Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #459603 > unrolled thread

What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter

Started bySilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>
First post2018-07-26 13:25 +0000
Last post2018-07-27 13:08 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 93 — 8 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy


Contents

  What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-26 13:25 +0000
    Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 15:19 +0000
      Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-26 15:20 +0000
        Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 15:23 +0000
          Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-26 16:12 +0000
            Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 09:34 -0700
            Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-26 09:37 -0700
            Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 20:09 +0000
              Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-26 13:53 -0700
          Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-26 09:37 -0700
        Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-26 09:37 -0700
          Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 10:05 -0700
        Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 09:50 -0700
      Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-26 09:37 -0700
    Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-26 09:28 -0700
    Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-26 12:18 -0500
      Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 10:36 -0700
      Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-26 11:09 -0700
        Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 12:43 -0700
      Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 20:15 +0000
        Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-26 13:55 -0700
      Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-26 20:47 +0000
        Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-26 14:00 -0700
          Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 14:48 -0700
            Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-26 15:02 -0700
              Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 15:22 -0700
                Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 16:07 -0700
                Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-26 16:33 -0700
                  Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 17:27 -0700
                    Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-26 17:33 -0700
                      Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 17:44 -0700
                        Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 18:29 -0700
                          Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 22:22 -0700
                    Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 17:58 -0700
                      Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 20:04 -0700
                    Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 18:45 -0700
            Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-26 22:52 +0000
              Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 16:23 -0700
              Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 16:31 -0700
                Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-26 16:40 -0700
              Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-26 16:38 -0700
                Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 17:10 -0700
        Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 14:16 -0700
        Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-27 07:03 -0500
          Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-27 13:13 +0000
            Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-27 08:46 -0500
              Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-27 15:46 +0000
                Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 09:33 -0700
                  Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-27 16:40 +0000
                    Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 09:51 -0700
                      Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 10:06 -0700
                      Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-27 17:12 +0000
                        Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 10:21 -0700
                          Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 10:37 -0700
                          Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-27 12:15 -0700
                        Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-27 12:14 -0700
                      Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-27 12:33 -0500
                      Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-27 12:12 -0700
                        Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 13:00 -0700
                          Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-27 13:16 -0700
                            Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 14:03 -0700
                              Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-28 08:11 -0700
                                Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-28 08:23 -0700
                                  Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-28 09:01 -0700
                                    Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-28 13:18 -0400
                                    Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 09:16 -0700
                                      Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-31 09:28 -0700
                    Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-27 12:12 -0700
                  Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 09:50 -0700
                  Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-27 12:31 -0500
                  Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-27 12:07 -0700
                Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-27 12:23 -0500
                Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-27 11:59 -0700
              Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-27 11:50 -0700
              Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 19:36 +0000
                Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-27 14:49 -0500
                  Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-27 13:12 -0700
                  Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 22:32 +0000
                    Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 15:33 -0700
                    Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-30 07:23 -0500
                      Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 05:40 -0700
                      Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-30 07:45 -0500
                        Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-30 08:58 -0700
                        Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 16:13 +0000
                          Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-30 09:26 -0700
                        Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2018-08-06 11:57 -0400
                Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-27 13:09 -0700
            Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-27 11:14 -0700
          Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-27 11:03 -0700
          Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 19:35 +0000
            Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-27 14:47 -0500
              Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-27 13:11 -0700
            Re: What they're not telling you about the Toronto shooter Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-27 13:08 -0700

Page 3 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5  Next page →


#459717

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-07-26 16:38 -0700
Message-ID<frv4cdF22nsU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#459704
On 7/26/18 3:52 PM, SilverSlimer wrote:
...
>> I realize you're trying to make an agenda driven point but it's not so
>> goofily cut and dried as you've presented it. You'd have to look at the
>> above (at least) which, if true (and I believe they both are, you can do
>> your own research) grinds the teeth off of whatever point you thought
>> you were making.
> 
> The fact that Muslims don't approve of the Bible because "humans had
> their hands on it" is hilarious considering how many different versions
> of the Qu'ran are in existence, how easily Muhammad's (shit be upon his
> head) followers changed the passages (one of which used this as reasoning
> for abandoning the religion and was beheaded once Muhammad conquered
> Medina), how the Qu'ran doesn't even have a passage stating that
> adulterers need to be stoned to death (because a goat ate it,
> apparently), and how "Allah" always added passages to the Qu'ran whenever
> Muhammad needed a favour (like having more than four wives). All of this
> is without mentioning that the "religion" wouldn't even exist at all had
> it not been for the hadiths, like amendments to the Qu'ran, which created
> Sunni, Shia and Wahhabi Islam and caused these bloodthirsty animals to be
> at each other's throats for an additional millennia.

People accept the Bible and reject the Qu'ran for equally absurd 
reasons. Sure, both religions rely on people accepting irrational ideas.

> In reality, Muslims are the biggest hypocrites in the world and they
> _knowingly_ disregard the contradictions and lies in Islam to push the
> religion as "God's word." 

Just as some Christians do this, some Muslims do, sure.

> And yes, the Qu'ran is more than a thousand
> times worse than the Bible because not only is it violent, but the Qu'ran
> is a loose plagiarism of the Bible, the Torah and other religious books.

As the Bible is plagiarized from other books... but for you that is OK 
for the Bible?

> Hell, the Qu'ran can't even figure out how "Allah" created the world and
> tells a multitude of different tales about how it was done in the same
> fucking book.

There are two different, conflicting accounts of Creation in the Bible, 
and the name of the main character, whom we call "God", is not 
consistent through the books!

> Fuck Islam and fuck Snit.

Ah, you are angry you cannot show Christianity to be better than Islam, 
and you want to put me down to try to feel better about yourself. OK.


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#459721

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-26 17:10 -0700
Message-ID<c69835a6-daf0-42ab-b271-ae8b61578b98@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#459717
On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 4:38:56 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote:
> On 7/26/18 3:52 PM, SilverSlimer wrote:
> ...
> >> I realize you're trying to make an agenda driven point but it's not so
> >> goofily cut and dried as you've presented it. You'd have to look at the
> >> above (at least) which, if true (and I believe they both are, you can do
> >> your own research) grinds the teeth off of whatever point you thought
> >> you were making.
> > 
> > The fact that Muslims don't approve of the Bible because "humans had
> > their hands on it" is hilarious considering how many different versions
> > of the Qu'ran are in existence, how easily Muhammad's (shit be upon his
> > head) followers changed the passages (one of which used this as reasoning
> > for abandoning the religion and was beheaded once Muhammad conquered
> > Medina), how the Qu'ran doesn't even have a passage stating that
> > adulterers need to be stoned to death (because a goat ate it,
> > apparently), and how "Allah" always added passages to the Qu'ran whenever
> > Muhammad needed a favour (like having more than four wives). All of this
> > is without mentioning that the "religion" wouldn't even exist at all had
> > it not been for the hadiths, like amendments to the Qu'ran, which created
> > Sunni, Shia and Wahhabi Islam and caused these bloodthirsty animals to be
> > at each other's throats for an additional millennia.
> 
> People accept the Bible and reject the Qu'ran for equally absurd 
> reasons. Sure, both religions rely on people accepting irrational ideas.
> 
> > In reality, Muslims are the biggest hypocrites in the world and they
> > _knowingly_ disregard the contradictions and lies in Islam to push the
> > religion as "God's word." 
> 
> Just as some Christians do this, some Muslims do, sure.
> 
> > And yes, the Qu'ran is more than a thousand
> > times worse than the Bible because not only is it violent, but the Qu'ran
> > is a loose plagiarism of the Bible, the Torah and other religious books.
> 
> As the Bible is plagiarized from other books... but for you that is OK 
> for the Bible?
> 
> > Hell, the Qu'ran can't even figure out how "Allah" created the world and
> > tells a multitude of different tales about how it was done in the same
> > fucking book.
> 
> There are two different, conflicting accounts of Creation in the Bible, 
> and the name of the main character, whom we call "God", is not 
> consistent through the books!
> 
> > Fuck Islam and fuck Snit.
> 
> Ah, you are angry you cannot show Christianity to be better than Islam, 
> and you want to put me down to try to feel better about yourself. OK.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
> cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
> somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
> 
> They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
> 
> <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>



Klaus Schadenfreude is far too idiotic to write a quality script. The only scripting he's ever shown he can do is automating his trolling in this group. 

It's his problem and he has to want to deal with it. Obviously he would rather blame others than face reality. Klaus Schadenfreude is seconds away from being in Steve Carroll's kill file. Klaus Schadenfreude is being controlled by RMS. 

--
Curious how these posts are made? www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZNxaaKD7-c

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#459689

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-26 14:16 -0700
Message-ID<94c15e5b-52d4-49d4-a842-e2b5f15edff5@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#459681
On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 1:47:07 PM UTC-7, SilverSlimer wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 12:18:45 -0500, chrisv wrote:
> 
> > SilverSlimer wrote:
> > 
> >>Killing every one of the socialists' arguments.
> > 
> > Quote and name the source of the "argument" that was "killed", "Slimer".
> > 
> > I don't think that anyone has denied that radical Muslims are killing
> > innocent people, in countries all over the world.
> > 
> > Idiot.
> 
> Actually, the media _constantly_ does by making it sound like the killer 
> is not a "true Muslim," that the actions are "not representative of the 
> faith" or that the killer had "mental issues" despite no evidence of any 
> such thing.
> 
> The actions are _very_ representative of the faith as my reading of the 
> Qu'ran confirmed and he was definitely a true Muslim for carrying out 
> such attacks. I will say this again and again: there is no hope for peace 
> so long as Islam exists.
> 
> -- 
> SilverSlimer
> Ubuntu 18.04 on MSI GT72 2QD



Jonas Eklundh can create a virtual machine. Rips what that Mac can do to shreds! I shall not ask Flooder Carroll how any part of Jonas Eklundh's body tastes no matter how many times Flooder Carroll smooches it. 

Flooder Carroll's behavior is totally fully false. There's no question that as soon as any former 'person in his KF' does one thing to wound the wimp's feelings that they'll be replonked. Just mindless trolling. And I am responding to that trolling. THAT is what the "Flooder Carroll circus" is. 

All that Flooder Carroll cares about is that Flooder Carroll gets to express his automated call and then hang up and giggle about it. The fact that Jonas Eklundh is an innocent patsy on the other end of the phone is the game. 



--
I Left My Husband & Daughter At Home And THIS happened
http://bit.ly/2oNYRgv
http://www.5z8.info/gruesome-gunshot-wounds_t5z0au_cockdock.gif
https://youtu.be/5OfWsoPAg7o
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#459768

Fromchrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
Date2018-07-27 07:03 -0500
Message-ID<4s1mld5h4n76nesuf9bnt7b1c48one8i3g@4ax.com>
In reply to#459681
SilverSlimer wrote:

> chrisv wrote:
>> 
>> I don't think that anyone has denied that radical Muslims are killing
>> innocent people, in countries all over the world.
>
>Actually, the media _constantly_ does 

Not.  

No one's "argument" was "killed".  Period.  *Everyone* acknowledges
the existence of these religious radicals.  *No one* denies that they
are motivated by their "faith".

>by making it sound like the killer 
>is not a "true Muslim," that the actions are "not representative of the 
>faith" 

They aren't.  It's a fact that the vast majority are not murdering the
"infidels".

>or that the killer had "mental issues" despite no evidence of any such thing.

It could be argued that anyone who murders innocent people, for their
superstitions, is mentally-ill. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#459778

FromSilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>
Date2018-07-27 13:13 +0000
Message-ID<XTE6D.223114$%s2.90470@fx18.iad>
In reply to#459768
On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 07:03:26 -0500, chrisv wrote:

> SilverSlimer wrote:
> 
>> chrisv wrote:
>>> 
>>> I don't think that anyone has denied that radical Muslims are killing
>>> innocent people, in countries all over the world.
>>
>>Actually, the media _constantly_ does
> 
> Not.
> 
> No one's "argument" was "killed".  Period.  *Everyone* acknowledges the
> existence of these religious radicals.  *No one* denies that they are
> motivated by their "faith".

Lie. The latest Muslim killer was clearly motivated by his "faith" but 
the news agencies across the planet were quick to judge that "mental 
illness" was the cause and not Islam itself. This despite the fact that 
people who knew him have said that nothing in his behaviour suggested any 
kind of mental issues.

<https://globalnews.ca/news/4348575/toronto-gunman-mental-health-family/>
<https://apnews.com/95f5f7b52c174e909329fab4eb79ac00>
 
>>by making it sound like the killer is not a "true Muslim," that the
>>actions are "not representative of the faith"
> 
> They aren't.  It's a fact that the vast majority are not murdering the
> "infidels".

Because they don't have the means to do it, not because they don't want 
to. Once the percentage of Muslims in a country reaches about 16%, the 
murders come and they come fast. The only way to keep these people 
peaceful is to make sure they are never allowed to go over 1% which is 
impossible anyway. They will procreate with any woman they can find, even 
if she is related.

<https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/feb/11/muslim-population-england-
wales-nearly-doubles-10-years>
<https://steemit.com/politics/@squawker.org/inbreeding-in-islam-over-70-
of-muslims-are-the-product-of-incest>

>>or that the killer had "mental issues" despite no evidence of any such
>>thing.
> 
> It could be argued that anyone who murders innocent people, for their
> superstitions, is mentally-ill.

Except that Islam *DEMANDS* that its adherents kill innocent people so 
long as they are not Muslim:

“Kill them wherever you find them and drive them out from where they 
drove you out. Persecution is worse than slaughter.” 2:191

“When you meet the unbelievers, smite their necks.” 47:4

 “Fight against those who do not obey Allah and do not believe in Allah 
or the Last Day and do not forbid what has been forbidden by Allah and 
His messenger even if they are of the People of the Book until they pay 
the Jizya with willing submission and feel themselves subdued.” 9:29

“When the sacred months have passed, then kill the Mushrikin wherever you 
find them. Capture them. Besiege them. Lie in wait for them in each and 
every ambush but if they repent, and perform the prayers, and give zacat 
then leave their way free.” 9:5

“They ask you about fighting during the sacred months. Tell them, 
fighting therein is a great sin but a greater sin is to prevent mankind 
from following the way of Allah, to disbelieve in him.” 2:217

“When your Lord revealed to the angels, ‘Truly I am with you. So, keep 
firm those who have believed. I will strike terror into the hearts of 
those who have disbelieved. So, strike them at the necks and cut off 
their fingers.’” 8:12

“Oh you who believe, fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you 
and let them find harshness in you.” 9:123


-- 
SilverSlimer
Ubuntu 18.04 on MSI GT72 2QD

Proudly blocking Facebook and Youtube

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#459787

Fromchrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
Date2018-07-27 08:46 -0500
Message-ID<l38mldhkpvbdhtom7k9pq2c6ufoi6kld8a@4ax.com>
In reply to#459778
SilverSlimer wrote:

> (snipped, unread)

I don't need to read your "lefties are stupid and naive" propaganda,
thanks.  It's simply not true, no matter how hard you try to twist
things.

That puerile, snittish video that you linked-to, mocking your moral
and intellectual superiors, shows your colors.

-- 
'You will notice that the "advocates" supported Flash when they found
out MS was heading HTML 5 route.  Amazing!'  -  Hadron Quark, lying
shamelessly

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#459800

FromSilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>
Date2018-07-27 15:46 +0000
Message-ID<i7H6D.379376$np1.362085@fx06.iad>
In reply to#459787
On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 08:46:24 -0500, chrisv wrote:

> SilverSlimer wrote:
> 
>> (snipped, unread)
> 
> I don't need to read your "lefties are stupid and naive" propaganda,
> thanks.

It's not propaganda when it's true.

> It's simply not true, no matter how hard you try to twist
> things.

See, even THAT is a leftist lie.
 
> That puerile, snittish video that you linked-to, mocking your moral and
> intellectual superiors, shows your colors.

My colours are white and red for Poland and Canada.



-- 
SilverSlimer
Ubuntu 18.04 on MSI GT72 2QD

Proudly blocking Facebook and Youtube

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#459809

FromSteve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-27 09:33 -0700
Message-ID<a4c82d19-57ca-405b-86f4-ddc5c323c61a@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#459800
On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 9:46:25 AM UTC-6, SilverSlimer wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 08:46:24 -0500, chrisv wrote:
> 
> > SilverSlimer wrote:
> > 
> >> (snipped, unread)
> > 
> > I don't need to read your "lefties are stupid and naive" propaganda,
> > thanks.
> 
> It's not propaganda when it's true.

How sure are you it's true that this shooter doesn't have mental issues?
I read (somewhere) that he has.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#459811

FromSilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>
Date2018-07-27 16:40 +0000
Message-ID<WVH6D.327422$R51.99070@fx03.iad>
In reply to#459809
On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 09:33:49 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote:

> On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 9:46:25 AM UTC-6, SilverSlimer wrote:
>> On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 08:46:24 -0500, chrisv wrote:
>> 
>> > SilverSlimer wrote:
>> > 
>> >> (snipped, unread)
>> > 
>> > I don't need to read your "lefties are stupid and naive" propaganda,
>> > thanks.
>> 
>> It's not propaganda when it's true.
> 
> How sure are you it's true that this shooter doesn't have mental issues?
> I read (somewhere) that he has.

Because his co-workers talked about "bubbly" he was and the fact that he 
never exhibited anything near a mental issue. Also, the claim that he had 
mental issues were broadcast to the public very quickly by a person who 
isn't even a member of the family but rather a self-professed 
spokesperson for Muslims in Canada. Besides, "mental issues" is the 
excuse used _every_ _single_ _time_ a long Muslim attacks people. It's 
getting old and was never believable to begin with.

-- 
SilverSlimer
Ubuntu 18.04 on MSI GT72 2QD

Proudly blocking Facebook and Youtube

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#459813

FromSteve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-27 09:51 -0700
Message-ID<565d1d38-7736-453c-965a-c6406c9cc43e@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#459811
On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 10:40:25 AM UTC-6, SilverSlimer wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 09:33:49 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote:
> 
> > On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 9:46:25 AM UTC-6, SilverSlimer wrote:
> >> On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 08:46:24 -0500, chrisv wrote:
> >> 
> >> > SilverSlimer wrote:
> >> > 
> >> >> (snipped, unread)
> >> > 
> >> > I don't need to read your "lefties are stupid and naive" propaganda,
> >> > thanks.
> >> 
> >> It's not propaganda when it's true.
> > 
> > How sure are you it's true that this shooter doesn't have mental issues?
> > I read (somewhere) that he has.
> 
> Because his co-workers talked about "bubbly" he was and the fact that he 
> never exhibited anything near a mental issue. Also, the claim that he had 
> mental issues were broadcast to the public very quickly by a person who 
> isn't even a member of the family but rather a self-professed 
> spokesperson for Muslims in Canada. Besides, "mental issues" is the 
> excuse used _every_ _single_ _time_ a long Muslim attacks people. It's 
> getting old and was never believable to begin with.


My take: Anyone who tries to shoot multiple people has mental issues of 
some sort. With that, I'm not excluding the potential it's politically driven.
To me the question is: Just how mentally unfit was he?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#459815

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-27 10:06 -0700
Message-ID<2c491f01-b5c5-43b5-9cdb-29ee132776c9@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#459813
On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 9:51:13 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 10:40:25 AM UTC-6, SilverSlimer wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 09:33:49 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote:
> > 
> > > On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 9:46:25 AM UTC-6, SilverSlimer wrote:
> > >> On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 08:46:24 -0500, chrisv wrote:
> > >> 
> > >> > SilverSlimer wrote:
> > >> > 
> > >> >> (snipped, unread)
> > >> > 
> > >> > I don't need to read your "lefties are stupid and naive" propaganda,
> > >> > thanks.
> > >> 
> > >> It's not propaganda when it's true.
> > > 
> > > How sure are you it's true that this shooter doesn't have mental issues?
> > > I read (somewhere) that he has.
> > 
> > Because his co-workers talked about "bubbly" he was and the fact that he 
> > never exhibited anything near a mental issue. Also, the claim that he had 
> > mental issues were broadcast to the public very quickly by a person who 
> > isn't even a member of the family but rather a self-professed 
> > spokesperson for Muslims in Canada. Besides, "mental issues" is the 
> > excuse used _every_ _single_ _time_ a long Muslim attacks people. It's 
> > getting old and was never believable to begin with.
> 
> 
> My take: Anyone who tries to shoot multiple people has mental issues of 
> some sort. With that, I'm not excluding the potential it's politically driven.
> To me the question is: Just how mentally unfit was he?



It was Chris Ahlstrom who got caught using tons of forgeries repeatedly, and these are 'people' who come basically out of the blue directly into threads where he was being ripped apart... nonstop for years. You're eight seconds away from being in Klaus Schadenfreude's kill filter. 

Enough already. You're again trying to act like you know as much as Klaus Schadenfreude. You're the dim bulb and your many stupid videos show this. 

-- 
Curious how these posts are made? Email: fretwizzer@gmail.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#459817

FromSilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>
Date2018-07-27 17:12 +0000
Message-ID<BnI6D.241896$mD.73805@fx31.iad>
In reply to#459813
On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 09:51:10 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote:

> On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 10:40:25 AM UTC-6, SilverSlimer wrote:
>> On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 09:33:49 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote:
>> 
>> > On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 9:46:25 AM UTC-6, SilverSlimer wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 08:46:24 -0500, chrisv wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> > SilverSlimer wrote:
>> >> > 
>> >> >> (snipped, unread)
>> >> > 
>> >> > I don't need to read your "lefties are stupid and naive"
>> >> > propaganda,
>> >> > thanks.
>> >> 
>> >> It's not propaganda when it's true.
>> > 
>> > How sure are you it's true that this shooter doesn't have mental
>> > issues?
>> > I read (somewhere) that he has.
>> 
>> Because his co-workers talked about "bubbly" he was and the fact that
>> he never exhibited anything near a mental issue. Also, the claim that
>> he had mental issues were broadcast to the public very quickly by a
>> person who isn't even a member of the family but rather a
>> self-professed spokesperson for Muslims in Canada. Besides, "mental
>> issues" is the excuse used _every_ _single_ _time_ a long Muslim
>> attacks people. It's getting old and was never believable to begin
>> with.
> 
> 
> My take: Anyone who tries to shoot multiple people has mental issues of
> some sort. With that, I'm not excluding the potential it's politically
> driven.
> To me the question is: Just how mentally unfit was he?

He followed a documented murderous pedophile whose favourite wife was six 
years-old when they got married and nine when they had sex. He believed 
that emulating such a monster (piss be upon him) would bring him closer 
to God.

If he has mental issues then so do a billion Muslims.

-- 
SilverSlimer
Ubuntu 18.04 on MSI GT72 2QD

Proudly blocking Facebook, Twitter and Youtube

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#459818

FromSteve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-27 10:21 -0700
Message-ID<87631e02-3420-46fd-8629-edd19a7326fc@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#459817
On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 11:12:04 AM UTC-6, SilverSlimer wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 09:51:10 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote:
> 
> > On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 10:40:25 AM UTC-6, SilverSlimer wrote:
> >> On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 09:33:49 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote:
> >> 
> >> > On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 9:46:25 AM UTC-6, SilverSlimer wrote:
> >> >> On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 08:46:24 -0500, chrisv wrote:
> >> >> 
> >> >> > SilverSlimer wrote:
> >> >> > 
> >> >> >> (snipped, unread)
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > I don't need to read your "lefties are stupid and naive"
> >> >> > propaganda,
> >> >> > thanks.
> >> >> 
> >> >> It's not propaganda when it's true.
> >> > 
> >> > How sure are you it's true that this shooter doesn't have mental
> >> > issues?
> >> > I read (somewhere) that he has.
> >> 
> >> Because his co-workers talked about "bubbly" he was and the fact that
> >> he never exhibited anything near a mental issue. Also, the claim that
> >> he had mental issues were broadcast to the public very quickly by a
> >> person who isn't even a member of the family but rather a
> >> self-professed spokesperson for Muslims in Canada. Besides, "mental
> >> issues" is the excuse used _every_ _single_ _time_ a long Muslim
> >> attacks people. It's getting old and was never believable to begin
> >> with.
> > 
> > 
> > My take: Anyone who tries to shoot multiple people has mental issues of
> > some sort. With that, I'm not excluding the potential it's politically
> > driven.
> > To me the question is: Just how mentally unfit was he?
> 
> He followed a documented murderous pedophile whose favourite wife was six 
> years-old when they got married and nine when they had sex. He believed 
> that emulating such a monster (piss be upon him) would bring him closer 
> to God.
> 
> If he has mental issues then so do a billion Muslims.

Right... there aren't any Muslims who aren't fanatics to this extent...
pull the other one ;)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#459822

FromSteve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-27 10:37 -0700
Message-ID<9b2f10d8-7464-4ddb-9e48-c1580a11f2f5@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#459818
On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 10:21:22 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 11:12:04 AM UTC-6, SilverSlimer wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 09:51:10 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote:
> > 
> > > On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 10:40:25 AM UTC-6, SilverSlimer wrote:
> > >> On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 09:33:49 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote:
> > >> 
> > >> > On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 9:46:25 AM UTC-6, SilverSlimer wrote:
> > >> >> On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 08:46:24 -0500, chrisv wrote:
> > >> >> 
> > >> >> > SilverSlimer wrote:
> > >> >> > 
> > >> >> >> (snipped, unread)
> > >> >> > 
> > >> >> > I don't need to read your "lefties are stupid and naive"
> > >> >> > propaganda,
> > >> >> > thanks.
> > >> >> 
> > >> >> It's not propaganda when it's true.
> > >> > 
> > >> > How sure are you it's true that this shooter doesn't have mental
> > >> > issues?
> > >> > I read (somewhere) that he has.
> > >> 
> > >> Because his co-workers talked about "bubbly" he was and the fact that
> > >> he never exhibited anything near a mental issue. Also, the claim that
> > >> he had mental issues were broadcast to the public very quickly by a
> > >> person who isn't even a member of the family but rather a
> > >> self-professed spokesperson for Muslims in Canada. Besides, "mental
> > >> issues" is the excuse used _every_ _single_ _time_ a long Muslim
> > >> attacks people. It's getting old and was never believable to begin
> > >> with.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > My take: Anyone who tries to shoot multiple people has mental issues of
> > > some sort. With that, I'm not excluding the potential it's politically
> > > driven.
> > > To me the question is: Just how mentally unfit was he?
> > 
> > He followed a documented murderous pedophile whose favourite wife was six 
> > years-old when they got married and nine when they had sex. He believed 
> > that emulating such a monster (piss be upon him) would bring him closer 
> > to God.
> > 
> > If he has mental issues then so do a billion Muslims.
> 
> Right... there aren't any Muslims who aren't fanatics to this extent...
> pull the other one ;)



At times, fancy is more valuable than faithful descriptions of reality. 

Can you cease begging for my attention? 

Sockboy claims to be the CLI-professor, let us see him put up a form without the data correction procedures.The full sham is chock-full of goofy gaps and leans heavily on Sockboy's 'liberal education' horseplay. 

Where did you find your scripts? My view is that we should ALL report the flooding and then it will stop. Usenet is a sovereign concordat based on virtue. Why does Sockboy focus on his own self-esteem issues so much? 

- 
What Every Entrepreneur Must Know!!
https://youtu.be/GPPqvw8iEBs
https://youtu.be/TETJEkaUoY4
http://tinyurl.com/gsleb4p
Jonas Eklundh

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#459852

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-07-27 12:15 -0700
Message-ID<fs199tFfvc7U10@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#459818
On 7/27/18 10:21 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 11:12:04 AM UTC-6, SilverSlimer wrote:
>> On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 09:51:10 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>
>>> On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 10:40:25 AM UTC-6, SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 09:33:49 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 9:46:25 AM UTC-6, SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 08:46:24 -0500, chrisv wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (snipped, unread)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't need to read your "lefties are stupid and naive"
>>>>>>> propaganda,
>>>>>>> thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's not propaganda when it's true.
>>>>>
>>>>> How sure are you it's true that this shooter doesn't have mental
>>>>> issues?
>>>>> I read (somewhere) that he has.
>>>>
>>>> Because his co-workers talked about "bubbly" he was and the fact that
>>>> he never exhibited anything near a mental issue. Also, the claim that
>>>> he had mental issues were broadcast to the public very quickly by a
>>>> person who isn't even a member of the family but rather a
>>>> self-professed spokesperson for Muslims in Canada. Besides, "mental
>>>> issues" is the excuse used _every_ _single_ _time_ a long Muslim
>>>> attacks people. It's getting old and was never believable to begin
>>>> with.
>>>
>>>
>>> My take: Anyone who tries to shoot multiple people has mental issues of
>>> some sort. With that, I'm not excluding the potential it's politically
>>> driven.
>>> To me the question is: Just how mentally unfit was he?
>>
>> He followed a documented murderous pedophile whose favourite wife was six
>> years-old when they got married and nine when they had sex. He believed
>> that emulating such a monster (piss be upon him) would bring him closer
>> to God.
>>
>> If he has mental issues then so do a billion Muslims.
> 
> Right... there aren't any Muslims who aren't fanatics to this extent...
> pull the other one ;)
> 

HEY! You called Slimer out on his bigotry... even if only gently! I 
commend you for it!

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#459851

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-07-27 12:14 -0700
Message-ID<fs198uFfvc7U9@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#459817
On 7/27/18 10:12 AM, SilverSlimer wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 09:51:10 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote:
> 
>> On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 10:40:25 AM UTC-6, SilverSlimer wrote:
>>> On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 09:33:49 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 9:46:25 AM UTC-6, SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 08:46:24 -0500, chrisv wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (snipped, unread)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't need to read your "lefties are stupid and naive"
>>>>>> propaganda,
>>>>>> thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's not propaganda when it's true.
>>>>
>>>> How sure are you it's true that this shooter doesn't have mental
>>>> issues?
>>>> I read (somewhere) that he has.
>>>
>>> Because his co-workers talked about "bubbly" he was and the fact that
>>> he never exhibited anything near a mental issue. Also, the claim that
>>> he had mental issues were broadcast to the public very quickly by a
>>> person who isn't even a member of the family but rather a
>>> self-professed spokesperson for Muslims in Canada. Besides, "mental
>>> issues" is the excuse used _every_ _single_ _time_ a long Muslim
>>> attacks people. It's getting old and was never believable to begin
>>> with.
>>
>>
>> My take: Anyone who tries to shoot multiple people has mental issues of
>> some sort. With that, I'm not excluding the potential it's politically
>> driven.
>> To me the question is: Just how mentally unfit was he?
> 
> He followed a documented murderous pedophile whose favourite wife was six
> years-old when they got married and nine when they had sex. He believed
> that emulating such a monster (piss be upon him) would bring him closer
> to God.
> 
> If he has mental issues then so do a billion Muslims.
> 

By your own standard, to be Christian also defines ones as mentally ill.

I do not agree with your standard.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#459821

Fromchrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
Date2018-07-27 12:33 -0500
Message-ID<4plmldd6devgv3ql3nuteal0q2708mi4ab@4ax.com>
In reply to#459813
Steve Carroll wrote:

>My take: Anyone who tries to shoot multiple people has mental issues of 
>some sort.

You think?

-- 
"Ah, in your mind OS X and Windows use Wayland. Amazing."  -  some
thing, lying shamelessly (but no one can quote it lying)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#459849

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-07-27 12:12 -0700
Message-ID<fs195aFfvc7U7@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#459813
On 7/27/18 9:51 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 10:40:25 AM UTC-6, SilverSlimer wrote:
>> On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 09:33:49 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>
>>> On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 9:46:25 AM UTC-6, SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 08:46:24 -0500, chrisv wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> (snipped, unread)
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't need to read your "lefties are stupid and naive" propaganda,
>>>>> thanks.
>>>>
>>>> It's not propaganda when it's true.
>>>
>>> How sure are you it's true that this shooter doesn't have mental issues?
>>> I read (somewhere) that he has.
>>
>> Because his co-workers talked about "bubbly" he was and the fact that he
>> never exhibited anything near a mental issue. Also, the claim that he had
>> mental issues were broadcast to the public very quickly by a person who
>> isn't even a member of the family but rather a self-professed
>> spokesperson for Muslims in Canada. Besides, "mental issues" is the
>> excuse used _every_ _single_ _time_ a long Muslim attacks people. It's
>> getting old and was never believable to begin with.
> 
> 
> My take: Anyone who tries to shoot multiple people has mental issues of
> some sort. With that, I'm not excluding the potential it's politically driven.
> To me the question is: Just how mentally unfit was he?
> 

You are mixing colloquial and medical views of mental illness.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#459876

FromSteve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com>
Date2018-07-27 13:00 -0700
Message-ID<bf7d7425-99e5-4a8a-bf74-43313a664f74@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#459849
On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 1:12:45 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
> On 7/27/18 9:51 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> > On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 10:40:25 AM UTC-6, SilverSlimer wrote:
> >> On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 09:33:49 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 9:46:25 AM UTC-6, SilverSlimer wrote:
> >>>> On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 08:46:24 -0500, chrisv wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> SilverSlimer wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> (snipped, unread)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I don't need to read your "lefties are stupid and naive" propaganda,
> >>>>> thanks.
> >>>>
> >>>> It's not propaganda when it's true.
> >>>
> >>> How sure are you it's true that this shooter doesn't have mental issues?
> >>> I read (somewhere) that he has.
> >>
> >> Because his co-workers talked about "bubbly" he was and the fact that he
> >> never exhibited anything near a mental issue. Also, the claim that he had
> >> mental issues were broadcast to the public very quickly by a person who
> >> isn't even a member of the family but rather a self-professed
> >> spokesperson for Muslims in Canada. Besides, "mental issues" is the
> >> excuse used _every_ _single_ _time_ a long Muslim attacks people. It's
> >> getting old and was never believable to begin with.
> > 
> > 
> > My take: Anyone who tries to shoot multiple people has mental issues of
> > some sort. With that, I'm not excluding the potential it's politically driven.
> > To me the question is: Just how mentally unfit was he?
> > 
> 
> You are mixing colloquial and medical views of mental illness.

Where did *I* do that?

Back to the topic I was talking about, you believe mass shooters
kill people without any connection or use of their brain? I don't, I
believe there is some underlying mental issue or issues that cause
them to act. This doesn't necessarily mean they are 'mentally ill',
it does suggest that they were not fit, mentally, *at the time* of 
their action. Being that no one has ever, or are they likely to be
able to, study someone mentally *at the time* of the act, I don't
buy all the egghead 'opinions' out there. If someone is doing this
stuff they are, to me, *obviously* having *some* mental issue
*at the time* they're doing it. I'm sure you'll now argue against it
but there really is such a thing as temporary insanity.

I think you're the one doing the "mixing" here... and it's probably 
not limited to your post ;)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#459886

FromSnit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Date2018-07-27 13:16 -0700
Message-ID<fs1cspFfvbnU16@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#459876
On 7/27/18 1:00 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 1:12:45 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
>> On 7/27/18 9:51 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 10:40:25 AM UTC-6, SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 09:33:49 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 9:46:25 AM UTC-6, SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 08:46:24 -0500, chrisv wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> SilverSlimer wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (snipped, unread)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't need to read your "lefties are stupid and naive" propaganda,
>>>>>>> thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's not propaganda when it's true.
>>>>>
>>>>> How sure are you it's true that this shooter doesn't have mental issues?
>>>>> I read (somewhere) that he has.
>>>>
>>>> Because his co-workers talked about "bubbly" he was and the fact that he
>>>> never exhibited anything near a mental issue. Also, the claim that he had
>>>> mental issues were broadcast to the public very quickly by a person who
>>>> isn't even a member of the family but rather a self-professed
>>>> spokesperson for Muslims in Canada. Besides, "mental issues" is the
>>>> excuse used _every_ _single_ _time_ a long Muslim attacks people. It's
>>>> getting old and was never believable to begin with.
>>>
>>>
>>> My take: Anyone who tries to shoot multiple people has mental issues of
>>> some sort. With that, I'm not excluding the potential it's politically driven.
>>> To me the question is: Just how mentally unfit was he?
>>>
>>
>> You are mixing colloquial and medical views of mental illness.
> 
> Where did *I* do that?

Above, where you talked about him being mentally ill (or at least havign 
"issues" in a discussion of illness) based on him killing.

> Back to the topic I was talking about, you believe mass shooters
> kill people without any connection or use of their brain?

Of course not. What a silly comment... and shows you are going into your 
game mode.

> I don't, I
> believe there is some underlying mental issue or issues that cause
> them to act. This doesn't necessarily mean they are 'mentally ill',
> it does suggest that they were not fit, mentally, *at the time* of
> their action.

OK, fair enough. Thanks for the clarification.

> Being that no one has ever, or are they likely to be
> able to, study someone mentally *at the time* of the act, I don't
> buy all the egghead 'opinions' out there.

Mental illness is not something that generally comes and goes like 
that... just as other illnesses do not.

> If someone is doing this
> stuff they are, to me, *obviously* having *some* mental issue
> *at the time* they're doing it. I'm sure you'll now argue against it
> but there really is such a thing as temporary insanity.

You are "sure" of some odd things about me that are not at all true. Sure.

> I think you're the one doing the "mixing" here... and it's probably
> not limited to your post ;)

See: another example what I just noted. And, no, because I note you are 
making mistakes as you make guesses about my views does NOT mean I want 
you to change the topic to what delusions you have that lead you to make 
such mistakes.


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 3 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy


csiph-web