Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #458413 > unrolled thread
| Started by | RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-07-19 18:14 +0000 |
| Last post | 2018-07-20 13:14 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 370 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy
Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 18:14 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 11:30 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-19 14:38 -0500
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 13:37 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 23:55 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 17:14 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 18:17 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-19 17:18 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 17:45 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 21:42 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-19 20:23 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Storage Unit <storage.unit@mailinator.com> - 2018-07-21 07:40 -0500
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-21 16:30 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 17:21 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-21 18:27 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 12:24 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 19:45 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-21 20:01 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 20:44 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 14:14 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 03:03 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 12:42 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 12:43 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 13:27 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 17:20 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 12:42 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 12:53 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-20 07:04 -0500
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 05:29 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 14:53 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-20 10:07 -0500
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 15:19 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-20 10:30 -0500
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 15:36 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-20 10:47 -0500
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 16:08 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 20:50 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-21 15:58 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 09:16 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-21 12:44 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 16:06 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-07-22 13:17 -0400
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-23 07:38 -0500
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 05:54 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 16:46 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-23 12:08 -0500
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 22:26 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-23 16:29 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 11:12 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 11:37 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 11:49 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 12:29 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 12:48 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 12:58 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 13:06 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 13:13 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 13:40 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 13:49 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 15:38 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 15:52 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 15:59 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 16:06 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 16:49 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 16:57 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 17:03 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 17:06 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 17:12 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 17:30 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-25 21:02 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 15:17 -0600
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 14:19 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-25 22:34 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 17:08 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-25 18:34 -0400
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 16:05 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-25 17:43 -0400
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 19:30 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 01:45 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-25 21:03 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-25 21:01 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 15:03 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 15:06 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-24 14:44 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 16:32 -0600
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-25 05:25 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 05:41 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 06:58 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 10:36 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 11:49 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 13:00 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 13:05 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 15:07 -0600
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 14:16 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 15:19 -0600
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 14:55 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-25 14:50 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 15:02 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-25 18:15 -0400
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 22:58 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 16:40 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-25 19:48 -0400
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 16:57 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-25 20:18 -0400
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 17:39 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 21:18 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 22:55 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-26 06:37 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-26 14:37 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-26 09:35 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-26 12:06 -0500
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 20:07 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-26 13:26 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 13:45 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-27 06:50 -0500
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-27 13:07 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 06:26 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-27 06:37 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-27 13:43 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-27 07:09 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-27 16:12 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 09:19 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-27 11:09 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 11:23 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-27 18:34 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-27 13:08 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 14:52 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 16:51 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-27 19:08 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 19:11 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 19:26 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 20:44 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 22:33 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-28 08:33 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-28 09:03 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-28 09:36 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-28 10:13 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-28 12:47 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-28 09:52 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-28 10:25 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-28 13:01 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-28 13:34 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-28 17:15 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-28 16:02 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-28 16:27 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-28 17:29 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-29 09:58 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-29 12:21 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-29 09:55 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-29 11:44 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-29 12:19 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-29 12:57 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-29 16:15 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-29 16:57 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-29 18:28 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-29 18:42 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-29 18:45 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-29 19:37 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-29 16:17 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-29 20:43 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-29 13:53 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-29 14:52 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-29 16:58 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-30 13:29 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 08:32 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-30 09:02 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-29 16:55 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-29 17:13 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-29 18:27 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-29 19:01 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-29 19:06 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-29 19:25 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-29 20:09 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-29 20:34 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-30 05:01 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 05:25 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-30 08:57 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 09:42 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-30 12:52 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 08:57 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-30 09:09 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-30 09:30 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-30 09:45 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 10:06 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-07-30 18:56 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 12:48 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-30 13:02 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-30 20:40 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-30 16:40 -0400
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-30 12:58 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 13:13 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-30 13:43 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Kompyler <kompyler@toke.com> - 2018-07-30 20:49 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-30 16:49 -0400
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 13:53 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-30 14:07 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 09:08 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-31 09:28 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 09:45 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-31 10:34 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 10:54 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-31 13:28 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 13:52 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-31 18:32 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-07-31 20:49 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-31 17:44 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 18:09 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-31 18:38 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 18:56 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-31 19:06 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-08-01 02:47 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 19:58 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-31 20:35 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-31 20:19 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 18:02 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-31 18:35 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 18:55 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-31 19:06 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 19:59 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-31 20:36 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 08:50 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-01 10:55 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 11:28 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-01 11:31 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 11:36 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-01 11:43 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 11:57 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-01 12:05 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 12:15 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-01 12:31 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 12:36 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-01 12:40 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 12:49 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-01 12:54 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 13:18 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-01 13:25 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-01 13:35 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-01 15:34 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-08-02 08:29 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-08-02 09:46 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-31 21:17 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-30 10:22 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-29 18:54 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-28 12:50 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-28 08:58 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-28 08:49 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-28 08:55 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-28 09:05 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 11:39 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-27 12:15 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-27 12:00 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-27 11:42 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 07:13 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-27 12:06 -0500
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 10:11 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-27 12:13 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-27 11:23 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-27 11:06 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 19:16 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-27 12:18 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-27 14:35 -0500
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-27 19:39 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-27 14:50 -0500
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-07-26 15:04 -0400
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 12:27 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 16:23 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 16:45 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 16:54 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 17:01 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 17:15 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 17:18 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 17:32 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 21:15 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 10:41 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-25 20:19 -0400
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 17:41 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-25 20:57 -0400
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 21:19 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-26 10:16 -0400
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 21:18 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 21:49 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 22:54 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 23:24 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 10:47 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 17:23 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-26 14:24 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-26 09:30 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 09:48 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 11:24 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-26 20:39 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 14:00 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 15:27 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-26 15:51 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 15:55 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 16:21 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 16:26 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 16:39 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 16:48 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 16:59 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 17:02 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-25 17:17 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-25 20:22 -0400
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-25 20:21 -0400
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 17:22 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia GasPipe <vinnythegaspipe@motz.org> - 2018-07-25 20:27 -0400
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-25 17:20 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-23 18:17 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 00:57 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-23 23:00 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 16:54 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-23 18:19 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 20:32 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 19:26 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 12:42 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 12:46 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-24 20:09 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-07-24 09:36 -0400
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 07:13 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-24 15:01 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-24 14:56 -0500
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2018-07-24 13:00 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-24 13:09 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 15:25 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-20 10:31 -0500
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 15:39 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 09:07 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 16:06 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 20:53 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-20 11:10 -0500
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-20 11:12 -0500
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 16:42 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 12:15 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 11:12 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 20:56 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-21 16:00 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-21 17:22 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 16:42 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-07-22 13:17 -0400
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 10:51 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-23 00:42 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-22 18:24 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-07-20 07:46 -0400
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 13:11 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 15:06 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 15:35 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2018-07-20 20:42 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 21:18 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 13:10 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 06:15 -0700
chrisv is an Arse! Simon bar Sinister <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 05:44 -0700
chrisv is a naive socialist SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 15:03 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 12:54 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 15:01 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 15:13 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 15:22 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 15:55 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 13:13 -0700
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-20 10:29 -0500
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 15:34 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-20 10:36 -0500
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 15:41 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-20 10:48 -0500
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 16:08 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 20:52 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 16:07 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2018-07-20 20:54 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 16:04 +0000
Re: Less than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 13:09 -0700
Re: More than 1% care about Russia chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-20 10:17 -0500
Re: More than 1% care about Russia SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-07-20 15:49 +0000
Re: More than 1% care about Russia Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-07-20 13:14 -0700
Page 15 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 13 14 [15] 16 17 … 19 Next page →
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-25 22:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <frt60eFio8uU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #459569 |
On 7/25/18 9:49 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 9:18:29 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote:
>> On 7/25/18 5:41 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 6:19:48 PM UTC-6, GasPipe wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 17:15:01 -0700 (PDT), Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 6:01:34 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/25/18 4:54 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 5:45:10 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 7/25/18 4:23 PM, Steve Carroll wrote:
>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>> 1. Personally, I think Trump is an idiot who is way out of his league when
>>>>>>>>>> it comes to politics. He is a savvy businessman but in no way a politician.
>>>>>>>>>> But in certain respects that is why he got elected. However his "good
>>>>>>>>>> points" are also combined with his idiocy. So while he may be correct about
>>>>>>>>>> NATO countries paying their fair share instead of relying on the US tits he
>>>>>>>>>> screws himself by making derogatory comments about Montenegro.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think a 'Trump' is something the U.S. has needed for a *long* time.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And you claim to be a moderate... even leaning to the left. LOL!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Where did I say I lean to the left?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Less than an hour ago!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Steve Carroll
>>>>>> -----
>>>>>> I'm pretty much dead center on these tests, a tad liberal,
>>>>>> actually.
>>>>>> -----
>>>>>
>>>>> LOL! You're now apparently *so* high that you equate a rating on tests
>>>>> I've taken as me 'claiming' to lean to the left. You'd better lock that thing
>>>>> right now!
>>>>>
>>>>>>> And what would that have to do with this statement?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You cannot see how the fact you think the country has needed a "Trump"
>>>>>> ties into your political views? LOL!
>>>>>
>>>>> But you're talking about me "leaning to the left", what would my leaning
>>>>> to one side or the other have to do with my view that U.S. politics *needed*
>>>>> to be shaken up at this point in time? Never mind... looks like this is another
>>>>> one of those instances where you don't even pay attention to what you've
>>>>> written.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> I believe, as I have for a long time, that both 'parties' are
>>>>>>> full of life long scam artists.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So the country needs a bigger one?
>>>>>
>>>>> Lemme guess, you *really* don't think he's had any effect on exploding U.S.
>>>>> politics (the very thing I'm talking about)? You should sober up now and then.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Anyone who believes the same would welcome
>>>>>>> anyone, even someone as politically clueless as Trump, to make everyone
>>>>>>> open their eyes and highlight that this is what can happen when we all stay
>>>>>>> too greedy and stupid for too long. Of course, never in my wildest dreams
>>>>>>> did I imagine that fool would pull off some of the stuff he has.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Like what type stuff?
>>>>>
>>>>> Don't worry your tiny, little brain over it, Snit ;)
>>>>
>>>> Snit is high as a kite tonight.
>>>
>>> Apparently. He regularly claims he wants to talk about tech, politics, etc. but keeps
>>> on lying his ass off. Seems he's more interested in disqualifying himself from the
>>> privilege of discussion than actually having one. That's the mark of a true 'victim'.
>>>
>>>> Let's have some fun :)
>>>
>>> I always have fun with him, just not the way he likes ;)
>>>
>>
>> Ah, all those unquotable lies from me, even as -hh and I quote you lying
>> nonstop. But in your mind the problem is with the people who call you
>> out on your lies, not you lying. Got it!
>>
>> But even with that, hey, if you want to talk about tech or politics I am
>> game. But you CANNOT. When you try you change the topic to problems with
>> drug abuse (which you project onto others) and to how everything wrong
>> in your life is someone else's fault, and your own insecurities, etc.
>>
>> Here, let me give you ANOTHER chance: pick a political topic and discuss
>> it. It. Your views of it. Not your views of me. Not your wishes for me.
>> Not your delusions about me. YOUR VIEWS.
>>
>> You will fail. It is 100% predictable.
>>
>> --
>> Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
>> cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
>> somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
>>
>> They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
>>
>> <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
>
>
>
> That's what Klaus Schadenfreude does when he gets caught. He quickly creates a new identity, starts a cross posted thread so he can claim it was Peter Köhlmann. Hey it was my left hand... and then he responds to his own post with his right hand. It's a piece of cake to pick by focusing on a few exceptions clashing from what is common. What is more important from an advocacy outlook are the ordinary events. What is your evidence? I think the person you are referencing is in my kill file.
>
> I'm well aware the channel I link to from Peter Köhlmann is absolute greenhorn level. That said, it is good enough.
>
> Times change. I think the idea of a chat client is getting outdated. Several of us reported Klaus Schadenfreude years ago. As expected, it did naught to derail the imbecile.
>
>
>
Steve Carroll:
-----
There is no bot, pathetic liar.
-----
Still claiming this is the case? LOL!
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-25 23:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5f740483-e6a4-40ac-b94f-19f017148989@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459576 |
On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 10:54:25 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > On 7/25/18 9:49 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 9:18:29 PM UTC-7, Snit wrote: > >> On 7/25/18 5:41 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 6:19:48 PM UTC-6, GasPipe wrote: > >>>> On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 17:15:01 -0700 (PDT), Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 6:01:34 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>>>> On 7/25/18 4:54 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>>>>> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 5:45:10 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>>>>>> On 7/25/18 4:23 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>>>>>> ... > >>>>>>>>>> 1. Personally, I think Trump is an idiot who is way out of his league when > >>>>>>>>>> it comes to politics. He is a savvy businessman but in no way a politician. > >>>>>>>>>> But in certain respects that is why he got elected. However his "good > >>>>>>>>>> points" are also combined with his idiocy. So while he may be correct about > >>>>>>>>>> NATO countries paying their fair share instead of relying on the US tits he > >>>>>>>>>> screws himself by making derogatory comments about Montenegro. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I think a 'Trump' is something the U.S. has needed for a *long* time. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> And you claim to be a moderate... even leaning to the left. LOL! > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Where did I say I lean to the left? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Less than an hour ago! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Steve Carroll > >>>>>> ----- > >>>>>> I'm pretty much dead center on these tests, a tad liberal, > >>>>>> actually. > >>>>>> ----- > >>>>> > >>>>> LOL! You're now apparently *so* high that you equate a rating on tests > >>>>> I've taken as me 'claiming' to lean to the left. You'd better lock that thing > >>>>> right now! > >>>>> > >>>>>>> And what would that have to do with this statement? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> You cannot see how the fact you think the country has needed a "Trump" > >>>>>> ties into your political views? LOL! > >>>>> > >>>>> But you're talking about me "leaning to the left", what would my leaning > >>>>> to one side or the other have to do with my view that U.S. politics *needed* > >>>>> to be shaken up at this point in time? Never mind... looks like this is another > >>>>> one of those instances where you don't even pay attention to what you've > >>>>> written. > >>>>> > >>>>>>> I believe, as I have for a long time, that both 'parties' are > >>>>>>> full of life long scam artists. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> So the country needs a bigger one? > >>>>> > >>>>> Lemme guess, you *really* don't think he's had any effect on exploding U.S. > >>>>> politics (the very thing I'm talking about)? You should sober up now and then. > >>>>> > >>>>>>> Anyone who believes the same would welcome > >>>>>>> anyone, even someone as politically clueless as Trump, to make everyone > >>>>>>> open their eyes and highlight that this is what can happen when we all stay > >>>>>>> too greedy and stupid for too long. Of course, never in my wildest dreams > >>>>>>> did I imagine that fool would pull off some of the stuff he has. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Like what type stuff? > >>>>> > >>>>> Don't worry your tiny, little brain over it, Snit ;) > >>>> > >>>> Snit is high as a kite tonight. > >>> > >>> Apparently. He regularly claims he wants to talk about tech, politics, etc. but keeps > >>> on lying his ass off. Seems he's more interested in disqualifying himself from the > >>> privilege of discussion than actually having one. That's the mark of a true 'victim'. > >>> > >>>> Let's have some fun :) > >>> > >>> I always have fun with him, just not the way he likes ;) > >>> > >> > >> Ah, all those unquotable lies from me, even as -hh and I quote you lying > >> nonstop. But in your mind the problem is with the people who call you > >> out on your lies, not you lying. Got it! > >> > >> But even with that, hey, if you want to talk about tech or politics I am > >> game. But you CANNOT. When you try you change the topic to problems with > >> drug abuse (which you project onto others) and to how everything wrong > >> in your life is someone else's fault, and your own insecurities, etc. > >> > >> Here, let me give you ANOTHER chance: pick a political topic and discuss > >> it. It. Your views of it. Not your views of me. Not your wishes for me. > >> Not your delusions about me. YOUR VIEWS. > >> > >> You will fail. It is 100% predictable. > >> > >> -- > >> Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > >> cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > >> somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > >> > >> They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > >> > >> <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> > > > > > > > > That's what Klaus Schadenfreude does when he gets caught. He quickly creates a new identity, starts a cross posted thread so he can claim it was Peter Köhlmann. Hey it was my left hand... and then he responds to his own post with his right hand. It's a piece of cake to pick by focusing on a few exceptions clashing from what is common. What is more important from an advocacy outlook are the ordinary events. What is your evidence? I think the person you are referencing is in my kill file. > > > > I'm well aware the channel I link to from Peter Köhlmann is absolute greenhorn level. That said, it is good enough. > > > > Times change. I think the idea of a chat client is getting outdated. Several of us reported Klaus Schadenfreude years ago. As expected, it did naught to derail the imbecile. > > > > > > > > > Steve Carroll: > ----- > There is no bot, pathetic liar. > ----- > > Still claiming this is the case? LOL! > > -- > Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They > cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel > somehow superior by attacking the messenger. > > They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. > > <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In article <fmre6tF8stoU3@mid.individual.net>, Snit wrote: >> Steve Carroll (Snit): >> For most I would say the comment is worth looking into. Of course, >> given that it's chrisv I would ignore that doubt and go straight >> to 'lie' because that's most of what chrisv does. Meaning no >> evidence is required to deem it dishonest. So what's chrisv's >> system for the flooding deluge? AppleScript? That is the only tool >> he knows, isn't it? He must be abusing it to create these goofy >> "obsession" garbage posts. My hypothesis, chrisv took Steven >> Petruzzellis's code that he stole and pretended was his... he's >> feeding it Steven Petruzzellis's posts, grabbing offensive >> paragraphs, then altering those using automated reinforcement >> learning and then he hand posts them because his insomnia enables >> him to do that practically endlessly. > >> The content is a bunch of randomized bullshit. That points to one >> person. Real discussion will be destroyed once the trolls >> overpopulate. That, and there will always be a butthurt insomniac >> or two in an open news group (hint: chrisv). The specifics of the >> bullshit aside, we have all seen who routinely gets angry when he >> does not get a response. > >> -- >> Best CMS Solution of 2017! >> https://www.facebook.com/JonasEklundh >> https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100012978552519 >> https://youtu.be/GPPqvw8iEBs >> Jonas Eklundh Communication > > Why do you link to Sandman's FB page? And you do so in the same post > you point to a link to his trolling. > Why? Did he leave COLA because of you? So cute, Snit thinks he can make me leave COLA :) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJbD6/mAAoJECFEwfBaA+jRjLYH+we67Zx/z0UtJtVFvIZJ/Kki 0ljOcqQgkGmhkW63ifRT6J3Lzk7JHiUs9I5ZLD09MGvk8ZIU8ZNhS7QKfGxrLJA2 k1JrXzrB+Ko6u56WOqeRMM3R17GsYDIxqwzWfzLwceGxs78Ikpjnd1J4pW1nq7yK hP/oVHenewp54mZIhb8e0eZWZasVLiKwSsO22Rr1NcJku4UrD25yNtrth+SH1ZRk 0U7X0KtHwKDE6MqlnZxexxKg+6sbdKwrn1C2oPSFc+7AtnaUfauPP0+dyrgD1rG3 +P3BkDk0eZsRgmC8kqEzCiveEk9zarSrJqLGjn3WOYiZa+aqzN9UqUCnblaFe+o= =kqoW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Eight things to never feed your cat! https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.c/KDQrv8appR8 http://prescottcomputerguy.com http://www.5z8.info/backyard-fireworks-disasters_t7w7pu_bombbuilding Jonas Eklundh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-26 10:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <27e01b1e-a5eb-4aa3-9ff8-4c3d0fe3c593@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459565 |
On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 10:18:29 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 7/25/18 5:41 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 6:19:48 PM UTC-6, GasPipe wrote: > >> On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 17:15:01 -0700 (PDT), Steve Carroll wrote: > >> > >>> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 6:01:34 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>> On 7/25/18 4:54 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>>> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 5:45:10 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >>>>>> On 7/25/18 4:23 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>>>> ... > >>>>>>>> 1. Personally, I think Trump is an idiot who is way out of his league when > >>>>>>>> it comes to politics. He is a savvy businessman but in no way a politician. > >>>>>>>> But in certain respects that is why he got elected. However his "good > >>>>>>>> points" are also combined with his idiocy. So while he may be correct about > >>>>>>>> NATO countries paying their fair share instead of relying on the US tits he > >>>>>>>> screws himself by making derogatory comments about Montenegro. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I think a 'Trump' is something the U.S. has needed for a *long* time. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> And you claim to be a moderate... even leaning to the left. LOL! > >>>>> > >>>>> Where did I say I lean to the left? > >>>> > >>>> Less than an hour ago! > >>>> > >>>> Steve Carroll > >>>> ----- > >>>> I'm pretty much dead center on these tests, a tad liberal, > >>>> actually. > >>>> ----- > >>> > >>> LOL! You're now apparently *so* high that you equate a rating on tests > >>> I've taken as me 'claiming' to lean to the left. You'd better lock that thing > >>> right now! > >>> > >>>>> And what would that have to do with this statement? > >>>> > >>>> You cannot see how the fact you think the country has needed a "Trump" > >>>> ties into your political views? LOL! > >>> > >>> But you're talking about me "leaning to the left", what would my leaning > >>> to one side or the other have to do with my view that U.S. politics *needed* > >>> to be shaken up at this point in time? Never mind... looks like this is another > >>> one of those instances where you don't even pay attention to what you've > >>> written. > >>> > >>>>> I believe, as I have for a long time, that both 'parties' are > >>>>> full of life long scam artists. > >>>> > >>>> So the country needs a bigger one? > >>> > >>> Lemme guess, you *really* don't think he's had any effect on exploding U.S. > >>> politics (the very thing I'm talking about)? You should sober up now and then. > >>> > >>>>> Anyone who believes the same would welcome > >>>>> anyone, even someone as politically clueless as Trump, to make everyone > >>>>> open their eyes and highlight that this is what can happen when we all stay > >>>>> too greedy and stupid for too long. Of course, never in my wildest dreams > >>>>> did I imagine that fool would pull off some of the stuff he has. > >>>> > >>>> Like what type stuff? > >>> > >>> Don't worry your tiny, little brain over it, Snit ;) > >> > >> Snit is high as a kite tonight. > > > > Apparently. He regularly claims he wants to talk about tech, politics, etc. but keeps > > on lying his ass off. Seems he's more interested in disqualifying himself from the > > privilege of discussion than actually having one. That's the mark of a true 'victim'. > > > >> Let's have some fun :) > > > > I always have fun with him, just not the way he likes ;) > > > > Ah, all those unquotable lies from me, even as -hh and I quote you lying Neither of you quoted any such thing. > But even with that, hey, if you want to talk about tech or politics I am > game. But you CANNOT I'm doing it... even with you... yet, you still persist with your lying. > Here, let me give you ANOTHER chance: pick a political topic and discuss > it. Being that you can't get past this topic without lying, what's my incentive to continue with you? Much of what you write validates the idea that your you deserve to be disqualified from the privilege of conversing with "others". You should be thanking anyone who responds to you at all, on any topic.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-25 17:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <84e0f70d-0119-4ab4-9360-3c3cd57836af@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459539 |
On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 5:15:04 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 6:01:34 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > On 7/25/18 4:54 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 5:45:10 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > >> On 7/25/18 4:23 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > >> ... > > >>>> 1. Personally, I think Trump is an idiot who is way out of his league when > > >>>> it comes to politics. He is a savvy businessman but in no way a politician. > > >>>> But in certain respects that is why he got elected. However his "good > > >>>> points" are also combined with his idiocy. So while he may be correct about > > >>>> NATO countries paying their fair share instead of relying on the US tits he > > >>>> screws himself by making derogatory comments about Montenegro. > > >>> > > >>> I think a 'Trump' is something the U.S. has needed for a *long* time. > > >> > > >> And you claim to be a moderate... even leaning to the left. LOL! > > > > > > Where did I say I lean to the left? > > > > Less than an hour ago! > > > > Steve Carroll > > ----- > > I'm pretty much dead center on these tests, a tad liberal, > > actually. > > ----- > > LOL! You're now apparently *so* high that you equate a rating on tests > I've taken as me 'claiming' to lean to the left. You'd better lock that thing > right now! > > > > And what would that have to do with this statement? > > > > You cannot see how the fact you think the country has needed a "Trump" > > ties into your political views? LOL! > > But you're talking about me "leaning to the left", what would my leaning > to one side or the other have to do with my view that U.S. politics *needed* > to be shaken up at this point in time? Never mind... looks like this is another > one of those instances where you don't even pay attention to what you've > written. > > > > I believe, as I have for a long time, that both 'parties' are > > > full of life long scam artists. > > > > So the country needs a bigger one? > > Lemme guess, you *really* don't think he's had any effect on exploding U.S. > politics (the very thing I'm talking about)? You should sober up now and then. > > > > Anyone who believes the same would welcome > > > anyone, even someone as politically clueless as Trump, to make everyone > > > open their eyes and highlight that this is what can happen when we all stay > > > too greedy and stupid for too long. Of course, never in my wildest dreams > > > did I imagine that fool would pull off some of the stuff he has. > > > > Like what type stuff? > > Don't worry your tiny, little brain over it, Snit ;) You're clueless! Given how regularly it seems that Steve Carroll's .sig file is some skew of a narrative Klaus Schadenfreude wrote which had been a bodyslam on Steve Carroll for something he did which was asinine/false/etc... its clearly a regular sign of Steve Carroll's constant embarrassment for having been so often pwned. Seriously, those of you who troll are not able to restrain Klaus Schadenfreude anymore. Turns out Steve Carroll's non-stop flooding comments of Klaus Schadenfreude met that definition, so he insisted that comment of his was forged by Klaus Schadenfreude. Seriously, what lie? But Steve Carroll feels the need to belittle the cult-like herd of convenient friends. So be it. Do you have a high school diploma? -- Curious how these posts are made? https://youtu.be/0ZNxaaKD7-c
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-26 14:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <hQk6D.475530$DS3.335326@fx42.iad> |
| In reply to | #459506 |
On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 18:15:04 -0400, GasPipe wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:50:23 -0700 (PDT), -hh wrote: > >> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 1:36:41 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 6:25:27 AM UTC-6, -hh wrote: >>>> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 6:32:26 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>> > On 2018-07-24 21:44:09 +0000, -hh said: >>>> > > On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 2:12:22 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll >>>> > > wrote: >>>> > >> On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 5:29:28 PM UTC-6, -hh wrote: >>>> > >> >>>> > >>> The investigation is still very, very early.>> Which is why no >>>> > >>> one should be alleging unquestionable guilt. >>>> > > >>>> > > When the party has already plead guilty ... that's pretty >>>> > > unquestionable. >>>> > >>>> > RonB: "I think the Russian collusion bullshit is just that, total >>>> > and complete bullshit." >>>> > You: "The investigation is still very, very early." >>>> > >>>> > There is no charge of "collusion" to "plead guilty" to. You're >>>> > confalting things. >>>> >>>> Incorrect >>> >>> So cite this collusion law, ... >> >> Malicious context change by how "Steve" edited (note how there's no >> punctuation) to deliberately try to alter the statement. >> The complete statement was: >> >> "Incorrect, because the investigation's scope is not narrowly only >> looking for criminal collusion of the current Administration with the >> Russians. >> >> As such, you're trying to move the goalposts to where it suits you. >> >> And similarly, so too is RonB: he's trying to only look at the last >> possible domino that could fall, as opposed to holistically viewing the >> entire realm of criminal activities." >> >> With this deliberate & dishonest act, Steve has forfeited. >> >> >> -hh > > How many indictments for Russian COLLUSION have been filed? > Seems Muller is indicting people on a wide scope of charges other than > the primary focus for the special counsel. He could indict random people who have some Russian lineage dating back to 1813 for something as irrelevant as jaywalking and the socialists - who never read past the headline - would scream that it's evidence of collusion. > And in no special order, as an independent who votes his wallet, so what > are you doing for my back pocket: > > 1. Personally, I think Trump is an idiot who is way out of his league > when it comes to politics. He is a savvy businessman but in no way a > politician. > But in certain respects that is why he got elected. However his "good > points" are also combined with his idiocy. So while he may be correct > about NATO countries paying their fair share instead of relying on the > US tits he screws himself by making derogatory comments about > Montenegro. > > 2. I do not believe Trump colluded with the Russians. Interested in dirt > on Hillary? Sure. Nothing new in politics and both sides did and > continue to do it. > > 3. I believe the Russians, Putin if you will, has some real nasty dirt > on Trump. There is probably some truth in hookers peeing on him and > Trump not being smart enough to assume the hotel was bugged fell into > the trap. Russian hookers have a reputation for doing "stuff" the other > hookers wouldn't dream of doing. Trump got sucked in, literally. > > 4. The MSM is out of control. For 8 years they kissed Obama's ass and > they wrongly assumed Hillary would take over the reigns for another 8 > years of liberal policies. It didn't happen. They need to get over it. > It's disgusting the way they attack Trump 24x7 and yet gave Obama a pass > on just about every gaff he made. How about Obama's red line in the > sand? Barely a mention when Putin laughed at him. How about when that > journalist got beheaded on TV. Obama was playing golf, paused for 2 > minutes, made some canned comments and then went back to his golf game. > The press said nothing. > It goes on and on. > > 5. That being said, Trump scares me. Having a vindictive (can you say > Nixon?) narcissistic president is a dangerous thing. I thought he would > surround himself with "smart people", same thing I thought of Obama, but > it never happened with either of them although Obama has a silver tongue > and knows how to act presidential. The problem is he takes the high road > and does nothing. North Korea is an example. At least Trump is trying > even if he fails. > He does needs to shut up and start acting presidential because the good > things he is doing are over shadowed by his stupid, big mouth. > > 6, As for the democrats, tell me what they have done for the blacks, > underclass and so forth? > Pretty much lip service and nothing more. > Race relations under Obama took a major turn back to the 1960's. You'll > never hear the MSM talk about that. > Oh and fossils like Mitch McConnell are a major part of the problem. > Career Republicans on the take are another reason people don't trust the > government. > Oh well, I've ranted enough for today. > We need a viable 3rd party. You have some but nobody wants to "waste his vote" by voting for a party which can't get more than 1% of the vote. Remember that the Green and the Libertarians were around as well even though their influence is nil. I disagree with most of what you said about Trump though. I don't think he is idiotic and I think that his directness is what attracted people to him. People are sick of politicians looking at a spade and describing it as everything other than a spade for fear of offending it. I want a man who can call it what it is and I need it here in Canada too because I'm sick of the pansy we have in office at the moment... who is on vacation yet again and didn't even bother to comment on the Toronto shooting for fear of sacrificing time on one of the 26 vacations he takes every year. -- SilverSlimer Ubuntu 18.04 on MSI GT72 2QD
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-26 09:30 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <frub9bFr0n1U4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #459612 |
On 7/26/18 7:24 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 18:15:04 -0400, GasPipe wrote: > >> On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:50:23 -0700 (PDT), -hh wrote: >> >>> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 1:36:41 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 6:25:27 AM UTC-6, -hh wrote: >>>>> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 6:32:26 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>>> On 2018-07-24 21:44:09 +0000, -hh said: >>>>>>> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 2:12:22 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 5:29:28 PM UTC-6, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The investigation is still very, very early.>> Which is why no >>>>>>>>> one should be alleging unquestionable guilt. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> When the party has already plead guilty ... that's pretty >>>>>>> unquestionable. >>>>>> >>>>>> RonB: "I think the Russian collusion bullshit is just that, total >>>>>> and complete bullshit." >>>>>> You: "The investigation is still very, very early." >>>>>> >>>>>> There is no charge of "collusion" to "plead guilty" to. You're >>>>>> confalting things. >>>>> >>>>> Incorrect >>>> >>>> So cite this collusion law, ... >>> >>> Malicious context change by how "Steve" edited (note how there's no >>> punctuation) to deliberately try to alter the statement. >>> The complete statement was: >>> >>> "Incorrect, because the investigation's scope is not narrowly only >>> looking for criminal collusion of the current Administration with the >>> Russians. >>> >>> As such, you're trying to move the goalposts to where it suits you. >>> >>> And similarly, so too is RonB: he's trying to only look at the last >>> possible domino that could fall, as opposed to holistically viewing the >>> entire realm of criminal activities." >>> >>> With this deliberate & dishonest act, Steve has forfeited. >>> >>> >>> -hh >> >> How many indictments for Russian COLLUSION have been filed? >> Seems Muller is indicting people on a wide scope of charges other than >> the primary focus for the special counsel. > > He could indict random people who have some Russian lineage dating back > to 1813 for something as irrelevant as jaywalking and the socialists - > who never read past the headline - would scream that it's evidence of > collusion. > >> And in no special order, as an independent who votes his wallet, so what >> are you doing for my back pocket: >> >> 1. Personally, I think Trump is an idiot who is way out of his league >> when it comes to politics. He is a savvy businessman but in no way a >> politician. >> But in certain respects that is why he got elected. However his "good >> points" are also combined with his idiocy. So while he may be correct >> about NATO countries paying their fair share instead of relying on the >> US tits he screws himself by making derogatory comments about >> Montenegro. >> >> 2. I do not believe Trump colluded with the Russians. Interested in dirt >> on Hillary? Sure. Nothing new in politics and both sides did and >> continue to do it. >> >> 3. I believe the Russians, Putin if you will, has some real nasty dirt >> on Trump. There is probably some truth in hookers peeing on him and >> Trump not being smart enough to assume the hotel was bugged fell into >> the trap. Russian hookers have a reputation for doing "stuff" the other >> hookers wouldn't dream of doing. Trump got sucked in, literally. >> >> 4. The MSM is out of control. For 8 years they kissed Obama's ass and >> they wrongly assumed Hillary would take over the reigns for another 8 >> years of liberal policies. It didn't happen. They need to get over it. >> It's disgusting the way they attack Trump 24x7 and yet gave Obama a pass >> on just about every gaff he made. How about Obama's red line in the >> sand? Barely a mention when Putin laughed at him. How about when that >> journalist got beheaded on TV. Obama was playing golf, paused for 2 >> minutes, made some canned comments and then went back to his golf game. >> The press said nothing. >> It goes on and on. >> >> 5. That being said, Trump scares me. Having a vindictive (can you say >> Nixon?) narcissistic president is a dangerous thing. I thought he would >> surround himself with "smart people", same thing I thought of Obama, but >> it never happened with either of them although Obama has a silver tongue >> and knows how to act presidential. The problem is he takes the high road >> and does nothing. North Korea is an example. At least Trump is trying >> even if he fails. >> He does needs to shut up and start acting presidential because the good >> things he is doing are over shadowed by his stupid, big mouth. >> >> 6, As for the democrats, tell me what they have done for the blacks, >> underclass and so forth? >> Pretty much lip service and nothing more. >> Race relations under Obama took a major turn back to the 1960's. You'll >> never hear the MSM talk about that. >> Oh and fossils like Mitch McConnell are a major part of the problem. >> Career Republicans on the take are another reason people don't trust the >> government. >> Oh well, I've ranted enough for today. >> We need a viable 3rd party. > > You have some but nobody wants to "waste his vote" by voting for a party > which can't get more than 1% of the vote. Remember that the Green and the > Libertarians were around as well even though their influence is nil. > > I disagree with most of what you said about Trump though. I don't think > he is idiotic and I think that his directness is what attracted people to > him. He is not "direct"... he is deeply dishonest and grossly bigoted. But you LIKE that. > People are sick of politicians looking at a spade and describing it > as everything other than a spade for fear of offending it. I want a man > who can call it what it is and I need it here in Canada too because I'm > sick of the pansy we have in office at the moment... who is on vacation > yet again and didn't even bother to comment on the Toronto shooting for > fear of sacrificing time on one of the 26 vacations he takes every year. You whined about Obama's vacations, too. But not Trump's golf trips. Almost like you are deeply biased. :) -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-26 09:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <e6abfbbd-e630-4a88-bf46-c410ccfc5639@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459633 |
On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 10:30:38 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 7/26/18 7:24 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 18:15:04 -0400, GasPipe wrote: > > > >> On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:50:23 -0700 (PDT), -hh wrote: > >> > >>> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 1:36:41 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 6:25:27 AM UTC-6, -hh wrote: > >>>>> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 6:32:26 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>>>> On 2018-07-24 21:44:09 +0000, -hh said: > >>>>>>> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 2:12:22 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 5:29:28 PM UTC-6, -hh wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> The investigation is still very, very early.>> Which is why no > >>>>>>>>> one should be alleging unquestionable guilt. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> When the party has already plead guilty ... that's pretty > >>>>>>> unquestionable. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> RonB: "I think the Russian collusion bullshit is just that, total > >>>>>> and complete bullshit." > >>>>>> You: "The investigation is still very, very early." > >>>>>> > >>>>>> There is no charge of "collusion" to "plead guilty" to. You're > >>>>>> confalting things. > >>>>> > >>>>> Incorrect > >>>> > >>>> So cite this collusion law, ... > >>> > >>> Malicious context change by how "Steve" edited (note how there's no > >>> punctuation) to deliberately try to alter the statement. > >>> The complete statement was: > >>> > >>> "Incorrect, because the investigation's scope is not narrowly only > >>> looking for criminal collusion of the current Administration with the > >>> Russians. > >>> > >>> As such, you're trying to move the goalposts to where it suits you. > >>> > >>> And similarly, so too is RonB: he's trying to only look at the last > >>> possible domino that could fall, as opposed to holistically viewing the > >>> entire realm of criminal activities." > >>> > >>> With this deliberate & dishonest act, Steve has forfeited. > >>> > >>> > >>> -hh > >> > >> How many indictments for Russian COLLUSION have been filed? > >> Seems Muller is indicting people on a wide scope of charges other than > >> the primary focus for the special counsel. > > > > He could indict random people who have some Russian lineage dating back > > to 1813 for something as irrelevant as jaywalking and the socialists - > > who never read past the headline - would scream that it's evidence of > > collusion. > > > >> And in no special order, as an independent who votes his wallet, so what > >> are you doing for my back pocket: > >> > >> 1. Personally, I think Trump is an idiot who is way out of his league > >> when it comes to politics. He is a savvy businessman but in no way a > >> politician. > >> But in certain respects that is why he got elected. However his "good > >> points" are also combined with his idiocy. So while he may be correct > >> about NATO countries paying their fair share instead of relying on the > >> US tits he screws himself by making derogatory comments about > >> Montenegro. > >> > >> 2. I do not believe Trump colluded with the Russians. Interested in dirt > >> on Hillary? Sure. Nothing new in politics and both sides did and > >> continue to do it. > >> > >> 3. I believe the Russians, Putin if you will, has some real nasty dirt > >> on Trump. There is probably some truth in hookers peeing on him and > >> Trump not being smart enough to assume the hotel was bugged fell into > >> the trap. Russian hookers have a reputation for doing "stuff" the other > >> hookers wouldn't dream of doing. Trump got sucked in, literally. > >> > >> 4. The MSM is out of control. For 8 years they kissed Obama's ass and > >> they wrongly assumed Hillary would take over the reigns for another 8 > >> years of liberal policies. It didn't happen. They need to get over it. > >> It's disgusting the way they attack Trump 24x7 and yet gave Obama a pass > >> on just about every gaff he made. How about Obama's red line in the > >> sand? Barely a mention when Putin laughed at him. How about when that > >> journalist got beheaded on TV. Obama was playing golf, paused for 2 > >> minutes, made some canned comments and then went back to his golf game. > >> The press said nothing. > >> It goes on and on. > >> > >> 5. That being said, Trump scares me. Having a vindictive (can you say > >> Nixon?) narcissistic president is a dangerous thing. I thought he would > >> surround himself with "smart people", same thing I thought of Obama, but > >> it never happened with either of them although Obama has a silver tongue > >> and knows how to act presidential. The problem is he takes the high road > >> and does nothing. North Korea is an example. At least Trump is trying > >> even if he fails. > >> He does needs to shut up and start acting presidential because the good > >> things he is doing are over shadowed by his stupid, big mouth. > >> > >> 6, As for the democrats, tell me what they have done for the blacks, > >> underclass and so forth? > >> Pretty much lip service and nothing more. > >> Race relations under Obama took a major turn back to the 1960's. You'll > >> never hear the MSM talk about that. > >> Oh and fossils like Mitch McConnell are a major part of the problem. > >> Career Republicans on the take are another reason people don't trust the > >> government. > >> Oh well, I've ranted enough for today. > >> We need a viable 3rd party. > > > > You have some but nobody wants to "waste his vote" by voting for a party > > which can't get more than 1% of the vote. Remember that the Green and the > > Libertarians were around as well even though their influence is nil. > > > > I disagree with most of what you said about Trump though. I don't think > > he is idiotic and I think that his directness is what attracted people to > > him. > > He is not "direct"... he is deeply dishonest and grossly bigoted. What definition of the term "bigoted" are you using? I ask because you used that term in an earlier post that I replied to: <978c1f14-3da2-4e23-851e-b717e911898b@googlegroups.com> Can you quote some of Trump's alleged "bigoted" claims so they can be compared to those you've alleged for Damore (after you quote those, too, naturally).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-26 11:24 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <3ba16154-c926-42c2-87b2-4ca56a7f50b3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459643 |
On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 9:48:26 AM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 10:30:38 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > On 7/26/18 7:24 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: > > > On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 18:15:04 -0400, GasPipe wrote: > > > > > >> On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:50:23 -0700 (PDT), -hh wrote: > > >> > > >>> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 1:36:41 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll wrote: > > >>>> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 6:25:27 AM UTC-6, -hh wrote: > > >>>>> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 6:32:26 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll wrote: > > >>>>>> On 2018-07-24 21:44:09 +0000, -hh said: > > >>>>>>> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 2:12:22 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 5:29:28 PM UTC-6, -hh wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> The investigation is still very, very early.>> Which is why no > > >>>>>>>>> one should be alleging unquestionable guilt. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> When the party has already plead guilty ... that's pretty > > >>>>>>> unquestionable. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> RonB: "I think the Russian collusion bullshit is just that, total > > >>>>>> and complete bullshit." > > >>>>>> You: "The investigation is still very, very early." > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> There is no charge of "collusion" to "plead guilty" to. You're > > >>>>>> confalting things. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Incorrect > > >>>> > > >>>> So cite this collusion law, ... > > >>> > > >>> Malicious context change by how "Steve" edited (note how there's no > > >>> punctuation) to deliberately try to alter the statement. > > >>> The complete statement was: > > >>> > > >>> "Incorrect, because the investigation's scope is not narrowly only > > >>> looking for criminal collusion of the current Administration with the > > >>> Russians. > > >>> > > >>> As such, you're trying to move the goalposts to where it suits you. > > >>> > > >>> And similarly, so too is RonB: he's trying to only look at the last > > >>> possible domino that could fall, as opposed to holistically viewing the > > >>> entire realm of criminal activities." > > >>> > > >>> With this deliberate & dishonest act, Steve has forfeited. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> -hh > > >> > > >> How many indictments for Russian COLLUSION have been filed? > > >> Seems Muller is indicting people on a wide scope of charges other than > > >> the primary focus for the special counsel. > > > > > > He could indict random people who have some Russian lineage dating back > > > to 1813 for something as irrelevant as jaywalking and the socialists - > > > who never read past the headline - would scream that it's evidence of > > > collusion. > > > > > >> And in no special order, as an independent who votes his wallet, so what > > >> are you doing for my back pocket: > > >> > > >> 1. Personally, I think Trump is an idiot who is way out of his league > > >> when it comes to politics. He is a savvy businessman but in no way a > > >> politician. > > >> But in certain respects that is why he got elected. However his "good > > >> points" are also combined with his idiocy. So while he may be correct > > >> about NATO countries paying their fair share instead of relying on the > > >> US tits he screws himself by making derogatory comments about > > >> Montenegro. > > >> > > >> 2. I do not believe Trump colluded with the Russians. Interested in dirt > > >> on Hillary? Sure. Nothing new in politics and both sides did and > > >> continue to do it. > > >> > > >> 3. I believe the Russians, Putin if you will, has some real nasty dirt > > >> on Trump. There is probably some truth in hookers peeing on him and > > >> Trump not being smart enough to assume the hotel was bugged fell into > > >> the trap. Russian hookers have a reputation for doing "stuff" the other > > >> hookers wouldn't dream of doing. Trump got sucked in, literally. > > >> > > >> 4. The MSM is out of control. For 8 years they kissed Obama's ass and > > >> they wrongly assumed Hillary would take over the reigns for another 8 > > >> years of liberal policies. It didn't happen. They need to get over it. > > >> It's disgusting the way they attack Trump 24x7 and yet gave Obama a pass > > >> on just about every gaff he made. How about Obama's red line in the > > >> sand? Barely a mention when Putin laughed at him. How about when that > > >> journalist got beheaded on TV. Obama was playing golf, paused for 2 > > >> minutes, made some canned comments and then went back to his golf game. > > >> The press said nothing. > > >> It goes on and on. > > >> > > >> 5. That being said, Trump scares me. Having a vindictive (can you say > > >> Nixon?) narcissistic president is a dangerous thing. I thought he would > > >> surround himself with "smart people", same thing I thought of Obama, but > > >> it never happened with either of them although Obama has a silver tongue > > >> and knows how to act presidential. The problem is he takes the high road > > >> and does nothing. North Korea is an example. At least Trump is trying > > >> even if he fails. > > >> He does needs to shut up and start acting presidential because the good > > >> things he is doing are over shadowed by his stupid, big mouth. > > >> > > >> 6, As for the democrats, tell me what they have done for the blacks, > > >> underclass and so forth? > > >> Pretty much lip service and nothing more. > > >> Race relations under Obama took a major turn back to the 1960's. You'll > > >> never hear the MSM talk about that. > > >> Oh and fossils like Mitch McConnell are a major part of the problem. > > >> Career Republicans on the take are another reason people don't trust the > > >> government. > > >> Oh well, I've ranted enough for today. > > >> We need a viable 3rd party. > > > > > > You have some but nobody wants to "waste his vote" by voting for a party > > > which can't get more than 1% of the vote. Remember that the Green and the > > > Libertarians were around as well even though their influence is nil. > > > > > > I disagree with most of what you said about Trump though. I don't think > > > he is idiotic and I think that his directness is what attracted people to > > > him. > > > > He is not "direct"... he is deeply dishonest and grossly bigoted. > > What definition of the term "bigoted" are you using? I ask because you > used that term in an earlier post that I replied to: > > <978c1f14-3da2-4e23-851e-b717e911898b@googlegroups.com> > > Can you quote some of Trump's alleged "bigoted" claims so they can be > compared to those you've alleged for Damore (after you quote those, too, > naturally). Are you being stupid on purpose? Are people still debating this? Besides DFS, who fails to understand what Melzzzzz is doing? Really, what lie? From how DFS asked - by asking for fundamentals of the system and suchlike - he has never worked on a data-intensive problem before. If he had he would have understood the requirements like using TWO equal signs to check equality! -- Best CMS Solution of 2017 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OffkiSAsYo8 Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-26 20:39 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <Hjq6D.405538$6C5.209070@fx07.iad> |
| In reply to | #459643 |
On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 09:48:23 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 10:30:38 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 7/26/18 7:24 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >> > On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 18:15:04 -0400, GasPipe wrote: >> > >> >> On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:50:23 -0700 (PDT), -hh wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 1:36:41 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll >> >>> wrote: >> >>>> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 6:25:27 AM UTC-6, -hh wrote: >> >>>>> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 6:32:26 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll >> >>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>> On 2018-07-24 21:44:09 +0000, -hh said: >> >>>>>>> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 2:12:22 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll >> >>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>> On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 5:29:28 PM UTC-6, -hh wrote: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> The investigation is still very, very early.>> Which is why >> >>>>>>>>> no one should be alleging unquestionable guilt. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> When the party has already plead guilty ... that's pretty >> >>>>>>> unquestionable. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> RonB: "I think the Russian collusion bullshit is just that, >> >>>>>> total and complete bullshit." >> >>>>>> You: "The investigation is still very, very early." >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> There is no charge of "collusion" to "plead guilty" to. You're >> >>>>>> confalting things. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Incorrect >> >>>> >> >>>> So cite this collusion law, ... >> >>> >> >>> Malicious context change by how "Steve" edited (note how there's no >> >>> punctuation) to deliberately try to alter the statement. >> >>> The complete statement was: >> >>> >> >>> "Incorrect, because the investigation's scope is not narrowly only >> >>> looking for criminal collusion of the current Administration with >> >>> the Russians. >> >>> >> >>> As such, you're trying to move the goalposts to where it suits you. >> >>> >> >>> And similarly, so too is RonB: he's trying to only look at the >> >>> last possible domino that could fall, as opposed to holistically >> >>> viewing the entire realm of criminal activities." >> >>> >> >>> With this deliberate & dishonest act, Steve has forfeited. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> -hh >> >> >> >> How many indictments for Russian COLLUSION have been filed? >> >> Seems Muller is indicting people on a wide scope of charges other >> >> than the primary focus for the special counsel. >> > >> > He could indict random people who have some Russian lineage dating >> > back to 1813 for something as irrelevant as jaywalking and the >> > socialists - who never read past the headline - would scream that >> > it's evidence of collusion. >> > >> >> And in no special order, as an independent who votes his wallet, so >> >> what are you doing for my back pocket: >> >> >> >> 1. Personally, I think Trump is an idiot who is way out of his >> >> league when it comes to politics. He is a savvy businessman but in >> >> no way a politician. >> >> But in certain respects that is why he got elected. However his >> >> "good points" are also combined with his idiocy. So while he may be >> >> correct about NATO countries paying their fair share instead of >> >> relying on the US tits he screws himself by making derogatory >> >> comments about Montenegro. >> >> >> >> 2. I do not believe Trump colluded with the Russians. Interested in >> >> dirt on Hillary? Sure. Nothing new in politics and both sides did >> >> and continue to do it. >> >> >> >> 3. I believe the Russians, Putin if you will, has some real nasty >> >> dirt on Trump. There is probably some truth in hookers peeing on him >> >> and Trump not being smart enough to assume the hotel was bugged fell >> >> into the trap. Russian hookers have a reputation for doing "stuff" >> >> the other hookers wouldn't dream of doing. Trump got sucked in, >> >> literally. >> >> >> >> 4. The MSM is out of control. For 8 years they kissed Obama's ass >> >> and they wrongly assumed Hillary would take over the reigns for >> >> another 8 years of liberal policies. It didn't happen. They need to >> >> get over it. It's disgusting the way they attack Trump 24x7 and yet >> >> gave Obama a pass on just about every gaff he made. How about >> >> Obama's red line in the sand? Barely a mention when Putin laughed at >> >> him. How about when that journalist got beheaded on TV. Obama was >> >> playing golf, paused for 2 minutes, made some canned comments and >> >> then went back to his golf game. The press said nothing. >> >> It goes on and on. >> >> >> >> 5. That being said, Trump scares me. Having a vindictive (can you >> >> say Nixon?) narcissistic president is a dangerous thing. I thought >> >> he would surround himself with "smart people", same thing I thought >> >> of Obama, but it never happened with either of them although Obama >> >> has a silver tongue and knows how to act presidential. The problem >> >> is he takes the high road and does nothing. North Korea is an >> >> example. At least Trump is trying even if he fails. >> >> He does needs to shut up and start acting presidential because the >> >> good things he is doing are over shadowed by his stupid, big mouth. >> >> >> >> 6, As for the democrats, tell me what they have done for the blacks, >> >> underclass and so forth? >> >> Pretty much lip service and nothing more. >> >> Race relations under Obama took a major turn back to the 1960's. >> >> You'll never hear the MSM talk about that. >> >> Oh and fossils like Mitch McConnell are a major part of the problem. >> >> Career Republicans on the take are another reason people don't trust >> >> the government. >> >> Oh well, I've ranted enough for today. >> >> We need a viable 3rd party. >> > >> > You have some but nobody wants to "waste his vote" by voting for a >> > party which can't get more than 1% of the vote. Remember that the >> > Green and the Libertarians were around as well even though their >> > influence is nil. >> > >> > I disagree with most of what you said about Trump though. I don't >> > think he is idiotic and I think that his directness is what attracted >> > people to him. >> >> He is not "direct"... he is deeply dishonest and grossly bigoted. > > What definition of the term "bigoted" are you using? I ask because you > used that term in an earlier post that I replied to: > > <978c1f14-3da2-4e23-851e-b717e911898b@googlegroups.com> > > Can you quote some of Trump's alleged "bigoted" claims so they can be > compared to those you've alleged for Damore (after you quote those, too, > naturally). You should go farther and ask that Snit provide a video link _showing_ him uttering the words they claim that he did and in that very order. Nothing the media says is true anymore. -- SilverSlimer Ubuntu 18.04 on MSI GT72 2QD
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-26 14:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0b5e42ab-50fe-4545-9252-b02b0fd96c8f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459678 |
On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 1:39:06 PM UTC-7, SilverSlimer wrote: > On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 09:48:23 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 10:30:38 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 7/26/18 7:24 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: > >> > On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 18:15:04 -0400, GasPipe wrote: > >> > > >> >> On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:50:23 -0700 (PDT), -hh wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 1:36:41 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll > >> >>> wrote: > >> >>>> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 6:25:27 AM UTC-6, -hh wrote: > >> >>>>> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 6:32:26 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll > >> >>>>> wrote: > >> >>>>>> On 2018-07-24 21:44:09 +0000, -hh said: > >> >>>>>>> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 2:12:22 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll > >> >>>>>>> wrote: > >> >>>>>>>> On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 5:29:28 PM UTC-6, -hh wrote: > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> The investigation is still very, very early.>> Which is why > >> >>>>>>>>> no one should be alleging unquestionable guilt. > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> When the party has already plead guilty ... that's pretty > >> >>>>>>> unquestionable. > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> RonB: "I think the Russian collusion bullshit is just that, > >> >>>>>> total and complete bullshit." > >> >>>>>> You: "The investigation is still very, very early." > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> There is no charge of "collusion" to "plead guilty" to. You're > >> >>>>>> confalting things. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Incorrect > >> >>>> > >> >>>> So cite this collusion law, ... > >> >>> > >> >>> Malicious context change by how "Steve" edited (note how there's no > >> >>> punctuation) to deliberately try to alter the statement. > >> >>> The complete statement was: > >> >>> > >> >>> "Incorrect, because the investigation's scope is not narrowly only > >> >>> looking for criminal collusion of the current Administration with > >> >>> the Russians. > >> >>> > >> >>> As such, you're trying to move the goalposts to where it suits you. > >> >>> > >> >>> And similarly, so too is RonB: he's trying to only look at the > >> >>> last possible domino that could fall, as opposed to holistically > >> >>> viewing the entire realm of criminal activities." > >> >>> > >> >>> With this deliberate & dishonest act, Steve has forfeited. > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> -hh > >> >> > >> >> How many indictments for Russian COLLUSION have been filed? > >> >> Seems Muller is indicting people on a wide scope of charges other > >> >> than the primary focus for the special counsel. > >> > > >> > He could indict random people who have some Russian lineage dating > >> > back to 1813 for something as irrelevant as jaywalking and the > >> > socialists - who never read past the headline - would scream that > >> > it's evidence of collusion. > >> > > >> >> And in no special order, as an independent who votes his wallet, so > >> >> what are you doing for my back pocket: > >> >> > >> >> 1. Personally, I think Trump is an idiot who is way out of his > >> >> league when it comes to politics. He is a savvy businessman but in > >> >> no way a politician. > >> >> But in certain respects that is why he got elected. However his > >> >> "good points" are also combined with his idiocy. So while he may be > >> >> correct about NATO countries paying their fair share instead of > >> >> relying on the US tits he screws himself by making derogatory > >> >> comments about Montenegro. > >> >> > >> >> 2. I do not believe Trump colluded with the Russians. Interested in > >> >> dirt on Hillary? Sure. Nothing new in politics and both sides did > >> >> and continue to do it. > >> >> > >> >> 3. I believe the Russians, Putin if you will, has some real nasty > >> >> dirt on Trump. There is probably some truth in hookers peeing on him > >> >> and Trump not being smart enough to assume the hotel was bugged fell > >> >> into the trap. Russian hookers have a reputation for doing "stuff" > >> >> the other hookers wouldn't dream of doing. Trump got sucked in, > >> >> literally. > >> >> > >> >> 4. The MSM is out of control. For 8 years they kissed Obama's ass > >> >> and they wrongly assumed Hillary would take over the reigns for > >> >> another 8 years of liberal policies. It didn't happen. They need to > >> >> get over it. It's disgusting the way they attack Trump 24x7 and yet > >> >> gave Obama a pass on just about every gaff he made. How about > >> >> Obama's red line in the sand? Barely a mention when Putin laughed at > >> >> him. How about when that journalist got beheaded on TV. Obama was > >> >> playing golf, paused for 2 minutes, made some canned comments and > >> >> then went back to his golf game. The press said nothing. > >> >> It goes on and on. > >> >> > >> >> 5. That being said, Trump scares me. Having a vindictive (can you > >> >> say Nixon?) narcissistic president is a dangerous thing. I thought > >> >> he would surround himself with "smart people", same thing I thought > >> >> of Obama, but it never happened with either of them although Obama > >> >> has a silver tongue and knows how to act presidential. The problem > >> >> is he takes the high road and does nothing. North Korea is an > >> >> example. At least Trump is trying even if he fails. > >> >> He does needs to shut up and start acting presidential because the > >> >> good things he is doing are over shadowed by his stupid, big mouth. > >> >> > >> >> 6, As for the democrats, tell me what they have done for the blacks, > >> >> underclass and so forth? > >> >> Pretty much lip service and nothing more. > >> >> Race relations under Obama took a major turn back to the 1960's. > >> >> You'll never hear the MSM talk about that. > >> >> Oh and fossils like Mitch McConnell are a major part of the problem. > >> >> Career Republicans on the take are another reason people don't trust > >> >> the government. > >> >> Oh well, I've ranted enough for today. > >> >> We need a viable 3rd party. > >> > > >> > You have some but nobody wants to "waste his vote" by voting for a > >> > party which can't get more than 1% of the vote. Remember that the > >> > Green and the Libertarians were around as well even though their > >> > influence is nil. > >> > > >> > I disagree with most of what you said about Trump though. I don't > >> > think he is idiotic and I think that his directness is what attracted > >> > people to him. > >> > >> He is not "direct"... he is deeply dishonest and grossly bigoted. > > > > What definition of the term "bigoted" are you using? I ask because you > > used that term in an earlier post that I replied to: > > > > <978c1f14-3da2-4e23-851e-b717e911898b@googlegroups.com> > > > > Can you quote some of Trump's alleged "bigoted" claims so they can be > > compared to those you've alleged for Damore (after you quote those, too, > > naturally). > > You should go farther and ask that Snit provide a video link _showing_ > him uttering the words they claim that he did and in that very order. > > Nothing the media says is true anymore. > > > > -- > SilverSlimer > Ubuntu 18.04 on MSI GT72 2QD Turns out Steven Carroll's non-stop flooding comments of F. Russell met the agreed on criteria of trolling, so he insisted that comment of his was forged by F. Russell. It was Steven Carroll who forged me and bragged about it. It's an endless story, and Steven Carroll is simultaneously unable to stop his trolling remarks, while posting with forgeries of F. Russell. You are quick as a tuna on ice. Perhaps you use it incorrectly. Do you not fathom the use of https? Can you get F. Russell to agree? By the way, taking time likely educating yourself is never a waste. Insisting you know everything and trying to persuade F. Russell that it is true, as Steven Carroll tries to do? THAT is a waste ;) Utter hogwash by an uninformed, misleading, conniving, collaborating peabrain who couldn't tell the truth if his life depended on it. -- "You'll notice how quickly he loses interest when everything is about him. He clearly wants the attention" Steve Carroll, making the dumbest comment ever uttered.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-26 15:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1c39f393-168a-4337-8bdd-9313565cf1d8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459678 |
On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 2:39:06 PM UTC-6, SilverSlimer wrote: > On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 09:48:23 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 10:30:38 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 7/26/18 7:24 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: > >> > On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 18:15:04 -0400, GasPipe wrote: > >> > > >> >> On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:50:23 -0700 (PDT), -hh wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 1:36:41 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll > >> >>> wrote: > >> >>>> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 6:25:27 AM UTC-6, -hh wrote: > >> >>>>> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 6:32:26 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll > >> >>>>> wrote: > >> >>>>>> On 2018-07-24 21:44:09 +0000, -hh said: > >> >>>>>>> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 2:12:22 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll > >> >>>>>>> wrote: > >> >>>>>>>> On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 5:29:28 PM UTC-6, -hh wrote: > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> The investigation is still very, very early.>> Which is why > >> >>>>>>>>> no one should be alleging unquestionable guilt. > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> When the party has already plead guilty ... that's pretty > >> >>>>>>> unquestionable. > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> RonB: "I think the Russian collusion bullshit is just that, > >> >>>>>> total and complete bullshit." > >> >>>>>> You: "The investigation is still very, very early." > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> There is no charge of "collusion" to "plead guilty" to. You're > >> >>>>>> confalting things. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Incorrect > >> >>>> > >> >>>> So cite this collusion law, ... > >> >>> > >> >>> Malicious context change by how "Steve" edited (note how there's no > >> >>> punctuation) to deliberately try to alter the statement. > >> >>> The complete statement was: > >> >>> > >> >>> "Incorrect, because the investigation's scope is not narrowly only > >> >>> looking for criminal collusion of the current Administration with > >> >>> the Russians. > >> >>> > >> >>> As such, you're trying to move the goalposts to where it suits you. > >> >>> > >> >>> And similarly, so too is RonB: he's trying to only look at the > >> >>> last possible domino that could fall, as opposed to holistically > >> >>> viewing the entire realm of criminal activities." > >> >>> > >> >>> With this deliberate & dishonest act, Steve has forfeited. > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> -hh > >> >> > >> >> How many indictments for Russian COLLUSION have been filed? > >> >> Seems Muller is indicting people on a wide scope of charges other > >> >> than the primary focus for the special counsel. > >> > > >> > He could indict random people who have some Russian lineage dating > >> > back to 1813 for something as irrelevant as jaywalking and the > >> > socialists - who never read past the headline - would scream that > >> > it's evidence of collusion. > >> > > >> >> And in no special order, as an independent who votes his wallet, so > >> >> what are you doing for my back pocket: > >> >> > >> >> 1. Personally, I think Trump is an idiot who is way out of his > >> >> league when it comes to politics. He is a savvy businessman but in > >> >> no way a politician. > >> >> But in certain respects that is why he got elected. However his > >> >> "good points" are also combined with his idiocy. So while he may be > >> >> correct about NATO countries paying their fair share instead of > >> >> relying on the US tits he screws himself by making derogatory > >> >> comments about Montenegro. > >> >> > >> >> 2. I do not believe Trump colluded with the Russians. Interested in > >> >> dirt on Hillary? Sure. Nothing new in politics and both sides did > >> >> and continue to do it. > >> >> > >> >> 3. I believe the Russians, Putin if you will, has some real nasty > >> >> dirt on Trump. There is probably some truth in hookers peeing on him > >> >> and Trump not being smart enough to assume the hotel was bugged fell > >> >> into the trap. Russian hookers have a reputation for doing "stuff" > >> >> the other hookers wouldn't dream of doing. Trump got sucked in, > >> >> literally. > >> >> > >> >> 4. The MSM is out of control. For 8 years they kissed Obama's ass > >> >> and they wrongly assumed Hillary would take over the reigns for > >> >> another 8 years of liberal policies. It didn't happen. They need to > >> >> get over it. It's disgusting the way they attack Trump 24x7 and yet > >> >> gave Obama a pass on just about every gaff he made. How about > >> >> Obama's red line in the sand? Barely a mention when Putin laughed at > >> >> him. How about when that journalist got beheaded on TV. Obama was > >> >> playing golf, paused for 2 minutes, made some canned comments and > >> >> then went back to his golf game. The press said nothing. > >> >> It goes on and on. > >> >> > >> >> 5. That being said, Trump scares me. Having a vindictive (can you > >> >> say Nixon?) narcissistic president is a dangerous thing. I thought > >> >> he would surround himself with "smart people", same thing I thought > >> >> of Obama, but it never happened with either of them although Obama > >> >> has a silver tongue and knows how to act presidential. The problem > >> >> is he takes the high road and does nothing. North Korea is an > >> >> example. At least Trump is trying even if he fails. > >> >> He does needs to shut up and start acting presidential because the > >> >> good things he is doing are over shadowed by his stupid, big mouth. > >> >> > >> >> 6, As for the democrats, tell me what they have done for the blacks, > >> >> underclass and so forth? > >> >> Pretty much lip service and nothing more. > >> >> Race relations under Obama took a major turn back to the 1960's. > >> >> You'll never hear the MSM talk about that. > >> >> Oh and fossils like Mitch McConnell are a major part of the problem. > >> >> Career Republicans on the take are another reason people don't trust > >> >> the government. > >> >> Oh well, I've ranted enough for today. > >> >> We need a viable 3rd party. > >> > > >> > You have some but nobody wants to "waste his vote" by voting for a > >> > party which can't get more than 1% of the vote. Remember that the > >> > Green and the Libertarians were around as well even though their > >> > influence is nil. > >> > > >> > I disagree with most of what you said about Trump though. I don't > >> > think he is idiotic and I think that his directness is what attracted > >> > people to him. > >> > >> He is not "direct"... he is deeply dishonest and grossly bigoted. > > > > What definition of the term "bigoted" are you using? I ask because you > > used that term in an earlier post that I replied to: > > > > <978c1f14-3da2-4e23-851e-b717e911898b@googlegroups.com> > > > > Can you quote some of Trump's alleged "bigoted" claims so they can be > > compared to those you've alleged for Damore (after you quote those, too, > > naturally). > > You should go farther and ask that Snit provide a video link _showing_ > him uttering the words they claim that he did and in that very order. No need, Snit has proven that the word he's cavalierly tossed around for at least the last 15 years is one he doesn't know the meaning of: <f78734b8-70d0-4132-9692-fdb609b28694@googlegroups.com> This one is funny because he tried to 'interpret' your post for me and something got lost in the translation ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-26 15:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d5e16425-8f6d-4a4e-b091-d2b96b35f9d5@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459701 |
On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 3:27:18 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 2:39:06 PM UTC-6, SilverSlimer wrote: > > On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 09:48:23 -0700, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > > > On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 10:30:38 AM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > > >> On 7/26/18 7:24 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: > > >> > On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 18:15:04 -0400, GasPipe wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> On Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:50:23 -0700 (PDT), -hh wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >>> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 1:36:41 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll > > >> >>> wrote: > > >> >>>> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 6:25:27 AM UTC-6, -hh wrote: > > >> >>>>> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 6:32:26 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll > > >> >>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>> On 2018-07-24 21:44:09 +0000, -hh said: > > >> >>>>>>> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 2:12:22 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll > > >> >>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>> On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 5:29:28 PM UTC-6, -hh wrote: > > >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>>>> The investigation is still very, very early.>> Which is why > > >> >>>>>>>>> no one should be alleging unquestionable guilt. > > >> >>>>>>> > > >> >>>>>>> When the party has already plead guilty ... that's pretty > > >> >>>>>>> unquestionable. > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> RonB: "I think the Russian collusion bullshit is just that, > > >> >>>>>> total and complete bullshit." > > >> >>>>>> You: "The investigation is still very, very early." > > >> >>>>>> > > >> >>>>>> There is no charge of "collusion" to "plead guilty" to. You're > > >> >>>>>> confalting things. > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> Incorrect > > >> >>>> > > >> >>>> So cite this collusion law, ... > > >> >>> > > >> >>> Malicious context change by how "Steve" edited (note how there's no > > >> >>> punctuation) to deliberately try to alter the statement. > > >> >>> The complete statement was: > > >> >>> > > >> >>> "Incorrect, because the investigation's scope is not narrowly only > > >> >>> looking for criminal collusion of the current Administration with > > >> >>> the Russians. > > >> >>> > > >> >>> As such, you're trying to move the goalposts to where it suits you. > > >> >>> > > >> >>> And similarly, so too is RonB: he's trying to only look at the > > >> >>> last possible domino that could fall, as opposed to holistically > > >> >>> viewing the entire realm of criminal activities." > > >> >>> > > >> >>> With this deliberate & dishonest act, Steve has forfeited. > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> -hh > > >> >> > > >> >> How many indictments for Russian COLLUSION have been filed? > > >> >> Seems Muller is indicting people on a wide scope of charges other > > >> >> than the primary focus for the special counsel. > > >> > > > >> > He could indict random people who have some Russian lineage dating > > >> > back to 1813 for something as irrelevant as jaywalking and the > > >> > socialists - who never read past the headline - would scream that > > >> > it's evidence of collusion. > > >> > > > >> >> And in no special order, as an independent who votes his wallet, so > > >> >> what are you doing for my back pocket: > > >> >> > > >> >> 1. Personally, I think Trump is an idiot who is way out of his > > >> >> league when it comes to politics. He is a savvy businessman but in > > >> >> no way a politician. > > >> >> But in certain respects that is why he got elected. However his > > >> >> "good points" are also combined with his idiocy. So while he may be > > >> >> correct about NATO countries paying their fair share instead of > > >> >> relying on the US tits he screws himself by making derogatory > > >> >> comments about Montenegro. > > >> >> > > >> >> 2. I do not believe Trump colluded with the Russians. Interested in > > >> >> dirt on Hillary? Sure. Nothing new in politics and both sides did > > >> >> and continue to do it. > > >> >> > > >> >> 3. I believe the Russians, Putin if you will, has some real nasty > > >> >> dirt on Trump. There is probably some truth in hookers peeing on him > > >> >> and Trump not being smart enough to assume the hotel was bugged fell > > >> >> into the trap. Russian hookers have a reputation for doing "stuff" > > >> >> the other hookers wouldn't dream of doing. Trump got sucked in, > > >> >> literally. > > >> >> > > >> >> 4. The MSM is out of control. For 8 years they kissed Obama's ass > > >> >> and they wrongly assumed Hillary would take over the reigns for > > >> >> another 8 years of liberal policies. It didn't happen. They need to > > >> >> get over it. It's disgusting the way they attack Trump 24x7 and yet > > >> >> gave Obama a pass on just about every gaff he made. How about > > >> >> Obama's red line in the sand? Barely a mention when Putin laughed at > > >> >> him. How about when that journalist got beheaded on TV. Obama was > > >> >> playing golf, paused for 2 minutes, made some canned comments and > > >> >> then went back to his golf game. The press said nothing. > > >> >> It goes on and on. > > >> >> > > >> >> 5. That being said, Trump scares me. Having a vindictive (can you > > >> >> say Nixon?) narcissistic president is a dangerous thing. I thought > > >> >> he would surround himself with "smart people", same thing I thought > > >> >> of Obama, but it never happened with either of them although Obama > > >> >> has a silver tongue and knows how to act presidential. The problem > > >> >> is he takes the high road and does nothing. North Korea is an > > >> >> example. At least Trump is trying even if he fails. > > >> >> He does needs to shut up and start acting presidential because the > > >> >> good things he is doing are over shadowed by his stupid, big mouth. > > >> >> > > >> >> 6, As for the democrats, tell me what they have done for the blacks, > > >> >> underclass and so forth? > > >> >> Pretty much lip service and nothing more. > > >> >> Race relations under Obama took a major turn back to the 1960's. > > >> >> You'll never hear the MSM talk about that. > > >> >> Oh and fossils like Mitch McConnell are a major part of the problem. > > >> >> Career Republicans on the take are another reason people don't trust > > >> >> the government. > > >> >> Oh well, I've ranted enough for today. > > >> >> We need a viable 3rd party. > > >> > > > >> > You have some but nobody wants to "waste his vote" by voting for a > > >> > party which can't get more than 1% of the vote. Remember that the > > >> > Green and the Libertarians were around as well even though their > > >> > influence is nil. > > >> > > > >> > I disagree with most of what you said about Trump though. I don't > > >> > think he is idiotic and I think that his directness is what attracted > > >> > people to him. > > >> > > >> He is not "direct"... he is deeply dishonest and grossly bigoted. > > > > > > What definition of the term "bigoted" are you using? I ask because you > > > used that term in an earlier post that I replied to: > > > > > > <978c1f14-3da2-4e23-851e-b717e911898b@googlegroups.com> > > > > > > Can you quote some of Trump's alleged "bigoted" claims so they can be > > > compared to those you've alleged for Damore (after you quote those, too, > > > naturally). > > > > You should go farther and ask that Snit provide a video link _showing_ > > him uttering the words they claim that he did and in that very order. > > No need, Snit has proven that the word he's cavalierly tossed around > for at least the last 15 years is one he doesn't know the meaning of: > > <f78734b8-70d0-4132-9692-fdb609b28694@googlegroups.com> > > This one is funny because he tried to 'interpret' your post for me and > something got lost in the translation ;) Klaus 'The Shill' Schadenfreude calls it "obsessing" over him, even though he proceeds to trigger that exact standard. Frankly I do not really think you understand. These types of trolls get their thrill out of drawing out reactions to their lies, which is the very definition of a troll. Troll Killer Snit and Klaus 'The Shill' Schadenfreude had their omissions and their blunders. One presented it dishonestly and didn't do anything too outrageous that could not be presented as stage magic. You _do_ realize that the massive floods ending up in multiple groups started out as a joke about hacking Google. I suspect we have two different views completely. - Live on Kickstarter! https://youtu.be/dNhvVfD4zu4 https://youtu.be/m37dF5X2S-4 http://www.5z8.info/how-to-build-a-bomb_h2o1be_peepshow Jonas Eklundh Communication
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-25 15:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9270b067-b4b7-4892-b7c2-875a23098f83@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459493 |
On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 3:50:25 PM UTC-6, -hh wrote: > On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 1:36:41 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 6:25:27 AM UTC-6, -hh wrote: > > > On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 6:32:26 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > > On 2018-07-24 21:44:09 +0000, -hh said: > > > > > On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 2:12:22 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > > >> On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 5:29:28 PM UTC-6, -hh wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >>> The investigation is still very, very early.>> Which is why no one > > > > >>> should be alleging unquestionable guilt. > > > > > > > > > > When the party has already plead guilty ... that's pretty unquestionable. > > > > > > > > RonB: "I think the Russian collusion bullshit is just that, total and > > > > complete bullshit." > > > > You: "The investigation is still very, very early." > > > > > > > > There is no charge of "collusion" to "plead guilty" to. You're > > > > confalting things. > > > > > > Incorrect > > > > So cite this collusion law, ... > > Malicious context change by how "Steve" The context is what you responded to, which was RonB's 'thought' on " collusion". If anyone changed it, or, is trying to (unsuccessfully) it's you. > edited (note how there's > no punctuation) to deliberately try to alter the statement. > The complete statement was: > > "Incorrect, because the investigation's scope is not narrowly only > looking for criminal collusion of the current Administration > with the Russians. That red herring doesn't save you, either. The context doesn't change just because you lies need it to. > As such, you're trying to move the goalposts to where it suits you. LOL! No, but you are. RonB, stating what he 'thinks', not a "claim" (like you dishonestly suggested): "I think the Russian collusion bullshit is just that, total and complete bullshit." <pj5kn2$oi4$1@dont-email.me> You: "The investigation is still very, very early. Take a look at how long it took for Watergate to finally crack. And how Nixon was screaming “witch hunt” until the day he resigned. And given how long the Republicans pursued Benghazi with zero inditements and zero guilty pleas, we easily have another year to go...and more will be invariably found." -hh <63f3804f-0e80-4c61-9719-9b8f508af1c0@googlegroups.com> Me... I broke in after your first sentence above with: "Which is why no one should be alleging unquestionable guilt." <ffc14c7e-b1d1-416d-ab59-861b54819d8e@googlegroups.com> You: "When the party has already plead guilty ... that's pretty unquestionable." -hh <70f99558-8e64-4dd0-9b1d-1812e9235cd0@googlegroups.com> Me: "There is no charge of "collusion" to "plead guilty" to. You're confalting things." <pj89dn$qi4$1@dont-email.me> Notably, you even essentially made *my* point (as I just quoted above): "It is equally ridiculous to see people jump to a conclusion" Along the way you also made a f*cking bizarre statement alluding to the idea that the "presumption of innocence" is *not* the "default: "Particularly since you're advocating for the principle of innocence as default, even though you're now appearing to be actually doing the opposite." -hh I can't even imagine what your brain must be doing to make the second half of that absurd statement. But more notable is that you dishonestly turn RonB's *thought* into a "claim": "Sure does, but the point is that RonB's claim is one that is based in utter ignorance:" -hh <70f99558-8e64-4dd0-9b1d-1812e9235cd0@googlegroups.com> > And similarly, so too is RonB: he's trying to only look at the > last possible domino that could fall, as opposed to holistically > viewing the entire realm of criminal activities." > > With this deliberate & dishonest act, Steve has forfeited. LOL! Except, the facts are what I've shown them to be, not your spinning of them. FWIW, you had *every* opportunity to show the evidence RonB claims he hasn't seen. Was there a post where you linked to it? This was as close to it from you as I saw... "But hey, at least you have Snit on your side ;)Well, prepare to eat crow, because they would not have filed charges if they didn’t already know that they had stuff they could adequately declassify for a jury in a public trail. Doesn’t mean it has to be everything, BTW..." -hh <d1590f84-13fb-457f-8bb8-b0593f327d3d@googlegroups.com> But that's not evidence, either... and the last I looked, people were allowed to say what they "think".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <frelwizzen@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-25 16:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c98f7f18-49f7-4643-b0ce-a586a6e043a0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459514 |
On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 3:55:42 PM UTC-7, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 3:50:25 PM UTC-6, -hh wrote: > > On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 1:36:41 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 6:25:27 AM UTC-6, -hh wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 6:32:26 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > > > On 2018-07-24 21:44:09 +0000, -hh said: > > > > > > On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 2:12:22 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll wrote: > > > > > >> On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 5:29:28 PM UTC-6, -hh wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> The investigation is still very, very early.>> Which is why no one > > > > > >>> should be alleging unquestionable guilt. > > > > > > > > > > > > When the party has already plead guilty ... that's pretty unquestionable. > > > > > > > > > > RonB: "I think the Russian collusion bullshit is just that, total and > > > > > complete bullshit." > > > > > You: "The investigation is still very, very early." > > > > > > > > > > There is no charge of "collusion" to "plead guilty" to. You're > > > > > confalting things. > > > > > > > > Incorrect > > > > > > So cite this collusion law, ... > > > > Malicious context change by how "Steve" > > The context is what you responded to, which was RonB's 'thought' on " > collusion". If anyone changed it, or, is trying to (unsuccessfully) it's you. > > > edited (note how there's > > no punctuation) to deliberately try to alter the statement. > > The complete statement was: > > > > "Incorrect, because the investigation's scope is not narrowly only > > looking for criminal collusion of the current Administration > > with the Russians. > > That red herring doesn't save you, either. The context doesn't change > just because you lies need it to. > > > As such, you're trying to move the goalposts to where it suits you. > > LOL! No, but you are. > > RonB, stating what he 'thinks', not a "claim" (like you dishonestly suggested): > "I think the Russian collusion bullshit is just that, total and complete bullshit." > <pj5kn2$oi4$1@dont-email.me> > > You: > "The investigation is still very, very early. Take a look at how long it took > for Watergate to finally crack. And how Nixon was screaming “witch hunt” > until the day he resigned. And given how long the Republicans pursued > Benghazi with zero inditements and zero guilty pleas, we easily have another > year to go...and more will be invariably found." -hh > <63f3804f-0e80-4c61-9719-9b8f508af1c0@googlegroups.com> > > Me... I broke in after your first sentence above with: > "Which is why no one should be alleging unquestionable guilt." > <ffc14c7e-b1d1-416d-ab59-861b54819d8e@googlegroups.com> > > You: > "When the party has already plead guilty ... that's pretty unquestionable." -hh > <70f99558-8e64-4dd0-9b1d-1812e9235cd0@googlegroups.com> > > Me: > "There is no charge of "collusion" to "plead guilty" to. You're confalting things." > <pj89dn$qi4$1@dont-email.me> > > Notably, you even essentially made *my* point (as I just quoted above): > "It is equally ridiculous to see people jump to a conclusion" > > Along the way you also made a f*cking bizarre statement alluding to the idea that the > "presumption of innocence" is *not* the "default: > > "Particularly since you're advocating for the principle of innocence as default, > even though you're now appearing to be actually doing the opposite." -hh > > I can't even imagine what your brain must be doing to make the second half > of that absurd statement. > > But more notable is that you dishonestly turn RonB's *thought* into a > "claim": > > "Sure does, but the point is that RonB's claim is one that is based in utter ignorance:" -hh > <70f99558-8e64-4dd0-9b1d-1812e9235cd0@googlegroups.com> > > > And similarly, so too is RonB: he's trying to only look at the > > last possible domino that could fall, as opposed to holistically > > viewing the entire realm of criminal activities." > > > > With this deliberate & dishonest act, Steve has forfeited. > > LOL! Except, the facts are what I've shown them to be, not your spinning of them. > > FWIW, you had *every* opportunity to show the evidence RonB claims he hasn't > seen. Was there a post where you linked to it? This was as close to it from you as I saw... > > "But hey, at least you have Snit on your side ;)Well, prepare to eat crow, because they would not have filed charges if they didn’t already know that they had stuff they could adequately declassify for a jury in a public trail. Doesn’t mean it has to be everything, BTW..." -hh > <d1590f84-13fb-457f-8bb8-b0593f327d3d@googlegroups.com> > > But that's not evidence, either... and the last I looked, people were allowed to say what they "think". How is FileZilla on Linux doing anything above the lowest common denominator? Any horribly hopeless insomniac could easily do the same. No no. He never agreed to stop accusing good people of being like him. He lied about his trolling which surprised nobody. Both Jonas Eklundh and chrisv had their duds and their predicaments. But one played it as the effect of ghosts and didn't do anything too publicly that could not be presented as the wagging of a dog. From what I've seen (which is none of it lately), it looks like the flood script got more sophisticated. - What Every Entrepreneur Must Know https://goo.gl/Fho5Nq http://alt.conspiracy.narkive.com/QcWYJ4Px/the-mentally-ill-mark-s-bilk Jonas Eklundh Communication AB
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-25 16:26 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <frsf9uFeavvU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #459514 |
On 7/25/18 3:55 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 3:50:25 PM UTC-6, -hh wrote: >> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 1:36:41 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 6:25:27 AM UTC-6, -hh wrote: >>>> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 6:32:26 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>> On 2018-07-24 21:44:09 +0000, -hh said: >>>>>> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 2:12:22 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>>>> On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 5:29:28 PM UTC-6, -hh wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The investigation is still very, very early.>> Which is why no one >>>>>>>> should be alleging unquestionable guilt. >>>>>> >>>>>> When the party has already plead guilty ... that's pretty unquestionable. >>>>> >>>>> RonB: "I think the Russian collusion bullshit is just that, total and >>>>> complete bullshit." >>>>> You: "The investigation is still very, very early." >>>>> >>>>> There is no charge of "collusion" to "plead guilty" to. You're >>>>> confalting things. >>>> >>>> Incorrect >>> >>> So cite this collusion law, ... >> >> Malicious context change by how "Steve" > > The context is what you responded to, which was RonB's 'thought' on " > collusion". If anyone changed it, or, is trying to (unsuccessfully) it's you. > >> edited (note how there's >> no punctuation) to deliberately try to alter the statement. >> The complete statement was: >> >> "Incorrect, because the investigation's scope is not narrowly only >> looking for criminal collusion of the current Administration >> with the Russians. > > That red herring doesn't save you, either. The context doesn't change > just because you lies need it to. Noting your dishonest snipping is not a "red herring" -- it is noting your dishonesty. >> As such, you're trying to move the goalposts to where it suits you. > > LOL! No, but you are. He just quoted the specific example of where you dishonestly snipped his content to work to change meanings, and your response is a PeeWee Herman-like "I know I am but what are you". Give it a break. You were dishonest. You were busted. Deal with it. Stop blaming others for YOUR dishonesty. > RonB, stating what he 'thinks', not a "claim" (like you dishonestly suggested): So he thinks something is the case but is not claiming it is? These are the types of idiotic word games you play. Just maddness. > "I think the Russian collusion bullshit is just that, total and complete bullshit." > <pj5kn2$oi4$1@dont-email.me> He is very much CLAIMING the claims of Russian collusion are incorrect. To note he is claiming this is not wrong. You do, though, as a part of your game -- to try to get -hh to defend himself on THAT and distract from your own dishonesty. And later you double down on this idiocy of yours: ... > But more notable is that you dishonestly turn RonB's *thought* into a > "claim": > > "Sure does, but the point is that RonB's claim is one that is based in utter ignorance:" -hh > <70f99558-8e64-4dd0-9b1d-1812e9235cd0@googlegroups.com> RonB made the claims attributed to him here. Absolutely. The fact he did not say "I claim" but directly claimed it does not reduce the "power" of the claim. You are playing games. ... >> With this deliberate & dishonest act, Steve has forfeited. > > LOL! Except, the facts are what I've shown them to be, not your spinning of them. -hh proved you were dishonestly snipping and then you responded with stupid games where you go into meta-debate mode and try split hairs with language. You were busted, Carroll. Remember just the other day when you said you could not have a reasoned conversation with ME... and then tried to blame ME? Well, now we see you lie in much the same way and play the same accusation game against -hh. You do it with me MORE because you are obsessed with me, but you do it with pretty much anyone who disagrees with you. > FWIW, you had *every* opportunity to show the evidence RonB claims he hasn't > seen. Was there a post where you linked to it? This was as close to it from you as I saw... > > "But hey, at least you have Snit on your side ;)Well, prepare to eat crow, because they would not have filed charges if they didn’t already know that they had stuff they could adequately declassify for a jury in a public trail. Doesn’t mean it has to be everything, BTW..." -hh > <d1590f84-13fb-457f-8bb8-b0593f327d3d@googlegroups.com> > > But that's not evidence, either... and the last I looked, people were allowed to say what they "think". Nobody said, suggested, hinted, or implied people cannot say what they think. You are, again, playing games. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-25 16:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a3285f11-20be-46a5-94f9-65679b3a20af@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459523 |
On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 5:26:58 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 7/25/18 3:55 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 3:50:25 PM UTC-6, -hh wrote: > >> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 1:36:41 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 6:25:27 AM UTC-6, -hh wrote: > >>>> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 6:32:26 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>>> On 2018-07-24 21:44:09 +0000, -hh said: > >>>>>> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 2:12:22 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>>>>> On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 5:29:28 PM UTC-6, -hh wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> The investigation is still very, very early.>> Which is why no one > >>>>>>>> should be alleging unquestionable guilt. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> When the party has already plead guilty ... that's pretty unquestionable. > >>>>> > >>>>> RonB: "I think the Russian collusion bullshit is just that, total and > >>>>> complete bullshit." > >>>>> You: "The investigation is still very, very early." > >>>>> > >>>>> There is no charge of "collusion" to "plead guilty" to. You're > >>>>> confalting things. > >>>> > >>>> Incorrect > >>> > >>> So cite this collusion law, ... > >> > >> Malicious context change by how "Steve" > > > > The context is what you responded to, which was RonB's 'thought' on " > > collusion". If anyone changed it, or, is trying to (unsuccessfully) it's you. > > > >> edited (note how there's > >> no punctuation) to deliberately try to alter the statement. > >> The complete statement was: > >> > >> "Incorrect, because the investigation's scope is not narrowly only > >> looking for criminal collusion of the current Administration > >> with the Russians. > > > > That red herring doesn't save you, either. The context doesn't change > > just because you lies need it to. > > Noting your dishonest snipping is not a "red herring" -- it is noting > your dishonesty. I didn't do any dishonest snipping, he bloviated a bunch of BS that sought to obscure his dishonesty. If you'll noice, neither. you nor he are providing *pertinent* quotes or links to the context that *he* originally addressed... that he is trying to pretend doesn't exist. I'm sure he'll take much comfort in the fact that the biggest liar, who also regularly can't comprehend what he reads, is 'backing' him ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-25 16:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <frsgi1FegntU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #459525 |
On 7/25/18 4:39 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 5:26:58 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >> On 7/25/18 3:55 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 3:50:25 PM UTC-6, -hh wrote: >>>> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 1:36:41 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 6:25:27 AM UTC-6, -hh wrote: >>>>>> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 6:32:26 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>>>> On 2018-07-24 21:44:09 +0000, -hh said: >>>>>>>> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 2:12:22 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 5:29:28 PM UTC-6, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The investigation is still very, very early.>> Which is why no one >>>>>>>>>> should be alleging unquestionable guilt. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> When the party has already plead guilty ... that's pretty unquestionable. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> RonB: "I think the Russian collusion bullshit is just that, total and >>>>>>> complete bullshit." >>>>>>> You: "The investigation is still very, very early." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There is no charge of "collusion" to "plead guilty" to. You're >>>>>>> confalting things. >>>>>> >>>>>> Incorrect >>>>> >>>>> So cite this collusion law, ... >>>> >>>> Malicious context change by how "Steve" >>> >>> The context is what you responded to, which was RonB's 'thought' on " >>> collusion". If anyone changed it, or, is trying to (unsuccessfully) it's you. >>> >>>> edited (note how there's >>>> no punctuation) to deliberately try to alter the statement. >>>> The complete statement was: >>>> >>>> "Incorrect, because the investigation's scope is not narrowly only >>>> looking for criminal collusion of the current Administration >>>> with the Russians. >>> >>> That red herring doesn't save you, either. The context doesn't change >>> just because you lies need it to. >> >> Noting your dishonest snipping is not a "red herring" -- it is noting >> your dishonesty. > > I didn't do any dishonest snipping, And yet he was able to quote you doing so. See above. And then you played word games and tried to split idiotic hairs over what RonB says he thinks is true and what RonB claimed was true. I mean, really, is there ANY hair too thin for you to try to split? > he bloviated a bunch of BS that sought > to obscure his dishonesty. If you'll noice, neither. you nor he are providing > *pertinent* quotes -hh provided the quotes you snipped apart in dishonest ways. Your denial is just you piling lies. Be an adult for a change and just admit you were busted lying and splitting idiotic hairs. > or links to the context that *he* originally addressed.... > that he is trying to pretend doesn't exist. I'm sure he'll take much comfort > in the fact that the biggest liar, who also regularly can't comprehend what > he reads, is 'backing' him ;) > -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-25 16:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d43130c1-1e64-4782-80c9-fd779ee47671@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459530 |
On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 5:48:21 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > On 7/25/18 4:39 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > > On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 5:26:58 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: > >> On 7/25/18 3:55 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 3:50:25 PM UTC-6, -hh wrote: > >>>> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 1:36:41 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>>> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 6:25:27 AM UTC-6, -hh wrote: > >>>>>> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 6:32:26 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>>>>> On 2018-07-24 21:44:09 +0000, -hh said: > >>>>>>>> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 2:12:22 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll wrote: > >>>>>>>>> On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 5:29:28 PM UTC-6, -hh wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> The investigation is still very, very early.>> Which is why no one > >>>>>>>>>> should be alleging unquestionable guilt. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> When the party has already plead guilty ... that's pretty unquestionable. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> RonB: "I think the Russian collusion bullshit is just that, total and > >>>>>>> complete bullshit." > >>>>>>> You: "The investigation is still very, very early." > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> There is no charge of "collusion" to "plead guilty" to. You're > >>>>>>> confalting things. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Incorrect > >>>>> > >>>>> So cite this collusion law, ... > >>>> > >>>> Malicious context change by how "Steve" > >>> > >>> The context is what you responded to, which was RonB's 'thought' on " > >>> collusion". If anyone changed it, or, is trying to (unsuccessfully) it's you. > >>> > >>>> edited (note how there's > >>>> no punctuation) to deliberately try to alter the statement. > >>>> The complete statement was: > >>>> > >>>> "Incorrect, because the investigation's scope is not narrowly only > >>>> looking for criminal collusion of the current Administration > >>>> with the Russians. > >>> > >>> That red herring doesn't save you, either. The context doesn't change > >>> just because you lies need it to. > >> > >> Noting your dishonest snipping is not a "red herring" -- it is noting > >> your dishonesty. > > > > I didn't do any dishonest snipping, > > And yet he was able to quote you doing so Not that was pertinent to the context he replied to. If it exists, why weren't you able to quote it? Gee, it can't be because you're a pathetic liar, can it? He did what you do, he spin up a bunch of irrelevant horsesh*t. When are you fools gonna learn that won't fly? Never it seems.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-25 17:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <frshbrFem11U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #459530 |
On 7/25/18 4:48 PM, Snit wrote: > On 7/25/18 4:39 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 5:26:58 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: >>> On 7/25/18 3:55 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 3:50:25 PM UTC-6, -hh wrote: >>>>> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 1:36:41 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>>> On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 6:25:27 AM UTC-6, -hh wrote: >>>>>>> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 6:32:26 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2018-07-24 21:44:09 +0000, -hh said: >>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 at 2:12:22 PM UTC-4, Steve Carroll >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Monday, July 23, 2018 at 5:29:28 PM UTC-6, -hh wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The investigation is still very, very early.>> Which is why >>>>>>>>>>> no one >>>>>>>>>>> should be alleging unquestionable guilt. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> When the party has already plead guilty ... that's pretty >>>>>>>>> unquestionable. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> RonB: "I think the Russian collusion bullshit is just that, >>>>>>>> total and >>>>>>>> complete bullshit." >>>>>>>> You: "The investigation is still very, very early." >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There is no charge of "collusion" to "plead guilty" to. You're >>>>>>>> confalting things. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Incorrect >>>>>> >>>>>> So cite this collusion law, ... >>>>> >>>>> Malicious context change by how "Steve" >>>> >>>> The context is what you responded to, which was RonB's 'thought' on " >>>> collusion". If anyone changed it, or, is trying to (unsuccessfully) >>>> it's you. >>>> >>>>> edited (note how there's >>>>> no punctuation) to deliberately try to alter the statement. >>>>> The complete statement was: >>>>> >>>>> "Incorrect, because the investigation's scope is not narrowly only >>>>> looking for criminal collusion of the current Administration >>>>> with the Russians. >>>> >>>> That red herring doesn't save you, either. The context doesn't change >>>> just because you lies need it to. >>> >>> Noting your dishonest snipping is not a "red herring" -- it is noting >>> your dishonesty. >> >> I didn't do any dishonest snipping, > > And yet he was able to quote you doing so. See above. And then you > played word games and tried to split idiotic hairs over what RonB says > he thinks is true and what RonB claimed was true. > > I mean, really, is there ANY hair too thin for you to try to split? > >> he bloviated a bunch of BS that sought >> to obscure his dishonesty. If you'll noice, neither. you nor he are >> providing >> *pertinent* quotes > > -hh provided the quotes you snipped apart in dishonest ways. Your denial > is just you piling lies. > > Be an adult for a change and just admit you were busted lying and > splitting idiotic hairs. > >> or links to the context that *he* originally addressed.... >> that he is trying to pretend doesn't exist. I'm sure he'll take much >> comfort >> in the fact that the biggest liar, who also regularly can't comprehend >> what >> he reads, is 'backing' him ;) >> > > > Unsurprisingly, Carroll responded by snipping the above -- adding dishonesty on top of his dishonesty. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-25 17:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <69da7461-c77e-4c31-b1b8-ad21b989bdfd@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #459537 |
On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 at 6:02:07 PM UTC-6, Snit wrote: litting idiotic hairs. > > > >> or links to the context that *he* originally addressed.... > >> that he is trying to pretend doesn't exist. I'm sure he'll take much > >> comfort > >> in the fact that the biggest liar, who also regularly can't comprehend > >> what > >> he reads, is 'backing' him ;) > >> > > > > > > > > Unsurprisingly, ... you're *still* not supplying any quotes or links to *pertinent* material that addresses the context -hh sought to pretend didn't exist? That's true. You probably have a diaper waiting for you ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 15 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 13 14 [15] 16 17 … 19 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.advocacy
csiph-web