it > >> normally takes for Muslims to start being a real nuisance politically > >> and sociologically. > > > > It is a MAJORITY Christian nation, most of those Christians being Catholics. > > The most common religion is Catholicism. And they passed a bill to imprison > > people for being gay... Does the bill suggest cutting any limbs off on the way in, Snit? And how many Catholics are actually OK with it? Let's call it... oh... 83% . What the hell, I'll even round that number up to 12 million. So we have 12 million Ugandans and imprisonment... as opposed to ~150 million Pakistanis and death. And, somehow, you see that as "much the same". Gee, I could be "wrong" but something tells me that the dying Pakistanis don't see it that way. Uganda has Constitutional protections in place that will undoubtedly knock this bill down if anyone tries to enforce it (as opposed to Pakistanis, who *are* getting stoned... even outside of courthouses!) > > which is better than the original bill which called > > for *death*, the very thing which three Republican Christian presidential > > candidates went to a conference which pushed that idea. > > > > The Republicans have been taken over by their extremists - including their > > right wing Christian extremists. > > > > > > Muslims only need about a 5-percent presence to start stirring up the > shit and completely ruin a normal country. Just look at Europe. Who > would want to go there now? It's weird how he keeps claiming how he doesn't think anyone should be comparing this stuff, yet, he keeps trying (unsuccessfully) to do it. Here's the big clue for his next 'comparison': There are only about 175 million Catholics in all of Africa. According to his 'logic', roughly one third of the people in Uganda are 'extremists' but the ~150 million Pakistanis aren't <eyeroll>.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 10:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n24uu0$uuq$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #332769 |
On 2015-11-12 8:20 PM, owl wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 11/12/15, 3:57 PM, in article sfhnejgu83.a0@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 11/11/15, 8:14 AM, in article n1vm19$fbs$1@news.albasani.net, "Marti van >>>> Lin" <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Op 10-11-15 om 03:09 schreef owl: >>>>> >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> <http://news.sciencemag.org/node/117179> >>>>>>> ----- >>>>> >>>>> [crap snipped] >>>>> >>>>>> Another horseshit, non-scientific "study." >>>>> >>>>> What else did you expect? Its a "Snit" post after all :-p >>>>> >>>>> [more ridiculous crap snipped] >>>>> >>>>>> Percentages matter. Muslims are hysterical, insane, violent subhumans >>>>>> in far greater percentages than any other group. >>>>> >>>>> I'm openly *GAY* (of Roman-Catholic descent) never seen a *Conservative >>>>> Christian* dropping a Homo from a large building so far :-p >>>> >>>> Uganda is a primarily Catholic nation >>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Uganda> >>>> >>>> And one of their laws dealing with homosexuality: >>>> <http://www.refworld.org/pdfid/530c4bc64.pdf> >>>> >>>> It is true the death penalty was dropped from the final version, but >>>> originally it included even that! >>> >>> Uganda was 12.1 percent Muslim in 2002, up from 10.5 percent in 1991. >>> Probably more like 15% today. Well beyond the 5 percent that it >>> normally takes for Muslims to start being a real nuisance politically >>> and sociologically. >> >> It is a MAJORITY Christian nation, most of those Christians being Catholics. >> The most common religion is Catholicism. And they passed a bill to imprison >> people for being gay... which is better than the original bill which called >> for *death*, the very thing which three Republican Christian presidential >> candidates went to a conference which pushed that idea. >> >> The Republicans have been taken over by their extremists - including their >> right wing Christian extremists. >> >> > > Muslims only need about a 5-percent presence to start stirring up the > shit and completely ruin a normal country. Just look at Europe. Who > would want to go there now? I'm not even willing to visit anymore. Perhaps Poland, but no other place. -- Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 12:32 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <slrnn49mp6.jqf.jedi@nomad.mishnet> |
| In reply to | #332553 |
On 2015-11-11, Marti van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> wrote: > Op 10-11-15 om 03:09 schreef owl: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> <http://news.sciencemag.org/node/117179> >>> ----- > > [crap snipped] > >> Another horseshit, non-scientific "study." > > What else did you expect? Its a "Snit" post after all :-p > > [more ridiculous crap snipped] > >> Percentages matter. Muslims are hysterical, insane, violent subhumans >> in far greater percentages than any other group. > > I'm openly *GAY* (of Roman-Catholic descent) never seen a *Conservative > Christian* dropping a Homo from a large building so far :-p > Give them a sense of empowerment and the idea that they could get away with it and I am sure quite a few of them (xians) would have no problem with it. On the other hand, they could all be dickless chickenshits that are all talk and no action. Too fat and happy in the world created by heretics.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 12:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D26A316E.63A6B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #332697 |
On 11/12/15, 11:32 AM, in article slrnn49mp6.jqf.jedi@nomad.mishnet, "JEDIDIAH" <jedi@nomad.mishnet> wrote: > On 2015-11-11, Marti van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> wrote: >> Op 10-11-15 om 03:09 schreef owl: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> <http://news.sciencemag.org/node/117179> >>>> ----- >> >> [crap snipped] >> >>> Another horseshit, non-scientific "study." >> >> What else did you expect? Its a "Snit" post after all :-p >> >> [more ridiculous crap snipped] >> >>> Percentages matter. Muslims are hysterical, insane, violent subhumans >>> in far greater percentages than any other group. >> >> I'm openly *GAY* (of Roman-Catholic descent) never seen a *Conservative >> Christian* dropping a Homo from a large building so far :-p >> > > Give them a sense of empowerment and the idea that they could get > away with it and I am sure quite a few of them (xians) would have no > problem with it. > > On the other hand, they could all be dickless chickenshits that are > all talk and no action. Too fat and happy in the world created by heretics. Many of the Christians in COLA seem to want to show that another religion is worse than theirs... as if it is a contest to see which religion is the most offensive. Just weird to me. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 00:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fsahue0.a3@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #332697 |
JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> wrote: > On 2015-11-11, Marti van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> wrote: >> Op 10-11-15 om 03:09 schreef owl: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> <http://news.sciencemag.org/node/117179> >>>> ----- >> >> [crap snipped] >> >>> Another horseshit, non-scientific "study." >> >> What else did you expect? Its a "Snit" post after all :-p >> >> [more ridiculous crap snipped] >> >>> Percentages matter. Muslims are hysterical, insane, violent subhumans >>> in far greater percentages than any other group. >> >> I'm openly *GAY* (of Roman-Catholic descent) never seen a *Conservative >> Christian* dropping a Homo from a large building so far :-p >> > > Give them a sense of empowerment and the idea that they could get > away with it and I am sure quite a few of them (xians) would have no > problem with it. > The bigot JEDIDIAH continues to use the term "xians" after being told that it is offensive to some Christians. > On the other hand, they could all be dickless chickenshits that are > all talk and no action. Too fat and happy in the world created by heretics. I'm for beheading all radical practitioners of the Atheist religion.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 17:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D26A8413.63B28%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #332754 |
On 11/12/15, 5:29 PM, in article fsahue0.a3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> wrote: >> On 2015-11-11, Marti van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> wrote: >>> Op 10-11-15 om 03:09 schreef owl: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> <http://news.sciencemag.org/node/117179> >>>>> ----- >>> >>> [crap snipped] >>> >>>> Another horseshit, non-scientific "study." >>> >>> What else did you expect? Its a "Snit" post after all :-p >>> >>> [more ridiculous crap snipped] >>> >>>> Percentages matter. Muslims are hysterical, insane, violent subhumans >>>> in far greater percentages than any other group. >>> >>> I'm openly *GAY* (of Roman-Catholic descent) never seen a *Conservative >>> Christian* dropping a Homo from a large building so far :-p >>> >> >> Give them a sense of empowerment and the idea that they could get >> away with it and I am sure quite a few of them (xians) would have no >> problem with it. > > The bigot JEDIDIAH continues to use the term "xians" after being told > that it is offensive to some Christians. You continue to be a bigot even after being told how offensive your bigotry is. You also have no right to not be offended: remember, the X for "Christ" has been used for a long time and by Christians. Stop whining about being persecuted. >> On the other hand, they could all be dickless chickenshits that are >> all talk and no action. Too fat and happy in the world created by heretics. > > I'm for beheading all radical practitioners of the Atheist religion. There is no atheist religion... but you are just showing your bigotry again. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 01:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fdsj390a3.f@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #332763 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 11/12/15, 5:29 PM, in article fsahue0.a3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> wrote: >>> On 2015-11-11, Marti van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> wrote: >>>> Op 10-11-15 om 03:09 schreef owl: >>>> >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> <http://news.sciencemag.org/node/117179> >>>>>> ----- >>>> >>>> [crap snipped] >>>> >>>>> Another horseshit, non-scientific "study." >>>> >>>> What else did you expect? Its a "Snit" post after all :-p >>>> >>>> [more ridiculous crap snipped] >>>> >>>>> Percentages matter. Muslims are hysterical, insane, violent subhumans >>>>> in far greater percentages than any other group. >>>> >>>> I'm openly *GAY* (of Roman-Catholic descent) never seen a *Conservative >>>> Christian* dropping a Homo from a large building so far :-p >>>> >>> >>> Give them a sense of empowerment and the idea that they could get >>> away with it and I am sure quite a few of them (xians) would have no >>> problem with it. >> >> The bigot JEDIDIAH continues to use the term "xians" after being told >> that it is offensive to some Christians. > > You continue to be a bigot even after being told how offensive your bigotry > is. You also have no right to not be offended: remember, the X for "Christ" > has been used for a long time and by Christians. Stop whining about being > persecuted. > Do blacks have a right not to be offended by the term "nigger"? Or jews the term "kike"? Or Mexicans the term "wetback"? You sure are apologetic for those of your own kind who revel in using derogatory language to describe a group of people. >>> On the other hand, they could all be dickless chickenshits that are >>> all talk and no action. Too fat and happy in the world created by heretics. >> >> I'm for beheading all radical practitioners of the Atheist religion. > > There is no atheist religion... but you are just showing your bigotry again. > Of course Atheism is a religion.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 18:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D26A8F05.63B58%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #332770 |
On 11/12/15, 6:23 PM, in article fdsj390a3.f@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 11/12/15, 5:29 PM, in article fsahue0.a3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>> JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> wrote: >>>> On 2015-11-11, Marti van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> wrote: >>>>> Op 10-11-15 om 03:09 schreef owl: >>>>> >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> <http://news.sciencemag.org/node/117179> >>>>>>> ----- >>>>> >>>>> [crap snipped] >>>>> >>>>>> Another horseshit, non-scientific "study." >>>>> >>>>> What else did you expect? Its a "Snit" post after all :-p >>>>> >>>>> [more ridiculous crap snipped] >>>>> >>>>>> Percentages matter. Muslims are hysterical, insane, violent subhumans >>>>>> in far greater percentages than any other group. >>>>> >>>>> I'm openly *GAY* (of Roman-Catholic descent) never seen a *Conservative >>>>> Christian* dropping a Homo from a large building so far :-p >>>>> >>>> >>>> Give them a sense of empowerment and the idea that they could get >>>> away with it and I am sure quite a few of them (xians) would have no >>>> problem with it. >>> >>> The bigot JEDIDIAH continues to use the term "xians" after being told >>> that it is offensive to some Christians. >> >> You continue to be a bigot even after being told how offensive your bigotry >> is. You also have no right to not be offended: remember, the X for "Christ" >> has been used for a long time and by Christians. Stop whining about being >> persecuted. > > Do blacks have a right not to be offended by the term "nigger"? Or jews > the term "kike"? Or Mexicans the term "wetback"? Of course they do. > You sure are apologetic for those of your own kind who revel in using > derogatory language to describe a group of people. You are the one using derogatory language in this discussion. >>>> On the other hand, they could all be dickless chickenshits that are >>>> all talk and no action. Too fat and happy in the world created by heretics. >>> >>> I'm for beheading all radical practitioners of the Atheist religion. >> >> There is no atheist religion... but you are just showing your bigotry again. > > Of course Atheism is a religion. Other than noting you have no idea what atheism is do you have a point to make? -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 02:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhau30a.a3@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #332778 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 11/12/15, 6:23 PM, in article fdsj390a3.f@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 11/12/15, 5:29 PM, in article fsahue0.a3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> wrote: >>>>> On 2015-11-11, Marti van Lin <ml2mst@dontevenbother.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> Op 10-11-15 om 03:09 schreef owl: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> <http://news.sciencemag.org/node/117179> >>>>>>>> ----- >>>>>> >>>>>> [crap snipped] >>>>>> >>>>>>> Another horseshit, non-scientific "study." >>>>>> >>>>>> What else did you expect? Its a "Snit" post after all :-p >>>>>> >>>>>> [more ridiculous crap snipped] >>>>>> >>>>>>> Percentages matter. Muslims are hysterical, insane, violent subhumans >>>>>>> in far greater percentages than any other group. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm openly *GAY* (of Roman-Catholic descent) never seen a *Conservative >>>>>> Christian* dropping a Homo from a large building so far :-p >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Give them a sense of empowerment and the idea that they could get >>>>> away with it and I am sure quite a few of them (xians) would have no >>>>> problem with it. >>>> >>>> The bigot JEDIDIAH continues to use the term "xians" after being told >>>> that it is offensive to some Christians. >>> >>> You continue to be a bigot even after being told how offensive your bigotry >>> is. You also have no right to not be offended: remember, the X for "Christ" >>> has been used for a long time and by Christians. Stop whining about being >>> persecuted. >> >> Do blacks have a right not to be offended by the term "nigger"? Or jews >> the term "kike"? Or Mexicans the term "wetback"? > > Of course they do. Why do they have the right not to be offended by a derogatory term, but Christians don't have the same right? Oh, I know, because in this new world it's OK to persecute Christians. > >> You sure are apologetic for those of your own kind who revel in using >> derogatory language to describe a group of people. > > You are the one using derogatory language in this discussion. > Nope. That was the Atheist bigot JEDEDIAH. >>>>> On the other hand, they could all be dickless chickenshits that are >>>>> all talk and no action. Too fat and happy in the world created by heretics. >>>> >>>> I'm for beheading all radical practitioners of the Atheist religion. >>> >>> There is no atheist religion... but you are just showing your bigotry again. >> >> Of course Atheism is a religion. > > Other than noting you have no idea what atheism is do you have a point to > make? > It's you who are mistaken about the Atheist religion. http://www.churchofsatan.com/faq-fundamental-beliefs.php <quote> Q. WHY DO SATANISTS WORSHIP THE DEVIL? A. We don???t. Satanists are atheists. </quote>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 19:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D26A983C.63B7F%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #332790 |
On 11/12/15, 7:21 PM, in article fhau30a.a3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: ... >>>> You continue to be a bigot even after being told how offensive your bigotry >>>> is. You also have no right to not be offended: remember, the X for "Christ" >>>> has been used for a long time and by Christians. Stop whining about being >>>> persecuted. >>> >>> Do blacks have a right not to be offended by the term "nigger"? Or jews >>> the term "kike"? Or Mexicans the term "wetback"? >> >> Of course they do. > > Why do they have the right not to be offended by a derogatory term, but > Christians don't have the same right? Oh, I know, because in this new > world it's OK to persecute Christians. Who said you did not have a right to be offended any stupid thing you want to be offended by? You can cry over red cups or how Christians have used the X to mean "Christ" for a very long time or how the lower case "e" does not have a curve you find appealing. That is your right. Does not mean you arbitrary whining should be taken seriously by others though. You get NO special entitlements from me no matter how much you beg. >>> You sure are apologetic for those of your own kind who revel in using >>> derogatory language to describe a group of people. >> >> You are the one using derogatory language in this discussion. > > Nope. Look above... you clearly use derogatory language. > That was the Atheist bigot JEDEDIAH. Can you quote his derogatory language and explain why you find it offensive? >>>>>> On the other hand, they could all be dickless chickenshits that are >>>>>> all talk and no action. Too fat and happy in the world created by >>>>>> heretics. >>>>> >>>>> I'm for beheading all radical practitioners of the Atheist religion. >>>> >>>> There is no atheist religion... but you are just showing your bigotry >>>> again. >>> >>> Of course Atheism is a religion. >> >> Other than noting you have no idea what atheism is do you have a point to >> make? > > It's you who are mistaken about the Atheist religion. > > http://www.churchofsatan.com/faq-fundamental-beliefs.php > <quote> > Q. WHY DO SATANISTS WORSHIP THE DEVIL? > > A. We don???t. Satanists are atheists. > </quote> The sad thing is you likely cannot figure out the MASSIVE flaw in your logic there. Hint: all squares are rectangles but not all rectangles are squares. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 02:49 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <rufds0.3rfa@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #332791 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 11/12/15, 7:21 PM, in article fhau30a.a3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > > ... >>>>> You continue to be a bigot even after being told how offensive your bigotry >>>>> is. You also have no right to not be offended: remember, the X for "Christ" >>>>> has been used for a long time and by Christians. Stop whining about being >>>>> persecuted. >>>> >>>> Do blacks have a right not to be offended by the term "nigger"? Or jews >>>> the term "kike"? Or Mexicans the term "wetback"? >>> >>> Of course they do. >> >> Why do they have the right not to be offended by a derogatory term, but >> Christians don't have the same right? Oh, I know, because in this new >> world it's OK to persecute Christians. > > Who said you did not have a right to be offended You did. > any stupid thing you want > to be offended by? You can cry over red cups or how Christians have used the > X to mean "Christ" for a very long time or how the lower case "e" does not > have a curve you find appealing. That is your right. > > Does not mean you arbitrary whining should be taken seriously by others > though. You get NO special entitlements from me no matter how much you beg. > >>>> You sure are apologetic for those of your own kind who revel in using >>>> derogatory language to describe a group of people. >>> >>> You are the one using derogatory language in this discussion. >> >> Nope. > > Look above... you clearly use derogatory language. > >> That was the Atheist bigot JEDEDIAH. > > Can you quote his derogatory language and explain why you find it offensive? > >>>>>>> On the other hand, they could all be dickless chickenshits that are >>>>>>> all talk and no action. Too fat and happy in the world created by >>>>>>> heretics. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm for beheading all radical practitioners of the Atheist religion. >>>>> >>>>> There is no atheist religion... but you are just showing your bigotry >>>>> again. >>>> >>>> Of course Atheism is a religion. >>> >>> Other than noting you have no idea what atheism is do you have a point to >>> make? >> >> It's you who are mistaken about the Atheist religion. >> >> http://www.churchofsatan.com/faq-fundamental-beliefs.php >> <quote> >> Q. WHY DO SATANISTS WORSHIP THE DEVIL? >> >> A. We don???t. Satanists are atheists. >> </quote> > > The sad thing is you likely cannot figure out the MASSIVE flaw in your logic > there. Hint: all squares are rectangles but not all rectangles are squares. It's you who cannot figure it out. All Atheists are Satanists, but not all Satanists are Atheists. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theistic_Satanism
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 20:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D26AA143.63BAC%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #332803 |
On 11/12/15, 7:49 PM, in article rufds0.3rfa@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 11/12/15, 7:21 PM, in article fhau30a.a3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >> ... >>>>>> You continue to be a bigot even after being told how offensive your >>>>>> bigotry >>>>>> is. You also have no right to not be offended: remember, the X for >>>>>> "Christ" >>>>>> has been used for a long time and by Christians. Stop whining about being >>>>>> persecuted. >>>>> >>>>> Do blacks have a right not to be offended by the term "nigger"? Or jews >>>>> the term "kike"? Or Mexicans the term "wetback"? >>>> >>>> Of course they do. >>> >>> Why do they have the right not to be offended by a derogatory term, but >>> Christians don't have the same right? Oh, I know, because in this new >>> world it's OK to persecute Christians. >> >> Who said you did not have a right to be offended > > You did. But, let me guess, in an unquotable way, right? >> any stupid thing you want >> to be offended by? You can cry over red cups or how Christians have used the >> X to mean "Christ" for a very long time or how the lower case "e" does not >> have a curve you find appealing. That is your right. >> >> Does not mean you arbitrary whining should be taken seriously by others >> though. You get NO special entitlements from me no matter how much you beg. >> >>>>> You sure are apologetic for those of your own kind who revel in using >>>>> derogatory language to describe a group of people. >>>> >>>> You are the one using derogatory language in this discussion. >>> >>> Nope. >> >> Look above... you clearly use derogatory language. >> >>> That was the Atheist bigot JEDEDIAH. >> >> Can you quote his derogatory language and explain why you find it offensive? >> >>>>>>>> On the other hand, they could all be dickless chickenshits that are >>>>>>>> all talk and no action. Too fat and happy in the world created by >>>>>>>> heretics. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm for beheading all radical practitioners of the Atheist religion. >>>>>> >>>>>> There is no atheist religion... but you are just showing your bigotry >>>>>> again. >>>>> >>>>> Of course Atheism is a religion. >>>> >>>> Other than noting you have no idea what atheism is do you have a point to >>>> make? >>> >>> It's you who are mistaken about the Atheist religion. >>> >>> http://www.churchofsatan.com/faq-fundamental-beliefs.php >>> <quote> >>> Q. WHY DO SATANISTS WORSHIP THE DEVIL? >>> >>> A. We don???t. Satanists are atheists. >>> </quote> >> >> The sad thing is you likely cannot figure out the MASSIVE flaw in your logic >> there. Hint: all squares are rectangles but not all rectangles are squares. > > It's you who cannot figure it out. > All Atheists are Satanists, but not all Satanists are Atheists. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theistic_Satanism And you just make shit up as you go. Whatever. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 03:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <sdfa0fa.ef@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #332813 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 11/12/15, 7:49 PM, in article rufds0.3rfa@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 11/12/15, 7:21 PM, in article fhau30a.a3@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>> ...
>>>>>>> You continue to be a bigot even after being told how offensive your
>>>>>>> bigotry
>>>>>>> is. You also have no right to not be offended: remember, the X for
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
_
| |__ ___ _ __ ___
| '_ \ / _ \ '__/ _ \
| | | | __/ | | __/
|_| |_|\___|_| \___|
>>>>>>> "Christ"
>>>>>>> has been used for a long time and by Christians. Stop whining about being
>>>>>>> persecuted.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do blacks have a right not to be offended by the term "nigger"? Or jews
>>>>>> the term "kike"? Or Mexicans the term "wetback"?
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course they do.
>>>>
>>>> Why do they have the right not to be offended by a derogatory term, but
>>>> Christians don't have the same right? Oh, I know, because in this new
>>>> world it's OK to persecute Christians.
>>>
>>> Who said you did not have a right to be offended
>>
>> You did.
>
> But, let me guess, in an unquotable way, right?
>
Unbelievable. Look up, you idiot. On this very post.
Snit:
<quote>
You also have no right to not be offended
</quote>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 01:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D26AF22B.63C11%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #332818 |
On 11/12/15, 8:23 PM, in article sdfa0fa.ef@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
<owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> On 11/12/15, 7:49 PM, in article rufds0.3rfa@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>> On 11/12/15, 7:21 PM, in article fhau30a.a3@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>>>>>> You continue to be a bigot even after being told how offensive your
>>>>>>>> bigotry
>>>>>>>> is. You also have no right to not be offended: remember, the X for
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> _
> | |__ ___ _ __ ___
> | '_ \ / _ \ '__/ _ \
> | | | | __/ | | __/
> |_| |_|\___|_| \___|
>
>
...
>>>> Who said you did not have a right to be offended
>>>
>>> You did.
>>
>> But, let me guess, in an unquotable way, right?
>>
>
> Unbelievable. Look up, you idiot. On this very post.
> Snit:
> <quote>
> You also have no right to not be offended
> </quote>
>
I note, correctly:
-----
You also have no right to not be offended
------
Owl lies and claims I said:
-----
| Who said you did not have a right to be offended
You did
-----
You have no right to NOT be offended, nor do the others you list. Nobody
does. You, however, demand special entitlements because you think you are a
special little snowflake.
--
* OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 09:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhfu30.a3rf@rooftop.invalid> |
| In reply to | #332839 |
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 11/12/15, 8:23 PM, in article sdfa0fa.ef@rooftop.invalid, "owl" > <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 11/12/15, 7:49 PM, in article rufds0.3rfa@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 11/12/15, 7:21 PM, in article fhau30a.a3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> ... >>>>>>>>> You continue to be a bigot even after being told how offensive your >>>>>>>>> bigotry >>>>>>>>> is. You also have no right to not be offended: remember, the X for >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> _ >> | |__ ___ _ __ ___ >> | '_ \ / _ \ '__/ _ \ >> | | | | __/ | | __/ >> |_| |_|\___|_| \___| >> >> > ... > >>>>> Who said you did not have a right to be offended >>>> >>>> You did. >>> >>> But, let me guess, in an unquotable way, right? >>> >> >> Unbelievable. Look up, you idiot. On this very post. >> Snit: >> <quote> >> You also have no right to not be offended >> </quote> >> > > I note, correctly: > ----- > You also have no right to not be offended > ------ > > Owl lies and claims I said: > ----- > | Who said you did not have a right to be offended > You did > ----- > > You have no right to NOT be offended, nor do the others you list. Nobody > does. You, however, demand special entitlements because you think you are a > special little snowflake. > Now why did I see this Rainman bullshit coming from a mile away... Here's a clue, Poindexter. In this context they mean the same thing. Much like how probably 90 percent of people say "not hardly" when they mean "hardly"; or "I could care less" when they mean "I could not care less". But if you want to succumb to Assburger pedantry, let's analyse the sanity of that particular negation. Did you really mean to say, "you also have no right to not be offended"? Really? So in your mind a Christian has no right *not* to be offended by the term "xian"? I take it that you feel it is their duty to be offended. Well, alrighty then. We've reached common ground.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 02:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D26AFDE6.63C28%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #332843 |
On 11/13/15, 2:24 AM, in article fhfu30.a3rf@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 11/12/15, 8:23 PM, in article sdfa0fa.ef@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 11/12/15, 7:49 PM, in article rufds0.3rfa@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 11/12/15, 7:21 PM, in article fhau30a.a3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>>> You continue to be a bigot even after being told how offensive your >>>>>>>>>> bigotry >>>>>>>>>> is. You also have no right to not be offended: remember, the X for >>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >>> _ >>> | |__ ___ _ __ ___ >>> | '_ \ / _ \ '__/ _ \ >>> | | | | __/ | | __/ >>> |_| |_|\___|_| \___| >>> >>> >> ... >> >>>>>> Who said you did not have a right to be offended >>>>> >>>>> You did. >>>> >>>> But, let me guess, in an unquotable way, right? >>>> >>> >>> Unbelievable. Look up, you idiot. On this very post. >>> Snit: >>> <quote> >>> You also have no right to not be offended >>> </quote> >>> >> >> I note, correctly: >> ----- >> You also have no right to not be offended >> ------ >> >> Owl lies and claims I said: >> ----- >> | Who said you did not have a right to be offended >> You did >> ----- >> >> You have no right to NOT be offended, nor do the others you list. Nobody >> does. You, however, demand special entitlements because you think you are a >> special little snowflake. >> > > Now why did I see this Rainman bullshit coming from a mile away... > Here's a clue, Poindexter. In this context they mean the same thing. Nope. Nobody has a right to not be offended. You simply are pushing the idea you are a special snowflake with special entitlements. > Much like how probably 90 percent of people say "not hardly" when they > mean "hardly"; or "I could care less" when they mean "I could not care > less". You can make up stories of what I meant all you want. > But if you want to succumb to Assburger pedantry, let's analyse the > sanity of that particular negation. Did you really mean to say, "you > also have no right to not be offended"? Really? So in your mind a > Christian has no right *not* to be offended by the term "xian"? They can be offended all they want. Does not mean they are making sense, but they have a right to be idiots. > I take > it that you feel it is their duty to be offended. Well, alrighty then. > We've reached common ground. You are an idiot... common ground. OK. -- * OS X / Linux: What is a file? <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI> * Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu: <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE> * Mint KDE working with folders: <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0> * Mint KDE creating files: <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8> * Mint KDE help: <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8> * Mint KDE general navigation: <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI> * Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs? <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA> * Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux: <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk> * OS / Word Processor Comparison: <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Slimer <.m@nsn.s> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 11:04 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n251ii$a2f$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #332843 |
On 2015-11-13 4:24 AM, owl wrote: > Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> On 11/12/15, 8:23 PM, in article sdfa0fa.ef@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 11/12/15, 7:49 PM, in article rufds0.3rfa@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 11/12/15, 7:21 PM, in article fhau30a.a3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>>> You continue to be a bigot even after being told how offensive your >>>>>>>>>> bigotry >>>>>>>>>> is. You also have no right to not be offended: remember, the X for >>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >>> _ >>> | |__ ___ _ __ ___ >>> | '_ \ / _ \ '__/ _ \ >>> | | | | __/ | | __/ >>> |_| |_|\___|_| \___| >>> >>> >> ... >> >>>>>> Who said you did not have a right to be offended >>>>> >>>>> You did. >>>> >>>> But, let me guess, in an unquotable way, right? >>>> >>> >>> Unbelievable. Look up, you idiot. On this very post. >>> Snit: >>> <quote> >>> You also have no right to not be offended >>> </quote> >>> >> >> I note, correctly: >> ----- >> You also have no right to not be offended >> ------ >> >> Owl lies and claims I said: >> ----- >> | Who said you did not have a right to be offended >> You did >> ----- >> >> You have no right to NOT be offended, nor do the others you list. Nobody >> does. You, however, demand special entitlements because you think you are a >> special little snowflake. >> > > Now why did I see this Rainman bullshit coming from a mile away... > Here's a clue, Poindexter. In this context they mean the same thing. > Much like how probably 90 percent of people say "not hardly" when they > mean "hardly"; or "I could care less" when they mean "I could not care > less". > > But if you want to succumb to Assburger pedantry, let's analyse the > sanity of that particular negation. Did you really mean to say, "you > also have no right to not be offended"? Really? So in your mind a > Christian has no right *not* to be offended by the term "xian"? I take > it that you feel it is their duty to be offended. Well, alrighty then. > We've reached common ground. Am I the only one significantly offended by the fact that Snit has elected himself the moral authority in this group? -- Slimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Big Fish in a Small Crotch <bigfishinasmallcrotch@myself.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-13 11:23 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <15zp2i9n2oago.f59o43vftp05$.dlg@40tude.net> |
| In reply to | #332873 |
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:04:45 -0500, Slimer wrote: > On 2015-11-13 4:24 AM, owl wrote: >> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>> On 11/12/15, 8:23 PM, in article sdfa0fa.ef@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>> On 11/12/15, 7:49 PM, in article rufds0.3rfa@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/12/15, 7:21 PM, in article fhau30a.a3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" >>>>>>> <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>>>> You continue to be a bigot even after being told how offensive your >>>>>>>>>>> bigotry >>>>>>>>>>> is. You also have no right to not be offended: remember, the X for >>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >>>> _ >>>> | |__ ___ _ __ ___ >>>> | '_ \ / _ \ '__/ _ \ >>>> | | | | __/ | | __/ >>>> |_| |_|\___|_| \___| >>>> >>>> >>> ... >>> >>>>>>> Who said you did not have a right to be offended >>>>>> >>>>>> You did. >>>>> >>>>> But, let me guess, in an unquotable way, right? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Unbelievable. Look up, you idiot. On this very post. >>>> Snit: >>>> <quote> >>>> You also have no right to not be offended >>>> </quote> >>>> >>> >>> I note, correctly: >>> ----- >>> You also have no right to not be offended >>> ------ >>> >>> Owl lies and claims I said: >>> ----- >>> | Who said you did not have a right to be offended >>> You did >>> ----- >>> >>> You have no right to NOT be offended, nor do the others you list. Nobody >>> does. You, however, demand special entitlements because you think you are a >>> special little snowflake. >>> >> >> Now why did I see this Rainman bullshit coming from a mile away... >> Here's a clue, Poindexter. In this context they mean the same thing. >> Much like how probably 90 percent of people say "not hardly" when they >> mean "hardly"; or "I could care less" when they mean "I could not care >> less". >> >> But if you want to succumb to Assburger pedantry, let's analyse the >> sanity of that particular negation. Did you really mean to say, "you >> also have no right to not be offended"? Really? So in your mind a >> Christian has no right *not* to be offended by the term "xian"? I take >> it that you feel it is their duty to be offended. Well, alrighty then. >> We've reached common ground. > > Am I the only one significantly offended by the fact that Snit has > elected himself the moral authority in this group? No. But you seem to be the only one who is still hanging on to that last thread of support for him. Surly by now you have to realize that much of what is said about snit is actually true and has happened the way all these different people claim? Snit likes to play the victim. And he's a pathological liar on top of that. A classic example is how he spouts "I'm here to discuss technology" yet he literally infests every single thread posted in COLA and now over in CSMA as well. Snit isn't interested in discussing technology although he will discuss technology when the right thread gets posted. Snit's entire purpose for being in these groups is to disrupt them and get the attention he craves. Snit is a very sick, mentally ill person. He really is. Hopefully you are beginning to realize that. -- You Ain't The Biggest Fish In The Crotch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web