Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #458532 > unrolled thread
| Started by | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-07-20 15:18 +0000 |
| Last post | 2018-07-20 14:20 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 115 — 8 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 15:18 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 15:29 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 16:05 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 20:58 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-21 16:13 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 09:52 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 17:18 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-20 12:42 -0500
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-20 12:53 -0500
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 18:19 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 21:08 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 14:36 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 18:17 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 11:43 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 21:16 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-21 16:25 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-23 07:22 -0500
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 05:38 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-23 08:04 -0500
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 06:10 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 08:00 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-23 14:12 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 07:28 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-23 11:07 -0500
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 09:20 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-23 17:00 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 10:22 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-23 12:35 -0500
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-23 23:01 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 02:00 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-24 07:01 -0500
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 05:23 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-24 12:24 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 06:58 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-24 07:43 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 08:00 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-24 15:13 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-25 15:04 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 16:08 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 08:30 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 08:47 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 13:14 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-26 14:56 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 14:58 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-26 15:03 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 15:12 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 15:35 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-26 16:29 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 17:40 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 17:42 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 15:19 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-26 22:54 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 16:19 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 16:38 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-26 16:34 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 17:41 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 19:24 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-27 12:36 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 13:18 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-27 13:33 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 14:31 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-28 08:25 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-28 08:35 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-28 09:04 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 22:02 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 20:44 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 13:44 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 14:31 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 12:41 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-26 07:30 -0500
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 05:57 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-26 14:16 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-23 14:30 -0500
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-23 12:51 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-23 23:04 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-23 12:43 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-23 12:42 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 12:38 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 13:33 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 21:06 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 16:18 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-21 16:22 +0000
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 09:32 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 13:05 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 13:49 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 12:33 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 12:44 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 13:02 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 13:17 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 13:19 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 16:21 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 16:31 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 18:07 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 20:35 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 17:50 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-21 21:09 -0400
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 18:48 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-21 21:50 -0400
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 18:59 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 19:13 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 03:50 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 15:34 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 10:08 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-22 11:06 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 18:58 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 17:24 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 17:32 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 11:28 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 12:07 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 12:39 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 12:55 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-05 14:52 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-08-06 01:42 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 22:21 -0700
Re: Socialist Whoopi Goldberg's tolerance Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 14:20 -0700
Page 3 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 Next page →
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-26 08:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e703c16f-c814-46a6-836c-f316df4cc33b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459624 |
On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 8:30:52 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 5:08:46 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > > I think he was the one who recently pointed to a story where a Google > > engineer was fired for posting bigoted claims about women on an internal > > message board. He presented Google as the bad guys here... which was > > rather insane. > > Can you quote these alleged "bigoted" claims? > > Have you ever even read a definition for the term? Do you > believe you understood it? Can you point to any you've read so > people can understand why you're using that term for this paper? > > > BTW, have you actually read his memo? Silly question, I know, you > must have to claim what you have just did. That I've seen, many in > the media appear to have taken headings like this... > > "Possible non-bias causes of the gender gap in tech" > > And morphed it into this in order to push their agenda... > > 'Non-bias causes of the gender gap in tech' > > And they read statements like this... > > " I’m simply stating that the distribution of preferences and abilities of men and women differ in part due to biological causes and that these differences may explain why we don’t see equal representation of women in tech and leadership" > > ... as if they were written like this... > > 'I’m simply stating that the distribution of preferences and abilities of men and women differ in part due to biological causes and that these differences unquestionably, and in every case, explain why we don’t see equal representation of women in tech and leadership' > > bigoted > "utterly intolerant of any creed, belief, or opinion that differs from one's own." > > <http://www.dictionary.com/browse/bigoted?s=t> > > Can you point to the material in Damore's memo (yes, it was a memo, not a message board entry, it's "interesting" how you wouldn't know that if you read it) where this 'utter intolerance' (btw, do you know what intolerance means?) reared its head? I ask because I read it and I never saw anything like what you just claimed so it would be instructive to see what I, if you are to be believed, must have missed with regards to Damore's alleged display of bigotry. > > In case it's too much work for you... > > intolerance > lack of tolerance; unwillingness or refusal to tolerate or respect opinions or beliefs contrary to one's own. > > unwillingness or refusal to tolerate or respect persons of a different social group, especially members of a minority group. > > incapacity or indisposition to bear or endure: > <http://www.dictionary.com/browse/intolerance> The content clearly is a bunch of rambling bullshit. That points to one person. I thought showing Desk 'The Fool' Rabbit a little generosity might help the situation. It did not. vallor owns Desk 'The Fool' Rabbit in every way possible. He makes false accusation to an entire group of people who have done nothing wrong, but that's a narcissist for you. What vallor and you care about isn't a factor. The bulk of the posters in this group do application development either as a leisure activity or as a vocation, so I have doubts anyone here consider automation to be "a black art". - Top 15 Ways Desk 'The Fool' Rabbit Trolls http://www.5z8.info/backyard-fireworks-disasters_t7w7pu_bombbuilding Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-26 13:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bfdb2842-700a-498e-95ae-e97b0067e09a@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459624 |
On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 8:30:52 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 5:08:46 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
>
> > I think he was the one who recently pointed to a story where a Google
> > engineer was fired for posting bigoted claims about women on an internal
> > message board. He presented Google as the bad guys here... which was
> > rather insane.
>
> Can you quote these alleged "bigoted" claims?
>
> Have you ever even read a definition for the term? Do you
> believe you understood it? Can you point to any you've read so
> people can understand why you're using that term for this paper?
>
>
> BTW, have you actually read his memo? Silly question, I know, you
> must have to claim what you have just did. That I've seen, many in
> the media appear to have taken headings like this...
>
> "Possible non-bias causes of the gender gap in tech"
>
> And morphed it into this in order to push their agenda...
>
> 'Non-bias causes of the gender gap in tech'
>
> And they read statements like this...
>
> " I’m simply stating that the distribution of preferences and abilities of men and women differ in part due to biological causes and that these differences may explain why we don’t see equal representation of women in tech and leadership"
>
> ... as if they were written like this...
>
> 'I’m simply stating that the distribution of preferences and abilities of men and women differ in part due to biological causes and that these differences unquestionably, and in every case, explain why we don’t see equal representation of women in tech and leadership'
>
> bigoted
> "utterly intolerant of any creed, belief, or opinion that differs from one's own."
>
> <http://www.dictionary.com/browse/bigoted?s=t>
>
> Can you point to the material in Damore's memo (yes, it was a memo, not a message board entry, it's "interesting" how you wouldn't know that if you read it) where this 'utter intolerance' (btw, do you know what intolerance means?) reared its head? I ask because I read it and I never saw anything like what you just claimed so it would be instructive to see what I, if you are to be believed, must have missed with regards to Damore's alleged display of bigotry.
>
> In case it's too much work for you...
>
> intolerance
> lack of tolerance; unwillingness or refusal to tolerate or respect opinions or beliefs contrary to one's own.
>
> unwillingness or refusal to tolerate or respect persons of a different social group, especially members of a minority group.
>
> incapacity or indisposition to bear or endure:
> <http://www.dictionary.com/browse/intolerance>
Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll's obsession with F 'The Fool' Russell started in 2004 when Carroll got mad about his then girlfriend obsessing over F 'The Fool' Russell (heavily documented here: <http://tinyurl.com/proof-about-ebot>). F 'The Fool' Russell continued to respond to Steve for about 5 years, when Steve flipped out in 2009 and started contacting F 'The Fool' Russell's employer with the stated goal to have him fired (he spoke of doing so even if he had to twist arms):
<http://goo.gl/OHNryA>
<http://goo.gl/MZ6yCD>
<http://goo.gl/WaKKGq>
There were more, but Carroll has had them deleted from the Google archive. I have not spent the time to find them elsewhere (and likely will not).
With that F 'The Fool' Russell stopped responding directly to Steve except for *one* chance he gave him in 2011 when Steve was accusing *F 'The Fool' Russell* of running: <http://goo.gl/racU64>.
Carroll, as predicted, ran (he always does when faced with facts):
<http://goo.gl/qHs5Xh>
Steven Petruzzellis knows he has no backing for any of his nonsense and has become, if anything, more and more obsessive since F 'The Fool' Russell stopped responding to him.
Steve "Steven Petruzzellis" Carroll is truly a very, very sick man.
--
Get Rich Slow
https://youtu.be/qwb1Ez0GWMA
https://youtu.be/TETJEkaUoY4
http://www.5z8.info/hackwebcam_e9z2tw_friendster-of-sex
Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-26 14:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fruubtFr13U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #459624 |
On 7/26/18 8:30 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: ... > Can you point to the material in Damore's memo (yes, it was a memo, not a message board entry, it's "interesting" how you wouldn't know that if you read it) <https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/google-engineer-fired-writing-manifesto-women-s-neuroticism-sues-company-n835836> OR <https://goo.gl/zRRcFs> ----- James Damore's controversial 10-page memo, posted to an internal Google message board in August, posited that women are underrepresented in tech because of "personality differences" between the sexes — not because of any workplace discrimination they may experience. The memo, which cited women's "neuroticism" as a reason there are fewer female workers in high-stress jobs, was published the following day by the tech website Gizmodo and went viral. Damore was quickly fired. ----- It was posted on the message board. How do you explain your error on this, and more than that, what does this teach you about your derogatory tone as you presumed YOUR error in knowing where it was posted was mine? And then the memo itself: <https://gizmodo.com/exclusive-heres-the-full-10-page-anti-diversity-screed-1797564320/amp> OR <https://goo.gl/5QhSgA> ... -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-26 14:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <627ea0cf-0fae-48ef-bd2f-c794dbec38c6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459693 |
On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 3:56:17 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 7/26/18 8:30 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > ... > > Can you point to the material in Damore's memo (yes, it was a memo, not a message board entry, it's "interesting" how you wouldn't know that if you read it) > > <https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/google-engineer-fired-writing-manifesto-women-s-neuroticism-sues-company-n835836> > OR <https://goo.gl/zRRcFs> > ----- > James Damore's controversial 10-page memo, posted to an internal Google > message board in August, posited that women are underrepresented in tech > because of "personality differences" between the sexes — not because of > any workplace discrimination they may experience. > > The memo, which cited women's "neuroticism" as a reason there are fewer > female workers in high-stress jobs, was published the following day by > the tech website Gizmodo and went viral. Damore was quickly fired. > ----- > > It was posted on the message board. Fine. So where is this alleged "bigotry"?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-26 15:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fruuouFuaaU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #459694 |
On 7/26/18 2:58 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 3:56:17 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 7/26/18 8:30 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >> ... >>> Can you point to the material in Damore's memo (yes, it was a memo, not a message board entry, it's "interesting" how you wouldn't know that if you read it) >> >> <https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/google-engineer-fired-writing-manifesto-women-s-neuroticism-sues-company-n835836> >> OR <https://goo.gl/zRRcFs> >> ----- >> James Damore's controversial 10-page memo, posted to an internal Google >> message board in August, posited that women are underrepresented in tech >> because of "personality differences" between the sexes — not because of >> any workplace discrimination they may experience. >> >> The memo, which cited women's "neuroticism" as a reason there are fewer >> female workers in high-stress jobs, was published the following day by >> the tech website Gizmodo and went viral. Damore was quickly fired. >> ----- >> >> It was posted on the message board. > > Fine. So where is this alleged "bigotry"? > <https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/google-engineer-fired-writing-manifesto-women-s-neuroticism-sues-company-n835836> OR <https://goo.gl/zRRcFs> ----- James Damore's controversial 10-page memo, posted to an internal Google message board in August, posited that women are underrepresented in tech because of "personality differences" between the sexes — not because of any workplace discrimination they may experience. The memo, which cited women's "neuroticism" as a reason there are fewer female workers in high-stress jobs, was published the following day by the tech website Gizmodo and went viral. Damore was quickly fired. ----- And then the memo itself: <https://gizmodo.com/exclusive-heres-the-full-10-page-anti-diversity-screed-1797564320/amp> OR <https://goo.gl/5QhSgA> -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-26 15:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1d481561-db5c-41e0-bed3-ecf84c53c4bc@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459696 |
On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 4:03:13 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 7/26/18 2:58 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 3:56:17 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 7/26/18 8:30 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >> ... > >>> Can you point to the material in Damore's memo (yes, it was a memo, not a message board entry, it's "interesting" how you wouldn't know that if you read it) > >> > >> <https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/google-engineer-fired-writing-manifesto-women-s-neuroticism-sues-company-n835836> > >> OR <https://goo.gl/zRRcFs> > >> ----- > >> James Damore's controversial 10-page memo, posted to an internal Google > >> message board in August, posited that women are underrepresented in tech > >> because of "personality differences" between the sexes — not because of > >> any workplace discrimination they may experience. > >> > >> The memo, which cited women's "neuroticism" as a reason there are fewer > >> female workers in high-stress jobs, was published the following day by > >> the tech website Gizmodo and went viral. Damore was quickly fired. > >> ----- > >> > >> It was posted on the message board. > > > > Fine. So where is this alleged "bigotry"? > > > > <https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/google-engineer-fired-writing-manifesto-women-s-neuroticism-sues-company-n835836> > OR <https://goo.gl/zRRcFs> > ----- > James Damore's controversial 10-page memo, posted to an internal Google > message board in August, posited that women are underrepresented in tech > because of "personality differences" between the sexes — not because of > any workplace discrimination they may experience. > > The memo, which cited women's "neuroticism" as a reason there are fewer > female workers in high-stress jobs, was published the following day by > the tech website Gizmodo and went viral. Damore was quickly fired. > ----- > > And then the memo itself: > > <https://gizmodo.com/exclusive-heres-the-full-10-page-anti-diversity-screed-1797564320/amp> > OR <https://goo.gl/5QhSgA> I still see no "bigoted claims" about anyone. You wrote: "a Google engineer was fired for posting bigoted claims about women" - Snit I even gave you a widely accepted definition of the term... so explain how what you've quoted here qualifies as 'utter intolerance'. I don't see Damore exhibiting anything remotely close to it in your quoted material here. Again, to aid you for your future use of the term: bigoted "utterly intolerant of any creed, belief, or opinion that differs from one's own." <http://www.dictionary.com/browse/bigoted?s=t> Being that you requoted the same thing, you got nuthin'... as I suspected. Thanks for proving that you don't even know what a word you've used for at least 15 years means. No one will be shocked.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-26 15:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1c269292-bf84-4745-abc5-5016b4976a83@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459698 |
On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 3:12:34 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 4:03:13 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > On 7/26/18 2:58 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 3:56:17 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > >> On 7/26/18 8:30 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > >> ... > > >>> Can you point to the material in Damore's memo (yes, it was a memo, not a message board entry, it's "interesting" how you wouldn't know that if you read it) > > >> > > >> <https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/google-engineer-fired-writing-manifesto-women-s-neuroticism-sues-company-n835836> > > >> OR <https://goo.gl/zRRcFs> > > >> ----- > > >> James Damore's controversial 10-page memo, posted to an internal Google > > >> message board in August, posited that women are underrepresented in tech > > >> because of "personality differences" between the sexes — not because of > > >> any workplace discrimination they may experience. > > >> > > >> The memo, which cited women's "neuroticism" as a reason there are fewer > > >> female workers in high-stress jobs, was published the following day by > > >> the tech website Gizmodo and went viral. Damore was quickly fired. > > >> ----- > > >> > > >> It was posted on the message board. > > > > > > Fine. So where is this alleged "bigotry"? > > > > > > > <https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/google-engineer-fired-writing-manifesto-women-s-neuroticism-sues-company-n835836> > > OR <https://goo.gl/zRRcFs> > > ----- > > James Damore's controversial 10-page memo, posted to an internal Google > > message board in August, posited that women are underrepresented in tech > > because of "personality differences" between the sexes — not because of > > any workplace discrimination they may experience. > > > > The memo, which cited women's "neuroticism" as a reason there are fewer > > female workers in high-stress jobs, was published the following day by > > the tech website Gizmodo and went viral. Damore was quickly fired. > > ----- > > > > And then the memo itself: > > > > <https://gizmodo.com/exclusive-heres-the-full-10-page-anti-diversity-screed-1797564320/amp> > > OR <https://goo.gl/5QhSgA> > > I still see no "bigoted claims" about anyone. You wrote: > > "a Google engineer was fired for posting bigoted claims about women" - Snit > > I even gave you a widely accepted definition of the term... so explain how what > you've quoted here qualifies as 'utter intolerance'. I don't see Damore exhibiting > anything remotely close to it in your quoted material here. Again, to aid you for > your future use of the term: > > bigoted > "utterly intolerant of any creed, belief, or opinion that differs from one's own." > <http://www.dictionary.com/browse/bigoted?s=t> > > Being that you requoted the same thing, you got nuthin'... as I suspected. > Thanks for proving that you don't even know what a word you've used for > at least 15 years means. No one will be shocked. His goal is to see me irritated by having me get blamed for his actions. And hey, that could work. Steve Carroll will be destroyed once those of us here before the eternal September are outnumbered. That and there will invariably be a butthurt insomniac or more in an unmoderated group (hello Klaus Schadenfreude). The specifics of the bullshit aside, we've all seen who regularly gets enraged when he does not get nonstop attention. You refuse to take blame for your own comments. Actions that are easily quoted. What did Steve Carroll expect from the lying imbecile? That Klaus Schadenfreude lamebrain has nothing to squander but time. He has nothing else, especially not a girlfriend. Klaus Schadenfreude lies that he uses Windows, while really he never timed it on a modern device and faithfully tried it. The one skill Klaus Schadenfreude learned well is to try to shame Steve Carroll into false confession and if that doesn't work, troll so hard the thread is ignored or quickly change the goalpost. Klaus Schadenfreude suffers from waking fantasies so, to him, everything, even treating him as he treats others, are "aggressive". Who DOESN'T know this? -- One Smart Penny! http://www.5z8.info/--INITIATE-CREDIT-CARD-XFER--_k7s1jt_inject_worm Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-26 16:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <frv3qkF1u6nU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #459698 |
On 7/26/18 3:12 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 4:03:13 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 7/26/18 2:58 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 3:56:17 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>> On 7/26/18 8:30 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>> ... >>>>> Can you point to the material in Damore's memo (yes, it was a memo, not a message board entry, it's "interesting" how you wouldn't know that if you read it) >>>> >>>> <https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/google-engineer-fired-writing-manifesto-women-s-neuroticism-sues-company-n835836> >>>> OR <https://goo.gl/zRRcFs> >>>> ----- >>>> James Damore's controversial 10-page memo, posted to an internal Google >>>> message board in August, posited that women are underrepresented in tech >>>> because of "personality differences" between the sexes — not because of >>>> any workplace discrimination they may experience. >>>> >>>> The memo, which cited women's "neuroticism" as a reason there are fewer >>>> female workers in high-stress jobs, was published the following day by >>>> the tech website Gizmodo and went viral. Damore was quickly fired. >>>> ----- >>>> >>>> It was posted on the message board. >>> >>> Fine. So where is this alleged "bigotry"? >>> >> >> <https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/google-engineer-fired-writing-manifesto-women-s-neuroticism-sues-company-n835836> >> OR <https://goo.gl/zRRcFs> >> ----- >> James Damore's controversial 10-page memo, posted to an internal Google >> message board in August, posited that women are underrepresented in tech >> because of "personality differences" between the sexes — not because of >> any workplace discrimination they may experience. >> >> The memo, which cited women's "neuroticism" as a reason there are fewer >> female workers in high-stress jobs, was published the following day by >> the tech website Gizmodo and went viral. Damore was quickly fired. >> ----- >> >> And then the memo itself: >> >> <https://gizmodo.com/exclusive-heres-the-full-10-page-anti-diversity-screed-1797564320/amp> >> OR <https://goo.gl/5QhSgA> > > I still see no "bigoted claims" about anyone. If you cannot see where he is showing prejudicial thinking toward a group I am not sure what can be done to help you in a group like this. Best wishes in your hunt for better understanding. ... -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-26 17:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2995985b-6c30-49cb-8130-8ad0c176dbd4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459711 |
On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 5:29:28 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
> On 7/26/18 3:12 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> > On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 4:03:13 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
> >> On 7/26/18 2:58 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> >>> On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 3:56:17 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
> >>>> On 7/26/18 8:30 AM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> >>>> ...
> >>>>> Can you point to the material in Damore's memo (yes, it was a memo, not a message board entry, it's "interesting" how you wouldn't know that if you read it)
> >>>>
> >>>> <https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/google-engineer-fired-writing-manifesto-women-s-neuroticism-sues-company-n835836>
> >>>> OR <https://goo.gl/zRRcFs>
> >>>> -----
> >>>> James Damore's controversial 10-page memo, posted to an internal Google
> >>>> message board in August, posited that women are underrepresented in tech
> >>>> because of "personality differences" between the sexes — not because of
> >>>> any workplace discrimination they may experience.
> >>>>
> >>>> The memo, which cited women's "neuroticism" as a reason there are fewer
> >>>> female workers in high-stress jobs, was published the following day by
> >>>> the tech website Gizmodo and went viral. Damore was quickly fired.
> >>>> -----
> >>>>
> >>>> It was posted on the message board.
> >>>
> >>> Fine. So where is this alleged "bigotry"?
> >>>
> >>
> >> <https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/google-engineer-fired-writing-manifesto-women-s-neuroticism-sues-company-n835836>
> >> OR <https://goo.gl/zRRcFs>
> >> -----
> >> James Damore's controversial 10-page memo, posted to an internal Google
> >> message board in August, posited that women are underrepresented in tech
> >> because of "personality differences" between the sexes — not because of
> >> any workplace discrimination they may experience.
> >>
> >> The memo, which cited women's "neuroticism" as a reason there are fewer
> >> female workers in high-stress jobs, was published the following day by
> >> the tech website Gizmodo and went viral. Damore was quickly fired.
> >> -----
> >>
> >> And then the memo itself:
> >>
> >> <https://gizmodo.com/exclusive-heres-the-full-10-page-anti-diversity-screed-1797564320/amp>
> >> OR <https://goo.gl/5QhSgA>
> >
> > I still see no "bigoted claims" about anyone.
>
> If you cannot see where he is showing prejudicial thinking
Are all reviews and/or studies that found there to be higher
levels of neuroticism in women based on prejudicial thinking?
Why the need for the study, then? And since when is bigotry
('utter intolerance') the same thing as prejudicial thinking?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-26 17:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d39f1b57-7e75-4165-9dca-0fde8f976ed2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459711 |
On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 4:29:28 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 7/26/18 3:12 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 4:03:13 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 7/26/18 2:58 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 3:56:17 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>> On 7/26/18 8:30 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>> ... > >>>>> Can you point to the material in Damore's memo (yes, it was a memo, not a message board entry, it's "interesting" how you wouldn't know that if you read it) > >>>> > >>>> <https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/google-engineer-fired-writing-manifesto-women-s-neuroticism-sues-company-n835836> > >>>> OR <https://goo.gl/zRRcFs> > >>>> ----- > >>>> James Damore's controversial 10-page memo, posted to an internal Google > >>>> message board in August, posited that women are underrepresented in tech > >>>> because of "personality differences" between the sexes — not because of > >>>> any workplace discrimination they may experience. > >>>> > >>>> The memo, which cited women's "neuroticism" as a reason there are fewer > >>>> female workers in high-stress jobs, was published the following day by > >>>> the tech website Gizmodo and went viral. Damore was quickly fired. > >>>> ----- > >>>> > >>>> It was posted on the message board. > >>> > >>> Fine. So where is this alleged "bigotry"? > >>> > >> > >> <https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/google-engineer-fired-writing-manifesto-women-s-neuroticism-sues-company-n835836> > >> OR <https://goo.gl/zRRcFs> > >> ----- > >> James Damore's controversial 10-page memo, posted to an internal Google > >> message board in August, posited that women are underrepresented in tech > >> because of "personality differences" between the sexes — not because of > >> any workplace discrimination they may experience. > >> > >> The memo, which cited women's "neuroticism" as a reason there are fewer > >> female workers in high-stress jobs, was published the following day by > >> the tech website Gizmodo and went viral. Damore was quickly fired. > >> ----- > >> > >> And then the memo itself: > >> > >> <https://gizmodo.com/exclusive-heres-the-full-10-page-anti-diversity-screed-1797564320/amp> > >> OR <https://goo.gl/5QhSgA> > > > > I still see no "bigoted claims" about anyone. > > If you cannot see where he is showing prejudicial thinking toward a > group I am not sure what can be done to help you in a group like this. > Best wishes in your hunt for better understanding. > ... > > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> Who *doesn't* know that this kind of hot air is Klaus Schadenfreude's approach, not the modus operandi of Jonas Eklundh? It's all just projection... the trolling, the forging, the writing of drivel, the temper... the puffy red eyes and tendency to show how distressed he is over being kicked from the schoolyard for pissing in it again... Klaus Schadenfreude can not help himself ;) You're clueless! I'm not irked, to the contrary, I'm in stitches because Klaus Schadenfreude's idiocy is so obvious. He actively did not speak of all the benchmarks that he would inevitably mock... and we all know why, Klaus Schadenfreude could not hide it if he tried. At least he has trolls rushing to his rescue. Lots of jerks are now babbling about the open source "desktop" as if it literally would be a good thing. How is wasting potential gray matter tied to love of Klaus Schadenfreude in any way going to lead to intelligent newsgroup discussion? Do you even believe the idiocy Klaus Schadenfreude is spewing? Protected code is totally screwing up your program. Klaus Schadenfreude failed to give a single time of a prosperous job creator that has acquired its fortune by not giving a hoot about its customers and wares. -- What Every Entrepreneur Must Know! https://youtu.be/VxLiH-x0aeY Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-26 15:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <4e5f04b4-bc1b-4aeb-9f7c-4ef7d4872d62@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459696 |
On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 3:03:13 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 7/26/18 2:58 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 3:56:17 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 7/26/18 8:30 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >> ... > >>> Can you point to the material in Damore's memo (yes, it was a memo, not a message board entry, it's "interesting" how you wouldn't know that if you read it) > >> > >> <https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/google-engineer-fired-writing-manifesto-women-s-neuroticism-sues-company-n835836> > >> OR <https://goo.gl/zRRcFs> > >> ----- > >> James Damore's controversial 10-page memo, posted to an internal Google > >> message board in August, posited that women are underrepresented in tech > >> because of "personality differences" between the sexes — not because of > >> any workplace discrimination they may experience. > >> > >> The memo, which cited women's "neuroticism" as a reason there are fewer > >> female workers in high-stress jobs, was published the following day by > >> the tech website Gizmodo and went viral. Damore was quickly fired. > >> ----- > >> > >> It was posted on the message board. > > > > Fine. So where is this alleged "bigotry"? > > > > <https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/google-engineer-fired-writing-manifesto-women-s-neuroticism-sues-company-n835836> > OR <https://goo.gl/zRRcFs> > ----- > James Damore's controversial 10-page memo, posted to an internal Google > message board in August, posited that women are underrepresented in tech > because of "personality differences" between the sexes — not because of > any workplace discrimination they may experience. > > The memo, which cited women's "neuroticism" as a reason there are fewer > female workers in high-stress jobs, was published the following day by > the tech website Gizmodo and went viral. Damore was quickly fired. > ----- > > And then the memo itself: > > <https://gizmodo.com/exclusive-heres-the-full-10-page-anti-diversity-screed-1797564320/amp> > OR <https://goo.gl/5QhSgA> > > > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> It is easy as pie to distort the truth by focusing on a small number of special cases unrepresentative from what is the norm. What a better tactic from an advocacy vantage point are the regular circumstances. The teller of untruths AKA Steven Petruzzellis does it every time. Then the deluge begins. Because the sissy just has to run to other groups to get the attention he's not getting here. Steven Petruzzellis is repeatedly seen posting "CANNOT BE FOUND" when it comes to details on the Internet where information is easy to find... but Steven Petruzzellis is just too daft and lazy to deduce any info he reads. Obviously, the sole thing that matters to Steven Petruzzellis is appearing "the winner", and if he can't have that he will do whatever it takes to actively shout William Poaster down, effectively destroying every group he goes to. The only way that I could overlook Scrivener's constant demand for fixing because of incompatibility headaches or badly written design flaws is if I enjoyed the substantial amount of Kool Aid flavors its community have been feeding Steven Petruzzellis since 1986. -- Eight things to never feed your dog http://www.5z8.info/stalin-will-rise-again_j3h5uj_nakedgrandmas.jpg http://www.5z8.info/dont-just-drizzle_y8q4ut_5waystokillwithamelon Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-26 22:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <iis6D.472210$br4.234114@fx34.iad> |
| In reply to | #459694 |
On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 14:58:35 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 3:56:17 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 7/26/18 8:30 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >> ... >> > Can you point to the material in Damore's memo (yes, it was a memo, >> > not a message board entry, it's "interesting" how you wouldn't know >> > that if you read it) >> >> <https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/google-engineer-fired-writing- manifesto-women-s-neuroticism-sues-company-n835836> >> OR <https://goo.gl/zRRcFs> >> ----- >> James Damore's controversial 10-page memo, posted to an internal Google >> message board in August, posited that women are underrepresented in >> tech because of "personality differences" between the sexes — not >> because of any workplace discrimination they may experience. >> >> The memo, which cited women's "neuroticism" as a reason there are fewer >> female workers in high-stress jobs, was published the following day by >> the tech website Gizmodo and went viral. Damore was quickly fired. >> ----- >> >> It was posted on the message board. > > Fine. So where is this alleged "bigotry"? James Damore suggesting that there are differences between men and women is "bigotry" according to the Prescott Cockroach. -- SilverSlimer Ubuntu 18.04 on MSI GT72 2QD
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-26 16:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fdaa837e-9733-4149-805c-da2fcb3a1b09@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459705 |
On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 4:54:08 PM UTC-6, SilverSlimer wrote: > On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 14:58:35 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 3:56:17 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 7/26/18 8:30 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >> ... > >> > Can you point to the material in Damore's memo (yes, it was a memo, > >> > not a message board entry, it's "interesting" how you wouldn't know > >> > that if you read it) > >> > >> <https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/google-engineer-fired-writing- > manifesto-women-s-neuroticism-sues-company-n835836> > >> OR <https://goo.gl/zRRcFs> > >> ----- > >> James Damore's controversial 10-page memo, posted to an internal Google > >> message board in August, posited that women are underrepresented in > >> tech because of "personality differences" between the sexes — not > >> because of any workplace discrimination they may experience. > >> > >> The memo, which cited women's "neuroticism" as a reason there are fewer > >> female workers in high-stress jobs, was published the following day by > >> the tech website Gizmodo and went viral. Damore was quickly fired. > >> ----- > >> > >> It was posted on the message board. > > > > Fine. So where is this alleged "bigotry"? > > James Damore suggesting that there are differences between men and women > is "bigotry" according to the Prescott Cockroach. I suppose the term "neuroticism", which there are studies for at the ages of the women who work for Google (generally younger), is what he glommed onto in the hopes of a save <shrug>. As I've complained of his misuse of the term often enough, one would tend to believe he look up the definition (or at least read the ones I've provided over the years). Even if Damore claimed all women are 10,000 times more prone to neuroticism than men, it still wouldn't be "bigoted" claim.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-26 16:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d7bbf499-0d57-48c2-addd-25f2977d2694@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459709 |
On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 4:19:53 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 4:54:08 PM UTC-6, SilverSlimer wrote: > > On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 14:58:35 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > > > On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 3:56:17 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > >> On 7/26/18 8:30 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > >> ... > > >> > Can you point to the material in Damore's memo (yes, it was a memo, > > >> > not a message board entry, it's "interesting" how you wouldn't know > > >> > that if you read it) > > >> > > >> <https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/google-engineer-fired-writing- > > manifesto-women-s-neuroticism-sues-company-n835836> > > >> OR <https://goo.gl/zRRcFs> > > >> ----- > > >> James Damore's controversial 10-page memo, posted to an internal Google > > >> message board in August, posited that women are underrepresented in > > >> tech because of "personality differences" between the sexes — not > > >> because of any workplace discrimination they may experience. > > >> > > >> The memo, which cited women's "neuroticism" as a reason there are fewer > > >> female workers in high-stress jobs, was published the following day by > > >> the tech website Gizmodo and went viral. Damore was quickly fired. > > >> ----- > > >> > > >> It was posted on the message board. > > > > > > Fine. So where is this alleged "bigotry"? > > > > James Damore suggesting that there are differences between men and women > > is "bigotry" according to the Prescott Cockroach. > > I suppose the term "neuroticism", which there are studies for at the ages of the > women who work for Google (generally younger), is what he glommed onto in the > hopes of a save <shrug>. As I've complained of his misuse of the term often > enough, one would tend to believe he look up the definition (or at least read the > ones I've provided over the years). Even if Damore claimed all women are 10,000 > times more prone to neuroticism than men, it still wouldn't be "bigoted" claim. This is what happens when acutely poor pride takes over Takuya 'The Moron' Saitoh's every moment. Takuya 'The Moron' Saitoh has yet to show how VPN does anything above the minimum on Linux. It was Takuya 'The Moron' Saitoh who stated that he and his college buddies used to troll grade school kids all the time and it was free entertainment, not even a slight concern. Nearly all people in this group do programming either as a necessity or as a vocation, so I have doubts anyone here consider automation to be "witch craft". You used it and benchmarked it and your "extensive experience" lead you to that assumption, and... -- E-commerce Simplified! Michael Glasser: Prescott Computer Guy http://prescottcomputerguy.com http://www.5z8.info/hateminorities_t7l3gt_linked-in-of-sex http://www.5z8.info/killallimmigrants_t8w8io_asian-brides Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-26 16:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <frv450F20veU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #459705 |
On 7/26/18 3:54 PM, SilverSlimer wrote: > On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 14:58:35 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: > >> On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 3:56:17 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>> On 7/26/18 8:30 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> ... >>>> Can you point to the material in Damore's memo (yes, it was a memo, >>>> not a message board entry, it's "interesting" how you wouldn't know >>>> that if you read it) >>> >>> <https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/google-engineer-fired-writing- > manifesto-women-s-neuroticism-sues-company-n835836> >>> OR <https://goo.gl/zRRcFs> >>> ----- >>> James Damore's controversial 10-page memo, posted to an internal Google >>> message board in August, posited that women are underrepresented in >>> tech because of "personality differences" between the sexes — not >>> because of any workplace discrimination they may experience. >>> >>> The memo, which cited women's "neuroticism" as a reason there are fewer >>> female workers in high-stress jobs, was published the following day by >>> the tech website Gizmodo and went viral. Damore was quickly fired. >>> ----- >>> >>> It was posted on the message board. >> >> Fine. So where is this alleged "bigotry"? > > James Damore suggesting that there are differences between men and women > is "bigotry" according to the Prescott Cockroach. > This is a direct lie about my views and comments, but, hey, it is what you do. And it also shows you cannot actual refute my ACTUAL comments... if you could you would not feel the need lie about them. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-26 17:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c29fcaf8-b8d1-46d7-9e80-33bc41ffcadf@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459715 |
On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 5:35:00 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 7/26/18 3:54 PM, SilverSlimer wrote: > > On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 14:58:35 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > >> On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 3:56:17 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>> On 7/26/18 8:30 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> ... > >>>> Can you point to the material in Damore's memo (yes, it was a memo, > >>>> not a message board entry, it's "interesting" how you wouldn't know > >>>> that if you read it) > >>> > >>> <https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/google-engineer-fired-writing- > > manifesto-women-s-neuroticism-sues-company-n835836> > >>> OR <https://goo.gl/zRRcFs> > >>> ----- > >>> James Damore's controversial 10-page memo, posted to an internal Google > >>> message board in August, posited that women are underrepresented in > >>> tech because of "personality differences" between the sexes — not > >>> because of any workplace discrimination they may experience. > >>> > >>> The memo, which cited women's "neuroticism" as a reason there are fewer > >>> female workers in high-stress jobs, was published the following day by > >>> the tech website Gizmodo and went viral. Damore was quickly fired. > >>> ----- > >>> > >>> It was posted on the message board. > >> > >> Fine. So where is this alleged "bigotry"? > > > > James Damore suggesting that there are differences between men and women > > is "bigotry" according to the Prescott Cockroach. > > > > This is a direct lie about my views and comments Being that your "views" were expressed using a word you clearly don't know the meaning of, I'd say you got off easy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-27 19:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pjfrhg$d75$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #459705 |
On 2018-07-26, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote: > On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 14:58:35 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: > >> On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 3:56:17 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>> On 7/26/18 8:30 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> ... >>> > Can you point to the material in Damore's memo (yes, it was a memo, >>> > not a message board entry, it's "interesting" how you wouldn't know >>> > that if you read it) >>> >>> <https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/google-engineer-fired-writing- > manifesto-women-s-neuroticism-sues-company-n835836> >>> OR <https://goo.gl/zRRcFs> >>> ----- >>> James Damore's controversial 10-page memo, posted to an internal Google >>> message board in August, posited that women are underrepresented in >>> tech because of "personality differences" between the sexes — not >>> because of any workplace discrimination they may experience. >>> >>> The memo, which cited women's "neuroticism" as a reason there are fewer >>> female workers in high-stress jobs, was published the following day by >>> the tech website Gizmodo and went viral. Damore was quickly fired. >>> ----- >>> >>> It was posted on the message board. >> >> Fine. So where is this alleged "bigotry"? > > James Damore suggesting that there are differences between men and women > is "bigotry" according to the Prescott Cockroach. Stating the obvious (that women and men are different) is "bigotry" now? Did they accidentally flush "Snit's" brain down the toilet when he was born? -- The more I see of Windows, the more I like Linux.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-27 12:36 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fs1ahkFfvc7U13@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #459859 |
On 7/27/18 12:24 PM, RonB wrote: > On 2018-07-26, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote: >> On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 14:58:35 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: >> >>> On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 3:56:17 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>>> On 7/26/18 8:30 AM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>> ... >>>>> Can you point to the material in Damore's memo (yes, it was a memo, >>>>> not a message board entry, it's "interesting" how you wouldn't know >>>>> that if you read it) >>>> >>>> <https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/google-engineer-fired-writing- >> manifesto-women-s-neuroticism-sues-company-n835836> >>>> OR <https://goo.gl/zRRcFs> >>>> ----- >>>> James Damore's controversial 10-page memo, posted to an internal Google >>>> message board in August, posited that women are underrepresented in >>>> tech because of "personality differences" between the sexes — not >>>> because of any workplace discrimination they may experience. >>>> >>>> The memo, which cited women's "neuroticism" as a reason there are fewer >>>> female workers in high-stress jobs, was published the following day by >>>> the tech website Gizmodo and went viral. Damore was quickly fired. >>>> ----- >>>> >>>> It was posted on the message board. >>> >>> Fine. So where is this alleged "bigotry"? >> >> James Damore suggesting that there are differences between men and women >> is "bigotry" according to the Prescott Cockroach. > > Stating the obvious (that women and men are different) is "bigotry" now? How so? > Did > they accidentally flush "Snit's" brain down the toilet when he was born? All too common with conservatives -- one conservative (Slimer) posts an idiotic straw man and then another conservative (RonB) acts like it is true. They do this out of ignorance and to kill the initial topic. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-27 13:18 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e1e4572c-134c-4a50-a8a1-607be5ed124b@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459866 |
On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 1:36:24 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 7/27/18 12:24 PM, RonB wrote: > > Stating the obvious (that women and men are different) is "bigotry" now? > > How so? Why did you answer a question with a question? Never mind, we know why ;) > > Did > > they accidentally flush "Snit's" brain down the toilet when he was born? > > All too common with conservatives -- one conservative (Slimer) posts an > idiotic straw man and then another conservative (RonB) acts like it is > true. They do this out of ignorance and to kill the initial topic. LOL! Face it, Snit, there's no reason someone shouldn't come away with that as based on what you tried to do here. You'll dismiss any contrary opinion, like the following, simply because it doesn't fit your narrative: "Contrary to what detractors would have you believe, women are, on average, higher in neuroticism and agreeableness, and lower in stress tolerance." <https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/no-the-google-manifesto-isnt-sexist-or-anti-diversity-its-science/article35903359/> "Debra Soh writes about the science of human sexuality and holds a PhD in sexual neuroscience from York University." But she only "holds a PhD in sexual neuroscience", it's not like she's an IT Master ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-27 13:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <fs1dsmFfvbnU17@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #459887 |
On 7/27/18 1:18 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Friday, July 27, 2018 at 1:36:24 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 7/27/18 12:24 PM, RonB wrote: > >>> Stating the obvious (that women and men are different) is "bigotry" now? >> >> How so? > > Why did you answer a question with a question? Never mind, we know why ;) Because the clear implication is that someone is suggesting so... and in fact, based on the next sentence the insinuation is *I* think so. Which is completely false. As such it is fair and reasonable to ask how he would come to such a bizarre conclusion. There: I have spent time helping you to understand basic communication... I suspect this is a part of your games but maybe you really were struggling to understand the flow of the conversation? >>> Did >>> they accidentally flush "Snit's" brain down the toilet when he was born? >> >> All too common with conservatives -- one conservative (Slimer) posts an >> idiotic straw man and then another conservative (RonB) acts like it is >> true. They do this out of ignorance and to kill the initial topic. > > LOL! Face it, Snit, there's no reason someone shouldn't come away with that > as based on what you tried to do here. See, here YOU claim to come to that same false conclusion. Can you explain how you arrived at such an erroneous idea? > You'll dismiss any contrary opinion, like > the following, simply because it doesn't fit your narrative: I am noting you are making false claims. And you are. That is simply a fact. I am also asking you to explain why you would make such an error. And you will not... you will blame me for YOUR error. It is not as though this is not predictable. But if you do as predicted do not expect me to keep playing your games. ... -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web